“New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard: Summary and Critique

“New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard first appeared in 2010 in the journal Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment (ISLE), published by Oxford University Press.

"New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism" by Greta Gaard: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard

“New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard first appeared in 2010 in the journal Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment (ISLE), published by Oxford University Press. This seminal essay reflects Gaard’s advocacy for integrating deeper feminist perspectives into ecocriticism, a field which had historically marginalized feminist and ecofeminist voices. Gaard critiques the omission of feminist analysis in canonical ecocritical texts and argues for an inclusive framework that incorporates gender, species, and sexuality into environmental criticism. Her work highlights the importance of acknowledging the intersectionality between environmental justice, gender equality, and speciesism. The essay has since been recognized as a key contribution to both literature and literary theory, urging scholars to expand their ecological critiques beyond traditional environmental and conservation concerns to embrace feminist and ecofeminist ideologies.

Summary of “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard

1. Historical Marginalization of Feminist and Ecofeminist Perspectives in Ecocriticism

Gaard opens her essay by addressing the historical sidelining of feminist and ecofeminist perspectives in the field of ecocriticism. Despite ecofeminism being a significant contributor to the environmental turn in literary studies, it is often backgrounded or omitted in key ecocritical works.

  • “Ecofeminism has been ‘one of the catalysts’ for ‘the environmental turn in literary studies,’ yet… it is curiously omitted or marginalized.”
  • Gaard critiques key texts, such as Lawrence Buell’s The Future of Environmental Criticism and Greg Garrard’s Ecocriticism, for not adequately incorporating ecofeminist perspectives, noting that “Buell’s historical narrative… backgrounds or omits ecofeminism.”

2. Calls for Reclaiming Ecofeminist Contributions to Ecocriticism

Gaard argues for the necessity of reclaiming ecofeminist contributions to the field of ecocriticism. Feminist ecocritics, she contends, must correct the historical narrative that often erases or distorts the contributions of ecofeminist scholars.

  • “The first task for feminist ecocritics involves recuperating the large history of feminist ecocriticism and the contributions of ecofeminist literary criticism within ecocritical thinking.”
  • Gaard stresses that ecofeminist scholarship, such as the works of “Carol Adams, Deane Curtin, and Josephine Donovan”, should be more integrated into mainstream ecocritical discussions.

3. Addressing the Intersectionality of Feminism, Speciesism, and Ecocriticism

Gaard emphasizes the importance of intersectionality within ecofeminism, particularly how feminist concerns with gender, speciesism, and environmental justice intersect with ecological critiques.

  • “The animal studies groundwork of vegan feminists and ecofeminists is barely mentioned in the currently celebrated field of posthumanism… Feminist scholarship both predates and helpfully complicates that work.”
  • She also highlights how ecofeminist perspectives critique the exploitation of both women and non-human animals, a theme often neglected in broader ecocritical discourse.

4. Critique of the “Wave” Narrative in Feminism and Ecocriticism

Gaard critiques the “wave” narrative used to describe the history of both feminism and ecocriticism. She argues that the wave model simplifies and erases the contributions of ecofeminism and feminists of color.

  • “The ‘wave’ narrative of feminism… erases the histories of Indigenous women, African-American women, Chicanas, Asian-Americans, and other feminists.”
  • Gaard calls for a more nuanced understanding of feminist and ecofeminist contributions to both fields, proposing instead a model that recognizes “the intersections of race, class, gender, and sexuality” in ecocritical history.

5. The Role of Feminists in Environmental Justice Movements

Gaard discusses the significant role that feminists and ecofeminists have played in shaping the environmental justice movement, despite being frequently left out of its historical narrative. Feminists have been integral to environmental justice, particularly at the grassroots level.

  • “It was feminists who sparked the Diversity Caucus… and feminists who took on the leadership.”
  • She points out that although environmental justice initially foregrounded race and class issues, ecofeminists have contributed to expanding the conversation to include gender and species concerns.

6. Ecofeminism and Sexual Justice

Gaard highlights the growing intersections between ecofeminism and sexual justice, exploring how ecofeminist theory can address issues of reproductive justice, queer ecologies, and sexual violence.

  • “An ecofeminist theory of sexual justice has already taken root in… Rachel Stein’s strategic attempt to reframe sexuality studies within the context of environmental justice ecocriticism.”
  • She discusses how ecofeminism can broaden the scope of environmental justice to include sexualities and explore feminist theories on the exploitation of women and nature.

7. Interspecies Eco/Feminist Ecocriticism

Gaard calls for the development of an interspecies focus within feminist ecocriticism, bringing attention to how humans’ treatment of animals mirrors their treatment of marginalized groups.

  • “Ecofeminism and feminist ecocriticism will need to articulate an interspecies focus… bringing forward the vegetarian and vegan feminist threads that have been developing since the nineteenth century.”
  • She encourages ecocritics to examine how literary texts depict animals and question the anthropocentric assumptions that often underlie these portrayals.

8. Expanding the Ecocritical Framework to Include Cross-Cultural and Global Perspectives

Gaard stresses the need for ecofeminists to develop more cross-cultural ecofeminist literatures and practices. She points to examples of ecofeminist movements in Asia and Latin America as vital contributions to global ecofeminism.

  • “Ecofeminists should seek out, build relationships with, and support cultural border-crossers whose values and goals coincide with the values and goals of feminism and ecofeminism.”
  • She underscores the importance of recognizing diverse cultural contexts when developing ecofeminist ethics and literary criticism.

9. Feminist Ecopsychology as a New Direction

Gaard advocates for a feminist approach to ecopsychology, challenging the traditional, male-dominated narrative of the field and emphasizing the relational identities that link humans, animals, and ecosystems.

  • “A feminist ecopsychology would build on the early work of feminist psychologists… and explore the ways that a feminist relational identity is developed in conjunction with connections to humans, place, plants, and species alike.”
  • She critiques the exclusion of gender, class, race, and sexuality in mainstream ecopsychology and calls for more inclusive perspectives.

10. Advancing Ecofeminist Ecoregionalism

Gaard connects ecofeminism with ecoregionalism, advocating for place-based activism that acknowledges the interconnectedness of humans, animals, and the environment. She stresses the importance of local activism that is rooted in community and rejects hierarchical structures.

  • “Ecofeminist ecoregionalism advances the analyses of feminisms, bioregionalisms, and social movements of ‘globalization from below.’”
  • Gaard advocates for restructuring power dynamics in communities to create more sustainable and inclusive forms of local governance and environmental care.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard
Literary Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationUsage/Importance in Gaard’s Essay
EcofeminismA theoretical and activist movement linking ecological concerns with feminist critiques of patriarchy.Central to Gaard’s argument, ecofeminism critiques the interconnected oppression of women, nature, and animals, advocating for gender and environmental justice.
EcocriticismThe study of literature and the environment, focusing on the relationship between human culture and the natural world.Gaard critiques traditional ecocriticism for sidelining feminist and ecofeminist perspectives, arguing for an expanded approach that includes gender, species, and sexuality.
IntersectionalityThe idea that different social identities (gender, race, class, sexuality, etc.) intersect and shape experiences of oppression or privilege.Gaard stresses the need for an intersectional approach in ecocriticism, linking feminism, speciesism, race, and sexuality in environmental discourse.
PosthumanismA theoretical framework that challenges human-centered views of the world and examines the agency of non-human entities.Gaard critiques posthumanism for neglecting ecofeminist foundations, emphasizing that ecofeminism predates and complicates posthumanist discussions of human/non-human relations.
Interspecies CriticismA critique that examines the relationship between humans and other animal species, often challenging speciesism.Gaard calls for an interspecies focus within ecofeminism, highlighting how the treatment of animals reflects broader patterns of domination and oppression.
Wave MetaphorA historical framework used to describe the development of feminism in waves (first wave, second wave, third wave, etc.).Gaard critiques the wave metaphor for erasing the contributions of ecofeminism and feminists of color, advocating for a more inclusive historical model.
BioregionalismA philosophical and political approach that emphasizes living in harmony with the natural characteristics of a specific region.Gaard connects bioregionalism with ecofeminism, advocating for localized, place-based activism that considers the interconnectedness of people, animals, and the environment.
Queer EcocriticismA critical approach that explores the intersections of queer theory and environmental criticism.Gaard explores how ecofeminism intersects with queer theory, particularly in addressing sexual justice and the connections between species, gender, and sexuality.
Reproductive JusticeA framework that links reproductive rights with broader social justice issues such as environmental health and gender equality.Gaard argues that ecofeminism can contribute to discussions of reproductive justice, connecting environmental degradation with reproductive health and rights.
EcophobiaA term describing fear or hostility toward the natural world, often manifesting as anthropocentrism or speciesism.Gaard references Simon Estok’s work on ecophobia to highlight the anthropocentric and speciesist tendencies in ecocriticism, urging for more inclusive ecological perspectives.
Material FeminismA branch of feminism that focuses on the material conditions of gender oppression, including environmental and bodily factors.Gaard aligns ecofeminism with material feminism, advocating for attention to the material impacts of environmental degradation on marginalized bodies and communities.
Ethical Contexts/ContentsThe ethical frameworks that guide decision-making, often influenced by cultural and historical contexts.Gaard discusses the importance of ethical contexts in ecofeminism, emphasizing that cross-cultural ecofeminist ethics must account for different historical and environmental contexts.
Sexual JusticeThe pursuit of fairness and equality in issues related to gender and sexuality, often linked to broader social justice concerns.Gaard proposes an ecofeminist theory of sexual justice that examines the intersections of environmental degradation, gender, and sexual exploitation.
Contribution of “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Expansion of Ecocriticism to Include Feminist and Ecofeminist Perspectives

Gaard’s essay is a critical intervention in ecocriticism, challenging its historical omission of feminist and ecofeminist perspectives. She critiques canonical texts within the field, such as Lawrence Buell’s The Future of Environmental Criticism and Greg Garrard’s Ecocriticism, for marginalizing ecofeminism.

  • “Despite ecofeminism being ‘one of the catalysts’ for the environmental turn in literary studies… Buell’s historical narrative of environmental literary criticism curiously backgrounds or omits ecofeminism.”
  • This contribution advocates for an inclusive ecocritical framework that integrates feminist concerns, thereby expanding the field beyond traditional environmental and conservationist critiques.

2. Intersectional Approach to Ecocriticism

Gaard’s work introduces intersectionality as a crucial lens for ecocriticism, particularly by emphasizing the interconnectedness of gender, species, race, class, and sexuality in environmental issues.

  • “An inclusive narrative of ecocritical history will recognize that each development contains, moves forward, augments, and interrogates the developments that precede it.”
  • Gaard urges ecocritics to adopt intersectionality as a core part of their analysis, suggesting that ecological and social justice issues cannot be fully understood without considering how different forms of oppression intersect.

3. Critique of the “Wave” Metaphor in Feminist and Ecocritical Histories

Gaard critiques the “wave” metaphor commonly used in feminist and ecocritical histories, which she argues oversimplifies and erases the contributions of feminists of color and ecofeminists.

  • “The ‘wave’ narrative of feminisms… erases the histories of Indigenous women, African-American women, Chicanas, Asian-Americans, and other feminists.”
  • Gaard calls for a new historical framework that acknowledges the ongoing and simultaneous contributions of various feminist perspectives, including ecofeminism, to the development of both feminism and ecocriticism.

4. Development of an Interspecies Criticism

One of the essay’s key contributions is its call for the development of an interspecies focus within ecofeminism and ecocriticism. Gaard highlights the parallels between the oppression of women and non-human animals, urging scholars to critique speciesism alongside sexism and other forms of oppression.

  • “In the near future, ecofeminism and feminist ecocriticism will need to articulate an interspecies focus within ecocriticism, bringing forward the vegetarian and vegan feminist threads that have been a developing part of feminist and ecological feminist theories since the nineteenth century.”
  • This approach extends ecofeminism’s critique of patriarchal domination to the treatment of animals, challenging anthropocentrism and promoting a more inclusive ecological ethics.

5. Connection Between Ecofeminism and Sexual Justice

Gaard’s essay makes significant contributions to the emerging intersections between ecofeminism and sexual justice. She examines how ecofeminist theory can address issues of sexual exploitation, reproductive justice, and the rights of LGBTQ+ communities.

  • “An ecofeminist theory of sexual justice has already taken root… examining the political and ecological dimensions of reproductive technologies and ideologies from an ecofeminist perspective.”
  • This contribution emphasizes the need for an intersectional approach to sexual justice that links environmental health, gender equality, and reproductive rights, expanding the scope of ecofeminism.

6. Critique of Posthumanism from an Ecofeminist Perspective

Gaard critiques posthumanism for neglecting the foundational contributions of ecofeminism to the critique of human exceptionalism and speciesism. She argues that ecofeminism predates and complicates the discussions in posthumanist theory.

  • “The animal studies groundwork of vegan feminists and ecofeminists is barely mentioned in the currently celebrated field of posthumanism… Feminist scholarship both predates and helpfully complicates that work.”
  • By linking ecofeminism to posthumanism, Gaard calls for a more inclusive and nuanced approach to critiquing human-centered views, one that acknowledges the interconnected oppression of women, animals, and nature.

7. Reintegration of Place-Based and Cross-Cultural Ecofeminism

Gaard highlights the importance of bioregionalism and place-based activism in ecofeminism, linking these concepts to larger global concerns such as environmental degradation, cultural preservation, and local governance.

  • “Ecofeminist ecoregionalism advances the analyses of those feminisms, bioregionalisms, and social movements of ‘globalization from below.’”
  • She also emphasizes the need for cross-cultural ecofeminist ethics, arguing that different cultural contexts must be considered when developing feminist and ecofeminist perspectives, thus contributing to a more global and contextually aware literary theory.

8. Call for a Feminist Ecopsychology

Gaard introduces the idea of a feminist ecopsychology, critiquing the male-dominated origins of the field and advocating for an approach that explores the relational identities formed through connections to nature, place, and non-human species.

  • “A feminist ecopsychology would build on the early work of feminist psychologists… and explore the ways that a feminist relational identity is developed in conjunction with connections to humans, place, plants, and species alike.”
  • This contribution challenges the traditional assumptions of ecopsychology and opens new avenues for exploring how ecological and psychological well-being are linked, particularly for marginalized groups.

References from the Article:

  1. “Ecofeminism has been ‘one of the catalysts’ for the environmental turn in literary studies… Buell’s historical narrative of environmental literary criticism curiously backgrounds or omits ecofeminism.”
  2. “The ‘wave’ narrative of feminisms… erases the histories of Indigenous women, African-American women, Chicanas, Asian-Americans, and other feminists.”
  3. “An ecofeminist theory of sexual justice has already taken root… examining the political and ecological dimensions of reproductive technologies and ideologies from an ecofeminist perspective.”
  4. “In the near future, ecofeminism and feminist ecocriticism will need to articulate an interspecies focus within ecocriticism.”
  5. “Ecofeminist ecoregionalism advances the analyses of those feminisms, bioregionalisms, and social movements of ‘globalization from below.’”
Examples of Critiques Through “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard
Literary WorkCritique through EcofeminismRelevant Concepts from Gaard’s Essay
Mary Austin’s The Land of Little RainThrough an ecofeminist lens, Austin’s work can be critiqued for how it engages with gender and the desert landscape. Austin’s depictions of nature reflect an ecological consciousness but avoid critiquing patriarchal narratives that link the land to the feminine in a passive, submissive way.Ecofeminism and Place Studies: Gaard would highlight the importance of reclaiming women’s agency in place-based narratives rather than reinforcing gendered depictions of land as “feminine.”
Rachel Carson’s Silent SpringAlthough Carson’s work is a powerful ecological critique, it lacks an intersectional focus on gender and species oppression. Gaard would critique the absence of a feminist and interspecies perspective, noting that Carson doesn’t fully explore the impact of environmental degradation on women and animals.Interspecies Criticism and Intersectionality: Gaard would urge for an analysis that connects environmental destruction to gender and species hierarchies.
William Faulkner’s The BearFaulkner’s story of human dominance over nature can be critiqued from an ecofeminist perspective for reinforcing patriarchal and anthropocentric values. The tale reflects human attempts to control and conquer the environment, without acknowledging the interconnectedness of gender, species, and environmental exploitation.Anthropocentrism and Patriarchy: Gaard’s ecofeminist critique would address the lack of attention to the way human domination over nature mirrors gender oppression.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s HerlandWhile Herland explores a feminist utopia, it can be critiqued for not sufficiently addressing the intersection of gender and environmental ethics. Gaard would critique the text’s portrayal of a gendered society that doesn’t fully explore ecofeminist concerns, especially with regards to species and ecological relationships.Ecofeminism and Gender/Sexuality: Gaard would focus on how Herland overlooks the connections between feminism and ecological consciousness, particularly in terms of species relations.

Key Concepts from Gaard’s New Directions For Ecofeminism Used in the Critiques:
  1. Ecofeminism and Place Studies: Gaard critiques depictions of nature that reinforce patriarchal ideas of the land as passive or feminine.
  2. Interspecies Criticism and Intersectionality: Gaard emphasizes the need for critiques that link environmental degradation to the oppression of both women and animals.
  3. Anthropocentrism and Patriarchy: Gaard critiques texts that promote human-centered (anthropocentric) perspectives, which often mirror patriarchal domination.
  4. Ecofeminism and Gender/Sexuality: Gaard critiques works that fail to explore how feminist concerns intersect with environmental and species issues, particularly in utopian or speculative literature.
Criticism Against “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard

  • Overemphasis on Gender and Species Intersectionality
  • Critics may argue that Gaard’s focus on gender and species intersectionality, while important, could overshadow other crucial elements in ecocriticism, such as race, class, and global economic systems. This emphasis might limit the broader scope of ecocriticism by making it overly specialized.
  • Insufficient Engagement with Broader Ecocritical Perspectives
  • Gaard critiques established works within ecocriticism, such as those by Lawrence Buell and Greg Garrard, for sidelining feminist perspectives. However, critics might argue that she does not fully engage with the broader ecocritical discourse, which may have developed significant contributions in areas other than ecofeminism.
  • Risk of Essentialism in Ecofeminism
  • Some may criticize Gaard’s reliance on ecofeminism for potentially falling into essentialist thinking. By linking women and nature too closely, critics could argue that Gaard reinforces stereotypes that women have a “natural” connection to the environment, which could limit the complexity of feminist critique.
  • Limited Focus on Practical Activism
  • Although Gaard’s work emphasizes the importance of feminist activism within environmental justice movements, critics may argue that her focus remains too theoretical and lacks specific guidance on how ecofeminist principles can be practically applied in activism or policymaking.
  • Exclusion of Non-Western Feminist Ecocriticism
  • Gaard’s essay is primarily concerned with Western feminist and ecofeminist critiques. Critics might argue that she neglects to sufficiently engage with non-Western perspectives on ecofeminism, limiting the global relevance of her theoretical framework.
  • Narrow Definition of Ecofeminism
  • Some scholars may argue that Gaard’s definition of ecofeminism is narrow and excludes other feminist perspectives that could contribute to ecological discussions, such as Marxist feminism or Indigenous ecofeminist traditions, which offer alternative ways of understanding the connections between gender and ecology.
  • Potential for Alienation within Ecocriticism
  • Critics could argue that Gaard’s strong focus on feminist and ecofeminist concerns risks alienating scholars within the broader ecocritical community who do not prioritize gender or species issues in their work, potentially limiting the essay’s appeal to a wider audience.

Representative Quotations from “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard with Explanation
QuotationExplanationCitation
“Ecofeminism has been ‘one of the catalysts’ for the environmental turn in literary studies…”Gaard highlights the role of ecofeminism in shaping the development of ecocriticism, even though it has been marginalized in many accounts of ecocritical history.(Gaard, 2010, p. 1)
“The first task for feminist ecocritics involves recuperating the large history of feminist ecocriticism…”Gaard calls for the reclamation of ecofeminism’s contributions to ecocriticism, addressing how feminist perspectives have been overlooked in both literary criticism and environmental activism.(Gaard, 2010, p. 1)
“Buell’s historical narrative of environmental literary criticism curiously backgrounds or omits ecofeminism…”This critique of Lawrence Buell’s work underscores how ecofeminism is sidelined in mainstream ecocritical discourse, even when it has been pivotal in shaping the field.(Gaard, 2010, p. 2)
“An inclusive narrative of ecocritical history will recognize that each development… interrogates what precedes it.”Gaard advocates for a more inclusive and layered understanding of ecocritical history, one that integrates feminist, ecofeminist, and intersectional perspectives.(Gaard, 2010, p. 4)
“The ‘wave’ narrative of feminisms… erases the histories of Indigenous women, African-American women, Chicanas…”Gaard critiques the “wave” metaphor in feminism for erasing the contributions of feminists of color, arguing that this same framework is replicated in ecocritical history.(Gaard, 2010, p. 3)
“Ecofeminist values oppose all forms of hierarchy and domination, and environmental justice is a movement challenging… the colonization of nature and marginalized humans.”Gaard connects ecofeminism to environmental justice, showing how both movements share a common goal of resisting various forms of oppression, including racial, gender, and environmental exploitation.(Gaard, 2010, p. 5)
“An ecofeminist theory of sexual justice has already taken root… exploring the intersections of ecofeminism and queer theory.”Gaard introduces the idea of sexual justice within ecofeminism, highlighting how ecofeminism can contribute to understanding the links between environmental justice, reproductive rights, and sexuality.(Gaard, 2010, p. 6)
“In the near future, ecofeminism and feminist ecocriticism will need to articulate an interspecies focus…”Gaard emphasizes the need for ecofeminism to focus on the interconnectedness of human and non-human species, critiquing speciesism and advancing interspecies ethics.(Gaard, 2010, p. 8)
“The space program is ‘an oversized literalization of the masculine transcendent idea… an attempt to achieve selfhood freed… from the pull of the Earth, of mater, dependence on the mother, the body.'”Gaard critiques the masculinist ideology behind space exploration, linking it to the patriarchal desire to transcend nature and the body, reinforcing ecofeminism’s critique of domination over the Earth.(Gaard, 2010, p. 16)
“Rather than despair, I would like to build on Adamson and Slovic’s wild optimism.”Despite the challenges faced by ecofeminism, Gaard remains hopeful about the potential for expanding ecocritical discourse to include more intersectional and feminist perspectives.(Gaard, 2010, p. 7)
Suggested Readings: “New Directions For Ecofeminism: Toward A More Feminist Ecocriticism” by Greta Gaard
  1. Gaard, Greta. “Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-Placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism.” Feminist Formations, vol. 23, no. 2, 2011, pp. 26–53. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41301655. Accessed 22 Oct. 2024.
  2. Gaard, Greta. “New Directions for Ecofeminism: Toward a More Feminist Ecocriticism.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, vol. 17, no. 4, 2010, pp. 643–65. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44087661. Accessed 22 Oct. 2024.
  3. Estok, Simon C. “An Introduction to ‘Ecocritical Approaches to Food and Literature in East Asia’: The Special Cluster.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, vol. 19, no. 4, 2012, pp. 681–90. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44087162. Accessed 22 Oct. 2024.
  4. Gaard, Greta. “Toward a Queer Ecofeminism.” Hypatia, vol. 12, no. 1, 1997, pp. 114–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810254. Accessed 22 Oct. 2024.
  5. Gaard, Greta. “Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, 2002, pp. 117–46. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3347337. Accessed 22 Oct. 2024.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *