“Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson: A Critical Analysis

“Our New Horse” by A.B. “Banjo” Paterson first appeared in Rio Grande’s Last Race and Other Verses in 1902.

"Our New Horse" by A.B. 'Banjo' Paterson: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson

“Our New Horse” by A.B. “Banjo” Paterson first appeared in Rio Grande’s Last Race and Other Verses in 1902. This humorous narrative poem explores the world of bush racing culture in rural Australia and captures the cycle of hope, disappointment, and irony experienced by a group of station hands obsessed with horse racing. The poem is centered around the sale and eventual return of their deceptive racehorse, Partner, whose unreliability on the track contrasts with the false promise shown during trials. Paterson deftly blends satire with bush realism, illustrating themes of gambling folly, rural camaraderie, and the emotional highs and lows of sport. Its popularity lies in the relatable depiction of bush characters, vivid vernacular language, and the biting irony of the final twist — that their “new” horse was their own underperforming Partner sold back to them at a loss. Lines like “They bit their own hook, and were landed / With fifty pounds’ loss on the deal” encapsulate the biting humor and the cautionary tone that made the poem resonate with audiences then and now.

Text: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson

The boys had come back from the races

   All silent and down on their luck;

They’d backed ’em, straight out and for places,

   But never a winner they struck.

They lost their good money on Slogan,

   And fell most uncommonly flat

When Partner, the pride of the Bogan,

   Was beaten by Aristocrat.

And one said, “I move that instanter

   We sell out our horses and quit;

The brutes ought to win in a canter,

   Such trials they do when they’re fit.

The last one they ran was a snorter —

   A gallop to gladden one’s heart —

Two-twelve for a mile and a quarter,

   And finished as straight as a dart.

“And then when I think that they’re ready

   To win me a nice little swag,

They are licked like the veriest neddy —

   They’re licked from the fall of the flag.

The mare held her own to the stable,

   She died out to nothing at that,

And Partner he never seemed able

   To pace it with Aristocrat.

“And times have been bad, and the seasons

   Don’t promise to be of the best;

In short, boys, there’s plenty of reasons

   For giving the racing a rest.

The mare can be kept on the station —

   Her breeding is good as can be —

But Partner, his next destination

   Is rather a trouble to me.

“We can’t sell him here, for they know him

   As well as the clerk of the course;

He’s raced and won races till, blow him,

   He’s done as a handicap horse.

A jady, uncertain performer,

   They weight him right out of the hunt,

And clap it on warmer and warmer

   Whenever he gets near the front.

“It’s no use to paint him or dot him

   Or put any fake on his brand,

For bushmen are smart, and they’d spot him

   In any sale-yard in the land.

The folk about here could all tell him,

   Could swear to each separate hair;

Let us send him to Sydney and sell him,

   There’s plenty of Jugginses there.

“We’ll call him a maiden, and treat ’em

   To trials will open their eyes;

We’ll run their best horses and beat ’em,

   And then won’t they think him a prize.

I pity the fellow that buys him,

   He’ll find in a very short space,

No matter how highly he tries him,

   The beggar won’t race in a race.”

Next week, under “Seller and Buyer”,

   Appeared in the Daily Gazette:

“A racehorse for sale, and a flyer;

   Has never been started as yet;

A trial will show what his pace is;

   The buyer can get him in light,

And win all the handicap races.

   Apply here before Wednesday night.”

He sold for a hundred and thirty,

   Because of a gallop he had

One morning with Bluefish and Bertie.

   And donkey-licked both of ’em bad.

And when the old horse had departed,

   The life on the station grew tame;

The race-track was dull and deserted,

   The boys had gone back on the game.

The winter rolled by, and the station

   Was green with the garland of spring;

A spirit of glad exultation

   Awoke in each animate thing;

And all the old love, the old longing,

   Broke out in the breasts of the boys —

The visions of racing came thronging

   With all its delirious joys.

The rushing of floods in their courses,

   The rattle of rain on the roofs,

Recalled the fierce rush of the horses,

   The thunder of galloping hoofs.

And soon one broke out: “I can suffer

   No longer the life of a slug,

The man that don’t race is a duffer,

   Let’s have one more run for the mug.

“Why, everything races, no matter

   Whatever its method may be:

The waterfowl hold a regatta;

   The possums run heats up a tree;

The emus are constantly sprinting

   A handicap out on the plain;

It seems that all nature is hinting

   ‘Tis time to be at it again.

“The cockatoo parrots are talking

   Of races to far-away lands;

The native companions are walking

   A go-as-you-please on the sands;

The little foals gallop for pastime;

   The wallabies race down the gap;

Let’s try it once more for the last time —

   Bring out the old jacket and cap.

“And now for a horse; we might try one

   Of those that are bred on the place.

But I fancy it’s better to buy one,

   A horse that has proved he can race.

Let us send down to Sydney to Skinner,

   A thorough good judge who can ride,

And ask him to buy us a spinner

   To clean out the whole country-side.”

They wrote him a letter as follows:

   “We want you to buy us a horse;

He must have the speed to catch swallows,

   And stamina with it, of course.

The price ain’t a thing that’ll grieve us,

   It’s getting a bad ‘un annoys

The undersigned blokes, and believe us,

   We’re yours to a cinder, ‘The boys’.”

He answered: “I’ve bought you a hummer,

   A horse that has never been raced;

I saw him run over the Drummer,

   He held him outclassed and outpaced.

His breeding’s not known, but they state he

   Is born of a thoroughbred strain.

I’ve paid them a hundred and eighty,

   And started the horse in the train.”

They met him — alas, that these verses

   Aren’t up to their subject’s demands —

Can’t set forth their eloquent curses,

   For Partner was back on their hands.

They went in to meet him with gladness

   They opened his box with delight —

A silent procession of sadness

   They crept to the station at night.

And life has grown dull on the station,

   The boys are all silent and slow;

Their work is a daily vexation,

   And sport is unknown to them now.

Whenever they think how they stranded,

   They squeal just as guinea-pigs squeal;

They bit their own hook, and were landed

   With fifty pounds’ loss on the deal.

Annotations: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
StanzaSimple English AnnotationLiterary Devices
1The boys came back from a horse race feeling disappointed — they had lost all their bets.🟦 Rhyme (races/places, luck/struck) 🟩 Imagery (emotional defeat)
2One boy suggests giving up horse racing because their horses always seem good during training but fail during real races.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Metaphor (brutes, snorter) 🟩 Imagery (speedy gallop)
3He’s frustrated that just when they think the horse will win, it performs poorly again.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Metaphor (“veriest neddy” = the worst horse) 🟥 Irony (high expectations, poor results)
4The boy explains times are hard and they should stop racing. The mare might be kept for breeding, but Partner’s future is uncertain.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Euphemism (“destination is rather a trouble”) 🟩 Imagery (bad seasons)
5They can’t sell Partner locally because everyone knows he’s unreliable and heavily handicapped in races.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Metaphor (“weight him right out”) 🟥 Irony (successful past makes him unsellable)
6They discuss how disguising Partner won’t work — locals will recognize him, so they should send him to Sydney where people won’t know.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Colloquialism (“Jugginses” = fools) 🟥 Irony (tricking someone else)
7They plan to fake Partner’s status as a new racer, impress buyers with fast trials, and sell him as a promising horse.🟦 Rhyme 🟩 Imagery (impressing in trials) 🟥 Irony (knowing he won’t race well)
8An ad appears in the newspaper describing Partner as a never-raced champion to attract a buyer.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Irony (complete lie in the ad) 🟩 Imagery (“win all the handicap races”)
9Partner is sold for a good price because of a fake trial. After selling him, life on the station becomes boring without racing.🟦 Rhyme 🟥 Irony (sold the excitement with the horse) 🟩 Contrast (before/after mood)
10Spring returns, bringing joy and making the boys feel the desire to race again.🟦 Rhyme 🟩 Personification (spring brings joy) 🟨 Metaphor (“garland of spring”)
11Sounds of nature remind the boys of horse racing, and one of them says he can’t live without it.🟦 Rhyme 🟩 Imagery (galloping hoofs, rushing floods) 🟨 Metaphor (life of a slug)
12The boy argues that racing is natural — all animals are racing in their own way.🟦 Rhyme 🟩 Imagery (animals racing) 🟥 Irony (justifying racing using animals)
13Birds and animals seem to be competing — it’s nature’s way of saying it’s time to race again.🟦 Rhyme 🟩 Personification (cockatoos talking, companions walking)
14They decide to buy a new horse instead of using their own — one that has already proven he can win.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Colloquialism (“clean out the countryside”)
15They send a letter to a trusted horseman, asking for a very fast and strong horse.🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Hyperbole (“speed to catch swallows”)
16The horseman replies that he found a great, fast horse that hasn’t raced yet and has good bloodlines.🟦 Rhyme 🟩 Imagery (outpaced Drummer) 🟨 Colloquialism (“hummer” = good horse)
17When the horse arrives, the boys are shocked — it’s actually Partner, their old horse, sold back to them.🟥 Dramatic Irony (they unknowingly bought their own horse) 🟦 Rhyme 🟨 Euphemism (“eloquent curses”)
18Now their lives are dull again; they realize they’ve been fooled and lost money in the deal.🟦 Rhyme 🟥 Irony (full circle loss) 🟩 Simile (“squeal just as guinea-pigs squeal”)
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
SymbolExample from PoemExplanation (Simple)
🔁 Alliteration“Partner, the pride of the Bogan”Repetition of ‘p’ sounds to create rhythm and draw attention to the horse’s importance.
💬 Allusion“Bluefish and Bertie”Refers to other horses or familiar racing names to create realism and connection with readers.
🐾 Animal Imagery“The wallabies race down the gap”Comparing animal actions to human racing, showing how nature is full of competitive motion.
📉 Anticlimax“A silent procession of sadness”After building excitement about the new horse, it ends in disappointment when Partner returns.
🤝 Colloquialism“Jugginses”Informal Aussie slang for “fools” — creates authentic rural voice and humor.
🔂 Cyclic StructureOpening: losing with Partner → Ending: buying Partner backThe story goes full circle, reinforcing the theme of repetition and futility.
💢 Dramatic IronyThe boys unknowingly buy back their own horseThe reader knows more than the characters, creating humor and sympathy.
📜 Enjambment“The visions of racing came thronging / With all its delirious joys.”The line flows to the next without punctuation — adds energy and natural speech rhythm.
👕 Euphemism“His next destination / Is rather a trouble to me”Softens the idea of getting rid of the horse — adds humor and subtlety.
🐎 Extended MetaphorHorse racing = life’s ups and downsThe entire poem uses racing as a metaphor for hopes, failure, and human folly.
😅 Hyperbole“Speed to catch swallows”Exaggeration to emphasize how fast they want the horse to be — adds humor.
🎨 Imagery“Green with the garland of spring”Vivid description paints a lively, fresh scene — creates mood and contrast.
🧩 Irony“The beggar won’t race in a race”They sell the horse by pretending he’s a star — the joke’s on them when they buy him back.
📍 Juxtaposition“Life on the station grew tame” vs. “delirious joys”Contrast between excitement of racing and dull daily life — highlights emotional stakes.
📣 Metaphor“The man that don’t race is a duffer”Racing symbolizes excitement and meaning in life — not racing means a dull existence.
📏 Meter (Rhythm)Consistent anapestic tetrameterGives the poem a musical, galloping rhythm — mirrors horse racing pace.
🖼️ Personification“A spirit of glad exultation / Awoke in each animate thing”Spring and nature are given human traits to reflect mood and renewal.
🧠 SatireMocking how the boys get fooledCritiques human gullibility and obsession with gambling in a humorous way.
💫 Simile“They squeal just as guinea-pigs squeal”Direct comparison adds humor and emphasizes their childish frustration.
🔗 SymbolismPartner the horse = false hopePartner symbolizes repetitive failure and self-deception in human nature.
Themes: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson

🎭 1. Disillusionment and False Hope: In “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson, the central theme of disillusionment is vividly portrayed through the recurring disappointments the characters face in the world of bush racing. The poem begins with the boys returning “silent and down on their luck,” having lost money on horses like Slogan and their own Partner. Their dreams are repeatedly crushed despite promising trial runs — “A gallop to gladden one’s heart” — that never translate to success on race day. The title itself, “Our New Horse,” is ironic, as their “new” hope turns out to be the very horse that had let them down before. Paterson uses this cycle to highlight the universal experience of misplaced belief — how easily people can fool themselves into believing that this time, things will be different.


💸 2. The Folly of Gambling and Risk: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson explores the seductive but often destructive nature of gambling and risk-taking. The boys invest money, hope, and pride into horses that consistently let them down, particularly Partner, who is “licked from the fall of the flag.” Even after swearing off racing, they fall back into the cycle, driven by the thrill of the punt and the fantasy of winning big — “He must have the speed to catch swallows.” The poem shows how gambling creates an illusion of control while feeding on desperation and excitement. Their final mistake — unknowingly buying back the same useless horse — and losing fifty pounds reflects not just a financial loss, but the absurdity of repeating poor decisions under the guise of optimism. Paterson critiques this cycle with biting humor and sharp rural wit.


🤝 3. Mateship and Group Mentality: In “Our New Horse”, A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson captures the uniquely Australian theme of mateship, where loyalty and collective experience are as important as the outcome. The poem’s characters act as a unified group — they lose together, dream together, and eventually are fooled together. When they decide to send away Partner, it’s a group decision; when they get him back unknowingly, the “silent procession of sadness” reflects their shared shame. They sign the letter to the horse buyer as a group — “The undersigned blokes… ‘The boys’.” While they are misguided, their camaraderie is never in question. This theme adds depth to the humor and irony, showing how friendship can endure even when decisions go hilariously wrong.


🔄 4. The Cyclical Nature of Human Mistakes: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson powerfully illustrates how people often repeat their mistakes, despite hard lessons. The poem starts and ends with the same outcome: failure with Partner. After trying to get rid of the horse and swearing off racing, the boys eventually return to their old habits, moved by the beauty of spring and racing nostalgia — “visions of racing came thronging.” They go full circle, believing that buying a new horse will change their luck, only to discover they’ve bought the same horse back. This circular structure mirrors real-life human behavior: the tendency to ignore past failures and believe that the next time will be different. Paterson cleverly uses this loop to comment on human nature with dry humor and ironic detachment.

Literary Theories and “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
🔍 TheoryApplication to the PoemPoem References
🧑‍🌾 Marxist TheoryFocuses on economic class, labor, and material struggle. The station hands dream of wealth through racing but are trapped in cycles of loss, showing how capitalism offers illusions of upward mobility.“They lost their good money on Slogan” / “Fifty pounds’ loss on the deal” – reflects how working-class men gamble for profit in an unfair system.
🧠 Psychoanalytic TheoryExamines unconscious motives, repetition compulsion, and self-deception. The boys subconsciously repeat their mistake (rebuying Partner), reflecting inner denial and the lure of risk.“The visions of racing came thronging” / “They bit their own hook” – shows how emotional desire overrides reason and leads to self-sabotage.
🌿 Eco-CriticismLooks at nature’s role in literature. Paterson blends bush life with horse racing, suggesting that nature mirrors or influences human behavior.“The wallabies race down the gap” / “The cockatoo parrots are talking of races” – all of nature is depicted as if it’s part of the competitive spirit.
🎭 Postmodernism (Satire & Irony)Highlights irony, self-referentiality, and distrust of grand narratives. The poem mocks traditional heroic racing tales with exaggerated failures and twists.“We’ll call him a maiden… I pity the fellow that buys him” / “Partner was back on their hands” – uses irony to undercut expectations and challenge narrative conventions.
Critical Questions about “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson

❓🧠 1. What does the poem reveal about human nature and the tendency to repeat mistakes?

In “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson, the poem reveals a universal truth about human nature: people often repeat their mistakes, even when past experiences suggest caution. After suffering repeated losses with their unreliable racehorse Partner, the station boys decide to abandon racing altogether. Yet, as spring returns and memories of racing stir their emotions, they fall back into old habits: “The visions of racing came thronging / With all its delirious joys.” Their decision to buy a “new” horse reignites their optimism—only for them to discover, with crushing irony, that it’s Partner once again. This shows how hope, nostalgia, and emotional impulses can override logic, pushing individuals into cycles of self-deception.


❓💸 2. How does Paterson critique the culture of gambling and false success in the bush?

In “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson, gambling is portrayed not just as a risky habit but as a reflection of deeper social illusions. The bushmen pin their financial and emotional hopes on horse racing, despite continual disappointments. They convince themselves that performance in training—“Two-twelve for a mile and a quarter”—is proof of future victory, only to be let down repeatedly. When they decide to sell Partner by pretending he’s never raced, the deception becomes a commentary on the false promises embedded in gambling culture. The final blow comes when they unknowingly repurchase the same horse they had misrepresented. Paterson uses humor to highlight how easily people are fooled—not only by others, but by themselves—when blinded by the dream of easy success.


❓🐎 3. What role does the rural Australian setting play in shaping the events and characters of the poem?

In “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson, the Australian bush setting is more than just a backdrop—it is a force that shapes the characters’ desires, actions, and identity. The isolated life on the station leaves the men yearning for excitement, which they find in racing. The natural world around them, teeming with motion and life, mirrors their competitive spirit: “The wallabies race down the gap” and “The cockatoo parrots are talking / Of races to far-away lands.” These lines blur the boundary between human sport and animal instinct. Racing becomes a part of the natural rhythm of life in the bush, making the characters’ obsession with it feel both inevitable and culturally grounded. Paterson uses the landscape to reflect both the grandeur and the folly of their pursuits.


❓🎭 4. How does irony contribute to the humor and message of the poem?

In “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson, irony is the engine of both the poem’s humor and its deeper message about delusion and misjudgment. From the start, the audience sees how easily the station boys misread their circumstances—placing too much faith in flashy trial runs and underestimating the reliability of what they already know to be a failure. The most striking use of irony comes at the climax: after dreaming of a fresh start, they receive their old, faulty horse—Partner—dressed up as a new prospect. The poem states, “They opened his box with delight — / A silent procession of sadness,” perfectly capturing the gut-punch of realization. Paterson’s clever use of irony not only entertains but delivers a cautionary lesson about the risks of wishful thinking.

Literary Works Similar to “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
  1. The Man from Ironbark” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
    Like “Our New Horse,” this poem uses humor and bush characters to explore rural life and the consequences of naivety and assumptions.
  2. Said Hanrahan” by John O’Brien
    Both poems reflect the cyclical pessimism and misfortune of country folk, capturing the Australian bush spirit with irony and rural idiom.
  3. Clancy of the Overflow” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
    Similar in tone and voice, it contrasts bush life with city life, highlighting the idealism, dreams, and nostalgia of Australian rural identity.
  4. “The Teamster’s Farewell” by Carl Sandburg
    This poem, like “Our New Horse,” presents the hardship and endurance of bushmen through a narrative filled with realism and reflective melancholy.
  5. Mulga Bill’s Bicycle” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
    Both poems use satire to mock overconfidence and pride, ending in humorous failure as the main character gets more than he bargained for.
Representative Quotations of “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective (in bold)
“They lost their good money on Slogan, / And fell most uncommonly flat”The boys return home disappointed after gambling on a horse race.💸 Marxist Theory – Exposes working-class vulnerability to economic risks and capitalist illusions.
“We’ll call him a maiden, and treat ’em / To trials will open their eyes”They decide to trick city buyers by disguising their old horse as a newcomer.🎭 Postmodern Irony – Challenges truth, identity, and the authenticity of appearances.
“Partner, the pride of the Bogan, / Was beaten by Aristocrat”Their trusted horse, Partner, is defeated again, this time by a horse symbolically named Aristocrat.🧠 Psychoanalytic Theory – Reveals subconscious humiliation and class envy.
“Let us send him to Sydney and sell him, / There’s plenty of Jugginses there.”They plan to offload their useless horse onto unsuspecting city folk.🧑‍🌾 Satirical Lens – Highlights rural cunning vs. urban gullibility.
“They bit their own hook, and were landed / With fifty pounds’ loss on the deal.”The final ironic twist — they accidentally buy back their own horse and lose money.🎭 Irony (New Historicism) – Reveals repetitive human folly within social and economic cycles.
“The visions of racing came thronging / With all its delirious joys.”Spring revives the boys’ obsession with racing despite past failures.🧠 Psychoanalytic Theory – Suggests a compulsion to repeat trauma under the influence of desire.
“The emus are constantly sprinting / A handicap out on the plain.”Nature is depicted as if it too engages in competitive racing.🌿 Eco-Criticism – Blurs lines between human and animal behavior, suggesting racing as natural instinct.
“And now for a horse; we might try one / Of those that are bred on the place.”The boys debate whether to trust homegrown horses or seek a new one.📜 Structuralism – Contrasts local vs. foreign, familiar vs. unknown as binary oppositions.
“The man that don’t race is a duffer, / Let’s have one more run for the mug.”Racing is framed as an essential aspect of identity and masculinity.🚹 Masculinity Studies – Ties sport to pride, action, and worth in male rural culture.
“They opened his box with delight — / A silent procession of sadness”Their joy turns to despair when they realize they’ve bought back Partner.🧠 Dramatic Irony (Reader-Response Theory) – The reader knows the truth before the characters, deepening emotional impact.
Suggested Readings: “Our New Horse” by A.B. ‘Banjo’ Paterson
  1. Heseltine, Harry P. “‘Banjo’Paterson: A Poet Nearly Anonymous.” Meanjin Quarterly 23.4 (1964): 386-402.
  2. Semmler, Clement. “Kipling and A. B. Paterson: Men of Empire and Action.” The Australian Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, 1967, pp. 71–78. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/20634130. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.
  3. Morgan, Patrick. “Australian Literature Through Time and Place.” Antipodes, vol. 8, no. 2, 1994, pp. 115–19. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41958469. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.

“My Last Farewell” by José Rizal: A Critical Analysis

“My Last Farewell” by José Rizal first appeared in 1897, as part of a posthumous collection of his writings, discovered hidden in an alcohol stove shortly after his execution by Spanish colonial authorities.

“My Last Farewell” by José Riza: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal

“My Last Farewell” by José Rizal first appeared in 1897, as part of a posthumous collection of his writings, discovered hidden in an alcohol stove shortly after his execution by Spanish colonial authorities. The poem stands as a final testament to Rizal’s unyielding patriotism and profound love for his country, the Philippines. The main ideas revolve around sacrifice, nationalism, and the hope for freedom—Rizal willingly offers his life for the motherland, finding beauty and meaning even in death if it contributes to his country’s liberation: “Gladly do I give you my life, though sad and repressed.” His vivid metaphors—like his blood becoming part of the “matutinal glow”—transform death into a source of national awakening and inspiration. The reason for the poem’s enduring popularity lies in its emotional depth, lyrical eloquence, and moral power. It became a symbol of Filipino resistance against colonial oppression, capturing the spirit of martyrdom with lines like “To die is to rest”, where Rizal suggests that his death is not an end but a peaceful offering for a brighter future.

Text: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal

Farewell, my adored Land, region of the sun caressed,
Pearl of the Orient Sea, our Eden lost,
With gladness I give you my Life, sad and repressed;
And were it more brilliant, more fresh and at its best,
I would still give it to you for your welfare at most.

On the fields of battle, in the fury of fight,
Others give you their lives without pain or hesitancy,
The place does not matter: cypress laurel, lily white,
Scaffold, open field, conflict or martyrdom’s site,
It is the same if asked by home and Country.

I die as I see tints on the sky b’gin to show
And at last announce the day, after a gloomy night;
If you need a hue to dye your matutinal glow,
Pour my blood and at the right moment spread it so,
And gild it with a reflection of your nascent light!

My dreams, when scarcely a lad adolescent,
My dreams when already a youth, full of vigor to attain,
Were to see you, gem of the sea of the Orient,
Your dark eyes dry, smooth brow held to a high plane
Without frown, without wrinkles and of shame without stain.

My life’s fancy, my ardent, passionate desire,
Hail! Cries out the soul to you, that will soon part from thee;
Hail! How sweet ’tis to fall that fullness you may acquire;
To die to give you life, ‘neath your skies to expire,
And in your mystic land to sleep through eternity!

If over my tomb some day, you would see blow,
A simple humble flow’r amidst thick grasses,
Bring it up to your lips and kiss my soul so,
And under the cold tomb, I may feel on my brow,
Warmth of your breath, a whiff of your tenderness.

Let the moon with soft, gentle light me descry,
Let the dawn send forth its fleeting, brilliant light,
In murmurs grave allow the wind to sigh,
And should a bird descend on my cross and alight,
Let the bird intone a song of peace o’er my site.

Let the burning sun the raindrops vaporize
And with my clamor behind return pure to the sky;
Let a friend shed tears over my early demise;
And on quiet afternoons when one prays for me on high,
Pray too, oh, my Motherland, that in God may rest I.

Pray thee for all the hapless who have died,
For all those who unequalled torments have undergone;
For our poor mothers who in bitterness have cried;
For orphans, widows and captives to tortures were shied,
And pray too that you may see you own redemption.

And when the dark night wraps the cemet’ry
And only the dead to vigil there are left alone,
Don’t disturb their repose, don’t disturb the mystery:
If you hear the sounds of cithern or psaltery,
It is I, dear Country, who, a song t’you intone.

And when my grave by all is no more remembered,
With neither cross nor stone to mark its place,
Let it be plowed by man, with spade let it be scattered
And my ashes ere to nothingness are restored,
Let them turn to dust to cover your earthly space.

Then it doesn’t matter that you should forget me:
Your atmosphere, your skies, your vales I’ll sweep;
Vibrant and clear note to your ears I shall be:
Aroma, light, hues, murmur, song, moanings deep,
Constantly repeating the essence of the faith I keep.

My idolized Country, for whom I most gravely pine,
Dear Philippines, to my last goodbye, oh, harken
There I leave all: my parents, loves of mine,
I’ll go where there are no slaves, tyrants or hangmen
Where faith does not kill and where God alone does reign.

Farewell, parents, brothers, beloved by me,
Friends of my childhood, in the home distressed;
Give thanks that now I rest from the wearisome day;
Farewell, sweet stranger, my friend, who brightened my way;
Farewell, to all I love. To die is to rest.

Annotations: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal

StanzaSimplified Annotation (Detailed in Simple English)Literary Devices
1Rizal bids farewell to the Philippines, calling it beautiful and beloved. He willingly offers his life, even if it were more youthful or valuable, just for the nation’s benefit.🌄 Imagery, 🎭 Metaphor, 🕊️ Symbolism, 🗣️ Apostrophe
2He honors others who also died for their country. It doesn’t matter where or how one dies—as long as it’s for the motherland, it is noble.🕊️ Symbolism, 🔀 Contrast, 🌄 Imagery, 🎭 Metaphor
3Rizal compares his blood to the colors of dawn. He hopes it brings brightness and freedom to his country after the dark times.🎭 Metaphor, 🕊️ Symbolism, 🌄 Imagery, 🗣️ Apostrophe
4He remembers his childhood dreams of a peaceful, honorable Philippines—free from sorrow, shame, or oppression.📜 Hyperbole, 🌄 Imagery, 🗣️ Apostrophe
5Rizal embraces death as sweet if it means the Philippines becomes free and complete. He desires eternal peace in his native land.❤️ Personification, 🕊️ Symbolism, 🎭 Metaphor, 🗣️ Apostrophe
6He asks that if a flower grows on his grave, someone kiss it to send their love to his soul beneath the ground.🕊️ Symbolism, 🌄 Imagery, ❤️ Personification
7Rizal wants nature—moonlight, wind, birds—to gently visit his grave and bring him peace.🌄 Imagery, 🎶 Sound Device, 🕊️ Symbolism
8He asks friends to remember him, cry for him, and pray not only for him but for the Philippines as well.🙏 Spiritual Tone, 🗣️ Apostrophe, 🕊️ Symbolism
9He urges prayer for all who suffered under tyranny—mothers, orphans, widows, and captives—so that the country may find redemption.🗣️ Apostrophe, 🙏 Spiritual Tone, 🕊️ Symbolism
10He tells people not to disturb the dead at night. If they hear music, it’s him singing to his country from beyond the grave.🕊️ Symbolism, ❤️ Personification, 🗣️ Apostrophe, 🌄 Imagery
11If his grave is forgotten, let it be destroyed and become part of the earth. Even as dust, he wants to serve the land.🕊️ Symbolism, 🌄 Imagery, 🎭 Metaphor
12He says that even if forgotten, his spirit will remain in the country’s air, light, and sounds, forever faithful to the Philippines.❤️ Personification, 🕊️ Symbolism, 🌄 Imagery
13Rizal deeply loves his country and says goodbye. He looks forward to going to a place where there’s no slavery or injustice—only God’s rule.🗣️ Apostrophe, 🔀 Contrast, 🕊️ Symbolism
14In his final farewell, he says goodbye to family, friends, and even strangers. He welcomes death as a form of rest from life’s hardships.🔁 Repetition, 🗣️ Apostrophe, 🙏 Spiritual Tone
Literary And Poetic Devices: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal
DeviceDefinitionExample from PoemDetailed Explanation
🗣️ ApostropheA direct address to someone absent or non-human as if it could hear.“Farewell, my adored Land…”Rizal speaks to the Philippines as if it were a person, showing personal, heartfelt patriotism.
💥 AlliterationRepetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of nearby words.“With gladness I give you my Life, sad and repressed”The repeated “g” and “s” sounds create a rhythm that emphasizes sincerity and sadness.
🔂 AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive lines.“Let the moon… Let the dawn… Let the bird…”Repeating “Let the” brings structure and poetic rhythm to his final wishes.
🎭 MetaphorA comparison made without “like” or “as.”“Pearl of the Orient Sea”Rizal compares the Philippines to a pearl, implying great value and beauty.
🧠 ConceitAn extended or complex metaphor.“Pour my blood… to dye your matutinal glow”His blood is imagined as the color of dawn—a deep metaphor for sacrifice bringing national awakening.
🔀 ContrastJuxtaposition of opposing ideas to highlight difference.“To die to give you life”Presents the paradox of dying for life—martyrdom giving rise to freedom.
🧩 IronyA contrast between expectations and reality.“To die is to rest.”Death is presented not as tragic, but as peaceful rest, which is unexpected in a patriotic context.
🕯️ ElegyA sorrowful poem lamenting death.The entire poemThis poem is Rizal’s poetic goodbye—reflecting on his own death and love for the nation.
🔉 EuphonyUse of pleasing and harmonious sounds.“Let the moon with soft, gentle light…”Soft consonants and vowels make this line calming and peaceful, reflecting Rizal’s peace with death.
🎶 Sound DeviceUse of musical language, such as rhyme and rhythm.“Let the bird intone a song of peace o’er my site.”Enhances the serenity of the scene through poetic musicality.
📜 HyperboleExtreme exaggeration for emphasis.“To die is to rest.”Oversimplifies death, showing how Rizal elevates sacrifice for the nation.
🌄 ImageryVivid descriptions that appeal to senses.“Warmth of your breath, a whiff of your tenderness”Allows the reader to imagine physical sensations, creating emotional closeness.
❤️ PersonificationGiving human qualities to non-human things.“My soul to you cries out…”His soul is personified as if it can speak, enhancing emotional intensity.
🔁 RepetitionReusing the same word or phrase for emphasis.“Farewell, farewell…”Emphasizes finality and emotional depth in saying goodbye.
🕊️ SymbolismUsing objects, actions, or ideas to represent something greater.“blood… matutinal glow”His blood symbolizes sacrifice; dawn represents hope and freedom.
⚔️ Heroic ToneElevated, noble language to honor sacrifice.“To die to give you life…”This line elevates martyrdom as the highest form of patriotism.
🗽 NationalismDeep pride and loyalty to one’s nation.“Dear Philippines… I go where there are no slaves…”Reflects his longing for national freedom and his identity as a Filipino.
🔄 Cycle of Life/DeathThe theme that death leads to rebirth or continuation.“Let them turn to dust to cover your earthly space.”His death nourishes the land—his legacy lives on in the soil.
🕊️🙏 Prayer / InvocationA solemn plea or request, often to God or country.“Pray thee for all the hapless who have died…”Rizal invokes his homeland and divine powers to remember the suffering.
🧑‍🎓 Didactic ToneA tone used to teach a moral or political lesson.“Give thanks that now I rest…”Suggests that death in service to the nation should be honored, not mourned.
Themes: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal

🕊️ 1. Patriotism and National Sacrifice: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal centers on the theme of patriotism, presenting the poet’s willingness to die for the Philippines as the highest act of love. Rizal views martyrdom not with fear but with pride, offering his life to the “Pearl of the Orient Sea”—a metaphor for the Philippines. In the first stanza, he writes, “With gladness I give you my life, sad and repressed,” which shows the depth of his sacrifice. He compares his blood to the dawn’s color (“Pour my blood and at the right moment spread it so”), symbolizing how even his death becomes part of the nation’s awakening. Through these lines, Rizal affirms that national liberty is worth every drop of blood, framing his execution as a heroic offering for future generations.


⚰️ 2. Death as Rest and Liberation: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal presents death not as an end but as peaceful rest, especially when it serves a greater cause. Rizal demystifies dying by calling it “to rest from the wearisome day,” emphasizing that death, when it brings freedom to others, is not something to mourn. In the final stanza, he writes, “To die is to rest,” showing his spiritual acceptance. He finds peace in the idea that his grave can be forgotten—as long as his death nourishes the land: “Let them turn to dust to cover your earthly space.” This cyclical imagery (🔄) reflects death as part of life’s natural process, not something to be feared. Rizal accepts his fate because it serves the greater purpose of national dignity and liberation.


🌄 3. Immortality Through Legacy: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal also explores the theme of immortality—not of the body, but of ideals and love for the nation. Even after death, Rizal imagines himself living through the country’s natural elements: “Your atmosphere, your skies, your vales I’ll sweep… constantly repeating the essence of the faith I keep.” This suggests that his spirit will live on in the Philippine landscape, in sounds and colors. He refuses to be erased—even if “neither cross nor stone” marks his grave—because he believes his sacrifice will echo in national memory. This theme reveals how heroes live forever through their principles and enduring impact, even when their names are forgotten. 🕊️


🙏 4. Prayer, Peace, and Spiritual Reflection: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal has a deeply spiritual tone, portraying death as a time for prayer, peace, and reflection. Rizal not only prays for himself but asks his country to pray for all who have suffered: “Pray thee for all the hapless who have died… for orphans, widows and captives.” His tone reflects humility and spiritual surrender. He also invites natural elements—“the moon,” “the wind,” “the bird”—to keep vigil at his grave, creating a peaceful scene surrounded by serenity and divinity. The poem is structured like an elegy and a prayer, expressing both personal reflection and national mourning. This theme emphasizes the sacredness of sacrifice and the moral call to remember the oppressed and martyred.

Literary Theories and “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal
📚 TheoryTheory ExplanationApplication to “My Last Farewell” (with Poem References)
🗽 Postcolonial TheoryExamines literature from formerly colonized nations and how identity, resistance, and power are portrayed.Rizal’s poem is a direct resistance to Spanish colonization, evident in his sacrificial love for the country: “I go where there are no slaves, tyrants, or hangmen.” He rejects colonial rule and embraces Filipino identity through “Pearl of the Orient Sea.” His farewell is both personal and political, reclaiming Filipino dignity.
🧠 Formalism / New CriticismFocuses on form, structure, literary devices, and text itself without external context.The poem uses metaphors (“blood to dye your matutinal glow”), imagery (“Let the moon with soft, gentle light me descry”), and repetition (“Farewell, farewell”) to create a mournful, noble tone. Its sonnet-like structure and controlled rhythm support its message of calm, selfless patriotism.
❤️ Reader-Response TheoryEmphasizes the reader’s emotional and personal interpretation of the text.Different readers may feel grief, admiration, or inspiration. Filipinos may interpret it as a national call for freedom, while others may see it as a universal reflection on mortality and legacy. Lines like “To die is to rest” or “I die as I see tints on the sky b’gin to show” evoke peace or sadness depending on personal lens.
🙏 Moral / Philosophical TheoryEvaluates a text by the moral lessons or values it conveys.The poem teaches heroism, love for country, and selflessness. Rizal’s message—“To die to give you life”—presents martyrdom as noble and moral. He also emphasizes compassion, asking readers to “Pray thee for all the hapless who have died.” It inspires ethical reflection on sacrifice and freedom.
Critical Questions about “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal

1. How does Rizal portray death in “My Last Farewell”?

“My Last Farewell” by José Rizal presents death not as an end, but as a noble and peaceful transition, especially when it serves a higher purpose—freedom. Rizal embraces death as a necessary part of his patriotic duty, stating in the final line, “To die is to rest.” This simple yet profound conclusion shows how he views death not with fear, but with acceptance and even relief. He also romanticizes it by expressing a wish that his “blood… dye your matutinal glow”—his sacrifice blending into the morning sky, symbolizing hope and national rebirth. This metaphor makes death poetic, even beautiful, especially when it benefits the “adored Land.” Rizal’s calm and dignified tone throughout the poem reveals his spiritual readiness, transforming the idea of dying into a lasting legacy rather than a loss.


2. In what ways does Rizal express love for the Philippines in the poem?

“My Last Farewell” by José Rizal is an outpouring of deep, unconditional love for the Philippines, expressed through language rich in tenderness and reverence. From the opening line, “Farewell, my adored Land, region of the sun caressed,” Rizal treats the country as a beloved entity—almost like a lover or family member. He calls it the “Pearl of the Orient Sea” and “our Eden lost,” highlighting both its beauty and its pain under colonial rule. His love is also shown through sacrifice: “With gladness I give you my life.” Despite knowing that he is to die, Rizal is joyful because he believes that his death will serve the country’s future. His wish to be remembered not through grand monuments but through nature—“Your atmosphere, your skies, your vales I’ll sweep”—demonstrates a humble yet profound attachment. For Rizal, true love for the motherland means giving everything, even one’s life.


3. How does nature contribute to the themes of the poem?

“My Last Farewell” by José Rizal uses nature as both a symbolic and emotional extension of his legacy, reinforcing themes of sacrifice, peace, and immortality. Nature elements—like the sun, dawn, moon, wind, and flowers—are present throughout the poem and serve as metaphors for his transition from life to death and from memory to myth. For instance, Rizal asks, “Let the moon with soft, gentle light me descry,” showing his desire to be watched over by nature after death. In another line, “If you need a hue to dye your matutinal glow, pour my blood,” he envisions his sacrifice nourishing the sky itself. Nature becomes his eternal voice: “Vibrant and clear note to your ears I shall be: Aroma, light, hues, murmur, song…” This use of imagery ties Rizal’s soul to the land forever, emphasizing that even if his physical body perishes, his ideals and devotion live on through the natural world. 🌄


4. What moral or philosophical lessons does the poem convey?

“My Last Farewell” by José Rizal conveys strong moral lessons about selflessness, love for country, and the dignity of sacrifice. Rizal does not seek revenge or bitterness in his final words; instead, he chooses forgiveness, peace, and hope. He appeals for prayers for all victims of colonial injustice, writing: “Pray thee for all the hapless who have died… for orphans, widows and captives.” This shows his empathy and concern for others even at the moment of death. His ultimate message is that serving the country is the highest good, even at the cost of one’s life. By saying “To die to give you life,” Rizal presents death as meaningful only when it uplifts others. His view is deeply ethical and philosophical: that one’s life finds its highest value not in comfort or survival, but in contribution to the freedom and dignity of others. 🙏

Literary Works Similar to “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal
  1. “If—” by Rudyard Kipling
    Both poems emphasize moral courage, inner strength, and the virtue of self-sacrifice in pursuit of a greater cause.
  2. Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” by Dylan Thomas
    Like Rizal’s poem, it powerfully reflects on death, urging emotional defiance and dignity in one’s final moments.
  3. “I Died for Beauty” by Emily Dickinson
    Both poems meditate on death and legacy, suggesting that ideals like truth and beauty (or patriotism) outlive the physical self.
  4. “The Soldier” by Rupert Brooke
    Both are farewell poems that present dying for one’s country as an honorable and spiritually fulfilling act.
Representative Quotations of “My Last Farewell” by José Riza
🔖 Quotation🧾 Context and Significance📚 Theoretical Perspective
🗣️ “Farewell, my adored Land, region of the sun caressed…”Opening line: Rizal addresses the Philippines with deep love and reverence, portraying the nation as both beautiful and wounded.Postcolonial Theory – Frames the Philippines as a colonized paradise in need of liberation.
🎭 “With gladness I give you my life, sad and repressed…”Rizal willingly sacrifices his life for his country, even though his life was full of sadness.Moral/Philosophical Criticism – Explores noble self-sacrifice for the greater good.
🕊️ “Pour my blood and at the right moment spread it so…”Blood as symbolic ink or color for freedom—a metaphor for national awakening.Formalism – Rich use of metaphor and imagery reveals poetic structure and emotional force.
💥 “To die to give you life…”Central paradox: dying brings life and freedom to others—a poetic expression of martyrdom.Reader-Response Theory – Evokes mixed emotions: grief, pride, hope.
❤️ “Let the moon with soft, gentle light me descry…”Rizal imagines nature watching over him in death—seeking eternal peace in the elements.Ecocriticism – Links human memory with the permanence and purity of nature.
🙏 “Pray thee for all the hapless who have died…”Extends his personal sacrifice to all victims of oppression—shows Rizal’s compassion.Moral/Philosophical Criticism – Broadens patriotism into a moral duty to all who suffer.
🌄 “Your atmosphere, your skies, your vales I’ll sweep…”Rizal sees his spirit merging with the land—an eternal presence within the homeland.Symbolism / Archetypal Theory – Connects legacy with natural cycles and national memory.
🧠 “Neither cross nor stone to mark its place…”He accepts being forgotten physically, as long as his ideals remain.Existentialism – Emphasizes meaning beyond recognition or physical remembrance.
🗽 “I go where there are no slaves, tyrants or hangmen…”Envisions death as spiritual liberation from colonial oppression.Postcolonial Theory – Reflects dream of an uncolonized world of freedom and justice.
🕯️ “To die is to rest.”Final line offers calm closure—death as peaceful rest after struggle.Elegiac / Structuralist Theory – Provide
Suggested Readings: “My Last Farewell” by José Rizal
  1. Rizal, Jose, and Charles Derbyshire. My Last Farewell. San Antonio Press, 1964.
  2. Rizal, José. “My Last Farewell.” JoseRizal.com, 2025, https://joserizal.com/my-last-farewell/. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.

“Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito: Summary and Critique

“Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito first appeared in Critical Inquiry, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Summer 2008), published by The University of Chicago Press.

"Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century" by Roberto Esposito: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito

“Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito first appeared in Critical Inquiry, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Summer 2008), published by The University of Chicago Press. In this influential article, Esposito offers a critical reinterpretation of twentieth-century history by contrasting two dominant hermeneutic paradigms: totalitarianism and biopolitics. Esposito argues that while traditional accounts—such as those of Hannah Arendt and Jacob Talmon—seek the origin of totalitarianism within a linear, historicist framework, this interpretive model ultimately collapses under its own internal contradictions, such as attempting to explain both Nazism and communism through a single philosophical genealogy (“how are we to hold together in a single categorical horizon a hypernaturalistic conception such as that of Nazism with the historicist paroxysm of communism?” [p. 637]). Instead, Esposito advocates for a shift from a philosophy about history to a philosophy within history, where meaning arises from the multiplicity and novelty of historical events themselves (“Meaning is no longer stamped on events from the outside… but… constituted by the facts themselves” [p. 634]). Central to this revision is the concept of biopolitics, drawn from Nietzsche and Foucault, which offers a genealogical rather than chronological understanding of modern power. Esposito argues that Nazism and liberalism, though politically opposed, both share a biopolitical structure: one as state control over life, the other as the individual’s proprietary claim over the body (“Nazism, the biopolitics of the state, and liberalism, the biopolitics of the individual” [p. 642]). This radical reconception challenges the binary of totalitarianism vs. democracy and calls for rethinking political theory in light of life itself as the new site of power. In the realm of literary theory and cultural criticism, Esposito’s intervention is significant for its deconstruction of grand narratives and its biopolitical reframing of subjectivity, history, and embodiment—concepts foundational to poststructuralist and posthumanist debates. Ultimately, the essay dismantles traditional historiography to foreground the philosophical stakes of life, death, and political power in the modern era (“all of the old philosophies of history and all the conceptual paradigms that refer to them must be dismantled” [p. 644]).

Summary of “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito

🔑 Reframing the Philosophy of History

  • Esposito opens by contrasting two approaches to interpreting 20th-century history:
    • One that imposes philosophical meaning onto events (e.g. Heidegger, Sartre) 📘
    • Another where “meaning is constituted by the facts themselves—by their novelty, their scope, and their effects” (p. 634) 🔄

➡️ “From that point on, history was, so to speak, no longer the object but if anything the subject of philosophy” (p. 634) – a crucial inversion that shifts the framework from external interpretation to internal meaning-production.


⚖️ Totalitarianism as a Classical Philosophical Paradigm

  • The totalitarian model is based on a chronological, origin-seeking historiography.
    • Exemplified by Arendt and Talmon’s attempts to locate totalitarianism’s “origin” in the Enlightenment or Rousseauian democracy (p. 636) 🧭
    • Esposito critiques this logic as self-contradictory:
      • “Why bother to find the origin of what doesn’t seem to have an origin?” (p. 635)

➡️ He calls this a paradigm “imprisoned by a second antinomy” (p. 636) because it tries to reconcile totalitarianism’s alleged discontinuity with historical continuity.


🧬 Biopolitics as an Alternative Hermeneutic Paradigm

  • Biopolitics, influenced by Foucault and Nietzsche, emerges not from abstract philosophy but from material life and power.

➡️ “The force of the biopolitical perspective lies precisely in its capacity to read this interweaving and this conflict” between politics and biology (p. 638) 🔬

  • Unlike totalitarianism, biopolitics doesn’t rely on a unified historical narrative.
    • It instead focuses on how power operates directly on bodies and life processes.
    • It reveals modern power as fundamentally about “making live and letting die” (Foucault, p. 638).

☠️ Nazism as Political Biology (Thanatopolitics)

  • Esposito insists that Nazism is not just a political ideology but a “political biology.”
    • “Nazism isn’t a political philosophy but a political biology… productive of death” (p. 640)
    • It is not ideologically comparable to communism because it functions on purely biological grounds, devoid of rational or ideological transcendence (p. 639)

➡️ This “immediately biological element of Nazism” makes the totalitarian category “historically and theoretically unusable” (p. 640) ❌


🔄 The Collapse of Liberal Democracy as a Category

  • Esposito argues that liberalism and Nazism share a biopolitical foundation, despite being opposed in ideology.
    • For Nazism, “man is his body”; for liberalism, “man is the possessor of his own body” (p. 641)
    • Both posit the body as object of political power, marking a shift from law and rights to life and control.

➡️ “Liberalism turns the Nazi perspective inside out… within the same biopolitical lexicon” (p. 641) 🔁


📉 Biopolitics and the Eclipse of Democracy

  • Esposito claims true democracy ceased in the 1920s–30s due to the rise of biopolitics.
    • The body—not the person or subject—is now the center of political legitimacy.
    • Issues like immigration, fertility, drugs, and health are not just policies—they are biopolitical imperatives.

➡️ “When the living or dying body becomes the symbolic and material epicenter… we move into a dimension… outside [democracy]” (p. 643)


🧩 Breakdown of Democratic Categories

  • Biopolitics undoes the fundamental oppositions on which democracy was built:
    • Public vs. private
    • Natural vs. artificial
    • Law vs. theology ⚖️

➡️ “Human life is precisely the space in which public and private, natural and artificial… are entwined to such a degree that no decision of the majority can undo it” (p. 644)


🌱 Toward a New Democratic Biopolitics?

  • Esposito closes with a speculative challenge:
    • Can we imagine a “democratic biopolitics”?
    • Can life be governed not on bodies, but for bodies?

➡️ “All of the old philosophies of history and all the conceptual paradigms that refer to them must be dismantled” (p. 644) 🔨

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito
🧠 Theoretical Term/Concept📖 Explanation💡 Example from the Article
🗝️ BiopoliticsA framework where life itself—especially biological life—becomes the central concern of politics and power. Biopolitics manages populations, bodies, health, and death. It’s drawn from Foucault and Nietzsche, not classical philosophy.“Nazism isn’t a political philosophy but a political biology” (p. 640); Biopolitics is what “finds its only possible basis of legitimacy in life” (p. 643).
📜 Philosophy of HistoryTraditional model where historical events are interpreted through grand philosophical narratives (e.g. totality, origin, progress). Esposito critiques this as reductive and outdated.“Only philosophy can impart an overarching sense to a series of facts” (p. 633); contrasts this with history as subject, not object, of philosophy.
⚖️ TotalitarianismA concept historically used to categorize regimes like Nazism and communism under a single philosophical framework. Esposito sees this as flawed due to logical contradictions and differences in their ideological nature.“A one-shaded drawing… carries the day over great logical, categorical, and linguistic caesurae” (p. 637).
🔬 Political BiologyA form of politics where biology—not ideas or rights—grounds political action. Especially evident in Nazism, which defines identity and power via biological life.“Nazism isn’t an ideology… it finds its essential foundation in its simple material force” (p. 639).
♻️ Genealogy (Nietzschean/Foucauldian)Instead of looking for a linear historical origin, genealogy examines the layered, fractured, and conflicting forces that shape power and meaning.“The entire historical event of the West… assumes features irreducible to the linearity of a single perspective” (p. 638).
🧍 Person vs BodyDemocracy is based on the abstract notion of the “person” as a rational subject; biopolitics replaces this with the body as the site of political intervention.“Democracy is always directed to a totality of equal subjects… separated from their own bodies” (p. 643).
🚫 Origin (Critique of Historicism)Esposito criticizes the obsession with finding a single “origin” of totalitarianism as flawed and contradictory.“Why bother to find the origin of what doesn’t seem to have an origin?” (p. 635).
🔀 Horizontal vs Vertical HistoryVertical history suggests a rise and fall (e.g. from democracy to totalitarianism); horizontal/topological history examines overlapping and conflicting forces without a single axis.“The correct distinction is… between democracy and communism on one side… and biopolitics on the other” (p. 642).
📊 Liberalism vs DemocracyLiberalism (body as property) and democracy (universal equality) are not synonymous. Esposito shows how liberalism, like Nazism, is embedded in a biopolitical logic.“Liberalism… turns the Nazi perspective inside out… within the same biopolitical lexicon” (p. 641).
⚔️ ThanatopoliticsA term often tied to biopolitics, describing the politics of death. In Nazism, politics over life turns into production of death.“Nazism… a politics of life and a politics over life transformed into its opposite and… productive of death” (p. 640).
Contribution of “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito to Literary Theory/Theories

📚 1. Poststructuralism and the Crisis of Grand Narratives

  • 🔄 Displacement of Meta-Narratives: Esposito critiques the traditional philosophy of history for imposing meaning from above, reflecting Lyotard’s idea of the incredulity toward metanarratives.
    • “Meaning is no longer stamped on events from the outside… instead this response focuses on how meaning originates and is constituted by the facts themselves” (p. 634).
  • 🔍 Genealogical Approach: Aligns with Foucault’s method of genealogy, rejecting linear causality in favor of fragmented historical processes.
    • “The origin is never a unity… it always splits and multiplies into many origins” (p. 638).

Literary theory impact: Undermines historicist literary interpretations that rely on fixed historical periods or ideologies by promoting a more contingent, power-sensitive reading of history and text.


🧬 2. Biopolitical Critique in Literary and Cultural Theory

  • 🧍 Body as Textual and Political Site: Esposito’s biopolitical lens invites analysis of how literature and culture engage with the body as both subject and object of control.
    • “When the living or dying body becomes the symbolic and material epicenter of the dynamics of politics… we move into a dimension… outside democracy” (p. 643).
  • 📖 Narratives of Life and Death: Literature becomes a space where biopolitical forces (e.g., eugenics, war, medicine, reproduction) are narrated, resisted, or naturalized.

Literary theory impact: Encourages biopolitical readings of texts—interpreting how literature thematizes state control, embodiment, or the politics of life and death.


🏛️ 3. Deconstruction of Political Binaries (e.g., Democracy/Totalitarianism)

  • Critique of Simplistic Dichotomies: Esposito disassembles the liberal democracy vs. totalitarianism binary, a framework often replicated in Cold War-era literary criticism.
    • “How can totalitarianism be defined in opposition to what it originates from?” (p. 637).
  • 🔁 Reconfiguration of Power Logics: Both Nazism and liberalism are shown to operate within biopolitical logic, despite appearing ideologically opposed.
    • “Liberalism… within the same biopolitical lexicon” (p. 641).

Literary theory impact: Challenges critics to move beyond binary models of politics in literature (e.g., fascist vs. democratic texts), and to recognize shared structures of biopolitical governance across genres and ideologies.


⚰️ 4. Thanatopolitics and Literary Representation of Death

  • ☠️ Politics of Death in Literary Form: Esposito introduces the concept of thanatopolitics—state-sanctioned death—as central to understanding Nazism.
    • “A politics over life transformed into its opposite and… productive of death” (p. 640).

Literary theory impact: Supports analyses of how literature depicts violence, genocide, and systemic death—not just as ethical concerns, but as structural operations of modern political systems.


📊 5. Rethinking Subjectivity and the ‘Person’ in Literature

  • 🧍 Disembodied Subject vs. Embodied Being: The biopolitical shift Esposito describes contrasts the abstract, juridical person (central to democratic philosophy) with the material, vulnerable body.
    • “The body substitutes or ‘restores’ the abstract subjectivity of the juridical person” (p. 643).

Literary theory impact: Opens literary subjectivity to critique—how are characters shaped by discourses of health, race, sex, and biology? This aligns with posthumanism and new materialism in literary theory.


🔧 6. Contribution to Critical Theory and Political Aesthetics

  • 🛠️ Calls for New Paradigms: Esposito doesn’t just critique old models; he urges a new conceptual lexicon to interpret contemporary life.
    • “All the old philosophies of history and all the conceptual paradigms that refer to them must be dismantled” (p. 644).

Literary theory impact: Reinforces the aesthetic turn in political theory—literature as a tool for reimagining life, power, and community in the age of biopolitics.


🧩 7. Multidisciplinary Integration

  • 🌐 Crossing Disciplines: Esposito fuses philosophy, history, political theory, and biological discourse—mirroring contemporary literary theory’s interdisciplinary turn.
    • “Modern philosophy is positioned along different vectors of sense… overlapping without coming together in a single line” (p. 638).

Literary theory impact: Encourages scholars to read literature through diverse frameworks (e.g. medicine, law, ecology) to account for complexity in biopolitical modernity.


🧠 Summary Impact

Roberto Esposito’s essay contributes significantly to literary theory by:

  • Deconstructing traditional historical narratives 📜
  • Promoting biopolitical readings of literature 🧬
  • Complicating political categories and subjectivity 🔄
  • Enabling new interdisciplinary methods for analyzing literature 🌐
  • Grounding literary analysis in contemporary stakes of life, embodiment, and power ⚖️
Examples of Critiques Through “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito
📘 Novel🧠 Esposito Concept Applied🔍 Critical Interpretation Through Esposito💬 Symbolic Insight
Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro (2005)🧬 Biopolitics / 🧍 Body as SubjectThe novel portrays human clones bred for organ donation. Their lives are valued only in relation to their biological utility, aligning with Esposito’s critique of life as governed by power, not rights.“Life becomes the basis of legitimacy in politics” (p. 643) 🔬
The Testaments by Margaret Atwood (2019)⚖️ Totalitarianism / 🔬 Political BiologyGilead’s regime enforces strict biological roles (Handmaids, Wives), reducing women to reproductive vessels. The system exemplifies Esposito’s political biology and the collapse of legal subjectivity into bodily control.“Nazism is not a political philosophy but a political biology” (p. 640) ⚔️
The Power by Naomi Alderman (2016)🗝️ Biopolitics / ⚔️ ThanatopoliticsWomen gain electrical powers, flipping gender hierarchies. Esposito’s frame reveals how power over life can easily become power to kill (thanatopolitics), questioning whether any new sovereign form escapes biopolitical logic.“Politics over life transformed into its opposite and… productive of death” (p. 640) ⚡
Klara and the Sun by Kazuo Ishiguro (2021)🧬 Biopolitics / 🚫 OriginThe artificial being Klara is subjected to the same bio-value logic as human characters—existence based on utility, illness, enhancement. Esposito’s critique of origin myths applies to how artificial and natural life are blurred.“Origin… always splits and multiplies into many origins” (p. 638) 🤖
Milkman by Anna Burns (2018)📜 Philosophy of History / 🔁 Horizontal HistoryThe Troubles are represented not through linear history but fragmented affect, rumor, and surveillance. Esposito’s idea that events contain philosophical power fits this decentered, biopolitical narrative of social control.“History… is no longer the object but the subject of philosophy” (p. 634) 🕵️
Machines Like Me by Ian McEwan (2019)🧠 Subjectivity / 🧍 Person vs BodyAndroids challenge the human/inhuman distinction. Esposito’s exploration of
Criticism Against “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito

Overgeneralization of Biopolitics

  • Esposito tends to stretch the concept of biopolitics too far, applying it to diverse and even contradictory political systems (Nazism, liberalism, democracy).
  • Critics argue this dilutes the specificity of the term and risks turning it into a catch-all category with reduced explanatory power.

⚖️ Asymmetrical Treatment of Totalitarianism

  • While Esposito rightly critiques the totalitarian paradigm, his dismissal of its conceptual usefulness (e.g., in Arendt or Talmon) may seem too sweeping.
  • He neglects the continuing analytical value of totalitarianism for understanding forms of authoritarian power that do not fit neatly into biopolitical frameworks.

🧩 Ambiguity in Political Prescription

  • Esposito deconstructs both liberalism and totalitarianism but offers no clear alternative.
  • His call for a “biopolitical democracy” remains vague and abstract: What would it look like? How would it operate?

📉 Neglect of Economic and Class Dimensions

  • The essay largely ignores the role of economic structures, class relations, and capitalism in shaping political life.
  • Critics influenced by Marxist or materialist traditions argue that a biopolitical reading without class analysis is incomplete.

🤝 Too Philosophical, Not Empirical

  • Esposito’s claims rely heavily on conceptual and philosophical logic rather than empirical or historical data.
  • Some scholars argue that without grounding in case studies, the theory becomes speculative and disconnected from actual political conditions.

🧪 Problematic Equation of Nazism and Liberalism under Biopolitics

  • Esposito’s suggestion that Nazism and liberalism share a biopolitical logic has provoked controversy.
  • Critics contend this flattens moral and structural differences between genocidal regimes and liberal democracies, risking false equivalence.

🌀 Obscuring the Agency of Subjects

  • The focus on systems of control over life may downplay the resistance, agency, and autonomy of political subjects.
  • Critics argue that this can make individuals appear as mere objects of power, ignoring their roles in reshaping political orders.

🔍 Insufficient Engagement with Race, Gender, and Colonialism

  • While Esposito references biopolitics, he gives limited attention to how race, gender, or colonial histories shape who is considered killable or governable.
  • Feminist, postcolonial, and critical race theorists argue that such dimensions are essential to any biopolitical analysis.
Representative Quotations from “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito with Explanation
📌 Quotation💬 Explanation🔣 Symbol
“History was, so to speak, no longer the object but if anything the subject of philosophy.” (p. 634)Esposito challenges traditional historiography, suggesting that history itself produces meaning rather than being interpreted from outside.🔄 History as Meaning-Producer
“Meaning is no longer stamped on events from the outside… but constituted by the facts themselves.” (p. 634)He shifts the locus of meaning from philosophical frameworks to the events’ own effects, novelty, and transformations.🧠 Event-Based Meaning
“Totalitarianism may be a novel category but its philosophical framework is absolutely classical.” (p. 635)Esposito criticizes totalitarianism discourse (e.g., Arendt, Talmon) for using outdated concepts like origin and causality.📜 Critique of Historicism
“Why bother to find the origin of what doesn’t seem to have an origin?” (p. 635)A rhetorical critique of the flawed search for historical “origins” in political theory—especially regarding totalitarianism.🚫 Critique of Origin
“Nazism isn’t a political philosophy but a political biology.” (p. 640)A central thesis: Nazism represents biopolitical control over life, not ideology—reducing human life to bare biological fact.🔬 Political Biology
“Liberalism… turns the Nazi perspective inside out… within the same biopolitical lexicon.” (p. 641)Esposito controversially argues that liberalism and Nazism, despite ideological differences, share a structure of life governance.📊 Biopolitics of Liberalism
“Democracy is always directed to a totality of equal subjects… separated from their own bodies.” (p. 643)He contrasts democracy’s abstract, juridical view of persons with biopolitics’ focus on concrete, embodied life.🧍 Disembodied Subjectivity
“When the living or dying body becomes the symbolic and material epicenter… we move… outside democracy.” (p. 643)Political focus on biological life (e.g. health, death) erodes traditional democratic structures.⚖️ Eclipse of Democracy
“The appearance onstage of biological life… has a disruptive effect.” (p. 638)The intrusion of biology into politics disrupts categories like ideology, sovereignty, and law.🧬 Biopolitical Disruption
“All of the old philosophies of history and all the conceptual paradigms that refer to them must be dismantled.” (p. 644)A radical call to rethink modern political theory beyond traditional binaries and frameworks.🛠️ Paradigm Dismantling
Suggested Readings: “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century” by Roberto Esposito
  1. Esposito, Roberto, and Timothy Campbell. “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 34, no. 4, 2008, pp. 633–44. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.1086/592537. Accessed 7 Aug. 2025.
  2. Campbell, Timothy. “‘Bios,’ Immunity, Life: The Thought of Roberto Esposito.” Diacritics, vol. 36, no. 2, 2006, pp. 2–22. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204123. Accessed 7 Aug. 2025.
  3. Bazzicalupo, Laura, and Clarissa Clò. “The Ambivalences of Biopolitics.” Diacritics, vol. 36, no. 2, 2006, pp. 109–16. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204130. Accessed 7 Aug. 2025.
  4. Bowring, Finn. “Totalitarianism.” Hannah Arendt: A Critical Introduction, Pluto Press, 2011, pp. 188–216. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183p31g.11. Accessed 7 Aug. 2025.