“Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen: Summary and Critique

“Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen first appeared in The American Journal of Cardiology in 1997 as part of a broader interdisciplinary discussion on the relationship between literature and medicine.

"Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience" by Helle Mathiasen: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen

“Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen first appeared in The American Journal of Cardiology in 1997 as part of a broader interdisciplinary discussion on the relationship between literature and medicine. This work explores how literature enriches medical practice by fostering empathy, addressing moral and philosophical issues, and enhancing the physician’s understanding of human suffering. Mathiasen argues that literature and medicine, though seemingly distinct disciplines, share a deep connection that dates back to ancient Greek mythology, where Apollo symbolized both healing and poetry. By examining the works of physician-writers like Anton Chekhov and William Carlos Williams, the article illustrates how medical practice informs literary expression and vice versa. Chekhov’s Ward Six, for instance, critiques medical apathy and highlights the transformative power of empathy when a doctor experiences the same neglect he once inflicted on his patients. Similarly, Williams’ The Use of Force delves into the ethical dilemmas of medical authority and patient autonomy. Mathiasen further contends that literature serves as a moral compass for physicians, presenting role models such as Dr. Bernard Rieux in Camus’ The Plague, who embodies professional dedication and ethical responsibility in the face of overwhelming suffering. Additionally, literature captures the emotional and existential dimensions of illness, as seen in Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilych, which portrays a dying man’s desperate search for meaning amid the indifference of medical professionals. The article underscores that literature not only humanizes medical training but also provides doctors with the tools to navigate the complexities of patient care. By incorporating literature into medical education, Mathiasen suggests, we can cultivate more compassionate and reflective healthcare practitioners, ultimately improving the doctor-patient relationship.

Summary of “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen

1. The Emergence of Literature and Medicine as a Discipline

  • Over the past 20 years, the interdisciplinary field of literature and medicine has grown significantly, leading to the establishment of journals, databases, and academic courses (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).
  • The connection between literature and medicine dates back to ancient Greece, where Apollo was associated with both healing and poetry (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).

2. Literature and Medicine as Humanistic Arts

  • Literature and medicine both contribute to a deeper understanding of human existence, suffering, and healing (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).
  • The physician-writers Anton Chekhov and William Carlos Williams demonstrate how medical experience enriches literary expression (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).

3. Moral and Ethical Lessons for Physicians

  • Literature provides moral instruction, helping doctors reflect on their professional and ethical responsibilities (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • In Ward Six, Chekhov critiques medical apathy through the story of a physician who only realizes the suffering of patients when he himself becomes one (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Dr. Bernard Rieux in Camus’ The Plague exemplifies professional dedication and ethical responsibility (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

4. The Role of Empathy in Medicine

  • Literature enhances physicians’ ability to empathize with patients by depicting the emotional and psychological aspects of illness (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • In Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilych, the protagonist’s suffering is largely ignored by his family and doctors, except for the empathetic servant Gerasim (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • Tillie Olsen’s Tell Me A Riddle portrays the compassion of a granddaughter caring for her dying grandmother, reinforcing the importance of human connection in healthcare (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

5. The Subjectivity of Medical Experience

  • Literature reveals the differing perspectives of doctors and patients, emphasizing the subjective nature of medical experiences (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar presents electroshock therapy as a traumatic experience for the patient, contrasting the physician’s clinical perspective (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Barbara Pym’s Quartet in Autumn illustrates a patient’s fear of judgment through her interactions with her doctor (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

6. Literature as a Tool for Medical Education

  • Medical training often neglects subjectivity, but literature provides insight into the complexities of doctor-patient interactions (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature and medicine courses have been introduced in medical schools to enhance students’ understanding of morality, emotion, and human suffering (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The study of literature can improve medical professionals’ ability to communicate effectively and compassionately with patients (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

7. The Importance of Narrative in Medicine

  • Storytelling allows physicians to process and reflect on their experiences, reinforcing their understanding of patients’ lives (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature serves as a medium for discussing illness, death, and ethical dilemmas in a way that scientific texts cannot (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Works such as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Angels in America help illustrate the psychological and social aspects of illness (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen
Theoretical Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationReference in the Article
Interdisciplinary StudiesThe integration of multiple academic fields to create a broader understanding of a subject. Literature and medicine intersect to enhance both fields.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1222)
Humanistic MedicineThe idea that medicine is not just a science but also an art that requires empathy, ethics, and a deep understanding of human experiences.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1222)
Narrative MedicineThe use of literature and storytelling to improve medical practice by fostering empathy and deeper patient understanding.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Medical EthicsThe study of moral values and principles in medical practice, including the responsibilities of doctors towards patients.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1223)
Empathy in MedicineThe ability of healthcare professionals to emotionally understand and connect with patients’ suffering and perspectives.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1224)
Subjectivity in MedicineRecognizing that medical experiences are influenced by personal perspectives, emotions, and social factors, not just objective science.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Symbolism in LiteratureThe use of symbols in literary texts to represent medical or humanistic themes, such as the caduceus (a medical symbol with two serpents).Mathiasen (1997, p. 1222)
Doctor-Patient RelationshipThe dynamic interaction between a physician and a patient, including trust, communication, and ethical responsibilities.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1224)
Moral Responsibility in MedicineThe ethical duty of doctors to prioritize patient care, demonstrate compassion, and maintain professional integrity.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1223)
Psychological Impact of IllnessHow literature portrays the emotional and mental challenges faced by patients and healthcare professionals.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1224)
Medical RealismA literary technique that accurately depicts medical environments, procedures, and the experiences of doctors and patients.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1223)
Literature as a Pedagogical ToolThe use of literature in medical education to teach students about ethical dilemmas, human emotions, and patient care.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Philosophy of MedicineThe broader theoretical and existential questions concerning health, illness, and the role of medical professionals in society.Mathiasen (1997, p. 1225)
Contribution of “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Reader-Response Theory

  • The article emphasizes how literature evokes empathy and moral reflection in readers, particularly in medical practitioners (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • Readers engage personally with medical narratives, shaping their understanding of ethical dilemmas in healthcare (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Example: The Death of Ivan Ilych by Tolstoy forces readers to confront mortality and the emotional consequences of medical neglect (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

2. Ethical Literary Criticism

  • Literature serves as a tool for moral education by offering role models and cautionary tales for doctors (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Stories like Ward Six by Chekhov critique the moral failures of medical professionals, reinforcing ethical responsibility in medicine (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • The Plague by Camus highlights the physician’s duty to combat suffering, aligning with ethical philosophy (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

3. Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine

  • Mathiasen argues that literature enriches medical education by providing insight into patient suffering and healthcare ethics (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Narrative structure in literature helps physicians understand patient experiences beyond clinical diagnoses (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Works such as The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath reveal how psychiatric treatments impact patients differently from doctors’ perceptions (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

4. Humanism in Literature

  • The article aligns with humanist literary theory, emphasizing that literature deepens our understanding of human conditions like illness and suffering (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222).
  • The focus on compassion, dignity, and ethical medical practice reflects Renaissance humanist ideals in literature (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Example: William Carlos Williams describes medicine as “the very thing which made it possible for me to write” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).

5. Existentialism in Literature

  • Mathiasen highlights how medical narratives explore existential questions of life, death, and human suffering (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The Death of Ivan Ilych presents existentialist dilemmas of facing mortality and the meaning of life (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • The Plague by Camus portrays human resilience in the face of absurdity, reinforcing existentialist themes (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).

6. Postmodernist Critique of Medical Objectivity

  • The article questions the scientific objectivity of medicine, arguing that literature reveals the subjective experiences of both doctors and patients (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Quartet in Autumn by Barbara Pym illustrates how doctors and patients perceive illness differently, challenging medical authority (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature shows the ambiguity of medical truth, as seen in The Bell Jar, where electroshock therapy is viewed as both a cure and a punishment (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).

7. Feminist Literary Criticism

  • Mathiasen discusses how gender influences medical treatment and patient experiences in literature (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman critiques the medical mistreatment of women, especially in cases of postpartum depression (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • The male-dominated medical profession is examined in literary texts where female characters suffer due to patriarchal medical practices (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
Examples of Critiques Through “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen
Literary Work & AuthorCritique Through Mathiasen’s PerspectiveReference in the Article
Ward Six – Anton Chekhov– Critiques medical apathy and the dehumanization of patients.
– Dr. Ragin, a physician, refuses to improve hospital conditions until he himself becomes a patient, highlighting lack of empathy in healthcare.
– Demonstrates the moral responsibility of doctors to acknowledge and alleviate suffering.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223
The Death of Ivan Ilych – Leo Tolstoy– Examines emotional neglect in medical practice, where doctors focus on diagnosis while ignoring the psychological and existential distress of the patient.
– Contrasts Gerasim’s empathy with the indifference of trained medical professionals, showing that compassion is as important as medical expertise.
– Critiques the medical tendency to see patients as cases rather than human beings.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224
The Bell Jar – Sylvia Plath– Highlights the subjectivity of medical experiences, particularly in psychiatric care.
– The protagonist’s electroshock therapy is portrayed as a punishment rather than a cure, revealing power imbalances between doctors and patients.
– Critiques the cold, clinical detachment of mental health practitioners, showing the need for a more patient-centered approach.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225
The Plague – Albert Camus– Presents Dr. Bernard Rieux as a model of ethical medical practice, illustrating compassion, resilience, and duty in healthcare.
– Demonstrates existentialist themes, showing that medicine is a fight against inevitable death.
– Challenges the notion of heroism in medicine, arguing that persistence in caregiving is an act of “common decency” rather than a grand sacrifice.
Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224
Criticism Against “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen

1. Overemphasis on the Humanistic Perspective

  • Mathiasen prioritizes literature’s moral and emotional aspects while underemphasizing the scientific and practical constraints of medical practice (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Critics argue that medical training requires technical precision, and literature, while valuable, may not provide sufficient guidance for real-world decision-making.

