Objectification in Literature & Literary Theory

Etymology of Objectification

Table of Contents

The term “objectification” gained prominence in late 20th-century philosophical and sociological discourse, notably through Simone de Beauvoir’s groundbreaking work, The Second Sex published in 1949. Martha Nussbaum further developed this concept in her book Sex and Social Justice published in 1999.

Rooted in these academic contributions, objectification refers to the reduction of a person, often women, to the status of an object, frequently for sexual or aesthetic gratification, effectively stripping them of their subjective agency and humanity.

This concept continues to be a focal point in gender studies, ethics, and social psychology, shedding light on the intricate interplay between culture, power dynamics, and individual identity.

Meanings of Objectification

Aspect	Meanings
Character	The portrayal of characters as mere objects or symbols, devoid of depth or agency, often for thematic or allegorical purposes.
Narrative	The treatment of elements within a narrative, such as objects, settings, or even other characters, as symbolic entities with reduced autonomy serve primarily as tools for storytelling.
Authorial	The distancing of the author from the narrative or characters, emphasizes the text’s autonomy over the author’s personal perspective or intention.
Readerly Objectification	The process by which readers may reduce characters or elements in a text to simplistic stereotypes or overlook their complexity, potentially reinforcing objectification themes present in the work.
Feminist Literary	The examination of how literature can reinforce or challenge societal objectification of women, often addressing issues of gender, power, and representation.
Postcolonial Literary	The analysis of how literature can perpetuate or critique colonialist objectification of cultures and people, explores themes of identity, imperialism, and resistance.

Definition of Objectification as a Theoretical Term

Objectification, as a theoretical term, refers to the process of reducing individuals, typically women, to the status of objects or commodities, stripping them of their subjective agency and inherent humanity.

It often manifests in media, literature, or societal practices where individuals are portrayed primarily for their physical attributes or as mere symbols, reinforcing harmful stereotypes and power imbalances.

In feminist theory and critical discourse, objectification is analyzed as a mechanism that perpetuates gender inequality and dehumanizes individuals through the lens of object-like qualities.

Objectification: Theorists, Works, and Arguments

Origin of Objectification:

The term “objectification” gained prominence in late 20th-century philosophical and sociological discourse, particularly through feminist theory and critical scholarship. It emerged as a crucial concept in discussions about the dehumanization and reduction of individuals, especially women, to the status of objects or commodities.

Key Theorists:

Simone de Beauvoir: A pioneering feminist philosopher, Simone de Beauvoir, is renowned for her seminal work, The Second Sex (1949). In this groundbreaking book, she critically examined the objectification of women in society and delved into its profound implications for gender inequality and women’s oppression.
Martha Nussbaum: A contemporary philosopher, Martha Nussbaum, explored the concept of objectification in her essay “Objectification,” which is a part of her book Sex and Social Justice (1999). Nussbaum’s work focuses on the philosophical dimensions, especially concerning issues of sexual objectification and the ethical concerns it raises.

Notable Works:

Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex (1949): This groundbreaking work provides a comprehensive analysis of this concept regarding women in society. It explores how women have historically been treated as objects and delves into the implications of this objectification on gender inequality and women’s liberation.
Martha Nussbaum’s Sex and Social Justice (1999): Nussbaum’s essay “Objectification” in this book offers a philosophical examination of the concept. It explores various aspects of objectification, including its ethical dimensions and its effects on human dignity and justice.

Key Arguments in Objectification Theory:

Reduction to Object Status: It involves the reduction of individuals, particularly women, to the status of objects or commodities. It emphasizes their physical attributes over their agency or humanity, treating them as objects of desire, adornment, or utility.

Reinforcement of Gender Inequality: It perpetuates gender inequality by reinforcing harmful stereotypes and power imbalances. It limits the opportunities and autonomy of those who are objectified, contributing to their marginalization and devaluation.
Necessity of Recognition and Challenge: Recognizing and challenging it is essential for achieving social justice, gender equality, and human dignity in contemporary society. This involves not only critiquing objectification in media, literature, and everyday life but also advocating for changes in societal norms and practices that perpetuate it. It is a critical step towards dismantling oppressive systems and fostering a more equitable and just society.

Objectification and Literary Theories

Objectification is a central concept in feminist literary theory. Feminist scholars analyze how literature often objectifies women by reducing them to mere symbols, sexual objects, or stereotypes. They examine how female characters are portrayed and how their agency and complexity are often overshadowed by their physical attributes or roles in relation to male characters. Feminist literary theory aims to expose and challenge these objectifying representations to promote a more nuanced and equitable portrayal of women in literature.

In Marxist literary theory, objectification can be seen in the way characters are depicted as commodities or as products of their social and economic circumstances. Literary works are examined for how they reflect and critique capitalist systems that objectify individuals by reducing them to their economic worth or social class.
Marxist theorists explore how literature can reveal the dehumanizing effects of objectification within a capitalist society.Postcolonial literary theory examines how literature can perpetuate or critique the objectification of cultures and peoples in the context of colonialism and imperialism. It explores how colonial narratives often reduce colonized people and their cultures to exotic stereotypes or objects of conquest. Postcolonial theorists seek to deconstruct these objectifying representations and reclaim agency and identity for marginalized groups
Psychoanalytic theory, as developed by Sigmund Freud and later theorists, delves into the psychological aspects of objectification. It explores how literary works can manifest and analyze the unconscious desires and objectifying tendencies of characters. This perspective can reveal how objectification operates on a psychological level, affecting both the characters within the narrative and the reader’s interpretation.

Objectification also plays a role in reader-response theory, which focuses on how readers engage with and interpret literary texts. Readers may objectify characters or elements within a text by reducing them to simplistic symbols or judgments. Reader-response theorists examine how different readers may approach objectification differently and how it influences their interpretation of the text.

Objectification in Literary Criticism

by Margaret Atwood (1985): In Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, objectification is a central theme. The story is set in a totalitarian society where women are reduced to their reproductive function and treated as objects of the state. Literary critics have explored how the author critiques patriarchal power structures and religious extremism through the objectification of women. This novel is often analyzed in feminist literary criticism for its portrayal of female characters as objects of control and reproduction.
by Bret Easton Ellis (1991): Bret Easton Ellis’s controversial novel American Psycho offers a complex examination of objectification, particularly through the lens of violence and consumerism. Literary critics have debated the extent to which the novel objectifies women and the protagonist’s obsession with appearances and materialism. The work has been scrutinized within the context of postmodernism and the dehumanizing effects of consumer culture.

by Amy Tan (1989): In Amy Tan’s novel The Joy Luck Club, objectification is explored in the context of cultural identity and generational conflicts. Critics have examined how the characters grapple with being objectified or stereotyped based on their Chinese heritage by both Western society and their own families. The novel is often discussed in the context of postcolonial and multicultural literary criticism, highlighting issues of cultural objectification and assimilation.
by Toni Morrison (1987): Toni Morrison’s Beloved explores this with reference to African American slaves during and after the era of slavery. Critics have analyzed the novel’s portrayal of the dehumanizing effects of slavery and how characters are objectified by both the institution of slavery and society at large. Literary criticism of Beloved often intersects with postcolonial and African American literature studies, emphasizing the importance of reclaiming agency and humanity in the face of historical objectification.

In each of these works, literary criticism can examine how it operates on various levels, whether through gender, cultural, or racial dynamics. Critics may explore how these authors challenge or reinforce

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	31