Genre Theory: Critics and Argument

Genre theory, a fundamental concept in literary and media studies, analyzes how texts are classified into distinct categories.

Introduction

Genre theory, or theory of genre, a fundamental concept in English Studies and literary theory, analyzes how texts are classified into distinct categories based on shared characteristics and conventions. To respond to question what is genre theory means to answer it what it provides. In fact, it provides a systematic framework to understand how genres function as communication tools, shaping audience expectations and responses. By identifying recurring patterns and structures within genres, scholars can explore the underlying cultural, social, and historical implications embedded within them. Furthermore, genre theory enables a nuanced examination of how creators draw on established conventions while also innovating, leading to the evolution of genres over time. Through its interdisciplinary approach, encompassing elements from linguistics, psychology, and sociology, genre theory serves as a valuable analytical lens for comprehending the role of genres in shaping both individual and collective cultural identities and practices.

Critics, Works and Arguments: Criticism Against Genre Theory
Critics:
  • Relevance in the Digital Age: Some critics argue genre theory struggles to adapt to the rapidly changing landscape of digital media and the proliferation of new media forms, which often defy traditional genre categorizations.
  • Overemphasis on Conventions: Certain scholars contend that genre theory places excessive emphasis on rigid conventions, potentially stifling creativity and innovation within artistic works.
  • Homogenization of Artistic Expression: Critics suggest that strict genre categorizations may lead to the homogenization of artistic expression, limiting the potential for cross-genre experimentation and boundary-breaking creations.
  • Inadequate Representation of Hybrid Genres: Genre theory has been challenged for its inability to effectively account for hybrid genres, which blend elements from multiple traditional genres, thus presenting difficulties in classifying such works accurately.
  • Cultural Relativity: Some argue that classification criteria of genre theory might be culturally biased, leading to a skewed understanding of genres from non-Western or marginalized cultural contexts.
  • Neglect of Individuality: Critics contend that its focus on shared characteristics overlooks the uniqueness and individuality of each work, potentially diminishing the significance of singular artistic accomplishments.
  • Limited Socio-Historical Context: Certain scholars point out that emphasis of this theory on formal features may overlook the rich socio-historical contexts that influence the emergence and development of genres over time.
  • Challenges in Defining Boundaries: Critics raise concerns about the difficulties in defining clear boundaries between genres, as some works may blur the lines between different categories, making definitive categorization problematic.
  • Dismissal of Genre Defying Works: Genre theory has been criticized for its tendency to dismiss or marginalize works that defy traditional genre classifications, as they may not neatly fit within established frameworks.
Works and Arguments Against Genre Theory:
  • Genre Trouble: Narrativism and the Art of Simulation by Marie-Laure Ryan: In this work, Ryan challenges the traditional understanding of genre and argues for a more dynamic and flexible approach that considers the narrative and ludic aspects of texts in shaping genres.
  • The Death of Genre by John Frow: Frow’s essay questions the relevance of genre theory in contemporary literary studies and suggests that genres are better understood as constantly evolving and contextual, rather than fixed and prescriptive categories.
  • Film Genre: From Iconography to Ideology by Barry Keith Grant: Grant offers a critical analysis of the limitations of genre theory in film studies and advocates for a more comprehensive examination of ideologies and cultural contexts in shaping film genres.
Examples of Genre Theory
ExampleCritique
Poem: “The Waste Land” by T.S. EliotApplying genre theory to “The Waste Land” might limit its interpretation to traditional poetic genres, such as epic or modernist poetry. However, this approach overlooks the poem’s collage-like structure, blending various voices, languages, and historical references. By focusing solely on generic conventions, critics may fail to appreciate the poem’s exploration of fractured modernity and the disillusionment of the post-World War I era.
Play: “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead” by Tom StoppardGenre theory applied to “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead” could categorize it as a comedy or absurdist play due to its humorous elements and existential themes. However, such a classification might neglect the play’s profound engagement with Shakespearean tragedy and its meta-theatrical commentary on the nature of reality and the role of supporting characters. An exclusive focus on generic conventions might obscure the play’s layered philosophical insights.
Movie: “Inception” directed by Christopher NolanWhen subjecting “Inception” to genre theory in film, some critics might classify it solely as a science fiction or action film, given its dream-based narrative and action-packed sequences. However, such a categorization might overlook its psychological depth and thematic exploration of memory, guilt, and the nature of reality. The film’s genre-blending nature, incorporating elements of thriller and heist genres, challenges traditional classifications and necessitates a more nuanced analysis.
Novel: Beloved by Toni MorrisonApplying genre theory to “Beloved” might classify it as historical fiction or magical realism due to its setting during the post-Civil War era and the presence of supernatural elements. However, a narrow focus on generic labels may fail to capture the novel’s profound exploration of slavery’s legacy, trauma, and the power of maternal love. Morrison’s innovative narrative style and blending of genres demand a broader perspective in its critical analysis.
Short Stories: “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’BrienGenre theory applied to the stories in “The Things They Carried” may label them as war stories or literary fiction due to their Vietnam War backdrop and the depth of character development. However, a rigid classification might overshadow the stories’ metafictional aspects, where O’Brien blurs the lines between fact and fiction, challenging the nature of storytelling and the reliability of memory. Appreciating these nuances requires looking beyond conventional genre distinctions.
Poetic Prose (e.g., “The Waves” by Virginia Woolf)Categorizing “The Waves” strictly as a novel or prose poetry might obscure its innovative structure and poetic prose style. Woolf’s use of six interconnected monologues blurs the boundaries between novelistic form and poetic expression. A genre theory approach that solely relies on traditional labels may overlook the profound exploration of consciousness, subjectivity, and the passage of time present in the text.
Keywords in Genre Theory

Some keywords associated with genre theory include:

  1. Genre: It is a distinct category or type of literary work characterized by shared conventions, themes, and stylistic features.
  2. Conventions: It means recurring elements and techniques commonly found within a particular genre, contributing to its recognizable identity.
  3. Hybridity: It means the blending of elements from multiple genres, resulting in works that defy easy categorization and challenge traditional genre boundaries.
  4. Evolution: It is the dynamic and changing nature of genres over time, influenced by cultural shifts, societal changes, and artistic innovations.
  5. Expectations: It means assumptions and anticipations formed by readers or audiences based on the conventions and patterns associated with a specific genre.
  6. Canon: It means the established and widely recognized set of influential works within a specific genre, contributing to the shaping of literary traditions.
  7. Intertextuality: It means the interconnectedness between different texts, genres, or literary works, often involving references, allusions, or adaptations of prior works.
  8. Audience Reception: It means how audiences respond to and interpret literary works based on their genre expectations and prior genre-related experiences.
  9. Generic Transformation: It means the process through which genres evolve and adapt to new contexts, incorporating elements from other genres or modifying existing conventions.
  10. Cultural Context: It means the broader societal, historical, and cultural factors that influence the emergence, development, and reception of genres in literature.
Suggested Readings
  1. Altman, Rick. Film/Genre. BFI Publishing, 1999.
  2. Derrida, Jacques. The Law of Genre. Critical Inquiry, vol. 7, no.1, 1980, pp. 55-81.
  3. Frow, John. Genre. Routledge, 2015.
  4. Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. Routledge, 2006.
  5. Miller, Nancy K. The Heroine’s Text: Readings in the French and English Novel, 1722-1782. Columbia University Press, 1980.
  6. Neale, Steve. Genre and Hollywood. Routledge, 2000.
  7. Prince, Gerald. A Dictionary of Narratology. University of Nebraska Press, 1987.
  8. Rabinowitz, Peter J., and Michael W. Smith, editors. Authorizing Readers: Resistance and Respect in the Teaching of Literature. Teachers College Press, 1998.
  9. Stam, Robert, et al. Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
  10. Swales, John. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
More from Literary Theory:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *