“Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling: Summary and Critique

“Manners, Morals, and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling, first appeared in 1948 in The Kenyon Review, has since become a cornerstone in literary criticism.

"Manners, Morals and the Novel" by Lionel Trilling: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling

“Manners, Morals, and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling, first appeared in 1948 in The Kenyon Review, has since become a cornerstone in literary criticism, offering profound insights into the novel’s role in exploring the complexities of human behavior. Trilling’s exploration of the interplay between social conventions (manners) and ethical principles (morals) within the narrative form has had a lasting impact on discussions of realism, morality, and the novel’s capacity to illuminate the human condition.

Summary of “Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling

·  Complex Understanding of “Manners”:

  • Trilling defines “manners” not merely as social etiquettes but as a broader cultural hum of implications, hinting at unexpressed values and norms. He articulates this as “the whole evanescent context in which its explicit statements are made” which includes everything from slang and humor to the gestures of daily life.

·  Significance of the Unexpressed in Historical Context:

  • The essay highlights the charm and melancholy of the past, suggesting that historical literature often misses the ‘buzz’ of implications, leaving a tranquil yet incomplete picture. Trilling writes, “Somewhere below all the explicit statements that a people makes through its art, religion, architecture, legislation, there is a dim mental region of intention.”

·  Literature’s Inquiry into Reality and Appearance:

  • Trilling discusses literature’s obsession with the dichotomy between reality and appearance, using classical examples like Oedipus and Othello to illustrate how literature explores the tension between what seems and what is. He emphasizes, “All literature tends to be concerned with the question of reality—I mean quite simply the old opposition between reality and appearance.”

·  Social Critique through the Novel:

  • The novel serves as a medium for social critique by capturing and reflecting the dynamics of social classes and manners. Trilling observes that novels historically have grappled with these themes, often revealing deep societal truths through their narratives.

·  American Literature’s Detachment from Social Reality:

  • Unlike European novels, American literature, according to Trilling, often eschews deep social exploration. He mentions American authors who diverged from exploring social realities, noting, “American writers of genius have not turned their minds to society.”

·  Contemporary American Literature and Its Shortcomings:

  • Modern American novels fail to adequately capture the complexities of contemporary society, often focusing on superficial narratives rather than profound social dynamics. Trilling argues that this superficial focus misses the potential richness of the American social landscape.

·  Criticism of Snobbery and Class Dynamics:

  • Trilling critiques the novel’s fixation on class and snobbery, emphasizing how these elements often overshadow deeper social insights. He argues that snobbery in literature reflects a preoccupation with status rather than meaningful social function.

·  The Novel as a Medium for Moral and Cultural Education:

  • The essay champions the novel as a tool for moral reflection and cultural education, arguing that it engages readers with ethical dilemmas and societal roles, prompting introspection about personal and collective morals.

·  Potential of the Novel for Social Reflection and Change:

  • Trilling concludes by highlighting the novel’s role in fostering a moral imagination and understanding of human motives, which is crucial for effective societal reform and empathy. He stresses, “It is to prevent this corruption, the most ironic and tragic that man knows, that we stand in need of the moral realism which is the product of the free play of the moral imagination.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling

·  Expanding the Understanding of “Manners” in Literature:

  • Trilling redefines “manners” beyond mere social etiquette to encompass the implicit cultural norms and values that shape societal interactions. He articulates this broader understanding by identifying manners as the “culture’s hum and buzz of implication,” encompassing all unexpressed or partially expressed societal values that influence behavior.

·  Emphasis on the Implicit Over the Explicit:

  • Trilling highlights the importance of what is not explicitly stated in literature, arguing that the unspoken or subtly implied elements often carry more weight in understanding a culture’s moral and ethical landscape. This contributes to literary theory by stressing the role of subtext and the implicit meanings that underpin the explicit narratives.

·  Exploration of Reality versus Appearance:

  • The essay extensively discusses the literary preoccupation with the conflict between reality and appearance, drawing on examples from classic literature like Oedipus and Othello. Trilling’s discussion contributes to literary theory by framing this conflict as central to understanding characters and plots, influencing how reality is constructed and perceived in literary contexts.

·  Novel as a Social Document:

  • Trilling argues that the novel serves as a critical reflection of societal norms and values, effectively making it a social document that offers insights into the manners and morals of the time. This view contributes to literary theory by supporting the idea that literature serves as a historical and sociological resource, reflecting and critiquing societal structures.

·  Critical Examination of American Literature’s Social Engagement:

  • Trilling critiques American literature for its lack of engagement with deep social realities, contrasting it with European literature’s rich exploration of class and societal dynamics. This contributes to literary theory by challenging American literary criticism to reconsider the depth and scope of its social engagement.

·  The Novel’s Role in Moral Education:

  • The essay positions the novel as a tool for moral education, suggesting that it engages readers with moral dilemmas and societal roles, encouraging introspection and ethical consideration. This perspective enriches literary theory by underscoring the ethical responsibilities of literature and its potential to influence readers’ moral considerations.

