“Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander: A Critical Analysis

“Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander first appeared in 2009 as a chapbook published by Graywolf Press, written especially for Barack Obama’s Presidential Inauguration on January 20, 2009.

Introduction: “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander

Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander first appeared in 2009 as a chapbook published by Graywolf Press, written especially for Barack Obama’s Presidential Inauguration on January 20, 2009. The poem celebrates the everyday heroism and resilience of ordinary Americans, capturing the shared human experience through vivid imagery of daily labor, communication, and love. Alexander weaves together the voices of the past and present, honoring the ancestors “who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges, picked the cotton and the lettuce,” while envisioning a hopeful collective future “on the brink, on the brim, on the cusp.” The poem’s popularity stems from its universal message of unity and compassion, articulated through its refrain-like structure and accessible language. Its central moral question—“What if the mightiest word is love?”—elevates it beyond a mere inaugural poem to a meditation on democracy, diversity, and renewal, reflecting the optimism of Obama’s historic presidency and the enduring power of communal hope.

Text: “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander

A Poem for Barack Obama’s Presidential Inauguration

Each day we go about our business,

walking past each other, catching each other’s

eyes or not, about to speak or speaking.

All about us is noise. All about us is

noise and bramble, thorn and din, each

one of our ancestors on our tongues.

Someone is stitching up a hem, darning

a hole in a uniform, patching a tire,

repairing the things in need of repair.

Someone is trying to make music somewhere,

with a pair of wooden spoons on an oil drum,

with cello, boom box, harmonica, voice.

A woman and her son wait for the bus.

A farmer considers the changing sky.

A teacher says, Take out your pencils. Begin.

We encounter each other in words, words

spiny or smooth, whispered or declaimed,

words to consider, reconsider.

We cross dirt roads and highways that mark

the will of some one and then others, who said

I need to see what’s on the other side.

I know there’s something better down the road.

We need to find a place where we are safe.

We walk into that which we cannot yet see.

Say it plain: that many have died for this day.

Sing the names of the dead who brought us here,

who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges,

picked the cotton and the lettuce, built

brick by brick the glittering edifices

they would then keep clean and work inside of.

Praise song for struggle, praise song for the day.

Praise song for every hand-lettered sign,

the figuring-it-out at kitchen tables.

Some live by love thy neighbor as thyself,

others by first do no harm or take no more

than you need. What if the mightiest word is love?

Love beyond marital, filial, national,

love that casts a widening pool of light,

love with no need to pre-empt grievance.

In today’s sharp sparkle, this winter air,

any thing can be made, any sentence begun.

On the brink, on the brim, on the cusp,

praise song for walking forward in that light.

Copyright Credit: Copyright © 2009 by Elizabeth Alexander.

Annotations: “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander
StanzaExplanationLiterary Devices
1. “Each day we go about our business…”The poem begins with an image of ordinary people going about their daily lives—working, passing each other, and occasionally connecting through eye contact or speech. It reflects human routine and shared existence.Imagery, Everyday diction, Enjambment, Alliteration (“past each other, catching each other’s”), Realism
2. “All about us is noise…”The poet describes the world as full of noise and chaos (“noise and bramble, thorn and din”), symbolizing struggle and hardship. The line “each one of our ancestors on our tongues” suggests the presence of history and heritage in our speech.Metaphor (noise = chaos of life), Symbolism (ancestors = heritage), Alliteration, Personification
3. “Someone is stitching up a hem…”These lines honor the unnoticed labor of everyday workers—seamstresses, soldiers, mechanics—who repair and maintain the fabric of society. It praises quiet perseverance and care.Imagery, Synecdoche (representing all workers through few examples), Repetition (“repairing”), Alliteration
4. “Someone is trying to make music…”This stanza shifts to creativity. People make music in different forms—traditional or improvised—showing human resilience and the universal urge to create beauty even in hardship.Imagery, Parallelism, Symbolism (music = hope, creativity), Alliteration
5. “A woman and her son wait for the bus…”The poet presents diverse, everyday moments—a mother waiting, a farmer watching the sky, a teacher beginning class—showing the shared rhythm of daily life and unity among professions and roles.Imagery, Enumeration, Symbolism (waiting = patience, hope), Juxtaposition
6. “We encounter each other in words…”The stanza explores communication—how language connects or divides us. “Words spiny or smooth” symbolizes the power of words to hurt or heal, emphasizing reflection and empathy.Metaphor (words as textured objects), Antithesis (“spiny or smooth”), Alliteration, Repetition
7. “We cross dirt roads and highways…”This evokes America’s history of migration, exploration, and change. The “roads and highways” represent the human journey and progress through generations.Symbolism (roads = life’s journey), Metaphor, Historical allusion, Imagery
8. “I know there’s something better down the road…”This expresses hope for the future—faith in something unseen. It captures optimism and courage to move toward safety and freedom despite uncertainty.Symbolism, Anaphora (“We need… We walk…”), Tone of hope, Repetition
9. “Say it plain: that many have died for this day…”The poet calls for remembrance of those who sacrificed—enslaved people, laborers, builders—who made progress possible. It is a collective tribute to struggle and endurance.Imperative mood, Anaphora (“who laid… who picked…”), Historical allusion, Repetition
10. “Praise song for struggle, praise song for the day…”This stanza acts as a refrain, celebrating perseverance and the small acts of daily problem-solving (“figuring-it-out at kitchen tables”). It links struggle with hope and gratitude.Repetition (“praise song”), Parallelism, Alliteration, Symbolism (kitchen table = unity, family)
11. “Some live by love thy neighbor…”The poet introduces moral and ethical values—different principles guiding people’s lives. It culminates in a question: “What if the mightiest word is love?” suggesting love as the greatest moral force.Biblical allusion (“love thy neighbor”), Rhetorical question, Contrast, Aphorism
12. “Love beyond marital, filial, national…”Here, love expands beyond personal and patriotic boundaries—becoming universal and transformative. Love is seen as light that can dissolve resentment.Anaphora (“love beyond…”), Metaphor (love as light), Symbolism, Alliteration
13. “In today’s sharp sparkle…”The closing lines evoke a new beginning—Obama’s inauguration as a moment of collective hope. “On the brink… on the brim… on the cusp” signals transition into a better future.Alliteration, Anaphora, Imagery, Symbolism (light = hope), Tone of renewal
14. “Praise song for walking forward in that light.”The poem ends on a hopeful note—celebrating the act of moving forward together in love and optimism. It’s both a prayer and a call to action.Repetition (closing refrain), Symbolism (light = unity and progress), Tone of faith, Parallelism
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander
DeviceDefinitionExample from the PoemExplanation
1. AlliterationRepetition of initial consonant sounds in nearby words.“someone is stitching up a hem”The repetition of the s sound creates musicality and rhythm, mirroring the act of stitching and everyday labor.
2. AllusionIndirect reference to a historical, cultural, or political event or idea.“Say it plain: that many have died for this day.”Refers to the long struggle for civil rights and freedom culminating in Obama’s inauguration.
3. AnaphoraRepetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive lines.“Someone is… Someone is…”Emphasizes the collective human effort and continuity of daily life.
4. AssonanceRepetition of vowel sounds within nearby words.“Each day we go about our business”The long a sound in “day” and “away” creates a soft, reflective tone that mirrors the calm observation of life.
5. CataloguingListing of people, actions, or things to emphasize diversity or unity.“A woman and her son wait for the bus. / A farmer considers the changing sky. / A teacher says, Take out your pencils.”The list honors different individuals in ordinary settings, showing America’s collective identity.
6. ContrastJuxtaposition of opposing ideas for emphasis.“Love beyond marital, filial, national”The contrast between limited and universal love expands the meaning to a broader, humanitarian ideal.
7. EnjambmentContinuation of a sentence beyond the end of a line.“We walk into that which we cannot yet see.”The line flows forward without pause, mirroring the act of walking toward an unseen future.
8. ImageryDescriptive language that appeals to the senses.“patching a tire, repairing the things in need of repair”Visual imagery highlights the theme of human resilience and the dignity of work.
9. MetaphorA comparison without using “like” or “as.”“each one of our ancestors on our tongues”Suggests that the voices and struggles of ancestors live through present generations.
10. ParallelismSimilar grammatical structure in a series of phrases or lines.“Praise song for struggle, praise song for the day.”The repetition and structure reinforce rhythm and unity, typical of African praise traditions.
11. PersonificationGiving human qualities to non-human things.“The will of some one and then others”Roads and highways seem to embody human will, symbolizing historical choices that shape destiny.
12. RepetitionDeliberate reuse of words or phrases for emphasis.“Praise song… Praise song…”Repetition of the phrase establishes rhythm and a ceremonial tone of gratitude.
13. Rhetorical QuestionA question asked for effect rather than an answer.“What if the mightiest word is love?”Encourages reflection on love’s power as a moral and social force.
14. SymbolismUse of an object or image to represent a deeper meaning.“We walk into that which we cannot yet see.”The act of walking symbolizes hope and progress into an uncertain but promising future.
15. ToneThe poet’s attitude toward the subject.Overall tone: hopeful, reverent, and unifying.The poem celebrates ordinary people and shared humanity, creating a tone of national optimism.
16. Triadic StructureUse of three parallel elements for rhythm or emphasis.“On the brink, on the brim, on the cusp.”The triple phrasing intensifies anticipation, suggesting a nation on the edge of transformation.
17. JuxtapositionPlacing contrasting images or ideas together.“noise and bramble, thorn and din”Contrasts chaos with perseverance, showing struggle within beauty.
18. Imagistic SymbolismCombination of concrete images to evoke symbolic meaning.“wooden spoons on an oil drum… cello, boom box, harmonica, voice.”The instruments symbolize cultural diversity and creativity across social classes.
19. Syntax VariationDeliberate change in sentence structure for rhythm and emphasis.“Say it plain: that many have died for this day.”The abrupt syntax commands attention, underscoring the solemnity of sacrifice.
20. ThemeCentral idea or message conveyed by the poem.“Praise song for every hand-lettered sign, / the figuring-it-out at kitchen tables.”The theme honors collective effort, love, and endurance that bind communities together in hope.
Themes: “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander

🌅 Theme 1: Unity in Diversity
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, the poet celebrates the unity of diverse people and experiences that form the essence of American identity. Through a rich catalog of everyday lives—“A woman and her son wait for the bus. / A farmer considers the changing sky. / A teacher says, Take out your pencils. Begin.”—Alexander portrays individuals from various walks of life engaged in ordinary yet meaningful acts. These scenes collectively symbolize the nation’s shared humanity and interconnectedness. The “praise song” becomes a hymn of inclusivity, where every labor and gesture contributes to the whole. By dignifying daily routines, Alexander emphasizes that national progress and peace stem not from hierarchy or might, but from mutual recognition and collective purpose.

💪 Theme 2: Resilience and Labor
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, the poet honors the dignity of human labor and resilience as vital forces behind the nation’s endurance. She pays tribute to the unseen workers who “stitched up a hem, darned a hole in a uniform, patched a tire,” elevating their acts of repair into symbols of perseverance. Later, she memorializes those who “picked the cotton and the lettuce, built / brick by brick the glittering edifices / they would then keep clean and work inside of.” These lines recognize laborers—especially marginalized ones—as the true builders of civilization. Alexander transforms their toil into sacred praise, suggesting that resilience, more than privilege or power, sustains collective progress.

💖 Theme 3: Love as a Transformative Force
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, the poet presents love as the most powerful and transformative human value. Her question, “What if the mightiest word is love?” reframes love as a unifying moral principle that transcends self-interest and boundaries. She advocates for “love beyond marital, filial, national,” a love that “casts a widening pool of light” to illuminate compassion, empathy, and peace. Through this theme, Alexander envisions a form of patriotism grounded in moral integrity rather than dominance. Love, in her vision, becomes an act of creation and renewal, offering humanity a path toward healing and harmony.

🌅 Theme 4: Hope and Progress
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, the theme of hope and collective progress underscores the poem’s uplifting conclusion. The poet writes, “We walk into that which we cannot yet see,” expressing faith in an unseen but promising future. The closing line—“praise song for walking forward in that light”—encapsulates optimism, urging continual movement toward enlightenment and justice. While the poem commemorates Barack Obama’s inauguration, its vision extends beyond politics into the universal human journey toward a better world. Alexander’s message is both spiritual and civic: that perseverance, unity, and moral courage are the guiding lights leading humanity toward renewal and shared destiny.

Literary Theories and “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander
Literary TheoryInterpretation of the PoemKey References from the Poem
1. New HistoricismThis poem reflects a historic moment — Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration — as a turning point in American racial and social history. It links everyday lives to a collective national identity shaped by struggle and change. The historical context deepens the poem’s message of renewal and inclusivity.Say it plain: that many have died for this day.” — honors those who fought for civil rights and freedom.“Who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges…” — recalls America’s working-class and enslaved laborers who built the nation.
2. Feminist TheoryThe poem elevates women’s roles in family, labor, and creativity, recognizing them as vital contributors to society. The “praise song” tradition often comes from women’s oral culture, and Alexander celebrates female resilience and domestic labor as forms of strength.Someone is stitching up a hem… patching a tire…” — highlights women’s unseen work.“Praise song for every hand-lettered sign, the figuring-it-out at kitchen tables.” — symbolizes women’s domestic leadership and activism.
3. Marxist TheoryThrough a Marxist lens, the poem exposes class distinctions and celebrates the dignity of labor. Alexander praises workers and common people as the true builders of America, contrasting their struggles with the glittering symbols of capitalism.Who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges… built brick by brick the glittering edifices they would then keep clean and work inside of.” — reveals exploitation and inequality.“Praise song for struggle, praise song for the day.” — honors labor as noble resistance.
4. Humanist/Universalist TheoryThe poem ultimately advocates for universal love, empathy, and shared humanity, transcending divisions of race, class, and nationality. Alexander envisions a moral awakening where love becomes the guiding principle for collective progress.What if the mightiest word is love?” — central moral vision of the poem.“Love beyond marital, filial, national, love that casts a widening pool of light.” — expresses universal compassion and human unity.
Critical Questions about “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander

🌿 Question 1: How does Elizabeth Alexander use ordinary imagery to represent national identity?
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, the poet constructs a vision of national identity through vivid depictions of everyday life. Rather than celebrating grand figures or monumental achievements, Alexander focuses on the mundane yet meaningful—“Someone is stitching up a hem, darning / a hole in a uniform, patching a tire.” These images elevate ordinary labor into acts of devotion, emphasizing that the strength of a nation lies in its people’s quiet persistence. The teacher, the farmer, and the mother waiting for the bus all become emblems of civic virtue and resilience. Through this focus on daily existence, Alexander redefines patriotism as participation in a shared human rhythm, where “each one of our ancestors [is] on our tongues,” suggesting that every individual contributes to the nation’s ongoing story.

💬 Question 2: What is the significance of love in the poem’s moral vision?
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, love emerges as a radical moral and social force that transcends personal boundaries. When Alexander asks, “What if the mightiest word is love?” she challenges political rhetoric and reorients moral discourse toward compassion and empathy. The poet expands love “beyond marital, filial, national,” transforming it into an inclusive, redemptive energy capable of bridging divisions. This universal love “casts a widening pool of light,” symbolizing a collective awakening that replaces resentment with understanding. By centering love as the highest ethical value, Alexander invites readers to imagine a democracy sustained by empathy rather than power—a moral vision where love itself becomes an act of civic courage and national renewal.

🌅 Question 3: How does the poem connect individual struggle with collective progress?
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, the poet intertwines personal perseverance with the nation’s broader journey toward justice and freedom. She honors the laborers who “picked the cotton and the lettuce, built / brick by brick the glittering edifices / they would then keep clean and work inside of.” These lines foreground generations of exploitation and endurance, acknowledging the sacrifices of the marginalized whose efforts shaped the nation’s foundation. Yet, Alexander transforms this historical pain into praise, asserting that collective progress is born from shared struggle. The repetition of “Praise song” serves as a ritual of remembrance and recognition, turning suffering into resilience. The poem thus becomes a national elegy and anthem combined—a reminder that progress is achieved not by erasing hardship but by honoring it as the soil from which equality grows.

🌞 Question 4: What role does hope play in shaping the poem’s tone and message?
In “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander, hope functions as both the emotional core and the guiding principle of the poem. The poet writes, “We walk into that which we cannot yet see,” expressing faith in the unseen future while acknowledging uncertainty. This hopeful forward motion reflects the spirit of Barack Obama’s inauguration—the sense of standing “on the brink, on the brim, on the cusp” of transformation. The closing blessing, “praise song for walking forward in that light,” suggests that hope itself is a communal act of courage. Alexander’s tone, steady and reverent, reinforces the belief that progress depends on perseverance and unity. By merging personal optimism with national aspiration, she frames hope not as naïve wishfulness but as a deliberate, collective commitment to renewal and justice.

Literary Works Similar to “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander
  • Still I Rise” by Maya Angelou — Like Alexander’s poem, it celebrates resilience and collective dignity in the face of historical oppression and racial injustice.
  • Let America Be America Again” by Langston Hughes — Both poems address the American dream, social struggle, and hope for equality, giving voice to ordinary people’s aspirations.
  • “One Today” by Richard Blanco — Written for President Obama’s second inauguration, it mirrors Alexander’s tone of unity and everyday heroism in American life.
  • I, Too” by Langston Hughes — Similar to “Praise Song for the Day,” it expresses faith in America’s inclusive future and honors the marginalized who helped shape the nation.
Representative Quotations of “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
Each day we go about our business, walking past each other…The poem opens by depicting ordinary human routines, symbolizing shared experience and interdependence in daily life.Humanist Theory — celebrates common humanity and social connection.
All about us is noise and bramble, thorn and din, each one of our ancestors on our tongues.Describes the world’s chaos but reminds us that our voices carry ancestral memory and cultural heritage.New Historicism — links present identity to historical and ancestral roots.
Someone is stitching up a hem, darning a hole in a uniform… repairing the things in need of repair.Honors the unnoticed labor of ordinary people whose work sustains society.Marxist Theory — dignifies manual labor and critiques class invisibility.
Someone is trying to make music somewhere… with cello, boom box, harmonica, voice.Illustrates creativity amid hardship, suggesting that art and expression belong to everyone.Humanist Theory — emphasizes creativity as an essential human act.
We encounter each other in words, words spiny or smooth, whispered or declaimed.Explores communication as the foundation of understanding and community.Linguistic/Structuralist Theory — shows how language constructs social relationships.
Say it plain: that many have died for this day.A direct acknowledgment of historical struggle—especially slavery and civil rights movements—that made progress possible.New Historicism — contextualizes the poem within America’s racial history.
Who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges… built brick by brick the glittering edifices they would then keep clean and work inside of.Recognizes marginalized laborers who built the nation yet remained excluded from its benefits.Marxist Theory — critiques exploitation and celebrates the working class.
Praise song for every hand-lettered sign, the figuring-it-out at kitchen tables.Pays tribute to grassroots activism and domestic spaces of problem-solving, especially by women.Feminist Theory — valorizes women’s roles and domestic labor as political and creative.
What if the mightiest word is love?The poem’s central question, proposing love as a moral and social force that transcends differences.Humanist / Universalist Theory — advocates empathy, compassion, and moral unity.
Love beyond marital, filial, national… love that casts a widening pool of light.Expands the definition of love to include universal solidarity and hope.Humanist / Postmodern Ethical Theory — envisions global, inclusive love as transformative.
Suggested Readings: “Praise Song for the Day” by Elizabeth Alexander

📚 Books

  1. Alexander, Elizabeth. Crave Radiance: New and Selected Poems, 1990–2010. Graywolf Press, 2010.
  2. Alexander, Elizabeth. Power and Possibility: Essays, Reviews, Interviews. University of Michigan Press, 2007.

📖 Academic Articles

  1. HAMMER, LANGDON. “History and Hope.” The American Scholar, vol. 79, no. 4, 2010, pp. 47–47. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41222249. Accessed 19 Oct. 2025.
  2. Pereira, Malin, et al. “Elizabeth Alexander.” Into a Light Both Brilliant and Unseen: Conversations with Contemporary Black Poets, University of Georgia Press, 2010, pp. 216–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46nh3m.12. Accessed 19 Oct. 2025.
  3. SCHNEIDERMAN, JASON. “Inaugural Poems and American Hope.” A Sense of Regard: Essays on Poetry and Race, edited by LAURA McCULLOUGH, University of Georgia Press, 2015, pp. 43–49. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt17573ds.10. Accessed 19 Oct. 2025.

🌐 Poem Websites

  1. “Praise Song for the Day.” Poetry Foundation, 2009.
    https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/52141/praise-song-for-the-day
  2. “Praise Song for the Day by Elizabeth Alexander.” Poets.org, Academy of American Poets, 2009. https://poets.org/poem/praise-song-day

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan: A Critical Analysis

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan first appeared in her 1980 poetry collection Passion: New Poems, 1977–1980, later reprinted in Directed by Desire: The Collected Poems of June Jordan (2005).

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan first appeared in her 1980 poetry collection Passion: New Poems, 1977–1980, later reprinted in Directed by Desire: The Collected Poems of June Jordan (2005). The poem is a fierce and unapologetic declaration of bodily autonomy, racial identity, and resistance against systems of oppression that criminalize and violate Black women’s existence. Through its confessional and political tone, Jordan connects personal trauma to collective histories of colonialism, racism, and patriarchy, stating, “I am the history of rape / I am the history of the rejection of who I am.” Her repetition of “wrong”—“the wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin”—exposes how societal hierarchies define worth and legitimacy through gender and race. The poem’s raw emotional force and political urgency made it one of the most celebrated feminist and anti-colonial texts of the late twentieth century. Its popularity stems from Jordan’s ability to merge personal pain with global injustice, linking “South Africa penetrating into Namibia” to the violence inflicted upon her own body. By ending with defiance—“Wrong is not my name / My name is my own my own my own”—Jordan transforms victimhood into resistance, asserting a radical self-ownership that resonates powerfully across feminist and liberationist discourses.

Text: “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan

Even tonight and I need to take a walk and clear

my head about this poem about why I can’t

go out without changing my clothes my shoes

my body posture my gender identity my age

my status as a woman alone in the evening/

alone on the streets/alone not being the point/

the point being that I can’t do what I want

to do with my own body because I am the wrong

sex the wrong age the wrong skin and

suppose it was not here in the city but down on the beach/

or far into the woods and I wanted to go

there by myself thinking about God/or thinking

about children or thinking about the world/all of it

disclosed by the stars and the silence:

I could not go and I could not think and I could not

stay there

alone

as I need to be

alone because I can’t do what I want to do with my own

body and

who in the hell set things up

like this

and in France they say if the guy penetrates

but does not ejaculate then he did not rape me

and if after stabbing him if after screams if

after begging the bastard and if even after smashing

a hammer to his head if even after that if he

and his buddies fuck me after that

then I consented and there was

no rape because finally you understand finally

they fucked me over because I was wrong I was

wrong again to be me being me where I was/wrong

to be who I am

which is exactly like South Africa

penetrating into Namibia penetrating into

Angola and does that mean I mean how do you know if

Pretoria ejaculates what will the evidence look like the

proof of the monster jackboot ejaculation on Blackland

and if

after Namibia and if after Angola and if after Zimbabwe

and if after all of my kinsmen and women resist even to

self-immolation of the villages and if after that

we lose nevertheless what will the big boys say will they

claim my consent:

Do You Follow Me: We are the wrong people of

the wrong skin on the wrong continent and what

in the hell is everybody being reasonable about

and according to the Times this week

back in 1966 the C.I.A. decided that they had this problem

and the problem was a man named Nkrumah so they

killed him and before that it was Patrice Lumumba

and before that it was my father on the campus

of my Ivy League school and my father afraid

to walk into the cafeteria because he said he

was wrong the wrong age the wrong skin the wrong

gender identity and he was paying my tuition and

before that

it was my father saying I was wrong saying that

I should have been a boy because he wanted one/a

boy and that I should have been lighter skinned and

that I should have had straighter hair and that

I should not be so boy crazy but instead I should

just be one/a boy and before that         

it was my mother pleading plastic surgery for

my nose and braces for my teeth and telling me

to let the books loose to let them loose in other

words

I am very familiar with the problems of the C.I.A.

and the problems of South Africa and the problems

of Exxon Corporation and the problems of white

America in general and the problems of the teachers

and the preachers and the F.B.I. and the social

workers and my particular Mom and Dad/I am very

familiar with the problems because the problems

turn out to be

me

I am the history of rape

I am the history of the rejection of who I am

I am the history of the terrorized incarceration of

myself

I am the history of battery assault and limitless

armies against whatever I want to do with my mind

and my body and my soul and

whether it’s about walking out at night

or whether it’s about the love that I feel or

whether it’s about the sanctity of my vagina or

the sanctity of my national boundaries

or the sanctity of my leaders or the sanctity

of each and every desire

that I know from my personal and idiosyncratic

and indisputably single and singular heart

I have been raped

be-

cause I have been wrong the wrong sex the wrong age

the wrong skin the wrong nose the wrong hair the

wrong need the wrong dream the wrong geographic

the wrong sartorial I

I have been the meaning of rape

I have been the problem everyone seeks to

eliminate by forced

penetration with or without the evidence of slime and/

but let this be unmistakable this poem

is not consent I do not consent

to my mother to my father to the teachers to

the F.B.I. to South Africa to Bedford-Stuy

to Park Avenue to American Airlines to the hardon

idlers on the corners to the sneaky creeps in

cars

I am not wrong: Wrong is not my name

My name is my own my own my own

and I can’t tell you who the hell set things up like this

but I can tell you that from now on my resistance

my simple and daily and nightly self-determination

may very well cost you your life

Copyright Credit: June Jordan, “Poem About My Rights” from Directed By Desire: The Collected Poems of June Jordan (Port Townsend, WA: Copper Canyon Press, 2005). Copyright © 2005 by The June M. Jordan Literary Trust. Used by permission of The June M. Jordan Literary Trust, www.junejordan.com.

Source: The Collected Poems of June Jordan (2005)