2. Lack of Empirical Evidence for Literary Impact on Medical Practice

  • The article assumes that reading literature directly improves medical ethics and empathy, but it does not provide concrete empirical studies or controlled research to support this claim (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Some scholars argue that medical ethics and empathy are shaped by direct patient experience rather than literary analysis.

3. Subjectivity of Literary Interpretation

  • Mathiasen presents literature as a tool for universal moral lessons, but literary interpretation is inherently subjective (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224).
  • Different readers, including medical professionals, may interpret the same text in conflicting ways, leading to varied and potentially contradictory conclusions.

4. Limited Discussion of Non-Western Medical Narratives

  • The article focuses heavily on Western literary traditions, with examples from Chekhov, Tolstoy, Camus, and Plath (Mathiasen, 1997, pp. 1223-1225).
  • Medical humanities in non-Western contexts—such as traditional Chinese, African, or Indigenous medical narratives—are largely ignored.

5. Idealization of Literary Physicians

  • The article presents physician-writers (Chekhov, Williams) as exemplary figures, but not all doctors who write literature necessarily practice ethical medicine (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223).
  • Some critics argue that idealizing literary doctors overlooks the systemic issues in modern healthcare, such as time constraints, bureaucracy, and financial pressures.

6. Lack of Engagement with Medical Technology and Contemporary Healthcare Issues

  • Mathiasen’s discussion does not address modern technological advancements in medicine, such as telemedicine, AI diagnostics, and bioethics (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Literature’s role in addressing contemporary healthcare challenges (e.g., pandemics, medical inequality, digital medicine) is not thoroughly explored.

7. The Risk of Over-Reliance on Literary Models for Medical Ethics

  • The article suggests that literature can offer role models for physicians, but fictional characters may not always be realistic or applicable to actual medical practice (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225).
  • Some argue that ethical dilemmas in modern hospitals are far more complex than those depicted in literary narratives.
Representative Quotations from “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“The study of Literature and Medicine has developed into an independent discipline over the last 20 years.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222)Mathiasen highlights the emergence of medical humanities as a formal academic field, emphasizing its interdisciplinary significance.
“The connection between [literature and medicine] can be traced back to the mythology of ancient Greece, which identified Apollo as god of music, medicine, and poetry.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222)The link between medicine and literature is not a modern construct but has historical and mythological roots. This legitimizes their continued integration.
“Recognizing this relationship depends on the fundamental assumption that literature and medicine are humanistic arts.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1222)Mathiasen argues that both fields share a common goal of understanding human experiences, particularly suffering, healing, and mortality.
“Chekhov’s story can then serve the ancient and important function of art, to provide moral education, not only to the health care provider but to the general reader.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223)Literature, especially stories by physician-writers like Chekhov, plays a key role in shaping ethical awareness in medicine.
“I have no doubt that the study of medicine has had an important influence on my literary work.” (Anton Chekhov, cited in Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223)Chekhov himself acknowledged that medicine enriched his writing, reinforcing the argument that literature and medicine are interconnected.
“Only the gifted storyteller can create and express a meaningful order out of the chaos of experience.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1224)This statement highlights the narrative power of literature in medicine—transforming fragmented experiences into coherent and insightful reflections.
“The doctor scrutinizes his patient’s body, but the patient wonders whether she has failed to live up to her doctor’s expectations. They are at cross purposes.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225)Mathiasen critiques the disconnect between doctors and patients, emphasizing the subjectivity of medical experiences and potential misunderstandings in healthcare.
“A story like ‘Ward Six’ satisfies our yearning for justice—what goes around, comes around.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1223)Chekhov’s Ward Six is an example of moral retribution in literature, where an apathetic doctor is forced to experience the suffering he once ignored.
“Perhaps the greatest benefit that physicians and the general reader can derive from literature is pleasure.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225)Beyond education and ethics, literature provides enjoyment, making it an effective medium for learning about medicine.
“Medical issues are life issues.” (Mathiasen, 1997, p. 1225)This phrase encapsulates the universal nature of medical narratives—illness, suffering, and healing affect everyone, not just doctors and patients.
Suggested Readings: “Literature and Medicine: The Human Experience” by Helle Mathiasen
  1. Mathiasen, Helle. “Literature and Medicine: the human experience.” The American journal of cardiology 79.9 (1997): 1222-1225.
  2. Downie, R. S. “Literature and Medicine.” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, 1991, pp. 93–98. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717024. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  3. Spiegel, Maura, and Rita Charon. “Editing and Interdisciplinarity: Literature, Medicine, and Narrative Medicine.” Profession, 2009, pp. 132–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595923. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  4. von Staden, Heinrich. “EXPERIMENT AND EXPERIENCE IN HELLENISTIC MEDICINE.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, no. 22, 1975, pp. 178–99. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43646348. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *