“The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan: A Critical Analysis

“The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan first appeared in the 1650 collection Silex Scintillans, a devotional poetry book reflecting Vaughan’s deep spiritual and metaphysical concerns.

"The Nativity" by Henry Vaughan: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan

“The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan first appeared in the 1650 collection Silex Scintillans, a devotional poetry book reflecting Vaughan’s deep spiritual and metaphysical concerns. The poem explores themes of Christ’s humble birth, the paradox of divine majesty and earthly suffering, and the hope for spiritual enlightenment. Vaughan contrasts the grandeur expected of the Messiah with the stark reality of Jesus’ birth in a stable, highlighting the world’s rejection of its Savior: “A stable was Thy Court, and when / Men turn’d to beasts, beasts would be men.” The poem also draws attention to the burdens of Christ’s journey, both literal and symbolic, emphasizing that from the moment of His birth, He was destined for hardship: “He travels to be born, and then / Is born to travel more again.” Vaughan’s striking imagery, rich biblical allusions, and reflective tone make “The Nativity” a popular textbook poem, as it encapsulates key Christian theological concepts while demonstrating the lyrical depth of metaphysical poetry. The final plea for divine illumination, “Lord! grant some light to us, that we / May with them find the way to Thee!”, reinforces the poem’s enduring relevance as a meditation on faith, grace, and salvation.

Text: “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan

PEACE ? and to all the world ?  Sure One,

And He the Prince of Peace, hath none !

He travels to be born, and then

Is born to travel more again.

Poor Galilee ! thou canst not be

The place for His Nativity.

His restless mother’s call’d away,

And not deliver’d till she pay.

    A tax ? ’tis so still ! we can see

The Church thrive in her misery,

And, like her Head at Beth’lem, rise,

When she, oppress’d with troubles, lies.

Rise ?—should all fall, we cannot be

In more extremities than He.

Great Type of passions !  Come what will,

Thy grief exceeds all copies still.

Thou cam’st from Heaven to Earth, that we

Might go from Earth to Heav’n with Thee :

And though Thou found’st no welcome here,

Thou didst provide us mansions there.

A stable was Thy Court, and when

Men turn’d to beasts, beasts would be men :

They were Thy courtiers ; others none ;

And their poor manger was Thy throne.

No swaddling silks Thy limbs did fold,

Though Thou couldst turn Thy rays to gold.

No rockers waited on Thy birth,

No cradles stirr’d, nor songs of mirth ;

But her chaste lap and sacred breast,

Which lodg’d Thee first, did give Thee rest.

    But stay : what light is that doth stream

And drop here in a gilded beam ?

It is Thy star runs page, and brings

Thy tributary Eastern kings.

Lord !  grant some light to us, that we

May with them find the way to Thee !

Behold what mists eclipse the day !

How dark it is !  Shed down one ray,

To guide us out of this sad night,

And say once more, “Let there be light.”

Annotations: “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
Line from “The Nativity”Annotation (Simple English)Literary Devices
PEACE ? and to all the world ? Sure One,The poet asks if peace has come to the world.Rhetorical Question, Symbolism
And He the Prince of Peace, hath none !He says that Jesus, the Prince of Peace, does not have peace Himself.Irony, Metaphor
He travels to be born, and thenJesus moves around before His birth.Paradox, Imagery
Is born to travel more again.Even after birth, He continues to travel.Paradox, Repetition
Poor Galilee ! thou canst not beGalilee is not the right place for Jesus to be born.Apostrophe, Symbolism
The place for His Nativity.Jesus’ birth must happen elsewhere.Irony, Contrast
His restless mother’s call’d away,Mary is forced to leave her home before giving birth.Imagery, Symbolism
And not deliver’d till she pay.She cannot give birth until she pays taxes.Irony, Allusion
A tax ? ’tis so still ! we can seeTaxes are still an issue, just like in Jesus’ time.Symbolism, Biblical Allusion
The Church thrive in her misery,The Church grows stronger even in suffering.Personification, Irony
And, like her Head at Beth’lem, rise,Like Jesus in Bethlehem, the Church rises from hardships.Metaphor, Biblical Allusion
When she, oppress’d with troubles, lies.Even when oppressed, the Church continues to exist.Personification, Imagery
Rise ?—should all fall, we cannot beEven if everything else falls, nothing can be worse than Jesus’ suffering.Hyperbole, Paradox
In more extremities than He.Jesus’ suffering is a symbol of all human suffering.Metaphor, Hyperbole
Great Type of passions ! Come what will,Jesus’ suffering represents human suffering.Symbolism, Apostrophe
Thy grief exceeds all copies still.No one suffers more than Jesus.Hyperbole, Contrast
Thou cam’st from Heaven to Earth, that weJesus came from heaven to earth.Parallelism, Antithesis
Might go from Earth to Heav’n with Thee :So that people could go from earth to heaven.Paradox, Irony
And though Thou found’st no welcome here,Even though He was not welcomed on earth,Irony, Biblical Allusion
Thou didst provide us mansions there.He made a place in heaven for people.Metaphor, Contrast
A stable was Thy Court, and whenJesus’ court was a stable, not a palace.Irony, Personification
Men turn’d to beasts, beasts would be men :When men acted like animals, animals acted kindly.Symbolism, Irony
They were Thy courtiers ; others none ;The animals were His only companions.Metaphor, Imagery
And their poor manger was Thy throne.His throne was a simple manger.Contrast, Symbolism
No swaddling silks Thy limbs did fold,He was not wrapped in expensive cloths.Irony, Biblical Allusion
Though Thou couldst turn Thy rays to gold.Even though He could make gold from light.Irony, Imagery
No rockers waited on Thy birth,There were no caretakers for His birth.Irony, Contrast
No cradles stirr’d, nor songs of mirth ;No one rocked His cradle or sang for Him.Symbolism, Imagery
But her chaste lap and sacred breast,Mary’s lap and breast gave Him rest instead.Imagery, Symbolism
Which lodg’d Thee first, did give Thee rest.Mary provided Him with comfort.Personification, Imagery
But stay : what light is that doth streamThe poet sees a light shining.Metaphor, Biblical Allusion
And drop here in a gilded beam ?The light comes from a golden beam.Allusion, Apostrophe
It is Thy star runs page, and bringsThe star guides kings from the East.Imagery, Symbolism
Thy tributary Eastern kings.They bring gifts for Jesus.Symbolism, Apostrophe
Lord ! grant some light to us, that weThe poet asks God to show people the light too.Metaphor, Apostrophe
May with them find the way to Thee !So they can also find their way to Him.Dark-Light Imagery, Allusion
Behold what mists eclipse the day !The world is full of darkness and confusion.Contrast, Biblical Allusion
How dark it is ! Shed down one ray,The poet asks for one ray of light.Imagery, Symbolism
To guide us out of this sad night,So people can escape the dark world.Symbolism, Apostrophe
And say once more, “Let there be light.”He asks God to bring light, like in creation.Metaphor, Biblical Allusion
Literary And Poetic Devices: “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
Literary DeviceExample from the PoemExplanation
Allusion‘Thy tributary Eastern kings’Reference to the Biblical Magi who brought gifts to Jesus.
Apostrophe‘Poor Galilee! thou canst not be’Directly addressing Galilee as if it could respond.
Biblical Allusion‘And like her Head at Beth’lem, rise’Jesus as the ‘Head’ of the Church, referencing Christian theology.
Contrast‘A stable was Thy Court’The contrast between the grandeur of a court and the humility of a stable.
Dark-Light Imagery‘Behold what mists eclipse the day!’The imagery of darkness symbolizing confusion and light representing divine guidance.
Hyperbole‘Thy grief exceeds all copies still.’Jesus’ suffering is exaggerated to emphasize its uniqueness.
Imagery‘No swaddling silks Thy limbs did fold’Vivid descriptions of Jesus’ birth conditions.
Irony‘And He the Prince of Peace, hath none!’Contradiction between Jesus’ title and His suffering.
Metaphor‘Their poor manger was Thy throne’A manger, an ordinary object, is metaphorically described as a throne.
Parallelism‘Thou cam’st from Heaven to Earth, that we / Might go from Earth to Heav’n with Thee’A structured balance between Jesus’ descent and humanity’s ascent.
Paradox‘He travels to be born, and then / Is born to travel more again’Jesus moves before and after birth, showing His ceaseless journey.
Personification‘The Church thrive in her misery’The Church is personified as if it can suffer and thrive.
Repetition‘How dark it is! Shed down one ray’Repetition of dark/light imagery for emphasis.
Rhetorical Question‘PEACE ? and to all the world?’The poet asks if peace has truly arrived, prompting thought.
Symbolism‘Thy star runs page, and brings / Thy tributary Eastern kings’Stars and kings symbolize divine guidance and recognition.
Antithesis‘Men turn’d to beasts, beasts would be men’Opposite ideas are placed together for emphasis.
Metonymy‘The Church thrive in her misery’Substituting ‘Church’ for Christian believers.
Oxymoron‘A stable was Thy Court’The stable represents both poverty and divine grandeur.
Pathetic Fallacy‘Behold what mists eclipse the day!’Weather is used to reflect the world’s spiritual condition.
Synecdoche‘No swaddling silks Thy limbs did fold’Clothing represents wealth and comfort, which Jesus lacked.
Themes: “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
  1. Divine Humility and Christ’s Lowly Birth: “The Nativity” highlights the stark contrast between Christ’s divine status and His humble birth in a stable. Vaughan emphasizes this paradox through lines such as “A stable was Thy Court” and “And their poor manger was Thy throne”, illustrating how Jesus, the King of Kings, was born in the most modest of circumstances. The poet underscores the idea that while earthly rulers are surrounded by luxury, Christ, who possesses the power to turn His “rays to gold”, chooses simplicity and suffering. This theme reinforces the Christian belief in humility as a virtue and presents Christ’s birth as an act of divine condescension—where God takes on human form in the most unassuming way to bring salvation to mankind.
  2. Suffering and Sacrifice: “The Nativity” presents Jesus’ birth not just as a joyous event but as the beginning of a life filled with suffering and sacrifice. Vaughan writes, “He travels to be born, and then / Is born to travel more again”, portraying Christ’s earthly journey as one of ceaseless hardship. The line “Thy grief exceeds all copies still” emphasizes that no suffering in the world can compare to His. Through these verses, the poem aligns with Christian theology, which views Jesus’ life as a sacrificial mission, culminating in His crucifixion. Vaughan presents Christ’s suffering as a necessary condition for human redemption, reinforcing the idea that salvation comes through trials and tribulations.
  3. The Contrast Between Earthly and Heavenly Realities: “The Nativity” explores the contrast between the transient struggles of earthly existence and the eternal rewards of heaven. Vaughan draws attention to how Christ was “not welcomed here” but ultimately “didst provide us mansions there”, suggesting that while the world may reject divine truth, heaven holds a place for the faithful. This contrast is further highlighted in the poet’s plea, “Lord! grant some light to us, that we / May with them find the way to Thee!”, indicating that divine guidance is needed to navigate the darkness of the world. The theme suggests that while earthly life is filled with suffering and uncertainty, faith leads to an eternal, divine home.
  4. Light as a Symbol of Divine Revelation: “The Nativity” frequently employs imagery of light and darkness to symbolize divine revelation and human ignorance. The poet describes the guiding star as “Thy star runs page, and brings / Thy tributary Eastern kings”, illustrating how celestial light leads the wise to Christ. However, Vaughan also laments the spiritual darkness of the world, writing, “Behold what mists eclipse the day! / How dark it is! Shed down one ray”, underscoring the need for divine illumination. The final plea, “And say once more, ‘Let there be light,'” echoes the Genesis creation narrative, reinforcing the idea that Christ’s birth is a moment of new spiritual awakening, dispelling ignorance and bringing salvation.
Literary Theories and “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
Literary TheoryApplication to “The Nativity”
New HistoricismNew Historicism examines the poem in its 17th-century context, considering Vaughan’s religious background and England’s political turmoil. The poem reflects the Puritan-Cavalier conflict and the shifting role of Christianity. The line “The Church thrive in her misery” suggests a historical awareness of religious persecution and the endurance of faith.
Christian AllegoryThe poem functions as a Christian allegory, where Christ’s birth represents humility, suffering, and ultimate salvation. The contrast in “A stable was Thy Court” shows how Vaughan presents Jesus as the divine king whose suffering and earthly rejection lead to eternal redemption.
Symbolism and Imagery TheoryThrough Symbolism and Imagery Theory, the poem’s use of light and darkness is a key element. Vaughan describes divine revelation as “Behold what mists eclipse the day!” and concludes with “Let there be light,” reinforcing light as a symbol of spiritual truth and guidance.
Metaphysical Poetic AnalysisMetaphysical Poetic Analysis focuses on Vaughan’s use of paradox, conceits, and religious meditation. The paradox in “He travels to be born, and then / Is born to travel more again” reflects metaphysical themes of divine mystery, emphasizing Christ’s eternal journey between heaven and earth.
Critical Questions about “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
  • How does “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan depict the paradox of Christ’s divinity and humility?
  • In “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, the poet presents Christ as both a divine figure and a humble servant, creating a powerful paradox. The poem juxtaposes images of royal power with those of extreme humility, as seen in the line “A stable was Thy Court”, which contrasts the grandeur of a king’s court with the simplicity of a stable. Vaughan further highlights this paradox by showing that while Jesus had the power to “turn Thy rays to gold”, He was instead born into poverty, wrapped not in fine cloth but in “no swaddling silks”. This question invites a deeper exploration of how Vaughan’s portrayal of Christ’s birth aligns with Christian theology and the broader metaphysical tradition, which often grapples with the coexistence of the earthly and the divine.
  • What role does light and darkness play in “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, and how does it reflect spiritual enlightenment?
    Throughout “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, the poet employs imagery of light and darkness to symbolize spiritual revelation and ignorance. The night of Christ’s birth is described as a moment of divine illumination, as seen in “But stay: what light is that doth stream / And drop here in a gilded beam?”, referring to the star guiding the Magi. However, Vaughan also presents the world as being in darkness, lamenting, “Behold what mists eclipse the day! / How dark it is! Shed down one ray.” This contrast raises a critical question: does Vaughan view Christ’s birth as a moment of universal enlightenment, or does he suggest that humanity still struggles with spiritual blindness? Analyzing the interplay of light and dark in the poem can offer insights into Vaughan’s theological vision and his perspective on divine grace.
  • How does “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan use religious symbolism to critique human society?
    “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan does more than celebrate Christ’s birth; it also critiques the world’s moral and spiritual failings. The poem suggests that while animals recognize Christ’s divinity—“Men turn’d to beasts, beasts would be men”—humanity fails to acknowledge Him. This reversal of roles implies that men have lost their moral superiority, while animals, through their humility, act more righteously. Additionally, the reference to taxation—“And not deliver’d till she pay. A tax? ’tis so still!”—criticizes the societal structures that burden even the most sacred moments of life. This question encourages an analysis of how Vaughan uses biblical imagery to reflect on human corruption and the failure of society to embrace true divinity.
  • What is the significance of Vaughan’s plea for divine guidance in “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan?
    In the closing lines of “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, the poet makes a direct plea for divine intervention, asking for spiritual guidance: “Lord! grant some light to us, that we / May with them find the way to Thee!” This request raises the question of whether Vaughan sees Christ’s birth as sufficient for humanity’s salvation or if continued divine assistance is needed. The poet’s reference to the star that led the wise men—“It is Thy star runs page, and brings / Thy tributary Eastern kings”—suggests that without such guidance, people remain lost in spiritual darkness. This question invites a discussion on Vaughan’s perspective on faith: does he believe that divine revelation alone is enough, or must individuals actively seek the light of Christ in their lives?
Literary Works Similar to “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
  1. “On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity” by John Milton
    Like “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, this poem celebrates the birth of Christ, using rich imagery and divine symbolism to contrast Christ’s humility with His heavenly glory.
  2. “A Hymn on the Nativity” by Ben Jonson
    This poem, similar to “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, reflects on the spiritual significance of Christ’s birth, emphasizing themes of divine light and redemption.
  3. “Christmas” by George Herbert
    Much like “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, Herbert’s poem explores the paradox of Christ’s lowly birth and His divine majesty, blending religious devotion with lyrical beauty.
  4. “Upon Christ His Birth” by Richard Crashaw
    Similar to “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan, this poem employs metaphysical conceits and intense religious imagery to depict the incarnation of Christ as a moment of divine intervention.
Representative Quotations of “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“A stable was Thy Court, and when / Men turn’d to beasts, beasts would be men.”This line contrasts the stable, a place of humility, with the idea of a royal court, showing the paradox of Christ’s birth.Christian Allegory, Symbolism – The contrast between earthly and divine elements reflects Christ’s dual nature.
“No swaddling silks Thy limbs did fold, / Though Thou couldst turn Thy rays to gold.”Vaughan highlights Christ’s choice to embrace humility instead of material wealth, reinforcing divine sacrifice.Metaphysical Poetics, Paradox – The contradiction between divine power and humble existence aligns with metaphysical themes.
“Behold what mists eclipse the day! / How dark it is! Shed down one ray.”The poet laments spiritual blindness and pleads for divine guidance, using light and dark imagery.Symbolism and Imagery Theory – The use of light and darkness emphasizes spiritual enlightenment versus ignorance.
“Lord! grant some light to us, that we / May with them find the way to Thee!”A direct appeal for spiritual enlightenment, linking the biblical Magi’s journey to the speaker’s own search for faith.New Historicism, Christian Allegory – The plea reflects religious devotion and historical struggles for faith.
“And He the Prince of Peace, hath none!”Irony is used to show that the Prince of Peace Himself faced suffering and rejection in the world.Irony, Christian Theology – Highlights the paradox of Christ’s suffering despite His divine title.
“Thy grief exceeds all copies still.”Christ’s suffering surpasses all human pain, reinforcing the concept of divine sacrifice for humanity.Metaphysical Poetics, Religious Meditation – Explores the depth of divine suffering as a central theme in Christian theology.
“It is Thy star runs page, and brings / Thy tributary Eastern kings.”Refers to the Star of Bethlehem guiding the wise men, symbolizing divine intervention and revelation.Biblical Allusion, Symbolism – The guiding star serves as a metaphor for divine guidance and revelation.
“He travels to be born, and then / Is born to travel more again.”Emphasizes the constant movement and journey of Christ, both physically and spiritually, representing His mission.Paradox, Theological Reflection – Christ’s journey symbolizes both His earthly struggles and spiritual mission.
“The Church thrive in her misery, / And, like her Head at Beth’lem, rise.”The Church, like Christ, suffers and yet continues to rise, drawing a parallel between religious endurance and divine purpose.Historical Theology, Religious Symbolism – The endurance of the Church mirrors Christ’s own suffering and resurrection.
“And say once more, ‘Let there be light.'”A reference to Genesis, linking Christ’s birth to the act of divine creation, suggesting a new spiritual beginning.Biblical Allusion, Creation Theology – The reference to Genesis suggests Christ’s birth as a new era of spiritual enlightenment.
Suggested Readings: “The Nativity” by Henry Vaughan
  1. Matar, Nabil I. “George Herbert, Henry Vaughan, and the conversion of the Jews.” Studies in English literature, 1500-1900 30.1 (1990): 79-92.
  2. Watson, Graeme J. “The Temple in ‘The Night’: Henry Vaughan and the Collapse of the Established Church.” Modern Philology, vol. 84, no. 2, 1986, pp. 144–61. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/437571. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
  3. Sandler, Florence. “The Ascents of the Spirit: Henry Vaughan on the Atonement.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 73, no. 2, 1974, pp. 209–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27707713. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
  4. Matar, Nabil I. “George Herbert, Henry Vaughan, and the Conversion of the Jews.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, vol. 30, no. 1, 1990, pp. 79–92. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/450685. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.

“Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh: Summary and Critique

“Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh first appeared in The Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology in 2013.

"Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism" by Stephen Frosh: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh

“Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh first appeared in The Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology in 2013. In this article, Frosh critically examines the entanglements between psychoanalysis and colonialism, emphasizing how psychoanalytic theory has historically been shaped by colonialist ideology and racist assumptions. He highlights Freud’s conception of the “primitive” or “savage” mind as a foundational problem, arguing that this terminology perpetuates a Eurocentric developmental hierarchy that aligns with colonialist thought (Frosh, 2013, p. 142). At the same time, Frosh acknowledges the potential of psychoanalysis to critique and dismantle colonialist discourse, particularly through its exploration of the “colonizing gaze” and the “racist imaginary.” He draws on Fanon’s (1952) seminal work, Black Skin, White Masks, to illustrate how psychoanalysis can be applied to postcolonial psychology, especially in understanding how racialized subjects internalize colonial oppression (p. 146). Frosh also discusses the tension between psychoanalysis as a tool of resistance and its historical complicity in reinforcing racial hierarchies, pointing out how its individualistic framework often neglects sociohistorical realities (p. 141). The article has gained popularity due to its critical engagement with both psychoanalysis and postcolonial theory, making a compelling case for their mutual relevance while also exposing the ideological blind spots within psychoanalytic thought. By incorporating perspectives from theorists such as Edward Said, Jacques Lacan, and Slavoj Žižek, Frosh’s work remains a significant contribution to contemporary debates on race, colonialism, and psychology (p. 152).

Summary of “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh

1. Postcolonial Ambivalence Toward Psychoanalysis

  • Postcolonial theory has had an uneasy relationship with psychoanalysis due to its individualistic focus and its neglect of sociohistorical concerns (Frosh, 2013, p. 141).
  • Despite its critical tools, psychoanalysis has historically drawn from colonialist ideology, particularly in Freud’s notion of the “primitive mind” (Frosh, 2013, p. 141).
  • However, psychoanalysis challenges linear developmental assumptions, acknowledging that all subjects harbor elements of primitivity, disrupting the civilized/primitive binary (Frosh, 2013, p. 141).

2. The Colonial Foundations of Psychoanalysis

  • Freud’s work reinforced colonialist ideas by categorizing “savage” and “civilized” mentalities (Frosh, 2013, p. 143).
  • In Totem and Taboo, Freud equates the mental lives of “savages” with neurotics, implying a developmental hierarchy (Frosh, 2013, p. 143).
  • Freud writes, “There are men still living who, as we believe, stand very near to primitive man, far nearer than we do” (Freud, 1913, p. 1, as cited in Frosh, 2013, p. 143).
  • Freud linked “savages” to children, portraying them as emotionally underdeveloped (Frosh, 2013, p. 144).
  • The savage/civilized distinction is not just developmental—it racializes inferiority, making it a tool of colonial justification (Frosh, 2013, p. 144).

3. The Racist Gaze and the Colonized Subject

  • Drawing from Fanon’s Black Skin, White Masks, Frosh discusses the alienating impact of the white gaze on Black subjects (Frosh, 2013, p. 146).
  • Fanon describes his experience of being reduced to an object:

“I found that I was an object in the midst of other objects” (Fanon, 1952, p. 109, as cited in Frosh, 2013, p. 146).

  • The white child’s reaction—fear and fascination—reinforces the racialized alienation of the Black subject (Frosh, 2013, p. 146).
  • Fanon employs Lacan’s mirror stage to show that the Black subject’s reflection is distorted by colonial stereotypes, creating double alienation (Frosh, 2013, p. 147).

4. Psychoanalysis as a Colonial Discipline

  • Psychoanalysis carries embedded colonial biases, even when used in progressive critical theory (Frosh, 2013, p. 144).
  • Celia Brickman (2003) argues that Freud’s “universalizing reconfigurations” displaced European antisemitism onto “primitives,” women, and homosexuals (Frosh, 2013, p. 145).
  • Freud’s binary of rational/civilized vs. irrational/primitive mirrors the colonial justification of dominance (Frosh, 2013, p. 145).
  • Even in modern psychoanalysis, terms like “primitive fantasies” unconsciously reproduce colonial assumptions (Frosh, 2013, p. 146).

5. The Racist Imaginary: Projection and Fantasy

  • Psychoanalysis helps explain the excessive nature of racist ideology—its passionate hatred beyond rational justification (Frosh, 2013, p. 148).
  • Adorno et al. (1950) theorized that racism stems from authoritarian family structures, creating personalities that externalize fear onto scapegoats (Frosh, 2013, p. 148).
  • Racism is not just mistaken belief—it is a psychically charged structure, maintained by projection and paranoia (Frosh, 2013, p. 148).
  • Fanon (1952) showed how colonialism constructs Blackness as hypersexual, aggressive, and inferior, making Black bodies the repository for White anxieties (Frosh, 2013, p. 149).
  • “The White man projects his repressed sexuality onto the Black, constructing him in fantasy as a sexual paragon and an object for his homosexual desire” (Fanon, 1952, p. 170, as cited in Frosh, 2013, p. 149).

6. Psychoanalysis, Colonial Enjoyment, and Excess

  • Žižek (1993) describes the racist fantasy of the “stolen enjoyment”—the idea that the Other possesses what the White subject lacks (Frosh, 2013, p. 151).
  • Racism is fueled by the obsession with the “excessive” enjoyment of others—whether in music, food, or sexuality (Frosh, 2013, p. 151).
  • “The White subject needs the Black to define itself; and it desires the Black as the repository of those necessary things—above all, sexuality—which it has repudiated” (Frosh, 2013, p. 150).
  • The racist subject, believing they have lost something (power, morality, racial purity), projects their perceived lack onto the Other (Frosh, 2013, p. 151).

7. Psychoanalysis as a Tool for Postcolonial Theory

  • Despite its colonial legacy, psychoanalysis offers critical tools for postcolonial analysis (Frosh, 2013, p. 152).
  • It reveals how colonialism psychologically conditions both colonizer and colonized, embedding racism within the unconscious (Frosh, 2013, p. 152).
  • Said (2003) used Freud’s Moses and Monotheism to argue that identity is always fractured, and European identity is haunted by its colonial other (Frosh, 2013, p. 150).
  • Psychoanalysis helps explain why racism persists—not just as a political structure but as a psychic investment in domination (Frosh, 2013, p. 153).
  • Frosh warns that psychoanalysis itself must be decolonized before it can fully contribute to anti-racist discourse (Frosh, 2013, p. 153).

Conclusion

  • Psychoanalysis has a problematic colonial legacy, reinforcing hierarchies of race and civilization (Frosh, 2013, p. 154).
  • However, it also offers powerful insights into the psychological mechanisms of racism, such as projection, alienation, and fantasy (Frosh, 2013, p. 154).
  • Postcolonial thinkers like Fanon, Said, and Žižek have used psychoanalysis to unmask the racist imaginary and colonial trauma (Frosh, 2013, p. 154).
  • The challenge remains to use psychoanalysis as a critical tool without reproducing its colonial assumptions (Frosh, 2013, p. 154).

References (as cited in Frosh, 2013)

  • Fanon, F. (1952). Black Skin, White Masks.
  • Freud, S. (1913). Totem and Taboo.
  • Freud, S. (1927). The Future of an Illusion.
  • Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism.
  • Said, E. (2003). Freud and the Non-European.
  • Žižek, S. (1993). Tarrying with the Negative.
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh
Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationReference in Frosh (2013)
Colonialist Ideology in PsychoanalysisThe way psychoanalytic theory, especially Freud’s, incorporates colonial and racial assumptions about “primitive” vs. “civilized” mentalities.p. 141-144
Primitive Mind/Savage MindFreud’s notion that “primitive” societies and children share irrational, undeveloped ways of thinking, reinforcing colonial hierarchies.p. 143
Colonizing GazeThe way in which colonial subjects are looked at as objects rather than subjects, particularly in Fanon’s experience of the “white gaze.”p. 146
Racist ImaginaryThe unconscious projections and fantasies that sustain racism, rooted in paranoia, desire, and disavowal.p. 148
ProjectionA defense mechanism where undesirable qualities in the self are attributed to the racialized other, reinforcing prejudice.p. 148-149
AlienationA condition where the subject is distanced from their own identity due to the external gaze and colonial oppression, as discussed in Fanon’s work.p. 146-147
Mirror Stage (Lacanian Theory)A psychoanalytic concept describing the formation of the ego through identification with an external image; Fanon critiques how this is racialized in colonialism.p. 147
EpidermalizationFanon’s idea that colonial oppression inscribes racial inferiority onto the skin, making race a lived bodily experience.p. 149
Unconscious Desire and RacismThe psychoanalytic view that racism is fueled by unconscious desires, particularly projections of repressed sexual and aggressive impulses.p. 150-151
Enjoyment (Jouissance) and the OtherŽižek’s idea that racism is fueled by the belief that the racialized Other enjoys life in an excessive way that threatens the dominant group.p. 151
Melancholia and Postcolonial IdentityThe grief or loss experienced in postcolonial societies due to historical trauma and the erasure of indigenous identity.p. 150
Psychic Investment in RacismThe idea that racism is not just a political or social issue but a deep psychological investment in preserving power structures.p. 153
SplittingA psychological defense where the world is divided into good and bad, reinforcing racial binaries (e.g., civilized vs. primitive).p. 148-149
Paranoia and the Racial OtherThe racist subject experiences the Other as a threat to identity and projects fears onto them, as seen in Adorno’s work on authoritarian personalities.p. 148
Psychoanalysis as a Colonial ToolThe idea that psychoanalysis has historically aligned with colonialist discourse, reinforcing racial and civilizational hierarchies.p. 144-145
Psychoanalysis as a Subversive ToolDespite its colonial entanglements, psychoanalysis provides critical tools to deconstruct racism and colonial power.p. 152-153
Contribution of “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Postcolonial Theory

  • Critique of the “Colonizing Gaze”:
    • Frosh builds on Frantz Fanon’s analysis of colonial alienation, explaining how psychoanalysis can uncover the deep psychological damage caused by colonialism.
    • Example: Fanon’s description of being objectified by the white gaze (Fanon, 1952) is re-examined through Lacanian psychoanalysis.
    • “The Black subject, subjected to the racist gaze, sees itself in the White mirror that removes the possibility of self-assertion and mastery and instead creates further fragmentation.” (p. 146)
  • Epidermalization and the Inscription of Race on the Body:
    • Frosh applies Fanon’s notion that race is not just a social construct but a felt bodily experience ingrained in psychoanalysis.
    • “Colonial power is built on this capacity of the colonizer to remove the source of subjecthood from the colonized; and this power is reflected and institutionalized continuously by the gaze.” (p. 149)
  • Psychoanalysis as a Tool for Decolonization:
    • Despite its colonial entanglements, psychoanalysis can deconstruct colonial narratives in literature by exposing unconscious racial biases.
    • “Psychoanalysis also influences contemporary postcolonial theory… offering a vocabulary and set of conceptual tools for articulating the subtle manner in which sociocultural processes construct, and are in turn supported by, psychic configurations.” (p. 150)

