“Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser: Summary and Critique

“Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser first appeared in La Pensée in 1970 and was later included in his collection Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays in 1971.

"Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses" by Louis Althusser: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser

“Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser first appeared in La Pensée in 1970 and was later included in his collection Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays in 1971, translated by Ben Brewster. This essay is one of Althusser’s most influential works, introducing the concept of Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs) to explain how ideology functions in maintaining the power structures of capitalist societies. Althusser distinguishes between Repressive State Apparatuses (RSAs), which function through force, and ISAs, which operate through ideology, such as the family, education, religion, and media. His analysis underscores how ISAs perpetuate the conditions of production by shaping individuals’ beliefs and behaviors, ensuring their submission to the dominant ideology. The work is significant in both literature and literary theory for its Marxist structural analysis of power and ideology, influencing poststructuralist thought and advancing the discussion on how culture and institutions play a central role in reproducing social hierarchies.

Summary of “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser

1. Reproduction of the Relations of Production

  • Althusser argues that for a society to continue producing, it must also reproduce the conditions that allow for production. This includes not only material goods but also social structures and ideologies that support the existing relations of production.
  • “The ultimate condition of production is therefore the reproduction of the conditions of production.”
  • He emphasizes that this reproduction is essential for the continued functioning of any capitalist society, ensuring the transmission of capitalist norms and labor power to future generations.

2. Ideology and its Role in Reproduction

  • Ideology is crucial for maintaining the social conditions required for production, particularly through its role in shaping individuals’ consciousness.
  • Althusser defines ideology as a system of beliefs and representations that shape how individuals perceive their relationship to the social structure.
  • “Ideology represents the imaginary relationship of individuals to their real conditions of existence.”
  • This “imaginary” relationship is not a false consciousness, but a necessary function of ideology to maintain social cohesion and class structure.

3. Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs) vs. Repressive State Apparatuses (RSAs)

  • Althusser differentiates between Repressive State Apparatuses (RSAs), which use force (e.g., police, military), and Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs), which operate through ideology (e.g., schools, family, media).
  • “The Repressive State Apparatus functions by violence, whereas the Ideological State Apparatuses function by ideology.”
  • While RSAs maintain order through direct repression, ISAs ensure compliance by shaping individuals’ beliefs and values, making them more subtle but equally effective in maintaining the capitalist system.

4. The School as the Dominant ISA

  • Among the various ISAs, Althusser identifies the educational system as the most influential in capitalist societies, as it molds individuals from a young age.
  • Schools teach skills needed for labor but, more importantly, instill ideological submission to capitalist values and social hierarchies.
  • “The School… takes children from every class at infant-school age, and then for years, it drums into them… a certain amount of ‘know-how’ wrapped in the ruling ideology.”
  • This process ensures the reproduction of labor power that is compliant with the needs of capitalist production.

5. Interpellation and the Creation of Subjects

  • Althusser introduces the concept of “interpellation,” describing how ideology works by “hailing” individuals and transforming them into subjects who recognize themselves within the existing social order.
  • “All ideology hails or interpellates concrete individuals as concrete subjects.”
  • Through this process, individuals internalize the dominant ideology, recognizing themselves as subjects within a structure that dictates their social roles and behaviors, thus ensuring their conformity.

6. The Role of the Family, Religion, and Media in Ideology

  • Besides the school, other ISAs such as the family, religion, and media play significant roles in instilling the dominant ideology.
  • These institutions shape individuals’ identities and reinforce the values of the ruling class, ensuring that the capitalist mode of production is accepted and perpetuated.
  • “The family apparatus, the religious apparatus, the political apparatus, the communications apparatus…” all work together to propagate capitalist ideology and maintain the status quo.

7. Ideology as an Eternal and Omnipresent Force

  • Althusser argues that ideology is omnipresent and has no history because it operates continuously and universally across societies, shaping individuals before they even become aware of it.
  • “Ideology has no history.”
  • This suggests that individuals are always-already subjects of ideology, which plays a fundamental role in structuring their perceptions and actions in all class societies.
 Literary Terms/Concepts in “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser
Term/ConceptDefinitionExplanation in Althusser’s Context
IdeologyA system of ideas, beliefs, and representations that shape how individuals perceive their relationship to the social structure.Althusser views ideology as a crucial tool for maintaining the status quo by making individuals perceive their roles within a capitalist society as natural and inevitable.
Repressive State Apparatuses (RSAs)Institutions that enforce the power of the ruling class through coercion, such as the police, military, and judicial systems.These function through violence or repression to maintain control over the population and ensure obedience to the ruling class.
Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs)Institutions that propagate ideology through non-coercive means, such as schools, churches, media, and the family.ISAs operate by shaping individuals’ beliefs and values, subtly ensuring their submission to the ruling ideology without direct force.
InterpellationThe process by which individuals are “hailed” or called by ideology to recognize themselves as subjects within the existing social structure.Althusser argues that individuals are interpellated by ideology, meaning they recognize themselves within social roles (e.g., worker, citizen) and thus conform to societal expectations.
SubjectIn Althusser’s framework, a subject is an individual who is constituted by ideology, recognizing themselves as a free, autonomous agent while being shaped by social forces.Ideology creates subjects who perceive themselves as free, but their identity and actions are dictated by the ideological structures they are born into.
Reproduction of the Relations of ProductionThe process by which social structures and ideologies are reproduced to maintain the conditions necessary for capitalist production.This concept refers to how ideology and ISAs ensure that labor power and social hierarchies are continuously regenerated to sustain capitalism.
Relative AutonomyThe idea that certain institutions, like ISAs, operate with some independence from the economic base, though ultimately they serve its interests.Althusser suggests that while ISAs may seem independent, they function to reproduce the conditions necessary for capitalist exploitation and maintain the dominance of the ruling class.
OverdeterminationA concept borrowed from psychoanalysis, where multiple causes contribute to a single event or phenomenon.Althusser applies this to explain how various ISAs (school, family, religion) work together to ensure individuals conform to the dominant ideology.
False ConsciousnessA Marxist term referring to the misperception of one’s real position within the social and economic structure, typically by adopting the worldview of the ruling class.While Althusser moves beyond “false consciousness,” he similarly discusses how ideology misrepresents individuals’ true conditions by making them accept their social position as natural.
Material Existence of IdeologyAlthusser’s claim that ideology is not just a set of abstract ideas but exists materially through institutions, practices, and rituals.For Althusser, ideology has a concrete form in the practices and rituals people engage in within ISAs, such as going to school or church, which embody and propagate dominant ideologies.
Contribution of “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Structuralism and Post-Structuralism

  • Althusser’s work is influenced by structuralism, particularly in its focus on how social structures (like ISAs) shape individual consciousness and societal functions. His ideas also laid the groundwork for post-structuralism by questioning how ideology operates within these structures.
  • “It is not their real conditions of existence… but their relation to those conditions of existence which is represented to them.”
  • This aligns with structuralist and post-structuralist views that meaning and identity are constructed through systems (like language or ideology), rather than inherent.

2. Marxist Literary Theory

  • Althusser’s essay is a foundational text in Marxist literary theory, emphasizing the role of ideology in maintaining capitalist social relations and the function of literature as an ideological apparatus.
  • “All ideology hails or interpellates concrete individuals as concrete subjects.”
  • In Marxist literary criticism, this concept of “interpellation” is used to analyze how literary texts reinforce or challenge the dominant ideology by positioning readers as subjects within certain ideological frameworks.

3. Ideology Critique

  • Althusser extends Marx’s concept of ideology, arguing that it is not just false consciousness but a material practice deeply embedded in social institutions. This notion impacts how literary critics approach the analysis of texts, seeing them as part of ideological state apparatuses that shape and reproduce social order.
  • “Ideology has a material existence.”
  • This view contributed to the development of ideology critique in literary theory, where texts are analyzed for how they reproduce or subvert dominant ideologies through their narratives, themes, and characters.

4. Cultural Materialism and New Historicism

  • Althusser’s emphasis on how ISAs such as education, media, and religion propagate ideology has influenced cultural materialism and New Historicism. These theories examine how literature reflects and contributes to the social and political structures of its time.
  • “The school… drums into them, whether it uses new or old methods, a certain amount of ‘know-how’ wrapped in the ruling ideology.”
  • Cultural materialists and New Historicists view literature as a product of its historical and cultural context, shaped by and shaping the ideologies of its time.

5. Reader-Response Theory and Subjectivity

  • Althusser’s idea of interpellation intersects with reader-response theory by examining how texts position readers as subjects. The concept that ideology shapes readers’ responses to texts helps explain how literature “hails” its audience into specific ideological positions.
  • “Ideology interpellates individuals as subjects.”
  • In reader-response theory, this idea helps understand how texts engage readers, making them complicit in the ideological frameworks the text supports or critiques.

6. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory

  • Althusser’s concept of interpellation, which shapes individuals’ subjectivity, echoes themes in psychoanalytic theory, particularly the ways in which individuals are “hailed” by forces beyond their control (like the unconscious in Freudian theory). His work parallels the process of subject formation described in psychoanalysis.
  • “The individual is interpellated as a (free) subject in order that he shall submit freely to the commandments of the Subject.”
  • This resonates with psychoanalytic theories that explore how identity and subjectivity are shaped by external forces, including cultural narratives found in literature.

7. Hegemony Theory (Antonio Gramsci)

  • Althusser builds on Gramsci’s concept of cultural hegemony, where the ruling class maintains power through consent rather than force. Althusser’s ISAs are central to understanding how literature and other cultural forms sustain hegemony by embedding dominant ideologies into everyday life.
  • “What unifies their diversity is precisely this functioning… beneath the ruling ideology, which is the ideology of the ruling class.”
  • Hegemony theory has been widely applied in literary studies to analyze how literature can either reinforce or challenge dominant cultural norms.

8. Post-Colonial Theory

  • Althusser’s theories of ideology and interpellation have been adapted in post-colonial theory to examine how colonial powers use ideological state apparatuses (such as education and religion) to impose their worldview on colonized populations.
  • “The Ideological State Apparatuses function by ideology, but they also function secondarily by repression.”
  • Post-colonial critics use this framework to explore how literature reflects the ideological domination of colonized people and how they resist or internalize these ideologies.

9. Feminist Literary Criticism

  • Althusser’s framework for understanding how ISAs perpetuate dominant ideologies has been influential in feminist literary criticism. Feminist theorists use his concept of interpellation to explore how literature shapes and reinforces gender roles and patriarchal ideology.
  • “The family ISA… plays a considerable part in the reproduction of labor power.”
  • Feminist critics apply this idea to analyze how literary texts reinforce or challenge the patriarchal structures that define gender relations.
Examples of Critiques Through “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser
Literary WorkBrief SynopsisAlthusserian Critique (Using ISAs and Ideology)
George Orwell’s 1984 (1949)A dystopian novel about a totalitarian regime that controls every aspect of life, including thought, through surveillance, propaganda, and repression.The Party in 1984 exemplifies the functioning of both RSAs (e.g., the Thought Police) and ISAs (e.g., the Ministry of Truth). The novel shows how ideology controls individuals by shaping their reality and subjectivity. The constant surveillance and manipulation of truth reflect how ISAs operate through ideology to reproduce obedience and submission to power.
Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre (1847)A coming-of-age story of an orphaned girl who becomes a governess and faces struggles in love, independence, and societal norms.The school system, represented by Lowood Institution, serves as an ISA, shaping Jane’s sense of duty, morality, and submission to authority. Through education, Jane is interpellated as a subject within the Victorian class and gender system. The novel can be read as a critique of how women are ideologically conditioned to accept submissive roles in both family and work environments.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby (1925)A novel about the American Dream, wealth, and class disparities, set in the 1920s, where the mysterious millionaire Jay Gatsby seeks to win back his lost love, Daisy Buchanan.The novel illustrates the American Dream as a dominant ideology, propagated by ISAs like the media and education, which interpellates individuals into believing in meritocracy and success through hard work. Gatsby’s tragic end critiques this ideology by showing the impossibility of transcending class boundaries, demonstrating how capitalist structures reproduce class hierarchies through ideology.
Toni Morrison’s Beloved (1987)A novel that explores the haunting legacy of slavery through the story of Sethe, an escaped slave, and the ghost of her dead daughter.The novel reveals how slavery, as an RSA, violently maintained the exploitation of Black labor, while also exploring how post-slavery ISAs (like religion and family structures) attempt to reconstitute the identity of freed slaves. The ideology of freedom and redemption, imposed by post-Civil War America, masks the deep trauma and structural inequalities that continue to interpellate African Americans as subjects within a still-racist society.
Criticism Against “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser

1. Overemphasis on Structure and Determinism

  • Critics argue that Althusser’s theory overemphasizes the deterministic power of ideology and social structures, leaving little room for individual agency or resistance.
  • The concept of “interpellation” suggests that individuals have limited capacity to resist the ideological frameworks imposed on them, reducing human subjectivity to mere products of ideological forces.

2. Neglect of Human Agency and Consciousness

  • Althusser’s focus on ideology as a material force downplays the role of individual consciousness and agency in shaping ideology or resisting it. Critics claim that this leads to a mechanistic view of individuals as passive subjects.
  • His theory gives insufficient attention to how people can challenge or subvert the ideologies that interpellate them, which weakens the possibility for revolutionary change.

3. Ambiguity of the Concept of Ideology

  • Some critics argue that Althusser’s definition of ideology as both material (embedded in practices) and imaginary (representing a distorted relationship to reality) is ambiguous and lacks clarity.
  • The duality of ideology as both material and imaginary leaves open questions about how exactly it functions in concrete terms and how it can be countered effectively.

4. Undermines Marxist Humanism

  • Althusser’s structuralist approach is seen as undermining the more humanist aspects of Marxist theory, particularly the emphasis on class struggle and revolutionary agency.
  • By focusing on how ISAs reproduce the conditions of production, Althusser is seen as shifting focus away from the central role of the proletariat in actively overthrowing capitalist systems.

5. Neglect of Class Struggle and Economic Base

  • Critics claim that Althusser’s theory underplays the role of the economic base (i.e., the material conditions of production) in determining social relations and overemphasizes the superstructure, particularly ideology.
  • This shift toward ideology is seen as a departure from classical Marxist thought, which prioritizes the economic base as the primary determinant of social relations and class struggle.

6. Limited Historical and Cultural Specificity

  • Althusser’s theory of ISAs has been criticized for being too abstract and not accounting for the historical and cultural specificities of different societies. His analysis can seem overly generalized and lacks concrete examples of how ideologies operate in different contexts.
  • By focusing on general structures like schools, churches, and media, Althusser fails to address how these institutions may operate differently in varying historical and social contexts.

7. Criticism from Feminist and Postcolonial Theorists

  • Feminist and postcolonial critics argue that Althusser’s theory does not sufficiently address how gender, race, and colonialism intersect with ideology and power.
  • His analysis focuses primarily on class and capitalism, neglecting other forms of oppression that are deeply embedded in ideologies propagated through ISAs like the family, religion, and education.
Representative Quotations from “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Ideology represents the imaginary relationship of individuals to their real conditions of existence.”Althusser argues that ideology does not present reality as it is, but rather an “imaginary” version of it. This distorted version helps individuals make sense of their roles within society, but it also serves to mask the exploitation inherent in capitalist structures.
“All ideology hails or interpellates concrete individuals as concrete subjects.”This introduces the concept of “interpellation,” where individuals are “hailed” by ideology and come to recognize themselves as subjects within it. Through this process, people accept their roles in society, believing they are acting freely when they are actually shaped by ideological forces.
“There is no ideology except by the subject and for subjects.”Althusser argues that ideology only exists through subjects and for subjects. Ideology is central to the creation of subjectivity—it is by positioning people as subjects within a social structure that ideology operates, ensuring individuals conform to societal roles and expectations.
“The Repressive State Apparatus functions by violence, whereas the Ideological State Apparatuses function by ideology.”This distinguishes between the state’s coercive tools (RSAs) like police and military, which enforce compliance through violence, and ISAs like schools, media, and religion, which enforce compliance more subtly through ideology, shaping beliefs and values.
“The reproduction of labour power requires not only a reproduction of its skills, but also, at the same time, a reproduction of its submission to the rules of the established order.”Althusser points out that, in capitalist societies, labor power must be reproduced not only by teaching skills but also by inculcating obedience to the established order. This is how workers learn to accept their roles in the capitalist system, ensuring the system’s continuity.
“The school… drums into them… a certain amount of ‘know-how’ wrapped in the ruling ideology.”The school, as a key Ideological State Apparatus, plays a critical role in transmitting skills necessary for labor, but also indoctrinates students with the dominant ideology. This ensures the reproduction of capitalist social relations by preparing individuals to accept their roles in the workforce and society.
“Ideology has no history.”Althusser claims that ideology operates across all historical periods and is transhistorical. Ideologies may change in form, but the function of ideology—maintaining the existing social order and subject formation—remains constant throughout history.
“The individual is interpellated as a (free) subject in order that he shall submit freely to the commandments of the Subject.”Althusser explains that individuals are made to believe they are free and autonomous, but this “freedom” is actually part of how they are controlled by ideology. Ideology allows people to willingly submit to the structures of power while thinking they are acting freely.
“The State Apparatus… contains the Government, the Administration, the Army, the Police, the Courts, the Prisons.”This list illustrates the Repressive State Apparatus (RSA), which functions through coercive measures. These institutions enforce the laws of the state and maintain the power of the ruling class through the use of force or the threat of force.
“What unifies their diversity is precisely this functioning… beneath the ruling ideology, which is the ideology of ‘the ruling class.’”Althusser explains that, despite the diversity of ISAs (schools, media, religion, etc.), they are unified by their ultimate function: to propagate the ideology of the ruling class. This ensures the continued domination of the capitalist system by shaping the consciousness of individuals in accordance with its needs.
Suggested Readings: “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Louis Althusser
  1. LAMPERT, MATTHEW. “RESISTING IDEOLOGY: ON BUTLER’S CRITIQUE OF ALTHUSSER.” Diacritics, vol. 43, no. 2, 2015, pp. 124–47. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24810261. Accessed 17 Oct. 2024.
  2. Althusser, Louis, et al. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: (Notes towards an Investigation).” Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, NYU Press, 2001, pp. 85–126. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qgh9v.9. Accessed 17 Oct. 2024.
  3. Sánchez, Raúl. “Composition’s Ideology Apparatus: A Critique.” JAC, vol. 21, no. 4, 2001, pp. 741–59. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20866444. Accessed 17 Oct. 2024.
  4. MONTAG, WARREN. “ALTHUSSER’S LENIN.” Diacritics, vol. 43, no. 2, 2015, pp. 48–66. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24810258. Accessed 17 Oct. 2024.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *