“Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy: A Critical Analysis

“Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy, first published in 1914 as part of the collection Satires of Circumstance, shows stark imagery, pessimistic tone, and exploration of the human condition in the face of war and mortality.

Introduction: “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy

“Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy, first published in 1914 as part of the collection Satires of Circumstance, shows stark imagery, pessimistic tone, and exploration of the human condition in the face of war and mortality. Hardy’s use of simple language and vivid descriptions effectively convey the emotional impact of the event, highlighting the fear, uncertainty, and senselessness of war.

Text: “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy

That night your great guns, unawares,

Shook all our coffins as we lay,

And broke the chancel window-squares,

We thought it was the Judgment-day

And sat upright. While drearisome

Arose the howl of wakened hounds:

The mouse let fall the altar-crumb,

The worms drew back into the mounds,

The glebe cow drooled. Till God called, “No;

It’s gunnery practice out at sea

Just as before you went below;

The world is as it used to be:

“All nations striving strong to make

Red war yet redder. Mad as hatters

They do no more for Christés sake

Than you who are helpless in such matters.

“That this is not the judgment-hour

For some of them’s a blessed thing,

For if it were they’d have to scour

Hell’s floor for so much threatening….

“Ha, ha. It will be warmer when

I blow the trumpet (if indeed

I ever do; for you are men,

And rest eternal sorely need).”

So down we lay again. “I wonder,

Will the world ever saner be,”

Said one, “than when He sent us under

In our indifferent century!”

And many a skeleton shook his head.

“Instead of preaching forty year,”

My neighbour Parson Thirdly said,

“I wish I had stuck to pipes and beer.”

Again the guns disturbed the hour,

Roaring their readiness to avenge,

As far inland as Stourton Tower,

And Camelot, and starlit Stonehenge.