Annotations: “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan
Section (Lines)Summary / Annotation Key Literary Devices (Definition + Example + Function)
1–10Jordan opens by expressing how even walking alone at night feels forbidden because society polices her as a woman, forcing her to alter her behavior and appearance. The repetition of “wrong” captures deep social conditioning and guilt.Repetition: “wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin” – stresses systemic labeling. Imagery: “changing my clothes my shoes my body posture” – visualizes fear and restriction. Enjambment: “alone on the streets/alone not being the point” – mirrors her restless thought process. Tone: Defiant yet weary – conveys frustration and introspection.
11–20The speaker longs for solitude and connection with nature but realizes even thinking freely is denied to her. Freedom itself becomes unsafe. “Stars and silence” symbolize the serenity she cannot access.Symbolism: “stars and the silence” – represent lost peace and freedom. Anaphora: “I could not go and I could not think” – emphasizes oppression. Contrast: Freedom vs. restriction – highlights gender-based limitation. Pathos: Emotional appeal evoking empathy for women’s loss of autonomy.
21–30She mocks patriarchal legal absurdities defining rape only by male pleasure. The irony exposes systemic victim-blaming and moral decay of justice systems.Irony: “then he did not rape me” – ridicules twisted legal standards. Hyperbole: “after smashing a hammer to his head” – exaggeration to reveal injustice. Repetition: “if… if…” – builds anger and rhythm. Satire: Legal and social mockery of victim consent.
31–40Her personal violation becomes political. Jordan compares rape to colonial penetration, merging gender oppression with racial and geopolitical exploitation.Extended Metaphor: “South Africa penetrating into Namibia” – equates imperialism with rape. Juxtaposition: Private assault vs. colonial invasion – blurs personal/political boundaries. Allusion: “Angola, Zimbabwe” – references African liberation struggles. Parallelism: “and if after…” – accumulates global scale of violence.
41–50She expands oppression globally — linking racism, colonialism, and American interventionism. “Wrong skin” and “wrong continent” mirror her personal alienation.Direct Address: “Do You Follow Me” – engages readers to confront truth. Political Allusion: “C.I.A… Nkrumah… Lumumba” – exposes Western exploitation. Repetition: “wrong people of the wrong skin” – universalizes oppression. Rhetorical Question: “what in the hell is everybody being reasonable about” – challenges moral complacency.
51–60Focus shifts to her family: her father’s fear and mother’s conformity reflect internalized racism and patriarchy. The poem reveals generational trauma rooted in colonial values.Generational Symbolism: “my father… my mother” – family mirrors social oppression. Irony: Parents adopt oppressive ideals instead of protecting her. Imagery: “plastic surgery for my nose” – evokes assimilation pressures. Repetition: “wrong” – continues inherited rejection of self.
61–70Jordan mocks institutions—C.I.A., FBI, Exxon—claiming their “problems” are actually her existence. It’s biting irony: marginalized people are treated as the “problem” itself.Irony: “the problems turn out to be me” – bitterly sarcastic realization. Parallelism: “the problems of…” – rhythmic indictment of systems. Tone Shift: From mockery to revelation. Metaphor: “I am the problem” – internalized social hostility.
71–80She universalizes her experience, declaring herself as the embodiment of all oppression. “I am the history of rape” transforms pain into collective resistance.Anaphora: “I am the history of…” – builds identity and solidarity. Metaphor: “history of rape” – symbolizes centuries of abuse. Personification: “limitless armies against whatever I want” – oppression as living force. Tone: Fierce and declarative – transforms trauma into defiance.
81–90The sanctity of her body, soul, and nation are intertwined. Personal autonomy equals political sovereignty; both have been violated and must be reclaimed.Parallelism: “sanctity of my vagina… sanctity of my leaders” – unites body and politics. Symbolism: “vagina” – personal autonomy and resistance. Repetition: “sanctity” – underscores sacredness of rights. Political Allegory: Her body as colonized territory.
91–EndThe poem ends in defiance: she rejects imposed “wrongness” and reclaims her name, declaring “this poem is not consent.” Her resistance becomes revolutionary self-determination.Anaphora: “my own my own my own” – asserts ownership and identity. Antithesis: “I am not wrong: Wrong is not my name” – rejects imposed labels. Metaphor: “this poem is not consent” – poem as act of refusal. Climax: Final assertion of freedom and rebellion.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan
Literary DeviceExamplesExplanation
Alliteration“body because I am the wrong / sex the wrong skin”The repetition of the s sound creates rhythm and intensity, emphasizing the suffocating persistence of identity-based oppression.
Allusion“Nkrumah… Patrice Lumumba… South Africa… C.I.A.”References to historical figures and geopolitical powers connect personal trauma to global systems of racism, patriarchy, and imperialism.
Anaphora“the wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin” / “I am the history of…”Repetition at the beginning of clauses underscores systemic and recurring forms of discrimination and self-reclamation.
Antithesis“This poem / is not consent.”Contrasts victimization with resistance, rejecting imposed guilt and asserting control over one’s identity and voice.
Apostrophe“Do You Follow Me”Direct address to the reader or audience breaks narrative distance and demands engagement and accountability.
Assonance“alone on the streets / alone not being the point”The long o sound conveys melancholy, echoing the theme of isolation and internal struggle.
Caesura“I have been raped / be– / cause I have been wrong…”The abrupt pause creates tension, reflecting both the speaker’s emotional fracture and the violence she describes.
Enjambment“alone / as I need to be / alone because I can’t do what I want…”Continuous thought flow mirrors a stream of consciousness, conveying frustration and urgency.
Free VerseEntire poem without rhyme or regular meterThe absence of formal structure symbolizes the poet’s resistance to confinement and the dismantling of social constraints.
Hyperbole“limitless armies against whatever I want to do with my mind and my body”Exaggeration expresses the overwhelming power of institutionalized oppression and the scale of control over her existence.
Imagery“down on the beach… thinking about God/or thinking about children or thinking about the world”Vivid visual and sensory imagery contrasts natural serenity with social restriction, showing the loss of freedom.
Irony“then I consented and there was / no rape”Highlights the absurdity and cruelty of legal systems that redefine violence to favor perpetrators, critiquing patriarchal reasoning.
Juxtaposition“Pretoria ejaculates… proof of the monster jackboot ejaculation on Blackland”The juxtaposition of sexual and political imagery equates colonial conquest with rape, linking bodily and geopolitical violation.
Metaphor“I am the history of rape” / “I have been the meaning of rape”The metaphor of rape represents historical and systemic violation, merging personal and political subjugation.
Parallelism“the sanctity of my vagina or / the sanctity of my national boundaries”Balanced phrasing parallels body and nation, connecting personal autonomy with political sovereignty.
Personification“the problems turn out to be / me”Society’s collective “problems” are personified in the speaker, showing how marginalized identities are scapegoated.
Repetition“I am not wrong: Wrong is not my name / My name is my own my own my own”Reinforces defiance and ownership of identity, turning self-naming into an act of rebellion.
Simile“which is exactly like South Africa / penetrating into Namibia”Compares political invasion to sexual assault, merging bodily violation with imperial aggression.
Symbolism“my own body” for self-ownership; “boundaries” for sovereigntySymbols of body and border represent freedom, autonomy, and resistance to patriarchal and colonial control.
ToneFrom despair (“I am the history of rape”) to defiance (“Wrong is not my name”)The tonal shift mirrors emotional and ideological transformation—from victimhood to empowered self-determination.
Themes: “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan

🌺 Theme 1: Gender and Bodily Autonomy
“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan explores the struggle for bodily autonomy within a patriarchal world that continually polices and violates women’s freedoms. The speaker laments, “I can’t do what I want / to do with my own body because I am the wrong / sex the wrong age the wrong skin,” highlighting how gender, race, and age intersect to define oppression. The poem transforms personal fear into political resistance, exposing how women are made to internalize blame for their own victimization. Jordan’s defiant statement—“this poem / is not consent”—reclaims control over her narrative, denying the world’s attempt to misinterpret her silence as submission. The repeated affirmation, “My name is my own my own my own,” becomes a rhythmic chant of self-possession, rejecting patriarchal ownership of the female body. Through this theme, Jordan demands recognition of a woman’s right to autonomy, asserting that resistance begins with reclaiming the body as one’s own sacred space.


🔥 Theme 2: Intersection of Racism, Sexism, and Colonial Oppression
“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan links the personal violation of women’s bodies to the political exploitation of colonized nations, exposing how both forms of domination stem from the same patriarchal logic of control. Jordan’s analogy—“which is exactly like South Africa / penetrating into Namibia”—merges the language of sexual violence with that of imperial invasion. This parallel transforms the poem into a broader critique of historical and racial injustice. Her references to “Patrice Lumumba” and “Nkrumah” situate her personal struggle within a global context of anti-colonial resistance, drawing attention to how the destruction of Black leaders mirrors the silencing of Black women. Through these juxtapositions, Jordan reveals that oppression operates simultaneously on individual and collective levels. The female body becomes a metaphor for occupied territory, and reclaiming it becomes an act of decolonization. Her voice, therefore, embodies both personal defiance and the collective resistance of oppressed peoples.


🌍 Theme 3: Identity, Self-Definition, and Resistance
“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan articulates a journey from imposed identity to self-definition, turning resistance into a form of self-creation. The poet repeatedly lists how she has been told she is “the wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin,” exposing how social norms shape internalized inferiority. Yet, through her language, Jordan dismantles this narrative of wrongness, declaring, “Wrong is not my name.” The act of naming herself becomes revolutionary—by reclaiming language, she reclaims power. Her insistence, “My name is my own,” signifies not only personal ownership but also the rejection of externally imposed labels of race, gender, and beauty. Through self-assertion, Jordan’s voice transcends victimhood, transforming identity into an active force of defiance. The poem thus celebrates the power of language as a tool of liberation, suggesting that naming oneself truthfully is the first step toward reclaiming existence from systems of oppression.


Theme 4: Violence, Power, and Global Injustice
“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan situates personal suffering within a larger framework of systemic violence and political corruption, revealing how institutions perpetuate domination at every level. Jordan writes, “I am very familiar with the problems of the C.I.A.… the problems turn out to be / me,” demonstrating how marginalized individuals bear the weight of global injustices. Her invocation of “South Africa,” “Exxon Corporation,” and “white America” connects the intimate violence of rape to the economic and political violence of colonial exploitation. The closing lines, “from now on my resistance / my simple and daily and nightly self-determination / may very well cost you your life,” shift the tone from victimization to revolutionary defiance. This assertion of power transforms survival into rebellion, suggesting that true justice threatens the systems that depend on inequality. Through this theme, Jordan turns her poem into both a personal manifesto and a global indictment of oppressive hierarchies that sustain violence in all its forms.

Literary Theories and “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan
Literary TheoryApplication with References from the Poem
1. Feminist TheoryJordan’s poem is a powerful feminist declaration against patriarchal oppression that denies women control over their bodies and freedom. She exposes how societal structures turn female existence into guilt and vulnerability. The lines “I can’t do what I want to do with my own body because I am the wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin” highlight gendered restriction and bodily surveillance. Her concluding defiance—“This poem is not consent… I am not wrong: Wrong is not my name”—reclaims identity, self-ownership, and autonomy. The poem thus becomes a manifesto of bodily sovereignty and female empowerment.
2. Postcolonial TheoryJordan merges the violence against women with colonial domination, portraying both as acts of forced penetration. Through the metaphor “South Africa penetrating into Namibia… Angola… Zimbabwe,” she equates sexual violation with political conquest. The line “We are the wrong people of the wrong skin on the wrong continent” universalizes racial oppression and links it to historical colonization. Her critique of Western imperialism and American hypocrisy transforms the personal narrative of rape into a broader indictment of global racial injustice, showing how gender and race intersect under postcolonial power.
3. Marxist TheoryThe poem denounces capitalist and imperial systems that objectify and exploit marginalized identities. Jordan mocks institutional power by listing agents of control—“I am very familiar with the problems of the C.I.A., South Africa, and Exxon Corporation.” These institutions symbolize economic and ideological domination. Her realization—“the problems turn out to be me”—reveals how the oppressed become scapegoats within capitalist hierarchies. Jordan’s poem exposes economic inequality and the commodification of human bodies, aligning her resistance with class and racial liberation.
4. Psychoanalytic TheoryJordan explores psychological trauma and internalized oppression inherited from her parents and society. Her father’s and mother’s remarks—“my father saying I was wrong… my mother pleading plastic surgery for my nose”—reflect racialized beauty standards and gender expectations. The repetition of “wrong” symbolizes deep-seated self-alienation and repression. Through confession and rebellion, Jordan transforms her unconscious pain into conscious defiance, healing through self-naming and affirmation. The poem thus functions as a cathartic act of reclaiming the self from the trauma of societal judgment.
Critical Questions about “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan

1. How does “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan challenge patriarchal control over women’s bodies?

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan fiercely denounces patriarchal structures that define, regulate, and criminalize women’s bodily autonomy. Jordan confronts the everyday fear women endure, declaring, “I can’t do what I want to do with my own body because I am the wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin.” This repetition of “wrong” exposes how identity becomes a weapon of control in a male-dominated world. By invoking daily acts like changing her “clothes” or “body posture,” she reveals the deep psychological and physical surveillance women internalize. The poem’s closing assertion, “This poem is not consent… I am not wrong: Wrong is not my name,” transforms her victimization into defiance, rejecting both the imposed guilt and the patriarchal right to define her. Through this personal yet political reclamation, Jordan transforms her poetry into an act of feminist resistance and liberation.


2. In what ways does “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan connect personal violation with political oppression?

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan merges the intimate trauma of sexual violence with the collective experience of political colonization. When she writes, “Which is exactly like South Africa penetrating into Namibia… and if after Angola and after Zimbabwe,” Jordan extends her own bodily violation into a metaphor for imperial aggression. The act of “penetration” signifies both sexual assault and colonial conquest—each a violation of autonomy. Her question, “how do you know if Pretoria ejaculates,” uses shocking imagery to expose how global politics mirrors personal violence, both justified through power. By linking her body to colonized nations, Jordan universalizes oppression, arguing that domination—whether sexual, racial, or political—stems from the same patriarchal desire to possess and control. Her poem thus becomes a revolutionary fusion of the personal and the political, asserting that freedom for women and freedom for nations are inseparable.


3. How does “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan represent the intersection of race, gender, and identity?

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan explores the layered oppression of being a Black woman whose identity is doubly marginalized by race and gender. The recurring phrase “wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin” powerfully encapsulates this intersectional struggle. Jordan’s use of “wrong” functions as both accusation and irony—it reflects society’s distorted standards while reclaiming her right to self-definition. The poet extends her critique beyond gender to racial and cultural alienation: “We are the wrong people of the wrong skin on the wrong continent.” Through this, she aligns her personal experience with global Black identity, confronting historical erasure and systemic racism. By the poem’s end, her declaration “My name is my own my own my own” becomes a radical assertion of identity, signaling her refusal to be defined by oppressive categories. Jordan thus articulates an early and powerful expression of intersectional feminism.


4. What role does resistance play in “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan?

“Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan transforms resistance from a political act into a personal necessity. After detailing the multiple layers of violence—societal, familial, and institutional—she concludes with an uncompromising assertion of rebellion: “Let this be unmistakable, this poem is not consent.” This line becomes both manifesto and warning, establishing the poem as a site of defiance rather than victimhood. Her phrase “from now on my resistance, my simple and daily and nightly self-determination may very well cost you your life” elevates self-defense and autonomy to acts of revolution. Resistance, for Jordan, is not optional—it is survival. It is through her words, her refusal to be silenced, that she reclaims power. The poem’s rhythm, repetition, and rage embody the energy of protest, turning personal pain into collective empowerment and transforming poetry into a weapon of justice.

Literary Works Similar to “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan
  • “Still I Rise” by Maya Angelou
    Both poems celebrate female resilience and defiance against oppression, using repetition and self-affirmation to transform pain into empowerment and to challenge racial and gender subjugation.
  • “The Woman Thing” by Audre Lorde
    Both poems explore the strength and vulnerability of womanhood within patriarchal societies, showing how survival itself becomes a form of rebellion against structures of domination.
  • “Power” by Audre Lorde
    Both poems confront systemic injustice by linking personal trauma to political violence, revealing how institutional power sustains racial and gender oppression.
  • “Phenomenal Woman” by Maya Angelou
    Both poems assert pride in one’s body and identity, rejecting imposed standards of beauty and celebrating self-ownership as an act of liberation.
  • “Rape” by Adrienne Rich
    Both poems expose sexual violence and the complicity of legal and social systems, transforming the female voice into a tool of truth-telling, resistance, and justice.
Representative Quotations of “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan
Quotation from the PoemContext and ExplanationTheoretical Perspective
“I can’t do what I want to do with my own body because I am the wrong sex the wrong age the wrong skin.”Jordan laments how society criminalizes her freedom to exist independently as a woman of color. This opening captures how gender, race, and age intersect to produce oppression.Feminist & Intersectional Theory – Exposes structural control over women’s bodies and identity.
“Alone not being the point / the point being that I can’t do what I want.”The poet rejects the idea that women’s solitude is unsafe by nature; instead, it is the social system that denies them freedom.Feminist Theory – Challenges patriarchal social norms restricting female autonomy.
“And in France they say if the guy penetrates but does not ejaculate then he did not rape me.”Jordan mocks patriarchal legal absurdities that invalidate women’s suffering. The shocking irony reveals the dehumanizing logic of rape culture.Feminist Legal Critique – Exposes male-centered law and its disregard for female pain and consent.
“Which is exactly like South Africa penetrating into Namibia.”She links sexual violence with colonial domination, transforming personal trauma into political metaphor.Postcolonial Theory – Parallels between bodily and territorial invasion critique imperialism.
“We are the wrong people of the wrong skin on the wrong continent.”Jordan universalizes the experience of racial injustice, pointing to systemic global racism and the historical legacy of colonization.Postcolonial Theory – Highlights racial othering and historical oppression of Black identity.
“I am very familiar with the problems of the C.I.A. and the problems of Exxon Corporation.”By naming global power institutions, she exposes how capitalism, imperialism, and state violence shape inequality.Marxist Theory – Critique of capitalist and institutional exploitation of marginalized people.
“The problems turn out to be me.”The speaker recognizes that oppressed individuals are blamed for systemic problems, revealing the psychological burden of marginalization.Marxist & Psychoanalytic Theory – Shows internalized guilt and ideological manipulation.
“My father saying I was wrong saying that I should have been a boy.”Jordan recalls parental disappointment shaped by patriarchal and racial expectations, showing how oppression begins within the home.Psychoanalytic Feminism – Reveals internalized sexism and family-induced identity repression.
“I am the history of rape.”A declarative transformation of personal trauma into a collective history of oppression; her body becomes the archive of resistance.Feminist & Historical Theory – Reclaims voice for all women silenced by patriarchal violence.
“This poem is not consent… I am not wrong: Wrong is not my name.”The poem ends with a bold reclamation of selfhood and resistance. Jordan denies patriarchal power to define her and asserts identity through speech.Feminist & Resistance Theory – Language becomes an act of rebellion and self-liberation.
Suggested Readings: “Poem about My Rights” by June Jordan

Books

  • Jordan, June. Directed by Desire: The Collected Poems of June Jordan. Edited by Jan Heller Levi and Sara Miles, Copper Canyon Press, 2005.
  • Pratt, Minnie Bruce. Crime Against Nature. Firebrand Books, 1990.

Academic Articles

  • MacPhail, Scott. “June Jordan and the New Black Intellectuals.” African American Review, vol. 33, no. 1, 1999, pp. 57–71. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2901301. Accessed 17 Oct. 2025.
  • Erickson, Peter. “The Love Poetry of June Jordan.” Callaloo, no. 26, 1986, pp. 221–34. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2931089. Accessed 17 Oct. 2025.

Websites

  • Academy of American Poets. “June Jordan.” Poets.org, poets.org/poet/june-jordan.