July 30, 2024 - English Studies

“The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks: A Critical Analysis

“The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks first appeared in 1960 in her poetry collection of the same name, The Bean Eaters.

Introduction: “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

“The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks first appeared in 1960 in her poetry collection of the same name, The Bean Eaters. The poem encapsulates many of the qualities found throughout Brooks’ work: its plain language and simple structure belie a deep emotional resonance. The poem portrays an elderly couple reflecting on their lives over a modest meal of beans, and through their experience, Brooks explores themes of aging, memory, poverty, and resilience in the face of adversity. The poem’s unadorned language and directness give it an authenticity that resonates with readers, while its focus on everyday experiences elevates the mundane to the profound.

Text: “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

They eat beans mostly, this old yellow pair.

Dinner is a casual affair.

Plain chipware on a plain and creaking wood,

Tin flatware.

Two who are Mostly Good.

Two who have lived their day,

But keep on putting on their clothes

And putting things away.

And remembering …

Remembering, with twinklings and twinges,

As they lean over the beans in their rented back room that is full of beads and receipts and dolls and cloths, tobacco crumbs, vases and fringes.

Annotations: “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

Line	Annotation
They eat beans mostly, this old yellow pair.	Highlights the couple’s poverty and simple diet, emphasizing the adjective “yellow” to suggest their age and perhaps race.
Dinner is a casual affair.	Underscores the unpretentious and routine nature of their meal, reflecting their daily life.
Plain chipware on a plain and creaking wood,	Describes their meager possessions and worn-out furniture, reinforcing the theme of poverty and age.
Tin flatware.	Further emphasizes their lack of material wealth and simple lifestyle.
Two who are Mostly Good.	Suggests a life lived with basic decency and kindness, despite hardships.
Two who have lived their day,	Acknowledges their advanced age and implies a life well-lived, despite its challenges.
But keep on putting on their clothes	Demonstrates their resilience and determination to continue with daily routines despite aging and limited resources.
And putting things away.	Shows their efforts to maintain order and dignity in their lives.
And remembering…	Introduces the theme of memory and reflection, which will be central to the rest of the poem.
Remembering, with twinklings and twinges,	Describes the bittersweet nature of memory, with moments of joy (“twinklings”) and pain (“twinges”).
As they lean over the beans in their rented back room that is full of beads and receipts and dolls and cloths, tobacco crumbs, vases and fringes.	The long, descriptive line paints a vivid picture of their cluttered living space, filled with mementos of their past lives. The accumulation of objects reflects the accumulation of memories and experiences.

Literary And Poetic Devices: “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

Device	Definition	Example	Explanation
Assonance	The repetition of vowel sounds in nearby words.	“twinklings and twinges”	The ‘i’ sound is repeated to create internal rhyming within the phrase.
Imagery	Descriptive language that appeals to the senses.	“rented back room that is full of beads”	Visual imagery is used to create a vivid picture of the couple’s cluttered room.
Symbolism	The use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities.	“beans”	Beans symbolize the simplicity and frugality of the couple’s life.
Enjambment	The continuation of a sentence without a pause beyond the end of a line.	“Plain chipware on a plain and creaking wood, / Tin flatware.”	The sentence flows over the line break, emphasizing the continuity of their simple life.
Repetition	The action of repeating something that has already been said or written.	“Putting on their clothes / And putting things away.”	The repetition of “putting” emphasizes the routine nature of their lives.
Irony	The expression of one’s meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite.	“Two who are Mostly Good.”	The word “Mostly” suggests a subtle irony about their goodness, indicating they are not perfect.
Metaphor	A figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.	“twinklings and twinges”	The memories are metaphorically described as “twinklings and twinges” to evoke a sense of fleeting and poignant moments.
Simile	A figure of speech involving the comparison of one thing with another thing of a different kind, using “like” or “as”.	None explicitly in the poem	The poem does not contain a direct simile.
Personification	Attribution of a personal nature or human characteristics to something nonhuman.	“creaking wood”	The wood is personified to suggest it is making a sound as if it were alive.
Hyperbole	Exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.	“lived their day”	The phrase exaggerates to emphasize that their prime years are behind them.
Oxymoron	A figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction.	“twinklings and twinges”	Combines contrasting feelings of joy and pain in memories.
Tone	The general character or attitude of a place, piece of writing, situation, etc.	Overall nostalgic and melancholic tone	The tone reflects a mix of nostalgia and melancholy for the past.
Juxtaposition	The fact of two things being seen or placed close together with contrasting effect.	“beans mostly” vs. “twinklings and twinges”	The simplicity of their meals contrasts with the complexity of their memories.
Consonance	The recurrence of similar sounds, especially consonants, in close proximity.	“tobacco crumbs, vases and fringes”	The ‘b’ and ‘s’ sounds create consonance, adding to the musicality of the line.
Theme	The central topic a text treats.	Simplicity and nostalgia	The poem’s theme revolves around the simplicity of life and the nostalgia of old age.
Mood	The atmosphere or pervading tone of something, especially a work of art.	Nostalgic and reflective	The mood evokes a reflective and nostalgic feeling about past experiences.
Diction	The choice and use of words and phrases in speech or writing.	Simple and unadorned diction	The straightforward language reflects the simplicity of the couple’s life.
Paradox	A statement that contradicts itself but might be true.	“Mostly Good”	The phrase suggests a contradiction, questioning the absoluteness of their goodness.
Allegory	A story, poem, or picture that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning.	The poem as a whole	The poem serves as an allegory for the enduring human spirit amidst simplicity and aging.

Themes: “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

Poverty and Simple Living: The poem is steeped in the imagery of poverty, from the “plain chipware” and “tin flatware” to the rented back room filled with humble possessions. The couple’s diet of beans emphasizes their meager means. Yet, there is no sense of bitterness or resentment. The poem highlights the dignity and resilience that can be found even in the most modest circumstances.
Aging and Memory: The elderly couple, having “lived their day,” now find themselves in a quieter phase of life, filled with reminiscences. The “twinklings and twinges” of memory suggest both the joys and sorrows of the past. The poem gently acknowledges the passage of time and the importance of holding onto memories as one ages.
Resilience and Dignity: Despite their poverty and the limitations of old age, the couple continues to “put on their clothes” and “put things away,” maintaining a sense of order and purpose. The poem celebrates the quiet strength and perseverance of ordinary people in the face of life’s challenges.

The Richness of Everyday Life: Even within their simple existence, the couple finds meaning and beauty. Their cluttered back room, filled with “beads and receipts and dolls and cloths,” is a testament to a life lived fully. The poem suggests that even the most humble lives are filled with experiences worth remembering and cherishing.

Literary Theories and “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

Literary Theory	Application to “The Bean Eaters”	Critique
Reader-Response Criticism	Focuses on how readers interact with and create meaning from the text. Readers might connect with the themes of aging, memory, poverty, and resilience based on their own experiences.	Neglects the author’s intent and historical context, potentially leading to overly subjective interpretations.
Feminist Criticism	Examines the poem’s portrayal of an elderly woman and her experiences. It might highlight how the woman’s life is defined by domesticity and caregiving, while also celebrating her quiet strength and resilience.	May overlook other important aspects of the poem, such as its focus on poverty and memory.
Marxist Criticism	Analyzes the poem through the lens of class struggle and economic inequality. It would emphasize the couple’s poverty and their meager possessions, while also exploring how their experiences are shaped by societal structures.	Could reduce the poem to a simplistic commentary on class, neglecting its nuanced exploration of human experience and emotions.

Critical Questions about “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

How does the poem’s structure and language contribute to its overall meaning?
The poem’s free verse form and simple, everyday language mirror the unadorned lives of the elderly couple. The lack of formal structure reflects the natural flow of their thoughts and memories. The use of repetition (“And remembering…”) emphasizes the importance of reminiscence in their lives. The poem’s directness and lack of embellishment create a sense of authenticity and intimacy, allowing readers to connect with the characters and their experiences.

What is the significance of the objects mentioned in the poem (beads, receipts, dolls, etc.)?
The objects in the couple’s back room are not merely clutter, but rather tangible representations of their life’s journey. The beads, receipts, dolls, and other items serve as triggers for memories, both joyful and painful. They symbolize the accumulation of experiences and relationships that have shaped the couple’s lives.
How does the poem challenge or reinforce stereotypes about aging and poverty?

The poem challenges stereotypes by portraying an elderly couple who, despite their poverty and limited resources, maintain their dignity and resilience. They are not defined solely by their age or economic status, but rather by their shared experiences and enduring love for each other.The poem celebrates the quiet strength and perseverance of ordinary people in the face of life’s challenges, offering a counter-narrative to the often-negative portrayal of aging and poverty.
What is the role of the speaker in the poem?
The speaker is an observer, presenting the couple’s lives without judgment or sentimentality. The speaker’s detached tone allows readers to form their own interpretations and connections with the characters.However, the speaker’s choice of words and details reveals a deep empathy and respect for the couple, highlighting their resilience and the richness of their lives.

Literary Works Similar to “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

“Those Winter Sundays” by Robert Hayden: Both poems reflect on the unnoticed, simple acts of love and sacrifice in daily life.
“A Blessing” by James Wright: Both poems capture moments of simple beauty and connection amidst humble settings.
“The House on the Hill” by Edwin Arlington Robinson: Both poems contemplate the passage of time and the quiet persistence of daily routines.

“The End and the Beginning” by Wisława Szymborska: Both poems explore themes of resilience and the quiet strength found in everyday life.
“To a Daughter Leaving Home” by Linda Pastan: Both poems depict the bittersweet emotions of aging and the passage of time in family life.

Representative Quotations of “The Bean Eaters” by Gwendolyn Brooks

Quotation	Context	Theoretical Perspective
“They eat beans mostly, this old yellow pair.”	The poem opens with an image of an elderly couple, emphasizing their humble meal of beans, which reflects their economic hardship and simplicity of life.	Marxist Theory: This line highlights economic struggles and class distinctions.
“Dinner is a casual affair.”	Describes the informal and unpretentious nature of the couple’s meals, suggesting a routine of simplicity and perhaps resignation to their modest circumstances.	Realism: Captures the everyday reality of the couple’s life without romanticizing it.
“Plain chipware on a plain and creaking wood, / Tin flatware.”	The imagery of cheap and worn-out dishes and utensils further illustrates the couple’s poverty and the worn state of their lives.	Material Culture: Focuses on the physical objects that represent the couple’s socio-economic status.
“Two who are Mostly Good.”	Reflects on the couple’s moral character, suggesting that despite their poverty, they maintain a sense of decency and goodness.	Humanism: Emphasizes the inherent dignity and moral worth of the couple.
“Remembering, with twinklings and twinges, / As they lean over the beans in their rented back room.”	Conveys a sense of nostalgia and the bittersweet nature of their memories as they reflect on their past while living in a rented, likely humble, space.	Psychoanalytic Theory: Examines the inner emotional life and memories of the couple.

“The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey: A Critical Analysis

“The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey first appeared in 1798 in the Morning Post newspaper.

Introduction: “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

“The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey first appeared in 1798 in the Morning Post newspaper, titled “After Blenheim,” the poem was not part of a collection when it was first published. This anti-war poem is a ballad that presents a conversation between an old man and a child about the Battle of Blenheim. The old man’s matter-of-fact responses to the child’s innocent questions highlight the futility and senselessness of war. Southey uses simple language and a straightforward rhyme scheme to emphasize the poem’s irony and underscore the tragedy of the battle’s human cost.

Text: “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

It was a summer evening,

Old Kaspar’s work was done,

And he before his cottage door

Was sitting in the sun,

And by him sported on the green

His little grandchild Wilhelmine.

She saw her brother Peterkin

Roll something large and round,

Which he beside the rivulet

In playing there had found;

He came to ask what he had found,

That was so large, and smooth, and round.

Old Kaspar took it from the boy,

Who stood expectant by;

And then the old man shook his head,

And, with a natural sigh,

“‘Tis some poor fellow’s skull,” said he,

“Who fell in the great victory.

“I find them in the garden,

For there’s many here about;

And often when I go to plough,

The ploughshare turns them out!

For many thousand men,” said he,

“Were slain in that great victory.”

“Now tell us what ’twas all about,”

Young Peterkin, he cries;

And little Wilhelmine looks up

With wonder-waiting eyes;

“Now tell us all about the war,

And what they fought each other for.”

“It was the English,” Kaspar cried,

“Who put the French to rout;

But what they fought each other for,

I could not well make out;

But everybody said,” quoth he,

“That ’twas a famous victory.

“My father lived at Blenheim then,

Yon little stream hard by;

They burnt his dwelling to the ground,

And he was forced to fly;

So with his wife and child he fled,

Nor had he where to rest his head.

“With fire and sword the country round

Was wasted far and wide,

And many a childing mother then,

And new-born baby died;

But things like that, you know, must be

At every famous victory.

“They say it was a shocking sight

After the field was won;

For many thousand bodies here

Lay rotting in the sun;

But things like that, you know, must be

After a famous victory.

“Great praise the Duke of Marlbro’ won,

And our good Prince Eugene.”

“Why, ’twas a very wicked thing!”

Said little Wilhelmine.

“Nay… nay… my little girl,” quoth he,

“It was a famous victory.

“And everybody praised the Duke

Who this great fight did win.”

“But what good came of it at last?”

Quoth little Peterkin.

“Why that I cannot tell,” said he,

“But ’twas a famous victory.”

Annotations: “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

Stanza	Annotation
1	Introduces Old Kaspar and his grandchild, Wilhelmine, setting a peaceful scene that contrasts with the upcoming war theme.
2	Peterkin finds a skull by the rivulet, initiating the conversation about the battle.
3	Kaspar identifies the skull as that of a fallen soldier, foreshadowing the poem’s anti-war message.
4	Kaspar reveals the abundance of skulls in the area, emphasizing the war’s human cost.
5	Peterkin and Wilhelmine’s innocent questions about the war highlight their naivete and contrast with Kaspar’s jaded perspective.
6	Kaspar remembers the English victory but admits his ignorance about the war’s purpose, emphasizing the senselessness of the conflict.
7	Kaspar recounts his father’s displacement due to the war, showcasing the personal impact of the conflict.
8	Kaspar describes the widespread devastation and loss of innocent lives, challenging the glorification of war.
9	Kaspar’s matter-of-fact description of the gruesome aftermath of the battle reinforces the poem’s anti-war message.
10	The children’s moral questioning of the war contrasts with Kaspar’s blind acceptance of its supposed glory, underscoring the poem’s irony.
11	Peterkin’s question about the war’s benefits highlights the poem’s central theme of the futility of war.

Literary And Poetic Devices: “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

Device	Definition	Example	Explanation
Alliteration	Repetition of initial consonant sounds	“She saw her brother Peterkin”	The repetition of the ‘s’ and ‘b/p’ sounds creates a musical effect.
Allusion	Reference to a well-known person, place, event	“The Duke of Marlbro'”	Refers to John Churchill, the Duke of Marlborough, a historical figure.
Assonance	Repetition of vowel sounds	“By him sported on the green”	The repetition of the ‘o’ sound creates internal rhyme within the line.
Ballad	A narrative poem in short stanzas	The entire poem “The Battle of Blenheim”	The poem tells a story in simple language and is structured in short stanzas.
Consonance	Repetition of consonant sounds	“Lay rotting in the sun”	The repetition of the ‘t’ and ‘n’ sounds emphasizes the grim image.
Dialogue	Conversation between characters	“Now tell us what ’twas all about,” Young Peterkin, he cries;	The characters engage in conversation, advancing the story and revealing their perspectives.
Dramatic Irony	When the audience knows something the characters do not	“But things like that, you know, must be After a famous victory.”	The children are unaware of the true horrors of war, while the audience understands the irony.
Imagery	Descriptive language that appeals to the senses	“For many thousand bodies here Lay rotting in the sun;”	Vivid descriptions create a mental image of the battlefield.
Irony	A contrast between expectation and reality	“It was a famous victory”	The repetition highlights the irony of calling a bloody, destructive battle ‘famous.’
Juxtaposition	Placing two elements side by side to present a comparison or contrast	“And he before his cottage door Was sitting in the sun,”	The peaceful setting contrasts with the violent history being discussed.
Metaphor	A comparison without using “like” or “as”	“‘Tis some poor fellow’s skull,” said he	The skull symbolizes the forgotten soldiers who died in the battle.
Narrative	A spoken or written account of connected events	The entire poem narrates the story of the Battle of Blenheim	The poem tells a story through the voice of Old Kaspar and his grandchildren.
Personification	Giving human traits to non-human things	“And, with a natural sigh”	The sigh is described as ‘natural,’ attributing a human quality to it.
Refrain	A repeated line or number of lines in a poem	“But ’twas a famous victory”	The repetition of this line reinforces the poem’s ironic tone.
Rhyme Scheme	The pattern of rhymes at the end of each line	ABABCC in each stanza	The consistent rhyme scheme adds rhythm and musicality to the poem.
Simile	A comparison using “like” or “as”	“With fire and sword the country round”	Although no direct simile, the vivid description functions similarly to create a comparison.
Symbolism	Use of symbols to signify ideas and qualities	“The skull”	The skull represents the death and destruction caused by the battle.
Tone	The attitude of the writer toward the subject	Reflective and ironic	The tone reflects on the futility of war and the irony of celebrating such destruction.
Visual Imagery	Descriptive language that appeals to the sight	“The ploughshare turns them out!”	The image of the ploughshare unearthing skulls is vivid and striking.
Voice	The distinctive style or manner of expression	Old Kaspar’s voice narrates the history	The poem’s narrative voice provides a personal perspective on historical events.

Themes: “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

Futility of War: Southey emphasizes the futility of war through Kaspar’s inability to comprehend its purpose. Despite witnessing the devastating consequences firsthand, he blindly accepts the victory as “famous” without understanding the reasons behind the conflict. This highlights the absurdity of war, where countless lives are lost for causes that remain unclear or unjustified, as reflected in Peterkin’s question, “But what good came of it at last?”
Human Cost of War: The poem vividly portrays the human cost of war through the abundance of skulls littering the landscape. The image of a child innocently playing with a skull underscores the tragic loss of life and the lasting impact of war on generations. Kaspar’s matter-of-fact description of the rotting bodies further emphasizes the dehumanizing nature of conflict.

Loss of Innocence: The children’s innocent questions about the war and their moral outrage at its consequences contrast sharply with Kaspar’s desensitized acceptance of violence. This contrast highlights how war can erode empathy and normalize brutality, leading to a loss of innocence and moral compass.
Blind Patriotism: Kaspar’s unquestioning acceptance of the “famous victory” and his praise for the Duke of Marlbro’ reflect a blind patriotism that ignores the true cost of war. This theme critiques the tendency to glorify military victories without considering the suffering they cause, urging readers to question the narratives that perpetuate violence.

Literary Theories and “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

Literary Theory	Application to “The Battle of Blenheim”	Critique
Marxist Theory:	Focuses on the socio-economic impact of war and the power dynamics between classes. In this poem, the war is depicted as a conflict between the ruling class (the Duke of Marlbro’) and the working class (Kaspar’s father), who suffer the most from its consequences. The poem critiques the glorification of war by the ruling class, who benefit from it while the working class bears the brunt of its devastation.	This theory overlooks the emotional and psychological impact of war on individuals, focusing solely on the economic aspects. It may also simplify the complex motivations behind war and ignore other factors like nationalism and ideology.
Reader-Response Theory:	Emphasizes the reader’s interpretation and emotional response to the poem. The simple language and ballad form invite readers to engage with the poem on a personal level, evoking empathy for the innocent victims of war. The contrast between the children’s questions and Kaspar’s indifference may provoke anger or sadness in readers, highlighting the poem’s anti-war message.	This theory can lead to subjective interpretations and may neglect the author’s intended meaning. It also assumes that all readers will have a similar emotional response, disregarding cultural and historical context.
New Historicism:	Examines the historical context in which the poem was written and its relationship to the socio-political climate of the time. “The Battle of Blenheim” was written during the French Revolutionary Wars, a period of widespread conflict and upheaval. The poem reflects the disillusionment with war and the growing awareness of its devastating consequences. It also critiques the blind patriotism and jingoism prevalent during wartime.	This theory may overly focus on the historical context and neglect the literary merits of the poem. It may also impose modern interpretations on historical texts, disregarding the original intentions of the author.

Critical Questions about “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

Question: What is the significance of the recurring phrase “a famous victory” in “The Battle of Blenheim”?

The repeated use of the phrase “a famous victory” underscores the ironic contrast between the glorification of military success and the grim reality of war’s aftermath. By continually referring to the battle as “a famous victory,” Southey highlights the disconnect between the celebrated historical narrative and the actual human suffering caused by the conflict. This irony serves to critique the way society often overlooks the devastating consequences of war in favor of glorifying its outcomes.
Question: How does Southey use the perspectives of children to convey his message about war?
Southey uses the innocent curiosity of Young Peterkin and little Wilhelmine, as they question Old Kaspar about the battle, to effectively convey the incomprehensibility and absurdity of war. Their struggle to understand the purpose of the conflict mirrors the poet’s own critique of the senselessness of war. Through the children’s eyes, the poem reveals the stark contrast between their innocent questions and the harsh realities of war, emphasizing the impact of conflict on ordinary lives and the difficulty in justifying such violence.

Question: What role does Old Kaspar’s character play in the poem’s narrative and message?
Old Kaspar acts as the narrator and a link to the past, recounting the events of the Battle of Blenheim with a resigned acceptance of the horrors of war. His inability to provide a satisfactory explanation for the conflict’s purpose reflects a cynical view of war as an inevitable but tragic aspect of human history. Through his matter-of-fact recounting of the casualties and destruction, Kaspar embodies the disillusionment with war and its supposed glory, highlighting the futility and recurring nature of such conflicts.
Question: How does the poem reflect on the human cost of war beyond the immediate battlefield?

The poem extends the impact of war to the civilian population by highlighting the deaths of mothers and infants, illustrating the widespread suffering and loss caused by the conflict. This focus on the broader human toll emphasizes the far-reaching and devastating consequences of war on society. By drawing attention to the collateral damage, the poem critiques the glorification of military victories and underscores the true cost of such conflicts, challenging the notion that any battle can be deemed “famous” when it results in such widespread devastation

Literary Works Similar to “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

“Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen: Both poems expose the brutal realities of war and challenge the glorification of violence through graphic imagery and stark language.
“The Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred Lord Tennyson: While seemingly glorifying a heroic charge, Tennyson’s poem also subtly questions the futility of war and the sacrifice of soldiers for unclear objectives.

“Grass” by Carl Sandburg: This poem reflects on the cyclical nature of war and how time obscures the memory of past conflicts, much like the skulls hidden beneath the earth in “The Battle of Blenheim.”
“Naming of Parts” by Henry Reed: Reed’s poem juxtaposes the beauty of nature with the harsh realities of military training, highlighting the disconnect between war and the human experience.
“Disabled” by Wilfred Owen: Owen’s poem explores the physical and psychological toll of war on an individual soldier, similar to how “The Battle of Blenheim” highlights the personal impact of conflict through Kaspar’s family history.

Representative Quotations of “The Battle of Blenheim” by Robert Southey

Quotation	Context	Theoretical Perspective
“But what they fought each other for, / I could not well make out”	Old Kaspar’s response to the children’s question about the war’s purpose.	Marxist: Reflects the alienation of the working class from the political decisions of the ruling class.
“‘Tis some poor fellow’s skull,” said he, / “Who fell in the great victory.”	Kaspar identifies the skull found by the children.	New Historicism: Highlights the human cost of war and the historical reality of mass casualties.
“And everybody praised the Duke / Who this great fight did win.”	Kaspar echoes the popular sentiment of glorifying military leaders.	Reader-Response: May evoke a sense of irony or skepticism in the reader, questioning the validity of such praise.
“With fire and sword the country round / Was wasted far and wide”	Kaspar describes the devastating impact of war on the land and its people.	Ecocriticism: Depicts the environmental destruction caused by war, emphasizing the interconnectedness of humans and nature.
“But what good came of it at last?” / Quoth little Peterkin.	Peterkin’s innocent question challenges the notion of a “famous victory.”	Postcolonial: Raises questions about the legitimacy of imperial wars and their impact on colonized peoples.

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31

Day: July 30, 2024