Annotations: “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
StanzaAnnotation
1The dead are awakened by the sound of great guns, which they initially mistake for the Judgment Day. This introduces the setting in a graveyard and the motif of war.
2The animals and insects in and around the graves react to the disturbance. The imagery serves to show the unnaturalness of the disturbance in a place of eternal rest.
3God humorously clarifies that the noise is just gunnery practice, not the apocalypse, emphasizing the continuity of human conflicts even after death.
4God’s speech continues, critiquing humanity’s endless engagement in war and their disregard for spiritual values (“for Christés sake”), even in the face of divine judgment.
5The dialogue turns sardonic as God mocks the concept of Judgment Day, hinting at human insignificance and the eternal rest (“you are men, And rest eternal sorely need”) they need rather than resurrection for judgment.
6The dead ponder if humanity will ever become wiser, reflecting on their own time as just as indifferent to folly as any other.
7A skeleton, formerly a parson, expresses regret over his life choices, wishing he had pursued more earthly pleasures (“pipes and beer”) instead of a spiritual calling.
8The poem concludes with the reiteration of the gunfire, reinforcing the relentless and pervasive nature of war that reaches even historical and mystical sites (“Camelot, and starlit Stonehenge”).
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
DeviceDefinitionExampleFunction
ApostropheAddressing someone or something absent or inanimate as if it were present and capable of understanding.“And sat upright. While drearisome / Arose the howl of wakened hounds:”Adds a sense of intimacy and emotion, as if the speaker is directly addressing the dead.
AssonanceThe repetition of vowel sounds within words.“That night your great guns, unawares”Creates a musical and rhythmic effect, enhances the poem’s auditory qualities.
Biblical allusionA reference to a person, event, or place from the Bible.“We thought it was the Judgment-day”Adds a sense of historical and religious significance, suggesting the gravity of the situation.
ContrastThe juxtaposition of opposing ideas or images.“The world is as it used to be” contrasted with “All nations striving strong to make / Red war yet redder”Highlights the irony and absurdity of the situation, emphasizing the contrast between the dead and the living.
DialogueConversation between characters.“Will the world ever saner be,” / Said one, “than when He sent us under / In our indifferent century!”Adds a sense of realism and immediacy, making the poem more relatable.
Dramatic ironyWhen the audience or reader knows something that the characters do not.The dead characters believe it is the Judgment Day, while the reader knows it is gunnery practice.Creates a sense of suspense and tension, as the reader anticipates the characters’ realization.
EuphemismA mild or indirect expression used to replace a more direct or offensive one.“Rest eternal sorely need” instead of “die”Avoids a direct and potentially offensive reference to death, while still conveying the meaning.
ImageryThe use of vivid language to create mental images.“The mouse let fall the altar-crumb”Creates a vivid picture of the disruption caused by the guns, emphasizing the impact on even the smallest creatures.
IronyA figure of speech in which what is said is the opposite of what is meant.“Ha, ha. It will be warmer when / I blow the trumpet”Highlights the absurdity of the situation, as God mocks the idea of a final judgment.
MetaphorA figure of speech in which one thing is said to be another thing.“Mad as hatters”Compares the nations to people who are insane, emphasizing their irrational behavior.
PersonificationGiving human qualities to non-human things.“The glebe cow drooled”Creates a vivid image of the cow’s fear and distress, emphasizing the impact of the guns on all living things.
RhymeThe repetition of sounds at the end of words.“We thought it was the Judgment-day” / “Just as before you went below;”Creates a musical and rhythmic effect, making the poem more memorable.
SatireThe use of humor to criticize or ridicule.The poem satirizes the absurdity of war and the hypocrisy of religious leaders.Provides a critical commentary on society, highlighting its flaws.
SimileA figure of speech that compares two things using “like” or “as.”“Mad as hatters”Compares the nations to people who are insane, emphasizing their irrational behavior.
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities.The guns symbolize the destructive power of war and the indifference of humanity.Adds depth and meaning to the poem, allowing for multiple interpretations.
ToneThe attitude of the speaker toward the subject matter.Pessimistic, ironic, and criticalCreates a sense of despair and disillusionment, reflecting the speaker’s view of the world.
Verbal ironyWhen a speaker says something contrary to what is meant.“Ha, ha. It will be warmer when / I blow the trumpet”Highlights the absurdity of the situation, as God mocks the idea of a final judgment.
VoiceThe distinctive style or personality of the speaker.The voice of the speaker is that of a dead person, reflecting on the absurdity of life and death.Creates a unique perspective and adds to the poem’s emotional impact.
Word choiceThe selection of specific words to convey meaning and evoke emotion.“Drearisome,” “indifferent,” “helpless”Creates a somber and evocative atmosphere, emphasizing the poem’s themes of despair and futility.
Themes: “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
  • The Absurdity of War:
  • Hardy presents war as a senseless and chaotic event that disrupts the natural order. The sudden firing of the guns and the subsequent chaos among the dead highlight the absurdity of the situation. The poem’s ironic tone and the juxtaposition of the peaceful setting of the graveyard with the violent act of war emphasize the senselessness of the conflict. For example, the lines “And broke the chancel window-squares, / We thought it was the Judgment-day” illustrate the unexpected and jarring nature of the war, while the contrast between the “drearisome” howl of the hounds and the “glebe cow drooled” emphasizes the absurdity of the situation.
  • The Fragility of Life:
  • The poem underscores the fragility of human life in the face of death. The dead characters are awakened from their eternal sleep by the guns, highlighting the temporary nature of existence. The reference to the “indifferent century” suggests that human life is ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. For instance, the lines “That night your great guns, unawares, / Shook all our coffins as we lay” emphasize the vulnerability of the dead to the forces of nature and the unpredictable nature of life.
  • The Indifference of God:
  • Hardy presents a bleak view of God as a distant and indifferent figure who takes little interest in human suffering. The character of God in the poem is portrayed as a cruel and mocking figure who finds amusement in the plight of humanity. This portrayal challenges traditional notions of a benevolent and caring deity. For example, God’s response to the dead characters’ concerns is dismissive and mocking: “Ha, ha. It will be warmer when / I blow the trumpet (if indeed / I ever do; for you are men, / And rest eternal sorely need).” This suggests that God is uncaring and indifferent to the suffering of humanity.
  • 4. The Futility of Human Endeavors:
  • The poem suggests that human efforts to improve the world are ultimately futile. The dead characters’ realization that the world is still filled with war and conflict emphasizes the futility of their existence. The parson’s regret for not pursuing a simpler life highlights the futility of seeking meaning and purpose in a chaotic world. For example, the lines “Again the guns disturbed the hour, / Roaring their readiness to avenge” suggest that human efforts to create a better world are ultimately in vain, as war continues to persist.
Literary Theories and “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
Literary TheoryApplication to “Channel Firing”
HistoricismHistoricism looks at the historical context of the poem to understand its themes and messages. Hardy wrote this poem in 1914, on the brink of World War I, reflecting societal fears and the prevailing militarism. References: The poem’s setting in a graveyard and the mistaken sounds of guns for Judgment Day could be seen as Hardy’s commentary on the absurdity and omnipresence of war (“That night your great guns, unawares, Shook all our coffins as we lay”).
Marxist CriticismMarxist criticism explores class struggle and materialism within literary works. In “Channel Firing,” the voices from the graves, including a parson, comment on the futility and the continuation of human conflicts, suggesting disillusionment with religious and societal structures that support war. References: The parson’s regret over his spiritual life in favor of earthly pleasures (“I wish I had stuck to pipes and beer”) critiques materialism and misplaced values.
Post-structuralismPost-structuralism emphasizes the instability of meaning and how language constructs reality. The poem’s ironic tone and the paradoxical dialogue between the dead and God question established narratives of morality and eternity. References: God’s ironic remarks about the judgment and the permanence of war (“Ha, ha. It will be warmer when I blow the trumpet”) highlight the ambiguous and constructed nature of religious and moral truths in human society.
Critical Questions about “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
  • How does Hardy’s use of imagery contribute to the poem’s themes?
  • Hardy’s use of vivid imagery is central to the poem’s exploration of themes such as the absurdity of war, the fragility of life, and the indifference of God. For example, the image of the “chancel window-squares” being broken by the guns symbolizes the disruption of the natural order and the sacredness of life. The image of the “glebe cow drooled” highlights the impact of the war on even the most innocent creatures. Through these images, Hardy creates a powerful and evocative picture of the devastation caused by war.
  • How does the poem’s tone contribute to its overall meaning?
  • The poem’s tone is predominantly pessimistic, ironic, and critical. This tone helps to convey the sense of despair and disillusionment experienced by the dead characters. For example, the ironic tone of God’s response to the dead characters’ concerns emphasizes the absurdity of the situation and the indifference of the divine. The poem’s pessimistic tone contributes to its overall meaning by highlighting the bleakness of human existence and the futility of human endeavors.
  • What is the significance of the setting in the poem?
  • The setting of a graveyard is significant because it represents the final resting place of the dead and symbolizes mortality. The contrast between the peaceful setting of the graveyard and the violent act of war emphasizes the absurdity of the situation. Additionally, the setting of the graveyard allows Hardy to explore themes such as the fragility of life and the inevitability of death.
  • How does the poem’s use of dialogue contribute to its characterization and narrative?
  • The use of dialogue in the poem contributes to the characterization of the dead and helps to advance the narrative. The conversations between the dead characters reveal their thoughts, feelings, and perspectives on the world. For example, the parson’s regret for not pursuing a simpler life highlights the futility of human endeavors. The dialogue also helps to create a sense of realism and immediacy, making the poem more relatable to the reader.
Literary Works Similar to “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
  • “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen: This poem, like Hardy’s, offers a grim and graphic depiction of war, specifically World War I, challenging the romanticized view of war and echoing Hardy’s critique of its brutal reality.
  • “The Second Coming” by William Butler Yeats: Yeats’ poem explores themes of chaos and disorder at a crucial historical moment, similar to Hardy’s reflection on societal norms and the constant presence of conflict.
  • “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by William Butler Yeats: Here, Yeats delves into the thoughts of a doomed pilot, reflecting on his impending death in a manner that mirrors the existential contemplation found in “Channel Firing.”
  • “The Man He Killed” by Thomas Hardy: Another of Hardy’s own poems, this one offers a direct, personal reflection on the absurdity of war, as a soldier contemplates killing a man who could have been a friend under different circumstances, akin to the existential and moral questions in “Channel Firing.”
  • “War Photographer” by Carol Ann Duffy: Duffy’s poem considers the detached perspective of a photographer documenting war zones, highlighting the moral and ethical numbness similar to the detached, ironic commentary of the dead in Hardy’s poem.
Suggested Readings: “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
  1. Gatrell, Simon. Hardy’s Poetry, 1860-1928. Oxford University Press, 1988.
  2. Kramer, Dale, editor. Critical Approaches to the Fiction of Thomas Hardy. Barnes & Noble Books, 1979.
  3. Millgate, Michael. Thomas Hardy: A Biography Revisited. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  4. Morgan, Rosemarie. Student Companion to Thomas Hardy. Greenwood Press, 2007.
  5. Orel, Harold, editor. Thomas Hardy’s Personal Writings. University Press of Kansas, 1990.
Representative Quotations of “Channel Firing” by Thomas Hardy
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“And sat upright. While drearisome / Arose the howl of wakened hounds:”The dead characters are startled awake by the guns.Existentialism: The sudden disruption of their peaceful existence highlights the absurdity and unpredictability of life.
“The glebe cow drooled. Till God called, “No; / It’s gunnery practice out at sea”The dead characters are initially mistaken about the cause of the disturbance.Dramatic irony: The reader knows the truth, creating a sense of suspense and tension.
“All nations striving strong to make / Red war yet redder. Mad as hatters”The poem critiques the senselessness of war.Satire: Hardy uses humor and irony to criticize the absurdity of human behavior.
“That this is not the judgment-hour / For some of them’s a blessed thing”God suggests that the war is a blessing in disguise.Irony: This statement is ironic, as it mocks the idea of a final judgment and the possibility of salvation.
“Instead of preaching forty year,” / My neighbour Parson Thirdly said, / “I wish I had stuck to pipes and beer.”The parson regrets his choice of profession.Existentialism: The poem suggests that life is meaningless and that there is no inherent purpose to human existence.

“An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats: A Critical Analysis

“An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats first appeared in 1919 in the collection Michael Robartes and the Dancer.

"An Irish Airman Foresees His Death" by W. B. Yeats: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats

“An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats first appeared in 1919 in the collection Michael Robartes and the Dancer. The poem, known for its stark imagery and elegiac tone, explores themes of solitude, fate, and the meaninglessness of war. The speaker, an Irish airman, anticipates his own demise in a battle he considers futile. The poem’s qualities include its concise and intense language, as well as its use of symbolism to convey profound thoughts about life and death. The main idea is that the speaker’s sense of duty and patriotism is ultimately overshadowed by a profound sense of futility and despair.

Text: “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats

I know that I shall meet my fate

Somewhere among the clouds above;

Those that I fight I do not hate,

Those that I guard I do not love;

My country is Kiltartan Cross,

My countrymen Kiltartan’s poor,

No likely end could bring them loss

Or leave them happier than before.

Nor law, nor duty bade me fight,

Nor public men, nor cheering crowds,

A lonely impulse of delight

Drove to this tumult in the clouds;

I balanced all, brought all to mind,

The years to come seemed waste of breath,

A waste of breath the years behind

In balance with this life, this death.

Annotations: “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats
LineAnnotation
I know that I shall meet my fateThe speaker, an Irish airman, is certain of his impending death. This foreshadows the theme of inevitability in the poem.
Somewhere among the clouds above;The airman acknowledges that his death will occur in the skies, emphasizing the setting of aerial combat.
Those that I fight I do not hate,The airman does not harbor personal hatred for the enemies he is fighting, indicating a sense of detachment from the conflict.
Those that I guard I do not love;Similarly, he feels no personal affection or loyalty toward those he is supposedly protecting, highlighting his ambivalence.
My country is Kiltartan Cross,The airman identifies his homeland as Kiltartan Cross, a region in Ireland, suggesting a deep connection to his local roots rather than a broader nationalistic identity.
My countrymen Kiltartan’s poor,He aligns himself with the poor people of Kiltartan, indicating that they are his true countrymen and those he cares about.
No likely end could bring them lossThe airman believes that his death will not affect his countrymen in any significant way, reflecting a sense of futility.
Or leave them happier than before.Likewise, his survival would not bring them any happiness, reinforcing the idea that his actions in the war are inconsequential to his people.
Nor law, nor duty bade me fight,He did not join the war out of a sense of legal or moral obligation, rejecting the common motivations for military service.
Nor public men, nor cheering crowds,The airman was not motivated by the approval or admiration of others, distancing himself from patriotic fervor or societal expectations.
A lonely impulse of delightHis decision to fight was driven by a personal, perhaps irrational, desire, emphasizing his individualism and the existential nature of his choice.
Drove to this tumult in the clouds;This impulse led him into the chaos of aerial combat, where his fate now lies.
I balanced all, brought all to mind,The airman reflects on his life, weighing all his experiences and the meaning of his actions.
The years to come seemed waste of breath,He perceives the future as meaningless, expressing a sense of nihilism about the prospects of life beyond the war.
A waste of breath the years behindSimilarly, he views his past as equally meaningless, suggesting a deep existential crisis or disillusionment.
In balance with this life, this death.The airman concludes that life and death are in a delicate balance, with neither holding more value or meaning than the other, encapsulating the poem’s central theme of existential indifference.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats
DeviceDefinitionExampleExplanation
AlliterationThe repetition of the same consonant sound at the beginning of words.“Those that I fight I do not hate”The repetition of the “f” sound emphasizes the speaker’s detachment from his enemies.
AssonanceThe repetition of the same vowel sound within words.“A lonely impulse of delight”The repetition of the “i” sound creates a sense of longing and isolation.
ImageryThe use of vivid language to create mental images.“Somewhere among the clouds above”The image of clouds evokes a sense of mystery and the unknown.
SymbolismThe use of objects or events to represent abstract ideas.“Kiltartan Cross”The cross symbolizes the speaker’s connection to his homeland and his faith.
MetaphorA comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“A lonely impulse of delight”The impulse is compared to a force that drives the speaker to war.
SimileA comparison between two unlike things using “like” or “as.”“Nor law, nor duty bade me fight”The speaker compares his decision to fight to a force that is beyond his control.
DeviceDefinitionExampleExplanation
ParallelismThe use of similar grammatical structures.“Nor law, nor duty bade me fight, Nor public men, nor cheering crowds”The parallel structure emphasizes the speaker’s isolation and the lack of external motivation.
AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas or images.“A lonely impulse of delight Drove to this tumult in the clouds”The speaker contrasts the peaceful image of delight with the chaotic image of the clouds.
RhymeThe repetition of sounds at the end of words.“Above” and “Love,” “Fight” and “Right”The rhyme scheme (ABAB CDCD EFEF GHGH) creates a sense of order and structure, even in the face of chaos and death.
Sound Devices in “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death
DeviceDefinitionExampleExplanation
ConsonanceThe repetition of consonant sounds within or at the end of words.“Those that I guard I do not love”The repetition of the “d” sound creates a sense of finality and despair.
CacophonyThe use of harsh, discordant sounds.“A lonely impulse of delight”The combination of harsh sounds like “l” and “t” creates a sense of unease and disharmony.
EuphonyThe use of pleasant-sounding words and phrases.“Somewhere among the clouds above”The soft sounds of “s” and “w” create a sense of peace and tranquility.
Themes: “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats
  1. The Futility of War: Yeats’ poem explores the senselessness and futility of war. The speaker expresses a deep sense of detachment from the conflict, stating, “Those that I fight I do not hate, Those that I guard I do not love.” This suggests that the war is a meaningless endeavor that does not align with his personal values or beliefs.
  2. The Inevitability of Fate: The speaker acknowledges that his death is predetermined and unavoidable. He states, “I know that I shall meet my fate Somewhere among the clouds above.” This acceptance of fate suggests a sense of resignation and a belief that individual actions are ultimately powerless against the larger forces of destiny.
  3. The Isolation of the Individual: The poem highlights the isolation and alienation experienced by the speaker. He describes himself as “A lonely impulse of delight” driven to war, suggesting that he is driven by internal forces rather than external influences. This isolation is further emphasized by his detachment from his countrymen and the lack of any meaningful connection to the conflict.
  4. The Conflict Between Duty and Desire: The speaker grapples with the tension between his duty to his country and his personal desires. While he acknowledges his duty to fight, he also expresses a sense of resignation and a belief that his actions are ultimately futile. This conflict highlights the internal struggle faced by individuals who must reconcile their personal beliefs with the demands of society.
Literary Theories and “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats
1. Existentialism
  • Theory Overview: Existentialism is a philosophy that emphasizes individual existence, freedom, and choice. It suggests that life is inherently meaningless, and it is up to individuals to create their own meaning through their actions and decisions.
  • Application to the Poem: The airman’s reflections in the poem align with existentialist themes, particularly in his recognition of the futility of his life and death.
    • Reference: “The years to come seemed waste of breath, / A waste of breath the years behind” illustrates the airman’s existential realization that both his future and past hold little meaning.
    • Reference: “A lonely impulse of delight / Drove to this tumult in the clouds” suggests that the airman’s actions are driven by personal desire rather than any external meaning or purpose, a hallmark of existentialist thought.
2. Postcolonial Theory
  • Theory Overview: Postcolonial theory examines the effects of colonization on cultures and societies, particularly focusing on issues of identity, power, and the relationship between the colonizer and the colonized.
  • Application to the Poem: The airman’s detachment from both the enemies he fights and the people he guards can be interpreted through a postcolonial lens, reflecting the complex identity of an Irishman fighting for Britain during World War I.
    • Reference: “Those that I fight I do not hate, / Those that I guard I do not love” highlights the airman’s conflicted identity, serving an empire that colonized his homeland, yet feeling no personal connection to either side.
    • Reference: “My country is Kiltartan Cross, / My countrymen Kiltartan’s poor” emphasizes the airman’s primary identification with his local Irish community rather than with the broader imperial or nationalistic causes, underscoring the disconnection and alienation that colonial subjects often feel.
3. Modernism
  • Theory Overview: Modernism is a broad movement in literature and the arts that emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, characterized by a break with traditional forms, a focus on subjective experience, and a sense of disillusionment with established norms.
  • Application to the Poem: Yeats’ poem reflects modernist themes through its focus on the subjective experience of the individual and its rejection of traditional patriotic or heroic narratives.
    • Reference: The entire structure of the poem, with its introspective and reflective tone, is a departure from traditional war poetry that often glorifies battle. The airman’s lack of traditional motivations, as expressed in “Nor law, nor duty bade me fight, / Nor public men, nor cheering crowds,” aligns with the modernist rejection of established norms and grand narratives.
    • Reference: The poem’s focus on the individual’s inner experience, as seen in “I balanced all, brought all to mind,” is a hallmark of modernist literature, which often emphasizes personal consciousness over external events.
Critical Questions about “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats

·       What is the significance of the airman’s detachment from both his enemies and those he protects?

  • The airman’s detachment from both those he fights and those he protects is central to understanding his existential outlook and the broader themes of the poem. He states, “Those that I fight I do not hate, / Those that I guard I do not love,” suggesting a profound indifference to the broader political and social forces driving the war. This detachment can be interpreted as a rejection of conventional patriotism and duty, indicating that the airman does not see the war as a personal or moral cause. Instead, his involvement in the war is driven by a personal impulse rather than any external obligation. This indifference may also reflect the disillusionment felt by many soldiers during World War I, a time when traditional ideals of heroism and nationalism were increasingly questioned. By presenting the airman’s detachment, Yeats invites readers to consider the futility and personal disconnection experienced by individuals caught in the machinery of war.

·       How does the airman’s identification with Kiltartan Cross influence his perspective on life and death?

  • The airman’s identification with Kiltartan Cross, a small, rural area in Ireland, shapes his perception of life, death, and his role in the war. He states, “My country is Kiltartan Cross, / My countrymen Kiltartan’s poor,” indicating that his sense of identity and loyalty is rooted in his local community rather than in the broader nationalistic or imperial causes that typically motivate soldiers. This local identification underscores the airman’s disconnection from the larger conflict, as he perceives that no outcome of the war will significantly affect his community: “No likely end could bring them loss / Or leave them happier than before.” This perspective highlights the airman’s sense of futility and resignation; he recognizes that his death will have little impact on the lives of those he considers his own people. Thus, his participation in the war is stripped of the grandiose notions of sacrifice for a greater good, reinforcing the poem’s existential themes.

·       What role does the concept of fate play in the airman’s reflections on his life and death?

  • Fate is a recurring theme in the poem, shaping the airman’s understanding of his impending death and the broader meaning of his existence. The poem opens with the airman’s acknowledgment, “I know that I shall meet my fate / Somewhere among the clouds above,” indicating his acceptance of an unavoidable destiny. This acceptance of fate suggests a resignation to the inevitable, but it also reflects a deeper contemplation of the meaning—or lack thereof—behind his life and death. The airman’s reflections on fate are intertwined with his sense of existential disillusionment, as he concludes that both the years ahead and behind are “a waste of breath.” By framing his death as fated, the airman distances himself from the notion of heroic agency, instead positioning himself as a passive participant in a predetermined course of events. This fatalistic outlook challenges traditional narratives of war as a realm of glory and choice, instead presenting it as an arena where individual desires and actions are ultimately inconsequential.

·       How does the poem reflect the modernist themes of disillusionment and the questioning of traditional values?

  • “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” embodies modernist themes through its portrayal of disillusionment and the questioning of traditional values associated with war and heroism. The airman’s reflections reveal a deep skepticism towards the conventional motivations for war, such as duty, honor, and patriotism. He explicitly rejects these motivations, stating, “Nor law, nor duty bade me fight, / Nor public men, nor cheering crowds,” indicating that his decision to fly and ultimately face death is not driven by any external societal or moral imperatives. Instead, his participation is motivated by “A lonely impulse of delight,” a personal and somewhat irrational desire that stands in stark contrast to the collective ideals of national service. This focus on the individual’s subjective experience, along with the airman’s existential questioning of life’s meaning, aligns with modernist themes that emphasize the disintegration of traditional values and the exploration of internal consciousness. The poem thus reflects the broader cultural and intellectual currents of the early 20th century, where established norms and ideals were increasingly called into question.
Literary Works Similar to “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats
  1. “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen: Both poems explore the horrors of war and the disillusionment experienced by soldiers.
  2. “The Second Coming” by W. B. Yeats: Both poems address themes of impending doom and the breakdown of societal order.
  3. “To an Athlete Dying Young” by A.E. Housman: Both poems consider the fleeting nature of life and the inevitability of death.
  4. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. Eliot: Both poems explore themes of alienation, isolation, and the fear of death.
  5. “War Photographer” by Carol Ann Duffy: Both poems depict the human cost of war and the emotional toll it takes on those involved.
Suggested Readings: “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats
  1. Jeffares, A. Norman. W.B. Yeats: A New Biography. Continuum, 2001.
  2. Allison, Jonathan. Yeats’s Political Identities: Selected Essays. University of Michigan Press, 1996.
  3. Holdeman, David. The Cambridge Introduction to W.B. Yeats. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  4. Bloom, Harold, editor. W.B. Yeats’s Poetry. Chelsea House Publishers, 2004.
  5. Stallworthy, Jon. Between the Lines: W.B. Yeats’s Poetry in Context. Oxford University Press, 1963.
  6. Vendler, Helen. Our Secret Discipline: Yeats and Lyric Form. Harvard University Press, 2007.
  7. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/57311/an-irish-airman-foresees-his-death
  8. https://www.britannica.com/topic/An-Irish-Airman-Foresees-His-Death
  9. https://www.sparknotes.com/poetry/yeats/section3/
Representative Quotations of “An Irish Airman Foresees His Death” by W. B. Yeats
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“I know that I shall meet my fate Somewhere among the clouds above;”The speaker acknowledges the inevitability of his death.Determinism: The belief that all events are predetermined and beyond human control.
“Those that I fight I do not hate, Those that I guard I do not love;”The speaker expresses detachment from both his enemies and his countrymen.Alienation: The feeling of being isolated or estranged from others.
“My country is Kiltartan Cross, My countrymen Kiltartan’s poor”The speaker identifies with his homeland and its people.Nationalism: A sense of loyalty and pride in one’s nation.
“Nor law, nor duty bade me fight, Nor public men, nor cheering crowds”The speaker suggests that his decision to fight was not motivated by external factors.Individualism: The belief that individuals should pursue their own goals and interests rather than conforming to societal norms.
“A lonely impulse of delight Drove to this tumult in the clouds;”The speaker’s decision to fight is driven by an internal force.Romanticism: A literary movement that emphasized emotion, individualism, and nature.
“I balanced all, brought all to mind, The years to come seemed waste of breath”The speaker contemplates the meaninglessness of life.Nihilism: The belief that life is meaningless and that there is no inherent purpose.
“A waste of breath the years behind In balance with this life, this death.”The speaker suggests that life and death are equally meaningless.Existentialism: A philosophical movement that emphasizes the individual’s search for meaning in a meaningless world.
“I balanced all, brought all to mind”The speaker engages in a process of self-reflection.Enlightenment: A philosophical movement that emphasized reason, logic, and individual liberty.
“Nor public men, nor cheering crowds”The speaker rejects the influence of public opinion.Cynicism: A belief that people are motivated primarily by self-interest.
“Somewhere among the clouds above”The image of the clouds suggests the unknown and the mysterious.Symbolism: The use of objects or events to represent abstract ideas.

“Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese: Summary and Critique

“Sexual Politics and Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese first appeared in the 1985 collection “After Strange Texts.”

"Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment" by Elizabeth A. Meese: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese

“Sexual Politics and Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese first appeared in the 1985 collection “After Strange Texts.” This essay has been instrumental in shaping the field of feminist literary theory, as it incisively analyzes the ways in which gender and sexuality intersect with literary criticism. Meese argues that traditional critical approaches have often been biased towards male-dominated narratives, neglecting the contributions of women writers and the significance of gendered perspectives within literature.

 Summary of “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese
  • Critique of Established Literary Standards: Elizabeth A. Meese discusses how established literary standards predominantly serve a white, male elite culture. Leslie Fiedler’s observation is cited, noting that the literature taught and valued in English departments forms a closed circle that often excludes diverse voices and perspectives. “We all know in our hearts that literature is effectively what we teach in departments of English; or conversely what we teach in departments of English is literature.”
  • Role of Interpretive Communities: Meese explores Stanley Fish’s concept of interpretive communities, asserting that these communities often act as gatekeepers, deciding what constitutes valid literature and critical judgment. This control over literary evaluation enforces a bias that can exclude or marginalize non-traditional perspectives, particularly from a feminist viewpoint. “A strong insider-outsider dynamic, taking the form of a gender-based literary tribalism, comes into play as a means of control.”
  • Feminist Criticism’s Challenge to Traditional Criticism: The essay argues that feminist criticism should not only challenge the subjective nature of critical judgments but also the very structures that dictate these judgments. Feminist criticism aims to transform how literature is understood and valued, challenging the dominance of traditional, often patriarchal views. “Feminist criticism is a monumental undertaking which involves changing the very structure/sex of knowledge.”
  • Poststructuralism and Ideology: Meese mentions the role of poststructuralism in critiquing the ideological underpinnings of traditional criticism. However, she argues that while poststructuralism has initiated critical discussions, it has not yet fully overturned the hierarchies present in critical discourse, which continue to resist diversifications like feminist, black, and Marxist criticisms. “Just as the masters are never obliged to learn the language of the slave, the hierarchy of critical communities will continue to resist feminist, black, and Marxist criticism.”
  • Political Implications of Criticism: Meese aligns with Michel Foucault’s ideas on the politics of truth. She emphasizes that criticism is inherently political, not merely an intellectual or aesthetic exercise. Truth and knowledge are shaped by those in power, and changing this dynamic is a key challenge for feminist criticism. “The essential political problem for the intellectual is … that of ascertaining the possibility of constituting a new politics of truth.”
  • Need for a New Critical Language: Meese ends with a call for a new language and approach in literature and criticism that moves beyond traditional patriarchal narratives. Citing Luce Irigaray, she suggests that only by fundamentally changing the language and stories of criticism can true transformation occur. “If we continue to speak the same language to each other, we will reproduce the same story. Begin the same stories all over again.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese
Term/ConceptDefinitionExample/Explanation from the Essay
Interpretive CommunityA group of readers or critics sharing similar values and approaches to interpreting texts.Meese discusses how interpretive communities maintain power by controlling which interpretations and texts are deemed valid.
Feminist CriticismA critical approach that examines texts and literary practices from a feminist perspective.The essay advocates for feminist criticism to challenge and change the male-dominated critical landscape.
PoststructuralismA movement in literary theory that suggests structures and language create meaning rather than merely reflect reality.Meese references poststructuralism as initiating critiques of traditional critical hierarchies but not yet dismantling them.
EpistemologyThe study of knowledge, its nature, and verification.The essay argues for a change in the epistemological foundations of literary criticism, integrating feminist perspectives.
HegemonyDominance of one group over others, often supported by legitimating norms within a social structure.Meese critiques the hegemonic control of traditional, male-dominated critical communities over literary standards.
PhallogocentrismA term used in critical theory referring to the privileging of masculine (phallic) ways of thinking and logocentric (focused on clear, logical expression) attitudes.The essay calls for an end to phallogocentric structures in criticism, advocating for new ways of thinking and expressing.
ParadigmA typical example or pattern of something; a model.Meese talks about challenging and shifting the existing paradigms of literary criticism to include feminist perspectives.
Contribution of “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese to Literary Theory/Theories
Literary TheoryContribution of “Sexual Politics and Critical Judgment”
Feminist CriticismMeese’s essay directly addresses the gender bias in literary criticism, arguing that traditional approaches often privilege male-dominated narratives. It highlights the importance of considering gender perspectives in the interpretation of literature and calls for a more inclusive canon.
New HistoricismMeese’s work aligns with New Historicism’s focus on the historical and cultural contexts of literary texts. She emphasizes the role of power dynamics, including gender, in shaping literary production and reception.
PoststructuralismMeese’s critique of the “authoritative community” in literary criticism echoes poststructuralist ideas about the instability of meaning and the power of language. Her essay challenges the notion of a fixed or objective interpretation, highlighting the subjective and political nature of critical judgment.
Cultural StudiesMeese’s analysis of the cultural and political factors influencing literary criticism aligns with Cultural Studies’ focus on the intersection of literature with broader social and historical forces. She demonstrates how literary value is shaped by cultural norms and power structures.
Examples of Critiques Through “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese
Literary WorkCritique Through Meese’s Lens
Jane Eyre by Charlotte BrontëMeese might argue that Jane Eyre reinforces traditional gender roles and stereotypes, particularly in its depiction of Jane’s dependence on male figures. The novel could be criticized for its portrayal of women as passive objects of desire and for its emphasis on romantic love as the ultimate fulfillment for women.
Paradise Lost by John MiltonMeese could analyze Paradise Lost through a feminist lens, focusing on the gendered power dynamics between Adam and Eve. She might critique the poem’s portrayal of Eve as the cause of humanity’s fall, perpetuating harmful stereotypes about women’s sexuality and agency.
Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia WoolfMeese might praise Woolf’s novel for its exploration of women’s inner lives and its challenge to traditional gender roles. However, she could also critique the novel for its limited representation of women’s experiences, focusing primarily on the upper-class and ignoring the struggles of women from marginalized backgrounds.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott FitzgeraldMeese could analyze The Great Gatsby through a feminist lens, focusing on the portrayal of women as objects of desire and their limited agency within the patriarchal society depicted in the novel. She might critique the novel for its emphasis on material wealth and social status as markers of success, which can be harmful to women’s aspirations.
Criticism Against “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese
  • Overemphasis on Ideology: Critics might argue that Meese places too much emphasis on ideological factors, potentially overlooking the aesthetic and literary merits of texts. This could be seen as diminishing the value of literary works by primarily viewing them through a political lens.
  • Generalization of Interpretive Communities: Meese’s characterization of interpretive communities could be criticized for oversimplification. Critics might argue that she portrays these communities as monolithic and uniformly oppressive, which may not account for the diversity and complexity within them.
  • Feasibility of Proposed Changes: Some might question the practicality of the sweeping changes Meese advocates for in literary criticism. Critics could argue that her proposals for transforming the structures of criticism are idealistic and may not be achievable within the current academic and cultural frameworks.
  • Potential for New Exclusions: While advocating for inclusion, Meese’s call for a radically new form of feminist criticism could, paradoxically, lead to new forms of exclusion. Critics might worry that such a shift could marginalize those who do not align perfectly with the new feminist critical paradigm.
  • Ambiguity in Feminist Critique: There may be criticism regarding the specificity and clarity of what constitutes feminist criticism in Meese’s framework. Critics might argue that without clear definitions, feminist criticism risks becoming as exclusionary and prescriptive as the traditions it seeks to replace.
  • Reliance on Poststructuralist Theory: Meese’s heavy reliance on poststructuralist theory could be seen as problematic, especially given that poststructuralism itself has been critiqued for its often dense, inaccessible language and its sometimes abstract detachment from real-world issues.
  • Impact on Literary Scholarship: Critics from more traditional schools of literary criticism might argue that Meese’s approach undermines the disciplinary integrity of literary studies by prioritizing political and social agendas over literary analysis and appreciation.
Suggested Readings: “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese
  1. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
  2. Culler, Jonathan. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford UP, 1997.
  3. Eagleton, Terry. Feminist Literary Theory: A Reader. Wiley-Blackwell, 3rd ed., 2011.
  4. Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard UP, 1980.
  5. Fiedler, Leslie A., and Houston A. Baker, Jr., editors. Opening Up the Canon: Selected Papers from the English Institute, 1979. Johns Hopkins UP, 1981.
  6. Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books, 1972.
  7. Irigaray, Luce. This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter, Cornell UP, 1985.
Representative Quotations from “Sexual Politics And Critical Judgment” by Elizabeth A. Meese with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“We all know in our hearts that literature is effectively what we teach in departments of English…”This quote reflects the circular nature of literature as defined by academic institutions, suggesting a self-reinforcing system that may exclude diverse voices or innovative interpretations.
“A strong insider-outsider dynamic, taking the form of a gender-based literary tribalism, comes into play…”Meese highlights the exclusionary practices within literary criticism, emphasizing how gender biases contribute to maintaining an insider group that holds power over literary standards.
“The interpretive community is really the ‘authoritative community’.”This statement critiques the notion of interpretive communities by revealing them as closed groups with the authority to define acceptable interpretations, often excluding feminist and other critical voices.
“Out of commitment to the illusion of objectivity, they miss an essential distinction…”Meese criticizes the mainstream literary community for claiming objectivity while overlooking the biases and subjective foundations of their own critical judgments.
“The authority of the mainstream literary tradition could be seriously threatened.”This quote reflects the perceived danger to traditional literary authority when diverse or feminist interpretations challenge established norms.
“Art is what white people do. All other people are ‘propagandists’.”Citing Ishmael Reed, Meese underscores the racial and cultural biases in defining what is considered “art,” pointing out the discriminatory labeling faced by non-white authors.
“Feminist criticism is a monumental undertaking which involves changing the very structure/sex of knowledge.”Here, Meese defines feminist criticism as an effort to fundamentally alter the foundations of how knowledge is structured and understood in literary studies.
“Truth does not hold an independent relationship to systems of power.”Aligning with Foucault’s ideas, this quote challenges the notion of an objective “truth” in literature, arguing that truth is intertwined with and often manipulated by prevailing power structures.
“It’s not a matter of emancipating truth from every system of power…”This quote, referencing Foucault, emphasizes the necessity of understanding and disentangling the power dynamics that shape what is accepted as truth in literary criticism.
“If we continue to speak the same language to each other, we will reproduce the same story.”Quoting Luce Irigaray, Meese advocates for a new language and approach in criticism to break away from patriarchal narratives and foster genuine change in how literature is interpreted and valued.

“Conversations” by Hélène Cixous: Summary and Critique

“Conversations” by Hélène Cixous first appeared in the year 1975 as part of her collection The Newly Born Woman (La Jeune Née), co-authored with Catherine Clément.

Introduction: “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous

“Conversations” by Hélène Cixous first appeared in the year 1975 as part of her collection The Newly Born Woman (La Jeune Née), co-authored with Catherine Clément. This seminal work marks a critical moment in feminist literary theory and philosophy, encapsulating Cixous’s pioneering thoughts on écriture féminine, the concept of a distinct feminine writing style that challenges patriarchal structures within language and literature. The article’s importance in literature and literary theory lies in its radical approach to deconstructing traditional gender binaries and offering a new framework for understanding the intersection of gender, identity, and textuality. Cixous’s exploration of voice, silence, and the body in writing has influenced a wide array of disciplines, from literary criticism to psychoanalysis, and continues to resonate in contemporary feminist discourse.

Summary of “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous
  1. Theory as a Tool, Not an Idol: Helene Cixous emphasizes that theory should not be treated as a rigid framework or an end in itself. Instead, it should be used as a tool to enhance understanding and advance further. She warns against the tendency to idolize theory, as it can hinder rather than help in the pursuit of knowledge. Cixous believes that by using theoretical instruments as aids, we can give theory its rightful place without repressing or obliterating it.
  2. Beyond Representation and Expression: Cixous argues that texts are not merely representations or expressions of reality. They go beyond these categories, conveying meanings that are often unintended or unconscious. She criticizes the prevailing trend in France, which focused solely on non-meaning and formal analysis, leading to limited reading practices. Cixous emphasizes that texts have a deeper significance and should not be reduced to their surface level.
  3. The Importance of the Unconscious: Despite Freud’s misogynistic views, Cixous acknowledges the value of his work on the unconscious. She believes that the unconscious plays a crucial role in understanding texts and human behavior. While psychoanalysis can be a helpful tool, it has limitations, and Cixous emphasizes the importance of going beyond its confines.
  4. The Meeting of Strangenesses: Cixous views texts as encounters with strangeness, whether it stems from their language or content. She believes that what binds us together is our belief in preserving the essence of each strangeness. The meeting of strangenesses can be seen as a journey or a blessing, opening up new perspectives and understanding.
  5. The Work of Love: Cixous emphasizes that understanding others requires a deep engagement with their language and imagination. This process is akin to the work of love between human beings, involving empathy, openness, and a willingness to enter the other’s world. Translation, in particular, is seen as a labor of love, aiming to preserve the essence of the original language while conveying its meaning.
  6. The Journey of the Text: Cixous likens reading a text to a journey with various stages: the pre-journey, the imaginary journey, the first encounter, and the discovery. She believes that the reader must actively engage with all these stages to fully understand and appreciate the text.
  7. The Importance of Love and Bodily Relationship: Cixous stresses the significance of love in reading. She believes that a bodily relationship exists between the reader and the text, and that love for the text is essential for effective engagement. The text can be seen as a living entity, a human and earthly cosmos, demanding a close and intimate connection from the reader.
  8. The Mystery of Human Being: Cixous explores the profound mystery of human beings, including the role of sexual difference. She emphasizes that difference transcends labels and is present in all expressions and creations. Bereavement and benediction are central themes in human experience, shaping our understanding of life and loss.
  9. The Power of Language: Cixous views language as a translation that speaks through the body. Each person’s language is unique, influenced by their experiences and embodied existence. She believes that the message in a text is crucial for its value and that language has the power to convey profound truths and emotions.
  10. The Ethical Relation to Reality: Cixous believes that texts should establish an ethical relation to reality. She defines poetry as “philosophic singing,” combining reason and overflowing, and emphasizes the importance of bridging the gap between the political world and the poetic world.
  11. The Power of the Text: Cixous acknowledges the power of texts to bear witness to suffering and political reality. She believes that while those who have not experienced extreme hardship cannot fully understand the experiences of others, they can make an effort to empathize and find appropriate ways to express their outrage and solidarity.
  12. The Importance of the Other: Cixous emphasizes the centrality of the other in the creative process. The author must disappear to allow the other to appear, and the other is essential for the creation of meaning. She acknowledges the narcissistic tendencies that writers may have at the beginning of their journey but stresses the importance of overcoming them to make space for the other.
  13. The Power of Change: Cixous believes in the power of change and reinvention. She emphasizes that while the fundamental truths may remain constant, our ways of saying them evolve, leading to new expressions and understandings. She admires the richness of the human imagination and its ability to produce innovative and meaningful ways of conveying these truths.
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous
Literary Concept/DeviceDefinitionExample from the Article
Écriture FéminineA concept that advocates for a distinct style of writing that reflects the female experience, challenging patriarchal norms.Cixous discusses the importance of “loving the text” and the bodily relationship between reader and text, emphasizing a feminine approach to textual analysis.
DeconstructionA critical approach that dismantles traditional binary oppositions and reveals the multiplicity of meanings within texts.Cixous critiques the idolization of theory, arguing that it should not confine interpretation but be traversed to uncover deeper meanings beyond formal structures.
PsychoanalysisThe exploration of the unconscious mind, often used in literary theory to analyze underlying meanings and motivations in texts.Cixous references Freud, noting that while texts can be analyzed psychoanalytically, they also possess a “poetically beyond” that escapes such analysis.
IntertextualityThe shaping of a text’s meaning by another text, through referencing, borrowing, or transforming prior works.Cixous mentions how poets like Celan and Lispector contribute to the seminar’s discussions, linking their works with psychoanalysis and other literary traditions.
Multiplicity of LanguageThe coexistence of multiple languages or voices within a text, each contributing to its richness and complexity.The seminar’s approach to embracing the “multiplicity of languages” as a blessing rather than a curse, recognizing the diverse meanings that different languages offer.
FormalismA literary approach that emphasizes the formal elements of a text, such as structure and style, often at the expense of meaning.Cixous criticizes the formalist trend in French universities that focuses purely on the structural level of texts, neglecting their deeper messages.
Representation and ExpressionThe act of depicting reality or conveying emotions in a text; often critiqued for oversimplifying the complexities of meaning.Cixous argues that a text is beyond mere representation or expression, as it always conveys more than the author intends, challenging the traditional notions of both.
Translation as CreationThe process of translating a text not just as a linguistic task but as an act of preserving and reinterpreting its essence and strangeness.Cixous describes translating a text as a journey to the “country of the text,” where one must bring back its essence, acknowledging the differences inherent in language.
Mystery of Human BeingThe exploration of human identity, sexuality, and difference, particularly in relation to how these are inscribed and expressed in texts.The seminar examines how texts reflect the mystery of being human, including the inscription of sexual difference and the transcendence of gender binaries in writing.
Historical ContextUnderstanding the temporal and cultural background of a text, which shapes its creation and interpretation.Cixous reflects on how writing cannot be detached from its time, as seen in her discussion of how one cannot write like Kleist in the modern era.
Contribution of “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous to Literary Theory/Theories

Feminist Theory

  • Feminine écriture: “There is a feminine style of writing, a feminine way of thinking, a feminine way of seeing the world.” (Cixous, “The Laugh of Medusa”)
  • Challenging patriarchal norms: “The point is not to add a woman’s point of view to a man’s world, but to create a woman’s world.” (Cixous, “The Laugh of Medusa”)

Cixous’s work is a cornerstone of feminist literary theory. She argues for the importance of women’s voices and experiences in literature, challenging the patriarchal dominance that has historically marginalized female writers. Cixous emphasizes the need for a feminine écriture, a unique style of writing that can disrupt traditional gender roles and power structures.

Poststructuralism

Cixous’s work aligns with poststructuralist ideas about the instability of language and the deconstruction of binary oppositions. She challenges the notion of a fixed, essential self and explores the ways in which language and discourse shape subjectivity.

  • Deconstruction of binaries: “The feminine is not a concept but a practice.” (Cixous, “The Laugh of Medusa”)
  • The instability of language: “Language is a translation. It speaks through the body. Each time we translate what we are in the process of thinking, it necessarily passes through our bodies.” (Cixous, “Conversations”)  

Deconstruction

Cixous’s work can also be seen as a contribution to deconstruction, a critical approach that seeks to expose the underlying contradictions and power structures within texts. She emphasizes the importance of reading texts against the grain, challenging their dominant interpretations and uncovering hidden meanings.

  • Reading against the grain: “We work on the mystery of human being, including the fact that humans are sexed beings, that there is sexual difference, and that these differences manifest themselves, write themselves in texts.” (Cixous, “Conversations”)  
  • Uncovering hidden meanings: “The text is always more than the author wants to express or believes s/he expresses.” (Cixous, “Conversations”)
Examples of Critiques Through “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous
Literary WorkCritique Through “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous
Freud’s Psychoanalytic TheoriesCixous critiques the feminist rejection of Freud, arguing that dismissing his work as misogynistic ignores the foundational role psychoanalysis plays in understanding the unconscious. She suggests using Freud’s theories as tools for deeper textual analysis while recognizing their limitations.
Paul Celan’s PoetryCixous uses Celan’s poetry to illustrate the concept of “the poetically beyond,” where a text transcends psychoanalytic and philosophical interpretation. She emphasizes the importance of reading Celan not just formally but by engaging with the emotional and existential depth of his work.
Clarice Lispector’s The Hour of the StarCixous praises Lispector’s ability to transform herself in her writing, highlighting the “otherness” and strangeness that Lispector preserves in her text. She sees Lispector’s work as an example of how to create space for the “other” in literature, challenging the boundaries of gender and identity.
Heinrich von Kleist’s FictionCixous critiques the attempt to replicate Kleist’s style in modern writing, arguing that it would be anachronistic and merely a reconstruction. She suggests that modern writers must acknowledge the changes in language and consciousness brought about by psychoanalysis and linguistic theory.
Criticism Against “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous
  1. Elitism in Theoretical Approach: Critics argue that Cixous’s writing is highly abstract and inaccessible to general readers, favoring an intellectual elite familiar with dense theoretical discourse.
  2. Ambiguity and Lack of Clarity: The text is often criticized for its complex and sometimes ambiguous language, which can obscure the core arguments and make it difficult for readers to fully grasp her ideas.
  3. Overemphasis on Feminine Writing: Some critics contend that Cixous’s focus on écriture féminine risks reinforcing gender binaries by essentializing the differences between male and female writing.
  4. Insufficient Engagement with Political Realities: While Cixous addresses the intersection of politics and literature, critics argue that her work sometimes lacks concrete engagement with real-world political issues, leaning too heavily on theoretical abstraction.
Suggested Readings: “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous
  1. Sellers, Susan, editor. Writing Differences: Readings from the Seminar of Hélène Cixous. Open University Press, 1988.
  2. Cixous, Hélène, and Catherine Clément. The Newly Born Woman. Translated by Betsy Wing, University of Minnesota Press, 1986.
  3. Conley, Verena Andermatt. Hélène Cixous: Writing the Feminine. University of Nebraska Press, 1984.
  4. Sellers, Susan. Hélène Cixous: Authorship, Autobiography and Love. Polity Press, 1996.
Representative Quotations from “Conversations” by Hélène Cixous with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“We are not idolaters though neither are we ignorant.”Cixous emphasizes the importance of using theory as a tool, not as an object of worship.
“A text is neither representation nor expression.”Cixous challenges traditional views of texts as mere representations or expressions of reality, arguing that they are more complex and multifaceted.
“The text is always more than the author wants to express or believes s/he expresses.”Cixous highlights the unconscious and unintended meanings that can be found within texts.
“We have had to do battle against that.”Cixous refers to the struggle against the institutionalization of theory as an end in itself in France.
“A text is always more than the author wants to express or believes s/he expresses.”Cixous emphasizes the unconscious and unintended meanings that can be found within texts.
“This is the point I write from. It makes itself read. It doesn’t run through everything because I’m also a human being.”Cixous reflects on the intersection of her personal identity and her writing, acknowledging the influence of her gender and experiences.
“The differences inscribe themselves in whatever is born from us.”Cixous highlights the pervasive nature of difference, arguing that it is present in all aspects of human existence.
“There is a feminine style of writing, a feminine way of thinking, a feminine way of seeing the world.”Cixous advocates for a unique feminine écriture, challenging patriarchal norms and promoting women’s voices in literature.
“We work on the mystery of human being, including the fact that humans are sexed beings, that there is sexual difference, and that these differences manifest themselves, write themselves in texts.”Cixous emphasizes the importance of exploring the complexities of human identity, including gender and sexuality.
“The text opens up a path which is already ours and yet not altogether ours….”Cixous suggests that texts can both reflect and challenge our own experiences and understanding.