“Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen: Summary and Critique

“Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen first appeared in The American Journal of Cardiology in 1997 as part of a broader interdisciplinary discussion on the relationship between literature and medicine.

"Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience" by Helle Mathiasen: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen

“Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen first appeared in The American Journal of Cardiology in 1997 as part of a broader interdisciplinary discussion on the relationship between literature and medicine. This work explores how literature enriches medical practice by fostering empathy, addressing moral and philosophical issues, and enhancing the physician’s understanding of human suffering. Mathiasen argues that literature and medicine, though seemingly distinct disciplines, share a deep connection that dates back to ancient Greek mythology, where Apollo symbolized both healing and poetry. By examining the works of physician-writers like Anton Chekhov and William Carlos Williams, the article illustrates how medical practice informs literary expression and vice versa. Chekhov’s Ward Six, for instance, critiques medical apathy and highlights the transformative power of empathy when a doctor experiences the same neglect he once inflicted on his patients. Similarly, Williams’ The Use of Force delves into the ethical dilemmas of medical authority and patient autonomy. Mathiasen further contends that literature serves as a moral compass for physicians, presenting role models such as Dr. Bernard Rieux in Camus’ The Plague, who embodies professional dedication and ethical responsibility in the face of overwhelming suffering. Additionally, literature captures the emotional and existential dimensions of illness, as seen in Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilych, which portrays a dying man’s desperate search for meaning amid the indifference of medical professionals. The article underscores that literature not only humanizes medical training but also provides doctors with the tools to navigate the complexities of patient care. By incorporating literature into medical education, Mathiasen suggests, we can cultivate more compassionate and reflective healthcare practitioners, ultimately improving the doctor-patient relationship.

Summary of “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen

1. The Emergence of Literature and Medicine as a Discipline

  • Over the past 20 years, the interdisciplinary field of literature and medicine has grown significantly, leading to the establishment of journals, databases, and academic courses (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).
  • The connection between literature and medicine dates back to ancient Greece, where Apollo was associated with both healing and poetry (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).

2. Literature and Medicine as Humanistic Arts

  • Literature and medicine both contribute to a deeper understanding of human existence, suffering, and healing (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).
  • The physician-writers Anton Chekhov and William Carlos Williams demonstrate how medical experience enriches literary expression (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).

3. Moral and Ethical Lessons for Physicians

  • Literature provides moral instruction, helping doctors reflect on their professional and ethical responsibilities (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • In Ward Six, Chekhov critiques medical apathy through the story of a physician who only realizes the suffering of patients when he himself becomes one (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Dr. Bernard Rieux in Camus’ The Plague exemplifies professional dedication and ethical responsibility (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

4. The Role of Empathy in Medicine

  • Literature enhances physicians’ ability to empathize with patients by depicting the emotional and psychological aspects of illness (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • In Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilych, the protagonist’s suffering is largely ignored by his family and doctors, except for the empathetic servant Gerasim (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • Tillie Olsen’s Tell Me A Riddle portrays the compassion of a granddaughter caring for her dying grandmother, reinforcing the importance of human connection in healthcare (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

5. The Subjectivity of Medical Experience

  • Literature reveals the differing perspectives of doctors and patients, emphasizing the subjective nature of medical experiences (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar presents electroshock therapy as a traumatic experience for the patient, contrasting the physician’s clinical perspective (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Barbara Pym’s Quartet in Autumn illustrates a patient’s fear of judgment through her interactions with her doctor (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

6. Literature as a Tool for Medical Education

  • Medical training often neglects subjectivity, but literature provides insight into the complexities of doctor-patient interactions (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature and medicine courses have been introduced in medical schools to enhance students’ understanding of morality, emotion, and human suffering (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The study of literature can improve medical professionals’ ability to communicate effectively and compassionately with patients (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

7. The Importance of Narrative in Medicine

  • Storytelling allows physicians to process and reflect on their experiences, reinforcing their understanding of patients’ lives (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature serves as a medium for discussing illness, death, and ethical dilemmas in a way that scientific texts cannot (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Works such as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Angels in America help illustrate the psychological and social aspects of illness (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen
Theoretical Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationReference in the Article
Interdisciplinary StudiesThe integration of multiple academic fields to create a broader understanding of a subject. Literature and medicine intersect to enhance both fields.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1222)
Humanistic MedicineThe idea that medicine is not just a science but also an art that requires empathy, ethics, and a deep understanding of human experiences.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1222)
Narrative MedicineThe use of literature and storytelling to improve medical practice by fostering empathy and deeper patient understanding.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Medical EthicsThe study of moral values and principles in medical practice, including the responsibilities of doctors towards patients.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1223)
Empathy in MedicineThe ability of healthcare professionals to emotionally understand and connect with patients’ suffering and perspectives.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1224)
Subjectivity in MedicineRecognizing that medical experiences are influenced by personal perspectives, emotions, and social factors, not just objective science.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Symbolism in LiteratureThe use of symbols in literary texts to represent medical or humanistic themes, such as the caduceus (a medical symbol with two serpents).Mathiasen (1997, p. 1222)
Doctor-Patient RelationshipThe dynamic interaction between a physician and a patient, including trust, communication, and ethical responsibilities.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1224)
Moral Responsibility in MedicineThe ethical duty of doctors to prioritize patient care, demonstrate compassion, and maintain professional integrity.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1223)
Psychological Impact of IllnessHow literature portrays the emotional and mental challenges faced by patients and healthcare professionals.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1224)
Medical RealismA literary technique that accurately depicts medical environments, procedures, and the experiences of doctors and patients.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1223)
Literature as a Pedagogical ToolThe use of literature in medical education to teach students about ethical dilemmas, human emotions, and patient care.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Philosophy of MedicineThe broader theoretical and existential questions concerning health, illness, and the role of medical professionals in society.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Contribution of “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Reader-Response Theory

  • The article emphasizes how literature evokes empathy and moral reflection in readers, particularly in medical practitioners (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • Readers engage personally with medical narratives, shaping their understanding of ethical dilemmas in healthcare (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Example: The Death of Ivan Ilych by Tolstoy forces readers to confront mortality and the emotional consequences of medical neglect (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

2. Ethical Literary Criticism

  • Literature serves as a tool for moral education by offering role models and cautionary tales for doctors (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Stories like Ward Six by Chekhov critique the moral failures of medical professionals, reinforcing ethical responsibility in medicine (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • The Plague by Camus highlights the physician’s duty to combat suffering, aligning with ethical philosophy (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

3. Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine

  • Mathiasen argues that literature enriches medical education by providing insight into patient suffering and healthcare ethics (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Narrative structure in literature helps physicians understand patient experiences beyond clinical diagnoses (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Works such as The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath reveal how psychiatric treatments impact patients differently from doctors’ perceptions (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

4. Humanism in Literature

  • The article aligns with humanist literary theory, emphasizing that literature deepens our understanding of human conditions like illness and suffering (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).
  • The focus on compassion, dignity, and ethical medical practice reflects Renaissance humanist ideals in literature (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Example: William Carlos Williams describes medicine as “the very thing which made it possible for me to write” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).

5. Existentialism in Literature

  • Mathiasen highlights how medical narratives explore existential questions of life, death, and human suffering (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The Death of Ivan Ilych presents existentialist dilemmas of facing mortality and the meaning of life (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • The Plague by Camus portrays human resilience in the face of absurdity, reinforcing existentialist themes (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

6. Postmodernist Critique of Medical Objectivity

  • The article questions the scientific objectivity of medicine, arguing that literature reveals the subjective experiences of both doctors and patients (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Quartet in Autumn by Barbara Pym illustrates how doctors and patients perceive illness differently, challenging medical authority (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature shows the ambiguity of medical truth, as seen in The Bell Jar, where electroshock therapy is viewed as both a cure and a punishment (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

7. Feminist Literary Criticism

  • Mathiasen discusses how gender influences medical treatment and patient experiences in literature (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman critiques the medical mistreatment of women, especially in cases of postpartum depression (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The male-dominated medical profession is examined in literary texts where female characters suffer due to patriarchal medical practices (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
Examples of Critiques Through “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen
Literary Work & AuthorCritique Through Mathiasen’s PerspectiveReference in the Article
Ward Six – Anton Chekhov– Critiques medical apathy and the dehumanization of patients.
– Dr. Ragin, a physician, refuses to improve hospital conditions until he himself becomes a patient, highlighting lack of empathy in healthcare.
– Demonstrates the moral responsibility of doctors to acknowledge and alleviate suffering.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223
The Death of Ivan Ilych – Leo Tolstoy– Examines emotional neglect in medical practice, where doctors focus on diagnosis while ignoring the psychological and existential distress of the patient.
– Contrasts Gerasim’s empathy with the indifference of trained medical professionals, showing that compassion is as important as medical expertise.
– Critiques the medical tendency to see patients as cases rather than human beings.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224
The Bell Jar – Sylvia Plath– Highlights the subjectivity of medical experiences, particularly in psychiatric care.
– The protagonist’s electroshock therapy is portrayed as a punishment rather than a cure, revealing power imbalances between doctors and patients.
– Critiques the cold, clinical detachment of mental health practitioners, showing the need for a more patient-centered approach.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225
The Plague – Albert Camus– Presents Dr. Bernard Rieux as a model of ethical medical practice, illustrating compassion, resilience, and duty in healthcare.
– Demonstrates existentialist themes, showing that medicine is a fight against inevitable death.
– Challenges the notion of heroism in medicine, arguing that persistence in caregiving is an act of “common decency” rather than a grand sacrifice.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224
Criticism Against “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen

1. Overemphasis on the Humanistic Perspective

  • Mathiasen prioritizes literature’s moral and emotional aspects while underemphasizing the scientific and practical constraints of medical practice (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Critics argue that medical training requires technical precision, and literature, while valuable, may not provide sufficient guidance for real-world decision-making.

2. Lack of Empirical Evidence for Literary Impact on Medical Practice

  • The article assumes that reading literature directly improves medical ethics and empathy, but it does not provide concrete empirical studies or controlled research to support this claim (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Some scholars argue that medical ethics and empathy are shaped by direct patient experience rather than literary analysis.

3. Subjectivity of Literary Interpretation

  • Mathiasen presents literature as a tool for universal moral lessons, but literary interpretation is inherently subjective (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • Different readers, including medical professionals, may interpret the same text in conflicting ways, leading to varied and potentially contradictory conclusions.

4. Limited Discussion of Non-Western Medical Narratives

  • The article focuses heavily on Western literary traditions, with examples from Chekhov, Tolstoy, Camus, and Plath (Mathiasen, 1997, pp. 1223-1225).
  • Medical humanities in non-Western contexts—such as traditional Chinese, African, or Indigenous medical narratives—are largely ignored.

5. Idealization of Literary Physicians

  • The article presents physician-writers (Chekhov, Williams) as exemplary figures, but not all doctors who write literature necessarily practice ethical medicine (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Some critics argue that idealizing literary doctors overlooks the systemic issues in modern healthcare, such as time constraints, bureaucracy, and financial pressures.

6. Lack of Engagement with Medical Technology and Contemporary Healthcare Issues

  • Mathiasen’s discussion does not address modern technological advancements in medicine, such as telemedicine, AI diagnostics, and bioethics (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature’s role in addressing contemporary healthcare challenges (e.g., pandemics, medical inequality, digital medicine) is not thoroughly explored.

7. The Risk of Over-Reliance on Literary Models for Medical Ethics

  • The article suggests that literature can offer role models for physicians, but fictional characters may not always be realistic or applicable to actual medical practice (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Some argue that ethical dilemmas in modern hospitals are far more complex than those depicted in literary narratives.
Representative Quotations from “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“The study of Literature and Medicine has developed into an independent discipline over the last 20 years.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222)Mathiasen highlights the emergence of medical humanities as a formal academic field, emphasizing its interdisciplinary significance.
“The connection between [literature and medicine] can be traced back to the mythology of ancient Greece, which identified Apollo as god of music, medicine, and poetry.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222)The link between medicine and literature is not a modern construct but has historical and mythological roots. This legitimizes their continued integration.
“Recognizing this relationship depends on the fundamental assumption that literature and medicine are humanistic arts.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222)Mathiasen argues that both fields share a common goal of understanding human experiences, particularly suffering, healing, and mortality.
“Chekhov’s story can then serve the ancient and important function of art, to provide moral education, not only to the health care provider but to the general reader.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223)Literature, especially stories by physician-writers like Chekhov, plays a key role in shaping ethical awareness in medicine.
“I have no doubt that the study of medicine has had an important influence on my literary work.” (Anton Chekhov, cited in Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223)Chekhov himself acknowledged that medicine enriched his writing, reinforcing the argument that literature and medicine are interconnected.
“Only the gifted storyteller can create and express a meaningful order out of the chaos of experience.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224)This statement highlights the narrative power of literature in medicine—transforming fragmented experiences into coherent and insightful reflections.
“The doctor scrutinizes his patient’s body, but the patient wonders whether she has failed to live up to her doctor’s expectations. They are at cross purposes.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225)Mathiasen critiques the disconnect between doctors and patients, emphasizing the subjectivity of medical experiences and potential misunderstandings in healthcare.
“A story like ‘Ward Six’ satisfies our yearning for justice—what goes around, comes around.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223)Chekhov’s Ward Six is an example of moral retribution in literature, where an apathetic doctor is forced to experience the suffering he once ignored.
“Perhaps the greatest benefit that physicians and the general reader can derive from literature is pleasure.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225)Beyond education and ethics, literature provides enjoyment, making it an effective medium for learning about medicine.
“Medical issues are life issues.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225)This phrase encapsulates the universal nature of medical narratives—illness, suffering, and healing affect everyone, not just doctors and patients.
Suggested Readings: “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen
  1. Mathiasen, Helle. “Literature and Medicine: the human experience.” The American journal of cardiology 79.9 (1997): 1222-1225.
  2. Downie, R. S. “Literature and Medicine.” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, 1991, pp. 93–98. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717024. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  3. Spiegel, Maura, and Rita Charon. “Editing and Interdisciplinarity: Literature, Medicine, and Narrative Medicine.” Profession, 2009, pp. 132–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595923. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  4. von Staden, Heinrich. “EXPERIMENT AND EXPERIENCE IN HELLENISTIC MEDICINE.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, no. 22, 1975, pp. 178–99. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43646348. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.

“Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton: A Critical Analysis

“Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton first appeared in Transformations (1971), a poetry collection that reinterprets classic fairy tales with a dark, feminist, and psychoanalytic lens.

"Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" by Anne Sexton: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton

“Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton first appeared in Transformations (1971), a poetry collection that reinterprets classic fairy tales with a dark, feminist, and psychoanalytic lens. This poem, like others in the collection, deconstructs traditional narratives to expose their unsettling undertones, particularly regarding beauty, power, and female subjugation. Sexton’s retelling presents Snow White as an objectified, passive figure—”rolling her china-blue doll eyes / open and shut”—who remains trapped in a cycle of male possession and societal expectations. The poem critiques the idealization of feminine innocence and the destructive nature of vanity, embodied in the queen’s obsessive rivalry. The haunting imagery, visceral language, and biting irony make the poem a staple in feminist literary studies and modern poetry anthologies. Its continued use in academic settings stems from its ability to challenge the sanitized versions of fairy tales and provoke discussions on gender roles, beauty standards, and psychological depth in literature.

Text: “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton

No matter what life you lead
the virgin is a lovely number:
cheeks as fragile as cigarette paper,
arms and legs made of Limoges,
lips like Vin Du Rhône,
rolling her china-blue doll eyes
open and shut.
Open to say,
Good Day Mama,
and shut for the thrust
of the unicorn.
She is unsoiled.
She is as white as a bonefish.

Once there was a lovely virgin
called Snow White.
Say she was thirteen.
Her stepmother,
a beauty in her own right,
though eaten, of course, by age,
would hear of no beauty surpassing her own.
Beauty is a simple passion,
but, oh my friends, in the end
you will dance the fire dance in iron shoes.
The stepmother had a mirror to which shereferred–
something like the weather forecast–
a mirror that proclaimed
the one beauty of the land.
She would ask,
Looking glass upon the wall,
who is fairest of us all?
And the mirror would reply,
You are the fairest of us all.
Pride pumped in her like poison.

Suddenly one day the mirror replied,
Queen, you are full fair, ’tis true,
but Snow White is fairer than you.
Until that moment Snow White
had been no more important
than a dust mouse under the bed.
But now the queen saw brown spots on her hand
and four whiskers over her lip
so she condemned Snow White
to be hacked to death.
Bring me her heart, she said to the hunter,
and I will salt it and eat it.
The hunter, however, let his prisoner go
and brought a boar’s heart back to the castle.
The queen chewed it up like a cube steak.
Now I am fairest, she said,
lapping her slim white fingers.

Snow White walked in the wildwood
for weeks and weeks.
At each turn there were twenty doorways
and at each stood a hungry wolf,
his tongue lolling out like a worm.
The birds called out lewdly,
talking like pink parrots,
and the snakes hung down in loops,
each a noose for her sweet white neck.
On the seventh week
she came to the seventh mountain
and there she found the dwarf house.
It was as droll as a honeymoon cottage
and completely equipped with
seven beds, seven chairs, seven forks
and seven chamber pots.
Snow White ate seven chicken livers
and lay down, at last, to sleep.

The dwarfs, those little hot dogs,
walked three times around Snow White,
the sleeping virgin.  They were wise
and wattled like small czars.
Yes.  It’s agood omen,
they said, and will bring us luck.
They stood on tiptoes to watch
Snow White wake up.  She told them
about the mirror and the killer-queen
and they asked her to stay and keep house.
Beware of your stepmother,
they said.
Soon she will know you are here.
While we are away in the mines
during the day, you must not
open the door.

Looking glass upon the wall . . .
The mirror told
and so the queen dressed herself in rags
and went out like a peddler to trap Snow White.
She went across seven mountains.
She came to the dwarf house
and Snow White opened the door
and bought a bit of lacing.
The queen fastened it tightly
around her bodice,
as tight as an Ace bandage,
so tight that Snow White swooned.
She lay on the floor, a plucked daisy.
When the dwarfs came home they undid the lace
and she revived miraculously.
She was as full of life as soda pop.
Beware of your stepmother,
they said.
She will try once more.

Looking glass upon the wall. . .
Once more the mirror told
and once more the queen dressed in rags
and once more Snow White opened the door.
This time she bought a poison comb,
a curved eight-inch scorpion,
and put it in her hair and swooned again.
The dwarfs returned and took out the comb
and she revived miraculously.
She opened her eyes as wide as Orphan Annie.
Beware, beware, they said,
but the mirror told,
the queen came,
Snow White, the dumb bunny,
opened the door
and she bit into a poison apple
and fell down for the final time.
When the dwarfs returned
they undid her bodice,
they looked for a comb,
but it did no good.
Though they washed her with wine
and rubbed her with butter
it was to no avail.
She lay as still as a gold piece.

The seven dwarfs could not bring themselves
to bury her in the black ground
so they made a glass coffin
and set it upon the seventh mountain
so that all who passed by
could peek in upon her beauty.
A prince came one June day
and would not budge.
He stayed so long his hair turned green
and still he would not leave.
The dwarfs took pity upon him
and gave him the glass Snow White–
its doll’s eyes shut forever–
to keep in his far-off castle.
As the prince’s men carried the coffin
they stumbled and dropped it
and the chunk of apple flew out
of her throat and she woke up miraculously.

And thus Snow White became the prince’s bride.
The wicked queen was invited to the wedding feast
and when she arrived there were
red-hot iron shoes,
in the manner of red-hot roller skates,
clamped upon her feet.
First your toes will smoke
and then your heels will turn black
and you will fry upward like a frog,
she was told.
And so she danced until she was dead,
a subterranean figure,
her tongue flicking in and out
like a gas jet.
Meanwhile Snow White held court,
rolling her china-blue doll eyes open and shut
and sometimes referring to her mirror
as women do.

Annotations: “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton
SectionSummaryKey ThemesLiterary DevicesQuotations
Opening LinesThe poem begins with a reflection on purity and virginity. Snow White is introduced as an idealized, fragile beauty, emphasizing the theme of innocence and objectification.Purity, Innocence, ObjectificationMetaphor (virgin as “a lovely number”), Simile (“cheeks as fragile as cigarette paper”), Symbolism (white as purity)“No matter what life you lead / the virgin is a lovely number”
Introduction of Snow WhiteSnow White is portrayed as a delicate, doll-like figure, reinforcing traditional femininity and desirability. Her passivity is emphasized.Idealized Beauty, Passive WomanhoodImagery (delicate, doll-like features), Symbolism (youth as purity)“Rolling her china-blue doll eyes / open and shut”
Stepmother’s Vanity and RivalryThe stepmother, obsessed with her own beauty, consults the mirror. The mirror’s response triggers her jealousy and desire to eliminate Snow White.Jealousy, Power Struggles, VanityPersonification (mirror as judge), Irony (beauty as obsession), Symbolism (aging as decay)“Pride pumped in her like poison”
Stepmother Orders Snow White’s DeathThe stepmother orders the hunter to kill Snow White and bring back her heart as proof. The hunter deceives the queen and lets Snow White go.Betrayal, Deception, MercyDiction (violent commands), Irony (hunter’s mercy), Grotesque imagery (queen eating the heart)“Bring me her heart, she said to the hunter, / and I will salt it and eat it.”
Snow White in the WildwoodSnow White wanders alone in the wilderness, facing numerous dangers. The imagery of wolves, birds, and snakes suggests both sexual threats and the harshness of the world.Danger, Sexual Threats, Loss of InnocencePersonification (wolves, birds, and snakes as threats), Symbolism (dark forest as loss of innocence)“Each a noose for her sweet white neck.”
Snow White Finds the DwarfsSnow White discovers the dwarfs’ cottage and finds safety. The dwarfs accept her, emphasizing the fairy tale motif of sanctuary and protection.Sanctuary, Safety, Domestic RoleRepetition (seven motifs), Fairy tale conventions (dwarfs as guardians), Symbolism (small size as wisdom)“Seven beds, seven chairs, seven forks”
First Attempt to Kill Snow White – LacingThe stepmother disguises herself and tricks Snow White into wearing a too-tight lace, causing her to faint. The dwarfs save her, warning her about future dangers.Naivety, Deception, RevivalForeshadowing (warnings), Symbolism (tight bodice as oppression), Dramatic irony (reader knows the stepmother’s disguise)“She lay on the floor, a plucked daisy.”
Second Attempt – Poison CombThe stepmother tries again, selling Snow White a poisoned comb. Snow White faints but is revived by the dwarfs, reinforcing her naivety and passivity.Repetition of Mistakes, Trust IssuesSymbolism (comb as a poisoned tool), Hyperbole (revival as miraculous), Repetition (queen’s persistence)“A curved eight-inch scorpion”
Final Attempt – Poison AppleThe final, fatal deception occurs when Snow White eats the poisoned apple. This time, the dwarfs are unable to save her, and she is placed in a glass coffin.Final Betrayal, Death, FateImagery (gold piece, stillness), Symbolism (apple as original sin), Tragedy (Snow White’s helplessness)“She lay as still as a gold piece.”
Snow White in the Glass CoffinSnow White’s beauty is preserved in death, reinforcing themes of passive femininity and the male gaze. She becomes an object to be admired rather than an active figure.Eternal Beauty, Male Gaze, ObjectificationSymbolism (glass coffin as preservation of beauty), Male Gaze (Snow White as a display object)“So that all who passed by / could peek in upon her beauty.”
Prince’s Arrival and Snow White’s RevivalThe prince arrives and becomes obsessed with Snow White. She is only revived by accident, emphasizing the arbitrary nature of her fate and lack of agency.Passivity, Arbitrary Fate, Male OwnershipIrony (prince’s love for a dead girl), Symbolism (revival through accidental action), Objectification“The chunk of apple flew out of her throat and she woke up miraculously.”
Stepmother’s PunishmentThe stepmother’s brutal punishment (dancing in red-hot iron shoes) serves as a grim moral lesson, though its cruelty undermines the simplistic ‘good vs. evil’ narrative.Justice, Revenge, Moral HypocrisyDark humor (gruesome punishment), Symbolism (red-hot shoes as poetic justice), Irony (excessive cruelty)“First your toes will smoke / and then your heels will turn black”
Closing Reflection on Snow WhiteSnow White, now a queen, mirrors the stepmother’s vanity by continuing to gaze into her own reflection. This suggests a cycle of female competition and objectification.Cyclical Nature of Beauty Standards, Feminine CompetitionSymbolism (mirror as vanity and self-surveillance), Irony (Snow White becomes like the stepmother)“Rolling her china-blue doll eyes open and shut / and sometimes referring to her mirror / as women do.”
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton
Literary DeviceExample from the PoemExplanation
Alliteration“Snow White walked in the wildwood”The repetition of the “w” sound enhances the fairy-tale quality of the line and creates a smooth, lyrical effect.
Allusion“She opened her eyes as wide as Orphan Annie.”Refers to the famous comic strip character, known for her large, round eyes, emphasizing Snow White’s innocence and naivety.
Ambiguity“She is as white as a bonefish.”The comparison suggests both purity and death, leaving multiple interpretations open.
Anaphora“Looking glass upon the wall…”The repeated phrase reinforces the mirror’s power and obsessive influence over the queen.
Assonance“The birds called out lewdly, / talking like pink parrots”The repetition of vowel sounds in “called,” “out,” and “lewdly” creates a musical, rhythmic effect.
Connotation“Rolling her china-blue doll eyes open and shut”The phrase “china-blue doll eyes” suggests fragility, passivity, and objectification, reinforcing Snow White’s lack of agency.
Dark Humor“The queen chewed it up like a cube steak.”The grotesque image of the queen eating what she believes is Snow White’s heart adds a macabre sense of humor.
Diction“The seven dwarfs could not bring themselves / to bury her in the black ground.”The phrase “black ground” evokes death and finality, contrasting with the idea of preserving Snow White’s beauty.
Dramatic Irony“Snow White, the dumb bunny, opened the door”The audience knows Snow White is in danger, but she remains unaware, creating tension and frustration.
Enjambment“And the snakes hung down in loops, / each a noose for her sweet white neck.”The line break forces the reader to pause, emphasizing the sinister imagery of the snakes as execution devices.
Epiphora“Beware of your stepmother, they said. / She will try once more.”The repetition of warnings underscores Snow White’s repeated failure to heed advice.
Euphemism“She lay as still as a gold piece.”Rather than explicitly stating that Snow White is dead, the comparison to a “gold piece” softens the imagery, making it poetic.
Grotesque Imagery“First your toes will smoke / and then your heels will turn black / and you will fry upward like a frog.”The exaggerated and unsettling depiction of the queen’s punishment adds to the fairy-tale horror element.
Hyperbole“A prince came one June day / and would not budge. / He stayed so long his hair turned green.”The extreme description of time passing emphasizes the prince’s obsessive devotion.
Imagery“His tongue lolling out like a worm.”The vivid comparison of the wolf’s tongue to a worm paints a disturbing picture of predatory hunger.
Irony“Now I am fairest, she said, / lapping her slim white fingers.”The queen believes she has won, but the audience knows Snow White is alive, highlighting the irony of her false victory.
Metaphor“The virgin is a lovely number.”Snow White is not literally a number; this metaphor equates purity with an abstract, measurable quality.
Personification“Pride pumped in her like poison.”Pride is given the qualities of a physical substance, emphasizing its destructive nature.
Repetition“The queen came, / Snow White, the dumb bunny, / opened the door”The repetition of the queen’s arrival and Snow White’s mistakes reinforces her passive role and the inevitability of the plot.
Symbolism“The glass coffin”The coffin represents both Snow White’s preservation as a beauty ideal and her entrapment within societal expectations of passive femininity.
Themes: “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton

1. The Objectification and Passivity of Women

  • Throughout the poem, Snow White is depicted as a passive, fragile, and doll-like figure, reinforcing the idea that women, especially in traditional fairy tales, are valued primarily for their beauty and compliance.
  • Example from the poem:

“Rolling her china-blue doll eyes / open and shut.”

  • The phrase “china-blue doll eyes” equates Snow White with a lifeless, decorative object, emphasizing her lack of autonomy. Her ability to open and shut her eyes is mechanical, reinforcing how she is merely an object to be admired rather than an active participant in her fate.
  • Passivity in Snow White’s fate:

“She lay as still as a gold piece.”

  • Snow White is completely motionless, waiting for an external force (the prince) to revive her. This highlights traditional expectations of female helplessness, where a woman must be “saved” by a man rather than take control of her own destiny.

2. The Destructive Nature of Beauty Standards and Female Competition

  • The queen’s obsession with her beauty and her rivalry with Snow White reflect society’s fixation on female youth and appearance. Sexton critiques the way women are pitted against each other due to these unrealistic beauty ideals.
  • Example from the poem:

“But now the queen saw brown spots on her hand / and four whiskers over her lip.”

  • The queen’s fear of aging is portrayed as an existential crisis. These minor, natural signs of aging become unbearable to her because they symbolize the loss of social power tied to youth and beauty.
  • The mirror as a tool of self-destruction:

“Looking glass upon the wall, / who is fairest of us all?”

  • The mirror serves as a metaphor for external validation, showing how women are conditioned to seek approval based on their physical attractiveness. The mirror dictates worth, making beauty a dangerous obsession.
  • Brutal consequences of beauty-driven rivalry:

“First your toes will smoke / and then your heels will turn black / and you will fry upward like a frog.”

  • The queen’s punishment—being forced to dance to death in red-hot iron shoes—serves as a grotesque metaphor for how the pursuit of beauty and power ultimately destroys women.

3. The Cycle of Female Oppression

  • Sexton suggests that the oppression women face is cyclical, where young women, once victimized, may later become the enforcers of the same oppressive standards.
  • Example from the poem:

“Meanwhile Snow White held court, / rolling her china-blue doll eyes open and shut / and sometimes referring to her mirror / as women do.”

  • Even after the queen’s downfall, Snow White mirrors her behavior, suggesting that she, too, may succumb to vanity and the inescapable burden of beauty expectations. The phrase “as women do” implies that this cycle of self-surveillance and insecurity is deeply ingrained in female experience.
  • Snow White’s eventual role as queen:
    • Unlike traditional fairy tales that end with “happily ever after,” Sexton’s version suggests that Snow White is not freed from the system but instead becomes a part of it. She moves from being an object to admire to one who will likely perpetuate the same standards.

4. Violence and the Dark Realities Beneath Fairy Tales

  • Sexton strips away the sanitized version of the Snow White story and exposes its inherent violence, cruelty, and grotesqueness. She highlights the brutality lurking beneath traditional tales.
  • Example from the poem:

“Bring me her heart, she said to the hunter, / and I will salt it and eat it.”

  • The queen’s command is disturbingly literal, revealing the cannibalistic, primal violence often present in old fairy tales before they were softened for children.
  • The wilderness as a place of threat:

“The birds called out lewdly, / talking like pink parrots, / and the snakes hung down in loops, / each a noose for her sweet white neck.”

  • The forest is not a place of safety but of lurking dangers, symbolizing the harsh, predatory nature of the real world. The imagery of snakes forming nooses further emphasizes the ever-present threat to Snow White’s purity and life.
  • Death and punishment in the fairy tale world:

“She danced until she was dead, / a subterranean figure, / her tongue flicking in and out like a gas jet.”

  • The queen’s death is graphic and relentless, reinforcing how fairy tales often contain violent moral lessons. Sexton does not shy away from this brutality but instead emphasizes it to expose the cruelty embedded in these stories.

Literary Theories and “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton

Literary TheoryInterpretation of the PoemTextual References & Analysis
Feminist CriticismFeminist analysis highlights the objectification of women, female rivalry caused by patriarchal beauty standards, and the passive role of Snow White. The poem critiques the way women are conditioned to be obsessed with beauty and remain submissive.“Rolling her china-blue doll eyes open and shut.” → Snow White is treated as an object, devoid of agency.
“Looking glass upon the wall, / who is fairest of us all?” → The mirror symbolizes the external validation women are conditioned to seek.
“Meanwhile Snow White held court… / sometimes referring to her mirror / as women do.” → This suggests that Snow White inherits the same vanity and objectification that plagued the queen, reinforcing a cycle of oppression.
Psychoanalytic CriticismThis approach examines psychological elements, including the stepmother’s obsession with youth, Snow White’s unconscious passivity, and the Oedipal undertones in the prince’s desire to possess a lifeless, preserved Snow White.“But now the queen saw brown spots on her hand / and four whiskers over her lip.” → The queen’s fear of aging reveals an obsessive neurosis, driven by anxiety over losing power and desirability.
“The seven dwarfs could not bring themselves / to bury her in the black ground.” → The preservation of Snow White in a glass coffin suggests an unconscious fear of death and decay, possibly linking to Freud’s theory of Thanatos (death drive).
“A prince came one June day / and would not budge.” → The prince’s fascination with a lifeless Snow White suggests an element of necrophilia or a desire for an idealized, passive female who cannot resist male control.
Marxist CriticismA Marxist reading examines class struggle and economic power. The stepmother represents the ruling class that wants to maintain dominance, while Snow White represents the exploited lower class, dependent on the dwarfs, who are working-class laborers.“While we are away in the mines / during the day, you must not / open the door.” → The dwarfs are workers (miners) who provide shelter for Snow White, while she takes on the role of a domestic laborer (housekeeper).
“The queen dressed herself in rags / and went out like a peddler to trap Snow White.” → The queen masks her class status to deceive Snow White, illustrating class struggle and manipulation.
“They made a glass coffin / and set it upon the seventh mountain / so that all who passed by / could peek in upon her beauty.” → Snow White becomes a spectacle, reflecting commodification, where her beauty is preserved for public consumption.
Postmodernism / DeconstructionFrom a postmodern perspective, Sexton deconstructs the traditional fairy tale, exposing its contradictions, dark humor, and unsettling undertones. The poem plays with irony, grotesque imagery, and an unreliable narrator to question the idealized world of fairy tales.“The queen chewed it up like a cube steak.” → The gruesome humor and grotesque imagery undermine the fairy tale’s traditional moral lessons.
“Snow White, the dumb bunny, opened the door.” → The mocking tone challenges Snow White’s purity and innocence, suggesting that she is not a noble heroine but a foolish, passive figure.
“And so she danced until she was dead, / a subterranean figure, / her tongue flicking in and out like a gas jet.” → The bizarre, exaggerated death scene of the queen dismantles the simplistic “good vs. evil” narrative of the original fairy tale.
Critical Questions about “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton

1. How does Sexton critique traditional fairy tale representations of women, particularly through Snow White and the stepmother?

Sexton’s “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” critiques traditional fairy tale depictions of women by exposing the harmful stereotypes of female purity and vanity. Snow White is passive, objectified, and reduced to her beauty, while the stepmother is villainized for her ambition and aging. The dichotomy of the “pure virgin” versus the “vain, aging woman” reflects societal expectations that reward women for youth and submissiveness while punishing them for power and age.

The poem highlights Snow White’s lack of agency, describing her as a doll-like figure, reinforcing the idea that women are valued only for their beauty and compliance:

“Rolling her china-blue doll eyes / open and shut.”

This mechanical imagery reduces Snow White to an object of display rather than a thinking, feeling individual. Even after her revival, she remains a symbol rather than an active figure, showing no personal growth.

Meanwhile, the stepmother’s descent into jealousy and destruction is tied to her fear of aging:

“But now the queen saw brown spots on her hand / and four whiskers over her lip.”

These minor, natural signs of aging become a source of existential crisis for the stepmother, illustrating how society devalues women as they age. The mirror, which she constantly consults, becomes a metaphor for female self-surveillance under patriarchy, showing how women are conditioned to base their worth on external validation. Ultimately, the stepmother’s punishment—dancing in red-hot iron shoes until she dies—demonstrates how women who seek power or defy conventional beauty ideals face cruel consequences.

Sexton’s retelling forces readers to question the fairy tale’s gender roles: why must Snow White remain passive and beautiful, while the stepmother—who fights for power—is cast as evil? The poem critiques how these traditional narratives pit women against each other, reinforcing destructive beauty standards and gender hierarchies.


2. What role does violence play in the poem, and how does it challenge traditional fairy tale storytelling?

Violence is central to Sexton’s reinterpretation of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs”, exposing the gruesome brutality that underlies traditional fairy tales. While classic fairy tales are often sanitized, Sexton amplifies the original Grimm Brothers’ violence, making it explicit and grotesque.

From the beginning, threats of violence loom over Snow White’s existence, driven by the stepmother’s vanity and insecurity:

“Bring me her heart, she said to the hunter, / and I will salt it and eat it.”

This cannibalistic imagery strips away the moral lessons of fairy tales and instead reveals their brutal, primal nature. The act of eating Snow White’s heart symbolizes the ultimate destruction of youth and beauty, as the stepmother seeks to consume and absorb what she no longer possesses.

Similarly, Snow White’s innocence and beauty are constantly linked with death and danger:

“Each a noose for her sweet white neck.”

This dark, predatory imagery paints the world as filled with sexual and mortal threats, making the traditional fairy tale setting much more sinister. The violent death of the stepmother, where she is forced to dance in red-hot iron shoes, also lacks the moral righteousness of classic fairy tales:

“First your toes will smoke / and then your heels will turn black / and you will fry upward like a frog.”

This exaggerated, grotesque punishment critiques the idea of fairy tale “justice”, suggesting that violence is not simply a consequence of evil but an inescapable reality in a world obsessed with beauty and power. Sexton’s use of violent imagery challenges readers to see fairy tales not as innocent moral lessons, but as disturbing reflections of real-world cruelty.


3. How does Sexton use irony and dark humor to subvert the traditional Snow White fairy tale?

Sexton’s version of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” is infused with irony and dark humor, undermining the traditional fairy tale’s innocence and exposing its absurd and unsettling undertones.

One of the most striking uses of irony comes in the mocking tone applied to Snow White’s purity and passivity. Instead of being a noble heroine, she is reduced to a clueless and helpless figure:

“Snow White, the dumb bunny, opened the door.”

Referring to her as a “dumb bunny” completely shatters the romanticized image of the innocent, intelligent princess. This ironic framing makes Snow White seem foolish rather than virtuous, suggesting that her passivity is not noble but dangerously naive.

Sexton also injects dark humor into traditionally solemn moments, such as the prince’s obsessive devotion to Snow White’s corpse:

“A prince came one June day / and would not budge. / He stayed so long his hair turned green.”

This absurd image of the prince waiting so long that his hair changes color makes his romantic devotion seem ridiculous rather than heroic. Instead of a love story, the prince’s fixation appears more like necrophilia, further deconstructing the fairy tale’s supposed happy ending.

Similarly, the queen’s exaggerated death scene reads more like a twisted comedy than a moral resolution:

“Her tongue flicking in and out like a gas jet.”

By making the queen’s suffering cartoonishly grotesque, Sexton forces the reader to question whether justice has actually been served or if fairy tale endings are simply cruel and arbitrary. Through irony and dark humor, the poem de-romanticizes Snow White, exposing the absurdity and brutality hidden beneath traditional fairy tale structures.


4. What is the significance of the mirror in the poem, and how does it function as a symbol?

The mirror is one of the most powerful symbols in “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs”, representing vanity, self-surveillance, and the oppressive nature of beauty standards. The stepmother’s reliance on the mirror defines her existence, making her entirely dependent on external validation:

“Looking glass upon the wall, / who is fairest of us all?”

The mirror acts as an omnipresent judge, reinforcing the idea that a woman’s worth is determined by her physical appearance. The stepmother’s downfall begins the moment she is no longer “the fairest”, highlighting how women are conditioned to see each other as competition under patriarchal beauty standards.

However, the mirror’s significance extends beyond the stepmother. At the end of the poem, Snow White begins using the mirror as well:

“Meanwhile Snow White held court, / rolling her china-blue doll eyes open and shut / and sometimes referring to her mirror / as women do.”

This final reference to the mirror suggests that Snow White has inherited the same obsession with appearance that destroyed the queen. Instead of breaking free from the cycle of vanity and self-judgment, she perpetuates it, reinforcing the idea that women remain trapped in a system that values beauty above all else.

Sexton’s use of the mirror highlights how society forces women into endless self-surveillance, turning them into both the victims and enforcers of beauty standards.Bottom of Form

Literary Works Similar to “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton
  1. “Cinderella” by Anne Sexton – Like “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs”, this poem from Sexton’s Transformations collection retells a classic fairy tale with dark humor and grotesque imagery, critiquing societal expectations of women and the illusion of fairy tale happiness.
  2. “Gretel in Darkness” by Louise Glück – This poem reimagines Hansel and Gretel from Gretel’s perspective, exploring themes of trauma, survival, and the psychological burden of past horrors, much like Sexton’s subversive take on Snow White.
  3. “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy – A feminist retelling of Little Red Riding Hood, this poem shares Sexton’s themes of female awakening, power struggles, and the deconstruction of traditional gender roles in fairy tales.
  4. “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton – Another poem from Transformations, “Rapunzel” mirrors “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” in its exploration of female entrapment, patriarchal control, and the illusions of fairy tale romance.
  5. “The Witch’s Life” by Anne Sexton – This poem, while not a direct fairy tale retelling, shares Sexton’s signature dark tone, exploring themes of female power, aging, and societal fears of independent women, much like the portrayal of the stepmother in “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs”.
Representative Quotations of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton

QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“Rolling her china-blue doll eyes / open and shut.”Snow White is introduced as a passive, doll-like figure, emphasizing her objectification and lack of agency.Feminist Criticism – Highlights how women, especially young girls, are valued for their appearance rather than their intelligence or actions.
“Looking glass upon the wall, / who is fairest of us all?”The stepmother repeatedly asks the mirror to validate her beauty, which dictates her sense of self-worth.Psychoanalytic Criticism – The mirror symbolizes the superego (external judgment), reinforcing the queen’s obsessive narcissism and fear of aging.
“Bring me her heart, she said to the hunter, / and I will salt it and eat it.”The queen demands Snow White’s heart to consume, believing it will restore her status as “fairest.”Marxist Criticism – The queen, representing the elite, seeks to “consume” the beauty of the younger generation, mirroring capitalist exploitation.
“The seven dwarfs could not bring themselves / to bury her in the black ground.”Snow White is not buried but placed in a glass coffin, where she remains on display for admiration.Feminist Criticism – Snow White is preserved as an object of male desire, reinforcing the idea that women are valued only for their beauty, even in death.
“A prince came one June day / and would not budge. / He stayed so long his hair turned green.”The prince’s absurd devotion to Snow White’s corpse is exaggerated, making his role comically obsessive.Postmodernism / Deconstruction – Challenges the traditional idea of “true love,” exposing the prince’s actions as disturbing rather than romantic.
“Snow White, the dumb bunny, opened the door.”Despite multiple warnings, Snow White naively lets the disguised queen in again, leading to her downfall.Feminist Criticism – Critiques the portrayal of women as innocent and helpless, reinforcing passivity as a desirable trait in fairy tales.
“First your toes will smoke / and then your heels will turn black / and you will fry upward like a frog.”The queen is punished with an exaggerated, gruesome death, forced to dance in red-hot iron shoes until she dies.Postmodernism / Deconstruction – The grotesque imagery mocks fairy tale “justice,” revealing the irrational cruelty behind traditional moral lessons.
“The birds called out lewdly, / talking like pink parrots, / and the snakes hung down in loops, / each a noose for her sweet white neck.”Snow White’s journey through the wild is depicted as sexually threatening, with predatory imagery.Psychoanalytic Criticism – The forest represents unconscious sexual fears, with animals symbolizing the dangers of growing up.
“Meanwhile Snow White held court, / rolling her china-blue doll eyes open and shut / and sometimes referring to her mirror / as women do.”In the end, Snow White, now a queen, continues to check her reflection, much like the stepmother.Feminist Criticism – Suggests that the cycle of female oppression continues, as Snow White now mirrors the vanity and insecurity of the previous queen.
“She lay as still as a gold piece.”After eating the poisoned apple, Snow White is described as a precious, lifeless object.Marxist Criticism – Snow White is reduced to a commodity, her beauty preserved for male ownership rather than personal autonomy.
Suggested Readings: “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton
  1. Mason, David. “Anne Sexton and Her Times.” The Hudson Review, vol. 45, no. 1, 1992, pp. 167–74. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3852113. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.
  2. McClatchy, J. D. “ANNE SEXTON: SOMEHOW TO ENDURE.” The Centennial Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 1975, pp. 1–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23738229. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.
  3. STONE, KAY F. “Feminist Approaches to the Interpretation of Fairy Tales.” Fairy Tales and Society: Illusion, Allusion, and Paradigm, edited by RUTH B. BOTTIGHEIMER, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986, pp. 229–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x1nhz.18. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.
  4. Sexton, Anne. “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.” The Classic Fairy Tales (1971): 96-100.

“Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau: Summary and Critique

“Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau first appeared in Isis in September 1981 (Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 406-424), published by The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society.

"Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field" by G. S. Rousseau: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau

“Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau first appeared in Isis in September 1981 (Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 406-424), published by The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society. In this seminal article, Rousseau examines the neglected interdisciplinary relationship between literature and medicine, arguing that while literature and science have long been studied together, the interplay between literature and medicine has received far less scholarly attention. He highlights the historical presence of medical themes in literature, from classical antiquity to modern novels, demonstrating that medicine has provided literature with rich metaphors, character types, and narrative structures. Conversely, he also suggests that literature has influenced medical discourse, shaping the language and conceptual frameworks of medical practitioners. Rousseau critiques the historiographical approaches that have traditionally framed the interaction between these disciplines, particularly the tendency to view medical influence on literature as a unidirectional process. Instead, he advocates for a more nuanced, reciprocal understanding of how literature and medicine shape each other. His work is significant in literary theory and cultural studies, as it challenges conventional disciplinary boundaries and underscores the importance of language, metaphor, and narrative in both medical and literary traditions. By tracing the evolution of medical themes and the portrayal of physicians and patients in literature, Rousseau’s article lays the groundwork for the development of medical humanities as a distinct academic field.

Summary of “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau
  • The Neglected Relationship Between Literature and Medicine
  • Unlike the well-established field of literature and science, the interplay between literature and medicine has been largely overlooked by scholars (Rousseau, 1981, p. 406). Rousseau argues that this neglect is not due to a lack of interaction between the two fields but rather a misunderstanding of their mutual influence. He traces medical themes in literature from classical antiquity to modern times, citing works such as Middlemarch, Ulysses, and The Magic Mountain as examples of literature deeply engaged with medical concerns (p. 407).
  • Historiographical Assumptions in the Study of Literature and Medicine
  • Rousseau identifies problematic assumptions in existing scholarship, particularly the belief that medical knowledge flows unidirectionally into literature. He critiques the traditional historicist approach, which emphasizes periodization and assumes that authors were simply “well grounded” in the medical concepts of their time (p. 408). He calls for a broader perspective that recognizes literature’s reciprocal influence on medicine.
  • Medicine’s Contribution to Literary Themes and Characters
  • Medicine has provided literature with metaphors, character types, and narrative structures (p. 409). Rousseau explores how medical knowledge shaped literary works such as The Anatomy of Melancholy, Shakespeare’s plays, and 19th-century realist novels, where doctors and illnesses often serve as key plot elements (p. 410). He notes that literary representations of medicine are often shaped by prevailing medical theories of the era.
  • The Overlooked Influence of Literature on Medical Thought
  • While medical ideas have influenced literature, Rousseau argues that literary works have also shaped medical discourse, yet this influence has been largely ignored by historians of science (p. 412). He provides examples of how literature has influenced medical case histories, the language of disease, and the social perception of illness. He suggests that literature has played a role in constructing cultural stereotypes of disease, such as tuberculosis in the Romantic era (p. 413).
  • The Literary Case History and Its Impact on Medicine
  • Rousseau examines how literature has shaped the format and perception of medical case histories. He points out that medical autobiographies, such as Thomas Perceval’s Narrative of the Treatment Experienced by a Gentleman, share literary techniques with contemporary novels (p. 414). He argues that literary case histories contribute to medical self-perception and the development of the doctor-patient relationship.
  • Science Fiction and Medical Utopias
  • Science fiction and speculative literature have played a role in shaping medical imagination by exploring hypothetical diseases and medical utopias (p. 415). Rousseau highlights how medical science fiction often critiques the medical profession while simultaneously envisioning idealized medical futures. He suggests that literature provides a framework for understanding the societal impact of medical advancements.
  • The Image of the Physician in Literature
  • The physician has been a recurring figure in literature, often depicted either as a noble healer or as a greedy, arrogant figure (p. 417). Rousseau calls for a comprehensive study of the literary portrayal of doctors throughout history, noting that literature provides insight into public perceptions of the medical profession. He suggests that the recurrent themes of greed and incompetence in fictional doctors reflect deep-seated cultural anxieties about medicine.
  • The Physician as Writer: Literature’s Role in Medical Self-Perception
  • Rousseau examines the phenomenon of doctors as literary figures, from Thomas Campion to William Carlos Williams (p. 419). He suggests that physician-writers often use literature to construct their professional identity and reflect on the practice of medicine. He argues that literature plays a crucial role in shaping how doctors view themselves and their work.
  • The Physician as Cultural Hero and Anti-Hero
  • During the 18th and 19th centuries, the physician was increasingly viewed as a cultural hero, yet this status was fraught with contradictions (p. 421). Rousseau notes that while doctors were sometimes romanticized as saviors, they were also criticized for their authority and institutional power. He argues that literature has played a key role in constructing and deconstructing the image of the doctor as a heroic figure.
  • Future Directions for the Study of Literature and Medicine
  • Rousseau concludes by calling for a more interdisciplinary approach that recognizes literature’s impact on medical thought (p. 423). He argues that literary scholars and medical historians should collaborate to better understand how literature has influenced medical language, patient narratives, and the social role of doctors. He warns, however, that literature should not be viewed as a practical guide to medicine but rather as a theoretical field that enriches our understanding of medical culture.
  • Conclusion
  • Rousseau’s article is a foundational work in the field of medical humanities. He challenges the traditional view that medicine influences literature in a one-way relationship and instead argues for a reciprocal model where literature shapes medical thought just as much as medicine influences literary narratives. His call for interdisciplinary study has paved the way for further research into the cultural intersections between literature and medicine.
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau
Theoretical Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationContext in Rousseau’s Argument
HistoriographyThe study of historical writing and methodologies used to interpret history.Rousseau critiques how literature and medicine have been historically studied, emphasizing the need for broader historiographical perspectives (p. 408).
PeriodizationThe division of history into distinct periods for analysis.Rousseau critiques the assumption that literature and medicine must be studied strictly within historical periods, arguing that influence can cross temporal boundaries (p. 409).
Directional InfluenceThe assumption that one field (e.g., medicine) influences another (e.g., literature) in a one-way process.Rousseau challenges the traditional belief that medicine influences literature without considering how literature shapes medical thought (p. 412).
Medical MetaphorThe use of illness and medical terminology as metaphors in literature and everyday discourse.Rousseau discusses how literature has shaped public perceptions of disease through metaphor, such as the romanticization of tuberculosis (p. 415).
Case History as NarrativeThe idea that medical case histories share literary structures and narrative techniques.Rousseau argues that medical case histories should be analyzed as literary texts to understand how doctors and patients construct medical narratives (p. 414).
Medical UtopiaA speculative vision of a society where medical advancements eliminate disease and suffering.Science fiction and utopian literature explore idealized medical systems, revealing cultural anxieties and aspirations about healthcare (p. 415).
Cultural Hero vs. Anti-HeroThe portrayal of figures as either noble saviors or morally flawed characters.Rousseau examines how doctors are depicted in literature as both heroic healers and greedy, arrogant figures, reflecting societal attitudes toward medicine (p. 421).
Constitutive SubjectA subject that is historically and culturally constructed rather than naturally given.Influenced by Foucault, Rousseau argues that the identity of the physician, patient, and medical history itself are constructed through literature and discourse (p. 419).
Medical HistoricismThe belief that medical knowledge and practices should be understood in their historical context.Rousseau critiques traditional historicist approaches that focus solely on the progression of medical knowledge without considering literary influences (p. 410).
Language as a Cultural ArchiveThe idea that language preserves cultural attitudes and biases over time.Rousseau suggests that medical language, including metaphors and disease classifications, reflects societal values and literary influences (p. 423).
Romanticization of DiseaseThe cultural tendency to idealize certain illnesses, associating them with heightened sensitivity or artistic genius.Rousseau discusses how tuberculosis in the 19th century and cancer in the 20th century have been shaped by literary narratives (p. 413).
InterdisciplinarityThe integration of different fields of study to develop new perspectives.Rousseau calls for an interdisciplinary approach to studying literature and medicine, bridging literary criticism and medical history (p. 423).
Social Construction of IllnessThe idea that perceptions of disease are shaped by cultural, social, and historical contexts.Rousseau argues that illness is not just a biological reality but also a cultural construct influenced by literature (p. 415).
Physician-Writer IdentityThe concept that doctors who write literature construct their professional identity through storytelling.Rousseau explores how physician-authors such as William Carlos Williams and Chekhov use literature to define their roles as doctors (p. 419).
Placebo Effect of LanguageThe psychological impact of medical language and communication on patients.Rousseau hints at the idea that medical rhetoric influences patient perception and treatment outcomes, though it remains underexplored in medical literature (p. 424).
Contribution of “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Historicism and New Historicism

Contribution:

  • Rousseau critiques traditional historicist approaches that assume a one-directional influence from medicine to literature and argues for a more complex, reciprocal relationship.
  • He calls for contextualizing medical and literary texts together rather than viewing literature as passively influenced by medical history.
  • His argument aligns with New Historicism, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of literature and its historical/cultural context.

Reference from the article:

“In these studies from medicine to literature each period is unfortunately associated with a particular type of medicine: the one that is popularized and mythologized and that will influence creative writers” (p. 410).

  • This reflects New Historicist concerns with how cultural discourses, including medical theories, circulate within literature rather than existing in separate spheres.

2. Foucauldian Discourse Analysis

Contribution:

  • Rousseau engages with Michel Foucault’s ideas on the construction of medical knowledge, the clinic, and the role of discourse in shaping social institutions.
  • He applies Foucault’s theory to literature, arguing that literary texts shape medical discourses as much as they reflect them.
  • He explores the formation of the physician as a “constitutive subject”, following Foucault’s claim that knowledge systems produce identities rather than merely documenting reality.

Reference from the article:

“Before we ask how the physician came to think of himself as a writer, we must inquire how he developed the capacity (i.e., what imagery he used) to view himself as a doctor” (p. 419).

  • This aligns with Foucault’s ideas on the ‘medical gaze’ and how institutionalized discourses create professional and social identities (as seen in The Birth of the Clinic).

3. Reader-Response Theory

Contribution:

  • Rousseau indirectly supports Reader-Response Theory by emphasizing how literary representations of illness shape reader perceptions of disease and medicine.
  • He suggests that the cultural reception of medical metaphors and narratives influences personal and societal understandings of health and illness.

Reference from the article:

“Literature and medicine, construed in this sense, share a common concern to articulate a culturally conditioned medical perception of general attitudes towards life and death” (p. 410).

  • This supports Stanley Fish’s argument that interpretation is shaped by cultural frameworks, including medical discourse.

4. Structuralism and Semiotics

Contribution:

  • Rousseau analyzes the language of medicine as a semiotic system, emphasizing how medical terminology and metaphors function as signs that structure human understanding of illness.
  • His work aligns with Roland Barthes’ structuralist approach to mythologies, where cultural meanings are encoded in language.

Reference from the article:

“Language is a common ground in literature and medicine; metaphors commonly used in both fields require scrutiny: ‘wasting away,’ ‘invaded by,’ ‘personality type’” (p. 412).

  • This corresponds to Barthes’ idea of ‘mythologies’, where seemingly neutral terms carry ideological weight.

5. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory

Contribution:

  • Rousseau suggests that literature’s portrayal of disease is often deeply psychological, reflecting both societal anxieties and individual neuroses.
  • He explores how patients and doctors internalize and reproduce cultural myths about disease, which aligns with Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis.

Reference from the article:

“By the mid-nineteenth century, all this begins to change. The patient and physician reverse roles: the afflictions of ordinary valetudinarians … are elevated and romanticized” (p. 421).

  • This supports Freud’s concept of the medicalization of neuroses, where symptoms are shaped by unconscious fears and desires.

6. Postmodernism and Interdisciplinarity

Contribution:

  • Rousseau’s insistence on blurring disciplinary boundaries between medicine and literature aligns with postmodernist literary criticism, which challenges rigid categories of knowledge.
  • He questions grand narratives about the separation of science and literature, proposing that both disciplines co-construct knowledge.

Reference from the article:

“Historians of science regularly study the influence of early science on much later science, and literary historians are perpetually studying the influence of early literary techniques on later writers” (p. 409).

  • This resonates with Jean-François Lyotard’s critique of metanarratives in The Postmodern Condition.

7. Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine

Contribution:

  • Rousseau is one of the early scholars advocating for “Narrative Medicine,” a field that has since developed within the Medical Humanities.
  • His argument that literature provides essential insight into medical practice and patient experience has influenced Rita Charon’s theories of Narrative Medicine.

Reference from the article:

“Every time a patient enters a practitioner’s office, a literary experience is about to occur: replete with characters, setting, time, place, language, and a scenario that can end in a number of predictable ways” (p. 414).

  • This supports the idea that medicine should be viewed as a narrative practice, where doctors and patients co-construct meaning.

Conclusion: Impact on Literary Theory

Rousseau’s work serves as a bridge between literary studies and medical history, influencing multiple theoretical frameworks:

  • New Historicism (contextualizing medicine and literature)
  • Foucauldian Discourse Analysis (power and knowledge in medicine)
  • Reader-Response Theory (cultural conditioning of disease perception)
  • Structuralism and Semiotics (language and medical metaphors)
  • Psychoanalysis (unconscious fears shaping disease narratives)
  • Postmodernism (interdisciplinary knowledge construction)
  • Narrative Medicine (medical humanities and storytelling)
Examples of Critiques Through “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau
Literary Work & AuthorCritique Through Rousseau’s FrameworkReference from Rousseau’s Article
Middlemarch – George EliotExamines Lydgate as a physician torn between idealism and medical ethics, reflecting 19th-century medical professional struggles.“Lydgate, a physician, epitomizes the whole European tradition of the physician” (p. 407).
The Magic Mountain – Thomas MannIllness symbolizes intellectual stagnation and existential crisis, paralleling medical discourse on tuberculosis.“Mann’s The Magic Mountain… neither had formal medical training, yet mastered an aspect of social medicine” (p. 410).
The Death of Ivan Ilyich – Leo TolstoyDepicts medical detachment from human suffering, critiquing the clinical approach to death.“Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich… the literary locus classicus of death” (p. 408).
Tristram Shandy – Laurence SterneReflects 18th-century beliefs about maternal imagination affecting fetal development, satirizing medical theories of the time.“Sterne’s medical source was… the influence of ‘the mother’s imagination’ on the fetus” (p. 411).
Gulliver’s Travels – Jonathan SwiftSatirizes early modern physicians, critiquing their obsession with abstract theories over practical healing.“Restoration medicine on the prose satires of Swift” (p. 407).
Equus – Peter ShafferExamines psychiatry’s ethical dilemmas and psychological dimensions, influenced by R.D. Laing’s theories.“Peter Shaffer, who must certainly have been reading or hearing about R. D. Laing while writing Equus” (p. 411).
Remembrance of Things Past – Marcel ProustUses medical metaphors to explore time, memory, and the fragility of the human body, reflecting early 20th-century medical thought.“Proust’s Remembrance of Things Past, for the density of its medical imagery” (p. 408).
Humphry Clinker – Tobias SmollettSatirizes quack doctors and medical incompetence, reflecting Smollett’s firsthand experience as a physician.“Smollett, himself a practicing physician… read extensively in psychiatry” (p. 411).
The Doctor’s Dilemma – George Bernard ShawCritiques the ethical dilemmas in medical decision-making, especially in resource allocation.“Shaw’s plays, especially The Doctor’s Dilemma, critique the ethical dilemmas in medicine” (p. 408).
Criticism Against “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau

🔹 Lack of Clear Methodology

  • Rousseau’s work does not establish a systematic methodological approach for analyzing literature through a medical lens.
  • It relies on historical anecdotes and examples rather than a clearly structured theoretical framework.

🔹 Overemphasis on Historical Context

  • The analysis heavily focuses on historical connections between medicine and literature rather than engaging with modern literary theory.
  • The discussion of historical medical influences on literature overshadows deeper textual analysis.

🔹 One-Directional Influence (Medicine to Literature)

  • Rousseau mostly examines how medicine influences literature but neglects how literature has shaped medical discourse and practice.
  • While he briefly mentions the reverse influence (literature to medicine), this section lacks depth and supporting examples.

🔹 Absence of Close Reading of Texts

  • The article does not engage in detailed literary criticism or textual analysis of the works it discusses.
  • The examples (e.g., Middlemarch, The Magic Mountain) are referenced in passing rather than examined in depth.

🔹 Limited Engagement with Critical Theories

  • There is minimal reference to contemporary literary theories, such as structuralism, poststructuralism, or psychoanalytic criticism.
  • The work does not engage with Feminist, Marxist, or Postcolonial perspectives, which could offer alternative readings of medical discourse in literature.

🔹 Lack of Attention to Patient Voices

  • The focus is mostly on physicians, medical theories, and literary depictions of doctors, neglecting how patients have written about their experiences.
  • Rousseau does not explore autobiographical narratives of illness in depth, missing a critical aspect of medical humanities.

🔹 Eurocentric and Canonical Focus

  • The study focuses predominantly on Western literature and European medical traditions, ignoring non-Western perspectives.
  • It neglects how medical themes appear in global literature or marginalized voices, reinforcing a Eurocentric bias.

🔹 Romanticization of the Physician-Writer

  • Rousseau idealizes physician-writers (e.g., Smollett, Keats, William Carlos Williams) but does not critique the power dynamics between doctors and patients in literature.
  • He overstates the cultural heroism of doctors in literary history without addressing the historical harms of medical authority.

🔹 Misses Modern Ethical and Bioethical Issues

  • The article does not engage with contemporary bioethics, such as medical ethics, disability studies, and narrative medicine.
  • Lacks discussion of how medical literature reflects issues like race, gender, class, and disability in modern contexts.

🔹 Minimal Interaction with Medical Humanities as a Discipline

  • The study does not explicitly position itself within the emerging field of medical humanities, which was growing during the 1980s.
  • It lacks engagement with contemporary scholars who have shaped the field after Rousseau, making it feel somewhat outdated.
Representative Quotations from “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Literature and Medicine, unlike literature and science … is not a field that has claimed significant numbers of students, certainly not of historians of science.”Rousseau argues that the intersection of literature and medicine has been largely neglected, unlike the well-developed field of literature and science.
“The irony of this contrast—literature and science versus literature and medicine—is that medicine surely has far more than science to offer literature, and vice versa.”Rousseau highlights how medicine has been deeply intertwined with literature but remains understudied compared to science.
“The assumptions usually made in the existing scholarship of literature and medicine are these: that literary history … is best studied in periods and that meaningful analysis of particular texts requires periodization.”Rousseau critiques traditional literary scholarship for its rigid periodization, which limits the understanding of medicine’s influence on literature.
“The arrows of influence in this body of scholarship are always drawn in one direction: from medicine to literature.”Rousseau criticizes the assumption that literature merely absorbs medical knowledge, arguing that literature also shapes medical discourse.
“In autobiography there is another essential difference: the writer is the subject; the writer is the case history.”He draws parallels between autobiography and medical case histories, suggesting that both construct identities based on narrative forms.
“Rarely is the belief expressed that this popular medicine itself has been determined by nonmedical factors: by social necessity … or psychological need.”Rousseau emphasizes the role of societal and psychological factors in shaping medical theories and public health concerns.
“Literature provides one of the richest archives: it is the lengthiest record, the only resource in which patients and doctors can be viewed from ancient Greece to the present.”He asserts that literature offers a more extensive and nuanced historical record of medical practices and doctor-patient relationships than medical texts.
“Calling medical men ‘physicians of no value’ and ‘forgers of lies,’ Job anticipated an attitude that has prevailed with only minor discontinuity since about 1800.”Rousseau traces historical skepticism toward doctors, showing that literature has long depicted them as flawed or corrupt figures.
“Illness is the night-side of life, a more onerous citizenship … sooner or later each of us is obliged … to identify ourselves as citizens of that other place.” (quoting Susan Sontag)He includes Sontag’s metaphor to highlight how illness functions as both a personal and cultural construct in literature.
“On this proof everything stands or falls, for without some reciprocity—from literature to medicine as well as from medicine to literature—there is neither a field nor its state to survey.”Rousseau concludes by stressing the necessity of recognizing bidirectional influence between literature and medicine for the field to develop.
Suggested Readings: “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field” by G. S. Rousseau
  1. McLellan, M. Faith. “Literature and medicine: narratives of physical illness.” The Lancet 349.9065 (1997): 1618-1620.
  2. Downie, R. S. “Literature and Medicine.” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, 1991, pp. 93–98. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717024. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  3. Rousseau, G. S. “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field.” Isis, vol. 72, no. 3, 1981, pp. 406–24. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/230258. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  4. Spiegel, Maura, and Rita Charon. “Editing and Interdisciplinarity: Literature, Medicine, and Narrative Medicine.” Profession, 2009, pp. 132–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595923. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  5. HOLLOWAY, MARGUERITE. “When Medicine Meets Literature.” Scientific American, vol. 292, no. 5, 2005, pp. 38–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26060992. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.

“Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al.: Summary and Critique

“Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Charon et al. first appeared in Annals of Internal Medicine in 1995 and has since played a foundational role in bridging the humanities and medical practice.

"Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice" by Rita Chauhan et al.: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al.

“Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Charon et al. first appeared in Annals of Internal Medicine in 1995 and has since played a foundational role in bridging the humanities and medical practice. This seminal work underscores how literature can enhance physicians’ understanding of patient narratives, fostering empathy, ethical discernment, and narrative competence in medical practice. The authors argue that incorporating literary studies into medical education serves five crucial purposes: teaching physicians about the lived experiences of illness, deepening their awareness of the implications of medical practice, refining their ability to interpret patients’ stories, strengthening their ethical reasoning, and providing new theoretical perspectives on medicine as a discipline. This article situates the field of literature and medicine within broader intellectual debates, referencing historical discussions such as C.P. Snow’s “two cultures” divide and Matthew Arnold’s defense of literature against the encroachment of scientific dominance. Through close readings of literary texts—from classical works like The Inferno to contemporary medical narratives—the authors demonstrate how literature offers a profound understanding of suffering, human frailty, and the moral complexities of clinical decision-making. By integrating literature into medical curricula, the article advocates for a more humanistic approach to doctoring, arguing that medical expertise must go beyond scientific proficiency to include compassionate engagement with patients’ stories. This work remains an influential contribution to literary theory and medical humanities, affirming the indispensable role of narrative in both understanding and practicing medicine.

Summary of “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al.

Introduction and Background

  • The field of Literature and Medicine was formally introduced into U.S. medical schools in 1972 to enhance physicians’ understanding of the human aspects of medical practice (Charon et al., 1995, p. 599).
  • The article argues that while medicine has made significant advances in diagnosis and therapy, it has lagged in recognizing and addressing patients’ emotional and existential suffering (p. 600).
  • Physicians are turning to the humanities, particularly literary studies, to develop a deeper comprehension of patient narratives and ethical medical practice (p. 601).

Five Key Contributions of Literature to Medicine

  1. Understanding Patients’ Lives Through Literary Accounts
    • Literary works provide insight into patients’ experiences, offering detailed and emotionally powerful representations of illness (p. 602).
    • Works such as The Death of Ivan Ilych (Tolstoy) and King Lear (Shakespeare) serve as profound explorations of suffering, mortality, and the patient experience (p. 603).
  2. Awareness of the Implications of Medical Practice
    • Classic and contemporary literature about medicine enables physicians to reflect on the ethical and personal ramifications of their profession (p. 604).
    • Stories by Anton Chekhov and William Carlos Williams, both physicians, illustrate the complexity of medical decision-making and the moral dilemmas faced by doctors (p. 605).
  3. Enhancing Narrative Competence in Medical Practice
    • Physicians must develop the ability to interpret patient stories, integrating verbal narratives with clinical signs to arrive at accurate diagnoses (p. 606).
    • The study of literature cultivates this skill by training doctors in close reading, pattern recognition, and thematic analysis (p. 607).
  4. Developing Narrative Ethics in Medicine
    • Ethical dilemmas in medicine cannot always be resolved through rigid ethical codes; they require nuanced, patient-centered judgment (p. 608).
    • Literary narratives such as Mercy by Richard Selzer illustrate moral conflicts in end-of-life care and physician-assisted dying (p. 609).
  5. Applying Literary Theory to Medical Texts and Practices
    • Reader-response theory, deconstructionism, feminist criticism, and psychoanalytic theory provide new perspectives on medical discourse and patient interactions (p. 610).
    • The study of clinical case histories as narrative structures reveals implicit biases, power dynamics, and the subjective nature of medical decision-making (p. 611).

The Role of Narrative Knowledge in Medical Training

  • Medical knowledge is not purely scientific; it is deeply embedded in storytelling and interpretation (p. 612).
  • Physicians must learn to recognize how narrative structures influence medical records, patient interviews, and case presentations (p. 613).
  • Narrative-based medical education has been shown to improve patient-physician communication, diagnostic accuracy, and ethical sensitivity (p. 614).

Practical Applications and Impact on Medical Education

  • Literature courses in medical schools have gained popularity, with students engaging in close reading, reflective writing, and literary discussions to enhance their clinical empathy (p. 615).
  • Many medical journals now publish physicians’ personal narratives, underscoring the importance of storytelling in medical practice (p. 616).
  • Research suggests that long-term engagement with literature improves doctors’ ability to navigate ethical dilemmas, foster empathy, and maintain emotional resilience (p. 617).

Conclusion

  • The study of literature provides essential skills for physicians, fostering a more compassionate and ethical approach to medical care (p. 618).
  • By integrating humanities into medical curricula, medical schools can cultivate doctors who are not only scientifically proficient but also deeply attuned to the suffering and narratives of their patients (p. 619).
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al.
Theoretical Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationReference in Article (Page)
Narrative CompetenceThe ability to recognize, absorb, interpret, and be moved by stories of illness. Physicians develop this through reading literature.p. 606
Narrative KnowledgeA form of understanding that configures individual human experiences into meaningful stories, as opposed to purely scientific or logical knowledge.p. 612
Narrative EthicsAn approach to medical ethics that focuses on the patient’s life story and moral complexities rather than applying universal ethical principles.p. 608
PathographyPersonal narratives written by patients about their experiences of illness and medical treatment. These provide insight into the subjective patient experience.p. 603
Reader-Response TheoryA literary theory that emphasizes the role of the reader in constructing meaning from a text. Physicians apply this theory when interpreting patient narratives.p. 610
DeconstructionismA critical theory (originating from Jacques Derrida) that examines contradictions in texts, including medical records and case histories, to reveal hidden biases and assumptions.p. 611
Feminist Literary CriticismA perspective that examines how narratives reflect gendered experiences, particularly relevant in studying women’s health and marginalized patient voices.p. 611
Psychoanalytic Literary CriticismThe application of Freudian and Lacanian theories to literature, helping physicians understand patient psychology and unconscious influences on behavior.p. 611
HermeneuticsThe theory and methodology of interpretation, applied to patient narratives and medical texts to extract deeper meaning.p. 613
Casuistic EthicsA case-based approach to medical ethics that examines specific patient cases rather than applying broad ethical frameworks.p. 608
Medical HumanitiesAn interdisciplinary field integrating literature, philosophy, ethics, and history to enrich medical practice and education.p. 599
The Two Cultures DebateA reference to C.P. Snow’s argument that the sciences and humanities are distinct and disconnected intellectual cultures, a divide literature and medicine seek to bridge.p. 600
Empathy through LiteratureThe idea that reading literature enhances physicians’ empathy by exposing them to diverse human experiences and emotions.p. 602
Metaphorical Thinking in MedicineThe use of metaphors to understand and communicate medical concepts, often found in literature and patient narratives.p. 604
Clinical Detachment vs. Humanistic CareThe tension between maintaining objective clinical judgment and engaging emotionally with patients, which literature helps balance.p. 606
Contribution of “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al. to Literary Theory/Theories
Literary TheoryCore IdeaContribution of the ArticleReference in Article
Narrative TheoryNarratives structure human experience and help create meaning.The article argues that patient histories and clinical experiences function as narratives. Physicians interpret these stories to provide better diagnoses and treatment.p. 601-603
Reader-Response TheoryThe meaning of a text is shaped by the reader’s experience, emotions, and prior knowledge.The article applies this theory to medical practice, suggesting that physicians “read” their patients’ stories differently based on their backgrounds, thus influencing diagnosis and treatment.p. 610-611
Narrative EthicsEthical dilemmas should be understood in the context of personal stories rather than abstract principles.The article introduces narrative ethics, which helps physicians make ethical decisions by fully understanding patients’ lived experiences rather than relying solely on medical principles.p. 608-609
Deconstruction (Derrida, de Man)Meaning is not fixed and is often shaped by contradictions within a text.The article applies deconstructionist ideas to medical texts, highlighting the implicit biases, assumptions, and power structures present in case histories and medical records.p. 611-612
Hermeneutics (Gadamer, Ricoeur)Interpretation is key to understanding texts, particularly within historical and cultural contexts.The article suggests that medical practice is a hermeneutic act—physicians interpret patients’ narratives just as literary critics interpret texts.p. 613
Feminist Literary CriticismLiterature (and by extension, medical discourse) reflects gendered experiences and often marginalizes women’s voices.The article discusses how feminist criticism helps in recognizing the silencing of certain patient narratives, especially those of women and marginalized communities.p. 611
Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism (Freud, Lacan)Literature reflects unconscious desires and anxieties.The article compares physician-patient interactions to psychoanalytic encounters, where patients express unconscious fears about illness, and physicians must interpret these narratives.p. 611-612
Structuralism (Saussure, Levi-Strauss)Meaning is constructed through systems of language and cultural codes.The article explains how medical discourse creates structured narratives that categorize diseases and treatments, sometimes at the expense of individual patient experiences.p. 612
Postmodernism (Foucault, Lyotard)Truth and knowledge are socially constructed, and there is skepticism toward grand narratives.The article critiques the rigid, scientific view of medicine and argues for incorporating diverse patient narratives to create a more humanistic practice.p. 613
Ethical Criticism (Martha Nussbaum, Booth)Literature teaches moral reasoning and empathy.The article argues that reading literature can enhance physicians’ moral sensitivity and ability to make compassionate decisions.p. 609
Examples of Critiques Through “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al.
Literary WorkCritique in the ArticleMedical/Ethical Themes ExploredReference in Article
The Death of Ivan Ilyich (Leo Tolstoy)The novel portrays the existential crisis of a bureaucrat facing death, highlighting the alienation of patients in a medicalized system. The protagonist’s suffering is largely ignored by physicians, mirroring real-life failures in palliative care.Patient experience of illness, palliative care, physician detachment, existential sufferingp. 603
Ward Number Six (Anton Chekhov)Depicts the dehumanization of psychiatric patients and the moral complacency of doctors. Dr. Ragin’s indifference to suffering reflects the ethical dilemma of medical detachment vs. empathy. The article uses this story to critique physician cynicism and the failure to recognize the humanity of patients.Physician cynicism, mental health stigma, patient dehumanization, ethical responsibility of doctorsp. 605
King Lear (William Shakespeare)The play illustrates themes of madness, aging, and loss of identity—paralleling experiences of dementia and chronic illness. The protagonist’s descent into madness is compared to the psychological turmoil of aging patients, and the lack of compassion from his daughters reflects elder neglect.Mental illness, dementia, geriatric care, patient vulnerability, family relationships in healthcarep. 603
The Metamorphosis (Franz Kafka)The protagonist’s transformation into an insect symbolizes the alienation and objectification of sick individuals. The article interprets this as an allegory for how patients with chronic or terminal illnesses are often reduced to their diseases rather than being seen as whole persons.Patient alienation, loss of autonomy, impact of illness on identity, societal rejection of the sickp. 604
Criticism Against “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al.
  1. Lack of Empirical Evidence for Effectiveness
    • The article advocates for literature’s role in medical education but lacks longitudinal, empirical studies demonstrating how reading literature directly improves clinical outcomes or physician behavior.
    • It relies on anecdotal evidence and qualitative assessments, making it difficult to quantify literature’s actual impact on medical practice. (p. 603)
  2. Over-Reliance on Classical Western Literature
    • The selection of literary works, such as Tolstoy, Chekhov, and Shakespeare, prioritizes canonical Western texts, potentially excluding diverse cultural perspectives on illness and healthcare.
    • There is limited discussion of non-Western medical narratives, Indigenous storytelling, or contemporary patient-authored works that could provide broader, multicultural insights. (p. 602-604)
  3. Limited Addressing of Practical Implementation in Medical Curricula
    • While the article promotes literary study in medical education, it does not offer concrete strategies for integrating literature into an already packed medical curriculum.
    • It does not fully address the institutional barriers (e.g., time constraints, assessment challenges, faculty training) that may hinder the widespread adoption of literature-based medical training. (p. 605)
  4. Potential for Subjectivity and Over-Interpretation
    • The analysis of literature in the medical context relies on interpretation and subjective meaning-making, raising concerns about inconsistencies in how different readers (i.e., medical students, physicians) extract meaning from texts.
    • Without structured guidance, there is a risk of overanalyzing narratives in ways that may not be directly applicable to clinical practice. (p. 601-602)
  5. Ethical Concerns in Narrative-Based Medicine
    • The article promotes narrative ethics, yet it does not fully address ethical concerns, such as the risks of physicians “appropriating” patient narratives for educational purposes rather than respecting them as lived experiences.
    • The focus on storytelling might inadvertently romanticize suffering rather than critically addressing the structural inequalities that contribute to patient distress. (p. 602-603)
  6. Insufficient Engagement with Scientific Approaches to Humanism in Medicine
    • While advocating for literature as a tool for empathy and ethical reasoning, the article does not engage enough with scientific studies on physician empathy, communication skills, or psychology.
    • A more interdisciplinary approach, integrating neuroscience, psychology, and empirical social science research, could have strengthened its claims. (p. 604-605)
  7. Potential to Reinforce Elitism in Medical Humanities
    • By emphasizing literary theory and classical literature, the article risks making medical humanities appear inaccessible or elitist, potentially alienating physicians who may not have prior experience with literary studies.
    • There is little discussion on how to make literature more approachable for medical students and professionals unfamiliar with literary criticism. (p. 605-606)
  8. Failure to Address the Changing Landscape of Medicine
    • The medical field has evolved significantly since the article’s publication in 1995. Modern healthcare issues such as digital medicine, artificial intelligence in diagnostics, and systemic healthcare inequalities are not addressed.
    • A more contemporary analysis could explore how literature interacts with modern bioethics, patient autonomy, and technological advancements in medicine. (p. 599-600)
Representative Quotations from “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al. with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Literary accounts of illness can teach physicians concrete and powerful lessons about the lives of sick people.”This highlights the importance of literature in providing physicians with insights into the lived experiences of patients, enhancing their empathy and understanding of suffering.
“Through the study of narrative, the physician can better understand patients’ stories of sickness and his or her own personal stake in medical practice.”This emphasizes how engaging with narrative structures helps doctors improve patient communication, diagnostic accuracy, and self-reflection.
“The study of literature contributes in several ways to achievement in the human dimensions of medicine.”The authors argue that literature fosters emotional intelligence, ethical reasoning, and humanistic engagement in medical professionals.
“Narrative knowledge offers physicians self-knowledge as well as knowledge of their patients.”This suggests that understanding and interpreting narratives not only improves patient care but also helps doctors better understand their own motivations and biases.
“Great works of fiction about medicine enable physicians to recognize the power and the implications of what they do.”Reading literature about medical practice allows doctors to reflect on their influence, ethical dilemmas, and responsibilities beyond clinical tasks.
“Unlike logico-scientific knowledge, narrative knowledge configures singular events befalling human beings into meaningful stories.”The authors contrast scientific knowledge with narrative knowledge, arguing that storytelling helps make sense of individual patient experiences in a holistic way.
“The practice of narrative ethics aims to prevent the development of ethical quandaries by building into medical care a fully articulated recognition of the moral dimensions of the patient’s actual life.”This underscores how literature aids in ethical decision-making by encouraging doctors to consider a patient’s unique circumstances rather than applying rigid ethical principles.
“Physicians and students have discovered that allowing their inner knowledge to achieve the status of language teaches them something of clinical value about their patients or their practices.”The act of writing about medical experiences helps practitioners refine their understanding of patient care and self-reflect on their professional growth.
“Reading literary works and writing in narrative genres allow physicians and students to better understand patients’ experience and to grow in self-understanding.”This reinforces the argument that literature is a tool for fostering empathy and self-awareness in medical practitioners.
“Together, medicine and literature can modulate the potentially alienating experiences of illness and doctoring into a richer and more mutually fulfilling human encounter that better brings about healing and alleviates suffering.”The ultimate goal of integrating literature in medicine is to transform the patient-physician relationship into a more humane and therapeutic engagement.
Suggested Readings: “Literature and Medicine: Contributions to Clinical Practice” by Rita Chauhan et al.
  1. McLellan, M. Faith. “Literature and medicine: narratives of physical illness.” The Lancet 349.9065 (1997): 1618-1620.
  2. Downie, R. S. “Literature and Medicine.” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, 1991, pp. 93–98. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717024. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  3. Rousseau, G. S. “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field.” Isis, vol. 72, no. 3, 1981, pp. 406–24. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/230258. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  4. Spiegel, Maura, and Rita Charon. “Editing and Interdisciplinarity: Literature, Medicine, and Narrative Medicine.” Profession, 2009, pp. 132–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595923. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  5. HOLLOWAY, MARGUERITE. “When Medicine Meets Literature.” Scientific American, vol. 292, no. 5, 2005, pp. 38–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26060992. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.

“Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan: Summary and Critique

“Literature and Medicine: Narratives of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan first appeared in The Lancet in 1997, offering a seminal exploration of the intersection between storytelling and illness experiences.

"Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness" by M. Faith McLellan: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan

“Literature and Medicine: Narratives of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan first appeared in The Lancet in 1997, offering a seminal exploration of the intersection between storytelling and illness experiences. McLellan examines how illness narratives, whether autobiographical or biographical, shape personal and cultural understandings of disease, suffering, and healing. The article emphasizes the thematic structures of these narratives, including restitution, chaos, and quest stories, illustrating how patients and caregivers use storytelling to reclaim agency and impose meaning on experiences of illness. The discussion highlights historical and contemporary examples, such as John Donne’s Devotions upon Emergent Occasions, which portrays illness as a spiritual rebirth, and contemporary memoirs like Reynolds Price’s A Whole New Life, which reflects on the transformative power of chronic illness. McLellan also explores the role of metaphor, particularly the military imagery frequently used to describe disease as a battle, shaping both medical discourse and patient perception. Additionally, the article recognizes the emergence of electronic narratives—multiauthored online forums where individuals collectively construct and modify stories of illness, creating a new genre of patient-driven storytelling. This work is significant in literary theory and medical humanities because it situates illness narratives as crucial texts that contribute to autobiography, ethical discourse, and medical education, providing both personal catharsis and broader societal impact.

Summary of “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan

1. The Emergence and Importance of Illness Narratives

  • Illness narratives have become a crucial part of autobiography, clinical practice, and medical ethics (McLellan, 1997, p. 1618).
  • Patients use storytelling to articulate their experiences of disease and suffering.
  • These narratives help in making sense of illness and serve as a therapeutic and communicative tool for both patients and caregivers.

2. Thematic Classification of Illness Narratives

  • McLellan identifies three major types of illness narratives (p. 1619):
    1. Restitution Stories – Focus on the desire to return to health.
    2. Chaos Stories – Depict the incomprehensibility of suffering and the impact of illness on identity (e.g., Gilda Radner’s It’s Always Something).
    3. Quest Narratives – Frame illness as a transformative journey leading to personal growth or insight (e.g., Reynolds Price’s A Whole New Life).

3. Use of Metaphors in Illness Narratives

  • Military metaphors are common in describing disease (p. 1618).
  • Illness is framed as a battle, with the body as a battlefield and treatments as weapons (e.g., Martha Weinman Lear’s Heartsounds uses war imagery to describe her husband’s heart disease).
  • These metaphors, while pervasive, have been critiqued for their potential to oversimplify the illness experience (Sontag, 1978, as cited in McLellan, 1997, p. 1618).

4. First-Person and Biographical Accounts of Illness

  • Some narratives are firsthand patient accounts, offering direct insight into personal suffering and resilience (p. 1619).
  • Examples:
    • Lucy Grealy’s Autobiography of a Face recounts her experience with facial disfigurement due to Ewing’s sarcoma.
    • John Gunther’s Death Be Not Proud is a father’s account of his son’s terminal illness.
    • Anatole Broyard’s Intoxicated by My Illness was completed posthumously by his wife.

5. The Rise of Electronic and Collective Narratives

  • Online platforms allow for multi-authored, evolving illness narratives (p. 1619).
  • Patients and caregivers share experiences in virtual support communities (e.g., Phil Catalfo’s online journal about his son’s leukemia).
  • Digital narratives are dynamic, enabling real-time interaction and collective storytelling.

6. The Motivations Behind Illness Narratives

  • Illness narratives are often cathartic for the writer, helping them process their experiences (p. 1619).
  • Writers may also aim to educate, raise awareness, or influence medical practice.
  • Some narratives have led to tangible changes in healthcare policies (e.g., hospital protocols modified based on patient feedback).

7. Literature and Medicine as Interconnected Disciplines

  • The study of illness narratives enhances understanding of the human condition in medical practice.
  • These stories provide healthcare professionals with insight into patient experiences beyond clinical symptoms.
  • They serve as essential texts for medical education, promoting empathy and ethical reflection.

Conclusion

  • McLellan’s work highlights how narratives of illness bridge literature and medicine, transforming personal suffering into a meaningful discourse (p. 1620).
  • Whether through books, online forums, or autobiographical accounts, these stories help individuals confront the chaos of illness, shape medical perspectives, and ultimately contribute to humanistic healthcare.
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
Term/ConceptDefinitionExample from the Article
Illness NarrativeA personal account of illness, typically autobiographical or biographical, used to convey experiences of suffering, treatment, and recovery.Lucy Grealy’s Autobiography of a Face details her journey with Ewing’s sarcoma (McLellan, 1997, p. 1619).
Restitution NarrativeA story where the ill person seeks to return to their previous state of health, often structured around medical intervention leading to recovery.Common in many illness stories where patients expect a cure or improvement (p. 1619).
Chaos NarrativeA narrative that expresses the overwhelming, often incoherent experience of illness, where suffering dominates and hope for improvement is uncertain.Gilda Radner’s It’s Always Something about her ovarian cancer attempts to make sense of the chaos (p. 1619).
Quest NarrativeA story in which the illness journey is framed as a transformative experience, often leading to newfound wisdom or insight.Reynolds Price’s A Whole New Life explores his gratitude for continued literary productivity despite his spinal tumor (p. 1619).
Military MetaphorThe framing of illness in terms of battle, where the body fights against disease, treatments are weapons, and survival is victory.Heartsounds by Martha Weinman Lear uses war imagery to describe her husband’s heart disease (p. 1618).
PathographyA biography or autobiography centered on a person’s illness and medical experiences.Often used to describe illness narratives such as John Gunther’s Death Be Not Proud (p. 1619).
Dual NarrationA narrative structure where both the patient and a close observer (e.g., family member or caregiver) contribute to the story.Cancer in Two Voices presents illness from both patient and partner perspectives (p. 1619).
Electronic NarrativeIllness stories shared through digital platforms, often co-authored by multiple contributors, allowing real-time interaction and support.Phil Catalfo’s online journal about his son’s leukemia fosters collective storytelling (p. 1619).
Therapeutic WritingWriting as a means of coping with illness, used to process emotions, gain control over one’s experience, or find meaning.Many first-person illness narratives function as cathartic exercises for the author (p. 1619).
Narrative EthicsThe use of storytelling in medical and ethical discussions to enhance understanding of patient experiences and improve healthcare.Physicians gain insight into patient struggles through online illness narratives, influencing medical decisions (p. 1620).
Victim ArtA critical term used to describe illness narratives that focus intensely on suffering, sometimes seen as self-indulgent or overly personal.Some critiques argue that illness narratives are driven by self-absorption rather than literary merit (p. 1620).
AutopathographyA form of autobiographical writing focused on illness and medical encounters, often used as an alternative to traditional autobiography.The Diving Bell and the Butterfly by Jean-Dominique Bauby, written using eye blinks, exemplifies this form (p. 1619).
Embodied ExperienceThe lived, subjective experience of illness as it affects both physical and psychological states.The uncertainty of daily life with multiple sclerosis, as described by Nancy Mairs, highlights this concept (p. 1620).
Contribution of “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Narrative Theory

  • Examines how illness stories are structured and classified into restitution, chaos, and quest narratives (McLellan, 1997, p. 1619).
  • Highlights the role of first-person narration and dual narration in shaping the reader’s understanding of illness experiences.
  • Emphasizes how electronic narratives on the internet have introduced multi-authored storytelling, altering traditional narrative structures (p. 1619).

2. Autobiographical Theory

  • Positions illness narratives within the broader genre of autobiography and pathography, demonstrating how they serve both self-representation and public engagement (p. 1618).
  • Discusses how the first-person account of illness functions as a form of self-therapy and identity reconstruction (p. 1619).
  • Explores the constraints and possibilities of autobiographical illness narratives, noting that chronic illnesses provide time for self-reflection and storytelling, unlike acute diseases (p. 1619).

3. Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine

  • Establishes the role of storytelling in enhancing doctor-patient relationships and medical ethics (p. 1620).
  • Shows how illness narratives provide insight into patient suffering, influencing medical practice and policies (p. 1620).
  • Identifies how narratives help patients reclaim agency, moving beyond clinical definitions of disease to personal meaning-making (p. 1620).

4. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory

  • Illness narratives function as cathartic texts, allowing patients to process trauma and regain control over their experiences (p. 1619).
  • Suggests that storytelling mitigates feelings of chaos and fear, helping patients impose structure on their suffering (p. 1620).
  • Examines how suppressed emotions and fears surface in narratives, particularly in chaos stories where meaning is elusive (p. 1619).

5. Postmodernism and Fragmentation

  • Discusses how chaos narratives resist linearity and coherence, reflecting the fragmented nature of illness experiences (p. 1619).
  • Electronic narratives challenge traditional authorial authority, as multiple contributors alter the original story’s meaning (p. 1619).
  • Online illness narratives blur the boundaries between personal and collective storytelling, embodying a postmodern, decentralized form of literature (p. 1619).

6. Metaphor and Symbolism in Literary Theory

  • Analyzes the prevalence of military metaphors in illness narratives and critiques their limitations (p. 1618).
  • Highlights how mythic structures, such as the hero’s journey, shape quest narratives of illness (p. 1619).
  • Explores the symbolic use of illness as a transformative force, where suffering leads to insight and personal growth (p. 1619).

7. Reader-Response Theory

  • Suggests that illness narratives shape reader empathy, fostering a deeper connection with the lived experience of disease (p. 1620).
  • Encourages interpretation from multiple perspectives, as both physicians and general readers engage with these texts differently (p. 1620).
  • Examines how interactive digital narratives allow readers to become co-authors, altering the meaning of the story through discussion and contribution (p. 1619).

8. Feminist Literary Theory

  • Highlights how women’s illness narratives challenge traditional gender roles, bringing attention to the experience of illness from a female perspective (p. 1619).
  • Explores the marginalization of female patient voices, particularly in medical settings, and how personal narratives counteract this (p. 1619).
  • Recognizes the gendered aspects of caregiving, with many illness narratives written by or about women who care for sick loved ones (p. 1619).
Examples of Critiques Through “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
Literary Work & Type of NarrativeMcLellan’s Thematic CritiqueKey Concepts & Theoretical Lens
John Donne – Devotions upon Emergent Occasions (Spiritual Illness Narrative, Rebirth & Reflection on Suffering)McLellan identifies Donne’s work as an early illness narrative structured around meditation, expostulation, and prayer. It portrays illness as a spiritual trial and a transformative experience rather than just a medical event (McLellan, 1997, p. 1618).Religious and spiritual framing of illness
Rebirth metaphor
Historical pathography
Martha Weinman Lear – Heartsounds (Military Metaphor in Illness, Heart Disease as a Battle)Critiqued for reinforcing the “war” metaphor, which frames illness as a battle. McLellan argues that while emotionally compelling, such metaphors oversimplify suffering and impose pressure on patients to “fight” their disease (p. 1618).Military metaphor critique
Metaphorical burden on patients
Emotional vs. clinical realism
Gilda Radner – It’s Always Something (Chaos Narrative, Ovarian Cancer)McLellan describes Radner’s memoir as a chaos narrative, highlighting the disruption illness causes to identity and meaning. Radner’s attempt to document chemotherapy sessions reflects an effort to regain control over a disorienting experience (p. 1619).Loss of narrative control
Illness as identity crisis
Emotional disarray in storytelling
Reynolds Price – A Whole New Life (Quest Narrative, Spinal Cord Tumor as a Transformative Journey)Price’s memoir embodies the quest narrative, where illness becomes a journey of self-discovery. McLellan notes that despite his suffering, Price finds artistic and intellectual renewal, illustrating illness as a transformative force (p. 1619).Illness as a journey
Transformative suffering
Autopathography and resilience
Criticism Against “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan

1. Overgeneralization of Illness Narratives

  • The classification of illness narratives into restitution, chaos, and quest (McLellan, 1997, p. 1619) may oversimplify the complexity and uniqueness of each patient’s experience.
  • Some illness narratives may not fit neatly into these categories, making the framework somewhat restrictive.

2. Lack of Critical Engagement with Power Dynamics in Medicine

  • McLellan primarily focuses on the literary and emotional aspects of illness narratives but does not sufficiently critique the medical power structures that influence how these stories are told.
  • The role of medical authority and institutional biases in shaping patient narratives is underexplored.

3. Uncritical Use of Electronic Narratives

  • While McLellan acknowledges the emergence of multi-authored electronic illness narratives (p. 1619), she does not critically analyze how digital platforms might distort or commodify patient experiences.
  • The potential for misinformation, performative storytelling, or loss of narrative control in online spaces is not fully examined.

4. Limited Discussion of Gender and Intersectionality

  • Although McLellan mentions gendered aspects of illness narratives, the analysis lacks a deep intersectional approach.
  • Race, socioeconomic status, and cultural background are not sufficiently addressed in relation to how different individuals experience and narrate illness.

5. Tendency to Privilege Literary Quality Over Raw Experience

  • McLellan critiques some illness narratives for their stylistic unevenness (p. 1619), but this may reflect an elitist perspective that prioritizes literary merit over authentic personal expression.
  • The emotional urgency of illness narratives should perhaps be valued beyond conventional literary standards.

6. Insufficient Engagement with Disability Studies

  • The article focuses on illness as an interruption to normalcy rather than engaging with disability as an identity and social construct.
  • Perspectives from disability studies scholars who view chronic illness as part of life rather than just a disruption are not fully incorporated.

7. Lack of Engagement with Reader-Response Criticism

  • The article assumes that illness narratives serve a therapeutic function for patients and educational function for doctors, but does not sufficiently explore how different readers interpret these texts based on their own experiences.
Representative Quotations from “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“They have been called stories of sickness, pathographies, and narratives of illness.” (p. 1618)This statement highlights the evolving terminology surrounding illness narratives, emphasizing their growing recognition in both literature and medical humanities. The various terms reflect different perspectives—personal, clinical, and literary—on how illness is experienced and communicated.
“Despite substantial critique of their appropriateness and usefulness, military metaphors are ubiquitous in illness narratives.” (p. 1618)McLellan critiques the common use of military metaphors in medical discourse, such as referring to disease as an “enemy” and treatment as a “battle.” This metaphorical framing can place an emotional burden on patients, making illness seem like a failure if one does not “win” the fight.
“Stories of sickness have also been described as narratives of restitution, chaos, and quest.” (p. 1619)This classification system, based on Arthur Frank’s typology, provides a framework for understanding how illness is structured in storytelling. The restitution narrative seeks recovery, the chaos narrative represents disorientation and suffering, while the quest narrative frames illness as a transformative journey.
“The chaos story focuses on what is most untellable about sickness: the nearly incomprehensible nature of loss and suffering.” (p. 1619)This reflects the existential and psychological dimensions of illness. Chaos narratives resist neat resolutions, often mirroring the actual experience of chronic or terminal illness, where clarity and recovery are not always possible.
“The quest narrative depicts illness as a mythical journey, in which the hero undergoes a series of trials before being granted upon his return a boon—if not health, perhaps empathy, insight, a special sensitivity, or a deepened awareness of life’s transience and value.” (p. 1619)The comparison of illness to mythic storytelling highlights how patients often find meaning in their suffering, transforming pain into personal growth. This perspective can offer comfort and a sense of purpose to individuals experiencing long-term illness.
“When the patient is unable to relate his own story, someone close to him may become the narrator, either in whole or in part.” (p. 1619)This acknowledges the role of caregivers, family members, and friends in preserving and conveying illness narratives, especially when the patient is unable to do so. This highlights the collaborative and communal nature of storytelling in illness experiences.
“Multiple narrators are a hallmark of a new form of illness narrative that is being created on the Internet, in discussion groups or on Web pages.” (p. 1619)McLellan emphasizes how digital platforms have transformed illness storytelling. Online narratives allow for shared authorship, interactivity, and collective meaning-making, demonstrating the democratization of illness experiences in the digital age.
“Writers’ motivations for telling stories of illness have bright and dark features.” (p. 1620)Illness narratives are often cathartic and therapeutic, helping authors process trauma. However, McLellan acknowledges the potential pitfalls, including emotional overindulgence, lack of literary refinement, and the challenge of balancing personal experience with artistic expression.
“One important value of illness narratives is their capacity to bring about change that improves the lives of patients, families, and caregivers.” (p. 1620)This underscores the practical impact of illness narratives. By sharing experiences, patients can influence medical policies, improve doctor-patient relationships, and foster empathy among healthcare providers.
“Narratives of illness provide eloquent proof, for patients and practitioners, that ‘when the lights of health go down,’ one’s own story can be illumination enough.” (p. 1620)This poetic statement captures the central thesis of McLellan’s argument: storytelling is a powerful tool for making sense of illness, offering both individual solace and broader cultural insight.
Suggested Readings: “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
  1. McLellan, M. Faith. “Literature and medicine: narratives of physical illness.” The Lancet 349.9065 (1997): 1618-1620.
  2. Downie, R. S. “Literature and Medicine.” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, 1991, pp. 93–98. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717024. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  3. Rousseau, G. S. “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field.” Isis, vol. 72, no. 3, 1981, pp. 406–24. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/230258. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  4. Spiegel, Maura, and Rita Charon. “Editing and Interdisciplinarity: Literature, Medicine, and Narrative Medicine.” Profession, 2009, pp. 132–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595923. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  5. HOLLOWAY, MARGUERITE. “When Medicine Meets Literature.” Scientific American, vol. 292, no. 5, 2005, pp. 38–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26060992. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.

“Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev: Summary and Critique

“Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev first appeared in Neohelicon XX/2, published by Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, and John Benjamins B.V., Amsterdam.

"Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature" by Amiya Dev: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev

“Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev first appeared in Neohelicon XX/2, published by Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, and John Benjamins B.V., Amsterdam. In this seminal essay, Dev explores the intricate relationships between literary history, literary theory, and comparative literature, arguing that comparative literature is not simply positioned between the two but is deeply intertwined with both. He challenges the perception of comparative literature as being trapped between the “murderous claims” of literary history and literary theory, instead proposing that comparative literature acts as a bridge—a dynamic space that navigates between historical positivism and theoretical abstraction. Dev draws from both Western and Eastern European perspectives, engaging with thinkers like Goethe, Marx, Engels, and Dionýz Ďurišin, to highlight the evolution of comparative literature from its historical roots to its growing theoretical inclinations. He critiques the rigid structuralist and historicist methodologies of the past while acknowledging that comparative literature remains fundamentally historical in its origins. The article also addresses the comparatist’s challenge of balancing national and world literature, emphasizing that the two should be seen as complementary rather than antithetical. Ultimately, Dev posits that comparative literature is not merely a passive mediator but an active epistemological framework that continuously redefines its position in relation to literary history and theory. His work is crucial in shaping modern comparative literary studies by advocating for a fluid, process-driven approach rather than a rigid, hierarchical division among the three disciplines.

Summary of “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev
  • Interconnected Nature of the Three Disciplines
    Amiya Dev argues that literary history, literary theory, and comparative literature are not isolated fields but are deeply interconnected. Comparative literature, in particular, does not stand between literary history and literary theory as a mere mediator but actively engages with both, shaping and being shaped by them (Dev, p. 24).
  • The Role of the “And” in the Title
    The conjunction “and” in the title is not merely additive but subversive, placing comparative literature dynamically between literary history and literary theory. Dev suggests that this creates a “Scylla and Charybdis” situation, where comparative literature must navigate between the dangers of being overwhelmed by historical positivism on one side and excessive theoretical abstraction on the other (Dev, p. 25).
  • Comparative Literature as a Balancing Act
    Comparative literature is depicted as Odysseus, steering between national literature and world literature. If it becomes too focused on national literature, it loses its credibility; if it leans too much toward world literature, it risks losing specificity. The discipline must therefore maintain a balance, engaging with both without being consumed by either (Dev, p. 26).
  • Western vs. East European Perspectives
    Dev contrasts the French school of comparative literature, which emphasizes historical positivism and rapports de fait, with East European approaches, particularly the work of Dionýz Ďurišin, who emphasizes a dynamic relationship between national and world literature. He suggests that instead of viewing national and world literature as oppositional, they should be seen as complementary parts of a larger literary process (Dev, p. 27).
  • Evolution from Literary History to Literary Theory
    Historically, comparative literature originated as a branch of literary history, closely tied to 19th-century historicism. However, by the mid-20th century, comparative literature began to align more with literary theory, particularly influenced by Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism. This shift reflects a broader transformation in literary studies, where theoretical concerns have increasingly replaced historical methodologies (Dev, p. 28).
  • Critique of the Decline of Literary History
    Dev notes that literary history has lost its former prestige, often reduced to “routine ruminations,” while literary theory has gained dominance. He critiques Hans Robert Jauss’s attempt to rehabilitate literary history, arguing that it remains “theory-prone” rather than truly reinvigorated (Dev, p. 29).
  • The Current Theoretical Pull in Comparative Literature
    Modern comparative literature is increasingly drawn toward literary theory. Dev describes this as a conscious choice rather than a matter of prestige. He warns, however, against extreme cases where comparatists abandon their discipline entirely in favor of theoretical studies, turning literary theory into their ultimate goal rather than an analytical tool (Dev, p. 30).
  • Reaffirming the Role of Comparative Literature
    While comparative literature has shifted towards theory, Dev emphasizes that it remains rooted in literary history. He advocates for an organic understanding of comparative literature as a discipline that begins in literary history and moves toward literary theory without being wholly absorbed by it (Dev, p. 31).
  • No Need for an “Odyssean” Role
    Dev ultimately rejects the idea that comparative literature is caught in a struggle between opposing forces. Instead, he envisions it as the hyphen or “and” that connects literary history and literary theory, ensuring their dialogue and mutual evolution (Dev, p. 32).
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev
Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationReference from the Article
Comparative LiteratureThe study of literature across cultures, languages, and historical periods, positioned between literary history and literary theory.“Comparative literature flanked by ‘literary history’ and ‘literary theory’ be our signified order” (Dev, p. 24).
Literary HistoryThe study of literature within its historical and cultural contexts, traditionally rooted in historical positivism.“Comparative literature evolved as a branch of literary history and at a time when literary history was itself being established in Europe” (Dev, p. 27).
Literary TheoryThe analytical and interpretative frameworks used to study literature, increasingly dominant in comparative literature.“Comparative literature today has little declaration to make for literary history… it is more and more drawn to literary theory” (Dev, p. 30).
Scylla and Charybdis MetaphorA metaphor borrowed from Greek mythology to describe the challenge of balancing between the extremes of literary history and literary theory without being overwhelmed by either.“That entails a further signification, that of a perilous journey between the murderous claims of literary history and literary theory” (Dev, p. 25).
National vs. World LiteratureThe challenge of comparative literature in navigating between the particular (national) and the universal (world literature).“Neither is national literature Scylla to him of a perilous proximity nor world literature Charybdis of an ominous whirlpool” (Dev, p. 26).
“Rapports de Fait”A term from the French school of comparative literature referring to historically ascertainable relationships between literary works.“Comparative literature’s affiliation to nineteenth-century historicism was particularly expressed in the ‘de fait'” (Dev, p. 27).
East European SchoolA theoretical perspective emphasizing the dynamic relationship between national and world literature, as seen in the work of Dionýz Ďurišin.“The Czech theorist Dionýz Ďurišin… assigned a dynamic place to world literature” (Dev, p. 27).
WeltliteraturGoethe’s idea of “world literature,” later endorsed by Marx and Engels, which envisions literature as an interconnected global phenomenon.“Goethe’s prophetic utterance on Weltliteratur and Marx and Engels’ scientific endorsement” (Dev, p. 25).
HistoricismThe belief that literary meaning is determined by historical context, which dominated early comparative literature studies.“Comparative literature’s affiliation to nineteenth-century historicism was particularly expressed in the ‘de fait'” (Dev, p. 27).
Russian Formalism & Czech StructuralismTheoretical movements that influenced comparative literature’s shift from history to theory, emphasizing form and structure over historical context.“The East European school emerging in the sixties and the seventies had its prime inspiration from Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism” (Dev, p. 28).
Jauss’s “Literaturgeschichte als Provokation”Hans Robert Jauss’s challenge to literary history, suggesting its revival through reader-response and reception theory.“Who would ever forget the provocation intended in the celebrated essay of Hans Robert Jauss’s ‘Literaturgeschichte als Provokation’?” (Dev, p. 29).
Hyphen/Comma MetaphorComparative literature is not just between literary history and literary theory but acts as a “hyphen” or “comma” that connects them organically.“The comparatist is that hyphen. He is the comma, if you want, of my title and he is the ‘and'” (Dev, p. 32).
Contribution of “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Contribution to Comparative Literature Theory

  • Redefinition of Comparative Literature’s Role: Dev moves beyond the traditional view of comparative literature as a passive intermediary between literary history and literary theory. Instead, he positions it as an active and dynamic field that navigates between these domains.
    • Reference: “Comparative literature flanked by ‘literary history’ and ‘literary theory’ be our signified order” (Dev, p. 24).
  • Balancing National and World Literature: He critiques the binary opposition between national and world literature and proposes an integrated approach.
    • Reference: “Instead of being antinomous, national and world literature would be complementary and part of the same process” (Dev, p. 26).
  • Critique of the French School’s Historical Positivism: Dev challenges the French school’s rigid emphasis on “rapports de fait,” advocating for a more dynamic and intertextual approach.
    • Reference: “Comparative literature’s affiliation to nineteenth-century historicism was particularly expressed in the ‘de fait'” (Dev, p. 27).

2. Contribution to World Literature Theory

  • Extension of Goethe’s Weltliteratur Concept: Dev builds upon Goethe’s and Marx-Engels’ Weltliteratur, arguing that world literature should not be seen as a static body of texts but as an evolving process.
    • Reference: “Goethe’s prophetic utterance on Weltliteratur and Marx and Engels’ scientific endorsement of that were at one level a question of this conspectus” (Dev, p. 25).
  • Integration of East European Perspectives: He introduces the East European approach, particularly Dionýz Ďurišin’s theory, which sees world literature as a dynamic field rather than an amorphous entity.
    • Reference: “The Czech theorist Dionýz Ďurišin… has not only authenticated national literature but assigned a dynamic place to world literature” (Dev, p. 27).

3. Contribution to Literary Historicism

  • Critique of Traditional Literary History: Dev argues that literary history has lost its former prestige and has been overtaken by literary theory, yet it remains foundational to comparative literature.
    • Reference: “Literary history had lost its nineteenth-century eminence and been pushed to routine ruminations” (Dev, p. 28).
  • Re-evaluating Hans Robert Jauss’s Approach: While acknowledging Jauss’s Literaturgeschichte als Provokation, he critiques the lack of a concrete theoretical challenge to literary history.
    • Reference: “Certainly the kind of literary history that Jauss advances is simple and smacks of theorization by proxy” (Dev, p. 29).

4. Contribution to Structuralism and Formalism

  • Influence of Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism: Dev highlights how comparative literature, after detaching from literary history, has been influenced by Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism, which emphasize textual structures and formal analysis.
    • Reference: “The East European school emerging in the sixties and the seventies had its prime inspiration from Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism” (Dev, p. 28).
  • Bridging Historical Positivism and Structuralist Analysis: He suggests that comparative literature should incorporate both historical and formalist methodologies instead of being confined to either.
    • Reference: “The comparatist’s task is no longer to show brinkmanship and be unscathed by both national and world literature, but exercise full concern and involvement with them” (Dev, p. 26).

5. Contribution to Poststructuralism and Deconstruction

  • Subversion of Traditional Binaries: Dev challenges the idea that literary history and literary theory are opposing forces, suggesting that comparative literature dissolves rigid distinctions between the two.
    • Reference: “There are only literary history and literary theory and a hyphen between them. The comparatist is that hyphen” (Dev, p. 32).
  • The Power of the “And” (A Derridean Perspective): Dev’s interpretation of the and in his title aligns with poststructuralist thought, where seemingly neutral linguistic elements carry subversive meanings.
    • Reference: “The ‘and’ in my title is not a simple-minded conjunction… It may in fact be quite subversive” (Dev, p. 24).

6. Contribution to Reception Theory and Reader-Response Criticism

  • Comparative Literature as a Reader-Oriented Field: Dev implies that comparative literature is shaped not just by historical and theoretical contexts but also by how readers and scholars engage with texts. This aligns with Jauss’s reception theory.
    • Reference: “Comparative literature to them is the portals but theory the shrine” (Dev, p. 30).
Examples of Critiques Through “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev
Literary WorkCritique Through Literary HistoryCritique Through Literary TheoryCritique Through Comparative Literature
Goethe’s FaustViewed historically, Faust reflects 19th-century Romanticism, exploring human ambition, knowledge, and the limits of reason (Dev, p. 27).Poststructuralist analysis sees Faust as destabilizing meaning, particularly through Mephistopheles’ ironic discourse (Dev, p. 30).Faust aligns with Weltliteratur, illustrating Goethe’s vision of a global literary dialogue (Dev, p. 25).
Marx & Engels’ The Communist ManifestoThe text is historically significant as a political-literary document influencing socialist realism (Dev, p. 27).Theoretical critiques, including Althusser’s Marxist structuralism, reveal ideology as a textual construct within The Communist Manifesto (Dev, p. 28).It exemplifies transnational thought, influencing socialist literature across cultures (Dev, p. 25).
T.S. Eliot’s The Waste LandRooted in post-World War I modernist history, reflecting cultural fragmentation (Dev, p. 28).Draws on intertextuality, aligning with Russian Formalist and structuralist approaches to meaning-making (Dev, p. 28).Comparative lens places it alongside Hindu, European, and classical texts, demonstrating cross-cultural literary evolution (Dev, p. 26).
Gabriel García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of SolitudeA historical novel reflecting Latin American magical realism, merging myth and history (Dev, p. 27).Postmodernist theory interprets its narrative non-linearity and metafictional elements as destabilizing historical truth (Dev, p. 30).Explores national vs. world literature, balancing Latin American identity with universal themes of exile and destiny (Dev, p. 26).
Criticism Against “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev

1. Overemphasis on the Metaphor of Scylla and Charybdis

  • Dev’s use of the Scylla and Charybdis metaphor to describe the position of comparative literature between literary history and literary theory is evocative but arguably reductive.
  • This framing suggests an unnecessary struggle when, in reality, disciplines can coexist without inherent peril (Dev, p. 25).

2. Ambiguity in the Role of Comparative Literature

  • While Dev rejects the idea of comparative literature as merely navigating between literary history and literary theory, he does not clearly define its independent methodological framework.
  • His conclusion that comparative literature is the “hyphen” between literary history and literary theory leaves room for ambiguity rather than a concrete theoretical position (Dev, p. 32).

3. Inconsistency in the Treatment of Literary History

  • Dev acknowledges the decline of literary history’s prominence but simultaneously argues that it remains fundamental to comparative literature.
  • This dual stance creates an inconsistency—if literary history has lost its intellectual authority, why must comparative literature remain rooted in it? (Dev, p. 28-29).

4. Eurocentric Focus Despite Acknowledgment of East European Thought

  • Although Dev highlights the contributions of East European scholars like Dionýz Ďurišin, his primary theoretical engagements remain within Western literary frameworks (French historicism, Russian Formalism, Jauss’s reception theory).
  • The essay lacks engagement with non-European perspectives, such as postcolonial literary history or comparative frameworks outside the Western canon (Dev, p. 27).

5. Limited Engagement with Postcolonial and Global South Perspectives

  • Dev does not sufficiently address how comparative literature functions in postcolonial studies, where national and world literatures interact in ways beyond the European model.
  • He does not explore how his theory applies to literatures from Africa, South Asia, or Latin America, which challenge traditional historical and theoretical narratives (Dev, p. 26).

6. Lack of Concrete Methodology for Comparative Literature

  • Dev argues that comparative literature should move organically between literary history and literary theory but does not provide a clear methodological framework for this process.
  • How should a comparatist engage with texts without falling into the binaries he critiques? The essay does not answer this sufficiently (Dev, p. 30).

7. Underestimation of the Autonomy of Literary Theory

  • Dev suggests that literary theory has overshadowed literary history in modern scholarship, but he does not fully acknowledge that literary theory itself has become a distinct and legitimate field, independent of historical frameworks (Dev, p. 29-30).
  • He treats literary theory as a force “pulling” comparative literature rather than recognizing its evolving role in shaping literary studies.

8. Insufficient Addressing of Digital Humanities and Contemporary Literary Studies

  • The essay does not account for the rise of digital humanities and computational literary analysis, which challenge both traditional literary history and established theoretical frameworks.
  • Newer methodologies, such as corpus-based literary studies and network theory, complicate Dev’s tripartite model but are left unaddressed (Dev, p. 32).
Representative Quotations from “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“The ‘and’ in my title is not a simple-minded conjunction… It may in fact be quite subversive.” (Dev, p. 24)Dev suggests that “and” in the title disrupts the rigid division between literary history, literary theory, and comparative literature. It challenges traditional academic compartmentalization, emphasizing their interconnectedness.
“Comparative literature flanked by ‘literary history’ and ‘literary theory’ be our signified order, then we have also to admit a Scylla and Charybdis situation here.” (Dev, p. 24)Using a Greek mythology metaphor, Dev argues that comparative literature must navigate between the “dangers” of literary history (excessive historicism) and literary theory (abstract formalism).
“A more immediate Scylla and Charybdis situation is often recognized for comparative literature, that of national and world literature.” (Dev, p. 26)Dev highlights another dilemma: comparative literature’s struggle between focusing on national literature and embracing world literature without losing its disciplinary identity.
“Instead of being antinomous, national and world literature would be complementary and part of the same process.” (Dev, p. 26)He rejects the binary opposition between national and world literature, advocating for an integrated literary framework that bridges both.
“Comparative literature evolved as a branch of literary history and at a time when literary history was itself being established in Europe.” (Dev, p. 27)Dev traces the historical development of comparative literature, showing its roots in 19th-century European literary history.
“Comparative literature’s affiliation to nineteenth-century historicism was particularly expressed in the ‘de fait’, for the ‘rapports’ were the bare given without which comparative literature would not be.” (Dev, p. 27)He critiques the French school of comparative literature, which relied on historical positivism (rapports de fait), emphasizing textual connections over theoretical frameworks.
“Who would ever forget the provocation intended in the celebrated essay of Hans Robert Jauss’s ‘Literaturgeschichte als Provokation’?” (Dev, p. 29)Dev references Hans Robert Jauss, a major figure in reception theory, who argued that literary history should be provocative and actively engage with readers.
“Comparative literature today has little declaration to make for literary history… it is being more and more drawn to literary theory.” (Dev, p. 30)He observes a shift in comparative literature, where it increasingly aligns with literary theory rather than its historical roots.
“The comparatist is that hyphen. He is the comma, if you want, of my title and he is the ‘and’.” (Dev, p. 32)Dev metaphorically defines the role of the comparatist as a bridge that connects literary history and theory rather than being limited by either.
“There are no Scylla and Charybdis. There are only literary history and literary theory and a hyphen between them.” (Dev, p. 32)He ultimately dismisses the idea of conflict, proposing that literary history and theory should be seen as complementary rather than antagonistic forces in literary studies.
Suggested Readings: “Literary History, Literary Theory And Comparative Literature” by Amiya Dev
  1. Dev, Amiya. “Literary History, Literary Theory, and Comparative Literature.” Literature East and West: Essays Presented to RK Dasgupta. Allied Publishers, 1995.
  2. Harris, Wendell V. “What Is Literary ‘History’?” College English, vol. 56, no. 4, 1994, pp. 434–51. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/378337. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  3. Pelc, Jerzy. “Some Methodological Problems in Literary History.” New Literary History, vol. 7, no. 1, 1975, pp. 89–96. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/468280. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  4. Searle, John R. “Literary Theory and Its Discontents.” New Literary History, vol. 25, no. 3, 1994, pp. 637–67. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/469470. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.

“Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice”: Summary and Critique

“Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice” first appeared in 1997 in the journal Religion (Volume 27, pp. 249–254) and was published by Academic Press Limited.

"Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice": Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice”

“Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice” first appeared in 1997 in the journal Religion (Volume 27, pp. 249–254) and was published by Academic Press Limited. The interview was conducted by James G. Williams on May 25, 1996, and excerpts from it were later included in The Girard Reader (New York: Crossroad Publishing, 1996). The discussion explores Girard’s major intellectual contributions, particularly his theories of mimetic desire, the scapegoat mechanism, and the anthropology of the Cross. He articulates how the Bible, especially the Passion narrative, uniquely exposes rather than perpetuates the scapegoating mechanism, contrasting it with myths that obscure the innocence of the victim. His insights have been foundational in literary theory, religious studies, and anthropology, especially in understanding how texts encode violence and social differentiation. Girard distinguishes between sacrifice as murder and sacrifice as renunciation, arguing that Christianity does not endorse sacrificial violence but instead reveals and subverts it. He reflects, “This is the most difficult thing for people to understand about my theory—that scapegoating does not play an essential role in the Gospels, whereas it has an enormous role in myths since it generates them”—a point crucial to his critique of traditional interpretations of sacrifice in Christianity. His work remains pivotal in examining the role of desire, violence, and redemption in literature and culture.

Summary of “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice”

1. Key Discoveries in Girard’s Intellectual Journey

Girard identifies three major breakthroughs in his thought: mimetic desire and rivalry, the scapegoat mechanism, and the unique revelation of the Bible (Girard, 1997, p. 249). His realization that human desires are imitative (mimetic) laid the foundation for his theory that societies stabilize themselves through scapegoating. He further claims that the Passion of Christ reveals and disrupts this hidden social mechanism (p. 250).


2. Christianity and the Exposure of the Scapegoat Mechanism

Unlike myths, which conceal the injustice of scapegoating, the Bible makes the victim’s innocence explicit. Girard argues that the Gospels do not promote scapegoating but unveil it, correcting the misunderstanding of many theologians who see Christianity as a scapegoat religion (p. 250). He compares this to the Dreyfus Affair, where those defending Dreyfus were paradoxically accused of scapegoating (p. 251).


3. Historical and Literary Parallels to Scapegoating

Girard illustrates scapegoating through Joan of Arc, whose divinization or demonization parallels how societies treat scapegoats (p. 251). Similarly, Herod’s belief in John the Baptist’s resurrection reflects how myths arise from scapegoated figures (p. 252). The Gospels differ by acknowledging the victim’s innocence, setting Christianity apart from other religions and myths.


4. Christianity as a Non-Sacrificial Religion

Girard challenges the traditional sacrificial reading of Christianity, distinguishing between sacrifice as murder and sacrifice as renunciation (p. 253). He credits Nietzsche with recognizing Christianity’s uniqueness in defending victims rather than justifying sacrifice, though Nietzsche rejected this ethic as harmful to society (p. 254).


5. The Role of the Passion in Understanding Scapegoating

The Passion of Christ provides a clear anthropological revelation of the scapegoat mechanism. The denial of Peter illustrates how even close followers succumb to scapegoating pressure (p. 255). Christ’s unwavering refusal to participate in mimetic rivalry demonstrates an alternative to violence, which Girard sees as the true meaning of atonement (p. 256).


6. The Gospels’ Narrative Against Violence and Exclusion

Girard critiques how Christianity has been misused to justify violence, particularly against Jews (p. 257). He argues that the New Testament does not single out Jewish authorities but implicates all of humanity in scapegoating Jesus. He likens this to the myth of Purusha in the Vedas, where a victim’s dismemberment creates social order—a dynamic the Gospels expose and reject (p. 258).


7. Theological Implications: Christ as the True Scapegoat

Girard ultimately accepts the scapegoat label for Christ, but only in reverse: rather than a society-constructed scapegoat, Christ consciously takes on the role to expose its injustice (p. 259). He interprets Isaiah 53’s Suffering Servant as a precursor to this revelation (p. 260).


8. Rethinking Atonement and Sacrifice

Girard critiques the satisfaction theory of atonement, arguing instead for an atonement based on reconciliation rather than divine retribution (p. 261). He supports Jean-Luc Marion’s idea of a “God without the sacred”, meaning a God free from the violent mechanisms of human religion (p. 262).


Conclusion

Girard’s interview presents Christianity as a unique revelation that unmasks and transcends the scapegoat mechanism. His theories challenge traditional readings of sacrifice and atonement, offering a non-violent, anthropological interpretation of the Gospel. Christianity, in his view, subverts sacred violence rather than perpetuating it, making it a pivotal force in human history (p. 263).

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice”
Term/ConceptDefinitionRelevance in Girard’s TheoryReference in the Interview
Mimetic DesireThe idea that human desire is not original but imitative; people want what others want, leading to rivalry.Foundation of Girard’s theory; explains the origins of social conflict and scapegoating.“First was mimetic desire and rivalry, when I realized that it accounted for so much” (p. 249).
Scapegoat MechanismA process where a society or group unconsciously transfers its tensions and conflicts onto a single victim, who is then expelled or sacrificed to restore order.Explains the role of violence in myths, religion, and culture; central to his interpretation of Christianity.“The second was the discovery of the scapegoat mechanism. This basically completed the mimetic theory” (p. 249).
Sacrificial vs. Non-Sacrificial ReadingDistinguishes between sacrifice as violent elimination (murder) and as self-renunciation. Girard argues that Christianity is non-sacrificial in the latter sense.Challenges traditional interpretations of Christian atonement; proposes Christianity exposes rather than endorses sacrifice.“I have come to be more positive about the word ‘sacrificial,’ so I would like first of all to make a distinction between sacrifice as murder and sacrifice as renunciation” (p. 253).
Victimization in Myth vs. GospelMyths conceal the innocence of the victim, portraying them as guilty or divine, whereas the Gospels reveal the victim’s innocence.Demonstrates how Christianity subverts the traditional scapegoating pattern.“This is the most difficult thing for people to understand about my theory—that scapegoating does not play an essential role in the Gospels, whereas it has an enormous role in myths” (p. 250).
The Passion as RevelationThe suffering and death of Christ expose the scapegoating mechanism, making it visible and ineffective.Distinguishes Christianity from archaic sacrificial religions and myths.“The mimetic representation of scapegoating in the Passion was the solution to the relationship of the Gospels and archaic cultures” (p. 250).
Conversion ExperienceA moment of transformation when individuals recognize mimetic desire and reject rivalry.Explains how novelists and religious figures arrive at deeper insights into human nature.“They have a kind of conversion experience, and this conversion is of the same nature as the shift from mythology to the Gospels” (p. 250).
Nietzsche’s Critique of ChristianityNietzsche saw Christianity’s defense of victims as harmful, arguing that societies need scapegoating to function.Girard agrees with Nietzsche’s observation but opposes his conclusion, advocating for a world without sacrificial violence.“Nietzsche was the first thinker to see clearly that the singularity of Judeo-Christianity was that it rehabilitates victims myths would regard as justly immolated” (p. 254).
Political Correctness (PC) and VictimhoodThe tendency in modern culture to protect marginalized groups, sometimes without fully understanding the mechanism of scapegoating.Girard sees irony in the way some uphold victimhood while ignoring its deeper implications.“The upholders of PC can find a strange kind of support in his writings. He was entranced with violent differentiation” (p. 251).
Biblical Texts as Anthropological RevelationThe idea that biblical texts, particularly the Gospels, provide a deep insight into human social structures and violence.Establishes Christianity as a unique cultural and anthropological breakthrough.“The story of the beheading of John is one of the reasons why the synoptic Gospels are so incredibly valuable for understanding the anthropology of revelation” (p. 250).
Atonement as ReconciliationAtonement is not about satisfying divine justice through sacrifice but about reconciling humanity with God.Moves away from traditional interpretations of atonement, supporting a non-violent theological perspective.“Atonement is ‘at-one-ment,’ becoming reconciled with God, and this is the work of Christ” (p. 261).
God Without the SacredThe idea that the true God is not tied to sacred violence or the need for sacrificial victims.Challenges the traditional notion of religious violence and argues for a God who liberates rather than demands sacrifice.“‘God without being’ could be translated as ‘God without the sacred’—God without sacred violence, God without scapegoating” (p. 262).
Contribution of “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice” to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Mimetic Theory and Literary Desire

  • Girard’s theory of mimetic desire has a profound impact on literary theory, particularly in the study of character motivation and narrative conflict.
  • He argues that human desire is imitative rather than autonomous, which shapes literary plots, character interactions, and conflicts (Girard, 1997, p. 249).
  • This aligns with his earlier work in Deceit, Desire, and the Novel, where he demonstrated how classic literary figures (e.g., Don Quixote, Emma Bovary) exhibit mimetic patterns of desire.
  • Reference: “First was mimetic desire and rivalry, when I realized that it accounted for so much” (p. 249).

2. Scapegoat Mechanism in Myth and Narrative Structure

  • Many literary works encode the scapegoat mechanism, wherein a character or group is blamed and expelled to resolve social tensions.
  • Girard’s reading of the Passion as an exposure of scapegoating influences the analysis of myth, tragedy, and religious narratives.
  • Classical and modern tragedies—from Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex to Shakespeare’s King Lear—follow the scapegoat pattern Girard identifies.
  • Reference: “The second was the discovery of the scapegoat mechanism. This basically completed the mimetic theory” (p. 249).

3. The Bible as an Alternative Literary Model to Myth

  • Girard contrasts the Gospels with traditional myth, arguing that myths conceal the victim’s innocence, whereas the Bible exposes the mechanics of sacrifice and violence.
  • This insight influences poststructuralist and deconstructive readings that question dominant sacrificial paradigms in literature.
  • Reference: “The Gospels seem so close to myth in a way, and yet they are poles apart” (p. 251).

4. Christianity as a Non-Sacrificial Narrative Model

  • Unlike traditional myths that validate sacrifice, Christianity subverts the sacrificial logic found in literature and religious texts.
  • This insight informs literary ethical criticism, which examines whether texts endorse or critique violence and exclusion.
  • Girard’s reading of Joan of Arc’s trial exemplifies how scapegoats are demonized or divinized, a pattern seen in literary figures from Hester Prynne to Frankenstein’s creature.
  • Reference: “The people who put her on trial divinized her, or ‘demonized’ her, in the sense of regarding her as a witch” (p. 251).

5. Girard and Nietzsche: The Literary Struggle Between Victim and Power

  • Girard builds on Nietzsche’s critique of Christianity but inverts its conclusions—whereas Nietzsche saw the Gospel’s defense of victims as weakness, Girard sees it as a revolutionary transformation of human culture.
  • This has implications for political literary theory, especially in postcolonial and feminist readings that critique structures of oppression.
  • Reference: “Nietzsche was the first thinker to see clearly that the singularity of Judeo-Christianity was that it rehabilitates victims myths would regard as justly immolated” (p. 254).

6. Political Correctness and Literary Representation of Victims

  • Girard’s discussion of political correctness (PC) and scapegoating influences the study of literature that engages with social justice, victimization, and power relations.
  • His work raises questions about whether some modern narratives perpetuate or dismantle scapegoating structures.
  • Reference: “The upholders of PC can find a strange kind of support in his writings. He was entranced with violent differentiation” (p. 251).

7. Atonement Theory and Literary Redemption Arcs

  • Girard’s distinction between satisfaction-based atonement and reconciliation-based atonement affects the study of redemption narratives.
  • Many modern novels, dramas, and films (e.g., Les Misérables, Crime and Punishment) explore whether atonement requires sacrifice or transformation.
  • Reference: “Atonement is ‘at-one-ment,’ becoming reconciled with God, and this is the work of Christ” (p. 261).

8. The “God Without the Sacred” and Postmodern Literary Criticism

  • Girard’s rejection of sacred violence challenges theological and philosophical readings of Western literature’s portrayal of God and the sacred.
  • This relates to Derrida’s deconstruction of logocentrism, questioning whether traditional texts reinforce or resist sacrificial logic.
  • Reference: “‘God without being’ could be translated as ‘God without the sacred’—God without sacred violence, God without scapegoating” (p. 262).
Examples of Critiques Through “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice”
Literary WorkGirardian Analysis Based on the InterviewRelevant Concepts from Girard’s InterviewReference from the Interview
Oedipus Rex (Sophocles)Oedipus is the quintessential scapegoat—the community projects its sins onto him to restore order. Myths like this conceal the innocence of the victim. The tragic irony is that Oedipus is framed as guilty, even though his fate is dictated by prophecy.Scapegoat Mechanism, Victimization in Myth, The Passion as Revelation“This is the most difficult thing for people to understand about my theory—that scapegoating does not play an essential role in the Gospels, whereas it has an enormous role in myths” (p. 250).
The Scarlet Letter (Nathaniel Hawthorne)Hester Prynne serves as a modern scapegoat; her public shaming reinforces the Puritan society’s moral order. Yet, her suffering exposes the hypocrisy of the system, much like the Passion of Christ reveals scapegoating. Dimmesdale’s eventual confession subverts the sacrificial order, suggesting a nonviolent path to redemption.Scapegoating in Society, Christianity as a Non-Sacrificial Narrative, Mimetic Rivalry“The Passion was the solution to the relationship of the Gospels and archaic cultures. In the Gospels we have the revelation of the mechanism that dominates culture unconsciously” (p. 250).
Lord of the Flies (William Golding)The boys on the island reenact the scapegoat mechanism, culminating in the murder of Simon. Simon, a Christ-like figure, is sacrificed as the group’s descent into chaos demands a victim. His death mirrors the ritualistic violence found in archaic societies and myths.The Bible as an Alternative Literary Model to Myth, Sacrificial vs. Non-Sacrificial Reading, Political Correctness and Scapegoating“Many observers think that because scapegoating becomes more and more visible in them, the Gospels must approve of it, they must advocate some kind of scapegoat religion. But… the Gospels seem so close to myth in a way, and yet they are poles apart” (p. 251).
Crime and Punishment (Fyodor Dostoevsky)Raskolnikov wrestles with Nietzschean and Christian models of sacrifice. He initially believes in sacrificial violence (killing the pawnbroker for the greater good) but later undergoes a transformation, embracing atonement through grace rather than scapegoating. His redemption aligns with Girard’s non-sacrificial model of Christianity.Nietzsche’s Critique of Christianity, Atonement as Reconciliation, The Passion as Revelation“Nietzsche saw the singularity of Judeo-Christianity was that it rehabilitates victims myths would regard as justly immolated” (p. 254).
Criticism Against “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice”

1. Overgeneralization of Mimetic Desire

  • Critics argue that not all human desires are mimetic and that some desires are autonomous or biologically driven rather than purely imitative.
  • Girard’s theory downplays individual agency and the role of personal will in shaping human behavior.
  • Counterpoint: While mimetic desire is influential, human motivation is complex and cannot be entirely reduced to imitation.

2. Reductionist View of Myth and Religion

  • Girard suggests that all myths conceal the scapegoat mechanism, while the Bible uniquely reveals it.
  • However, some scholars argue that other religious traditions also critique violence and sacrifice, such as aspects of Buddhism, Hinduism, and indigenous spirituality.
  • Counterpoint: His binary view—myth obscures, Christianity reveals—oversimplifies the diversity of religious traditions.

3. Questionable Interpretation of Christianity’s Uniqueness

  • Girard’s claim that Christianity uniquely exposes the scapegoat mechanism is seen as Christian exceptionalism, which ignores other traditions that critique violence.
  • Critics point out that Jewish prophetic literature and other religious texts also reveal the injustice of scapegoating.
  • Counterpoint: The Bible does emphasize the innocence of the victim, but this does not mean it is the only tradition to do so.

4. Ambiguity in the Role of Sacrifice in Christianity

  • Girard shifts between rejecting and accepting sacrifice, making his stance on Christian atonement unclear.
  • He initially rejects the traditional sacrificial reading of Christ’s death but later accepts the idea of sacrifice as renunciation.
  • Counterpoint: His distinction between sacrifice as murder and sacrifice as renunciation is insightful but lacks precision in defining how Christ’s death functions theologically.

5. Misinterpretation of Nietzsche’s Critique of Christianity

  • Girard argues that Nietzsche misunderstood Christianity’s concern for victims (p. 254), but some scholars suggest that Girard misrepresents Nietzsche’s position.
  • Nietzsche criticized Christian morality as an oppressive force that weakens human potential, rather than simply failing to understand the scapegoat mechanism.
  • Counterpoint: Girard’s reading of Nietzsche is too one-sided, missing the nuance in Nietzsche’s critique of resentment and power dynamics.

6. Inconsistencies in Historical and Literary Comparisons

  • While Girard uses examples like Joan of Arc, the Dreyfus Affair, and biblical narratives, critics argue these comparisons oversimplify historical complexities.
  • For example, Joan of Arc’s trial was political and gendered, not just a case of scapegoating.
  • Counterpoint: While these examples illustrate Girard’s theory, they risk ignoring other socio-political factors beyond scapegoating.

7. Underestimating Structural and Systemic Violence

  • Girard’s focus on scapegoating as a social mechanism does not fully account for institutionalized and systemic violence such as colonialism, racism, and capitalism.
  • His theory emphasizes individual and communal violence but does not address structural oppression as effectively as Marxist or postcolonial critiques.
  • Counterpoint: The scapegoat mechanism may still be a foundational insight, but Girard does not extend it sufficiently to systemic violence.

8. Political Correctness and Victimhood Critique Lacks Nuance

  • Girard’s skepticism about political correctness (PC) and modern victimhood narratives is ambiguous and potentially dismissive of legitimate social justice movements.
  • Some critics argue that he misinterprets PC as a misguided continuation of scapegoating rather than a response to historical injustices.
  • Counterpoint: While some uses of victimhood can be problematic, Girard’s critique does not fully engage with the positive role of victim-centered discourse in human rights advocacy.
Representative Quotations from “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice” with Explanation
QuotationExplanationPage Reference
“The most satisfying thing has been the actual experience of discovery. I would say that there have been three great moments in the process of my thinking and writing.”Girard reflects on his intellectual journey, identifying mimetic desire, the scapegoat mechanism, and the unique revelation of Christianity as his three most important discoveries. These concepts form the foundation of his theory of human culture and violence.p. 249
“This is the most difficult thing for people to understand about my theory—that scapegoating does not play an essential role in the Gospels, whereas it has an enormous role in myths since it generates them.”Here, Girard distinguishes between myth and the Gospel, arguing that while myths conceal scapegoating, the Gospels expose and reject it. This is a key aspect of his claim that Christianity disrupts the cycle of violence rather than reinforcing it.p. 250
“The Passion was the solution to the relationship of the Gospels and archaic cultures. In the Gospels, we have the revelation of the mechanism that dominates culture unconsciously.”Girard argues that Christ’s Passion serves as a historical and theological turning point, exposing the hidden violence underlying all societies and cultures. The Passion makes visible what archaic cultures kept concealed.p. 250
“An example which I have been working on a little bit is Joan of Arc. The people who put her on trial divinized her, or ‘demonized’ her, in the sense of regarding her as a witch.”Girard applies his scapegoat theory to Joan of Arc, illustrating how societies oscillate between demonizing and divinizing their scapegoats. This reflects a common pattern of persecution found throughout history and literature.p. 251
“Nietzsche was the first thinker to see clearly that the singularity of Judeo-Christianity was that it rehabilitates victims myths would regard as justly immolated.”Girard acknowledges Nietzsche’s insight that Christianity sides with victims, unlike previous religions that justified violence. However, he critiques Nietzsche for rejecting this moral stance and favoring a return to sacrificial violence.p. 254
“Atonement is ‘at-one-ment,’ becoming reconciled with God, and this is the work of Christ.”Girard reinterprets atonement as reconciliation rather than divine punishment, opposing traditional satisfaction-based models of atonement. This supports his argument that Christianity is non-sacrificial.p. 261
“‘God without being’ could be translated as ‘God without the sacred’—God without sacred violence, God without scapegoating.”Girard critiques the traditional theological concept of God, proposing a God that is free from violence and the sacrificial logic seen in myths. This aligns with his broader claim that Christianity reveals a nonviolent divine order.p. 262
“All those who have tried to follow the way of Christ and the Kingdom of God, living as nonviolently as possible, have understood, though not necessarily intellectually.”Girard suggests that true Christian practice is nonviolent, emphasizing action over mere intellectual belief. He implies that those who reject violence intuitively grasp Christianity’s true ethical core.p. 257
“The people who were among the first to embrace political correctness confused it with authentic Christianity.”Girard critiques political correctness (PC), arguing that while PC seeks to protect victims, it often operates without true understanding of scapegoating. He suggests that PC can itself become a form of social exclusion.p. 251
“I had avoided the word scapegoat for Jesus, but now I agree with Raymund Schwager that he is scapegoat for all—except now in reverse fashion, for theologically considered, the initiative comes from God rather than simply from human beings with their scapegoat mechanism.”Girard ultimately embraces the idea of Jesus as a scapegoat, but reverses the traditional notion—Jesus is not just another victim, but one who consciously takes on the role to reveal and overcome scapegoating.p. 259
Suggested Readings: “Interview with René Girard: Comments on Christianity, Scapegoating, and Sacrifice”
  1. Girard, René. “Interview with René Girard: Comments on christianity, scapegoating, and sacrifice.” (1997): 249-254.
  2. Doran, Robert, and René Girard. “Apocalyptic Thinking after 9/11: An Interview with René Girard.” SubStance, vol. 37, no. 1, 2008, pp. 20–32. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25195154. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.
  3. Casini, Federica, and Pierpaolo Antonello. “The Reception or René Girard’s Thought in Italy: 1965—Present.” Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture, vol. 17, 2010, pp. 139–74. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41925321. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.
  4. NORTH, ROBERT. “Violence and the Bible: The Girard Connection.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 1, 1985, pp. 1–27. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43719151. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.

“Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton: A Critical Analysis

“Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton first appeared in Transformations (1971), a poetry collection that reimagines classic fairy tales through a dark, psychological, and often feminist lens.

"Rapunzel" by Anne Sexton: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton

“Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton first appeared in Transformations (1971), a poetry collection that reimagines classic fairy tales through a dark, psychological, and often feminist lens. This poem, like others in the collection, explores themes of female relationships, sexuality, oppression, and the complexities of power. Sexton retells the traditional Rapunzel story with an emphasis on the intense, sometimes possessive love between women, particularly between Rapunzel and Mother Gothel. The poem implies a homoerotic bond, reinforced by lines such as “A woman / who loves a woman / is forever young.” Mother Gothel’s protectiveness over Rapunzel is presented not only as maternal but also possessive and erotic, creating a complex and layered relationship. The poem also critiques societal constraints on female sexuality, drawing parallels between Rapunzel’s isolation and the way women have historically been confined under patriarchal structures. Because of its exploration of these themes, Rapunzel is often studied in literature courses, particularly in feminist and psychoanalytic readings of fairy tales. The poem remains a compelling text in contemporary discussions on gender and desire, reinforcing Sexton’s reputation as a poet who redefined traditional narratives through a confessional and subversive voice.

Text: “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton

A woman
who loves a woman
is forever young.
The mentor
and the student
feed off each other.
Many a girl
had an old aunt
who locked her in the study
to keep the boys away.
They would play rummy
or lie on the couch
and touch and touch.
Old breast against young breast…
Let your dress fall down your shoulder,

come touch a copy of you
for I am at the mercy of rain,
for I have left the three Christs of Ypsilanti
for I have left the long naps of Ann Arbor
and the church spires have turned to stumps.
The sea bangs into my cloister
for the politicians are dying,
and dying so hold me, my young dear,
hold me…
The yellow rose will turn to cinder

and New York City will fall in
before we are done so hold me,
my young dear, hold me.
Put your pale arms around my neck.
Let me hold your heart like a flower
lest it bloom and collapse.
Give me your skin
as sheer as a cobweb,
let me open it up
and listen in and scoop out the dark.
Give me your nether lips
all puffy with their art
and I will give you angel fire in return.
We are two clouds
glistening in the bottle galss.
We are two birds
washing in the same mirror.
We were fair game
but we have kept out of the cesspool.
We are strong.
We are the good ones.
Do not discover us
for we lie together all in green
like pond weeds.
Hold me, my young dear, hold me.
They touch their delicate watches

one at a time.
They dance to the lute
two at a time.
They are as tender as bog moss.
They play mother-me-do
all day.
A woman
who loves a woman
is forever young.
Once there was a witch’s garden
more beautiful than Eve’s
with carrots growing like little fish,
with many tomatoes rich as frogs,
onions as ingrown as hearts,
the squash singing like a dolphin
and one patch given over wholly to magic —
rampion, a kind of salad root
a kind of harebell more potent than penicillin,
growing leaf by leaf, skin by skin.
as rapt and as fluid as Isadoran Duncan.
However the witch’s garden was kept locked
and each day a woman who was with child
looked upon the rampion wildly,
fancying that she would die
if she could not have it.
Her husband feared for her welfare
and thus climbed into the garden
to fetch the life-giving tubers.

Ah ha, cried the witch,
whose proper name was Mother Gothel,
you are a thief and now you will die.
However they made a trade,
typical enough in those times.
He promised his child to Mother Gothel
so of course when it was born
she took the child away with her.
She gave the child the name Rapunzel,
another name for the life-giving rampion.
Because Rapunzel was a beautiful girl
Mother Gothel treasured her beyond all things.
As she grew older Mother Gothel thought:
None but I will ever see her or touch her.
She locked her in a tow without a door
or a staircase. It had only a high window.
When the witch wanted to enter she cried”
Rapunzel, Rapunzel, let down your hair.
Rapunzel’s hair fell to the ground like a rainbow.
It was as strong as a dandelion
and as strong as a dog leash.
Hand over hand she shinnied up
the hair like a sailor
and there in the stone-cold room,
as cold as a museum,
Mother Gothel cried:
Hold me, my young dear, hold me,
and thus they played mother-me-do.

Years later a prince came by
and heard Rapunzel singing her loneliness.
That song pierced his heart like a valentine
but he could find no way to get to her.
Like a chameleon he hid himself among the trees
and watched the witch ascend the swinging hair.
The next day he himself called out:
Rapunzel, Rapunzel, let down your hair,
and thus they met and he declared his love.
What is this beast, she thought,
with muscles on his arms
like a bag of snakes?
What is this moss on his legs?
What prickly plant grows on his cheeks?
What is this voice as deep as a dog?
Yet he dazzled her with his answers.
Yet he dazzled her with his dancing stick.
They lay together upon the yellowy threads,
swimming through them
like minnows through kelp
and they sang out benedictions like the Pope.

Each day he brought her a skein of silk
to fashion a ladder so they could both escape.
But Mother Gothel discovered the plot
and cut off Rapunzel’s hair to her ears
and took her into the forest to repent.
When the prince came the witch fastened
the hair to a hook and let it down.
When he saw Rapunzel had been banished
he flung himself out of the tower, a side of beef.
He was blinded by thorns that prickled him like tacks.
As blind as Oedipus he wandered for years
until he heard a song that pierced his heart
like that long-ago valentine.
As he kissed Rapunzel her tears fell on his eyes
and in the manner of such cure-alls
his sight was suddenly restored.

They lived happily as you might expect
proving that mother-me-do
can be outgrown,
just as the fish on Friday,
just as a tricycle.
The world, some say,
is made up of couples.
A rose must have a stem.

As for Mother Gothel,
her heart shrank to the size of a pin,
never again to say: Hold me, my young dear,
hold me,
and only as she dreamed of the yellow hair
did moonlight sift into her mouth.

Annotations: “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton
StanzaAnnotation
A woman / who loves a woman / is forever young.This opening line establishes the theme of female intimacy and possibly queer love. The phrase “forever young” suggests that such love resists the aging effects of time, reinforcing a romanticized and timeless quality.
The mentor / and the student / feed off each other.Introduces the dynamic between Rapunzel and Mother Gothel, presenting it as one of learning and dependence. The phrase “feed off each other” suggests emotional, psychological, or even physical intimacy.
Many a girl / had an old aunt / who locked her in the study / to keep the boys away.A modernized allusion to societal control over female sexuality, echoing the way Rapunzel is confined. The “old aunt” metaphorically represents figures who suppress young women’s autonomy.
They would play rummy / or lie on the couch / and touch and touch.The “touch and touch” hints at a possible erotic subtext, emphasizing intimacy between women that goes beyond familial bonds.
Old breast against young breast… / Let your dress fall down your shoulder,This explicitly describes a physical closeness that blurs the line between maternal care and eroticism, reinforcing the poem’s exploration of complex female relationships.
Come touch a copy of you / for I am at the mercy of rain,“Touch a copy of you” suggests a mirroring effect, possibly alluding to a lesbian relationship where the two women see themselves in each other. “Mercy of rain” implies vulnerability and surrender to desire.
For I have left the three Christs of Ypsilanti / for I have left the long naps of Ann ArborReference to The Three Christs of Ypsilanti, a psychological study on schizophrenia, possibly symbolizing breaking away from imposed narratives or societal expectations. The “long naps of Ann Arbor” suggests a past life of passivity or dreaming.
The sea bangs into my cloister / for the politicians are dying, / and dying so hold me, my young dear, hold me…“Cloister” implies isolation (as in a convent), while the “sea banging” suggests an intrusion of emotion or chaos. The reference to dying politicians may symbolize societal change or decay.
The yellow rose will turn to cinder / and New York City will fall in / before we are done so hold me,“Yellow rose” traditionally symbolizes friendship but turning to “cinder” implies destruction. The image of New York City’s fall suggests impermanence and upheaval, reinforcing the urgency of intimacy.
Put your pale arms around my neck. / Let me hold your heart like a flower / lest it bloom and collapse.The fragility of love and emotion is highlighted through the metaphor of a blooming flower, suggesting both beauty and vulnerability.
Give me your skin / as sheer as a cobweb, / let me open it up / and listen in and scoop out the dark.These lines use visceral imagery, implying an intense, almost surgical desire to know the other deeply. “Scoop out the dark” suggests revealing hidden fears, traumas, or truths.
Give me your nether lips / all puffy with their art / and I will give you angel fire in return.This is an overtly sensual line, reinforcing the theme of sexual intimacy. “Angel fire” juxtaposes the carnal with the divine, suggesting transcendent passion.
We are two clouds / glistening in the bottle glass. / We are two birds / washing in the same mirror.The imagery of “clouds” and “birds” suggests fluidity and symmetry in their relationship, emphasizing unity and reflection.
We were fair game / but we have kept out of the cesspool.This suggests that, despite being vulnerable to judgment or harm, they have managed to avoid societal corruption or degradation.
We are strong. / We are the good ones.This declaration reaffirms their resilience and self-righteous confidence in their relationship.
Do not discover us / for we lie together all in green / like pond weeds.“Pond weeds” imply secrecy and natural entanglement, reinforcing the theme of hidden, forbidden love.
Hold me, my young dear, hold me.The repeated plea underscores emotional and physical dependence.
They touch their delicate watches / one at a time.Watches symbolize time, suggesting a fleeting nature of youth or love.
They dance to the lute / two at a time.Lutes were historically used in courtly love songs, enhancing the poem’s romantic tones.
They are as tender as bog moss.“Bog moss” evokes softness and moisture, reinforcing sensuality and closeness.
They play mother-me-do / all day.“Mother-me-do” refers to a childlike game, reinforcing the theme of maternal intimacy and emotional dependence.
A woman / who loves a woman / is forever young.Repeated refrain that suggests timeless, youthful vitality in same-sex relationships.
Once there was a witch’s garden / more beautiful than Eve’s…Introduces the Rapunzel story, linking it to the Biblical garden, thus connecting female desire to original sin.
However, the witch’s garden was kept locked…Represents restricted access to knowledge, power, or sexuality, much like Rapunzel’s later imprisonment.
Her husband feared for her welfare / and thus climbed into the garden…Suggests the gendered dynamic where men must transgress boundaries to “save” women.
Ah ha, cried the witch, / whose proper name was Mother Gothel…Introduces Mother Gothel as both captor and protector, mirroring the possessiveness seen earlier in the poem.
Because Rapunzel was a beautiful girl / Mother Gothel treasured her beyond all things.Reinforces the obsessive nature of their relationship, highlighting themes of possessiveness and control.
As she grew older Mother Gothel thought: / None but I will ever see her or touch her.Echoes the earlier lesbian undertones, portraying Gothel as a jealous lover as well as a mother figure.
When the witch wanted to enter she cried: / Rapunzel, Rapunzel, let down your hair.Retains the classic fairy-tale motif, but in the context of the poem, it gains an erotic charge.
Years later a prince came by / and heard Rapunzel singing her loneliness.The prince symbolizes heteronormative love, contrasted against the closeness Rapunzel shares with Gothel.
Like a chameleon he hid himself among the trees…Suggests deception or the idea that he must adapt to access her.
Yet he dazzled her with his dancing stick.The “dancing stick” is a phallic symbol, highlighting Rapunzel’s transition into heterosexual desire.
They lay together upon the yellowy threads, / swimming through them / like minnows through kelp.Sexual consummation is depicted through natural imagery, reinforcing transformation.
Mother Gothel discovered the plot / and cut off Rapunzel’s hair to her ears.The cutting of hair symbolizes a loss of power and punishment for transgression.
As blind as Oedipus he wandered for years…Links the prince’s suffering to Greek tragedy, suggesting fate and redemption.
They lived happily as you might expect…The traditional “happy ending” is presented almost ironically, contrasting with the earlier deep female connection.
As for Mother Gothel, / her heart shrank to the size of a pin…Gothel’s downfall parallels the loss of her obsessive love for Rapunzel.
And only as she dreamed of the yellow hair / did moonlight sift into her mouth.Suggests that even in defeat, Gothel is haunted by her love for Rapunzel.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton
Poetic DeviceExample from PoemExplanation
Alliteration“with carrots growing like little fish.”Repetition of consonant sound “l”at the beginning of words enhances musicality.
Allusion“For I have left the three Christs of Ypsilanti.”Reference to a real psychological study, expanding the poem’s depth.
Anaphora“Hold me, my young dear, hold me…”Repetition of phrases at the start of clauses to emphasize longing and emotional weight.
Assonance“The sea bangs into my cloister.”Repeated vowel sounds create a lyrical and flowing effect.
Caesura“Put your pale arms around my neck. Let me hold your heart like a flower.”A natural pause in the middle of the line adds emphasis and rhythm.
Consonance“What is this beast, she thought, with muscles on his arms like a bag of snakes?”Repetition of consonant sounds creates a textured and rhythmic quality.
Ekphrasis“They lay together upon the yellowy threads, swimming through them like minnows through kelp.”A vivid, descriptive passage that paints a picture for the reader.
Enjambment“The yellow rose will turn to cinder and New York City will fall in before we are done…”A sentence or phrase continues beyond the line break, creating fluidity.
Epistrophe“A woman who loves a woman is forever young.”Repetition at the end of clauses or lines reinforces key themes.
Euphemism“Mother-me-do.”A gentle or indirect expression referring to maternal intimacy instead of overt sexuality.
Hyperbole“The prince flung himself out of the tower, a side of beef.”An exaggerated description to intensify the emotional impact.
Imagery“We lie together all in green like pond weeds.”Evocative language appeals to the senses and creates a strong mental picture.
Irony“As for Mother Gothel, her heart shrank to the size of a pin.”Contradicts the reader’s expectation—Gothel, once powerful, is reduced emotionally.
Metaphor“We are two birds washing in the same mirror.”A direct comparison suggesting unity and shared experience.
Onomatopoeia“The sea bangs into my cloister.”A word imitates the sound it describes, reinforcing the sensory experience.
Paradox“We are the good ones.”A statement that seems contradictory but holds truth, as society may see them otherwise.
Personification“Moonlight sifted into her mouth.”Giving human qualities to nature, reinforcing the magical, surreal tone.
Refrain“A woman who loves a woman is forever young.”A repeated line or phrase that emphasizes a central theme.
Simile“What is this moss on his legs?”A comparison using ‘like’ or ‘as’ to describe unfamiliar experiences.
Symbolism“Rapunzel’s hair fell to the ground like a rainbow.”Her hair represents power, beauty, and entrapment.
Themes: “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton

1. Female Desire, Intimacy, and Queer Love: One of the most striking themes in “Rapunzel” is the exploration of female desire and same-sex intimacy. Sexton subverts the traditional fairy tale to depict a deeply emotional and possibly erotic bond between Rapunzel and Mother Gothel. The line “A woman / who loves a woman / is forever young.” suggests a love that transcends time, reinforcing the idea that women who engage in relationships with other women escape the societal constraints of aging and traditional domesticity. Throughout the poem, there are overtly sensual descriptions that blur the line between maternal care and romantic affection, such as “Old breast against young breast… / Let your dress fall down your shoulder.” These moments challenge conventional interpretations of the Rapunzel story by transforming it into a narrative of forbidden, hidden, yet deeply powerful female love. The portrayal of this relationship not only adds a queer reading to the text but also critiques how female bonds are often controlled and restricted by society.


2. Control, Possession, and Maternal Obsession: Mother Gothel’s relationship with Rapunzel is marked by an intense possessiveness that reflects themes of control and maternal obsession. Unlike the classic fairy tale, Sexton presents Gothel as more than just a captor—she is an emotionally dependent figure who treasures Rapunzel to the point of imprisonment. The line “None but I will ever see her or touch her.” highlights her obsessive desire to keep Rapunzel for herself, denying her access to the outside world. Gothel’s possessiveness is further emphasized in moments where she pleads for intimacy, repeating “Hold me, my young dear, hold me.” This suggests that she needs Rapunzel as much as Rapunzel needs her. This portrayal complicates the traditional idea of maternal love by merging it with elements of dependence and control. Ultimately, Gothel’s love is not purely nurturing but suffocating, symbolizing how women, especially young ones, have historically been confined under the guise of protection.


3. Entrapment and Female Oppression: The theme of entrapment is central to Sexton’s version of “Rapunzel”, reinforcing the historical oppression of women through confinement. Rapunzel is locked away in a tower, isolated from the world, much like how women have been physically and metaphorically restricted by patriarchal structures. The stanza “She locked her in a tower without a door / or a staircase. It had only a high window.” powerfully conveys the extent of her imprisonment, both physical and emotional. The poem also draws a parallel between Rapunzel’s confinement and the ways women have been guarded or kept under surveillance, as shown in “Many a girl / had an old aunt / who locked her in the study / to keep the boys away.” This suggests that women’s freedom has been historically controlled by both external (men) and internal (other women) forces, making escape a nearly impossible feat. The prince’s eventual arrival represents a traditional form of liberation, but Sexton complicates this by showing how Gothel’s grip on Rapunzel is emotional as well as physical, making the concept of true freedom uncertain.


4. Transformation and the Loss of Innocence: Sexton’s “Rapunzel” also addresses transformation, particularly the transition from innocence to experience. Rapunzel begins as a sheltered, innocent girl, but her relationship with Gothel, and later the prince, forces her into the complexities of love, desire, and betrayal. The moment she meets the prince, she is confronted with the unfamiliar nature of men: “What is this beast, she thought, / with muscles on his arms / like a bag of snakes? / What is this moss on his legs?” These lines illustrate her naïveté and the way she views male physicality as strange and foreign. Her eventual escape with the prince symbolizes the inevitable loss of childhood dependency and innocence. However, unlike traditional fairy tales, Sexton doesn’t present this transition as purely positive. The cutting of Rapunzel’s hair—“Mother Gothel discovered the plot / and cut off Rapunzel’s hair to her ears.”—acts as a violent marker of change, signifying both punishment and the loss of youthful power. In the end, the prince’s blinding and subsequent cure through Rapunzel’s tears suggest that transformation is painful but ultimately necessary, reinforcing the inevitability of growth and change.

Literary Theories and “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton

1. Feminist Literary Theory: Feminist literary criticism is particularly relevant to “Rapunzel”, as Anne Sexton rewrites the traditional fairy tale through a lens that critiques the oppression of women and the restrictive roles imposed on them. The poem explores themes of female autonomy, control, and confinement, particularly in how Rapunzel is isolated by Mother Gothel. The line “She locked her in a tower without a door / or a staircase. It had only a high window.” symbolizes the historical oppression of women, where they were often confined to domestic spaces or denied agency over their own bodies. The theme of possession—“None but I will ever see her or touch her.”—further reflects how women have been controlled under patriarchal systems, whether by men or by maternal figures reinforcing those societal structures. Feminist theory can also be applied to analyze the portrayal of female relationships, as the poem challenges the heteronormative expectations found in traditional fairy tales.


2. Queer Theory: Queer theory is essential in interpreting “Rapunzel”, as the poem presents a subversive and possibly homoerotic relationship between Rapunzel and Mother Gothel. Sexton rewrites the classic story to explore the dynamics of same-sex intimacy, particularly through lines like “A woman / who loves a woman / is forever young.” This suggests an eternal and unbreakable bond between women, possibly hinting at a romantic or sexual relationship. The imagery of physical closeness—“Old breast against young breast… / Let your dress fall down your shoulder.”—further supports a reading of queer desire. Mother Gothel’s possessiveness over Rapunzel can be interpreted as both protective and jealous, reinforcing the complexity of same-sex relationships that do not fit into traditional societal norms. By applying queer theory, the poem can be seen as a radical reimagining of female desire, breaking away from heteronormative constraints and celebrating the fluidity of gender and sexuality.


3. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory (Freudian and Lacanian Analysis): A psychoanalytic reading of “Rapunzel” reveals deep-seated themes of obsession, desire, and transformation. Sigmund Freud’s theories on attachment and repression can be applied to Mother Gothel’s relationship with Rapunzel, as her excessive control mirrors an Oedipal-like complex where the maternal figure refuses to release the child into independence. The line “Hold me, my young dear, hold me.” is repeated throughout the poem, indicating Gothel’s emotional dependency on Rapunzel, which could be interpreted as a subconscious fear of abandonment.

Lacanian psychoanalysis, particularly the concept of the “mirror stage,” is also applicable. Rapunzel’s first encounter with the prince—“What is this beast, she thought, / with muscles on his arms / like a bag of snakes?”—demonstrates her confusion and fear upon encountering the Other (the male figure), which disrupts her world of maternal attachment. Rapunzel’s transformation from a secluded girl to an independent woman mirrors Lacan’s theory of identity formation, where she moves from the Imaginary (a world shaped by her relationship with Mother Gothel) to the Symbolic Order (the world of desire and sexual maturity represented by the prince).


4. Postmodernism and Intertextuality: Anne Sexton’s “Rapunzel” is a prime example of postmodern literature, which often deconstructs traditional narratives and reinterprets them through a contemporary lens. The poem engages in intertextuality by reworking the well-known fairy tale, but instead of presenting a straightforward moral lesson, Sexton injects ambiguity and psychological depth. The reference to “the three Christs of Ypsilanti” (a real-life psychiatric case study) disrupts the fairy-tale setting, blending reality with myth and challenging traditional narrative expectations.

Postmodern theory also examines the instability of meaning, and in “Rapunzel”, there is no clear moral resolution. While traditional fairy tales present clear distinctions between good and evil, Sexton’s version complicates this binary. Mother Gothel is not merely a villain; she is also a woman driven by love and fear. The final lines—“As for Mother Gothel, / her heart shrank to the size of a pin, / never again to say: Hold me, my young dear, hold me.”—suggest that she, too, is a tragic figure, left alone after losing the person she tried to keep. This subversion of the conventional fairy-tale structure aligns with postmodern themes of fragmentation, reinterpretation, and challenging dominant ideologies.

Critical Questions about “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton

1. How does Anne Sexton reinterpret the theme of confinement in her version of “Rapunzel”?

Anne Sexton’s “Rapunzel” offers a profound reinterpretation of the theme of confinement, not just physically but emotionally and socially. Traditionally, Rapunzel is confined to a tower, symbolizing her physical isolation from the world. Sexton deepens this by exploring the psychological and emotional dimensions of confinement. For instance, when Sexton describes how Mother Gothel locks Rapunzel away (“She locked her in a tow without a door or a staircase,”), she not only reinforces the literal confinement but also alludes to the stifling of Rapunzel’s personal growth and autonomy. The repetition of “Hold me, my young dear, hold me,” underscores a possessive and suffocating form of love, emphasizing how confinement can extend beyond physical spaces to the control over personal relationships and emotional states.

2. What role does transformation play in Sexton’s “Rapunzel”?

Transformation is a central theme in Anne Sexton’s “Rapunzel,” reflecting significant changes in characters’ lives and perspectives. The poem narrates transformations that are both literal and metaphorical. For example, Rapunzel’s growth from a secluded young girl to a woman who experiences love and betrayal illustrates a personal transformation that challenges her understanding of herself and the world (“They lay together upon the yellowy threads, swimming through them like minnows through kelp”). Moreover, the transformation of the prince, who is blinded and then healed by Rapunzel’s tears, symbolizes redemption and the power of love to change lives (“As he kissed Rapunzel her tears fell on his eyes and in the manner of such cure-alls his sight was suddenly restored”). These transformations emphasize the theme of resilience and growth through adversity.

3. Analyze the portrayal of relationships in Sexton’s “Rapunzel.”

In “Rapunzel,” Anne Sexton portrays relationships as complex and often fraught with power dynamics and emotional intensity. The relationship between Rapunzel and Mother Gothel is particularly emblematic of this complexity. Mother Gothel’s affection is portrayed as both caring and controlling (“Mother Gothel cried: Hold me, my young dear, hold me”), suggesting a possessive love that stifles Rapunzel’s independence. In contrast, the relationship between Rapunzel and the prince introduces a different dynamic, one that is initially based on romantic love and mutual escape but evolves into a partnership that fosters personal growth and healing. Sexton’s depiction of these relationships highlights the ambivalent nature of human connections, where love can both empower and imprison.

4. What does the ending of Sexton’s “Rapunzel” suggest about the notions of “happily ever after”?

The ending of Sexton’s “Rapunzel” offers a nuanced take on the traditional fairy tale conclusion of “happily ever after.” While the poem concludes with Rapunzel and the prince overcoming their adversities and finding happiness (“They lived happily as you might expect”), Sexton introduces a layer of realism that questions the permanence of such happiness. The mention that “The world, some say, is made up of couples. A rose must have a stem.” implies that happiness is not an isolated state but one that depends on ongoing relationships and connections. Additionally, the fate of Mother Gothel (“her heart shrank to the size of a pin”) serves as a counterpoint to the couple’s happiness, suggesting that happiness for some might come at the expense of others. Sexton’s ending reflects a more mature and perhaps cynical view of fairy tale resolutions, acknowledging that life’s complexities continue beyond the narrative closure.

Literary Works Similar to “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton
  1. “Cinderella” by Anne Sexton – Like “Rapunzel”, this poem is part of Sexton’s Transformations collection and retells a classic fairy tale with dark, subversive, and feminist undertones, critiquing traditional happy endings.
  2. “Goblin Market” by Christina Rossetti – This poem shares themes of female intimacy, temptation, and the complexities of desire, as two sisters navigate a world where their bodies and autonomy are at stake.
  3. “The Lady of Shalott” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson – Similar to “Rapunzel”, this poem features a woman trapped in isolation, longing for the outside world, and ultimately facing tragic consequences when she tries to break free.
  4. “Mirror” by Sylvia Plath – Both poems explore themes of female identity, transformation, and the passage of time, using reflection and entrapment as central metaphors.
  5. “The Ballad of Reading Gaol” by Oscar Wilde – Though not a fairy-tale retelling, this poem resonates with “Rapunzel” in its themes of imprisonment, longing, and the psychological impact of confinement.
Representative Quotations of “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“A woman / who loves a woman / is forever young.”This line is repeated throughout the poem and establishes the theme of female intimacy and possibly same-sex desire. It suggests that love between women exists outside societal expectations of aging and domesticity.Queer Theory & Feminist Theory – Challenges heteronormative love and traditional gender roles, portraying female relationships as eternal and transcendent.
“She locked her in a tower without a door / or a staircase. It had only a high window.”Describes Mother Gothel’s act of imprisoning Rapunzel, reinforcing the theme of control and restriction.Feminist Theory & Psychoanalytic Theory – Symbolizes female oppression and maternal possessiveness, preventing Rapunzel from attaining independence.
“Hold me, my young dear, hold me.”Repeated throughout the poem, this plea from Mother Gothel highlights her dependence on Rapunzel and blurs the line between maternal and romantic love.Psychoanalytic Theory & Queer Theory – Suggests emotional fixation and attachment, possibly reflecting Freudian concepts of desire and repression.
“Old breast against young breast…”An explicit moment of physical closeness between Gothel and Rapunzel, reinforcing the poem’s underlying eroticism.Queer Theory & Feminist Theory – Explores non-normative female relationships and subverts traditional mother-daughter dynamics.
“What is this beast, she thought, / with muscles on his arms / like a bag of snakes?”Rapunzel’s first reaction to the prince, portraying him as strange and foreign.Psychoanalytic Theory & Postmodernism – Highlights Rapunzel’s detachment from traditional masculinity and disrupts the fairy-tale trope of instant romantic attraction.
“They lay together upon the yellowy threads, / swimming through them / like minnows through kelp.”Describes the sexual encounter between Rapunzel and the prince, using organic imagery.Psychoanalytic Theory & Feminist Theory – Symbolizes sexual awakening but also contrasts natural freedom with Rapunzel’s past confinement.
“Mother-me-do all day.”A phrase describing the intimate bond between Gothel and Rapunzel, reinforcing childlike dependency.Psychoanalytic Theory – Represents emotional regression and prolonged maternal control, preventing Rapunzel’s maturation.
“As blind as Oedipus he wandered for years / until he heard a song that pierced his heart.”The prince, blinded after his fall, is restored by Rapunzel’s presence.Intertextuality & Psychoanalytic Theory – References Greek tragedy, emphasizing fate and suffering as part of transformation.
“The yellow rose will turn to cinder / and New York City will fall in / before we are done.”A surreal, apocalyptic image suggesting impermanence and inevitable change.Postmodernism – Blends fairy-tale imagery with real-world references, destabilizing traditional narrative expectations.
“As for Mother Gothel, / her heart shrank to the size of a pin, / never again to say: Hold me, my young dear, / hold me.”Describes Gothel’s downfall after losing Rapunzel, emphasizing her emotional devastation.Psychoanalytic Theory & Feminist Theory – Highlights the loss of power and emotional dependency in maternal control, reinforcing themes of abandonment and possession.
Suggested Readings: “Rapunzel” by Anne Sexton
  1. Gonzalez, Matilde Martin. “Fairy Tales Revisited and Transformed: Anne Sexton’s Critique of Social (ized) Femininity‖.” Universidad de la Laguna (1999): 10-21.
  2. GETTY, LAURA J. “Maidens and Their Guardians: Reinterpreting the ‘Rapunzel’ Tale.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, 1997, pp. 37–52. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44029886. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  3. Skorczewski, Dawn. “What Prison Is This? Literary Critics Cover Incest in Anne Sexton’s ‘Briar Rose.'” Signs, vol. 21, no. 2, 1996, pp. 309–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3175066. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  4. McClatchy, J. D. “ANNE SEXTON: SOMEHOW TO ENDURE.” The Centennial Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 1975, pp. 1–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23738229. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.

“Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy: A Critical Analysis

“Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy first appeared in The World’s Wife (1999), a poetry collection that reimagines mythic, biblical, and historical female figures through a feminist lens.

"Little Red-Cap" by Carol Ann Duffy: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy

“Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy first appeared in The World’s Wife (1999), a poetry collection that reimagines mythic, biblical, and historical female figures through a feminist lens. The poem is a modern retelling of the classic Little Red Riding Hood tale, reinterpreted as a coming-of-age narrative about a young girl’s journey into womanhood, self-discovery, and intellectual awakening. Duffy subverts the traditional story by transforming the wolf into an older poet figure, symbolizing both literary mentorship and predatory male influence. The speaker, initially naïve and drawn to the world of poetry, willingly follows the wolf into the “dark tangled thorny place” of experience, a metaphor for both romantic and literary initiation. However, as she matures, she recognizes the wolf’s stagnation—his “same rhyme, same reason” existence—and ultimately liberates herself by metaphorically killing him, emerging from the forest independent and self-sufficient. The poem’s blend of feminist empowerment, literary symbolism, and evocative imagery makes it a popular choice in literature curricula, offering rich material for discussions on gender roles, power dynamics, and poetic craft. The final triumphant image—“Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone”—cements the speaker’s transformation, encapsulating the poem’s themes of independence, artistic identity, and female agency.

Text: “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy

At childhood’s end, the houses petered out

into playing fields, the factory, allotments

kept, like mistresses, by kneeling married men,

the silent railway line, the hermit’s caravan,

till you came at last to the edge of the woods.

It was there that I first clapped eyes on the wolf.

He stood in a clearing, reading his verse out loud

in his wolfy drawl, a paperback in his hairy paw,

red wine staining his bearded jaw. What big ears

he had! What big eyes he had! What teeth!

In the interval, I made quite sure he spotted me,

sweet sixteen, never been, babe, waif, and bought me a drink,

my first. You might ask why. Here’s why. Poetry.

The wolf, I knew, would lead me deep into the woods,

away from home, to a dark tangled thorny place

lit by the eyes of owls. I crawled in his wake,

my stockings ripped to shreds, scraps of red from my blazer

snagged on twig and branch, murder clues. I lost both shoes

but got there, wolf’s lair, better beware. Lesson one that night,

breath of the wolf in my ear, was the love poem.

I clung till dawn to his thrashing fur, for

what little girl doesn’t dearly love a wolf?

Then I slid from between his heavy matted paws

and went in search of a living bird—white dove—

which flew, straight, from my hands to his open mouth.

One bite, dead. How nice, breakfast in bed, he said,

licking his chops. As soon as he slept, I crept to the back

of the lair, where a whole wall was crimson, gold, aglow with books.

Words, words were truly alive on the tongue, in the head,

warm, beating, frantic, winged; music and blood.

But then I was young—and it took ten years

in the woods to tell that a mushroom

stoppers the mouth of a buried corpse, that birds

are the uttered thought of trees, that a greying wolf

howls the same old song at the moon, year in, year out,

season after season, same rhyme, same reason. I took an axe

to a willow to see how it wept. I took an axe to a salmon

to see how it leapt. I took an axe to the wolf

as he slept, one chop, scrotum to throat, and saw

the glistening, virgin white of my grandmother’s bones.

I filled his old belly with stones. I stitched him up.

Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone.

Annotations: “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
LineAnnotation
At childhood’s end, the houses petered outMarks the transition from childhood to adulthood, setting up the theme of growth and transformation.
into playing fields, the factory, allotmentsDepicts the landscape shifting from innocence (playing fields) to industrialization (factory) and secrecy (allotments, metaphorically kept like mistresses).
kept, like mistresses, by kneeling married men,Hints at male dominance and hidden affairs, reinforcing themes of gender dynamics and power.
the silent railway line, the hermit’s caravan,Suggests isolation and a journey into the unknown, setting up the transition into the woods.
till you came at last to the edge of the woods.Introduces the woods, a metaphor for experience, danger, and transformation.
It was there that I first clapped eyes on the wolf.Introduces the wolf as a figure of temptation and learning, representing both danger and knowledge.
He stood in a clearing, reading his verse out loudDepicts the wolf as a poet, suggesting the allure of literature and experience.
in his wolfy drawl, a paperback in his hairy paw,Blends human and animal characteristics, emphasizing his dual nature of intellect and predatoriness.
red wine staining his bearded jaw. What big earsRed wine symbolizes excess, indulgence, and possibly seduction.
he had! What big eyes he had! What teeth!References the original fairy tale but here suggests both admiration and foreboding.
In the interval, I made quite sure he spotted me,Shifts agency to the speaker, showing her desire to be noticed and engage with the wolf.
sweet sixteen, never been, babe, waif, and bought me a drink,Plays on innocence and initiation, reinforcing the theme of youthful naivety meeting experience.
my first. You might ask why. Here’s why. Poetry.Explicitly states that the wolf represents poetry, learning, and inspiration, not just seduction.
The wolf, I knew, would lead me deep into the woods,Acknowledges the wolf as a guide into experience, adventure, and the unknown.
away from home, to a dark tangled thorny placeDescribes the woods as a place of difficulty, challenge, and transformation.
lit by the eyes of owls. I crawled in his wake,Owls symbolize wisdom, but also haunting mystery. The crawling suggests submission or difficulty.
my stockings ripped to shreds, scraps of red from my blazerSuggests loss of innocence, transformation, and hints at a violent struggle.
snagged on twig and branch, murder clues. I lost both shoesForeboding imagery of being marked by experience, referencing fairy tale tropes.
but got there, wolf’s lair, better beware. Lesson one that night,Acknowledges the danger in the relationship, reinforcing the idea of the wolf as both a mentor and a threat.
breath of the wolf in my ear, was the love poem.Suggests intimacy, seduction, and the imparting of knowledge through poetry.
I clung till dawn to his thrashing fur, forImplies struggle and passion, possibly an intense but draining relationship.
what little girl doesn’t dearly love a wolf?Questions societal fascination with danger and forbidden experiences.
Then I slid from between his heavy matted pawsSignifies separation, moving away from the wolf after experience and learning.
and went in search of a living bird—white dove—Symbolizes purity, peace, and possibly seeking renewal or something untainted.
which flew, straight, from my hands to his open mouth.Represents loss of innocence or ideals being consumed by the wolf.
One bite, dead. How nice, breakfast in bed, he said,Dark humor emphasizes the wolf’s selfish, predatory nature.
licking his chops. As soon as he slept, I crept to the backShows the speaker’s growing awareness and plotting of escape or revenge.
of the lair, where a whole wall was crimson, gold, aglow with books.Books symbolize knowledge, power, and the true treasure the wolf possesses.
Words, words were truly alive on the tongue, in the head,Describes the power of literature and poetry as a living force.
warm, beating, frantic, winged; music and blood.Metaphorically connects literature to passion, life, and intensity.
But then I was young—and it took ten yearsAcknowledges the passage of time, maturity, and eventual realization.
in the woods to tell that a mushroomMushroom imagery suggests decay, hidden truths, and the reality of experience.
stoppers the mouth of a buried corpse, that birdsDark realization of hidden deaths, secrets, and the symbolic connection of birds to memory or speech.
are the uttered thought of trees, that a greying wolfConnects nature to thought, implying that even the wolf is aging and stagnant.
howls the same old song at the moon, year in, year out,The wolf is now repetitive, predictable, and no longer exciting or new.
season after season, same rhyme, same reason.Criticizes monotony, particularly in literature and relationships.
I took an axeShifts tone to action, suggesting a break from the past.
to a willow to see how it wept. I took an axe to a salmonTesting the effect of violence, challenging nature, perhaps asserting control.
to see how it leapt. I took an axe to the wolfCulmination of rebellion, symbolically breaking free from the wolf’s influence.
as he slept, one chop, scrotum to throat, and sawGruesome imagery of violent retribution, reclaiming power.
the glistening, virgin white of my grandmother’s bones.References the original fairy tale—discovering hidden truth within the wolf.
I filled his old belly with stones. I stitched him up.Echoes the fairy tale’s conclusion, signifying closure and triumph.
Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone.Ends on an image of independence and renewal, emphasizing self-sufficiency.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
Literary DeviceExample from the PoemExplanation
Alliteration“same rhyme, same reason”The repetition of the ‘s’ sound emphasizes the monotonous and cyclical nature of the wolf’s poetry and life.
Allusion“What big ears he had! What big eyes he had! What teeth!”References Little Red Riding Hood, but subverts it by making the wolf a poet rather than a straightforward villain.
Ambiguity“Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone.”The ending is open to interpretation—does she celebrate freedom, mourn loss, or signify creative rebirth?
Assonance“At childhood’s end, the houses petered out”The repetition of vowel sounds in “childhood’s” and “houses” creates a musical effect that enhances rhythm.
Caesura“My first. You might ask why. Here’s why. Poetry.”The use of punctuation forces a pause, emphasizing the weight of her initiation into the literary world.
Consonance“lit by the eyes of owls. I crawled in his wake,”The repetition of ‘l’ and ‘w’ sounds creates a flowing, haunting effect.
Dark Humor“One bite, dead. How nice, breakfast in bed, he said, licking his chops.”The casual tone about a violent act adds a layer of grim irony.
Diction“thrashing fur, for what little girl doesn’t dearly love a wolf?”The word choice (“thrashing,” “dearly love”) contrasts violence and affection, highlighting the complex relationship.
Double Entendre“I took an axe to a willow to see how it wept.”The word “wept” can refer to both the tree releasing sap and an emotional response, reinforcing themes of pain and discovery.
Enjambment“Words, words were truly alive on the tongue, in the head, / warm, beating, frantic, winged; music and blood.”The sentence flows onto the next line without punctuation, mimicking the uncontrollable excitement of discovery.
Foreshadowing“better beware. Lesson one that night, breath of the wolf in my ear, was the love poem.”The warning hints at the eventual consequences of her relationship with the wolf.
Imagery“my stockings ripped to shreds, scraps of red from my blazer snagged on twig and branch, murder clues.”Vivid sensory details emphasize loss of innocence and danger, evoking a crime scene.
Irony“what little girl doesn’t dearly love a wolf?”The statement contrasts with the actual dangers the wolf represents, highlighting the paradox of attraction to risk.
Metaphor“Words, words were truly alive on the tongue, in the head, warm, beating, frantic, winged; music and blood.”Language and poetry are compared to living things, emphasizing their power and intensity.
Personification“the silent railway line, the hermit’s caravan”The railway is described as “silent,” giving it a human characteristic, enhancing the eerie tone.
Repetition“Words, words were truly alive…”Repeating “words” emphasizes their significance in her journey of self-discovery.
Rhyme“season after season, same rhyme, same reason.”A subtle internal rhyme reinforces monotony and the speaker’s realization about the wolf’s predictable nature.
Symbolism“a living bird—white dove—which flew, straight, from my hands to his open mouth.”The white dove symbolizes peace and innocence, which the wolf devours, signifying destruction of purity.
Tone Shift“I took an axe to the wolf as he slept, one chop, scrotum to throat.”The shift from poetic reflection to stark violence marks a dramatic turn in the speaker’s journey.
Transformation (Motif)“Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone.”The speaker transitions from naïve girl to independent woman, illustrating personal and intellectual growth.
Themes: “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
  • Female Empowerment and Liberation: One of the central themes of “Little Red-Cap” is female empowerment and liberation from patriarchal control. The poem reinterprets the traditional Little Red Riding Hood tale, where the girl is typically depicted as naïve and in need of rescue. Instead, Duffy’s speaker actively seeks out the wolf, who represents experience, poetry, and male influence. Initially, she follows him into the woods, symbolizing her transition into womanhood and intellectual maturity. However, as she gains knowledge and independence, she realizes that the wolf, despite his initial allure, is ultimately stagnant—“same rhyme, same reason”—and no longer serves her growth. In a powerful moment of self-assertion, she kills him: “I took an axe to the wolf as he slept, one chop, scrotum to throat”, symbolizing her rejection of male dominance. She emerges from the forest “singing, all alone”, a triumphant figure of self-sufficiency. The poem, therefore, celebrates female agency and the ability to carve out one’s own path beyond societal expectations.
  • The Journey from Innocence to Experience: Duffy explores the classic literary theme of moving from innocence to experience, often associated with coming-of-age narratives. At the beginning of “Little Red-Cap,” the speaker is “sweet sixteen, never been, babe, waif”, highlighting her youthful innocence. However, she is drawn to the wolf not out of fear but out of curiosity and ambition, particularly for poetry: “You might ask why. Here’s why. Poetry.” Her journey into the woods represents an initiation into adulthood, knowledge, and passion, where she willingly follows the wolf, even as her clothes—symbols of innocence—are torn: “my stockings ripped to shreds, scraps of red from my blazer snagged on twig and branch, murder clues.” Over time, she grows disillusioned with the wolf’s repetitive nature and realizes that true knowledge lies beyond him. The symbolic ten years in the woods represent her deepening understanding of life: “it took ten years in the woods to tell that a mushroom stoppers the mouth of a buried corpse.” By the end of the poem, she emerges wiser and more self-assured, showing the inevitable transformation from naïve youth to empowered adulthood.
  • The Power of Literature and Artistic Awakening: Literature, poetry, and artistic discovery play a crucial role in “Little Red-Cap,” with the wolf embodying both a mentor and a threat. The speaker is drawn to the wolf not for romance but for poetry, seeing him as a gateway into the literary world: “The wolf, I knew, would lead me deep into the woods.” He introduces her to the power of words, as seen in the imagery of his lair: “a whole wall was crimson, gold, aglow with books.” The descriptions of poetry as “warm, beating, frantic, winged; music and blood” emphasize its vitality and its ability to shape identity. However, the wolf’s stagnation—*”same rhyme, same reason”—*reveals that her growth requires moving beyond him. Her decision to kill the wolf and leave the woods symbolizes her rejection of outdated literary traditions and her ability to forge her own artistic voice. The poem ultimately champions literature as a tool for self-discovery and liberation, but one that must evolve rather than remain fixed.
  • Gender Power Dynamics and the Predatory Male Figure: The poem critiques the power dynamics between older men and younger women, particularly in artistic and intellectual circles. The wolf, an experienced poet, represents an older, authoritative male figure who takes interest in the young speaker, mirroring real-world imbalances in mentorship and romantic relationships. His presence is both enticing and dangerous, evident in the fairy tale references: “What big ears he had! What big eyes he had! What teeth!” While he provides the speaker with access to poetry and knowledge, there is an underlying sense of exploitation, reinforced by the violent imagery: “I clung till dawn to his thrashing fur.” Over time, she sees through his influence and recognizes his repetitive, self-indulgent nature. The moment she kills him—“one chop, scrotum to throat”—is both a literal and symbolic act of reclaiming power. By filling his belly with stones and leaving the forest independently, the speaker reverses the traditional damsel-in-distress narrative, instead positioning herself as the one in control. “Little Red-Cap” critiques gendered power structures and highlights the necessity of breaking free from exploitative relationships.
Literary Theories and “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
Literary TheoryApplication to “Little Red-Cap”References from the Poem
Feminist Literary TheoryExamines how the poem challenges patriarchal structures and reclaims female agency. The poem subverts the traditional Little Red Riding Hood tale, where the girl is usually a passive victim, by making the speaker an active agent of her own transformation. The wolf symbolizes a dominant male figure (mentor/lover), and his eventual death represents the speaker’s rejection of male control and assertion of independence.“I took an axe to the wolf as he slept, one chop, scrotum to throat, and saw the glistening, virgin white of my grandmother’s bones.” → The violent act symbolizes the breaking of patriarchal constraints, reclaiming female autonomy.
Psychoanalytic Literary Theory (Freudian and Lacanian Analysis)Explores the subconscious desires, fears, and psychological transformation of the speaker. The journey into the woods represents a psychological rite of passage, with the wolf symbolizing both a father figure and a forbidden desire (Freudian interpretation). Lacanian theory might view the wolf as representing the “Other,” a figure who introduces the speaker to language, poetry, and self-awareness. However, she ultimately surpasses him and claims her own identity.“The wolf, I knew, would lead me deep into the woods, away from home, to a dark tangled thorny place.” → Suggests a journey into the unconscious mind and personal discovery.
Postmodernism / IntertextualityThe poem plays with intertextuality by reinterpreting a well-known fairy tale with modern themes. Duffy deconstructs the traditional Little Red Riding Hood story, turning it into a feminist and literary awakening narrative. The self-awareness and playfulness of language align with postmodern techniques.“What big ears he had! What big eyes he had! What teeth!” → A direct reference to the fairy tale but used in a context where the speaker is not a helpless victim but a willing participant in her transformation.
Marxist Literary TheoryExamines power dynamics, class struggles, and systems of control. The wolf can be interpreted as an embodiment of institutionalized literary tradition or an elitist figure that controls access to knowledge. The speaker’s act of destroying him can symbolize breaking free from the intellectual hierarchy that privileges certain voices over others.“Words, words were truly alive on the tongue, in the head, warm, beating, frantic, winged; music and blood.” → Suggests the democratization of literature and breaking free from traditional literary structures.
Critical Questions about “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
  • How does Duffy subvert the traditional “Little Red Riding Hood” fairy tale in “Little Red-Cap”?
  • Carol Ann Duffy radically transforms the classic Little Red Riding Hood story in “Little Red-Cap” by shifting the narrative from one of passive victimhood to one of female empowerment and self-discovery. In the traditional tale, Little Red Riding Hood is a naïve girl who falls prey to the manipulative and cunning wolf, requiring a male savior (the woodsman) to rescue her. Duffy’s version, however, presents a speaker who actively seeks out the wolf, drawn not by fear but by curiosity and ambition—“You might ask why. Here’s why. Poetry.” Unlike the traditional protagonist, this Red-Cap is aware of her choices and willingly follows the wolf into the woods, symbolizing her initiation into knowledge, experience, and sexuality. The wolf, no longer just a predator, becomes a poet and mentor figure, embodying both temptation and inspiration. However, as the speaker matures, she recognizes the wolf’s stagnation—“same rhyme, same reason”—and ultimately overcomes him, taking control of her own destiny. The dramatic moment where she kills the wolf—“one chop, scrotum to throat”—represents not only a break from male control but also an assertion of female power and independence. By the end, she emerges “singing, all alone,” rewriting the fairy tale to center on self-liberation rather than victimization.
  • How does “Little Red-Cap” explore the relationship between gender and power?
  • “Little Red-Cap” presents a nuanced exploration of gender and power, particularly in the context of mentorship, literary authority, and male dominance in artistic and intellectual spheres. The wolf, an older, knowledgeable poet, initially holds power over the young speaker, offering her an introduction to poetry and experience. His presence carries both a seductive and predatory quality—“breath of the wolf in my ear, was the love poem.” This dynamic mirrors real-world relationships where older men often serve as literary or intellectual gatekeepers, shaping the development of young female voices. However, as the speaker matures, she recognizes the wolf’s limitations: his poetry is repetitive, his influence is cyclical—“howls the same old song at the moon, year in, year out.” The power dynamic shifts when she takes agency into her own hands, killing the wolf and metaphorically dismantling his influence over her. The gruesome imagery—“one chop, scrotum to throat”—specifically targets male anatomy, reinforcing the theme of breaking free from patriarchal control. The poem critiques traditional gender roles, where men are often seen as the literary authorities and women as their protégés, and instead envisions a world where women claim their own creative and intellectual space.
  • How does the imagery in “Little Red-Cap” contribute to the themes of transformation and self-discovery?
  • Duffy’s use of rich and often violent imagery in “Little Red-Cap” plays a crucial role in illustrating the speaker’s transformation from innocence to experience. At the beginning of the poem, the setting is described with subtle foreboding—“At childhood’s end, the houses petered out into playing fields, the factory, allotments kept, like mistresses, by kneeling married men.” The transition from childhood to adulthood is mapped onto the landscape, suggesting a journey into a more complex, hidden world. As the speaker follows the wolf into the woods, the imagery becomes increasingly dark and intense—“a dark tangled thorny place lit by the eyes of owls.” This description evokes both mystery and danger, reinforcing the idea that knowledge and experience are not easily gained. The transformation culminates in the moment of violence—“I took an axe to the wolf as he slept, one chop, scrotum to throat.” Here, the stark brutality of the language marks a definitive break from the past, signaling the speaker’s final assertion of selfhood. The closing image—“Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone.”—suggests rebirth and renewal, as she emerges from the metaphorical woods of experience into a space of independent creativity.
  • What role does poetry and language play in “Little Red-Cap” as a form of empowerment?
  • Poetry and language function as central themes in “Little Red-Cap,” representing both a source of fascination and a means of liberation for the speaker. From the outset, the wolf is not just a figure of danger but also a poet—“He stood in a clearing, reading his verse out loud in his wolfy drawl, a paperback in his hairy paw.” The speaker is initially drawn to him not out of fear but because of his connection to poetry, which she sees as a gateway to knowledge and power. The imagery of books as treasures—“a whole wall was crimson, gold, aglow with books.”—reinforces the idea that literature holds transformative potential. However, as she matures, she realizes that the wolf’s poetry is repetitive and stagnant—“same rhyme, same reason.” Her final act of killing the wolf is not just about severing ties with a controlling figure, but about claiming poetry and language for herself. The triumphant ending—“Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone.”—suggests that she has taken control of her own voice, no longer needing validation from male literary figures. Duffy positions poetry as both a means of oppression (through established, male-dominated literary traditions) and a tool for personal and artistic emancipation.
Literary Works Similar to “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
  1. “The Applicant” by Sylvia Plath – Similar to “Little Red-Cap”, this poem critiques gender roles, societal expectations of women, and the imbalance of power between men and women.
  2. “Goblin Market” by Christina Rossetti – Both poems focus on a young female protagonist encountering an alluring yet dangerous male presence, with a strong emphasis on female agency and resistance.
  3. “Medusa” by Carol Ann Duffy – Another poem from The World’s Wife, “Medusa” shares “Little Red-Cap”’s themes of female rage, independence, and breaking free from male influence.
Representative Quotations of “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“At childhood’s end, the houses petered out into playing fields, the factory, allotments kept, like mistresses, by kneeling married men.”The opening lines describe the transition from childhood to adulthood, setting a tone of transformation.Psychoanalytic Theory – The movement away from childhood represents the unconscious shift from innocence to experience, where hidden desires and societal corruption become visible.
“It was there that I first clapped eyes on the wolf.”Introduces the wolf as a significant figure in the speaker’s journey, signaling the beginning of a transformative relationship.Feminist Theory – The wolf, often symbolic of male authority, represents both attraction and danger in patriarchal structures.
“What big ears he had! What big eyes he had! What teeth!”A direct reference to the traditional Little Red Riding Hood fairy tale, but here the speaker is aware of the wolf’s characteristics rather than being deceived.Intertextuality & Postmodernism – Duffy plays with fairy tale conventions, reworking them into a feminist framework where the protagonist has agency.
“You might ask why. Here’s why. Poetry.”The speaker justifies her decision to engage with the wolf, showing that her attraction to him is based on literature and intellectual discovery rather than mere seduction.Marxist Theory – Knowledge and cultural capital (poetry) are central to power structures. The wolf holds intellectual authority, which the speaker initially seeks before claiming it for herself.
“I crawled in his wake, my stockings ripped to shreds, scraps of red from my blazer snagged on twig and branch, murder clues.”The imagery of torn clothing and “murder clues” suggests a loss of innocence and foreshadows violence.Psychoanalytic & Feminist Theory – The destruction of the red clothing, symbolic of youth and femininity, represents both sexual awakening and the erasure of innocence.
“I clung till dawn to his thrashing fur, for what little girl doesn’t dearly love a wolf?”This rhetorical question implies both irony and inevitability, reinforcing the traditional attraction to danger.Feminist & Gender Theory – The relationship reflects gender power dynamics, where women are socialized to be drawn to dominant, even destructive, male figures.
“Words, words were truly alive on the tongue, in the head, warm, beating, frantic, winged; music and blood.”A passionate depiction of poetry as something vital, urgent, and transformative.Postmodernism & Literary Theory – Celebrates language as a living force, aligning with the idea that words shape reality and personal identity.
“howls the same old song at the moon, year in, year out, season after season, same rhyme, same reason.”The speaker recognizes the wolf’s stagnation and repetitive nature, implying her disillusionment.Poststructuralism & Feminist Theory – Critiques the cyclical, self-indulgent traditions in male-dominated literary and social structures.
“I took an axe to the wolf as he slept, one chop, scrotum to throat, and saw the glistening, virgin white of my grandmother’s bones.”The speaker violently kills the wolf, symbolizing her rejection of male control and her reclamation of female legacy.Feminist & Psychoanalytic Theory – Represents a Freudian “killing the father” moment and breaking free from patriarchal literary authority.
“Out of the forest I come with my flowers, singing, all alone.”The final line portrays a sense of completion, independence, and creative rebirth.Feminist & Existentialist Theory – The speaker emerges as an autonomous individual, rejecting male validation and embracing self-sufficiency.
Suggested Readings: “Little Red-Cap” by Carol Ann Duffy
  1. Duffy, Carol Ann. “Little Red-Cap.” Ambit, no. 158, 1999, pp. 102–03. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44338870. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  2. Varty, Anne. “Carol Ann Duffy: ‘The Edge Has Become the Centre.’” Women, Poetry and the Voice of a Nation, Edinburgh University Press, 2022, pp. 121–43. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctv287sb3j.10. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
  3. Duffy, Carol Ann. “Little Red-Cap.” Ambit 158 (1999): 102-103.

“Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton: A Critical Analysis

“Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton first appeared in her 1972 poetry collection Transformations, a book that reimagines classic fairy tales with dark, ironic, and psychological depth.

"Little Red Riding Hood" by Anne Sexton: A Critical Analysis

Introduction: “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton

“Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton first appeared in her 1972 poetry collection Transformations, a book that reimagines classic fairy tales with dark, ironic, and psychological depth. Sexton’s retelling of Little Red Riding Hood explores themes of deception, violence, and survival, revealing the grim realities behind the stories traditionally told to children. The poem subverts the innocence of the original folktale, presenting a world where deception lurks everywhere—not just in the woods, but in everyday life, from fraudulent schemes to hidden despair. Sexton’s stark, confessional style, infused with irony, exposes how easily innocence is preyed upon and how survival often requires a grim transformation. The poem remains a staple in literature and feminist studies due to its critique of societal norms and its dark, modernist reinterpretation of classic narratives. As Sexton writes, “Many a deception ends on such a note.” Her exploration of deception, power, and the grotesque makes this poem a popular choice in literature courses, where it serves as an example of both feminist revisionism and psychological complexity.

Text: “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton

Many are the deceivers:
The suburban matron,
proper in the supermarket,
list in hand so she won’t suddenly fly,
buying her Duz and Chuck Wagon dog food,
meanwhile ascending from earth,
letting her stomach fill up with helium,
letting her arms go loose as kite tails,
getting ready to meet her lover
a mile down Apple Crest Road
in the Congregational Church parking lot.
Two seemingly respectable women
come up to an old Jenny
and show her an envelope
full of money
and promise to share the booty
if she’ll give them ten thou
as an act of faith.
Her life savings are under the mattress
covered with rust stains
and counting.
They are as wrinkled as prunes
but negotiable.
The two women take the money and disappear.
Where is the moral?
Not all knives are for
stabbing the exposed belly.
Rock climbs on rock
and it only makes a seashore.
Old Jenny has lost her belief in mattresses
and now she has no wastebasket in which
to keep her youth.
The standup comic
on the “Tonight” show
who imitates the Vice President
and cracks up Johnny Carson
and delays sleep for millions
of bedfellows watching between their feet,
slits his wrist the next morning
in the Algonquin’s old-fashioned bathroom,
the razor in his hand like a toothbrush,
wall as anonymous as a urinal,
the shower curtain his slack rubberman audience,
and then the slash
as simple as opening as a letter
and the warm blood breaking out like a rose
upon the bathtub with its claw and ball feet.
And I. I too.
Quite collected at cocktail parties,
meanwhile in my head
I’m undergoing open-heart surgery.
The heart, poor fellow,
pounding on his little tin drum
with a faint death beat,
The heart, that eyeless beetle,
running panicked through his maze,
never stopping one foot after the other
one hour after the other
until he gags on an apple
and it’s all over.
And I. I too again.
I built a summer house on Cape Ann.
A simple A-frame and this too was
a deception — nothing haunts a new house.
When I moved in with a bathing suit and tea bags
the ocean rumbled like a train backing up
and at each window secrets came in
like gas. My mother, that departed soul,
sat in my Eames chair and reproached me
for losing her keys to the old cottage.
Even in the electric kitchen there was
the smell of a journey. The ocean
was seeping through its frontiers
and laying me out on its wet rails.
The bed was stale with my childhood
and I could not move to another city
where the worthy make a new life.
Long ago
there was a strange deception:
a wolf dressed in frills,
a kind of transvestite.
But I get ahead of my story.
In the beginning
there was just little Red Riding Hood,
so called because her grandmother
made her a red cape and she was never without it.
It was her Linus blanket, besides
it was red, as red as the Swiss flag,
yes it was red, as red as chicken blood,
But more than she loved her riding hood
she loved her grandmother who lived
far from the city in the big wood.
This one day her mother gave her
a basket of wine and cake
to take to her grandmother
because she was ill.
Wine and cake?
Where’s the aspirin? The penicillin?
Where’s the fruit juice?
Peter Rabbit got chamomile tea.
But wine and cake it was.
On her way in the big wood
Red Riding Hood met the wolf.
Good day, Mr. Wolf, she said,
thinking him no more dangerous
than a streetcar or a panhandler.
He asked where she was going
and she obligingly told him
There among the roots and trunks
with the mushrooms pulsing inside the moss
he planned how to eat them both,
the grandmother an old carrot
and the child a shy budkin
in a red red hood.
He bade her to look at the bloodroot,
the small bunchberry and the dogtooth
and pick some for her grandmother.
And this she did.
Meanwhile he scampered off
to Grandmother’s house and ate her up
as quick as a slap.
Then he put on her nightdress and cap
and snuggled down in to bed.
A deceptive fellow.
Red Riding hood
knocked on the door and entered
with her flowers, her cake, her wine.
Grandmother looked strange,
a dark and hairy disease it seemed.
Oh Grandmother, what big ears you have,
ears, eyes, hands and then the teeth.
The better to eat you with my dear.
So the wolf gobbled Red Riding Hood down
like a gumdrop. Now he was fat.
He appeared to be in his ninth month
and Red Riding Hood and her grandmother
rode like two Jonahs up and down with
his every breath. One pigeon. One partridge.
He was fast asleep,
dreaming in his cap and gown,
wolfless.
Along came a huntsman who heard
the loud contented snores
and knew that was no grandmother.
He opened the door and said,
So it’s you, old sinner.
He raised his gun to shoot him
when it occurred to him that maybe
the wolf had eaten up the old lady.
So he took a knife and began cutting open
the sleeping wolf, a kind of caesarian section.
It was a carnal knife that let
Red Riding Hood out like a poppy,
quite alive from the kingdom of the belly.
And grandmother too
still waiting for cakes and wine.
The wolf, they decided, was too mean
to be simply shot so they filled his belly
with large stones and sewed him up.
He was as heavy as a cemetery
and when he woke up and tried to run off
he fell over dead. Killed by his own weight.
Many a deception ends on such a note.
The huntsman and the grandmother and Red Riding Hood
sat down by his corpse and had a meal of wine and cake.
Those two remembering
nothing naked and brutal
from that little death,
that little birth,
from their going down
and their lifting up.

Annotations: “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton
LineAnnotation
Many are the deceivers:Sexton begins with a statement about deception, setting the theme for the poem.
The suburban matron, proper in the supermarket,Depicts a seemingly respectable woman who hides a secret life.
List in hand so she won’t suddenly fly,Her shopping list serves as a metaphor for maintaining control over her facade.
Buying her Duz and Chuck Wagon dog food,Ordinary purchases contrast with her hidden intentions.
Meanwhile ascending from earth,Suggests an escape or detachment from reality.
Letting her stomach fill up with helium,Symbolizes a feeling of lightness or release from societal constraints.
Letting her arms go loose as kite tails,A sense of freedom and surrender to temptation.
Getting ready to meet her lover a mile down Apple Crest RoadReveals her deception, meeting a lover in secrecy.
Two seemingly respectable womenIntroduces another deception, this time in the form of a scam.
Come up to an old Jenny and show her an envelopeThey prey on an elderly woman’s trust.
Full of money and promise to share the bootyA classic confidence trick, exploiting greed and desperation.
If she’ll give them ten thou as an act of faith.The victim is manipulated into giving up her savings.
Her life savings are under the mattressRepresents old-fashioned security and trust in material wealth.
Covered with rust stains and counting.Suggests decay and the futility of hoarding money.
They are as wrinkled as prunes but negotiable.Age and value juxtaposed, implying vulnerability.
The two women take the money and disappear.The deception is completed, leaving the victim destitute.
Where is the moral?Questions the presence of justice in such a world.
Not all knives are for stabbing the exposed belly.Not all harm is physical; deception wounds the soul.
Rock climbs on rock and it only makes a seashore.Nature’s indifference contrasts with human cruelty.
Old Jenny has lost her belief in mattressesSymbolizes lost trust in security and stability.
And now she has no wastebasket in which to keep her youth.A poignant metaphor for irreversible loss.
The standup comic on the ‘Tonight’ showIntroduces another deceptive figure, a comedian hiding pain.
Who imitates the Vice President and cracks up Johnny CarsonPublic success masks private despair.
And delays sleep for millions of bedfellows watching between their feet,Television as escapism, disconnecting from reality.
Slits his wrist the next morning in the Algonquin’s old-fashioned bathroom,The contrast between laughter and suicide.
The razor in his hand like a toothbrush,Suicide made mundane, a daily ritual of despair.
Wall as anonymous as a urinal,A metaphor for isolation and impersonal surroundings.
The shower curtain his slack rubberman audience,A tragic irony, performing even in death.
And then the slash as simple as opening a letterSuicide depicted as an everyday action.
And the warm blood breaking out like a roseBeauty juxtaposed with violence.
Upon the bathtub with its claw and ball feet.Even the setting has an eerie, animate presence.
And I. I too.The speaker connects herself to these figures of deception.
Quite collected at cocktail parties,Maintaining an outward facade of composure.
Meanwhile in my head I’m undergoing open-heart surgery.Contrasts the external image with internal turmoil.
The heart, poor fellow, pounding on his little tin drumThe heart is personified as suffering, struggling.
With a faint death beat,Suggests an impending collapse, physical or emotional.
The heart, that eyeless beetle, running panicked through his maze,Depicts anxiety and the inevitability of fate.
Never stopping one foot after the other one hour after the otherA relentless, futile struggle.
Until he gags on an apple and it’s all over.A reference to mortality and possibly the Fall of Man.
And I. I too again.Repetition emphasizes the speaker’s personal connection to deception.
I built a summer house on Cape Ann.A metaphor for creating an illusion of stability.
A simple A-frame and this too was a deceptionAcknowledges the false security of material possessions.
Nothing haunts a new house.The idea that new beginnings do not erase the past.
When I moved in with a bathing suit and tea bagsSimple objects contrast with the weight of memory.
The ocean rumbled like a train backing upNature as a force of inevitability.
And at each window secrets came in like gas.Memories and regrets infiltrate despite attempts to escape.
My mother, that departed soul, sat in my Eames chairThe presence of the past in the present.
And reproached me for losing her keys to the old cottage.Guilt and unresolved familial ties.
Even in the electric kitchen there was the smell of a journey.The past remains alive in the senses.
The ocean was seeping through its frontiersThe inability to contain or control nature and memory.
And laying me out on its wet rails.A metaphor for submission to fate.
The bed was stale with my childhoodMemory turns even comforting spaces oppressive.
And I could not move to another city where the worthy make a new life.A sense of being trapped in one’s history.
Long ago there was a strange deception:Shifts back to the fairy tale narrative.
A wolf dressed in frills, a kind of transvestite.A literal deception, but also symbolic of societal disguise.
But I get ahead of my story.Acknowledging the nonlinear nature of memory and narration.
In the beginningMarks the transition into the fairy tale, signaling a return to traditional storytelling.
There was just little Red Riding Hood,Introduces the protagonist, emphasizing her innocence.
So called because her grandmotherExplains the origin of her name, tying it to family.
Made her a red cape and she was never without it.The red cape symbolizes both protection and vulnerability.
It was her Linus blanket, besidesA reference to Peanuts, implying comfort and emotional security.
It was red, as red as the Swiss flag,Emphasizes the striking color, linking it to national identity and symbolism.
Yes, it was red, as red as chicken blood,Links the red color to life, violence, and danger.
But more than she loved her riding hoodSuggests that her affection extends beyond material objects.
She loved her grandmother who livedEstablishes the grandmother as an important figure in her life.
Far from the city in the big wood.The setting evokes isolation and danger, emphasizing vulnerability.
This one day her mother gave herBegins the familiar fairy tale narrative.
A basket of wine and cakeA symbolic offering, but an unusual one for someone who is sick.
To take to her grandmotherEstablishes the central mission of the story.
Because she was ill.Provides motivation for Red Riding Hood’s journey.
Wine and cake?A questioning tone, adding irony and skepticism.
Where’s the aspirin? The penicillin?A modern contrast to the old-fashioned remedy.
Where’s the fruit juice?Questions the logic of traditional medicinal offerings.
Peter Rabbit got chamomile tea.A humorous reference to another children’s story.
But wine and cake it was.Accepts the traditional fairy tale logic with resignation.
On her way in the big woodReinforces the theme of venturing into the unknown.
Red Riding Hood met the wolf.Introduces the antagonist, signaling danger.
Good day, Mr. Wolf, she said,Her politeness contrasts with the wolf’s hidden intentions.
Thinking him no more dangerousShows her naivety and lack of suspicion.
Than a streetcar or a panhandler.Modernizes the threat, comparing it to urban dangers.
He asked where she was goingThe wolf’s deceptive tactics begin.
And she obligingly told himDemonstrates her innocence and trust.
There among the roots and trunksEvokes a natural yet eerie setting.
With the mushrooms pulsing inside the mossA vivid, almost surreal depiction of the forest.
He planned how to eat them both,Reveals the wolf’s true intentions.
The grandmother an old carrotReduces the grandmother to mere food, emphasizing predation.
And the child a shy budkin in a red red hood.Depicts Red Riding Hood as small and delicate, reinforcing vulnerability.
He bade her to look at the bloodroot,A symbolic plant associated with both medicine and danger.
The small bunchberry and the dogtoothNatural elements that add to the fairy tale imagery.
And pick some for her grandmother.A distraction tactic by the wolf.
And this she did.Shows her obedience and trust.
Meanwhile he scampered offThe wolf takes action while she is preoccupied.
To Grandmother’s house and ate her upA shocking, violent moment, reflecting the brutality of fairy tales.
As quick as a slap.Simile emphasizing the suddenness of the attack.
Then he put on her nightdress and capThe wolf’s deceptive transformation begins.
And snuggled down into bed.A grotesque imitation of human behavior.
A deceptive fellow.Reinforces the theme of trickery and disguise.
Red Riding Hood knocked on the door and enteredShe walks unknowingly into danger.
With her flowers, her cake, her wine.The gifts now seem ironic in contrast with the danger ahead.
Grandmother looked strange,Hints at Red Riding Hood’s growing suspicion.
A dark and hairy disease it seemed.Describes the wolf in grotesque, almost medical terms.
Oh Grandmother, what big ears you have,Begins the well-known exchange.
Ears, eyes, hands and then the teeth.The progressive buildup of tension.
The better to eat you with my dear.The climax of the deception and reveal of the wolf’s true nature.
So the wolf gobbled Red Riding Hood downA violent and sudden resolution, mirroring the grandmother’s fate.
Like a gumdrop.Juxtaposes horror with childlike imagery, reinforcing irony.
Now he was fat.His greed and overindulgence are emphasized.
He appeared to be in his ninth monthA grotesque image, likening him to pregnancy.
And Red Riding Hood and her grandmotherSuggests they are trapped inside him.
Rode like two Jonahs up and down with his every breath.A biblical allusion to Jonah in the whale, reinforcing themes of survival and rebirth.
One pigeon. One partridge.A surreal comparison, almost playful despite the horror.
He was fast asleep,The wolf’s overindulgence makes him vulnerable.
Dreaming in his cap and gown,An absurdly civilized image, contrasting his monstrous actions.
Wolfless.An ironic term, as if he is free from his predatory nature in sleep.
Along came a huntsman who heardIntroduces the rescuer figure.
The loud contented snoresReinforces the wolf’s false sense of security.
And knew that was no grandmother.His experience and wisdom contrast with Red Riding Hood’s innocence.
He opened the door and said,Begins the decisive confrontation.
So it’s you, old sinner.Names the wolf’s deception as a moral failing.
He raised his gun to shoot himSuggests an immediate act of justice.
When it occurred to him that maybeShows a moment of thoughtfulness.
The wolf had eaten up the old lady.The huntsman considers an alternative solution.
So he took a knife and began cutting openA literal and symbolic unveiling.
The sleeping wolf, a kind of caesarian section.Juxtaposes birth and death in a grotesque comparison.
It was a carnal knife that letSuggests both violence and renewal.
Red Riding Hood out like a poppy,A delicate and vivid image of rebirth.
Quite alive from the kingdom of the belly.Frames the stomach as a dark, almost mythical place.
And grandmother tooCompletes the miraculous rescue.
Still waiting for cakes and wine.A humorous touch, as if she was oblivious to her ordeal.
The wolf, they decided, was too meanHis fate is debated rather than immediately executed.
To be simply shot so they filled his bellyHis punishment is tied to his own gluttony.
With large stones and sewed him up.A strangely meticulous act of vengeance.
He was as heavy as a cemeteryA metaphor for his inescapable fate.
And when he woke up and tried to run offHis final moment of struggle.
He fell over dead.His greed and deception ultimately destroy him.
Killed by his own weight.A moral conclusion, reinforcing poetic justice.
Many a deception ends on such a note.Reinforces the theme that deception often leads to downfall.
The huntsman and the grandmother and Red Riding HoodMarks the restoration of order after the wolf’s demise.
Sat down by his corpse and had a meal of wine and cake.Darkly ironic, as they celebrate right next to the dead wolf.
Those two rememberingRefers to Red Riding Hood and her grandmother.
Nothing naked and brutalSuggests they do not acknowledge or recall the horror they endured.
From that little death,A reference to their near-death experience.
That little birth,Equates their rescue to a form of rebirth.
From their going downSymbolizes their entrapment inside the wolf.
And their lifting up.Represents their rescue and return to life.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton
Literary DeviceExampleExplanation
Alliteration“Red Riding Hood met the wolf.”The repetition of the ‘R’ sound creates rhythm and emphasis.
Allusion“One pigeon. One partridge.”References the Twelve Days of Christmas song, adding a surreal effect.
Ambiguity“Nothing haunts a new house.”Implies multiple meanings—emptiness, escape, or a hidden past.
Anaphora“And I. I too.”Repetition of “I” emphasizes the speaker’s personal connection to deception.
Assonance“Oh Grandmother, what big ears you have.”The repetition of vowel sounds creates musicality and emphasis.
Caesura“Dreaming in his cap and gown, / wolfless.”A pause in the line breaks the flow, emphasizing irony.
Dark Humor“Sat down by his corpse and had a meal of wine and cake.”Juxtaposes violence with an absurdly casual reaction.
Diction“As quick as a slap.”Simple, direct word choice enhances the suddenness of the wolf’s attack.
Dramatic Irony“Good day, Mr. Wolf, she said, / thinking him no more dangerous than a streetcar or a panhandler.”The reader knows the wolf is a threat, while Red Riding Hood does not.
Enjambment“The better to eat you with my dear. / So the wolf gobbled Red Riding Hood down like a gumdrop.”A sentence spills over multiple lines, creating a fast-paced effect.
Epizeuxis“Red, as red as the Swiss flag, / yes, it was red, as red as chicken blood.”Repetition of “red” intensifies its symbolic meaning.
Grotesque Imagery“He appeared to be in his ninth month.”Describes the wolf’s bloated stomach as if he were pregnant, creating unease.
Hyperbole“Her life savings are under the mattress / covered with rust stains and counting.”Exaggeration emphasizes the vulnerability of the old woman.
Irony“Still waiting for cakes and wine.”Grandmother’s calmness after being rescued contrasts with the horror of her ordeal.
Metaphor“The heart, that eyeless beetle, / running panicked through his maze.”Compares the heart to a blind insect, evoking anxiety.
Mood“A dark and hairy disease it seemed.”Creates a sinister, unsettling atmosphere.
Paradox“Killed by his own weight.”The idea that the wolf’s downfall is caused by his own greed is contradictory but true.
Personification“The mushrooms pulsing inside the moss.”Gives lifelike qualities to nature, enhancing the eerie setting.
Satire“Where’s the aspirin? The penicillin? Where’s the fruit juice?”Mocks the impracticality of fairy tale remedies with modern skepticism.
Symbolism“Red Riding Hood out like a poppy.”The poppy symbolizes rebirth and fragility, reinforcing her survival.

Themes in “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton

  1. Deception: Sexton’s version of “Little Red Riding Hood” delves deeply into the theme of deception, portraying it as a pervasive element in human interaction and societal norms. The wolf, traditionally the deceiver in this tale, is not alone in his guises; Sexton extends this motif to humans who wear social masks. The poem opens with the imagery of a suburban matron who appears ordinary but is secretly planning to meet a lover, illustrating that deception is not limited to malicious acts but can also be found in everyday social facades. Similarly, the wolf’s disguise as the grandmother and the manipulative acts of the two women who trick old Jenny out of her savings underscore a world where deception crosses boundaries between the mundane and the predatory, suggesting that everyone, not just the obvious villains, harbors potential for deceit.
  2. Loss of Innocence: Sexton uses the story of Red Riding Hood as a metaphor for the loss of innocence and the harsh awakenings that accompany growing up. The poem captures this transition through the protagonist’s journey, where she starts with a naive trust in the wolf, whom she perceives as harmless as a “streetcar or a panhandler.” This innocence is shattered when she encounters the wolf in her grandmother’s clothing, only to be swallowed whole. Sexton captures the brutality of this loss with stark, violent imagery, emphasizing the abrupt and often brutal confrontation with reality that marks the passage from childhood to adulthood.
  3. Confrontation with Reality: Throughout the poem, characters face moments of stark reality that challenge their previous perceptions or beliefs. For instance, old Jenny loses her life savings to fraud, shattering her trust in others and her belief in a just world. Similarly, Red Riding Hood’s realization of the wolf’s true nature at her grandmother’s house is a sudden confrontation with evil and danger, stripping away her earlier innocence. These moments reflect the broader human experience of encountering truths that are difficult to accept yet are essential for personal growth and understanding of the world.
  4. Cyclical Nature of Life: Sexton portrays life as a cycle of events that repeat or mirror each other, suggesting a rhythm to human experiences that can be both comforting and disquieting. This is seen in the poem’s structure and recurring motifs, such as the opening and closing scenes which both involve deceptive appearances and end with revelations. The cyclical motif is further emphasized by the huntsman who decides to cut the wolf open, mirroring the wolf’s earlier consumption of the grandmother and Red Riding Hood. This act of cutting open to reveal the truth suggests a recurring need to examine and re-examine our surroundings and ourselves, a process that is continuous and necessary for survival and understanding.
Literary Theories and “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton
Literary TheoryExample from the PoemExplanation
Feminist Criticism“A wolf dressed in frills, a kind of transvestite.”Examines gender roles and how the wolf deceives by adopting a traditionally feminine disguise, reinforcing themes of manipulation and patriarchal control.
Psychoanalytic Criticism“And I. I too. / Quite collected at cocktail parties, / meanwhile in my head / I’m undergoing open-heart surgery.”Analyzes internal conflict and hidden psychological distress, reflecting themes of repression and the unconscious mind.
Marxist Criticism“Her life savings are under the mattress / covered with rust stains and counting.”Highlights economic vulnerability and exploitation, as seen in the scam that targets an old woman’s financial insecurity.
Postmodernism“Where’s the aspirin? The penicillin? / Where’s the fruit juice?”Challenges traditional fairy tale logic with modern skepticism, subverting classical narratives and questioning societal norms.
Critical Questions about “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton
  • How does Sexton use deception as a central theme in the poem?
  • Deception is a dominant theme in Anne Sexton’s “Little Red Riding Hood,” extending beyond the fairy tale’s traditional trickery to explore the pervasive nature of deceit in everyday life. The poem opens with vignettes of deception in modern society, such as a seemingly respectable suburban matron leading a double life and two women conning an elderly woman out of her savings: “Many are the deceivers: The suburban matron, proper in the supermarket, / list in hand so she won’t suddenly fly.” These stories parallel the deception at the heart of the fairy tale, where the wolf disguises himself to trick both Red Riding Hood and her grandmother. Sexton deepens the theme by suggesting that not all knives are used for physical violence: “Not all knives are for / stabbing the exposed belly.” This statement implies that deception itself can be a weapon, one that wounds psychologically rather than physically. The wolf’s ability to disguise himself as the grandmother (“A wolf dressed in frills, a kind of transvestite.”) highlights societal concerns about identity and manipulation. Through these layered examples, Sexton expands the traditional moral of the story to critique the deceptive nature of human interactions in various forms.
  • How does Sexton modernize and subvert the classic fairy tale?
  • Sexton’s retelling of “Little Red Riding Hood” moves beyond a simple cautionary tale into a satirical and psychological exploration of power and deception. She inserts modern skepticism by questioning the logic of fairy tale conventions: “Wine and cake? Where’s the aspirin? The penicillin? Where’s the fruit juice?” This humorous interjection mocks the outdated remedies given to the sick grandmother and forces the reader to reconsider how fairy tales often ignore practical realities. Similarly, the huntsman, traditionally the hero, is depicted in a way that challenges conventional ideas of salvation. Instead of swiftly executing the wolf, he considers his actions, turning the scene into a bizarre and grotesque surgical procedure: “So he took a knife and began cutting open / the sleeping wolf, a kind of caesarian section.” The choice to describe the wolf’s disembowelment as a birth-like event (“Red Riding Hood out like a poppy, quite alive from the kingdom of the belly.”) adds an unsettling dimension, blending violence with renewal. By blending dark humor, realism, and irony, Sexton transforms the fairy tale into a postmodern reflection on power, deception, and the absurdities of traditional narratives.
  • What role does violence play in the poem, and how is it portrayed differently than in the traditional fairy tale?
  • Violence in Sexton’s “”Little Red Riding Hood” is not just a tool for punishment but an intrinsic part of the world she creates, occurring in both grotesque and absurd ways. The fairy tale traditionally depicts the wolf’s devouring of Red Riding Hood and her grandmother as a moment of horror, followed by a clean-cut resolution where the huntsman heroically saves them. However, Sexton makes the violence disturbingly graphic, describing the wolf’s consumption as “Now he was fat. He appeared to be in his ninth month / and Red Riding Hood and her grandmother rode like two Jonahs up and down with his every breath.” The grotesque imagery of the wolf appearing pregnant with his victims adds to the unsettling nature of the violence. Furthermore, the wolf’s punishment is exaggerated in a way that highlights the absurdity of fairy tale justice: “They filled his belly with large stones and sewed him up. / He was as heavy as a cemetery and when he woke up and tried to run off / he fell over dead.” The wolf is not just killed; he is weighed down by the consequences of his greed, quite literally destroyed by his own excess. This exaggerated and surreal depiction forces the reader to question whether justice in fairy tales is ever truly moral or if it is just another form of storytelling convenience.
  • What is the significance of Sexton’s use of confessional poetry in this retelling?
  • As a poet associated with the Confessional movement, Sexton often intertwined personal emotions with classical narratives, and “Little Red Riding Hood” is no exception. Unlike the traditional fairy tale, which maintains a sense of detachment, Sexton inserts herself into the narrative, breaking the fourth wall with personal asides: “And I. I too. / Quite collected at cocktail parties, / meanwhile in my head / I’m undergoing open-heart surgery.” This abrupt shift from the fairy tale to a deeply personal confession disrupts the reader’s expectations, blending autobiography with storytelling. Sexton suggests that the theme of deception is not just external—it is internal, as people mask their true emotions even in social settings. By merging personal reflection with the fairy tale, Sexton draws a parallel between Red Riding Hood’s naive trust and the poet’s own struggles with psychological vulnerability. The inclusion of confessional elements forces readers to reconsider the fairy tale not as a distant moral fable, but as a deeply human experience, where fear, deception, and survival are personal battles we all face.
Literary Works Similar to “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton
  1. “Gretel in Darkness” by Louise Glück – Like Sexton’s poem, this piece reimagines a fairy tale (Hansel and Gretel) from a psychological and feminist perspective, emphasizing trauma and survival.
  2. “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” by Anne Sexton – Another poem from Transformations, this work similarly deconstructs a classic fairy tale, exposing its dark undertones and critiquing traditional gender roles.
  3. “The Witch’s Life” by Anne Sexton – This poem also explores themes of power, deception, and female identity, drawing connections between fairy tale archetypes and real-life struggles.
  4. “Cinderella” by Sylvia Plath – Like Sexton, Plath reinterprets a well-known fairy tale through an ironic and unsettling lens, critiquing the illusion of happily-ever-after endings.
  5. “The Brothers Grimm” by Lisel Mueller – This poem reflects on the darker themes underlying fairy tales, much like Sexton’s work, using vivid imagery to challenge idealized childhood narratives.
Representative Quotations of “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“Many are the deceivers…”The poem begins by highlighting deception in everyday life, from suburban matrons to scam artists, suggesting that appearances can be misleading.Postmodernism – Challenges the notion of a singular, stable truth by exposing the artificiality of societal roles.
“Not all knives are for stabbing the exposed belly.”The poem contrasts literal violence with metaphorical deception, implying that harm can be inflicted through manipulation rather than physical force.Deconstruction – Questions traditional binary oppositions (violence vs. non-violence, honesty vs. deception).
“The standup comic… slits his wrist the next morning.”The poem presents the tragic irony of performers who bring joy to others but suffer internally, leading to self-destruction.Psychoanalysis – Explores the split between public personas and private despair, aligning with Freudian concepts of repression and the death drive.
“And I. I too. Quite collected at cocktail parties, meanwhile in my head I’m undergoing open-heart surgery.”The speaker reveals her own struggle with internal pain masked by outward composure.Confessional Poetry – A hallmark of Sexton’s style, revealing personal trauma and existential angst.
“Long ago there was a strange deception: a wolf dressed in frills, a kind of transvestite.”Sexton’s retelling of Little Red Riding Hood casts the wolf as a transgressor of gender norms, emphasizing the theme of disguise.Queer Theory – Highlights gender fluidity and challenges heteronormative interpretations of fairy tales.
“Good day, Mr. Wolf, she said, thinking him no more dangerous than a streetcar or a panhandler.”Red Riding Hood’s naïve perception of the wolf critiques societal conditioning that downplays danger in familiar settings.Feminist Criticism – Examines the socialization of women to be polite and trusting, even in dangerous situations.
“A deceptive fellow.”A succinct description of the wolf, reinforcing the theme of deception woven throughout the poem.Structuralism – Identifies the wolf as a recurring archetype of the trickster across folklore.
“So he took a knife and began cutting open the sleeping wolf, a kind of caesarian section.”The huntsman’s act of slicing open the wolf to retrieve the swallowed women is compared to childbirth, adding an unsettling layer of imagery.Feminist Psychoanalysis – Aligns with Kristeva’s concept of the abject, where birth and death merge in grotesque ways.
“He was as heavy as a cemetery and when he woke up and tried to run off he fell over dead.”The wolf’s death by his own weight symbolizes how deception and excess lead to downfall.Moral Criticism – Reinforces the idea that deception ultimately collapses under its own weight.
“Those two remembering nothing naked and brutal from that little death, that little birth, from their going down and their lifting up.”The survivors do not fully acknowledge the violence and transformation they have endured, suggesting a cycle of forgetfulness.Existentialism – Implies that individuals avoid confronting the absurdity and brutality of life.
Suggested Readings: “Little Red Riding Hood” by Anne Sexton
  1. Sexton, Anne. “Red Riding Hood (1971).” The Trials and Tribulations of Little Red Riding Hood. Routledge, 2017. 241-245.
  2. OSTRIKER, ALICIA. “That Story: Anne Sexton And Her Transformations.” The American Poetry Review, vol. 11, no. 4, 1982, pp. 11–16. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27776967. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.
  3. Bernheimer, Kate. “This Rapturous Form.” Marvels & Tales, vol. 20, no. 1, 2006, pp. 67–83. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41388776. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.
  4. Haase, Donald. “Feminist Fairy-Tale Scholarship: A Critical Survey and Bibliography.” Marvels & Tales, vol. 14, no. 1, 2000, pp. 15–63. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41380741. Accessed 6 Feb. 2025.