“Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy: A Critical Analysis

“Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy, first appeared in her 1996 collection, Rapture,  is popular for its exploration of biblical themes.

"Delilah" by Carol Ann Duffy: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy

“Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy, first appeared in her 1996 collection, Rapture,  is popular for its exploration of biblical themes. It explores the complex relationship between Samson and Delilah. Duffy presents Delilah as a figure misunderstood and exploited, challenging traditional portrayals of her as a femme fatale. The poem highlights the power dynamics at play, suggesting that Delilah’s actions may have been driven by desperation or a desire for agency, rather than mere malice.

Text: “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy

Teach me, he said—

we were lying in bed—

how to care.

I nibbled the purse of his ear.

What do you mean?

Tell me more.

He sat up and reached for his beer

I can rip out the roar

from the throat of a tiger,

or gargle with fire

or sleep one whole night in the Minotaur’s lair,

or flay the bellowing fur

from a bear,

all for a dare.

There’s nothing I fear.

Put your hand here—

he guided my fingers over the scar

over his heart,

a four-medal wound from the war—

but I cannot be gentle, or loving, or tender.

I have to be strong.

What is the cure?

He f**ked me again

until he was sore,

then we both took a shower.

Then he lay with his head on my lap

for a darkening hour;

his voice, for a change, a soft burr

I could just about hear.

And, yes, I was sure

that he wanted to change,

my warrior.

I was there.

So when I felt him soften and sleep,

when he started, as usual, to snore,

I let him slip and slide and sprawl, handsome and huge,

on the floor.

And before I fetched and sharpened my scissors—

snipping first at the black and biblical air—

I fastened the chain to the door.

That’s the how and the why and the where.

Then with deliberate, passionate hands

I cut every lock of his hair.

Annotations: “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
LineTextAnnotation
1Teach me, he said—Samson requests to be taught by Delilah.
2we were lying in bed—Setting of their intimate moment.
3how to care.Samson desires tenderness and affection.
4I nibbled the purse of his ear.A playful, intimate gesture.
5What do you mean?Delilah seeks clarification.
6Tell me more.Delilah expresses interest in learning.
7He sat up and reached for his beerSamson’s response, perhaps seeking comfort or distraction.
8I can rip out the roarDelilah’s declaration of her strength and abilities.
9from the throat of a tiger,A hyperbolic example of her power.
10or gargle with fireAnother exaggerated claim.
11or sleep one whole night in the Minotaur’sReference to the mythical creature, symbolizing danger.
12lair,Continuation of the reference to the Minotaur.
13or flay the bellowing furAnother example of her physical prowess.
14from a bear,Continuation of the example.
15all for a dare.Delilah’s willingness to perform dangerous acts.
16There’s nothing I fear.A statement of her boldness and confidence.
17Put your hand here—Delilah gestures to a physical mark.
18he guided my fingers over the scarSamson reveals a personal wound.
19over his heart,The location of the scar, suggesting emotional depth.
20a four-medal wound from the war—A symbol of Samson’s past and experiences.
21but I cannot be gentle, or loving, or tender.Samson’s acknowledgment of his own limitations.
22I have to be strong.Samson’s belief in the necessity of strength.
23What is the cure?Samson seeks a solution to his emotional dilemma.
24He f**ked me againA physical act, perhaps a temporary escape or release.
25until he was sore,A sign of intensity or exhaustion.
26then we both took a shower.A cleansing act, possibly symbolizing renewal or purification.
27Then he lay with his head on my lapA gesture of vulnerability and trust.
28for a darkening hour;A peaceful moment of connection.
29his voice, for a change, a soft burrA shift in Samson’s demeanor.
30I could just about hear.A subtle indication of Delilah’s attentiveness.
31And, yes, I was sureDelilah’s belief in Samson’s desire for change.
32that he wanted to change,A hope for a positive transformation.
33my warrior.A term of endearment or respect.
34I was there.Delilah’s assertion of her presence and support.
35So when I felt him soften and sleep,A moment of vulnerability.
36when he started, as usual, to snore,A mundane, everyday occurrence.
37I let him slip and slide and sprawl, handsomeA description of Samson’s relaxed state.
38and huge,Emphasizing Samson’s physical stature.
39on the floor.A symbol of his vulnerability or helplessness.
40And before I fetched and sharpened my scissors—A foreshadowing of Delilah’s actions.
41snipping first at the black and biblical air—A symbolic gesture, perhaps representing a break from tradition or religious norms.
42I fastened the chain to the door.A practical action, securing the room.
43That’s the how and the why and the where.A summary of the events.
44Then with deliberate, passionate handsA description of Delilah’s actions.
45I cut every lock of his hair.The climax of the poem, symbolizing the loss of Samson’s strength and power.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
Literary/Poetic DeviceDefinitionExample from “Delilah”Explanation
AlliterationRepetition of the same initial consonant sounds in nearby words.“snipping first at the black and biblical air”The repetition of the “b” sound in “black” and “biblical” emphasizes the action and creates a rhythmical flow.
AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds in nearby words.“sleep, when he started, as usual, to snore”The repetition of the “e” sound in “sleep” and “snore” creates a sense of fluidity, mimicking the sound of soft breathing or snoring.
MetaphorA figure of speech where something is described as if it were something else.“I can rip out the roar from the throat of a tiger”The speaker is not literally ripping a roar from a tiger’s throat but uses this metaphor to express bravery and power.
SimileA comparison using “like” or “as.”“like his head on my lap for a darkening hour”Compares the resting of his head on her lap to the idea of time darkening, suggesting emotional heaviness.
PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human things.“gargle with fire”Fire is given human-like behavior by saying it can be gargled, adding a surreal, heroic quality.
HyperboleDeliberate exaggeration for emphasis or effect.“I can rip out the roar from the throat of a tiger”An exaggerated claim of strength and bravery to emphasize the character’s sense of invincibility.
IronyA contrast between expectation and reality.“I let him slip and slide and sprawl, handsome and huge, on the floor.”The ironic contrast between his strength and masculinity, and his vulnerability as he lies helplessly on the floor.
EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence without a pause beyond the end of a line.“he guided my fingers over the scar / over his heart”The lack of pause between these lines mimics the fluid motion of her fingers moving over his scar.
ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses.“I nibbled the purse of his ear”This vivid image appeals to the sense of touch and taste, drawing the reader into the intimate moment.
SymbolismUsing symbols to signify ideas and qualities beyond their literal sense.“I cut every lock of his hair”His hair symbolizes his strength, masculinity, and perhaps control, which she takes away by cutting it.
Internal RhymeRhyme within a single line of poetry.“there’s nothing I fear / Put your hand here”The rhyme between “fear” and “here” within a single line emphasizes the connection between his bravado and his vulnerability.
ToneThe attitude or approach the author takes towards the subject.Throughout the poemThe tone shifts from playful and intimate to somber and even vengeful, reflecting the complexity of the relationship.
JuxtapositionPlacing two contrasting elements side by side.“But I cannot be gentle, or loving, or tender. I have to be strong.”The juxtaposition of tenderness and strength highlights the conflict within the male character’s emotions and identity.
ConsonanceRepetition of consonant sounds in the middle or end of words.“Put your hand here—he guided my fingers over the scar”The repetition of the “r” sound in “scar” and “here” connects the two ideas of physical pain and emotional vulnerability.
AnaphoraThe repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses.“I can rip… I can gargle… I can sleep”The repetition of “I can” emphasizes the character’s strength and capability.
RepetitionRepeated use of sounds, words, or ideas for effect and emphasis.“Teach me, he said… Tell me more”The repetition of his request for teaching emphasizes his desire for emotional understanding.
AllusionA brief reference to a person, place, or event, often historical or mythological.“sleep one whole night in the Minotaur’s lair”References the Greek myth of the Minotaur, symbolizing danger, bravery, and fearlessness.
CaesuraA strong pause within a line of poetry.“Put your hand here—he guided my fingers”The pause after “here” creates a dramatic moment, allowing the reader to reflect on the action.
OxymoronA combination of contradictory terms.“soft burr”Combines softness (gentleness) with “burr,” which suggests something rough, indicating a contradiction in the character’s personality.
Themes: “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
  1. Power and Control: The theme of power dynamics is central to “Delilah”, with references to physical strength and dominance, particularly from the male character. He boasts of his ability to perform heroic acts such as ripping the “roar from the throat of a tiger” or “gargling with fire.” These exaggerated claims of power highlight his obsession with physical strength and invincibility. However, the moment Delilah cuts his hair, she symbolically seizes control, stripping him of his strength and undermining his masculinity. The act of cutting his hair while he is vulnerable underscores the transfer of power from him to her.
  2. Love and Intimacy: The poem explores the complex nature of love and intimacy, which are often juxtaposed with power and control. The intimate moments between Delilah and the man—such as when she “nibbled the purse of his ear” and when he lays his head in her lap for “a darkening hour”—contrast with his inability to express tenderness. He admits, “I cannot be gentle, or loving, or tender,” emphasizing the conflict between his emotional desires and the rigid masculinity he feels compelled to uphold. This tension between love and emotional vulnerability reflects the difficulty of genuine connection in the relationship.
  3. Gender Roles and Masculinity: Duffy’s poem critiques traditional notions of masculinity, showing how the male character is trapped by societal expectations of strength and invulnerability. His self-proclaimed feats of daring reflect an exaggerated form of masculine bravado, yet he confesses his inability to express tenderness, revealing a deeper vulnerability. The scar “over his heart” symbolizes both his emotional and physical wounds, representing the burden of living up to these masculine ideals. Delilah’s act of cutting his hair—an emasculating gesture—challenges these gender norms, suggesting that true strength may lie in vulnerability rather than brute force.
  4. Betrayal and Transformation: The theme of betrayal echoes the biblical story of Samson and Delilah, but Duffy gives it a modern twist. Delilah’s actions can be interpreted as an act of betrayal when she cuts the man’s hair, rendering him powerless. The betrayal is deliberate and calculated—she even “fastened the chain to the door” before carrying out the act. However, this betrayal is not purely malicious; it can be seen as a transformative moment for both characters. The man’s loss of strength signals a shift in their relationship and perhaps a step toward self-realization. Delilah, too, transforms from a passive lover to an active agent in reclaiming her own power.
Literary Theories and “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
Literary TheoryKey ConceptsReferences from “Delilah”
Feminist CriticismExamines how gender is represented in literature, often focusing on the portrayal of women and their experiences.– Delilah’s agency and decision-making: “I fastened the chain to the door.” – The subversion of traditional gender roles: Delilah as a powerful figure, not merely a victim.
Psychoanalytic CriticismAnalyzes the unconscious mind and its influence on behavior, often drawing on Freud’s theories.– Samson’s desire for control and power: “I have to be strong.” – Delilah’s possible motivations: a need for love, revenge, or self-preservation.
DeconstructionChallenges the idea of a fixed meaning in texts, focusing on contradictions and ambiguities.– The ambiguous nature of Delilah’s actions: are they motivated by love or betrayal? – The questioning of traditional interpretations of the biblical story.
Critical Questions about “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
  • How does the poem challenge traditional gender roles, particularly in the depiction of masculinity?
  • The poem “Delilah” challenges traditional gender roles by presenting a male character who is outwardly strong but inwardly conflicted. The man boasts about his physical prowess, claiming he can “rip out the roar from the throat of a tiger” or “gargle with fire.” These exaggerated assertions reflect stereotypical masculine ideals of strength and fearlessness. However, despite this bravado, he reveals his emotional vulnerability by admitting that he cannot be “gentle, or loving, or tender.” This contrast exposes the limitations of rigid masculinity, showing that it suppresses emotional expression. Delilah’s act of cutting his hair—symbolic of taking away his power—reverses the gender dynamic, as she becomes the one in control. This challenges the notion that masculinity is inherently linked to dominance and strength, suggesting that vulnerability and emotional openness might be stronger qualities.
  • In what ways does the poem depict power dynamics within the relationship between Delilah and the male character?
  • Power dynamics play a central role in the poem, shifting between Delilah and the man. At the start, the man appears to hold the power, boasting about his physical feats and his ability to endure hardship. However, as the poem progresses, it becomes clear that his emotional strength does not match his physical prowess. He asks Delilah, “Teach me… how to care,” revealing his inability to connect on an emotional level. In contrast, Delilah’s quiet patience, highlighted by her care and attentiveness (“he lay with his head on my lap for a darkening hour”), suggests that she possesses a different kind of power—one rooted in emotional awareness. The ultimate shift in power comes when Delilah cuts his hair while he sleeps, a deliberate act that robs him of his physical strength. This act symbolizes her ability to control him and subverts the typical power dynamic of a relationship where the man is physically dominant.
  • How does the poem reflect the complexities of love and intimacy?
  • Delilah explores the complexities of love and intimacy through the juxtaposition of physical and emotional connection. The man seeks affection and comfort from Delilah, as seen when he lays his head in her lap and speaks in a “soft burr.” However, his inability to be “gentle, or loving, or tender” reflects an emotional disconnect despite his physical closeness. The repeated acts of sex (“He f**ked me again until he was sore”) further highlight this disconnect, as the physical act of love becomes a substitute for the emotional connection he struggles to express. Delilah’s response to his vulnerability—cutting his hair—can be interpreted as an attempt to free him (and herself) from this cycle of emotional repression. The poem suggests that love is not just about physical closeness but requires emotional honesty and tenderness, which the man is unable to provide.
  • What role does betrayal play in the poem, and how does it relate to the theme of transformation?
  • Betrayal is a key theme in Delilah, but it is portrayed as more complex than a simple act of treachery. Delilah’s decision to cut the man’s hair while he sleeps echoes the biblical betrayal of Samson, yet in Duffy’s version, it feels less malicious and more transformative. The moment of betrayal is premeditated—Delilah “fastened the chain to the door” before cutting his hair, suggesting that she has taken control of the situation. However, this act of betrayal could also be seen as an attempt to initiate change. The man’s obsession with physical strength has left him emotionally stunted, and by removing his hair, Delilah symbolically strips away his reliance on external power, forcing him to confront his vulnerabilities. The betrayal, therefore, serves as a catalyst for transformation, not only for the man but also for Delilah, who seizes power in the relationship and possibly frees herself from his emotional demands.
Literary Works Similar to “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
  1. “Medusa” by Carol Ann Duffy: Both poems are modern retellings of mythological women, focusing on themes of power, betrayal, and transformation through the lens of a female perspective.
  2. “My Last Duchess” by Robert Browning: Like “Delilah”, this dramatic monologue explores themes of control, power, and the complexities of relationships, highlighting the destructive consequences of dominance.
  3. “Salome” by Carol Ann Duffy: Another poem by Duffy, it reimagines a biblical female figure, much like “Delilah”, and examines themes of manipulation, power, and sexual politics.
  4. “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. Eliot: Both poems explore inner conflict and vulnerability in male characters, revealing their struggle with emotional intimacy and societal expectations of masculinity.
  5. “Porphyria’s Lover” by Robert Browning: Similar to “Delilah”, this poem delves into a destructive relationship where one partner exercises control and power, leading to an ultimate act of dominance and transformation.
Representative Quotations of “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“Teach me, he said— we were lying in bed— how to care.”The male character expresses his emotional incapacity and seeks guidance from Delilah on how to feel and express tenderness.Psychoanalytic Theory: This quote explores the internal emotional conflict and repression often discussed in psychoanalysis, particularly the male character’s struggle with emotional vulnerability.
“I nibbled the purse of his ear.”A moment of intimacy between Delilah and the male character, emphasizing their physical closeness.Feminist Theory: This quote can be viewed through the lens of female agency and control over intimacy, as Delilah actively engages in the physical dynamic of the relationship.
“I can rip out the roar from the throat of a tiger, or gargle with fire.”The male character boasts about his physical prowess, exaggerating his strength.Masculinity Studies: This quote highlights the traditional construction of masculinity, which prioritizes physical strength and heroic feats while suppressing emotional vulnerability.
“but I cannot be gentle, or loving, or tender. I have to be strong.”The male character admits his emotional limitations, acknowledging the societal pressure to maintain strength.Gender Theory: This line critiques toxic masculinity and societal expectations that force men to prioritize strength over emotional expression.
“He f**ked me again until he was sore, then we both took a shower.”This stark, blunt description of their sexual encounter emphasizes the physical aspect of their relationship, devoid of tenderness.Postmodernism: The raw, unromantic language reflects postmodernist rejection of idealized love, revealing the physicality and emotional detachment within their relationship.
“And before I fetched and sharpened my scissors— snipping first at the black and biblical air—”Delilah prepares to cut his hair, evoking the biblical story of Samson and Delilah.Intertextuality: This moment alludes to the biblical narrative of Samson and Delilah, offering a modern reworking of the tale with a feminist twist.
“he guided my fingers over the scar over his heart, a four-medal wound from the war—”The male character shows Delilah his war wound, symbolizing both physical and emotional scars.Trauma Theory: This line touches on the lasting impacts of trauma, particularly war trauma, and how it shapes emotional and relational dynamics.
“I fastened the chain to the door.”Delilah locks the door before cutting the man’s hair, signifying her control over the situation.Feminist Theory: This act symbolizes Delilah’s power and autonomy, challenging traditional gender roles and expectations of passivity in women.
“I let him slip and slide and sprawl, handsome and huge, on the floor.”The male character, once strong, now lies helpless and vulnerable after Delilah cuts his hair.Deconstruction: This line deconstructs the idea of the male as powerful, showing the reversal of power dynamics and exposing the fragility of masculinity.
“Then with deliberate, passionate hands I cut every lock of his hair.”Delilah deliberately and decisively removes his hair, symbolically stripping him of his strength and control.Feminist Theory: This act of cutting his hair is symbolic of reclaiming power and rejecting patriarchal dominance, as Delilah becomes the agent of his downfall.
Suggested Readings: “Delilah” by Carol Ann Duffy
  1. Jane Satterfield. The Antioch Review, vol. 59, no. 1, 2001, pp. 123–24. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/4614132. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  2. Yorke, Liz. “British Lesbian Poetics: A Brief Exploration.” Feminist Review, no. 62, 1999, pp. 78–90. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1395648. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  3. Smith, Stan. “‘What Like Is It?’: Carol Ann Duffy’s Différance.” Poetry & Displacement, Liverpool University Press, 2007, pp. 101–22. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vj9sw.9. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  4. LOGAN, WILLIAM. “The Beasts and the Bees (Carol Ann Duffy).” Broken Ground: Poetry and the Demon of History, Columbia University Press, 2021, pp. 57–60. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/loga20106.9. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.

“As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips: A Critical Analysis

“As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips first appeared in the 2006 collection Quiver of Arrows: Selected Poems, 1986-2006.

"As from a Quiver of Arrows" by Carl Phillips: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips

“As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips first appeared in the 2006 collection Quiver of Arrows: Selected Poems, 1986-2006. Renowned for its poignant exploration of grief and loss, the poem is a powerful meditation on the aftermath of a friend’s death. Phillips employs a series of questions and images to convey the speaker’s profound sense of loss and confusion. The poem’s central themes include the fragility of life, the enduring nature of love, and the struggle to find meaning in the face of tragedy.

Text: “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips

What do we do with the body, do we

burn it, do we set it in dirt or in

stone, do we wrap it in balm, honey,

oil, and then gauze and tip it onto

and trust it to a raft and to water?

What will happen to the memory of his

body, if one of us doesn’t hurry now

and write it down fast? Will it be

salt or late light that it melts like?

Floss, rubber gloves, and a chewed cap

to a pen elsewhere —how are we to

regard his effects, do we throw them

or use them away, do we say they are

relics and so treat them like relics?

Does his soiled linen count? If so,

would we be wrong then, to wash it?

There are no instructions whether it

should go to where are those with no

linen, or whether by night we should

memorially wear it ourselves, by day

reflect upon it folded, shelved, empty.

Here, on the floor behind his bed is

a bent photo—why? Were the two of

them lovers? Does it mean, where we

found it, that he forgot it or lost it

or intended a safekeeping? Should we

attempt to make contact? What if this

other man too is dead? Or alive, but

doesn’t want to remember, is human?

Is it okay to be human, and fall away

from oblation and memory, if we forget,

and can’t sometimes help it and sometimes

it is all that we want? How long, in

dawns or new c**ks, does that take?

What if it is rest and nothing else that

we want? Is it a findable thing, small?

In what hole is it hidden? Is it, maybe,

a country? Will a guide be required who

will say to us how? Do we fly? Do we

swim? What will I do now, with my hands?

Annotations: “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips
LineTextAnnotation
1What do we do with the body, do weThe poem opens with a reflective question about what to do with the body after death, setting a contemplative tone.
2burn it, do we set it in dirt or inThis line presents options for dealing with the dead: cremation (burn) or burial (dirt). It contrasts different funeral practices.
3stone, do we wrap it in balm, honey,“Stone” refers to entombment; “balm, honey” evokes ancient embalming techniques, suggesting preservation of the body and memory.
4oil, and then gauze and tip it ontoContinues the imagery of ritualistic body preparation, symbolizing care and reverence for the dead.
5and trust it to a raft and to water?Shifts to the idea of water burial, suggesting themes of transition, purification, and passage to the afterlife.
6What will happen to the memory of hisThe focus moves from the body to the memory, expressing concern over how memories of the deceased will be preserved.
7body, if one of us doesn’t hurry nowIntroduces urgency in preserving memory before it fades, emphasizing the fleeting nature of life and remembrance.
8and write it down fast? Will it beWriting is posed as a way to immortalize the body, preventing it from being forgotten.
9salt or late light that it melts like?Metaphors of salt and light suggest that memory could dissolve or fade away, highlighting its fragility.
10Floss, rubber gloves, and a chewed capThe introduction of mundane objects contrasts with the earlier focus on the body, questioning the significance of personal effects.
11to a pen elsewhere—how are we toScattered belongings evoke the sense of disarray and the difficulty of knowing how to handle them.
12regard his effects, do we throw themThe speaker questions whether to discard or keep the deceased’s belongings, reflecting emotional conflict.
13or use them away, do we say they areSuggests using the belongings in daily life as a way to honor the deceased, raising questions about memory and practicality.
14relics and so treat them like relics?The objects may be treated as sacred relics, highlighting the tension between attachment and moving forward.
15Does his soiled linen count? If so,The speaker considers even the most mundane items (soiled linen) as potentially sacred, questioning their value.
16would we be wrong then, to wash it?Washing the linen might erase part of the deceased’s memory, suggesting an ethical dilemma around cleansing and forgetting.
17There are no instructions whether itExpresses the lack of clear guidance on how to handle the dead’s possessions, reinforcing the sense of confusion.
18should go to where are those with noRaises the possibility of donating the linen, reflecting the practical considerations of handling the belongings.
19linen, or whether by night we shouldSuggests a more intimate act of remembrance, where the living wear the deceased’s clothing as a memorial.
20memorially wear it ourselves, by dayWearing the linen would create a direct connection to the deceased, contrasting public and private modes of remembrance.
21reflect upon it folded, shelved, empty.If not worn, the linen could be kept as a symbol, folded and empty, signifying the absence of the deceased.
22Here, on the floor behind his bed isShifts attention to a bent photo found behind the bed, evoking a sense of forgotten or hidden memories.
23a bent photo—why? Were the two ofThe speaker speculates about the relationship between the deceased and the person in the photo, possibly lovers.
24them lovers? Does it mean, where weQuestions the significance of the photo’s location and condition, adding ambiguity to the deceased’s life and relationships.
25found it, that he forgot it or lost itContinues the uncertainty about the photo’s meaning, reflecting broader themes of memory and loss.
26or intended a safekeeping? Should weThe speaker considers whether the photo was intentionally placed for safekeeping, symbolizing care and intention.
27attempt to make contact? What if thisConsiders reaching out to the person in the photo, suggesting the possibility of closure or connection.
28other man too is dead? Or alive, butRaises the possibility that the other man might also be dead, deepening the sense of loss and isolation.
29doesn’t want to remember, is human?Acknowledges that the person may not want to remember, reflecting on the human tendency to avoid painful memories.
30Is it okay to be human, and fall awayThe speaker questions whether it is acceptable to let go of memory, suggesting a conflict between obligation and emotional survival.
31from oblation and memory, if we forget,“Oblation” (offering) connects to religious duty, asking whether forgetting is a failure or part of being human.
32and can’t sometimes help it and sometimesAcknowledges that forgetting is sometimes involuntary, reflecting the complexity of grief and memory.
33it is all that we want? How long, inThe speaker wonders how long it takes to move on from grief, introducing uncertainty about the passage of time.
34dawns or new **cks, does that take?Uses the natural cycles of dawn and roosters to question how time affects memory and healing.
35What if it is rest and nothing else thatIntroduces the idea that rest, rather than memory, may be the ultimate desire in the face of grief.
36we want? Is it a findable thing, small?The speaker wonders if rest is something tangible that can be found, suggesting it may be elusive.
37In what hole is it hidden? Is it, maybe,Rest is metaphorically hidden, suggesting difficulty in accessing peace after loss.
38a country? Will a guide be required whoConsiders whether rest is a destination (country) and whether external guidance is needed to find it.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips
DeviceDefinitionExplanation in the Poem
AlliterationThe repetition of initial consonant sounds.we want? Is it a findable thing, small?
AnaphoraThe repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or sentences.“What do we do with the body, do we burn it…”
AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas or images.“or late light that it melts like?”
ApostropheAddressing a person or thing not present.“What will happen to the memory of his body…”
AssonanceThe repetition of vowel sounds within words.“body, if one of us doesn’t hurry now and”
ConnotationThe emotional or associative meaning of a word.“relics” suggests sacred or valuable objects
EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence or thought beyond the end of a line of poetry.“What will happen to the memory of his body…”
ImageryThe use of vivid language to create images in the reader’s mind.“Floss, rubber gloves, and a chewed cap”
MetaphorA comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“What if it is rest and nothing else that we want?”
MetonymyThe use of the name of one thing to represent something closely associated with it.“his soiled linen” represents the deceased person
OxymoronA figure of speech combining contradictory terms.“safekeeping” suggests both security and uncertainty
PersonificationGiving human qualities to non-human things.“What will I do now, with my hands?”
Rhetorical QuestionA question asked for effect, not expecting an answer.“What do we do with the body, do we burn it…”
SimileA comparison between two unlike things using “like” or “as.”“or late light that it melts like?”
SymbolismThe use of objects or events to represent ideas or qualities.“linen” may symbolize mortality and decay
SynecdocheA figure of speech in which a part represents the whole or vice versa.“hands” represent the speaker’s entire self
ToneThe writer’s attitude toward the subject matter.Reflective, contemplative, and mournful
Verbal IronyA figure of speech in which what is said is the opposite of what is meant.Not directly present in the poem, but could be inferred if the speaker’s actions contradict their words
Themes: “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips
  1. Mortality and Loss: Phillips’ poem is a poignant exploration of mortality and the profound impact of loss. The central question of what to do with a deceased friend’s body serves as a metaphor for the broader question of how to cope with the absence of a loved one. The speaker’s ruminations on memory, relics, and the fragility of life highlight the inevitability of death and the challenges of coming to terms with it. Lines such as “What do we do with the body, do we burn it…” and “What will happen to the memory of his body…” underscore the theme of mortality.
  2. Memory and Remembrance: The poem delves into the complexities of memory and the role it plays in preserving the presence of the deceased. The speaker grapples with the question of whether to write down the details of the friend’s body, suggesting a desire to capture and preserve a tangible memory. The poem also explores the idea that memory can be both a source of comfort and a source of pain. Lines such as “Will it be salt or late light that it melts like?” and “Does his soiled linen count?” reflect the speaker’s struggle to reconcile the past with the present.
  3. The Human Condition: Phillips’ poem offers a meditation on the human condition, exploring themes of love, loss, and the search for meaning. The speaker’s questions about the deceased’s relationships and the motivations behind his actions reveal the complexities of human nature. The poem also raises questions about the nature of grief and the ways in which individuals cope with loss. Lines such as “Were the two of them lovers?” and “Is it okay to be human, and fall away from oblation and memory…” explore the intricacies of human experience.
  4. The Passage of Time: The poem is a reflection on the passage of time and the ways in which it shapes our experiences. The speaker’s questions about the duration of grief and the possibility of finding rest highlight the temporal nature of life. The poem also suggests that time can both heal and wound, as evidenced by the speaker’s desire to escape from the pain of memory. Lines such as “How long, in dawns or new c**ks, does that take?” and “Is it a findable thing, small?” explore the role of time in shaping our lives.
Literary Theories and “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips
Literary TheoryLine(s) from the PoemExplanation/Analysis
Psychoanalytic Theory“What will happen to the memory of his / body, if one of us doesn’t hurry now / and write it down fast?” (Lines 6-8)This theory, rooted in Freudian psychology, focuses on the human psyche, unconscious desires, and emotional conflicts. The speaker’s anxiety over the memory of the deceased suggests a deeper fear of loss and forgetting. The urgency to “write it down fast” can be seen as an attempt to control the uncontrollable fear of mortality and loss.
Post-Structuralism“Does his soiled linen count? If so, / would we be wrong then, to wash it?” (Lines 15-16)Post-structuralism challenges fixed meanings, highlighting ambiguity and the instability of language. The poem’s recurring questions, such as whether the soiled linen counts and if it should be washed, create ambiguity around memory, value, and ritual. These uncertainties emphasize how meaning and significance are constructed and subjective.
New Historicism“Floss, rubber gloves, and a chewed cap / to a pen elsewhere — how are we to / regard his effects, do we throw them / or use them away” (Lines 10-13)New Historicism emphasizes the influence of historical and cultural context on literature. The mention of mundane objects like “rubber gloves” and “floss” invites readers to consider how contemporary rituals around death and remembrance are influenced by social norms, materialism, and practical concerns. This reflects a modern, possibly consumerist approach to memory.
Critical Questions about “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips

·         How does the poem grapple with the tension between physical objects and memory?

  • The poem explores the tension between the physical remnants of the deceased and the intangible nature of memory. In lines such as, “Does his soiled linen count? If so, / would we be wrong then, to wash it?” (lines 15-16), the speaker questions whether these physical objects hold any meaningful connection to the person who has died. The linen, mundane and “soiled,” represents the material reality of death, but the speaker wonders if preserving or cleaning it would alter its significance. This tension reveals the emotional struggle to find meaning in the physical traces left behind, while simultaneously grappling with the ephemeral nature of memory and whether these objects truly help preserve the essence of the deceased.

·         How does the poem reflect on the limitations of human memory and the desire to preserve it?

  • Throughout the poem, the speaker demonstrates a sense of urgency about preserving the memory of the deceased. In the lines, “What will happen to the memory of his / body, if one of us doesn’t hurry now / and write it down fast?” (lines 6-8), there is an implicit fear that memory will fade if not captured quickly. The use of the word “hurry” suggests the fleeting nature of human memory and the anxiety surrounding its loss. The act of writing down the memory becomes a metaphor for an attempt to solidify the transient and ensure that it endures beyond the body’s physical absence. However, the repeated questions throughout the poem reflect the limitations of this endeavor, suggesting that no matter how quickly or earnestly we try to preserve memory, it may still fade like “salt or late light” (line 9).

·         How does the poem question the role of rituals and traditions in dealing with death?

  • The poem frequently questions traditional practices surrounding death, asking what the proper way to handle a body or the deceased’s belongings is. In the opening lines, “What do we do with the body, do we / burn it, do we set it in dirt or in / stone” (lines 1-3), the speaker contemplates burial, cremation, and entombment—rituals steeped in tradition. However, the poem is filled with uncertainty about the appropriateness of these customs, as seen in questions about how to handle personal effects: “how are we to / regard his effects, do we throw them / or use them away, do we say they are / relics and so treat them like relics?” (lines 11-14). This questioning suggests a deeper critique of the limitations of ritual in making sense of death and grief. The poem implies that these practices may be inadequate in addressing the personal, emotional weight of loss.

·         What does the poem suggest about the human desire for closure, and is closure ever truly attainable?

  • The speaker’s many questions throughout the poem indicate a search for closure that remains elusive. For instance, the lines “What if it is rest and nothing else that / we want? Is it a findable thing, small?” (lines 35-36) express a yearning for peace or resolution after loss. The reference to “rest” suggests the speaker’s desire to move on, to achieve a state of finality. However, the poem’s structure—built entirely on unanswered questions—suggests that closure may be unattainable or at least ambiguous. The speaker’s ongoing uncertainty about how to remember the deceased, how to handle their possessions, and even whether it’s acceptable to forget, reflects the human struggle to find a definitive way to deal with grief. The final question, “What will I do now, with my hands?” (line 40), leaves the speaker in a state of unresolved grief, highlighting the impossibility of true closure.
Literary Works Similar to “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips
  1. “Funeral Blues” by W.H. Auden
    Similar in its contemplation of grief and mourning, this poem also expresses the struggle to cope with loss and the desire to memorialize the deceased.
  2. “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop
    This poem explores themes of loss, especially personal and emotional, similar to how Phillips navigates the tension between memory and forgetting.
  3. “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” by Dylan Thomas
    Thomas’ poem, like Phillips’, reflects on death, the body’s fate, and the emotional challenge of dealing with the finality of loss.
  4. “The Emperor of Ice-Cream” by Wallace Stevens
    Both poems share a preoccupation with the physical and ephemeral aspects of death, with Stevens focusing on the rituals surrounding death, much like Phillips questions them.
  5. “Because I could not stop for Death” by Emily Dickinson
    Dickinson’s meditation on death and the journey of the soul parallels Phillips’ exploration of death’s rituals and the uncertain handling of the dead’s memory
Representative Quotations of “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“What do we do with the body, do we / burn it, do we set it in dirt or in / stone”The speaker questions how to handle the deceased’s body, grappling with traditional burial practices.New Historicism: The line reflects on cultural and historical rituals around death, questioning their relevance in modern times.
“What will happen to the memory of his / body, if one of us doesn’t hurry now / and write it down fast?”Expresses fear of losing the memory of the deceased if it’s not quickly preserved.Psychoanalytic Theory: Reflects the speaker’s anxiety over the fleeting nature of memory and the unconscious fear of forgetting.
“salt or late light that it melts like?”The metaphor compares the dissolution of memory to salt or fading light, emphasizing impermanence.Deconstruction/Post-Structuralism: Challenges stable meaning, emphasizing the ephemeral and mutable nature of memory and language.
“Floss, rubber gloves, and a chewed cap / to a pen elsewhere”Mundane items are listed as remnants of the deceased, prompting reflection on the value of personal effects.Material Culture Studies: Highlights how everyday objects are imbued with emotional meaning after death, questioning the boundary between the personal and the trivial.
“Does his soiled linen count? If so, / would we be wrong then, to wash it?”The speaker questions the value of seemingly insignificant belongings like soiled linen.Post-Structuralism: Raises ambiguity about the significance of objects and the subjectivity of meaning, challenging binary notions of sacred vs. mundane.
“how are we to / regard his effects, do we throw them / or use them away, do we say they are / relics?”The speaker ponders whether to treat the belongings as sacred relics or discard them, emphasizing the conflict in handling the dead’s possessions.Cultural Criticism: Reflects on the tension between commodification of memory and the sacred treatment of personal items in modern society.
“There are no instructions whether it / should go to where are those with no / linen”The absence of guidance for how to distribute or deal with the deceased’s belongings adds to the confusion.New Historicism: Reflects the lack of prescriptive cultural traditions in contemporary society, where death rituals are less clearly defined.
“memorially wear it ourselves, by day / reflect upon it folded, shelved, empty.”The speaker contemplates wearing the deceased’s linen or keeping it as a folded reminder of absence.Phenomenology: Explores how the presence of objects (the linen) evokes reflection on the absence of the person, engaging with how memory is lived and felt through physical things.
“What if it is rest and nothing else that / we want?”The speaker wonders if rest, rather than remembrance or ritual, is the true desire after loss.Existentialism: Raises questions about the human need for rest and peace in the face of grief, reflecting existential anxieties about the search for meaning and resolution.
“What will I do now, with my hands?”The final line leaves the speaker in uncertainty, unsure of how to proceed after death and grief.Psychoanalytic Theory: Highlights the speaker’s unresolved grief and the unconscious desire for direction or action in the face of existential uncertainty.
Suggested Readings: “As from a Quiver of Arrows” by Carl Phillips
  1. Phillips, Carl, and Nick Flynn. “Carl Phillips.” BOMB, no. 76, 2001, pp. 50–55. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40426828. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  2. “About Carl Phillips.” Ploughshares, vol. 29, no. 1, 2003, pp. 199–204. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40353466. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  3. Phillips, Carl. “On Restlessness.” New England Review (1990-), vol. 30, no. 1, 2009, pp. 131–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40245202. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.
  4. PHILLIPS, CARL. “A Politics of Mere Being.” Poetry, vol. 209, no. 3, 2016, pp. 295–310. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26493090. Accessed 7 Oct. 2024.

“Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser: A Critical Analysis

“Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser first appeared in 1595 as part of the Amoretti and Epithalamion collection.

"Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name" by Edmund Spenser: A Critical Analysis
Introduction:”Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser

“Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser first appeared in 1595 as part of the Amoretti and Epithalamion collection. This sonnet is renowned for its exquisite language, intricate imagery, and profound exploration of love and immortality. The poem’s central idea revolves around the poet’s desire to immortalize his beloved’s name through his writing, suggesting that love and art can transcend time and death.

Text: “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser

One day I wrote her name upon the strand,

But came the waves and washed it away:

Again I wrote it with a second hand,

But came the tide, and made my pains his prey.

“Vain man,” said she, “that dost in vain assay,

A mortal thing so to immortalize;

For I myself shall like to this decay,

And eke my name be wiped out likewise.”

“Not so,” (quod I) “let baser things devise

To die in dust, but you shall live by fame:

My verse your vertues rare shall eternize,

And in the heavens write your glorious name:

Where whenas death shall all the world subdue,

Our love shall live, and later life renew.”

Annotations: “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser
LineAnnotation
1. One day I wrote her name upon the strandThe speaker describes a romantic gesture, writing his beloved’s name on the beach, symbolizing the act of capturing something ephemeral.
2. But came the waves and washed it away:The waves represent the inevitability of nature and time, which erases the writing, indicating the transient nature of life and human efforts.
3. Again I wrote it with a second hand,The speaker is persistent, rewriting the name, showing his determination to immortalize his beloved.
4. But came the tide, and made my pains his prey.Once again, nature (the tide) erases the name, symbolizing the futility of trying to achieve immortality through earthly means.
5. “Vain man,” said she, “that dost in vain assay,The woman speaks, calling the speaker’s attempts vain, and reminding him of the inevitable failure of trying to preserve mortality.
6. A mortal thing so to immortalize;She challenges the notion of immortalizing a mortal being, indicating that earthly things cannot escape the natural cycle of decay.
7. For I myself shall like to this decay,The woman acknowledges her own mortality, comparing herself to the fading name written on the sand.
8. And eke my name be wiped out likewise.”She extends the metaphor, stating that just as the waves wiped away her name, she too will eventually be forgotten by time.
9. “Not so,” (quod I) “let baser things deviseThe speaker counters, suggesting that common or lesser things may succumb to decay, but not something as special as his love.
10. To die in dust, but you shall live by fame:He asserts that while ordinary things may die and be forgotten, his beloved will live on through fame, particularly through his poetry.
11. My verse your vertues rare shall eternize,The speaker believes that his poetry will immortalize her virtues, preserving her name and essence for future generations.
12. And in the heavens write your glorious name:He claims that her name will be written in the heavens, an indication of her spiritual elevation and eternal remembrance.
13. Where whenas death shall all the world subdue,The speaker acknowledges death’s universal power over the world, yet still believes their love will transcend it.
14. Our love shall live, and later life renew.”In the concluding line, the speaker expresses confidence that their love will be immortal and will be revived or remembered in future life.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser
DeviceExplanationUsage in the Poem
AlliterationThe repetition of initial consonant sounds in nearby words.“But came the waves and washed it away” (line 2) – The repetition of the “w” sound creates a musical quality.
AllusionA reference to a person, place, event, or another literary work.The mention of “heavens” (line 12) is an allusion to the afterlife or the divine realm, suggesting her name will be remembered eternally.
AnaphoraThe repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses.“But came the waves… But came the tide” (lines 2, 4) – Repetition of “But came” emphasizes the persistence of nature’s forces.
ApostropheAddressing an absent person, an abstract idea, or an object as if it were present or alive.The speaker addresses his beloved (who is not literally present in the poem), as well as “death” in line 13, giving it human qualities.
AssonanceThe repetition of vowel sounds in nearby words.“Again I wrote it with a second hand” (line 3) – The “a” sound is repeated, enhancing the rhythm of the line.
CaesuraA pause in the middle of a line of verse, often indicated by punctuation.“Not so,” (quod I) “let baser things devise” (line 9) – The pause after “Not so” creates a dramatic effect.
ConsonanceThe repetition of consonant sounds in close proximity, particularly at the end of words.“My pains his prey” (line 4) – The repetition of the “p” sound ties the words together, creating a harsh tone to convey struggle.
DialogueThe use of conversation between two characters.The poem includes a dialogue between the speaker and his beloved, beginning in line 5 (“Vain man,” said she…) and continuing until line 14.
End-Stopped LineA line of poetry that concludes with a pause, often signified by punctuation like a period or comma.“And eke my name be wiped out likewise.” (line 8) – The line concludes with a period, emphasizing the finality of the statement.
EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence or clause across a line break without a pause.“One day I wrote her name upon the strand, / But came the waves and washed it away” (lines 1-2) – The idea flows across the line break without punctuation.
HyperboleDeliberate exaggeration for emphasis or effect.“And in the heavens write your glorious name” (line 12) – The idea of writing a name in the heavens is an exaggeration meant to signify eternal fame.
ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses (sight, sound, touch, etc.).The imagery of writing a name on the beach and waves washing it away creates a vivid visual scene, representing impermanence (lines 1-4).
IronyA contrast between expectation and reality.The beloved dismisses the speaker’s efforts as futile, but the irony lies in the fact that the poem itself immortalizes her as he intended (lines 5-6).
MetaphorA direct comparison between two unlike things, saying one is the other.The tide is metaphorically described as “mak[ing] my pains his prey” (line 4), comparing the waves to a predator that consumes the speaker’s efforts.
MetonymyA figure of speech in which one thing is represented by another that is closely associated with it.“The heavens” (line 12) is used as a metonym for eternity or the afterlife, where the beloved’s name will be remembered.
PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human things.The waves are personified as actively “washing” and “preying” on the speaker’s efforts (lines 2 and 4).
Rhyme SchemeThe ordered pattern of rhymes at the ends of lines in a poem.The poem follows an ABAB BCBC rhyme scheme, typical of Spenserian sonnets.
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities beyond their literal meaning.The waves symbolize the passage of time and the inevitable erasure of human effort, while the act of writing represents the desire to immortalize love (lines 1-4).
ToneThe attitude or mood conveyed by the poem.The tone shifts from melancholic (the inevitability of decay) to triumphant (immortalizing love through poetry) as the speaker challenges mortality (lines 1-14).
VoltaA shift in the poem’s theme or tone, often occurring in sonnets.The volta occurs in line 9, where the speaker shifts from acknowledging mortality to proclaiming that his poetry will grant eternal life to his beloved.
Themes: “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser
  • Theme 1: The Ephemeral Nature of Love and Life: The poem begins by illustrating the transience of both love and life. The poet writes his beloved’s name on the sand, only for the waves to erase it. This imagery symbolizes the impermanence of human existence and the fragility of love. The beloved’s response, “For I myself shall like to this decay,” reinforces this theme, suggesting that even she, a beautiful and immortalized figure, will eventually succumb to the passage of time.
  • Theme 2: The Power of Art to Immortalize: In contrast to the fleeting nature of life, the poet asserts the enduring power of art. He argues that by writing his beloved’s name in verse, he can immortalize her and their love. This theme is encapsulated in the lines, “My verse your vertues rare shall eternize, / And in the heavens write your glorious name.” The poet believes that through his poetry, he can transcend the limitations of mortality and ensure that his beloved’s memory will live on.
  • Theme 3: The Triumph of Love Over Death: The poem concludes with a hopeful vision of love triumphing over death. The poet suggests that while death may eventually conquer the physical world, their love will endure. This theme is conveyed in the final lines, “Where whenas death shall all the world subdue, / Our love shall live, and later life renew.” The poet expresses a belief in the eternal nature of love, suggesting that it can transcend even the most fundamental aspects of human existence.
  • Theme 4: The Poet’s Dedication to His Beloved: Throughout the poem, the poet expresses a deep and unwavering dedication to his beloved. His desire to immortalize her name and their love reflects a profound commitment to preserving their relationship. This theme is evident in the poet’s persistence despite the challenges posed by the natural world and the inevitability of death.
Literary Theories and “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser 
Literary TheoryKey ConceptsApplication to the PoemReferences
New CriticismClose reading, textual analysis, focus on the poem’s internal structure and languageThe poem’s intricate imagery and symbolism, such as the waves erasing the poet’s writing, contribute to its overall meaning and theme of the impermanence of life and love.“But came the waves and washed it away”
DeconstructionChallenges the notion of a fixed meaning, explores underlying contradictions and ambiguitiesThe poem’s tension between the desire for immortality and the inevitability of decay creates a deconstructive reading, highlighting the impossibility of fully escaping the limitations of time and mortality.“Again I wrote it with a second hand, / But came the tide, and made my pains his prey”
Feminist CriticismExamines gender roles, power dynamics, and representations of women in literatureWhile the poem is addressed to a woman, it can be analyzed through a feminist lens to explore how the beloved is portrayed and whether she is given agency or is merely an object of the poet’s desire.“Vain man,” said she, “that dost in vain assay, / A mortal thing so to immortalize”
Critical Questions about “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser
  • How does Spenser explore the theme of mortality in the sonnet?
  • In “Amoretti LXXV”, Spenser grapples with the theme of mortality by illustrating the transient nature of life through the act of writing his beloved’s name on the beach, only for the waves to wash it away. This imagery highlights the inevitable decay that time imposes on all things, including human life and memory: “But came the waves and washed it away” (line 2). His beloved acknowledges this reality, telling the speaker, “A mortal thing so to immortalize” (line 6), stressing that it is impossible to make mortal life eternal. This pessimistic view of mortality is challenged by the speaker, who believes that through his poetry, he can defy time and preserve her name and virtues. The juxtaposition between the physical impermanence of her name and the promise of immortality through verse highlights the tension between mortality and the human desire for lasting remembrance.
  • In what way does the poem reflect the Renaissance ideal of eternal fame through art?
  • The poem strongly reflects the Renaissance ideal that art, particularly poetry, has the power to grant eternal life. Spenser, writing during the Renaissance, adheres to the belief that while physical life may perish, artistic expression can immortalize a person or event. In line 11, the speaker claims, “My verse your vertues rare shall eternize,” suggesting that his poetic composition will capture and preserve his beloved’s essence for future generations. The Renaissance emphasis on human achievement and the capacity of art to transcend time is evident in the speaker’s conviction that his poetry will inscribe his beloved’s name “in the heavens” (line 12), symbolizing her eternal place in the universe. The idea of transcending death through art aligns with the Renaissance humanist view of the artist as a creator of timeless works that defy the boundaries of mortality.
  • What role does nature play in the poem, and how does it contribute to its themes?
  • Nature, represented by the waves and tide, plays a central role in “Amoretti LXXV” as a force that symbolizes the passage of time and the impermanence of life. The waves “washed it away” (line 2), and the tide “made my pains his prey” (line 4), serving as metaphors for time’s relentless ability to erase human achievements and memories. The constant movement of the waves mirrors the inevitability of decay and death, emphasizing the frailty of human life and efforts. However, nature’s role is contrasted with the speaker’s belief in poetry’s ability to defy this natural cycle. While the natural world may obliterate physical traces, the speaker argues that his verse can withstand these forces and preserve his beloved’s name. Thus, nature in the poem underscores the conflict between time and the speaker’s desire for eternal remembrance through art.
  • How does the dialogue between the speaker and his beloved shape the poem’s argument?
  • The dialogue between the speaker and his beloved is crucial to the development of the poem’s argument, as it presents opposing views on the nature of mortality and immortality. The beloved’s words, “Vain man” (line 5), represent a rational acceptance of the inevitability of death and the futility of trying to preserve mortal things. She reminds the speaker that “I myself shall like to this decay” (line 7), implying that, just like the writing on the sand, she too will fade. This argument embodies a stoic realism, grounded in the acknowledgment of life’s impermanence. In response, the speaker counters with an idealistic belief in the power of poetry to transcend death. He claims that “my verse your vertues rare shall eternize” (line 11), proposing that while her physical body may decay, her memory will live on through his writing. This exchange sets up a tension between realism and idealism, with the speaker ultimately asserting that love and art can triumph over death.
Literary Works Similar to “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser
  • Sonnet 18: Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?” by William Shakespeare
  • Similarity: Like Spenser’s sonnet, Shakespeare’s Sonnet 18 explores the theme of immortalizing a beloved through poetry. Shakespeare, too, believes that verse has the power to preserve beauty and love beyond the decay of time.
  • “Ozymandias” by Percy Bysshe Shelley
  • Similarity: Shelley’s “Ozymandias” similarly reflects on the transient nature of human achievements and how time erases even the greatest monuments, paralleling Spenser’s meditation on how earthly things are washed away, despite human attempts at permanence.
  • “Sonnet 55: Not marble, nor the gilded monuments” by William Shakespeare
  • Similarity: In this sonnet, Shakespeare, much like Spenser, asserts that poetry has the power to outlast physical monuments and ensure that the memory of a beloved remains eternal, despite the inevitable destruction of time.
  • “Ode on a Grecian Urn” by John Keats
  • Similarity: Keats’s ode shares the theme of immortality through art with Spenser’s sonnet. Both works contemplate how art can capture moments and emotions, preserving them beyond the limits of life and time.
  • “When I Have Fears That I May Cease to Be” by John Keats
  • Similarity: Keats, like Spenser, explores the fear of mortality and the desire to leave a lasting legacy. Both poems reflect on the potential of poetry to grant immortality in a world where human life is fleeting.
Representative Quotations of “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“One day I wrote her name upon the strand”The poem begins with the poet writing his beloved’s name on the beach.New Criticism: This imagery sets the stage for the poem’s exploration of mortality and the transience of love.
“But came the waves and washed it away”The waves erase the poet’s writing, symbolizing the impermanence of life and love.Deconstruction: This image highlights the inherent contradiction between the poet’s desire for immortality and the inevitable forces of nature.
“Again I wrote it with a second hand”The poet tries to rewrite his beloved’s name, demonstrating his persistence in preserving her memory.Feminist Criticism: While the poem is addressed to a woman, this line can be interpreted as the poet’s attempt to control or possess her through his writing.
“But came the tide, and made my pains his prey”The tide erases the poet’s second attempt, reinforcing the theme of the futility of his efforts.New Criticism: This image contributes to the poem’s overall tone of despair and melancholy.
“Vain man,” said she, “that dost in vain assay, / A mortal thing so to immortalize”The beloved responds to the poet’s attempts, suggesting that his efforts are futile.Feminist Criticism: This line suggests that the beloved may be aware of the poet’s objectification and is challenging his assumptions.
“For I myself shall like to this decay”The beloved acknowledges her own mortality, further emphasizing the theme of the impermanence of life.Deconstruction: This line reinforces the deconstructive reading of the poem, highlighting the impossibility of escaping death and decay.
“Not so,” (quod I) “let baser things devise / To die in dust, but you shall live by fame”The poet argues that through his poetry, he can immortalize his beloved.New Criticism: This line expresses the poet’s belief in the power of art to transcend mortality.
“My verse your vertues rare shall eternize”The poet asserts that his poetry will preserve his beloved’s memory.Deconstruction: This line can be read as a contradictory statement, as it suggests that the poet believes he can overcome the limitations of language and time.
“And in the heavens write your glorious name”The poet envisions his beloved’s name being written in the heavens, symbolizing her eternal fame.New Criticism: This image creates a sense of hope and transcendence, contrasting with the earlier images of loss and decay.
“Where whenas death shall all the world subdue, / Our love shall live, and later life renew”The poet suggests that their love will endure beyond death.Deconstruction: This final line can be seen as a hopeful affirmation of love’s power, but it also raises questions about the nature of love and its ability to truly transcend mortality.
Suggested Readings: “Amoretti LXXV: One Day I Wrote her Name” by Edmund Spenser
  1. Araujo, Laura Ribeiro. “The Crisscrossing of Time in Spenser’s Amoretti LXXV and Shakespeare’s Sonnet XVIII.” Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) 8.2 (2022): 62-70.
  2. BATES, CATHERINE. “The Politics of Spenser’s ‘Amoretti.’” Criticism, vol. 33, no. 1, 1991, pp. 73–89. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23113624. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  3. Johnson, William C. “Spenser’s Amoretti and the Art of the Liturgy.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, vol. 14, no. 1, 1974, pp. 47–61. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/449682. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.

“Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis

“Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection of sonnets.

"Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring" by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare

“Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection of sonnets. The sonnet is characterized by its melancholic tone and the speaker’s longing for his beloved. The main idea of the sonnet is the speaker’s regret and sadness over being absent from his lover during the beautiful spring season.

Text: “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare

From you have I been absent in the spring,

When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim,

Hath put a spirit of youth in everything,

That heavy Saturn laughed and leaped with him.

Yet nor the lays of birds, nor the sweet smell

Of different flowers in odour and in hue,

Could make me any summer’s story tell,

Or from their proud lap pluck them where they grew:

Nor did I wonder at the lily’s white,

Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose;

They were but sweet, but figures of delight

Drawn after you, – you pattern of all those.

    Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away,

    As with your shadow I with these did play.

Annotations: “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
LineTextAnnotation
1From you have I been absent in the spring,The speaker expresses absence from the beloved during springtime.
2When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim,April, a symbol of spring, is described as colorful and adorned.
3Hath put a spirit of youth in everything,Springtime brings vitality and rejuvenation to everything.
4That heavy Saturn laughed and leaped with him.Even the serious Saturn (associated with time and limitations) rejoices.
5Yet nor the lays of birds, nor the sweet smellDespite the beauty of nature, the speaker remains unmoved.
6Of different flowers in odour and in hue,The speaker describes the variety of flowers in scent and color.
7Could make me any summer’s story tell,The speaker is unable to find joy or meaning in the summer.
8Or from their proud lap pluck them where they grew:The speaker is uninterested in even picking the flowers.
9Nor did I wonder at the lily’s white,The speaker does not admire the beauty of the lily.
10Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose;The speaker does not appreciate the beauty of the rose.
11They were but sweet, but figures of delightThe flowers are merely pleasant but lack true meaning.
12Drawn after you, – you pattern of all those.The flowers are mere imitations of the beloved.
13Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away,Without the beloved, the speaker feels it is still winter.
14As with your shadow I with these did play.The speaker compares playing with the flowers to playing with the beloved’s shadow.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
DeviceDefinitionExampleExplanation
AlliterationRepetition of initial consonant sounds“When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim”The repetition of the “p” sound creates a rhythmic effect, emphasizing the imagery of spring.
AllusionReference to another work, person, or event“That heavy Saturn laughed and leaped with him”Saturn is a reference to the Roman god, symbolizing melancholy, contrasting with the joy of spring.
AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of clauses“Nor the lays of birds, nor the sweet smell”Repeating “Nor” highlights the speaker’s disconnection from nature.
AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds“When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim”The “i” sound in “pied” and “trim” adds a harmonious effect that reflects the season’s beauty.
ConsonanceRepetition of consonant sounds, especially at the end of words“Drawn after you, – you pattern of all those”The “n” sound in “Drawn” and “pattern” connects the words musically, linking ideas.
EnjambmentContinuation of a sentence beyond the end of a line“Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away,”The sentence flows into the next line, enhancing the speaker’s reflective tone.
HyperboleExaggerated statements“That heavy Saturn laughed and leaped with him”This exaggeration of Saturn “laughing and leaping” emphasizes the joyfulness of spring.
ImageryDescriptive language appealing to the senses“Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose”“Deep vermilion” vividly appeals to the sense of sight, evoking the rich color of the rose.
MetaphorA direct comparison between two things“You pattern of all those”The speaker compares the beloved to a “pattern,” meaning they are the ideal model of beauty.
PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human things“Hath put a spirit of youth in everything”Spring is personified as placing youth and energy into the world.
QuatrainA stanza of four linesFirst four lines of the poemThe poem follows the quatrain structure, typical of Shakespearean sonnets, providing a rhythmic form.
RefrainA repeated line or group of lines“Nor the lays of birds, nor the sweet smell”Repeated phrases like “nor” create a refrain-like effect, emphasizing the speaker’s emotional state.
RhymeCorrespondence of sound between words“Trim – him; hue – grew”The rhyme enhances the musical quality and creates a sense of closure in each quatrain.
SimileA comparison using “like” or “as”“As with your shadow I with these did play”The speaker compares interacting with nature to playing with a shadow, indicating a lack of true engagement.
SonnetA poem of 14 lines with a specific rhyme schemeThe entire poemThe poem follows the traditional Shakespearean sonnet form, with a rhyme scheme of ABAB CDCD EFEF GG.
SymbolismUse of symbols to signify ideas and qualities beyond the literal sense“The lily’s white”The lily symbolizes purity, which the speaker fails to appreciate in the absence of the beloved.
ToneThe general attitude or mood of the poemThe speaker’s melancholic reflectionThe poem’s tone reflects sadness and longing as the speaker feels disconnected from the beauty of spring.
Iambic PentameterA line of verse with five metrical feet, each consisting of one short syllable followed by a long syllable“From you have I been absent in the spring,”This line follows the iambic pentameter, a rhythmic structure typical of Shakespeare’s sonnets.
VoltaThe turn of thought or argument in a sonnet“Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away,”This line marks a shift in tone, from describing spring to the speaker’s inner sense of winter.
SynecdocheA figure of speech in which a part is made to represent the whole“Proud lap pluck them where they grew”“Lap” is used to represent the earth as a whole, emphasizing the connection between nature and the speaker.
Themes: “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
  1. Absence and Longing: The central theme of the sonnet is the speaker’s emotional disconnection from the joys of spring due to the absence of the beloved. The speaker’s inability to appreciate the beauty of the season is evident in lines such as, “Nor did I wonder at the lily’s white, / Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose” (lines 9-10). The absence creates a deep sense of longing, as the speaker feels isolated from the vibrancy of life that surrounds him, underscoring the emotional weight of separation.
  2. The Power of Love: Another significant theme is the transformative power of love. The speaker suggests that his experience of beauty, joy, and even nature itself is deeply tied to the presence of the beloved. Despite the arrival of spring, a season of renewal and youth, the speaker remarks, “Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away, / As with your shadow I with these did play” (lines 13-14). This suggests that love not only influences the speaker’s emotions but also his perception of the world, with everything seeming cold and lifeless without the beloved.
  3. Nature and Beauty: The sonnet explores the relationship between nature and beauty, with the speaker reflecting on the splendor of spring — “When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim, / Hath put a spirit of youth in everything” (lines 2-3). However, he paradoxically finds no joy in it because, for him, the beloved is the embodiment of all beauty. The speaker cannot appreciate the vibrant colors and sweet smells of the flowers because they are mere reflections of the beloved, described as the “pattern of all those” (line 12), emphasizing that the beloved surpasses all natural beauty.
  4. Time and Seasons: The contrast between spring and winter highlights the theme of time, particularly in relation to emotional states. Spring typically symbolizes rebirth, growth, and vitality, while winter often represents death or dormancy. The speaker, however, feels stuck in an emotional “winter” despite the arrival of spring, symbolizing how time and seasons can be experienced differently based on one’s internal emotional state. The reference to “heavy Saturn” (line 4), the Roman god associated with time, reinforces the idea that time feels burdensome and joyless in the beloved’s absence.
Literary Theories and “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
Literary TheoryApplication to “Sonnet 98”References from the Sonnet
Psychoanalytic TheoryThis theory, based on Freud’s ideas, explores the speaker’s inner emotional conflict and unconscious desires. The sonnet reflects a sense of emotional repression, as the speaker is unable to connect with the joys of spring, which may suggest deep psychological attachment to the beloved.The speaker’s statement, “Nor did I wonder at the lily’s white, / Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose” (lines 9-10), reveals his inability to experience external beauty, symbolizing emotional detachment or sublimated desire for the beloved.
New CriticismFocuses on close reading of the text, emphasizing formal elements like imagery, structure, and metaphor. In this approach, the sonnet’s careful use of form, rhyme, and metaphor highlights the emotional depth of the speaker’s experience.The structured rhyme scheme (ABAB) and use of metaphor, such as “You pattern of all those” (line 12), emphasize the beloved as the ideal form of beauty and order in the speaker’s emotional and aesthetic world.
EcocriticismThis theory examines the relationship between literature and the natural world. The sonnet can be viewed as exploring the speaker’s disconnection from nature, reflecting on how human emotions shape one’s interaction with the environment.Despite the lush imagery of spring, such as “When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim” (line 2), the speaker cannot appreciate nature’s beauty due to his emotional state, showing the influence of human emotions on one’s perception of the natural world.
Critical Questions about “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
  1. How does the speaker’s emotional state affect his perception of nature in the sonnet?
    The speaker’s emotional state dramatically alters how he perceives the natural world. Although it is spring, a time traditionally associated with beauty and renewal, the speaker feels detached from its vibrancy because of the absence of the beloved. This is expressed in lines like, “Nor did I wonder at the lily’s white, / Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose” (lines 9-10). The speaker’s lack of enthusiasm for these typically admired features of nature reflects his inner desolation and longing. His emotional state transforms the beauty of spring into something mundane, suggesting that his appreciation for nature is contingent upon the presence of the beloved.
  2. Why does the speaker compare the absence of the beloved to winter despite it being spring?
    The speaker compares the absence of the beloved to winter to highlight the emotional coldness and barrenness he feels without them. While nature is in full bloom during spring, the speaker feels no warmth or joy, stating, “Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away” (line 13). This comparison emphasizes the dissonance between the external world and the speaker’s inner experience. Though the season is one of renewal and growth, the speaker’s heart remains frozen, illustrating how love profoundly shapes his perception of time and seasons.
  3. What is the significance of the reference to Saturn in the sonnet?
    The reference to Saturn in line 4—“That heavy Saturn laughed and leaped with him”—is significant as it brings a symbolic layer of time and melancholy to the sonnet. Saturn, the Roman god associated with time and age, is often linked with somberness and reflection. By stating that even Saturn laughed and leaped during spring, the speaker highlights the stark contrast between the season’s natural exuberance and his own sadness. The reference to Saturn underscores the weight of time on the speaker, suggesting that in the absence of the beloved, even time feels oppressive and joyless.
  4. How does Shakespeare use imagery to contrast the speaker’s emotions with the setting of spring?
    Shakespeare uses rich imagery throughout the sonnet to contrast the speaker’s emotional emptiness with the flourishing beauty of spring. The detailed description of spring, with phrases like “proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim” (line 2) and “different flowers in odour and in hue” (line 6), paints a vivid picture of nature in full bloom. However, the speaker remains unaffected by these sensory delights, stating, “Could make me any summer’s story tell” (line 7). The contrast between the colorful, lively imagery of spring and the speaker’s emotional detachment emphasizes how deeply his feelings for the absent beloved influence his entire experience of the world, rendering beauty meaningless without their presence.
Literary Works Similar to “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
  1. “Bright Star” by John Keats
    Both poems explore themes of longing and an intense emotional connection to a loved one, with nature serving as a backdrop to personal feelings.
  2. “She Walks in Beauty” by Lord Byron
    Like Shakespeare’s sonnet, this poem celebrates the beauty of a beloved, drawing comparisons between the beloved and natural elements.
  3. Ode to a Nightingale” by John Keats
    Keats, like Shakespeare, contrasts nature’s beauty with the speaker’s emotional turmoil and sense of disconnection from life’s joys.
  4. “A Red, Red Rose” by Robert Burns
    Burns’ poem shares a theme of comparing the beloved to elements of nature, emphasizing the lover’s deep affection and connection to beauty.
  5. “The Wild Swans at Coole” by W.B. Yeats
    Similar to Shakespeare’s exploration of seasonal changes, Yeats reflects on the passage of time and the speaker’s longing for a sense of emotional fulfillment.
Representative Quotations of “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
QuotationContextTheoretical PerspectiveReferences from the Sonnet
“From you have I been absent in the spring”The speaker begins by lamenting their physical and emotional separation from the beloved.Psychoanalytic Theory: Highlights the speaker’s inner conflict and longing.Line 1
“When proud-pied April, dressed in all his trim”The speaker describes the lively and colorful spring, symbolizing nature’s renewal.Ecocriticism: Illustrates the natural world’s vibrancy, but the speaker remains detached.Line 2
“Hath put a spirit of youth in everything”Spring’s energy revitalizes the natural world, creating an atmosphere of rejuvenation.New Criticism: Focuses on the metaphor of spring’s youthfulness and its contrast with the speaker’s mood.Line 3
“That heavy Saturn laughed and leaped with him”Even the typically melancholic figure of Saturn is described as joyful in spring.Classical Allusion & Psychoanalytic Theory: Saturn, as a symbol of time and melancholy, contrasts with the joy of spring.Line 4
“Nor the lays of birds, nor the sweet smell”The speaker lists sensory delights of spring, but remains emotionally unaffected by them.Psychoanalytic Theory: The speaker’s emotional numbness reflects inner conflict.Line 5
“Of different flowers in odour and in hue”Nature’s diversity and beauty are described, with emphasis on the sensory richness of spring.Ecocriticism: Highlights nature’s flourishing, contrasting with the speaker’s disconnection.Line 6
“Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose”The speaker acknowledges the beauty of the rose but cannot appreciate it without the beloved.New Criticism: Symbolism of the rose as a representation of beauty the speaker cannot fully experience.Line 10
“You pattern of all those”The beloved is described as the model of all beauty, surpassing nature itself.Psychoanalytic Theory & New Criticism: The beloved is idealized, becoming the speaker’s emotional and aesthetic focus.Line 12
“Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away”Despite the arrival of spring, the speaker feels as though it remains winter in the beloved’s absence.Psychoanalytic Theory: Emotional detachment shapes perception of time and seasons.Line 13
“As with your shadow I with these did play”The speaker interacts with the beauty of spring as though it is a mere shadow of the beloved.New Criticism: The metaphor of the shadow emphasizes the speaker’s inability to engage with nature without the beloved.Line 14
Suggested Readings: “Sonnet 98: From You Have I Been Absent in The Spring” by William Shakespeare
  1. Emerson, Oliver Farrar. “Shakespeare’s Sonneteering.” Studies in Philology, vol. 20, no. 2, 1923, pp. 111–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171848. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  2. Bates, Ernest Sutherland. “The Sincerity of Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” Modern Philology, vol. 8, no. 1, 1910, pp. 87–106. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/432499. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  3. MATZ, ROBERT. “THE SCANDALS OF SHAKESPEARE’S SONNETS.” ELH, vol. 77, no. 2, 2010, pp. 477–508. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40664640. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  4. Barber, C. L. “Shakespeare in His Sonnets.” The Massachusetts Review, vol. 1, no. 4, 1960, pp. 648–72. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25086565. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.

“Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis

Sonnet 116: “Let Me Not to the Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection “Sonnets”.

"Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds" by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare

Sonnet 116: “Let Me Not to the Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection “Sonnets”. This sonnet is praised for its enduring qualities of love and commitment. The main idea is to assert that true love is steadfast and unchangeable, unaffected by time, distance, or external circumstances. Shakespeare emphasizes the enduring nature of love through metaphors and imagery, suggesting that it is a constant force that transcends the fleeting nature of life.

Text: “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare

Let me not to the marriage of true minds

Admit impediments. Love is not love

Which alters when it alteration finds,

Or bends with the remover to remove.

O no! it is an ever-fixed mark

That looks on tempests and is never shaken;

It is the star to every wand’ring bark,

Whose worth’s unknown, although his height be taken.

Love’s not Time’s fool, though rosy lips and cheeks

Within his bending sickle’s compass come;

Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,

But bears it out even to the edge of doom.

If this be error and upon me prov’d,

I never writ, nor no man ever lov’d.

Annotations: “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare
LineTextAnnotation
1Let me not to the marriage of true mindsIntroduces the theme of true love and its enduring nature.
2Admit impediments.Implies that there should be no obstacles to true love.
3Love is not loveDefines what true love is not: something that changes or weakens.
4Which alters when it alteration finds,Continues to define false love as something that changes in response to circumstances.
5Or bends with the remover to remove.Further emphasizes the idea that false love is easily influenced and swayed.
6O no! it is an ever-fixed markContrasts true love with false love, stating that it is unchanging and steadfast.
7That looks on tempests and is never shaken;Metaphorically compares true love to a fixed point that remains unaffected by storms or challenges.
8It is the star to every wand’ring bark,Similes true love to a guiding star for those who may be lost.
9Whose worth’s unknown, although his height be taken.Suggests that the value of true love is immeasurable, even if its physical manifestations are measured.
10Love’s not Time’s fool,Asserts that true love is not subject to the passage of time.
11though rosy lips and cheeksAcknowledges the physical aspects of love, but emphasizes that these are not essential to true love.
12Within his bending sickle’s compass come;Metaphorically refers to the aging process and the effects of time on physical appearance.
13Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,Reiterates the idea that true love is unaffected by the passage of time.
14But bears it out even to the edge of doom.Suggests that true love endures until the end of life or the world.
15If this be error and upon me prov’d,Challenges the reader to disprove the assertion that true love is enduring.
16I never writ, nor no man ever lov’d.Implies that if the poem’s assertion is false, then neither the poet nor anyone else has ever truly loved.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare
Literary/Poetic DeviceExampleExplanation
AlliterationLet me not to the marriage of true mindsRepetition of the initial ‘m’ sound in ‘marriage’ and ‘minds’.
AnaphoraLove is not loveRepetition of ‘Love is’ at the beginning of two lines.
AssonanceLove alters not with his brief hoursRepetition of vowel sound in ‘alters’ and ‘hours’.
ConsonanceThat looks on tempests and is never shakenRepetition of consonant sound in ‘tempests’ and ‘never’.
MetaphorIt is the star to every wandering barkComparing love to a guiding star.
SimileLove’s not Time’s foolLove is compared to a servant of Time, though not directly.
PersonificationLove’s not Time’s foolTime is personified as a force that ages people, but cannot alter love.
HyperboleLove alters not with his brief hours and weeksExaggeration of love’s unchanging nature despite time.
SymbolismIt is the star to every wandering barkThe star symbolizes love’s constancy and guidance.
EnjambmentOr bends with the remover to removeThe thought runs over the end of the line into the next.
Iambic PentameterThroughout the entire sonnetEach line follows an unstressed-stressed syllable pattern.
VoltaLine 9: ‘Love’s not Time’s fool…’Shift in the poem’s argument, from describing love to contrasting it with Time.
ImageryThat looks on tempests and is never shakenVivid description of love as a ‘fixed mark’ and ‘star’.
AllusionLove’s not Time’s foolReference to classical notions of Time and love.
IronyThough rosy lips and cheeksIt is ironic that time affects physical appearance, but not love.
ParadoxLove’s not Time’s foolContradictory statement that love is eternal despite Time’s effects.
CaesuraO no! it is an ever-fixed markPause for emphasis before ‘O no!’.
ApostropheIf this be error and upon me prov’dDirectly addressing the hypothetical reader or critic.
EpigramIf this be error and upon me prov’dA brief, clever, and memorable statement.
OxymoronLove is not love which altersContradictory ideas: love’s permanence vs Time’s transient nature.
Themes: “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare
  1. The Enduring Nature of True Love: In Sonnet 116, Shakespeare presents a powerful argument for the enduring nature of true love. He asserts that true love is a constant force that transcends time, distance, and external circumstances. Lines such as “Love is not love / Which alters when it alteration finds” and “Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks” emphasize this theme, suggesting that true love is a fixed point that remains unshaken by life’s challenges. Unlike false love, which is easily influenced and swayed by external factors, true love is a steadfast and unwavering commitment.
  2. The Contrast Between True and False Love: The sonnet contrasts true love with false love, which is characterized by its dependence on external factors and its susceptibility to change. Lines like “Or bends with the remover to remove” and “Love’s not Time’s fool” highlight the difference between the steadfast nature of true love and the fleeting nature of false love. While false love may be influenced by physical beauty, social status, or other superficial factors, true love is based on a deep emotional connection that is not easily broken.
  3. The Power of Love to Transcend Physical Limitations: Shakespeare suggests that true love is not defined solely by physical attraction or beauty. Lines like “though rosy lips and cheeks / Within his bending sickle’s compass come” acknowledge the physical aspects of love but emphasize that these are not essential to its true nature. True love, the sonnet implies, is a spiritual connection that transcends the limitations of the physical world. It is a bond that is rooted in shared values, experiences, and a deep understanding of each other’s souls.
  4. The Assertion of Love’s Enduring Value: The sonnet concludes with a powerful assertion of love’s enduring value. Lines like “If this be error and upon me prov’d, / I never writ, nor no man ever lov’d” challenge the reader to disprove the poem’s claim that true love is a constant force. Shakespeare suggests that if his assertion is false, then neither he nor anyone else has ever truly loved. This bold statement underscores the importance of true love and its ability to withstand the test of time.
Literary Theories and “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare
Literary TheoryExplanationExample/Lines from the Sonnet
Formalism/New CriticismFocuses on the form, structure, and language of the poem without considering external context like the author’s biography or historical background. Formalists would analyze the sonnet’s use of rhyme, meter, and literary devices to convey meaning.“Love is not love Which alters when it alteration finds” – Formalists would analyze the structure of the line and how the repetition emphasizes the steadfastness of love.
StructuralismExamines the underlying structures that shape the meaning of the text, including patterns, symbols, and binary oppositions. In “Sonnet 116”, one might analyze the binary oppositions of change vs. constancy and time vs. eternity.“Love’s not Time’s fool” – The opposition between love and time serves as a structure to examine the eternal nature of love versus the transient nature of time.
Psychoanalytic TheoryThis theory explores the psychological motivations of characters and the subconscious desires or anxieties reflected in the text. In “Sonnet 116”, one could explore how love is portrayed as an idealized, almost unattainable state, reflecting human fears of loss and change.“It is the star to every wand’ring bark” – The metaphor of love as a guiding star might be seen as a projection of the speaker’s desire for stability in a chaotic world, highlighting a deep-seated fear of emotional change.
Critical Questions about “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare

·         How does Shakespeare define true love in Sonnet 116?

  • Shakespeare defines true love as unwavering, constant, and immune to external changes. In the sonnet, he emphasizes that real love does not alter when circumstances shift. He states, “Love is not love which alters when it alteration finds” (line 3), meaning that true love remains constant, even when faced with difficulties or changes in the beloved. He further describes love as an “ever-fixed mark” (line 5), symbolizing its immutability, and compares it to a guiding star that helps ships navigate, suggesting that love guides us through life’s challenges. The constancy of true love is contrasted with time and physical decay, reinforcing the idea that love transcends the temporary.

·         What is the significance of time in the sonnet, and how does it relate to love?

  • Time plays a crucial role in the sonnet as a force that can diminish physical beauty and alter the world, yet it is depicted as powerless against true love. Shakespeare acknowledges that time affects human beings, as seen in “rosy lips and cheeks within his bending sickle’s compass come” (line 9-10), where the sickle represents time’s ability to bring about aging and mortality. However, love is not susceptible to the ravages of time. He claims, “Love’s not Time’s fool” (line 9), suggesting that while time may change appearances, it cannot alter true love. This contrast between love and time highlights love’s endurance, even in the face of inevitable decay and death.

·         How does Shakespeare use metaphor to convey the nature of love?

  • Shakespeare employs metaphors throughout the sonnet to depict love as both a constant and a guiding force. One of the most prominent metaphors is “It is the star to every wandering bark” (line 7), comparing love to a fixed star that helps lost ships (barks) navigate. This metaphor suggests that love is a source of direction and stability, guiding individuals through life’s tumultuous seas. Another powerful metaphor is “an ever-fixed mark” (line 5), which evokes the image of a lighthouse or immovable landmark, symbolizing love’s unshakeable presence even in the face of challenges (“tempests”). These metaphors underscore love’s steadfast, eternal qualities.

·         What role does the speaker’s assertion of personal authority play in the sonnet’s argument about love?

  • The speaker ends the sonnet with a bold declaration of his personal conviction about love, stating, “If this be error and upon me proved, I never writ, nor no man ever loved” (lines 13-14). This assertion serves to emphasize the speaker’s confidence in his understanding of love’s true nature. By placing his reputation as a writer and his authority on the line, he strengthens his argument that love is eternal and unchangeable. The final couplet is not only a reaffirmation of the sonnet’s main theme but also an act of personal accountability, as the speaker stakes his credibility on the belief that his description of love is accurate, suggesting that any contradiction would invalidate his life’s work.
Literary Works Similar to “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare
  1. “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell: Both poems explore the enduring nature of love and the passage of time.
  2. “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. Eliot: Both works grapple with the complexities of human relationships and the fear of aging.
  3. “Ode on a Grecian Urn” by John Keats: Both poems celebrate the enduring power of art and beauty, even in the face of time’s ravages.
  4. “Annabel Lee” by Edgar Allan Poe: Both poems celebrate the enduring power of love, even in the face of death.
Representative Quotations of “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments”The opening line declares that nothing should stand in the way of true love.Formalism: Focuses on the structure of the sentence, where “marriage” becomes a metaphor for unity.
“Love is not love which alters when it alteration finds”This line states that true love does not change when external circumstances change.Structuralism: Examines the binary opposition of constancy vs. change to define love’s permanence.
“Or bends with the remover to remove”Suggests that love does not waver even when someone tries to take it away.Psychoanalytic Theory: Could reflect the fear of abandonment or the anxiety about love’s stability.
“O no! it is an ever-fixed mark”Describes love as an unchanging point, like a lighthouse guiding through a storm.Formalism: Focuses on metaphor and how it shapes the concept of love as constant and unyielding.
“That looks on tempests and is never shaken”Love remains steadfast even in the face of adversity and emotional turmoil.New Criticism: Analyzes the imagery of storms to signify emotional challenges in relationships.
“It is the star to every wand’ring bark”Love is compared to a star that guides lost ships.Structuralism: Focuses on the symbol of the star, representing love as a guiding and stable force.
“Love’s not Time’s fool”Time does not govern true love, despite its effects on physical beauty and youth.Historical Criticism: Could be interpreted in the context of Elizabethan notions of time and fate.
“Though rosy lips and cheeks within his bending sickle’s compass come”Acknowledges that physical beauty fades under the influence of time, but love remains.Psychoanalytic Theory: Represents the human fear of aging and decay, contrasting with the endurance of love.
“Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks”Time is portrayed as fleeting, while love endures beyond it.New Criticism: Focuses on the dichotomy between the ephemeral nature of time and the permanence of love.
“If this be error and upon me prov’d, I never writ, nor no man ever lov’d”The concluding couplet emphasizes the speaker’s certainty about the nature of true love.Deconstruction: Examines the self-referential nature of the final statement, questioning meaning and truth.
Suggested Readings: “Sonnet 116: Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds” by William Shakespeare
  1. Neely, Carol Thomas. “Detachment and Engagement in Shakespeare’s Sonnets: 94, 116, and 129.” PMLA, vol. 92, no. 1, 1977, pp. 83–95. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/461416. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  2. Roessner, Jane. “The Coherence and the Context of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 81, no. 3, 1982, pp. 331–46. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27709024. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  3. Emerson, Oliver Farrar. “Shakespeare’s Sonneteering.” Studies in Philology, vol. 20, no. 2, 1923, pp. 111–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171848. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  4. MATZ, ROBERT. “THE SCANDALS OF SHAKESPEARE’S SONNETS.” ELH, vol. 77, no. 2, 2010, pp. 477–508. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40664640. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.

“Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis

“Sonnet 147: My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1598 in the collection “The Passionate Pilgrim”.

"Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still" by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare

“Sonnet 147: My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1598 in the collection “The Passionate Pilgrim”. This sonnet explores the overwhelming power of love, comparing it to a consuming fever. The speaker describes the intensity of their longing and the physical and emotional turmoil it causes. The main idea is that love can be both exhilarating and painful, and its effects can be all-consuming.

Text: “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare

My love is as a fever, longing still

For that which longer nurseth the disease,

Feeding on that which doth preserve the ill,

Th’ uncertain sickly appetite to please.

My reason, the physician to my love,

Angry that his prescriptions are not kept,

Hath left me, and I desperate now approve

Desire is death, which physic did except.

Past cure I am, now reason is past care,

And frantic-mad with evermore unrest;

My thoughts and my discourse as madmen’s are,

At random from the truth vainly expressed:

    For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright,

    Who art as black as hell, as dark as night.

Annotations: “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare
LineTextAnnotation
1My love is as a fever, longing stillThe speaker compares their love to a persistent fever, suggesting its intensity and consuming nature.
2For that which longer nurseth the disease,The fever is sustained by the object of the speaker’s love, implying that their desire is self-destructive.
3Feeding on that which doth preserve the ill,The speaker continues to indulge in their passion, even though it is causing them harm.
4Th’ uncertain sickly appetite to please.The fever is likened to a sick appetite, implying that the speaker’s desire is irrational and uncontrollable.
5My reason, the physician to my love,The speaker’s reason, or rational mind, is presented as a physician trying to treat their love.
6Angry that his prescriptions are not kept,The speaker’s reason is frustrated because their desires are not being followed.
7Hath left me, and I desperate now approveReason has abandoned the speaker, leaving them hopeless and accepting their situation.
8Desire is death, which physic did except.The speaker acknowledges that their desire is ultimately destructive, contrary to what reason might have advised.
9Past cure I am, now reason is past care,The speaker believes they are beyond help, and reason has given up on them.
10And frantic-mad with evermore unrest;The speaker is driven to madness by their constant turmoil and longing.
11My thoughts and my discourse as madmen’s are,The speaker’s thoughts and speech are disordered and irrational, like those of a madman.
12At random from the truth vainly expressed:The speaker’s words are incoherent and do not reflect reality.
13For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright,The speaker has convinced themselves of the beauty and goodness of their beloved.
14Who art as black as hell, as dark as night.However, the beloved is revealed to be truly evil and corrupt.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare
DeviceDefinitionExample from the TextExplanation
SimileA comparison using “like” or “as.”“My love is as a fever”The speaker compares love to a fever, emphasizing its intensity and consuming nature.
MetaphorA direct comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“My reason, the physician to my love”Reason is compared to a physician, suggesting that reason tries to cure the speaker’s irrational love.
PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human things.“My reason… Hath left me”Reason is personified as a doctor abandoning the speaker, emphasizing the speaker’s lack of control.
AlliterationThe repetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of words.“Feeding… preserve… please”The repeated “p” sound adds rhythm and emphasis to the destructive nature of the speaker’s love.
AnaphoraThe repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses.“My love… My reason”The repetition of “My” highlights the conflict between love and reason.
ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses.“Frantic-mad with evermore unrest”This line evokes the image of madness, conveying the speaker’s emotional turmoil.
IronyA contrast between what is expected and what occurs.“Desire is death, which physic did except.”It is ironic that what should heal (desire) actually leads to death, emphasizing the paradox of love.
OxymoronA figure of speech in which contradictory terms appear together.“Sickly appetite”The combination of “sickly” and “appetite” reflects the unhealthy nature of the speaker’s desires.
ParadoxA statement that contradicts itself but reveals a truth.“Desire is death”The idea that desire, which is typically life-giving, leads to death, reflects the self-destructive nature of obsessive love.
HyperboleExaggeration for emphasis or effect.“Frantic-mad with evermore unrest”The speaker exaggerates his mental state to convey the depth of his suffering.
CaesuraA pause or break in the middle of a line of poetry.“Past cure I am, now reason is past care”The pause in this line emphasizes the speaker’s resignation and despair.
AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas.“Who art as black as hell, as dark as night.”The contrast between the previously idealized view of the beloved and their current description reflects the speaker’s shift.
End RhymeRhyming of the final words in two or more lines.“unrest… expressed”Creates a sense of unity and closure in the couplet.
EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence or phrase from one line of poetry to the next without a pause.“Feeding on that which doth preserve the ill, / Th’ uncertain…”This enjambment maintains the flow of the poem, mirroring the speaker’s uncontrollable feelings.
AssonanceThe repetition of vowel sounds within words.“Feeding on that which doth preserve the ill”The long “e” and “i” sounds draw attention to the destructive cycle described.
ConsonanceThe repetition of consonant sounds within or at the end of words.“Thoughts and discourse as madmen’s are”The repetition of the “s” sound links “thoughts” and “discourse,” emphasizing their chaotic nature.
PunA play on words that have multiple meanings or similar sounds.“Physic”“Physic” refers to medicine but also hints at physical love, creating a double meaning.
ToneThe attitude or feeling conveyed by the speaker or writer.The tone of despair and madness throughoutThe tone reflects the speaker’s inner turmoil and the destructive nature of his love.
VoltaA rhetorical shift or dramatic change in thought or emotion.“For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright…”The volta occurs when the speaker shifts from idealizing his love to expressing disillusionment.
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities.“Black as hell, as dark as night”The color black symbolizes evil or despair, representing the speaker’s view of his lover at this point.
Themes: “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare
  • The Destructive Power of Unrequited Love: Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 147” delves into the profound and often devastating consequences of unrequited love. The speaker’s passion, metaphorically described as a “fever,” consumes them, leading to a state of physical and emotional turmoil. The lines “My love is as a fever, longing still” and “Desire is death” vividly illustrate the destructive nature of this unfulfilled desire. The speaker’s love, like a disease, feeds on itself, perpetuating the suffering and ultimately leading to self-destruction.
  • The Conflict Between Reason and Passion: The sonnet highlights the internal struggle between reason and passion, a timeless theme explored by countless artists. The speaker’s reason, represented as a “physician,” attempts to intervene and provide a rational perspective on their situation. However, the overwhelming power of their emotions ultimately triumphs, leading to the abandonment of reason. Lines such as “My reason, the physician to my love” and “Past cure I am, now reason is past care” emphasize this conflict, demonstrating the struggle between logic and desire.
  • The Illusion of Love: Shakespeare presents a disillusioned view of love in “Sonnet 147,” challenging the idealized notions often associated with this emotion. The speaker initially believes their beloved to be “fair” and “bright,” only to later realize their true nature as “black as hell, as dark as night.” This stark contrast reveals the deceptive nature of love, highlighting the potential for heartbreak and disillusionment. The sonnet suggests that love can be a powerful illusion, blinding individuals to the reality of their beloved’s character.
  • The Madness of Love: The sonnet explores the idea that love can drive individuals to the brink of madness, a theme that resonates with many who have experienced intense and unrequited passion. The speaker’s thoughts and discourse become “as madmen’s are,” reflecting the irrationality and intensity of their emotions. Lines such as “And frantic-mad with evermore unrest” and “My thoughts and my discourse as madmen’s are” emphasize this theme, suggesting that love can be a powerful force that can distort perception and lead to irrational behavior.
Literary Theories and “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare
Literary TheoryExplanationRelevant Lines from Sonnet 147
Psychoanalytic TheoryThis theory focuses on the unconscious mind and its influence on human behavior. In “Sonnet 147,” the speaker’s intense love and its destructive consequences can be analyzed through a psychoanalytic lens. The sonnet suggests that the speaker’s unconscious desires are driving their actions, leading to self-destructive behavior.“My love is as a fever, longing still”
New HistoricismThis theory examines literature within its historical and cultural context. In “Sonnet 147,” the sonnet can be analyzed in relation to the Elizabethan era’s understanding of love, medicine, and the role of reason. The speaker’s comparison of love to a disease and the conflict between reason and passion reflect the cultural beliefs of the time.“My reason, the physician to my love”
Feminist TheoryThis theory examines the representation of women in literature and the power dynamics between genders. While “Sonnet 147” does not explicitly focus on women, it can be analyzed through a feminist lens by considering the speaker’s objectification of their beloved and the portrayal of love as a consuming force that can lead to self-destruction.“For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright”
Critical Questions about “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare

·         How does Shakespeare portray the conflict between love and reason in “Sonnet 147”?

  • In “Sonnet 147,” Shakespeare vividly portrays the conflict between love and reason through the metaphor of illness. The speaker’s love is described as a “fever” that worsens with time, indicating that it is both irrational and destructive (line 1: “My love is as a fever, longing still”). Reason, which is personified as a “physician” (line 5: “My reason, the physician to my love”), is supposed to cure this irrational affection but fails to do so. The speaker admits that reason has been abandoned, leading to emotional chaos (line 6: “Hath left me, and I desperate now approve”). This breakdown of reason leaves the speaker helpless, consumed by love’s destructive power. The internal struggle between rational thought and uncontrollable passion is at the heart of the sonnet, showing how love can overpower the mind and leave one in a state of emotional disarray.

·         How does the metaphor of illness contribute to the overall meaning of the poem?

  • The metaphor of illness in “Sonnet 147” serves to underscore the destructive and uncontrollable nature of the speaker’s love. The sonnet opens with the comparison of love to a “fever” (line 1), a metaphor that suggests an intense, consuming, and unhealthy passion. This fever “nurseth the disease” (line 2), meaning that the speaker’s desires only worsen his condition, feeding the very thing that makes him suffer. The metaphor continues with the reference to reason as a physician who can no longer provide a cure, indicating that the speaker’s mental and emotional state is beyond help (line 9: “Past cure I am, now reason is past care”). Ultimately, the metaphor highlights how love, when unchecked by reason, becomes a sickness that destroys the self. The comparison to illness not only emphasizes the intensity of the speaker’s passion but also reflects the self-destructive consequences of love that is irrational and obsessive.

·         What role does self-delusion play in the speaker’s experience of love?

  • Self-delusion is a key theme in “Sonnet 147,” as the speaker realizes that he has deceived himself regarding the true nature of his beloved. The sonnet’s concluding couplet reveals the speaker’s painful awareness of this self-deception (lines 13-14: “For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright, / Who art as black as hell, as dark as night”). Here, the speaker admits that he once viewed his lover as beautiful and virtuous, but now sees her as deceitful and morally corrupt. The imagery of “black as hell” and “dark as night” contrasts sharply with the earlier idealization of the lover as “fair” and “bright,” emphasizing the depth of the speaker’s disillusionment. This sudden realization speaks to the power of love to cloud judgment and foster self-deception, causing the speaker to live in a fantasy that ultimately leads to emotional destruction.

·         How does the sonnet explore the theme of madness in love?

  • “Sonnet 147” explores the theme of madness in love by portraying the speaker as someone who has lost control over his thoughts and emotions. The speaker confesses that his “thoughts and [his] discourse as madmen’s are” (line 11), suggesting that his obsession with love has driven him to irrationality and mental instability. His speech and reasoning become disordered, “at random from the truth vainly expressed” (line 12), indicating that he is no longer able to distinguish between reality and the delusions created by his passion. The comparison to madness is further reinforced by the metaphor of illness throughout the sonnet, with the speaker’s feverish love escalating into a form of emotional and psychological breakdown. This descent into madness reflects the destructive power of love when it is unrequited or unhealthy, as well as the speaker’s inability to escape its grasp despite recognizing its harmful effects.
Literary Works Similar to “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare
  1. “La Belle Dame sans Merci” by John Keats
    This poem shares a theme of destructive, unrequited love, where the speaker is consumed by a fatal obsession with an enchanting yet heartless woman.
  2. “When We Two Parted” by Lord Byron
    Like “Sonnet 147,” Byron’s poem conveys the emotional suffering of a speaker who feels betrayed and disillusioned by a former lover.
  3. “Love’s Alchemy” by John Donne
    Donne’s poem critiques the false promises of romantic love, much like how Shakespeare’s speaker reflects on the self-deception caused by intense desire.
  4. “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe
    Poe’s narrative poem delves into the theme of madness driven by loss and longing, paralleling the speaker’s descent into irrationality in “Sonnet 147.”
  5. “The Sick Rose” by William Blake
    This short poem uses the metaphor of a rose being destroyed by a worm, echoing the idea of love as an illness that consumes and destroys, much like Shakespeare’s feverish love.
Representative Quotations of “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“My love is as a fever, longing still”The speaker introduces the metaphor of love as a consuming illness.Psychoanalytic: The metaphor reflects unconscious desire and the destructive, uncontrollable nature of love.
“For that which longer nurseth the disease”The speaker reveals that his love continues to fuel the very sickness it creates.Feminist: Love as a self-destructive force could represent the societal pressures to idealize unattainable women.
“Feeding on that which doth preserve the ill”The speaker admits that his desire perpetuates his suffering.Deconstruction: This line suggests that love is paradoxical, both life-giving and life-destroying.
“My reason, the physician to my love”Reason is personified as a doctor who tries to cure the speaker’s irrational love.Rationalist: This line reflects the tension between reason and emotion, a central theme in rationalist philosophy.
“Hath left me, and I desperate now approve”The speaker acknowledges that reason has abandoned him, leaving him in a state of desperation.Existentialist: The abandonment of reason leaves the speaker in a crisis, reflecting existential isolation.
“Desire is death, which physic did except”The speaker suggests that desire leads to death, rejecting the idea that love can be cured.Freudian: The line reveals the death drive (Thanatos), a deep association between desire and destruction.
“Past cure I am, now reason is past care”The speaker declares that he is beyond saving, having lost control over his emotions.Tragic: This line highlights the speaker’s tragic realization of his helplessness, evoking themes of tragic downfall.
“Frantic-mad with evermore unrest”The speaker describes his mental state as frantic, driven to madness by his uncontrolled love.Psychological: The speaker’s madness can be seen as the result of emotional repression and irrational obsession.
“My thoughts and my discourse as madmen’s are”The speaker compares his thoughts to those of a madman, indicating a break from rationality.Cognitive Dissonance: The speaker’s mental state reflects the internal conflict between idealized love and reality.
“For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright”The speaker admits that he once idealized his lover, but now sees her true nature.Romantic Disillusionment: The speaker’s realization points to disillusionment with romantic idealization.
Suggested Readings: “Sonnet 147:  My Love Is as A Fever, Longing Still” by William Shakespeare
  1. “Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 5, 1997, pp. 743–48. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871362. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  2. Bates, Ernest Sutherland. “The Sincerity of Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” Modern Philology, vol. 8, no. 1, 1910, pp. 87–106. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/432499. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  3. Crosman, Robert. “Making Love out of Nothing at All: The Issue of Story in Shakespeare’s Procreation Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, 1990, pp. 470–88. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2870777. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  4. Schalkwyk, David. “‘She Never Told Her Love’: Embodiment, Textuality, and Silence in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4, 1994, pp. 381–407. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2870963. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.

“Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis

Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection “Shakespeare’s Sonnets.”

"Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear'st love to any" by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare

Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection “Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” This sonnet is distinguished by its direct and passionate plea from the speaker to their beloved to acknowledge their feelings of love. The main idea of the sonnet is to express the speaker’s frustration and disappointment with their beloved’s denial of their love, arguing that such denial is a shame and a contradiction to their own actions and behavior.

Text: “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare

For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any,

Who for thy self-art so unprovident.

Grant, if thou wilt, thou art beloved of many,

But that thou none lov’st is most evident:

For thou art so possessed with murderous hate,

That ‘gainst thy self thou stick’st not to conspire,

Seeking that beauteous roof to ruinate

Which to repair should be thy chief desire.

O! change thy thought, that I may change my mind:

Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?

Be, as thy presence is, gracious and kind,

Or to thyself at least kind-hearted prove:

   Make thee another self for love of me,

   That beauty still may live in thine or thee.

Annotations: “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare
LineTextAnnotation
1For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any,The speaker urges their beloved to stop denying their love, using “for shame” to imply that such denial is shameful.
2Who for thyself art so unprovident.The speaker criticizes their beloved for being so self-destructive and careless about their own well-being.
3Grant, if thou wilt, thou art beloved of many,The speaker acknowledges that their beloved may be loved by many others.
4But that thou none lov’st is most evident:However, the speaker insists that their beloved does not love anyone, including themselves.
5For thou art so possessed with murderous hate,The speaker accuses their beloved of being filled with hatred and destructive impulses.
6That ‘gainst thyself thou stick’st not to conspire,The speaker suggests that their beloved is plotting against their own happiness and well-being.
7Seeking that beauteous roof to ruinateThe speaker compares their beloved’s body and mind to a beautiful building and suggests that they are trying to destroy it.
8Which to repair should be thy chief desire.The speaker argues that their beloved should be focused on preserving and improving their own well-being.
9O! change thy thought, that I may change my mind:The speaker pleads with their beloved to change their attitude so that the speaker can change their own feelings.
10Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?The speaker asks rhetorically whether hatred is a better dwelling place than love.
11Be, as thy presence is, gracious and kind,The speaker urges their beloved to be as gracious and kind as they appear to be.
12Or to thyself at least kind-hearted prove:Alternatively, the speaker suggests that their beloved should at least be kind to themselves.
13Make thee another self for love of me,The speaker asks their beloved to become a better person for the sake of their love.
14That beauty still may live in thine or thee.The speaker suggests that by improving themselves, their beloved can ensure that their beauty and worth will endure.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare
Literary/Poetic DeviceDefinitionExplanation in Sonnet 10
AlliterationRepetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of wordsExample: “For shame deny,” emphasizing the harshness of denial and self-destruction.
AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clausesExample: “For thou,” repeated to stress the speaker’s accusatory tone towards the subject.
AntithesisJuxtaposition of contrasting ideas in a balanced structureExample: “Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?” contrasting hate and love.
ApostropheDirect address to someone absent or something non-humanThe speaker addresses an unnamed individual as “thou,” urging a change in attitude.
AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds within wordsExample: “Thou none lov’st” (long “o” sound), creating a melodic effect and emphasizing the isolation in love.
ConceitAn extended metaphor with complex logicExample: The speaker compares the beloved’s beauty to a “beauteous roof,” which should be maintained but is being ruined.
CoupletTwo consecutive rhyming linesExample: “Make thee another self for love of me, / That beauty still may live in thine or thee.” Summarizing the speaker’s plea.
EnjambmentContinuation of a sentence without a pause beyond a lineExample: “Or to thyself at least kind-hearted prove: / Make thee another self…” extending thought across lines.
HyperboleExaggeration for emphasisExample: “Murderous hate,” exaggerating the self-destructive emotions of the subject.
ImageryVisually descriptive languageExample: “Beauteous roof to ruinate,” evoking an image of physical beauty deteriorating.
MetaphorComparison between two things without using “like” or “as”Example: “Beauteous roof” is a metaphor for the subject’s physical beauty.
OxymoronCombination of contradictory termsExample: “Murderous hate” combines the ideas of self-harm with the normally outward-directed emotion of hate.
PersonificationGiving human traits to non-human entitiesExample: “Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?” Love and hate are personified as lodgers in the heart.
PunPlay on words with multiple meaningsExample: “Make thee another self,” suggesting both procreation and creating a new persona.
RepetitionRepeating words or phrases for emphasisExample: “For shame” and “For thou” are repeated to emphasize the moral appeal and accusation.
Rhetorical QuestionA question asked for effect rather than an answerExample: “Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?” This question challenges the beloved’s emotional choices.
SynecdocheA part representing the wholeExample: “Another self” refers to a child or continuation of the subject’s legacy.
ToneThe attitude or mood conveyed by the writerThe tone is reproachful and pleading, as the speaker tries to convince the subject to change.
VoltaThe turn in argument or shift in tone in a sonnetExample: Occurs in line 9: “O! change thy thought,” where the speaker shifts from criticizing to offering a solution.
Iambic PentameterA metrical pattern with five feet of unstressed/stressed syllables per lineExample: The entire sonnet follows this rhythmic structure, typical of Shakespearean sonnets.
Themes: “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare
  • Theme 1: Self-Love and Self-Preservation: Sonnet 10 delves into the profound theme of self-love and self-preservation. The speaker, exasperated by their beloved’s self-destructive tendencies, implores them to “repair” their “beauteous roof” (lines 7-8), a vivid metaphor for their physical and mental well-being. This urgent plea underscores the critical importance of self-care and self-preservation as foundational elements of a fulfilling life. The speaker’s concern for their beloved’s well-being reveals a deep-seated understanding that neglecting one’s own needs ultimately leads to a decline in overall happiness and fulfillment.
  • Theme 2: The Transformative Power of Love: Beyond its plea for self-preservation, Sonnet 10 also explores the transformative power of love. The speaker firmly believes that love can profoundly alter both the beloved and themselves (line 9). They envision a scenario where the beloved, by embracing love, can “make thee another self” (line 13), suggesting a metamorphosis of character and a newfound sense of purpose. This optimistic outlook highlights the potential for love to heal wounds, inspire growth, and ultimately lead to a more meaningful existence.
  • Theme 3: The Pain of Unrequited Love: The speaker’s frustration and disappointment with their beloved’s denial of love are palpable throughout the sonnet. The lines “For thou art so possessed with murderous hate” (line 5) and “Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?” (line 10) convey the intense pain and anguish associated with unrequited love. The speaker’s passionate pleas and rhetorical questions reveal the emotional turmoil they experience as a result of their beloved’s indifference.
  • Theme 4: The Importance of Honesty and Authenticity: Sonnet 10 also emphasizes the significance of honesty and authenticity in relationships. The speaker urges their beloved to “deny that thou bear’st love to any” (line 1), suggesting that pretending to feel love when they do not is detrimental to both parties involved. The poem implies that genuine feelings and open communication are essential for building strong, enduring relationships. By highlighting the importance of honesty, the sonnet serves as a reminder that true intimacy and connection can only be achieved through authenticity and vulnerability.
Literary Theories and “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare
Literary TheoryReference LinesAnalysis
Psychoanalytic Theory“Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?” (line 10)The speaker’s internal conflict between love and hate suggests repressed desires or unresolved conflicts.
New Historicism“For thou art so possessed with murderous hate” (line 5)The speaker’s portrayal of hatred reflects the Elizabethan era’s preoccupation with violence and social unrest.
Feminist Theory“That beauteous roof to ruinate” (line 7)The focus on the beloved’s physical beauty reinforces traditional gender roles and expectations.
Critical Questions about “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare

·         How does the speaker use shame to motivate change in the beloved?

  • In the opening line, “For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any,” the speaker invokes shame as a powerful emotional tool to push the beloved towards self-reflection. The phrase “For shame” directly appeals to the beloved’s sense of guilt, suggesting that the act of denying love is something to be ashamed of. This tactic frames the speaker’s argument from the outset, positioning love not just as a desirable feeling, but as a moral responsibility. The question emerges: Is the beloved’s refusal to love rooted in selfishness or in fear? The speaker implies it’s the former by calling the beloved “unprovident” (line 2), suggesting a lack of foresight that ultimately leads to self-destruction.

·         What role does the concept of self-destruction play in the speaker’s argument?

  • The sonnet frequently references the beloved’s self-destructive tendencies. In lines 5-6, the speaker claims, “For thou art so possessed with murderous hate, / That ‘gainst thy self thou stick’st not to conspire,” suggesting that the beloved’s refusal to love is tantamount to self-harm. This notion of conspiring against oneself is crucial to understanding the sonnet’s emotional intensity. The speaker accuses the beloved of ruining their own beauty and potential by refusing love, positioning the refusal not as a passive choice but as an active destruction of the self. The question is: Does the beloved understand their own role in this downfall, or is it the speaker’s projection?

·         How does the metaphor of a “beauteous roof” function in the sonnet?

  • In lines 7-8, the speaker uses the metaphor of a “beauteous roof” to describe the beloved’s physical appearance and potential, claiming that the beloved is seeking to “ruinate” this beauty rather than repair it. The imagery of a roof that needs repairing but is instead being destroyed suggests neglect and waste. This raises the question: Is the speaker more concerned with the beloved’s inner qualities or with preserving external beauty? By asking the beloved to “repair” their beauty, the speaker implies that love is the key to this restoration, tying physical preservation to emotional openness.

·         What is the significance of the sonnet’s closing couplet in the speaker’s plea?

  • The final couplet, “Make thee another self for love of me, / That beauty still may live in thine or thee,” presents a solution to the self-destruction described earlier in the poem. The speaker encourages the beloved to “make another self,” likely referring to the idea of procreation, but it could also suggest an emotional rebirth. The couplet ties the continuation of the beloved’s beauty either to themselves or to the legacy they could create. The critical question here is whether the speaker’s plea is driven by personal desire (love of me) or a more altruistic concern for the preservation of beauty. The ambiguity of whether this is a selfish request or one for the beloved’s benefit adds complexity to the speaker’s motivations.
Literary Works Similar to “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare
  1. John Donne’s “Holy Sonnet XIV: Batter my heart, three-person’d God”: Similar in its plea for transformation, Donne’s sonnet uses religious imagery to urge God to break and remake him, paralleling Shakespeare’s appeal for change in the beloved.
  2. Sir Philip Sidney’s “Astrophel and Stella” (Sonnet 1): Like Shakespeare’s Sonnet 10, this work explores unrequited love and the poet’s emotional turmoil, using persuasive rhetoric to express deep longing and a desire for reciprocation.
  3. Edmund Spenser’s “Amoretti LXXV” (“One day I wrote her name upon the strand”): Spenser’s sonnet addresses themes of immortality through love and beauty, similar to Shakespeare’s focus on preserving beauty and legacy through love and potential procreation.
  4. Christina Rossetti’s “Remember“: Rossetti’s poem reflects on themes of love, loss, and remembrance, much like Shakespeare’s sonnet, which focuses on legacy and the enduring nature of beauty through emotional or physical reproduction.
  5. George Herbert’s “Love (III)“: Herbert’s poem presents an intimate dialogue between the speaker and Love personified, echoing the internal conflict between love and self-destruction found in Shakespeare’s Sonnet 10.
Representative Quotations of “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any”The speaker urges their beloved to acknowledge their feelings of love.Psychoanalytic Theory: The speaker’s insistence on their beloved’s feelings suggests a desire for recognition and validation.
“Who for thyself art so unprovident”The speaker criticizes their beloved for their self-destructive behavior.Feminist Theory: The speaker’s concern for their beloved’s well-being can be interpreted as a reflection of patriarchal societal norms.
“For thou art so possessed with murderous hate”The speaker accuses their beloved of being filled with hatred.New Historicism: The reference to hatred reflects the Elizabethan era’s preoccupation with violence and social unrest.
“Seeking that beauteous roof to ruinate”The speaker compares their beloved’s body and mind to a building and suggests that they are trying to destroy it.Psychoanalytic Theory: The image of destruction suggests underlying anxieties and fears.
“O! change thy thought, that I may change my mind”The speaker pleads with their beloved to change their attitude.Feminist Theory: The speaker’s submissive tone can be seen as a reflection of patriarchal power dynamics.
“Shall hate be fairer lodged than gentle love?”The speaker asks rhetorically whether hatred is a better dwelling place than love.Psychoanalytic Theory: The contrast between hate and love suggests internal conflict and unresolved issues.
“Be, as thy presence is, gracious and kind”The speaker urges their beloved to be kind and gracious.New Historicism: The emphasis on kindness and grace reflects Elizabethan ideals of courtly love.
“Make thee another self for love of me”The speaker asks their beloved to become a better person for the sake of their love.Feminist Theory: The speaker’s desire for their beloved to change suggests a belief in the transformative power of love.
“That beauty still may live in thine or thee”The speaker suggests that by improving themselves, their beloved can ensure that their beauty and worth will endure.Psychoanalytic Theory: The focus on beauty and self-preservation suggests underlying anxieties about mortality and decay.
“For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any”The speaker’s repetition of this phrase emphasizes the importance of honesty and authenticity in relationships.New Historicism: The emphasis on honesty reflects Elizabethan values of truthfulness and integrity.
Suggested Readings: “Sonnet 10: For shame deny that thou bear’st love to any” by William Shakespeare
  1. Emerson, Oliver Farrar. “Shakespeare’s Sonneteering.” Studies in Philology, vol. 20, no. 2, 1923, pp. 111–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171848. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  2. Schalkwyk, David. “‘She Never Told Her Love’: Embodiment, Textuality, and Silence in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4, 1994, pp. 381–407. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2870963. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  3. Bates, Ernest Sutherland. “The Sincerity of Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” Modern Philology, vol. 8, no. 1, 1910, pp. 87–106. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/432499. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  4. “Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 5, 1997, pp. 743–48. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871362. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.
  5. Crosman, Robert. “Making Love out of Nothing at All: The Issue of Story in Shakespeare’s Procreation Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, 1990, pp. 470–88. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2870777. Accessed 6 Oct. 2024.

“Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare

“Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare was first published in 1609 in the collection “Shakespeare’s Sonnets”.

"Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed" by William Shakespeare
Introduction: “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare

“Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare was first published in 1609 in the collection “Shakespeare’s Sonnets”. This sonnet is a classic example of the English sonnet form, known for its fourteen lines and iambic pentameter. The sonnet explores themes of weariness, sleep, and the desire for peace and rest. The main idea is that the speaker seeks solace and rejuvenation in sleep, escaping the troubles and demands of the day. The sonnet’s tone is both contemplative and melancholic, reflecting on the fleeting nature of life and the importance of finding moments of tranquility.

Text: “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare

Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed,

The dear repose for limbs with travel tired;

But then begins a journey in my head,

To work my mind, when body’s work’s expired:

For then my thoughts, from far where I abide,

Intend a zealous pilgrimage to thee,

And keep my drooping eyelids open wide,

Looking on darkness which the blind do see:

Save that my soul’s imaginary sight

Presents thy shadow to my sightless view,

Which, like a jewel hung in ghastly night,

Makes black night beauteous and her old face new.

    Lo! Thus, by day my limbs, by night my mind,

    For thee and for myself no quiet find.

Annotations: “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare
LineTextAnnotation
1Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed,The speaker is tired from the day’s work and seeks rest.
2The dear repose for limbs with travel tired;Sleep is seen as a welcome relief for the weary body.
3But then begins a journey in my head,Despite physical exhaustion, the mind remains active.
4To work my mind, when body’s work’s expired:The speaker’s thoughts continue to engage, even when the body rests.
5For then my thoughts, from far where I abide,The speaker’s thoughts wander and yearn for something or someone.
6Intend a zealous pilgrimage to thee,The speaker’s thoughts embark on a journey toward a loved one.
7And keep my drooping eyelids open wide,The speaker’s mind keeps them awake, despite the desire to sleep.
8Looking on darkness which the blind do see:The speaker’s mind sees in the darkness, even though their physical eyes are closed.
9Save that my soul’s imaginary sightThe speaker’s mind’s eye can see things that the physical eye cannot.
10Presents thy shadow to my sightless view,The speaker’s mind imagines the presence of a loved one, even in darkness.
11Which, like a jewel hung in ghastly night,The loved one is compared to a precious gem shining in the darkness.
12Makes black night beauteous and her old face new.The loved one’s presence transforms the darkness into something beautiful.
13Lo! Thus, by day my limbs, by night my mind,The speaker’s body and mind both struggle for rest.
14For thee and for myself no quiet find.Neither the speaker’s physical needs nor their emotional desires are fulfilled.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare
DeviceDefinitionExplanation
AlliterationRepetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of words.“Weary with toil” repeats the “w” sound, creating a rhythmic effect.
AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or lines.“For thee and for myself” repeats the phrase “for” at the start of consecutive clauses.
ApostropheAddressing someone absent or something non-human as if it were present.The speaker addresses the absent lover (“thee”) as if they were directly present.
AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds within nearby words.“To work my mind, when body’s work’s expired” repeats the “i” sound, creating a musical quality.
CaesuraA pause in a line of poetry, often marked by punctuation.The line “For thee and for myself no quiet find.” contains a natural pause at the comma.
ConceitAn extended metaphor with complex logic.The poem develops the extended metaphor of mental “journey” or “pilgrimage” in contrast to physical rest.
ConsonanceRepetition of consonant sounds within words.“Limbs with travel tired” repeats the “l” and “t” sounds, creating internal consonance.
CoupletTwo consecutive rhyming lines of verse.The last two lines (“Lo! Thus, by day my limbs, by night my mind…”) form a rhyming couplet, summarizing the theme.
DictionThe choice of words in a literary work.The poem uses elevated and formal diction, e.g., “repose,” “zealous pilgrimage.”
End RhymeThe rhyme that occurs at the end of lines.“Bed” and “tired,” “head” and “expired” show typical end rhymes throughout the sonnet.
EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence or phrase beyond the end of a line.“But then begins a journey in my head, / To work my mind…” carries the thought into the next line.
HyperboleExaggerated statements not meant to be taken literally.The idea of thoughts traveling far distances (“zealous pilgrimage”) exaggerates the mental effort of the speaker.
ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses.“Looking on darkness which the blind do see” creates a vivid image of blindness and the perception of darkness.
JuxtapositionPlacing two contrasting ideas or images close together.The poem contrasts physical rest (“bed”) with mental activity (“journey in my head”).
MetaphorA figure of speech where one thing is compared directly to another.The “journey in my head” is a metaphor for the speaker’s mental activity and thoughts of his lover.
PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human things.“My soul’s imaginary sight” gives the abstract concept of the soul the human ability to see.
PunA play on words with multiple meanings.The phrase “my soul’s imaginary sight / Presents thy shadow” plays on “sight” and “shadow,” blending physical and mental images.
QuatrainA stanza of four lines, often with alternating rhyme.The poem is composed of three quatrains, each with alternating rhymes (ABAB CDCD EFEF).
SimileA comparison using “like” or “as.”“Which, like a jewel hung in ghastly night” compares the lover’s shadow to a jewel.
SymbolismUsing symbols to represent ideas or qualities.Night and darkness symbolize the speaker’s mental state and separation from his lover.
Themes: “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare
  • Physical Exhaustion vs. Mental Restlessness: The sonnet contrasts the weariness of the body with the unrelenting activity of the mind. The speaker is physically drained, seeking “repose for limbs with travel tired,” but finds no rest as his mind begins a new journey once his body rests. This theme highlights the disconnect between physical and mental states, where the body may stop working, but the mind continues its “zealous pilgrimage.”
  • Love and Longing: The speaker’s thoughts are consumed by the person he loves, even when he is physically distant. His mind undertakes a “zealous pilgrimage” to his lover, showing the depth of his emotional attachment. Even in the darkness of night, his thoughts remain fixed on the beloved, with the line “Presents thy shadow to my sightless view” illustrating the enduring presence of his lover in his mind, despite their physical separation.
  • Night and Darkness: Night, often associated with rest and peace, becomes a setting for the speaker’s inner turmoil. Rather than bringing relief, night only intensifies his thoughts and longing. The imagery of “Looking on darkness which the blind do see” emphasizes the theme of darkness as both literal and metaphorical. It represents not only the absence of light but also the emotional darkness the speaker feels in his lover’s absence.
  • Inner Conflict: The speaker’s internal struggle is a central theme, as he finds himself torn between physical exhaustion and the relentless workings of his mind. The sonnet portrays a dual battle between body and mind, as well as between desire and the inability to fulfill it. The closing couplet, “Lo! Thus, by day my limbs, by night my mind, / For thee and for myself no quiet find,” encapsulates this inner conflict, where neither day nor night offers him peace.
Literary Theories and “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare
Literary TheoryApplication to Sonnet 27Reference
PsychoanalysisThe sonnet explores the speaker’s internal conflict between physical exhaustion and mental activity. The desire for rest and the inability to sleep suggest underlying psychological tensions.“Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed”
RomanticismThe sonnet emphasizes the power of the imagination and the mind’s ability to transcend physical limitations. The speaker’s vivid imagery and the romanticization of the loved one align with Romantic ideals.“Save that my soul’s imaginary sight / Presents thy shadow to my sightless view”
DeconstructionThe sonnet can be deconstructed to reveal underlying contradictions and ambiguities. For example, the speaker’s desire for rest and the inability to sleep create a tension between physical and mental states.“Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed”
Critical Questions about “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare

·         How does the sonnet explore the relationship between the physical body and the mind?

  • Shakespeare’s Sonnet 27 delves into the complex interplay between the physical body and the mind. The speaker describes the weariness of their body after a day of toil, yet their mind remains active and engaged. This contrast highlights the limitations and challenges of attempting to reconcile the demands of both. The speaker’s inability to find rest, despite their physical exhaustion, suggests that the mind can often be a source of its own turmoil.

·         What is the significance of the speaker’s journey in their head?

  • The speaker’s “journey in their head” is a central metaphor in the sonnet, representing the restless nature of their thoughts and the constant pursuit of something, likely a loved one. This internal journey suggests that even when the body is at rest, the mind can be a source of endless activity and longing. The speaker’s inability to control their thoughts and their desire to escape the darkness of their mind further emphasize the power and complexity of the human mind.

·         How does the sonnet portray the power of imagination and the mind’s ability to transcend physical limitations?

  • The sonnet showcases the power of the imagination and the mind’s ability to transcend physical limitations. Despite the speaker’s physical exhaustion and the darkness surrounding them, their mind can vividly imagine and visualize the presence of a loved one. This suggests that the mind can create its own reality, independent of external circumstances. The speaker’s ability to find beauty and solace in the darkness through their imagination highlights the transformative power of the human mind.

·         What is the significance of the sonnet’s final couplet?

  • The sonnet’s final couplet, “Lo! Thus, by day my limbs, by night my mind, / For thee and for myself no quiet find,” encapsulates the central theme of the poem: the struggle to find peace and rest. The speaker’s body and mind are both restless, seeking fulfillment and satisfaction. This final couplet emphasizes the enduring nature of human desire and the constant search for something more.
Literary Works Similar to “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare
  1. “When You Are Old” by W.B. Yeats: This poem reflects on love, time, and longing. Like Shakespeare’s sonnet, it explores the theme of emotional yearning, particularly in its focus on how love transcends physical presence and time.
  2. “A Noiseless Patient Spider” by Walt Whitman: Whitman’s poem draws a parallel between the soul’s search for connection and a spider casting its web. It shares with Shakespeare’s sonnet the theme of mental and emotional exploration, where thoughts become a kind of journey or “pilgrimage.”
  3. “The Sleeper” by Edgar Allan Poe: This melancholic poem, much like “Sonnet 27,” juxtaposes physical rest and mental unrest. Poe’s poem explores the theme of death as a form of eternal sleep, while Shakespeare deals with sleeplessness due to emotional turmoil.
  4. “To Sleep” by John Keats: In this poem, Keats personifies sleep and begs for relief from the cares and troubles of the day, akin to how Shakespeare’s speaker longs for rest but is denied peace by his thoughts. Both poems emphasize the conflict between physical exhaustion and mental activity.
  5. “Love’s Alchemy” by John Donne: Donne’s metaphysical poem explores the complexities of love and the mind’s intricate processes. It resonates with Shakespeare’s sonnet in its exploration of how love can consume the mind, leading to a restless inner world despite physical circumstances.
Representative Quotations of “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed”The speaker begins by expressing physical exhaustion from a long day’s work.Humanist: Focuses on the human condition and the body’s limitations, highlighting the need for physical rest.
“The dear repose for limbs with travel tired”Emphasizes the relief the speaker seeks for his tired body, associating bed with physical rest.Psychological Realism: Explores the natural desire for rest after physical exertion.
“But then begins a journey in my head”While the body rests, the mind remains active, starting a new “journey” of thought and emotion.Cognitive Theory: Examines the dual nature of rest and the mind’s inability to shut down despite fatigue.
“To work my mind, when body’s work’s expired”Highlights the contrast between physical rest and mental activity.Dualism: Philosophical contrast between the body and mind, suggesting they operate independently.
“Intend a zealous pilgrimage to thee”The speaker’s thoughts travel to the distant beloved, showing devotion and longing.Romanticism: Emphasizes the emotional and spiritual journey toward love, elevating it to a form of pilgrimage.
“And keep my drooping eyelids open wide”Despite exhaustion, the speaker’s thoughts prevent him from sleeping, keeping him awake.Existentialism: Reflects the conflict between desire for rest and the impossibility of escape from one’s thoughts.
“Looking on darkness which the blind do see”The speaker experiences a kind of mental darkness, similar to blindness, despite being awake.Phenomenology: Explores subjective perception of reality and the inner experience of the speaker’s mental state.
“Save that my soul’s imaginary sight”The speaker’s soul visualizes the beloved in his mind, though he cannot physically see them.Idealism: The mind creates its own reality, focusing on the power of imagination and the soul’s perception.
“Presents thy shadow to my sightless view”The speaker imagines his lover’s presence in the dark, where physical sight fails him.Symbolism: The shadow represents the intangible nature of memory and longing in absence.
“Lo! Thus, by day my limbs, by night my mind”The closing couplet summarizes the conflict: physical fatigue by day, mental exhaustion by night.Psychoanalytic Theory: The divided self, where conscious and unconscious desires create continuous conflict.
Suggested Readings: “Sonnet 27: Weary With Toil, I Haste Me To My Bed” by William Shakespeare
  1. McGuire, Philip C. “Shakespeare’s Non-Shakespearean Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 3, 1987, pp. 304–19. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2870505. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  2. “Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 5, 1997, pp. 743–48. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871362. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  3. https://stuffjeffreads.wordpress.com/2017/03/04/sonnet-27-weary-with-toil-i-haste-me-to-my-bed-by-william-shakespeare/
  4. https://www.william-shakespeare.info/william-shakespeare-sonnet-27.htm

“Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis

“Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection “Shakespeare’s Sonnets”.

"Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage" by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare

“Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare first appeared in 1609 in the collection “Shakespeare’s Sonnets”. This sonnet is a classic example of the English sonnet form, with its fourteen lines and iambic pentameter. Known for its introspective and melancholic tone, the sonnet explores themes of mortality, self-doubt, and the fleeting nature of life. The main idea is that the speaker feels like an inadequate actor on life’s stage, unable to fully express or appreciate the beauty and complexity of the world around them.

Text: “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare

As an unperfect actor on the stage,

Who with his fear is put beside his part,

Or some fierce thing replete with too much rage,

Whose strength’s abundance weakens his own heart;

So I, for fear of trust, forget to say

The perfect ceremony of love’s rite,

And in mine own love’s strength seem to decay,

O’ ercharged with burthen of mine own love’s might.

O! let my looks be then the eloquence

And dumb presagers of my speaking breast,

Who plead for love, and look for recompense,

More than that tongue that more hath more express’d.

   O! learn to read what silent love hath writ:

   To hear with eyes belongs to love’s fine wit.

Annotations: “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
LineTextAnnotation
1As an unperfect actor on the stage,The speaker compares himself to an inexperienced or inadequate actor on a stage.
2Who with his fear is put beside his part,The actor’s fear distracts him from his role and performance.
3Or some fierce thing replete with too much rage,The speaker also compares himself to a violent or uncontrolled force.
4Whose strength’s abundance weakens his own heart;The excess of strength or passion can be detrimental.
5So I, for fear of trust, forget to sayThe speaker’s fear of trusting or expressing his love prevents him from speaking openly.
6The perfect ceremony of love’s rite,The “perfect ceremony” refers to a formal or ideal expression of love.
7And in mine own love’s strength seem to decay,Despite the strength of his love, the speaker feels weakened or diminished.
8O’ercharged with burthen of mine own love’s might.The weight of his own love is overwhelming.
9O! let my looks be then the eloquenceThe speaker wishes his appearance and expressions could convey his love more effectively than words.
10And dumb presagers of my speaking breast,His body language and silent gestures are seen as indicators of his feelings.
11Who plead for love, and look for recompense,His looks and actions are pleading for love and seeking a return of affection.
12More than that tongue that more hath more express’d.His silent expressions are more meaningful than words can convey.
13O! learn to read what silent love hath writ:The speaker urges his beloved to understand the unspoken language of love.
14To hear with eyes belongs to love’s fine wit.True love involves understanding emotions and feelings through visual cues rather than just words.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
DeviceDefinitionExampleExplanation
AlliterationRepetition of initial consonant sounds in nearby words.“fear of trust, forget”The repetition of the ‘f’ sound emphasizes the speaker’s emotional turmoil about trusting in love.
AllusionA reference to a well-known person, event, or work.“As an unperfect actor on the stage”This alludes to theater and actors, referencing Shakespeare’s world and comparing the speaker’s feelings of inadequacy in love to an actor forgetting his lines on stage.
AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses.“O! let my looks be then the eloquence / O! learn to read”The repetition of “O!” draws attention to the speaker’s pleas for understanding in love and highlights his emotional intensity.
AntithesisJuxtaposition of contrasting ideas for effect.“Whose strength’s abundance weakens his own heart”The contrast between strength and weakness illustrates how the intensity of love paradoxically weakens the speaker’s ability to express it.
ApostropheDirect address to an absent person or abstract idea.“O! let my looks be then the eloquence”The speaker addresses love itself as though it can respond, intensifying the emotional appeal for his unspoken love to be understood.
AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds within words.“fear is put beside his part”The repetition of the long ‘e’ sound in “fear” and “beside” creates a sense of unease, emphasizing the actor’s fear and inability to perform properly, reflecting the speaker’s difficulty in expressing love.
ConsonanceRepetition of consonant sounds, typically at the end of words.“strength’s abundance weakens his own heart”The repetition of ‘s’ and ‘t’ sounds mirrors the tension and conflict between strength and weakness, adding to the emotional strain the speaker feels.
Dramatic MetaphorComparison between two unlike things using a theatrical concept.“As an unperfect actor on the stage”The speaker compares himself to an actor who forgets his lines, symbolizing his inability to express love properly due to fear and insecurity.
EnjambmentContinuation of a sentence or phrase beyond the line break.“So I, for fear of trust, forget to say / The perfect ceremony of love’s rite”The thought spills over to the next line, reflecting the speaker’s struggle to articulate his feelings, with the structure mirroring his emotional overflow.
HyperboleExaggeration for emphasis or effect.“Whose strength’s abundance weakens his own heart”The speaker exaggerates the power of his emotions by stating that their sheer strength weakens him, emphasizing the overwhelming nature of his feelings.
ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses.“Dumb presagers of my speaking breast”This phrase evokes a strong visual image of silent, yet expressive gestures from the speaker’s heart, symbolizing the inner emotions that words cannot fully convey.
IronyExpression of meaning using language that normally signifies the opposite.“And in mine own love’s strength seem to decay”The speaker ironically suggests that his love’s strength causes him to feel weak and unable to express it, highlighting the paradox of his emotional state.
MetaphorComparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as”.“My looks be then the eloquence”The speaker compares his looks to eloquent speech, using a metaphor to suggest that his silent expressions communicate more effectively than his words.
OxymoronA figure of speech that combines contradictory terms.“Silent love hath writ”The phrase “silent love” is an oxymoron, combining silence and expression to reflect the speaker’s desire to convey his love without words.
PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human things.“Dumb presagers of my speaking breast”Love is personified as something that “speaks” silently through the speaker’s heart, suggesting that love communicates through emotional and non-verbal cues.
QuatrainA stanza of four lines, often with alternating rhyme.Lines 1-4The sonnet follows the traditional Shakespearean structure, with three quatrains and a couplet, enhancing its formal and rhythmic quality.
Rhetorical QuestionA question posed for effect rather than an answer.“O! learn to read what silent love hath writ”Though not framed as a typical question, this plea urges the listener to interpret the speaker’s silent love, serving a rhetorical function by highlighting the depth of unspoken emotions.
SimileComparison between two unlike things using “like” or “as”.“As an unperfect actor on the stage”The speaker compares himself to an actor using “as,” illustrating his fear and hesitation in performing the role of a lover.
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities.“The perfect ceremony of love’s rite”The “ceremony of love’s rite” symbolizes the formal expression of love, which the speaker struggles to perform due to emotional turmoil, thus representing his fear of inadequacy.
VoltaA rhetorical shift or dramatic change in thought or emotion.“O! let my looks be then the eloquence”The volta in line 9 signals a shift from the speaker’s frustration with words to his reliance on non-verbal expression, marking a change in the sonnet’s tone from despair to hopeful resolution.
Themes: “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
  1. Insecurity and Self-Doubt: The speaker expresses feelings of inadequacy in love, likening himself to “an unperfect actor on the stage” (line 1) who is overwhelmed by fear and unable to perform his part. This insecurity prevents him from expressing his emotions fully, as seen in the line, “for fear of trust, forget to say / The perfect ceremony of love’s rite” (lines 5-6). The actor’s forgetfulness symbolizes the speaker’s own inability to convey his love properly due to his self-doubt.
  2. The Paradox of Strength and Weakness: Shakespeare explores the paradoxical relationship between strength and weakness in love. The speaker notes that “Whose strength’s abundance weakens his own heart” (line 4), suggesting that the overwhelming intensity of his love actually weakens him, making it harder for him to express it. This theme reflects the tension between the power of love and the emotional vulnerability it brings to the speaker.
  3. The Limits of Language: A key theme in the sonnet is the inadequacy of words to convey deep emotions. The speaker acknowledges that his speech fails him, and he must rely on non-verbal communication: “O! let my looks be then the eloquence / And dumb presagers of my speaking breast” (lines 9-10). He believes that his silent expressions of love are more powerful than any spoken words, suggesting the limitations of language in capturing the depth of true love.
  4. The Power of Silent Love: The sonnet emphasizes the idea that love can be communicated through silence and gestures, not just words. The speaker urges his beloved to “learn to read what silent love hath writ” (line 13), indicating that love’s true meaning is often conveyed through unspoken emotions. This theme highlights the idea that true understanding in love requires the ability to interpret non-verbal cues, as “to hear with eyes belongs to love’s fine wit” (line 14), suggesting that love transcends verbal expression.
Literary Theories and “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
Literary TheoryApplication to Sonnet 23Reference
PsychoanalysisThe sonnet explores the speaker’s internal conflict and self-doubt. The fear of trust and the feeling of being overwhelmed by love suggest underlying psychological issues.“for fear of trust, forget to say / The perfect ceremony of love’s rite,” “O’ercharged with burthen of mine own love’s might”
New HistoricismThe sonnet can be interpreted within the context of Elizabethan England. The fear of inadequacy and the desire for perfection may reflect societal pressures and expectations.“As an unperfect actor on the stage”
DeconstructionThe sonnet’s language and imagery can be deconstructed to reveal underlying contradictions and ambiguities. For example, the speaker’s desire for love and his fear of expressing it create a tension.“So I, for fear of trust, forget to say / The perfect ceremony of love’s rite”
Critical Questions about “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
  • How does the metaphor of the actor reflect the speaker’s emotional struggle in love?
  • The metaphor of the “unperfect actor on the stage” (line 1) is central to the sonnet, portraying the speaker’s emotional struggle in love. Like an actor who is overwhelmed by fear and forgets his lines, the speaker feels incapable of expressing his love due to self-doubt. The comparison reflects the tension between the speaker’s desire to perform perfectly in love and his fear that he will fail, leading him to “forget to say / The perfect ceremony of love’s rite” (lines 5-6). This question invites readers to examine how Shakespeare uses the image of an actor to symbolize the inner conflict of self-expression in relationships.
  • What role does fear play in the speaker’s inability to express love?
  • Fear is a dominant emotion in the sonnet, and it significantly hinders the speaker’s ability to communicate his feelings. The speaker admits that “for fear of trust, forget to say / The perfect ceremony of love’s rite” (lines 5-6), suggesting that his fear of vulnerability or betrayal prevents him from fully expressing his love. The speaker’s fear weakens his confidence, much like the actor who is “put beside his part” (line 2). This question encourages readers to explore how fear acts as an obstacle in love, causing the speaker to withhold the emotional honesty necessary for a meaningful connection.
  • What is the significance of non-verbal communication in the sonnet?
  • In Sonnet 23, the speaker ultimately shifts from verbal expression to non-verbal communication as a means of conveying love. He asks his beloved to “let my looks be then the eloquence / And dumb presagers of my speaking breast” (lines 9-10), suggesting that his physical gestures and facial expressions reveal his true feelings more effectively than words. The speaker believes that love’s depth is often communicated silently and urges his beloved to “learn to read what silent love hath writ” (line 13). This question prompts an analysis of how Shakespeare elevates non-verbal cues as a powerful way of expressing love, particularly when words fail.
  • How does Shakespeare address the paradox of strength and weakness in the speaker’s emotions?
  • The sonnet presents a paradox where the speaker’s love, though strong, weakens him emotionally. The line “Whose strength’s abundance weakens his own heart” (line 4) reflects this contradiction, as the intensity of the speaker’s love makes him feel vulnerable and incapable of expressing it. Rather than empowering him, his love creates a burden that he cannot bear, leaving him “o’ ercharged with burthen of mine own love’s might” (line 8). This question encourages readers to consider how Shakespeare explores the complexity of emotions, where love simultaneously gives the speaker strength and renders him powerless to express it.
Literary Works Similar to “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
  1. “When You Are Old” by W.B. Yeats
    A reflective poem where the speaker contemplates unspoken love and the passage of time, emphasizing emotional vulnerability and unexpressed feelings.
  2. Love’s Philosophy” by Percy Bysshe Shelley
    This poem explores the interconnectedness of love and nature, using natural imagery to express the speaker’s longing for a love that remains unreciprocated.
  3. A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning” by John Donne
    A poem where Donne discusses the strength of silent, spiritual love, contrasting it with the inadequacy of physical separation and spoken words.
  4. Bright Star” by John Keats
    In this sonnet, Keats conveys the speaker’s yearning for eternal, steadfast love, highlighting the limitations of human existence in expressing enduring emotions.
  5. “The Silent Lover I” by Sir Walter Raleigh
    Raleigh’s poem describes a lover’s silent suffering and the inability to verbalize his feelings, aligning closely with the theme of unspoken love present in Shakespeare’s Sonnet 23.
Representative Quotations of “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“As an unperfect actor on the stage,”The speaker compares himself to an inexperienced or inadequate actor.Psychoanalysis: This suggests feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt.
“Who with his fear is put beside his part,”The actor’s fear distracts him from his role.Psychoanalysis: This further emphasizes the speaker’s internal conflict and anxiety.
“So I, for fear of trust, forget to say / The perfect ceremony of love’s rite,”The speaker’s fear of trusting or expressing his love prevents him from speaking openly.Psychoanalysis: This highlights the speaker’s emotional turmoil and inability to communicate his feelings.
“And in mine own love’s strength seem to decay,Despite the strength of his love, the speaker feels weakened or diminished.Deconstruction: This reveals a contradiction between the speaker’s love and his feelings of inadequacy.
“O! let my looks be then the eloquence / And dumb presagers of my speaking breast,”The speaker wishes his appearance and expressions could convey his love more effectively than words.New Historicism: This may reflect societal pressures of the time, where physical appearance and behavior were important indicators of social status and worth.
“Who plead for love, and look for recompense,His looks and actions are pleading for love and seeking a return of affection.Psychoanalysis: This suggests a deep-seated need for love and validation.
“More than that tongue that more hath more express’d.”His silent expressions are more meaningful than words can convey.Deconstruction: This challenges the traditional notion that language is the primary means of communication.
“O! learn to read what silent love hath writ:The speaker urges his beloved to understand the unspoken language of love.New Historicism: This may reflect the Elizabethan emphasis on the power of nonverbal communication and the importance of understanding emotions through observation.
“To hear with eyes belongs to love’s fine wit.”True love involves understanding emotions and feelings through visual cues rather than just words.Deconstruction: This challenges the idea that language is the sole means of expressing and understanding love.
“O’ercharged with burthen of mine own love’s might.”The weight of his own love is overwhelming.Psychoanalysis: This suggests that intense emotions can be both a source of strength and a burden.
Suggested Readings: “Sonnet 23: As An Unperfect Actor On The Stage” by William Shakespeare
  1. Emerson, Oliver Farrar. “Shakespeare’s Sonneteering.” Studies in Philology, vol. 20, no. 2, 1923, pp. 111–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171848. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  2. Dubrow, Heather. “‘Incertainties Now Crown Themselves Assur’d’: The Politics of Plotting Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 3, 1996, pp. 291–305. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2871379. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  3. Emily E. Stockard. “Patterns of Consolation in Shakespeare’s Sonnets 1-126.” Studies in Philology, vol. 94, no. 4, 1997, pp. 465–93. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4174591. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  4. “Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 5, 1997, pp. 743–48. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871362. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.

“Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis

“Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted,” by William Shakespeare, was first published in 1609 as part of his collection Shakespeare’s Sonnets.

"Sonnet 20: A woman's face with nature's own hand painted" by William Shakespeare: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare

“Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted,” by William Shakespeare, was first published in 1609 as part of his collection Shakespeare’s Sonnets. This sonnet is renowned for its exquisite imagery, poetic language, and exploration of the enduring beauty and youthfulness of the beloved. The central theme of the poem revolves around the idea that the woman’s beauty is a masterpiece created by nature itself, surpassing any human artistry.

Text: “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare

A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted

Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion;

A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquainted

With shifting change as is false women’s fashion;

An eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling,

Gilding the object whereupon it gazeth;

A man in hue, all hues in his controlling,

Which steals men’s eyes and women’s souls amazeth.

And for a woman wert thou first created,

Till nature as she wrought thee fell a-doting,

And by addition me of thee defeated

By adding one thing to my purpose nothing.

      But since she pricked thee out for women’s pleasure,

      Mine be thy love and thy love’s use their treasure.

Annotations: “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare
Line NumberTextAnnotation
1A woman’s face with nature’s own hand paintedThe sonnet begins by comparing the woman’s face to a masterpiece created by nature itself.
2Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion;The speaker addresses the woman directly, acknowledging her control over his emotions.
3A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquaintedThe woman is described as having a gentle heart, unlike the fickle and false hearts of other women.
4With shifting change as is false women’s fashion;This line continues to contrast the woman’s constancy with the inconstancy of other women.
5An eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling,The woman’s eyes are described as being more beautiful and honest than those of other women.
6Gilding the object whereupon it gazeth;The woman’s gaze is said to enhance the beauty of whatever it looks upon.
7A man in hue, all hues in his controlling,The woman’s beauty is described as being so diverse and captivating that it can steal the attention of both men and women.
8Which steals men’s eyes and women’s souls amazeth.This line continues to emphasize the captivating nature of the woman’s beauty.
9And for a woman wert thou first created,The speaker suggests that the woman was originally intended to be a man, but nature changed her during her creation.
10Till nature as she wrought thee fell a-doting,This line implies that nature became so enamored with the woman that she changed her into a woman.
11And by addition me of thee defeatedThe speaker suggests that nature’s addition of femininity to the woman has made her unattainable for him.
12By adding one thing to my purpose nothing.This line continues to express the speaker’s frustration at the woman’s femininity, which prevents him from possessing her.
13But since she pricked thee out for women’s pleasure,The speaker acknowledges that the woman was created to be a source of pleasure for men.
14Mine be thy love and thy love’s use their treasure.The speaker declares his love for the woman, even though he knows she was created for others. He also suggests that the woman’s love should be considered a treasure that others can enjoy.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare
DeviceDefinitionExampleExplanation
AlliterationThe repetition of the same consonant sound at the beginning of words.“A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted”The repetition of the “w” sound creates a musical effect and emphasizes the woman’s beauty.
AllusionA reference to a famous person, place, thing, or event.“A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquainted With shifting change as is false women’s fashion;”This line alludes to the fickle nature of women, a common stereotype in Shakespeare’s time.
AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas or images.“An eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling”The contrast between the woman’s honest eyes and the dishonest eyes of other women emphasizes her superiority.
HyperboleExaggeration for effect.“Which steals men’s eyes and women’s souls amazeth”The speaker exaggerates the effect of the woman’s beauty, suggesting that it can captivate both men and women.
ImageryThe use of vivid language to create mental pictures.“A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted”This line creates a vivid image of the woman’s face as a beautiful work of art.
MetaphorA comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“A man in hue, all hues in his controlling”The woman’s beauty is compared to a man, suggesting that it is both powerful and captivating.
OxymoronA figure of speech combining contradictory terms.“Gentle heart”The word “gentle” suggests kindness and tenderness, while the word “heart” implies strength and emotion.
PersonificationGiving human qualities to non-human things.“Nature as she wrought thee fell a-doting”Nature is described as being “a-doting,” suggesting that it has human emotions like love and infatuation.
SimileA comparison between two unlike things using “like” or “as.”“An eye more bright than theirs”The woman’s eyes are compared to the eyes of other women, suggesting that they are more beautiful.
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or concepts.“A woman’s face”The woman’s face represents beauty, perfection, and the power of nature.
SynecdocheA figure of speech in which a part is used to represent the whole, or vice versa.“Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion;”The word “master-mistress” is used to represent both the woman’s power and her beauty.
AllusionA reference to a famous person, place, thing, or event.“A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquainted With shifting change as is false women’s fashion;”This line alludes to the fickle nature of women, a common stereotype in Shakespeare’s time.
AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas or images.“An eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling”The contrast between the woman’s honest eyes and the dishonest eyes of other women emphasizes her superiority.
HyperboleExaggeration for effect.“Which steals men’s eyes and women’s souls amazeth”The speaker exaggerates the effect of the woman’s beauty, suggesting that it can captivate both men and women.
ImageryThe use of vivid language to create mental pictures.“A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted”This line creates a vivid image of the woman’s face as a beautiful work of art.
MetaphorA comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“A man in hue, all hues in his controlling”The woman’s beauty is compared to a man, suggesting that it is both powerful and captivating.
OxymoronA figure of speech combining contradictory terms.“Gentle heart”The word “gentle” suggests kindness and tenderness, while the word “heart” implies strength and emotion.
PersonificationGiving human qualities to non-human things.“Nature as she wrought thee fell a-doting”Nature is described as being “a-doting,” suggesting that it has human emotions like love and infatuation.
SimileA comparison between two unlike things using “like” or “as.”“An eye more bright than theirs”The woman’s eyes are compared to the eyes of other women, suggesting that they are more beautiful.
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or concepts.“A woman’s face”The woman’s face represents beauty, perfection, and the power of nature.
SynecdocheA figure of speech in which a part is used to represent the whole, or vice versa.“Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion;”The word “master-mistress” is used to represent both the woman’s power and her beauty.
Themes: “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare
  • The Power of Nature: Shakespeare emphasizes the extraordinary power of nature in creating beauty. The woman’s face is described as a masterpiece “with nature’s own hand painted,” suggesting that nature’s artistry surpasses human capabilities. This theme highlights the awe-inspiring beauty of the natural world and its ability to create something truly extraordinary.
  • The Enduring Nature of Beauty: The sonnet explores the idea that true beauty is timeless and can withstand the test of time. The woman’s beauty is described as “A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted,” implying that it is a work of art that will endure. This theme suggests that beauty is not merely superficial but is a deep-rooted quality that transcends fleeting trends and societal standards.
  • The Limitations of Human Creation: Shakespeare contrasts the woman’s natural beauty with the limitations of human artistry. He suggests that no human artist can create something as perfect as nature. This theme highlights the superiority of the natural world and the inherent flaws and limitations of human creations.
  • Unrequited Love and Frustration: The sonnet reveals the speaker’s unrequited love for the woman and his frustration at being unable to possess her. He acknowledges that she was created for the pleasure of others and that his love is futile. This theme explores the pain and anguish of unrequited love and the limitations imposed by societal expectations and conventions.
Literary Theories and “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare
Literary TheoryExplanationReferences in Sonnet 20
Feminist CriticismThis theory analyzes literature from a feminist perspective, focusing on gender roles, power dynamics, and the representation of women.“A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquainted With shifting change as is false women’s fashion;”
New HistoricismThis theory examines literature within its historical and cultural context, considering factors such as social, political, and economic conditions.“Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion;”
Psychoanalytic CriticismThis theory analyzes literature from a psychological perspective, exploring the unconscious motivations and desires of characters.“A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted”
Critical Questions about “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare

·         How does Shakespeare portray the subject’s beauty in contrast to traditional gender roles?

  • Shakespeare’s portrayal of the subject in “Sonnet 20” blends elements of both male and female beauty, defying traditional gender roles. The speaker refers to the subject as having “A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted,” which emphasizes an idealized beauty typically associated with femininity. However, the subject is described as the “master-mistress” of the speaker’s passion, suggesting that they possess the allure of both genders. This fluidity disrupts the conventional distinctions between male and female, aligning with Renaissance anxieties and fascinations with androgyny. The subject’s beauty is seen as superior to a woman’s because it is “not acquainted / With shifting change as is false women’s fashion,” further suggesting that their beauty is more enduring and constant than the fickle, deceptive nature often ascribed to women in Elizabethan literature.

·         What role does nature play in shaping the identity of the sonnet’s subject?

  • Nature is personified in the sonnet as the creator of the subject’s beauty, and it plays a critical role in shaping their dual-gendered identity. The subject is initially described as having been created “for a woman,” but Nature “fell a-doting” and added something that defeated the speaker’s desires. This “addition” refers to the subject’s masculine traits, particularly the “one thing” (presumably a phallus) that disrupts the speaker’s purpose. Nature’s involvement emphasizes a form of creative imperfection or whimsy, as she altered her original plan due to excessive admiration (“doting”). This change prevents the speaker from possessing the subject in a physical or sexual manner, yet the speaker still claims the subject’s emotional love (“Mine be thy love”), leaving the physical aspect for women’s “pleasure.”

·         How does the speaker’s relationship with the subject evolve throughout the poem?

  • The speaker’s relationship with the subject in “Sonnet 20” is complex and evolves from admiration to acceptance of boundaries. Initially, the speaker is captivated by the subject’s beauty, describing it in terms that merge feminine softness with masculine strength. As the sonnet progresses, however, the speaker realizes that this beauty, while enchanting, is ultimately unattainable on a physical level. The addition Nature made “defeated” the speaker’s desires, as it created a divide between emotional love and physical pleasure. In the final couplet, the speaker acknowledges this limitation: “Mine be thy love and thy love’s use their treasure.” The speaker seems to reconcile the fact that while he can have the subject’s love, the physical relationship is reserved for women. This marks a shift from desire to resigned acceptance.

·         How does Shakespeare explore themes of love and desire in “Sonnet 20”?

  • “Sonnet 20” intricately explores the themes of love and desire, particularly in the context of unfulfilled or platonic love. The speaker expresses intense emotional attraction to the subject, admiring their beauty and character, which transcends both gender and physicality. However, the poem also acknowledges the limitations of this love, as the subject’s physical form prevents a full realization of the speaker’s desire. Shakespeare contrasts the purity and constancy of the speaker’s love with the physical, sexual desire that is reserved for women. This separation of love and lust can be interpreted as a reflection on the nature of idealized love—where emotional connection surpasses physical constraints, but also where desire must remain unfulfilled. The speaker’s final acceptance of this divide between emotional and physical love (“Mine be thy love and thy love’s use their treasure”) illustrates the tension between spiritual affection and carnal desire.
Literary Works Similar to “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare

·         Ode to a Grecian Urn” by John Keats: Similarity: Like “Sonnet 20,” this poem by Keats reflects on the timeless beauty of an object (the Grecian urn) that transcends the boundaries of gender and physicality, capturing an idealized, eternal beauty much like the androgynous figure in Shakespeare’s sonnet.

·         “The Picture of Little T.C. in a Prospect of Flowers” by Andrew Marvell: Similarity: Marvell’s poem explores the delicate beauty of a young girl, reflecting on innocence and purity while also acknowledging the inevitability of change and the passage of time, much like Shakespeare’s meditation on immutable beauty in “Sonnet 20.”

·         The Definition of Love” by Andrew Marvell: Similarity: Marvell’s poem, like “Sonnet 20,” grapples with unattainable love. Both poems explore love that cannot be fully realized due to external circumstances, whether it’s Nature’s intervention in Shakespeare’s poem or the cosmic impossibility in Marvell’s work.

·         She Walks in Beauty” by Lord Byron: Similarity: Byron’s poem celebrates the harmonious blending of physical beauty and inner virtue, reminiscent of how Shakespeare combines feminine beauty with masculine constancy in “Sonnet 20.”

·         “The Love That Dare Not Speak Its Name” by Lord Alfred Douglas: Similarity: This poem explores themes of same-sex attraction and love that is socially or culturally unaccepted, akin to the subtext of homoerotic desire in “Sonnet 20,” where love is celebrated but physical union is denied.

Representative Quotations of “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare
QuotationExplanation
“A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted”The speaker admires the subject’s beauty, which is as delicate and perfect as a woman’s but created directly by Nature.
“Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion”The subject is both master and mistress, blending masculine and feminine qualities, which captivate the speaker’s passion.
“A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquainted / With shifting change as is false women’s fashion”The subject has a woman’s gentle heart but lacks the perceived fickleness often attributed to women.
“An eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling”The subject’s eyes are brighter than a woman’s and more honest, suggesting a purity of gaze and intention.
“Gilding the object whereupon it gazeth”The subject’s gaze adds value and beauty to whatever it looks upon, further emphasizing their idealized nature.
“A man in hue, all hues in his controlling”Although the subject possesses feminine beauty, they are a man, controlling all colors or aspects of beauty.
“Which steals men’s eyes and women’s souls amazeth”The subject captivates both men and women, stealing the gaze of men and astonishing women, highlighting their universal allure.
“And for a woman wert thou first created”The speaker suggests the subject was initially intended to be a woman, reinforcing their feminine traits.
“But since she pricked thee out for women’s pleasure”Nature added male attributes to the subject, making them sexually available to women but not to the speaker.
“Mine be thy love and thy love’s use their treasure”The speaker claims the subject’s emotional love while accepting that their physical relationship is reserved for women.
Suggested Readings: “Sonnet 20: A woman’s face with nature’s own hand painted” by William Shakespeare
  1. Emerson, Oliver Farrar. “Shakespeare’s Sonneteering.” Studies in Philology, vol. 20, no. 2, 1923, pp. 111–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171848. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  2. Charles, Casey. “Was Shakespeare Gay? Sonnet 20 and the Politics of Pedagogy.” College Literature, vol. 25, no. 3, 1998, pp. 35–51. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25112402. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
  3. NELLES, WILLIAM. “Sexing Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Reading Beyond Sonnet 20.” English Literary Renaissance, vol. 39, no. 1, 2009, pp. 128–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24463748. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.