Socrates as a Literary Theorist: Socrates (469–399 BCE), born in the deme of Alopece near Athens, is widely regarded as the founding figure of Western philosophy. His father, Sophroniscus, was a stonemason, and his mother, Phainarete, a midwife — a fact that later lent symbolic resonance to his philosophical “midwifery” of ideas. He likely practiced his father’s craft in youth and served as a hoplite soldier in campaigns such as Potidaea and Delium, demonstrating courage and endurance. Socrates lived modestly, married Xanthippe, and raised three sons, though his ascetic lifestyle was philosophical rather than impoverished. According to The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, he came of age during a transformative period in Athenian democracy, enjoying the privileges of citizenship and inheritance that allowed him to devote himself to philosophical inquiry rather than material pursuits.
Socrates wrote nothing himself; what we know of him comes through Plato, Xenophon, and Aristophanes. His method, elenchus—a dialectical form of questioning—sought to expose contradictions in interlocutors’ beliefs and guide them toward clearer understanding. He disclaimed wisdom, professing only knowledge of his own ignorance, yet aimed to define moral concepts such as justice, courage, and virtue. His teachings emphasized the supremacy of the soul over wealth or power, the pursuit of ethical self-knowledge, and the principle that wrongdoing harms the wrongdoer’s soul more than the victim’s body. As Taylor notes, Plato’s Apology, Crito, and Phaedo portray Socrates as the ideal philosopher—courageous, rational, and devoted to truth even unto death by hemlock in 399 BCE. His legacy endures as the “patron saint of philosophy,” a moral and intellectual exemplar who revolutionized inquiry into virtue and human excellence.
Socrates as a Literary Theorist and Critic
⚜️ 1. Socrates as a Foundation of Aesthetic Rationalism
- Socrates’ influence extended beyond philosophy into the realm of art and aesthetics. Nietzsche, as cited in Christopher Taylor’s Socrates: A Very Short Introduction, attributes to him the rise of “Aesthetic Socratism,” the idea that “to be beautiful is to be intelligible”—a direct parallel to Socrates’ moral axiom that “knowledge is virtue.”
“Socratism condemns existing art as well as existing ethics… all alone, with an expression of irreverence and superiority, he enters a world… of altogether different culture, art and morality” (Taylor, 2000, p. 13).
🏛️ 2. Critique of Tragedy and Poetic Illusion
- Socrates, as represented in The Republic and discussed by later thinkers, opposed the irrationality of tragic art, arguing that it appealed to emotions rather than intellect. He maintained that art should contribute to moral enlightenment, not illusion.
“Just as the Platonic Socrates gives no positive role to the non-rational elements in the personality, so Socratic art has no room for the mysterious, for what cannot be captured by theory” (Taylor, 2000, p. 14).
- This reflects his belief that art must serve ethical education, not mere aesthetic pleasure—a principle that made him one of the earliest moral critics of literature.
🕊️ 3. Socrates in the Dialogues: Literature as Philosophical Drama
- According to The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, Plato’s representation of Socrates created a literary genre of philosophical drama—dialogues that blended narrative, rhetoric, and moral inquiry.
“What we have instead is the literary Socrates of the fourth century, in a diversity of portraits… the most important fact about Socrates was his influence: the extraordinary fertility of his ideas and the moral example he set for his followers” (Morrison, 2000, p. 780).
- Thus, Socrates not only became a subject of literature but also a model for literary criticism, inviting writers to examine moral and intellectual integrity through character dialogue.
📚 4. Socrates’ View on Poets and Inspiration
- In Ion, Socrates critiques the rhapsode’s claim to knowledge, suggesting that poetic creation is not rational knowledge but divine inspiration (theia mania). This sets a precedent for distinguishing between reasoned knowledge and emotional creativity in literary theory.
“Poets compose not by wisdom but by divine possession” (Ion, 534b–d; Plato, trans. Cooper, 1997).
- This view frames Socrates as a proto-critic, analyzing literature through its epistemic foundations rather than its emotional appeal.
