“Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom: Summary and Critique

“Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom first appeared in Orbis Litterarum in 2005.

"Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen" Harold Bloom: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom

“Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom first appeared in Orbis Litterarum in 2005. This scholarly article explores the unique qualities and significance of Andersen’s work, positioning him among literary giants like Shakespeare and Goethe. Bloom delves into the fusion of folklore, romanticism, and Andersen’s personal struggles, suggesting that his stories reflect a pagan reverence for fate intertwined with his personal life’s tragedies. Bloom’s analysis reveals Andersen’s fairy tales as deeply complex, often dark narratives that transcend traditional children’s literature. His article underlines the lasting importance of Andersen’s tales in literary theory and criticism, emphasizing their cruel beauty and the profound existential undercurrents that resonate with both adults and children alike.

Summary of “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom

1. Andersen’s Literary Influences and Precursors

  • Andersen’s work is deeply influenced by Shakespeare and Sir Walter Scott, blending the fantastical with folklore.
  • Bloom states: “Andersen’s prime precursors included Shakespeare and Sir Walter Scott, and his best work can be thought of as an amalgam of A Midsummer Night’s Dream and the almost as magnificent ‘Wandering Willie’s Tale’ from Scott’s Redgauntlet.”

2. Themes of Fate and Renunciation

  • Andersen’s stories often revolve around the concept of fate and renunciation, drawing from Goethean influences.
  • “Goethean ‘renunciation’ was central to Andersen’s art, which truly worships only one god, who can be called Fate.”

3. Andersen’s Homoerotic and Autoerotic Sexuality

  • Bloom discusses Andersen’s complex sexual orientation, linking it to the homoerotic and autoerotic tendencies in his works.
  • “Like Walt Whitman’s, Andersen’s authentic sexual orientation was homoerotic. Pragmatically, both great writers were autoerotic.”

4. Andersen’s Artistic Legacy and Children’s Literature

  • While Andersen is seen as a children’s author, Bloom argues his tales transcend this label and appeal to “intelligent children of all ages.”
  • “I myself see no distinction between children’s literature and good or great writing for extremely intelligent children of all ages.”

5. Psychological and Mythological Depth of Andersen’s Fairy Tales

  • Bloom emphasizes the psychological and mythological dimensions in Andersen’s stories, particularly focusing on the cruelty and complexity found in The Little Mermaid and The Snow Queen.
  • “Andersen’s imagination is as cruel as it is powerful, and ‘The Little Mermaid’ is least persuasive (to me) in its benign conclusion.”

6. Kierkegaard and Andersen: Diverging Projects

  • Bloom compares Andersen to his Danish contemporary Kierkegaard, noting that while Kierkegaard explored existential Christian dilemmas, Andersen sought to retain his childlike perspective in a harsh adult world.
  • “Andersen covertly had a rather different project: how to remain a child in an ostensibly adult world.”

7. Aesthetic and Allegorical Ambiguity

  • Andersen’s stories, such as The Shadow and The Red Shoes, are noted for their aesthetic ambiguity, avoiding clear allegorical readings, which Bloom highlights as a key strength.
  • “There is no consistent allegory in ‘The Little Mermaid,’ and whoever finds a moral in it should be shot.”

8. Critique of Modern Writers

  • Bloom is critical of modern children’s authors like J.K. Rowling and Stephen King, advocating instead for the enduring literary value of Andersen and Dickens.
  • “J. K. Rowling and Stephen King are equally bad writers, appropriate titans of our new Dark Age of the Screens.”

9. Andersen’s Personal Struggles and Desire for Fame

  • Andersen’s personal life, marked by loneliness and unfulfilled desires, deeply influenced his artistic ambitions and narrative themes.
  • “The driving purpose of his career was to win fame and honor while not forgetting how hard the way up had been.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom
Literary Term/ConceptExplanationQuotation/Reference from the Article
RenunciationThe act of rejecting or giving up something, often seen in a spiritual or philosophical context.“Goethean ‘renunciation’ was central to Andersen’s art, which truly worships only one god, who can be called Fate.”
FateA force that predetermines events in a person’s life, often beyond their control, prevalent in Andersen’s stories.“Andersen’s art, which truly worships only one god, who can be called Fate.”
HomoeroticismThe representation of same-sex desire, which Bloom discusses in the context of Andersen’s sexual orientation.“Like Walt Whitman’s, Andersen’s authentic sexual orientation was homoerotic.”
AutoeroticismRefers to self-love or self-desire, connected by Bloom to both Andersen’s and Whitman’s lives and works.“Pragmatically, both great writers were autoerotic.”
AnimismThe belief that objects, places, and creatures all possess a distinct spiritual essence, a key feature in Andersen’s tales.“One of Andersen’s weirdest and greatest gifts is that his stories live in an animistic cosmos, in which there are no mere objects whatsoever.”
IronyA literary device where the meaning implied by a statement or situation is opposite to the literal meaning.“Kierkegaard had chastised Andersen for lacking an irony of vision.”
Mythological AllusionReferences to myths or mythological figures in literature, which Bloom finds present in Andersen’s fairy tales.“That vision has the strangeness of lasting myth.” (Referring to The Wild Swans)
AllegoryA narrative where characters and events symbolize abstract ideas or moral qualities, though Bloom criticizes reading Andersen purely as allegory.“There is no consistent allegory in ‘The Little Mermaid,’ and whoever finds a moral in it should be shot.”
MetaphorA figure of speech that refers to one thing by mentioning another, often used to draw symbolic parallels.“The Snow Queen… an ‘ice puzzle of the mind,’ a marvelous phrase taken from and alluding to the unfinished visionary novel of Novalis.”
PaganismReligious beliefs that involve the worship of nature or multiple deities, which Bloom links to Andersen’s reverence for fate and animism.“His art is pagan in nature.” (Contrasting Andersen’s religious devotion with his pagan artistic elements)
SublimationA psychological concept where socially unacceptable impulses are transformed into socially acceptable actions or art, present in Andersen’s tales.“The aesthetic difficulty is not sentimentality but sublimation, a defense against the erotic drive that may work for the rare saint but almost never convinces us.”
SentimentalityExcessive tenderness, sadness, or nostalgia, which Bloom critiques in Andersen’s later works.“The aesthetic difficulty is not sentimentality but sublimation.”
PhantasmagoriaA sequence of real or imaginary images like those seen in a dream; Bloom uses this to describe Andersen’s vivid storytelling.“Even the most menacing entities pass by in a phantasmagoric rush.”
AndrogynyThe combination of masculine and feminine characteristics, a recurring theme in Andersen’s portrayal of characters and Bloom’s interpretation.“Andersen’s androgynous princes.”
RomanticismA literary movement emphasizing emotion, individualism, and nature, which Bloom ties to Andersen’s aesthetic.“Kierkegaard and Andersen both developed into major erotic ironists… Andersen was post-Goethean.”
Indirect CommunicationA method of conveying ideas without stating them outright, often through irony or subtle hints, common in Kierkegaard and Andersen’s work.“All of Kierkegaard is indirect communication, since his purpose is not to instruct us but to make it more difficult for us to read him.”
Contribution of “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Reader-Response Theory

  • Contribution: Bloom’s approach emphasizes the importance of the reader’s interpretation over the author’s intended meaning, aligning with Reader-Response Theory. He suggests that the stories themselves, not the author’s biography or intentions, hold the true meaning.
  • Reference: “Trust the tale, not the teller,” originally a quote by D.H. Lawrence, is echoed throughout the article, underlining that readers should derive meaning from the narrative rather than Andersen’s personal life or authorial intent.
  • Theory Impact: This emphasis on the autonomy of the text encourages readers to engage actively with the narrative, moving away from biographical criticism.

2. Psychoanalytic Criticism

  • Contribution: Bloom analyzes the psychological depth of Andersen’s characters, particularly exploring themes of repressed desires, sexual frustration, and sublimation, which are central to psychoanalytic criticism.
  • Reference: “Sexual frustration is Andersen’s pervasive though hidden obsession, embodied in his witches and icy temptresses, and in his androgynous princes.”
  • Theory Impact: By highlighting Andersen’s repressed sexuality and his portrayal of androgyny, Bloom’s essay offers psychoanalytic insights into how Andersen’s personal psyche influenced his narratives, particularly through sublimation.

3. Myth Criticism

  • Contribution: Bloom engages with myth criticism by identifying mythological structures and archetypes within Andersen’s tales, suggesting they have a deeper, universal resonance.
  • Reference: “That vision has the strangeness of lasting myth” (in reference to The Wild Swans), and the emphasis on Andersen’s use of pagan themes and archetypal figures like witches and mermaids.
  • Theory Impact: Bloom’s focus on mythic elements in Andersen’s stories places them within a broader tradition of myth-making, where archetypes resonate beyond individual tales, contributing to the collective unconscious in the Jungian sense.

4. Romanticism and Post-Romanticism

  • Contribution: Bloom positions Andersen firmly within the Romantic and post-Romantic traditions, aligning his tales with the emotional intensity, existential questioning, and imagination characteristic of these movements.
  • Reference: “Kierkegaard and Andersen both developed into major erotic ironists… Andersen was post-Goethean.”
  • Theory Impact: This linkage to Romanticism allows for a reevaluation of Andersen’s work as part of the High Romantic tradition, showcasing how his tales explore emotional extremes, the sublime, and the inner conflicts of his characters.

5. Queer Theory

  • Contribution: Bloom’s discussion of Andersen’s homoerotic and autoerotic tendencies aligns with Queer Theory, which interrogates normative sexual identities and explores hidden or marginalized sexualities in literature.
  • Reference: “Like Walt Whitman’s, Andersen’s authentic sexual orientation was homoerotic.” Bloom also emphasizes the presence of androgyny and sexual ambiguity in Andersen’s characters.
  • Theory Impact: This contribution allows for a Queer theoretical reading of Andersen’s work, where characters embody fluid or ambiguous sexual identities, reflecting the complexity of desire and gender in his narratives.

6. Structuralism

  • Contribution: Bloom hints at structuralist approaches by analyzing recurring motifs, themes, and binary oppositions (e.g., fate vs. free will, human vs. supernatural) that structure Andersen’s fairy tales.
  • Reference: “Andersen’s universe is totally vitalistic, but more malign than not,” reflects a structuralist approach to analyzing the deep structures within Andersen’s stories.
  • Theory Impact: Bloom’s analysis contributes to understanding how these narrative structures function across Andersen’s body of work, revealing underlying patterns and oppositions that inform the text’s meaning.

7. Existentialism

  • Contribution: Bloom draws parallels between Andersen and existentialist themes, particularly in relation to Kierkegaard’s philosophy. Andersen’s stories often explore existential dilemmas of isolation, fate, and self-realization.
  • Reference: “Kierkegaard covertly had a rather different project: how to remain a child in an ostensibly adult world.” This reflects the existential tension in Andersen’s work between innocence and the adult world.
  • Theory Impact: Bloom’s reading introduces existential concerns into Andersen’s tales, such as the struggle for meaning in an indifferent or malevolent universe, aligning his works with existentialist literary theory.

8. Allegory and Anti-Allegory

  • Contribution: While Bloom acknowledges that Andersen’s tales can be read allegorically, he warns against simplistic allegorical readings, aligning with anti-allegorical trends in modern criticism.
  • Reference: “There is no consistent allegory in ‘The Little Mermaid,’ and whoever finds a moral in it should be shot.”
  • Theory Impact: This anti-allegorical stance encourages readers and scholars to avoid moralistic interpretations, instead focusing on the aesthetic, emotional, and psychological layers of Andersen’s stories.

9. Feminist Criticism

  • Contribution: Bloom touches upon feminist themes, particularly in his exploration of how female suffering and gender roles are portrayed in Andersen’s tales. However, he also critiques the oversimplification of feminist readings.
  • Reference: “Female suffering, in ‘The Marsh King’s Daughter’ as elsewhere in Andersen’s stories, is powerfully but unhealthily conveyed, since I cannot see how the strong elements of sadomasochism are to be evaded by readers of any age.”
  • Theory Impact: While acknowledging feminist concerns about Andersen’s portrayal of female suffering, Bloom also invites a more nuanced analysis of gender and power dynamics in his stories.

10. New Historicism

  • Contribution: Bloom places Andersen’s stories within the broader historical and cultural context of 19th-century Denmark and Europe, reflecting how societal norms, religious influences, and personal struggles shaped his work.
  • Reference: “The driving purpose of his career was to win fame and honor while not forgetting how hard the way up had been.”
  • Theory Impact: By contextualizing Andersen’s tales within his personal and cultural milieu, Bloom’s essay encourages a New Historicist reading, examining how his texts reflect and respond to the social and historical forces of his time.
Examples of Critiques Through “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom

1. The Little Mermaid (1837)

  • Critique: Bloom reads The Little Mermaid as a tale of horror and existential sacrifice, focusing on the ghastly nature of the mermaid’s transformation and the underlying theme of renunciation. He argues that the conventional moral reading of the story (as a tale of love and sacrifice) is insufficient to capture its true aesthetic and psychological depth.
  • Reference from Bloom: “On its vivid surfaces ‘The Little Mermaid’ suggests a parable of renunciation, and yet in my own literary sense of the tale, it is a horror story.”
  • Approach: Rather than viewing the tale as a simple moral allegory, Bloom emphasizes its cruel aesthetic, focusing on the mermaid’s torment and the painful consequences of her desire to become human. The story’s resolution, with the mermaid’s ascension to the daughters of the air, is criticized as a sentimental overlay that does not align with the tale’s deeper existential tragedy.
  • Key Theoretical Lens: Psychoanalytic Criticism (sublimation of desire, renunciation), Reader-Response (emphasis on the reader’s interpretation over authorial intent).

2. The Snow Queen (1845)

  • Critique: Bloom interprets The Snow Queen as a psychological and existential narrative that resists reductive interpretations. He highlights the story’s refusal to conform to a simple moral or allegorical reading and instead focuses on the complexity of the characters, particularly Gerda’s strength and resourcefulness in rescuing Kai.
  • Reference from Bloom: “The fascination of ‘The Snow Queen’ is Gerda’s continuous resourcefulness and strength, which derives from her freedom or refusal of all reductiveness.”
  • Approach: Instead of reading The Snow Queen as a mere children’s adventure or a moral tale, Bloom elevates it as a story that embodies the richness of Andersen’s imagination, where characters like Gerda resist simple categorizations. The evil mirror, the Snow Queen, and Gerda’s quest are seen as symbolic, but their significance goes beyond allegory, touching on themes of perception, emotional isolation, and the power of innocence.
  • Key Theoretical Lens: Myth Criticism (mythical and archetypal elements), Romanticism (individualism, emotional intensity).

3. The Red Shoes (1845)

  • Critique: Bloom critiques The Red Shoes for its dark and disturbing portrayal of obsession, compulsion, and punishment. He rejects a moralistic reading of the tale, instead focusing on the over-determined nature of the narrative, where Karen’s perpetual motion and suffering reflect deep psychological and existential conflicts.
  • Reference from Bloom: “The beautiful red dancing shoes whirl Karen into a cursed existence of perpetual motion, that cannot be solved even when her feet (with her consent) are cut off.”
  • Approach: Bloom’s reading rejects simplistic interpretations of the tale as a cautionary moral fable about vanity or disobedience. Instead, he views it as an exploration of uncontrollable desires and the destructive consequences of yielding to them. The macabre punishment Karen endures transcends mere morality, reflecting a psychological torment that cannot be resolved even by physical sacrifice.
  • Key Theoretical Lens: Psychoanalytic Criticism (over-determination, unconscious drives), Anti-Allegory (resisting moralistic interpretations).

4. The Shadow (1847)

  • Critique: The Shadow is seen by Bloom as one of Andersen’s most enigmatic and complex tales, where the narrative explores the duality of self and the metaphysical implications of losing one’s identity. He suggests that the story, with its themes of doppelgängers and existential bewilderment, anticipates modernist and postmodernist concerns about selfhood and reality.
  • Reference from Bloom: “The Shadow…may be Andersen’s most evasive masterpiece. The author and his shadow disengage from one another…and Andersen’s shadow is malign and Iago-like.”
  • Approach: Bloom emphasizes the metaphysical depth of The Shadow, interpreting the tale as a narrative of identity disintegration rather than a mere moral or allegorical tale about good and evil. The shadow, representing an autonomous, darker self, reflects existential dread and the loss of personal agency. This foreshadows modernist works that explore the fragmentation of self.
  • Key Theoretical Lens: Existentialism (exploration of self and identity), Structuralism (binary opposition of self and shadow).

Summary of Bloom’s Critique Approach:

  • Key Principles: Harold Bloom’s critiques consistently advocate for trusting the complexity of the narrative itself, rather than reducing it to simple moral or biographical readings. His approach prioritizes the aesthetic, psychological, and existential dimensions of Andersen’s stories.
  • Literary Theories Engaged: Psychoanalytic Criticism, Reader-Response Theory, Myth Criticism, Anti-Allegory, Romanticism, Existentialism.
Criticism Against “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom

1. Overemphasis on Aesthetic Autonomy

  • Critics might argue that Bloom’s insistence on separating the author from the tale (“Trust the tale, not the teller”) undermines the value of contextual, biographical, or historical readings of Andersen’s work, which can offer significant insights.
  • By focusing primarily on the aesthetic and psychological aspects of Andersen’s tales, Bloom could be seen as neglecting the broader socio-political or cultural contexts that shaped Andersen’s writing.

2. Dismissal of Moral and Allegorical Interpretations

  • Bloom’s strong stance against allegorical and moral readings could be seen as reductive. Critics may argue that Andersen’s tales, especially those written for children, naturally lend themselves to moral interpretations, and by dismissing this, Bloom potentially overlooks an important layer of the text.
  • His statement, “whoever finds a moral in it should be shot,” can be seen as extreme, disregarding readers or scholars who find value in interpreting moral messages in Andersen’s work.

3. Limited Engagement with Feminist and Gender Criticism

  • While Bloom touches upon issues of gender and sexuality in his analysis (particularly through Queer Theory), his lack of deep engagement with feminist criticism, especially concerning Andersen’s portrayal of female suffering and victimization, could be seen as a gap.
  • Critics might argue that Bloom does not sufficiently address the problematic gender dynamics and representations of women in Andersen’s tales, such as the passive suffering of female characters in stories like The Little Mermaid and The Red Shoes.

4. Overshadowing of Andersen’s Religious and Theological Themes

  • Some might criticize Bloom for downplaying the religious elements in Andersen’s work, dismissing his Christian sentiments as “sentimental” or “pagan.” This might be seen as a narrow view, ignoring the complexity of Andersen’s engagement with Christian theology and existential questions of faith.
  • His remark, “Andersen’s art is pagan in nature,” may be criticized as oversimplifying the complex interplay between Christian and pagan themes in Andersen’s storytelling.

5. Resistance to Postmodern and Poststructuralist Readings

  • Bloom’s approach, rooted in a traditional Romantic and psychoanalytic framework, might be seen as resistant to more contemporary postmodern or poststructuralist readings, which would focus on deconstructing the text’s language and narrative strategies.
  • His focus on myth and archetypes, while valuable, could be seen as out of step with newer critical approaches that emphasize fluidity, fragmentation, and multiple interpretations of texts.

6. Lack of Attention to Andersen’s Folk and Popular Culture Sources

  • Critics may argue that Bloom’s emphasis on Andersen’s literary precursors (such as Shakespeare and Goethe) neglects the importance of the folk and popular culture traditions that greatly influenced Andersen’s tales.
  • By focusing on high literary influences, Bloom could be accused of sidelining the significance of oral storytelling traditions and folklore in shaping Andersen’s narrative style and themes.

7. Elitist Dismissal of Modern Popular Writers

  • Bloom’s harsh criticism of contemporary authors like J.K. Rowling and Stephen King as “equally bad writers” could be viewed as elitist and dismissive of the cultural impact of popular literature.
  • Critics might argue that Bloom’s literary taste is overly narrow, failing to recognize the value of diverse literary traditions and their role in engaging a wide audience.

8. Insufficient Engagement with Children’s Literature Scholarship

  • While Bloom challenges the distinction between children’s literature and great writing, some may argue that his analysis lacks a nuanced engagement with scholarship on children’s literature as a field.
  • His dismissal of the genre as merely “for extraordinarily intelligent children of all ages” might overlook critical discussions about how Andersen’s work fits within the broader discourse of children’s storytelling and education.

9. Psychological Reductionism

  • Critics could accuse Bloom of reducing many of Andersen’s characters and stories to psychological conflicts, particularly sexual frustration and sublimation, which may not fully account for the narrative complexity or broader thematic concerns.
  • His focus on psychoanalytic criticism may overshadow other interpretive possibilities, such as sociocultural, ecological, or historical readings of Andersen’s work.
Representative Quotations from “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
1. “Trust the tale, not the teller.”This central theme, borrowed from D.H. Lawrence, emphasizes that the meaning of Andersen’s stories should be derived from the text itself, not from the author’s biography or intentions.
2. “Goethean ‘renunciation’ was central to Andersen’s art, which truly worships only one god, who can be called Fate.”Bloom highlights how themes of renunciation and fate pervade Andersen’s work, showing his existential struggle with control, destiny, and personal sacrifice.
3. “There is no consistent allegory in ‘The Little Mermaid,’ and whoever finds a moral in it should be shot.”This hyperbolic statement underlines Bloom’s disdain for reductive moral or allegorical readings of Andersen’s stories, favoring more complex interpretations that resist easy categorization.
4. “Andersen’s imagination is as cruel as it is powerful.”Bloom emphasizes the darker, more disturbing elements in Andersen’s stories, which often explore suffering, emotional pain, and cruelty alongside their more fantastical elements.
5. “Like Walt Whitman’s, Andersen’s authentic sexual orientation was homoerotic.”Bloom compares Andersen and Whitman, arguing that both writers sublimated their homoerotic desires into their creative work, influencing their narratives and emotional depth.
6. “I myself see no distinction between children’s literature and good or great writing for extremely intelligent children of all ages.”Bloom dismisses the idea that Andersen’s work is only for children, suggesting that his stories have deep, complex layers that appeal to readers of all ages and should be treated as high art.
7. “The aesthetic difficulty is not sentimentality but sublimation, a defense against the erotic drive.”Bloom argues that Andersen’s use of sublimation—transforming unfulfilled desires into art—helps explain the deeper psychological and emotional complexity in his stories.
8. “Andersen covertly had a rather different project: how to remain a child in an ostensibly adult world.”Bloom suggests that Andersen’s work reflects a hidden desire to retain childlike innocence and wonder in a world dominated by adult concerns and cynicism.
9. “J. K. Rowling and Stephen King are equally bad writers, appropriate titans of our new Dark Age of the Screens.”Bloom critiques modern popular authors, contrasting them with Andersen, whom he considers a true literary genius, and lamenting the decline of literary standards in the digital age.
10. “Andersen’s universe is totally vitalistic, but more malign than not.”Bloom describes the animistic, vital world of Andersen’s stories, where even objects possess life, but notes that this world is often cruel and imbued with malevolent forces.
Suggested Readings: “Trust the Tale, Not the Teller: Hans Christian Andersen” by Harold Bloom
  1. Stougaard-Nielsen, Jakob. “The Fairy Tale and The Periodical: Hans Christian Andersen’s Scrapbooks.” Book History, vol. 16, 2013, pp. 132–54. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42705783. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  2. Shakespeare, William, et al. “AN ESSAY BY HAROLD BLOOM.” Othello, Yale University Press, 2005, pp. 205–58. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nph2f.7. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  3. Stougaard-Nielsen, Jakob. “The Fairy Tale and The Periodical: Hans Christian Andersen’s Scrapbooks.” Book History, vol. 16, 2013, pp. 132–54. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42705783. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.

“The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom: Summary and Critique

“The Necessity of Misreading” by Harold Bloom, first appeared in 1975 in the journal The Georgia Review, is a cornerstone of Bloom’s theory of strong poetry.

"The Necessity Of Misreading" By Harold Bloom: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom

“The Necessity of Misreading” by Harold Bloom, first appeared in 1975 in the journal The Georgia Review, is a cornerstone of Bloom’s theory of strong poetry, arguing that great poets achieve originality and significance by misreading and reimagining the works of their predecessors. Bloom contends that this process of “misreading” is essential for poets to establish their own unique poetic voice and contribute to the ongoing evolution of the literary tradition. His theory has had a significant impact on literary theory, influencing debates about originality, influence, and the canonization of literary works. Bloom’s emphasis on the importance of misreading has encouraged readers to approach texts with a more critical and interpretive eye, recognizing the dynamic and ongoing nature of literary creation.

Summary of “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom

1. The Interplay of Arbitrary and Overdetermined Forces in Reading

  • Reading as Life: Bloom highlights that most people read in the same way they live, oscillating between randomness and determinism, “We read seriously…in the same uneasy alternation, between the notion that we choose what we read and the notion that it is chosen for us” (p. 267).
  • Literary Tradition and Conventions: Readers follow established literary conventions, often questioning who controls these conventions. “Who or what is the shaper of the shape? How are the phenomena of tradition formed?” (p. 267).

2. Canon Formation and Influence

  • Choosing Poets for Posterity: Bloom discusses how academic critics like himself participate in canon formation by selecting which contemporary poets should be read. “However diffidently I give the answer, I am engaged in canon-formation” (p. 268).
  • The Role of Influence in Canon: He examines the dynamic of influence, comparing two maxims: “You are or become what you read” versus “That which you are, that only can you read” (p. 268).

3. The Necessity of Misreading

  • Misreading as Inevitable: Bloom asserts that misreading is a fundamental part of reading. “Reading is therefore misprision—or misreading—just as writing is falsification” (p. 269).
  • Tradition and Hyperbole: He describes tradition as an exaggerated form shaped by misreadings. “Tradition is always a hyperbole, and the images used to describe tradition will tend to be those of height and depth” (p. 269).

4. Revisionism and the Growth of Literary Tradition

  • Revisionism Through Misreading: Literature evolves through the misreading and reinterpretation of previous works. “The history of poetry is the history of misreading” (p. 271).
  • Canonization as the Final Misreading: Bloom explains that canonization is the final form of misreading, where works become classics through a process of distortion. “Canonization is the most extreme version of what Nietzsche called Interpretation” (p. 270).

5. The Ambivalence of Influence

  • Influence as Both Powerful and Distorting: Bloom compares influence to the Kabbalistic concept of Keter, signifying both absence and presence. “Influence…is as complex a trope as language affords” (p. 271).
  • Defensive Mechanism in Reading: He proposes that reading is an act of defense against the overwhelming influence of prior texts, comparing it to warfare. “Reading is defensive warfare” (p. 273).

6. The Primacy of Tropes in Literary Interpretation

  • Tropes as Defense Mechanisms: Bloom views literary tropes as essential tools in the defensive process of reading. “Poems are apotropaic litanies, systems of defensive tropes and troping defenses” (p. 278).
  • Poetry and Perspective: In analyzing Wallace Stevens’ “Anecdote of the Jar,” Bloom argues that metaphors in poetry inevitably shift perspectives. “As soon as you troped your jar you mutilated it, and it took dominion only by self-reduction” (p. 278).

7. Misreading as Creative Necessity

  • Strong Poets Must Be Misread: Misreading is not just inevitable but necessary for strong poets, whose works must be misinterpreted to survive. “Strong poets must be mis-read; there are no generous errors to be made in apprehending them” (p. 273).
  • Poetry as Schizophrenia: Bloom provocatively suggests that poetry thrives on contradiction, where a poem must force readers into misreading it. “Schizophrenia is disaster in life, and success in poetry” (p. 278).

8. The Fallacy of Fixed Meaning in Texts

  • Relational Nature of Meaning: Bloom argues that texts do not have inherent meanings but are understood in relation to other texts. “A single text has only part of a meaning; it is itself a synecdoche for a larger whole” (p. 274).
  • Meaning of a Poem is Another Poem: He emphasizes that the meaning of a poem is not contained within itself but in its connection to other works. “The meaning of a poem could only be another poem” (p. 276).

9. Criticism as Autobiography

  • Criticism as an Extension of the Critic: Bloom, referencing Oscar Wilde, asserts that criticism is a form of autobiography, where the critic’s interpretation is a reflection of their own perspective. “Criticism, as the record of the critic’s soul, is called by Wilde ‘the only civilized form of autobiography'” (p. 287).
  • Misreading in Criticism: Strong criticism, like strong poetry, relies on misreading as a form of revisionism. “A reading, to be strong, must be a misreading, for no strong reading can fail to insist upon itself” (p. 287).

10. The Futility of Seeking Objective Truth in Literature

  • Interpretation as Revisionism: In Bloom’s view, all interpretation is inherently revisionist, shaped by the critic’s subjectivity. “Interpretation is revisionism, and the strongest readers so revise as to make every text belated” (p. 287).
  • Criticism and Poetic Survival: He concludes that both strong poems and strong criticism must “lie against time” by revising prior interpretations. “A strong poem lies against time, and against the strong poems before it, and a strong criticism must do the same” (p. 287).
Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom
Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationReference/Quote
Misreading (Misprision)The act of interpreting a text differently, usually by misunderstanding or willfully altering its meaning. Bloom asserts this is necessary for literary growth.“Reading is therefore misprision—or misreading—just as writing is falsification” (p. 269).
InfluenceThe impact of earlier works on the creation and interpretation of new literary works. For Bloom, influence is ambivalent, acting both as a guide and an obstacle.“Influence…is as complex a trope as language affords” (p. 271).
Canon FormationThe process by which certain works are selected as classics, determining which authors and texts are given enduring significance.“I am engaged in canon-formation, in trying to help decide a question that is ultimately of sad importance: ‘Which poet shall live?'” (p. 267).
TraditionThe accumulation of literary works and ideas that influence current and future writers, often described as a “hyperbole” or exaggerated idealization.“Tradition is always hyperbole, and the images used to describe tradition will tend to be those of height and depth” (p. 269).
Defensive ReadingThe idea that readers and writers protect themselves from being overwhelmed by the influence of previous texts, turning reading into an act of defense.“Reading is defensive warfare, however generously or joyously we read” (p. 273).
TropesFigures of speech or symbolic expressions used in literature. In Bloom’s theory, tropes function as defenses that mediate a reader’s or writer’s relationship to tradition.“Poems are apotropaic litanies, systems of defensive tropes and troping defenses” (p. 278).
BelatednessThe sense of coming after influential works or authors, where a writer or reader feels the pressure of preceding achievements.“Every act of reading is an exercise in belatedness” (p. 268).
RevisionismThe reinterpretation of texts or traditions, often involving a creative misreading that alters how a text is understood within its literary context.“Canonization is the final or transumptive form of literary revisionism” (p. 270).
Poetic InfluenceThe relationship between poets, particularly how newer poets are influenced by and reinterpret the works of their predecessors. Bloom argues that strong poets misread their predecessors to assert their own originality.“Every strong poet caricatures tradition and every strong poet is then necessarily mis-read by the tradition that he fosters” (p. 273).
Schizophrenia in PoetryA metaphor Bloom uses to describe the inherent contradictions in strong poetry, which forces readers to adopt conflicting interpretations.“Schizophrenia is disaster in life, and success in poetry” (p. 278).
IntertextualityThe interconnectedness of literary texts, where the meaning of one text is influenced by and relates to others. In Bloom’s view, no text stands alone in meaning; it is always part of a network of interpretations.“Texts don’t have meanings, except in their relations to other texts” (p. 274).
Error as Creative ForceThe idea that mistakes or misinterpretations in reading are necessary for the evolution of literature. Bloom sees error as a driving force behind the production of new works and interpretations.“Error about life is necessary for life; error about a poem is necessary if there is to be yet another strong poem” (p. 269).
Apotropaic LiteratureLiterature that functions to ward off or defend against influences or threats. Bloom describes poems as rituals that protect themselves from being fully understood or consumed by prior traditions.“Poems are apotropaic litanies, systems of defensive tropes and troping defenses” (p. 278).
Proleptic RepresentationA rhetorical strategy where a future event is represented as if it has already happened. In canon formation, critics often project a work’s future classic status before it has proven itself in posterity.“Proleptic representation is the inevitable rhetorical resource of all canonizing discourse” (p. 270).
Will-to-PowerNietzschean concept applied to literary interpretation, where reading and writing are seen as exercises of power over texts. Canon formation and misreading become forms of exerting dominance over literary tradition.“Canonization is the most extreme version of what Nietzsche called Interpretation, or the exercise of the Will-to-Power over texts” (p. 270).
Hermeneutic CircleA concept in literary theory that suggests the meaning of a text is derived from understanding the whole in relation to its parts, and vice versa. Bloom applies this to the relationship between misreading and textual meaning.“A poem can be about previous poems only by misreading them, which completes our bewilderingly perverse revision of a hermeneutic circle” (p. 278).
Metaphor and PerspectiveMetaphors, in Bloom’s view, are rhetorical devices that change the perspective of readers, and thus, every metaphor is a failed attempt at unity because it always involves a shift in meaning.“A jar may be a unity, and you can do with Tennessee what you will, but as soon as you troped your jar you mutilated it” (p. 278).
Contribution of “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Reader-Response Theory

  • Contribution: Bloom emphasizes the role of the reader in creating meaning, positioning the act of reading as central to the interpretive process. He argues that reading is always a misreading and that interpretation is an active, creative process rather than a passive reception of the text.
  • Reference: “Every act of reading is an exercise in belatedness, yet every such act is also defensive, and as defense it makes of interpretation a necessary misprision” (p. 268).
  • Impact on Theory: Bloom extends Reader-Response Theory by asserting that readers, like poets, are engaged in a process of influence and misreading, and meaning is generated not from the text alone but from the reader’s active reinterpretation.

2. Influence Theory

  • Contribution: Bloom’s theory of poetic influence, particularly articulated in his earlier works like The Anxiety of Influence, is further elaborated in The Necessity of Misreading. He contends that strong poets must misread their precursors to assert their originality, and this process is fundamental to literary evolution.
  • Reference: “Strong poets must be mis-read; there are no generous errors to be made in apprehending them” (p. 273).
  • Impact on Theory: This notion introduces the idea of creative misreading, wherein influence is not simply about imitation but about deliberate distortion and revision, shaping how later poets and critics interpret earlier works.

3. Intertextuality

  • Contribution: Bloom argues that texts do not have meanings in isolation but derive meaning through their relationships with other texts, a key element of intertextuality. His view aligns with poststructuralist theories of language and meaning, particularly those of Roland Barthes and Julia Kristeva.
  • Reference: “Texts don’t have meanings, except in their relations to other texts, so that there is something uneasily dialectical about literary meaning” (p. 274).
  • Impact on Theory: By framing reading as an inherently relational act, Bloom reinforces the intertextual nature of literature, suggesting that every text is a response to and a reworking of prior texts. His work intersects with structuralist and poststructuralist notions of the text as a part of a larger network of meaning.

4. Deconstruction

  • Contribution: Bloom’s concept of misreading resonates with deconstructionist theories, particularly in its rejection of fixed meanings and the emphasis on the instability of interpretation. He suggests that interpretation is always revisionist and that texts resist any final, stable meaning.
  • Reference: “The history of poetry is also governed by the primacy of the trope, and by the defensive nature of the trope” (p. 285).
  • Impact on Theory: This mirrors Jacques Derrida’s assertion that meaning is always deferred and never fully present. Bloom contributes to deconstruction by framing misreading as a necessary and ongoing process of reinterpretation, thereby destabilizing any notion of a definitive reading.

5. Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism

  • Contribution: Bloom draws on psychoanalytic concepts, particularly Freud’s ideas of repression and defense mechanisms, to describe the processes of reading and writing. He argues that reading is an act of defense, often akin to the psychoanalytic concept of denial or repression.
  • Reference: “Defense is always against influence. But the inter-poetic… is only a trope for the reading-process, and so I propose the unhappy formula that reading is always a defensive process” (p. 273).
  • Impact on Theory: Bloom’s use of Freudian psychoanalysis deepens our understanding of how readers and writers psychologically interact with texts, treating literary influence as a kind of Oedipal struggle. His work intersects with psychoanalytic criticism, suggesting that literary creation and interpretation are acts of psychic negotiation with powerful precursors.

6. Poststructuralism and the Death of the Author

  • Contribution: Bloom aligns with poststructuralist theories that challenge the notion of a singular, authoritative authorial voice. He argues that poets are not self-begotten and that texts do not originate in a vacuum, thus contributing to the poststructuralist critique of authorial intent.
  • Reference: “The more ‘tradition’ is exalted, the more egregious the mistakes become. I will venture the formula that only minor or weak poets… can be read accurately” (p. 273).
  • Impact on Theory: Bloom’s insistence that all authors and texts are in conversation with previous works complicates traditional notions of authorship, aligning his work with Roland Barthes’ The Death of the Author and Michel Foucault’s What is an Author?.

7. Hermeneutics

  • Contribution: Bloom’s theory of misreading revises traditional hermeneutics, particularly the idea of the hermeneutic circle (understanding a text by relating its parts to the whole). He argues that the interpretation of a text is an inherently flawed and incomplete process, rooted in the reader’s psychological and historical context.
  • Reference: “A poem can be about previous poems only by misreading them, which completes our bewilderingly perverse revision of a hermeneutic circle” (p. 278).
  • Impact on Theory: Bloom’s contribution to hermeneutics lies in his assertion that interpretation is never neutral or objective but is always shaped by prior texts and misreadings, thus challenging traditional hermeneutic practices that seek coherence and unity in interpretation.

8. Romanticism and Imagination

  • Contribution: Bloom explores Romanticism’s concept of imagination but challenges the Romantic ideal of originality. He suggests that even the Romantics were engaged in acts of misreading, over-completing or hyperbolizing nature and their predecessors.
  • Reference: “Romanticism being antithetical or contra naturam had to acknowledge that nature retained priority, that nature was the primary” (p. 271).
  • Impact on Theory: Bloom contributes to Romantic studies by recasting the role of imagination not as the creation of something entirely new but as an act of revision and re-interpretation of previous texts, adding complexity to Romantic notions of originality.
Examples of Critiques Through “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom
Literary WorkCritique Through “The Necessity of Misreading”Explanation of Misreading (Bloom’s Concept)Reference to Bloom’s Theory
John Milton’s Paradise LostMilton’s Satan has been misread as a heroic figure, especially by Romantic poets like Blake and Shelley, who transformed him into a symbol of rebellion and individuality.Strong poets like Blake misread Milton by transforming Satan into a symbol of defiance, contrary to Milton’s original moral framework.“Strong poets must be mis-read; there are no generous errors to be made in apprehending them” (p. 273).
William Wordsworth’s The PreludeWordsworth has been misread as a nature-healer and a poet of simple pastoral beauty, rather than as a poet deeply engaged with inner psychological struggles and crises.Romantic readers and critics over-idealized Wordsworth’s connection with nature, missing the deeper psychological and philosophical themes in his work.“Wordsworth, a wholly antithetical poet, has been read as a primary healer, a nature-thaumaturgist” (p. 273).
Wallace Stevens’ The Snow ManStevens’ poem is often misread as purely ironic or detached, but Bloom argues that it must be seen as engaging deeply with the romantic sublime and the defense of poetic transcendence.Critics misread Stevens as an ironist, but Stevens was more concerned with maintaining a transcendental perspective within the constraints of modernity.“Stevens, a qualified but still incessant Transcendentalist, is being read as an ironist and as an exposer of poetry’s pretensions” (p. 273).
T. S. Eliot’s The Waste LandEliot’s The Waste Land has been misread as a work of despair and disintegration, but Bloom suggests it should be viewed as Eliot’s attempt to misread and outdo his poetic predecessors.Eliot’s poem reworks literary tradition, not as an act of despair, but as a powerful misreading and revision of earlier texts, creating something new.“Every strong poet caricatures tradition, and every strong poet is then necessarily misread by the tradition that he fosters” (p. 273).
Criticism Against “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom

Overemphasis on Strong Poets

  • Critics argue that Bloom’s focus on “strong poets” marginalizes lesser-known or “weaker” poets, implying that only significant, canonical figures are worthy of critical attention.
  • Critique: This hierarchical view reduces the literary field to a few influential figures and dismisses a broader diversity of voices in literature.

Subjective and Elitist Approach

  • Bloom’s theory suggests that interpretation and misreading are subjective, which some scholars see as overly elitist because it places too much emphasis on the critic’s interpretive power.
  • Critique: This undermines the idea of objective or shared meaning in texts, making literary criticism seem like a closed game only for experts or “strong readers.”

Neglect of Historical and Social Context

  • Bloom’s focus on textual misreading and poetic influence often neglects the broader historical, social, and cultural contexts that shape literature.
  • Critique: His approach minimizes the importance of external factors like race, gender, class, and historical events in shaping both texts and their interpretation.

Psychoanalytic Determinism

  • Bloom’s use of Freudian psychoanalysis, particularly the Oedipal framework, is viewed as reductive and deterministic, with critics arguing that it oversimplifies the complexities of influence and creativity.
  • Critique: This narrow psychoanalytic view can limit alternative interpretations of literary influence that do not align with Freudian ideas of rivalry and repression.

Ambiguity in Defining Misreading

  • Bloom’s concept of misreading is seen by some as too vague and flexible, leading to concerns that it can justify any interpretation as valid, regardless of textual evidence.
  • Critique: This opens the door to interpretive anarchy, where there are no guidelines for what constitutes a valid or invalid reading of a text.

Undermining Authorial Intent

  • Some critics feel that Bloom’s theory completely disregards the importance of authorial intent, reducing authors to mere participants in a continuous cycle of misreading.
  • Critique: This downplays the significance of what authors themselves aim to express through their works, ignoring their conscious choices and messages.

Excessive Focus on Western Canon

  • Bloom’s arguments in “The Necessity of Misreading” heavily favor the Western literary canon, especially Romantic and modernist poets.
  • Critique: This emphasis excludes non-Western literary traditions and overlooks the rich diversity of global literary influences and interpretations.

Circular Reasoning

  • Critics have pointed out that Bloom’s idea that all interpretation is misreading can lead to circular reasoning, as it assumes that no reading can ever be entirely accurate or correct.
  • Critique: This undermines the critical project by negating the possibility of understanding texts on their own terms, leading to an endless loop of reinterpretation without any firm conclusions.
Representative Quotations from “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Every act of reading is an exercise in belatedness, yet every such act is also defensive, and as defense it makes of interpretation a necessary misprision.” (p. 268)Bloom argues that all readings are influenced by prior texts (belatedness) and involve some form of misreading (misprision), as readers defensively shape their understanding in relation to previous interpretations.
“You are or become what you read” and “That which you are, that only can you read.” (p. 267)These two maxims highlight Bloom’s idea that reading and interpretation are subjective, with the reader’s identity influencing their understanding of a text, and vice versa. Both reader and text transform through this interaction.
“Reading is therefore misprision—or misreading—just as writing is falsification, in Oscar Wilde’s sense of ‘lying’.” (p. 268)Bloom likens the act of reading to misreading, paralleling it with Wilde’s idea that writing is a form of artistic falsification or creative “lying,” meaning that both reading and writing are inherently transformative and interpretive.
“Strong poets must be mis-read; there are no generous errors to be made in apprehending them.” (p. 273)Bloom asserts that powerful poets create such profound work that misreading them is inevitable. The strength of their influence forces readers to misinterpret them in ways that continue their legacy through revision and reinterpretation.
“Canonization is the most extreme version of what Nietzsche called Interpretation, or the exercise of the Will-to-Power over texts.” (p. 270)Bloom compares the process of canon formation to Nietzsche’s idea of interpretation as an act of power, where the elevation of certain texts to “classic” status is itself an act of imposing meaning and authority over literary history.
“All canonizing of literary texts is a self-contradictory process, for by canonizing a text you are troping upon it, which means that you are misreading it.” (p. 271)Canonization involves imposing a fixed meaning on a text, which is a form of misreading because it limits the text’s interpretive possibilities, contradicting the dynamic nature of literary meaning.
“Tradition is itself then without a referential aspect, like the Romantic Imagination or like God. Tradition is a daemonic term.” (p. 269)Bloom argues that literary tradition, like the Romantic notion of the Imagination or the concept of God, is indefinable and operates as a “daemonic” force, shaping texts without any clear origin or reference.
“Influence, as I employ it, is not a doctrine of causation. It does not mean that an earlier poem causes a later one.” (p. 280)Bloom clarifies that his concept of influence is not about direct causation but about a complex relationship between texts, where later works misread and transform the meaning of earlier ones, rather than being simply caused by them.
“Poetry begins, always, when someone who is going to become a poet reads a poem.” (p. 275)Bloom emphasizes the cyclical nature of poetic creation, where a poet’s writing starts from their act of reading and misreading other poets, suggesting that all poetry is born from prior literary engagement.
“A strong poem starts out strong by knowing and showing that it must be mis-read, that it must force the reader to take up a stance that he knows to be untrue.” (p. 278)Bloom suggests that strong poems deliberately invite misreading, as their complexity compels readers to adopt interpretive stances that they know might be flawed, which adds to the ongoing creative dialogue between text and reader.
Suggested Readings: “The Necessity Of Misreading” By Harold Bloom
  1. Bloom, Harold. “The Necessity of Misreading.” The Georgia Review, vol. 55/56, 2001, pp. 69–87. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41402122. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  2. Altevers, Nannette. “The Revisionary Company: Harold Bloom’s ‘Last Romanticism.’” New Literary History, vol. 23, no. 2, 1992, pp. 361–82. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/469241. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  3. Bloom, Harold. “POETIC CROSSING: RHETORIC AND PSYCHOLOGY.” The Georgia Review, vol. 30, no. 3, 1976, pp. 495–524. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41397273. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  4. Kaiser, Daniel. Studies in Romanticism, vol. 15, no. 2, 1976, pp. 320–26. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/25600016. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.

“The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold: Summary and Critique

“The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold first appeared in 1864 as part of his collection Essays in Criticism.

"The Function of Criticism" by Matthew Arnold: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold

“The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold first appeared in 1864 as part of his collection Essays in Criticism. This seminal work is considered one of Arnold’s most important contributions to the field of literary criticism. Arnold emphasizes the critic’s role in fostering intellectual growth and guiding public opinion, arguing that criticism is not merely a passive reflection on art but an active, creative force that shapes cultural development. He highlights the importance of disinterestedness, suggesting that critics should approach literature with objectivity, free from personal bias or emotional attachment. Arnold’s ideas significantly influenced later critical theories, advocating for criticism as a crucial tool in understanding and elevating literature, making it essential for the broader progress of society.

Summary of “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold
  • The Role of Criticism in Literature: Arnold begins his essay by asserting the essential role of criticism in literature. He argues that criticism should be an “endeavour to see the object as in itself it really is.” For Arnold, the goal of criticism is to approach literature and art with intellectual objectivity and detachment, avoiding personal bias or immediate practical concerns. As he says, “the critical power is of lower rank than the creative,” but nonetheless necessary to prepare the intellectual foundation upon which great literary works are built. He stresses that criticism must analyze ideas disinterestedly, separate from personal or political motives. Arnold laments that English literature lacks this depth of criticism, in contrast to French and German literature, which actively engage in this intellectual pursuit.
  • The Relationship Between Criticism and Creative Power: Arnold makes a case that while creativity is the highest form of literary achievement, it relies on a foundation of ideas that criticism provides. He explains that “the creative power works with elements, with materials” and without these materials, literary creativity is often stunted or misdirected. For Arnold, the critic’s task is to ensure that these intellectual materials—ideas, philosophical or social understandings—are refined and available. He illustrates this with the comparison between Byron and Goethe, noting that Goethe’s work endured because it was supported by critical reflection, whereas Byron’s lacked such a foundation. “The creation of a modern poet… implies a great critical effort behind it,” Arnold argues, emphasizing the inseparable link between criticism and literary creation.
  • Criticism as an Intellectual Necessity: Arnold presents criticism as an intellectual endeavor that serves society by fostering a climate of “the best ideas” and enabling cultural progress. Criticism’s ultimate goal is to establish “an order of ideas,” allowing for creative literary genius to flourish. He contrasts eras of great literary production with those of intellectual barrenness, linking this to the presence or absence of robust criticism. For Arnold, criticism is a process of intellectual preparation: “Labour may be vainly spent in attempting it, which might with more fruit be used in preparing for it, in rendering it possible.”
  • Criticism and Disinterestedness: Arnold emphasizes that true criticism must be disinterested, or free from political, religious, or social biases. It must aim to create “a current of fresh and true ideas,” without being swayed by practical, polemical, or partisan motives. He critiques English criticism for often being polemical, serving the needs of particular factions rather than engaging with ideas on a purely intellectual level. For Arnold, the essence of criticism is a “free play of the mind on all subjects it touches,” an unencumbered intellectual activity that exists solely to illuminate truth.
  • Criticism as Preparation for Future Creative Epochs: Finally, Arnold suggests that criticism is the precursor to great creative periods. Without the groundwork of criticism, creative genius lacks the “atmosphere” or “intellectual situation” necessary for its full development. He argues that England’s creative stagnation during the 19th century was due to a lack of such critical preparation. He concludes with an optimistic vision that criticism, if properly practiced, will eventually lead to a new era of literary creation, saying, “Criticism first; a time of true creative activity, perhaps—hereafter.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold
Term/ConceptDefinitionExplanation in Arnold’s Context
CriticismThe practice of analyzing, evaluating, and interpreting literature, art, or ideas.Arnold views criticism as an intellectual effort to see things as they truly are, rather than through personal biases.
DisinterestednessObjective and impartial analysis, free from political, religious, or personal motivations.A central tenet of Arnold’s argument, where he asserts that criticism should focus on truth and not serve ulterior ends.
Creative PowerThe ability to create original works of literature or art.While Arnold acknowledges the superiority of creative power, he argues that it depends on a foundation of critical thought.
Intellectual AtmosphereThe prevailing ideas, culture, and intellectual environment that influence creativity.Arnold believes that creative power thrives only in an atmosphere rich with well-developed ideas, established by critics.
Epochs of ExpansionPeriods in history characterized by intellectual and artistic growth.Arnold argues that these creative periods are rare and result from thorough critical preparation and intellectual groundwork.
Intellectual PreparationThe role of criticism in cultivating ideas and refining intellectual materials for future creative work.Criticism, according to Arnold, must precede and prepare the way for significant creative achievements.
Synthesis vs. DiscoveryThe act of combining existing ideas to form new, harmonious creations (synthesis) rather than uncovering new ideas (discovery).Arnold emphasizes that literature often synthesizes ideas already present, rather than inventing new ones, unlike philosophy.
Objective TruthA reality that exists independent of individual perceptions, emotions, or political motives.Arnold insists that criticism’s role is to pursue and reflect objective truth, devoid of personal or partisan agendas.
Polemical CriticismCriticism that serves a political or ideological purpose, often aggressive or controversial.Arnold critiques this form of criticism as being too narrow and focused on practical concerns, rather than on intellectual ideals.
Best IdeasThe highest and most valuable intellectual concepts and insights that should prevail in society.For Arnold, the critic’s task is to promote these “best ideas” by evaluating and spreading them through society.
Contribution of “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold to Literary Theory/Theories
  • Foundation for Modern Literary Criticism
    • Arnold’s work is a cornerstone for later developments in literary theory, especially emphasizing the importance of criticism in understanding and shaping literature. His notion that criticism should be a disinterested intellectual activity laid the groundwork for literary analysis as a serious academic discipline. He writes that criticism’s role is to “learn and propagate the best that is known and thought in the world.”
  • Development of Disinterested Criticism
    • Arnold introduced the concept of disinterestedness in criticism, meaning that criticism should be objective and free from personal or political bias. This idea influenced later theoretical approaches, such as New Criticism, which emphasized the importance of examining texts without external influence. Arnold states, “The rule may be summed up in one word—disinterestedness.”
  • Influence on New Criticism
    • Arnold’s emphasis on the critic’s duty to focus on the text itself, to see it “as in itself it really is,” foreshadowed New Criticism’s focus on close reading and intrinsic analysis of literary works, without reference to historical or biographical context. His critique of “practical” or “polemical” criticism also anticipated the New Critics’ rejection of external social or political concerns in literary analysis.
  • Literature as a Moral and Social Force
    • Arnold argued that literature has the capacity to shape society and that criticism plays a role in ensuring that the best ideas prevail. This perspective influenced later theories, such as moral and ethical criticism, that see literature as a vehicle for social change. He writes, “It tends to establish an order of ideas, if not absolutely true, yet true by comparison with that which it displaces; to make the best ideas prevail.”
  • Preparation for Creative Power
    • Arnold’s idea that criticism prepares the way for creative power influenced structuralist and poststructuralist theories, which argue that texts are built on the foundation of pre-existing structures, ideas, and critical reflection. He asserted that “the creative power works with elements, with materials,” which are provided through the efforts of critical thought.
  • Criticism as a Cultural Force
    • Arnold’s work contributed to cultural criticism by suggesting that criticism helps shape intellectual and cultural life. His view that criticism not only evaluates literature but also aids in the intellectual progress of society prefigured cultural studies and critical theory, which see literature and criticism as intertwined with broader cultural and ideological forces.
  • Criticism and Intellectual Climate
    • Arnold’s argument that literary creation depends on the intellectual atmosphere provided by criticism had a strong impact on later thinkers in the field of literary theory, especially in terms of how criticism creates a space for ideas to flourish. His statement that “the grand work of literary genius is a work of synthesis and exposition, not of analysis and discovery” highlights the relationship between criticism and creative work.
Examples of Critiques Through “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold
Literary Work & AuthorCritique Through Arnold’s Lens & Key Arnoldian Concept Applied
“The Prelude” by William WordsworthArnold would critique The Prelude for its deep personal insights but might argue that Wordsworth’s isolation from intellectual currents limits its breadth. “Wordsworth cared little for books,” Arnold notes, implying that his poetry could have been richer with more critical reflection on the intellectual atmosphere of the time. Key Concept: Intellectual Preparation – Criticism supplies ideas and perspectives necessary for deeper literary expression.
“Don Juan” by Lord ByronArnold would likely critique Byron’s Don Juan for its energy and wit but argue that it lacks lasting depth due to Byron’s detachment from critical ideas and intellectual preparation. Byron, Arnold claims, “had not those materials” from criticism to work with, resulting in a work that “had so little endurance in it.” Key Concept: Criticism as Intellectual Atmosphere – Byron’s work lacked the intellectual context and critical groundwork for enduring literary value.
“Faust” by Johann Wolfgang von GoetheArnold would praise Faust for its integration of critical thought and creative power. Goethe’s immersion in intellectual and philosophical criticism allowed Faust to be a profound and lasting work. Arnold admires Goethe’s work, saying “Goethe knew life and the world… much more comprehensively and thoroughly than Byron.” Key Concept: Synthesis of Criticism and CreationFaust exemplifies the successful integration of creative genius with critical ideas, enriching its value.
“Prometheus Unbound” by Percy Bysshe ShelleyArnold might critique Prometheus Unbound for its incoherence, despite its lyrical brilliance. He would argue that Shelley’s lack of engagement with the critical environment resulted in a work that lacked the intellectual grounding to support its lofty aspirations. As Arnold says, “Shelley… so incoherent.” Key Concept: Creative Power and Criticism – Shelley’s work illustrates Arnold’s view that creative efforts unmoored from criticism risk incoherence.
Criticism Against “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold

·         Overemphasis on Disinterestedness: Arnold’s insistence on disinterestedness in criticism has been critiqued as unrealistic and overly idealistic. Critics argue that no criticism can be entirely free from personal, cultural, or political biases, and that attempting to do so may strip criticism of its relevance and engagement with the issues of its time.

·         Neglect of the Social and Political Context:Arnold’s focus on criticism as an intellectual endeavor, detached from social and political concerns, has been challenged by critics who believe that literature and criticism are inherently connected to the social and political climates in which they are produced. This view is particularly opposed by Marxist and cultural critics who argue that literature cannot be separated from its socio-political context.

·         Undervaluing the Creative Power: Arnold’s distinction between the creative and critical powers, where he places criticism in a supporting role to creativity, has been criticized for undermining the originality and power of literary creation itself. Some argue that by focusing too much on the preparation for creativity, Arnold downplays the importance of raw, innovative artistic expression that can exist without the intellectual groundwork of criticism.

·         Elitism and Exclusion of Popular Culture: Arnold’s emphasis on high culture and the “best that is known and thought in the world” has been critiqued for its elitism. His focus on the intellectual elite and classical literature excludes popular culture and diverse voices, thereby limiting the scope of literary criticism to a narrow and traditional canon, which critics argue reinforces existing cultural hierarchies.

·         Over-reliance on European Models: Arnold’s admiration for French and German criticism, which he holds as a standard for English literature to follow, has been critiqued as overly Eurocentric. His approach excludes the contributions of other cultures and literatures, particularly non-Western literary traditions, from the global literary conversation.

·         Limited Focus on Innovation in Criticism: Critics argue that Arnold’s framework limits the role of criticism to a preparatory function rather than allowing it to be a site of innovation. Poststructuralists and deconstructionists, in particular, critique Arnold for reducing criticism to a passive role, rather than recognizing it as an active force that can reshape literary meaning and interpretation.

Representative Quotations from “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“The critical power is of lower rank than the creative.”Arnold acknowledges the higher status of creative genius but emphasizes that criticism still plays a vital role in shaping and preparing creativity.
“The endeavor, in all branches of knowledge, to see the object as in itself it really is.”This defines Arnold’s concept of disinterestedness, where criticism seeks to understand literature and ideas objectively, without external bias.
“Without criticism, there is no satisfactory creation.”Arnold argues that great creative works are often dependent on a foundation of ideas and intellectual atmosphere developed through critical thought.
“To make the best ideas prevail.”The critic’s task, according to Arnold, is to identify and promote the highest intellectual and moral ideas, which ultimately influence society.
“The grand work of literary genius is a work of synthesis and exposition, not of analysis and discovery.”Arnold views the role of literature as synthesizing and presenting ideas, while criticism’s role is to analyze and refine those ideas beforehand.
“Our English poetry of the first quarter of this century, with plenty of energy, plenty of creative force, did not know enough.”Arnold criticizes early 19th-century English poetry for lacking intellectual depth and critical grounding, which weakened its long-term impact.
“Two powers must concur, the power of the man and the power of the moment.”For Arnold, great literary works emerge when the creative genius of the individual aligns with the intellectual and cultural conditions of the time.
“The best that is known and thought in the world.”Arnold emphasizes that criticism should aim to identify and propagate the most valuable and enduring ideas, ensuring they shape cultural and intellectual life.
“Disinterestedness is the essential condition of criticism.”Arnold insists that critics must remain impartial, detached from practical or political considerations, to pursue truth in literature and ideas.
“The business of criticism is simply to know the best that is known and thought in the world, and to make this known.”Arnold sees criticism as an intellectual pursuit that spreads the highest forms of knowledge, contributing to the moral and cultural improvement of society.
Suggested Readings: “The Function of Criticism” by Matthew Arnold
  1. Knickerbocker, William S. “Matthew Arnold’s Theory of Poetry.” The Sewanee Review, vol. 33, no. 4, 1925, pp. 440–50. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27533919. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  2. Whipple, Edwin P. “Matthew Arnold.” The North American Review, vol. 138, no. 330, 1884, pp. 429–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25118379. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  3. TAYLOR, MARK. “The Lower Criticism.” Representations, no. 150, 2020, pp. 32–60. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27213534. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  4. WHALLEY, GEORGE. “England / Romantic – Romanticism.” “Romantic” and Its Cognates: The European History of a Word, edited by HANS EICHNER, University of Toronto Press, 1972, pp. 157–262. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt1vgw865.6. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  5. Kenneth Allott. The Modern Language Review, vol. 63, no. 2, 1968, pp. 465–67. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3723269. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.

“I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson: A Critical Analysis

“I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson first appeared in 1891, in the posthumous collection Poems: Second Series, edited by Thomas Wentworth Higginson and Mabel Loomis Todd.

"I started Early — Took my Dog —" by Emily Dickenson: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson

“I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson first appeared in 1891, in the posthumous collection Poems: Second Series, edited by Thomas Wentworth Higginson and Mabel Loomis Todd. Known for its enigmatic style, the poem showcases several of Dickinson’s key literary qualities: vivid imagery, personification of nature, and a contemplative tone. In this poem, Dickinson depicts a journey to the sea, symbolizing an encounter between the individual and nature’s vast, powerful forces. The main idea revolves around the speaker’s exploration of boundaries—both physical and metaphorical—as she encounters the overwhelming majesty of the ocean, ultimately retreating from its depths, reflecting a balance between curiosity and caution.

Text: “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson

I started Early – Took my Dog –

And visited the Sea –

The Mermaids in the Basement

Came out to look at me –

And Frigates – in the Upper Floor

Extended Hempen Hands –

Presuming Me to be a Mouse –

Aground – opon the Sands –

But no Man moved Me – till the Tide

Went past my simple Shoe –

And past my Apron – and my Belt

And past my Boddice – too –

And made as He would eat me up –

As wholly as a Dew

Opon a Dandelion’s Sleeve –

And then – I started – too –

And He – He followed – close behind –

I felt His Silver Heel

Opon my Ancle – Then My Shoes

Would overflow with Pearl –

Until We met the Solid Town –

No One He seemed to know –

And bowing – with a Mighty look –

At me – The Sea withdrew –

Annotations: “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
LineAnnotation
I started Early – Took my Dog –The speaker embarks on a journey, with her dog as a companion, setting a casual and intimate tone.
And visited the Sea –The speaker reaches the sea, a symbol of nature, vastness, and the unknown.
The Mermaids in the Basement“Mermaids” personify the mythical and magical aspects of the sea, suggesting a fantastical interpretation.
Came out to look at me –The sea creatures, intrigued, observe the speaker, giving the sea an animated, sentient quality.
And Frigates – in the Upper Floor“Frigates” (large ships) represent human activity in the sea, contrasting with the mermaids’ mysterious nature.
Extended Hempen Hands –The ships’ ropes (“hempen hands”) seem to reach out toward the speaker, possibly menacing or protective.
Presuming Me to be a Mouse –The speaker feels small and insignificant in the presence of these powerful entities.
Aground – opon the Sands –The speaker is on the shore, grounded, implying a place of safety or vulnerability against the vast sea.
But no Man moved Me – till the TideNo human presence influences the speaker; it is nature itself—the rising tide—that begins to move her.
Went past my simple Shoe –The water starts to rise, initially in a gentle, harmless way, symbolizing the encroachment of nature.
And past my Apron – and my BeltThe tide continues to rise, submerging more of the speaker, suggesting a deepening immersion in nature.
And past my Boddice – too –The water reaches even higher, evoking both physical immersion and a symbolic engulfing by natural forces.
And made as He would eat me up –The tide (personified as “He”) seems as though it will consume the speaker entirely, conveying danger.
As wholly as a DewThe speaker compares herself to delicate dew, emphasizing her vulnerability to nature’s overwhelming force.
Opon a Dandelion’s Sleeve –A fragile image that conveys how easily nature can overwhelm small, delicate things.
And then – I started – too –The speaker finally reacts, starting to move, possibly out of fear or self-preservation.
And He – He followed – close behind –The sea continues to follow her, relentless in its pursuit, reinforcing its powerful, omnipresent nature.
I felt His Silver Heel“Silver Heel” refers to the shining waves or the tide itself, symbolizing the continuous pull of the sea.
Opon my Ancle – Then My ShoesThe water reaches her ankles and shoes, creating an image of nature seeping into her life.
Would overflow with Pearl –The water brings pearls, a symbol of beauty and mystery, highlighting the duality of nature as both dangerous and alluring.
Until We met the Solid Town –The speaker reaches the safety of the town, a symbol of civilization and stability, contrasting the fluidity of the sea.
No One He seemed to know –The sea, now estranged from the town, represents an outsider, emphasizing the divide between nature and society.
And bowing – with a Mighty look –The sea, personified, respectfully withdraws, acknowledging the boundary between itself and human life.
At me – The Sea withdrew –The sea retreats, leaving the speaker with a sense of having confronted and survived nature’s immense power.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
Literary DeviceDefinitionExample from PoemExplanation
AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or lines.“And past my Apron – and my Belt / And past my Boddice – too –”The repetition of “And past” emphasizes the rising tide and the increasing danger.
AssonanceThe repetition of vowel sounds within nearby words.“He followed – close behind –”The repetition of the “o” sound in “followed” and “close” creates a smooth, melodic quality.
ConsonanceThe repetition of consonant sounds within or at the end of words.“And Frigates – in the Upper Floor / Extended Hempen Hands”The “n” and “s” sounds are repeated, adding to the musical quality of the line.
EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence without a pause beyond the end of a line.“And made as He would eat me up – / As wholly as a Dew”The sentence flows from one line to the next without a pause, creating a sense of continuity.
HyperboleExaggerated statements not meant to be taken literally.“And made as He would eat me up”The idea of the sea “eating” the speaker is an exaggeration of the overwhelming power of nature.
ImageryLanguage that appeals to the senses, creating vivid pictures.“Silver Heel / Opon my Ancle”Vivid visual imagery is used to describe the rising tide as it touches the speaker’s body.
IronyA contrast between expectation and reality.“No One He seemed to know”The sea, so powerful and ever-present, becomes unfamiliar in the structured “Solid Town.”
MetaphorA figure of speech that directly compares two unlike things.“The Sea withdrew”The sea is metaphorically personified as a force that can act with agency, bowing and withdrawing.
MetonymyA figure of speech in which one word or phrase is substituted for another with which it is closely associated.“Silver Heel”The “Silver Heel” represents the waves or tide, using a part of the sea to refer to the whole.
OnomatopoeiaA word that imitates the sound it represents.“Overflow”The word “overflow” mimics the sound and sensation of water spilling over, creating a sound effect.
OxymoronA figure of speech that combines contradictory terms.“Simple Shoe”The simplicity of the shoe contrasts with the complexity and power of the sea, creating an ironic juxtaposition.
ParadoxA statement that appears self-contradictory but reveals a truth.“Presuming Me to be a Mouse”The speaker feels insignificant in the vastness of the sea, yet her presence is powerful enough to inspire action from the sea.
PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human things.“And He – He followed – close behind”The sea is personified as “He,” capable of actions such as following and retreating, making it a sentient force.
RepetitionReusing words or phrases for emphasis.“And past my Apron – and my Belt / And past my Boddice – too –”The repetition of “And past” emphasizes the overwhelming force of the rising tide.
SimileA comparison using “like” or “as.”“As wholly as a Dew / Opon a Dandelion’s Sleeve”The speaker compares herself to dew, fragile and easily overwhelmed by the sea.
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities.The SeaThe sea symbolizes nature’s vast, powerful, and uncontrollable forces, contrasting with human fragility.
SynecdocheA figure of speech in which a part is used to represent the whole.“Frigates – in the Upper Floor”“Frigates” represents the ships in the sea, with the “Upper Floor” symbolizing the sky above.
ToneThe attitude or mood expressed by the writer.“And then – I started – too –”The tone shifts from calm curiosity to apprehension and awe as the speaker faces the power of the sea.
Vivid DetailThe use of specific, descriptive language to create clear pictures in the reader’s mind.“My Shoes / Would overflow with Pearl”The description of shoes overflowing with pearls creates a vivid image of the sea’s richness and beauty.
Themes: “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
  • Nature’s Power and Mystery
  • One of the central themes in “I started Early — Took my Dog —” is the overwhelming power and enigmatic nature of the sea, which symbolizes the broader forces of nature. The speaker ventures toward the sea, initially as an observer, but quickly finds herself submerged in its rising tides: “And past my Apron – and my Belt / And past my Boddice – too.” The personification of the sea, particularly in lines like “And He – He followed – close behind,” highlights nature’s relentless and unpredictable force. The speaker’s final retreat from the sea suggests that while nature can be alluring and beautiful, it also possesses a dangerous, uncontrollable power that compels respect.
  • Human Vulnerability
  • Dickinson explores human vulnerability in the face of nature’s vastness. The speaker’s smallness and fragility are emphasized throughout the poem, particularly in the metaphor where she compares herself to “Dew / Opon a Dandelion’s Sleeve,” implying how easily she could be overwhelmed by the sea. Her reference to being “Presumed…to be a Mouse” by the Frigates further illustrates her insignificance in the grand scheme of the natural world. The rising tide, described in detail as it moves higher on her body, symbolizes how close she comes to being consumed, underlining humanity’s susceptibility to forces beyond its control.
  • The Boundary Between Nature and Civilization
  • The contrast between nature and civilization is evident in the poem, particularly in the closing lines. The speaker ventures into the wildness of the sea, but she ultimately returns to “the Solid Town,” a place of structure, safety, and familiarity. The sea, personified as a male figure, “bowing – with a Mighty look,” respects the boundaries of civilization, retreating as the speaker re-enters human space. This juxtaposition between the fluid, unpredictable sea and the structured, grounded town reflects a broader theme of the division between nature’s chaos and human attempts to create order and safety.
  • Exploration and Curiosity
  • The poem also reflects a theme of exploration, both literal and metaphorical. The speaker begins the poem with the intention to explore: “I started Early – Took my Dog – / And visited the Sea –.” Her journey can be seen as a metaphor for venturing into the unknown, driven by curiosity about nature’s depths and mysteries. However, as she progresses deeper into the sea’s embrace, her curiosity shifts to caution. The sea’s power grows overwhelming, and she is forced to retreat: “And then – I started – too.” This theme speaks to the human desire to explore the world around us, balanced by the need to recognize and respect its limits.
Literary Theories and “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
Literary TheoryExplanationApplication to “I started Early — Took my Dog —”References from the Poem
Feminist Literary TheoryExamines how literature perpetuates or challenges the roles and power dynamics of gender, particularly the experiences of women.Through the lens of feminist theory, the poem can be interpreted as a reflection on the female experience of autonomy and vulnerability in a male-dominated world. The sea, personified as “He,” can be seen as a representation of masculine power. The speaker’s retreat from the sea after its attempts to “consume” her can be viewed as a woman’s struggle to maintain autonomy in the face of overwhelming, external male forces.“And made as He would eat me up” – the sea, personified as a male figure, threatens to overpower the speaker, reflecting themes of male dominance and female vulnerability.
EcocriticismFocuses on the relationship between literature and the natural environment, often examining how nature is portrayed and the ethical concerns related to human interaction with the environment.Ecocriticism would examine how the poem portrays the sea as a powerful, uncontrollable force of nature, which both draws the speaker in and pushes her back. The speaker’s interaction with the sea reflects a larger commentary on the human relationship with nature—its beauty and allure, but also its capacity to overwhelm. This theory can explore the poem’s representation of nature’s autonomy and humanity’s insignificance within it.“And He – He followed – close behind – / I felt His Silver Heel / Opon my Ancle –” – The sea’s force is presented as something that moves of its own accord, not easily contained or understood by humans.
Psychoanalytic CriticismAnalyzes literature in terms of psychological theories, especially those of Freud or Jung, focusing on unconscious desires, fears, or anxieties within characters or the text.The poem can be viewed through a psychoanalytic lens as an exploration of the unconscious mind and repressed fears. The speaker’s journey to the sea can represent a descent into the unconscious, where the sea becomes a symbol of deep, hidden emotions or anxieties. Her eventual retreat might suggest a fear of being consumed by these emotions, with the sea’s pursuit representing the persistence of the unconscious mind in surfacing repressed thoughts or fears.“As wholly as a Dew / Opon a Dandelion’s Sleeve –” – The delicate, ephemeral image may symbolize the fragility of the human psyche when confronted with overwhelming subconscious fo
Critical Questions about “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
  • What is the significance of the speaker’s relationship with the sea in the poem?
  • The speaker’s relationship with the sea in “I started Early — Took my Dog —” symbolizes both attraction and danger, reflecting a complex dynamic between humanity and nature. Throughout the poem, the speaker approaches the sea with curiosity, initially observing the mermaids and ships. As the tide rises, however, the sea becomes more menacing: “And made as He would eat me up.” The sea, personified as a male figure, represents both the allure of the unknown and its overwhelming, consuming power. The speaker’s eventual retreat suggests a recognition of the boundaries between herself and the vastness of nature. The sea’s final gesture, as it “withdrew,” symbolizes the temporary interaction between human and nature, where the speaker escapes before being fully overwhelmed.
  • How does the poem explore the theme of human vulnerability?
  • The theme of human vulnerability is central to Dickinson’s poem, as the speaker confronts the immense power of nature. The rising tide progressively envelops the speaker, first touching her “simple Shoe,” then moving “past my Apron – and my Belt / And past my Boddice – too.” This gradual submersion highlights the speaker’s physical vulnerability in the face of nature’s unstoppable force. Additionally, the metaphor of the speaker as “Dew / Opon a Dandelion’s Sleeve” underscores her fragility, suggesting that she, like the dew, could easily be swept away by the sea. The sea’s relentless advance, personified as “He,” contrasts sharply with the speaker’s diminutive and fragile existence, emphasizing the power imbalance between nature and humanity.
  • What role does imagery play in developing the poem’s mood?
  • Imagery plays a crucial role in shaping the mood of the poem, transitioning from curiosity to apprehension and awe. The early images of “Mermaids in the Basement” and “Frigates in the Upper Floor” evoke a sense of wonder, as the speaker observes the sea’s fantastical elements. However, as the poem progresses, the mood shifts to one of tension and uncertainty as the tide begins to rise. The detailed imagery of water passing the speaker’s apron, belt, and bodice creates a vivid sense of danger, as the speaker is slowly engulfed. The final image of her shoes “overflow[ing] with Pearl” blends beauty with the looming threat of the sea, reinforcing the ambivalent mood, where nature is both alluring and potentially destructive.
  • How does Dickinson use personification to enhance the theme of nature’s power?
  • Dickinson uses personification extensively in the poem to enhance the theme of nature’s power by giving the sea human-like qualities. The sea is personified as a male figure, referred to as “He,” who actively interacts with the speaker. For example, the sea “followed – close behind” the speaker, giving it agency and a sense of relentless pursuit. The description of the sea as preparing to “eat me up” further underscores its potential danger. By attributing these human characteristics to the sea, Dickinson transforms it from a passive natural force into an active, powerful entity capable of engulfing the speaker. This personification heightens the tension between the human and the natural world, emphasizing nature’s ability to overpower and dominate.
Literary Works Similar to “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
  1. “The Sea” by James Reeves
    Both poems personify the sea as a living, powerful entity, reflecting its dual nature as beautiful yet potentially dangerous.
  2. “Dover Beach” by Matthew Arnold
    Like Dickinson’s poem, “Dover Beach” explores the emotional and existential impact of the sea, using it as a metaphor for human vulnerability and the unknown.
  3. “The Tide Rises, The Tide Falls” by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
    This poem, similar to Dickinson’s, reflects on the inevitable cycle of nature and the insignificance of human life in the face of natural forces.
  4. “Crossing the Bar” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
    Tennyson’s poem, like Dickinson’s, uses the sea as a symbol for the boundary between life and death, highlighting themes of exploration and departure.
  5. “To the Sea” by Philip Larkin
    Both Larkin and Dickinson reflect on the sea’s mysterious allure, using vivid imagery to capture its emotional and symbolic resonance.
Representative Quotations of “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“I started Early – Took my Dog –”The speaker begins her journey to the sea, a place of curiosity and exploration.Psychoanalytic Criticism: The beginning of a metaphorical journey into the subconscious.
“The Mermaids in the Basement / Came out to look at me –”The speaker imagines mystical creatures, suggesting an otherworldly connection with nature.Ecocriticism: Nature is depicted as magical and alive, with its own forms of life observing humanity.
“And Frigates – in the Upper Floor / Extended Hempen Hands –”Ships, personified with human-like “hands,” exist in the higher realm of the sea, contrasting with the mermaids below.Feminist Literary Theory: The ships represent structures of human (male) power, contrasted with the feminine, mythical mermaids.
“Presuming Me to be a Mouse – / Aground – opon the Sands –”The speaker feels small and insignificant in the vastness of nature.Existentialism: Highlights the individual’s insignificance in the grand scheme of the universe.
“But no Man moved Me – till the Tide / Went past my simple Shoe –”The speaker remains untouched by human influence until nature begins to affect her directly.Feminist Literary Theory: Suggests independence from male influence, with nature as the true force affecting the speaker.
“And made as He would eat me up – / As wholly as a Dew”The tide, personified as “He,” threatens to consume the speaker, symbolizing nature’s power.Psychoanalytic Criticism: Represents the unconscious mind’s overwhelming power to consume the self.
“And He – He followed – close behind – / I felt His Silver Heel”The sea continues to pursue the speaker, personified as a male figure, suggesting tension between the self and nature.Gender Theory: The sea, personified as male, reflects traditional notions of male pursuit and dominance over the female subject.
“Would overflow with Pearl –”The rising tide threatens to flood the speaker’s shoes, turning the natural force into something both beautiful and dangerous.Marxist Theory: Nature’s beauty (the pearls) can be overwhelming and potentially hazardous when not controlled or understood.
“Until We met the Solid Town – / No One He seemed to know –”The speaker reaches the town, a place of safety, where the sea becomes foreign and retreats.Ecocriticism: Reflects the divide between human civilization and the untamable forces of nature.
“And bowing – with a Mighty look – / At me – The Sea withdrew –”The sea, as a sentient force, respectfully retreats after its encounter with the speaker.Psychoanalytic Criticism: The sea represents repressed desires or fears that, after being confronted, recede into the unconscious.
Suggested Readings: “I started Early — Took my Dog —” by Emily Dickenson
  1. Humiliata, Mary. “Emily Dickinson-Mystic Poet?” College English, vol. 12, no. 3, 1950, pp. 144–49. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/372528. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  2. ARCHER, SETH. “‘I Had a Terror’: Emily Dickinson’s Demon.” Southwest Review, vol. 94, no. 2, 2009, pp. 255–73. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43472987. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  3. Bonheim, Helmut. “Narrative Technique in Emily Dickinson’s ‘My Life Had Stood a Loaded Gun.’” The Journal of Narrative Technique, vol. 18, no. 3, 1988, pp. 258–68. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30225225. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  4. Sobolev, Dennis. “Metaphor Revisited.” New Literary History, vol. 39, no. 4, 2008, pp. 903–29. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20533122. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.

“pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings: A Critical Analysis

“Pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e.e. Cummings, first appeared in 1944 as part of his collection 1 x 1, reflects Cummings’ distinctive style, marked by unconventional grammar, punctuation, and wordplay.

"pity this busy monster, manunkind" by e e cummings: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings

“Pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e.e. Cummings, first appeared in 1944 as part of his collection 1 x 1, reflects Cummings’ distinctive style, marked by unconventional grammar, punctuation, and wordplay. It critiques the dehumanizing effects of modern technology and scientific progress, portraying “manunkind” as obsessed with control and domination over nature, ultimately leading to its own alienation. The central idea of the poem is the loss of humanity’s natural connection to the world, as it trades organic simplicity for a mechanized, artificial existence. Cummings juxtaposes this with a hopeful belief in nature’s resilience, as expressed in the closing line: “a world of born.”

Text: “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings

pity this busy monster, manunkind,

not. Progress is a comfortable disease:

your victim (death and life safely beyond)

plays with the bigness of his littleness

— electrons deify one razorblade

into a mountainrange; lenses extend

unwish through curving wherewhen till unwish

returns on its unself.

                          A world of made

is not a world of born — pity poor flesh

and trees, poor stars and stones, but never this

fine specimen of hypermagical

ultraomnipotence. We doctors know

a hopeless case if — listen: there”s a hell

of a good universe next door; let”s go

Annotations: “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
LineAnnotation
pity this busy monster, manunkind,Cummings refers to humanity as a “monster” that is overly busy with industrialization and modernity, distancing itself from nature and spirituality.
not. Progress is a comfortable disease:The poet rejects the idea of feeling sorry for humanity’s self-destruction, calling progress a “comfortable disease,” a critique of blind faith in technology.
your victim (death and life safely beyond)Suggests that in this obsession with progress, life and death become disconnected, with humans acting as if they are beyond natural limitations.
plays with the bigness of his littlenessIronically highlights humanity’s self-importance, playing with grand ideas while being insignificant in the larger scheme of nature and the universe.
— electrons deify one razorbladeA metaphor for humanity’s overreliance on technology; the poet describes how humans exaggerate the importance of small technological advancements (like electrons).
into a mountainrange; lenses extendTechnology transforms the insignificant (razorblade) into something monumental (mountainrange), using lenses (science/technology) to extend perception artificially.
unwish through curving wherewhen till unwishDescribes how technology twists our understanding of space and time (“wherewhen”) and how human desires (“unwish”) are lost in these distortions.
returns on its unself.The result is a return to an unrecognizable state, where humans lose their identity (“unself”) in the process of technological expansion.
A world of made is not a world of bornContrasts the artificial, constructed world (“made”) with the natural, organic world (“born”), emphasizing the alienation caused by modernity.
pity poor fleshCummings expresses sympathy for the natural human body (“flesh”) that is vulnerable in contrast to artificial constructs.
and trees, poor stars and stones, but never thisExtends this sympathy to all natural elements—trees, stars, stones—while excluding the artificial, technological world from pity.
fine specimen of hypermagicalSarcastically refers to humanity’s exaggerated sense of power and control, using the terms “hypermagical” to mock human hubris.
ultraomnipotence. We doctors knowContinues the mockery by suggesting that humanity’s sense of omnipotence (god-like power) is a delusion, something “doctors” would recognize as a “hopeless case.”
a hopeless case if — listen: there’s a hellThe poet interjects, suggesting that humanity is a “hopeless case,” beyond cure.
of a good universe next door; let’s goThe poem ends with an escape fantasy, proposing that a better, healthier universe exists nearby, and suggesting a desire to abandon the flawed world of humanity.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
Literary/Poetic DeviceDefinitionExample from the PoemExplanation
AlliterationRepetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of words.“pity poor flesh”The “p” sound in “pity” and “poor” creates a rhythmic emphasis on the subject of human vulnerability.
AmbiguityA word, phrase, or statement with multiple meanings.“a world of made / is not a world of born”“Made” and “born” carry ambiguous connotations, contrasting the artificial and natural worlds, allowing for multiple interpretations of creation versus fabrication.
AnaphoraRepetition of the same word or phrase at the beginning of lines.“pity poor flesh / and trees, poor stars and stones”The repetition of “pity” and “poor” emphasizes the lament for the natural world, highlighting the damage caused by humanity.
AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas in balanced phrases.“a world of made / is not a world of born”The contrast between “made” (artificial) and “born” (natural) emphasizes the divide between human constructs and the natural world.
AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds within words.“listen: there’s a hell”The repetition of the “e” sound in “listen,” “there,” and “hell” creates a rhythmic flow that draws attention to the speaker’s call to action.
ConsonanceRepetition of consonant sounds within or at the end of words.“your victim (death and life safely beyond)”The “t” sound is repeated in “victim,” “death,” and “beyond,” reinforcing the contrast between life and death.
EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence without a pause beyond a line break.“electrons deify one razorblade / into a mountainrange”The sentence flows across two lines without punctuation, creating a sense of continuous action that mirrors the transformation of small to large.
HyperboleExaggeration for emphasis or effect.“electrons deify one razorblade / into a mountainrange”The exaggeration of turning a razorblade into a mountain range illustrates the absurdity of how technology magnifies insignificant things.
ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses.“trees, poor stars and stones”The poet uses imagery to evoke the natural world, contrasting it with humanity’s artificial constructs and eliciting sympathy for nature.
IronyA contrast between expectation and reality.“Progress is a comfortable disease”The phrase is ironic, as progress is typically seen as positive, but here it is depicted as a harmful and destructive force.
JuxtapositionPlacement of two or more things side by side for comparison.“flesh / and trees, poor stars and stones”The juxtaposition of human flesh with natural elements like trees and stones emphasizes humanity’s connection to and divergence from the natural world.
MetaphorA direct comparison between two unlike things.“Progress is a comfortable disease”Progress is metaphorically compared to a “disease,” suggesting that it is a harmful force disguised as beneficial.
NeologismA newly coined word or expression.“unwish,” “hypermagical,” “ultraomnipotence”Cummings invents new words like “unwish” to reflect abstract concepts, challenging conventional language and intensifying the poem’s themes of complexity and contradiction.
OxymoronA figure of speech in which contradictory terms appear together.“comfortable disease”The terms “comfortable” and “disease” are opposites, used to highlight the paradoxical nature of progress being both appealing and destructive.
ParadoxA statement that contradicts itself but contains a truth.“a world of made / is not a world of born”The paradox lies in the notion that something created (made) cannot truly possess the authenticity of something naturally born.
PersonificationAttributing human qualities to inanimate objects or abstract ideas.“electrons deify one razorblade”The electrons are personified as “deifying” the razorblade, giving human-like qualities to electrons, exaggerating the significance of technological advancements.
SarcasmUse of irony to mock or convey contempt.“We doctors know / a hopeless case”Cummings uses sarcasm to mock humanity’s belief in its own power and progress, implying that it is a “hopeless case” beyond help.
SimileA comparison using “like” or “as.”None in this poem.This poem does not use similes explicitly, relying more on metaphors and abstract comparisons instead.
SymbolismUse of symbols to represent ideas or qualities.“razorblade,” “mountainrange”The “razorblade” symbolizes something small and insignificant, while the “mountainrange” represents exaggeration and inflated importance through technological progress.
WordplayClever or witty use of words and meanings.“unwish,” “unself,” “hypermagical”Cummings plays with language by creating new words, manipulating prefixes like “un-” to convey abstract concepts of negation and existential questioning.
Themes: “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
  1. The Critique of Technological Progress: A central theme of the poem is the critique of unchecked technological progress. Cummings portrays progress as a “comfortable disease,” suggesting that while humanity believes technological advancements are beneficial, they are actually harmful in the long run. This idea is further emphasized when the poet describes how “electrons deify one razorblade into a mountainrange,” highlighting the absurdity of inflating the significance of small technological achievements. Through this metaphor, Cummings questions the dehumanizing effects of technology and warns of its negative impact on the natural world.
  2. The Alienation from Nature: Cummings contrasts the natural world with the artificial, manufactured world created by humans. In the lines “A world of made / is not a world of born,” the poet critiques humanity’s alienation from the organic, natural world. He expresses pity for “poor flesh and trees, poor stars and stones,” indicating that the poet sympathizes with the natural elements that are being destroyed or overshadowed by human creations. The world of “made” represents the artificial constructs that replace nature, symbolizing the loss of humanity’s connection to its origins.
  3. Human Hubris and Overconfidence: Another key theme is the poet’s critique of human arrogance. Cummings refers to humanity as a “fine specimen of hypermagical ultraomnipotence,” using sarcasm to mock the exaggerated sense of power and control humans believe they have over the world. This idea of hubris is extended when he states, “We doctors know / a hopeless case,” implying that humanity’s belief in its own greatness is beyond remedy. By highlighting this overconfidence, the poet suggests that humanity’s self-perceived omnipotence is leading to its own downfall.
  4. The Desire for Escape: In the final lines, Cummings hints at a theme of escape and the possibility of a better alternative. He writes, “there’s a hell of a good universe next door; let’s go,” suggesting that while this world (dominated by human arrogance and technological progress) is beyond saving, there may be another, better universe where harmony and simplicity still exist. This closing sentiment expresses a longing for a world free from the artificial and alienating influences of modern life, where a reconnection with nature and the natural order is still possible.
Literary Theories and “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
Literary TheoryApplication to the PoemReferences from the Poem
EcocriticismEcocriticism focuses on the relationship between literature and the natural environment. In “pity this busy monster, manunkind,” Cummings critiques humanity’s exploitation of nature in favor of technological progress. The poet laments how human innovation alienates individuals from the natural world, symbolized by the contrast between “made” and “born.”“A world of made / is not a world of born” highlights the divide between artificial creations and nature, emphasizing the environmental harm caused by human progress. The sympathy for “poor trees, poor stars and stones” further supports this ecocritical perspective.
PostmodernismPostmodernism often challenges conventional ideas of progress, truth, and meaning, favoring fragmentation, irony, and skepticism. Cummings’ poem reflects postmodern thought by questioning the validity of technological progress (“Progress is a cExistentialism in Literatureomfortable disease”) and rejecting traditional notions of human superiority over nature. The creation of neologisms like “hypermagical” and “ultraomnipotence” adds to the playful, ironic tone typical of postmodernism.“Progress is a comfortable disease” challenges the idea that technological and scientific advancement inherently benefits humanity, reflecting postmodern skepticism about grand narratives of progress. The sarcastic tone in “fine specimen of hypermagical ultraomnipotence” mocks humanity’s sense of control.
ExistentialismExistentialism explores themes of alienation, individual choice, and the search for meaning in an indifferent universe. In this poem, Cummings addresses the existential alienation of humans from nature and the meaninglessness of their technological pursuits. The closing lines, “there’s a hell of a good universe next door; let’s go,” express a desire to escape from a meaningless, artificial world to one that may offer a deeper sense of existence and connection.“unwish through curving wherewhen till unwish / returns on its unself” reflects the existential confusion and alienation caused by modern technology. The desire for escape in “let’s go” signifies an existential yearning for a more authentic existence.
Critical Questions about “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
  • How does Cummings portray the concept of progress, and what is his attitude toward it?
  • Cummings’ portrayal of progress is deeply ironic and critical, as seen in the line “Progress is a comfortable disease.” By describing progress as a “disease,” the poet subverts the conventional view of technological and scientific advancements as inherently positive. The addition of “comfortable” to this metaphor further highlights humanity’s complacency in its reliance on technology, suggesting that people accept harmful innovations without question. Cummings’ tone reflects skepticism toward progress, portraying it as something that isolates humans from the natural world and leads them away from true fulfillment. The description of how “electrons deify one razorblade into a mountainrange” critiques humanity’s tendency to overinflate the significance of its technological achievements, ultimately questioning whether such progress truly benefits society.
  • What is the role of nature in the poem, and how does it contrast with the human-made world?
  • In “pity this busy monster, manunkind,” nature represents purity and authenticity, in stark contrast to the artificial world created by humanity. Cummings illustrates this tension by contrasting “A world of made” with “a world of born.” The “made” world symbolizes the artificial and mechanical constructs of human progress, while the “born” world refers to the natural, organic processes of life. The poet expresses sympathy for nature’s elements—”poor flesh and trees, poor stars and stones”—suggesting that they are the true victims of humanity’s technological pursuits. Through this contrast, Cummings mourns the loss of humanity’s connection to the natural world, which is increasingly overshadowed by human arrogance and artificiality.
  • What does the poem suggest about humanity’s relationship with power and control?
  • Cummings’ poem presents a satirical view of humanity’s relationship with power, suggesting that humans possess an inflated sense of their control over the world. The line “fine specimen of hypermagical ultraomnipotence” mocks the idea that humanity has god-like power over nature and the universe. The exaggerated language (“hypermagical” and “ultraomnipotence”) highlights the absurdity of humans believing they are all-powerful. This belief in control is further undermined by the speaker’s statement, “We doctors know a hopeless case,” implying that humanity’s sense of superiority is misguided and unsustainable. By framing humanity as a “hopeless case,” Cummings suggests that humans are not as powerful as they think and that their efforts to dominate nature are ultimately futile.
  • What is the significance of the poem’s closing lines, and how do they reflect the speaker’s view of humanity’s future?
  • The closing lines of the poem—”there’s a hell of a good universe next door; let’s go”—express a longing for escape from the world that humanity has created. These lines suggest that the speaker views humanity’s current trajectory as irredeemable, with no hope for change in the existing “made” world. The idea of a “good universe next door” offers an alternative vision, perhaps one in which nature and humanity are in harmony rather than in conflict. The casual tone of “let’s go” indicates both a desire to abandon the current world and a resignation that there is no saving it. This ending reflects the speaker’s pessimistic view of humanity’s future, suggesting that the only solution is to leave this world behind in search of something better, a place where human arrogance and technological domination do not prevail.
Literary Works Similar to “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
  1. “The Second Coming” by W.B. Yeats
    Similar in its critique of modernity, this poem reflects on societal collapse and the consequences of unchecked human progress.
  2. “Dover Beach” by Matthew Arnold
    Like Cummings, Arnold expresses concern over the loss of faith and the growing disconnect between humanity and nature.
  3. “God’s Grandeur” by Gerard Manley Hopkins
    Hopkins also critiques industrialization, lamenting humanity’s exploitation of nature and celebrating the enduring power of the natural world.
  4. “The World Is Too Much with Us” by William Wordsworth
    This poem similarly explores the alienation of humanity from nature due to materialism and industrialization.
  5. “The Waste Land” by T.S. Eliot
    Eliot’s poem, like Cummings’, addresses the spiritual and environmental degradation of the modern world, questioning the direction of human progress.
Representative Quotations of “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“pity this busy monster, manunkind,”The opening line introduces the poem’s critique of humanity, portraying “manunkind” as a destructive force.Ecocriticism: Highlights humanity’s detachment from nature, framing humans as monstrous due to overdevelopment.
“Progress is a comfortable disease:”This metaphor criticizes the notion of progress, suggesting it is harmful despite being seen as positive.Postmodernism: Challenges the grand narrative of technological and scientific progress.
“your victim (death and life safely beyond)”Describes humanity’s perceived control over life and death, furthering the critique of its overconfidence.Existentialism: Suggests that humans, in their pursuit of control, are alienated from the fundamental nature of life and death.
“plays with the bigness of his littleness”Ironically points out humanity’s inflated sense of importance in the grand scheme of things.Postmodernism: Highlights the fragmented, contradictory nature of human self-importance and smallness.
“electrons deify one razorblade into a mountainrange;”Critiques how humanity turns minor technological advancements into monumental achievements.Technological Criticism: Focuses on the absurdity of humans deifying technology and overestimating its value.
“A world of made / is not a world of born”Emphasizes the contrast between the artificial world humans create and the natural world they destroy.Ecocriticism: Critiques humanity’s preference for artificial constructs over the natural world.
“pity poor flesh / and trees, poor stars and stones”Expresses sympathy for the natural world, which is seen as the victim of human progress.Ecocriticism: Suggests that nature suffers as a result of human actions, emphasizing environmental loss.
“fine specimen of hypermagical / ultraomnipotence”Sarcastically refers to humanity’s exaggerated sense of power and control.Postmodernism: Uses irony to mock humanity’s self-perceived omnipotence.
“We doctors know / a hopeless case”Declares that humanity’s belief in its progress and power is beyond help or redemption.Postmodernism: Cynically implies that humanity’s delusion of power is irreparable.
“there’s a hell of a good universe next door; let’s go”Ends with an invitation to escape the current, flawed world for a better one.Existentialism: Expresses the desire to escape a meaningless existence and find a more authentic reality.
Suggested Readings: “pity this busy monster, manunkind” by e e cummings
  1. Sickels, Eleanor M. “The Unworld of E. E. Cummings.” American Literature, vol. 26, no. 2, 1954, pp. 223–38. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2921833. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  2. Cureton, Richard D. “E.E. Cummings: A Study of the Poetic Use of Deviant Morphology.” Poetics Today, vol. 1, no. 1/2, 1979, pp. 213–44. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1772048. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  3. Fasel, Ida. “The Multiple Approach to Meaning.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 14, no. 1, 1963, pp. 41–43. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/355299. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  4. Essert, Emily. “‘Since Feeling Is First’: E. E. Cummings and Modernist Poetic Difficulty.” Spring, no. 14/15, 2005, pp. 197–210. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43915269. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  5. TRIEM, EVE. “E. E. Cummings.” E.E. Cummings – American Writers 87: University of Minnesota Pamphlets on American Writers, NED-New edition, University of Minnesota Press, 1969, pp. 5–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttth5r.2. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.

“my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings: A Critical Analysis

“my father moved through dooms of love” by e.e. cummings was first published in his groundbreaking 1926 collection, Tulips.

"my father moved through dooms of love" by e e cummings
Introduction: “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings

“my father moved through dooms of love” by e.e. cummings was first published in his groundbreaking 1926 collection, Tulips. Known for his experimental style, Cummings subverts traditional poetic conventions in this work. The poem’s syntax is deliberately unconventional, with sentences often fragmented and rearranged to create a unique rhythm and meaning. Additionally, Cummings eschews capitalization, using lowercase letters throughout to emphasize the democratic and egalitarian nature of his message. The poem’s typography also plays a significant role, with words and phrases arranged in unconventional ways to visually represent the themes and emotions expressed.

The main idea of “my father moved through dooms of love” is a celebration of love and life, despite the challenges and hardships that may be encountered. Cummings suggests that even in the face of adversity, love can provide a source of strength and resilience. The poem’s imagery, often drawn from nature, evokes a sense of hope and renewal. Ultimately, “my father moved through dooms of love” is a testament to the enduring power of human connection and the ability of love to transcend even the darkest of times.

Text: “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings

my father moved through dooms of love
through sames of am through haves of give,
singing each morning out of each night
my father moved through depths of height

this motionless forgetful where
turned at his glance to shining here;
that if (so timid air is firm)
under his eyes would stir and squirm

newly as from unburied which
floats the first who, his april touch
drove sleeping selves to swarm their fates
woke dreamers to their ghostly roots

and should some why completely weep
my father’s fingers brought her sleep:
vainly no smallest voice might cry
for he could feel the mountains grow.

Lifting the valleys of the sea
my father moved through griefs of joy;
praising a forehead called the moon
singing desire into begin

joy was his song and joy so pure
a heart of star by him could steer
and pure so now and now so yes
the wrists of twilight would rejoice

keen as midsummer’s keen beyond
conceiving mind of sun will stand,
so strictly (over utmost him
so hugely) stood my father’s dream

his flesh was flesh his blood was blood:
no hungry man but wished him food;
no cripple wouldn’t creep one mile
uphill to only see him smile.

Scorning the Pomp of must and shall
my father moved through dooms of feel;
his anger was as right as rain
his pity was as green as grain

septembering arms of year extend
less humbly wealth to foe and friend
than he to foolish and to wise 
offered immeasurable is

proudly and (by octobering flame
beckoned) as earth will downward climb,
so naked for immortal work
his shoulders marched against the dark

his sorrow was as true as bread:
no liar looked him in the head;
if every friend became his foe
he’d laugh and build a world with snow.

My father moved through theys of we,
singing each new leaf out of each tree
(and every child was sure that spring
danced when she heard my father sing)

then let men kill which cannot share,
let blood and flesh be mud and mire,
scheming imagine, passion willed,
freedom a drug that’s bought and sold

giving to steal and cruel kind,
a heart to fear, to doubt a mind,
to differ a disease of same,
conform the pinnacle of am

though dull were all we taste as bright,
bitter all utterly things sweet,
maggoty minus and dumb death
all we inherit, all bequeath

and nothing quite so least as truth
—i say though hate were why men breathe—
because my Father lived his soul
love is the whole and more than all

Annotations: “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings
StanzaAnnotation
my father moved through dooms of love through sames of am through haves of give, singing each morning out of each night my father moved through depths of heightThe poem opens with contrasting images, blending abstract opposites like “dooms of love” and “depths of height” to describe the father as a figure who transcends dualities. Cummings portrays him as someone who embraces contradictions and moves with love through both joy and hardship. The use of “singing each morning out of each night” suggests renewal and optimism in his actions.
this motionless forgetful where turned at his glance to shining here; that if (so timid air is firm) under his eyes would stir and squirm newly as from unburied which floats the first who, his april touch drove sleeping selves to swarm their fatesThe father’s presence transforms spaces, bringing vitality where there was stillness or forgetfulness. His influence wakes people to their destinies, as symbolized by the “sleeping selves” that are driven to “swarm their fates.” His “April touch” suggests renewal and hope, associated with spring and rebirth. The father seems to represent a guiding force that brings life and awareness to those around him.
woke dreamers to their ghostly roots and should some why completely weep my father’s fingers brought her sleep: vainly no smallest voice might cry for he could feel the mountains grow. Lifting the valleys of the sea my father moved through griefs of joy;The father possesses a comforting and almost magical power: he awakens dreamers and soothes weeping individuals. The imagery of “feeling the mountains grow” and “lifting the valleys of the sea” positions him as someone deeply connected to nature, with a strength that transcends ordinary limits. His ability to navigate “griefs of joy” highlights his capacity to hold both sorrow and happiness simultaneously, emphasizing his emotional depth.
praising a forehead called the moon singing desire into begin joy was his song and joy so pure a heart of star by him could steer and pure so now and now so yes the wrists of twilight would rejoiceThis stanza portrays the father as a figure of joy and inspiration. His praise of the moon’s forehead suggests reverence for natural beauty, and “singing desire into begin” highlights his role in inspiring creativity or new beginnings. His joy is depicted as pure and influential, able to steer a “heart of star.” This joy seems to transcend time, as even “the wrists of twilight” (a metaphor for the end of the day) rejoice in his presence.
keen as midsummer’s keen beyond conceiving mind of sun will stand, so strictly (over utmost him so hugely) stood my father’s dream his flesh was flesh his blood was blood: no hungry man but wished him food;The father’s dream is depicted as something vast and all-encompassing, standing as firmly as the sun. Despite his deep spirituality and idealism, the father is still human—his “flesh was flesh, his blood was blood.” This stanza emphasizes his generosity and empathy, suggesting that no one who encountered him could remain untouched by his kindness. The hungry desired food from him, reflecting his willingness to provide for others in a material and spiritual sense.
no cripple wouldn’t creep one mile uphill to only see him smile. Scorning the Pomp of must and shall my father moved through dooms of feel; his anger was as right as rain his pity was as green as grainThe father’s smile is so powerful that even the crippled would climb uphill to witness it. This reflects his immense charisma and emotional influence. He rejects societal expectations (the “Pomp of must and shall”) and instead follows his own emotional compass. His anger and pity are natural, inevitable, and righteous, compared to “rain” and “grain,” emphasizing that his emotions are not destructive but necessary parts of life.
septembering arms of year extend less humbly wealth to foe and friend than he to foolish and to wise offered immeasurable is proudly and (by octobering flame beckoned) as earth will downward climb, so naked for immortal work his shoulders marched against the darkThe passage of time is compared to the father’s humility and generosity. He gives freely, without distinction between the “foolish” and the “wise.” His shoulders, “naked for immortal work,” suggest that he is vulnerable yet unyielding in his confrontation with challenges (“marched against the dark”). The “octobering flame” may symbolize the fading of life, yet he continues with purpose, suggesting endurance and commitment to higher principles.
his sorrow was as true as bread: no liar looked him in the head; if every friend became his foe he’d laugh and build a world with snow.The father’s sorrow is described as fundamental and nourishing, like bread. He is portrayed as a figure of integrity—liars could not meet his gaze, and even if all his friends turned against him, he would respond with resilience, symbolized by “building a world with snow.” This implies that he could create something beautiful and pure even from cold and desolate conditions, reflecting his unwavering positivity and creativity in the face of adversity.
My father moved through theys of we, singing each new leaf out of each tree (and every child was sure that spring danced when she heard my father sing)The father is again shown as a life-giving force, bringing forth new growth (“new leaf”) and joy, as every child believes that spring dances to his singing. This stanza emphasizes the father’s connection to nature and renewal, as well as his ability to inspire joy and hope in others. He moves beyond individual identity (“theys of we”), indicating a broad, inclusive spirit.
then let men kill which cannot share, let blood and flesh be mud and mire, scheming imagine, passion willed, freedom a drug that’s bought and sold giving to steal and cruel kind, a heart to fear, to doubt a mind, to differ a disease of same, conform the pinnacle of amIn this stanza, cummings critiques a world filled with violence, greed, and conformity. The father stands apart from this, rejecting a society where freedom is commodified, kindness is cruel, and individuality is seen as a disease. This stanza emphasizes the father’s moral and philosophical opposition to a corrupted world that values conformity and materialism over love and truth.
though dull were all we taste as bright, bitter all utterly things sweet, maggoty minus and dumb death all we inherit, all bequeath and nothing quite so least as truth —i say though hate were why men breathe— because my Father lived his soul love is the whole and more than allThe poem concludes with a meditation on the bleakness of human existence—everything bright is dull, everything sweet is bitter, and death is inevitable. Despite this, the father’s existence stands as a testament to the power of love, which is presented as “the whole and more than all.” The final lines affirm that, even in a world driven by hate, the father’s soul proves that love transcends everything. Love is the ultimate truth and surpasses all else.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings
Literary DeviceDefinitionExample from PoemExplanation
AlliterationRepetition of initial consonant sounds in nearby words.“moved through dooms of love”The repeated ‘m’ and ‘d’ sounds create rhythm and emphasize key words, adding musicality to the poem.
AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or lines.“my father moved” (repeated throughout)This repetition emphasizes the actions and qualities of the father, highlighting his movement through different experiences.
AntithesisJuxtaposition of contrasting ideas in parallel structures.“griefs of joy”Contrasting ideas of grief and joy are placed together to reflect the father’s ability to navigate opposites gracefully.
AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds in nearby words.“vainly no smallest voice might cry”The repetition of the long ‘a’ sound in “vainly” and “smallest” creates internal rhyme, enhancing the poem’s flow.
ConsonanceRepetition of consonant sounds, typically at the end of words.“flesh was flesh his blood was blood”The repetition of ‘sh’ and ‘d’ sounds creates harmony and reinforces the parallelism of the father’s humanity.
EnjambmentContinuation of a sentence or clause across a line break.“my father moved through depths of height / this motionless forgetful where”The sentence runs over from one line to the next, creating a sense of motion and fluidity that mirrors the father’s actions.
EpizeuxisRepetition of a word or phrase in immediate succession.“so now and now so yes”The repeated “now” and “so” intensifies the feeling of the immediacy and purity of the father’s joy.
HyperboleExaggeration for emphasis or effect.“he could feel the mountains grow”This exaggeration highlights the father’s extraordinary ability to sense and perceive the world beyond ordinary human limits.
ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses.“woke dreamers to their ghostly roots”The use of “ghostly roots” evokes vivid visual and emotional imagery, suggesting a deep connection to one’s origin or past.
IronyExpression of meaning using language that normally signifies the opposite, often for emphasis or humor.“freedom a drug that’s bought and sold”The statement reflects the irony that freedom, which should be innate, has been commercialized in society.
JuxtapositionPlacement of two things side by side to highlight contrasts.“giving to steal and cruel kind”The juxtaposition of “giving” and “steal” or “cruel” and “kind” highlights the contradictory nature of society.
MetaphorDirect comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“a heart of star by him could steer”The metaphor suggests that the father’s pure joy has the power to guide, like a star leading a traveler.
OxymoronA figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction.“dooms of love”“Dooms” and “love” are contradictory, creating tension between destruction and affection, reflecting the father’s life.
ParadoxA statement that appears contradictory but reveals a deeper truth.“griefs of joy”This paradox suggests that joy and grief are intertwined in the father’s emotional experience, revealing life’s complexity.
PersonificationAttributing human qualities to inanimate objects or abstract concepts.“the wrists of twilight would rejoice”Twilight is given human qualities like wrists and the ability to rejoice, enhancing the poetic imagery of the father’s joy.
RepetitionRepeated use of words or phrases for emphasis.“my father moved” (multiple times)Repetition emphasizes the father’s constant and impactful movement through life’s different aspects.
SimileA comparison using “like” or “as.”“his anger was as right as rain”The simile compares the father’s anger to rain, suggesting that it is natural, necessary, and balanced.
SymbolismUse of symbols to represent ideas or qualities beyond the literal meaning.“forehead called the moon”The moon symbolizes guidance and beauty, representing the father’s ability to inspire and lead.
SynecdocheA figure of speech in which a part is made to represent the whole.“his shoulders marched against the dark”“Shoulders” stand for the father’s whole being, emphasizing his strength and determination.
ToneThe attitude or mood conveyed by the poem.Overall tone: Reverent, CelebratoryThe tone throughout the poem reveres the father’s virtues, celebrating his moral strength and impact on the world.
Themes: “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings

1. Love as a Transformative Force

The central theme of the poem is love’s transformative power, which transcends all limitations and contradictions. The father moves through “dooms of love,” a paradox that emphasizes love’s ability to exist even in the face of adversity and hardship. His love is portrayed as something that can bring life and vitality where there was none, as seen in the line, “his april touch drove sleeping selves to swarm their fates.” This suggests that the father’s love awakens people to their true potential. Moreover, love is described as “the whole and more than all,” affirming that it surpasses all other human experiences and remains the ultimate guiding principle in life.

2. Joy and Optimism in the Face of Adversity

The poem portrays the father as a figure who embraces joy and remains optimistic despite life’s inevitable struggles. Cummings writes, “joy was his song and joy so pure / a heart of star by him could steer,” suggesting that the father’s joyful nature is both pure and powerful, capable of guiding others. His resilience is further emphasized when the poem states, “if every friend became his foe / he’d laugh and build a world with snow,” indicating that he responds to opposition with creativity and positivity. Even in the darkest moments, the father radiates hope and joy, showing that optimism can endure through challenges.

3. The Conflict Between Individuality and Conformity

Cummings explores the tension between individuality and societal conformity throughout the poem. The father rejects the “Pomp of must and shall,” a critique of the rigid expectations society places on individuals. He moves through life with his own set of values, free from the constraints of conformity. The poem later critiques the societal norms of a world where “freedom [is] a drug that’s bought and sold” and “to differ a disease of same.” The father stands as a figure who resists these norms, suggesting that true freedom and individuality lie outside of society’s materialistic and conformist structures.

4. Nature and Human Connection

Nature plays a significant role in the poem, with the father portrayed as being deeply connected to natural forces. His presence is linked to elements like “mountains,” “valleys of the sea,” and the “forehead called the moon.” These natural images suggest that the father possesses an intrinsic bond with the earth, which reinforces his strength and wisdom. His ability to “feel the mountains grow” and his association with seasonal imagery, such as his “april touch,” reflect the cyclical and regenerative nature of life. This connection to nature underscores the father’s ability to bring renewal and growth, both physically and spiritually, to those around him.

Literary Theories and “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings
Literary TheoryApplication to the PoemReferences from the Poem
New CriticismNew Criticism focuses on close reading, analyzing the text itself, its language, structure, and literary devices. This approach emphasizes the poem’s internal coherence, including its paradoxes, symbolism, and form.In “my father moved through dooms of love,” the poem is rich in paradoxes such as “dooms of love” and “griefs of joy,” which reveal the tension between contrasting emotions and ideas. The poem’s structure—marked by enjambment, alliteration, and symbolism like “a heart of star”—creates layers of meaning that reflect the father’s larger-than-life influence. New Criticism would analyze these elements to uncover the poem’s deeper coherence.
Psychoanalytic CriticismPsychoanalytic theory, particularly Freudian analysis, would focus on the father figure’s symbolic significance and explore themes of authority, identity, and unconscious desires. The father can be seen as an idealized figure, representing a strong moral and emotional guide in the speaker’s psychological landscape.The father in the poem is described with a blend of awe and reverence, as seen in “no cripple wouldn’t creep one mile / uphill to only see him smile.” This idealized view of the father figure could reflect the speaker’s unconscious yearning for security, authority, and moral guidance. The line “because my Father lived his soul” could also suggest the father as an embodiment of the speaker’s superego, a model of moral perfection.
PostmodernismA postmodernist reading would explore the poem’s resistance to traditional binaries and its critique of societal structures. It would also highlight how the poem defies conventional forms of expression through its unconventional syntax and grammar.The rejection of societal norms and binaries, such as in “freedom a drug that’s bought and sold” and “to differ a disease of same,” reflects postmodern critiques of conformity, commodification, and the loss of individuality. The poem’s fragmented syntax, evident in lines like “his shoulders marched against the dark,” further supports a postmodern reading by breaking away from traditional poetic forms and embracing ambiguity and multiplicity.
Critical Questions about “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings

·         How does cummings portray the father figure as both a human and an almost mythical presence?

  • In “my father moved through dooms of love,” e.e. cummings presents the father as both grounded in human reality and elevated to an almost mythological stature. On one hand, the father is described in simple, earthly terms: “his flesh was flesh, his blood was blood,” grounding him in the physical and mortal realm. However, cummings also imbues the father with extraordinary qualities, such as the ability to “feel the mountains grow” and “lift the valleys of the sea.” These lines suggest that the father possesses a near-supernatural connection with nature, positioning him as more than just a man, but a transcendent figure capable of altering the world around him. This duality raises the question of how we can reconcile these two portrayals — a father both humanly tangible and divinely powerful.

·         How does the poem explore the conflict between societal norms and individual freedom?

  • The poem critiques societal norms and emphasizes the father’s resistance to conformity, prompting readers to question the cost of societal expectations on personal freedom. In the lines “Scorning the Pomp of must and shall,” cummings reveals the father’s rejection of rigid social rules, celebrating his individualism. The later critique of society is even sharper: “freedom a drug that’s bought and sold,” “to differ a disease of same,” showing how conformity and materialism corrupt true freedom. These critiques suggest that society’s values are often restrictive and commodified, forcing individuals to conform rather than celebrating uniqueness. The father, however, moves through life freely, embracing love and emotional truth, a stark contrast to the limitations society imposes.

·         What role does nature play in symbolizing the father’s influence and power?

  • Nature plays a vital symbolic role in representing the father’s strength, wisdom, and connection to the world in “my father moved through dooms of love.” The poem is rich in natural imagery, portraying the father’s influence through references to the earth, sea, and sky. Lines like “he could feel the mountains grow” and “lifting the valleys of the sea” position the father as a figure deeply intertwined with the natural world. His “april touch” brings to mind the regenerative power of spring, symbolizing his ability to awaken others to their potential. This connection to nature suggests that the father’s power is both elemental and life-giving, reinforcing his role as a nurturing, guiding presence in the speaker’s life and beyond.

·         How does the poem balance the personal and the universal in its portrayal of the father?

  • While the poem is clearly a personal tribute to the speaker’s father, its themes resonate on a universal level, raising the question of how cummings manages to balance these two dimensions. The personal nature of the poem is evident in the repeated use of “my father,” emphasizing the intimate relationship between the speaker and the subject. Yet, the father is described in grand, almost universal terms: “a heart of star by him could steer” and “my father moved through griefs of joy,” suggesting that his qualities extend beyond the individual and apply to broader human experiences. The father embodies values like love, joy, and resilience, making him a symbol of idealized humanity. In this way, cummings transforms the personal figure of his father into a universal representation of love’s power and human potential.
Literary Works Similar to “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings
  1. “Those Winter Sundays” by Robert Hayden
    This poem reflects on a father’s quiet, unacknowledged sacrifices and hard work for his family. Similar to cummings’ portrayal, Hayden’s father is a figure of strength and love, but his actions go unnoticed by the speaker until later in life.
  2. “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” by Dylan Thomas
    Thomas’ villanelle is a plea for his father to fight against death, emphasizing the intensity of love and emotion tied to the parent-child relationship. Like cummings’ poem, it combines reverence for the father with themes of resilience and strength.
  3. “Digging” by Seamus Heaney
    This poem reflects on Heaney’s relationship with his father and grandfather, focusing on their work ethic and connection to the land. It shares themes of legacy, familial love, and the passing of values across generations, much like cummings’ tribute to his father.
  4. “My Papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke
    Roethke’s poem explores the complex emotions tied to a father-son relationship, using vivid imagery to depict an affectionate yet rough interaction. It reflects similar themes of admiration and emotional depth in the portrayal of fathers.
  5. “Father” by Edgar Albert Guest
    Guest’s poem is a tribute to the father figure, celebrating his wisdom, sacrifice, and strength. It shares the same reverential tone found in cummings’ poem, with a focus on the father as an emotional and moral pillar in the family.
Representative Quotations of “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“my father moved through dooms of love”The opening line establishes the central paradox of the poem, portraying the father as navigating both love and hardship.New Criticism – Focuses on the juxtaposition of “dooms” and “love,” highlighting the complexity of human emotions.
“his flesh was flesh his blood was blood”This line emphasizes the father’s humanity, grounding his character in physical reality.Humanism – Examines the father as an embodiment of human experience, emphasizing physicality and mortality.
“he could feel the mountains grow”The father is depicted as having an extraordinary connection with nature, symbolizing his strength and sensitivity.Ecocriticism – Explores the deep bond between the father and the natural world, suggesting harmony between humans and nature.
“if every friend became his foe he’d laugh and build a world with snow”The father’s resilience is highlighted as he turns conflict into creative action, even if all around him turn against him.Psychoanalytic Criticism – Reflects on the father as a symbol of inner strength, possibly representing the ego or superego.
“joy was his song and joy so pure a heart of star by him could steer”The father’s joy is portrayed as a guiding force for others, akin to a star steering travelers.Romanticism – Elevates the father as a transcendent, joyful figure who inspires and leads others.
“freedom a drug that’s bought and sold”This line critiques the commodification of freedom in society, implying that it has lost its true value.Postmodernism – Critiques the commercialization of abstract concepts like freedom, reflecting on societal corruption.
“his shoulders marched against the dark”The father is shown as confronting adversity head-on, moving forward despite obstacles.Existentialism – Emphasizes the father’s individual struggle and determination to create meaning in the face of darkness.
“woke dreamers to their ghostly roots”The father’s influence awakens others to their past and potential, emphasizing his role as a guide and catalyst.Psychoanalytic Criticism – Symbolizes the father as a figure who helps others access their unconscious or hidden potential.
“Scorning the Pomp of must and shall”The father rejects societal rules and expectations, moving through life on his own terms.Marxism – Critiques the rigid structures of authority and societal expectations, emphasizing individual agency.
“love is the whole and more than all”The poem’s closing line affirms the father’s essence as being rooted in love, which transcends all.New Criticism – Focuses on the centrality of love as a thematic resolution, reinforcing the poem’s unity and coherence.
Suggested Readings: “my father moved through dooms of love” by e e cummings
  1. TRIEM, EVE. “E. E. Cummings.” E.E. Cummings – American Writers 87: University of Minnesota Pamphlets on American Writers, NED-New edition, University of Minnesota Press, 1969, pp. 5–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttth5r.2. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024
  2. Terblanche, Etienne. “E. E. Cummings’ Fluid ‘Objectivity’ : A Deep Ecological Response to Michael Webster’s ‘The New Nature Poetry and the Old.’” Spring, no. 13, 2004, pp. 128–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43915248. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  3. TRIEM, EVE. “E. E. Cummings.” Six American Poets from Emily Dickinson to the Present: An Introduction, edited by ALLEN TATE, NED-New edition, University of Minnesota Press, 1969, pp. 159–94. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttssmh.8. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  4. FORREST, DAVID V. “A FIRST LOOK AT THE DREAMS OF E. E. CUMMINGS: The Preconscious of A Synesthetic Genius.” Spring, no. 2, 1993, pp. 8–19. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43913132. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  5. Johnson, Sabina Thorne. “Remedial English: The Anglocentric Albatross?” College English, vol. 33, no. 6, 1972, pp. 670–85. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/374798. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.

“The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti: A Critical Analysis

“The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti first appeared in her posthumous collection New Poems in 1896, compiled by her brother William Michael Rossetti.

"The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red" by Christina Georgina Rossetti: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti

“The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti first appeared in her posthumous collection New Poems in 1896, compiled by her brother William Michael Rossetti. This short yet evocative poem exemplifies Rossetti’s characteristic style of simplicity, grace, and profound meaning woven into natural imagery. The poem centers on the rose as a symbol of fleeting beauty and innocence, a theme that resonates with much of Rossetti’s work, which often explores the impermanence of life and the purity of nature. Through the rose’s blush, she reflects on the tension between beauty and decay, hinting at a broader meditation on the passage of time and the inevitability of loss. The qualities of the poem, including its brevity, soft tone, and use of vivid, natural symbols, emphasize Rossetti’s ability to express deep emotional truths with subtlety and elegance.

Text: “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti

The rose that blushes rosy red,
She must hang her head;
The lily that blows spotless white,
She may stand upright.

Annotations: “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti
LineAnnotation
The rose that blushes rosy red,The rose is often associated with beauty, love, and passion. The adjective “blushes” suggests modesty or embarrassment, while “rosy red” evokes vibrancy and vitality.
She must hang her head;The phrase “must hang her head” implies humility, submission, or sorrow, suggesting that even the most beautiful things may carry a burden or sense of shame.
The lily that blows spotless white,The lily, symbolizing purity, innocence, and virtue, is described as “spotless white.” The word “blows” refers to the flower blooming or flourishing.
She may stand upright.Unlike the rose, the lily “may stand upright,” representing the idea that innocence and purity allow one to maintain a position of pride and dignity.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti
DeviceDefinitionExampleExplanation
AlliterationThe repetition of the same consonant sound at the beginning of words.“The rose that blushes rosy redThe repetition of the “r” sound creates a sense of rhythm and emphasizes the softness of the rose.
AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas or images.“The rose that blushes rosy red, / She must hang her head”The contrast between the rose’s beauty and its need to hang its head creates a sense of irony and humility.
ImageryThe use of vivid language to create mental images.“The rose that blushes rosy red”The phrase “rosy red” creates a vivid mental image of a beautiful, blooming rose.
MetaphorA comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“She must hang her head”The rose is compared to a person who is ashamed or embarrassed.
PersonificationGiving human qualities to non-human things.“The rose that blushes rosy red”The rose is described as “blushing,” which is a human emotion.
RhymeThe repetition of sounds at the end of words.“red” and “head,” “white” and “upright”The rhyme scheme of the poem is ABAB, which creates a musical and rhythmic effect.
SymbolismThe use of objects or images to represent abstract ideas.The rose represents beauty, love, and fragility.The rose’s delicate nature and vibrant color symbolize these qualities.
ToneThe author’s attitude towards the subject matter.The tone is gentle and contemplative.The soft imagery and gentle rhythm contribute to the contemplative tone.
Visual ImageryThe use of language to create mental images related to sight.“The lily that blows spotless white”The phrase “spotless white” creates a vivid visual image of a pure and beautiful lily.
Word ChoiceThe careful selection of words to convey meaning and tone.The use of simple, descriptive words like “rosy,” “red,” “white,” and “upright” contributes to the poem’s clarity and beauty.
Themes: “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti
  • Beauty and Modesty: Rossetti’s poem delves into the intricate relationship between beauty and humility. The rose, often associated with love, passion, and grace, is portrayed as “blushing rosy red,” suggesting a sense of modesty and embarrassment. This paradoxical image highlights the idea that true beauty is not merely a superficial quality but a combination of outward appearance and inner virtue. The rose’s inclination to “hang its head” further emphasizes this theme, suggesting that those who possess true beauty are often aware of their imperfections and exhibit a sense of humility.
  • The Fragility of Life: The poem also explores the fleeting nature of beauty and life. The rose, despite its vibrant color and delicate petals, is ultimately vulnerable to the forces of nature. Its need to “hang its head” suggests a sense of fragility and mortality. This theme resonates with the broader human experience, reminding us that even the most beautiful things are subject to decay and impermanence.
  • The Contrast Between Appearance and Reality: Rossetti’s poem challenges the notion that appearances are always reliable indicators of inner worth. While the rose may seem perfect on the surface, its need to “hang its head” reveals a deeper layer of complexity and imperfection. This contrast highlights the importance of looking beyond outward appearances to understand the true nature of individuals and things. It suggests that beauty is not merely skin deep but a reflection of inner qualities such as humility, vulnerability, and resilience.
  • The Power of Nature: The poem celebrates the beauty and power of nature. The rose and lily, both symbols of natural beauty, are depicted as delicate yet resilient creatures. This theme underscores the importance of appreciating and respecting the natural world and its ability to inspire and uplift us. The poem suggests that nature possesses a transformative power that can enhance our lives and remind us of the beauty and fragility of existence.
Literary Theories and “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti
Literary TheoryApplication to “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red”References from the Poem
Feminist TheoryThis theory can be applied by examining how gender roles, especially female identity and virtue, are portrayed through the symbolism of the rose and lily. The rose’s need to “hang her head” can be read as a reflection of traditional societal expectations of female modesty.“The rose that blushes rosy red, / She must hang her head;” – This can symbolize the pressure on women to appear humble despite their beauty.
Symbolism and AestheticismAestheticism focuses on beauty and sensory experiences, while Symbolism delves into the deeper meanings behind images. This poem uses nature (the rose and lily) to symbolize abstract qualities like beauty, humility, and purity.“The lily that blows spotless white, / She may stand upright;” – The lily symbolizes purity, standing with dignity due to its innocence.
Moral CriticismThe poem reflects moral values associated with beauty and innocence, particularly the contrast between outward beauty (rose) and inner purity (lily), suggesting that purity is more virtuous and leads to moral uprightness.“She must hang her head;” vs. “She may stand upright;” – This juxtaposition highlights the moral superiority of purity over beauty.
Critical Questions about “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti
  • How does Rossetti use natural imagery to explore themes of beauty and morality?
  • Rossetti’s poem contrasts the rose and the lily to symbolize two differing approaches to beauty and morality. The rose, which “blushes rosy red,” represents physical beauty and passion, but the phrase “must hang her head” suggests a sense of guilt or shame associated with this beauty. In contrast, the lily, described as “spotless white,” symbolizes purity and moral uprightness, as reflected in the line “she may stand upright.” The juxtaposition between the rose’s modesty and the lily’s confidence raises questions about the moral value assigned to physical appearance versus inner purity. Rossetti uses these natural symbols to suggest that purity, rather than beauty, is morally superior.
  • What role does gender play in the symbolic meaning of the rose and the lily?
  • The use of feminine pronouns in both “the rose that blushes rosy red” and “the lily that blows spotless white” invites a gendered reading of the poem. The rose, often associated with femininity and love, is portrayed as needing to “hang her head,” perhaps reflecting societal expectations of women to be modest, humble, or even ashamed of their beauty. Conversely, the lily is allowed to “stand upright,” symbolizing the freedom and dignity that comes with moral purity. This dichotomy may reflect traditional views on the roles of women, where beauty is seen as dangerous or compromising, while purity is rewarded with social and moral esteem.
  • What does the poem suggest about the relationship between physical beauty and moral virtue?
  • The poem appears to draw a line between external beauty, as embodied by the rose, and moral virtue, represented by the lily. The rose’s beauty causes it to “blush” and “hang her head,” suggesting that physical attractiveness is fraught with complexity, shame, or societal judgment. On the other hand, the lily’s “spotless white” purity allows it to stand “upright,” implying that moral integrity leads to a more dignified and respected existence. This comparison suggests that, in Rossetti’s view, moral virtue surpasses physical beauty in value, reflecting Victorian ideals where purity and inner character were often seen as more important than outward appearance.
  • How does the structure of the poem enhance its thematic contrasts?
  • The poem’s structure, with its concise, symmetrical lines, mirrors the contrasts between the rose and the lily, beauty and purity, humility and pride. The first two lines focus on the rose, with a tone that conveys both admiration and sorrow as it “blushes” yet “must hang her head.” The next two lines introduce the lily, whose “spotless white” allows it to “stand upright,” presenting a more straightforward image of confidence and pride. The parallel structure of the two images highlights the differences between them, emphasizing the tension between beauty and virtue. This simple, balanced structure reinforces the thematic contrasts at the heart of the poem.
Literary Works Similar to “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti
  1. “To a Skylark” by Percy Bysshe Shelley: Both poems celebrate the beauty and fragility of nature, using vivid imagery to evoke a sense of wonder and awe.
  2. “The Lamb” by William Blake: Both poems employ simple language and a childlike perspective to explore themes of innocence and purity.
  3. “The Red Wheelbarrow” by William Carlos Williams: Both poems use concise language and vivid imagery to capture the beauty of everyday objects.
  4. “Daffodils” by William Wordsworth: Both poems explore the power of nature to evoke strong emotions and memories.
  5. “A Dream Within a Dream” by Edgar Allan Poe: Both poems explore themes of mortality and the fleeting nature of life, using vivid imagery to create a haunting atmosphere.

Representative Quotations of “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti


1. “The rose that blushes rosy red, / She must hang her head;”

Context: In this opening line, Rossetti personifies the rose, suggesting a sense of modesty and shame through its symbolic color, red, which often connotes passion or desire. The rose “blushes,” indicating an emotional response, and “must hang her head,” signifying humility or possibly guilt.

Theoretical Perspective: Feminist Criticism
Through the lens of feminist theory, this imagery can be interpreted as a reflection of the social constraints placed on women during the Victorian era. The rose represents a woman who, despite her vibrancy or beauty (blushing red), must adopt a submissive posture (hanging her head), reflective of societal expectations of modesty and restraint for women, particularly regarding expressions of passion.


2. “The lily that blows spotless white, / She may stand upright.”

Context: In contrast to the rose, the lily, often associated with purity and innocence due to its white color, is permitted to stand tall. This creates a dichotomy between the rose’s passion and the lily’s purity, elevating the latter as a more acceptable virtue.

Theoretical Perspective: Moral Criticism
Viewed through moral criticism, this line upholds the traditional Victorian moral values that prized purity (symbolized by the white lily) over passion or sexuality (symbolized by the red rose). The lily’s upright posture suggests that those who maintain innocence or chastity are rewarded with dignity and social acceptance, while passion or emotion leads to subjugation.


3. “The rose that blushes rosy red, / She must hang her head;”

Context: This repetition emphasizes the contrast between the rose and the lily, solidifying the thematic division between passionate and innocent femininity. The rose’s beauty is paired with a sense of shame or resignation, creating a layered representation of emotional vulnerability.

Theoretical Perspective: Psychoanalytic Criticism
From a psychoanalytic perspective, the rose can be seen as embodying the conflict between desire and repression. The act of “hanging her head” suggests a suppression of desire, aligning with Freudian concepts of the unconscious, where socially unacceptable feelings (in this case, desire represented by the blush) are repressed by societal norms, leaving the individual (or in this case, the rose) in a state of conflicted expression.


4. “The lily that blows spotless white, / She may stand upright.”

Context: In contrast to the rose, the lily is presented as morally superior, without the weight of societal judgment. The metaphorical connotation of “spotless white” underscores an idealized state of moral and physical purity, with no need for shame.

Theoretical Perspective: Structuralism
Using structuralist theory, this juxtaposition of the rose and lily reflects binary oppositions: passion vs. purity, red vs. white, submission vs. freedom. The structure of the poem relies on these oppositions to convey its deeper meanings about societal views on women, creating a system of signs where each flower represents a broader concept within Victorian social structures.

Suggested Readings: “The Rose That Blushes Rosy Red” by Christina Georgina Rossetti

  1. Harrison, Antony H. “Christina Rossetti: Illness and Ideology.” Victorian Poetry, vol. 45, no. 4, 2007, pp. 415–28. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40347411. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  2. Dombrowski, Theo. “Dualism in the Poetry of Christina Rossetti.” Victorian Poetry, vol. 14, no. 1, 1976, pp. 70–76. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40001863. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  3. Leighton, Angela. “‘When I Am Dead, My Dearest’: The Secret of Christina Rossetti.” Modern Philology, vol. 87, no. 4, 1990, pp. 373–88. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/438559. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.
  4. Simon Avery. “Piety, Poetry, Passion: Contexts for Christina Rossetti.” History Workshop Journal, no. 40, 1995, pp. 244–45. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4289406. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.