!["Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness" by M. Faith McLellan: Summary and Critique](https://i0.wp.com/english-studies.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/image-38.png?resize=432%2C462&ssl=1)
Introduction: “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
“Literature and Medicine: Narratives of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan first appeared in The Lancet in 1997, offering a seminal exploration of the intersection between storytelling and illness experiences. McLellan examines how illness narratives, whether autobiographical or biographical, shape personal and cultural understandings of disease, suffering, and healing. The article emphasizes the thematic structures of these narratives, including restitution, chaos, and quest stories, illustrating how patients and caregivers use storytelling to reclaim agency and impose meaning on experiences of illness. The discussion highlights historical and contemporary examples, such as John Donne’s Devotions upon Emergent Occasions, which portrays illness as a spiritual rebirth, and contemporary memoirs like Reynolds Price’s A Whole New Life, which reflects on the transformative power of chronic illness. McLellan also explores the role of metaphor, particularly the military imagery frequently used to describe disease as a battle, shaping both medical discourse and patient perception. Additionally, the article recognizes the emergence of electronic narratives—multiauthored online forums where individuals collectively construct and modify stories of illness, creating a new genre of patient-driven storytelling. This work is significant in literary theory and medical humanities because it situates illness narratives as crucial texts that contribute to autobiography, ethical discourse, and medical education, providing both personal catharsis and broader societal impact.
Summary of “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
1. The Emergence and Importance of Illness Narratives
- Illness narratives have become a crucial part of autobiography, clinical practice, and medical ethics (McLellan, 1997, p. 1618).
- Patients use storytelling to articulate their experiences of disease and suffering.
- These narratives help in making sense of illness and serve as a therapeutic and communicative tool for both patients and caregivers.
2. Thematic Classification of Illness Narratives
- McLellan identifies three major types of illness narratives (p. 1619):
- Restitution Stories – Focus on the desire to return to health.
- Chaos Stories – Depict the incomprehensibility of suffering and the impact of illness on identity (e.g., Gilda Radner’s It’s Always Something).
- Quest Narratives – Frame illness as a transformative journey leading to personal growth or insight (e.g., Reynolds Price’s A Whole New Life).
3. Use of Metaphors in Illness Narratives
- Military metaphors are common in describing disease (p. 1618).
- Illness is framed as a battle, with the body as a battlefield and treatments as weapons (e.g., Martha Weinman Lear’s Heartsounds uses war imagery to describe her husband’s heart disease).
- These metaphors, while pervasive, have been critiqued for their potential to oversimplify the illness experience (Sontag, 1978, as cited in McLellan, 1997, p. 1618).
4. First-Person and Biographical Accounts of Illness
- Some narratives are firsthand patient accounts, offering direct insight into personal suffering and resilience (p. 1619).
- Examples:
- Lucy Grealy’s Autobiography of a Face recounts her experience with facial disfigurement due to Ewing’s sarcoma.
- John Gunther’s Death Be Not Proud is a father’s account of his son’s terminal illness.
- Anatole Broyard’s Intoxicated by My Illness was completed posthumously by his wife.
5. The Rise of Electronic and Collective Narratives
- Online platforms allow for multi-authored, evolving illness narratives (p. 1619).
- Patients and caregivers share experiences in virtual support communities (e.g., Phil Catalfo’s online journal about his son’s leukemia).
- Digital narratives are dynamic, enabling real-time interaction and collective storytelling.
6. The Motivations Behind Illness Narratives
- Illness narratives are often cathartic for the writer, helping them process their experiences (p. 1619).
- Writers may also aim to educate, raise awareness, or influence medical practice.
- Some narratives have led to tangible changes in healthcare policies (e.g., hospital protocols modified based on patient feedback).
7. Literature and Medicine as Interconnected Disciplines
- The study of illness narratives enhances understanding of the human condition in medical practice.
- These stories provide healthcare professionals with insight into patient experiences beyond clinical symptoms.
- They serve as essential texts for medical education, promoting empathy and ethical reflection.
Conclusion
- McLellan’s work highlights how narratives of illness bridge literature and medicine, transforming personal suffering into a meaningful discourse (p. 1620).
- Whether through books, online forums, or autobiographical accounts, these stories help individuals confront the chaos of illness, shape medical perspectives, and ultimately contribute to humanistic healthcare.
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
Term/Concept | Definition | Example from the Article |
Illness Narrative | A personal account of illness, typically autobiographical or biographical, used to convey experiences of suffering, treatment, and recovery. | Lucy Grealy’s Autobiography of a Face details her journey with Ewing’s sarcoma (McLellan, 1997, p. 1619). |
Restitution Narrative | A story where the ill person seeks to return to their previous state of health, often structured around medical intervention leading to recovery. | Common in many illness stories where patients expect a cure or improvement (p. 1619). |
Chaos Narrative | A narrative that expresses the overwhelming, often incoherent experience of illness, where suffering dominates and hope for improvement is uncertain. | Gilda Radner’s It’s Always Something about her ovarian cancer attempts to make sense of the chaos (p. 1619). |
Quest Narrative | A story in which the illness journey is framed as a transformative experience, often leading to newfound wisdom or insight. | Reynolds Price’s A Whole New Life explores his gratitude for continued literary productivity despite his spinal tumor (p. 1619). |
Military Metaphor | The framing of illness in terms of battle, where the body fights against disease, treatments are weapons, and survival is victory. | Heartsounds by Martha Weinman Lear uses war imagery to describe her husband’s heart disease (p. 1618). |
Pathography | A biography or autobiography centered on a person’s illness and medical experiences. | Often used to describe illness narratives such as John Gunther’s Death Be Not Proud (p. 1619). |
Dual Narration | A narrative structure where both the patient and a close observer (e.g., family member or caregiver) contribute to the story. | Cancer in Two Voices presents illness from both patient and partner perspectives (p. 1619). |
Electronic Narrative | Illness stories shared through digital platforms, often co-authored by multiple contributors, allowing real-time interaction and support. | Phil Catalfo’s online journal about his son’s leukemia fosters collective storytelling (p. 1619). |
Therapeutic Writing | Writing as a means of coping with illness, used to process emotions, gain control over one’s experience, or find meaning. | Many first-person illness narratives function as cathartic exercises for the author (p. 1619). |
Narrative Ethics | The use of storytelling in medical and ethical discussions to enhance understanding of patient experiences and improve healthcare. | Physicians gain insight into patient struggles through online illness narratives, influencing medical decisions (p. 1620). |
Victim Art | A critical term used to describe illness narratives that focus intensely on suffering, sometimes seen as self-indulgent or overly personal. | Some critiques argue that illness narratives are driven by self-absorption rather than literary merit (p. 1620). |
Autopathography | A form of autobiographical writing focused on illness and medical encounters, often used as an alternative to traditional autobiography. | The Diving Bell and the Butterfly by Jean-Dominique Bauby, written using eye blinks, exemplifies this form (p. 1619). |
Embodied Experience | The lived, subjective experience of illness as it affects both physical and psychological states. | The uncertainty of daily life with multiple sclerosis, as described by Nancy Mairs, highlights this concept (p. 1620). |
Contribution of “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan to Literary Theory/Theories
- Examines how illness stories are structured and classified into restitution, chaos, and quest narratives (McLellan, 1997, p. 1619).
- Highlights the role of first-person narration and dual narration in shaping the reader’s understanding of illness experiences.
- Emphasizes how electronic narratives on the internet have introduced multi-authored storytelling, altering traditional narrative structures (p. 1619).
2. Autobiographical Theory
- Positions illness narratives within the broader genre of autobiography and pathography, demonstrating how they serve both self-representation and public engagement (p. 1618).
- Discusses how the first-person account of illness functions as a form of self-therapy and identity reconstruction (p. 1619).
- Explores the constraints and possibilities of autobiographical illness narratives, noting that chronic illnesses provide time for self-reflection and storytelling, unlike acute diseases (p. 1619).
3. Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine
- Establishes the role of storytelling in enhancing doctor-patient relationships and medical ethics (p. 1620).
- Shows how illness narratives provide insight into patient suffering, influencing medical practice and policies (p. 1620).
- Identifies how narratives help patients reclaim agency, moving beyond clinical definitions of disease to personal meaning-making (p. 1620).
4. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory
- Illness narratives function as cathartic texts, allowing patients to process trauma and regain control over their experiences (p. 1619).
- Suggests that storytelling mitigates feelings of chaos and fear, helping patients impose structure on their suffering (p. 1620).
- Examines how suppressed emotions and fears surface in narratives, particularly in chaos stories where meaning is elusive (p. 1619).
5. Postmodernism and Fragmentation
- Discusses how chaos narratives resist linearity and coherence, reflecting the fragmented nature of illness experiences (p. 1619).
- Electronic narratives challenge traditional authorial authority, as multiple contributors alter the original story’s meaning (p. 1619).
- Online illness narratives blur the boundaries between personal and collective storytelling, embodying a postmodern, decentralized form of literature (p. 1619).
6. Metaphor and Symbolism in Literary Theory
- Analyzes the prevalence of military metaphors in illness narratives and critiques their limitations (p. 1618).
- Highlights how mythic structures, such as the hero’s journey, shape quest narratives of illness (p. 1619).
- Explores the symbolic use of illness as a transformative force, where suffering leads to insight and personal growth (p. 1619).
- Suggests that illness narratives shape reader empathy, fostering a deeper connection with the lived experience of disease (p. 1620).
- Encourages interpretation from multiple perspectives, as both physicians and general readers engage with these texts differently (p. 1620).
- Examines how interactive digital narratives allow readers to become co-authors, altering the meaning of the story through discussion and contribution (p. 1619).
8. Feminist Literary Theory
- Highlights how women’s illness narratives challenge traditional gender roles, bringing attention to the experience of illness from a female perspective (p. 1619).
- Explores the marginalization of female patient voices, particularly in medical settings, and how personal narratives counteract this (p. 1619).
- Recognizes the gendered aspects of caregiving, with many illness narratives written by or about women who care for sick loved ones (p. 1619).
Examples of Critiques Through “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
Literary Work & Type of Narrative | McLellan’s Thematic Critique | Key Concepts & Theoretical Lens |
John Donne – Devotions upon Emergent Occasions (Spiritual Illness Narrative, Rebirth & Reflection on Suffering) | McLellan identifies Donne’s work as an early illness narrative structured around meditation, expostulation, and prayer. It portrays illness as a spiritual trial and a transformative experience rather than just a medical event (McLellan, 1997, p. 1618). | – Religious and spiritual framing of illness – Rebirth metaphor – Historical pathography |
Martha Weinman Lear – Heartsounds (Military Metaphor in Illness, Heart Disease as a Battle) | Critiqued for reinforcing the “war” metaphor, which frames illness as a battle. McLellan argues that while emotionally compelling, such metaphors oversimplify suffering and impose pressure on patients to “fight” their disease (p. 1618). | – Military metaphor critique – Metaphorical burden on patients – Emotional vs. clinical realism |
Gilda Radner – It’s Always Something (Chaos Narrative, Ovarian Cancer) | McLellan describes Radner’s memoir as a chaos narrative, highlighting the disruption illness causes to identity and meaning. Radner’s attempt to document chemotherapy sessions reflects an effort to regain control over a disorienting experience (p. 1619). | – Loss of narrative control – Illness as identity crisis – Emotional disarray in storytelling |
Reynolds Price – A Whole New Life (Quest Narrative, Spinal Cord Tumor as a Transformative Journey) | Price’s memoir embodies the quest narrative, where illness becomes a journey of self-discovery. McLellan notes that despite his suffering, Price finds artistic and intellectual renewal, illustrating illness as a transformative force (p. 1619). | – Illness as a journey – Transformative suffering – Autopathography and resilience |
Criticism Against “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
1. Overgeneralization of Illness Narratives
- The classification of illness narratives into restitution, chaos, and quest (McLellan, 1997, p. 1619) may oversimplify the complexity and uniqueness of each patient’s experience.
- Some illness narratives may not fit neatly into these categories, making the framework somewhat restrictive.
2. Lack of Critical Engagement with Power Dynamics in Medicine
- McLellan primarily focuses on the literary and emotional aspects of illness narratives but does not sufficiently critique the medical power structures that influence how these stories are told.
- The role of medical authority and institutional biases in shaping patient narratives is underexplored.
3. Uncritical Use of Electronic Narratives
- While McLellan acknowledges the emergence of multi-authored electronic illness narratives (p. 1619), she does not critically analyze how digital platforms might distort or commodify patient experiences.
- The potential for misinformation, performative storytelling, or loss of narrative control in online spaces is not fully examined.
4. Limited Discussion of Gender and Intersectionality
- Although McLellan mentions gendered aspects of illness narratives, the analysis lacks a deep intersectional approach.
- Race, socioeconomic status, and cultural background are not sufficiently addressed in relation to how different individuals experience and narrate illness.
5. Tendency to Privilege Literary Quality Over Raw Experience
- McLellan critiques some illness narratives for their stylistic unevenness (p. 1619), but this may reflect an elitist perspective that prioritizes literary merit over authentic personal expression.
- The emotional urgency of illness narratives should perhaps be valued beyond conventional literary standards.
6. Insufficient Engagement with Disability Studies
- The article focuses on illness as an interruption to normalcy rather than engaging with disability as an identity and social construct.
- Perspectives from disability studies scholars who view chronic illness as part of life rather than just a disruption are not fully incorporated.
7. Lack of Engagement with Reader-Response Criticism
- The article assumes that illness narratives serve a therapeutic function for patients and educational function for doctors, but does not sufficiently explore how different readers interpret these texts based on their own experiences.
Representative Quotations from “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan with Explanation
Quotation | Explanation |
“They have been called stories of sickness, pathographies, and narratives of illness.” (p. 1618) | This statement highlights the evolving terminology surrounding illness narratives, emphasizing their growing recognition in both literature and medical humanities. The various terms reflect different perspectives—personal, clinical, and literary—on how illness is experienced and communicated. |
“Despite substantial critique of their appropriateness and usefulness, military metaphors are ubiquitous in illness narratives.” (p. 1618) | McLellan critiques the common use of military metaphors in medical discourse, such as referring to disease as an “enemy” and treatment as a “battle.” This metaphorical framing can place an emotional burden on patients, making illness seem like a failure if one does not “win” the fight. |
“Stories of sickness have also been described as narratives of restitution, chaos, and quest.” (p. 1619) | This classification system, based on Arthur Frank’s typology, provides a framework for understanding how illness is structured in storytelling. The restitution narrative seeks recovery, the chaos narrative represents disorientation and suffering, while the quest narrative frames illness as a transformative journey. |
“The chaos story focuses on what is most untellable about sickness: the nearly incomprehensible nature of loss and suffering.” (p. 1619) | This reflects the existential and psychological dimensions of illness. Chaos narratives resist neat resolutions, often mirroring the actual experience of chronic or terminal illness, where clarity and recovery are not always possible. |
“The quest narrative depicts illness as a mythical journey, in which the hero undergoes a series of trials before being granted upon his return a boon—if not health, perhaps empathy, insight, a special sensitivity, or a deepened awareness of life’s transience and value.” (p. 1619) | The comparison of illness to mythic storytelling highlights how patients often find meaning in their suffering, transforming pain into personal growth. This perspective can offer comfort and a sense of purpose to individuals experiencing long-term illness. |
“When the patient is unable to relate his own story, someone close to him may become the narrator, either in whole or in part.” (p. 1619) | This acknowledges the role of caregivers, family members, and friends in preserving and conveying illness narratives, especially when the patient is unable to do so. This highlights the collaborative and communal nature of storytelling in illness experiences. |
“Multiple narrators are a hallmark of a new form of illness narrative that is being created on the Internet, in discussion groups or on Web pages.” (p. 1619) | McLellan emphasizes how digital platforms have transformed illness storytelling. Online narratives allow for shared authorship, interactivity, and collective meaning-making, demonstrating the democratization of illness experiences in the digital age. |
“Writers’ motivations for telling stories of illness have bright and dark features.” (p. 1620) | Illness narratives are often cathartic and therapeutic, helping authors process trauma. However, McLellan acknowledges the potential pitfalls, including emotional overindulgence, lack of literary refinement, and the challenge of balancing personal experience with artistic expression. |
“One important value of illness narratives is their capacity to bring about change that improves the lives of patients, families, and caregivers.” (p. 1620) | This underscores the practical impact of illness narratives. By sharing experiences, patients can influence medical policies, improve doctor-patient relationships, and foster empathy among healthcare providers. |
“Narratives of illness provide eloquent proof, for patients and practitioners, that ‘when the lights of health go down,’ one’s own story can be illumination enough.” (p. 1620) | This poetic statement captures the central thesis of McLellan’s argument: storytelling is a powerful tool for making sense of illness, offering both individual solace and broader cultural insight. |
Suggested Readings: “Literature And Medicine: Narratives Of Physical Illness” by M. Faith McLellan
- McLellan, M. Faith. “Literature and medicine: narratives of physical illness.” The Lancet 349.9065 (1997): 1618-1620.
- Downie, R. S. “Literature and Medicine.” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, 1991, pp. 93–98. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717024. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
- Rousseau, G. S. “Literature and Medicine: The State of the Field.” Isis, vol. 72, no. 3, 1981, pp. 406–24. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/230258. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
- Spiegel, Maura, and Rita Charon. “Editing and Interdisciplinarity: Literature, Medicine, and Narrative Medicine.” Profession, 2009, pp. 132–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595923. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.
- HOLLOWAY, MARGUERITE. “When Medicine Meets Literature.” Scientific American, vol. 292, no. 5, 2005, pp. 38–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26060992. Accessed 8 Feb. 2025.