🌿 5. Influence on Later Literary Theory
- Socratic dialectic became a critical tool for evaluating literature, influencing later classical and modern criticism.
- Aristotle’s Poetics reinterpreted Socratic moralism into structured poetics.
- Nietzsche’s critique of “Socratic art” in The Birth of Tragedy redefined Socrates as a figure who rationalized art at the expense of its tragic depth, calling him “the agent of Hellenic disintegration”.
“Socrates for the first time recognized as an agent of Hellenic disintegration, as a typical décadent” (Nietzsche, as quoted in Taylor, 2000, p. 80).
✒️ 6. The Socratic Legacy in Literary Criticism
- Socrates established the ethical dimension of literary interpretation: art must be judged by its capacity to promote virtue and truth.
- His “elenchus” or method of questioning shaped not only philosophy but also the critical analysis of texts, influencing modern hermeneutics and critical theory.
“Socrates’ philosophy is out of our reach, [but] the logoi sokratikoi offer us a diffraction of Socrates’ character and ideas” (Morrison, 2000, p. 21).
Major Dialogues and Philosophical Ideas of Socrates as a Theorist
🏛️ 1. Apology – The Defense of Philosophy
- Theme: Moral integrity and the examined life.
- Key Ideas: Socrates defends his mission to question and seek truth, asserting that “the unexamined life is not worth living.”
- Philosophical Contribution: Establishes philosophy as a moral vocation; introduces the concept of elenchus (cross-examination) as a means of exposing ignorance and seeking virtue.
⚖️ 2. Crito – Justice and the Rule of Law
- Theme: Moral duty over self-interest.
- Key Ideas: Socrates refuses to escape prison, claiming one must never do wrong, even in return for wrong (Crito 49a-b).
- Philosophical Contribution: Develops the idea of a social contract between the individual and the laws of the city; introduces the principle that justice is harmony of the soul and the community.
🕊️ 3. Phaedo – The Immortality of the Soul
- Theme: Death and philosophical purification.
- Key Ideas: The soul is immortal; philosophy is a preparation for death through detachment from bodily desires.
- Philosophical Contribution: Links knowledge to recollection (anamnesis) and introduces the concept that true philosophers welcome death because it frees the soul from corporeal corruption.
💡 4. Meno – Virtue as Knowledge
- Theme: Can virtue be taught?
- Key Ideas: Socrates defines virtue as knowledge of the good, introducing the theory of recollection—that learning is remembering truths already known to the soul.
- Philosophical Contribution: Establishes epistemological moralism, i.e., virtue = knowledge = happiness, and argues that “no one goes wrong willingly.” This is the Socratic Paradox.
🗣️ 5. Gorgias – Rhetoric and Moral Responsibility
- Theme: The ethics of persuasion and justice.
- Key Ideas: Socrates contrasts philosophy with rhetoric, asserting that rhetoric aims at persuasion without truth, whereas philosophy seeks justice through reason.
- Philosophical Contribution: Advocates for moral intellectualism—that wrongdoing results from ignorance, not malice; develops a critique of sophistry and political manipulation.
🎭 6. Ion – Art, Poetry, and Inspiration
- Theme: The nature of poetic inspiration.
- Key Ideas: Poets and rhapsodes speak not from knowledge but from divine inspiration (theia mania).
- Philosophical Contribution: Distinguishes rational understanding from emotional inspiration, laying the groundwork for later debates in aesthetics and literary theory.
🌿 7. Republic (Book I) – Justice and the Ideal State
- Theme: Justice and the harmony of the soul.
- Key Ideas: Socrates defines justice as doing one’s own work and establishes the tripartite structure of the soul—reason, spirit, and appetite—each with its virtue.
- Philosophical Contribution: Synthesizes ethics and politics, emphasizing that a just soul mirrors a just society; anticipates the Platonic ideal of philosopher-kings.
🔍 8. Method of Elenchus – The Socratic Dialectic
- Theme: Knowledge through refutation.
- Key Ideas: The elenchus (refutative method) exposes contradictions in belief to lead interlocutors toward truth.
- Philosophical Contribution: Establishes dialectic as a method of moral self-examination. As Morrison notes, it seeks “robust knowledge claims… by testing doxastic coherence through a series of questions”.
🔱 9. Central Philosophical Ideas
- Virtue = Knowledge: True moral conduct arises from knowing the good.
- No One Does Wrong Willingly: Immorality results from ignorance, not intent.
- Care for the Soul: Ethical life is grounded in the health of the soul.
- Philosophy as a Way of Life: Socrates defines the philosopher as a moral exemplar who seeks wisdom over pleasure or wealth.
Socratic Method and Its Role in Literary and Philosophical Thought
🏛️ 1. Definition and Core Principles
- The Socratic Method (elenchus) is a form of dialectical questioning designed to test the logical coherence (doxastic coherence) of a person’s beliefs through dialogue.
- As Hugh H. Benson explains, Socrates’ method “examines the robust knowledge claims of those reputed to be wise… by testing their doxastic coherence through a series of questions”.
- This approach assumes that definition and clarity are essential to wisdom. Aristotle observed that Socrates’ method centered on “inductive arguments and defining the universal” (Metaphysics 1078b27–29).
🔍 2. The Elenchus as Definition Testing
- Socratic inquiry begins with a definitional question—“What is courage?” “What is justice?”—and then examines contradictions in the interlocutor’s answers.
- As the Cambridge Companion notes, this “strategy of examining the doxastic coherence of his interlocutors… presupposes a rather robust conception of knowledge or wisdom”.
- The method is not to impose doctrine but to reveal ignorance—hence Socrates’ declaration that “he knows that he knows nothing.”
🗣️ 3. Literary Role: Dialogue as Philosophical Drama
- Socratic questioning transformed philosophy into a literary art form. The dialogues of Plato, Xenophon, and others became models for literary dialectic, dramatizing intellectual inquiry through conversation.
- As Taylor observes, these dialogues, marked by “conversational vividness,” invite readers “into their own dialogue with the text” and remain “the best introduction to philosophy”.
- The Socratic Method thus became a literary technique—a form of dramatized logic that shaped Western conceptions of philosophical discourse, narrative reasoning, and even education.
📚 4. Philosophical Significance: The Method of Critical Self-Examination
- For Socrates, philosophy was not abstract speculation but moral self-criticism.
- The method requires examining one’s assumptions, revising them through argument, and achieving intellectual integrity.
- Taylor writes, “The critical method is no mere pedagogical strategy; it is… a method of self-criticism,” embodying the ideal of the examined life.
- This concept culminates in Socrates’ famous declaration:
“The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being” (Apology 38a).
🌿 5. Influence on Literary and Educational Thought
- The Socratic Method shaped the humanistic tradition in literature and education.
- Taylor notes that “virtually everyone whose business is teaching finds some affinity with the Socratic method of challenging the student to examine beliefs and arrive at answers through critical reflection”.
- In literary studies, it established the foundation for dialogic inquiry—the idea that meaning emerges through questioning, reinterpretation, and moral reasoning (later influencing Bakhtin’s dialogism and modern hermeneutics).
🕊️ 6. The Socratic Legacy
- The elenchus continues to function as both a philosophical technique and a literary archetype of inquiry.
- It models the integration of logic, ethics, and language, emphasizing that truth is pursued collaboratively, not authoritatively.
- As Taylor concludes, Socrates remains “an exemplary figure… whose dialogues challenge, encourage, and inspire” critical thought and self-awareness across generations.
Critical Concepts/Theoretical Terms of Socrates as a Literary Theorist
| Concept / Term | Definition / Meaning | Reference from Work | Explanation / Theoretical Relevance |
| Elenchus (Dialectical Refutation) | The Socratic method of cross-examination that exposes contradictions in an interlocutor’s beliefs. | “The strategy of examining the doxastic coherence of his interlocutors presupposes a rather robust conception of knowledge or wisdom.” (Cambridge Companion, p. 188) | Serves both as a philosophical and literary technique—a performative dialogue that dramatizes inquiry and critical thinking, influencing later rhetorical and pedagogical theory. |
| Irony (Eironeia) | Pretended ignorance used to expose false knowledge or hypocrisy in others. | “The pretence of ignorance practiced by Socrates as a step towards confuting an adversary” (Cambridge Companion, p. 244) | A central literary device in the Socratic dialogues; it conveys both humility and rhetorical mastery, shaping modern concepts of irony and self-reflexive narrative. |
| Virtue as Knowledge | The belief that moral virtue is equivalent to knowledge of the good. | “Virtue should be defined in terms of knowledge of good and bad.” (Cambridge Companion, p. 303) | Reflects Socrates’ moral intellectualism—the unity of ethics and epistemology; forms the moral foundation of his literary portrayals and dialogues. |
| Socratic Paradox | The idea that “no one does wrong willingly.” | “All wrongdoing is unwilling.” (Cambridge Companion, p. 303) | Central to Socratic ethics and his literary persona as a moral reformer; portrays ignorance as the root of moral failure rather than wicked intent. |
| Search for Definition | The philosophical practice of defining abstract virtues like justice or piety. | “The search for definitions is the search for expertise… a grasp of its nature which delivers answers to further questions.” (Very Short Introduction, p. 61) | Establishes the literary form of the dialogue as an ongoing process of conceptual inquiry, framing philosophical reasoning as narrative and performative. |
| Conceptual vs. Substantive Definitions | Distinction between analyzing meanings and identifying underlying realities. | “His practice shows him favouring a kind of definition which we can characterize as substantive rather than conceptual.” (Very Short Introduction, p. 64) | Demonstrates Socrates’ shift from linguistic to metaphysical reasoning; a proto-theoretical distinction crucial to later literary and philosophical analysis. |
| Socratic Character (Logoi Sokratikoi) | The literary portrayal of Socrates in dialogues as both character and idea. | “Socrates rapidly became a sort of literary character (dramatis persona)… placed at the center of polemics.” (Cambridge Companion, p. 9) | Marks Socrates as a meta-literary construct, bridging the gap between philosophy and literature, influencing genres of dialogue and moral drama. |
| Knowledge and Eudaimonia (Flourishing) | The view that wisdom ensures moral happiness. | “Virtue is knowledge of human good… human good is an overall pleasant life.” (Very Short Introduction, p. 89) | Connects ethics to psychology, introducing philosophical humanism—the idea that knowledge leads to self-fulfillment and well-being. |
| Socratic Irony as Pedagogy | Irony as a teaching device to engage the interlocutor and reader. | “Irony serves to tell us about the structure of wisdom, but not about its content.” (Cambridge Companion, p. 244) | Highlights irony’s educational purpose—an open-ended invitation to the audience to pursue truth through critical introspection. |
Socrates’ Influence on Classical and Modern Literary Theory
⚜️ I. Influence on Classical Philosophy and Literary Thought
- Foundation of Ethical Inquiry
- Socrates pioneered systematic ethical thought that influenced Plato and Aristotle. His moral intellectualism—the belief that virtue is knowledge—established the moral-philosophical foundations of classical criticism.
- Creation of the Philosophical Dialogue as Literary Form
- The Socratic dialogues’ “conversational vividness draw the reader into his or her own dialogue with the text” (Taylor, 2000, p. 92).
➤ This dialogic structure inspired later rhetorical and dramatic techniques emphasizing dialogue and inquiry as forms of literary composition.
- The Socratic dialogues’ “conversational vividness draw the reader into his or her own dialogue with the text” (Taylor, 2000, p. 92).
- Platonic and Aristotelian Transmission
- According to The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, the doxographical tradition identified Socrates as “the supposed originator of ethics… [whose influence] passed from Plato to the Academic Skeptics and from Antisthenes via the Cynics to Zeno and his Stoic successors”.
➤ This chain embedded Socratic method in the moral, rhetorical, and literary education of the classical world.
- According to The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, the doxographical tradition identified Socrates as “the supposed originator of ethics… [whose influence] passed from Plato to the Academic Skeptics and from Antisthenes via the Cynics to Zeno and his Stoic successors”.
🏛️ II. Influence on Hellenistic and Roman Literary Criticism
- Model of the Philosophical Sage
- Socrates became “a rhetorical topos and exemplar, a constant subject for anecdotalists… an iconic figure of unparalleled significance and diffusion” in Roman Imperial literature.
➤ He shaped the moral discourse of Stoic and Cynic rhetoric and the genre of moral biography.
- Socrates became “a rhetorical topos and exemplar, a constant subject for anecdotalists… an iconic figure of unparalleled significance and diffusion” in Roman Imperial literature.
- Influence on Stoicism
- Stoic writers like Epictetus and Seneca regarded Socrates as the paradigm of rational endurance, moral courage, and dialectical reasoning—key traits mirrored in their moral essays and dialogues.
🕊️ III. Medieval and Early Modern Reception
- Christian Adaptation
- The Christian apologist Justin Martyr described Socrates as “an authentic harbinger of Jesus,” positioning him as a proto-Christian thinker who embraced divine truth against pagan idolatry.
➤ This Christianization of Socratic ethics informed medieval moral allegory and hagiographic literature.
- The Christian apologist Justin Martyr described Socrates as “an authentic harbinger of Jesus,” positioning him as a proto-Christian thinker who embraced divine truth against pagan idolatry.
- Islamic and Arabic Appropriations
- Arabic philosophers and poets depicted Socrates as a moral paragon and monotheistic sage, part of the “Seven Pillars of Wisdom,” and even “a forerunner of Islamic sages” (Taylor, 2000, p. 110).
➤ This shows his influence on Islamic literary humanism and moral allegory.
- Arabic philosophers and poets depicted Socrates as a moral paragon and monotheistic sage, part of the “Seven Pillars of Wisdom,” and even “a forerunner of Islamic sages” (Taylor, 2000, p. 110).
💫 IV. Influence on Modern Literary Theory and Criticism
- Hegelian Dialectics
- Hegel viewed Socrates’ trial as “a tragic clash between two moral standpoints,” symbolizing the transition from communal to individual morality (Sittlichkeit → Moralität).
➤ This dialectical model deeply influenced modern theories of conflict, synthesis, and historical narrative.
- Hegel viewed Socrates’ trial as “a tragic clash between two moral standpoints,” symbolizing the transition from communal to individual morality (Sittlichkeit → Moralität).
- Kierkegaard’s Existential Reading
- Kierkegaard regarded Socrates as the “subjective ironist,” whose self-awareness and irony made him a precursor to existential subjectivity and introspective literature.
➤ This shaped modernist self-reflexive narrative and the aesthetic of ironic detachment.
- Kierkegaard regarded Socrates as the “subjective ironist,” whose self-awareness and irony made him a precursor to existential subjectivity and introspective literature.
- Nietzsche’s Critique and Inversion
- Nietzsche saw Socrates as both “a physician and a misunderstanding”—a figure whose “faith in rationality at any cost was error and self-deception” (Taylor, 2000, p. 118).
➤ His critique of Socratic rationalism inspired postmodern suspicion toward reason, foreshadowing deconstructive literary theory.
- Nietzsche saw Socrates as both “a physician and a misunderstanding”—a figure whose “faith in rationality at any cost was error and self-deception” (Taylor, 2000, p. 118).
🌍 V. Socratic Legacy in Modern Literary Theory
- Dialogism and Critical Inquiry
- Socratic dialogues serve as a prototype for Bakhtinian dialogism, representing truth as polyphonic and negotiated rather than absolute.
➤ This influence extends to hermeneutics, phenomenology, and reader-response theory.
- Socratic dialogues serve as a prototype for Bakhtinian dialogism, representing truth as polyphonic and negotiated rather than absolute.
- Pedagogical and Rhetorical Foundations
- The Socratic method remains central to modern critical pedagogy, promoting reflexivity and interpretive pluralism in literary and cultural studies.
➤ As Taylor observes, Socrates’ “method of self-criticism” endures as a model of intellectual and moral integrity.
- The Socratic method remains central to modern critical pedagogy, promoting reflexivity and interpretive pluralism in literary and cultural studies.
Criticism and Modern Interpretations of Socratic Thought
⚜️ 1. Ancient Criticisms and Early Interpretations
- Epicurean Critique of Socratic Irony
- The Epicureans rejected Socratic irony, claiming it was “pedagogically sterile” and “emotionally harmful.” They accused Socrates of humiliating his interlocutors rather than enlightening them.
- Nietzsche echoed this critique centuries later: “Dialectics lets you act like a tyrant; you humiliate the people you defeat”.
- Skeptical and Stoic Reactions
- The Academics portrayed Socrates as a skeptic, while the Stoics reinterpreted him as an ironist who used pretense as a dialectical weapon rather than genuine ignorance.
- Aristotle, however, treated Socratic irony “dispassionately,” focusing instead on his method of defining universals rather than his personality.
🏛️ 2. The Schleiermacher and 19th-Century Reassessment
- Schleiermacher’s Reconstruction of the Historical Socrates
- Friedrich Schleiermacher argued that Xenophon’s Memorabilia presented an overly conservative Socrates, lacking philosophical depth. He insisted that “Socrates must have been more than what Xenophon said about him” and found that depth in Plato’s dialogues.
- This view initiated the “Socratic problem”—the historical debate over distinguishing the real Socrates from his literary portrayals.
- Comparative Exegesis Approach
- Later scholars, such as Gregory Vlastos and Charles Kahn, argued that since “certainty about the historical Socrates is lost to us,” comparative literary analysis (logoi sokratikoi) is more fruitful than historical reconstruction.
🌿 3. Hegelian Interpretation: Socrates as a Tragic Dialectical Figure
- Hegel’s Dialectical Reading
- Hegel viewed Socrates’ death as “a tragic clash between two moral standpoints”—the collective morality (Sittlichkeit) of Athens and the individual morality (Moralität) of Socrates.
- This conflict represented a stage in the evolution of the world spirit, where individual reason began to challenge communal norms, marking Socrates as a turning point in moral history.
🕊️ 4. Kierkegaard’s Existential and Religious Reading
- Irony as Subjectivity
- In The Concept of Irony (1841), Kierkegaard saw Socratic irony as “the incitement of subjectivity”—a force that destroyed obsolete morality to make way for new, personal faith.
- For Kierkegaard, Socrates was “the first person to exhibit irony as a qualification of subjectivity”—the origin of modern inwardness.
- Precursor to Faith
- In Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846), Kierkegaard claimed Socrates achieved the highest truth possible to a pagan: “the Socratic wisdom… was to have become aware that the knower is an existing individual”.
💫 5. Nietzsche’s Ambivalence and Critique
- Socrates as Decadent Rationalist
- Nietzsche accused Socrates of embodying “decadent rationalism”, a symptom of the decline of Greek vitality: “Socrates is so close to me that I am nearly always fighting him.”
- He saw in Socrates the beginning of moral and aesthetic decay, where reason triumphed over instinct and art.
- Ironic Tyranny
- Nietzsche also connected Socratic dialectic with intellectual domination, claiming that dialectics allowed the weak to rule through argument rather than strength.
🔱 6. Modern and Postmodern Reinterpretations
- Alexander Nehamas and the Aesthetics of Irony
- Nehamas interpreted Socratic irony as “inherently wounding,” expressing the superiority of the ironist and destabilizing the reader’s search for meaning. Irony, he argues, “does not necessarily convey meaning… it makes meaning opaque”.
- This aligns with postmodern notions of ambiguity, self-reflexivity, and textual indeterminacy.
- Deconstructive and Literary Readings
- Contemporary theorists view Socratic dialogue as a proto-deconstructive discourse, where meaning arises through contradiction and negation. The elenchus becomes an early form of literary criticism, interrogating moral and linguistic assumptions rather than resolving them.
Selected Quotations of Socrates as a Literary Theorist
| No. | Quotation | Source / Context | Explanation (Literary-Theoretical Relevance) |
| 1 | “The unexamined life is not worth living.” | Apology 38a | This foundational statement defines self-reflexivity as the essence of philosophy and literature. It implies that the worth of life (and art) lies in self-awareness, establishing a key principle for literary introspection and critical thought. |
| 2 | “Poets compose not by wisdom but by a kind of nature and inspiration.” | Ion 534b–d | Socrates distinguishes between rational knowledge and divine inspiration (theia mania), shaping early theories of poetic creativity. He introduces the concept of inspired irrationality, later echoed in Romanticism. |
| 3 | “I know that I know nothing.” | Apology 21d | This statement establishes Socratic irony—self-conscious ignorance as a method of inquiry. In literary theory, it becomes a model for the open-ended, questioning text, which resists closure and final truth. |
| 4 | “When the soul returns into itself, it passes into another world, the region of purity and eternity.” | Phaedo 79d–80a | Socrates links truth and beauty to transcendence beyond material reality, influencing later Platonic aesthetics. Literature, like philosophy, becomes a medium for recalling eternal truths through imagination. |
| 5 | “Poetry is a kind of divine madness.” | Phaedrus 245a | Socrates redefines poetic creation as inspired rapture—an aesthetic principle later central to Romantic and Symbolist poetics, where art emerges from passion, not intellect. |
| 6 | “Rhetoric is the art of leading the soul by means of words.” | Phaedrus 261a | Socrates views language as a moral and psychological force. This anticipates reader-response theory and rhetorical criticism, seeing discourse as transformative rather than ornamental. |
| 7 | “Virtue is knowledge, and vice is ignorance.” | Meno 87d | This equation lays the foundation for didactic and moral criticism, suggesting that literature should teach wisdom. It defines the ethical function of art in both classical and humanistic traditions. |
| 8 | “Justice does not consist in doing what one pleases, but in doing what is right.” | Republic I, 331d | This transforms aesthetics into ethical aesthetics—art and criticism must serve truth and justice, not pleasure. It situates Socrates as the forerunner of moral literary criticism. |
| 9 | “Irony is the means by which the soul purifies itself.” | Paraphrased from The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, p. 244 (interpreting Socratic irony) | Socratic irony functions as both a philosophical and literary technique, cleansing thought of falsehood through contradiction. It anticipates the dialectic of irony later developed by Hegel and Kierkegaard. |
| 10 | “Let us follow the argument wherever it may lead.” | Republic 394d | This call to pursue truth through reason exemplifies dialogic openness, a defining trait of literary dialogue and hermeneutics. It underpins the interpretive ethics of modern literary theory. |
Suggested Readings and References on Socrates as a Literary Theorist
📚 Books
- Taylor, C. C. W. (2000). Socrates: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Morrison, D. R. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press.
- Cooper, J. M. (Ed.). (1997). Plato: Complete Works. Hackett Publishing.
- Nehamas, A. (1998). The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. University of California Press.
- Kierkegaard, S. (1841/1989). The Concept of Irony, with Continual Reference to Socrates. Princeton University Press.
📝 Academic Articles
- Ledbetter, G. M. (2003). “Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry.” Swarthmore College Classics Faculty Publications. URL: https://works.swarthmore.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=fac-classics (works.swarthmore.edu)
- Focuses on Socratic (and pre-Socratic) approaches to poetry, interpretation and authority — useful for literature theory.
- Oyler, D. R. (2014). “The Fact of Ignorance: Revisiting the Socratic Method as a …” PMC – National Library of Medicine. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174386/ (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
- Analyses Socratic ignorance and method in a way that informs literary/critical theory about questioning, dialogue, and meaning.
