Arbitrariness of Signs in Literature & Literary Theory

Arbitrariness of Signs: Etymology and Concept

Etymology: The arbitrariness of signs, a fundamental concept in semiotics, emphasizes the lack of inherent connection between linguistic signs and their meanings. Ferdinand de Saussure, a pioneer in the field, argued that the relationship between a word (signifier) and its meaning (signified) is based on convention rather than any natural or logical connection. The concept challenges the notion that words have an intrinsic connection to the objects or ideas they represent. Instead, linguistic signs derive their meaning from the agreed-upon conventions within a linguistic community. Etymology, the study of the history and origins of words, further illustrates this arbitrariness by revealing the historical shifts and cultural influences that shape the meanings of words over time. The study of etymology serves as a lens through which one can trace the evolution of linguistic signs and understand the arbitrary nature of their associations.

Concept: Arbitrariness of Signs

Aspect	Explanation
1. Semiotics in Linguistics and Literary Theory	– Semiotics studies signs and symbols in language.
	– Crucial for unraveling meaning layers in literature.
2. Ferdinand de Saussure’s Contribution	– Saussure’s structuralism and the signifier-signified.
	– Challenges fixed meanings with arbitrary connections.
3. Arbitrariness in Language	– No inherent link between linguistic form and meaning.
	– Authors play with arbitrariness for artistic expression.
4. Structuralism in Literary Theory	– Applies semiotics to analyze structures in literature.
	– Recognizes arbitrariness as fundamental in literature.
5. Deconstructionist Perspectives	– Challenges stability of meanings in language.
	– Derrida’s critique questions fixed meanings.
6. Post-Structuralist Developments	– Moves beyond rigid structures, acknowledging complexity.
	– Explores and complicates the concept of arbitrariness.
7. Intertextuality and Semiotic Play	– Explores interconnected signs in literary texts.
	– Authors engage in playful manipulation of signs.
8. Linguistic Relativity in Literary Expression	– Examines language’s influence on thought in creation.
	– Writers navigate linguistic constraints creatively.
9. Contemporary Debates in Literary Semiotics	– Ongoing discussions on the relevance of arbitrariness.
	– Intersects with cultural and postcolonial theories.
10. Future Directions in Linguistic and Literary	– Examines emerging trends in semiotic studies.
Semiotics	– Considers relevance in the evolving literary landscape.

Arbitrariness of Signs: Meanings

1. No Natural Connection: The idea of arbitrariness of signs means that words or symbols don’t have a built-in connection to what they represent.
2. Human Agreement: The meanings we give to words are based on agreements within a community or society, rather than any inherent logic.
3. Change Over Time: The meanings of words can change over time as societies evolve, and new agreements about words are formed.
4. Creative Expression: Writers and speakers can play with the meanings of words creatively, using language in unique ways to express ideas and emotions.

Arbitrariness of Signs: Theorists, Works, and Arguments

Theorist	Work	Argument
Ferdinand de Saussure	Course in General Linguistics	Saussure argued that the relationship between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary, challenging inherent connections.
Charles Sanders Peirce	Collected Papers	Peirce introduced icons, indexes, and symbols, exploring both arbitrariness and the potential for natural sign connections.
Jacques Derrida	Of Grammatology	Derrida critically examined language’s instability, questioning fixed meanings and advocating for multiple interpretations.
Roman Jakobson	Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics	Jakobson explored the poetic function of language, acknowledging arbitrariness while emphasizing the importance of expression.
Umberto Eco	A Theory of Semiotics	Eco discussed the role of codes in interpreting signs, recognizing arbitrariness while highlighting cultural codes’ influence.
Roland Barthes	Mythologies	Barthes engaged with the arbitrary nature of symbols, exploring how cultural phenomena carry symbolic meanings in society.
George Lakoff and Mark Johnson	Metaphors We Live By	Lakoff and Johnson focused on metaphor’s role in shaping thought and language, acknowledging arbitrariness within cultural context.
Noam Chomsky	Syntactic Structures	Chomsky critiqued behaviorist views of language acquisition, indirectly contributing to the understanding of linguistic signs.

Arbitrariness of Signs: Features

1. No Inherent Connection:
   • Description: The fundamental feature is the absence of any inherent or natural connection between the signifier (the form of a word or symbol) and the signified (the concept or meaning it represents).
   • Significance: This characteristic challenges the notion that words or symbols have intrinsic meanings and emphasizes the role of societal agreement in assigning meaning.
2. Cultural and Linguistic Convention:
   • Description: Meanings assigned to signs are products of cultural and linguistic conventions.
   • Significance: This feature highlights that the meanings of signs are not universal but are shaped by the conventions and agreements within a specific cultural and linguistic context.
3. Subject to Change:
   • Description: The meanings of signs are not fixed; they can change over time.
   • Significance: This dynamic nature allows for linguistic evolution and adaptation to cultural shifts, impacting how signs are interpreted across different historical periods.
4. Creative Expression:
   • Description: Writers and speakers can creatively play with the arbitrariness of signs to convey unique meanings or evoke specific emotions.
   • Significance: This feature emphasizes the flexibility and expressive potential inherent in language, enabling the manipulation of signs for artistic and communicative purposes.
5. Semantic Ambiguity:
   • Description: Arbitrariness contributes to the potential for semantic ambiguity, where a single sign can have multiple interpretations.
   • Significance: This characteristic underscores the complexity of language and the richness of possible meanings that arise from the arbitrary nature of signs.
6. Central to Semiotics:
   • Description: The concept is central to semiotics, the study of signs and symbols and their interpretation.
   • Significance: Semioticians use the idea of arbitrariness to analyze how signs function in various cultural, linguistic, and literary contexts.
7. Foundational in Linguistics:
   • Description: Linguists recognize the arbitrariness of signs as a foundational concept in the study of language.
   • Significance: Understanding this feature is essential for exploring linguistic structures, the evolution of languages, and the dynamics of communication.
8. Critical in Literary Theory:
   • Description: Literary theorists incorporate the arbitrariness of signs into their analyses of texts.
   • Significance: This feature helps illuminate how authors manipulate language creatively, contributing to the layers of meaning in literature.
9. Influence on Meaning-Making:
   • Description: The arbitrary nature of signs influences how meaning is constructed and understood in both everyday communication and artistic expression.
   • Significance: Recognizing this feature enhances our comprehension of the intricacies of language and its role in shaping human thought and culture.

Arbitrariness of Signs: Relevance in Literary Theory

Relevance in Literary Theory	Explanation
1. Interpretation and Meaning Construction	– The arbitrary nature of signs underscores the interpretive flexibility in literary analysis, allowing for diverse and nuanced meanings to be constructed.
	– Literary theorists leverage this feature to explore how authors intentionally manipulate signs to evoke specific interpretations and responses from readers.
2. Creative Language Use	– Writers utilize the arbitrariness of signs to creatively play with language, introducing new meanings, metaphors, and symbols that contribute to the artistic richness of literature.
	– This aspect is particularly evident in poetry, where poets often exploit the malleability of language to create vivid and imaginative expressions.
3. Intertextuality and Literary References	– The concept is crucial in understanding intertextuality, where signs in one literary work refer to or draw meaning from signs in other texts, creating layers of significance and interconnectedness.
	– Literary theorists analyze how authors use arbitrariness to incorporate references, allusions, and echoes from other works, enriching the depth of literary texts.
4. Symbolism and Allegory	– Arbitrariness is fundamental to the creation and interpretation of symbols and allegorical elements in literature, where signs carry deeper, often hidden, meanings beyond their literal sense.
	– Literary theorists delve into the arbitrary associations of symbols to uncover allegorical layers, exploring the social, political, or philosophical commentary embedded in the text.
5. Evolution of Language in Literature	– Examining the arbitrariness of signs allows literary theorists to trace the evolution of language within specific literary periods, discerning shifts in meaning and cultural influences on linguistic expression.
	– Understanding how signs change over time provides insights into the historical and social contexts that shape literary works, enhancing the study of literature as a reflection of its era.
6. Deconstructionist Perspectives	– Deconstructionist theorists, influenced by the arbitrariness of signs, challenge fixed meanings and hierarchies in literature, encouraging an exploration of the inherent instability and ambiguity in language.
	– This perspective promotes a critical examination of binary oppositions and traditional structures, opening up new avenues for understanding the complexities of literary texts.

Arbitrariness of Signs: Application in Critiques

1984 by George Orwell:

• Application of Arbitrariness: In 1984, the arbitrariness of signs is evident in the manipulation of language by the totalitarian regime. The concept of Newspeak illustrates how those in power deliberately redefine and restrict language to control thought and eliminate dissent. The arbitrary alteration of meanings serves as a powerful critique of authoritarian regimes that seek to shape reality through linguistic control.
• Implications for Critique: Orwell’s portrayal of linguistic manipulation highlights the dangers of unchecked authority over language and its impact on individual autonomy. The arbitrariness of signs becomes a tool for critiquing the erosion of truth and the manipulation of public perception in dystopian societies.

2. The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka:

• Application of Arbitrariness: Kafka’s The Metamorphosis explores the arbitrary nature of identity and societal expectations. Gregor Samsa’s transformation into an insect challenges conventional symbols of humanity. The arbitrary reaction of his family and society to his changed form reflects how societal norms can dictate the interpretation of signs, leading to isolation and alienation.
• Implications for Critique: Kafka’s use of arbitrariness critiques the rigid social structures that impose fixed meanings on individuals. The story serves as a commentary on the arbitrary judgments society makes based on external appearances, questioning the validity of such societal signifiers in defining human worth.

3. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald:

• Application of Arbitrariness: In The Great Gatsby, symbols like the green light, the valley of ashes, and the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg are laden with arbitrary meanings. The green light, for example, represents both Gatsby’s unreachable dreams and the elusive nature of the American Dream itself. The arbitrariness of these symbols reflects the complexity of interpreting cultural and personal signifiers.
• Implications for Critique: Fitzgerald’s use of arbitrary symbols critiques the superficiality and materialism of the Jazz Age. The novel suggests that the meanings attributed to symbols are contingent on personal perspectives and societal values, questioning the authenticity of the American Dream in the face of arbitrary cultural symbols.

4. One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez:

• Application of Arbitrariness: Marquez’s magical realism in “One Hundred Years of Solitude” introduces arbitrary elements, such as flying carpets and levitating priests, blurring the lines between reality and fantasy. These fantastical elements challenge traditional interpretations of reality and meaning, embracing the arbitrary nature of storytelling.
• Implications for Critique: Marquez’s use of arbitrariness critiques conventional narrative structures and the limitations of realistic representation. By weaving magical and arbitrary elements into the narrative, he questions the boundaries between truth and fiction, suggesting that storytelling itself is an arbitrary act that transcends conventional meanings.

Arbitrariness of Signs: Relevant Terms

1. Arbitrary Sign: A sign with a meaning based on convention, not inherent connection.
2. Signifier: The physical form of a sign.
3. Signified: The concept or meaning associated with a sign.
4. Semiotics: Study of signs and symbols.
5. Saussurean Linguistics: Linguistic theories emphasizing sign arbitrariness.
6. Deconstruction: Critical theory challenging stable meanings in language.
7. Structuralism: Framework analyzing underlying structures in language and culture.
8. Intertextuality: Interconnected nature of texts influencing each other.
9. Cultural Semiotics: Application of semiotics to analyze signs in a cultural context.
10. Symbolic Interactionism: Sociological perspective emphasizing symbols in human interaction.

Arbitrariness of Signs: Suggested Readings

1. Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin, Harper, 2011.
2. Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
3. Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press, 1979.
4. Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers, Hill and Wang, 2012.
5. Peirce, Charles Sanders. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Harvard University Press, 1960.
6. Jakobson, Roman. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” Style in Language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok, MIT Press, 1960, pp. 350-377.
7. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 2003.
8. Chomsky, Noam. Syntactic Structures. Walter de Gruyter, 2002.
9. Marquez, Gabriel Garcia. One Hundred Years of Solitude. Translated by Gregory Rabassa, HarperCollins, 2006.
10. Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Cornell University Press, 1982.

Read more on Theoretical Terms below:

• Bidirectionality in Literature & Literary Theory
• Interstice in Literature and Literary Theory
• Anachrony in Literature and Literary Theory
• Carnivalesque in Literature and Literary Theory
• Gender Performativity in Literature & Literary Theory