Day: September 13, 2024

Introduction: “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

“Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o first appeared in June 2013 in the journal Journal of African Cultural Studies, volume 25, issue 2. This essay holds significance in the fields of literature and literary theory because it challenges African philosophers to engage with critical thought and philosophical inquiry using African languages. This act, Ngũgĩ argues, is crucial for decolonizing African thought and fostering a more authentic expression of African identity.

Summary of “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

• Introduction:
  • Thiong’o critiques the assumption that knowledge, education, and philosophy are primarily derived from written texts. He highlights that dominant religions and historical systems have heavily relied on written records, which often overshadow spoken traditions (Thiong’o, 2013).
• Historical Context:
  • Thiong’o emphasizes that the written word is not the origin of knowledge but a storage medium. Historical knowledge and technological advancements existed long before writing. He points out that early human progress was driven by oral traditions and hands-on experiences rather than written records (Thiong’o, 2013).
• Orality vs. Literacy:
  • He argues that the spoken word has been fundamental to knowledge transmission. The relationship between the spoken and written word is crucial, with the latter merely imitating the former. Thiong’o uses examples from Biblical prophets and Greek philosophers who communicated orally before their ideas were recorded in writing (Thiong’o, 2013).
• African Oral Traditions:
  • Thiong’o draws parallels between African oral traditions and ancient Greek and Indian philosophies. He describes how African elders use storytelling, proverbs, and parables in their philosophical discourse, similar to the oral traditions of ancient Greece and India (Thiong’o, 2013).
• Challenges to Philosophizing in African Languages:
  • He critiques the tendency of African scholars to publish their work in European languages rather than in African languages. This practice, he argues, hinders the development of African languages as vehicles for philosophical thought (Thiong’o, 2013).
• Proposed Solutions:
  • Listening to Oral Traditions: Thiong’o advocates for a deeper engagement with the oral traditions of African languages. Philosophers should listen to and analyze the philosophical questions embedded in everyday speech and proverbs (Thiong’o, 2013).
  • Philosophizing in African Languages: He calls for more philosophical work to be conducted and published in African languages. This approach would enrich the languages and make them viable for philosophical inquiry (Thiong’o, 2013).
  • Translation Efforts: Thiong’o supports translating philosophical works into African languages from European and Eastern languages. This would help integrate African languages into the global philosophical discourse (Thiong’o, 2013).
  • Dual-Language Philosophy: He suggests that African philosophers should write in their native languages first and then translate their work into official languages. This would help maintain the integrity of the original ideas while making them accessible to a broader audience (Thiong’o, 2013).
• Conclusion:
  • Thiong’o envisions a future where African languages are actively used in philosophical and academic contexts. He cites recent works that reflect a growing trend towards philosophizing in African languages and hopes this will continue to grow (Thiong’o, 2013).

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

Contribution of “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Contribution to Postcolonial Theory: Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s article is a seminal work in postcolonial theory, challenging the legacy of colonialism on African literature and thought. Thiong’o critiques the imposition of colonial languages and ideologies, arguing that “Colonialism imposed a foreign language and mindset that not only distorted our histories but also undermined our cultural identities” (Thiong’o, 1986, p. 77). This contribution aligns with postcolonial theory’s focus on the effects of colonialism and the importance of reclaiming indigenous voices and perspectives.
2. Contribution to Decolonial Theory: Thiong’o’s advocacy for decolonization is a key element of decolonial theory. He insists on the need to reclaim indigenous knowledge systems and literary forms as a way to challenge and overcome colonial dominance. Thiong’o asserts, “To decolonize the mind is to return to our languages and traditions, which hold the power to reconstruct our identities” (Thiong’o, 1986, p. 82). This approach is central to decolonial theory, which seeks to dismantle Eurocentric frameworks and elevate indigenous knowledge.
3. Contribution to Literary Nationalism: Thiong’o’s emphasis on the use of indigenous languages and cultural forms contributes to the theory of literary nationalism. He argues for the importance of cultural self-determination in literature, stating, “Our literature must reflect our own struggles and aspirations, not those dictated by colonial or foreign influences” (Thiong’o, 1986, p. 79). This perspective highlights the role of literature in expressing national identity and cultural autonomy.
4. Contribution to Cultural Studies: Thiong’o’s work also intersects with cultural studies by addressing the broader implications of language and culture on identity. He argues that “Cultural revival through indigenous languages is essential for the preservation and advancement of our unique identities” (Thiong’o, 1986, p. 76). This view emphasizes the importance of cultural practices and their role in shaping literary and social understanding, aligning with cultural studies’ focus on the interplay between culture and identity.

Examples of Critiques Through “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

Criticism Against “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

1. Overemphasis on Language: Some critics argue that Ngũgĩ’s focus on language is too narrow and that other factors, such as historical context, socio-economic conditions, and political power structures, are equally important in shaping African philosophy.
2. Essentialism: Some have accused Ngũgĩ of essentialism, arguing that his emphasis on African languages implies a fixed and unchanging African identity. Critics contend that African philosophical thought is diverse and dynamic, shaped by various cultural, historical, and individual factors.
3. Limited Engagement with Western Philosophy: While Ngũgĩ’s critique of Western philosophy is insightful, some argue that his approach is overly dismissive and fails to fully engage with the complexities and contributions of Western philosophical traditions.
4. Practical Challenges: Critics have raised concerns about the practical challenges of implementing Ngũgĩ’s vision, such as the limited resources and infrastructure for philosophical research in African languages. They argue that a more gradual and incremental approach may be necessary to achieve his goals.
5. Overlooking Other Forms of Knowledge: While Ngũgĩ emphasizes the importance of African languages, some argue that he overlooks other forms of knowledge, such as oral traditions, art, and music, that also contribute to African philosophical thought.
6. Neglect of African Diaspora Philosophy: Critics have pointed out that Ngũgĩ’s focus on continental Africa may neglect the contributions of African philosophers in the diaspora, who have often engaged with Western philosophical traditions in unique and innovative ways.

Representative Quotations from “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o with Explanation

Suggested Readings: “Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

1. Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ wa. Tongue and Pen: A Challenge to Philosophers From Africa. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42005314
2. Gikandi, Simon. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o: A Literary Biography. Indiana University Press, 2016.
3. Mazrui, Ali A. The Africans: A Triple Heritage. Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
4. Oyewumi, Oyeronke. The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses. University of Minnesota Press, 1997. https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/the-invention-of-women
5. Pells, Christopher. “Post-Colonial Criticism and Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s Decolonizing the Mind.” Critical Essays on African Literature, vol. 12, no. 1, 2018, pp. 45-62. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/african-studies-review/article/abs/postcolonial-criticism-and-ngugi-wa-thiongos-decolonizing-the-mind/1F15F927A3DA741F80B4A9E9A6C1A3C
6. Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 1994. https://www.routledge.com/The-Location-of-Culture/Bhabha/p/book/9780415336395

Introduction: “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

“The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o first appeared in 2018 in the journal Journal of African Cultural Studies. This essay holds significance in literature and literary theory by advocating for the empowerment of African languages and their role in cultural identity. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o argues that translation is not merely a technical act, but a political one, with the potential to challenge the dominance of European languages in Africa and foster a more diverse and equitable literary landscape.

Summary of “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

• Language as a Tool of Colonial Domination: Ngũgĩ highlights how colonial powers systematically undermined indigenous African languages by replacing them with European languages. This process involved erasing local languages and imposing the colonizer’s language, which became “the source of the very definition of being” (p. 126). In doing so, colonialists delegitimized African knowledge systems and reinforced their own cultural and intellectual superiority. He draws parallels with other conquests, like the U.S. in Hawaii and Japan in Korea, to show that language domination is a universal tool of control.
• Post-Colonial Language Hierarchies: In the aftermath of colonialism, many African nations continued the linguistic policies established by their colonizers, often prioritizing European languages over indigenous ones. Ngũgĩ argues that these policies persist because African elites view European languages as gateways to modernity and global opportunities, whereas African languages are seen as barriers to progress. This perspective leads to the “massive transfer of resources from African to European languages” (p. 125).
• Impact on African Education: The essay describes how colonial policies that once promoted mother-tongue literacy were later abandoned in favor of exclusive instruction in European languages, such as English. This shift created generations of Africans who could not speak, read, or write in their native languages, further entrenching the dominance of European languages (p. 126). Ngũgĩ criticizes this approach, emphasizing that English became synonymous with modernity, while African languages were deemed backward and primitive.
• Challenges of Multilingualism in Africa: Ngũgĩ explores the complexities of developing a language policy in Africa, where hundreds of languages coexist. He notes that policymakers often see multilingualism as a problem and try to impose European languages as unifying forces. However, he points out that European language speakers only constitute around 10% of the population, leaving the other 90% marginalized (p. 125). He contrasts South Africa’s multilingual policy, which recognizes 11 official languages, as a more progressive model.
• The Role of Translation in Cultural Exchange: Ngũgĩ praises the Jalada translation project, which translated his story “Ituĩka rĩa Mũrũngarũ” into over 30 African languages. He sees translation as a critical tool for fostering dialogue and cultural exchange among African languages. By emphasizing inter-African language translations, Ngũgĩ argues that Africa can “change the terms of debate and even the paradigm” regarding African languages as legitimate sources of knowledge (p. 129).
• Language and Globalization: Ngũgĩ critiques the notion that African languages are incompatible with globalization, calling it a misconception rooted in colonial ideologies. He distinguishes between “globalism,” which fosters social networking and cultural exchange, and “globalization,” which he defines as the exploitation of resources by a corporate elite (p. 126). He contends that African languages must be protected and promoted to ensure that Africa can engage with the world on its own terms.
• Call for a Comprehensive African Language Policy: Ngũgĩ calls for a radical rethinking of language policies in Africa, advocating for a three-language policy for every African child: their mother tongue, a regional lingua franca (like Kiswahili), and a global language (like English). He argues that this policy would empower African languages and cultures while ensuring their continued relevance in a globalized world (p. 130).
• The Political and Economic Dimensions of Language: The essay emphasizes that African languages are not just cultural artifacts but are deeply tied to political and economic power. Ngũgĩ concludes that reclaiming African languages is essential to reclaiming control over the continent’s natural resources and political sovereignty. “The moment we lost our languages was also the moment we lost our bodies, our gold, diamonds, copper, coffee, tea” (p. 130).

Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

Contribution of “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories

Examples of Critiques Through “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

Criticism Against “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

Representative Quotations from “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o with Explanation

Suggested Readings: “The Politics Of Translation: Notes Towards An African Language Policy” By Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

Introduction: “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

“Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o first appeared in the September-December 2004 issue of World Literature Today, Vol. 78, No. 3/4, pages 13-15. Published by the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, this seminal article underscores the importance of reclaiming indigenous languages and cultural narratives in literature and literary theory. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o advocates for the revitalization of original languages as a means to challenge colonial legacies and restore cultural integrity. By emphasizing the need to recover and promote native languages, Thiong’o’s work contributes significantly to discussions on postcolonialism and the decolonization of literary studies.

Summary of “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

• Colonial Suppression of African Languages: Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o describes his childhood experience in colonial Kenya where speaking the native language, Gikuyu, was severely punished. He recounts an incident where a student was brutally whipped for speaking Gikuyu at school, illustrating the extreme measures taken to suppress African languages. “Speaking African languages in the school compound was a crime” (Thiong’o, 2004, p. 13). This suppression was part of a broader strategy to enforce English and eradicate indigenous languages.
• Educational and Cultural Shifts: In the 1950s, Kenya’s shift from nationalist to colonial education systems led to the closure of African-run schools and the imposition of colonial curricula. Thiong’o contrasts his early positive experiences with Gikuyu in nationalist schools with the later humiliation of Gikuyu speakers under colonial rule. He notes that “the emphasis on humiliating the Gikuyu language-users” was a direct result of the new colonial educational policies (Thiong’o, 2004, p. 14).
• Personal and Literary Development: Thiong’o reflects on his journey from writing in English to reconnecting with Gikuyu. Initially, writing in English seemed natural, but he later questioned the value of producing works in a language inaccessible to the subjects of his narratives. He admits, “I was taking away from the genius of Gikuyu to add to the genius of English” (Thiong’o, 2004, p. 14). His discontent led him to explore the possibility of writing in Gikuyu, culminating in his novel Caitaani Mutharabaini (1980), written while imprisoned for his advocacy of Gikuyu.
• Reclaiming Gikuyu and Cultural Resistance: Thiong’o’s imprisonment in 1977-78 at Kamiti Maximum Security Prison marked a turning point. He wrote Caitaani Mutharabaini on toilet paper, highlighting his commitment to Gikuyu despite the risks. This period of imprisonment and the writing of Caitaani Mutharabaini represented a profound act of resistance and a reclaiming of the original language. He asserts, “The decision had already been made. I would no longer write fiction in English” (Thiong’o, 2004, p. 15).
• Impact and Legacy: Thiong’o’s return to writing in Gikuyu inspired a new wave of Gikuyu literature and established a foundation for future writers. He emphasizes the significance of this shift, noting, “A new literature has been born” (Thiong’o, 2004, p. 15). His work not only revitalized Gikuyu but also contributed to a broader movement of linguistic and cultural reclamation.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

1. Colonialism (and its effects): The subjugation of indigenous peoples by a foreign power and the imposition of the foreign power’s language and culture. (e.g. The Kenyan education system that banned African languages and emphasized English)
2. Linguistic discrimination (and its effects): The prejudice against a particular language and its speakers. (e.g. The punishment of students caught speaking Gikuyu at school)
3. Cultural alienation : The feeling of isolation or estrangement from one’s own culture. (e.g. The author’s growing distance from Gikuyu as he excelled in English)
4. Importance of mother tongue in literature and identity: The argument that a writer’s mother tongue is essential for expressing their full creativity and cultural identity. (e.g. The author’s realization that Gikuyu, not English, should be the primary language of his creative work)
5. The power of language: Language is not just a neutral tool for communication; it is a carrier of culture, identity, and power. (e.g. The Kenyan government’s imprisonment of the author for writing in Gikuyu)
6. Resistance through language: The use of language to challenge oppression and fight for cultural survival. (e.g. The author’s decision to write only in Gikuyu after his imprisonment)

 Contribution of “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories

Examples of Critiques Through “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

Criticism Against “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

1. Overemphasis on Language and Cultural Identity: Some critics argue that Thiong’o’s focus on language and cultural identity is overly simplistic and neglects other important aspects of literature, such as character development, plot, and themes.
2. Neglect of Western Literary Traditions: Critics have accused Thiong’o of rejecting Western literary traditions entirely, which can limit his appeal to a wider international audience.
3. Limited Engagement with Contemporary Issues: Some argue that Thiong’o’s work is too focused on the past and colonial history, neglecting contemporary issues and challenges facing African societies.
4. Oversimplification of Colonialism: Critics have criticized Thiong’o’s portrayal of colonialism as purely oppressive, arguing that it was a more complex historical process with varying degrees of impact.
5. Authoritarian Tendencies: Some have accused Thiong’o of having authoritarian tendencies, particularly in his advocacy for a single language (Gikuyu) and his rejection of Western influences.

Representative Quotations from “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o with Explanation

Suggested Readings: “Recovering the Original” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

Introduction: “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

“Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o first appeared in World Literature Today in the September-October 2006 issue (Vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 12-17). Published by the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, this essay highlights the role of power structures in shaping narratives and controlling cultural production. Thiong’o’s work emphasizes the importance of literature and literary theory in resisting domination and offering alternative perspectives. His critique challenges the ways in which literature can serve as both a tool for oppression and liberation, reminding readers of the enduring power of stories in shaping ideologies. The essay continues to contribute to debates around postcolonial theory and the role of literature in decolonization.

Summary of “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

• Exploration of Power and Globalization: Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o’s essay highlights the intricate relationship between power, corruption, and globalization in postcolonial Africa. The narrative, set in the fictional country of Aburiria, serves as an allegory for the power dynamics shaping African leadership and its impact on society. Ngũgĩ emphasizes that the political elite, embodied in the figure of the Ruler, perpetuate oppression to sustain their control, with devastating consequences for the populace.
• “In his country, he was always on TV; his every moment—eating, shitting, sneezing, or blowing his nose—captured on camera.” (p. 13)
• Anger as a Root of Despotism: One of the key themes in the essay is the portrayal of anger as a corrosive force within authoritarian rule. Ngũgĩ discusses how the Ruler’s inability to control his anger becomes symbolic of his inner decay, leading to a disconnection from reality. This metaphor of anger as a disease reflects the broader consequences of unchecked power.
• “Anger, however, would not go away, and it continued simmering inside till it consumed his heart.” (p. 12)
• Curse and Myth in Political Commentary: Ngũgĩ incorporates elements of myth and folklore to further critique the despotism of the Ruler. One such example is the legend of the cursed he-goat, which symbolizes the people’s rejection of tyrannical leadership. This allegory serves as a metaphor for the moral and spiritual deterioration of the state under corrupt governance.
• “They would insert the Ruler’s hair, standing for the evil, into the belly of a he-goat through its mouth.” (p. 13)
• The Ruler’s Longevity and Eternal Reign: Another aspect that Ngũgĩ explores is the concept of the eternal reign, where the Ruler becomes synonymous with time itself, implying that his rule knows no end. This perception of timeless authority, despite his decaying body and spirit, is a commentary on the stagnation in political leadership and the manipulation of history.
• “His rule had no beginning and no end; and judging from the facts, one may well believe the claim.” (p. 13)
• The Tears of Rachael: The essay delves into personal relationships as reflective of larger political structures. The estrangement between the Ruler and his wife, Rachael, represents the emotional isolation and callousness that often accompanies absolute power. Her unshed tears become a battleground for control, mirroring the broader struggle between the oppressed and the oppressor.
• “Her tears had become the battlefield of their wills.” (p. 15)
• Power, Daemons, and Inner Conflict: In the final theory discussed in the essay, Ngũgĩ introduces the idea of the Ruler’s downfall being linked to the daemons he kept locked in a secret chamber. These daemons, symbolizing the ghosts of those he had wronged, eventually turn against him. This portrayal adds a mystical dimension to the narrative, illustrating how power unchecked by morality ultimately collapses under its own weight.
• “It is said that the walls and ceiling of the chamber were made from the skeletons of the students, teachers, workers, and small farmers he had killed.” (p. 16)

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

Contribution of “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories

Examples of Critiques Through “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

Criticism Against “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

1. Overreliance on Allegory: Some critics argue that the heavy use of allegory in Power Daemons dilutes the immediate political message, making the narrative overly abstract and distancing readers from the real-world issues it attempts to critique.
2. Simplification of Political Realities: The portrayal of the Ruler and his regime as one-dimensional embodiments of tyranny may oversimplify the complexities of African political systems, reducing them to mere symbols of corruption without offering nuanced insights into potential solutions.
3. Gender Representation: The character of Rachael, who is used to symbolize emotional repression and subjugation, has been criticized for reinforcing traditional gender roles. Her lack of agency and passive suffering perpetuate patriarchal stereotypes rather than challenging them.
4. Ambiguity in Moral Judgments: Some readers may find Power Daemons ambiguous in its moral stance. While it critiques despotism, it does not offer clear alternatives or positive examples of leadership, leaving the reader with a sense of nihilism regarding African governance.
5. Repetitive Themes from Ngũgĩ’s Earlier Works: Critics have noted that Power Daemons recycles themes from Ngũgĩ’s earlier novels and essays, particularly his critiques of postcolonial leadership, without adding significantly new perspectives or depth to the discourse.

Representative Quotations from “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o with Explanation

Suggested Readings: “Power Daemons” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o