Day: October 5, 2024

Introduction: “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

“Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom first appeared in 1975 in the journal Critical Inquiry, is considered a seminal work in literary theory, particularly within the framework of American Romanticism. Bloom argues that poets engage in a process of “revisionism” against their predecessors, striving to assert their originality and poetic authority. This revisionism, however, often involves the “repression” of earlier poetic influences, which are subsequently internalized and transformed within the poet’s own work. Bloom’s essay has been influential in shaping our understanding of poetic influence, intertextuality, and the dynamics of literary tradition. It continues to be a valuable resource for scholars and students of literature.

Summary of “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

• Introduction of Key Concepts
  Bloom opens the essay by interrogating the relationship between psyche and text, framing poetry as a battlefield where authentic forces struggle for victory over oblivion. He emphasizes the psychoanalytical framework, notably the “psyche,” “text,” and “represented,” as key terms, arguing that poetry is not self-contained but continuously woven into the broader fabric of literary tradition.
• The Will of the Strong Poet
  Bloom describes strong poets as those driven by desire, a concept he attributes to Nietzsche’s philosophy. He argues that poets, particularly the strong ones, are engaged in a search for pleasure rather than truth, leading to a continuous process of interpreting past works in ways that serve their personal artistic visions. This revisionism is not a simple act of homage, but an essential struggle against the past, a battle for originality and survival in the literary canon.
• Poetry as a Form of Rewriting
  In Bloom’s view, every poem is inherently a “rewriting” of previous works, meaning that no poem can claim true autonomy. He introduces the idea of “poetic misprision,” where poets creatively misread their precursors to assert their individuality. This echoes Freud’s concept of “retroactive meaningfulness,” wherein meaning is constructed by selecting and repressing influences from prior texts.
• Intertextuality and Influence
  Drawing on the theories of Vico and Freud, Bloom outlines how poets are always belated—born into a literary tradition they cannot escape. Every poet must repress the weight of precursors, but in doing so, they create their own unique, exaggerated style that becomes their signature. The act of revision, whether conscious or subconscious, is central to poetic creation.
• The Role of Rhetoric and Tropes in Poetry
  Bloom emphasizes the importance of rhetoric in poetry, especially through the use of tropes such as irony, metonymy, and hyperbole. He contends that rhetoric is not merely a tool of persuasion but a mode of survival in the world of literary competition. Poets use these devices to revise and reinterpret the works of their predecessors, which he aligns with Vico’s idea that “ignorance is the mother of wonder.”
• Defense Mechanisms in Poetry
  He links poetic creation to psychic defense mechanisms, suggesting that poets engage in a process of repression and substitution that mirrors Freud’s concept of defense against instincts. For Bloom, poetry involves “defensive processes,” where strong poets must continually wrestle with their influences to forge new meanings.
• Gnosticism and Revisionism
  Bloom draws parallels between Gnosticism and poetic misprision, arguing that strong poets, much like Gnostics, seek to rewrite and reinterpret traditional narratives to claim authority over their creative output. This revisionism is presented as a struggle for poetic freedom, an attempt to transcend the limitations imposed by history and tradition.
• The Sublime and the Strong Poet
  Bloom concludes by exploring the concept of the Sublime, identifying Milton and Satan in Paradise Lost as exemplars of this mode. He asserts that the strongest poets achieve a kind of “Counter-Sublime” by transforming repression into creative power. In Bloom’s framework, repression is not merely a psychological burden but a source of poetic strength that allows the poet to transcend time and tradition.

Quote from Bloom:
“Poems are not psyches, nor things…they are defensive processes in constant change, which is to say that poems themselves are acts of reading.”

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

Literary Term/Concept	Explanation	Context in Bloom’s Essay
Psyche	Refers to the human mind or soul, often linked to internal forces, desires, and instincts.	Bloom explores the psyche as a battlefield where the poet’s internal desires clash with literary tradition, driving the creative process.
Text	A woven construct, a fabrication of words that engages in continuous intertextuality.	Poetry is framed as a text that exists within a broader network of literary works, always referring to or rewriting prior texts.
Revisionism	The act of reinterpreting or rewriting earlier works to assert new meanings or personal interpretations.	Central to Bloom’s theory, where poets revise their precursors’ works to create original interpretations and assert their individuality.
Misprision	A “creative misreading” of precursor texts, where poets reinterpret earlier works to forge new meanings.	Poets must misread the works of their predecessors to create space for their own creative expression, avoiding direct imitation.
Intertextuality	The idea that all texts are interconnected, and no text exists in isolation from other literary works.	Bloom emphasizes that every poem is an inter-poem, inherently tied to a network of previous texts, thus rejecting the notion of poetic autonomy.
Poetic Repression	The poet’s need to suppress certain influences or predecessors in order to create original work.	Poets selectively repress traces of their precursors’ works to assert their own voice, but this repression is always partial, leading to a complex relationship with literary history.
Strong Poet	A poet who engages deeply with tradition and struggles to assert their individuality by creatively revising past works.	The “strong poet” dares to challenge the influence of past poets, driven by personal desire rather than the pursuit of objective truth.
Tropes	Figures of speech or rhetorical devices used to shape meaning in poetry (e.g., irony, metaphor, metonymy).	Tropes are seen as central to poetic creation, with strong poets using them to revise and reinterpret previous works, thus engaging in rhetorical revisionism.
The Sublime	A concept in literature that refers to overwhelming grandeur or emotional intensity, often linked to transcendence.	Bloom discusses how strong poets, like Milton’s Satan, achieve the Sublime through their struggle with tradition, leading to a heightened, often paradoxical, form of poetic expression.
Nachträglichkeit (Retroactive Meaning)	A Freudian term referring to the process by which later events give new meanings to earlier ones.	Bloom applies this concept to poetry, where later poets reinterpret earlier works in ways that create new meanings for both the precursor and the later poet’s own work.
Rhetoric	The art of persuasion through language, often employing figures of speech or argumentation.	Bloom argues that rhetoric is central to poetry, with poets using it not just for persuasion but as a means of defending their originality and resisting the influence of their precursors.
Clinamen	A swerve or deviation in literary creation, a concept borrowed from Lucretius to describe the act of misreading or revision.	Bloom uses the term “clinamen” to explain how poets deviate from their precursors in order to assert their own creativity, representing the initial stage in the process of revision.
Tessera	A completion or “filling in” of the gaps left by precursor texts, often through reinterpretation or antithetical completion.	Tessera refers to the poet’s attempt to complete or respond to their precursors’ works, adding to or transforming the original text’s meaning, often in a contradictory or opposing manner.
Askesis	A process of self-restraint or reduction, often seen as a form of creative discipline in poetry.	Bloom uses “askesis” to describe how poets limit or restrain themselves to focus their creativity, often as a way of sublimating their struggle with their literary predecessors.
Daemonization	The stage where the poet intensifies their creative process, often through hyperbole, to assert their individuality.	In Bloom’s framework, daemonization represents the poet’s heightened struggle to overcome the influence of their precursors, often marked by extreme or exaggerated poetic expression.
Metalepsis (Transumption)	The substitution of one term for another, often in a complex chain of figurative associations that transforms earlier meanings.	Bloom sees metalepsis as a final trope in the revisionary process, where the poet transcends previous meanings by transforming and reinterpreting the works of their precursors in profound ways.
Freudian Repression	The psychological process of pushing desires or memories out of conscious awareness, often linked to creative expression.	Bloom relates Freudian repression to the poet’s need to suppress certain influences or aspects of their own creativity, using this suppression as a source of poetic power.

Contribution of “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Intertextuality

• Contribution: Bloom asserts that no poem is self-contained, and every poem exists in a network of interrelated texts. He emphasizes that a poem is always a “rewriting” of previous poems, building on the idea that literature is inherently dialogical.
• Reference: Bloom argues, “Any poem is an inter-poem, and any reading of a poem is an inter-reading. A poem is not writing, but rewriting, and though a strong poem is a fresh start, such a start is a starting-again” (p. 234). This statement reinforces the idea that poems are deeply enmeshed in a web of prior literary works, adding to the theory of intertextuality introduced by thinkers like Julia Kristeva and Mikhail Bakhtin.

2. Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism

• Contribution: Bloom’s exploration of repression and poetic creation is heavily influenced by Freudian psychoanalysis, particularly in terms of how poets handle their influences. He adapts the Freudian concept of repression, using it to describe how poets deal with the weight of literary precursors. Bloom links the creative process to psychic defenses, arguing that poetry is a result of both conscious and unconscious processes.
• Reference: Bloom discusses the role of repression in poetic creativity, asserting that “even the strongest poet must take up his stance within literary language” (p. 236), implying that repression of past influences is a key element in the creation of strong poetry. This connection to Freudian repression contributes to Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism, particularly how unconscious influences shape literary texts.

3. Anxiety of Influence and Revisionist Criticism

• Contribution: Bloom’s most significant contribution to literary theory is his Anxiety of Influence, which he expands on in this essay. He argues that poets are driven by a competitive relationship with their predecessors, and the act of poetic creation is a struggle to overcome the influence of earlier poets. The process of creative misreading or misprision is how a poet establishes their own originality.
• Reference: Bloom states, “The strong poet dares the error of reading all of reality as a text, and all prior texts as openings for its own totalizing and unique interpretations” (p. 233). This idea is central to his Revisionist Criticism, where poets must wrestle with and revise the works of their precursors to assert their own poetic identities. This approach influenced deconstruction and post-structuralist theories, particularly those concerning authorship and textuality.

4. Rhetorical Theory

• Contribution: Bloom situates poetry as deeply rhetorical, focusing on the use of tropes and rhetoric as key mechanisms through which poets engage in revision. He argues that poetry is not merely about meaning but about persuading the reader through rhetorical strategies, suggesting that the act of writing poetry is fundamentally rhetorical.
• Reference: He claims, “Rhetoric can be seconded only by rhetoric, for all that rhetoric can intend is more rhetoric” (p. 233). In this view, poetry becomes a persuasive system of tropes, aligning with the ancient rhetorical tradition while also contributing to modern rhetorical theory, where language is seen as a means of constructing reality.

5. Poetic Misprision as a Mechanism of Literary Development

• Contribution: Bloom’s theory of misprision—a creative misreading of past works—positions poetic creation as an inherently revisionist act. He suggests that poets must misinterpret their predecessors to create new meanings and establish their own voices.
• Reference: Bloom asserts, “This remembering is a misprision, or creative misreading, but no matter how strong a misprision, it cannot achieve an autonomy of meaning, or a meaning fully present, that is, free from all literary context” (p. 235). His theory of misprision is a crucial element of literary evolution, suggesting that literature progresses through acts of misinterpretation rather than direct influence, a concept that engages with post-structuralist notions of difference and deferral in meaning (as discussed by Derrida).

6. The Sublime in Post-Enlightenment Poetry

• Contribution: Bloom revises the notion of the Sublime, which traditionally refers to an overwhelming sense of awe or grandeur in art and literature. He argues that in the post-Enlightenment era, the Sublime is achieved through the poet’s struggle with their precursors, an inner conflict that results in hyperbolic, extreme expression.
• Reference: Bloom writes, “The strongest artists…prevail by reattaining the Sublime, though a greatly altered Sublime” (p. 247). This redefinition of the Sublime places it within the context of literary revisionism, suggesting that the Sublime is no longer about external grandeur but about internal, psychological struggle.

7. Poetic Immortality and Gnosticism

• Contribution: Bloom incorporates Gnostic philosophy into his theory of poetic creation, arguing that strong poets, like Gnostics, seek to “divine” their own origins through their work, striving for a form of poetic immortality. This aligns with the Gnostic rejection of conventional religious tradition, mirroring the poet’s rejection of literary tradition to assert originality.
• Reference: Bloom states, “A strong poet, for Vico or for us, is precisely like a gentile nation; he must divine or invent himself, and so attempt the impossibility of originating himself” (p. 237). This Gnostic approach to poetry contributes to theories of authorship and individual genius in literature, where the poet is seen as a self-creator.

Examples of Critiques Through “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

Literary Work	Critique Through Bloom’s Lens (Poetry, Revisionism, Repression)	Key Bloomian Concepts Applied
John Milton’s Paradise Lost	Milton’s depiction of Satan reflects the strong poet’s struggle to achieve the Sublime by resisting the influence of previous epic traditions (e.g., Homer, Virgil). Satan, with his rebellious and rhetorical brilliance, represents a figure who asserts himself through creative misprision, turning the traditional model of epic heroism on its head.	Sublime, Poetic Misprision, Daemonization: Satan embodies Milton’s engagement in revisionism by hyperbolically reimagining the hero, defying predecessors like Dante’s Satan.
William Wordsworth’s Prelude	Wordsworth can be viewed as revising Milton and attempting to overcome his anxiety of influence through the creation of a deeply personal and introspective epic. His repression of Milton’s grand theological scope allows him to develop a more subjective, Romantic vision of nature and self. Wordsworth’s work is an attempt to rewrite epic poetry in his own image, emphasizing human consciousness over grand cosmological themes.	Repression, Intertextuality, Anxiety of Influence: Wordsworth represses the influence of Milton to construct a more personal, psychological epic focused on individual experience.
T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land	Eliot’s intertextuality and allusive style showcase the poet’s awareness of literary precursors and his need to engage in revisionism. Through his fragmented form and collage of references, Eliot performs a creative misreading of prior texts (e.g., Dante, Shakespeare, and the Bible). His work embodies a modernist anxiety of influence, where he both draws upon and subverts the meanings of his literary heritage.	Intertextuality, Poetic Misprision, Anxiety of Influence: Eliot consciously rewrites and revises earlier texts, creating a mosaic of fragmented influences to reflect modernity’s fractured experience.
Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Ode to the West Wind	Shelley’s ode can be seen as a struggle with his Romantic precursors, particularly Wordsworth and Milton. The West Wind symbolizes a force of transformation, reflecting Shelley’s desire to assert his poetic autonomy through a powerful, elemental image. He revises Wordsworth’s naturalism by portraying nature as a revolutionary and destructive force, rather than a peaceful, pastoral presence.	Misprision, Clinamen, Revisionism: Shelley swerves from Wordsworth’s view of nature, reinterpreting it as a force for radical change, thereby asserting his own poetic vision.

Explanation of the Critiques:

1. John Milton’s Paradise Lost:
   Through Bloom’s lens, Paradise Lost is a profound example of the Sublime achieved through poetic misprision. Satan’s rhetoric and rebellious nature are a reflection of Milton’s struggle to transcend his literary predecessors (e.g., Homer, Dante). Milton’s Satan represents a daemonization of previous epic heroes, where the protagonist’s hyperbolic self-assertion becomes a method of achieving poetic strength.
2. William Wordsworth’s Prelude:
   Wordsworth’s Prelude rewrites the epic tradition by focusing on subjective experience rather than grand religious or cosmological themes. His approach reflects repression of Milton’s theological concerns, allowing Wordsworth to create a uniquely Romantic form of the epic that centers on the individual’s relationship with nature and consciousness. This repression enables Wordsworth to engage in poetic misprision by asserting his own vision against Miltonic influence.
3. T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land:
   Eliot’s The Waste Land is an exemplary text for intertextuality, in which Eliot both engages with and revises a multitude of earlier texts. His use of fragmentation, allusion, and myth reflects an intense anxiety of influence where Eliot wrestles with the overwhelming presence of literary tradition. By misreading these sources, Eliot crafts a modernist work that simultaneously acknowledges and subverts its precursors.
4. Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Ode to the West Wind:
   In Ode to the West Wind, Shelley revises the naturalism of Wordsworth by presenting nature as a transformative, revolutionary force rather than a source of tranquility. This represents a clinamen, or swerve, from the Romantic tradition, where Shelley seeks to assert his own poetic power through the imagery of the West Wind. The poem embodies Bloom’s concept of revisionism by reinterpreting nature in a more dynamic, volatile manner.

Criticism Against “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

• Overemphasis on Influence and Anxiety
  Critics argue that Bloom places too much importance on the concept of anxiety of influence, suggesting that it oversimplifies the creative process by reducing it to a struggle against predecessors. This focus diminishes other factors such as historical context, social influences, or personal experiences in the creative act.
• Neglect of Diversity in Literary Traditions
  Bloom’s theory is criticized for being overly focused on a narrow Western canon, particularly the Romantic and post-Enlightenment tradition. His exclusion of non-Western, minority, or feminist voices has been seen as limiting and outdated, ignoring the diversity of global literary traditions and how different cultural backgrounds might influence poetic creation.
• Psychological Reductionism
  Some critics contend that Bloom’s reliance on Freudian psychoanalysis to explain the poet’s creative process is overly reductive. They argue that framing poetry as a battle of repressed desires and misreadings limits the broader understanding of literary creativity and fails to account for other psychological, philosophical, or aesthetic influences beyond repression and revision.
• Elitism and Canon Worship
  Bloom’s focus on “strong poets” and his promotion of the Western literary canon have been criticized as elitist. His valorization of canonical figures (e.g., Milton, Wordsworth) tends to dismiss contemporary, experimental, or non-canonical writers, reinforcing traditional literary hierarchies rather than opening up space for new voices.
• Obscurantism and Complexity
  Some critics find Bloom’s writing unnecessarily dense, with his use of terms like misprision, daemonization, and clinamen perceived as arcane or overly complex. This has led to accusations that Bloom’s work is inaccessible and obscures rather than clarifies the process of poetic creation.
• Lack of Engagement with Formalist or Structuralist Criticism
  Bloom’s theory is often criticized for its lack of attention to formalist and structuralist concerns. By focusing predominantly on the relationship between poets and their precursors, he neglects to consider the formal and structural aspects of the text itself, such as language, syntax, and narrative technique.
• Gender Bias and Marginalization of Female Poets
  Bloom’s critical framework is seen by some as marginalizing female poets, focusing predominantly on male figures within the Western canon. His theory, critics argue, does not adequately address how female poets may engage with literary tradition and influence differently, nor does it challenge patriarchal structures within the literary canon.

Representative Quotations from “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“A poem is not writing, but rewriting, and though a strong poem is a fresh start, such a start is a starting-again.”	Bloom emphasizes that all poetry is inherently intertextual and revisionist, building on previous works rather than emerging as wholly original creations.
“The strong poet dares the error of reading all of reality as a text, and all prior texts as openings for its own totalizing and unique interpretations.”	This highlights the boldness of strong poets, who reinterpret reality and previous literary works through their personal, often unique, perspectives, turning tradition into opportunity.
“Any poem is an inter-poem, and any reading of a poem is an inter-reading.”	Bloom reinforces the idea that every poem exists within a network of other texts, denying the notion of a self-contained or isolated literary work.
“Rhetoric can be seconded only by rhetoric, for all that rhetoric can intend is more rhetoric.”	Bloom suggests that poetry is a series of rhetorical acts, and one rhetorical system can only be answered or revised by another. This places rhetoric at the heart of poetic creation.
“Even the strongest poet must take up his stance within literary language.”	A strong poet cannot escape the confines of literary tradition, but must work within it to create something new and individual through the act of revision.
“Poetry lives always under the shadow of poetry.”	This quote reflects Bloom’s belief that influence is unavoidable in poetry, and every new poem is haunted by the works of previous poets.
“Repression becomes contaminated by instinct, and so becomes compulsive and at least partly repressed, which rhetorically means hyperbolical or Sublime.”	Bloom links Freudian repression to the poetic process, arguing that repression leads to the Sublime, a heightened or exaggerated poetic expression driven by unconscious forces.
“The curse of an increased belatedness, a dangerously self-conscious belatedness, is that creative envy becomes the ecstasy, the Sublime, of the sign-system of poetic language.”	This describes how modern poets are increasingly aware of their belatedness (coming after a long literary tradition), and their creative envy manifests as intense, Sublime expression.
“Every poet is belated, that every poem is an instance of what Freud called Nachträglichkeit or ‘retroactive meaningfulness.'”	Bloom applies Freud’s notion of retroactive meaning to poetry, arguing that every poem gains significance through its relationship with, and revision of, earlier works.
“Poems are not psyches, nor things, nor are they renewable archetypes in a verbal universe… They are defensive processes in constant change.”	Bloom argues that poems are not static objects but dynamic processes, continuously evolving through revision and misprision as they engage with both the past and the present.

Explanation of the Quotations:

These quotes and their explanations showcase the core ideas of Bloom’s theory from “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression”. Central to Bloom’s framework are the concepts of revisionism, intertextuality, and repression, where strong poets engage in a struggle with their precursors, misreading and revising earlier works to assert their own creative voices. Bloom also emphasizes the dynamic and rhetorical nature of poetry, asserting that it is always a process of rewriting and reinterpretation rather than an isolated act of creation.

Suggested Readings: “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

1. Bloom, Harold. “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 2, no. 2, 1975, pp. 233–51. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342901. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
2. Diehl, Joanne Feit. “‘Come Slowly: Eden’: An Exploration of Women Poets and Their Muse.” Signs, vol. 3, no. 3, 1978, pp. 572–87. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3173172. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
3. Purser, J. W. R. The Review of English Studies, vol. 14, no. 54, 1963, pp. 209–11. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/513524. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
4. Beach, Christopher. “Ezra Pound and Harold Bloom: Influences, Canons, Traditions, and the Making of Modern Poetry.” ELH, vol. 56, no. 2, 1989, pp. 463–83. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2873068. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
5. Schultz, Susan M. “‘Returning to Bloom’: John Ashbery’s Critique of Harold Bloom.” Contemporary Literature, vol. 37, no. 1, 1996, pp. 24–48. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1208749. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.

Introduction: “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom

“First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom appeared in 1970 in the journal Studies in Romanticism, is considered a seminal work in the field of Romanticism studies. Bloom argues that the Romantic poets, particularly William Blake, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and John Keats, represent the “first and last” Romantics because they embody the essence of the Romantic spirit more fully than any other writers. He further highlights their main qualities as their emphasis on the individual imagination, their rejection of traditional authority, and their exploration of the mysteries of existence. These arguments of Bloom have had a profound influence on literature and literary theory, shaping the way we understand and appreciate Romantic literature and its legacy.

Summary of “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom

• Romanticism as Quest and Journey:
  • Bloom begins by exploring the idea that the “Odyssey” is the original Romantic poem, embodying the essential characteristics of a quest romance. The hero embarks on a journey not just toward home, but toward an ideal home, or a “supreme trial,” and this motif becomes a defining element of Romantic literature.
  • He states that “romance is a journey towards home, the hero’s home though not the reader’s” and this journey, in Romanticism, is more about the process than the destination, as exemplified by works like Browning, Kafka, and Yeats (“Demonic romance values the journey more than the destination”).
• Romanticism as Fusion of Romance and Prophecy:
  • Bloom argues that Romanticism blends traditional romance with prophetic vision, creating a new form of artistic and spiritual expression. He contrasts Romanticism with earlier literary forms by emphasizing its prophetic nature, drawn from figures like St. John the Apocalyptic rather than just ancient poets like Homer.
  • “Romanticism fused romance and prophecy,” suggesting that Romantic poets were not merely telling stories but were attempting to create new visions of reality, where prophecy plays a critical role.
• Historical Perspective on Romanticism:
  • Bloom discusses the idea that both “First” and “Last” Romantics can be freely chosen by critics, as every critic situates their understanding of Romanticism in relation to their own context. By choosing one’s first Romantic figure, Bloom argues, one also reveals the kind of last Romantic or anti-Romantic one might aspire to be.
  • He notes, “Choose your first Romantic, or your first Romanticism, and you tell us what kind of last Romantic you yourself are,” highlighting the subjectivity involved in defining Romanticism.
• Romanticism as Renaissance of the Renaissance:
  • Bloom identifies English Romanticism as a revival of the Renaissance tradition, looking back to poets like Spenser and Shakespeare rather than the Augustan poets such as Pope and Johnson. He emphasizes how this selective return to Renaissance ideals was central to shaping Romantic imagination.
  • He explains, “English Romanticism, as opposed to Continental, was a renaissance of the Renaissance,” stressing the Romantic movement’s continuity with earlier literary traditions.
• Tensions with Anti-Romanticism:
  • Bloom addresses the counter-arguments of critics like Dr. Samuel Johnson, who viewed the Romantic celebration of the marvelous with skepticism. Johnson dismissed such invention as “fabulous appendages of spectres and predictions” and called for poetry that engages with the real and the imitable.
  • Johnson’s criticism of Gray’s “The Bard” exemplifies this anti-Romantic stance, wherein he valued “original invention” grounded in realism over the supernatural elements Romantic poets cherished.
• Romanticism and the Divine or Eternal:
  • A recurring theme in Romanticism, as Bloom notes, is the poet’s quest for divination or immortality, often expressed through the symbolism of gods, myths, and visionary experiences. Bloom references Borges, who illustrates this with a parable about scholars joyfully killing degenerate gods, showing both the allure and the danger of the Romantic return to divine themes.
  • Bloom describes Romantic poets as “Olympian bards who sung divine ideas below,” poets seeking a form of eternal life through their imaginative powers and divinatory abilities.
• Shamanism and Romanticism:
  • The essay explores the influence of shamanistic traditions on certain strands of Romanticism, particularly in poets like Yeats and Lawrence, whose works show elements of ritual and psychic transformation. However, Bloom notes that the High Romantics (e.g., Blake, Browning) largely moved beyond these magical elements to embrace a more rational, imaginative catharsis.
  • “The shamanism of Empedocles, so strangely re-born in Yeats’s A Vision,” illustrates how mystical traditions permeate the work of later Romantics, though Bloom points out that this is less central to the High Romanticism of the earlier nineteenth century.
• Invention as Divination:
  • Bloom asserts that for the strongest Romantic poets, invention itself becomes a form of divination—a way of creating new realities through imagination. This contrasts with the shamanistic, magical forms of divination, which seek control over nature. Romantic invention, he argues, creates a “world in which the Real Man, the Imagination, can never die.”
  • He notes, “Invention is a positive mode of divination… since it seeks not the heterocosm, but actual power over nature,” thereby elevating the Romantic poet’s creative powers to a quasi-divine status.
• Conclusion: Romanticism’s Legacy:
  • Bloom concludes by discussing the enduring legacy of Romanticism, asserting that modern poets must align themselves with the right precursors within the Romantic tradition to avoid the pitfalls of illusion and phantasmagoria. He names poets like Hardy and Stevens as examples of those who have successfully inherited this tradition without succumbing to its excesses.
  • He emphasizes that the “dark luminous” quality of Romantic poetry can help navigate challenging times, provided poets draw from the right Romantic ancestors.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom

Literary Term/Concept	Explanation	Reference in Text
Quest Romance	A narrative centered around a hero’s journey toward an idealized goal, often more about the process and challenges than the final destination.	“Romance is a journey towards home… a supreme trial, after which home is possible, or else homelessness will suffice.”
Demonic Romance	A subversion of traditional romance where the quest’s goal is revealed to be delusive or unattainable, focusing more on the journey’s value than the destination’s fulfillment.	“Demonic romance values the journey more than the destination, and leaves us something other than a sense of loss.”
Prophetic Vision	The role of prophecy in Romanticism, blending the visionary aspect with poetic imagination to create a new form of spiritual and artistic revelation.	“Romanticism fused romance and prophecy… What the late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Romantics named as vision might better be termed a making and a hearing.”
Anxiety of Influence	A term coined by Bloom referring to a poet’s struggle to assert originality in the shadow of predecessors, dealing with the creative pressure exerted by earlier literary giants.	“Johnson, who wrote only a few strong poems, had felt deeply the anxiety of influence, as yet another variety of melancholy to add to his afflictions.”
Renaissance of the Renaissance	The idea that English Romanticism was a revival of the Renaissance tradition, selectively returning to figures like Spenser, Shakespeare, and Milton rather than more recent predecessors.	“English Romanticism, as opposed to Continental, was a renaissance of the Renaissance.”
Shamanism	A concept describing mystical, magical elements in literature, often involving rituals or psychic transformations. Bloom explores its presence in Romantic poetry.	“The shamanism of Empedocles, so strangely re-born in Yeats’s A Vision…”
Divination	The act of gaining insight or knowledge, often supernatural or prophetic, a central theme in Romanticism’s quest for immortality and transcendence.	“The return of the Gods means then, for Romanticism, the divination of immortality for and by poets…”
Phantasmagoria	A sequence of real or imagined images, often surreal, used by Bloom to describe illusions in Romantic poetry that poets must navigate or resist.	“Every Romantic has a tendency to drink unnecessarily from the Circean cup of illusion…”
Invention	Refers to the poet’s creative originality, seen by Bloom as a positive mode of divination, where the Romantic poet creates new worlds or realities through imagination.	“Invention is a positive mode of divination… The strong Romantic poet, when he is most himself, makes a world in which his Real Man, the Imagination, can never die.”

Contribution of “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom to Literary Theory/Theories

• Development of the “Anxiety of Influence” Theory:
  • Bloom expands on his theory of poetic influence in this work, emphasizing how Romantic poets struggled to assert their originality in the shadow of literary giants like Homer, Milton, and Shakespeare.
  • He writes that poets like Samuel Johnson felt “deeply the anxiety of influence,” revealing how later poets were burdened by their predecessors’ achievements, which shaped their own creative processes.
• Romanticism as Fusion of Romance and Prophecy:
  • Bloom’s contribution includes defining Romanticism as a unique fusion of the traditional quest romance with prophetic vision. This idea adds to the understanding of Romantic poetry not just as storytelling but as a form of visionary literature.
  • He explains, “Romanticism fused romance and prophecy,” and by doing so, Romantic poets became creators of new spiritual and imaginative realms, marking a shift in the purpose of poetry.
• Elevation of Imaginative Creation as Divination:
  • Bloom highlights the Romantic poet’s creative process as a form of divination, where invention itself becomes a mystical act. This emphasizes the poet’s role as a visionary who creates new worlds through imagination, contributing to theories of literary creation and originality.
  • “Invention is a positive mode of divination… The strong Romantic poet, when he is most himself, makes a world in which his Real Man, the Imagination, can never die.”
• Concept of the “Demonic Romance”:
  • Bloom introduces the idea of “demonic romance,” where the quest’s goal becomes delusive or unattainable, yet the journey remains valuable. This concept enriches literary theory by challenging the traditional hero’s journey and reinterpreting the Romantic quest as inherently ambiguous.
  • He discusses how works like Hart Crane’s The Bridge exemplify this idea, with “quest fulfilled to no consequence, or fulfillment revealed as a parody of the goal.”
• Return to the Renaissance as Source of Romantic Imagination:
  • Bloom redefines the lineage of English Romanticism by arguing that it is a “renaissance of the Renaissance,” positioning the Romantics as heirs to Renaissance figures like Spenser and Shakespeare. This perspective reframes Romanticism within a broader historical and literary tradition, influencing how later critics understand its roots.
  • He writes, “English Romanticism, as opposed to Continental, was a renaissance of the Renaissance,” placing Romantic poets in a selective dialogue with their Renaissance predecessors.
• Critique of Anti-Romanticism and Traditional Invention:
  • Bloom engages with anti-Romantic critics, particularly Samuel Johnson, who viewed the Romantic imagination with skepticism. This dialogue adds depth to literary theory by juxtaposing Romantic ideals with realist, rational critiques, showing the tension between invention and imitation in poetic creation.
  • Johnson’s dismissal of Romantic invention as “fabulous appendages of spectres and predictions” represents this critical tension.
• Influence of Shamanism and Myth in Romanticism:
  • Bloom introduces the idea that Romantic poets engage with shamanistic traditions, connecting their poetic inspiration to ancient forms of psychic transformation and ritual. This links Romanticism to broader theories of myth and archetype in literature, offering a framework to analyze mystical elements in poetry.
  • “The shamanism of Empedocles, so strangely re-born in Yeats’s A Vision,” exemplifies this mystical aspect of Romanticism that Bloom explores.
• Incorporation of Psychological and Philosophical Elements:
  • Bloom’s essay contributes to the intersection of literary theory with psychology and philosophy, particularly through his analysis of how poets like Byron and Shelley grappled with existential and metaphysical themes, such as immortality, self-recognition, and divination.
  • He delves into the poets’ “obsessive need for a literal immortality,” positioning Romanticism as a response to human existential concerns, thereby influencing psychoanalytic and existential readings of literature.

Examples of Critiques Through “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom

Literary Work and Author	Critique through Bloom’s Lens	Reference in Text
The Odyssey by Homer	Bloom identifies The Odyssey as the “first Romantic poem” and a foundational quest romance, where the journey (more than the destination) defines the Romantic essence of the hero’s narrative.	“The Odyssey is the fundamental quest romance, and the first Romantic poem… Romance is a journey towards home.”
The Bard by Thomas Gray	Bloom critiques Johnson’s dismissal of The Bard as overly fantastical and disconnected from reality, highlighting the tension between Romantic imagination and anti-Romantic realism.	“To select a singular event, and swell it to a giant’s bulk by fabulous appendages of spectres and predictions, has little difficulty…”
The Bridge by Hart Crane	Bloom interprets The Bridge as a “demonic romance” in which the quest is fulfilled with no meaningful consequence, reflecting Romanticism’s focus on the journey and disillusionment with the goal.	“Hart Crane’s The Bridge… would be seen more clearly as demonic romance, quest fulfilled to no consequence, or fulfillment revealed as a parody of the goal.”
Paradise Lost by John Milton	Bloom examines Milton’s work in relation to his anxieties about poetic divination, interpreting Paradise Lost as an epic where the poet cannot evade the fall or death, unlike other Romantic works.	“Milton… feared from the start that a demon of transformations would mock his career. Lycidas laments the loss of the poetic power of divination…”

Criticism Against “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom

• Overemphasis on Poetic Influence:
  • Critics argue that Bloom’s focus on the “anxiety of influence” overshadows the individuality of Romantic poets, reducing their originality by framing their work primarily as responses to predecessors like Milton, Homer, and Shakespeare.
  • This perspective diminishes the cultural, social, and historical contexts that shaped Romanticism, prioritizing literary lineage over broader influences.
• Neglect of Non-Western and Female Voices:
  • Bloom’s analysis primarily centers on Western male poets, ignoring significant contributions from female writers and non-Western literary traditions. This exclusion limits the scope of his definition of Romanticism, which could benefit from a more diverse range of voices.
  • By focusing mainly on figures like Byron, Keats, and Shelley, Bloom’s study is criticized for reinforcing a narrow, Eurocentric view of literary history.
• Romanticism as Too Mystical and Abstract:
  • Some scholars argue that Bloom’s interpretation of Romanticism, especially his emphasis on divination, prophecy, and shamanism, pushes the concept into a mystical, abstract realm that detaches it from the real-world concerns of Romantic poets.
  • Romanticism often addressed political, social, and personal struggles, but Bloom’s focus on the visionary and supernatural aspects risks overlooking the grounded, human elements of the movement.
• Simplification of Anti-Romanticism:
  • Bloom’s treatment of anti-Romantic critics like Samuel Johnson is seen as overly simplified. By positioning Johnson as a foil to Romantic creativity, Bloom reduces the complexity of anti-Romantic criticism, which often addressed significant concerns about realism and moral values in literature.
  • His portrayal of Johnson’s skepticism as merely anti-Romantic downplays the nuanced critical perspectives of the period.
• Subjectivity in Defining First and Last Romantics:
  • Bloom’s suggestion that critics can choose their “First and Last Romantics” according to personal preference has been criticized for its subjectivity. This approach implies that Romanticism’s boundaries are flexible and potentially arbitrary, weakening the theoretical foundation of his argument.
  • Critics argue that literary movements need clearer historical and thematic definitions rather than being open to individual interpretation.

Representative Quotations from “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The Odyssey is the fundamental quest romance, and the first Romantic poem.”	Bloom identifies The Odyssey as the archetypal Romantic journey, establishing a connection between classical literature and Romanticism’s themes of quests, trials, and idealized homecomings.
“Romanticism fused romance and prophecy.”	This phrase captures Bloom’s central thesis that Romantic poets combined the narrative form of romance with the visionary qualities of prophecy, creating a new genre of imaginative expression.
“Demonic romance values the journey more than the destination.”	Bloom introduces the concept of “demonic romance,” where the process of the quest is valued over its conclusion, reflecting the Romantic disillusionment with traditional notions of fulfillment.
“Choose your first Romantic, or your first Romanticism, and you tell us what kind of last Romantic you yourself are.”	This quote suggests the subjective nature of defining Romanticism, where identifying a “First Romantic” reflects a critic’s own biases and intellectual positioning within literary history.
“English Romanticism, as opposed to Continental, was a renaissance of the Renaissance.”	Bloom argues that English Romanticism revived Renaissance ideals and looked to figures like Spenser and Shakespeare, rather than later poets, as primary influences.
“Invention is a positive mode of divination… The strong Romantic poet, when he is most himself, makes a world in which his Real Man, the Imagination, can never die.”	This reflects Bloom’s view that poetic creation (invention) in Romanticism is a form of divination, where imagination transcends mortality, linking creativity to immortality.
“Johnson, who wrote only a few strong poems, had felt deeply the anxiety of influence.”	Bloom highlights Samuel Johnson’s experience of the “anxiety of influence,” which he argues is central to understanding the struggles of Romantic poets in relation to their predecessors.
“Every Romantic has a tendency to drink unnecessarily from the Circean cup of illusion.”	This metaphor refers to the Romantics’ temptation to indulge in illusion and fantasy, drawing from the myth of Circe, a recurrent theme of transformation and seduction in Romantic literature.
“The return of the Gods means then, for Romanticism, the divination of immortality for and by poets.”	Bloom associates Romanticism with a quest for divination and immortality, framing poets as creators of visionary worlds that challenge the limitations of mortality.
“Romantic poetry, in its long history, has been saved from those worst difficulties by its sense of its own tradition, by the liberating burden of poetic influence.”	Bloom emphasizes that Romanticism’s strength lies in its awareness of and dialogue with its literary tradition, even as poets struggle under the “burden” of influence from past greats.

Suggested Readings: “First and Last Romantics” by Harold Bloom

1. Bloom, Harold. “First and Last Romantics.” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 9, no. 4, 1970, pp. 225–32. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/25599769. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024
2. Altevers, Nannette. “The Revisionary Company: Harold Bloom’s ‘Last Romanticism.’” New Literary History, vol. 23, no. 2, 1992, pp. 361–82. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/469241. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
3. Giraldi, William. “Bloomian Stride.” The Kenyon Review, vol. 35, no. 2, 2013, pp. 175–85. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24242006. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.

Introduction: “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom

“Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom first appeared in Diacritics, Spring 1972″ and explores the complex relationship between Samuel Taylor Coleridge and his literary influences, particularly the towering figure of John Milton. Bloom argues that Coleridge, despite possessing the potential to be a strong poet, never fully developed his abilities due to the anxiety he felt about living up to his predecessors.

Key points:

• Source Study vs. Influence: Bloom criticizes traditional source studies that simply identify influences on a poet’s work. Instead, he proposes a concept of “poetic misprision,” where the later poet actively reinterprets and challenges the work of the earlier one.
• Revisionary Ratios: Bloom outlines six stages (“revisionary ratios”) a strong poet goes through as they grapple with their influences. These include clinamen (swerving away), tessera (completing and contrasting), kenosis (self-emptying), daemonization (creating a counter-sublime), askesis (self-purgation), and apophrades (the return of the dead).
• Coleridge’s Case: Bloom argues that Coleridge never fully engaged with these revisionary ratios. While he attempted to escape Milton’s influence through poems like “Frost at Midnight,” he ultimately shied away from the full confrontation necessary to become a truly strong poet.
• Later Works: In Coleridge’s later works, like “Dejection: an Ode” and “To William Wordsworth,” Bloom sees an attempt to create an askesis, purging himself of the combined influence of Milton and Wordsworth. However, this effort ultimately led to a decline in his poetic ambitions. It offers a valuable framework for understanding the complex relationship between poets and their influences. Bloom’s concept of “anxiety of influence” has been influential in literary criticism, prompting scholars to examine how poets negotiate their relationship with literary giants of the past.

Summary of “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom

Literary Term/Concept	Definition	Explanation in Bloom’s Essay
Anxiety of Influence	The psychological struggle of a poet to overcome the influence of their predecessors in order to create original work.	Bloom applies this concept to Coleridge, suggesting that his poetic ambition was inhibited by his reverence for Milton and Wordsworth.
Poetic Misprision	A creative misreading or misinterpretation of a precursor’s work by a later poet.	Coleridge’s poetry, according to Bloom, involves a series of misreadings of Milton, in which he tries to revise or alter Milton’s legacy.
Clinamen	The swerve or deviation of a poet from their precursor’s work to assert originality.	Bloom argues that Coleridge executed a “swerve” away from Milton in poems like “Frost at Midnight.”
Tessera	A term for completing or antithetically extending a precursor’s work, using its elements but altering their meaning.	Bloom suggests that Coleridge attempts this in moments of philosophical divergence, but often fails to fully break free of Milton’s shadow.
Kenosis	A deliberate self-emptying or reduction in poetic power to resist the overwhelming influence of a precursor.	In “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” Coleridge humbles himself by reducing the concept of sin from Milton’s grandiose vision to mere ignorance.
Daemonization	A poet’s engagement with a “Counter-Sublime” force, often dark or daemonic, to counteract the precursor’s influence.	Coleridge attempts this in “Kubla Khan” and “Christabel,” where he confronts darker, daemonic aspects of poetic genius.
Askesis	A self-purgation or curtailment of certain poetic faculties in order to achieve solitude or independence from a precursor.	Coleridge’s later poems, like “Dejection: An Ode,” reflect a self-limiting move to distance himself from the overwhelming influence of Milton and Wordsworth.
Apophrades	The “return of the dead,” where the later poet’s work seems to be haunted by the presence of the precursor’s influence.	Bloom interprets Coleridge’s late fragments, such as “Limbo,” as haunted by Milton’s influence, marking Coleridge’s inability to escape it.
Organic Analogue	The belief that a work of art grows naturally and organically, without external influence, like a living organism.	Bloom critiques Coleridge’s reliance on this concept, arguing that it limited his ability to engage fully with the creative struggle needed to overcome his predecessors.

Contribution of “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Influence Theory / Anxiety of Influence

• Contribution: Bloom’s essay is pivotal in advancing his theory of the “anxiety of influence”, which explores the psychological struggle that poets face when they engage with their literary predecessors. This concept revolutionized the understanding of how poets relate to their influences, emphasizing the tensions between originality and imitation.
• Reference: “Poetic influence, in this sense, is actually poetic misprision, a poet’s taking or doing amiss of a parent-poem.” Bloom argues that Coleridge’s career was shaped by his engagement with Milton, and this struggle led to both creative limitations and breakthroughs.
• Impact on Theory: Bloom’s model of influence is now a foundational concept in literary theory. It suggests that all literature is dialogical, meaning that later works are responses to and revisions of earlier ones. This idea challenges earlier notions that viewed literary works as self-contained or purely original.

2. Intertextuality

• Contribution: Bloom’s analysis of Coleridge is deeply rooted in intertextuality, the idea that texts are interconnected and that no text exists in isolation. His discussion of how Coleridge’s poetry is a response to Milton’s influence highlights the complex web of literary connections that exist across time.
• Reference: “The meaning of a strong poem is another strong poem, a precursor’s poem which is being misinterpreted, revised, corrected, evaded, twisted askew…” Bloom suggests that Coleridge’s poetry can only be fully understood by examining its relationship to Milton’s work.
• Impact on Theory: This contribution reinforces the concept of dialogic relationships between texts (as later expanded by theorists like Julia Kristeva and Mikhail Bakhtin). Bloom’s insights into Coleridge emphasize how literary texts derive meaning through their engagement with previous works, shaping the broader study of intertextuality.

3. Romanticism and Poetic Legacy

• Contribution: Bloom redefines the relationship between Romanticism and its predecessors, particularly through Coleridge’s struggles with Milton. He asserts that the central task of the Romantic poet was to humanize the Miltonic Sublime, yet Coleridge, unlike Blake or Wordsworth, was overwhelmed by the grandeur of Milton.
• Reference: “Milton’s greatness is purchased at the cost of something dear to Coleridge, a principle of difference.” Bloom shows how Coleridge’s poetic identity was formed and constrained by Milton’s shadow.
• Impact on Theory: Bloom’s reading reshapes how scholars understand Romanticism. Instead of seeing Romantic poets as merely reacting against Enlightenment ideas or creating in isolation, Bloom highlights their deep, anxious engagement with their literary ancestors, which enriches the understanding of Romantic intertextuality and continuity within literary traditions.

4. Revisionary Ratios / Creative Struggle

• Contribution: Bloom introduces his revisionary ratios, six stages in which poets engage with and revise their predecessors. These include clinamen (swerve), tessera (completion), kenosis (emptying), daemonization, askesis (self-purgation), and apophrades (return of the dead).
• Reference: “These are six revisionary ratios, and I think they can be observed, usually in cyclic appearance, in the life’s work of every Post-Enlightenment strong poet…” Bloom identifies Coleridge’s use of kenosis in “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” where he humbles himself by revising Milton’s grand narrative of sin and disobedience.
• Impact on Theory: This theoretical framework offers a structured approach to understanding how poets engage with influence. It has been widely influential in the study of literary inheritance and innovation, helping scholars trace how poets revise and transform their precursors’ work.

5. Organic Analogue and its Critique

• Contribution: Bloom critiques Coleridge’s adherence to the Organic Analogue, the belief that poems grow naturally from within like living organisms. While Coleridge viewed this as central to his creative process, Bloom and others argue that this concept inhibited Coleridge from fully realizing his creative potential.
• Reference: “The Organic Analogue… appealed so overwhelmingly to Coleridge because it seemed to preclude the anxiety of influence.”
• Impact on Theory: This critique of the organic theory of creation challenges idealistic notions of natural, effortless artistic creation. Bloom’s argument suggests that the true creative process involves struggle, revision, and conscious engagement with external influences rather than natural growth alone.

6. Romantic Sublime and Counter-Sublime

• Contribution: Bloom explores the Romantic poet’s relationship to the Sublime, particularly how Coleridge’s attempt to humanize the Sublime faltered. Bloom contrasts Coleridge’s failures with the successful humanization of the Sublime in poets like Blake and Wordsworth.
• Reference: “Kubla Khan” and “Christabel” represent Coleridge’s attempt at a Counter-Sublime, wherein he engaged with darker, daemonic forces, but ultimately failed to sustain this engagement.
• Impact on Theory: This concept of the Counter-Sublime offers a new way to understand the Romantic poet’s struggle with the overwhelming grandeur of the Sublime, adding nuance to the study of Romantic aesthetics and the psychological dimensions of poetic creation.

Examples of Critiques Through “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom

Literary Work	Author	Critique Through “The Anxiety of Influence”	Explanation
“Paradise Lost”	John Milton	Coleridge is haunted by Milton’s overwhelming influence, which stifles his own poetic ambition.	Milton represents the pinnacle of the Sublime, and Coleridge’s admiration and envy for Milton inhibit him from fully realizing his own potential as a strong poet.
“The Prelude”	William Wordsworth	Coleridge struggles to match Wordsworth’s poetic achievements, resulting in both admiration and creative paralysis.	Wordsworth serves as both friend and rival. Coleridge seeks to revise and respond to Wordsworth’s greatness, especially regarding the themes of nature and the self.
“Frost at Midnight”	Samuel Taylor Coleridge	This poem represents Coleridge’s clinamen (swerve) away from Milton by softening and domesticating the Miltonic Sublime.	Instead of confronting Milton directly, Coleridge finds his own voice by focusing on personal and domestic themes, avoiding Milton’s grand, cosmic vision.
“Kubla Khan”	Samuel Taylor Coleridge	Coleridge engages with the Counter-Sublime through daemonic and visionary forces but fails to sustain this revisionary step.	In “Kubla Khan,” Coleridge attempts to counteract Milton’s influence by invoking daemonic powers, but his retreat from full engagement reveals his creative anxiety.

Summary:

This table illustrates how “The Anxiety of Influence” manifests in Coleridge’s relationship with Milton and Wordsworth, as well as his own works. Coleridge’s poetry reflects Bloom’s revisionary steps, such as clinamen (a swerve from Milton in “Frost at Midnight”) and daemonization (in “Kubla Khan”). These critiques highlight the tension between admiration for poetic precursors and the struggle for creative independence.

Criticism Against “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom

Representative Quotations from “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Coleridge could have been a strong poet… another mighty antagonist for the Great Spectre Milton.”	Bloom sets the stage for his analysis, arguing that Coleridge had the potential to rival Milton but was inhibited by the overpowering influence of Milton’s poetic legacy.
“Poetic influence, in this sense, is actually poetic misprision.”	This is the core of Bloom’s theory, suggesting that influence involves a creative misinterpretation of predecessor poets, where the later poet both revises and resists them.
“The meaning of a strong poem is another strong poem.”	Bloom argues that great poetry derives its meaning in dialogue with other great works, reinforcing his theory of influence and intertextuality.
“Milton’s greatness is purchased at the cost of something dear to Coleridge, a principle of difference.”	Bloom emphasizes how Milton’s influence overwhelmed Coleridge’s ability to establish his own unique poetic voice, leading to creative tension and struggle.
“That exaggerated inwardness is barren… it cheats the senses and the emotions of their triumph.”	Bloom, referencing Pater, critiques Coleridge’s tendency toward philosophical inwardness, which Pater saw as limiting his ability to express a full range of emotions in poetry.
“Coleridge’s Counter-Sublime, his answer to the anxiety of influence, in strong poets.”	Bloom introduces the idea of the “Counter-Sublime,” showing how Coleridge attempted to respond to the overwhelming Sublime of Milton by engaging with darker, daemonic forces.
“Frost at Midnight swerves away from Milton by softening him, by domesticating his style.”	Bloom uses clinamen, the idea of a “swerve,” to explain how Coleridge moved away from Milton’s grand themes, focusing on more personal, intimate settings in his poetry.
“Kubla Khan” represents Coleridge’s attempt to counteract Milton’s influence by invoking daemonic powers.”	Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan” reflects Bloom’s concept of daemonization, where the poet interacts with otherworldly forces to challenge the influence of a powerful precursor.
“Coleridge had the potential of the strong poet, but declined the full process of developing into one.”	Bloom suggests that Coleridge, unlike Blake or Wordsworth, did not fully embrace the necessary struggles to become a “strong poet” and reach his highest creative potential.
“The Organic Analogue… appealed so overwhelmingly to Coleridge because it seemed to preclude the anxiety of influence.”	Bloom critiques Coleridge’s reliance on the Organic Analogue, arguing that this concept allowed him to avoid facing the creative tension posed by the anxiety of influence.

Suggested Readings: “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence” by Harold Bloom

1. Bloom, Harold. “Coleridge: The Anxiety of Influence.” Diacritics, vol. 2, no. 1, 1972, pp. 36–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/464923. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
2. Polansky, Steve. “A Family Romance-Northrop Frye and Harold Bloom: A Study of Critical Influence.” Boundary 2, vol. 9, no. 2, 1981, pp. 227–46. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/303059. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
3. Robinson, Daniel. “‘Work without Hope’: Anxiety and Embarrassment in Coleridge’s Sonnets.” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 39, no. 1, 2000, pp. 81–110. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/25601432. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
4. Bloom, Harold. “Water Pater: The Intoxication of Belatedness.” Yale French Studies, no. 50, 1974, pp. 163–89. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2929474. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
5. Bloom, Harold. “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction.” Diacritics, vol. 1, no. 2, 1971, pp. 39–46. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/465081. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.

Introduction: “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom

“Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom was written and published in 1971 ina  journal, Diacritics. This essay holds great significance in literary criticism and literary theory due to its unique perspective and main points. Bloom argues that literary criticism often falls into two opposing camps: either too reverent or too dismissive of authors and their works. He proposes a new approach, “antithetical criticism,” which focuses on the inherent tension and conflict between an author and their predecessors. Bloom believes that by understanding these antagonistic relationships, we can gain deeper insights into the originality and significance of an author’s contribution to literature.

Summary of “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom

Term/Concept	Definition	Explanation from Bloom’s Text
Anxiety of Influence	A poet’s fear or anxiety of being overshadowed by their predecessors.	Poets experience anxiety when they feel creatively influenced by earlier poets, which can inhibit originality.
Misprision	The deliberate misinterpretation or distortion of a predecessor’s work to create something new.	Strong poets misinterpret their precursors as a way of escaping their influence and creating new poetry.
Clinamen	A “swerve” or deviation from a precursor’s work.	Derived from Lucretius, it refers to the poet’s creative move away from a precursor’s work to establish their own poetic identity.
Tessera	A process of completing or “completing” a predecessor’s work.	The poet views the precursor’s work as incomplete and seeks to complete it in their own poetic vision.
Antithetical Criticism	A form of criticism that focuses on how poets misinterpret their predecessors.	Bloom’s proposed criticism highlights the tension between a poet and their precursor, reading newer works in light of deviations from older ones.
Family Romance	A psychological concept borrowed from Freud, used to describe a poet’s relationship with precursors.	Poets relate to their predecessors as children relate to parents, seeking to assert their independence but often repeating patterns.
Primal Words	Words that carry opposing meanings, reflecting ambivalence.	Bloom links this concept to Freud’s discussion of primal words, noting that poets’ works often contain inherent contradictions or oppositions.
Ephebe	A young or beginning poet.	The ephebe (or young poet) struggles to overcome the influence of older, more established poets.
Swerve	A deviation or shift from an earlier poetic model.	This is another term for “clinamen,” referring to the poet’s movement away from the path of a precursor to create their own work.
Misinterpretation	A crucial aspect of the creative process where the poet distorts the work of their precursor.	Bloom argues that every poem is a misinterpretation of an earlier poem, and this misinterpretation is essential for poetic creation.
Metaphor of Combat	Poets are engaged in a struggle with their precursors.	Bloom uses the metaphor of combat to describe the poet’s effort to “overcome” the influence of their literary ancestors.

Contribution of “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom to Literary Theory/Theories

• Intertextuality
• Contribution:
  Bloom’s theory provides a distinct perspective on intertextuality, where texts are seen as not merely interconnected but deeply shaped by the anxiety of influence. Unlike traditional intertextuality, which often views literary works as equal participants in a dialogue, Bloom emphasizes that later poets engage in a struggle with their precursors.
• Key Reference:
• “Every poem is a misinterpretation of a parent poem. A poem is not an overcoming of anxiety, but is that anxiety.”
• Here, Bloom positions each poetic creation as inherently derivative, not in a collaborative sense, but in a competitive and revisionary relationship with earlier works. This reshapes the discussion of how texts are interconnected by introducing the notion of misreading or misprision as an essential part of creation.
• Relation to Theory:
  Intertextuality in Bloom’s view is not merely about reference or homage, but about deliberate distortion of predecessors to assert originality, distinguishing his approach from scholars like Julia Kristeva, who emphasize a more symbiotic relationship between texts.
• Reader-Response Theory
• Contribution:
  While Bloom’s essay does not directly engage with reader-response theory, his focus on misprision highlights the active role of the poet as a reader who reshapes the meaning of precursor texts through personal anxiety and struggle. In this way, poets are readers first, and their interpretation (or misinterpretation) of earlier works is crucial in shaping their own creations.
• Key Reference:
• “To imagine is to misinterpret. But alas—to misinterpret is not necessarily to imagine (or re-imagine).”
• Relation to Theory:
  In Bloom’s view, each poet’s reading of past works is subjective and creative. This anticipates the reader’s role in co-creating meaning in reader-response theory, where the meaning of a text is not fixed but is generated through the interaction between text and reader. Bloom applies this idea to poets, who as readers engage in a highly personal, psychological interpretation of earlier poetry.
• Connection to Stanley Fish’s Reader-Response Theory:
  Bloom’s idea aligns with Stanley Fish’s theory that meaning is not embedded in the text but generated by the reader. Here, the poet as reader becomes an active participant in generating new meanings by misreading past poets.
• Psychoanalytic Literary Theory
• Contribution:
  Bloom’s theory is deeply informed by psychoanalysis, particularly in its focus on the family romance and the Freudian concept of repression and sublimation. He frames the relationship between poets and their predecessors in terms of psychological conflict and anxiety, which becomes a driving force behind poetic creation.
• Key Reference:
• “The strong poet-like the Hegelian great man-is both hero of poetic history, and victim of it.”
• This reference to Hegelian dialectics in combination with the Freudian family romance illustrates how Bloom views poets as both creators and victims of their psychological inheritance, paralleling the familial struggle for identity. Poets must “kill” their precursors, similar to the Oedipal complex, to establish their own creative autonomy.
• Relation to Theory:
  Bloom’s theory directly engages with Freudian psychoanalytic theory, applying the notion of family dynamics (the precursor as symbolic father) to literary influence. This shifts psychoanalytic criticism from a focus on character analysis within texts to an examination of the creative process itself as a form of psychological drama.
• Historicism and the Role of Tradition
• Contribution:
  Bloom challenges traditional historicism and tradition, particularly the ways in which past texts influence the present. He argues that poets are both burdened and inspired by the literary tradition, but must revise and misinterpret this tradition to create something new. He rejects the positivist historical view that places poets as mere products of their times or literary traditions.
• Key Reference:
• “Poetry is thus both contraction and expansion, for both clinamen and tessera are contracting movements, yet making is an expansive one.”
• Relation to Theory:
  Bloom’s approach critiques traditional historicism, which often sees texts as firmly rooted in the context of their production. Instead, he positions poets as revisionary figures who engage with history not by simply inheriting it but by reworking it. His work aligns with New Historicism, in its focus on the dynamic relationship between past and present texts, but Bloom emphasizes the psychological struggle over the socio-political context.
• Deconstruction
• Contribution:
  Bloom’s idea that all interpretation is misinterpretation has echoes of deconstruction, particularly its emphasis on the instability of meaning. Like deconstruction, Bloom argues that no text can fully transcend its influences or achieve absolute originality. There is always a degree of misinterpretation involved in any creative or critical act.
• Key Reference:
• “There are no interpretations but only misinterpretations, and so all criticism is prose poetry.”
• Relation to Theory:
  This statement aligns with the deconstructive idea that meaning is always unstable and that texts are constantly being reinterpreted and revised. Bloom takes this a step further by focusing on poetic creation as a form of deconstructive misreading where the poet’s work is always already entangled with past texts.
• Romanticism and Post-Romanticism
• Contribution:
  Bloom’s theory is also a contribution to the understanding of Romanticism, especially in his use of ephebe and the struggle for originality. He highlights the Romantic poet’s need to reconcile individual genius with the influence of predecessors.
• Key Reference:
• “Romanticism’s quest is to re-beget one’s own self, to become one’s own great original.”
• Relation to Theory:
  Bloom provides a Post-Romantic revision of traditional Romantic ideals of genius and originality, asserting that true creativity arises not in isolation but in response to the anxiety caused by earlier works. This reinterpretation emphasizes the paradox of originality in Romantic and post-Romantic poetry.

---

Examples of Critiques Through “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom

Literary Work	Precursor/Influence	Bloom’s Antithetical Critique	Key Concepts
“The Waste Land” by T.S. Eliot	The Bible, Shakespeare, and Dante	Eliot’s poem deliberately misinterprets the sacred and mythic texts (The Bible, Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Dante’s Divine Comedy) to convey modern disillusionment. He appropriates fragments from these precursors but subverts their meanings, signaling a clinamen or “swerve” that reflects his struggle with the overwhelming literary past.	Misprision, Clinamen (swerve), Anxiety of Influence
“Ulysses” by James Joyce	Homer’s Odyssey	Joyce’s Ulysses is a revisionary retelling of Homer’s Odyssey, where he re-envisions the heroic quest in a modern, mundane setting. Through his misprision of the classical epic, Joyce diminishes the grandeur of Homer’s characters, showing that modern heroes are ordinary people like Leopold Bloom. This is Joyce’s way of both embracing and defying Homer’s literary dominance.	Tessera (completion), Misprision, Family Romance
“Paradise Lost” by John Milton	The Bible, Greek Epics (Homer, Virgil)	Milton engages in a profound struggle with his precursors, especially The Bible and classical epics like The Iliad and The Aeneid. Milton attempts to surpass these texts by presenting Satan as a tragic, almost heroic figure, thereby misinterpreting the traditional Christian depiction of the fall. This signals a radical swerve from religious orthodoxy, re-casting epic traditions through a lens of individual freedom and rebellion.	Clinamen, Misprision, Anxiety of Influence
“Song of Myself” by Walt Whitman	Ralph Waldo Emerson, Bible	Whitman’s work can be seen as a tessera, where he seeks to complete Emerson’s vision of self-reliance and transcendentalism, extending it into a more radical, democratic embrace of the individual’s connection to the cosmos. However, Whitman misinterprets Emerson by focusing less on the spiritual and intellectual aspects and more on the sensual, bodily experience of existence. This is Whitman’s way of asserting his own poetic authority.	Tessera (completion), Misprision, Anxiety of Influence

Key Concepts in the Table:

• Clinamen (Swerve): A poet’s deviation from their precursor’s work, signaling an effort to escape being overwhelmed by past influence.
• Tessera (Completion): A poet seeks to “complete” the precursor’s work, viewing it as incomplete or lacking in some aspect.
• Misprision: The act of deliberately misinterpreting or revising a predecessor’s work to establish originality.
• Anxiety of Influence: The psychological struggle poets experience when they feel overshadowed by their precursors.
• Family Romance: A psychoanalytic lens where the relationship between poets and their predecessors is akin to a child’s relationship with their parents, filled with both admiration and rebellion.

Criticism Against “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom

• Overemphasis on Psychological Conflict
  Bloom’s theory heavily relies on the psychological struggle between poets and their precursors, often framing literary creation as a personal conflict rooted in anxiety. Critics argue that this reduces the complexity of literary production to a singular psychoanalytic model, ignoring broader social, political, and cultural factors that also shape creative processes.
• Neglect of Collaborative and Symbiotic Influences
  Bloom’s focus on misprision and the competitive struggle for originality between poets overlooks more collaborative and symbiotic relationships between writers. Some literary traditions, especially non-Western or communal cultures, may not experience influence through the anxiety Bloom emphasizes but rather through mutual enrichment and dialogue.
• Dismissal of Non-Canonical Writers and Voices
  Bloom’s theory primarily centers on a Eurocentric, male-dominated literary canon (e.g., Shakespeare, Milton, and Dante), often disregarding non-canonical, female, or marginalized voices. His framework has been criticized for perpetuating a narrow literary tradition that excludes diverse authors who do not fit into his model of agonistic literary relations.
• Reduction of Literary Creativity to Influence
  Critics contend that Bloom’s focus on poetic influence diminishes the role of original creativity. By asserting that all literary creation is essentially a product of anxiety and influence from predecessors, Bloom underplays the possibility that poets and writers generate new, independent ideas and innovations that are not simply responses to past works.
• Limited Applicability Across Genres and Forms
  Bloom’s theory is largely focused on poetry, particularly on the relationship between strong poets and their predecessors. This narrow focus raises concerns about the theory’s applicability to other genres like prose fiction, drama, or contemporary experimental forms, which might not follow the same dynamics of influence and anxiety.
• Neglect of Reader’s Role in Interpretation
  While Bloom emphasizes the role of the poet as a reader of precursors, he gives little attention to the role of the audience or reader in the interpretation of texts. This exclusion undermines the relevance of reader-response theory and suggests that the meaning of a text is primarily determined by the author’s relationship with their precursor, not by the interaction between the text and its readers.
• Overemphasis on Western Romantic and Modernist Traditions
  Bloom’s ideas are deeply rooted in Western Romantic and Modernist traditions, with a strong focus on individual genius and originality. This has drawn criticism for being too narrow and specific to certain literary movements, making it less relevant to other literary traditions, such as postcolonial, feminist, or collective literary movements, which may not prioritize individual struggle in the same way.
• Exaggeration of the Struggle for Originality
  Some critics argue that Bloom’s preoccupation with the anxiety of originality is overstated. They believe many poets and writers do not experience creativity as a struggle against predecessors, but instead see it as a process of inspiration, adaptation, or homage, where influence can be a positive force rather than a burden.

Representative Quotations from “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Every poem is a misinterpretation of a parent poem.”	Bloom asserts that all poetry is fundamentally influenced by previous works and that each poem is, in essence, a deliberate misreading or reinterpretation of its predecessors. This underscores his concept of misprision, where new poems rework and distort older ones to assert their originality.
“A poem is not an overcoming of anxiety, but is that anxiety.”	Bloom highlights that the act of poetic creation is driven by the anxiety of influence. Poets do not simply overcome their predecessors’ influence; instead, this anxiety is embedded in the poem itself and fuels its creation.
“To imagine is to misinterpret.”	Imagination, in Bloom’s framework, is equated with misinterpretation. To create something new, a poet must first misinterpret the work of predecessors, reimagining it in a way that allows the new poem to emerge.
“Influence is Influenza—an astral disease.”	Bloom uses this metaphor to suggest that influence is a pervasive and unavoidable force in poetry, much like a contagious disease. It affects all poets, often unconsciously, shaping their work in ways they cannot control.
“Poetry is misunderstanding, misinterpretation, misalliance.”	Here, Bloom summarizes his view that poetry is inherently a process of misunderstanding and reworking previous texts. The creative act is not about producing something entirely new, but about reinterpreting past works through deliberate misreading.
“The meaning of a poem can only be another poem.”	Bloom argues that the meaning of a poem is not self-contained. It can only be understood in relation to other poems, particularly those that influenced it. This is a key aspect of his theory of antithetical criticism, where poetry is always in dialogue with past works.
“The strong poet, like the Hegelian great man, is both hero of poetic history, and victim of it.”	Bloom suggests that the strongest poets are those who actively engage with and transform literary tradition, but they are also victimized by it, as their work is forever marked by the anxiety of trying to escape the shadow of their predecessors.
“To imagine is to misinterpret. But alas—to misinterpret is not necessarily to imagine (or re-imagine).”	Bloom acknowledges the difficulty of true creative imagination. While misinterpretation is a central part of poetic creation, not all misinterpretations result in successful re-imaginings. This points to the uncertainty and difficulty in producing truly original poetry.
“A poem is a poet’s melancholy at his lack of priority.”	This quote reflects Bloom’s idea that poems are born from a melancholic recognition that the poet is not the first to explore certain themes or ideas. The act of writing is, in part, an expression of the poet’s struggle to achieve originality in a world where much has already been said.
“Poetry is the enchantment of incest, disciplined by resistance to that enchantment.”	Bloom uses the metaphor of incest to describe the close, often uncomfortable relationship between poets and their predecessors. Poets are drawn to their precursors but must discipline this intense attraction by resisting their influence to create something new.

Suggested Readings: “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction” by Harold Bloom

1. Bloom, Harold. “Antithetical Criticism: An Introduction.” Diacritics, vol. 1, no. 2, 1971, pp. 39–46. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/465081. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
2. Barzilai, Shuli. “A Review of Paul de Man’s ‘Review of Harold Bloom’s Anxiety of Influence.’” Yale French Studies, no. 69, 1985, pp. 134–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2929930. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
3. Bloom, Harold. “The Necessity of Misreading.” The Georgia Review, vol. 55/56, 2001, pp. 69–87. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41402122. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
4. Colilli, Paul. “Harold Bloom and the Post-Theological Dante.” Annali d’Italianistica, vol. 8, 1990, pp. 132–43. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24004257. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.