“Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed: Summary and Critique

Introduction: “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed

“Horror and The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed first appeared in Screen in 1986. This pivotal article examines the representation of the monstrous-feminine in horror films through the lens of Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection. Creed explores the way in which the horror genre constructs femininity as monstrous and abject, rooted in cultural and psychoanalytic anxieties about female sexuality, maternity, and the maternal body. She highlights the recurring themes of the “toothed vagina,” the “archaic mother,” and the maternal authority as sites of terror and fascination, intertwined with patriarchal fears of castration and engulfment. By examining films like Alien and Psycho, Creed reveals how horror narratives stage the abjection of the maternal figure to reassert symbolic order and male dominance. This work is seminal in literary and film theory, offering profound insights into gendered depictions of fear, the body, and societal boundaries. It remains influential for feminist film analysis and cultural criticism, bridging psychoanalytic theories with visual media representations.

Summary of “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed

• The Concept of the Monstrous-Feminine: Creed explores how patriarchal and phallocentric ideologies construct the notion of the “monstrous-feminine” by associating women with abject, horrifying qualities. This framework is rooted in fears surrounding sexual difference and castration anxiety, as articulated by Freud (Creed, p. 44-45).
• Freudian and Mythological Influences: Drawing on Freud and Joseph Campbell, Creed illustrates how cultural symbols like the Medusa and the “toothed vagina” reflect male anxieties about female sexuality and its perceived threat to male potency and identity (Freud, 1922; Campbell, 1969).
• Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection: Creed utilizes Julia Kristeva’s concept of abjection to argue that horror films evoke a visceral response by confronting viewers with elements that defy societal norms, such as bodily wastes, corpses, and the maternal body. These aspects disturb the symbolic order, creating terror and fascination (Kristeva, 1982, p. 4).
• The Maternal Body as Abject: The maternal figure becomes abject when the child separates from the mother to enter the symbolic order. This rejection is a ritualized process in many societies, yet it also underscores the tension between societal structure and individual subjectivity (Kristeva, p. 91-92).
• Religious and Historical Constructs of Abjection: Creed examines how religious and cultural taboos, such as those surrounding menstruation and excrement, reinforce notions of the abject, further linking these to the maternal body. These taboos highlight the fragile boundaries between purity and defilement (Creed, p. 52-54).
• The Role of the Horror Film: Horror films exemplify abjection by visually and thematically confronting viewers with the abject, such as corpses, blood, and decayed bodies. These films also blur the boundaries between human and non-human, good and evil, and the symbolic and pre-symbolic (Creed, p. 48).
• The Monstrous-Feminine in Cinema: Creed dissects films like Psycho, Alien, and Carrie to illustrate how the maternal figure is often depicted as monstrous, controlling, and consuming. This portrayal aligns with patriarchal fears of female power and autonomy, often linking the maternal body to images of decay and death (Creed, p. 60).
• Archaic Maternal Figures: Beyond Kristeva, Creed posits an even more primordial maternal figure—the “archaic mother”—associated with creation and destruction. Films like Alien visualize this figure through womb-like spaces and monstrous reproductive imagery (Creed, p. 63-65).
• The Fetishization of the Monstrous-Feminine: Creed discusses the fetishistic dynamics in horror films, where the maternal figure is transformed into both an object of fear and fascination. This dynamic reveals male anxieties about the maternal phallus and the threat of female agency (Creed, p. 68-69).
• Conclusion on Patriarchal Control: The horror genre, Creed argues, works to control and repudiate the maternal figure by constructing her as abject. This dynamic reflects broader patriarchal anxieties about femininity, reproduction, and the symbolic order (Creed, p. 70).

References

• Creed, B. (1986). Horror and the Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection. Screen, 27(1), 44-70.
• Freud, S. (1922). Medusa’s Head. In Strachey, J. (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud.
• Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Campbell, J. (1969). The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology. New York: Penguin.

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed

Theoretical Term/Concept	Definition/Explanation	Source/Reference
Monstrous-Feminine	The representation of women in horror as monstrous and abject, emphasizing their association with fear, danger, and the body.	Creed, p. 44
Abjection	A psychoanalytic concept by Julia Kristeva describing what is expelled or excluded to maintain societal norms and the symbolic order.	Kristeva (1982), p. 2
Castration Anxiety	A Freudian theory where men fear the symbolic loss of power or masculinity, often linked to the sight of female genitals.	Freud (1922); Creed, p. 45
The Semiotic Chora	Kristeva’s notion of the pre-verbal stage where the child is in union with the mother, preceding the symbolic order.	Kristeva, p. 14
Maternal Authority	The role of the mother in mapping the body and teaching the distinction between clean/unclean and proper/improper.	Kristeva, p. 72
Symbolic Order	The domain of language, rules, and law established by the paternal figure, where meaning and identity are stabilized.	Kristeva, p. 2
Archaic Mother	A primordial maternal figure representing generative and destructive forces, existing beyond the patriarchal framework.	Creed, p. 63
Phallic Mother	A figure in psychoanalysis where the mother is imagined as possessing a phallus, symbolizing power and threatening male identity.	Freud; Creed, p. 65
Toothed Vagina (Vagina Dentata)	A mythological motif representing the vagina as threatening and castrating, embodying male fears of female sexuality.	Campbell (1969); Creed, p. 44
Uncanny (Unheimlich)	Freud’s concept of something familiar yet alien, often associated with repressed fears or desires.	Freud (1922); Creed, p. 64
Corpse as Abject	The corpse is the ultimate symbol of abjection, representing the collapse of life and order into decay and death.	Kristeva, p. 3
Fetishism	In psychoanalysis, the disavowal of castration through fixation on a substitute object (fetish).	Freud; Creed, p. 68
Maternal as Abject	The mother’s body, particularly its reproductive functions, is seen as polluting and destabilizing societal and symbolic boundaries.	Kristeva; Creed, p. 48
Ritual Impurity	Cultural and religious practices of separating the “pure” from the “impure,” often tied to the maternal figure.	Kristeva, p. 52
Horror Film as Defilement Rite	Horror films mimic rituals of defilement by confronting the viewer with abjection and re-establishing societal norms.	Creed, p. 52
Psychoanalytic Primal Scene	The imagined or fantasized observation of parental intercourse, often depicted in horror films in symbolic forms.	Freud (1922); Creed, p. 56
Monstrous-Womb Imagery	Horror films depict womb-like spaces as sites of terror and abjection, reinforcing fears of the maternal body.	Creed, p. 63
Cannibalistic Mother	A figure in horror representing the oral-sadistic aspect of the mother, devouring and destructive.	Creed, p. 65
Desire for Non-Differentiation	The desire to return to the maternal womb, signifying the loss of individuality and self, linked to death.	Bataille; Creed, p. 64

Contribution of “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed to Literary Theory/Theories

---

• Psychoanalytic Theory: Extension of Freudian Concepts
  • Creed expands Freud’s theories of castration anxiety and the uncanny by linking them to the abject and monstrous representations of the feminine in horror films.
    “The sight of the Medusa’s head makes the spectator stiff with terror… the Medusa’s head becomes a fetish object that substitutes for the castrated female genitalia.” (Creed, p. 45)

---

• Julia Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection
  • Builds on Kristeva’s abjection to analyze the maternal figure as central to horror narratives, where the maternal body is both the site of creation and the source of terror.
    “The maternal body becomes a site of conflicting desires… the child’s struggle to break free marks the mother as abject.” (Creed, p. 48)
  • Links abjection to cultural rituals and horror cinema, framing horror films as a form of modern defilement rites.
    “Horror films confront us with abjection through images of bodily waste, corpses, and blood, functioning as a form of catharsis.” (Creed, p. 52)

---

• Feminist Film Theory
  • Reframes the role of the monstrous-feminine, arguing that horror films construct female bodies as sites of fear and desire, challenging male-dominated perspectives in film criticism.
    “The horror film stages the feminine as monstrous through the bleeding body, linking woman’s body to castration anxiety and impurity.” (Creed, p. 64)
  • Critiques patriarchal ideologies that define women through absence or lack, proposing the archaic mother as a disruptive figure outside the patriarchal symbolic order.
    “The archaic mother signifies the generative principle but is demonized within patriarchal narratives.” (Creed, p. 63)

---

• Cultural Studies and Mythology
  • Integrates mythological motifs (e.g., the toothed vagina, Medusa, and archaic mother) into the analysis of horror films, linking ancient cultural fears to modern cinema.
    “Mythological narratives of the Sphinx and Medusa are retold in horror films, reflecting patriarchal fears of the maternal and reproductive powers of women.” (Creed, p. 44)

---

• Structuralism and Semiotics
  • Applies structuralist ideas to the representation of borders (e.g., human/non-human, clean/unclean) in horror, showing how films use these categories to signify terror and instability.
    “Abjection is rooted in crossing borders, and horror films visualize these transgressions in monstrous imagery, from hybrids to mutilated bodies.” (Creed, p. 52)

---

• Gender Studies: Rejection of Fixed Gender Roles
  • Challenges traditional gender binaries by exploring the monstrous-feminine as a figure that destabilizes norms of male dominance and female submission.
    “The maternal body, in its bleeding and birthing, defies patriarchal attempts to confine woman’s identity within symbolic categories.” (Creed, p. 64)

---

• Postmodern Literary Theory
  • Suggests that horror films deconstruct the symbolic order, forcing viewers to confront their fascination and repulsion for the abject.
    “The horror film works as a form of art that engages with the collapse of meaning, forcing a confrontation with the abject.” (Creed, p. 70)

---

Examples of Critiques Through “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed

Literary Work	Aspect Critiqued	Application of Creed’s Theory	Relevant Reference from Creed
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein	Representation of the monstrous and maternal.	The creation of the monster as an act of abject creation without maternal involvement critiques patriarchal fears of the maternal body.	“The abject threatens life; it must be ‘radically excluded’… The monster signifies the dangers of violating natural borders.” (Creed, p. 48)
Bram Stoker’s Dracula	Feminine sexuality and abjection.	The female vampires embody the monstrous-feminine through their erotic and abject characteristics, linking femininity to terror and desire.	“The horror film abounds in images of abjection… the monstrous-feminine threatens the symbolic order.” (Creed, p. 52)
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter	The abject as social exclusion linked to femininity.	Hester Prynne’s punishment and social isolation reflect her abject status, as her body and sexuality are seen as threats to societal norms.	“Abjection works to demarcate boundaries between the clean and unclean, human and non-human.” (Creed, p. 45)
Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s The Yellow Wallpaper	Maternal abjection and madness.	The protagonist’s descent into madness critiques societal repression of female creativity and maternal identity, aligning with abjection.	“The maternal figure becomes abject when she disrupts the symbolic order, often tied to madness and instability.” (Creed, p. 48)

Criticism Against “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed

• Lack of Focus on Female Subjectivity:
  • Critics argue that Creed’s analysis heavily centers on male anxieties and patriarchal constructs, offering limited insight into female spectatorship or the subjective experience of women engaging with horror films.
• Over-reliance on Psychoanalytic Theory:
  • Creed’s dependence on Freudian and Kristevan psychoanalysis has been critiqued as outdated, as these frameworks are often seen as restrictive and not universally applicable to contemporary feminist analyses.
• Neglect of Cultural and Historical Contexts:
  • The theory is sometimes criticized for not sufficiently accounting for cultural and historical variations in the depiction of the monstrous-feminine, potentially universalizing patriarchal fears and anxieties.
• Binary Representation of Femininity:
  • Creed’s categorization of women as either “monstrous” or abject risks reinforcing essentialist binaries, leaving little room for diverse or subversive representations of femininity in horror.
• Limited Engagement with Female Agency:
  • Critics argue that the theory tends to portray women in horror solely as symbols of male fear and control, neglecting instances where female characters assert agency or subvert patriarchal narratives.
• Inconsistent Application of Kristeva’s Abjection:
  • Some scholars highlight inconsistencies in Creed’s use of Julia Kristeva’s concept of abjection, particularly in extending it to horror films without fully addressing its complexities in non-Western or non-cinematic contexts.
• Simplistic Treatment of Gender Roles:
  • The essay has been critiqued for a narrow interpretation of gender, focusing predominantly on heterosexual and cisgender dynamics, and failing to explore how the monstrous-feminine might operate in LGBTQ+ contexts.
• Overemphasis on Maternal Figures:
  • Creed’s analysis has been challenged for its disproportionate focus on maternal imagery and its failure to explore other aspects of feminine monstrosity, such as independent female villains or femme fatales.

Representative Quotations from “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The monstrous-feminine horrifies precisely because it is constructed within a patriarchal ideology as a perversion of the maternal figure.”	Highlights Creed’s core argument that the horror genre distorts the maternal into a figure of monstrosity, reflecting patriarchal fears and anxieties.
“Abjection is that which does not respect borders, positions, rules. It disturbs identity, system, order.”	Refers to Julia Kristeva’s concept of abjection, emphasizing the breakdown of boundaries in horror and the societal need to exclude such disturbances.
“The figure of the archaic mother is present in all horror films as the blackness of extinction—death.”	Depicts the archaic mother as a symbol of both creation and destruction, central to horror’s portrayal of existential fears.
“The horror film stages and re-stages a constant repudiation of the maternal figure.”	Argues that horror films systematically reject and vilify the maternal to affirm patriarchal norms.
“Menstrual blood, on the contrary, stands for the danger issuing from within identity.”	Discusses the societal and cinematic use of menstrual imagery to signify the disruptive power of femininity.
“The maternal body becomes a site of conflicting desires, where the symbolic and the semiotic collide.”	Explains how the maternal body destabilizes societal norms by being both nurturing and threatening.
“Viewing the horror film signifies a desire not only for perverse pleasure but also a desire to throw out, eject the abject.”	Connects the act of watching horror to the psychological process of confronting and rejecting the abject.
“The corpse, the most sickening of wastes, is a border that has encroached upon everything.”	Relates the corpse to the ultimate abjection in horror, symbolizing the collapse of life’s boundaries.
“Woman’s body is slashed and mutilated, not only to signify her own castrated state but also the possibility of castration for the male.”	Discusses the misogynistic implications of violence against women in horror, tying it to male anxieties.
“The monstrous feminine is constructed as a sign of abjection, within the text’s patriarchal discourses.”	Reinforces the idea that horror movies exploit female monstrosity to reassert patriarchal control.

Suggested Readings: “Horror And The Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection” by Barbara Creed

1. Peters, Gary. Revue Canadienne d’Études Cinématographiques / Canadian Journal of Film Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, 1994, pp. 108–13. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24402392. Accessed 10 Jan. 2025.
2. Creed, Barbara. “‘HORROR AND THE MONSTROUSFEMININE: AN IMAGINARY ABJECTION.'” Feminist Film Theory: A Reader, edited by Sue Thornham, Edinburgh University Press, 1999, pp. 251–66. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvxcrtm8.26. Accessed 10 Jan. 2025.
3. Young, Elizabeth. “Here Comes the Bride: Wedding Gender and Race in ‘Bride of Frankenstein.'” Feminist Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, 1991, pp. 403–37. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178280. Accessed 10 Jan. 2025.
4. Acker, Paul. “Horror and the Maternal in ‘Beowulf.'” PMLA, vol. 121, no. 3, 2006, pp. 702–16. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25486349. Accessed 10 Jan. 2025.