“Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andrew C. Long first appeared in Orientalism and Literature, edited by Geoffrey P. Nash, as part of the Cambridge Critical Concepts series, published by Cambridge University Press in 2019 (pp. 235–252).
Introduction: “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long
“Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andrew C. Long first appeared in Orientalism and Literature, edited by Geoffrey P. Nash, as part of the Cambridge Critical Concepts series, published by Cambridge University Press in 2019 (pp. 235–252). In this chapter, Long engages in a critical dialogue with Edward Said’s literary criticism, particularly examining the tension between Said’s postcolonial critique of imperialism and his engagement with canonical modernist writers such as Joseph Conrad and Albert Camus. Central to Long’s argument is Aijaz Ahmad’s critique, articulated in In Theory (1992), which accuses Said of absolving cosmopolitan writers of their racial biases while being more stringent in his critiques of overtly colonialist figures. Ahmad argues that Said’s privileging of European comparative literature and his selective application of contrapuntal reading limits his engagement with Third World writers and reinforces the intellectual hierarchy of Western literary traditions.
Long explores how Said’s intellectual formation, deeply influenced by Cold War cultural critique, shaped his interpretation of literary texts. He contrasts Said’s analysis of Heart of Darkness, where Said acknowledges Conrad’s critique of imperialism but hesitates to fully address its racialized representation of Africa, with Said’s reading of Camus’ The Stranger, which Said interprets as a text of liberal settler consciousness rather than outright racism. Chinua Achebe’s landmark critique of Conrad in An Image of Africa (1975) serves as a pivotal counterpoint in the debate, arguing that Heart of Darkness dehumanizes Africans and should not be upheld as a literary classic. Long further situates this discourse in contemporary postcolonial literary responses, such as Kamel Daoud’s The Meursault Investigation, which reimagines Camus’ novel from the perspective of the unnamed murdered “Arab” and interrogates the legacy of French colonialism.
The chapter highlights the broader implications of this debate for postcolonial literary studies, addressing whether texts that employ racist tropes can still be read as critiques of empire and how they should be approached in educational and critical contexts. Long ultimately argues for a nuanced contrapuntal reading that acknowledges the limitations of these canonical texts while resisting both their outright rejection and an uncritical valorization. His work contributes to ongoing discussions in literary theory regarding the ethics of reading, the role of race in modernist literature, and the politics of canon formation in postcolonial and decolonial studies.
Summary of “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long
Main Ideas
Ahmad’s Critique of Said’s Literary Analysis
Aijaz Ahmad critiques Edward Said’s literary criticism in Orientalism and After (1992), arguing that Said absolves cosmopolitan modernist writers like Joseph Conrad and E.M. Forster of racism while critiquing others (Long, p. 235).
Ahmad claims Said’s work is shaped by Cold War intellectual traditions, particularly the influence of Lionel Trilling and Clement Greenberg (Long, p. 236).
Said’s Engagement with Conrad and Camus
Said’s work, especially in Culture and Imperialism, focuses extensively on Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, yet he does not fully respond to Chinua Achebe’s condemnation of Conrad as a “thoroughgoing racist” (Long, p. 235).
Long compares Said’s treatment of Heart of Darkness with The Stranger by Albert Camus, arguing that while Conrad’s racism is overt, Camus’ novel represents “liberal settler consciousness” (Long, p. 235-236).
Achebe’s Rejection of Conrad and the Defense of Heart of Darkness
Achebe denounces Heart of Darkness for its racist language and portrayal of Africans, calling it a work that questions “the very humanity of black people” (Long, p. 237).
Conrad scholars like Cedric Watts and Hunt Hawkins defend Heart of Darkness, arguing it critiques rather than perpetuates imperialism (Long, p. 238).
Some scholars argue Achebe misreads Conrad, while others acknowledge the novella’s racial biases but insist on its literary complexity (Long, p. 238).
The Role of Contrapuntal Reading and Standpoint Theory
Long discusses Said’s contrapuntal reading strategy, which examines what is both “there and not there” in texts (Long, p. 241).
Said applies this method to Camus’ The Stranger, recognizing how the novel omits Algerian perspectives while framing French colonial subjects as universal figures (Long, p. 243).
Standpoint theory emerges as an essential lens in Said’s post-Orientalism work, where he examines literature from the perspective of historically marginalized groups (Long, p. 246).
The Cold War Cultural Critique and Literary Canon Formation
Said’s preference for canonical texts aligns with Cold War cultural critique, which emphasized detachment, irony, and aesthetic independence from political ideology (Long, p. 245).
Literary critics like Trilling and Greenberg argue for an elite, high-art literary tradition, which influences Said’s approach to literature (Long, p. 245).
This tradition values writers like Conrad and Camus while marginalizing Third World writers, a criticism Ahmad levels against Said (Long, p. 236).
Contemporary Postcolonial Reinterpretations
Kamel Daoud’s The Meursault Investigation (2015) offers a counter-narrative to Camus’ The Stranger, giving voice to the murdered “Arab” by telling the story from his brother’s perspective (Long, p. 247).
The novel critiques the colonial legacy of French Algeria and highlights the silencing of native voices in European literature (Long, p. 248).
Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved?
Long concludes that cosmopolitan writers cannot be entirely absolved of racism; rather, their works should be critically examined through contrapuntal reading and postcolonial critique (Long, p. 248).
While Said does not explicitly condemn writers like Conrad and Camus, his analysis reveals how their works are implicated in colonialist and racist ideologies (Long, p. 249).
The debate extends into pedagogy: should works like Heart of Darkness still be taught, and if so, in what context? (Long, p. 249).
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long
Term/Concept
Definition & Explanation
Reference in the Chapter
Cosmopolitan Writer
A worldly intellectual who operates beyond national ideologies and engages with multiple cultural traditions, often associated with figures like Joseph Conrad and Albert Camus.
“The cosmopolitan writer is not the critic Edward Said but rather the cosmopolitan intellectual, a worldly figure who thinks and writes from the borders of national ideology, a detached critic.” (Long, p. 235)
Cold War Cultural Critique
A form of literary and cultural analysis shaped by Cold War ideological values, emphasizing aesthetic detachment, irony, and universalism while often marginalizing anti-colonial and Marxist perspectives.
“Said’s valuation of Joseph Conrad and many other cosmopolitan writers is rooted in what I call a Cold War cultural critique.” (Long, p. 245)
Contrapuntal Reading
A method of reading that examines both what is present and absent in a text, recognizing the ideological structures that shape its meaning.
“A contrapuntal reading recognizes the oppositions – the implicit/explicit and the absent/present – that underpin a text.” (Long, p. 241)
Standpoint Theory
A theoretical approach that emphasizes reading and interpreting literature from the perspective of marginalized or colonized subjects.
“His reading practice here is linked to standpoint, a term or hermeneutic with which we might reassess and press his idea of the contrapuntal reading.” (Long, p. 246)
A concept developed by Edward Said describing the Western construction of the “Orient” as an exotic, inferior, and monolithic Other.
“Orientalism is a book that is in spirit, if not word, supportive of Achebe’s criticism of the legacy of colonialism and racism in American and European literary criticism.” (Long, p. 237)
Postcolonial Criticism
A theoretical framework that analyzes literature through the lens of colonial histories, racial hierarchies, and imperial legacies.
“Said increasingly asserts the importance of political critique, coalescing in his ideas of the contrapuntal and, especially, standpoint.” (Long, p. 246)
A worldview that privileges European culture, history, and literature as superior or universal, often at the expense of non-Western perspectives.
“Ahmad also criticizes Said’s use of the work of Michel Foucault, as, while Said remains an avowed humanist, Foucault’s project was entirely opposed to the institutions of the Enlightenment and Western humanism.” (Long, p. 236)
Colonial Discourse
The system of representation through which colonial powers construct the identities of colonizers and the colonized.
“Achebe’s reading of Heart of Darkness is contrapuntal, as Africa is a site for Europe’s metaphysical crises and a place to stage its ‘comforting myths’.” (Long, p. 237)
Literary Canon Formation
The process through which certain texts are deemed as “great” or “universal,” often reinforcing Western-centric values while marginalizing non-Western voices.
“Should the novella be taught at all, and, if so, in what sort of pedagogical context?” (Long, p. 238)
Liberal Settler Consciousness
The ideological framework in which colonial settlers perceive themselves as both progressive and universal, while remaining complicit in colonial domination.
“The Stranger is more difficult to read as a racist text, and it is only with Said’s reading practice that we might understand how this vaunted novel of Western consciousness is in fact an insidious text of liberal settler consciousness.” (Long, p. 236)
Contribution of “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long to Literary Theory/Theories
Challenges the Eurocentrism of literary canon formation by interrogating the continued valorization of Conrad, Camus, and other modernist writers.
Critiques the exclusion of Third World writers from dominant literary discourse, aligning with Aijaz Ahmad’s arguments in In Theory (1992).
Questions how postcolonial studies should approach racist texts: “Should the novella be taught at all, and, if so, in what sort of pedagogical context?” (Long, p. 238).
Demonstrates how colonial discourse shapes literary representations, as seen in Achebe’s critique of Conrad: “Achebe’s reading of Heart of Darkness is contrapuntal, as Africa is a site for Europe’s metaphysical crises and a place to stage its ‘comforting myths’.” (Long, p. 237).
2. Contrapuntal Reading (Edward Said)
Builds on Said’s contrapuntal reading method, which highlights what is both present and absent in literary texts.
Examines how Said applied this reading strategy to Heart of Darkness and The Stranger, revealing underlying colonial ideologies.
Proposes a more rigorous application of contrapuntal reading to expose racial biases and class hierarchies in literature: “A contrapuntal reading recognizes the oppositions – the implicit/explicit and the absent/present – that underpin a text.” (Long, p. 241).
Extends contrapuntal reading to contemporary texts like Kamel Daoud’s The Meursault Investigation, which “offers a counter-narrative to Camus’ The Stranger, giving voice to the murdered ‘Arab’ by telling the story from his brother’s perspective.” (Long, p. 247).
3. Cold War Cultural Critique
Examines how Cold War intellectual traditions shaped Said’s literary criticism, influencing his engagement with modernist literature.
Highlights the ideological roots of aesthetic detachment, irony, and cosmopolitanism in mid-20th-century literary criticism: “Said’s valuation of Joseph Conrad and many other cosmopolitan writers is rooted in what I call a Cold War cultural critique.” (Long, p. 245).
Links Cold War literary criticism to the marginalization of anti-colonial and Marxist perspectives in Western academia: “The anticommunism, elitism, and values of the Cold War cultural critique are finally a function – moralizing – of a moral purpose and cause.” (Long, p. 245).
4. Standpoint Theory (Feminist and Postcolonial Adaptation)
Argues that literary criticism must be informed by the perspectives of marginalized and colonized groups.
Advocates for reading texts “from the standpoint of its victims,” following Said’s approach in Zionism from the Standpoint of its Victims (Long, p. 246).
Demonstrates how Algerian and African voices—such as Daoud’s The Meursault Investigation and Achebe’s An Image of Africa—challenge Western literary interpretations: “Achebe is right; to the African reader the price of Conrad’s eloquent denunciation of colonization is the recycling of racist notions of the ‘dark’ continent and her people.” (Long, p. 247).
5. Canon Formation and Literary Pedagogy
Engages in the debate over whether racially problematic literary texts should remain in the literary canon.
Acknowledges the aesthetic complexity of texts like Heart of Darkness while questioning their continued prominence in education: “It is hard to imagine a classroom in the United States today where one might teach Heart of Darkness in the aesthetic terms – irony, detachment, existential, écriture blanche – in which it was championed for so many years.” (Long, p. 249).
Suggests that literary pedagogy should balance critique with historical contextualization, rather than moralizing rejection: “We can read – and teach in the appropriate context – contrapuntally even the most racist poems and novels, not as an affirmation of racism or sexism but rather as a critical analysis of how the questionable worldview, and hegemony, works in a given text.” (Long, p. 248).
Examples of Critiques Through “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long
Literary Work
Critique in Long’s Chapter
Key Theoretical Concerns
Heart of Darkness (Joseph Conrad, 1902)
– Chinua Achebe condemns the novella as a “thoroughgoing racist” text that dehumanizes Africans and perpetuates imperialist ideology (Long, p. 235). – Edward Said, while acknowledging its racial biases, argues that its narrative technique (irony and detachment) critiques imperialism rather than affirming it (Long, p. 241). – Scholars like Cedric Watts defend Conrad, claiming Heart of Darkness exposes, rather than endorses, colonialism (Long, p. 238).
– Postcolonial Criticism (Achebe’s critique of racism in literature). – Contrapuntal Reading (Said’s nuanced interpretation of Conrad’s work). – Canon Formation Debate (Should racist texts be taught in classrooms?)
The Stranger (L’Étranger) (Albert Camus, 1942)
– Long critiques Said’s reading of Camus, arguing that The Stranger reflects “liberal settler consciousness,” an insidious colonial worldview that erases native Algerian perspectives (Long, p. 236). – Conor Cruise O’Brien critiques Camus for reinforcing a Eurocentric, colonialist narrative, as the murdered “Arab” remains unnamed and dehumanized (Long, p. 243). – Said views Camus as “a moral man in an immoral situation,” highlighting the contradictions in his stance on colonial Algeria (Long, p. 243).
– Colonial Discourse (The erasure of indigenous Algerians). – Cold War Cultural Critique (Camus as an existentialist figure aligned with European humanism). – Contrapuntal Reading (Long argues for a more critical reassessment of Camus’ political implications).
The Meursault Investigation (Kamel Daoud, 2015)
– Presents a counter-narrative to The Stranger, giving the murdered Arab a name (Musa) and telling the story from his brother’s perspective (Long, p. 247). – Daoud critiques Camus’ colonial erasure, rewriting the narrative from the standpoint of an Algerian victim of colonial violence (Long, p. 247). – Highlights the failure of postcolonial states to adequately address colonial histories, challenging both French and Algerian nationalist narratives (Long, p. 248).
– Postcolonial Rewriting (Reframing colonial literature from the perspective of the oppressed). – Standpoint Theory (The importance of marginalized perspectives in literary critique). – Contrapuntal Reading (How colonial legacies persist in literature).
A Bend in the River (V. S. Naipaul, 1979)
– Said critiques Naipaul for adopting an anti-African, colonialist perspective, arguing that the novel echoes Heart of Darkness in its depiction of postcolonial Africa as chaotic and ungovernable (Long, p. 241). – Naipaul’s portrayal of African politics is rooted in Eurocentric pessimism, reinforcing Western stereotypes of post-independence African nations (Long, p. 242). – Long aligns Said’s criticism with a broader discussion of cosmopolitan writers who, while critical of empire, still adopt colonialist frameworks (Long, p. 241).
– Postcolonial Critique of Cosmopolitanism (Naipaul as a “cosmopolitan intellectual” detached from Third World struggles). – Eurocentrism in Postcolonial Literature (Depicting Africa through a Western lens). – Canon Formation and Pedagogy (Should Naipaul’s work be read as critique or reinforcement of imperialist ideology?).
Criticism Against “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long
Overemphasis on Said’s Intellectual Formation
Long attributes Said’s contradictions largely to Cold War cultural critique, particularly the influence of Lionel Trilling and Clement Greenberg, but underplays Said’s engagement with anti-colonial and Marxist thinkers like Frantz Fanon and Antonio Gramsci (Long, p. 236).
This reduces Said’s complex theoretical shifts to Cold War liberalism rather than acknowledging his later political radicalization.
Limited Engagement with Third-World Literature
Long critiques Said for favoring Western canonical writers over Third World authors (Long, p. 236), yet his own analysis remains focused on figures like Conrad, Camus, and Naipaul, engaging only briefly with writers like Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and Kamel Daoud.
His work could benefit from more discussion of non-Western literary traditions and their critiques of cosmopolitanism.
Contradictions in the Evaluation of Cosmopolitan Writers
While Long argues that cosmopolitanism often masks Eurocentrism, he still engages with texts by cosmopolitan writers (e.g., Conrad, Camus, Naipaul) without fully exploring alternative postcolonial or indigenous literary frameworks (Long, p. 248).
His critique does not fully address whether all cosmopolitan intellectuals are inevitably implicated in colonial discourse or if some transcend these limitations.
Insufficient Discussion on Teaching Racist Texts
Long raises the issue of whether texts like Heart of Darkness should still be taught but does not provide a clear pedagogical framework for how they should be approached in the classroom (Long, p. 238).
His argument remains ambiguous on whether the contrapuntal method alone is enough to justify their continued inclusion in literary curricula.
Binary Framing of Postcolonial Criticism
His analysis sometimes frames postcolonial criticism as either moralistic denunciation (Ahmad) or contrapuntal critique (Said) without considering other methodologies (Long, p. 249).
This neglects alternative postcolonial approaches, such as decoloniality, that might offer more radical critiques beyond contrapuntal reading.
Neglects the Role of Gender in Literary Criticism
While engaging with race, colonialism, and class, Long does not address the role of gender and how colonial discourse intersects with representations of women in cosmopolitan literature (Long, p. 237).
His discussion of Heart of Darkness and The Strangerdoes not critically examine the portrayal of women in these texts, despite their importance in colonial narratives.
Representative Quotations from “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long with Explanation
“Indeed, Said never fully answered Chinua Achebe’s denunciation of the novelist as a ‘thoroughgoing racist,’ and his reluctance, I argue, is rooted in his intellectual formation in Cold War literary and cultural criticism.” (p. 235)
Long critiques Said’s hesitance to engage with Achebe’s critique of Heart of Darkness, attributing this to Said’s academic background, which was shaped by Cold War intellectuals such as Lionel Trilling.
“The racism of Heart of Darkness is obvious, The Stranger is more difficult to read as a racist text, and it is only with Said’s reading practice … that we might understand how this vaunted novel of Western consciousness is in fact an insidious text of liberal settler consciousness.” (p. 235)
Long highlights how different canonical texts contain racial biases, suggesting that Said’s methods help expose their ideological underpinnings. He suggests that Camus’ The Stranger also embodies colonial racism, despite its surface neutrality.
“Ahmad also criticizes Said’s use of the work of Michel Foucault, as, while Said remains an avowed humanist, Foucault’s project was entirely opposed to the institutions of the Enlightenment and Western humanism.” (p. 236)
Aijaz Ahmad critiques Said for inconsistencies in his theoretical influences, noting a contradiction in his admiration for both Foucault and the humanist literary tradition.
“It is especially exasperating for Ahmad that Said champions Salman Rushdie, a writer long based in Britain. Without supporting the fatwa, Ahmad points out that Rushdie writes for an elite Anglophone audience, not his fellow working-class Britons of South Asian ancestry.” (p. 236)
Ahmad sees a contradiction in Said’s postcolonial critique, arguing that Said privileges cosmopolitan, elite writers over more grounded Third World voices.
“The strongest parts of his argument, however, concern the representation of Africans in Heart of Darkness and the racist language of the text.” (p. 237)
Long acknowledges Achebe’s critique of Conrad’s portrayal of Africans as dehumanized figures, reinforcing the argument that Heart of Darkness perpetuates racist imagery.
“Should the novella be taught at all, and, if so, in what sort of pedagogical context?” (p. 238)
Long raises the important question of how racist texts should be engaged in contemporary classrooms—whether they should be studied as historical artifacts or challenged through new critical frameworks.
“It is only in his well-known chapter of Culture and Imperialism ‘Two Visions in Heart of Darkness’ that Said finally discusses the colonial and racial references and textual features of this novella.” (p. 241)
Long points out that Said took a long time to directly address the racial aspects of Heart of Darkness, suggesting an initial reluctance to frame it as a racist text.
“For O’Brien, as Said observes, Camus was a ‘moral man in an immoral situation,’ a position which preserves his humanist reputation and resonates with Said’s comments on Conrad and his novella.” (p. 243)
Long connects critiques of Conrad and Camus, arguing that both are excused as humanists despite the colonialist and racist dimensions of their works.
“Simply put, Said’s valuation of Joseph Conrad and many other cosmopolitan writers is rooted in what I call a Cold War cultural critique, albeit with some aspects inverted.” (p. 244)
Long introduces the idea that Said’s literary criticism was shaped by Cold War-era aesthetic and political debates, which shaped his tendency to defend certain canonical figures.
“And yet, yes, we should not jettison these texts, at least according to Said’s valuation of literature in Orientalism and in Culture and Imperialism … even the most racist poems and novels, not as an affirmation of racism or sexism but rather as a critical analysis of how the questionable worldview, and hegemony, works in a given text.” (p. 248)
Long concludes that racist texts should not be discarded but rather critically analyzed using Said’s contrapuntal method, which exposes their underlying power structures.
Suggested Readings: “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?” by Andew C. Long
Long, Andrew C. “Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism?.” Orientalism and Literature.
Long AC. Can the Cosmopolitan Writer Be Absolved of Racism? In: Nash GP, ed. Orientalism and Literature. Cambridge Critical Concepts. Cambridge University Press; 2019:235-252.
“Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning first appeared in 1850 as part of his collection Christmas-Eve and Easter-Day.
Introduction: “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
“Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning first appeared in 1850 as part of his collection Christmas-Eve and Easter-Day. The poem is a dramatic monologue exploring themes of faith, doubt, religious experience, and the tension between institutionalized religion and personal spirituality. Browning presents a journey of religious introspection through the perspective of a skeptical yet searching narrator who attends different Christian services—first in a Nonconformist chapel, then at St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, and finally in a German university lecture hall. The poem’s popularity lies in its rich philosophical and theological engagement, as well as Browning’s ability to depict religious experiences with psychological depth. Through striking imagery and rhythmic variation, he contrasts the rigid dogmatism of different religious traditions with the intimate and mystical experience of divine revelation. The narrator’s ultimate realization that personal faith transcends doctrinal barriers is symbolized by his vision of Christ’s garment, reinforcing the idea that true spiritual connection is found beyond mere rituals and theological debates. The poem’s vivid descriptions—such as the stormy night setting of the chapel (“the rain kept driving” and “the crazy hinge”)—create a sensory experience that mirrors the narrator’s inner turmoil. Similarly, the grand spectacle of St. Peter’s Basilica, where “earth breaks up, time drops away,” heightens the contrast between ornate Catholic ritual and personal faith. Browning’s exploration of faith remains relevant because of its nuanced treatment of doubt and conviction, making Christmas Eve an enduring work in religious and philosophical poetry.
Text: “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
I. OUT of the little chapel I burst Into the fresh night air again. I had waited a good five minutes first In the doorway, to escape the rain That drove in gusts down the common’s centre, At the edge of which the chapel stands, Before I plucked up heart to enter: Heaven knows how many sorts of hands Reached past me, groping for the latch Of the inner door that hung on catch, More obstinate the more they fumbled, Till, giving way at last with a scold Of the crazy hinge, in squeezed or tumbled One sheep more to the rest in fold, And left me irresolute, standing sentry In the sheepfold’s lath-and-plaster entry, Four feet long by two feet wide, Partitioned off from the vast inside— I blocked up half of it at least. No remedy; the rain kept driving: They eyed me much as some wild beast, The congregation, still arriving, Some of them by the mainroad, white A long way past me into the night, Skirting the common, then diverging; Not a few suddenly emerging From the common’s self thro’ the paling-gaps,— —They house in the gravel-pits perhaps, Where the road stops short with its safeguard border Of lamps, as tired of such disorder;— But the most turned in yet more abruptly From a certain squalid knot of alleys, Where the town’s bad blood once slept corruptly, Which now the little chapel rallies And leads into day again,—its priestliness Lending itself to hide their beastliness So cleverly (thanks in part to the mason), And putting so cheery a whitewashed face on Those neophytes too much in lack of it, That, where you cross the common as I did, And meet the party thus presided, “Mount Zion,” with Love-lane at the back of it, They front you as little disconcerted, As, bound for the hills, her fate averted And her wicked people made to mind him, Lot might have marched with Gomorrah behind him.
II. Well, from the road, the lanes or the common, In came the flock: the fat weary woman, Panting and bewildered, down-clapping Her umbrella with a mighty report, Grounded it by me, wry and flapping, A wreck of whalebones; then, with a snort, Like a startled horse, at the interloper Who humbly knew himself improper, But could not shrink up small enough, Round to the door, and in,—the gruff Hinge’s invariable scold Making your very blood run cold. Prompt in the wake of her, up-pattered On broken clogs, the many-tattered Little old-faced, peaking sister-turned-mother Of the sickly babe she tried to smother Somehow up, with its spotted face, From the cold, on her breast, the one warm place; She too must stop, wring the poor suds dry Of a draggled shawl, and add thereby Her tribute to the door-mat, sopping Already from my own clothes’ dropping, Which yet she seemed to grudge I should stand on; Then stooping down to take off her pattens, She bore them defiantly, in each hand one, Planted together before her breast And its babe, as good as a lance in rest. Close on her heels, the dingy satins Of a female something, past me flitted, With lips as much too white, as a streak Lay far too red on each hollow cheek; And it seemed the very door-hinge pitied All that was left of a woman once, Holding at least its tongue for the nonce. Then a tall yellow man, like the Penitent Thief, With his jaw bound up in a handkerchief, And eyelids screwed together tight, Led himself in by some inner light. And, except from him, from each that entered, I had the same interrogation— “What, you, the alien, you have ventured “To take with us, elect, your station? “A carer for none of it, a Gallio?”— Thus, plain as print, I read the glance At a common prey, in each countenance, As of huntsman giving his hounds the tallyho: And, when the door’s cry drowned their wonder, The draught, it always sent in shutting, Made the flame of the single tallow candle In the cracked square lanthorn I stood under, Shoot its blue lip at me, rebutting, As it were, the luckless cause of scandal: I verily thought the zealous light (In the chapel’s secret, too!) for spite, Would shudder itself clean off the wick, With the airs of a St. John’s Candlestick. There was no standing it much longer. “Good folks,” said I, as resolve grew stronger, “This way you perform the Grand-Inquisitor, “When the weather sends you a chance visitor? “You are the men, and wisdom shall die with you, “And none of the old Seven Churches vie with you! “But still, despite the pretty perfection “To which you carry your trick of exclusiveness, “And, taking God’s word under wise protection, “Correct its tendency to diffusiveness, “Bidding one reach it over hot ploughshares,— “Still, as I say, though you’ve found salvation, “If I should choose to cry—as now—’Shares!’— “See if the best of you bars me my ration! “Because I prefer for my expounder “Of the laws of the feast, the feast’s own Founder: “Mine’s the same right with your poorest and sickliest, “Supposing I don the marriage-vestiment; “So, shut your mouth, and open your Testament, “And carve me my portion at your quickliest!” Accordingly, as a shoemaker’s lad With wizened face in want of soap, And wet apron wound round his waist like a rope, After stopping outside, for his cough was bad, To get the fit over, poor gentle creature, And so avoid disturbing the preacher, Passed in, I sent my elbow spikewise At the shutting door, and entered likewise,— Received the hinge’s accustomed greeting, Crossed the threshold’s magic pentacle, And found myself in full conventicle, —To wit, in Zion Chapel Meeting, On the Christmas-Eve of ‘Forty-nine, Which, calling its flock to their special clover, Found them assembled and one sheep over, Whose lot, as the weather pleased, was mine.
III. I very soon had enough of it. The hot smell and the human noises, And my neighbour’s coat, the greasy cuff of it, Were a pebble-stone that a child’s hand poises, Compared with the pig-of-lead-like pressure Of the preaching-man’s immense stupidity, As he poured his doctrine forth, full measure, To meet his audience’s avidity. You needed not the wit of the Sybil To guess the cause of it all, in a twinkling— No sooner had our friend an inkling Of treasure hid in the Holy Bible, (Whenever it was the thought first struck hin How Death, at unawares, might duck him Deeper than the grave, and quench The gin-shop’s light in Hell’s grim drench) Than he handled it so, in fine irreverence, As to hug the Book of books to pieces: And, a patchwork of chapters and texts in severance, Not improved by the private dog’s-ears and creases, Having clothed his own soul with, he’d fain see equipt yours,— So tossed you again your Holy Scriptures. And you picked them up, in a sense, no doubt: Nay, had but a single face of my neighbours Appeared to suspect that the preacher’s labours Were help which the world could be saved without, ‘Tis odds but I had borne in quiet A qualm or two at my spiritual diet; Or, who can tell? had even mustered Somewhat to urge in behalf of the sermon: But the flock sate on, divinely flustered, Sniffing, methought, its dew of Hermon With such content in every snuffle, As the devil inside us loves to ruffle. My old fat woman purred with pleasure, And thumb round thumb went twirling faster While she, to his periods keeping measure, Maternally devoured the pastor. The man with the handkerchief, untied it. Showed us a horrible wen inside it, Gave his eyelids yet another screwing. And rocked himself as the woman was doing. The shoemaker’s lad, discreetly choking, Kept down his cough. ‘Twas too provoking! My gorge rose at the nonsense and stuff of it, And saying, like Eve when she plucked the apple, “I wanted a taste, and now there’s enough of it,” I flung out of the little chapel.
IV. There was a lull in the rain, a lull In the wind too; the moon was risen, And would have shone out pure and full, But for the ramparted cloud-prison, Block on block built up in the west, For what purpose the wind knows best, Who changes his mind continually. And the empty other half of the sky Seemed in its silence as if it knew What, any moment, might look through A chance-gap in that fortress massy:— Through its fissures you got hints Of the flying moon, by the shifting tints, Now, a dull lion-colour, now, brassy Burning to yellow, and whitest yellow, Like furnace-smoke just ere the flames bellow, All a-simmer with intense strain To let her through,—then blank again, At the hope of her appearance failing. Just by the chapel, a break in the railing Shows a narrow path directly across; ‘Tis ever dry walking there, on the moss— Besides, you go gently all the way uphill: I stooped under and soon felt better: My head grew light, my limbs more supple, As I walked on, glad to have slipt the fetter; My mind was full of the scene I had left, That placid flock, that pastor vociferant, —How this outside was pure and different! The sermon, now—what a mingled weft Of good and ill! were either less, Its fellow had coloured the whole distinctly; But alas for the excellent earnestness, And the truths, quite true if stated succinctly, But as surely false, in their quaint presentment, However to pastor and flock’s contentment! Say rather, such truths looked false to your eyes, With his provings and parallels twisted and twined, Till how could you know them, grown double their size, In the natural fog of the good man’s mind? Like yonder spots of our roadside lamps, Haloed about with the common’s damps. Truth remains true, the fault’s in the prover; The zeal was good, and the aspiration; And yet, and yet, yet, fifty times over, Pharaoh received no demonstration By his Baker’s dream of Baskets Three, Of the doctrine of the Trinity,— Although, as our preacher thus embellished it, Apparently his hearers relished it With so unfeigned a gust—who knows if They did not prefer our friend to Joseph? But so it is everywhere, one way with all of them! These people have really felt, no doubt, A something, the motion they style the Call of them; And this is their method of bringing about, By a mechanism of words and tones, (So many texts in so many groans) A sort of reviving or reproducing, More or less perfectly, (who can tell?—) Of the mood itself, that strengthens by using; And how it happens, I understand well. A tune was born in my head last week, Out of the thump-thump and shriek-shriek Of the train, as I came by it, up from Manchester; And when, next week, I take it back again, My head will sing to the engine’s clack again, While it only makes my neighbour’s haunches stir, —Finding no dormant musical sprout In him, as in me, to be jolted out. ‘Tis the taught already that profit by teaching; He gets no more from the railway’s preaching, Than, from this preacher who does the rail’s office, I, Whom therefore the flock casts a jealous eye on. Still, why paint over their door “Mount Zion,” To which all flesh shall come, saith the prophecy?
V. But wherefore be harsh on a single case? After how many modes, this Christmas-Eve, Does the selfsame weary thing take place? The same endeavour to make you believe, And much with the same effect, no more: Each method abundantly convincing, As I say, to those convinced before, But scarce to he swallowed without wincing, By the not-as-yet-convinced. For me, I have my own church equally. And in this church my faith sprang first! (I said, as I reached the rising ground, And the wind began again, with a burst Of rain in my face, and a glad rebound From the heart beneath, as if, God speeding me, I entered His church-door, Nature leading me) —In youth I looked to these very skies, And probing their immensities, I found God there, His visible power; Yet felt in my heart, amid all its sense Of that power, an equal evidence That His love, there too, was the nobler dower. For the loving worm within its clod, Were diviner than a loveless god Amid his worlds, I will dare to say. You know what I mean: God’s all, man’s nought: But also, God, whose pleasure brought Man into being, stands away As it were, an handbreadth off, to give Room for the newly-made to live, And look at Him from a place apart, And use his gifts of brain and heart, Given, indeed, but to keep for ever. Who speaks of man, then, must not sever Man’s very elements from man, Saying, “But all is God’s”—whose plan Was to create man and then leave him Able, His own word saith, to grieve Him, But able to glorify Him too, As a mere machine could never do, That prayed or praised, all unaware Of its fitness for aught but praise and prayer, Made perfect as a thing of course. Man, therefore, stands on his own stock Of love and power as a pin-point rock, And, looking to God who ordained divorce Of the rock from His boundless continent, Sees in His Power made evident, Only excess by a million fold O’er the power God gave man in the mould. For, see: Man’s hand, first formed to carry A few pounds’ weight, when taught to marry Its strength with an engine’s, lifts a mountain, —Advancing in power by one degree; And why count steps through eternity? But Love is the ever springing fountain: Man may enlarge or narrow his bed For the water’s play, but the water head— How can he multiply or reduce it? As easy create it, as cause it to cease: He may profit by it, or abuse it; But ’tis not a thing to bear increase As power will: be love less or more In the heart of man, he keeps it shut Or opes it wide as he pleases, but Love’s sum remains what it was before. So, gazing up, in my youth, at love As seen through power, ever above All modes which make it manifest, My soul brought all to a single test— That He, the Eternal First and Last, Who, in His power, had so surpassed All man conceives of what is might,— Whose wisdom, too, showed infinite, —Would prove as infinitely good; Would never, my soul understood, With power to work all love desires, Bestow e’en less than man requires: That He who endlessly was teaching, Above my spirit’s utmost reaching, What love can do in the leaf or stone, (So that to master this alone, This done in the stone or leaf for me, I must go on learning endlessly) Would never need that I, in turn, Should point him out a defect unheeded, And show that God had yet to learn What the meanest human creature needed,— —Not life, to wit, for a few short years, Tracking His way through doubts and fears, While the stupid earth on which I stay Suffers no change, but passive adds Its myriad years to myriads, Though I, He gave it to, decay, Seeing death come and choose about me, And my dearest ones depart without me. No! love which, on earth, amid all the shows of it, Has ever been seen the sole good of life in it, The love, ever growing there, spite of the strife in it, Shall arise, made perfect, from death’s repose of it! And I shall behold Thee, face to face, O God, and in Thy light retrace How in all I loved here, still wast Thou! Whom pressing to, then, as I fain would now, I shall find as able to satiate The love, Thy gift, as my spirit’s wonder Thou art able to quicken and sublimate, Was this sky of Thine, that I now walk under, And glory in Thee as thus I gaze, —Thus, thus! oh, let men keep their ways Of seeking Thee in a narrow shrine— Be this my way! And this is mine!
VI. For lo, what think you? suddenly The rain and the wind ceased, and the sky Received at once the full fruition Of the moon’s consummate apparition. The black cloud-barricade was riven, Ruined beneath her feet, and driven Deep in the west; while, bare and breathless, North and south and east lay ready For a glorious Thing, that, dauntless, deathless, Sprang across them, and stood steady. ‘Twas a moon-rainbow, vast and perfect, From heaven to heaven extending, perfect As the mother-moon’s self, full in face. It rose, distinctly at the base With its seven proper colours chorded, Which still, in the rising, were compressed, Until at last they coalesced, And supreme the spectral creature lorded In a triumph of whitest white,— Above which intervened the night. But above night too, like the next, The second of a wondrous sequence, Reaching in rare and rarer frequence, Till the heaven of heavens be circumflext, Another rainbow rose, a mightier, Fainter, flushier, and flightier,— Rapture dying along its verge! Oh, whose foot shall I see emerge, WHOSE, from the straining topmost dark, On to the keystone of that arc?
VII. This sight was shown me, there and then,— Me, one out of a world of men, Singled forth, as the chance might hap To another, if in a thunderclap Where I heard noise, and you saw flame, Some one man knew God called his name. For me, I think I said, “Appear! “Good were it to be ever here. “If Thou wilt, let me build to Thee “Service-tabernacles Three, “Where, for ever in Thy presence, “In extatic acquiescence, “Far alike from thriftless learning “And ignorance’s undiscerning, ” I may worship and remain!” Thus, at the show above me, gazing With upturned eyes, I felt my brain Glutted with the glory, blazing Throughout its whole mass, over and under, Until at length it burst asunder, And out of it bodily there streamed The too-much glory, as it seemed, Passing from out me to the ground, Then palely serpentining round Into the dark with mazy error.
VIII. All at once I looked up with terror. He was there. He Himself with His human air, On the narrow pathway, just before: I saw the back of Him, no more— He had left the chapel, then, as I. I forgot all about the sky. No face: only the sight Of a sweepy Garment, vast and white, With a hem that I could recognise. I felt terror, no surprise: My mind filled with the cataract, At one bound, of the mighty fact. I remembered, He did say Doubtless, that, to this world’s end, Where two or three should meet and pray, He would be in the midst, their Friend: Certainly He was there with them. And my pulses leaped for joy Of the golden thought without alloy, That I saw His very Vesture’s hem. Then rushed the blood back, cold and clear With a fresh enhancing shiver of fear, And I hastened, cried out while I pressed To the salvation of the Vest, “But not so, Lord! It cannot be “That Thou, indeed, art leaving me— “Me, that have despised Thy friends. “Did my heart make no amends? “Thou art the Love of God—above “His Power, didst hear me place His Love, “And that was leaving the world for Thee! “Therefore Thou must not turn from me “As if I had chosen the other part. “Folly and pride o’ercame my heart. “Our best is bad, nor bears Thy test “Still it should be our very best. “I thought it best that Thou, the Spirit, “Be worshipped in spirit and in truth, “And in beauty, as even we require it— “Not in the forms burlesque, uncouth, “I left but now, as scarcely fitted “For Thee: I knew not what I pitied: “But, all I felt there, right or wrong, “What is it to Thee, who curest sinning? “Am I not weak as Thou art strong? “I have looked to Thee from the beginning, “Straight up to Thee through all the world “Which, like an idle scroll, lay furled “To nothingness on either side: “And since the time Thou wast descried, “Spite of the weak heart, so have I “Lived ever, and so fain would die, “Living and dying, Thee before! “But if Thou leavest me—”
IX. Less or more, I suppose that I spoke thus. When,—have mercy, Lord, on us! The whole Face turned upon me full. And I spread myself beneath it, As when the bleacher spreads, to seethe it In the cleansing sun, his wool,— Steeps in the flood of noontide whiteness Some defiled, discoloured web— So lay I, saturate with brightness. And when the flood appeared to ebb, Lo, I was walking, light and swift, With my senses settling fast and steadying, But my body caught up in the whirl and drift Of the Vesture’s amplitude, still eddying On, just before me, still to be followed, As it carried me after with its motion: What shall I say?—as a path were hollowed And a man went weltering through the ocean, Sucked along in the flying wake Of the luminous water-snake. Darkness and cold were cloven, as through I passed, upborne yet walking too. And I turned to myself at intervals,— “So He said, and so it befals. “God who registers the cup “Of mere cold water, for His sake “To a disciple rendered up, “Disdains not His own thirst to slake “At the poorest love was ever offered: “And because it was my heart I proffered, “With true love trembling at the brim, “He suffers me to follow Him “For ever, my own way,—dispensed “From seeking to be influenced “By all the less immediate ways “That earth, in worships manifold, “Adopts to reach, by prayer and praise, ‘The Garment’s hem, which, lo, I hold!”
X. And so we crossed the world and stopped. For where am I, in city or plain, Since I am ‘ware of the world again? And what is this that rises propped With pillars of prodigious girth? Is it really on the earth, This miraculous Dome of God? Has the angel’s measuring-rod Which numbered cubits, gem from gem, ‘Twixt the gates of the New Jerusalem, Meted it out,—and what he meted, Have the sons of men completed? —Binding, ever as he bade, Columns in this colonnade With arms wide open to embrace The entry of the human race To the breast of . . . what is it, yon building, Ablaze in front, all paint and gilding, With marble for brick, and stones of price For garniture of the edifice? Now I see: it is no dream: It stands there and it does not seem; For ever, in pictures, thus it looks, And thus I have read of it in books, Often in England, leagues away, And wondered how those fountains play, Growing up eternally Each to a musical water-tree, Whose blossoms drop, a glittering boon, Before my eyes, in the light of the moon, To the granite lavers underneath. Liar and dreamer in your teeth! I, the sinner that speak to you, Was in Rome this night, and stood, and knew Both this and more! For see, for see, The dark is rent, mine eye is free To pierce the crust of the outer wall, And I view inside, and all there, all, As the swarming hollow of a hive, The whole Basilica alive! Men in the chancel, body, and nave, Men on the pillars’ architrave, Men on the statues, men on the tombs With popes and kings in their porphyry wombs, All famishing in expectation Of the main-altar’s consummation. For see, for see, the rapturous moment Approaches, and earth’s best endowment Blends with heaven’s: the taper-fires Pant up, the winding brazen spires Heave loftier yet the baldachin: The incense-gaspings, long kept in, Suspire in clouds; the organ blatant Holds his breath and grovels latent, As if God’s hushing finger grazed him, (Like Behemoth when He praised him) At the silver bell’s shrill tinkling, Quick cold drops of terror sprinkling On the sudden pavement strewed With faces of the multitude. Earth breaks up, time drops away, In flows heaven, with its new day Of endless life, when He who trod, Very Man and very God, This earth in weakness, shame and pain, Dying the death whose signs remain Up yonder on the accursed tree,— Shall come again, no more to be Of captivity the thrall, But the one God, all in all, King of kings, and Lord of lords, As His servant John received the words, “I died, and live for evermore!”
XI. Yet I was left outside the door. Why sate I there on the threshold-stone, Left till He returns, alone Save for the Garment’s extreme fold Abandoned still to bless my hold?— My reason, to my doubt, replied, As if a book were opened wide, And at a certain page I traced Every record undefaced, Added by successive years,— The harvestings of truth’s stray ears Singly gleaned, and in one sheaf Bound together for belief. Yes, I said—that He will go And sit with these in turn, I know. Their faith’s heart beats, though her head swims Too giddily to guide her limbs, Disabled by their palsy-stroke From propping me. Though Rome’s gross yoke Drops off, no more to be endured, Her teaching is not so obscured By errors and perversities, That no truth shines athwart the lies: And He, whose eye detects a spark Even where, to man’s, the whole seems dark, May well see flame where each beholder Acknowledges the embers smoulder. But I, a mere man, fear to quit The clue God gave me as most fit To guide my footsteps through life’s maze, Because Himself discerns all ways Open to reach Him: I, a man He gave to mark where faith began To swerve aside, till from its summit Judgment drops her damning plummet, Pronouncing such a fatal space Departed from the Founder’s base: He will not bid me enter too, But rather sit, as now I do, Awaiting His return outside. —’Twas thus my reason straight replied, And joyously I turned, and pressed The Garment’s skirt upon my breast, Until, afresh its light suffusing me, My heart cried,—what has been abusing me That I should wait here lonely and coldly, Instead of rising, entering boldly, Baring truth’s face, and letting drift Her veils of lies as they choose to shift? Do these men praise Him? I will raise My voice up to their point of praise! I see the error; but above The scope of error, see the love.— Oh, love of those first Christian days! —Fanned so soon into a blaze, From the spark preserved by the trampled sect, That the antique sovereign Intellect Which then sate ruling in the world, Like a change in dreams, was hurled From the throne he reigned upon: —You looked up, and he was gone! Gone, his glory of the pen! —Love, with Greece and Rome in ken, Bade her scribes abhor the trick Of poetry and rhetoric, And exult, with hearts set free, In blessed imbecility Scrawled, perchance, on some torn sheet, Leaving Livy incomplete. Gone, his pride of sculptor, painter! —Love, while able to acquaint her With the thousand statues yet Fresh from chisel, pictures wet From brush, she saw on every side, Chose rather with an infant’s pride To frame those portents which impart Such unction to true Christian Art. Gone, Music too! The air was stirred By happy wings: Terpander’s bird (That, when the cold came, fled away) Would tarry not the wintry day,— As more-enduring sculpture must, Till a filthy saint rebuked the gust With which he chanced to get a sight Of some dear naked Aphrodite He glanced a thought above the toes of, By breaking zealously her nose off. Love, surely, from that music’s lingering, Might have filched her organ-fingering, Nor chose rather to set prayings To hog-grunts, praises to horse-neighings. Love was the startling thing, the new; Love was the all-sufficient too; And seeing that, you see the rest. As a babe can find its mother’s breast As well in darkness as in light, Love shut our eyes, and all seemed right. True, the world’s eyes are open now: —Less need for me to disallow Some few that keep Love’s zone unbuckled, Peevish as ever to be suckled, Lulled by the same old baby-prattle With intermixture of the rattle, When she would have them creep, stand steady Upon their feet, or walk already, Not to speak of trying to climb. I will be wise another time, And not desire a wall between us, When next I see a church-roof cover So many species of one genus, All with foreheads bearing Lover Written above the earnest eyes of them; All with breasts that beat for beauty, Whether sublimed, to the surprise of them, In noble daring, steadfast duty, The heroic in passion, or in action,— Or, lowered for the senses’ satisfaction, To the mere outside of human creatures, Mere perfect form and faultless features. What! with all Rome here, whence to levy Such contributions to their appetite, With women and men in a gorgeous bevy, They take, as it were, a padlock, and clap it tight On their southern eyes, restrained from feeding On the glories of their ancient reading, On the beauties of their modern singing, On the wonders of the builder’s bringing, On the majesties of Art around them,— And, all these loves, late struggling incessant, When faith has at last united and bound them, They offer up to God for a present! Why, I will, on the whole, be rather proud of it,— And, only taking the act in reference To the other recipients who might have allowed of it I will rejoice that God had the preference!
XII. So I summed up my new resolves: Too much love there can never be. And where the intellect devolves Its function on love exclusively, I, as one who possesses both, Will accept the provision, nothing loth, —Will feast my love, then depart elsewhere, That my intellect may find its share. And ponder, O soul, the while thou departest, And see thou applaud the great heart of the artist, Who, examining the capabilities Of the block of marble he has to fashion Into a type of thought or passion,— Not always, using obvious facilities, Shapes it, as any artist can, Into a perfect symmetrical man, Complete from head to foot of the life-size, Such as old Adam stood in his wife’s eyes,— But, now and then, bravely aspires to consummate A Colossus by no means so easy to come at, And uses the whole of his block for the bust, Leaving the minds of the public to finish it, Since cut it ruefully short he must: On the face alone he expends his devotion; He rather would mar than resolve to diminish it, —Saying, “Applaud me for this grand notion “Of what a face may be! As for completing it “In breast and body and limbs, do that, you!” All hail! I fancy how, happily meeting it, A trunk and legs would perfect the statue, Could man carve so as to answer volition. And how much nobler than petty cavils, A hope to find, in my spirit-travels, Some artist of another ambition, Who having a block to carve, no bigger, Has spent his power on the opposite quest, And believed to begin at the feet was best— For so may I see, ere I die, the whole figure!
XIII. No sooner said than out in the night! And still as we swept through storm and night, My heart beat lighter and more light: And lo, as before, I was walking swift, With my senses settling fast and steadying, But my body caught up in the whirl and drift Of the Vesture’s amplitude, still eddying On just before me, still to be followed, As it carried me after with its motion, —What shall I say?—as a path were hollowed, And a man went weltering through the ocean Sucked along in the flying wake Of the luminous water-snake.
XIV. Alone! I am left alone once more— (Save for the Garment’s extreme fold Abandoned still to bless my hold) Alone, beside the entrance-door Of a sort of temple,—perhaps a college, —Like nothing I ever saw before At home in England, to my knowledge. The tall, old, quaint, irregular town! It may be . . though which, I can’t affirm . . any Of the famous middle-age towns of Germany; And this flight of stairs where I sit down, Is it Halle, Weimar, Cassel, or Frankfort, Or Göttingen, that I have to thank for’t? It may be Göttingen,—most likely. Through the open door I catch obliquely Glimpses of a lecture-hall; And not a bad assembly neither— Ranged decent and symmetrical On benches, waiting what’s to see there; Which, holding still by the Vesture’s hem, I also resolve to see with them, Cautious this time how I suffer to slip The chance of joining in fellowship With any that call themselves His friends, As these folks do, I have a notion. But hist—a buzzing and emotion! All settle themselves, the while ascends By the creaking rail to the lecture-desk, Step by step, deliberate Because of his cranium’s over-freight, Three parts sublime to one grotesque, If I have proved an accurate guesser, The hawk-nosed, high-cheek-boned Professor. I felt at once as if there ran A shoot of love from my heart to the man— That sallow, virgin-minded, studious Martyr to mild enthusiasm, As he uttered a kind of cough-preludious That woke my sympathetic spasm, (Beside some spitting that made me sorry) And stood, surveying his auditory With a wan pure look, well nigh celestial,— —Those blue eyes had survived so much! While, under the foot they could not smutch, Lay all the fleshly and the bestial. Over he bowed, and arranged his notes, Till the auditory’s clearing of throats Was done with, died into silence; And, when each glance was upward sent, Each bearded mouth composed intent, And a pin might be heard drop half a mile hence,— He pushed back higher his spectacles, Let the eyes stream out like lamps from cells, And giving his head of hair—a hake Of undressed tow, for colour and quantity— One rapid and impatient shake, (As our own young England adjusts a jaunty tie When about to impart, on mature digestion, Some thrilling view of the surplice-question) —The Professor’s grave voice, sweet though hoarse, Broke into his Christmas-Eve’s discourse.
XV. And he began it by observing How reason dictated that men Should rectify the natural swerving, By a reversion, now and then, To the well-heads of knowledge, few And far away, whence rolling grew The life-stream wide whereat we drink, Commingled, as we needs must think, With waters alien to the source: To do which, aimed this Eve’s discourse. Since, where could be a fitter time For tracing backward to its prime, This Christianity, this lake, This reservoir, whereat we slake, From one or other bank, our thirst? So he proposed inquiring first Into the various sources whence This Myth of Christ is derivable; Demanding from the evidence, (Since plainly no such life was liveable) How these phenomena should class? Whether ’twere best opine Christ was, Or never was at all, or whether He was and was not, both together— It matters little for the name, So the Idea be left the same: Only, for practical purpose’ sake, ‘Twas obviously as well to take The popular story,—understanding How the ineptitude of the time, And the penman’s prejudice, expanding Fact into fable fit for the clime, Had, by slow and sure degrees, translated it Into this myth, this Individuum,— Which, when reason had strained and abated it Of foreign matter, gave, for residuum, A Man!—a right true man, however, Whose work was worthy a man’s endeavour! Work, that gave warrant almost sufficient To his disciples, for rather believing He was just omnipotent and omniscient, As it gives to us, for as frankly receiving His word, their tradition,—which, though it meant Something entirely different From all that those who only heard it, In their simplicity thought and averred it, Had yet a meaning quite as respectable: For, among other doctrines delectable, Was he not surely the first to insist on, The natural sovereignty of our race?— Here the lecturer came to a pausing-place. And while his cough, like a drouthy piston, Tried to dislodge the husk that grew to him, I seized the occasion of bidding adieu to him, The Vesture still within my hand.
XVI. I could interpret its command. This time He would not bid me enter The exhausted air-bell of the Critic. Truth’s atmosphere may grow mephitic When Papist struggles with Dissenter, Impregnating its pristine clarity, —One, by his daily fare’s vulgarity, Its gust of broken meat and garlic; —One, by his soul’s too-much presuming, To turn the frankincense’s fuming And vapours of the candle starlike Into the cloud her wings she buoys on: And each, that sets the pure air seething, Poisoning it for healthy breathing— But the Critic leaves no air to poison; Pumps out by a ruthless ingenuity Atom by atom, and leaves you—vacuity. Thus much of Christ, does he reject? And what retain? His intellect? What is it I must reverence duly? Poor intellect for worship, truly, Which tells me simply what was told (If mere morality, bereft Of the God in Christ, be all that’s left) Elsewhere by voices manifold; With this advantage, that the stater Made nowise the important stumble Of adding, he, the sage and humble, Was also one with the Creator. You urge Christ’s followers’ simplicity: But how does shifting blame, evade it? Have wisdom’s words no more felicity? The stumbling-block, His speech—who laid it? How comes it that for one found able, To sift the truth of it from fable, Millions believe it to the letter? Christ’s goodness, then—does that fare better? Strange goodness, which upon the score Of being goodness, the mere due Of man to fellow-man, much more To God,—should take another view Of its possessor’s privilege, And bid him rule his race! You pledge Your fealty to such rule? What, all— From Heavenly John and Attic Paul, And that brave weather-battered Peter Whose stout faith only stood completer For buffets, sinning to be pardoned, As the more his hands hauled nets, they hardened,— All, down to you, the man of men, Professing here at Göttingen, Compose Christ’s flock! So, you and I Are sheep of a good man! and why? The goodness,—how did he acquire it? Was it self-gained, did God inspire it? Choose which; then tell me, on what ground Should its possessor dare propound His claim to rise o’er us an inch? Were goodness all some man’s invention, Who arbitrarily made mention What we should follow, and where flinch,— What qualities might take the style Of right and wrong,—and had such guessing Met with as general acquiescing As graced the Alphabet erewhile, When A got leave an Ox to be, No Camel (quoth the Jews) like G,— For thus inventing thing and title Worship were that man’s fit requital. But if the common conscience must Be ultimately judge, adjust Its apt name to each quality Already known,—I would decree Worship for such mere demonstration And simple work of nomenclature, Only the day I praised, not Nature, But Harvey, for the circulation. I would praise such a Christ, with pride And joy, that he, as none beside, Had taught us how to keep the mind God gave him, as God gave his kind, Freer than they from fleshly taint! I would call such a Christ our Saint, As I declare our Poet, him Whose insight makes all others dim: A thousand poets pried at life, And only one amid the strife Rose to be Shakespeare! Each shall take His crown, I’d say, for the world’s sake— Though some objected—”Had we seen “The heart and head of each, what screen “Was broken there to give them light, “While in ourselves it shuts the sight, “We should no more admire, perchance, “That these found truth out at a glance, “Than marvel how the bat discerns “Some pitch-dark cavern’s fifty turns, “Led by a finer tact, a gift “He boasts, which other birds must shift “Without, and grope as best they can.” No, freely I would praise the man.— Nor one whit more, if he contended That gift of his, from God, descended. Ah, friend, what gift of man’s does not? No nearer Something, by a jot, Rise an infinity of Nothings Than one: take Euclid for your teacher: Distinguish kinds: do crownings, clothings, Make that Creator which was creature? Multiply gifts upon his head, And what, when all’s done, shall be said But . . . the more gifted he, I ween! That one’s made Christ, another, Pilate, And This might be all That has been,— So what is there to frown or smile at? What is left for us, save, in growth, Of soul, to rise up, far past both, From the gift looking to the Giver, And from the cistern to the River, And from the finite to Infinity, And from man’s dust to God’s divinity?
XVII. Take all in a word: the Truth in God’s breast Lies trace for trace upon ours impressed: Though He is so bright and we so dim, We are made in His image to witness Him; And were no eye in us to tell, Instructed by no inner sense. The light of Heaven from the dark of Hell, That light would want its evidence,— Though Justice, Good and Truth were still Divine, if by some demon’s will, Hatred and wrong had been proclaimed Law through the worlds, and Right misnamed. No mere exposition of morality Made or in part or in totality, Should win you to give it worship, therefore: And, if no better proof you will care for, —Whom do you count the worst man upon earth? Be sure, he knows, in his conscience, more Of what Right is, than arrives at birth In the best man’s acts that we bow before: This last knows better—true; but my fact is, ‘Tis one thing to know, and another to practise; And thence I conclude that the real God-function Is to furnish a motive and injunction For practising what we know already. And such an injunction and such a motive As the God in Christ, do you waive, and “heady High minded,” hang your tablet-votive Outside the fane on a finger-post? Morality to the uttermost, Supreme in Christ as we all confess, Why need we prove would avail no jot To make Him God, if God He were not? What is the point where Himself lays stress Does the precept run “Believe in Good, “In Justice, Truth, now understood “For the first time?”—or, “Believe in ME, “Who lived and died, yet essentially “Am Lord of Life?” Whoever can take The same to his heart and for mere love’s sake Conceive of the love,—that man obtains A new truth; no conviction gains Of an old one only, made intense By a fresh appeal to his faded sense.
XVIII. Can it be that He stays inside? Is the Vesture left me to commune with? Could my soul find aught to sing in tune with Even at this lecture, if she tried? Oh, let me at lowest sympathise With the lurking drop of blood that lies In the desiccated brain’s white roots Without a throb for Christ’s attributes, As the Lecturer makes his special boast! If love’s dead there, it has left a ghost. Admire we, how from heart to brain (Though to say so strike the doctors dum One instinct rises and falls again, Restoring the equilibrium. And how when the Critic had done his best, And the Pearl of Price, at reason’s test, Lay dust and ashes levigable On the Professor’s lecture-table; When we looked for the inference and monition That our faith, reduced to such a condition, Be swept forthwith to its natural dust-hole,— He bids us, when we least expect it, Take back our faith,—if it be not just whole, Yet a pearl indeed, as his tests affect it, Which fact pays the damage done rewardingly, So, prize we our dust and ashes accordingly! “Go home and venerate the Myth “I thus have experimented with— “This Man, continue to adore him “Rather than all who went before him, “And all who ever followed after!”— Surely for this I may praise you, my brother! Will you take the praise in tears or laughter? That’s one point gained: can I compass another? Unlearned love was safe from spurning— Can’t we respect your loveless learning? Let us at least give Learning honour! What laurels had we showered upon her, Girding her loins up to perturb Our theory of the Middle Verb; Or Turklike brandishing a scimetar O’er anapests in comic-trimeter; Or curing the halt and maimed Iketides, While we lounged on at our indebted ease: Instead of which, a tricksy demon Sets her at Titus or Philemon! When Ignorance wags his ears of leather And hates God’s word, ’tis altogether; Nor leaves he his congenial thistles To go and browze on Paul’s Epistles. —And you, the audience, who might ravage The world wide, enviably savage Nor heed the cry of the retriever, More than Herr Heine (before his fever),— I do not tell a lie so arrant As say my passion’s wings are furled up, And, without the plainest Heavenly warrant, I were ready and glad to give this world up— But still, when you rub the brow meticulous, And ponder the profit of turning holy If not for God’s, for your own sake solely, —God forbid I should find you ridiculous! Deduce from this lecture all that eases you, Nay, call yourselves, if the calling pleases you, “Christians,”—abhor the Deist’s pravity,— Go on, you shall no more move my gravity, Than, when I see boys ride a-cockhorse I find it in my heart to embarrass them By hinting that their stick’s a mock horse, And they really carry what they say carries them.
XIX. So sate I talking with my mind. I did not long to leave the door And find a new church, as before, But rather was quiet and inclined To prolong and enjoy the gentle resting From further tracking and trying and testing. This tolerance is a genial mood! (Said I, and a little pause ensued). One trims the bark ‘twixt shoal and shelf, And sees, each side, the good effects of it, A value for religion’s self, A carelessness about the sects of it. Let me enjoy my own conviction, Not watch my neighbour’s faith with fretfulness, Still spying there some dereliction Of truth, perversity, forgetfulness! Better a mild indifferentism, To teach that all our faiths (though duller His shines through a dull spirit’s prism) Originally had one colour— Sending me on a pilgrimage Through ancient and through modern times To many peoples, various climes, Where I may see Saint, Savage, Sage Fuse their respective creeds in one Before the general Father’s throne!
XX. . . . ‘T was the horrible storm began afresh! The black night caught me in his mesh Whirled me up, and flung me prone. I was left on the college-step alone. I looked, and far there, ever fleeting Far, far away, the receding gesture, And looming of the lessening Vesture, Swept forward from my stupid hand, While I watched my foolish heart expand In the lazy glow of benevolence, O’er the various modes of man’s belief. I sprang up with fear’s vehemence. —Needs must there be one way, our chief Best way of worship: let me strive To find it, and when found, contrive My fellows also take their share. This constitutes my earthly care: God’s is above it and distinct! For I, a man, with men am linked, And not a brute with brutes; no gain That I experience, must remain Unshared: but should my best endeavour To share it, fail—subsisteth ever God’s care above, and I exult That God, by God’s own ways occult, May—doth, I will believe—bring back All wanderers to a single track! Meantime, I can but testify God’s care for me—no more, can I— It is but for myself I know. The world rolls witnessing around me Only to leave me as it found me; Men cry there, but my ear is slow. Their races flourish or decay —What boots it, while yon lucid way Loaded with stars, divides the vault? How soon my soul repairs its fault When, sharpening senses’ hebetude, She turns on my own life! So viewed, No mere mote’s-breadth but teems immense With witnessings of providence: And woe to me if when I look Upon that record, the sole book Unsealed to me, I take no heed Of any warning that I read! Have I been sure, this Christmas-Eve; God’s own hand did the rainbow weave, Whereby the truth from heaven slid Into my soul?—I cannot bid The world admit He stooped to heal My soul, as if in a thunder-peal Where one heard noise, and one saw flame, I only knew He named my name. And what is the world to me, for sorrow Or joy in its censures, when to-morrow It drops the remark, with just-turned head Then, on again—That man is dead? Yes,—but for me—my name called,—drawn As a conscript’s lot from the lap’s black yawn, He has dipt into on a battle-dawn: Bid out of life by a nod, a glance,— Stumbling, mute-mazed, at nature’s chance,— With a rapid finger circled round, Fixed to the first poor inch of ground, To light from, where his foot was found; Whose ear but a minute since lay free To the wide camp’s buzz and gossipry— Summoned, a solitary man, To end his life where his life began, From the safe glad rear, to the dreadful van! Soul of mine, hadst thou caught and held By the hem of the Vesture . . .
XXI. And I caught At the flying Robe, and unrepelled Was lapped again in its folds full-fraught With warmth and wonder and delight, God’s mercy being infinite. And scarce had the words escaped my tongue, When, at a passionate bound, I sprung Out of the wandering world of rain, Into the little chapel again.
XXII. How else was I found there, bolt upright On my bench, as if I had never left it? —Never flung out on the common at night Nor met the storm and wedge-like cleft it, Seen the raree-show of Peter’s successor, Or the laboratory of the Professor! For the Vision, that was true, I wist, True as that heaven and earth exist. There sate my friend, the yellow and tall, With his neck and its wen in the selfsame place; Yet my nearest neighbour’s cheek showed gall, She had slid away a contemptuous space: And the old fat woman, late so placable, Eyed me with symptoms, hardly mistakeable, Of her milk of kindness turning rancid: In short a spectator might have fancied That I had nodded betrayed by a slumber, Yet kept my seat, a warning ghastly, Through the heads of the sermon, nine in number, To wake up now at the tenth and lastly. But again, could such a disgrace have happened? Each friend at my elbow had surely nudged it; And, as for the sermon, where did my nap end? Unless I heard it, could I have judged it? Could I report as I do at the close, First, the preacher speaks through his nose: Second, his gesture is too emphatic: Thirdly, to waive what’s pedagogic, The subject-matter itself lacks logic: Fourthly, the English is ungrammatic. Great news! the preacher is found no Pascal, Whom, if I pleased, I might to the task call Of making square to a finite eye The circle of infinity, And find so all-but-just-succeeding! Great news! the sermon proves no reading Where bee-like in the flowers I may bury me, Like Taylor’s, the immortal Jeremy! And now that I know the very worst of him, What was it I thought to obtain at first of him? Ha! Is God mocked, as He asks? Shall I take on me to change His tasks, And dare, despatched to a river-head For a simple draught of the element, Neglect the thing for which He sent, And return with another thing instead?— Saying . . . “Because the water found “Welling up from underground, “Is mingled with the taints of earth, “While Thou, I know, dost laugh at dearth, “And couldest, at a word, convulse “The world with the leap of its river-pulse,— “Therefore I turned from the oozings muddy, “And bring thee a chalice I found, instead: “See the brave veins in the breccia ruddy! “One would suppose that the marble bled. “What matters the water? A hope I have nursed, “That the waterless cup will quench my thirst.” —Better have knelt at the poorest stream That trickles in pain from the straitest rift! For the less or the more is all God’s gift, Who blocks up or breaks wide the granite-seam. And here, is there water or not, to drink? I, then, in ignorance and weakness, Taking God’s help, have attained to think My heart does best to receive in meekness This mode of worship, as most to His mind, Where earthly aids being cast behind, His All in All appears serene, With the thinnest human veil between, Letting the mystic Lamps, the Seven, The many motions of His spirit, Pass, as they list, to earth from Heaven. For the preacher’s merit or demerit, It were to be wished the flaws were fewer In the earthen vessel, holding treasure, Which lies as safe in a golden ewer; But the main thing is, does it hold good measure? Heaven soon sets right all other matters!— Ask, else, these ruins of humanity, This flesh worn out to rags and tatters, This soul at struggle with insanity, Who thence take comfort, can I doubt, Which an empire gained, were a loss without. May it be mine! And let us hope That no worse blessing befal the Pope, Turn’d sick at last of the day’s buffoonery, Of his posturings and his petticoatings, Beside the Bourbon bully’s gloatings In the bloody orgies of drunk poltroonery! Nor may the Professor forego its peace At Göttingen, presently, when, in the dusk Of his life, if his cough, as I fear, should increase, Prophesied of by that horrible husk; And when, thicker and thicker, the darkness fills The world through his misty spectacles, And he gropes for something more substantial Than a fable, myth, or personification, May Christ do for him, what no mere man shall, And stand confessed as the God of salvation! Meantime, in the still recurring fear Lest myself, at unawares, be found, While attacking the choice of my neighbours round, Without my own made—I choose here! The giving out of the hymn reclaims me; I have done!—And if any blames me, Thinking that merely to touch in brevity The topics I dwell on, were unlawful,— Or, worse, that I trench, with undue levity, On the bounds of the Holy and the awful, I praise the heart, and pity the head of him, And refer myself to THEE, instead of him; Who head and heart alike discernest, Looking below light speech we utter, When the frothy spume and frequent sputter Prove that the soul’s depths boil in earnest! May the truth shine out, stand ever before us! I put up pencil and join chorus To Hepzibah Tune, without further apology, The last five verses of the third section Of the seventeenth hymn in Whitfield’s Collection, To conclude with the doxology.
The narrator leaves a Nonconformist chapel, describing the bleak weather and the poor congregation entering. He feels reluctant and out of place.
II
The congregation members arrive from various social backgrounds. The narrator senses judgment from them and critiques their exclusivity.
III
The preacher delivers an uninspiring sermon filled with clichés. The narrator grows frustrated with the blind acceptance of the congregation and leaves.
IV
Outside, he reflects on the contrast between institutionalized religion and the purity of nature. He criticizes preachers who distort truth.
V
The narrator embraces personal spirituality over religious dogma. He believes God’s love is evident in nature rather than rigid doctrines.
VI
A celestial vision appears—a moon-rainbow breaking through the sky—symbolizing divine revelation and the transcendence of rituals.
VII
The narrator experiences a mystical moment, feeling chosen by God. He wishes to remain in this divine presence forever.
VIII
He sees Christ in a vision but only recognizes His garment, symbolizing divine mystery and the limits of human understanding.
IX
Overwhelmed, he acknowledges Christ’s presence and seeks forgiveness. The brightness represents purification and enlightenment.
X
He suddenly finds himself in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, experiencing the grandeur of Catholic worship, which starkly contrasts with his earlier experiences.
XI
Despite the impressive ceremony, he feels like an outsider. He contemplates how all Christian traditions contain truth but also human flaws.
XII
He resolves that love, rather than doctrine, should be the foundation of faith. He compares religious truth to an unfinished statue needing completion.
XIII
He is swept away again in his spiritual journey, signifying the continuity of divine revelation beyond organized religion.
XIV
He arrives at a German university and encounters a rationalist professor who lectures on Christ as a myth, contrasting faith with intellectual skepticism.
XV
The professor argues that Christianity is a legend, reducing it to mere philosophy. The narrator rejects this purely intellectual view of faith.
XVI
He critiques the idea of Christ as only a moral teacher, insisting that faith requires divine recognition, not just rational understanding.
XVII
He reflects on human conscience as innate evidence of divine truth and emphasizes that true faith transcends moral teachings.
XVIII
He acknowledges the role of intellect in faith but asserts that spirituality goes beyond logic alone. Love must guide belief.
XIX
He momentarily appreciates religious diversity but soon feels the urgency of finding a singular truth rather than passive tolerance.
XX
A storm interrupts his thoughts, symbolizing divine intervention. He realizes faith must be actively pursued and shared.
XXI
He is drawn back to the chapel, embracing divine mercy. This moment signifies spiritual renewal and the reaffirmation of his faith.
XXII
He finds himself back in his seat, as if he never left. Whether his journey was real or a vision, he affirms the need for sincere worship over superficial rituals.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
“The Vesture’s amplitude, still eddying / On just before me”
The flowing garment of Christ symbolizes divine guidance and spiritual transformation.
Themes: “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
1. Religious Hypocrisy and Critique of Dogmatism: One of the central themes of “Christmas Eve” is Browning’s critique of religious exclusivism and hypocrisy within institutionalized Christianity. The speaker, initially an observer at a dissenting chapel, is disillusioned by the congregation’s judgmental attitude and the preacher’s narrow, rigid sermon. He describes the scene with irony and disdain, noting how the worshippers “eyed me much as some wild beast” (I), implying their exclusionary mindset. The speaker also mocks their self-righteousness: “You are the men, and wisdom shall die with you!” (II), parodying their belief in their own theological superiority. The preacher’s sermon, which he describes as a “pig-of-lead-like pressure” (III), suggests that religious fervor has been reduced to meaningless dogma rather than true spiritual enlightenment. Browning critiques those who claim to have found salvation but show little charity or inclusivity. The theme ultimately questions whether rigid, doctrinal religion aligns with Christ’s message of love and universality.
2. Spiritual Transformation and Divine Revelation: The poem explores the speaker’s personal spiritual journey, which evolves from skepticism and disillusionment into profound revelation. Initially, he is critical of organized worship, but as the poem progresses, he experiences a transformative vision. He describes his mystical encounter with Christ’s presence: “All at once I looked up with terror. / He was there.” (VIII). The divine moment is reinforced by the imagery of light and movement, as he follows “the flying Robe” (IX), which symbolizes his journey toward spiritual awakening. This theme highlights Browning’s belief in a personal and mystical connection with the divine, transcending institutional religion. The experience renews his faith, and he embraces a more inclusive understanding of worship, concluding: “Let men keep their ways of seeking Thee in a narrow shrine—Be this my way! And this is mine!” (V). This theme suggests that divine truth is not confined to any one denomination or doctrine but is accessible to the sincere seeker in multiple forms.
3. The Contrast Between Institutional and Personal Religion: Browning contrasts institutionalized religion, characterized by rituals and exclusivity, with personal faith, which is intimate and direct. The speaker moves from a rigid chapel setting to the vast natural world, where he feels a deeper spiritual connection. He reflects, “In youth I looked to these very skies, / And probing their immensities, / I found God there” (V), suggesting that nature offers a purer form of divine presence than the dogmatic sermon he previously endured. Later, he visits a grand Catholic church in Rome and a rationalist lecture hall, further reinforcing the theme. In both cases, he sees how human institutions have distorted the essence of faith—whether through excessive ritualism or excessive intellectualism. The concluding lines suggest that true religion lies in a personal relationship with God rather than adherence to a particular creed. This theme encourages readers to reflect on the balance between communal worship and individual spirituality.
4. The Universality of Faith and Religious Tolerance: A major conclusion of the poem is the idea that God can be worshiped in many different ways, and no single tradition holds a monopoly on truth. The speaker initially scorns different religious expressions—whether the evangelical fervor of the chapel, the grandeur of Catholicism, or the rationalism of academia—but ultimately recognizes value in each. He acknowledges, “Do these men praise Him? I will raise / My voice up to their point of praise!” (XI), demonstrating his shift toward religious tolerance. The vision of Christ in the poem reinforces the idea that divine love transcends human divisions. The recurring imagery of the “Vesture’s amplitude” (IX, XIII) symbolizes God’s encompassing grace, which covers all seekers of truth regardless of their denominational differences. By the end, the speaker is no longer concerned with choosing the “right” way to worship but embraces the diversity of religious expression, concluding that all sincere faith leads to the same divine truth.
Literary Theories and “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
This theory focuses on the poem’s formal elements, structure, and use of literary devices. The poem’s rich imagery, such as the symbolic “Vesture’s amplitude” (IX) representing divine grace, can be analyzed in terms of metaphor and symbolism. The contrasts between darkness and light also reinforce thematic tensions, independent of historical context.
This theory considers how different readers interpret the poem based on their backgrounds. A religious reader may see the poem as a spiritual revelation, while a skeptic might interpret the narrator’s journey as an ironic critique of organized religion. The varied reactions to the chapel’s worshippers (‘What, you, the alien?’ II) highlight the subjective nature of religious experience.
Poststructuralism deconstructs the binaries within the poem, such as faith versus doubt and institutional religion versus personal belief. The speaker oscillates between rejecting and embracing faith, questioning the meaning of divine truth. The line “Truth remains true, the fault’s in the prover” (IV) exemplifies the instability of meaning and interpretation in religious discourse.
Religious and Theological Criticism
This approach examines the theological messages within the poem, particularly Browning’s critique of religious exclusivity and his exploration of divine grace. The speaker’s mystical vision of Christ (“He was there” VIII) aligns with Christian mysticism, suggesting an intimate experience of God that surpasses institutionalized dogma. The poem debates the nature of worship and the accessibility of salvation.
Critical Questions about “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
1. How does Browning critique organized religion in “Christmas Eve”?
Browning presents a nuanced critique of organized religion, highlighting its exclusivity, hypocrisy, and limitations in truly understanding divine grace. The speaker’s experience in the chapel reveals a sense of alienation, as he is viewed with suspicion by the congregation: “What, you, the alien, you have ventured / To take with us, elect, your station?” (II). This moment emphasizes the speaker’s struggle with religious institutions that claim to be inclusive yet judge outsiders harshly. Additionally, the sermon’s lack of intellectual depth frustrates the narrator, who mocks its artificial fervor: “The pig-of-lead-like pressure / Of the preaching-man’s immense stupidity.” (III). The poem further critiques the rigid structures of religious dogma by contrasting them with the narrator’s personal and mystical experience of God outside of the chapel. This suggests that true spirituality might be better found beyond the confines of formalized worship.
2. What role does personal revelation play in the speaker’s spiritual journey?
The poem emphasizes the importance of personal revelation over institutionalized faith. After leaving the chapel, the speaker experiences a mystical vision of Christ, reinforcing the idea that spiritual truth is not confined to formal religious practice. The turning point occurs when the narrator exclaims: “All at once I looked up with terror. / He was there.” (VIII). This direct encounter with Christ contrasts sharply with the artificiality of the church service, reinforcing the theme that divine truth is found through personal experience rather than blind adherence to doctrine. The narrator also reflects on the limitations of human understanding: “Truth remains true, the fault’s in the prover.” (IV). This suggests that religious institutions often distort divine truth, whereas personal revelation provides a purer, more direct connection to God.
3. How does Browning use imagery to contrast different types of faith?
Browning employs vivid imagery to differentiate between institutional faith and personal spirituality. The chapel is depicted in restrictive and uninspiring terms: a “lath-and-plaster entry” (I) and a dimly lit space filled with uninspired worshippers. In contrast, the speaker’s journey outside is described with natural and celestial imagery, emphasizing a more profound, transcendent spirituality. When he looks up, he sees: “The black cloud-barricade was riven, / Ruined beneath her feet, and driven / Deep in the west.” (VI). This moment of revelation is depicted as a breaking open of divine truth, whereas the sermon inside the church is described as suffocating and intellectually barren. Browning’s contrast between dull, confined religious spaces and the grandeur of the natural world suggests that true faith flourishes in openness rather than in rigid institutions.
4. What is the significance of the poem’s ending, and how does it reflect the speaker’s resolution?
The ending of “Christmas Eve” presents a reconciliation between the speaker’s skepticism of organized religion and his recognition of divine grace. After experiencing his vision of Christ, he finds himself back in the chapel as if nothing had happened. This cyclical structure suggests that while the institutional church is flawed, it still plays a role in people’s spiritual lives. The speaker ultimately chooses to remain part of religious tradition, albeit with a newfound perspective: “For the less or the more is all God’s gift, / Who blocks up or breaks wide the granite-seam.” (XXII). This suggests an acceptance of religious imperfections, recognizing that divine truth exists within and beyond the institution. The poem ends with the speaker joining in the hymn, implying that while he remains critical, he also embraces the communal aspect of faith.
Literary Works Similar to “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
“The Waste Land” by T.S. Eliot – Like “Christmas Eve”, this poem explores themes of spiritual desolation and the search for divine truth, using fragmented narrative and vivid imagery to depict religious and existential struggles.
“The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge – Both poems incorporate mystical and supernatural elements, presenting spiritual revelation through a transformative journey that alters the protagonist’s perception of faith and redemption.
“The Divine Comedy” (Inferno, Purgatorio, Paradiso) by Dante Alighieri – Browning’s poem, like Dante’s epic, follows a personal journey that contrasts religious dogma with direct divine encounters, questioning human interpretations of faith.
“The Church” (Collection) by George Herbert – Herbert’s devotional poetry, particularly “The Collar”, mirrors Browning’s theme of religious doubt and reconciliation, illustrating an individual’s personal struggle between rebellion and submission to faith.
“Hymn to God, My God, in My Sickness” by John Donne – This poem, like “Christmas Eve”, reflects on mortality, religious devotion, and the tension between doctrinal belief and personal spiritual experience.
Representative Quotations of “Christmas Eve” by Robert Browning
Raymond, William O. “Browning’s Casuists.” Studies in Philology, vol. 37, no. 4, 1940, pp. 641–66. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4172507. Accessed 11 Mar. 2025.
Tracy, C. R. “Browning’s Heresies.” Studies in Philology, vol. 33, no. 4, 1936, pp. 610–25. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4172341. Accessed 11 Mar. 2025.
Palmer, George Herbert. “The Monologue of Browning.” The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 11, no. 2, 1918, pp. 121–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1507117. Accessed 11 Mar. 2025.
“A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson first appeared in the early 17th century and was included in his collection of religious poetry, reflecting his later turn toward spiritual themes.
Introduction: “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
“A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson first appeared in the early 17th century and was included in his collection of religious poetry, reflecting his later turn toward spiritual themes. The poem celebrates the miraculous birth of Christ, emphasizing his divine and redemptive nature. Through vivid imagery and lyrical reverence, Jonson portrays Christ as both the “author of life and light” and a humble infant laid in a manger, a paradox that underscores the mystery of the Incarnation. The poem’s central themes include divine wisdom, obedience, salvation, and the ultimate sacrifice of Christ. Jonson’s use of rhythmic, hymn-like structure and simple yet profound diction enhances its devotional quality, making it a popular piece for religious reflection. The poem’s enduring appeal lies in its heartfelt meditation on Christ’s role as the “price of sin,” whose birth brings “comfort” and hope to humanity. The rhetorical question in the closing lines—”Can man forget the story?”—reinforces its central message: the Nativity is not just an event but a transformative story of salvation that should never be forgotten.
Text: “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
I sing the birth was born to-night The author both of life and light; The angels so did sound it. And like the ravished shepherds said, Who saw the light, and were afraid, Yet searched, and true they found it.
The Son of God, th’ eternal king, That did us all salvation bring, And freed the soul from danger; He whom the whole world could not take, The Word, which heaven and earth did make, Was now laid in a manger.
The Father’s wisdom willed it so, The Son’s obedience knew no No, Both wills were in one stature; And as that wisdom had decreed. The Word was now made flesh indeed. And took on him our nature.
What comfort by him do we win. Who made himself the price of sin. To make us heirs of glory! To see this babe all innocence; A martyr born in our defence: Can man forget the story?
Annotations: “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
Christ taking human form symbolizes divine love and the doctrine of Incarnation.
Tone (Reverent & Worshipful)
“What comfort by him do we win, / Who made himself the price of sin.”
The tone conveys deep admiration and gratitude for Christ’s sacrifice.
Themes: “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
The Incarnation and Divine Paradox: In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, the theme of the Incarnation is central, emphasizing the paradox of Christ’s divinity and humanity. The poem reflects on the mystery of how “He whom the whole world could not take, / The Word, which heaven and earth did make, / Was now laid in a manger.” This stark contrast highlights the humility of Christ’s birth despite his divine nature. Jonson marvels at how the infinite and omnipotent Creator chose to take on human form, submitting to the limitations of mortality. The paradox of an eternal King being born as a helpless infant underscores the Christian belief in God’s profound love and sacrifice. The poet portrays this divine act as the fulfillment of God’s wisdom (“The Father’s wisdom willed it so”) and Christ’s obedience (“The Son’s obedience knew no No”), reinforcing the theological foundation of the Incarnation—God becoming flesh to dwell among humanity.
Salvation and Redemption: In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, the theme of salvation and redemption is woven throughout, emphasizing Christ’s birth as the beginning of humanity’s deliverance from sin. The poem declares, “The Son of God, th’ eternal king, / That did us all salvation bring, / And freed the soul from danger.” Here, Jonson presents Christ not just as a newborn but as the Savior who has come to rescue humanity from spiritual peril. The reference to “the price of sin” implies the doctrine of atonement—Jesus was born to suffer and die in place of humankind. The final rhetorical question, “Can man forget the story?”, serves as a direct appeal to the reader, urging them to remember and appreciate the significance of Christ’s birth as an act of divine grace. This theme ties into the larger Christian narrative of redemption, where Jesus’ birth, life, and ultimate sacrifice are seen as God’s gift to mankind.
Divine Will and Obedience: In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, the theme of divine will and obedience is explored through the interplay between God the Father and God the Son. The poet highlights how Christ’s coming into the world was not by accident but was a deliberate fulfillment of divine wisdom: “The Father’s wisdom willed it so, / The Son’s obedience knew no No.” This conveys the idea that Christ willingly accepted his mission to save humanity, aligning his will perfectly with that of God. The phrase “Both wills were in one stature” emphasizes the unity between the Father and the Son, reinforcing theological doctrines of divine purpose and Christ’s voluntary submission to God’s plan. Through this theme, Jonson presents Christ as an ideal model of obedience and self-sacrifice, fulfilling the prophecy that “the Word was now made flesh indeed, / And took on him our nature.” This theme not only highlights Christ’s humility but also serves as an implicit call for believers to align their own will with God’s.
Light as a Symbol of Divine Truth: In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, light serves as a symbol of divine truth and revelation, playing a crucial role in conveying the significance of Christ’s birth. The poet writes, “I sing the birth was born to-night, / The author both of life and light.” Here, Christ is depicted as the source of both physical and spiritual enlightenment, reinforcing biblical themes where light represents purity, truth, and salvation. The shepherds’ experience further illustrates this symbolism: “Who saw the light, and were afraid, / Yet searched, and true they found it.” Their initial fear of the divine light gives way to understanding, symbolizing humanity’s journey from ignorance to faith. The imagery of light throughout the poem emphasizes Christ as the ultimate truth-bringer, illuminating the path to salvation. By contrasting light and darkness, Jonson aligns with traditional Christian themes where Christ dispels spiritual blindness and guides believers toward eternal glory.
Literary Theories and “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
1. Formalist Theory (New Criticism)
Literary Theory
Application to the Poem
References from the Poem
Formalist (New Criticism)
This approach focuses on the structure, language, and literary devices within the poem rather than historical or external influences. It examines the poem’s form, rhyme scheme, and imagery.
Jonson employs rhymed couplets, creating a hymn-like structure. The poem’s balanced meter and repetition reinforce its meditative and solemn tone. The use of paradox, such as “He whom the whole world could not take, / Was now laid in a manger,” highlights Christ’s dual nature—both divine and human.
Imagery & Symbolism
The poem uses light imagery to symbolize divine truth and revelation. The contrast between the grandeur of Christ and his humble birth reflects the theological mystery of the Incarnation.
“I sing the birth was born to-night, / The author both of life and light.” The symbol of light here represents Christ as a guiding spiritual force.
Sound & Rhythm
The poem’s musicality and hymn-like repetition enhance its devotional quality.
“Can man forget the story?” The rhetorical question and repetition engage the reader emotionally and intellectually.
2. Historical-Biographical Theory
Literary Theory
Application to the Poem
References from the Poem
Historical-Biographical
This theory considers how Jonson’s personal life, religious beliefs, and the socio-religious context of 17th-century England influenced the poem.
Jonson converted to Catholicism in 1610 but later returned to Anglicanism. His religious transformation likely shaped the poem’s intense devotion to Christ’s birth.
Religious Climate
During Jonson’s time, England was divided between Protestantism and Catholicism. The poem’s universal Christian themes reflect the era’s deep theological concerns.
“The Father’s wisdom willed it so, / The Son’s obedience knew no No.” This reflects the doctrine of divine sovereignty, a theme heavily debated during Jonson’s time.
Jonson’s Personal Struggles
Jonson faced hardships, including imprisonment and financial instability. His later works, including this poem, reflect his search for spiritual solace and redemption.
“What comfort by him do we win, / Who made himself the price of sin.” This suggests personal reflection on salvation and suffering.
3. Theological (Christian Literary Criticism)
Literary Theory
Application to the Poem
References from the Poem
Theological (Christian Literary Criticism)
This approach interprets the poem through the lens of Christian doctrine, particularly the significance of Christ’s birth, obedience, and sacrifice.
The poem emphasizes the Incarnation, presenting Christ as both eternal king and humble infant.
Doctrine of the Incarnation
Jonson highlights Christ’s divine nature and human vulnerability, reinforcing Christian theology.
“The Word was now made flesh indeed, / And took on him our nature.” This directly references John 1:14, a core biblical verse on the Incarnation.
Salvation and Atonement
The poem presents Christ’s birth as the first step toward salvation, foreshadowing his sacrifice.
“A martyr born in our defence.” This suggests Christ was born to die for humanity’s sins, aligning with Christian beliefs on atonement.
This theory focuses on how readers interpret the poem based on their own beliefs, emotions, and experiences. Different readers may respond to the themes of redemption, light, and sacrifice in unique ways.
A devout Christian reader might see the poem as a reaffirmation of faith, while a secular reader might appreciate its poetic beauty and reflection on human humility.
Emotional Appeal
The poem directly engages readers with rhetorical questions and calls to remembrance.
“Can man forget the story?” This line forces the reader to actively reflect on the significance of Christ’s birth.
Universality vs. Personal Connection
While the poem follows Christian doctrine, its themes of sacrifice, humility, and light can resonate with broader audiences beyond Christianity.
The contrast between fear and faith (“Who saw the light, and were afraid, / Yet searched, and true they found it.”) speaks to the universal human journey of doubt and discovery.
Critical Questions about “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
How does “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson use paradox to emphasize the mystery of the Incarnation?
In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, paradox is used to highlight the mystery of the Incarnation, presenting Christ as both divine and human. The poet captures this contradiction by stating, “He whom the whole world could not take, / The Word, which heaven and earth did make, / Was now laid in a manger.” This paradox emphasizes that the infinite and all-powerful Creator has taken the form of a helpless infant, making his humility and grandeur exist simultaneously. Another striking paradox appears in the line, “A martyr born in our defence,” implying that Christ’s birth was already tied to his sacrificial death. These juxtapositions force the reader to reflect on the theological mystery of the Incarnation—how God, beyond human limitations, chose to enter the world as a vulnerable child. By using paradox, Jonson deepens the reader’s sense of awe and faith, compelling them to contemplate the divine mystery that cannot be easily understood. This literary technique makes the message of the poem both profound and thought-provoking, inviting readers to grapple with the significance of Christ’s birth in a way that transcends mere celebration.
In what ways does “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson reflect the idea of divine will and human obedience?
In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, the theme of divine will and obedience is central, emphasizing Christ’s submission to God’s plan. The poet highlights this in the lines, “The Father’s wisdom willed it so, / The Son’s obedience knew no No, / Both wills were in one stature.” Here, Jonson portrays Christ as fully accepting his mission, aligning his will with that of the Father. This theological idea reflects the belief that Jesus did not resist his role in humanity’s salvation but embraced it out of divine love. The poem presents obedience not as passive submission but as an active fulfillment of God’s wisdom. Jonson’s depiction suggests that obedience to divine will is not just an expectation for Christ but also a model for humanity, encouraging believers to align themselves with God’s greater plan. By framing Christ’s birth as a fulfillment of divine intent, the poem reinforces the theological doctrine of providence and the belief that salvation history unfolds according to God’s perfect wisdom.
How does “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson use imagery to enhance its themes of light, truth, and revelation?
In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, imagery plays a crucial role in reinforcing the themes of light, truth, and revelation. The poet repeatedly associates Christ with light, as seen in the lines, “I sing the birth was born to-night, / The author both of life and light.” This imagery aligns with the biblical description of Christ as the “Light of the World,” symbolizing divine truth and spiritual awakening. The poem also depicts the shepherds witnessing this divine revelation: “Who saw the light, and were afraid, / Yet searched, and true they found it.” This moment reflects the universal experience of encountering a profound truth—initial fear followed by understanding. The contrast between darkness (ignorance) and light (spiritual knowledge) illustrates Christ’s role in guiding humanity toward salvation. By emphasizing light imagery, Jonson enhances the reader’s perception of Christ’s birth as a moment of divine illumination, revealing the path to truth and redemption. The poem’s use of vivid imagery not only deepens its theological message but also makes the Nativity feel immediate and visually powerful for the reader.
What role does memory and tradition play in “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson?
In “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson, memory and tradition play a vital role in preserving the significance of Christ’s birth. The poem’s final line, “Can man forget the story?”, directly challenges the reader, emphasizing the importance of remembrance. This rhetorical question suggests that the Nativity is not just a historical event but a foundational moment that must be continually recalled and honored. Jonson’s poem itself serves as an act of remembrance, written in the style of a hymn—a form traditionally used to retell sacred stories in Christian worship. The repetition of theological themes, such as salvation and divine obedience, reinforces the idea that Christ’s birth is a moment meant to be revisited in faith and devotion. By urging believers to remember the Nativity, Jonson highlights how religious traditions function as a means of keeping divine truths alive across generations. The poem thus acts as both a personal meditation and a communal call to ensure that Christ’s birth remains central to Christian faith and worship.
Literary Works Similar to “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
“On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity” – John Milton Similar in its exaltation of Christ’s birth, Milton’s poem also blends theological reflection with rich imagery, emphasizing the Incarnation and divine glory.
“A Christmas Carol” – Christina Rossetti Like Jonson’s poem, Rossetti’s work meditates on the humility of Christ’s birth and the spiritual significance of the Nativity, using simple yet profound religious devotion.
“Hymn for Christmas Day” – Charles Wesley Wesley’s hymn shares Jonson’s focus on Christ’s role as Savior, using structured, hymn-like verses to celebrate the divine purpose of Jesus’ birth.
“In the Bleak Midwinter” – Christina Rossetti Though more introspective, this poem echoes Jonson’s theme of Christ’s humble birth and the paradox of divinity entering the world in poverty.
“Nativity” – John Donne Donne, like Jonson, employs paradox and theological depth to explore the mystery of Christ’s birth, portraying the Incarnation as both miraculous and sacrificial.
Representative Quotations of “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson
PRITCHARD, WILLIAM H. “Ben Jonson: Poet.” The Hudson Review, vol. 65, no. 1, 2012, pp. 43–54. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23241316. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
Fraser, Russell. “Ben Jonson’s Poetry.” The Sewanee Review, vol. 101, no. 4, 1993, pp. 489–507. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27546765. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
CLARK, IRA. “Ben Jonson’s Imitation.” Criticism, vol. 20, no. 2, 1978, pp. 107–27. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23102646. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
“Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson first appeared in Literature Compass in 2006.
Introduction: “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson
“Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson first appeared in Literature Compass in 2006. This article examines the evolution of race studies in early modern English literature, emphasizing its shift from a marginal subject to a crucial field in literary analysis. Floyd-Wilson highlights how earlier scholarship, such as Winthrop Jordan’s White Over Black (1968) and G.K. Hunter’s Othello and Colour Prejudice (1967), framed Renaissance racial discourse through typological interpretations, viewing blackness primarily as a symbol of sin and moral depravity. However, she critiques these perspectives for their oversimplified assumptions about Elizabethan xenophobia and the supposed instinctual aversion to blackness. The article also discusses how feminist scholarship in the late 1980s, particularly works by Karen Newman and Ania Loomba, integrated race and gender, revealing how the construction of racial identity in early modern England was deeply intertwined with class and patriarchy. Moreover, Floyd-Wilson underscores the necessity of examining race through interdisciplinary lenses, including religion, geography, and trade relations. She references scholars like Kim F. Hall, who demonstrated how the language of Renaissance literature played a crucial role in formulating racial and national identities, and Nabil Matar, whose studies on early English encounters with Islam challenge Eurocentric narratives of racial difference. Floyd-Wilson’s retrospective thus positions race studies as an indispensable framework for understanding English Renaissance literature, moving beyond simplistic racial binaries to explore the complexities of identity formation in the period.
Summary of “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson
Development of Race Studies in Early Modern Literature
Over the last thirty years, race studies in Renaissance literature have evolved from a marginalized field to a central topic of scholarly inquiry (Floyd-Wilson 1044).
Early studies largely employed typological interpretations of blackness, viewing black figures in literature as symbolic representations of sin and moral degradation (1044).
The field has expanded beyond narrow frameworks to include perspectives from disciplines like science, geography, religion, and trade relations (1044).
The Curse of Ham and Typological Interpretations of Blackness
The late 1960s marked an important period with foundational texts such as Winthrop D. Jordan’s White Over Black (1968) and G.K. Hunter’s Othello and Colour Prejudice (1967) (1044).
Hunter argued that Othello’s blackness was primarily a theatrical and typological device rather than an accurate reflection of Elizabethan encounters with Moors (1044).
Jordan posited that English racial attitudes predated the Atlantic slave trade, reinforcing a notion that white reactions to blackness were instinctive (1045).
Scholars such as Alden and Virginia Mason Vaughan have since critiqued Jordan’s claims, pointing out that English racial perceptions were shaped by sudden exposure to blackness rather than an inherent aversion (1045).
Intersection of Race, Gender, and Class
Feminist scholarship in the late 1980s transformed Renaissance racial studies, examining racial identity alongside gender and class (1046).
Karen Newman argued that Desdemona and Othello were constructed through discourses on femininity and blackness that reinforced early modern ideas of racial and gendered difference (1046).
Ania Loomba’s Gender, Race, Renaissance Drama (1989) highlighted the interconnectedness of racial and gendered othering within white patriarchal society (1046).
Lynda Boose’s work demonstrated that black women were largely unrepresentable in English Renaissance literature, as their existence challenged dominant patriarchal narratives (1046).
Religious Identity and the Concept of Race
Race in early modern England was often understood through religious frameworks, with blackness associated with non-Christian identities (1047).
James Shapiro’s Shakespeare and the Jews (1997) demonstrated how English identity formation was shaped by anxieties about religious difference (1047).
Daniel Vitkus’s work on Othello emphasized that English fears of conversion and conquest by Islamic forces influenced racial portrayals of Moors (1047).
Nabil Matar’s Turks, Moors, and Englishmen in the Age of Discovery (1999) provided archival evidence that English interactions with Muslim cultures were more extensive than previously thought, complicating simplistic racial binaries (1047).
Geography, Science, and Racial Construction
Recent scholarship has turned to pre-colonial concepts of race and geography to challenge teleological readings of race and imperialism (1048).
Emily Bartels argued that Europeans constructed Africa as both a space of exoticism and familiarity, rather than simply an “Other” (1048).
Valerie Traub suggested that early modern maps and geographical treatises contributed to racial and cultural differentiation (1048).
Floyd-Wilson’s own work in English Ethnicity and Race in Early Modern Drama (2003) explores how geohumoral theories shaped English perceptions of blackness and whiteness (1048).
Conclusion and Future Directions
The study of race in Renaissance literature has moved from a minor subtopic to a major interdisciplinary field (1049).
Future research is expected to further explore the intersections of race and religion, race and science, and transatlantic racial economies (1049).
Floyd-Wilson emphasizes that historicizing race requires both archival rigor and critical engagement with inherited myths (1049).
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson
Theoretical Term/Concept
Definition/Explanation
Reference from the Article
Typological Interpretations of Blackness
The belief that blackness in Renaissance literature functioned symbolically rather than reflecting real interactions with Black people.
“Othello is purposively black for theatrical and typological ends” (1044).
The Curse of Ham
A biblical justification for racial inferiority, arguing that blackness was a divine curse.
“Jordan attributes the ‘extraordinary persistence’ of the Curse of Ham legend to the probable ‘feeling’ among Europeans that ‘blackness could scarcely be anything but a curse'” (1045).
Phenotypical Differences
Physical racial characteristics and their cultural interpretations.
“Scholars aim to discover how early modern responses to phenotypical differences relate to the eventual construction of race” (1044).
Racial Performativity
The ways race was performed on stage and interpreted by audiences in early modern England.
“Othello was a white man’—a fact that underscores the ‘exclusionary privilege’ of whiteness in all early modern English stagings of blackness” (1045).
Ethnocentricity of English Petrarchism
The preference for fair-skinned beauty ideals in Renaissance poetry and art.
“Jordan also suggestively identifies the ethnocentricity of English Petrarchism” (1045).
Origins Debate
The discussion on whether racism led to slavery or slavery produced racism.
“Engaged in the ‘origins debate’ of American scholarship, which queried whether racism begat slavery, or slavery produced racism” (1045).
Intersectionality
The analysis of race in relation to other identity markers like gender and class.
“Renaissance racial studies changed significantly with the entrance of feminism in the late 80s” (1046).
Exclusionary Privilege of Whiteness
The systemic centering of whiteness in literary and cultural representation.
“Othello was a white man’—a fact that underscores the ‘exclusionary privilege’ of whiteness” (1045).
Religious Othering
The racialization of religious identity, particularly regarding Islam and Judaism.
“English identity, religion, and emergent racial categories were intertwined” (1047).
Geohumoralism
The belief that climate and geography influenced racial and ethnic characteristics.
“Humoralism, I argue, functioned as ethnology for the English” (1048).
Racial Teleology
The tendency to project modern racial categories backward onto early modern texts.
“Most scholarship continues to view early modern racialism through a narrative of conquest” (1048).
Cultural Taxonomy
The classification of people based on perceived racial, religious, or geographic differences.
“The complexity of tracing what’s familiar and what’s peculiar about premodern taxonomies” (1044).
Transatlantic Racial Economies
The study of how race was constructed within early economic and colonial exchanges.
“More exciting work soon, particularly on the interrelations between race and religion, race and science, and on race within a transatlantic economy” (1049).
Contribution of “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson to Literary Theory/Theories
Floyd-Wilson explores how race is a social construct rather than a biological reality, aligning with the fundamental premise of CRT that race is historically contingent and shaped by power structures.
She challenges earlier scholarship that assumed Elizabethan racial attitudes were natural or instinctual, instead emphasizing how race was produced through discourse (1044-1045).
Example: She critiques Winthrop Jordan’s claim that “white responses to blackness may be instinctual or atavistic,” arguing that this assumption essentializes racial prejudice and ignores historical complexity (1045).
The article examines early English constructions of racial and cultural difference before the rise of colonialism, reinforcing postcolonial scholars’ interest in how race was formed in pre-imperial contexts.
Floyd-Wilson highlights how early modern racial discourse was shaped by religion, geography, and trade, rather than colonial conquest alone (1047-1048).
Example: She draws on Nabil Matar’s research, which reveals that English portrayals of Moors were influenced by their encounters with Muslims and Native Americans, complicating Eurocentric narratives of race (1047).
She also critiques Emily Bartels’ argument that early racial representations should not always be read through a colonial lens, emphasizing the fluidity of pre-colonial racial categories (1048).
The article contributes to feminist literary criticism by demonstrating how race and gender were mutually constructed in early modern England (1046).
Example: She references Karen Newman’s reading of Othello to argue that “Desdemona and Othello, woman and black man, are represented by discourses about femininity and blackness which managed and produced difference” (1046).
Floyd-Wilson also acknowledges Ania Loomba’s work, which was among the first to analyze how gender, race, and class intersected in Renaissance drama, reinforcing an intersectional approach (1046).
4. Performance and Cultural Studies
The article engages with Performance Theory by analyzing how race was performed on the Renaissance stage, rather than being an intrinsic identity.
Example: Floyd-Wilson highlights Dympna Callaghan’s argument that Othello was played by a white actor in blackface, reinforcing the exclusionary privilege of whiteness in early modern theater (1045).
She also references Virginia Mason Vaughan’s work on Performing Blackness, which investigates how white audiences “read” racialized characters on stage (1045).
Floyd-Wilson situates racial discourse within historical and archival contexts, emphasizing that race in Renaissance literature cannot be understood outside its cultural, religious, and economic background.
Example: She argues that scholars must avoid imposing “an American history of race relations onto pre-slavery English origins” (1046), advocating for a historically specific reading of race.
Her engagement with New Historicism is evident in her focus on primary texts, archival sources, and cultural artifacts, such as travel narratives and religious writings (1047-1048).
6. Geohumoralism and Environmental Determinism
The article contributes to early modern ethnology by revisiting the role of geohumoralism (the belief that climate shaped racial and ethnic traits).
Example: Floyd-Wilson notes that Renaissance English texts often described blackness as associated with wisdom and spirituality, while whiteness was linked to barbarism and mutability (1048).
This analysis challenges modern assumptions about racial hierarchy by retrieving pre-Enlightenment models of difference (1048).
7. Religious Studies and Race
Floyd-Wilson highlights how racial identity in early modern England was deeply tied to religious affiliation, contributing to the study of theology and race in literature.
Example: She discusses Daniel Vitkus’s argument that early English fears of Moors were framed within anxieties about Islam and Christian conversion, rather than purely racial concerns (1047).
Similarly, she cites Ania Loomba, who argues that skin color and religious identity were intertwined in early English debates about community and belonging (1047).
8. Economic Criticism and Transatlantic Studies
The article anticipates further scholarship on how race was shaped by early transatlantic trade and economic networks.
Example: She suggests that “future work should examine race within a transatlantic economy” (1049), signaling a shift toward economic and materialist interpretations of race.
Examples of Critiques Through “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson
Literary Work
Critique Through Floyd-Wilson’s Analysis
Reference from the Article
Othello (William Shakespeare)
– Floyd-Wilson critiques early interpretations of Othello’s blackness as merely a typological symbol of sin and death. – She engages with Karen Newman’s feminist reading, which argues that Desdemona and Othello are represented through discourses of femininity and blackness that reinforce racial and gender hierarchies (1046). – She also references Dympna Callaghan’s argument that Othello was historically played by a white man in blackface, highlighting how race was performed rather than embodied (1045). – Daniel Vitkus’s work on “Turning Turk” suggests that Othello’s racial identity is linked to religious conversion anxieties, rather than just skin color (1047).
– “Othello is purposively black for theatrical and typological ends” (1044). – “Desdemona and Othello, woman and black man, are represented by discourses about femininity and blackness” (1046). – “Othello was a white man” (1045). – “The play’s portrait of the Moor is framed by the widespread European fear of being conquered and captured by Turks” (1047).
Titus Andronicus (William Shakespeare)
– Floyd-Wilson argues that early modern English literature associated blackness with negative traits such as cruelty, barbarism, and lasciviousness, as seen in Aaron the Moor’s portrayal in Titus Andronicus (1044-1045). – She highlights Winthrop Jordan’s claim that early English audiences instinctively responded negatively to blackness, though this view has been critiqued as overly deterministic (1045). – The play demonstrates how race was framed not only through skin color but also through religious and cultural associations, a theme that aligns with her discussion on racial typologies and geohumoralism (1048).
– “Anyone who reads Othello or Titus Andronicus will recognize that early modern English culture identified black skin with a set of negative qualities” (1044). – “Blackness seemed to produce a powerful and instinctively negative response in white observers” (1045). – “Geohumoral conceptual frameworks associated blackness with wisdom, spirituality, and resolution, and whiteness with barbarism, mutability, and slow-wittedness” (1048).
The Merchant of Venice (William Shakespeare)
– Floyd-Wilson connects The Merchant of Venice to James Shapiro’s Shakespeare and the Jews, arguing that racial identity in the play is tied to religious othering rather than skin color alone (1047). – She references Ania Loomba’s work on Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism, which suggests that racial anxieties in early modern England were closely linked to fears of conversion and assimilation (1047). – Elizabeth Spiller’s essay suggests that race and romance intersect in Shakespeare’s work, where Shylock’s Jewish identity is framed through cultural and economic exclusion (1048).
– “Religious concepts of community were challenged most powerfully by differences in skin colour, sparking off intense debates about religious identity as well as blackness” (1047). – “Shapiro’s Shakespeare and the Jews provides an important methodological model for thinking about the complex ways in which English identity, religion, and emergent racial categories were intertwined” (1047). – “Elizabeth Spiller’s essay… provocatively outlines how race and romance intersect in The Merchant of Venice” (1048).
Tamburlaine (Christopher Marlowe)
– Floyd-Wilson applies geohumoralism to Tamburlaine, arguing that early modern English audiences understood race through climate-based theories rather than rigid racial categories (1048). – She critiques earlier scholarship that saw Tamburlaine as either a racialized “Other” or a heroic conqueror, arguing that his portrayal is shaped by both cultural admiration and racial anxiety (1048). – She also highlights how early modern English drama often associated “Moorishness” with both religious and geographical alterity, rather than simply skin color (1047).
– “The English geographic imagination located England on the margins of the classical world – a marginalization that affected their conception of physiological and emotional differences” (1048). – “Moorish identities could confusingly be understood through religious, cultural, and racial categories that sometimes clashed” (1047). – “Humoralism functioned as ethnology for the English” (1048).
Criticism Against “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson
1. Overemphasis on Shakespearean Studies
The article centers Shakespearean drama, particularly Othello, Titus Andronicus, and The Merchant of Venice, at the core of race studies while neglecting other Renaissance literary forms.
Critics might argue that her focus reinforces the canonization of Shakespeare, overlooking important non-dramatic texts, such as early modern poetry, pamphlets, and travel narratives.
She briefly acknowledges “the wonderful scholarship on the New Atlantic World, the matter of Britain, and Spanish imperialism” but does not explore these areas in depth (1049).
2. Lack of Engagement with Non-European Perspectives
Floyd-Wilson primarily analyzes how English writers constructed racial identity but does not significantly engage with African, Middle Eastern, or indigenous perspectives on racial identity.
Some critics argue that race studies should incorporate decolonial approaches by focusing on how Moors, Africans, and Muslims represented themselves, rather than how they were framed by European texts.
Scholars like Nabil Matar have worked to recover Muslim voices in early modern encounters, but Floyd-Wilson does not fully integrate these alternative viewpoints into her analysis (1047).
3. Limited Critique of Early Race Theories
While Floyd-Wilson critiques Winthrop Jordan’s White Over Black (1968) for assuming that white reactions to blackness were instinctual, she does not fully deconstruct the methodological flaws in early racial scholarship (1045).
Critics might argue that she relies on summaries rather than offering a deep theoretical engagement with early race theorists.
For example, while she acknowledges Benjamin Braude’s critique of Jordan’s work as “anachronistic” (1045), she does not expand on how modern race studies have moved beyond Jordan’s framework.
4. Insufficient Attention to Economic and Colonial Frameworks
The article mentions transatlantic racial economies only briefly in its conclusion, despite the significant role of trade, colonialism, and capitalism in shaping early racial ideologies (1049).
Scholars working in materialist and economic criticism (such as Kim F. Hall’s Things of Darkness) have argued that racial identity in early modern England was deeply tied to emerging capitalist structures, but Floyd-Wilson does not focus on this aspect.
She acknowledges the importance of “race within a transatlantic economy” as a future area of study but does not explore the economic dimensions of race in detail (1049).
5. Theoretical Overlap Without Original Contribution
Some critics might argue that Floyd-Wilson’s article is more of a survey of existing race studies rather than offering a groundbreaking theoretical intervention.
While she synthesizes major scholars like Ania Loomba, Karen Newman, and Nabil Matar, she does not propose a new theoretical framework or methodology for race studies in Renaissance literature.
The retrospective approach is valuable, but some might see it as reiterating established debates rather than advancing new arguments.
6. Limited Discussion of Performance Studies Beyond Blackface
While Floyd-Wilson references Virginia Mason Vaughan’s work on blackface performance, she does not fully engage with broader issues of racial performativity in early modern theater (1045).
Scholars such as Ian Smith have explored the racialization of stage movements, speech patterns, and costuming, which Floyd-Wilson does not analyze in depth.
Her discussion of “Othello as a white man in blackface” (1045) is useful, but her argument could be extended by considering how performance reinforced or disrupted racial hierarchies.
Representative Quotations from “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson with Explanation
“In thirty years the study of race in early modern literature has moved from the margins of scholarship to occupy its now central role in the analysis of English Renaissance culture.” (1044)
Floyd-Wilson highlights the academic shift in literary studies, where race has become a central focus rather than a peripheral topic. This reflects the broader impact of critical race theory and postcolonial studies on early modern literature.
“Anyone who reads Othello or Titus Andronicus will recognize that early modern English culture identified black skin with a set of negative qualities.” (1044)
This statement underscores how racial stereotypes were embedded in Renaissance literature, portraying blackness as synonymous with moral and social inferiority. It aligns with typological interpretations of race.
“Race, as it surfaces in Shakespeare’s and other early modern texts, reveals itself to be a multiplicity of loci, of axes of determinism, as well as of metaphorical systems to aid and abet its deployment across a variety of boundaries in the making.” (1044)
Quoting Margo Hendricks, Floyd-Wilson suggests that race in early modern texts is fluid and constructed through multiple intersecting factors, including gender, religion, and geography. This aligns with intersectionality theory in literary studies.
“Winthrop Jordan also maintained that the interaction between the English and Africans had been limited.” (1045)
Floyd-Wilson critiques Jordan’s argument that racial prejudice in early modern England was instinctual rather than socially constructed. She emphasizes the need for historical specificity rather than assuming universal racial attitudes.
“Scholars began to consider race as a category of difference analogous to class, nationality, but most especially gender.” (1046)
This reflects the influence of feminist and intersectional theory, which considers how race operates alongside gender and class in shaping identity and exclusion in Renaissance texts.
“Religious concepts of community were challenged most powerfully by differences in skin colour, sparking off intense debates about religious identity as well as blackness.” (1047)
Floyd-Wilson discusses how race was linked to religious othering, particularly in early modern England’s encounters with Islam and Judaism. This ties into the study of race and religion in early modern texts.
“The English geographic imagination located England on the margins of the classical world – a marginalization that affected their conception of physiological and emotional differences.” (1048)
This statement highlights geohumoralism, the early modern belief that climate and geography shaped racial and ethnic traits. It shows how England saw itself in relation to Mediterranean and African identities.
“The complexity of tracing what’s familiar and what’s peculiar about premodern taxonomies and their cultural functions has intrigued critics for several generations.” (1044)
Floyd-Wilson acknowledges the challenges of historicizing race, emphasizing that racial categories in the Renaissance were different from modern racial ideologies.
“Othello was a white man” – a fact that underscores the ‘exclusionary privilege’ of whiteness in all early modern English stagings of blackness.” (1045)
This quotation from Dympna Callaghan highlights racial performativity in early modern theater, where white actors in blackface reinforced dominant racial hierarchies.
“Historicizing race depends, of course, on solid archival research, but as astute readers of fiction and culture, literary scholars have interpreted and dismantled inherited myths.” (1049)
Floyd-Wilson affirms that race studies must combine historical research with literary interpretation, dismantling racial myths and assumptions in Renaissance literature.
Suggested Readings: “Moors, Race, and the Study of English Renaissance Literature: A Brief Retrospective” by Mary Floyd-Wilson
Floyd‐Wilson, Mary. “Moors, race, and the study of English renaissance literature: A brief retrospective.” Literature Compass 3.5 (2006): 1044-1052.
STANIVUKOVIC, GORAN V. “RECENT STUDIES OF ENGLISH RENAISSANCE LITERATURE OF THE MEDITERRANEAN.” English Literary Renaissance, vol. 32, no. 1, 2002, pp. 168–86. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24463713. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
Smith, Emma. “Race and Othello.” Othello, Liverpool University Press, 2005, pp. 28–48. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5qdgmv.8. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
Mason, Philip. “Othello and Race Prejudice.” Caribbean Quarterly, vol. 8, no. 3, 1962, pp. 154–62. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40652820. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
“Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn, first appeared in the Anthropology Newsletter in October 1997, critiques the use of racial and ethnic classifications in anthropological discourse, arguing that such terminology often reinforces divisive and outdated notions of identity.
Introduction: “Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn
“Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn, first appeared in the Anthropology Newsletter in October 1997, critiques the use of racial and ethnic classifications in anthropological discourse, arguing that such terminology often reinforces divisive and outdated notions of identity. He challenges terms such as “Euro-American” and “People of Color,” questioning their coherence in a global and linguistic sense, and warning that such categorizations risk reviving dangerous racial essentialism. Drawing from historical examples, he highlights how labeling individuals based on race or ethnicity has often preceded acts of discrimination and violence, from Nazi Germany to ethnic conflicts in the 20th century. Cohn’s essay is significant in literary theory and anthropology as it engages with the politics of language, emphasizing how words shape social perceptions and reinforce hierarchies. His critique aligns with broader debates in linguistic anthropology regarding the construction of identity and the power of language in social classification. By invoking both historical atrocities and contemporary academic discourse, Cohn urges anthropologists to be mindful of the implications of racialized terminology, warning that uncritical usage can undermine the very principles of anthropology—understanding human cultures in their fluid, interconnected, and evolving contexts.
Summary of “Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn
Critique of Racial and Ethnic Terminology in Anthropology
Cohn argues that certain terms used by anthropologists, such as Euro-American, People of Color, and Third World Intellectual, reinforce racial essentialism and are reminiscent of divisive racial classifications from the past (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
He criticizes the lack of clarity in defining “Euro-American,” questioning whether it includes Finns, Magyars, or Muslims from the Balkans (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Historical and Political Implications of Racial Labels
Cohn highlights that the term People of Color was historically used in contexts of oppression, including the era of slavery in the U.S. and Apartheid in South Africa (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
He points out the ambiguity of racial labels, asking whether an American-born child of an Indonesian is considered a person of color and whether the Inuit of Alaska are colorless (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Dangers of Group-Based Classification
He warns that the misuse of ethnic and quasi-national terminology has historically led to violence, such as ethnic cleansing in Burundi, Bosnia, and the Sudetenland (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Cohn asserts that reducing individuals to group identities undermines anthropology’s goal of understanding human cultural diversity (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Jewish Identity and Misuse of Ethnic Labels
He draws from his own work with Jewish communities, noting that labels like Ashkenazi, Sephardi, German Jew, or Eastern Jew often imply cultural superiority and overlook historical intermarriage and migration (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
He expresses personal discomfort with racial classification, having experienced being categorized as a Jew under Nazi Germany (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Skepticism Toward “Third World Intellectual”
Cohn criticizes the term Third World Intellectual, suggesting it is problematic and reinforces a hierarchical view of global academia (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Conclusion: The Need for Precision and Ethical Responsibility in Anthropological Language
He argues that anthropology should avoid rigid racial and ethnic classifications and instead focus on cultural fluidity and historical complexity (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Cohn warns that failing to do so risks repeating past mistakes of scientific racism, drawing a parallel to Nazi racial research (Rassenforschung) (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
The use of language to categorize and hierarchize racial and ethnic groups, reinforcing discrimination.
Cohn argues that terms like Euro-American and People of Color perpetuate outdated racial categorizations and can be misused to essentialize identity (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Essentialism
The belief that social groups have fixed, inherent characteristics that define them.
Cohn critiques how racial terms assume uniformity within groups, ignoring historical migration, intermarriage, and cultural exchange (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Ethnic Classification
The process of categorizing individuals based on ethnicity, culture, or nationality.
Cohn warns that classifying people into rigid ethnic categories can lead to exclusion and historical inaccuracies, such as defining all Europeans as “Euro-Americans” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Historical Linguistics and Identity
The study of how language shapes and reflects identity over time.
Cohn points out that linguistic ancestry (e.g., Finns and Magyars with roots in Central Asia) complicates racial classifications (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Race as a Social Construct
The idea that race is not a biological fact but a social and political categorization.
Cohn argues that racial labels do not correspond to biological realities and are often politically motivated (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Scientific Racism
The historical misuse of science to justify racial hierarchies and discrimination.
He warns that anthropologists risk reviving pseudo-scientific racial classifications reminiscent of Rassenforschung in Nazi Germany (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Cultural Relativism
The principle that cultural practices and beliefs should be understood in their own context rather than judged by external standards.
Cohn emphasizes that group identity is fluid, and imposing rigid racial or ethnic categories ignores cultural variation (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Postcolonial Critique
The examination of how colonial histories shape modern discourse and classifications.
Cohn critiques terms like Third World Intellectual, suggesting they reinforce hierarchical, colonial-era distinctions (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Social Categorization Theory
A psychological theory explaining how individuals classify themselves and others into social groups.
Cohn criticizes how identity labels create artificial boundaries, leading to exclusion and social division (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Ethnolinguistic Identity
The connection between language and group identity.
He argues that linguistic labels often fail to capture the complexities of individual and group identities, such as Jewish communities with diverse backgrounds (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Contribution of “Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn to Literary Theory/Theories
Cohn challenges the reification of racial categories in anthropological discourse, aligning with CRT’s argument that race is a social construct rather than a biological reality (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
He critiques how terms like People of Color and Euro-American impose rigid racial classifications, which CRT scholars argue perpetuate systemic discrimination (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
His discussion of linguistic categorization reflects CRT’s concern with how language reinforces power hierarchies and racial biases.
Cohn critiques the term Third World Intellectual, arguing that it implies a colonial hierarchy in knowledge production (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
His work aligns with postcolonial theorists like Edward Said, who argue that Western discourse often “others” non-Western identities through language (Said, Orientalism, 1978).
Cohn highlights how colonial-era racial terminologies persist in modern academic and political discourse, mirroring the postcolonial critique of neocolonial structures in language (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Linguistic Anthropology and Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
His argument that racial categories shape social perception aligns with the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, which suggests that language structures thought (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
He critiques the assumed fixed meanings of ethnic and racial terms, reflecting the linguistic anthropology perspective that language is dynamic and socially constructed (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Cohn’s critique of racial terminology resonates with Ferdinand de Saussure’s view that meaning is relational and arbitrary (Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, 1916).
He challenges the fixed meaning of terms like Euro-American, arguing that linguistic signs should be understood within shifting historical and social contexts (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Discourse Analysis (Michel Foucault)
Cohn’s argument reflects Foucault’s view that language is a tool of power and social control (The Archaeology of Knowledge, 1969).
He warns that racial classifications in anthropology function as discursive practices that reinforce social hierarchies, similar to how Foucault describes knowledge-power dynamics (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
His critique of Jewish identity labels (Ashkenazi, Sephardi, German Jew, etc.) aligns with Stuart Hall’s theory that identity is fluid and constructed through discourse (Cultural Identity and Diaspora, 1990).
He argues that essentialist labels ignore cultural hybridity and historical migration, a key theme in contemporary identity politics (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Examples of Critiques Through “Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn
Literary Work
Critique Through “Linguistic Racism”
Key Themes from Cohn’s Argument
Joseph Conrad – Heart of Darkness (1899)
The novel reinforces racial binaries by depicting Africans as the Other through dehumanizing language, reducing them to racial stereotypes rather than individual identities. Conrad’s language constructs rigid racial hierarchies that mirror colonial discourses (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Aligns with Cohn’s critique of racial essentialism, where language is used to define entire populations in simplistic, hierarchical terms (People of Color, Third World Intellectuals).
Harper Lee – To Kill a Mockingbird (1960)
While the novel critiques racism, it also reinforces problematic linguistic hierarchies, particularly in how Black characters like Tom Robinson and Calpurnia are depicted. The term “boy” used for African American men reflects linguistic subordination (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Connects to Cohn’s analysis of racial terminology, where language constructs racial identities in ways that uphold social power dynamics.
Toni Morrison – Beloved (1987)
Morrison exposes how linguistic classification under slavery dehumanized Black individuals (e.g., referring to them as property). This aligns with Cohn’s argument that racial terms historically used in oppression (such as People of Color) carry harmful legacies (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Reflects Cohn’s critique of the historical misuse of racial categories, showing how language has been central to racial discrimination.
Chinua Achebe – Things Fall Apart (1958)
Achebe critiques colonial linguistic frameworks that define African identity from a Eurocentric perspective. The British use of terms like primitive and savage mirrors Cohn’s concerns about imposed linguistic classifications (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Supports Cohn’s argument that rigid ethnic and racial labels erase cultural fluidity and reduce people to essentialized categories (Euro-American as a broad and inaccurate label).
Criticism Against “Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn
Overgeneralization of Racial Terminology Issues
Cohn argues that terms like People of Color and Euro-American are either meaningless or pejorative, but critics may contend that these terms serve important sociopolitical functions, particularly in identity politics and anti-racist movements (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
The use of racial terminology is often strategic and self-affirming, helping marginalized groups assert agency rather than reinforcing oppression.
Lack of Nuance in Addressing Identity Politics
While Cohn criticizes racial labels for being imprecise, he does not fully engage with the ways marginalized communities reclaim and redefine these terms for empowerment.
Scholars in critical race theory argue that terms like African American serve as political identifiers that challenge exclusion rather than reinforce racial essentialism (Kimberlé Crenshaw, 1991).
Comparison to Nazi Racial Science is Overstated
Cohn likens the use of racial classifications in anthropology to Rassenforschung (racial science) in Nazi Germany (Cohn, 1997, p. 4), which some critics may find an extreme and inappropriate comparison.
Modern racial terminology is not used to justify genocide but rather to acknowledge historical injustices and promote inclusivity.
Fails to Address Structural Racism in Language
Cohn focuses on the dangers of racial categorization but does not sufficiently explore how language also perpetuates systemic racism.
Scholars like Marcyliena Morgan (1997) argue that linguistic hierarchies uphold power structures, and eliminating racial labels does not necessarily eliminate racial discrimination.
Dismissal of Postcolonial Perspectives
His critique of Third World Intellectual as a problematic term ignores the ways in which postcolonial scholars use it to reclaim intellectual space for non-Western thinkers (Cohn, 1997, p. 4).
Postcolonial theorists like Edward Said and Homi Bhabha emphasize that language is a site of resistance as much as oppression.
Ignores the Role of Self-Identification
While Cohn critiques racial labels imposed by others, he does not adequately address how individuals and communities choose to identify themselves.
Terms like Latinx, Black, and Indigenous have evolved through community discourse, reflecting self-determined identities rather than externally imposed classifications.
Representative Quotations from “Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn with Explanation
Quotation
Explanation
“Judging by some of the recent Anthropology Newsletters some anthropologists are now using ethnic and racial terms in ways that would be fully acceptable in Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
Cohn makes a strong comparison between contemporary racial terminology and the racial science (Rassenforschung) of Nazi Germany. He argues that uncritical usage of racial classifications risks legitimizing harmful essentialist ideas about identity.
“Geographically, the term ‘Euro’ may have some coherence, but linguistically, culturally, and even genetically it certainly does not.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
This critique highlights the imprecision of the term Euro-American. Cohn argues that such racial classifications ignore the diversity of European cultures and languages, reinforcing artificial boundaries.
“The term ‘people of color’ was common usage among slave dealers prior to 1860 and was also used in the Apartheid period in South Africa.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
By tracing the historical roots of the term People of Color, Cohn suggests that its contemporary use carries problematic connotations, potentially reducing individuals to racial categories with oppressive histories.
“Is the American-born child of an Indonesian a ‘person of color,’ and are the Inuit of Alaska ‘colorless’?” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
Here, Cohn points out the ambiguity and contradictions inherent in racial terminology. He questions whether such classifications have any objective meaning or are merely subjective social constructs.
“The misuse of ethnic or quasi-national terminology is dangerous, as we have learned to our sorrow in the 20th century.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
This statement underscores his broader concern: that language has historically been used to justify exclusion, violence, and genocide. He warns that careless application of racial terms can contribute to similar patterns of division.
“If we anthropologists act as if all groups have unique experiences and exist in concrete borders, that all individuals share in these cultural and biological characteristics, then we deny all anthropological experience and the function of anthropology itself.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
Cohn critiques essentialist views of culture and race, arguing that anthropology should recognize cultural fluidity rather than reinforcing rigid group identities.
“As a Jew who left Germany after Hitler’s rise to power I have no desire to repeat the experience of being classified by ‘race,’ ‘ethnic identity’ or even gender.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
This personal statement emphasizes his concern with racial labeling, drawing on his own experience of persecution under Nazi Germany to highlight the dangers of racial classification.
“The term ‘Third World Intellectual’ is equally suspect. It seems to imply that academics from these regions are inherently different from those in the West.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
Cohn critiques the term Third World Intellectual, suggesting that it reinforces a colonial hierarchy in knowledge production, positioning scholars from non-Western nations as fundamentally separate from their Western counterparts.
“Hindu scientists from Bombay have more in common with a scientist from Bogota, Colombia, than with a Hindu scientist born in London.” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
He uses this example to challenge the assumption that race or ethnicity determines shared experiences. Instead, he emphasizes commonalities based on profession, education, and intellectual background rather than race or national identity.
“That way lies scientific disaster and Hitler’s ‘Rassenforschung.'” (Cohn, 1997, p. 4)
By referencing Rassenforschung (Nazi racial science), Cohn warns that classifying people into rigid racial and ethnic categories can lead to dangerous and pseudoscientific conclusions, undermining both ethical and academic integrity.
Suggested Readings: “Linguistic Racism” by Michael Cohn
Friedrich, Patricia. “Anti-Racist Linguistics.” The Anti-Racism Linguist: A Book of Readings, edited by Patricia Friedrich, Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications, 2023, pp. 1–25. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.22679667.4. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
Berk-Seligson, Susan. Language in Society, vol. 41, no. 1, 2012, pp. 123–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41329698. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
Comas, Juan. “‘Scientific’ Racism Again?” Current Anthropology, vol. 2, no. 4, 1961, pp. 303–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2739858. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
“Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson first appeared in 2007 in the Journal of Gerontological Social Work and was later published online by Routledge on September 25, 2008.
Introduction: “Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson
“Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson first appeared in 2007 in the Journal of Gerontological Social Work and was later published online by Routledge on September 25, 2008. The article investigates skepticism and resistance toward ethnic minority care workers among elderly care recipients in Sweden. Through interviews with caregiver organization representatives and minority care workers, Jönson reveals a disconnect between official anti-racist policies and the pragmatic and pathologizing approaches adopted by care providers. While officials often downplay racism, framing it as language barriers or fear of the unknown, ethnic minority caregivers report frequent discrimination, particularly in first-time encounters. The study contributes to literature and literary theory by exposing how ideological frameworks, including anti-racism and patient rights, shape discourse on discrimination. Jönson’s work is significant in highlighting how structural inequalities and power dynamics influence caregiving relationships, challenging simplistic narratives of racism and advocating for a nuanced understanding of care, vulnerability, and systemic bias.
Summary of “Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson
Investigating Resistance Toward Ethnic Minority Care Workers
The study examines skepticism and resistance toward ethnic minority caregivers among elderly recipients in Sweden.
Care provider representatives downplay resistance, often attributing it to:
Language barriers
Temporary adjustment difficulties
Fear of the unknown (Jönson, 2007, p. 80).
Minority care workers report more severe and frequent racism, especially in first-time encounters (Jönson, 2007, p. 83).
Changing Demographics in Swedish Elder Care
Sweden has shifted from a monocultural to a multicultural society with:
10% of the population foreign-born.
20% of newly employed elder care workers from outside Sweden (Jönson, 2007, p. 80).
While many appreciate minority care workers, some elderly recipients display skepticism or outright rejection.
Language as a Pretext for Racism
Many elderly recipients cite language difficulties as a reason for rejecting minority care workers.
Some complaints are legitimate, particularly when miscommunication affects care quality.
Others use language as a socially acceptable excuse to refuse non-Swedish staff (Jönson, 2007, p. 86).
A manager noted: “If we complain about somebody’s headcloth, we would be labeled as racists. So, we’ll attack the language” (Jönson, 2007, p. 88).
Pragmatic and Pathologizing Responses to Racism
Care institutions avoid addressing racism directly by reframing it as:
A symptom of dementia, dependency, or aging (Jönson, 2007, p. 89).
A temporary issue that disappears with familiarity.
Pragmatic solutions dominate:
Many comply with racist requests to prevent conflicts (Jönson, 2007, p. 90).
Supervisors often replace minority workers rather than confront discrimination.
Care Recipient Rights vs. Anti-Discrimination Laws
A core conflict exists between:
Care recipients’ rights to choose caregivers.
Anti-discrimination laws protecting employees.
Some managers justify compliance by comparing care recipients to customers who can choose their services (Jönson, 2007, p. 88).
Others argue that forcing care recipients to accept certain workers may cause distress (Jönson, 2007, p. 91).
Need for Clearer Anti-Racism Policies
Care organizations lack clear policies on handling racism from care recipients.
An overly ideological anti-racist approach may:
Create tensions among staff.
Alienate elderly care recipients who fear repercussions for complaints (Jönson, 2007, p. 94).
Jönson recommends localized anti-racist policies that balance:
Pragmatism (practical service delivery).
Ethical caregiving (ensuring fair treatment).
Protection of employees from discrimination (Jönson, 2007, p. 92).
Conclusion: Addressing Conflicting Interests
Elder care providers and policymakers must acknowledge the complex dynamics of race, care, and aging.
Ignoring racism by labeling it as pathology or pragmatism leaves minority care workers vulnerable.
A balanced approach should:
Educate staff and recipients on anti-racist practices.
Implement fair but flexible workplace policies.
Recognize that both caregivers and care recipients deserve respect and protection (Jönson, 2007, p. 96).
Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against individuals based on ethnicity, race, skin color, or religion (Jönson, 2007, p. 80).
Explored through skepticism and resistance toward ethnic minority caregivers by elderly care recipients.
Ethnic Discrimination
Unfair treatment of individuals based on ethnicity, race, religion, or descent, often in legal and workplace settings (Westin, 2000).
Examined in the conflict between care recipients’ preferences and anti-discrimination laws protecting minority caregivers.
Pathologizing Approach
Framing discriminatory behavior as a result of illness, dementia, dependency, or cognitive decline rather than deliberate racism (Jönson, 2007, p. 89).
Used by care providers to excuse racism among elderly care recipients, avoiding direct confrontation.
Pragmatic Approach
Emphasizing practical solutions over ideological or ethical considerations (Jönson, 2007, p. 90).
Care providers comply with racist requests to avoid conflicts rather than challenge discrimination.
Fear of the Unknown
Psychological resistance to unfamiliar individuals or cultural differences, often leading to prejudice (Jönson, 2007, p. 80).
Used as a justification for initial skepticism and rejection of minority care workers.
Social Construction of Race
The idea that racial and ethnic categories are shaped by social and cultural perceptions rather than biological differences (Berger & Luckmann, 1966).
Care recipients’ negative perceptions of minority workers are influenced by societal narratives about race and immigration.
Customer-Service Model
A perspective in which care recipients are treated as consumers who have the right to choose services (Jönson, 2007, p. 88).
Used by some managers to justify complying with racist preferences by equating care to a commercial service.
Techniques of Neutralization
Strategies used to justify or excuse morally questionable actions, such as denying responsibility or minimizing harm (Sykes & Matza, 1957).
Care providers justify replacing minority workers by framing it as a practical necessity rather than discrimination.
Power Relations in Care Work
The dynamic between caregivers and care recipients, shaped by race, gender, and social status (Szebehely, 1995).
While care workers typically hold authority, racialized power structures reverse this dynamic, making minority workers more vulnerable to discrimination.
Elderly Vulnerability vs. Caregiver Protection
The ethical dilemma of balancing elderly recipients’ emotional well-being with the rights of care workers (Jönson, 2007, p. 91).
Care providers hesitate to challenge racist behavior to avoid distressing elderly individuals, often at the cost of minority staff.
Institutional Anti-Racism vs. Everyday Practices
The gap between official anti-racist policies and real-world workplace decisions (Jönson, 2007, p. 92).
While institutions uphold anti-racist policies, pragmatic decisions often reinforce racial bias in practice.
Workplace Discrimination
Unequal treatment of employees based on ethnicity, race, or religion, often embedded in organizational culture (Jönson, 2007, p. 95).
Care workers of foreign origin experience frequent resistance, microaggressions, and exclusion.
Moral Balancing in Policy Implementation
The need to balance competing moral and ethical concerns in workplace policies (Jönson, 2007, p. 94).
Calls for localized policies that balance pragmatism, fairness, and anti-discrimination laws in elder care.
Contribution of “Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson to Literary Theory/Theories
Explores racialized power structures in caregiving, where ethnic minority workers are subjected to discrimination despite their vital role (Jönson, 2007, p. 80).
Links resistance to historical colonial narratives, where non-European individuals are framed as “the other” (Jönson, 2007, p. 83).
Examines how language barriers serve as a disguised form of racial exclusion, reflecting colonial legacies of linguistic hierarchy (Jönson, 2007, p. 86).
Highlights systemic racism in Swedish elder care, showing how policies and institutional practices reinforce discrimination (Jönson, 2007, p. 92).
Demonstrates “colorblind racism”—where care providers avoid addressing racism directly by reframing it as practical concerns (Jönson, 2007, p. 89).
Challenges “white normativity”, as elder care is structured around the expectations of white Swedish care recipients (Jönson, 2007, p. 90).
3. Structuralism and the Social Construction of Race
Applies Berger and Luckmann’s (1966) concept of the social construction of reality, arguing that race is socially constructed through discourse and everyday interactions (Jönson, 2007, p. 84).
Shows how racist attitudes toward care workers are culturally produced rather than biologically determined (Jönson, 2007, p. 85).
Demonstrates how “fear of the unknown” operates as a socially learned response rather than an innate reaction (Jönson, 2007, p. 80).
4. Discourse Analysis (Foucaultian Theory)
Investigates how racism is rationalized through institutional discourse, enabling care providers to comply with racist preferences while maintaining an anti-racist stance (Jönson, 2007, p. 90).
Examines how managerial language (“customer service model”) legitimizes discrimination by reframing racism as a service preference (Jönson, 2007, p. 88).
Connects elderly care policies to broader national discourses on multiculturalism and migration in Sweden (Jönson, 2007, p. 94).
Highlights gendered and racialized labor divisions, showing how immigrant women are disproportionately placed in caregiving roles (Jönson, 2007, p. 81).
Analyzes the intersection of race, gender, and labor precarity, as minority care workers face both racial and gender-based discrimination (Jönson, 2007, p. 85).
Demonstrates how power dynamics in caregiving are shaped by both ethnicity and social status, reinforcing double marginalization of minority women in elder care (Jönson, 2007, p. 91).
Discusses the role of perception and interpretation in shaping racist attitudes among elderly care recipients (Jönson, 2007, p. 86).
Suggests that resistance toward minority care workers is influenced by personal experiences, social conditioning, and media representation (Jönson, 2007, p. 87).
Illustrates how care recipients “read” racialized bodies and respond to them based on pre-existing biases rather than actual interactions (Jönson, 2007, p. 88).
Examines how hegemonic ideologies shape both individual and institutional responses to racism in elder care (Jönson, 2007, p. 90).
Shows how care providers are complicit in maintaining racial hierarchy by prioritizing the preferences of Swedish care recipients over the rights of minority workers (Jönson, 2007, p. 91).
Discusses how pragmatic approaches to racism are shaped by dominant ideologies that normalize workplace discrimination (Jönson, 2007, p. 92).
8. Human Rights and Ethics in Literary Theory
Addresses conflicts between human rights frameworks and real-world caregiving ethics (Jönson, 2007, p. 93).
Questions whether elderly individuals should be granted the “right” to refuse minority caregivers, even when such refusals are rooted in racism (Jönson, 2007, p. 94).
Advocates for policy solutions that balance anti-racism with ethical caregiving, ensuring both caregivers and recipients are treated fairly (Jönson, 2007, p. 96).
Examples of Critiques Through “Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson
Literary Work
Themes in the Work
Critique Through Jönson’s Framework
Joseph Conrad – Heart of Darkness
– Colonialism and racial hierarchy – “Othering” of non-Europeans – White European superiority complex
– Jönson’s study critiques how colonial narratives continue to influence racial perceptions, particularly in elder care, where minority care workers are viewed as the “other” (Jönson, 2007, p. 80). – Similar to Heart of Darkness, Swedish elder care reproduces racialized power structures, where non-Swedish workers are treated as outsiders (Jönson, 2007, p. 83). – Language barriers in Jönson’s study parallel Conrad’s depictions of “unintelligible natives,” reinforcing how communication differences become a pretext for exclusion (Jönson, 2007, p. 86).
Toni Morrison – Beloved
– Legacy of slavery and racial trauma – Dehumanization of Black bodies – Psychological impact of racism
– Jönson’s findings align with Morrison’s exploration of racial trauma, showing how care workers of foreign origin internalize racist abuse as part of their job (Jönson, 2007, p. 85). – In Beloved, characters struggle against systemic racism, much like minority care workers in Sweden who face discrimination but lack institutional support (Jönson, 2007, p. 92). – The pathologizing approach in Jönson’s study (“It’s just dementia, not racism”) mirrors the rationalizations of white violence in Beloved, where oppressors excuse or justify their actions through social norms (Jönson, 2007, p. 89).
Jean Rhys – Wide Sargasso Sea
– Postcolonial displacement – Racial and cultural marginalization – Identity crisis of Creole characters
– The resistance toward ethnic minority care workers in Jönson’s study mirrors the alienation of Antoinette (Bertha) in Wide Sargasso Sea, where she is “too white for the Caribbean, too foreign for England” (Jönson, 2007, p. 81). – Fear of the unknown (Jönson, 2007, p. 80) plays a key role in both texts—elderly Swedes reject minority caregivers just as Rochester rejects Antoinette based on racial and cultural stereotypes. – The discourse of “civilized” vs. “uncivilized” in Rhys’s novel parallels Jönson’s critique of Sweden’s care system, where minority workers must “prove” their competence to skeptical Swedish recipients (Jönson, 2007, p. 88).
Ralph Ellison – Invisible Man
– Racial invisibility and identity – Power structures and systemic oppression – Survival under racism
– Like Ellison’s narrator, ethnic minority care workers in Sweden become “invisible”—their presence is tolerated but not fully accepted (Jönson, 2007, p. 83). – The customer-service model in Jönson’s study (“the patient gets to choose”) reflects how racialized workers are dehumanized and reduced to economic functions (Jönson, 2007, p. 88). – Both Invisible Man and Jönson’s study highlight how institutions adopt a rhetoric of anti-racism while maintaining discriminatory practices (Jönson, 2007, p. 92).
Criticism Against “Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson
1. Limited Scope and Sample Size
The study relies on a small sample size of 12 representatives and 3 ethnic minority care workers, making it difficult to generalize the findings (Jönson, 2007, p. 82).
The research focuses on a single Swedish municipality, which may not represent broader trends in Sweden or other multicultural societies.
A larger, more diverse sample could provide deeper insights into racism in elder care across different regions and care institutions.
2. Overemphasis on Pragmatism and Pathologization
The study argues that care providers frame racism as “fear of the unknown” or dementia, rather than actively confronting it (Jönson, 2007, p. 89).
Critics may argue that this framing oversimplifies the complexity of prejudice among elderly care recipients.
By emphasizing pathologization, the study risks excusing racist behavior instead of advocating for stronger institutional interventions.
3. Lack of Direct Ethnographic Engagement with Care Recipients
The study primarily relies on interviews with care providers and minority staff, rather than directly interviewing elderly care recipients about their perceptions.
Without firsthand accounts from care recipients, the study risks misinterpreting their motives, potentially exaggerating or downplaying the role of racism.
Ethnographic fieldwork or observational research could provide a more nuanced understanding of recipient-caregiver interactions.
4. Insufficient Policy Recommendations
While Jönson highlights the gap between anti-racist policies and real-world practices, his recommendations remain vague (Jönson, 2007, p. 92).
The study does not offer concrete solutions for care institutions, such as training programs, institutional reforms, or legal enforcement strategies.
A stronger policy-driven conclusion could have enhanced the study’s impact on workplace reforms.
5. Failure to Address the Role of Care Workers’ Agency
The study focuses on care workers as victims of racism, but does not deeply explore how they resist, navigate, or reshape power dynamics in care institutions.
Some scholars argue that migrant care workers develop coping strategies, solidarity networks, and active resistance, which Jönson does not fully examine.
Including examples of agency among minority care workers could have provided a more balanced portrayal of power relations in elder care.
6. Potential Bias in Framing Institutional Racism
The study presents elder care institutions as largely complicit in maintaining racial discrimination (Jönson, 2007, p. 90).
However, it does not explore cases where institutions have successfully challenged racism or where care recipients have changed their attitudes over time.
A more balanced discussion of institutional responses—both failures and successes—could have strengthened the study’s credibility.
7. Oversimplification of Cultural Conflicts
The study frames resistance to minority care workers as largely a racial issue, but does not sufficiently consider cultural misunderstandings or generational differences in social norms.
Some care recipients may struggle with linguistic differences, unfamiliar caregiving styles, or religious customs, which the study overlooks as non-racialized concerns (Jönson, 2007, p. 86).
Addressing how cultural adjustment plays a role in care work would have made the analysis more nuanced.
Representative Quotations from “Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson with Explanation
“Fear of the unknown among older people who had previously met few people of foreign origin.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 80)
Jönson explains how elderly care recipients often react with skepticism toward ethnic minority caregivers due to limited exposure to multicultural environments. Care providers justify this reaction as a natural response rather than active racism.
Social Construction of Race & Othering – Aligns with postcolonial theory and structuralism, where race and difference are socially constructed rather than inherent.
“We are trained to provide service and the customer pays for that service… It is a form of service and then we’ll have to ignore that other issue [playing along with racism].” (Jönson, 2007, p. 86)
This statement reflects a pragmatic approach used by care providers to justify compliance with discriminatory requests from care recipients. It highlights market-based reasoning in elder care.
Neoliberalism & Market Logic in Social Work – Demonstrates how commodification of care shifts ethical decisions into consumer-driven services.
“No, I haven’t really reflected on this and sometimes I wonder if it is not really the regular Swedish staff who make up this problem.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 87)
A care provider shifts the focus from care recipients’ racism to potential bias within staff interactions. This deflects accountability from institutions and elder care policies.
Structural Racism & Institutional Bias – Shows how racism is often downplayed or redirected within bureaucratic settings.
“It’s her home, and she has the right to decide who to let in.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 88)
This justification prioritizes the autonomy of care recipients over ethical concerns about racial discrimination. It frames private homes as exempt from anti-discrimination policies.
Liberal Individualism vs. Anti-Discrimination – Highlights tension between personal choice and societal responsibility in multicultural care settings.
“Some do know and think that these are not people who… I mean these are sick people, old people, helpless people—and they [staff] are pretty able to see the circumstances.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 90)
This statement pathologizes racism among elderly care recipients, dismissing it as a symptom of aging rather than a social issue. It reflects the normalization of elder racism in caregiving.
Medicalization of Prejudice – Frames racist attitudes as a side effect of illness rather than an ethical problem requiring intervention.
“We are not here to educate the pensioners.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 89)
This statement highlights a pragmatic refusal to challenge racist attitudes among older people. Care providers prioritize avoiding conflict over promoting social change.
Political Correctness vs. Moral Responsibility – Engages with debates on whether social workers should challenge discrimination or accommodate it.
“Adding to this, populist claims makers with nationalist/racist agendas have referred to the growing interest in the special needs of elderly immigrants when arguing for similar needs among ethnic Swedes.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 83)
Right-wing groups use discourses of cultural needs to justify exclusionary policies that prioritize ethnic Swedes over minority groups in elder care.
Cultural Nationalism & Identity Politics – Shows how care policies can be co-opted by xenophobic narratives.
“Organizations perceived to comply with racism will be subject to public criticism.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 91)
Institutions must balance public accountability and practical caregiving decisions, leading to compromised anti-racism policies.
Corporate Image & Ethical Responsibility – Examines how social institutions navigate public perception in ethical dilemmas.
“There is a need to develop research and policy perspectives that take the complexity of care work into account and acknowledge the occurrence of mixed and shifting power relations.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 94)
Jönson argues that power dynamics in elder care are fluid, involving both vulnerable caregivers and care recipients.
Intersectionality & Power Relations – Demonstrates how racism interacts with aging, labor conditions, and social vulnerabilities.
“A strong anti-racist policy may result in oppression of care recipients, who fear labeling and sanctions.” (Jönson, 2007, p. 93)
Jönson warns that overly rigid anti-racism policies might discourage elderly people from voicing valid concerns about care quality.
Critical Race Theory & Free Speech Debate – Explores the tension between anti-racism enforcement and individual expression.
Suggested Readings: “Is It Racism?” by Håkan Jönson
Jönson, Hakan. “Is it racism? Skepticism and resistance towards ethnic minority care workers among older care recipients.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work 49.4 (2007): 79-96.
DiAngelo, Robin. “WHAT IS RACISM?” Counterpoints, vol. 497, 2016, pp. 107–24. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45157301. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
Ronald R. Sundstrom, and David Haekwon Kim. “Xenophobia and Racism.” Critical Philosophy of Race, vol. 2, no. 1, 2014, pp. 20–45. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.2.1.0020. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.