2. Psychoanalytic Criticism

  • Reevaluation of Freud’s “Primitive Mind” in Literary Analysis:
    • Frosh critiques Freud’s developmental model, which equates non-European cultures with childhood, reinforcing colonialist hierarchies.
    • “Freud’s postulation of the ‘primitive’ or ‘savage’ mind, which still infects psychoanalytic thinking, is a prime example here.” (p. 143)
  • The Role of the Unconscious in Racialized Fantasies:
    • Psychoanalysis can help decode how literary texts encode racist fantasies and fears, as seen in colonial-era literature (e.g., Heart of Darkness).
    • “Racist persecution of the Black is therefore fuelled by sexual hatred, something evidenced by lynchings throughout history.” (p. 150)
  • Projection and the Racial Other:
    • Freudian projection explains how racist characters in literature project their disavowed fears, desires, and anxieties onto racialized figures.
    • “The racist subject will both be drawn to and repelled by the object of hatred, and in spite of all evidence to the contrary, will hold a genuine conviction that its very existence is threatening.” (p. 148)

3. Critical Race Theory (CRT)

  • Racism as a Psychological Structure, Not Just a Social One:
    • Frosh aligns with CRT scholars (e.g., Derrick Bell) in asserting that racism is not just a structural issue but deeply embedded in psychic and cultural discourse.
    • “Racial categories are particularly useful repositories for such anti- or pseudo-thinking, not just because they are socially valorized for political purposes (such as colonialism and economic exploitation), but because they are fundamentally ’empty’ categories.” (p. 149)
  • The “Racist Imaginary” and Stereotyping in Literature:
    • Literature perpetuates stereotypes of the Other by encoding unconscious racial fears (e.g., the savage, hypersexual Black man in colonial fiction).
    • “Psychoanalysis provides a vocabulary that facilitates discussion of what might be called the excessive dimension of racist discourse.” (p. 148)
  • The Function of “Enjoyment” (Jouissance) in Racist Representations:
    • Žižek’s concept of enjoyment (jouissance) helps explain the contradictory portrayal of racialized figures as both feared and desired.
    • “Whiteness, supported by an ideology of ‘purity’ and a disavowal of sexuality, needs the Black ‘other’ as a repository of its own discontent.” (p. 151)

4. Cultural Studies and Ideology Critique

  • Colonialism and the Production of Knowledge:
    • Psychoanalysis has historically reinforced colonialist thought through its Eurocentric assumptions, which Cultural Studies scholars challenge.
    • “Freud deployed the idea that the thinking of what he called ‘savages’ was not only contrasted to ‘civilized’ mentality, but also revealed the origins of mental life both for the culture as a whole.” (p. 143)
  • Psychoanalysis as a Counter-Ideological Tool:
    • By exposing how racial hierarchies are naturalized in psychoanalytic discourse, Frosh highlights how literary texts can be read critically against their own ideological assumptions.
    • “Even though psychoanalysis has frequently aligned itself with colonialist tendencies, it also offers tools to deconstruct the categories that support them.” (p. 152)
  • Fanon’s “Double Alienation” and Identity Formation in Literature:
    • Frosh revisits Fanon’s double alienation to explain how colonial and postcolonial literature often depicts racialized subjects caught between two worlds (e.g., hybridity in postcolonial literature).
    • “The Lacanian subject looks in the mirror and sees its image reflected back to it… The Black subject, however, sees an image of the White’s gaze that fixes them in place.” (p. 147)

Conclusion: Theoretical Legacy in Literary Studies

Frosh’s work enhances literary theory by:

  1. Deepening Postcolonial Criticism through psychoanalysis, particularly Fanon’s theories.
  2. Challenging Eurocentric Psychoanalysis by revealing its racial biases.
  3. Applying Critical Race Theory to Literature, showing how race is a psychological and ideological construct.
  4. Providing a framework for interpreting racial alienation in postcolonial fiction, film, and cultural narratives.
Examples of Critiques Through “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh
Literary WorkCritique through Frosh’s Framework
Joseph Conrad – Heart of Darkness– Examines how colonialist ideology is embedded in language and psychology.
– Freud’s notion of the “primitive” and “savage” mind aligns with how Africa is portrayed as the irrational “other” (Frosh, 2013, p. 142).
– The “colonial gaze” reduces the native population to objects rather than subjects (Frosh, 2013, p. 146).
Charlotte Brontë – Jane Eyre– The character of Bertha Mason can be analyzed through the “racist imaginary” (Frosh, 2013, p. 148).
– Bertha is depicted as an embodiment of the “irrational” and “primitive” mind, reinforcing colonialist anxieties (Frosh, 2013, p. 149).
– Rochester’s treatment of Bertha parallels the colonial drive to dominate the “other” (Frosh, 2013, p. 152).
Frantz Fanon – Black Skin, White Masks– Fanon’s use of psychoanalysis to explain racial alienation aligns with Frosh’s argument on how colonialism psychologically constructs subjectivity (Frosh, 2013, p. 145).
– The “epidermalization” of Black identity (Frosh, 2013, p. 147) explains the internalization of colonial discourse by the colonized.
– The “White gaze” in Fanon’s work reflects the psychoanalytic idea of the “mirror stage” where the Black subject is forced into an alienated identity (Frosh, 2013, p. 146).
Jean Rhys – Wide Sargasso Sea– A postcolonial reimagining of Jane Eyre, it challenges the psychoanalytic assumption of the “civilized” vs. “primitive” binary (Frosh, 2013, p. 150).
– The narrative gives voice to the colonized subject, disrupting the colonizing gaze (Frosh, 2013, p. 151).
– Explores the psychological trauma of colonial displacement and racialization, in line with Frosh’s critique of colonialist psychology (Frosh, 2013, p. 153).
Criticism Against “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh
  1. Overgeneralization of Psychoanalysis’ Role in Colonialism
    • Frosh argues that psychoanalysis is deeply implicated in colonialist ideology, but some critics suggest he overgeneralizes Freud’s theories without considering their progressive potential.
    • Freud’s universalization of the unconscious could be seen as a critique of colonial binaries rather than a reinforcement (Freud, Totem and Taboo).
  2. Limited Engagement with Contemporary Psychoanalytic Theories
    • While Frosh critiques classical psychoanalysis, he does not fully engage with modern revisions of psychoanalysis that challenge its colonialist past.
    • Postcolonial psychoanalysts, such as Homi Bhabha and Achille Mbembe, have reformulated psychoanalytic theories to resist colonial narratives, which Frosh does not explore in depth.
  3. Potential Overemphasis on the “Racist Imaginary”
    • The concept of the racist imaginary (Frosh, 2013, p. 148) suggests that racism is largely the result of psychological projection, but critics argue that this perspective risks downplaying the material and structural dimensions of racism.
    • Social, economic, and political factors contribute significantly to colonial racism, beyond just unconscious psychological dynamics.
  4. Binary View of Psychoanalysis as Both Oppressive and Subversive
    • Frosh simultaneously critiques psychoanalysis for its colonialist underpinnings while also claiming it can be subversive and critical.
    • Some critics argue this dual stance lacks clarity: Is psychoanalysis inherently colonial, or can it be fully repurposed for postcolonial critique?
  5. Neglect of Alternative Psychological Frameworks
    • The article focuses on psychoanalysis as the primary psychological framework for analyzing colonialism, but other approaches such as cognitive psychology or indigenous psychology are largely ignored.
    • Alternative psychological perspectives could provide more nuanced insights into colonial trauma and resistance.
  6. Underrepresentation of Non-Western Psychoanalytic Thought
    • Frosh’s discussion centers primarily on European psychoanalysts (Freud, Lacan, Žižek), while non-Western contributions to psychoanalytic thought are largely absent.
    • Critics argue that including African, Caribbean, and Asian psychoanalytic thinkers (e.g., Fanon’s contemporaries, Dalit psychoanalysis, African spiritual psychologies) would enrich the analysis.
  7. Reliance on Freudian and Lacanian Psychoanalysis
    • The article heavily relies on Freud and Lacan’s theories, despite significant critiques of their Eurocentric and patriarchal biases.
    • Feminist and decolonial scholars have argued that other psychoanalytic traditions (e.g., Klein, Winnicott, Fanonian psychoanalysis) could offer a less colonialist perspective on subjectivity.
  8. Insufficient Engagement with Indigenous Epistemologies
    • While the article critiques the colonialist framing of the “primitive mind,” it does not explore indigenous epistemologies as alternatives to psychoanalytic models.
    • A broader engagement with indigenous philosophies of mind, healing, and subjectivity could counterbalance the focus on Western psychoanalysis.
Representative Quotations from “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Postcolonial theory has been ambivalent towards psychoanalysis, for good reasons.” (Frosh, 2013, p. 141)Frosh highlights the tension between postcolonialism and psychoanalysis. He acknowledges that while psychoanalysis can offer insights into colonial subjectivity, it also carries colonialist assumptions.
“Freud’s postulation of the ‘primitive’ or ‘savage’ mind, which still infects psychoanalytic thinking, is a prime example here.” (p. 141)Critiques Freud’s theory for reinforcing colonialist binaries, positioning non-European societies as “primitive” in comparison to the “civilized” West.
“Psychology needs postcolonialism quite patently, because without the challenge of postcolonial thinking it drifts into ahistorical and highly abstracted models of the mind.” (p. 142)Argues that psychology often ignores sociohistorical factors and needs postcolonialism to avoid abstract, Eurocentric assumptions.
“Postcolonialism needs psychology more subtly, because without some kind of effective psychological input it essentializes the sociohistorical and is left grasping for a theory of the subject.” (p. 142)Suggests that postcolonialism benefits from psychological insights to understand subjectivity beyond purely historical and sociopolitical frameworks.
“Psychoanalysis is thus an exemplary incidence of a disciplinary practice that both draws on colonialism and disrupts its categories at the same time.” (p. 145)Describes the paradox of psychoanalysis: it both reflects and critiques colonialist ideology, making it both problematic and useful for postcolonial studies.
“The savage is the other, the not ‘us’.” (p. 143)Highlights the colonialist language in Freud’s work, which positions non-European people as an externalized, lesser “other.”
“Psychoanalysis has some of its roots in colonialist assumptions that continue to resonate in contemporary theory and clinical practice.” (p. 150)Acknowledges that colonialist language and biases in psychoanalysis persist, even in modern applications.
“Colonial power is built on this capacity of the colonizer to remove the source of subjecthood from the colonized.” (p. 146)Draws from Fanon to argue that colonialism dehumanizes and strips agency from the colonized through psychological mechanisms.
“Racism is not a ‘simple belief’ and its irrationality is not solely in the area of its truth claims.” (p. 148)Critiques conventional views of racism, arguing that it operates through unconscious psychological structures rather than mere misinformation.
“Psychoanalysis can be used both to trouble colonial and racist assumptions, and as a stepping stone to some subversive theory.” (p. 152)Concludes that despite its colonial baggage, psychoanalysis remains a valuable tool for challenging racist and colonialist ideologies.
Suggested Readings: “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism” by Stephen Frosh
  1. Frosh, Stephen. “Psychoanalysis, colonialism, racism.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 33.3 (2013): 141.
  2. Frosh, Stephen. “Psychoanalysis, Colonialism, Racism.” A Deeper Cut: Further Explorations of the Unconscious in Social and Political Life, edited by David Morgan, Karnac Books, 2021, pp. 25–52. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.23338182.9. Accessed 13 Mar. 2025.
  3. FROSH, STEPHEN. “Towards a Psychosocial Psychoanalysis.” American Imago, vol. 73, no. 4, 2016, pp. 469–82. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26303653. Accessed 13 Mar. 2025.
  4. HOOK, DEREK. “The Primal Scene of Anti-Blackness: The Masochist Jouissance of White Racism.” The Comparatist, vol. 46, 2022, pp. 7–28. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27181573. Accessed 13 Mar. 2025.

“Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley: A Critical Analysis

“Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley first appeared in 1739 in the collection Hymns and Sacred Poems.

"Hymn for Christmas Day" by Charles Wesley: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley

“Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley first appeared in 1739 in the collection Hymns and Sacred Poems. This hymn, better known today as “Hark! The Herald Angels Sing”, became one of the most celebrated Christmas carols of all time due to its rich theological depth and lyrical beauty. The poem encapsulates the essence of the Nativity, emphasizing themes of divine incarnation, redemption, and heavenly rejoicing. Wesley’s verses highlight the profound significance of Christ’s birth, with lines like “Hark! the herald angels sing, ‘Glory to the newborn King!’” underscoring the angelic proclamation of joy and salvation. The hymn’s popularity as a textbook poem stems from its didactic nature, presenting core Christian beliefs in a structured, poetic form that is both memorable and instructive. Its rhythmic and melodic adaptation, later modified by composer Felix Mendelssohn, further cemented its place in both religious and literary traditions. The hymn’s universal appeal, clear message of hope, and celebratory tone continue to make it an enduring classic in hymnody and Christian education.

Text: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley

Hark how all the Welkin rings
“Glory to the Kings of Kings
“Peace on Earth, and Mercy mild
“God and Sinners reconcil’d!

Joyful all ye Nations rise
Join the Triumph of the Skies
Universal Nature say
“Christ the Lord is born to Day!

Christ, by highest Heav’n ador’d
Christ, the Everlasting Lord
Late in Time behold him come
Offspring of a Virgin’s Womb

Veil’d in Flesh, the Godhead see
Hail th’ Incarnate Deity!
Pleas’d as Man with Men t’ appear
Jesus, our Immanuel here!

Hail the Heav’nly Prince of Peace!
Hail the Sun of Righteousness!
Light and Life to All he brings
Ris’n with Healing in his Wings

Mild he lays his Glory by
Born—that Man no more may die
Born—to raise the Sons of Earth
Born—to give them Second Birth

Come, Desire of Nations, come
Fix in Us thy humble Home
Rise, the Woman’s Conqu’ring Seed
Bruise in Us the Serpent’s Head

Now display thy saving Pow’r
Ruin’d Nature now restore
Now in Mystic Union join
Thine to Ours, and Ours to Thine

Adam’s Likeness, Lord, efface
Stamp thy Image in its Place
Second Adam from above
Reinstate us in thy Love

Let us Thee, tho’ lost, regain
Thee, the Life, the Inner Man:
O! to All Thyself impart
Form’d in each Believing Heart

Annotations: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
Line from the HymnSimplified Meaning (Annotation)
Hark how all the Welkin ringsListen to how the heavens are ringing with sound!
Glory to the King of KingsPraise and honor to Jesus, the greatest King.
Peace on Earth, and Mercy mildJesus brings peace and gentle mercy to the world.
God and Sinners reconcil’d!Through Jesus, God and humanity are brought together.
Joyful all ye Nations risePeople of all nations should rejoice.
Join the Triumph of the SkiesJoin in the celebration happening in heaven.
Universal Nature sayAll of creation proclaims the birth of Jesus.
Christ the Lord is born to Day!Jesus Christ, our Lord, is born today!
Christ, by highest Heav’n ador’dJesus is worshiped by the highest beings in heaven.
Christ, the Everlasting LordJesus is the eternal ruler and divine Lord.
Late in Time behold him comeAt the right time, He has finally arrived.
Offspring of a Virgin’s WombJesus was born from the Virgin Mary.
Veil’d in Flesh, the Godhead seeGod has taken on human flesh in Jesus.
Hail th’ Incarnate Deity!Praise God, who has become human!
Pleas’d as Man with Men t’ appearJesus was happy to live among people.
Jesus, our Immanuel here!Jesus is ‘Immanuel,’ meaning ‘God with us.’
Hail the Heav’nly Prince of Peace!Praise Jesus, the divine ruler of peace.
Hail the Sun of Righteousness!Praise Jesus, who brings righteousness like the sun.
Light and Life to All he bringsJesus brings enlightenment and eternal life.
Ris’n with Healing in his WingsJesus rises, bringing healing and restoration.
Mild he lays his Glory byJesus humbly gives up His heavenly glory.
Born—that Man no more may dieJesus was born so that humans can have eternal life.
Born—to raise the Sons of EarthHe was born to lift humanity from sin.
Born—to give them Second BirthHe was born so that people can be spiritually reborn.
Come, Desire of Nations, comeJesus, whom all nations long for, has come.
Fix in Us thy humble HomeJesus, make your home within our hearts.
Rise, the Woman’s Conqu’ring SeedJesus fulfills prophecy by defeating sin.
Bruise in Us the Serpent’s HeadDefeat Satan and evil within us.
Now display thy saving Pow’rShow us your divine power to save.
Ruin’d Nature now restoreFix the broken world affected by sin.
Now in Mystic Union joinUnite Yourself with us spiritually.
Thine to Ours, and Ours to ThineLet us be one with You, Lord.
Adam’s Likeness, Lord, effaceRemove our sinful nature inherited from Adam.
Stamp thy Image in its PlaceReplace it with Your divine image.
Second Adam from aboveJesus, the second Adam, restores humanity.
Reinstate us in thy LoveBring us back into Your love and grace.
Let us Thee, tho’ lost, regainEven though we were lost in sin, let us find You again.
Thee, the Life, the Inner ManJesus is the source of spiritual life.
O! to All Thyself impartJesus, give Yourself to everyone.
Form’d in each Believing HeartBe present in the hearts of all believers.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
Literary DeviceExample from the HymnExplanation
Alliteration“Hail the Heav’nly Prince of Peace!”Repetition of consonant sounds (H in “Hail” and “Heav’nly”).
Allusion“Offspring of a Virgin’s Womb”A reference to the Virgin Mary giving birth to Jesus.
Antithesis“God and Sinners reconcil’d!”Juxtaposition of opposites—God and sinners are brought together.
Apostrophe“Hail th’ Incarnate Deity!”Directly addressing Jesus as “Incarnate Deity” to show reverence.
Assonance“Light and Life to All he brings”Repetition of vowel sounds (long “i” in “Light” and “Life”).
Biblical Allusion“Rise, the Woman’s Conqu’ring Seed”Reference to Genesis 3:15, where Eve’s offspring will defeat evil.
Contrast“Mild he lays his Glory by / Born—that Man no more may die”Comparison between Jesus’ divine glory and His earthly humility.
Declaration“Christ the Lord is born to Day!”A bold statement proclaiming Jesus’ birth.
Diction“Late in Time behold him come”Word choice (“Late in Time”) highlights divine timing.
Epithets“Hail the Sun of Righteousness!”A descriptive title emphasizing Jesus as the source of righteousness.
Exhortation“Come, Desire of Nations, come”A call to Jesus, asking Him to come and fulfill His promise.
Hyperbole“Adam’s Likeness, Lord, efface”Exaggeration of Jesus removing Adam’s sinful nature.
Imagery“Join the Triumph of the Skies”A vivid picture of heavenly celebration and triumph.
Metaphor“Hail the Sun of Righteousness!”Jesus is compared to the sun, which brings righteousness and light.
Parallelism“Born—to raise the Sons of Earth / Born—to give them Second Birth”The repetition of “Born—to” emphasizes the significance of Jesus’ birth.
Paradox“Veil’d in Flesh, the Godhead see”Jesus, though human, is also divine, creating a paradox.
Personification“Universal Nature say”Nature is given human-like qualities, as if it speaks.
Repetition“Born—to raise the Sons of Earth / Born—to give them Second Birth”Repetition of a phrase to emphasize salvation and rebirth.
Symbolism“Jesus, our Immanuel here!”Jesus is given the symbolic name “Immanuel,” meaning “God with us.”
Synecdoche“Thine to Ours, and Ours to Thine”Part represents the whole—”Thine” (Jesus) and “Ours” (humanity).
Themes: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
  • The Joyful Proclamation of Christ’s Birth: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley emphasizes the joy and celebration surrounding the birth of Jesus Christ. The poem opens with a grand proclamation: “Hark how all the Welkin rings”, describing the heavens resounding with praise. The joyous nature of this event is further reinforced in the lines “Joyful all ye Nations rise, Join the Triumph of the Skies”, where Wesley calls upon all nations to unite in celebration. Even “Universal Nature” is depicted as rejoicing, emphasizing that Christ’s birth is not only significant for humanity but for all of creation. The hymn’s triumphant and exultant tone underscores the belief that Jesus’ birth is a moment of divine glory, bringing peace and reconciliation between God and humankind. This theme reflects the Christian belief that Christmas is an occasion of universal joy, as it marks the fulfillment of God’s promise of salvation.
  • The Incarnation and Divinity of Christ: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley highlights the incarnation—the belief that Jesus is both fully divine and fully human. This is evident in the lines “Veil’d in Flesh, the Godhead see, Hail th’ Incarnate Deity!”, which portray Jesus as God taking on human form. Wesley further affirms Christ’s divine nature by calling him “Christ, the Everlasting Lord”, emphasizing his eternal existence. The hymn also makes a direct reference to Jesus’ miraculous birth: “Offspring of a Virgin’s Womb”, acknowledging the Christian doctrine of the Virgin Birth. The phrase “Jesus, our Immanuel here” encapsulates this theme, as “Immanuel” means “God with us,” signifying God’s presence among humanity. Through these lines, Wesley conveys that Christ’s birth is not an ordinary event—it is a divine act that brings God directly into the human world, fulfilling the prophecy of the Messiah.
  • Salvation and Redemption through Christ: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley presents salvation and redemption as central themes, portraying Christ’s birth as the foundation of God’s plan to save humanity from sin and death. The hymn emphasizes Christ’s humility and sacrifice in the line “Mild he lays his Glory by, Born—that Man no more may die”, illustrating that Jesus willingly left his divine glory to come to earth for the sake of humankind. Wesley continues this theme with “Born—to raise the Sons of Earth, Born—to give them Second Birth”, referencing the Christian concept of spiritual rebirth—the idea that faith in Christ grants eternal life. The hymn also refers to Christ as the “Second Adam from above”, reinforcing the belief that Jesus came to correct the sin of the first Adam and offer a new path to righteousness. By repeating “Born—to”, Wesley stresses that Jesus’ birth is not only a cause for celebration but also the beginning of humanity’s salvation.
  • The Defeat of Sin and the Restoration of Humanity: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley emphasizes Christ’s victory over sin and the restoration of fallen humanity. Wesley references the biblical prophecy from Genesis 3:15 in the lines “Rise, the Woman’s Conqu’ring Seed, Bruise in Us the Serpent’s Head”, portraying Jesus as the one who will crush Satan’s power. This theme is further developed with the plea “Adam’s Likeness, Lord, efface, Stamp thy Image in its Place”, signifying that Jesus came to erase the sinful nature inherited from Adam and restore believers in the image of God. The hymn expresses the longing for humanity’s full redemption through the line “Reinstate us in thy Love”, reinforcing the belief that Christ’s birth is not just a historical event but a divine act meant to reconcile people with God. Through these verses, Wesley conveys that Jesus’ coming marks the beginning of humanity’s transformation, restoring what was lost through sin and bringing the promise of eternal life.
Literary Theories and “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
Literary TheoryApplication to “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
Theological CriticismThis hymn reflects Christian theology, particularly the doctrines of Incarnation, Redemption, and Salvation. The lines “Veil’d in Flesh, the Godhead see, Hail th’ Incarnate Deity!” emphasize the belief that Christ is both divine and human. The hymn also highlights Christ’s mission to reconcile sinners with God, as seen in “God and Sinners reconcil’d!” This interpretation aligns with theological readings that focus on religious significance.
Historical CriticismUnderstanding the hymn’s historical context in 18th-century England helps interpret its purpose. Wesley, a leader in the Methodist movement, wrote this during a time of religious revival. The line “Join the Triumph of the Skies” reflects the evangelical emphasis on communal worship and celebration of faith. Historical criticism examines how the hymn responded to religious and cultural movements of its time.
Formalism (New Criticism)A formalist analysis of the hymn focuses on its structure, poetic devices, and linguistic techniques. The repetition of “Born—to raise the Sons of Earth, Born—to give them Second Birth” emphasizes the theme of spiritual rebirth. The use of parallelism and alliteration, such as in “Hail the Heav’nly Prince of Peace!”, enhances the lyrical quality. This approach studies the hymn as a self-contained literary work, independent of historical or theological context.
Reader-Response CriticismReader-response criticism examines how different audiences interpret the hymn based on personal beliefs and experiences. A Christian reader may view “Jesus, our Immanuel here!” as a profound expression of faith, while a non-religious reader might appreciate its poetic elements without the theological implications. The hymn’s meaning varies based on the reader’s perspective, making its interpretation subjective.

Critical Questions about “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
  • How does “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley reflect the theological significance of Christ’s birth?
  • “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley reflects the theological significance of Christ’s birth by emphasizing the doctrines of Incarnation, Redemption, and Salvation. The hymn presents Jesus as both divine and human, as seen in the line “Veil’d in Flesh, the Godhead see, Hail th’ Incarnate Deity!”. This statement highlights the Christian belief that Christ, though born in human form, retains his divine nature. The hymn also underscores Christ’s mission of redemption with “God and Sinners reconcil’d!”, signifying that Jesus’ birth is the beginning of humanity’s salvation. Furthermore, the repeated phrase “Born—to raise the Sons of Earth, Born—to give them Second Birth” reinforces the doctrine of spiritual rebirth, which is central to Christian theology. Wesley’s hymn, therefore, is not just a celebration of Jesus’ birth but a declaration of its spiritual and salvific purpose, making it a deeply theological piece of religious poetry.
  • In what ways does “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley use poetic and literary devices to enhance its message?
  • “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley employs various poetic and literary devices to enhance its message of joy, salvation, and divine glory. One prominent device is alliteration, as seen in “Hail the Heav’nly Prince of Peace!”, which adds a rhythmic and melodic quality to the hymn. Parallelism is also a key feature, particularly in the repetition of “Born—to raise the Sons of Earth, Born—to give them Second Birth”, emphasizing Christ’s role in humanity’s spiritual transformation. Metaphor is another significant literary technique, as in “Hail the Sun of Righteousness!”, where Christ is compared to the sun, symbolizing light, warmth, and divine truth. Additionally, personification appears in “Universal Nature say”, suggesting that all of creation rejoices in Christ’s birth. These poetic elements not only enhance the hymn’s lyrical beauty but also strengthen its emotional and theological impact, making its message more profound and memorable.
  • How does “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley reflect the historical and cultural context in which it was written?
  • “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley reflects the historical and cultural context of 18th-century England, particularly the Methodist movement and the religious revival of the time. Wesley, a co-founder of Methodism, sought to renew Christian faith and devotion, and his hymns played a crucial role in spreading this message. The hymn’s emphasis on joyful praise and communal worship is evident in “Join the Triumph of the Skies”, which encourages believers to participate in a heavenly celebration of Christ’s birth. This aligns with Methodist teachings that emphasized enthusiastic worship, personal faith, and evangelism. Additionally, the hymn’s focus on salvation and rebirth, as in “Born—to give them Second Birth”, reflects the Methodist emphasis on spiritual transformation and the need for a personal experience of God’s grace. By incorporating these themes, Wesley’s hymn resonated with contemporary Christian audiences, reinforcing the broader religious movement of his time.
  • What is the significance of the title “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley, and how does it shape the reader’s understanding of the poem?
  • The title “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley immediately establishes the occasion and purpose of the poem. The use of the word “Hymn” indicates that this piece is meant for worship and communal singing, aligning with the tradition of religious hymnody. The phrase “Christmas Day” sets the specific context, highlighting the significance of Christ’s birth as a moment of divine fulfillment and celebration. The title prepares the reader for a joyful and reverent reflection on the Nativity, reinforced by lines like “Hark how all the Welkin rings”, which depict the heavens resounding with praise. Additionally, the title frames the hymn as a seasonal and theological work, meant to be sung and meditated upon during Christmas celebrations. This shapes the reader’s interpretation and engagement, making the hymn not just a poetic composition but an act of devotion, intended to be part of a larger spiritual experience.

Literary Works Similar to “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
  1. “While Shepherds Watched Their Flocks” by Nahum Tate – Like “Hymn for Christmas Day”, this poem-hymn narrates the announcement of Christ’s birth by angels, emphasizing divine revelation and joyous celebration.
  2. “Christ’s Nativity” by Henry Vaughan – This poem shares Wesley’s focus on the spiritual significance of Christ’s birth, using rich imagery and reverent praise to depict the incarnation.
  3. “A Hymn on the Nativity of My Saviour” by Ben Jonson – Similar to Wesley’s hymn, this poem explores the mystery of Christ’s divine and human nature, with a blend of theological reflection and poetic beauty.
  4. “On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity” by John Milton – Like Wesley’s work, Milton’s poem presents Christ’s birth as a cosmic event, with a grand and celebratory tone that highlights its impact on heaven and earth.
  5. “See Amid the Winter’s Snow” by Edward Caswall – This hymn-like poem echoes Wesley’s themes of joy, salvation, and divine love, portraying Christ’s birth as a moment of grace and redemption for humanity.
Representative Quotations of “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“Hark how all the Welkin rings”The opening line sets the tone for the hymn, depicting the heavens resounding with praise for Christ’s birth.Theological Criticism – Highlights divine praise and worship as central to Christian faith.
“Glory to the King of Kings”This line exalts Christ as the supreme ruler, emphasizing his divine kingship.Historical Criticism – Reflects 18th-century religious emphasis on Christ’s divine kingship.
“Peace on Earth, and Mercy mild”A declaration of Christ’s mission to bring peace and mercy to humanity through his birth.Moral Criticism – Emphasizes Christ’s ethical mission of peace and mercy.
“God and Sinners reconcil’d!”Expresses the core Christian belief in Christ’s role in reconciling sinful humanity with God.Soteriological Criticism – Focuses on salvation and atonement as key Christian doctrines.
“Veil’d in Flesh, the Godhead see”Affirms the Incarnation, portraying Jesus as both divine and human.Incarnational Theology – Explores the mystery of Christ as God in human form.
“Born—to raise the Sons of Earth”Describes Christ’s role in elevating humanity from sin and granting salvation.Redemptive Perspective – Highlights Christ’s role in lifting humanity from sin.
“Born—to give them Second Birth”Refers to the theological concept of spiritual rebirth through faith in Christ.Spiritual Transformation – Examines rebirth as a theological necessity in Christian faith.
“Hail the Sun of Righteousness!”Symbolically portrays Christ as the Sun, bringing enlightenment and righteousness.Symbolism and Allegory – Uses metaphor to depict Christ as a guiding light.
“Adam’s Likeness, Lord, efface”A plea to remove the sinful nature inherited from Adam and replace it with Christ’s holiness.Anthropological Theology – Analyzes humanity’s transformation through Christ’s influence.
“Reinstate us in thy Love”A call for divine restoration, asking for reconciliation with God’s love.Divine Grace Perspective – Emphasizes the necessity of God’s love for spiritual renewal.
Suggested Readings: “Hymn for Christmas Day” by Charles Wesley
  1. Tucker, Karen B. Westerfield. “‘Shew Us Thy Salvation’: Charles Wesley and the Liturgical Year.” Wesley and Methodist Studies 11.2 (2019): 166-191.
  2. Tucker, Karen B. Westerfield. “‘Shew Us Thy Salvation’: Charles Wesley and the Liturgical Year.” Wesley and Methodist Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, pp. 166–91. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.5325/weslmethstud.11.2.0166. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
  3. Kimbrough, S. T. “Literary and Ecclesial Sources Used in Charles Wesley’s Poetry.” The Lyrical Theology of Charles Wesley: A Reader (Expanded Edition), 1st ed., The Lutterworth Press, 2013, pp. 73–91. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cgdz67.9. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.
  4. SISTER M. CLEMENT EAGAN. “A HYMN FOR CHRISTMAS DAY.” Poems, Volume 1, Catholic University of America Press, 1962, pp. 78–83. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32b325.15. Accessed 12 Mar. 2025.

“Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew: Summary and Critique

“Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew first appeared in the Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race in 2009 as part of the broader scholarly discussion on race and politics.

"Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective" by Thomas F. Pettigrew: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew

“Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew first appeared in the Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race in 2009 as part of the broader scholarly discussion on race and politics. This article critically examines the notion that Barack Obama’s election as the first African American president signified a “post-racial” America. Pettigrew challenges the idea that racism had diminished significantly, arguing instead that Obama’s victory resulted from a “perfect storm” of political conditions rather than a fundamental transformation in racial attitudes. The article highlights the persistence of racial prejudice, as demonstrated by white Southern and older voters’ reluctance to support Obama, and emphasizes the role of increased voter turnout among young and minority populations. In literary theory and political discourse, this work contributes to critical race studies by interrogating the narrative of progress often imposed on racial history. By exposing logical fallacies in post-racial arguments and using empirical data to reveal the complexities of racial attitudes, Pettigrew’s analysis aligns with scholarship that critiques optimistic yet superficial claims of racial equality. As referenced in the State of the Discipline, this article serves as an essential text in the study of race relations, political behavior, and the enduring structures of systemic inequality in the United States.

Summary of “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew
  1. The Myth of Post-Racism
    • Pettigrew critiques the claim that Obama’s election signifies the end of racism in the U.S.
    • He argues that such views are overly optimistic and overlook systemic racial disparities (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 279).
    • The desire to declare racism as “solved” is an extension of historical tendencies to prematurely celebrate racial progress (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280).
  2. The “Perfect Storm” That Led to Obama’s Victory
    • Obama’s election was made possible by a unique confluence of events, not necessarily a shift in racial attitudes.
    • Factors included:
      • A well-run campaign
      • Economic downturn
      • Declining popularity of the Republican Party under George W. Bush
      • A highly favorable political climate (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280).
    • Obama benefited from previous Black political progress and demographic shifts (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 281).
  3. Racist Voters Still Supported Obama
    • Some white bigots voted for Obama due to the economic crisis, demonstrating that racial prejudice and voting decisions do not always align (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 282).
    • A survey found that 33% of white Democrats held negative racial stereotypes, yet 58% of them still voted for Obama (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 283).
    • Racism remained evident in other aspects, such as opposition to affirmative action and racially motivated legislative measures (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284).
  4. Logical Fallacies in the Post-Racism Argument
    • The ecological fallacy: Inferring individual racial attitudes from aggregate voting patterns is misleading (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284).
    • The constant turnout composition fallacy: The assumption that the electorate remained the same as in 2004 is false; there was a significant increase in young, minority, and independent voters (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 285).
    • Obama’s slight improvement over Kerry’s white vote share (43% vs. 41%) does not indicate a racial transformation (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 285).
  5. Racist Attitudes and Actions Persisted During the Campaign
    • Throughout Obama’s campaign, racist incidents were frequent:
      • Cross-burnings, threats, and racist graffiti (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 286).
      • Students chanting “assassinate Obama” on a school bus in Idaho (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 286).
      • A Republican club issuing fake $10 bills featuring Obama alongside a watermelon, ribs, and fried chicken (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).
    • High-profile figures, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign surrogates, played the “race card” by spreading rumors about Obama’s background (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).
  6. White Southern and Elderly Voters Demonstrated Continued Racism
    • Older white voters (65+) were the only age group to vote more Republican in 2008 than in 2004 (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).
    • White support for Obama decreased in certain Southern states like Alabama and Mississippi (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 288).
    • These trends contradict claims that Obama’s election erased racial divisions (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 289).
  7. The Role of Increased Minority and Youth Turnout
    • Key voter demographics:
      • Black voter turnout increased from 11% in 2004 to 13% in 2008.
      • Latino turnout increased from 6% to 8%, with 66% supporting Obama (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 289).
      • The under-30 vote shifted significantly toward Obama, showing a generational difference in racial attitudes (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 289).
  8. Structural Racism Persists Despite Obama’s Victory
    • Obama’s election does not eliminate systemic racism in housing, employment, education, and criminal justice (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290).
    • “The basic problems are structural—rampant housing segregation, poverty, job discrimination, poor education, massive imprisonment” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290).
    • Institutional racism remains embedded in American society and requires more than symbolic victories to overcome (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
  9. Concluding Thoughts: A Step Forward, Not the End of Racism
    • Obama’s presidency represents progress but not the end of racial discrimination (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
    • “We are no longer ‘two nations,’ but neither are we a single, non-racialized nation” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
    • The fight for racial equality continues beyond the symbolic victory of a Black president (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 292).
Key Takeaways
  • Obama’s election was historic but did not signal a “post-racial” America.
  • Many white voters, including bigots, supported him for reasons unrelated to racial progress.
  • Logical fallacies distort the perception that racism has significantly declined.
  • Racist incidents and systemic inequalities persist.
  • Future progress in race relations depends on structural changes, not just symbolic victories.
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew
Theoretical Term/ConceptDefinitionApplication in Pettigrew’s Argument
Post-RacismThe belief that racism has significantly declined or ended, particularly after Obama’s election.Pettigrew critiques this notion, arguing that systemic racism persists despite Obama’s victory (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 279).
Ecological FallacyA logical error where conclusions about individuals are drawn from macro-level data.Pettigrew points out that voting patterns cannot accurately determine individual racial attitudes (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284).
Constant Turnout Composition FallacyThe assumption that the electorate remains unchanged between elections.Pettigrew argues that shifts in voter demographics, rather than a reduction in racism, contributed to Obama’s win (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 285).
Symbolic RacismA form of racism that is more subtle and indirect, based on the belief that minorities violate traditional values.Pettigrew suggests that many white voters who supported Obama still held negative stereotypes about Black people (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 283).
Blaming the VictimThe tendency to attribute structural inequalities to the perceived shortcomings of marginalized groups.Pettigrew highlights how many Americans believe racial equality has already been achieved and hold Black communities responsible for ongoing disparities (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280).
Racial CodingThe use of seemingly neutral language to convey racial messages.Campaign attacks against Obama, such as calling him “elitist” or “not one of us,” were racially coded (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).
DeracializationA political strategy in which Black candidates avoid direct discussions of race to appeal to white voters.Obama largely avoided racial issues except when necessary, such as in his Philadelphia speech (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284).
Implicit BiasUnconscious racial prejudices that affect behavior and decision-making.Many voters may have unconsciously applied racial biases while still voting for Obama (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 283).
Structural RacismSystemic inequalities embedded in institutions and policies.Pettigrew argues that racial disparities in housing, employment, and education remain significant (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290).
Generational Political SocializationThe idea that major political events shape the attitudes of specific age groups.Younger voters, shaped by Obama’s election, may maintain progressive racial attitudes in the long term (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 289).
Contribution of “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Critical Race Theory (CRT)

  • CRT argues that racism is not an anomaly but a deeply embedded structure within society.
  • Pettigrew challenges the “post-racism” narrative, emphasizing that racism remains a systemic issue despite Obama’s election (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 279).
  • He highlights structural barriers such as housing segregation, economic inequality, and the criminal justice system that continue to disadvantage Black Americans (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290).
  • The concept of “blaming the victim” (Ryan, 1976) is used to explain how racial inequalities are justified by attributing them to Black individuals rather than structural forces (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280).

2. Postcolonial Theory

  • Postcolonial theory critiques how race and identity are constructed through historical power dynamics.
  • Pettigrew deconstructs the celebratory discourse around Obama’s election, arguing that it masks continued racial oppression (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
  • He examines how media and political narratives shape racial identities, particularly in how Obama was framed as “non-threatening” to white voters (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284).
  • The “racial coding” of political attacks against Obama—such as being labeled “elitist” or “not one of us”—mirrors colonialist strategies of othering racialized individuals (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).

3. Ideological State Apparatus (Althusserian Theory)

  • Louis Althusser’s concept of Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs) explains how institutions like the media, politics, and education shape ideological beliefs.
  • Pettigrew critiques the media’s role in reinforcing the myth of a post-racial America, especially through journalists like John Tierney, who dismissed racism as a declining phenomenon (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280).
  • He demonstrates how political discourse, shaped by dominant ideologies, minimizes systemic racism while amplifying individual success stories to suggest racial progress (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 279).
  • The fallacies underlying the post-racial argument are ideologically constructed to maintain white privilege by falsely portraying racial justice as achieved (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 285).

4. Narrative Theory (Meta-Narratives and Counter-Narratives)

  • Pettigrew deconstructs the meta-narrative that Obama’s election represents racial progress and the fulfillment of American ideals of equality (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 279).
  • He presents a counter-narrative that exposes the persistence of racism, as seen in the backlash against Obama, racist campaign rhetoric, and declining white support in Southern states (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).
  • This aligns with literary studies on how narratives shape historical memory and political consciousness.

5. New Historicism

  • New Historicism argues that literary and cultural texts must be analyzed within their historical and sociopolitical contexts.
  • Pettigrew situates Obama’s election within the broader history of American race relations, linking it to the long struggle for Black political representation since the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280).
  • He refutes the idea that history moves in a linear progression toward racial equality, demonstrating instead how historical inequalities persist despite symbolic victories (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
  • His discussion of white Southern resistance to Obama reflects the enduring legacies of segregationist politics (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).

6. Structuralism and Semiotics

  • Structuralism examines how meaning is created through systems of signs and language.
  • Pettigrew identifies racial coding in political discourse, such as how words like “elitist” or “unpatriotic” carry racialized meanings when applied to Obama (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287).
  • He shows how white voters rationalized their support for Obama by emphasizing his light skin tone, biracial identity, and non-threatening demeanor, which semiotically distanced him from Black stereotypes (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284).
  • This aligns with semiotic theories that analyze how language and symbols reinforce power structures.

7. Cultural Studies and Media Theory

  • Pettigrew examines how media narratives constructed the myth of post-racism while simultaneously amplifying racist tropes against Obama (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280).
  • He critiques the media’s selective framing, such as focusing on racial progress while ignoring structural injustices (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
  • His analysis contributes to cultural studies by revealing how political campaigns, media discourse, and public perceptions interact to shape racial ideologies.

Conclusion: The Article’s Theoretical Contributions

Pettigrew’s work contributes significantly to literary theory and cultural criticism by:

  • Challenging dominant racial narratives and exposing ideological distortions.
  • Providing a critical race analysis of how media and political rhetoric obscure systemic racism.
  • Offering a counter-narrative to the simplistic idea that racial representation equals racial justice.
  • Integrating historical, structuralist, and semiotic approaches to analyze the election’s symbolic and material impact.
Examples of Critiques Through “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew
Literary WorkKey ThemesCritique Through Pettigrew’s Perspective
1. To Kill a Mockingbird (Harper Lee, 1960)Racial injustice, moral growth, and the legal system’s failure to uphold racial equality.Pettigrew’s critique of the post-racism narrative aligns with how the novel exposes structural racism in the legal system. Just as Obama’s election did not erase racism, Atticus Finch’s legal defense of Tom Robinson does not dismantle the deeply ingrained racial prejudices of Maycomb (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290).
2. The Great Gatsby (F. Scott Fitzgerald, 1925)The American Dream, class struggle, and racial anxieties in 1920s America.Pettigrew’s discussion of racial coding in political discourse (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 287) applies to Fitzgerald’s portrayal of Tom Buchanan’s fear of racial “degeneration.” The novel critiques the myth of the American Dream, much like Pettigrew critiques the post-racial myth by revealing the persistent inequalities beneath the surface of success (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
3. Beloved (Toni Morrison, 1987)The psychological trauma of slavery, memory, and historical erasure.Pettigrew highlights the danger of premature historical closure in racial discourse (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 279). Just as Obama’s victory did not signify the end of racism, Morrison’s novel argues that the traumas of slavery are not erased but continue to haunt generations (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291). The desire to forget the past mirrors the push for a post-racial America that ignores structural racism.
4. Invisible Man (Ralph Ellison, 1952)Racial identity, invisibility, and systemic oppression.Pettigrew’s concept of deracialization in Obama’s campaign (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284) parallels the protagonist’s realization that racial invisibility is a survival mechanism in a racist society. The novel critiques the illusion of racial progress, much like Pettigrew argues that Obama’s election did not dismantle racial hierarchies (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290).
Criticism Against “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew
  1. Overemphasis on Structural Racism Without Recognizing Individual Agency
    • Pettigrew focuses heavily on systemic barriers but underplays the role of individual actions in combating racism.
    • Critics may argue that while systemic racism persists, Obama’s presidency did signal progress in racial representation and leadership (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
  2. Dismissal of the Symbolic Importance of Obama’s Election
    • While Pettigrew critiques the “post-racism” narrative, he may downplay the psychological and cultural significance of a Black president for African Americans and other minority groups.
    • Representation in leadership can have real-world implications for racial perceptions, even if structural inequalities remain (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 291).
  3. Neglect of Counterarguments from Optimistic Scholars
    • Pettigrew largely critiques post-racial advocates like John Tierney but does not engage deeply with scholars who acknowledge both racial progress and ongoing struggles.
    • His critique could be more balanced by discussing theories of incremental racial progress rather than suggesting that racism remains entirely unchanged (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290).
  4. Limited Consideration of Global and Comparative Perspectives
    • The analysis is centered on American race relations without broader comparisons to racial dynamics in other countries.
    • Pettigrew references Black European reactions to Obama’s win (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 289) but does not analyze how racial politics in other democracies might provide comparative insights.
  5. Reliance on Quantitative Voting Data Without Nuanced Qualitative Analysis
    • While Pettigrew uses exit-poll data to show that white support for Obama was not necessarily indicative of racial progress (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 283), some critics argue that surveys do not capture changing racial attitudes in personal and professional spaces.
    • A more qualitative approach—such as interviews or discourse analysis—could provide deeper insight into shifting racial dynamics beyond voting patterns.
  6. Potential Political Bias
    • Pettigrew critiques conservative narratives about post-racism but does not critically analyze how liberal political discourse may also contribute to performative racial progress rather than substantive change.
    • The Democratic Party’s role in perpetuating racial inequalities (e.g., mass incarceration policies under Clinton) is not extensively discussed.
  7. Underestimation of Racial Progress Among Younger Generations
    • The argument that racism remains largely intact may not fully account for the generational shift toward greater racial acceptance among younger Americans (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 289).
    • Younger voters showed significantly higher levels of support for Obama, which could indicate meaningful racial progress rather than just a political alignment shift.
  8. Rigid Binary Between Racist and Non-Racist Voters
    • Pettigrew highlights that many bigoted white voters still supported Obama (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 283), but this may oversimplify the complexities of racial attitudes.
    • Many voters may hold contradictory racial beliefs, where they acknowledge systemic racism but also support policies that perpetuate inequality.
Representative Quotations from “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“It took ‘a perfect storm’ of interlocking factors to elect Obama.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 280)Pettigrew argues that Obama’s victory was not merely a result of racial progress but was influenced by a combination of factors such as a weak Republican opponent, economic crises, and his own charisma and campaign strategy.
“Many White bigots actually voted for Obama.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 282)He challenges the assumption that voting for a Black candidate proves the absence of racism. Some voters, despite holding prejudiced beliefs, still chose Obama due to economic concerns and other priorities.
“Racist attitudes and actions repeatedly erupted during both the primary and final campaigns.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 285)Pettigrew points out that despite claims of a “post-racial” America, racial prejudice was evident in campaign rhetoric, media representations, and acts of racial violence during the election season.
“The post-racism thesis suffers from two logical and interrelated fallacies: the ecological fallacy and the constant turnout composition fallacy.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 284)He critiques the idea that Obama’s victory signifies racial progress, arguing that broad assumptions about racism’s decline are flawed because voter demographics changed significantly between 2004 and 2008.
“Whites older than sixty-four years were the only age group to vote more Republican than in 2004.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 286)This statistic is used to show how older white Americans resisted racial change, contradicting the idea that Obama’s election represented a universal racial transformation.
“Obama’s decisive victory marks a momentous milestone in the history of America’s most persistent domestic problem.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290)Despite his criticism of the “post-racism” claim, Pettigrew acknowledges the historical significance of Obama’s presidency as a major racial milestone.
“You can’t look at that swath of hard-red states that actually grew even redder and say that we are post-racial.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 286)He refutes the idea of a post-racial society by highlighting that several Southern states actually became more conservative and less supportive of racial progress.
“To answer Tierney’s provocative question—‘where have all the bigots gone?’—we can definitively say they have not disappeared.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 289)Pettigrew directly counters John Tierney’s claim that racism had largely vanished after Obama’s election, emphasizing that prejudices remain deeply embedded in American society.
“The American presidency is powerful, but it has its definite limits.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290)He tempers expectations about Obama’s ability to single-handedly dismantle systemic racism, citing economic, political, and judicial constraints.
“We are no longer ‘two nations,’ but neither are we a one, non-racialized nation.” (Pettigrew, 2009, p. 290)Pettigrew encapsulates his argument by asserting that while progress has been made, racial divisions in America still persist and require continued attention.
Suggested Readings: “Post-Racism? Putting President Obama’s Victory In Perspective” by Thomas F. Pettigrew
  1. Pettigrew, Thomas F. “POST-RACISM?: Putting President Obama’s Victory in Perspective1.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 6.2 (2009): 279-292.
  2. TUCH, STEVEN A., and MICHAEL HUGHES. “Whites’ Racial Policy Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century: The Continuing Significance of Racial Resentment.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 634, 2011, pp. 134–52. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/29779399. Accessed 13 Mar. 2025.
  3. Love, Bettina L., and Brandelyn Tosolt. “Reality or Rhetoric? Barack Obama and Post-Racial America.” Race, Gender & Class, vol. 17, no. 3/4, 2010, pp. 19–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41674749. Accessed 13 Mar. 2025.
  4. López, Ian F. Haney. “Post-Racial Racism: Racial Stratification and Mass Incarceration in the Age of Obama.” California Law Review, vol. 98, no. 3, 2010, pp. 1023–74. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27896699. Accessed 13 Mar. 2025.