Epistemicide in Literature and Literary Theory

Epistemicide: Etymology

The term “epistemicide” derives its etymology from the fusion of two key components: “episteme,” rooted in ancient Greek, connoting knowledge or understanding, and “cide,” derived from the Latin word “caedere,” signifying the act of killing or destruction.

Coined in the realm of critical theory, particularly within postcolonial discourse, “epistemicide” encapsulates the systematic eradication or suppression of diverse knowledge systems, especially those indigenous or non-Western, by dominant and often colonial epistemologies.

Epistemicide: Conceptual Meanings

Aspect	Meanings
Knowledge Suppression	Deliberate destruction of diverse knowledge systems, especially outside dominant or colonial epistemologies.
Cultural Eradication	Systematic elimination of alternative ways of knowing, often targeting indigenous or non-Western knowledge traditions.
Hegemonic Dominance	Underscores power structures marginalizing and erasing non-dominant knowledge paradigms, critiquing intellectual colonization.
Systematic Erasure	Highlights intentional obliteration of non-hegemonic knowledge, emphasizing consequences of intellectual marginalization.
Advocacy for Diversity	Encourages recognition, preservation, and promotion of a plurality of knowledge traditions for a more inclusive landscape.

Epistemicide: Theorists, Works and Arguments

Theorists:

1. Boaventura de Sousa Santos:
   • Santos, a Portuguese sociologist, has extensively explored the concept of epistemicide in the context of decolonizing knowledge. His work emphasizes the need to recognize and value diverse knowledge systems.
2. Walter Mignolo:
   • As a leading scholar in decolonial theory, Mignolo has contributed significantly to discussions on epistemicide. His works examine how Western epistemologies perpetuate the marginalization of other knowledge traditions.
3. Ramón Grosfoguel:
   • Grosfoguel, a critical scholar in the field of decolonial studies, has analyzed epistemicide as a form of colonial violence that impacts the ways in which knowledge is produced and legitimized.

Works:

1. Epistemicide! The Tale of a Predatory Discourse (Boaventura de Sousa Santos):
   • Santos explores the predatory nature of certain discourses that contribute to the erasure of alternative knowledge systems, shedding light on the consequences of epistemicide.
2. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking (Walter Mignolo):
   • Mignolo’s influential work delves into the intersections of coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking, providing insights into how epistemicide operates within global designs of knowledge.
3. The Structure of Knowledge in Westernized Universities: Epistemic Racism/Sexism and the Four Genocides/Epistemicides of the Long 16th Century (Ramón Grosfoguel):
   • Grosfoguel’s essay critically examines the structure of knowledge in Westernized universities, highlighting the intersections of epistemic racism/sexism and the historical genocides/epistemicides.

Arguments:

1. Colonial Legacy and Knowledge Hegemony:
   • The theorists argue that epistemicide is deeply rooted in the colonial legacy, where Western knowledge systems have been imposed as hegemonic, leading to the marginalization and erasure of non-dominant ways of knowing.
2. Decolonization of Knowledge:
   • They advocate for the decolonization of knowledge, urging a reevaluation of epistemological frameworks to include and respect diverse knowledge traditions, challenging the structures that perpetuate epistemicide.
3. Intersectionality of Power:
   • The theorists highlight the intersectionality of power dynamics in epistemicide, emphasizing how colonial, racial, and gendered hierarchies contribute to the suppression and devaluation of certain knowledge systems.

Epistemicide: Features

Feature	Explanation	Example
Deliberate Knowledge Suppression	Epistemicide involves the intentional and systematic suppression or destruction of diverse knowledge systems, particularly those outside dominant or colonial epistemologies.	The suppression of indigenous healing practices in favor of Western medical approaches.
Cultural Eradication	It encompasses the cultural erasure of alternative ways of knowing, often targeting indigenous or non-Western knowledge traditions, resulting in a loss of cultural diversity.	The prohibition and neglect of indigenous languages, diminishing cultural heritage and oral traditions.
Hegemonic Dominance	Epistemicide highlights power structures that perpetuate the dominance of certain knowledge paradigms, marginalizing and erasing non-dominant forms of understanding and wisdom.	The imposition of Eurocentric perspectives in history textbooks, marginalizing diverse historical narratives.
Historical and Colonial Roots	Rooted in historical and colonial contexts, epistemicide reflects the enduring impact of colonialism on knowledge systems, where Western epistemologies have been imposed as hegemonic.	The imposition of Western scientific classifications on indigenous ecological knowledge.
Systematic Undermining	The concept underscores the systematic undermining or obliteration of non-hegemonic knowledge, emphasizing the intentional nature of the devaluation and marginalization process.	Discrediting traditional ecological knowledge in environmental policy decisions, favoring Western scientific approaches.
Global and Local Manifestations	Epistemicide is not confined to a specific geographic or cultural context; it manifests globally and locally, with instances of knowledge suppression occurring across various disciplines and regions.	The global dominance of English as the primary academic language marginalizing local languages in scholarly discourse.
Intellectual Colonization	It serves as a critique of intellectual colonization, revealing how certain knowledge systems, often associated with colonial powers, have been privileged at the expense of others.	The imposition of Western philosophical frameworks in educational curricula of former colonies.
Consequences of Marginalization	The consequences of epistemicide include the marginalization of diverse voices and perspectives, hindering the development of a more inclusive and holistic understanding of the world.	Limited representation of non-Western perspectives in mainstream media and academic literature.
Advocacy for Plurality	In response to epistemicide, there is a growing advocacy for the recognition, preservation, and promotion of a plurality of knowledge traditions, emphasizing the importance of diverse intellectual perspectives.	Initiatives to integrate indigenous knowledge into sustainable development practices for environmental conservation.
Intersectionality of Power Dynamics	Epistemicide involves complex power dynamics, intertwining colonial, racial, and gendered hierarchies that contribute to the suppression and devaluation of certain knowledge systems.	The marginalization of intersectional feminist perspectives in academic discourse, reinforcing patriarchal norms.

Epistemicide and Literary Theories

1. Postcolonial Literary Theory:
   • Postcolonial literary theory engages with epistemicide by examining how colonial powers imposed their cultural and intellectual frameworks on colonized societies. It explores the effects of this imposition on literature, language, and storytelling, often seeking to reclaim and amplify marginalized voices.
2. Decolonial Literary Theory:
   • Decolonial literary theory directly addresses epistemicide, emphasizing the need to deconstruct and decolonize dominant literary canons. It aims to uncover alternative literary traditions, challenge Eurocentric perspectives, and restore agency to historically marginalized writers.
3. Feminist Literary Theory:
   • Feminist literary theory intersects with epistemicide by highlighting the gendered dimensions of knowledge suppression. It examines how patriarchal structures contribute to the erasure of women’s voices and perspectives in literature, advocating for a more inclusive and equitable representation.
4. Critical Race Theory (CRT):
   • Critical Race Theory, in the context of literature, explores how racial hierarchies contribute to epistemicide. It scrutinizes how certain narratives perpetuate racial stereotypes and marginalize non-dominant racial perspectives, aiming to dismantle such structures through critical analysis.
5. Global Anglophone Literature:
   • Global Anglophone literature engages with epistemicide by questioning the dominance of English-language literature and its potential marginalization of non-Western literary traditions. It seeks to broaden the literary canon and challenge linguistic hierarchies.
6. Ecocriticism:
   • Ecocritical perspectives on epistemicide focus on the suppression of indigenous ecological knowledge and wisdom. It explores how literature can contribute to environmental justice by acknowledging and valuing diverse ways of understanding and interacting with the environment.
7. Narrative Medicine:
   • Narrative medicine, as a literary theory, considers the impact of epistemicide on health narratives. It explores how certain medical and health-related knowledge systems have been prioritized, often neglecting diverse cultural and experiential understandings of health and illness.
8. Literary Activism:
   • Literary activism engages with epistemicide by using literature as a tool for social change. It involves challenging oppressive narratives, amplifying marginalized voices, and advocating for the inclusion of diverse perspectives in literary spaces.
9. Afrofuturism:
   • Afrofuturist literature addresses epistemicide by envisioning alternative futures that challenge historical oppressions. It explores how speculative fiction can provide a platform for reimagining and reclaiming African and diasporic narratives.
10. Indigenous Literary Criticism:
    • Indigenous literary criticism directly confronts epistemicide by examining how indigenous voices and storytelling traditions have been suppressed. It seeks to revive and celebrate indigenous literary expressions, fostering a deeper understanding of their cultural significance.

Epistemicide: Application in Critiques

Work	Critique
Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe:	Achebe’s novel illustrates the impact of epistemicide by portraying the clash between traditional Igbo beliefs and colonial forces. The deliberate suppression of indigenous knowledge systems is evident as the arrival of colonialism disrupts and erodes the existing social and cultural fabric. Achebe’s narrative serves as a critique of the hegemonic dominance of Western epistemologies, highlighting the consequences of intellectual colonization on a traditional African society.
One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez	Marquez’s novel can be critiqued through the lens of epistemicide by examining how European colonial influences have marginalized and distorted Latin American narratives. The magical realism employed in the novel challenges Western literary conventions, serving as a form of resistance against the erasure of non-dominant ways of knowing. The narrative thus becomes a commentary on the consequences of cultural and epistemic suppression in the context of Latin American history.
The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy	Roy’s novel provides a platform for critiquing epistemicide through the lens of postcolonial feminist theory. The suppression of traditional knowledge, particularly regarding gender roles and social hierarchies, is evident in the narrative. The story exposes how colonial powers and patriarchal structures intersect to erase alternative knowledge systems, especially those related to women. The novel challenges these power dynamics, advocating for the recognition of diverse and marginalized voices.
The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin	Le Guin’s work can be critiqued within the framework of epistemicide by exploring the portrayal of two contrasting societies and their knowledge systems. The novel critiques the dominance of capitalist and authoritarian ideologies, showcasing how alternative ways of organizing society and knowledge are marginalized. Le Guin challenges the hegemony of certain epistemologies, emphasizing the consequences of suppressing diverse forms of understanding and wisdom.

Epistemicide: Relevant Terms

1. Colonialism:
   • The historical and political system where a nation extends its power over other territories, often imposing its cultural, economic, and intellectual frameworks.
2. Hegemony:
   • The dominance or control of one group over others, especially in terms of cultural, political, or intellectual influence.
3. Decolonization:
   • The process of undoing the effects of colonialism, which includes dismantling colonial structures and reclaiming indigenous knowledge.
4. Postcolonialism:
   • An academic and cultural framework that critically analyzes the legacy of colonialism, exploring its impact on societies, cultures, and knowledge systems.
5. Cultural Hegemony:
   • The domination or control of a particular cultural group over others, influencing norms, values, and knowledge production.
6. Intersectionality:
   • The recognition of interconnected social categories (such as race, gender, and class) and their combined impact on individuals and communities, contributing to systems of oppression.
7. Decoloniality:
   • A theoretical framework that seeks to challenge and overcome the lingering effects of colonialism on various aspects of life, including knowledge production.
8. Alternative Epistemologies:
   • Diverse ways of knowing and understanding the world that exist outside of or challenge dominant Western knowledge systems.
9. Cultural Relativism:
   • The principle that cultural beliefs and practices should be understood within the context of their own culture, without imposing external judgments based on one’s own cultural norms.
10. Global South:
    • A term used to refer collectively to countries and regions in Africa, Latin America, Asia, and Oceania, often associated with historical experiences of colonization and struggles for decolonization.

Epistemicide: Suggested Readings

1. Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books, 1972.
2. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Routledge, 2014.
3. Mignolo, Walter D. Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-Colonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, no. 7-8, 2009, pp. 1-23.
4. Quijano, Aníbal. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Social Classification. In Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate, edited by Mabel Moraña et al., Duke University Press, 2008, pp. 181-224.
5. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books, 1999.
6. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization. Routledge, 2018.
7. Bhambra, Gurminder K. Connected Sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.
8. Grosfoguel, Ramón. The Structure of Knowledge in Westernized Universities: Epistemic Racism/Sexism and the Four Genocides/Epistemicides of the Long 16th Century. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, vol. 11, no. 1, 2013, pp. 73-90.

Read more on Theoretical Terms below:

• Arbitrariness of Signs in Literature & Literary Theory
• Decoloniality in Literature & Literary Theory
• Epistemic Disobedience in Literature & Literary Theory
• Fanonism in Literature & Literary Theory
• In-Betweenness in Literature & Literary Theory