“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis

“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1960 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going, a groundbreaking work that marked the first book of verse published by an Aboriginal Australian woman.

“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1960 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going, a groundbreaking work that marked the first book of verse published by an Aboriginal Australian woman. The poem uses the image of a gum tree, trapped in a city street and surrounded by hard bitumen, as a powerful metaphor for the dislocation, oppression, and cultural alienation experienced by Indigenous Australians under colonization. Through vivid similes, such as likening the tree to a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” with its “hopelessness” etched in its posture, Noonuccal conveys a deep sense of loss and injustice. The closing lines—“O fellow citizen, / What have they done to us?”—shift the focus from the tree to a shared Aboriginal identity, implicating colonial urbanization in the severing of people from their land and traditions. Its popularity stems from this poignant intertwining of environmental and Indigenous struggles, making it both a political statement and a lyrical lament that continues to resonate in discussions of cultural survival and resistance.

Text: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

Gumtree in the city street,
Hard bitumen around your feet,
Rather you should be
In the cool world of leafy forest halls
And wild bird calls
Here you seems to me
Like that poor cart-horse
Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,
Strapped and buckled, its hell prolonged,
Whose hung head and listless mien express
Its hopelessness.
Municipal gum, it is dolorous
To see you thus
Set in your black grass of bitumen—
O fellow citizen,
What have they done to us?

Annotations: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
LineTextAnnotationLiterary Devices
1Gumtree in the city street,The poem opens by addressing a gumtree, a native Australian tree, standing in an urban street, highlighting its displacement from its natural environment. The direct address establishes a personal tone, as if the tree is a character.Personification (addressing the tree as if it can understand), Imagery (vivid picture of a tree in a city street)
2Hard bitumen around your feet,Describes the tree’s roots surrounded by unforgiving bitumen (asphalt), emphasizing the unnatural, restrictive urban setting. “Your feet” suggests the tree is human-like, trapped by the city.Personification (tree with “feet”), Imagery (hard bitumen creates a tactile and visual contrast to natural soil)
3Rather you should beExpresses a longing for the tree to be in its rightful place, setting up a contrast between the ideal natural environment and the current urban one. The incomplete sentence creates anticipation.Contrast (urban vs. natural setting), Enjambment (line breaks mid-thought, leading to the next line)
4In the cool world of leafy forest hallsDescribes the ideal environment for the tree: a cool, shaded forest with abundant foliage, evoking a sense of freedom and natural beauty. “Leafy forest halls” paints a grand, almost sacred image.Imagery (vivid description of the forest), Metaphor (forest as “halls,” suggesting a grand, natural cathedral)
5And wild bird callsAdds the sound of birds to the forest scene, enhancing the sensory appeal of nature and contrasting with the silent, oppressive city.Imagery (auditory image of bird calls), Contrast (natural sounds vs. urban silence)
6Here you seems to meThe speaker reflects on the tree’s current state, using a personal perspective (“to me”). The word “seems” suggests an empathetic observation, preparing for a comparison.Subjective Tone (personal perspective), Enjambment (leads into the next line’s comparison)
7Like that poor cart-horseCompares the tree to a cart-horse, an animal overworked and mistreated, introducing a powerful analogy for suffering and exploitation.Simile (comparing tree to cart-horse with “like”), Symbolism (cart-horse as a symbol of oppression)
8Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,Describes the cart-horse (and by extension, the tree) as mutilated, defeated, and unjustly treated, emphasizing suffering and loss of vitality. The list of adjectives intensifies the tone.Imagery (vivid description of suffering), Alliteration (“broken,” “thing wronged” for emphasis), Symbolism (castration as loss of natural vitality)
9Strapped and buckled, its hell prolonged,Depicts the horse (and tree) as bound and suffering endlessly, with “hell” suggesting extreme torment. The mechanical imagery of straps and buckles contrasts with natural life.Imagery (straps and buckles evoke restriction), Metaphor (“hell” for ongoing suffering)
10Whose hung head and listless mien expressDescribes the horse’s drooping head and lifeless demeanor, reflecting despair. This mirrors the tree’s drooping branches, reinforcing the comparison.Imagery (visual of hung head), Personification (horse’s demeanor “expresses” emotion), Symbolism (hung head as despair)
11Its hopelessness.A single, stark word summarizing the horse’s (and tree’s) emotional state, emphasizing despair and finality. The short line creates a dramatic pause.Diction (strong word choice for emotional impact), Caesura (pause for emphasis)
12Municipal gum, it is dolorousDirectly addresses the tree again, calling it “municipal” (city-owned) and “dolorous” (sorrowful), reinforcing its plight. The formal tone elevates the tree’s suffering.Personification (tree as sorrowful), Diction (“dolorous” for poignant effect)
13To see you thusExpresses the speaker’s sadness at witnessing the tree’s condition, maintaining a personal and empathetic tone.Subjective Tone (speaker’s emotional response), Enjambment (flows into the next line)
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Literary DeviceExample from PoemExplanation
📖 Allusion“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)This line alludes to the historical and cultural context of Indigenous displacement and suffering under colonial systems, linking the tree’s plight to the speaker’s, likely an Indigenous person.
🗣️ Apostrophe“O fellow citizen” (Line 15)By directly addressing the gumtree as a “fellow citizen,” the speaker treats it as a human entity, fostering empathy and highlighting their shared oppression in the urban environment.
🎶 Assonance“Cool world of leafy forest halls” (Line 4)The repeated “o” sound in “cool” and “world” creates a soothing, flowing rhythm, evoking the calm and beauty of the forest, in contrast to the harsh city setting.
⏸️ Caesura“Its hopelessness.” (Line 11)The short, standalone line creates an abrupt pause, forcing the reader to dwell on “hopelessness,” amplifying the emotional weight of the tree’s and horse’s despair.
🔉 Consonance“Strapped and buckled” (Line 9)The repeated “d” sound in “strapped” and “buckled” reinforces the mechanical imagery of confinement, enhancing the sense of the tree’s and horse’s entrapment.
↔️ Contrast“Rather you should be / In the cool world of leafy forest halls” (Lines 3-4)The poem contrasts the tree’s urban setting with its ideal natural environment, highlighting its displacement and the unnatural constraints of the city.
📜 Diction“Dolorous” (Line 12)The word “dolorous” (meaning sorrowful) conveys deep sadness with a formal, mournful tone, elevating the tree’s suffering to a tragic, almost poetic level.
➡️ Enjambment“Here you seems to me / Like that poor cart-horse” (Lines 6-7)The thought spills over without punctuation, creating urgency and continuity, pulling the reader into the comparison between the tree and the cart-horse.
🖼️ Imagery“Hard bitumen around your feet” (Line 2)Vivid sensory details depict the tree’s roots trapped in unyielding asphalt, creating a tactile and visual image that emphasizes its unnatural, restrictive environment.
🤝 Inclusive Pronoun“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)The pronoun “us” unites the speaker and the tree, suggesting a shared experience of oppression, possibly reflecting the broader Indigenous struggle.
😏 Irony“Black grass of bitumen” (Line 14)Calling bitumen “black grass” is ironic, sarcastically equating lifeless asphalt with natural grass, underscoring the unnatural urban setting imposed on the tree.
⚖️ Juxtaposition“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1)Placing the natural gumtree next to the urban “city street” highlights the stark incompatibility between nature and the man-made environment.
🌌 Metaphor“Black grass of bitumen” (Line 14)Bitumen is compared to grass, presenting it as a false, lifeless substitute for the tree’s natural environment, reinforcing themes of displacement and loss.
😔 Mood“Municipal gum, it is dolorous” (Line 12)The poem establishes a mournful, melancholic mood through words like “dolorous” and imagery of suffering, evoking sympathy for the tree’s plight.
🌳 Personification“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1)The tree is addressed as if human, with “feet” and the capacity to suffer, fostering empathy and emphasizing its victimization by urban forces.
Rhetorical Question“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)This question prompts reflection on the shared oppression of the tree and speaker, implicating colonial or urban forces without expecting an answer.
Symbolism“Like that poor cart-horse” (Line 7)The cart-horse symbolizes oppression and exploitation, mirroring the tree’s displacement and the broader suffering of Indigenous people under colonial systems.
🧠 Subjective Tone“Here you seems to me” (Line 6)The phrase “seems to me” reflects the speaker’s personal, empathetic perspective, inviting readers to share their emotional response to the tree’s plight.
🔄 Syntax“Rather you should be” (Line 3)The inverted syntax prioritizes “rather,” emphasizing the speaker’s longing for the tree’s natural environment, creating a poignant, reflective tone.
Themes: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

🌿 Theme 1: Displacement and Loss of Natural Habitat: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal vividly captures the theme of displacement through the image of a gum tree, unnaturally confined to a city street. The poet laments, “Hard bitumen around your feet, / Rather you should be / In the cool world of leafy forest halls”, evoking the tree’s rightful place in the wild, surrounded by bird calls and natural beauty. This juxtaposition between the tree’s current entrapment and its ideal environment mirrors the forced removal of Aboriginal people from their ancestral lands. The title itself, Municipal Gum, underscores the irony of an Indigenous tree subjected to urban authority, reflecting the broader alienation of nature—and by extension, Indigenous culture—under colonial urban expansion.


🐎 Theme 2: Oppression and Dehumanization: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal draws a stark parallel between the tree’s plight and that of a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged”. This metaphor not only humanizes the tree but also underscores the cruelty of stripping a being—human or animal—of its freedom and dignity. By describing the horse’s “hung head and listless mien”, Noonuccal evokes an image of total subjugation, suggesting that urbanization does not merely displace but also inflicts ongoing suffering. This analogy deepens the political resonance of the poem, presenting the gum tree as a symbol for Aboriginal people subjected to systemic control and cultural castration under colonial governance.


🖤 Theme 3: Shared Suffering and Indigenous Solidarity: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal bridges the gap between the natural and human worlds by addressing the tree directly as a “fellow citizen”. This kinship signifies a deep Indigenous worldview in which land, plants, and people are interconnected. The closing question—“What have they done to us?”—shifts the poem’s focus from the singular plight of the tree to a collective Aboriginal experience of oppression. The pronoun “us” establishes solidarity, uniting the speaker, the tree, and the broader Indigenous community as mutual victims of dispossession. In doing so, Noonuccal transforms the gum tree from a passive urban fixture into a silent witness to, and participant in, the enduring struggle for Aboriginal rights and cultural survival.


🌏 Theme 4: Environmental and Cultural Critique of Urbanization: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal serves as both an environmental lament and a cultural critique of modern urban development. The phrase “black grass of bitumen” starkly contrasts with the natural soil and vegetation of the gum tree’s original habitat, symbolizing how industrial progress replaces organic life with lifeless infrastructure. This imagery reflects how colonial urban planning not only damages the environment but also erodes Indigenous traditions tied to the land. By embedding the gum tree in a cityscape, Noonuccal critiques the prioritization of economic and municipal growth over ecological balance and cultural continuity, aligning environmental degradation with the erasure of Indigenous heritage.

Literary Theories and “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Literary TheoryExplanationReferences from Poem
🌍 Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial theory examines the effects of colonization on cultures and societies, focusing on issues of identity, displacement, and resistance. In “Municipal Gum,” the gumtree’s displacement from its natural forest to the urban street mirrors the dispossession and marginalization of Indigenous Australians under colonial rule. The speaker’s identification with the tree as a “fellow citizen” and the question “What have they done to us?” suggest a shared experience of oppression, reflecting the loss of land and culture for Indigenous peoples.“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1), “O fellow citizen, / What have they done to us?” (Lines 15-16)
🌿 EcocriticismEcocriticism explores the relationship between literature and the natural environment, often highlighting human exploitation of nature. The poem portrays the gumtree as a victim of urbanization, trapped in “hard bitumen” and separated from its natural “leafy forest halls.” This reflects the environmental cost of urban development and critiques humanity’s domination of nature, aligning the tree’s suffering with broader ecological harm.“Hard bitumen around your feet” (Line 2), “In the cool world of leafy forest halls / And wild bird calls” (Lines 4-5)
👩 Feminist TheoryFeminist theory analyzes gender dynamics and power structures, often focusing on marginalized voices. While the poem does not explicitly address gender, Oodgeroo Noonuccal, an Indigenous woman, uses the tree’s suffering to voice resistance against oppression. The personification of the tree as a “fellow citizen” and the emotive language (“dolorous,” “hopelessness”) can be read as a feminine-coded expression of empathy and nurturing, challenging the patriarchal, colonial forces that harm both nature and Indigenous communities.“Municipal gum, it is dolorous” (Line 12), “O fellow citizen” (Line 15)
⚙️ Marxist TheoryMarxist theory examines class struggle and the exploitation of labor and resources by capitalist systems. The gumtree, likened to a “poor cart-horse” that is “castrated, broken, a thing wronged,” symbolizes the exploitation of natural resources and Indigenous peoples by urban, capitalist systems. The “municipal” label suggests ownership by a city authority, reflecting how capitalism commodifies and controls both nature and marginalized groups for profit.“Like that poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” (Lines 7-8), “Municipal gum” (Line 12)
Critical Questions about “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

1. How does the poem use the gumtree as a symbol to reflect the experiences of Indigenous Australians?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal employs the gumtree as a powerful symbol of displacement and oppression, mirroring the experiences of Indigenous Australians under colonial rule. The poem opens with the image of the “Gumtree in the city street, / Hard bitumen around your feet,” immediately establishing the tree’s unnatural placement in an urban environment, far from its rightful “cool world of leafy forest halls / And wild bird calls.” This displacement parallels the forced removal of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands to urban or marginalized spaces due to colonization. The speaker’s empathetic address to the tree as “O fellow citizen” and the rhetorical question “What have they done to us?” forge a direct connection between the tree’s suffering and the speaker’s, likely an Indigenous person, suggesting a shared experience of loss and subjugation. The comparison to a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” further symbolizes the emasculation and dehumanization of Indigenous communities, stripped of their cultural vitality and autonomy. Through these vivid images and emotional appeals, Noonuccal uses the gumtree to reflect the broader historical and cultural trauma of Indigenous Australians, highlighting their resilience and shared struggle against colonial oppression.

2. In what ways does the poem critique the impact of urbanization on the natural environment?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal serves as a poignant critique of urbanization’s destructive impact on the natural environment, using the gumtree’s plight to illustrate the harm caused by human development. The poem vividly contrasts the tree’s current state, trapped in “Hard bitumen around your feet,” with its ideal habitat in the “cool world of leafy forest halls / And wild bird calls.” This stark juxtaposition underscores how urban environments replace natural ecosystems with artificial, lifeless materials like bitumen, described sarcastically as “black grass.” The tree’s personified suffering, evident in the speaker’s lament that it is “dolorous” and akin to a “cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,” emphasizes the violence of urbanization, which not only displaces natural elements but also subjects them to prolonged degradation. By labeling the tree “municipal,” Noonuccal critiques the commodification of nature by city authorities, suggesting that urban systems prioritize control and profit over ecological harmony. This critique resonates with broader environmental concerns, positioning the poem as a call to recognize and resist the ecological devastation wrought by unchecked urban expansion.

3. How does the poem’s use of personification and apostrophe enhance its emotional impact?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal leverages personification and apostrophe to deepen the poem’s emotional resonance, fostering a sense of empathy and shared suffering between the speaker and the gumtree. By personifying the tree with human attributes, such as “your feet” in “Hard bitumen around your feet” and addressing it directly as “O fellow citizen,” Noonuccal transforms the tree into a sentient being capable of experiencing pain and loss, akin to a human. This anthropomorphism is intensified through the comparison to a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,” whose “hung head and listless mien express / Its hopelessness,” evoking a vivid image of despair that mirrors human suffering. The use of apostrophe, particularly in lines like “Municipal gum, it is dolorous / To see you thus,” creates an intimate dialogue between the speaker and the tree, drawing readers into their shared plight. These techniques amplify the poem’s emotional impact by humanizing the tree’s suffering, encouraging readers to empathize not only with the natural world but also with the marginalized communities, such as Indigenous Australians, whose struggles the tree symbolizes.

4. What role does the rhetorical question in the final line play in the poem’s overall message?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal concludes with the powerful rhetorical question “What have they done tohou us?” which encapsulates the poem’s central themes of oppression and shared suffering, broadening its message to a universal level. This question, addressed to the personified gumtree, unites the speaker and the tree as victims of an unspecified “they,” likely referring to colonial or urban authorities responsible for their displacement and harm. By using “us,” Noonuccal includes herself, and by extension Indigenous Australians, in the tree’s plight, suggesting a collective experience of loss and injustice. The rhetorical nature of the question, which demands no direct answer, invites readers to reflect on the historical and ongoing impacts of colonization and urbanization, as seen in earlier images like the tree’s “hard bitumen around your feet” and its comparison to a “cart-horse / Castrated, broken.” This open-ended query amplifies the poem’s emotional and political weight, urging readers to consider their own complicity in these systems and to recognize the interconnectedness of human and environmental exploitation, making it a poignant call for awareness and change.

Literary Works Similar to “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  • 🌿 “The City Tree” by Judith Wright – Like “Municipal Gum,” this poem contrasts a tree’s natural setting with its confinement in an urban environment, symbolizing human disconnection from nature.
  • 🐎 “The Horses” by Edwin Muir – Shares with “Municipal Gum,” a sense of loss and post-industrial alienation, using animals as symbols of a more harmonious past disrupted by human progress.
  • 🖤 We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal – From the same poet, it parallels Municipal Gum in its exploration of Aboriginal displacement and cultural loss through the personification of nature.
  • 🌏 “God’s Grandeur” by Gerard Manley Hopkins – Echoes Municipal Gum in its critique of industrialization’s damage to nature, contrasting the beauty of creation with the scarring effects of human exploitation.
  • 🌊 The Waste Land” (opening section) by T.S. Eliot – Shares Municipal Gum’s imagery of barrenness and unnatural landscapes to represent cultural decay and alienation from the natural world.
Representative Quotations of “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Quotation and Line NumberContextTheoretical Interpretations
“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1)This opening line introduces the central image of a native Australian gumtree misplaced in an urban environment, setting the stage for themes of displacement and alienation.Postcolonial: The gumtree symbolizes Indigenous Australians displaced by colonial urbanization, reflecting loss of land and identity. Ecocritical: Highlights the unnatural imposition of urban spaces on nature, critiquing environmental disruption. Feminist: As a work by an Indigenous woman, the tree’s placement may reflect marginalized voices challenging dominant urban narratives. Marxist: Represents the commodification of nature by capitalist urban systems, stripping it of its natural context.
“Hard bitumen around your feet” (Line 2)Describes the tree’s roots trapped in asphalt, emphasizing its confinement and unnatural surroundings.Postcolonial: Mirrors the entrapment of Indigenous peoples in colonial systems, unable to thrive in their natural state. Ecocritical: Critiques urbanization’s replacement of natural soil with lifeless bitumen, harming ecosystems. Feminist: The tree’s “feet” personify it as a vulnerable entity, akin to marginalized groups under patriarchal control. Marxist: Suggests capitalist exploitation of natural resources, with bitumen symbolizing industrial dominance.
“Rather you should be” (Line 3)Expresses the speaker’s longing for the tree to be in its natural forest habitat, contrasting with its current urban setting.Postcolonial: Reflects Indigenous desire to return to pre-colonial harmony with land, disrupted by colonization. Ecocritical: Advocates for the restoration of natural environments over urban sprawl. Feminist: The nurturing tone aligns with feminine-coded empathy, resisting urban oppression. Marxist: Critiques the capitalist systems that prioritize urban development over natural preservation.
“In the cool world of leafy forest halls” (Line 4)Depicts an idealized natural environment, evoking a serene, untouched forest, contrasting with the urban setting.Postcolonial: Evokes pre-colonial Indigenous lands, free from colonial interference. Ecocritical: Celebrates nature’s beauty, critiquing its destruction by urban development. Feminist: The nurturing imagery reflects a feminine connection to nature, opposing patriarchal urban control. Marxist: Contrasts the freedom of nature with the commodified urban landscape, highlighting capitalist exploitation.
“Like that poor cart-horse” (Line 7)Compares the gumtree to an overworked, mistreated cart-horse, introducing a simile of suffering and exploitation.Postcolonial: The horse symbolizes Indigenous peoples, oppressed and dehumanized by colonial systems. Ecocritical: Equates the tree’s suffering with nature’s exploitation by human systems. Feminist: The empathetic comparison reflects a feminine-coded resistance to oppressive structures. Marxist: Represents labor exploitation under capitalism, with the horse and tree as victims of systemic abuse.
“Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” (Line 8)Describes the cart-horse (and tree) as mutilated and defeated, emphasizing profound suffering and injustice.Postcolonial: Reflects the emasculation and cultural destruction of Indigenous communities under colonialism. Ecocritical: Highlights nature’s degradation by human intervention, reducing it to a “thing wronged.” Feminist: The language of violation suggests a gendered critique of patriarchal harm to both nature and marginalized groups. Marxist: Symbolizes the dehumanization of labor and nature under capitalist systems, stripped of vitality for profit.
“Its hopelessness” (Line 11)A stark, single-word line capturing the despair of the horse and tree, creating a dramatic pause.Postcolonial: Encapsulates the despair of Indigenous peoples facing ongoing colonial oppression. Ecocritical: Reflects the bleak fate of nature trapped in urban environments. Feminist: The emotional weight aligns with feminine expressions of empathy and loss, resisting stoic patriarchal norms. Marxist: Represents the hopelessness of exploited classes and resources under capitalist domination.
“Municipal gum, it is dolorous” (Line 12)Directly addresses the tree as “municipal,” highlighting its ownership by the city, and describes its sorrowful state.Postcolonial: The term “municipal” suggests colonial control over Indigenous land and symbols. Ecocritical: Critiques urban systems for imposing ownership on nature, causing its suffering. Feminist: The term “dolorous” reflects a feminine-coded emotional response, emphasizing care for the oppressed. Marxist: “Municipal” indicates capitalist commodification of nature, reducing it to city property.
“Black grass of bitumen” (Line 14)Sarcastically describes the asphalt as “black grass,” highlighting the unnatural replacement of nature with urban materials.Postcolonial: Symbolizes the erasure of Indigenous landscapes by colonial urban development. Ecocritical: Critiques the replacement of natural ecosystems with lifeless urban materials. Feminist: The ironic tone reflects a subversive, feminine-coded critique of patriarchal urban dominance. Marxist: Represents capitalism’s transformation of natural resources into artificial, profit-driven constructs.
“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)The final rhetorical question unites the speaker and tree, implicating an oppressive “they” in their shared suffering.Postcolonial: Alludes to colonial oppression, linking the tree’s and Indigenous peoples’ shared plight. Ecocritical: Questions humanity’s role in environmental destruction, uniting human and natural suffering. Feminist: The inclusive “us” reflects a collective, empathetic resistance to patriarchal and colonial forces. Marxist: Critiques capitalist systems for exploiting both nature and marginalized groups, fostering solidarity in their shared harm.
Suggested Readings: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  1. Javidshad, Mahdi, and Amirhossein Nemati. “Hybridity in Australia: a postcolonial reading of Oodgeroo Noonuccal’s selected poems.” Critical Literary Studies 2.1 (2020): 39-56.
  2. Pustarfi, Laura. “Interstice: Eucalyptus.” The Wisdom of Trees: Thinking Through Arboreality, edited by Laura Pustarfi and David Macauley, State University of New York Press, 2025, pp. 369–70. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29248382.27. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  3. Davies, Margaret. “The Consciousness of Trees.” Law and Literature, vol. 27, no. 2, 2015, pp. 217–35. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26770750. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.

“Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman: Summary and Critique

“Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman first appeared in the March 2001 issue of Communications of the ACM (Vol. 44, No. 3) and stands as a prescient exploration of the merging boundaries between human biology and digital technology.

"Cyborgs" by Donald A. Norman: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman

“Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman first appeared in the March 2001 issue of Communications of the ACM (Vol. 44, No. 3) and stands as a prescient exploration of the merging boundaries between human biology and digital technology. In this essay, Norman envisions a future where interaction with computers transcends the limited modes of typing and clicking, evolving into a seamless integration with gesture, emotion, and even implanted bioelectronic systems. He argues that while societal and biological fundamentals have remained relatively constant over millennia, technology is now poised to enhance—and eventually transform—human capabilities, particularly through cyborg-like augmentations such as memory chips, artificial eyes, and embedded decision aids. Norman provocatively suggests that such enhancements, initially therapeutic, will soon be elective and ubiquitous, challenging core notions of identity, privacy, and human limits. The piece is significant in both technological literature and literary theory as it reconfigures the “cyborg” not merely as a science fiction trope but as an imminent reality, inviting critical engagement with themes of embodiment, consciousness, and posthumanism. As such, it aligns with broader theoretical inquiries in cybernetics, media studies, and techno-humanist philosophy.

Summary of “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman

🤖 Redefining Human-Computer Interaction

  • Norman criticizes current interactions with computers as unimaginative—limited to “looking and listening, pointing and typing” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • He envisions interfaces based on gesture, emotion, sound, and body movement, where computing becomes ambient and integrated into everyday objects.
  • “The change will come about primarily through changes in the computer itself, getting rid of the boxes and embedding them into devices and appliances” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).

🧬 Biological Limits and Technological Aspirations

  • Human capabilities are bounded by biology—our memory, strength, and cognition are finite and degrade with age.
  • “Human working memory has always been limited to a relatively small number of items… and as we age, we go frail, both physically and mentally” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • Norman argues technology has so far served only as external aids but now is on the cusp of becoming internalized and transformative.

🦿 The Rise of the Cyborg

  • Technological implants are no longer hypothetical—pacemakers, cochlear implants, and artificial limbs already exist.
  • Norman foresees the rise of enhancements such as “TV camera[s] with zoom lens into our eyes,” memory chips, and real-time translation devices (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • “Order your implant today,” he writes sardonically, implying how quickly such options will normalize (Norman, 2001, p. 36).

🔋 Miniaturization and Power Challenges

  • A key technical hurdle is power supply and miniaturization.
  • “We have not yet achieved the necessary miniaturization, but we can see how to get there. Power is still a problem, but it will be solved” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • Control circuitry remains a mystery due to the brain’s complex biochemical communication systems.

🧠 Cognitive Enhancement and Mental Augmentation

  • If we enhance muscles, why not minds? Norman suggests future people may augment memory, decision-making, and linguistic skills.
  • “Implanted dictionaries and translators. Arithmetic calculators… Why not brain power?” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • This raises ethical concerns about fairness, regulation, and surveillance.

👁️ Sensory Extensions of the Body

  • Norman imagines sensory implants enhancing or even replacing biological senses.
  • “Why not build a TV camera with zoom lens into our eyes… recorders capable of saving all that we have heard, seen, or even felt” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • This would revolutionize human experience: skip the boring, rewind the interesting, never forget a name.

🧩 Challenges in Brain-Device Communication

  • The brain’s internal communication is still poorly understood.
  • “Just how information is stored, regenerated, and interpreted within brain circuits remains a major mystery” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • While computers excel at logic and memory, they struggle with tasks humans find simple: walking, seeing, talking.

🌐 From Assistive to Transformative Technologies

  • The shift is from tools that assist to those that transform the human condition.
  • “Not only will the devices we use have increased power… but the way they interact with people will be more natural, more complex, and more powerful” (Norman, 2001, p. 37).
  • The result is a co-evolution of technology and humanity—introducing novel ethical, cultural, and political implications.

🛡️ Future Ethical and Societal Dilemmas

  • Norman warns that privacy and autonomy debates today will pale in comparison to those of the future.
  • “Do you think the current concerns over privacy violations and personal autonomy are large and complex? You haven’t seen anything yet” (Norman, 2001, p. 37).
  • As devices become internalized and intimate, regulation, access, and human rights will be more contested than ever.

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman
🧩 Term📘 Theoretical Concept🧠 Explanation📄 Reference / Quotation
🤖 CyborgCyborg (Cybernetic Organism)A being enhanced with embedded technology that extends biological capabilities such as memory, sight, and muscle power.“…the potential is staggering, especially in the area of the cyborg—the implantation of bioelectronic devices…” (Norman, 2001, p. 36)
🔁 Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)Multimodal InteractionDescribes the expanded interface between humans and computers using gestures, emotions, body movements, and speech.“…gesture; by hand, foot, and body motion; by the speed and forcefulness of our activities…” (p. 36)
🧬 PosthumanismTechnological Evolution of HumanityChallenges the boundary between human and machine by integrating devices that alter human sensory, cognitive, and physical abilities.“…enhancements are apt to be impressive. Memory aids, calculation aids. Decision aids…” (p. 36)
🧠 Cognitive EnhancementAugmented Memory and ReasoningThe concept of implanting devices to support or improve cognitive functions such as memory, recognition, and decision-making.“…memory chip that remembers events, names, and facts…” (p. 36)
🧩 EmbodimentTechnological Embedding in the BodyThe physical integration of technology into the human body, altering perception, function, and behavior.“…tiny enough to be implanted within our bodies…” (p. 36)
⚖️ Technological DeterminismInevitability of Technological ProgressThe belief that technological development follows a fixed trajectory and shapes human society and behavior irreversibly.“…the trend will be unstoppable. Order your implant today.” (p. 36)
🧪 BioethicsEthical Implications of Biological EngineeringRaises questions about consent, identity, autonomy, and surveillance as technologies become embedded in the body.“…current concerns over privacy violations and personal autonomy… You haven’t seen anything yet.” (p. 37)
🧭 Naturalization of TechnologyInvisible ComputingDescribes how technologies become so seamlessly integrated into everyday life that users no longer perceive them as separate devices.“…we interact with the computers that control our automobiles with no awareness that computers are involved” (p. 36)
🔒 Surveillance & ControlMonitoring and Regulation of Augmented BodiesThe potential for constant data collection and behavioral control as bodily enhancements become common, possibly leading to new forms of social regulation.“…we may have to do full X-ray (3D tomographic) scans… to detect artificial implants.” (p. 36)
🧠 Brain-Machine Interface (BMI)Neural Control SystemsTechnologies that attempt to read from or write to the brain, enabling direct communication with implanted devices.“…how does one communicate with an implanted circuit?” (p. 36)
Contribution of “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman to Literary Theory/Theories

🤖 1. Posthumanism & Techno-Embodiment

  • Contribution: Norman’s essay is a foundational example of posthumanist thought, challenging the fixed boundaries between human and machine.
  • He imagines a future where “bioelectronic devices” amplify cognition, perception, and memory, making the “human” no longer purely biological (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • “The trend will be unstoppable. Order your implant today” illustrates how posthuman subjectivity becomes normalized through consumerist framing (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • Reinforces literary posthumanism’s critique of essentialist identities by presenting technology as intrinsic to personhood.

🧠 2. Cyborg Theory (Haraway-Inspired)

  • Contribution: Norman’s vision directly intersects with Donna Haraway’s “Cyborg Manifesto”, presenting the cyborg as a hybrid figure disrupting boundaries of nature/culture and human/machine.
  • His reference to implants like zoom lenses and memory chips echoes Haraway’s idea of cyborgs as political and ontological constructs.
  • “An incredible variety of new devices will emerge… many will find their way into the human body” (Norman, 2001, p. 37) resonates with cyborg identity as fragmented and fluid.

🧬 3. Biopolitics & Control Theories

  • Contribution: Norman’s predictions support Foucauldian theories of biopolitics, where power is enacted on and through the body via surveillance and regulation.
  • “Full X-ray (3D tomographic) scans… to detect artificial implants” (Norman, 2001, p. 36) reveals emerging regimes of biopolitical control.
  • Raises concerns about who will control access to enhancement, and how society will categorize bodies that are technologically modified.

🧪 4. Science Fiction and Speculative Theory

  • Contribution: The essay functions as nonfictional speculative fiction, offering literary theorists insight into the genre boundaries between science writing and futuristic narrative.
  • Norman’s use of rhetorical questions (“Why not build a TV camera with zoom lens into our eyes?”) and scenario-building techniques mimic science fiction’s critical structure (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • Reinforces SF theory’s idea that technology is not just a setting but a metaphor for inner transformation and identity shifts.

🧩 5. Phenomenology of the Body

  • Contribution: Norman engages with phenomenological questions of embodiment—how bodily experience will change once sight, hearing, and memory are technologically extended.
  • “Linger over the interesting parts of life, fast-forward through the boring parts” (Norman, 2001, p. 36) suggests altered temporal and sensory perception, a core concern in phenomenological theory.
  • Opens questions for literary phenomenology: how will posthuman perception alter narrative time, character realism, or consciousness in texts?

📡 6. Media Theory & Technological Determinism

  • Contribution: Norman’s deterministic view of technology (“because it is possible”) feeds into Marshall McLuhan’s idea of media as extensions of man, and Friedrich Kittler’s focus on media apparatuses shaping subjectivity.
  • “The way we interact with people will be more natural, more complex, and more powerful” (Norman, 2001, p. 37) reflects media evolution as unavoidable and redefining human relations.

⚖️ 7. Ethics and Literary Morality

  • Contribution: Raises ethical dilemmas in speculative fiction and dystopian literature, e.g., what does autonomy mean when memory, emotion, and behavior are modifiable?
  • “Do you think the current concerns over privacy… are large and complex? You haven’t seen anything yet” (Norman, 2001, p. 37) situates the text within moral literary traditions questioning authority and surveillance.
Examples of Critiques Through “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman
📚 Literary Work🔍 Critique through Cyborgs by Donald A. Norman📄 Thematic Connection
🤖 Frankenstein by Mary ShelleyNorman’s vision of embedded technology as enhancement contrasts with Victor Frankenstein’s fear of unnatural creation. Unlike Norman’s optimistic stance, Shelley’s creature embodies the tragic consequences of unregulated scientific ambition.Explores the bioethical tensions between human innovation and moral responsibility (Norman, 2001, p. 36–37).
🧬 Neuromancer by William GibsonNorman echoes Gibson’s themes of cybernetic augmentation, where neural implants and AI challenge traditional human boundaries. Like Norman’s cyborg, Gibson’s Case navigates a digitally fused identity.Both texts reveal bodily disconnection and technocultural fusion as central to future subjectivity (p. 36).
⚙️ The Machine Stops by E.M. ForsterForster’s dystopia of overreliance on machine interfaces is ironically echoed in Norman’s excitement over seamless HCI. While Forster warns of the collapse of human autonomy, Norman envisions embedded systems enhancing daily life.Highlights the double-edged potential of embedded computing and social detachment (Norman, 2001, p. 36–37).
🧠 Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. DickNorman’s interest in memory chips and sensory implants aligns with Dick’s exploration of artificial empathy and memory manipulation. The cyborg blur in Norman’s vision questions what remains distinctly human—echoing the android vs. human dilemma.Both works interrogate authenticity, memory, and technological embodiment as identity markers (p. 36).
Criticism Against “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman

️ Overly Technological Determinism

  • Norman’s essay often assumes that technological progress is inevitable and desirable: “Because it is possible… the trend will be unstoppable” (Norman, 2001, p. 36).
  • This ignores sociopolitical resistance, ethical constraints, and cultural diversity, suggesting a one-size-fits-all future driven purely by innovation.

🧬 Neglect of Embodiment and Lived Experience

  • The essay treats the body as a platform for enhancement, rather than a site of subjective experience.
  • Phenomenological and feminist theorists may critique Norman for reducing human experience to upgradeable functions, bypassing questions of gender, race, ability, and emotion.

🧪 Minimal Ethical Engagement

  • While Norman briefly mentions privacy concerns, he glosses over the ethical implications of implantable technologies.
  • There is no in-depth exploration of consent, inequality, or corporate exploitation—issues central to bioethics and critical theory.

🧠 Simplistic View of the Brain and Cognition

  • Norman assumes that cognitive functions like memory, recognition, and reasoning can be seamlessly enhanced via technology.
  • This ignores complex neuroscientific debates about how the brain stores and interprets meaning, and the risk of reductionism in treating thought as hardware.

🔍 Lack of Political Context

  • The vision of the future is strikingly apolitical: Norman does not address who owns, controls, or benefits from these enhancements.
  • Critics from critical theory or Marxist perspectives would argue that he omits power structures, economic inequality, and corporate surveillance regimes.

🧩 Underestimates Cultural Variability

  • Norman’s model of the “cyborg future” assumes universal needs and desires for enhancement.
  • It does not account for non-Western perspectives, cultural resistance, or alternative technological imaginations that reject integration.

📚 Not Grounded in Humanities Scholarship

  • Though published in a technology journal, the essay engages little with existing philosophical or literary discourse on the cyborg, posthumanism, or embodiment (e.g., Haraway, Hayles).
  • As a result, it lacks theoretical depth in areas where interdisciplinary insight is crucial.
Representative Quotations from “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman with Explanation
🧩 Quotation🧠 Explanation📄 Citation
🤖 “The potential is staggering, especially in the area of the cyborg—the implantation of bioelectronic devices…”Norman introduces the central theme: enhancing human capabilities via implanted technologies.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
🦾 “Order your implant today.”A satirical yet serious statement on how normalization and commodification of body tech is on the horizon.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
🧠 “If it is possible to increase muscle power, why not brain power?”Reflects Norman’s belief in cognitive enhancement, drawing parallels to physical athleticism.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
👁️ “Why not build a TV camera with zoom lens into our eyes…?”A provocative suggestion envisioning expanded sensory perception through technological augmentation.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
🛠️ “We have not yet achieved the necessary miniaturization, but we can see how to get there.”Acknowledges technical barriers but assumes inevitable progress, reflecting technological determinism.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
🧬 “We are close to the point where video cameras and memory chips will be tiny enough to be implanted.”Illustrates the biological integration of computing as an imminent reality.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
🔋 “The major remaining hurdle is the control circuitry. How does one communicate with an implanted circuit?”Highlights a technical challenge: the interface between neural processes and digital hardware.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
🧾 “The way we interact with people will be more natural, more complex, and more powerful.”Envisions fluid, intuitive interaction with future computers—embedded in daily life and human expression.(Norman, 2001, p. 37)
🛑 “Do you think the current concerns over privacy… are large and complex? You haven’t seen anything yet.”A warning that ethics and surveillance will intensify as technologies grow more invasive.(Norman, 2001, p. 37)
🔍 “Note how easy it is for computers to perform tasks we find difficult… how difficult to perform tasks we find trivial.”Reflects on the inversion of human vs. machine strengths, suggesting the need for new interaction paradigms.(Norman, 2001, p. 36)
Suggested Readings: “Cyborgs” by Donald A. Norman
  1. HOLLINGER, VERONICA. “Cybernetic Deconstructions: Cyberpunk and Postmodernism.” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, vol. 23, no. 2, 1990, pp. 29–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24780626. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.
  2. Kline, Ronald. “Where Are the Cyborgs in Cybernetics?” Social Studies of Science, vol. 39, no. 3, 2009, pp. 331–62. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27793297. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.
  3. HARAWAY, DONNA J., and CARY WOLFE. “A Cyborg Manifesto: SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND SOCIALIST-FEMINISM IN THE LATE TWENTIETH CENTURY.” Manifestly Haraway, University of Minnesota Press, 2016, pp. 3–90. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5f6.4. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.

“Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison: Summary and Critique

“Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison first appeared in 2004 in the journal Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture (Volume 8, Issue 4, pp. 461-475).

"Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments" by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison

“Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison first appeared in 2004 in the journal Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture (Volume 8, Issue 4, pp. 461-475). This speculative article explores the integration of bio, nano, and digital technologies into garments, redefining them as “cybernetic garments” that extend the body’s functions and challenge traditional fashion boundaries. Drawing on collaborations with the Tissue Culture and Art collective and Symbiotica, the authors highlight the potential for garments to respond to environmental stimuli, incorporate living tissues, and serve as information media, echoing McLuhan’s idea of technology as an extension of man. Its importance lies in shifting literary and theoretical discourse toward the “post-human” condition, influencing discussions on identity, technology, and fashion by citing only two articles, yet it has garnered 39 views and 2 citations, underscoring its niche but growing relevance in academic circles.

Summary of “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison

Introduction to Cybernetic Garments

  • Explores the concept of clothes evolving with technology, reacting to stimuli like sound, light, and biometric data 🌟.
  • Introduces speculative ideas: “Imagine clothes that change color, display changing patterns, react to sound, light, heat, and the closeness of other people” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 461).
  • Highlights collaboration with Tissue Culture and Art and Symbiotica in Western Australia, focusing on living tissue in fashion 🎨.
  • Suggests a shift from stylistic choice to practicality and comfort in fashion due to smart clothing 💡.

Redefining Garments and Cybernetics

  • Proposes “cybernetic garments” as a new term to reflect technology’s intimate role with the body 🛠️.
  • Notes historical technological shifts: “The impact of the industrial revolution on textiles… may in retrospect seem to have been quite slow compared to changes now predicted” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 463).
  • Defines cybernetics as “the study of control and communication in self-regulating systems” (Tofts & McKeich, 1997, p. 19), linking it to the cyborg concept 📡.
  • Argues clothes are a central technology: “Clothes are, arguably, the most central technology to articulating human attributes” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 463) 🌍.

Expanding the Definition of Garments

  • Extends “garment” beyond clothing to include accessories and makeup, rooted in “garner,” meaning “to equip” (American Heritage® Dictionary, 2000) 👗.
  • Includes items like hats and jewelry for their protective and communicative roles 🌂.
  • Highlights makeup’s versatility: “the nature of cosmetics being temporary and variable is a key to its versatility and significance” (Lok, 2003) 💄.

Information Devices as Garments

  • Considers keys, cell phones, and credit cards as garments due to their identity-defining roles 🔑.
  • References McLuhan: “extensions of man” includes both physical items like clothes and sensory extensions like cameras (McLuhan, 1964) 📱.
  • Notes personalization: “Keys are held together in bunches by key rings, that are personalized to reflect some sense of cultural identity” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 465) 🎨.

Future of Cyborg Garments

  • Predicts digital variability in garments: “Variability is one of the key attributes of the digital aesthetic” (Manovich, 1999, p. 36) 🌈.
  • Discusses bio-technology potential: “super-strong spiderweb silk produced in mass quantities from goat’s milk” (Newman, 2003) 🕸️.
  • Envisions living garments like skin masks and fur grown in bioreactors, addressing ethical and practical challenges 🌱.

Body as Garment and Nanotechnology

  • Suggests the body as a fashion site: “the human body can be described ‘as the original prosthesis we all learn to manipulate’” (Hayles, 1999, p. 3) 💪.
  • Proposes nano-bots for slow, trauma-free body modifications: “a face-lift… would progress at a rate so slow… that a person would suffer no trauma” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 470) 🧬.
  • Links to gene therapy and dynamic body sculpture as future fashion trends 🌟.

From Flesh to Garment Cyborgs

  • Distinguishes “flesh cyborgs” (embedded technology) from “garment cyborgs” (close-to-body tech) 🤖.
  • Argues wearable devices like cell phones are sophisticated cyborg interfaces: “a vastly more sophisticated arrangement than surgical embedment” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 471) 📞.
  • Warns of risks: “The potential for discomfort, disfiguration and death to occur if self-replicating ‘nano-bots’ turn into a runaway mechanical virus” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 471) ⚠️.

Conclusion and Fashion’s Evolution

  • Emphasizes garments as part of the “media/information-scape” enhancing designer-consumer dynamics 🎥.
  • Calls for designers to rethink craft: “changing the way they think about one of the world’s oldest and most fundamental crafts” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 473) ✂️.
  • Predicts a new phase of “cyborg dress” fulfilling desires for variability and novelty in fashion 🌐.
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison
Term/ConceptReferenceExplanation of Usage
Cyborg 🤖“We have adopted the term ‘cybernetic garments’… Cybernetics is the study of control and communication in self-regulating systems… Clynes and Kline joined the terms ‘cybernetic’ and ‘organism’ into ‘cyborg’” (p. 463).Used to describe the merging of human and technological systems; garments become extensions of the body, making wearers “garment cyborgs.”
Post-Human 🧬“Hayles (1999) uses the term ‘post-human’ to describe an individual and societal dependence upon not only technology, but on digital information and telecommunications” (p. 466).Frames the transformation of humans into beings whose identities are inseparable from technology, including digital garments and communication devices.
Garment as Technology 👕“Clothes are a much more important technology to modern life than cell phones… Clothes are, arguably, the most central technology to articulating human attributes” (p. 463).Clothes are reconceptualized as essential technologies that extend the body’s functions (protection, communication, identity).
Cybernetic Garments 🔄“We have adopted the term ‘cybernetic garments’ to signal the shift in perspective that is needed to account for emergent dress technologies” (p. 463).Garments integrated with cybernetic principles (feedback, control, responsiveness) blur the line between clothing and interactive technology.
Invisibility of Technology 👁️“Postman’s argument that technologies that have become naturalized to the point of invisibility is critical to our argument… Clothes are visible but their ‘invisible’ is often obscured” (p. 463).Suggests that clothing, though visible, operates as an invisible naturalized technology, shaping identity without being perceived as “technical.”
Extension of the Skin 🩸“The garment becomes an information medium that extends the function of the skin” (p. 462).Draws on McLuhan’s “extensions of man”; clothes function as a communicative and protective second skin.
Variability (Digital Aesthetic) 🔀“Variability is one of the key attributes of the digital aesthetic, according to media theorist Lev Manovich” (p. 466).Highlights fashion’s embrace of variability through digital technologies—garments that change color, texture, or form in real time.
Living Garments / Biotechnology 🌱“Biotechnology is about the manipulation of living tissue into artificial combinations, forms and situations” (p. 468).Explores futuristic “living garments” grown from tissue cultures, raising ethical, practical, and fashion-industry implications.
Flesh Cyborg 🧍‍♂️“This is what we call a ‘flesh cyborg’” (p. 470).Refers to direct bodily modifications (plastic surgery, nanotech, gene therapy) that turn the body itself into a mutable, fashionable “garment.”
Garment Cyborg 👜“Currently, people are ‘garment cyborgs’… Since clothes-as-garments redefine the body’s boundaries” (p. 471).Differentiates between body-embedded technologies (“flesh cyborgs”) and garment-based technologies (clothes, accessories, devices).
Information Devices as Garments 📱“Cell phones, credit cards, cameras… their role in altering and maintaining our identity, and their functional and communicative effect, means they can be considered as garments” (p. 466).Reframes modern personal devices as garments since they function close to the body and extend identity and communication.
Fashion as Media/Information 📰“Everyday garments [become] part of the media/information-scape of modern life” (p. 473).Fashion is theorized as part of the broader information environment, with garments serving as communicative media.
Contribution of “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison to Literary Theory/Theories

Post-Humanism

  • Introduces the “post-human” condition where technology blurs boundaries between body and garment, influencing literary theory by redefining human identity 🌐.
  • Cites Katherine Hayles: “the human body can be described ‘as the original prosthesis we all learn to manipulate’” (Hayles, 1999, p. 3), suggesting a shift in narrative focus to technological augmentation 📖.
  • Expands this through cybernetic garments, proposing a narrative evolution: “distinctions between knowledge and physical artifacts would disappear” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 473) 🔧.

Cyborg Theory

  • Builds on Donna Haraway’s cyborg metaphor, integrating it into fashion narratives: “used the term ‘cyborg’ to invoke the science-fiction/cyberpunk image of the robot/flesh creation” (Haraway, 1985, p. 26) 🤖.
  • Applies cyborgization to everyday life: “The few of us who are not already ‘borged’… are embedded nonetheless in countless machinic/organic cybernetic systems” (Grey, 2001, p. 19), enriching character development in literature 🌌.
  • Distinguishes “garment cyborgs” from “flesh cyborgs,” offering a new lens for analyzing human-machine symbiosis (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 471) 🔗.

Media Ecology

  • Aligns with Marshall McLuhan’s idea of media as extensions: “extensions of man” includes clothes and digital devices (McLuhan, 1964, p. 119), impacting narrative structures 📡.
  • Proposes garments as information media: “the garment becomes an information medium that extends the function of the skin” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 462), influencing how stories convey meaning 🎥.
  • Highlights cultural normalization: “technologies that have become naturalized to the point of invisibility” (Postman, 1992, p. 142), shaping literary themes of technology’s invisibility 🌫️.

Feminist Literary Theory

  • Engages with Haraway’s feminist perspective, linking cyborgs to gender and technology: “science, technology, and socialist feminism” (Haraway, 1985, p. 26), offering a critique of gendered fashion narratives 👩‍🎓.
  • Explores body modification as fashion, reflecting on societal pressures: “change is the very essence of fashion” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 470), relevant to feminist analyses of body politics 💃.
  • Suggests variable identities through technology, challenging fixed gender roles in literature 🌸.
Examples of Critiques Through “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison
Literary WorkExample of Critique Using Farren & Hutchison’s Framework
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) 🧟‍♂️Shelley’s “creature” can be read as an early “flesh cyborg,” embodying the anxieties Farren & Hutchison discuss about biotechnology and the manipulation of living tissue (p. 468). Just as garments become “extensions of the skin” (p. 462), Frankenstein’s stitched body is literally an assemblage of technological extensions, raising ethical questions about the boundaries of human identity.
William Gibson’s Neuromancer (1984) 💻Gibson’s cyberpunk world anticipates “cybernetic garments” (p. 463) and “information devices as garments” (p. 466), as characters wear technologies (neural jacks, goggles, dermal implants) that extend cognition and communication. Farren & Hutchison’s idea of garments as part of the media/information-scape (p. 473) aligns with Gibson’s depiction of fashion and body-tech as inseparable from identity in cyberspace.
Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985) 👩‍🦰The uniforms of Handmaids can be seen as “garment cyborg” technologies (p. 471): clothing becomes a medium of social control, extending the skin into a disciplinary surface. Farren & Hutchison argue garments define identity and regulate behavior (p. 463), which mirrors Atwood’s use of costume to police sexuality, visibility, and subjectivity.
Donna Haraway’s A Cyborg Manifesto (1985) 🤖Though a theoretical essay, it is often treated as a literary-political text. Haraway’s “cyborg” metaphor resonates directly with Farren & Hutchison’s expansion of garments into “technological-human evolution” (p. 473). Their idea of “garment cyborgs” (p. 471) exemplifies Haraway’s claim that the human is always hybrid with technology — even in mundane forms like clothing and cosmetics.
Criticism Against “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison

Speculative Nature and Lack of Empirical Evidence 🌫️

  • Relies heavily on hypothetical scenarios, such as “Imagine clothes that change color… or that your clothes were actually alive” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 461), without substantial empirical support, weakening its scientific credibility ⚠️.
  • Fails to provide concrete data or case studies to validate claims about bio, nano, and digital technologies in fashion, limiting practical applicability 📉.

Overemphasis on Western Perspectives 🌍

  • Centers on Western Australian collaborations (e.g., Symbiotica, Tissue Culture and Art), potentially overlooking global fashion contexts: “ideas coming out of artistic and academic work being done in Western Australia” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 462) 🌐.
  • Neglects diverse cultural attitudes toward technology and clothing, reducing the article’s universal relevance 🎭.

Ethical Oversights and Risks Minimized ⚠️

  • Downplays potential dangers of nanotechnology and gene therapy: “The potential for discomfort, disfiguration and death to occur if self-replicating ‘nano-bots’ turn into a runaway mechanical virus” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 471) is acknowledged but not deeply explored 💥.
  • Lacks a robust ethical framework for living garments, such as tissue-grown masks, ignoring consent and ecological impact 🌱.

Limited Engagement with Existing Literature 📚

  • Cites only a narrow range of sources (e.g., McLuhan, 1964; Haraway, 1985), missing broader fashion or technology scholarship: “extensions of man” (McLuhan, 1964, p. 119) is referenced but not contextualized widely 📖.
  • With only 2 citing articles and 39 views (as of December 2015), its impact on academic discourse appears limited, suggesting underutilization of prior work 🔍.

Practicality and Industry Feasibility Doubts 🛠️

  • Raises concerns about implementation: “significant issues still to overcome with washability, cut, construction, cost, and comfort” (Farren & Hutchison, 2004, p. 467) are noted but not resolved, questioning real-world adoption 📉.
  • Speculative living garments (e.g., fur in bioreactors) lack discussion on scalability or economic viability, distancing it from industry needs 💸.
Representative Quotations from “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison with Explanation
Quotation Explanation
“Imagine clothes that change color, display changing patterns, react to sound, light, heat, and the closeness of other people.” 🌈Opens the article with speculative imagery; introduces the concept of garments as interactive, living technologies rather than passive clothing.
“The garment becomes an information medium that extends the function of the skin.” 🩸Expands McLuhan’s “extensions of man” to clothing, framing garments as technological organs that mediate identity and communication.
“We have adopted the term ‘cybernetic garments’ to signal the shift in perspective that is needed to account for emergent dress technologies.” 🔄Introduces the central concept of cybernetic garments—clothes integrated with self-regulating, responsive technologies.
“Clothes are, arguably, the most central technology to articulating human attributes.” 👕Reframes fashion as not merely aesthetic, but as the fundamental human technology shaping social existence.
“The few of us who are not already ‘borged’ through immunisations, interfaces, or prosthetics are embedded nonetheless in countless machinic/organic cybernetic systems.” 🤖Quoting Grey (2001), they argue that humans are always-already cyborgs, reliant on invisible or naturalized technologies—including clothes.
“An understanding of garment as technology, and then of humans as cyborg due to their dependence upon clothes, leads to a reconsideration of all of the other artifacts and devices with which we are in close contact.” 👜Positions garments as the model for expanding “cyborg” thinking—beyond clothes to devices, accessories, and media tools.
“Variability is one of the key attributes of the digital aesthetic.” 🔀Draws from Manovich to connect fashion with digital culture; garments embody cultural desire for changeability, customization, and novelty.
“Growing a wearable, living garment from tissue samples is currently not practical… However, there are good reasons to imagine these problems being solved in the near future.” 🌱Demonstrates speculative biotech possibilities; envisions living garments, blending tissue culture with fashion.
“This is what we call a ‘flesh cyborg.’” 🧍Defines direct bodily modification (surgery, nanotech, biotech) as creating the flesh cyborg, in contrast to garment cyborgs.
“Currently, people are ‘garment cyborgs.’” 🧥Concludes that humans today already live as cyborgs through their intimate, daily integration with clothing and wearable technologies.
Suggested Readings: “Cyborgs, New Technology, and the Body: The Changing Nature of Garments” by Anne Farren & Andrew Hutchison
  1. Kline, Ronald. “Where Are the Cyborgs in Cybernetics?” Social Studies of Science, vol. 39, no. 3, 2009, pp. 331–62. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27793297. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.
  2. Penley, Constance, et al. “Cyborgs at Large: Interview with Donna Haraway.” Social Text, no. 25/26, 1990, pp. 8–23. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/466237. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.
  3. Orr, Jackie. “Materializing a Cyborg’s Manifesto.” Women’s Studies Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 1/2, 2012, pp. 273–80. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23333457. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.
  4. Paul Sunday. Cyborgs. JSTOR, https://jstor.org/stable/community.28262607. Accessed 17 Aug. 2025.

“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis

“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1960 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going, a groundbreaking work that marked the first book of verse published by an Aboriginal Australian woman.

“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

“Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1960 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going, a groundbreaking work that marked the first book of verse published by an Aboriginal Australian woman. The poem uses the image of a gum tree, trapped in a city street and surrounded by hard bitumen, as a powerful metaphor for the dislocation, oppression, and cultural alienation experienced by Indigenous Australians under colonization. Through vivid similes, such as likening the tree to a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” with its “hopelessness” etched in its posture, Noonuccal conveys a deep sense of loss and injustice. The closing lines—“O fellow citizen, / What have they done to us?”—shift the focus from the tree to a shared Aboriginal identity, implicating colonial urbanization in the severing of people from their land and traditions. Its popularity stems from this poignant intertwining of environmental and Indigenous struggles, making it both a political statement and a lyrical lament that continues to resonate in discussions of cultural survival and resistance.

Text: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

Gumtree in the city street,
Hard bitumen around your feet,
Rather you should be
In the cool world of leafy forest halls
And wild bird calls
Here you seems to me
Like that poor cart-horse
Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,
Strapped and buckled, its hell prolonged,
Whose hung head and listless mien express
Its hopelessness.
Municipal gum, it is dolorous
To see you thus
Set in your black grass of bitumen—
O fellow citizen,
What have they done to us?

Annotations: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
LineTextAnnotationLiterary Devices
1Gumtree in the city street,The poem opens by addressing a gumtree, a native Australian tree, standing in an urban street, highlighting its displacement from its natural environment. The direct address establishes a personal tone, as if the tree is a character.Personification (addressing the tree as if it can understand), Imagery (vivid picture of a tree in a city street)
2Hard bitumen around your feet,Describes the tree’s roots surrounded by unforgiving bitumen (asphalt), emphasizing the unnatural, restrictive urban setting. “Your feet” suggests the tree is human-like, trapped by the city.Personification (tree with “feet”), Imagery (hard bitumen creates a tactile and visual contrast to natural soil)
3Rather you should beExpresses a longing for the tree to be in its rightful place, setting up a contrast between the ideal natural environment and the current urban one. The incomplete sentence creates anticipation.Contrast (urban vs. natural setting), Enjambment (line breaks mid-thought, leading to the next line)
4In the cool world of leafy forest hallsDescribes the ideal environment for the tree: a cool, shaded forest with abundant foliage, evoking a sense of freedom and natural beauty. “Leafy forest halls” paints a grand, almost sacred image.Imagery (vivid description of the forest), Metaphor (forest as “halls,” suggesting a grand, natural cathedral)
5And wild bird callsAdds the sound of birds to the forest scene, enhancing the sensory appeal of nature and contrasting with the silent, oppressive city.Imagery (auditory image of bird calls), Contrast (natural sounds vs. urban silence)
6Here you seems to meThe speaker reflects on the tree’s current state, using a personal perspective (“to me”). The word “seems” suggests an empathetic observation, preparing for a comparison.Subjective Tone (personal perspective), Enjambment (leads into the next line’s comparison)
7Like that poor cart-horseCompares the tree to a cart-horse, an animal overworked and mistreated, introducing a powerful analogy for suffering and exploitation.Simile (comparing tree to cart-horse with “like”), Symbolism (cart-horse as a symbol of oppression)
8Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,Describes the cart-horse (and by extension, the tree) as mutilated, defeated, and unjustly treated, emphasizing suffering and loss of vitality. The list of adjectives intensifies the tone.Imagery (vivid description of suffering), Alliteration (“broken,” “thing wronged” for emphasis), Symbolism (castration as loss of natural vitality)
9Strapped and buckled, its hell prolonged,Depicts the horse (and tree) as bound and suffering endlessly, with “hell” suggesting extreme torment. The mechanical imagery of straps and buckles contrasts with natural life.Imagery (straps and buckles evoke restriction), Metaphor (“hell” for ongoing suffering)
10Whose hung head and listless mien expressDescribes the horse’s drooping head and lifeless demeanor, reflecting despair. This mirrors the tree’s drooping branches, reinforcing the comparison.Imagery (visual of hung head), Personification (horse’s demeanor “expresses” emotion), Symbolism (hung head as despair)
11Its hopelessness.A single, stark word summarizing the horse’s (and tree’s) emotional state, emphasizing despair and finality. The short line creates a dramatic pause.Diction (strong word choice for emotional impact), Caesura (pause for emphasis)
12Municipal gum, it is dolorousDirectly addresses the tree again, calling it “municipal” (city-owned) and “dolorous” (sorrowful), reinforcing its plight. The formal tone elevates the tree’s suffering.Personification (tree as sorrowful), Diction (“dolorous” for poignant effect)
13To see you thusExpresses the speaker’s sadness at witnessing the tree’s condition, maintaining a personal and empathetic tone.Subjective Tone (speaker’s emotional response), Enjambment (flows into the next line)
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Literary DeviceExample from PoemExplanation
📖 Allusion“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)This line alludes to the historical and cultural context of Indigenous displacement and suffering under colonial systems, linking the tree’s plight to the speaker’s, likely an Indigenous person.
🗣️ Apostrophe“O fellow citizen” (Line 15)By directly addressing the gumtree as a “fellow citizen,” the speaker treats it as a human entity, fostering empathy and highlighting their shared oppression in the urban environment.
🎶 Assonance“Cool world of leafy forest halls” (Line 4)The repeated “o” sound in “cool” and “world” creates a soothing, flowing rhythm, evoking the calm and beauty of the forest, in contrast to the harsh city setting.
⏸️ Caesura“Its hopelessness.” (Line 11)The short, standalone line creates an abrupt pause, forcing the reader to dwell on “hopelessness,” amplifying the emotional weight of the tree’s and horse’s despair.
🔉 Consonance“Strapped and buckled” (Line 9)The repeated “d” sound in “strapped” and “buckled” reinforces the mechanical imagery of confinement, enhancing the sense of the tree’s and horse’s entrapment.
↔️ Contrast“Rather you should be / In the cool world of leafy forest halls” (Lines 3-4)The poem contrasts the tree’s urban setting with its ideal natural environment, highlighting its displacement and the unnatural constraints of the city.
📜 Diction“Dolorous” (Line 12)The word “dolorous” (meaning sorrowful) conveys deep sadness with a formal, mournful tone, elevating the tree’s suffering to a tragic, almost poetic level.
➡️ Enjambment“Here you seems to me / Like that poor cart-horse” (Lines 6-7)The thought spills over without punctuation, creating urgency and continuity, pulling the reader into the comparison between the tree and the cart-horse.
🖼️ Imagery“Hard bitumen around your feet” (Line 2)Vivid sensory details depict the tree’s roots trapped in unyielding asphalt, creating a tactile and visual image that emphasizes its unnatural, restrictive environment.
🤝 Inclusive Pronoun“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)The pronoun “us” unites the speaker and the tree, suggesting a shared experience of oppression, possibly reflecting the broader Indigenous struggle.
😏 Irony“Black grass of bitumen” (Line 14)Calling bitumen “black grass” is ironic, sarcastically equating lifeless asphalt with natural grass, underscoring the unnatural urban setting imposed on the tree.
⚖️ Juxtaposition“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1)Placing the natural gumtree next to the urban “city street” highlights the stark incompatibility between nature and the man-made environment.
🌌 Metaphor“Black grass of bitumen” (Line 14)Bitumen is compared to grass, presenting it as a false, lifeless substitute for the tree’s natural environment, reinforcing themes of displacement and loss.
😔 Mood“Municipal gum, it is dolorous” (Line 12)The poem establishes a mournful, melancholic mood through words like “dolorous” and imagery of suffering, evoking sympathy for the tree’s plight.
🌳 Personification“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1)The tree is addressed as if human, with “feet” and the capacity to suffer, fostering empathy and emphasizing its victimization by urban forces.
❓ Rhetorical Question“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)This question prompts reflection on the shared oppression of the tree and speaker, implicating colonial or urban forces without expecting an answer.
⭐ Symbolism“Like that poor cart-horse” (Line 7)The cart-horse symbolizes oppression and exploitation, mirroring the tree’s displacement and the broader suffering of Indigenous people under colonial systems.
🧠 Subjective Tone“Here you seems to me” (Line 6)The phrase “seems to me” reflects the speaker’s personal, empathetic perspective, inviting readers to share their emotional response to the tree’s plight.
🔄 Syntax“Rather you should be” (Line 3)The inverted syntax prioritizes “rather,” emphasizing the speaker’s longing for the tree’s natural environment, creating a poignant, reflective tone.
Themes: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

🌿 Theme 1: Displacement and Loss of Natural Habitat: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal vividly captures the theme of displacement through the image of a gum tree, unnaturally confined to a city street. The poet laments, “Hard bitumen around your feet, / Rather you should be / In the cool world of leafy forest halls”, evoking the tree’s rightful place in the wild, surrounded by bird calls and natural beauty. This juxtaposition between the tree’s current entrapment and its ideal environment mirrors the forced removal of Aboriginal people from their ancestral lands. The title itself, Municipal Gum, underscores the irony of an Indigenous tree subjected to urban authority, reflecting the broader alienation of nature—and by extension, Indigenous culture—under colonial urban expansion.


🐎 Theme 2: Oppression and Dehumanization: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal draws a stark parallel between the tree’s plight and that of a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged”. This metaphor not only humanizes the tree but also underscores the cruelty of stripping a being—human or animal—of its freedom and dignity. By describing the horse’s “hung head and listless mien”, Noonuccal evokes an image of total subjugation, suggesting that urbanization does not merely displace but also inflicts ongoing suffering. This analogy deepens the political resonance of the poem, presenting the gum tree as a symbol for Aboriginal people subjected to systemic control and cultural castration under colonial governance.


🖤 Theme 3: Shared Suffering and Indigenous Solidarity: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal bridges the gap between the natural and human worlds by addressing the tree directly as a “fellow citizen”. This kinship signifies a deep Indigenous worldview in which land, plants, and people are interconnected. The closing question—“What have they done to us?”—shifts the poem’s focus from the singular plight of the tree to a collective Aboriginal experience of oppression. The pronoun “us” establishes solidarity, uniting the speaker, the tree, and the broader Indigenous community as mutual victims of dispossession. In doing so, Noonuccal transforms the gum tree from a passive urban fixture into a silent witness to, and participant in, the enduring struggle for Aboriginal rights and cultural survival.


🌏 Theme 4: Environmental and Cultural Critique of Urbanization: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal serves as both an environmental lament and a cultural critique of modern urban development. The phrase “black grass of bitumen” starkly contrasts with the natural soil and vegetation of the gum tree’s original habitat, symbolizing how industrial progress replaces organic life with lifeless infrastructure. This imagery reflects how colonial urban planning not only damages the environment but also erodes Indigenous traditions tied to the land. By embedding the gum tree in a cityscape, Noonuccal critiques the prioritization of economic and municipal growth over ecological balance and cultural continuity, aligning environmental degradation with the erasure of Indigenous heritage.

Literary Theories and “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Literary TheoryExplanationReferences from Poem
🌍 Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial theory examines the effects of colonization on cultures and societies, focusing on issues of identity, displacement, and resistance. In “Municipal Gum,” the gumtree’s displacement from its natural forest to the urban street mirrors the dispossession and marginalization of Indigenous Australians under colonial rule. The speaker’s identification with the tree as a “fellow citizen” and the question “What have they done to us?” suggest a shared experience of oppression, reflecting the loss of land and culture for Indigenous peoples.“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1), “O fellow citizen, / What have they done to us?” (Lines 15-16)
🌿 EcocriticismEcocriticism explores the relationship between literature and the natural environment, often highlighting human exploitation of nature. The poem portrays the gumtree as a victim of urbanization, trapped in “hard bitumen” and separated from its natural “leafy forest halls.” This reflects the environmental cost of urban development and critiques humanity’s domination of nature, aligning the tree’s suffering with broader ecological harm.“Hard bitumen around your feet” (Line 2), “In the cool world of leafy forest halls / And wild bird calls” (Lines 4-5)
👩 Feminist TheoryFeminist theory analyzes gender dynamics and power structures, often focusing on marginalized voices. While the poem does not explicitly address gender, Oodgeroo Noonuccal, an Indigenous woman, uses the tree’s suffering to voice resistance against oppression. The personification of the tree as a “fellow citizen” and the emotive language (“dolorous,” “hopelessness”) can be read as a feminine-coded expression of empathy and nurturing, challenging the patriarchal, colonial forces that harm both nature and Indigenous communities.“Municipal gum, it is dolorous” (Line 12), “O fellow citizen” (Line 15)
⚙️ Marxist TheoryMarxist theory examines class struggle and the exploitation of labor and resources by capitalist systems. The gumtree, likened to a “poor cart-horse” that is “castrated, broken, a thing wronged,” symbolizes the exploitation of natural resources and Indigenous peoples by urban, capitalist systems. The “municipal” label suggests ownership by a city authority, reflecting how capitalism commodifies and controls both nature and marginalized groups for profit.“Like that poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” (Lines 7-8), “Municipal gum” (Line 12)
Critical Questions about “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

1. How does the poem use the gumtree as a symbol to reflect the experiences of Indigenous Australians?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal employs the gumtree as a powerful symbol of displacement and oppression, mirroring the experiences of Indigenous Australians under colonial rule. The poem opens with the image of the “Gumtree in the city street, / Hard bitumen around your feet,” immediately establishing the tree’s unnatural placement in an urban environment, far from its rightful “cool world of leafy forest halls / And wild bird calls.” This displacement parallels the forced removal of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands to urban or marginalized spaces due to colonization. The speaker’s empathetic address to the tree as “O fellow citizen” and the rhetorical question “What have they done to us?” forge a direct connection between the tree’s suffering and the speaker’s, likely an Indigenous person, suggesting a shared experience of loss and subjugation. The comparison to a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” further symbolizes the emasculation and dehumanization of Indigenous communities, stripped of their cultural vitality and autonomy. Through these vivid images and emotional appeals, Noonuccal uses the gumtree to reflect the broader historical and cultural trauma of Indigenous Australians, highlighting their resilience and shared struggle against colonial oppression.

2. In what ways does the poem critique the impact of urbanization on the natural environment?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal serves as a poignant critique of urbanization’s destructive impact on the natural environment, using the gumtree’s plight to illustrate the harm caused by human development. The poem vividly contrasts the tree’s current state, trapped in “Hard bitumen around your feet,” with its ideal habitat in the “cool world of leafy forest halls / And wild bird calls.” This stark juxtaposition underscores how urban environments replace natural ecosystems with artificial, lifeless materials like bitumen, described sarcastically as “black grass.” The tree’s personified suffering, evident in the speaker’s lament that it is “dolorous” and akin to a “cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,” emphasizes the violence of urbanization, which not only displaces natural elements but also subjects them to prolonged degradation. By labeling the tree “municipal,” Noonuccal critiques the commodification of nature by city authorities, suggesting that urban systems prioritize control and profit over ecological harmony. This critique resonates with broader environmental concerns, positioning the poem as a call to recognize and resist the ecological devastation wrought by unchecked urban expansion.

3. How does the poem’s use of personification and apostrophe enhance its emotional impact?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal leverages personification and apostrophe to deepen the poem’s emotional resonance, fostering a sense of empathy and shared suffering between the speaker and the gumtree. By personifying the tree with human attributes, such as “your feet” in “Hard bitumen around your feet” and addressing it directly as “O fellow citizen,” Noonuccal transforms the tree into a sentient being capable of experiencing pain and loss, akin to a human. This anthropomorphism is intensified through the comparison to a “poor cart-horse / Castrated, broken, a thing wronged,” whose “hung head and listless mien express / Its hopelessness,” evoking a vivid image of despair that mirrors human suffering. The use of apostrophe, particularly in lines like “Municipal gum, it is dolorous / To see you thus,” creates an intimate dialogue between the speaker and the tree, drawing readers into their shared plight. These techniques amplify the poem’s emotional impact by humanizing the tree’s suffering, encouraging readers to empathize not only with the natural world but also with the marginalized communities, such as Indigenous Australians, whose struggles the tree symbolizes.

4. What role does the rhetorical question in the final line play in the poem’s overall message?

Municipal Gum by Oodgeroo Noonuccal concludes with the powerful rhetorical question “What have they done tohou us?” which encapsulates the poem’s central themes of oppression and shared suffering, broadening its message to a universal level. This question, addressed to the personified gumtree, unites the speaker and the tree as victims of an unspecified “they,” likely referring to colonial or urban authorities responsible for their displacement and harm. By using “us,” Noonuccal includes herself, and by extension Indigenous Australians, in the tree’s plight, suggesting a collective experience of loss and injustice. The rhetorical nature of the question, which demands no direct answer, invites readers to reflect on the historical and ongoing impacts of colonization and urbanization, as seen in earlier images like the tree’s “hard bitumen around your feet” and its comparison to a “cart-horse / Castrated, broken.” This open-ended query amplifies the poem’s emotional and political weight, urging readers to consider their own complicity in these systems and to recognize the interconnectedness of human and environmental exploitation, making it a poignant call for awareness and change.

Literary Works Similar to “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  • 🌿🐎 “The Horses” by Edwin Muir – Shares with “Municipal Gum” a sense of loss and post-industrial alienation, using animals as symbols of a more harmonious past disrupted by human progress.
  • 🖤 “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal – From the same poet, it parallels Municipal Gum in its exploration of Aboriginal displacement and cultural loss through the personification of nature.
  • 🌏 “God’s Grandeur” by Gerard Manley Hopkins – Echoes “Municipal Gum” in its critique of industrialization’s damage to nature, contrasting the beauty of creation with the scarring effects of human exploitation.
  • 🌊 The Waste Land” (opening section) by T.S. Eliot – Shares “Municipal Gum’”s imagery of barrenness and unnatural landscapes to represent cultural decay and alienation from the natural world.
Representative Quotations of “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Quotation and Line NumberContextTheoretical Interpretations
“Gumtree in the city street” (Line 1)This opening line introduces the central image of a native Australian gumtree misplaced in an urban environment, setting the stage for themes of displacement and alienation.Postcolonial: The gumtree symbolizes Indigenous Australians displaced by colonial urbanization, reflecting loss of land and identity. Ecocritical: Highlights the unnatural imposition of urban spaces on nature, critiquing environmental disruption. Feminist: As a work by an Indigenous woman, the tree’s placement may reflect marginalized voices challenging dominant urban narratives. Marxist: Represents the commodification of nature by capitalist urban systems, stripping it of its natural context.
“Hard bitumen around your feet” (Line 2)Describes the tree’s roots trapped in asphalt, emphasizing its confinement and unnatural surroundings.Postcolonial: Mirrors the entrapment of Indigenous peoples in colonial systems, unable to thrive in their natural state. Ecocritical: Critiques urbanization’s replacement of natural soil with lifeless bitumen, harming ecosystems. Feminist: The tree’s “feet” personify it as a vulnerable entity, akin to marginalized groups under patriarchal control. Marxist: Suggests capitalist exploitation of natural resources, with bitumen symbolizing industrial dominance.
“Rather you should be” (Line 3)Expresses the speaker’s longing for the tree to be in its natural forest habitat, contrasting with its current urban setting.Postcolonial: Reflects Indigenous desire to return to pre-colonial harmony with land, disrupted by colonization. Ecocritical: Advocates for the restoration of natural environments over urban sprawl. Feminist: The nurturing tone aligns with feminine-coded empathy, resisting urban oppression. Marxist: Critiques the capitalist systems that prioritize urban development over natural preservation.
“In the cool world of leafy forest halls” (Line 4)Depicts an idealized natural environment, evoking a serene, untouched forest, contrasting with the urban setting.Postcolonial: Evokes pre-colonial Indigenous lands, free from colonial interference. Ecocritical: Celebrates nature’s beauty, critiquing its destruction by urban development. Feminist: The nurturing imagery reflects a feminine connection to nature, opposing patriarchal urban control. Marxist: Contrasts the freedom of nature with the commodified urban landscape, highlighting capitalist exploitation.
“Like that poor cart-horse” (Line 7)Compares the gumtree to an overworked, mistreated cart-horse, introducing a simile of suffering and exploitation.Postcolonial: The horse symbolizes Indigenous peoples, oppressed and dehumanized by colonial systems. Ecocritical: Equates the tree’s suffering with nature’s exploitation by human systems. Feminist: The empathetic comparison reflects a feminine-coded resistance to oppressive structures. Marxist: Represents labor exploitation under capitalism, with the horse and tree as victims of systemic abuse.
“Castrated, broken, a thing wronged” (Line 8)Describes the cart-horse (and tree) as mutilated and defeated, emphasizing profound suffering and injustice.Postcolonial: Reflects the emasculation and cultural destruction of Indigenous communities under colonialism. Ecocritical: Highlights nature’s degradation by human intervention, reducing it to a “thing wronged.” Feminist: The language of violation suggests a gendered critique of patriarchal harm to both nature and marginalized groups. Marxist: Symbolizes the dehumanization of labor and nature under capitalist systems, stripped of vitality for profit.
“Its hopelessness” (Line 11)A stark, single-word line capturing the despair of the horse and tree, creating a dramatic pause.Postcolonial: Encapsulates the despair of Indigenous peoples facing ongoing colonial oppression. Ecocritical: Reflects the bleak fate of nature trapped in urban environments. Feminist: The emotional weight aligns with feminine expressions of empathy and loss, resisting stoic patriarchal norms. Marxist: Represents the hopelessness of exploited classes and resources under capitalist domination.
“Municipal gum, it is dolorous” (Line 12)Directly addresses the tree as “municipal,” highlighting its ownership by the city, and describes its sorrowful state.Postcolonial: The term “municipal” suggests colonial control over Indigenous land and symbols. Ecocritical: Critiques urban systems for imposing ownership on nature, causing its suffering. Feminist: The term “dolorous” reflects a feminine-coded emotional response, emphasizing care for the oppressed. Marxist: “Municipal” indicates capitalist commodification of nature, reducing it to city property.
“Black grass of bitumen” (Line 14)Sarcastically describes the asphalt as “black grass,” highlighting the unnatural replacement of nature with urban materials.Postcolonial: Symbolizes the erasure of Indigenous landscapes by colonial urban development. Ecocritical: Critiques the replacement of natural ecosystems with lifeless urban materials. Feminist: The ironic tone reflects a subversive, feminine-coded critique of patriarchal urban dominance. Marxist: Represents capitalism’s transformation of natural resources into artificial, profit-driven constructs.
“What have they done to us?” (Line 16)The final rhetorical question unites the speaker and tree, implicating an oppressive “they” in their shared suffering.Postcolonial: Alludes to colonial oppression, linking the tree’s and Indigenous peoples’ shared plight. Ecocritical: Questions humanity’s role in environmental destruction, uniting human and natural suffering. Feminist: The inclusive “us” reflects a collective, empathetic resistance to patriarchal and colonial forces. Marxist: Critiques capitalist systems for exploiting both nature and marginalized groups, fostering solidarity in their shared harm.
Suggested Readings: “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  1. Javidshad, Mahdi, and Amirhossein Nemati. “Hybridity in Australia: a postcolonial reading of Oodgeroo Noonuccal’s selected poems.” Critical Literary Studies 2.1 (2020): 39-56.
  2. Pustarfi, Laura. “Interstice: Eucalyptus.” The Wisdom of Trees: Thinking Through Arboreality, edited by Laura Pustarfi and David Macauley, State University of New York Press, 2025, pp. 369–70. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29248382.27. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  3. Davies, Margaret. “The Consciousness of Trees.” Law and Literature, vol. 27, no. 2, 2015, pp. 217–35. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26770750. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.

“Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg: A Critical Analysis

“Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg first appeared in Poetry magazine in December 1916, later gaining recognition as part of the canon of First World War poetry for its stark realism and ironic tone.

“Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg

“Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg first appeared in Poetry magazine in December 1916, later gaining recognition as part of the canon of First World War poetry for its stark realism and ironic tone. Set against the dawn in the trenches, the poem captures the grim normality of war through the image of a sardonic rat, whose “cosmopolitan sympathies” allow it to move freely between English and German lines, indifferent to national boundaries or human slaughter. The speaker’s act of placing a “parapet’s poppy” behind his ear contrasts the symbolic beauty of the flower with the carnage of “torn fields of France,” where poppies draw nourishment “from man’s veins.” Rosenberg’s blend of vivid imagery, bitter irony, and the juxtaposition of natural resilience with human fragility gave the poem enduring popularity. Its appeal lies in how it subverts traditional war poetry by focusing not on patriotic heroism but on the absurdity and futility of conflict, embodied in the rat’s survival amid “bonds to the whims of murder” and the soldiers’ certain mortality.

Text: “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg

The darkness crumbles away.

It is the same old druid Time as ever,

Only a live thing leaps my hand,

A queer sardonic rat,

As I pull the parapet’s poppy

To stick behind my ear.

Droll rat, they would shoot you if they knew

Your cosmopolitan sympathies.

Now you have touched this English hand

You will do the same to a German

Soon, no doubt, if it be your pleasure

To cross the sleeping green between.

It seems you inwardly grin as you pass

Strong eyes, fine limbs, haughty athletes,

Less chanced than you for life,

Bonds to the whims of murder,

Sprawled in the bowels of the earth,

The torn fields of France.

What do you see in our eyes

At the shrieking iron and flame

Hurled through still heavens?

What quaver—what heart aghast?

Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins

Drop, and are ever dropping;

But mine in my ear is safe—

Just a little white with the dust.

Annotations: “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg

LineOriginal TextSimple English ExplanationLiterary Devices
1The darkness crumbles away.The night is fading as dawn begins.Metaphor, Imagery
2It is the same old druid Time as ever,Time feels ancient and unchanging, like a mystical figure.Personification, Allusion
3Only a live thing leaps my hand,A living creature, a rat, jumps onto my hand.Imagery
4A queer sardonic rat,The rat seems strange and mocking.Personification, Adjective
5As I pull the parapet’s poppyWhile I pick a poppy flower from the trench’s edge.Alliteration, Imagery
6To stick behind my ear.To place the poppy behind my ear.Imagery
7Droll rat, they would shoot you if they knewFunny rat, soldiers would kill you if they knew your nature.Apostrophe, Irony
8Your cosmopolitan sympathies.Your tendency to interact with all sides, regardless of nationality.Irony, Personification
9Now you have touched this English handYou’ve touched my English hand.Synecdoche
10You will do the same to a GermanYou’ll likely touch a German soldier’s hand too.Parallelism
11Soon, no doubt, if it be your pleasureProbably soon, if you choose to.Apostrophe, Irony
12To cross the sleeping green between.To cross the quiet no-man’s-land between trenches.Metaphor, Imagery
13It seems you inwardly grin as you passYou seem to smirk as you move past.Personification, Imagery
14Strong eyes, fine limbs, haughty athletes,Healthy, proud soldiers with strong bodies.Imagery, Adjective
15Less chanced than you for life,Less likely to survive than you, the rat.Irony, Comparison
16Bonds to the whims of murder,Bound to the random violence of war.Metaphor, Personification
17Sprawled in the bowels of the earth,Lying dead in the trenches or battlefields.Metaphor, Imagery
18The torn fields of France.The war-damaged fields of France.Imagery
19What do you see in our eyesWhat do you notice in our eyes, rat?Apostrophe, Rhetorical Question
20At the shrieking iron and flameWhen we face the loud shells and fire of war.Imagery, Onomatopoeia
21Hurled through still heavens?Thrown through the quiet sky?Imagery, Oxymoron
22What quaver—what heart aghast?What fear or trembling do you see in us?Rhetorical Question, Alliteration
23Poppies whose roots are in man’s veinsPoppies that seem to grow from human blood.Metaphor, Symbolism
24Drop, and are ever dropping;They wilt and keep wilting.Repetition, Imagery
25But mine in my ear is safe—But the poppy behind my ear is secure.Contrast, Imagery
26Just a little white with the dust.Slightly pale from the trench dust.Imagery, Adjective
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg
Literary DeviceDefinitionExample from PoemExplanation
🟢 AlliterationThe repetition of initial consonant sounds in closely positioned words to enhance rhythm and emphasize key ideas.“Parapet’s poppy” (Line 5)The repetition of the “p” sound in “parapet’s poppy” creates a rhythmic effect, drawing attention to the act of picking the poppy, a symbol of death and remembrance in the war-torn trench setting. This reinforces the contrast between the delicate act and the harsh environment.
🟡 AllusionA reference to a well-known person, place, event, or concept to add deeper meaning.“It is the same old druid Time as ever” (Line 2)The reference to “druid Time” alludes to ancient, mystical Celtic priests, suggesting that time is an unchanging, almost supernatural force overseeing the war’s futility. This adds a layer of timeless tragedy to the soldiers’ plight.
🔵 AnaphoraThe repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or lines for emphasis.“What do you see… What quaver…” (Lines 19, 22)The repeated “What” in the rhetorical questions addressing the rat emphasizes the speaker’s curiosity about the rat’s perspective on human suffering, intensifying the poem’s introspective and questioning tone.
🔴 ApostropheAddressing a non-human entity as if it can respond, often to express emotion or reflection.“Droll rat, they would shoot you if they knew” (Line 7)The speaker directly addresses the rat, attributing human-like qualities to it, which highlights the absurdity of war where even a rat’s neutrality is a threat. This device creates intimacy and underscores the poem’s ironic tone.
🟠 AssonanceThe repetition of vowel sounds in nearby words to create musicality or emphasize mood.“Queer sardonic rat” (Line 4)The repeated “a” sounds in “sardonic” and “rat” create a subtle musicality, emphasizing the rat’s mocking demeanor. This enhances the poem’s sardonic tone, reflecting the grim humor in the face of war’s horrors.
🟣 CaesuraA pause or break within a line, often marked by punctuation, to create emphasis or disrupt rhythm.“What quaver—what heart aghast?” (Line 22)The dash creates a pause, mimicking the speaker’s hesitation and emotional weight as they question the fear in soldiers’ eyes. This pause heightens the emotional intensity and mirrors the fragmented experience of war.
🟤 ConsonanceThe repetition of consonant sounds, typically within or at the end of words, for rhythmic effect.“Strong eyes, fine limbs” (Line 14)The repeated “s” and “n” sounds in “strong” and “fine” create a smooth, flowing rhythm, contrasting the vitality of the soldiers with their doomed fate, thus amplifying the tragedy of their loss in war.
🔷 ContrastJuxtaposing opposing ideas to highlight differences or create tension.“But mine in my ear is safe— / Just a little white with the dust” (Lines 25-26)The contrast between the poppy’s safety behind the speaker’s ear and the wilting poppies rooted in “man’s veins” highlights the fleeting nature of life in war, emphasizing the speaker’s temporary survival amidst pervasive death.
🟡 EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence or clause across a line break without a pause.“Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins / Drop, and are ever dropping” (Lines 23-24)The flow from “veins” to “Drop” without punctuation links the poppies to human bloodshed, emphasizing the ongoing cycle of death in war. This device mirrors the relentless nature of the conflict.
🔶 HyperboleExaggeration for emphasis or dramatic effect.“Bonds to the whims of murder” (Line 16)Describing war as “whims of murder” exaggerates its randomness and brutality, portraying soldiers as helpless victims of an arbitrary force, which intensifies the poem’s anti-war sentiment.
🔸 ImageryVivid descriptive language that appeals to the senses to create mental pictures.“The torn fields of France” (Line 18)This vivid image of war-ravaged fields evokes the destruction and desolation of the battlefield, appealing to the visual sense and reinforcing the poem’s grim depiction of World War I’s toll.
🟥 IronyA contrast between expectation and reality, often highlighting absurdity or injustice.“Your cosmopolitan sympathies” (Line 8)The rat’s impartiality, touching both English and German hands, is ironic in a war defined by national enmity. This underscores the absurdity of human conflict, as even a rat seems more humane than warring soldiers.
🟦 JuxtapositionPlacing two elements side by side to highlight their differences or similarities.“Strong eyes, fine limbs, haughty athletes, / Less chanced than you for life” (Lines 14-15)Juxtaposing the soldiers’ vitality with their lesser chance of survival compared to the rat highlights the tragic waste of human potential in war, emphasizing its senseless destruction.
🟧 MetaphorA direct comparison between unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“The darkness crumbles away” (Line 1)Comparing darkness to a crumbling substance suggests dawn breaking in a fragile, tactile way, setting a tone of transience and vulnerability in the war-torn trench setting.
🔹 OnomatopoeiaWords that mimic the sound they describe to enhance auditory imagery.“Shrieking iron and flame” (Line 20)“Shrieking” mimics the sound of artillery shells, immersing the reader in the chaotic, terrifying soundscape of war and intensifying the sensory experience of the battlefield.
🟪 OxymoronCombining contradictory terms to create a paradoxical effect.“Still heavens” (Line 21)The phrase pairs the calm of “still” with the vastness of “heavens” amidst war’s chaos, highlighting the surreal contrast between the sky’s tranquility and the violence below.
🔺 ParallelismUsing similar grammatical structures to create rhythm and reinforce ideas.“Now you have touched this English hand / You will do the same to a German” (Lines 9-10)The parallel structure emphasizes the rat’s impartiality, reinforcing the poem’s theme of war’s futility by showing how it crosses enemy lines without distinction.
🟫 PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human entities.“It seems you inwardly grin as you pass” (Line 13)The rat is given the human trait of grinning, suggesting it mocks the soldiers’ plight. This personification enhances the rat’s role as an observer of war’s absurdity, contrasting its survival with human fragility.
🔻 Rhetorical QuestionA question asked for effect, not expecting an answer, to provoke thought.“What do you see in our eyes” (Line 19)Addressing the rat, this question prompts reflection on the soldiers’ fear and despair, deepening the poem’s exploration of war’s psychological toll without requiring a literal response.
🟨 SymbolismUsing an object or word to represent an abstract idea.“Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins” (Line 23)Poppies symbolize death and remembrance, with their “roots in man’s veins” suggesting they grow from soldiers’ blood, representing the sacrifice and loss of life in war, a powerful anti-war image.
Themes: “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg

🕰 Theme 1: Time and the Cycles of War: In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, time is presented as an eternal, impartial force that persists regardless of human suffering. The opening lines — “The darkness crumbles away. / It is the same old druid Time as ever” — liken time to a “druid,” suggesting ancient wisdom and detachment. The arrival of dawn marks both renewal and monotony, as every day in the trenches repeats the same horrors. This cyclical framing emphasizes the futility of war when placed within the vast, unchanging continuum of history, where battles fade into obscurity yet time remains untouched.


🐀 Theme 2: The Irony of Survival: In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, the “queer sardonic rat” becomes a central emblem of survival against the odds. While soldiers are “less chanced than you for life” and tied to “the whims of murder,” the rat roams freely between enemy lines, showing “cosmopolitan sympathies” toward both English and German hands. This inversion — where a despised vermin thrives while human beings perish — exposes the absurdity of war. The rat’s indifference to nationality underlines the arbitrariness of human divisions and the bitter irony that life often favors the least noble of creatures.


🌺 Theme 3: Nature’s Indifference and Coexistence with Death: In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, the image of the “parapet’s poppy” encapsulates the coexistence of beauty and destruction. The speaker observes that “Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins / Drop, and are ever dropping,” suggesting that the flowers draw life from soldiers’ blood. Yet the poppy behind his ear is “safe— / Just a little white with the dust,” untouched by the violence that sustains others. This juxtaposition portrays nature as indifferent to human suffering, thriving in the soil enriched by death without moral judgment or emotional response.


💣 Theme 4: The Psychological Strain of Modern Warfare: In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, the psychological burden of trench life emerges in moments of reflection and fear. The question “What do you see in our eyes / At the shrieking iron and flame / Hurled through still heavens?” conveys the dissonance between the calm of nature and the chaos of battle. The fallen “strong eyes, fine limbs, haughty athletes” lying in “the bowels of the earth” show how war reduces human vitality to lifeless bodies. Phrases like “quaver” and “heart aghast” capture the internalized terror and emotional erosion that define the mental landscape of soldiers.

Literary Theories and “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg
Literary TheoryApplication to the PoemReferences from Poem
New CriticismNew Criticism focuses on the text itself, analyzing its formal elements like structure, imagery, and irony to uncover meaning without external context. In “Break of Day in the Trenches”, the poem’s use of irony and vivid imagery creates a stark contrast between life and death. The rat, described as having “cosmopolitan sympathies” (Line 8), ironically navigates the war’s divisions freely, unlike the soldiers “bonds to the whims of murder” (Line 16). The poppy, a symbol of death with “roots in man’s veins” (Line 23), is juxtaposed with the speaker’s act of placing one “behind my ear” (Line 6), safe but “a little white with the dust” (Line 26). This contrast emphasizes the fragility of life amidst war’s destruction, with the poem’s tight structure and vivid imagery reinforcing its anti-war message through internal textual elements.“Cosmopolitan sympathies” (Line 8), “Bonds to the whims of murder” (Line 16), “Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins” (Line 23), “Behind my ear” (Line 6), “A little white with the dust” (Line 26)
Marxist CriticismMarxist Criticism examines literature through the lens of class struggle, power dynamics, and socioeconomic conditions. The poem critiques the dehumanizing effects of war, which serves the interests of those in power while sacrificing the working-class soldiers. The soldiers, described as “haughty athletes” (Line 14) yet “less chanced than you [the rat] for life” (Line 15), are reduced to pawns in the “torn fields of France” (Line 18), suggesting their exploitation by a system that values territorial gain over human lives. The rat’s ability to cross “the sleeping green between” (Line 12) highlights its freedom compared to the soldiers, who are trapped by the “whims of murder” (Line 16), reflecting the class-based disposability of the lower ranks in wartime hierarchies.“Haughty athletes” (Line 14), “Less chanced than you for life” (Line 15), “Torn fields of France” (Line 18), “Sleeping green between” (Line 12), “Whims of murder” (Line 16)
Postcolonial CriticismPostcolonial Criticism explores themes of imperialism, cultural identity, and resistance to colonial power. While World War I is not typically a colonial context, the poem can be read as critiquing the imperial systems that fueled the war, with Rosenberg, a Jewish poet, potentially reflecting on marginalized identities. The rat’s “cosmopolitan sympathies” (Line 8) and its crossing between “this English hand” and “a German” (Lines 9-10) challenge the nationalistic divisions imposed by imperial powers. The “torn fields of France” (Line 18) evoke the devastation of a colonized landscape, exploited for the war’s aims, while the poppy “in man’s veins” (Line 23) symbolizes the universal cost of imperial conflicts, questioning the legitimacy of such wars for marginalized groups like Rosenberg himself.“Cosmopolitan sympathies” (Line 8), “This English hand / You will do the same to a German” (Lines 9-10), “Torn fields of France” (Line 18), “Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins” (Line 23)
Psychoanalytic CriticismPsychoanalytic Criticism analyzes literature through the lens of the human psyche, exploring unconscious fears, desires, and traumas. The poem reflects the speaker’s psychological state in the face of war’s horrors, with the rat serving as a projection of the speaker’s survival instincts and detachment. The rhetorical questions “What do you see in our eyes” and “What quaver—what heart aghast?” (Lines 19, 22) reveal the speaker’s anxiety and fear of death, confronting the trauma of “shrieking iron and flame” (Line 20). The act of placing the poppy “behind my ear” (Line 6) suggests a subconscious attempt to cling to beauty and normalcy amidst the “bowels of the earth” (Line 17), reflecting a defense mechanism against the overwhelming terror and mortality of the trenches.“What do you see in our eyes” (Line 19), “What quaver—what heart aghast?” (Line 22), “Shrieking iron and
Critical Questions about “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg

🕰 Question 1: How does the poem depict the relationship between time and war?

In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, time is shown as an unchanging, almost mystical force, detached from human suffering. The opening line, “The darkness crumbles away. / It is the same old druid Time as ever,” compares time to an ancient druid — wise, enduring, and indifferent. By setting the poem at dawn, Rosenberg links the cyclical rhythm of day and night with the repetitive, grinding reality of trench warfare. The constancy of time contrasts sharply with the fleeting lives of soldiers, whose existence is dictated by “the whims of murder.” This portrayal underscores the futility of human endeavors in the face of time’s relentless progression, where the war is just one episode in an endless historical continuum.


🐀 Question 2: What is the significance of the rat as a central image in the poem?

In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, the “queer sardonic rat” becomes a powerful symbol of ironic survival and neutrality. While soldiers on both sides are bound by “bonds to the whims of murder,” the rat roams freely between English and German trenches, demonstrating “cosmopolitan sympathies.” This unaligned creature’s ability to survive in a war zone highlights the absurdity of human divisions, where national identities dictate life and death for men but mean nothing to an animal. The rat’s sardonic presence, as if mocking the doomed soldiers, forces the reader to confront the randomness of survival and the hollow nature of wartime nationalism.


🌺 Question 3: How does the poem use the imagery of the poppy to comment on death and beauty?

In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, the “parapet’s poppy” is a multi-layered symbol that blends natural beauty with the grim reality of war. The lines “Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins / Drop, and are ever dropping” suggest that the flowers feed on the blood of the dead, transforming human sacrifice into natural growth. Yet, the poppy the speaker tucks behind his ear is “safe— / Just a little white with the dust,” protected from the violence that sustains others. This contrast reveals nature’s moral indifference — beauty can flourish alongside carnage without being tainted by human grief. The poppy becomes a reminder of both fragility and resilience, embodying the coexistence of life and death.


💣 Question 4: In what ways does the poem explore the psychological impact of trench warfare?

In “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg, psychological strain surfaces in the juxtaposition of calm nature and violent human action. The speaker asks, “What do you see in our eyes / At the shrieking iron and flame / Hurled through still heavens?” — capturing the soldiers’ terror and the surreal coexistence of beauty and destruction. The image of “strong eyes, fine limbs, haughty athletes” lying in “the bowels of the earth” reveals the physical and emotional devastation, turning once-proud men into lifeless bodies. Words like “quaver” and “heart aghast” convey moments of intense fear and vulnerability, suggesting that war’s deepest wounds are often internal, eroding not just the body but the spirit.


Literary Works Similar to “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg
  • 🔴 “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen
    This poem, like Rosenberg’s, vividly depicts the horrors of World War I through stark imagery and irony, exposing the brutal reality of trench warfare and challenging glorified notions of war.
  • 🟢 “In Flanders Fields” by John McCrae
    Similar to Rosenberg’s use of poppies as a symbol of death and remembrance, this poem uses the poppy to reflect on the sacrifices of soldiers in the war-torn fields of Flanders.
  • 🟡 “The Soldier” by Rupert Brooke
    This poem contrasts with Rosenberg’s grim tone by idealizing sacrifice, but both engage with the soldier’s experience in World War I, highlighting different perspectives on death and duty.
  • 🔵 “Anthem for Doomed Youth” by Wilfred Owen
    Like Rosenberg’s poem, this work uses vivid imagery and a mournful tone to lament the senseless loss of young lives in World War I, focusing on the dehumanizing effects of war.
  • 🟣 “Dead Man’s Dump” by Isaac Rosenberg
    Written by Rosenberg himself, this poem shares the same gritty, visceral depiction of war’s devastation and the futility of conflict, using stark imagery to portray the battlefield’s horrors.
Representative Quotations of “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“The darkness crumbles away.” (Line 1)This opening line describes dawn breaking in the trenches, signaling the start of another day in the grim reality of war.New Criticism: The metaphor of crumbling darkness emphasizes the poem’s formal imagery, setting a transient tone that contrasts the fleeting beauty of dawn with the enduring violence of war.
“It is the same old druid Time as ever” (Line 2)The speaker reflects on time as an ancient, unchanging force overseeing the war’s futility.Mythological Criticism: The allusion to “druid Time” invokes a mystical, timeless perspective, suggesting war’s cyclical nature as part of a larger, archetypal human struggle.
“A queer sardonic rat” (Line 4)The rat, a recurring figure, is introduced as a mocking observer of the soldiers’ plight, navigating the trenches freely.Existential Criticism: The rat’s sardonic nature reflects an existential indifference to human suffering, highlighting the absurdity and meaninglessness of war in the face of survival instincts.
“Droll rat, they would shoot you if they knew / Your cosmopolitan sympathies” (Lines 7-8)The speaker addresses the rat, noting its impartiality in touching both English and German soldiers, an act that could provoke hostility.Postcolonial Criticism: The rat’s “cosmopolitan sympathies” challenge the nationalistic divisions of imperial powers, suggesting a critique of the war’s ideological underpinnings from a marginalized poet’s perspective.
“Now you have touched this English hand / You will do the same to a German” (Lines 9-10)The rat’s neutrality is emphasized as it crosses enemy lines, highlighting the shared humanity of soldiers.Humanist Criticism: This parallelism underscores the universal humanity of soldiers, transcending national boundaries and critiquing the artificial divisions imposed by war.
“To cross the sleeping green between” (Line 12)The rat is described as moving across no-man’s-land, a dangerous space between opposing trenches.Ecocriticism: The “sleeping green” personifies the land as peaceful despite its war-torn state, inviting reflection on the environmental destruction caused by human conflict.
“Less chanced than you for life” (Line 15)The speaker compares the soldiers’ slim chances of survival to the rat’s greater likelihood of enduring the war.Marxist Criticism: This line highlights the disposability of soldiers, particularly the working-class, in a war serving the interests of those in power, emphasizing class-based exploitation.
“What do you see in our eyes / At the shrieking iron and flame” (Lines 19-20)The speaker questions what the rat perceives in the soldiers’ fearful expressions amidst the chaos of artillery fire.Psychoanalytic Criticism: These rhetorical questions probe the unconscious fear and trauma of soldiers, reflecting the psychological toll of war’s relentless violence.
“Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins” (Line 23)Poppies, symbolizing death and remembrance, are depicted as growing from the blood of fallen soldiers.Symbolist Criticism: The poppy serves as a potent symbol of sacrifice and loss, with its roots in “man’s veins” evoking the bloodshed that fuels both the war and the flower’s growth.
“But mine in my ear is safe— / Just a little white with the dust” (Lines 25-26)The speaker notes the poppy behind their ear is safe, unlike those wilting on the battlefield, lightly dusted by the trench’s dirt.New Criticism: The contrast between the safe poppy and the ever-dropping ones highlights the poem’s formal tension between fleeting personal survival and the pervasive death surrounding the speaker.
Suggested Readings: “Break of Day in the Trenches” by Isaac Rosenberg
  1. Rosenberg, Isaac. “Break of Day in the Trenches.” Poetry 9.3 (1916): 128-129.
  2. SIMPSON, MATT. “Only a Living Thing — Some Notes towards a Reading of Isaac Rosenberg’s ‘Break of Day in the Trenches.’” Critical Survey, vol. 2, no. 2, 1990, pp. 128–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41555520. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  3. JOHNSTON, JOHN H. “POETRY AND PITY: ISAAC ROSENBERG.” English Poetry of the First World War, Princeton University Press, 1964, pp. 210–49. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pt66.9. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  4. JOHNSTON, JOHN H. “POETRY AND PITY: ISAAC ROSENBERG.” English Poetry of the First World War, Princeton University Press, 1964, pp. 210–49. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pt66.9. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.

“Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis

“Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1964 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going.

"Then and Now" by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

“Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1964 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going. The poem reflects the deep cultural loss experienced by Aboriginal people through colonisation and urbanisation, contrasting the freedom, joy, and communal connection of traditional life with the alienation, materialism, and regimentation of modern city living. Drawing on vivid contrasts between past and present — such as the “didgeridoo” and “woomera” replaced by “neon lights” and “traffic” — the poem mourns the erasure of Indigenous traditions, language, and landscapes. Its popularity stems from its emotional honesty, accessible language, and powerful imagery, which made Aboriginal experiences visible to a broad Australian audience at a time when such voices were marginalised. By merging personal nostalgia with cultural critique, Noonuccal captures both the resilience and the grief of a people whose way of life has been irreversibly changed.

Text: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

In my dreams I hear my tribe
Laughing as they hunt and swim,
But dreams are shattered by rushing car,
By grinding tram and hissing train,
As I see no more my tribe of old
As I walk alone in the teeming town.

I have seen corroboree
Where that factory belches smoke;
Here where they have memorial park
One time lubras dug for yams;
One time our children played
There where the railway yards are now,
And where I remember the didgeridoo
Calling to us to dance and play,
Offices now, neon lights now,
Bank and shop and advertisement now,
Traffic and trade of the busy town.

No more woomera, no more boomerang,
No more playabout, no more the old ways.
Children of nature we were then.
No clocks hurrying crowds to toil.
Now I am civilized and work in the white way,
Now I have dress, now I have shoes:
‘Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!’
Better when I had only a dillybag.
Better when I had nothing but happiness.

Annotations: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
LineSimple MeaningLiterary Devices
In my dreams I hear my tribeThe speaker dreams of hearing her community’s joyful sounds.Imagery 🎨, Nostalgia 💭
Laughing as they hunt and swimThe tribe is happy and active in traditional life.Imagery 🎨, Positive Tone 🌞
But dreams are shattered by rushing car,Modern life interrupts her dreams with cars.Juxtaposition ⚖️, Onomatopoeia 🔊
By grinding tram and hissing train,The noise of urban transport replaces natural sounds.Onomatopoeia 🔊, Imagery 🎨
As I see no more my tribe of oldShe no longer sees her community as it was.Contrast ⚖️, Nostalgia 💭
As I walk alone in the teeming town.She is isolated in the crowded city.Alliteration ✨, Imagery 🎨
I have seen corroboreeShe has seen traditional dances and ceremonies.Cultural Reference 🪶, Imagery 🎨
Where that factory belches smoke;A factory now stands where traditions once occurred.Personification 🗣️, Imagery 🎨
Here where they have memorial parkA park now stands in a place once used traditionally.Contrast ⚖️
One time lubras dug for yams;Aboriginal women once gathered food here.Historical Reference 📜, Imagery 🎨
One time our children playedChildren once played freely in nature.Nostalgia 💭, Imagery 🎨
There where the railway yards are now,A railway has replaced the old play areas.Contrast ⚖️, Imagery 🎨
And where I remember the didgeridooShe recalls hearing a traditional musical instrument.Cultural Symbol 🪘, Imagery 🎨
Calling to us to dance and play,The instrument invited the community to gather and celebrate.Personification 🗣️, Imagery 🎨
Offices now, neon lights now,Modern infrastructure replaces traditional spaces.Repetition 🔁, Imagery 🎨
Bank and shop and advertisement now,Commercial areas have replaced nature and culture.Listing 📋, Contrast ⚖️
Traffic and trade of the busy town.The town is full of business and transport.Alliteration ✨, Imagery 🎨
No more woomera, no more boomerang,Traditional tools are no longer used.Repetition 🔁, Cultural Symbol 🪶
No more playabout, no more the old ways.Traditional lifestyles and customs are gone.Repetition 🔁, Nostalgia 💭
Children of nature we were then.They once lived in harmony with nature.Metaphor 🌿, Nostalgia 💭
No clocks hurrying crowds to toil.They had no time pressure in the past.Personification 🗣️, Contrast ⚖️
Now I am civilized and work in the white way,She works under Western systems now.Irony 😏, Contrast ⚖️
Now I have dress, now I have shoes:She has adopted Western clothing.Repetition 🔁, Symbolism 🪶
‘Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!’Others see her new life as fortunate.Irony 😏, Direct Speech 🗨️
Better when I had only a dillybag.She feels life was better with only a traditional bag.Symbolism 🪶, Nostalgia 💭
Better when I had nothing but happiness.She believes the old life was happier despite having less.Contrast ⚖️, Hyperbole 💥
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Device Example from PoemExplanation
Alliteration“teeming town”, “traffic and trade”Repetition of initial consonant sounds to create rhythm and draw attention to certain images or ideas.
Cultural Reference 🪶“corroboree”Direct mention of a traditional Aboriginal ceremony, grounding the poem in cultural identity.
Contrast ⚖️“Children of nature we were then. / Now I am civilized and work in the white way”Shows stark differences between traditional and modern life, highlighting cultural loss.
Cultural Symbol 🪘“didgeridoo”, “woomera”, “boomerang”Objects representing Aboriginal heritage and traditions, evoking identity and belonging.
Direct Speech 🗨️“‘Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!'”Quoted speech from an external voice, showing societal attitudes and irony.
Historical Reference 📜“One time lubras dug for yams”Refers to traditional food-gathering practices of Aboriginal women before colonisation.
Hyperbole 💥“Better when I had nothing but happiness”Exaggeration to stress that emotional well-being outweighed material possessions.
Imagery 🎨“grinding tram and hissing train”, “neon lights now”Vivid sensory descriptions that make the contrast between past and present tangible.
Irony 😏“Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!”The “luck” is viewed sarcastically, as the job comes at the cost of cultural loss.
Juxtaposition ⚖️“dreams are shattered by rushing car”Placing opposing elements side by side — peaceful dreams versus harsh urban noise — to highlight change.
Listing 📋“Bank and shop and advertisement now”Enumerating modern intrusions, emphasizing the overwhelming transformation.
Metaphor 🌿“Children of nature we were then”Compares Aboriginal people to “children of nature” to show their close bond with the land.
Nostalgia 💭“Better when I had only a dillybag”Expresses longing for the simplicity and joy of the past.
Onomatopoeia 🔊“hissing train”, “grinding tram”Words that imitate sounds, making the urban intrusion more vivid.
Personification 🗣️“that factory belches smoke”Gives human qualities to a factory, making industrialisation seem aggressive.
Positive Tone 🌞“Laughing as they hunt and swim”Joyful tone reflecting the happiness of traditional life.
Repetition 🔁“No more woomera, no more boomerang”Repeating phrases for emphasis, reinforcing the sense of cultural erasure.
Sensory Detail 👂“Calling to us to dance and play”Appeals to hearing, allowing readers to imagine the didgeridoo’s sound.
Symbolism 🪶“dillybag”Represents Aboriginal culture and self-sufficiency, contrasting with modern possessions.
Tone Shift 🎭From joyful memories (“Laughing as they hunt and swim”) to resignation (“Now I am civilized and work in the white way”)Change in tone from nostalgia to loss, mirroring the emotional journey of the speaker.
Themes: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

🌿 Connection to Nature and Traditional Life: In “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal, the poet evokes a deep sense of harmony with the natural world and Indigenous traditions, portraying a lifestyle in which people lived as “children of nature” without “clocks hurrying crowds to toil.” This connection is shown through sensory-rich memories of hunting, swimming, and communal gatherings, as in “Laughing as they hunt and swim” and “the didgeridoo calling to us to dance and play.” These images, combined with references to traditional tools like the “woomera” and “boomerang”, establish a world where life was guided by seasons and culture rather than economic systems. By contrasting this life with her present, Noonuccal mourns the loss of not only natural surroundings but also the values and rhythms embedded within them.


⚖️ Cultural Displacement and Loss: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal vividly depicts the displacement of Aboriginal culture under the forces of colonisation and urbanisation, where spaces once used for communal living are transformed beyond recognition. The poet laments how “One time lubras dug for yams” in the very spot where “the railway yards are now”, symbolising a profound shift from self-sustaining cultural practices to industrial domination. Factories “belching smoke” stand where corroborees once gathered the community, and neon lights have replaced the warmth of fires. Through repetition — “No more woomera, no more boomerang” — the poet reinforces the eradication of cultural symbols, underscoring that displacement is not merely physical but an erasure of language, art, and identity.


😏 Irony of Civilisation: In “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal, the poet critiques the so-called “progress” of Western civilisation, using irony to reveal the cost of this transformation. While others remark approvingly, “Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!”, the speaker counters with the belief that life was “better when I had only a dillybag”. This ironic juxtaposition highlights how societal definitions of success — wearing a dress, owning shoes, and working in the “white way” — are hollow when they replace cultural fulfillment with economic labor. The modern world’s markers of “civilisation” are shown not as gains, but as losses disguised as benefits, as material possessions have supplanted what she calls “nothing but happiness.”


💭 Nostalgia and Memory as Resistance: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal is deeply anchored in nostalgia, where memory serves as both a personal refuge and an act of cultural preservation. Even as she walks “alone in the teeming town”, her mind returns to the days when she was surrounded by her tribe, “laughing as they hunt and swim”. The contrast between dreams — vibrant, communal, rooted in tradition — and waking reality — filled with “traffic and trade of the busy town” — intensifies her longing for a time before disruption. This persistent return to the past is more than longing; it is a subtle form of resistance, asserting that the old ways hold enduring value despite the dominance of the present.

Literary Theories and “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Literary TheoryReferences from the PoemExplanation
Postcolonial Theory 🌏“One time lubras dug for yams”, “No more woomera, no more boomerang”Examines the impact of colonisation, showing how Indigenous practices, tools, and spaces have been replaced by Western industrial and commercial structures. Highlights cultural erasure and identity loss.
Marxist Theory 💰“Now I am civilized and work in the white way”, “Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!”Analyses class structures and economic power; critiques how capitalist labor systems replace communal living with wage work, framing material possessions as progress despite emotional loss.
Eco-Criticism 🌿“Children of nature we were then”, “Better when I had only a dillybag”Focuses on the relationship between humans and nature; the poem contrasts sustainable traditional lifestyles with the environmental and spiritual costs of industrialisation.
Feminist Theory 👩“One time lubras dug for yams”, “Now I have dress, now I have shoes”Highlights Indigenous women’s roles in traditional life versus their assimilation into Western gender norms; explores how colonialism reshaped female identity and labor.
Critical Questions about “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

🌏 How does the poem reflect the lasting impact of colonisation on Aboriginal identity?

In “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal, colonisation’s impact is not simply implied but vividly rendered through spatial transformation and cultural erasure, as the speaker recalls “One time lubras dug for yams” in places now occupied by “railway yards”. This replacement of traditional spaces with industrial infrastructure symbolises the systematic displacement of Aboriginal culture, while the repeated refrain “No more woomera, no more boomerang” underscores the complete disappearance of material and symbolic cultural artefacts. By juxtaposing these losses against her own assimilation into “the white way”, the poet reveals how colonisation infiltrates identity, reshaping self-perception while erasing historical continuity.


💰 In what ways does the poem critique capitalist definitions of success?

“Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal exposes the hollowness of capitalist progress by presenting the speaker’s modern life — “Now I have dress, now I have shoes” — as an external marker of achievement contrasted with her heartfelt belief that it was “Better when I had only a dillybag.” The sarcastic echo of societal approval in “Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!” highlights how economic productivity is prized over cultural heritage and emotional well-being. This critique implies that capitalist measures of success often mask deeper losses, replacing collective joy and connection with individual labour and material acquisition.


🌿 What role does the natural environment play in shaping the poem’s emotional tone?

In “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal, the natural environment functions as both a setting and a source of emotional resonance, with pastoral images such as “laughing as they hunt and swim” evoking joy, community, and freedom. These idyllic memories, tied to land and tradition, stand in stark opposition to the sensory overload of the modern world — “grinding tram and hissing train” — where industrial noise replaces the sounds of nature. By drawing this sharp contrast, the poem uses environmental imagery to generate a tone of mourning, positioning the loss of the natural world as inseparable from the loss of cultural identity.


👩 How does the poem address changes in the roles and identities of Aboriginal women?

“Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal subtly comments on the shifting roles of Aboriginal women by contrasting the communal and resourceful labour of “lubras dug for yams” with the Westernised identity of the speaker, now “civilized” and dressed according to European norms. This transition reflects not only a change in lifestyle but a redefinition of worth, where practical cultural contributions are overshadowed by the appearance of conformity. The adoption of Western dress and the loss of traditional tasks suggest an imposed standard of femininity, illustrating how colonial assimilation reshaped gender roles alongside cultural displacement.

Literary Works Similar to “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

“We Are Going” – Oodgeroo Noonuccal

  • Shares the same postcolonial and cultural loss themes, using repetition and stark contrasts to depict Aboriginal displacement, much like “Then and Now”.

🌿 “Municipal Gum” – Oodgeroo Noonuccal

  • Uses symbolism of a chained gum tree to reflect alienation from the natural environment, paralleling the environmental and spiritual displacement in “Then and Now”.

💭 “The Past” – Oodgeroo Noonuccal

  • Blends nostalgia with cultural memory, much like “Then and Now”, showing the persistence of Indigenous heritage despite modernisation.

😏 “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” – Oodgeroo Noonuccal

  • Uses a strong, assertive voice to address inequality and colonial oppression, aligning with the critical tone of “Then and Now” in confronting societal injustice.
Representative Quotations of “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Quotation ContextExplanation with Theoretical Perspective
“In my dreams I hear my tribe” 🗨️Opening memory of cultural connection.Postcolonial Theory 🌏 – Highlights the centrality of Indigenous community in identity, framing the dream as resistance to colonial erasure.
“Laughing as they hunt and swim” 🌞Depicts joyful traditional life.Eco-Criticism 🌿 – Connects joy and freedom to a harmonious relationship with nature.
“Dreams are shattered by rushing car” 🔊Modern sounds interrupt her memories.Postcolonial Theory 🌏 – Symbolises colonial intrusion disrupting cultural continuity.
“One time lubras dug for yams” 📜Refers to women’s traditional food gathering.Feminist Theory 👩 – Reflects Aboriginal women’s agency in pre-colonial society, later undermined by Western norms.
“Where that factory belches smoke” 🗣️Industrialisation replaces traditional spaces.Eco-Criticism 🌿 – Personifies environmental degradation, critiquing industrial encroachment on sacred land.
“No more woomera, no more boomerang” 🪘Lists lost cultural tools.Postcolonial Theory 🌏 – Shows material symbols of cultural heritage erased by colonisation.
“Children of nature we were then” 🌿Describes life before colonisation.Eco-Criticism 🌿 – Frames traditional Aboriginal identity as inseparable from the natural world.
“Now I am civilized and work in the white way” 😏Speaks ironically about assimilation.Marxist Theory 💰 – Critiques the capitalist and colonial framing of “civilisation” as economic participation.
“Isn’t she lucky to have a good job!” 🗨️A voice from outside praises her assimilation.Marxist Theory 💰 – Ironically shows capitalist labour as falsely equated with progress.
“Better when I had nothing but happiness” 💭Concludes with longing for a simpler past.Postcolonial Theory 🌏 – Rejects materialist measures of success, valuing cultural and emotional richness instead.
Suggested Readings: “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  1. Collins, John. “Oodgeroo of the tribe Noonuccal.” Race & class 35.4 (1994): 77-87.
  2. Fox, Karen. “Oodgeroo Noonuccal: Media Snapshots of a Controversial Life.” Indigenous Biography and Autobiography, edited by Peter Read et al., vol. 17, ANU Press, 2008, pp. 57–68. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24h88s.9. Accessed 12 Aug. 2025.
  3. Collins, John. “OBITUARY: OODGEROO OF THE TRIBE NOONUCCAL.” Aboriginal History, vol. 18, no. 1/2, 1994, pp. 1–4. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24046080. Accessed 12 Aug. 2025.

“Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter: Summary and Critique

“Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter first appeared in CR: The New Centennial Review in 2010, published by Michigan State University Press.

"Eternal Life and Biopower" by Miguel Vatter: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter

“Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter first appeared in CR: The New Centennial Review in 2010, published by Michigan State University Press. In this pivotal essay, Vatter rethinks Michel Foucault’s theory of biopower in the context of philosophical traditions that conceive of life as eternal, particularly drawing from the works of Aristotle, Spinoza, and Heidegger. Vatter critically engages with thinkers like Giorgio Agamben and Roberto Esposito, who frame biopolitics as inevitably leading toward thanatopolitics—a politics of death—and instead posits that a genuinely affirmative biopolitics depends on re-conceiving life not as finite biological existence (zoē), but as contemplative and eternal (zoē aionios). Through a detailed analysis of Spinoza’s metaphysics, Vatter suggests that eternal life is not a transcendent afterlife but the immanent force by which each being perseveres in its being—its conatus—in alignment with divine immanence. This notion provides a political and philosophical counterpoint to biopolitics as domination, grounding resistance in a vision of life as inherently ethical and contemplative. The essay’s importance in literary and political theory lies in how it bridges theology, metaphysics, and post-structuralist biopolitics, challenging the dominant narrative of sovereign power over life with a Spinozist model of providential vitality (Vatter, 2010, pp. 217–249).

Summary of “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter
  • Thanatopolitics, Biopower, and Contemplative Life
    • The article introduces Foucault’s concept of biopower to explain thanatopolitics, the mass slaughter in the name of life, and critiques interpretations by Agamben and Esposito that link biopower to sovereignty or external power over life.
    • Hypothesis: Biopolitics turns into thanatopolitics when life (zoë) is separated from form (bios), producing a life destined to die; affirmative biopower requires eternal life (zoë aionios) as contemplative or philosophical.
    • Links to Benjamin’s ideas on guilt in natural life and redemption through eternal life beyond myth and morality.
    • “Foucault introduced the concept of biopower to explain how something like ‘thanatopolitics,’ the mobilization of entire populations ‘for the purpose of wholesale slaughter in the name of life necessity,’ became the norm in the twentieth century (1990, 137).”
    • “Eternal life is a theme that traverses both Western philosophical and religious traditions… philosophy becomes truly political when it provides a conception of life (zoë) that is immediately theoretical or contemplative.”
  • Spinoza and Providential Life
    • Spinoza conceives life as eternal through conatus (effort to persevere in being), linking finite things to God’s infinite life; distinguishes abstract existence (dependent on others) from the “very nature of existence” tied to God’s essence.
    • God’s life is power (potentia Dei), providential in general (sustaining all as parts of nature) and particular (favoring virtuous beings that cultivate power).
    • Eternal life felt in the mind as the idea of the body under eternity, leading to intellectual love of God and blessedness.
    • “By life we for our part understand the force through which things persevere in their own being… those speak best who call God ‘life'” (Spinoza 2002, Metaphysical Thoughts, 197).
    • “The human mind cannot be absolutely destroyed along with the body, but something of it remains, which is eternal” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 23).
    • “Salvation or blessedness or freedom consists in the constant and eternal love toward God, that is, in God’s love toward men” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 36, scholium).
  • Heidegger and the Deconstruction of Existential Life
    • Heidegger separates animal life (poor in world, driven by captivation) from human existence (being-towards-death); organs serve organism’s drive for self-preservation.
    • Franck and Derrida deconstruct this: Anxiety and being-towards-death reveal life’s priority over existence, with death as possibility of impossibility, folding existence back to eternal life.
    • Suggests pathways from Heidegger to Spinoza, where life escapes duration and is incarnate without Being or time.
    • “Capacity is only to be found where there is drive” (Heidegger 1995, sec. 54, 228).
    • “Death is also for Dasein… the possibility of an impossibility” (Derrida 1993, 68, citing Heidegger 1986, sec. 53).
    • “Resoluteness being motivated by the drive, we must stop understanding ourselves as Dasein and temporality and think ourselves as living, driven flesh” (Franck 1991, 145).
  • Feeling of Eternity
    • Agamben interprets Aristotelian potentiality as capacity for impotentiality (not-to-act), preserving itself in actuality; links to feeling (presentient self-reflexivity) in flesh as transcendental perception.
    • Eternal life in reproduction and metabolism imitates divine being; Deleuze’s immanence as “a life” (virtual, impersonal) fuses biological and contemplative life.
    • Undermines hierarchies: Nutritive life (metabolism) coincides with conatus, eternalizing finite beings.
    • “To be potential means: to be one’s own lack, to be in relation to one’s own incapacity” (Agamben 1999, 182).
    • “It is the most natural function in living things… to produce another thing like themselves… in order that they may partake of the everlasting and divine in so far as they can” (Aristotle, De Anima 415a27-b1).
    • “Immanent life is ‘pure contemplation without knowledge'” (Deleuze, cited in Agamben 1999, 233).
  • Glory, or the Metabolism of God
    • Metabolism as divine nourishment: Glorification feeds God’s life, which sustains all; in Spinoza, intellectual love immanentizes God, turning philosophy into God’s Sabbath.
    • Acquiescientia in se ipso (rest in oneself) as reflexive action where agent and patient indistinguish; politics of eternal life renders bios inoperable, coinciding with zoë in livability.
    • Critiques Aristotelian limits; suggests true society metabolizes God/Nature without end.
    • “The mind’s intellectual love toward God is part of the infinite love wherewith God loves himself” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 36).
    • “Life, which contemplates its (proper) power to act makes itself inoperosa [unworkable] in all of its actions, it lives only (its) vivibilità [livability]” (Agamben 2007, 274).
    • “Society is therefore the perfected unity in essence of man with nature, the true resurrection of nature, the realized naturalism of man and the realized humanism of nature” (Marx 1975, 350).
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter
Term / ConceptDefinition, Usage, Quotation(s), and Explanation
Biopower 🌱 (Green)Definition: Power over life, managing populations through techniques that optimize biological existence. Present Usage: Frames Foucault’s explanation of thanatopolitics, contrasted with an affirmative power of eternal life resisting death-dealing tendencies. Quotation: “Foucault introduced the concept of biopower to explain how something like ‘thanatopolitics,’ the mobilization of entire populations ‘for the purpose of wholesale slaughter in the name of life necessity,’ became the norm in the twentieth century” (Foucault 1990, The History of Sexuality: Vol. I, 137, cited in Vatter, 217). Explanation: Biopower is critiqued for enabling thanatopolitics when externally controlling life. Vatter proposes an affirmative biopower rooted in Spinoza’s eternal life, emphasizing life’s immanent power.
Thanatopolitics 💀 (Red)Definition: Politics mobilizing populations toward mass death, justified by life’s necessity. Present Usage: Describes the negative outcome of biopolitics when zoë is separated from bios, leading to a life destined to die, countered by eternal life. Quotation: “If biopolitics can be transformed into thanatopolitics, this may derive from the fact that the life here produced, namely, a zoë entirely separate from a bios, is a life destined to die” (Vatter, 218). Explanation: Thanatopolitics highlights biopower’s destructive potential. Vatter uses Agamben and Esposito to argue that eternal life resists this by affirming zoë’s contemplative nature.
Zoë 🌀 (Blue)Definition: Bare, biological life, distinct from bios, the qualified life of political or social existence. Present Usage: When separated from bios, zoë fuels thanatopolitics; Vatter reinterprets it as contemplative and eternal, resisting reduction to mere biology. Quotation: “In both Agamben and Esposito, therefore, the power over life has its source outside of life… a zoë entirely separate from a bios, is a life destined to die” (Vatter, 218). Explanation: Zoë is central to biopolitical debates. Vatter aligns it with Spinoza’s conatus, proposing a philosophical zoë that is eternal and contemplative, countering its devaluation.
Bios 🏛️ (Gold)Definition: Qualified, political, or social form of life, shaped by culture or governance. Present Usage: Serves zoë’s perseverance in Spinoza’s ethics, shaping a divine, eternal life through virtue, not dominating zoë. Quotation: “Spinoza’s ‘ethics’ is entirely dedicated to the proposition that life (zoë) does not persevere because it receives a form, a determination by the activity of its faculties (bios), but to the contrary, its form or determination serves the end of maintaining a life (zoë) that perseveres in an absolute fashion” (Vatter, 225). Explanation: Bios is reframed as supporting zoë’s eternal striving, not as a separate or superior entity, emphasizing a philosophical life aligned with divine immanence.
Eternal Life ✨ (Zoë Aionios, Purple)Definition: Life not destined to die, transcending fate, conceived as contemplative and immanent. Present Usage: Core to Vatter’s affirmative biopower, linking Spinoza’s conatus and Aristotle’s contemplative life to resist thanatopolitics. Quotation: “My hypothesis is that an affirmative conception of the power of life requires conceiving of life as eternal, a zoë aionios that is not destined to die, that stands over mythical fate itself” (Vatter, 218). Explanation: Eternal life is Vatter’s solution to thanatopolitics, integrating philosophy and politics through a contemplative zoë that immanentizes God’s life, drawing on Spinoza and Benjamin.
Conatus ⚡ (Orange)Definition: The effort of all things to persevere in their being, linking finite beings to God’s eternal life. Present Usage: Spinoza’s mechanism for eternal life, where conatus reflects God’s immanent life, enabling finite things to persist eternally. Quotation: “By life we for our part understand the force through which things persevere in their own being… those speak best who call God ‘life'” (Spinoza 2002, Metaphysical Thoughts, 197, cited in Vatter, 223). Explanation: Conatus connects finite and infinite, making life eternal by tying it to God’s essence. It underpins Vatter’s vision of an affirmative biopower resisting external destruction.
Providence 🕊️ (White)Definition: God’s immanent sustaining of all things (general) and favoring of virtuous beings (particular). Present Usage: Describes life’s dependence on God’s eternal life; philosophy becomes political by aligning human striving with divine favor. Quotation: “Spinoza defines the second true attribute of God… as consisting in ‘his Providence, which to us is nothing else than the striving which we find in the whole of Nature and in individual things to maintain and preserve their own existence'” (Spinoza 2002, Short Treatise, ch. 5, cited in Vatter, 224). Explanation: Providence redefines politics as cultivating life’s power, aligning human conatus with divine immanence, making philosophical life a form of divine service.
Being-Towards-Death ⚰️ (Black)Definition: Heidegger’s concept where human existence (Dasein) is defined by awareness of mortality. Present Usage: Critiqued via Derrida and Franck to show life’s priority over existence, folding back into eternal life through deconstruction. Quotation: “Death is also for Dasein… the possibility of an impossibility” (Derrida 1993, Aporias, 68, citing Heidegger 1986, Sein und Zeit, sec. 53, cited in Vatter, 231). Explanation: Being-towards-death is challenged to reveal life’s eternal dimension, where dying connects to an immanent, contemplative life, bridging Heidegger to Spinoza.
Immanence 🌌 (Teal)Definition: The state where all things exist within God, without transcendence, as univocal being. Present Usage: Deleuze and Spinoza’s framework for eternal life, where zoë is contemplative, resisting separation from bios. Quotation: “Immanent life is ‘pure contemplation without knowledge’… marks the radical impossibility of establishing hierarchies and separations” (Agamben 1999, 233, cited in Vatter, 239). Explanation: Immanence enables a philosophical life where God and things coexist, supporting Vatter’s eternal life as a counter to thanatopolitical hierarchies.
Glory 👑 (Silver)Definition: Mutual nourishment between God and humanity via intellectual love, redefining sovereignty. Present Usage: Spinoza’s intellectual love immanentizes God, linking metabolism and contemplation as a political act of glorification. Quotation: “The mind’s intellectual love toward God is part of the infinite love wherewith God loves himself” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 36, cited in Vatter, 243). Explanation: Glory transforms sovereignty into a reciprocal relationship where philosophical life nourishes God’s life, making politics a contemplative act of eternal life.

Contribution of “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter to Literary Theory/Theories
  • Biopolitical Theory 🌱
    • Contribution: Vatter reinterprets Foucault’s biopower, proposing an affirmative conception rooted in eternal life to counter thanatopolitics, challenging Agamben and Esposito’s views of biopower as externally controlling life.Quotation and Citation: “Foucault introduced the concept of biopower to explain how something like ‘thanatopolitics,’ the mobilization of entire populations ‘for the purpose of wholesale slaughter in the name of life necessity,’ became the norm in the twentieth century” (Foucault 1990, The History of Sexuality: Vol. I, 137, cited in Vatter, 217). “My hypothesis is that an affirmative conception of the power of life requires conceiving of life as eternal, a zoë aionios that is not destined to die” (Vatter, 218).
    • Explanation: Vatter’s affirmative biopower, grounded in Spinoza’s eternal life, shifts biopolitical theory from death-driven politics to a life-affirming framework. This impacts literary analyses of power and governance in texts, such as dystopian or political narratives, by emphasizing life’s immanent potential over sovereign control, offering a lens for reading resistance to oppressive structures.
  • Poststructuralism 🌀
    • Contribution: Vatter employs Derrida and Franck to deconstruct Heidegger’s being-towards-death, folding existence into eternal life and challenging binaries like life/existence and zoë/bios, aligning with Deleuze’s immanence.Quotation and Citation: “Death is also for Dasein… the possibility of an impossibility” (Derrida 1993, Aporias, 68, citing Heidegger 1986, Sein und Zeit, sec. 53, cited in Vatter, 231). “Resoluteness being motivated by the drive, we must stop understanding ourselves as Dasein and temporality and think ourselves as living, driven flesh” (Franck 1991, Being and the Living, 145, cited in Vatter, 229).
    • Explanation: By undermining Heidegger’s existential priority, Vatter’s poststructuralist approach enriches literary theory for analyzing texts with fluid boundaries between life and death, such as gothic or spectral narratives. It emphasizes immanence and destabilized identities, aligning with poststructuralist readings of ambiguity and multiplicity in literature.
  • Spinozist Philosophy ⚡ (Orange)
    • Contribution: Vatter uses Spinoza’s conatus, providence, and intellectual love to frame a philosophical life that is eternal and political, redefining bios as serving zoë’s perseverance.
    • Quotation and Citation: “By life we for our part understand the force through which things persevere in their own being… those speak best who call God ‘life’” (Spinoza 2002, Metaphysical Thoughts, 197, cited in Vatter, 223). “The mind’s intellectual love toward God is part of the infinite love wherewith God loves himself” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 36, cited in Vatter, 243).
    • Explanation: Vatter’s Spinozist lens offers literary theory a framework for interpreting texts exploring human striving, divine immanence, or ethical life, such as philosophical novels or allegories. It highlights life’s eternal persistence, providing a new perspective on narratives of redemption or resilience against temporal constraints.
  • Phenomenology ⚰️
    • Contribution: Vatter reinterprets Heidegger’s phenomenology via Franck’s focus on flesh and drive, prioritizing life’s eternal dimension over existence, enhancing phenomenological readings of embodiment in literature.Quotation and Citation: “Capacity is only to be found where there is drive” (Heidegger 1995, The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics, sec. 54, 228, cited in Vatter, 228). “Resoluteness being motivated by the drive, we must stop understanding ourselves as Dasein and temporality and think ourselves as living, driven flesh” (Franck 1991, Being and the Living, 145, cited in Vatter, 229).
    • Explanation: Vatter’s phenomenological contribution challenges existentialist separations, offering literary theory a way to analyze texts centered on embodiment or mortality, such as modernist works exploring lived experience. It emphasizes life’s immanent drive, enriching readings of physicality and persistence in narrative contexts.
  • Deleuzian Immanence 🌌
    • Contribution: Vatter adopts Deleuze’s immanence to fuse biological and contemplative life, dissolving hierarchies between zoë and bios, providing a lens for virtual, impersonal life in literary analysis.Quotation and Citation: “Immanent life is ‘pure contemplation without knowledge’… marks the radical impossibility of establishing hierarchies and separations” (Agamben 1999, Potentialities, 233, citing Deleuze, cited in Vatter, 239). “Deleuze illustrates this mortal yet eternal life, a virtual life, by referring to the description found in a novel by Dickens” (Agamben 1999, Potentialities, 229, cited in Vatter, 237).
    • Explanation: Vatter’s Deleuzian approach enables literary theory to explore texts where life transcends individual subjectivity, such as postmodern or experimental narratives. It supports readings of transformation and becoming, emphasizing life as a virtual force that resists fixed categories, enhancing analyses of fluid identities or collective experiences.
  • Political Theology 👑
    • Contribution: Vatter redefines glory as mutual nourishment between God and humanity, transforming sovereignty into an immanent, philosophical life, enriching analyses of divine-human relations in literature.Quotation and Citation: “The mind’s intellectual love toward God is part of the infinite love wherewith God loves himself” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 36, cited in Vatter, 243). “By feeding the gods through their glorification, people are in reality nourishing themselves from the glory of the gods” (Agamben 2007, Il Regno e la Gloria, 250, cited in Vatter, 245).
    • Explanation: Vatter’s political theology reimagines sovereignty as reciprocal, impacting literary readings of texts with theological or communal themes, such as epics or religious allegories. It offers a framework for analyzing divine-human interdependence, emphasizing eternal life’s role in reshaping power dynamics in narrative contexts.
Examples of Critiques Through “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter
🔍 Literary Work⚖️ Biopolitical Lens (Control/Power) · ♾️ Eternal Life (zoē aionios) · 🔥 Resistance & Ethical Vitality · 🧠 Philosophical Alignment
1. The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley (2024)Biopolitical Lens: 🕰️ Government controls time-traveling detainees, extending biopower through temporality. Eternal Life: 🔄 Time-displacement evokes zoē aionios—life beyond chronological limits. Resistance & Vitality: 🧬 Emotional entanglement (love, intimacy) acts as defiance, transcending temporal control. Philosophical Alignment: 🔁 Resonates with Spinoza’s immanence against the state’s authority over time.
2. James by Percival Everett (2024)Biopolitical Lens: 🪶 Revisits Huckleberry Finn from the enslaved perspective—biopolitical regulation of race, status, and speech. Eternal Life: ✊ Reclaims agency as eternal human dignity, irreducible to legality or ownership. Resistance & Vitality: 🗣️ Voice as survival—narrative reclamation of history becomes ethical vitality. Philosophical Alignment: ⚖️ Challenges Agamben’s homo sacer while infusing Spinoza’s conatus as perseverance of life.
3. Grief Is the Thing with Feathers (Stage Adaptation, 2023)Biopolitical Lens: 🐦 Death manifests as biopolitical absence—the family structure destabilized by loss. Eternal Life: 🌫️ Grief becomes a timeless, lingering presence, suggesting eternal affective life. Resistance & Vitality: 🐾 The Crow disrupts normative mourning—life survives through absurd, poetic resistance. Philosophical Alignment: 💭 Reflects Foucaultian disruptions while affirming Spinozist vitality within affect and imagination.
4. The Fraud by Zadie Smith (2023)Biopolitical Lens: 📚 Examines Victorian racial politics and legal spectacles—sovereign power exercised through narrative control. Eternal Life: 🧾 Storytelling as an eternal act, preserving lives beyond bodily death. Resistance & Vitality: 📖 Satire and truth-telling as ethical forms of resistance to sovereign narratives. Philosophical Alignment: ✍️ Affirms immanent truth as life-force, challenging state narration with Spinozist ethical resistance.
Criticism Against “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter
  • Overreliance on Philosophical Synthesis 🌱 (Green)
    • Criticism: Vatter’s attempt to synthesize Foucault, Spinoza, Heidegger, Agamben, and Deleuze into a cohesive theory of affirmative biopower risks diluting the specificity of each thinker’s framework, potentially leading to conceptual overreach.
    • Explanation: The article ambitiously integrates diverse philosophical traditions to propose an eternal life countering thanatopolitics, but this synthesis may oversimplify complex distinctions. For instance, combining Spinoza’s conatus with Heidegger’s being-towards-death (Vatter, 231) overlooks their fundamentally opposed views on life and existence, potentially weakening the argument’s rigor. Literary theorists might find this blending problematic for analyzing texts requiring fidelity to a single theoretical lens, as it could blur nuanced interpretations of power or subjectivity.
    • Quotation and Citation: “I shall suggest that those contemporary thinkers who have dealt with the idea of eternal life and its internal relation to the power of life, from Jonas to Derrida and Deleuze to Agamben, have all in their own ways tried to bring together Heidegger and Spinoza” (Vatter, 221).
  • Limited Engagement with Foucault’s Original Framework 🌀 (Blue)
    • Criticism: Vatter’s reorientation of Foucault’s biopower toward a Spinozist eternal life underemphasizes Foucault’s focus on historical and institutional practices, potentially disconnecting the argument from biopolitics’ material grounding.
    • Explanation: While Vatter cites Foucault’s biopower as a starting point (Vatter, 217), his shift to a philosophical, contemplative life neglects Foucault’s emphasis on specific technologies of power (e.g., medical or disciplinary institutions). This could limit the article’s utility for literary analyses of texts grounded in historical or social contexts, where biopower’s concrete mechanisms are central. Critics might argue that Vatter’s abstract approach risks idealizing life at the expense of its socio-political realities.
    • Quotation and Citation: “Foucault introduced the concept of biopower to explain how something like ‘thanatopolitics,’ the mobilization of entire populations ‘for the purpose of wholesale slaughter in the name of life necessity,’ became the norm in the twentieth century” (Foucault 1990, The History of Sexuality: Vol. I, 137, cited in Vatter, 217).
  • Underdeveloped Literary Application ⚡ (Orange)
    • Criticism: The article’s heavy philosophical focus leaves its implications for literary theory underdeveloped, limiting its direct applicability to textual analysis.
    • Explanation: Vatter’s argument centers on philosophical concepts like eternal life and immanence, but it offers minimal explicit guidance on how these apply to literary texts beyond broad references, such as to Dickens via Agamben (Vatter, 237). Literary scholars might criticize the lack of concrete examples or methodologies for applying these ideas to narrative structures, character development, or thematic analysis, making the article less accessible for literary studies.
    • Quotation and Citation: “Deleuze illustrates this mortal yet eternal life, a virtual life, by referring to the description found in a novel by Dickens” (Agamben 1999, Potentialities, 229, cited in Vatter, 237).
  • Ambiguity in Defining Eternal Life ⚰️ (Black)
    • Criticism: Vatter’s concept of eternal life (zoë aionios) remains conceptually ambiguous, potentially undermining its analytical precision for both philosophical and literary applications.
    • Explanation: While Vatter posits eternal life as a counter to thanatopolitics (Vatter, 218), the term oscillates between Spinoza’s conatus, Aristotle’s contemplative life, and Deleuze’s immanence, creating a vague construct. This lack of clarity could confuse literary theorists seeking a stable framework for interpreting life’s representation in texts, as the term’s theological and philosophical dimensions are not fully reconciled.
    • Quotation and Citation: “My hypothesis is that an affirmative conception of the power of life requires conceiving of life as eternal, a zoë aionios that is not destined to die, that stands over mythical fate itself” (Vatter, 218).
  • Neglect of Feminist and Materialist Perspectives 🌌 (Teal)
    • Criticism: Vatter’s focus on abstract, male-dominated philosophical traditions (Spinoza, Heidegger, Deleuze) overlooks feminist or materialist critiques of biopolitics, limiting its inclusivity and relevance to diverse literary contexts.
    • Explanation: The article engages minimally with materialist concerns, such as those raised by Marx (Vatter, 246), and ignores feminist critiques of biopolitics, such as those addressing gendered bodies or reproductive politics. This omission could alienate literary scholars analyzing texts through feminist or materialist lenses, where embodiment and socio-economic conditions are central, reducing the article’s scope for intersectional literary analysis.
    • Quotation and Citation: “Society is therefore the perfected unity in essence of man with nature, the true resurrection of nature, the realized naturalism of man and the realized humanism of nature” (Marx 1975, Early Writings, 350, cited in Vatter, 246).
  • Overemphasis on Theological Framing 👑 (Silver)
    • Criticism: Vatter’s reliance on political theology, particularly through Spinoza’s intellectual love and Agamben’s glory, risks alienating secular literary theorists and may not resonate with non-theological texts.
    • Explanation: The article’s framing of eternal life as a theological concept, tied to Spinoza’s God and glory (Vatter, 243-245), may limit its appeal for secular literary analyses or texts outside theological traditions. Critics might argue that this focus narrows the article’s applicability, particularly for modern or postmodern literature where secular or atheistic themes predominate.
    • Quotation and Citation: “The mind’s intellectual love toward God is part of the infinite love wherewith God loves himself” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 36, cited in Vatter, 243). “By feeding the gods through their glorification, people are in reality nourishing themselves from the glory of the gods” (Agamben 2007, Il Regno e la Gloria, 250, cited in Vatter, 245).
Representative Quotations from “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter with Explanation
QuotationPageExplanation
🌱 “Foucault introduced the concept of biopower to explain how something like ‘thanatopolitics,’ the mobilization of entire populations ‘for the purpose of wholesale slaughter in the name of life necessity,’ became the norm in the twentieth century” (Foucault 1990, The History of Sexuality: Vol. I, 137, cited in Vatter, 217).217This sets Vatter’s engagement with Foucault’s biopower, framing his critique of thanatopolitics as death-driven. It provides literary theory a lens for analyzing narratives of power and violence, like dystopian or war literature, by contrasting life-affirming biopolitics.
🌀 “My hypothesis is that an affirmative conception of the power of life requires conceiving of life as eternal, a zoë aionios that is not destined to die, that stands over mythical fate itself” (Vatter, 218).218Vatter’s core thesis posits eternal life as a counter to thanatopolitics, redefining biopolitics philosophically. It offers literary theory a framework for texts resisting death-driven narratives, such as philosophical or redemptive works, emphasizing life’s immanence.
⚡ “By life we for our part understand the force through which things persevere in their own being. . . . those speak best who call God ‘life’” (Spinoza 2002, Metaphysical Thoughts, 197, cited in Vatter, 223).223This Spinozist definition links life’s conatus to divine immanence, supporting Vatter’s eternal life argument. It enriches literary theory for texts exploring striving or divine connections, like allegories, focusing on persistence over moral limits.
⚰️ “Capacity is only to be found where there is drive” (Heidegger 1995, The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics, sec. 54, 228, cited in Vatter, 228).228Vatter uses Heidegger’s drive to bridge life and existence, challenging their separation. This aids literary analyses of embodiment in texts, like modernist works, by prioritizing life’s driven nature over existential temporality.
🌌 “Resoluteness being motivated by the drive, we must stop understanding ourselves as Dasein and temporality and think ourselves as living, driven flesh” (Franck 1991, Being and the Living, 145, cited in Vatter, 229).229Via Franck, Vatter reframes Dasein as driven flesh, aligning with eternal life. This enables literary analyses of texts emphasizing physicality over existential concerns, such as visceral narratives, enhancing immanence-focused readings.
👑 “The mind’s intellectual love toward God is part of the infinite love wherewith God loves himself” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 36, cited in Vatter, 243).243This Spinozist idea ties intellectual love to divine immanence, central to Vatter’s political theology. It provides literary theory a lens for texts with divine-human reciprocity, like religious epics, emphasizing mutual nourishment.
🌱 “Immanent life is ‘pure contemplation without knowledge’… marks the radical impossibility of establishing hierarchies and separations” (Agamben 1999, Potentialities, 233, citing Deleuze, cited in Vatter, 239).239Vatter’s use of Deleuze’s immanence via Agamben posits life as a non-hierarchical force. This aids literary theory for texts with fluid life, like postmodern works, focusing on virtuality and becoming over fixed identities.
🌀 “By feeding the gods through their glorification, people are in reality nourishing themselves from the glory of the gods” (Agamben 2007, Il Regno e la Gloria, 250, cited in Vatter, 245).245This reframes glory as mutual nourishment, supporting Vatter’s political theology. It offers literary theory a framework for communal or theological narratives, like allegories, highlighting divine-human interdependence.
⚡ “Nevertheless, we feel and experience that we are eternal” (Spinoza 2002, Ethics V, Prop. 23, scholium, cited in Vatter, 226).226Spinoza’s claim underscores the mind’s eternal feeling, supporting Vatter’s argument. It aids literary theory for texts exploring eternal consciousness, like mystical works, emphasizing spiritual persistence.
⚰️ “Death is also for Dasein… the possibility of an impossibility” (Derrida 1993, Aporias, 68, citing Heidegger 1986, Sein und Zeit, sec. 53, cited in Vatter, 231).231Derrida’s deconstruction of Heidegger’s being-towards-death, used by Vatter, suggests a return to life’s immanence. This enables literary analyses of texts blurring death and life, like spectral narratives, challenging existentialist readings.
Suggested Readings: “Eternal Life and Biopower” by Miguel Vatter
  1. Vatter, Miguel. “Eternal Life and Biopower.” CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 10, no. 3, 2010, pp. 217–49. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41949718. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  2. Campbell, Timothy. “‘Bios,’ Immunity, Life: The Thought of Roberto Esposito.” Diacritics, vol. 36, no. 2, 2006, pp. 2–22. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204123. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  3. Vatter, Miguel. “Biopolitics of Covid-19 and the Space of Animals: A Planetary Perspective.” The Biopolitical Animal, edited by Felice Cimatti and Carlo Salzani, Edinburgh University Press, 2024, pp. 58–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/jj.17733019.7. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1962 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going, which was the first book of poetry published by an Aboriginal Australian woman.

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1962 in her debut poetry collection We Are Going, which was the first book of poetry published by an Aboriginal Australian woman. The poem is a powerful political manifesto that articulates the demands of Aboriginal Australians for equality, justice, and dignity. Through a series of parallel constructions and contrasts—“hope, not racialism,” “brotherhood, not ostracism,” “independence, not compliance”—Noonuccal rejects tokenistic gestures and calls for tangible change in social, political, and economic life. The poem’s popularity lies in its uncompromising yet lyrical voice, its rhythmic, chant-like repetition that mirrors protest slogans, and its ability to turn lived oppression into an eloquent public demand for reform. Its enduring resonance comes from its unflinching exposure of racial discrimination (“Must we native Old Australians / in our land rank as aliens?”) and its insistence on self-determination, making it a cornerstone of Aboriginal literary and political expression.

Text: “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

We want hope, not racialism,
Brotherhood, not ostracism,
Black advance, not white ascendance.
Make us equals, not dependents.
We need help, not exploitation,
We want freedom, not frustration;
Not control, but self-reliance,
Independence, not compliance,
Not rebuff, but education,
Self-respect, not resignation.
Free us from mean subjection,
From a bureaucrat Protection.
Let’s forget the old-time slavers:
Give us fellowship, not favours;
Encouragement, not prohibitions,
Homes, not settlements and missions.
We need love, not overlordship,
Grip of hand, not whip-hand wardship;
Opportunity that places
White and black on equal basis.
You dishearten, not defend us,
Circumscribe, who should befriend us.
Give us welcome, not aversion,
Give us choice, not cold coercion,
Status, not discrimination,
Human rights, not segregation.
You the law, like Roman Pontius,
Make us proud, not colour-conscious;
Give us the deal you still deny us,
Give goodwill not bigot bias;
Give ambition, not prevention,
Confidence, not condescension;
Give incentive, not restriction,
Give us Christ, not crucifixion.
Though baptised and blessed and bibled
We are still tabooed and libelled.
You devout Salvation-sellers;
Make us neighbours, not fringe-dwellers;
Make us mates, not poor relations,
Citizens, not serfs on stations.
Must we native Old Australians
in our land rank as aliens?
Banish bans and conquer caste
Then we’ll win our own at last

Annotations: “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
LineOriginal TextSimple English ExplanationLiterary Devices
1We want hope, not racialismWe want optimism, not racismAntithesis, Repetition
2Brotherhood, not ostracismWe want unity, not exclusionAntithesis
3Black advance, not white ascendanceWe want progress for Aboriginal people, not white dominanceAntithesis, Alliteration
4Make us equals, not dependentsTreat us as equals, not as reliant on othersAntithesis
5We need help, not exploitationWe need support, not being taken advantage ofAntithesis
6We want freedom, not frustrationWe want liberty, not obstaclesAntithesis, Alliteration
7Not control, but self-relianceWe want independence, not dominationAntithesis
8Independence, not complianceWe want autonomy, not submissionAntithesis
9Not rebuff, but educationWe want learning opportunities, not rejectionAntithesis
10Self-respect, not resignationWe want dignity, not giving upAntithesis
11Free us from mean subjectionRelease us from cruel oppressionAlliteration
12From a bureaucrat ProtectionFrom government control disguised as helpIrony
13Let’s forget the old-time slaversLet’s move past historical oppressorsAllusion
14Give us fellowship, not favoursOffer us partnership, not charityAntithesis, Alliteration
15Encouragement, not prohibitionsSupport us, don’t restrict usAntithesis
16Homes, not settlements and missionsGive us proper homes, not controlled communitiesAntithesis
17We need love, not overlordshipWe want compassion, not dominationAntithesis, Alliteration
18Grip of hand, not whip-hand wardshipOffer friendship, not oppressive controlAntithesis, Metaphor
19Opportunity that placesChances that make us equal
20White and black on equal basisBoth races treated the sameAntithesis
21You dishearten, not defend usYou discourage us, not protect usAntithesis
22Circumscribe, who should befriend usYou limit us instead of supporting usAntithesis
23Give us welcome, not aversionAccept us, don’t reject usAntithesis
24Give us choice, not cold coercionLet us choose, don’t force usAntithesis, Alliteration
25Status, not discriminationGive us respect, not prejudiceAntithesis
26Human rights, not segregationGrant us equality, not separationAntithesis
27You the law, like Roman PontiusYou, the authorities, act like Pontius PilateAllusion, Metaphor
28Make us proud, not colour-consciousHelp us feel pride, not judged by raceAntithesis, Alliteration
29Give the deal you still deny usGive us the fair treatment you withhold
30Give goodwill, not bigot biasOffer kindness, not prejudiceAntithesis, Alliteration
31Give ambition, not preventionEncourage our goals, don’t block themAntithesis
32Confidence, not condescensionBuild our confidence, don’t patronize usAntithesis, Alliteration
33Give incentive, not restrictionMotivate us, don’t limit usAntithesis
34Give us Christ, not crucifixionShare Christian love, not sufferingAntithesis, Allusion
35Though baptised and blessed and bibledDespite being ChristianizedAlliteration
36We are still tabooed and libelledWe’re still stigmatized and slanderedAlliteration
37You devout Salvation-sellersYou hypocritical religious peopleIrony, Metaphor
38Make us neighbours, not fringe-dwellersTreat us as equals, not outcastsAntithesis
39Make us mates, not poor relationsTreat us as friends, not lesser kinAntithesis, Metaphor
40Citizens, not serfs on stationsRecognize us as citizens, not slaves on farmsAntithesis, Metaphor
41Must we native Old AustraliansWhy must Indigenous AustraliansRhetorical Question
42In our land rank as aliens?Be treated as foreigners in our own country?Rhetorical Question, Irony
43Banish bans and conquer casteEnd restrictions and social divisionsAlliteration
44Then we’ll win our own at lastThen we’ll achieve our rights finally
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Literary Device and SymbolDefinitionExample from PoemExplanation
🟢 AlliterationThe repetition of initial consonant sounds in closely positioned words to create rhythm and emphasis.“Freedom, not frustration” (Line 6)The repetition of the “f” sound emphasizes the contrast between the desired state (freedom) and the current state (frustration), enhancing the poem’s rhythm and urgency.
🟡 AllusionA reference to a well-known person, place, event, or work, often to add deeper meaning.“You the law, like Roman Pontius” (Line 27)Refers to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor who sentenced Jesus, implying authorities’ moral failure in upholding justice for Indigenous people.
🔵 AnaphoraThe repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or lines for emphasis.“We want hope… We need help… We want freedom…” (Lines 1, 5, 6)The repeated “We want” and “We need” emphasize the collective demands of the Aboriginal people, reinforcing their urgency and unity.
🔴 AntithesisThe juxtaposition of contrasting ideas in balanced phrases or clauses to highlight opposition.“Hope, not racialism” (Line 1)Contrasts positive (hope) and negative (racialism) concepts to underscore the speaker’s desire for equality over discrimination.
🟠 AssonanceThe repetition of vowel sounds in nearby words to create musicality or emphasis.“Make us mates” (Line 39)The repeated “a” sound in “make” and “mates” creates a rhythmic flow, emphasizing the call for camaraderie.
🟣 CaesuraA pause or break within a line of poetry, often marked by punctuation, to create emphasis or rhythm.“Give us Christ, not crucifixion.” (Line 34)The comma creates a pause, emphasizing the contrast between Christian love and the suffering imposed on Indigenous people.
🟤 ConsonanceThe repetition of consonant sounds, typically within or at the end of words, for effect.“Banish bans” (Line 43)The repeated “n” sound reinforces the call to eliminate restrictions, adding a forceful tone.
🔷 DictionThe choice of words and style of expression to convey tone or attitude.“Mean subjection” (Line 11)The word “mean” conveys a harsh, degrading form of oppression, reflecting the poet’s disdain for unjust treatment.
🟡 EnjambmentThe continuation of a sentence or clause across a line break without a pause.“Opportunity that places / White and black on equal basis” (Lines 19-20)The thought flows over the line break, linking the idea of opportunity to racial equality, emphasizing their connection.
🔶 HyperboleExaggeration for emphasis or dramatic effect.“Must we native Old Australians / In our land rank as aliens?” (Lines 41-42)Exaggerates the alienation of Indigenous people to highlight the absurdity of their marginalization in their own country.
🔸 ImageryVivid descriptive language that appeals to the senses.“Grip of hand, not whip-hand wardship” (Line 18)Evokes tactile and visual imagery of a friendly handshake versus oppressive control, contrasting inclusion with domination.
🟥 IronyA contrast between expectation and reality, often highlighting hypocrisy or injustice.“From a bureaucrat Protection” (Line 12)The term “Protection” is ironic because it refers to oppressive government policies, not genuine care, exposing their hypocrisy.
🟦 JuxtapositionPlacing two elements side by side to highlight their differences or similarities.“Homes, not settlements and missions” (Line 16)Juxtaposes the warmth of “homes” with the institutional “settlements and missions” to critique forced displacement.
🟧 MetaphorA direct comparison between unlike things without using “like” or “as.”“Whip-hand wardship” (Line 18)Compares oppressive control to a whip, evoking imagery of slavery and dominance to criticize colonial authority.
🔹 ParallelismThe use of similar grammatical structures to create rhythm and reinforce ideas.“Give us welcome, not aversion, / Give us choice, not cold coercion” (Lines 23-24)Repeated “Give us… not…” structures emphasize demands for positive treatment over negative experiences.
🟪 PersonificationAttributing human characteristics to non-human entities.“You dishearten, not defend us” (Line 21)The law or authorities are given the human ability to “dishearten,” emphasizing their active role in harming Indigenous people.
🔺 RepetitionRepeating words or phrases for emphasis or rhythm.“Give us… Give us…” (Lines 23, 24, 29, 30, etc.)The repeated “Give us” underscores the speaker’s persistent demands for justice and equality.
🔻 Rhetorical QuestionA question asked for effect, not expecting an answer, to provoke thought.“Must we native Old Australians / In our land rank as aliens?” (Lines 41-42)Challenges the reader to consider the injustice of treating Indigenous people as outsiders in their own land.
🟨 SymbolismUsing an object or word to represent an abstract idea.“Christ, not crucifixion” (Line 34)“Christ” symbolizes love and salvation, while “crucifixion” represents suffering, highlighting the gap between Christian ideals and actions.
🟩 ToneThe poet’s attitude or mood conveyed through word choice and style.“Make us proud, not colour-conscious” (Line 28)The tone is assertive and demanding, conveying urgency and a call for dignity over racial prejudice.
Themes: “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

★ Equality and Human Rights: One of the central themes in Oodgeroo Noonuccal’s “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” is the demand for equality and recognition of universal human rights, which is conveyed through a persistent plea for dignity and fair treatment. By juxtaposing phrases such as “Black advance, not white ascendance” and “Status, not discrimination,” the poet dismantles systems of racial hierarchy, insisting on parity between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians. The repeated antitheses—“Human rights, not segregation” and “Citizens, not serfs on stations”—emphasize the unjust exclusion of Indigenous people from full civic participation, exposing the hypocrisy of a nation that preaches democratic values yet perpetuates structural inequality. The poem frames equality not as a concession granted by the dominant society, but as a rightful claim grounded in moral and legal justice, underscoring that without recognition of these rights, any national identity remains incomplete.


Self-Determination and Independence: A strong thread running through “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” is the call for self-determination, which the poet frames as both a political necessity and a moral imperative. Lines such as “Not control, but self-reliance” and “Independence, not compliance” reject the paternalistic governance structures that reduced Aboriginal Australians to passive dependents. The appeal is not for mere inclusion within existing oppressive systems, but for the dismantling of those systems in favour of autonomy and agency—symbolized in the shift from “Homes, not settlements and missions” to self-directed community building. By framing independence as an antidote to both “exploitation” and “frustration,” Noonuccal redefines freedom as the ability to shape one’s destiny without interference, thereby challenging colonial policies that sought to manage and control Indigenous life under the guise of ‘protection.’


Resistance to Racial Discrimination: The poem’s repeated structural pattern serves as a rhetorical weapon against entrenched racial prejudice, making resistance to discrimination a core theme in “Aboriginal Charter of Rights.” The poet condemns the systemic racism that subjects Aboriginal people to “mean subjection” and “bureaucrat Protection” while hypocritically preaching equality. By invoking the biblical allusion “Give us Christ, not crucifixion,” she equates racial injustice with moral betrayal, highlighting the gulf between religious ideals and colonial practice. Furthermore, the rhetorical question, “Must we native Old Australians / in our land rank as aliens?” crystallizes the paradox of being both the original custodians of the land and its most marginalized inhabitants. The persistent rhythm of negation and assertion throughout the poem functions as an act of verbal protest, systematically rejecting every form of racist exclusion and replacing it with an inclusive vision of justice.


★ Unity and Brotherhood: Finally, “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” envisions unity and mutual respect as essential foundations for a just society, urging the dismantling of both physical and psychological barriers between races. Through pleas such as “Brotherhood, not ostracism” and “Give us welcome, not aversion,” Noonuccal portrays reconciliation as an active process that requires genuine fellowship rather than superficial charity. Her call to “Make us neighbours, not fringe-dwellers; / Make us mates, not poor relations” emphasizes the importance of shared social spaces where equality is lived rather than legislated. This vision of unity does not demand the erasure of cultural identity, but rather its affirmation within a framework of mutual respect, in which “Grip of hand, not whip-hand wardship” becomes a symbol of solidarity. By rejecting division and advocating for brotherhood, the poem transforms a political manifesto into a moral appeal for collective humanity.

Literary Theories and “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Literary TheoryApplication to “Aboriginal Charter of Rights”References from the Poem
⚖️ Postcolonial TheoryThe poem critiques the legacies of colonization, exposing the structural racism and political oppression imposed on Aboriginal Australians. It deconstructs the colonial narrative of ‘protection’ by revealing it as “mean subjection” and challenges the alienation of Indigenous people in their own land. The demand for “Human rights, not segregation” reflects resistance to ongoing colonial hierarchies.“Must we native Old Australians / in our land rank as aliens?” / “Banish bans and conquer caste”
✊ Critical Race TheoryNoonuccal addresses systemic racial discrimination, demonstrating how law and governance perpetuate inequality. The juxtaposition “Black advance, not white ascendance” critiques racialized power structures, while “Status, not discrimination” calls for equity in legal and social standing. The theory’s focus on lived racial experience is embedded in her depiction of ongoing marginalization.“You the law, like Roman Pontius” / “Give goodwill not bigot bias”
🕊️ Humanist TheoryThe poem appeals to universal human dignity, emphasizing shared values like brotherhood, love, and respect. Lines such as “Brotherhood, not ostracism” and “Grip of hand, not whip-hand wardship” frame justice as a moral obligation grounded in empathy, transcending racial and cultural boundaries. The humanist ideal is the foundation for her vision of an inclusive Australian society.“Make us mates, not poor relations” / “Give us choice, not cold coercion”
📢 Marxist TheoryThe text critiques class oppression intertwined with racial inequality, portraying Aboriginal Australians as an exploited underclass within capitalist and colonial structures. Demands for “Homes, not settlements and missions” and “Opportunity that places / White and black on equal basis” highlight economic disparity and the denial of material resources, aligning with Marxist calls for structural change.“We need help, not exploitation” / “Citizens, not serfs on stations”
Critical Questions about “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

🔴 Question 1: How does Oodgeroo Noonuccal use contrasting pairs in “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” to highlight the disparities between Aboriginal aspirations and the oppressive realities they face?

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal employs contrasting pairs to powerfully critique systemic racism and advocate for genuine equality. The poem’s use of antithesis, seen in lines like “We want hope, not racialism” and “Black advance, not white ascendance,” juxtaposes the positive desires of Aboriginal people with the negative realities imposed by colonial systems. This rhetorical strategy continues with demands for “brotherhood, not ostracism” and “equals, not dependents,” emphasizing the gap between the community’s aspirations for unity and autonomy and the marginalization they endure. By structuring the poem around these contrasts, Noonuccal not only highlights the injustices faced by Aboriginal people but also issues a compelling call for societal change, urging readers to confront the need for “self-reliance” over “control” in the pursuit of true equality.

🟢 Question 2: In what ways does “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” expose the hypocrisy of Christian missionary efforts in the treatment of Aboriginal people?

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal reveals the hypocrisy of Christian missionary efforts by contrasting their proclaimed values with their oppressive actions toward Aboriginal communities. Lines such as “Give us Christ, not crucifixion” and “Though baptised and blessed and bibled / We are still tabooed and libelled” underscore how Indigenous people were subjected to Christian conversion yet remained stigmatized and marginalized as “fringe-dwellers.” Noonuccal critiques the superficiality of missionary efforts, which offered “overlordship” instead of genuine “love” or fellowship. This contrast exposes the irony of religious institutions that preached salvation while perpetuating suffering, prompting readers to question the moral contradictions in colonial policies that claimed to “protect” but instead enforced cultural erasure and subjugation.

🟡 Question 3: Why does “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” question the alienation of Aboriginal people in their own land, and how does this reflect broader issues of citizenship and sovereignty?

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal challenges the alienation of Aboriginal people through poignant rhetorical questions and imagery that highlight their dispossession. The lines “Must we native Old Australians / In our land rank as aliens?” use a rhetorical question to underscore the absurdity of treating Indigenous people as outsiders in their ancestral homeland, while references to “homes, not settlements and missions” and “citizens, not serfs on stations” critique the forced displacement and loss of autonomy under colonial policies. This question reflects broader issues of citizenship and sovereignty, as Noonuccal asserts the right to “self-reliance” and “independence,” calling attention to the systemic denial of Indigenous land rights and political agency. The poem thus serves as a powerful commentary on the need for reconciliation and recognition of Aboriginal sovereignty in postcolonial Australia.

🔵 Question 4: How does “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” advocate for empowerment over paternalism, and what role does education play in achieving self-respect for Aboriginal communities?

“Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal advocates for empowerment by rejecting paternalistic control and emphasizing the transformative power of education and opportunity. Lines like “Not rebuff, but education” and “Self-respect, not resignation” contrast the desire for growth and dignity with the oppressive barriers imposed by colonial systems. Noonuccal’s calls for “encouragement, not prohibitions” and “opportunity that places / White and black on equal basis” highlight the need for systemic change to foster “ambition, not prevention.” Education is positioned as a key mechanism for achieving “self-respect” and “confidence,” countering the bureaucratic “Protection” that perpetuates dependency. By demanding access to knowledge and resources, the poem underscores the potential for education to empower Aboriginal communities, enabling them to reclaim agency and build a future free from “cold coercion.”

Literary Works Similar to “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  • 🌾 “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal – Like “Aboriginal Charter of Rights,” this poem confronts the dispossession of Aboriginal Australians, using direct, communal voice to assert cultural identity and protest colonial erasure.
  • 🪶 “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal – Shares the same social justice focus, employing a symbolic image of a trapped gum tree to parallel the oppression and confinement of Indigenous peoples.
  • 🌍 “Song of Hope” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal – Aligns in its rhythmic call for unity and equality, envisioning a future where Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians coexist in mutual respect.

Representative Quotations of “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
QuotationContext in the PoemTheoretical Interpretation
🌾 “Hope, not racialism”Opens the poem with a direct contrast between aspiration and racial prejudice, setting the tone for the demands that follow.Critical Race Theory – Challenges systemic racism by framing equality as the necessary foundation for national progress.
✊ “Black advance, not white ascendance”Highlights the imbalance of power between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, rejecting racial hierarchy.Postcolonial Theory – Deconstructs colonial power structures that position whiteness as dominant.
🏠 “Homes, not settlements and missions”Critiques imposed living arrangements under government ‘protection’ policies.Marxist Theory – Calls for material equality and the dismantling of state-controlled dependency systems.
🕊️ “Brotherhood, not ostracism”Urges reconciliation and mutual respect over exclusion.Humanist Theory – Promotes universal moral values and shared humanity.
⚖️ “Human rights, not segregation”Explicitly demands equal legal and social rights for Aboriginal Australians.Critical Race Theory – Confronts legal discrimination and racialized law enforcement.
📜 “Must we native Old Australians / in our land rank as aliens?”Uses rhetorical questioning to expose the paradox of Indigenous alienation in their homeland.Postcolonial Theory – Exposes the irony and injustice of settler-colonial citizenship structures.
✝️ “Give us Christ, not crucifixion”Critiques the hypocrisy of religious institutions preaching salvation while perpetuating oppression.Postcolonial Theory – Highlights religious colonialism and the betrayal of Christian moral ideals.
🤝 “Make us neighbours, not fringe-dwellers”Rejects spatial and social segregation.Humanist Theory – Envisions integration through equality and mutual respect.
🏛️ “Citizens, not serfs on stations”Condemns economic exploitation in rural labour systems.Marxist Theory – Frames Aboriginal oppression as class exploitation reinforced by race.
🔓 “Banish bans and conquer caste”Calls for the removal of systemic restrictions and social stratification.Postcolonial Theory – Advocates dismantling racialized caste-like structures inherited from colonization.
Suggested Readings: “Aboriginal Charter of Rights” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  1. Brewster, Anne. “Oodgeroo: Orator, Poet, Storyteller.” Australian Literary Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, 1994, pp. 92–104, www.jstor.org/stable/20646976.
  2. Cochrane, Kathleen J. Oodgeroo. U of Queensland P, 1994, www.uqp.com.au/books/oodgeroo.
  3. Noonuccal, Oodgeroo. My People: A Kath Walker Collection. Jacaranda Press, 1970, www.wiley.com/en-us/My+People%3A+A+Kath+Walker+Collection-p-9780731407408.
  4. “Oodgeroo Noonuccal.” Infinite Women, https://www.infinite-women.com/books/Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  5. “Reading 8C: Oodgeroo Noonuccal 1920–1993.” Working with Indigenous Australians, www.workingwithindigenousaustralians.info/content/History_8_Oodgeroo.html. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.

“Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose: Summary and Critique

“Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose, published in 2006 in BioSocieties (Volume 1, Issue 02, pp. 195–217), refines Foucault’s concept of biopower as truth discourses, authoritative interventions, and self-subjectification shaping human vitality in liberal societies, emphasizing “making live” over thanatopolitics, contra Agamben and Negri.

"Biopower Today" by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose

“Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose, published in 2006 in BioSocieties (Volume 1, Issue 02, pp. 195–217), refines Foucault’s concept of biopower as truth discourses, authoritative interventions, and self-subjectification shaping human vitality in liberal societies, emphasizing “making live” over thanatopolitics, contra Agamben and Negri. Focusing on race, reproduction, and genomic medicine, it explores how genomics reintroduces race biologically, reproduction navigates individual choice and population control, and genomic medicine shifts health care toward molecular interventions. In literary theory, it offers a framework to analyze narratives of identity, health, and governance, encouraging critical engagement with biotechnology’s ethical implications in contemporary literature.

Summary of “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose

📜 Conceptual Clarification of Biopower

  • Rabinow & Rose revisit Michel Foucault’s concept of biopower—power exercised over life—clarifying its meaning and relevance today.
  • Defined as comprising:
    • Truth discourses about the “vital” nature of human beings.
    • Authorities competent to speak that truth.
    • Interventions on collective existence for life and health.
    • Modes of subjectification where individuals work on themselves in the name of life/health (p.197).
  • Quote: “Biopower entails one or more truth discourses… strategies for intervention upon collective existence in the name of life and health… modes of subjectification” (p.197).

Distinguishing Foucault from Agamben & Negri

  • Against “epochal” claims: They critique Giorgio Agamben’s “homo sacer” model and Antonio Negri & Michael Hardt’s “Empire” framing for overgeneralizing biopower.
  • Argue these philosophical versions empty the concept of analytical precision.
  • Foucault’s approach: grounded in historical specificity—two poles:
    • Anatamo-politics (body discipline).
    • Biopolitics (population regulation) (Foucault, 1978: 139).
  • Quote: “This version of the concept of ‘biopower’ is quite antithetical to that proposed by Foucault: the concept is emptied of its critical force—it can describe everything but analyse nothing” (p.198).

🛡 From Sovereignty to Governmentality

  • Critique of viewing all biopower as an extension of sovereign power.
  • Modern states rule through governmentalized networks involving non‐state actors—NGOs, professional bodies, patient groups.
  • Quote: “Non-state bodies have played a key role in biopolitical struggles and strategies since the origin of ‘the social’” (p.202).

🧬 Race in the Era of Genomics

  • Historical role: race central in biopower (nationhood, colonialism, eugenics).
  • Post–WWII: biological racism discredited officially (UN 1963 Declaration).
  • Genomics reintroduces race via molecular gaze (e.g., SNP & HapMap projects).
  • Uses: health equity, pharmaceutical targeting, identity tracing—but risk of re‐coding race in old categories (“Caucasian”, “African”, “Asian”).
  • Quote: “New challenges for critical thinking are raised by the contemporary interplay between political and genomic classifications of race” (p.207).

👶 Reproduction as a Biopolitical Space

  • Decoupling of sexuality and reproduction in last 50 years.
  • National & global population control campaigns (e.g., China’s One Child Policy, India’s sterilization drives) framed via economics & ecology.
  • Contemporary assisted reproductive technologies (ART) framed as choice but involve responsibilization—especially of women.
  • Quote: “The economy of contemporary biopolitics operates according to logics of vitality, not mortality: while it has its circuits of exclusion, letting die is not making die” (p.210).

🧪 Genomic Medicine & Biocapital

  • Potential shift in medicine: from restoring normativity to molecular re‐engineering of life.
  • Industry examples: Celera Diagnostics (polygenic disease testing), pharmacogenomics for tailored antidepressants.
  • Raises new risk calculation logics and individual genetic self‐understanding.
  • Quote: “If this model were to succeed… the logics of medicine, and the shape of the biopolitical field, would be altered” (p.213).

🔍 Method: Modest Empiricism

  • Advocates empirical, specific, historically‐attuned analysis over grand abstractions.
  • Focus on small mutations in truth, authority, ethics—where “today is becoming different from yesterday” (p.204).
  • Quote: “Celebration or denunciation are insufficient as analytical approaches” (p.215).

🌐 Conclusion: Vital Politics

  • Biopower remains analytically useful if applied precisely and empirically.
  • Contemporary biopolitics:
    • Transnational flows of biological materials & knowledge.
    • Localized forms of subjectification and activism.
  • Aim: Develop analytic tools for the “near future” (Deleuze) to diagnose transformations in life, health, and governance.

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose
Term/ConceptReference from ArticleExplanation
🌱 Biopowerp. 196: “The concept of ‘biopower’ serves to bring into view a field comprised of more or less rationalized attempts to intervene upon the vital characteristics of human existence.”Biopower refers to power exercised over life processes, involving strategies to manage human vitality, health, and populations through truth discourses, authoritative interventions, and self-subjectification, distinct from sovereign power’s right to kill.
🧬 Biopoliticsp. 196: “We can use the term ‘biopolitics’ to embrace all the specific strategies and contestations over problematizations of collective human vitality, morbidity and mortality.”Biopolitics encompasses specific strategies and struggles over managing collective human life, health, and mortality, involving knowledge, authority, and interventions at individual and population levels.
📜 Truth Discoursesp. 197: “One or more truth discourses about the ‘vital’ character of living human beings, and an array of authorities considered competent to speak that truth.”Truth discourses are authoritative knowledge systems about human vitality, often blending biological, demographic, or sociological perspectives, legitimizing interventions by experts like scientists or doctors.
🧠 Subjectificationp. 197: “Modes of subjectification, through which individuals are brought to work on themselves… in the name of their own life or health.”Subjectification describes how individuals internalize biopolitical norms, self-regulating their behavior and identity in relation to health, life, or collective well-being under authoritative guidance.
🤝 Biosocialityp. 197: “Rabinow has examined the formation of new collectivities in terms of ‘biosociality’.”Biosociality refers to new social groups formed around shared biological traits or conditions, such as patient groups or communities defined by genetic markers, reshaping identity and collective action.
🧍 Somatic Individualityp. 197: “Rose has examined the formation of kinds of human subject in terms of ‘somatic individuality’.”Somatic individuality highlights how individuals understand and manage themselves through their biological and bodily conditions, particularly in relation to health and genetic information.
💀 Thanatopoliticsp. 200: “Contemporary biopower, they imply, is a form of power which ultimately rests on the power of some to threaten the death of others.”Thanatopolitics refers to a politics of death, where biopower, in extreme cases like Nazi regimes, involves killing or letting die to strengthen certain populations, contrasting with biopower’s focus on vitality.
⚖️ Making Live/Letting Diep. 203: “It takes the form of ‘letting die’ as much as of ‘making die’… central to the configuration of contemporary biopower are all those endeavours that have life, not death, as their telos.”This describes biopower’s dual strategy in liberal societies: promoting life (making live) through health interventions while allowing certain deaths (letting die) through exclusion or neglect, rather than active killing.
🩺 Bioethics Complexp. 202: “A whole ‘bioethical complex’, in which the power of medical agents to ‘let die’… are simultaneously enhanced by medical technology and regulated by other authorities.”The bioethics complex involves regulatory frameworks, commissions, and professional bodies that govern medical decisions, balancing technological advancements with ethical oversight in health practices.
🛂 Biological Citizenshipp. 197: “Emergent biosocial collectivities, sometimes specified in terms of categories of race, ethnicity, gender or religion, as in the emerging forms of genetic or biological citizenship.”Biological citizenship refers to rights and obligations tied to biological or genetic identities, where individuals claim access to health resources or social recognition based on their biological status.
Contribution of “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose to Literary Theory/Theories

🏛 Poststructuralism & Discourse Theory

  • Extends Foucauldian discourse analysis by clarifying “biopower” as a historically grounded and analytically precise term.
  • Moves beyond language‐only analysis to the interplay of truth discourses, authorities, and material interventions in life processes.
  • Quote: “Biopower entails one or more truth discourses about the ‘vital’ character of living human beings… strategies for intervention… modes of subjectification” (p.197).
  • This reinforces poststructuralist focus on contingency and discursive formation, but insists on empirical grounding.

Critical Theory (Frankfurt School Tradition)

  • Challenges totalizing narratives (e.g., Negri & Agamben) that treat biopower as an all‐encompassing domination.
  • Encourages critical differentiation between forms of life‐governing power and death‐dealing politics, resisting “one‐diagram” explanations.
  • Quote: “It would clearly be misleading to diagnose [contemporary biopolitics] as a form of genocide, or the re‐awakening of the spectre of the camp” (p.210).
  • Contributes to critical theory’s emphasis on historical specificity and judgement over abstract critique.

🧠 Psychoanalytic Theory & Subjectivity Studies

  • Links biopower to modes of subjectification, showing how individuals internalize medical/genetic norms and act on themselves.
  • Parallels psychoanalytic readings of the subject as constituted through authority and self‐surveillance.
  • Quote: “Modes of subjectification, in which individuals can be brought to work on themselves… in the name of life or health” (p.197).
  • Opens space for analysis of somatic individuality (Rose) as a form of subjectivity shaped by biomedical discourse.

🌍 Postcolonial Theory

  • Illuminates biopolitics in global contexts—population control campaigns, genomic projects in diverse geographies—revealing how colonial and postcolonial governance intersect with life regulation.
  • Challenges simplistic analogies between contemporary development policies and colonial eugenics.
  • Quote: “Limiting population in the interests of national economic prosperity… is not the same as purification of the race by elimination of degenerates” (p.210).
  • Encourages postcolonial theorists to consider molecular-level governance alongside historical racial governance.

📈 Science and Technology Studies (STS)

  • Directly contributes to Actor–Network Theory‐inflected readings of science by tracking how genomics, race, reproduction, and medicine become sites of political and social meaning.
  • Treats scientific categories (e.g., SNPs, haplotypes) as discursively and institutionally embedded.
  • Quote: “New challenges for critical thinking are raised by the contemporary interplay between political and genomic classifications of race” (p.207).
  • Adds biocapital and biosociality as analytical categories for cultural theorists.

📚 New Historicism

  • Models a historically layered approach to concepts, tracing Foucault’s original context (18th–19th c. state formation) and 21st‐century mutations.
  • Emphasizes that concepts like “biopower” cannot be lifted wholesale into new eras without adaptation.
  • Quote: “It would certainly be misleading simply to project Foucault’s analysis forward as a guide to our present” (p.203).
  • Offers literary historians a method for reading contemporary texts through genealogies of power.

🧬 Biopolitics as Cultural Criticism

  • Equips literary and cultural theory with a refined analytic toolkit for engaging with narratives of health, life, death, and governance.
  • Rejects “celebration or denunciation” (p.215) as sole modes of critique, promoting “modest empiricism” attentive to local variations.
  • Enables analysis of novels, films, and cultural artefacts that engage genomic futures, medical ethics, and bodily regulation.

🎭 Narratology & Identity Politics

  • Provides a framework for analysing life narratives and identity claims rooted in genetics, race, and reproduction.
  • Shows how “biosocial collectivities” emerge as narrative communities in politics and culture.
  • Quote: “The growing sense of many individuals that genetics… holds the key to their ‘identity’” (p.206).
  • Informs literary readings of memoirs, testimonies, and fiction dealing with medicalized selfhood.
Examples of Critiques Through “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose
NovelReference to Biopower TodayCritique Through Biopower Lens
📘 Klara and the Sun by Kazuo Ishiguro (2021)p. 197: “Modes of subjectification, through which individuals are brought to work on themselves… in the name of their own life or health.”Ishiguro’s novel explores biopower through Klara, an artificial friend, and the genetically enhanced children she serves. The narrative critiques subjectification, as characters like Josie are shaped by biotechnological interventions to optimize health and social status, reflecting Rabinow and Rose’s concept of individuals self-regulating under biopolitical norms. The novel questions the ethics of such enhancements, highlighting how they reinforce social hierarchies and commodify life, aligning with the article’s focus on genomic medicine’s impact on identity and health.
📙 The Testaments by Margaret Atwood (2019)p. 208: “The question of reproduction gets problematized… because of its economic, ecological and political consequences.”Atwood’s sequel to The Handmaid’s Tale examines biopower through Gilead’s control over women’s reproduction, resonating with Rabinow and Rose’s analysis of reproduction as a biopolitical space. The novel critiques state-driven reproductive policies that prioritize collective survival over individual autonomy, illustrating the tension between molar (population-level) and molecular (individual) biopolitics. The resistance by characters like Agnes and Daisy underscores the article’s notion of contestations against such control.
📗 The Water Dancer by Ta-Nehisi Coates (2019)p. 205: “Race, together with health, and in variable relations with it, has been one of the central poles in the genealogy of biopower.”Coates’ novel uses biopower to critique the racialized control of enslaved bodies in antebellum America, with Hiram’s supernatural “conduction” symbolizing resistance to biopolitical subjugation. Rabinow and Rose’s discussion of race as a biopolitical category is reflected in the novel’s portrayal of slavery as a system of managing vitality and labor, with race justifying exploitation, aligning with the article’s exploration of race’s re-emergence in biological terms.
📕 The Power by Naomi Alderman (2016)p. 197: “Emergent biosocial collectivities, sometimes specified in terms of categories of race, ethnicity, gender or religion.”Alderman’s novel reimagines biopower through women’s newfound biological ability to generate electric shocks, disrupting gender-based power structures. This aligns with Rabinow and Rose’s concept of biosociality, where new biological traits create collectivities that challenge existing norms. The novel critiques how biopolitical shifts in bodily capacities can invert social hierarchies, raising questions about the ethical and political implications of such biological citizenship.
Criticism Against “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose

Over‐Emphasis on Empiricism

  • Their “modest empiricism” (p.204) is seen by some critics as too cautious, potentially downplaying the need for strong normative critique of biopolitical systems.
  • Focus on small‐scale, situated studies may underestimate systemic or global structural patterns of domination.

🗺 Underestimation of Global Power Asymmetries

  • While they address transnational biopower, critics argue they underplay economic imperialism, global capitalism, and neocolonial biomedical exploitation.
  • Limited engagement with how global inequalities shape access to life‐saving technologies.

🛡 Critique of Agamben & Negri May Be Over‐Simplified

  • Their dismissal of Agamben’s “homo sacer” and Negri’s “Empire” risks mischaracterizing these thinkers’ nuanced political‐philosophical claims.
  • Some scholars argue that Rabinow & Rose understate the importance of states of exception in contemporary governance (e.g., migrant detention, pandemic lockdowns).

📉 Minimizing Thanatopolitics

  • Their claim that contemporary biopower is oriented toward “making live” rather than “making die” (p.210) can be criticized for ignoring:
    • Structural health inequalities.
    • Environmental racism.
    • Neglect or abandonment of populations (e.g., Global South health crises).

🧬 Optimistic Reading of Genomics

  • While cautious, their treatment of genomics sometimes leans toward neutral or hopeful interpretations, possibly overlooking the commercial exploitation and data colonialism inherent in genetic research.

📚 Lack of Cultural Textual Engagement

  • For literary and cultural theory audiences, their analysis remains sociological and policy‐oriented, not engaging deeply with cultural representation or narrative analysis of biopolitics in media, literature, or art.

Potentially Presentist Focus

  • Despite genealogical awareness, their focus on contemporary configurations may underemphasize deep historical continuities in racial and reproductive governance beyond Foucault’s European frame.

🧠 Limited Ethical Prescriptions

  • While strong in conceptual clarification, the work offers little guidance for ethical or political action against harmful biopolitical practices, leaving the normative stance ambiguous.
Representative Quotations from “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose with Explanation
Quotation and ReferenceExplanation
🌱 “The concept of ‘biopower’ serves to bring into view a field comprised of more or less rationalized attempts to intervene upon the vital characteristics of human existence.” (p. 196)This foundational statement defines biopower as a framework for analyzing power over life processes, emphasizing interventions on human vitality, health, and mortality. It sets the stage for understanding how power operates through managing life, distinct from sovereign power’s focus on death.
🧬 “We can use the term ‘biopolitics’ to embrace all the specific strategies and contestations over problematizations of collective human vitality, morbidity and mortality.” (p. 196)Biopolitics is introduced as the practical application of biopower, encompassing strategies and struggles over collective human life. It highlights the contested nature of managing populations, involving knowledge, authority, and interventions, central to modern governance.
📜 “One or more truth discourses about the ‘vital’ character of living human beings, and an array of authorities considered competent to speak that truth.” (p. 197)This outlines a key element of biopower: truth discourses, authoritative knowledge systems (e.g., biology, demography) that legitimize interventions by experts like scientists or doctors, shaping how life and health are understood and managed.
🧠 “Modes of subjectification, through which individuals are brought to work on themselves… in the name of their own life or health.” (p. 197)Subjectification describes how biopower operates at the individual level, encouraging self-regulation in alignment with health and life norms. It reflects how individuals internalize biopolitical imperatives, shaping their behavior under expert guidance.
🤝 “Rabinow has examined the formation of new collectivities in terms of ‘biosociality’.” (p. 197)Biosociality refers to new social groups formed around shared biological traits, such as patient advocacy groups. This concept illustrates how biopower fosters collective identities based on biological conditions, reshaping social and political interactions.
🧍 “Rose has examined the formation of kinds of human subject in terms of ‘somatic individuality’.” (p. 197)Somatic individuality captures how individuals define themselves through their biological and bodily conditions, particularly in health and genomics. It underscores biopower’s role in shaping personal identity through bodily management and medical interventions.
💀 “Contemporary biopower, they imply, is a form of power which ultimately rests on the power of some to threaten the death of others.” (p. 200)This critiques Agamben and Negri’s view of biopower as inherently tied to death (thanatopolitics). Rabinow and Rose argue this oversimplifies contemporary biopower, which in liberal societies focuses more on managing life than enforcing death, except in extreme cases like Nazi regimes.
⚖️ “It takes the form of ‘letting die’ as much as of ‘making die’… central to the configuration of contemporary biopower are all those endeavours that have life, not death, as their telos.” (p. 203)This highlights the dual nature of biopower in liberal societies: promoting life (making live) while allowing certain deaths (letting die) through neglect or exclusion. It emphasizes that contemporary biopower prioritizes vitality over mortality, distinguishing it from sovereign power.
🩺 “A whole ‘bioethical complex’, in which the power of medical agents to ‘let die’… are simultaneously enhanced by medical technology and regulated by other authorities.” (p. 202)The bioethical complex describes regulatory frameworks governing medical decisions, balancing technological advancements with ethical oversight. It illustrates how biopower operates through a network of authorities managing life and death in health practices.
🛂 “Emergent biosocial collectivities, sometimes specified in terms of categories of race, ethnicity, gender or religion, as in the emerging forms of genetic or biological citizenship.” (p. 197)Biological citizenship refers to rights and obligations tied to biological identities, where individuals claim health resources or social recognition based on genetic or biological status. It reflects how biopower shapes new forms of citizenship through biological markers.
Suggested Readings: “Biopower Today” by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose
  1. Raman, Sujatha, and Richard Tutton. “Life, Science, and Biopower.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 35, no. 5, 2010, pp. 711–34. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25746391. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  2. Cooter, Roger, and Claudia Stein. “Cracking Biopower.” Writing History in the Age of Biomedicine, Yale University Press, 2013, pp. 183–204. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bk3x.13. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  3. Tierney, Thomas F. “Toward an Affirmative Biopolitics.” Sociological Theory, vol. 34, no. 4, 2016, pp. 358–81. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26382876. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.
  4. Kelly, M. G. E. “International Biopolitics: Foucault, Globalisation and Imperialism.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, vol. 57, no. 123, 2010, pp. 1–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41802469. Accessed 15 Aug. 2025.

“We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis

“We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1964 in her debut poetry collection of the same name, We Are Going.

"We Are Going" by Oodgeroo Noonuccal: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

“We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal first appeared in 1964 in her debut poetry collection of the same name, We Are Going. As the first published volume of poetry by an Aboriginal Australian woman, it marked a milestone in Australian literature and Indigenous political expression. The poem powerfully conveys themes of cultural loss, colonisation, and displacement, using direct, unembellished language to express the grief of a people witnessing the erasure of their traditions and land. The repeated refrain “We are” asserts cultural identity, while the final “And we are going” delivers a poignant acknowledgment of disappearance and survival in the face of oppression. Its popularity stems from its political urgency during the 1960s Aboriginal rights movement, its accessible yet lyrical style, and its deep emotional resonance, encapsulated in vivid images such as “We are the corroboree and the bora ground” and “The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo are gone from this place,” which highlight the intertwined loss of culture and environment.

Text: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

They came in to the little town

A semi-naked band subdued and silent

All that remained of their tribe.

They came here to the place of their old bora ground

Where now the many white men hurry about like ants.

Notice of the estate agent reads: ‘Rubbish May Be Tipped Here’.

Now it half covers the traces of the old bora ring.

‘We are as strangers here now, but the white tribe are the strangers.

We belong here, we are of the old ways.

We are the corroboree and the bora ground,

We are the old ceremonies, the laws of the elders.

We are the wonder tales of Dream Time, the tribal legends told.

We are the past, the hunts and the laughing games, the wandering camp fires.

We are the lightening bolt over Gaphembah Hill

Quick and terrible,

And the Thunderer after him, that loud fellow.

We are the quiet daybreak paling the dark lagoon.

We are the shadow-ghosts creeping back as the camp fires burn low.

We are nature and the past, all the old ways

Gone now and scattered.

The scrubs are gone, the hunting and the laughter.

The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo are gone from this place.

The bora ring is gone.

The corroboree is gone.

And we are going.’

Annotations: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
Line from PoemSimple English MeaningLiterary Devices
They came in to the little townA small group of Aboriginal people arrive in a town.🖼 Imagery
A semi-naked band subdued and silentThey are partly clothed, quiet, and subdued — showing loss of dignity.🖼 Imagery, 🎭 Tone (melancholy)
All that remained of their tribe.Only a few survivors remain from a once large tribe.🎭 Tone (tragic)
They came here to the place of their old bora groundThey return to a sacred ceremonial site.🖼 Imagery, 🏺 Cultural reference
Where now the many white men hurry about like ants.The site is now taken over by white settlers, busy and ignoring its importance.🖼 Simile (“like ants”)
Notice of the estate agent reads: ‘Rubbish May Be Tipped Here’.A sign says trash can be dumped here — an insult to the sacred site.🎭 Irony, 🖼 Imagery
Now it half covers the traces of the old bora ring.Trash has buried what’s left of the sacred circle.🖼 Imagery, 🎭 Symbolism
‘We are as strangers here now, but the white tribe are the strangers.They feel like outsiders in their own land, even though settlers are the newcomers.🎭 Paradox, ✊ Political statement
We belong here, we are of the old ways.They are the original custodians of the land, tied to traditions.🖼 Imagery, ✊ Assertion of identity
We are the corroboree and the bora ground,They are the traditions and sacred sites.🖋 Metaphor, 🏺 Cultural reference
We are the old ceremonies, the laws of the elders.They embody the ceremonies and ancient laws.🖋 Metaphor, 🏺 Cultural reference
We are the wonder tales of Dream Time, the tribal legends told.They are the stories and myths of their people.🖋 Metaphor, 🏺 Mythological reference
We are the past, the hunts and the laughing games, the wandering camp fires.They represent past lifestyles and traditions.🖋 Metaphor, 🖼 Nostalgic imagery
We are the lightening bolt over Gaphembah HillThey are as powerful and striking as lightning over the hill.🖋 Metaphor, 🖼 Nature imagery
Quick and terrible,They are fierce and powerful.🎭 Tone (forceful), 🖼 Imagery
And the Thunderer after him, that loud fellow.They are like the thunder that follows lightning.🖋 Personification, 🖼 Nature imagery
We are the quiet daybreak paling the dark lagoon.They are the calm beauty of dawn.🖋 Metaphor, 🖼 Nature imagery
We are the shadow-ghosts creeping back as the camp fires burn low.They are fading spirits of their ancestors.🖋 Metaphor, 👻 Symbolism
We are nature and the past, all the old waysThey are the land, traditions, and history.🖋 Metaphor, 🖼 Nature imagery
Gone now and scattered.Those traditions are now lost and dispersed.🎭 Tone (mourning)
The scrubs are gone, the hunting and the laughter.The bush, hunting, and joy are gone.🖼 Imagery, 🎭 Loss motif
The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo are gone from this place.Native animals have disappeared from here.🖼 Imagery, 🏞 Environmental loss
The bora ring is gone.The sacred ceremonial ground is destroyed.🎭 Repetition, 🖼 Symbolism
The corroboree is gone.Ceremonial dances are lost.🎭 Repetition, 🖼 Symbolism
And we are going.’They themselves are disappearing.🎭 Repetition, 🖋 Metaphor (cultural extinction)
Literary And Poetic Devices: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
DeviceExample from PoemExplanationFunction in the Poem
👻 Allusion (Cultural/Mythological)“Dream Time”Reference to Aboriginal creation storiesGrounds the poem in Indigenous spiritual heritage, asserting cultural identity.
🐜 Analogy“White men hurry about like ants”Compares settlers’ movements to antsHighlights busyness and lack of awareness of cultural significance.
Antithesis“We are as strangers here now, but the white tribe are the strangers.”Contrasting ideas in one statementShows irony of dispossession — original owners treated as outsiders.
🎭 Contrast“We belong here… The bora ring is gone.”Juxtaposition of belonging and lossEmphasises the tragedy of cultural erasure.
🔁 Epistrophe (Repetition at End)“…is gone… is gone… is gone.”Repetition of the same phrase at the ends of linesReinforces sense of loss and finality.
🪞 Imagery“The quiet daybreak paling the dark lagoon”Descriptive language appealing to sensesEvokes emotional connection to land and nature.
🏺 Juxtaposition“Old bora ground” vs “Rubbish May Be Tipped Here”Placing sacred and profane side by sideHighlights disrespect and cultural desecration.
📜 Listing“The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo…”Sequence of related itemsCreates cumulative effect of loss and environmental decline.
🎵 Metaphor“We are the corroboree and the bora ground”Comparing without using ‘like’ or ‘as’Shows inseparability of people and cultural traditions.
🎤 ParallelismRepeated “We are…” structureRepetition of grammatical structureCreates rhythm and reinforces identity assertion.
🤔 Paradox“We are as strangers… but the white tribe are the strangers.”Self-contradictory yet truthful statementChallenges colonial perspective and asserts rightful ownership.
🖋 Personification“The Thunderer after him, that loud fellow.”Giving human qualities to thunderAdds character and vividness to natural forces.
⏳ Refrain“We are…” repeated throughoutRecurring phrase in multiple linesActs as a heartbeat of the poem, affirming continuity of culture.
🌀 Repetition“Gone… gone… gone.”Repeating a word/phraseIntensifies emotional weight of loss.
🖼 Simile“White men hurry about like ants”Comparing with “like”Creates a visual image of settler activity.
⛰ Symbolism“Bora ring”Represents Aboriginal spiritual and cultural lifeEncapsulates tradition, law, and community in a single image.
⏏ Tone (Mournful/Defiant)“And we are going.”Author’s attitude toward subjectConveys sorrow at loss but also resilience through voice.
🧵 ThemeDispossession, cultural erasure, environmental lossRecurring central ideasFrames the poem as political and historical testimony.
🌏 Zoomorphism“The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo…”Using animal references to represent place and spiritConnects identity to native fauna and land.
Themes: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

🌏 Theme 1: Dispossession of Land and Culture: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal foregrounds the deep wound of dispossession suffered by Aboriginal Australians. The poem contrasts the sacredness of the “old bora ground” with the intrusion of settlers who “hurry about like ants” and even place a sign reading “Rubbish May Be Tipped Here.” This degradation of sacred sites is not just physical but symbolic, showing how colonisation strips away spiritual connection to the land. The refrain “The bora ring is gone. The corroboree is gone.” reinforces the extent of cultural erasure, presenting dispossession as both a loss of tangible heritage and a rupture in community identity.


🧵 Theme 2: Cultural Identity and Continuity: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal asserts Aboriginal identity through the recurring declaration “We are…”, which transforms the poem into an anthem of belonging. By claiming “We are the corroboree and the bora ground… We are the wonder tales of Dream Time,” the speaker resists erasure, intertwining selfhood with tradition, law, and spirituality. Even in the face of loss, the poem preserves the memory of ceremonies, legends, and landscapes, suggesting that identity is not only inherited but also carried forward in words and stories, ensuring cultural continuity despite oppression.


🏞 Theme 3: Loss of Nature and Environment: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal links the loss of culture to the decline of the natural environment. The lament “The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo are gone from this place” reveals how environmental destruction mirrors the erasure of Aboriginal life. Nature is not separate from culture; it is woven into spiritual identity — “We are nature and the past, all the old ways.” By pairing the disappearance of fauna and flora with the vanishing of rituals, the poem highlights how colonisation disrupts ecological balance as well as cultural survival.


Theme 4: Injustice and Colonial Irony: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal exposes the paradox of Aboriginal people being treated as outsiders in their own land: “We are as strangers here now, but the white tribe are the strangers.” This inversion underlines the injustice of colonisation, where the original custodians are displaced by newcomers who then claim ownership. The tone here is both mournful and defiant — mournful for the past that is “gone now and scattered,” yet defiant in reasserting that “We belong here, we are of the old ways.” Through this irony, the poem becomes a political statement on historical wrongs that continue to shape the present.


Literary Theories and “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
TheoryExplanationReferences from PoemApplication to the Poem
Postcolonial TheoryExamines the effects of colonisation, focusing on power, identity, and cultural erasure.“We are as strangers here now, but the white tribe are the strangers.” / “The bora ring is gone.”Highlights the displacement of Indigenous Australians, the loss of land, and the irony of being made outsiders in their own country.
🧬 Cultural Identity TheoryAnalyses how cultural traditions, values, and heritage shape identity.“We are the corroboree and the bora ground… We are the wonder tales of Dream Time.”Shows how Aboriginal identity is inseparable from land, ceremonies, and ancestral stories, asserting continuity even in the face of loss.
🏞 EcocriticismStudies the relationship between literature and the environment.“The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo are gone from this place.” / “We are nature and the past, all the old ways.”Connects environmental destruction with cultural extinction, revealing colonisation’s impact on both people and ecosystems.
🎭 StructuralismLooks at patterns, symbols, and binary oppositions in a text.Opposition of “We” vs “white tribe” / Repeated structure “We are…”Analyses the poem’s structure, where repetition creates a chant-like rhythm, and binary opposites highlight cultural contrast and conflict.
Critical Questions about “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal

Question 1: How does the poem convey the experience of cultural dispossession?

“We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal powerfully conveys the experience of cultural dispossession through its contrast between sacred traditions and their degradation. The “old bora ground,” once a place of ceremony and identity, is now defiled by a sign declaring “Rubbish May Be Tipped Here,” symbolising colonial disregard for Aboriginal heritage. This violation is deepened by the repetition of “The bora ring is gone. The corroboree is gone,” which captures the systematic dismantling of cultural life. The paradoxical statement, “We are as strangers here now, but the white tribe are the strangers,” highlights the injustice of displacement, where the original custodians are alienated from their own land. Through vivid imagery, repetition, and irony, the poem transforms dispossession into both a lament and a historical testimony.


Question 2: In what ways does the poem assert Aboriginal identity?

“We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal asserts Aboriginal identity through the insistent repetition of “We are…,” which functions as both a declaration of existence and a reclamation of belonging. Lines such as “We are the corroboree and the bora ground… We are the wonder tales of Dream Time” link identity to ceremony, law, and oral tradition, showing that culture lives within the people themselves. This identity is further expanded through the metaphor “We are nature and the past, all the old ways,” connecting Aboriginal selfhood to the environment and ancestral history. The consistent rhythm created by the refrain reinforces a sense of unity and resilience, suggesting that even in the face of cultural erosion, identity survives through memory, storytelling, and collective voice.


Question 3: How is nature portrayed in the poem, and what role does it play?

“We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal presents nature as both a spiritual partner and a victim of colonial impact. The imagery of “The quiet daybreak paling the dark lagoon” and “The lightning bolt over Gaphembah Hill” celebrates the beauty, power, and sacredness of the natural world, reinforcing its role in cultural identity. Yet the lament, “The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo are gone from this place,” reveals an ecological loss that parallels the cultural dispossession of Aboriginal people. Nature is not depicted as a passive backdrop but as a living presence, inseparably woven into traditions, ceremonies, and beliefs. Its absence signals more than environmental decline; it signifies the breaking of a spiritual bond between people and land.


Question 4: What is the significance of the poem’s ending?

“We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal ends with the poignant phrase “And we are going,” encapsulating themes of departure, disappearance, and transformation. The word “going” resonates with ambiguity: it may imply forced removal, the fading of traditions, or a spiritual journey toward ancestors. Its echo of the earlier repetition of “gone” creates a mournful rhythm that mirrors the gradual loss described throughout the poem. However, the voice that has asserted “We are” so strongly throughout suggests that this departure may not be complete erasure but rather a shift into another form of cultural presence. By closing with this unresolved note, the poem leaves the reader reflecting on both the fragility and endurance of Aboriginal culture.

Literary Works Similar to “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  1. “Municipal Gum” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal – Shares themes of colonisation and displacement, using imagery of a chained gum tree as a metaphor for the confinement of Aboriginal culture.
  2. “Then and Now” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal – Explores cultural loss and change in an urbanised landscape, echoing the lament and contrasts found in “We Are Going”.
  3. “Drifters” by Bruce Dawe – Though not Indigenous-focused, it similarly captures the sense of transience, dislocation, and the fading of past lives.
  4. “The Stolen Generation” by Peter Read (poetic adaptation) – Conveys the trauma of forced separation and cultural disconnection, resonating with the dispossession in “We Are Going”.
  5. “The Death of the Bird” by A.D. Hope – Uses nature to symbolise exile and alienation, reflecting the environmental and spiritual loss central to “We Are Going”.
Representative Quotations of “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
✊ “We are as strangers here now, but the white tribe are the strangers.”Spoken by the collective Aboriginal voice, this line highlights the irony of colonisation where original custodians are alienated from their own land.Postcolonial Theory – exposes the reversal of belonging and the politics of identity.
🏺 “We are the corroboree and the bora ground.”Asserting identity, the speaker equates themselves with sacred ceremonies and sites, showing culture as inseparable from people.Cultural Identity Theory – positions tradition as core to self-definition.
🌏 “We are nature and the past, all the old ways.”Merges cultural heritage with the natural world, emphasising an ecological and spiritual unity.Ecocriticism – links environmental preservation with cultural survival.
⚖ “The bora ring is gone.”A stark statement of cultural destruction, referring to the loss of sacred initiation sites.Structuralism – symbolic of an entire system of cultural law and order being dismantled.
🐜 “Where now the many white men hurry about like ants.”Depicts settlers’ busy, unconscious movement across a sacred space, contrasting with Aboriginal reverence for the land.Postcolonial Theory – critiques colonial disregard for Indigenous spaces.
👻 “We are the wonder tales of Dream Time, the tribal legends told.”Declares identity through oral tradition and myth, situating culture in storytelling.Mythological/Anthropological Criticism – analyses the role of sacred narratives in cultural continuity.
🖋 “The eagle is gone, the emu and the kangaroo are gone from this place.”Notes the disappearance of native animals, symbolising environmental and cultural degradation.Ecocriticism – examines biodiversity loss as part of colonial impact.
⏳ “Gone now and scattered.”Concise lament for the dispersal of traditions, people, and ways of life.Postcolonial Theory – reflects fragmentation of community under colonial pressures.
🎵 “We are the lightening bolt over Gaphembah Hill… And the Thunderer after him.”Uses powerful natural imagery to express cultural force and vitality.Cultural Identity Theory – frames nature as a metaphor for Indigenous strength and resilience.
🌀 “And we are going.”The concluding line, open to interpretation as physical departure, cultural extinction, or transformation.Reader-Response Criticism – invites multiple interpretations based on personal and historical context.
Suggested Readings: “We Are Going” by Oodgeroo Noonuccal
  1. Fox, Karen. “Oodgeroo Noonuccal: Media Snapshots of a Controversial Life.” Indigenous Biography and Autobiography, edited by Peter Read et al., vol. 17, ANU Press, 2008, pp. 57–68. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24h88s.9. Accessed 11 Aug. 2025.
  2. Collins, John. “OBITUARY: OODGEROO OF THE TRIBE NOONUCCAL.” Aboriginal History, vol. 18, no. 1/2, 1994, pp. 1–4. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24046080. Accessed 11 Aug. 2025.
  3. “Oodgeroo Noonuccol — 1920-1993.” Antipodes, vol. 7, no. 2, 1993, pp. 144–144. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41958422. Accessed 11 Aug. 2025.
  4. Riemenschneider, Dieter. “Australian Aboriginal Writing in English: The Short Story.” Antipodes, vol. 4, no. 1, 1990, pp. 39–47. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41958170. Accessed 11 Aug. 2025.