·  Implications for Modern Literary Criticism and Social Responsibility:

  • Trilling calls for a modern literary criticism that acknowledges the novel’s potential to reflect and reform societal morals and manners. This challenges existing literary theories to incorporate a more robust consideration of literature’s role in shaping and critiquing societal norms, emphasizing the ethical implications of literary production and criticism.
Examples of Critiques Through “Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling
Literary WorkMannersMoralsTrilling’s Critique
Pride and PrejudiceReflects societal hierarchies and power dynamics; used to expose moral complexitiesCharacters navigate societal expectations while maintaining personal integrityAusten effectively uses manners to illuminate moral dilemmas.
The Great GatsbySuperficiality and moral decay masked by opulent manners; critique of American DreamExploration of idealism, disillusionment, and the American DreamFitzgerald employs manners to expose the emptiness of material wealth and the distortion of values.
BelovedFractured manners and cultural norms of African Americans post-slavery; reveal psychological and societal scarsChallenges traditional notions of morality; explores ethical dilemmas in an oppressive societyMorrison uses manners to illuminate the impact of historical trauma on individuals and communities.
1984Rigid social control and manipulation of language; tool for suppressing individualityRaises questions about truth, power, and resistanceOrwell employs manners to critique totalitarian regimes and the dangers of unchecked authority.
Criticism Against “Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling
  • Overemphasis on Traditional Narrative Forms: Critics argue that Trilling places too much importance on traditional novelistic forms and their exploration of manners and morals, potentially disregarding other literary forms and modern experimental narratives that may not fit into his framework.
  • Idealization of European Literature: Trilling’s apparent preference for European literature’s depth and complexity might be seen as an idealization, possibly overlooking the unique cultural and social contributions of American literature beyond its European counterparts.
  • Narrow Definition of American Literature: Some critics might find that Trilling’s characterization of American literature as lacking in social texture is overly broad and dismissive of the varied and rich contributions of American writers who deeply engage with social issues.
  • Elitist Perspective: Trilling’s focus on literature as a medium for moral and cultural education can be criticized as elitist, suggesting a top-down approach to culture that values high literature as a moral guide for the masses.
  • Neglect of Non-Western Literatures: By focusing primarily on Western literary traditions, Trilling may be criticized for not acknowledging the rich literary and cultural traditions outside the Western canon that also explore complex social and moral issues.
  • Underestimation of Audience Engagement: His view might underestimate the ability of readers to engage with complex social issues in literature without the traditional narrative structures he champions.
  • Potential Misinterpretation of Historical Context: Critics might argue that Trilling imposes contemporary moral and cultural interpretations on historical literature, potentially distorting the original contexts and meanings of those works.
Suggested Readings: “Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling
  1. Berman, Marshall. All That is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. Verso, 1982.
  2. Kirsch, Adam. Why Trilling Matters. Yale University Press, 2011.
  3. Leitch, Vincent B. American Literary Criticism Since the 1930s. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2010.
  4. Longstaff, Charles. The Role of the Intellectual in Public Bureaucracy: Lionel Trilling and the Critic’s Mandate. Nova Science Publishers, 2008.
  5. Menand, Louis. The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University. W.W. Norton & Company, 2010.
  6. Poirier, Richard. Lionel Trilling: And the Fate of Cultural Criticism. Northwestern University Press, 1987.
  7. Quirk, Tom. Lionel Trilling and the End of Romanticism. Southern Illinois University Press, 1999.
  8. Rawlings, Peter. American Theorists of the Novel: Henry James, Lionel Trilling and Wayne C. Booth. Routledge, 2006.
Representative Quotations from “Manners, Morals and the Novel” by Lionel Trilling with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“What I understand by manners, then, is a culture’s hum and buzz of implication.”Trilling expands the definition of “manners” beyond mere social etiquette to encompass the broader, often unspoken cultural norms that subtly influence behavior and social dynamics.
“The right way to begin to deal with such a subject is to gather together as much of its detail as we possibly can.”Emphasizes the importance of comprehensively understanding cultural nuances to fully grasp the societal implications of literature.
“All literature tends to be concerned with the question of reality—I mean quite simply the old opposition between reality and appearance.”Trilling highlights a central theme in literary analysis, the distinction between what things are and what they seem to be, which is a recurrent exploration in literature.
“The novel, then, is a perpetual quest for reality, the field of its research being always the social world.”Defines the novel’s primary function as exploring and reflecting the social realities of its time, thereby acting as a tool for societal reflection and critique.
“It is the peculiar vice not of aristocratic societies…but of bourgeois democratic societies.”Discusses snobbery as a distinctive feature of modern democratic societies, contrasting it with the class pride of aristocratic systems, thus critiquing contemporary social structures.
“We make public demands for love, for we know that broad social feeling should be infused with warmth…”Criticizes the superficial engagement with societal issues, arguing that true engagement requires a deeper, more genuine emotional investment.
“The very people who talk most about class and its evils think that Fitzgerald was bedazzled and Hemingway right.”Challenges the simplistic and often hypocritical views of social class held by literary critics and readers, urging a more nuanced understanding.
“For our time the most effective agent of the moral imagination has been the novel of the last two hundred years.”Trilling asserts the novel’s unique power in shaping moral and ethical sensibilities, emphasizing its role in the development of individual and collective moral consciousness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *