“Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom: Summary and Critique

Introduction: “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

“Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom first appeared in 1975 in the journal Critical Inquiry, is considered a seminal work in literary theory, particularly within the framework of American Romanticism. Bloom argues that poets engage in a process of “revisionism” against their predecessors, striving to assert their originality and poetic authority. This revisionism, however, often involves the “repression” of earlier poetic influences, which are subsequently internalized and transformed within the poet’s own work. Bloom’s essay has been influential in shaping our understanding of poetic influence, intertextuality, and the dynamics of literary tradition. It continues to be a valuable resource for scholars and students of literature.

Summary of “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

• Introduction of Key Concepts
  Bloom opens the essay by interrogating the relationship between psyche and text, framing poetry as a battlefield where authentic forces struggle for victory over oblivion. He emphasizes the psychoanalytical framework, notably the “psyche,” “text,” and “represented,” as key terms, arguing that poetry is not self-contained but continuously woven into the broader fabric of literary tradition.
• The Will of the Strong Poet
  Bloom describes strong poets as those driven by desire, a concept he attributes to Nietzsche’s philosophy. He argues that poets, particularly the strong ones, are engaged in a search for pleasure rather than truth, leading to a continuous process of interpreting past works in ways that serve their personal artistic visions. This revisionism is not a simple act of homage, but an essential struggle against the past, a battle for originality and survival in the literary canon.
• Poetry as a Form of Rewriting
  In Bloom’s view, every poem is inherently a “rewriting” of previous works, meaning that no poem can claim true autonomy. He introduces the idea of “poetic misprision,” where poets creatively misread their precursors to assert their individuality. This echoes Freud’s concept of “retroactive meaningfulness,” wherein meaning is constructed by selecting and repressing influences from prior texts.
• Intertextuality and Influence
  Drawing on the theories of Vico and Freud, Bloom outlines how poets are always belated—born into a literary tradition they cannot escape. Every poet must repress the weight of precursors, but in doing so, they create their own unique, exaggerated style that becomes their signature. The act of revision, whether conscious or subconscious, is central to poetic creation.
• The Role of Rhetoric and Tropes in Poetry
  Bloom emphasizes the importance of rhetoric in poetry, especially through the use of tropes such as irony, metonymy, and hyperbole. He contends that rhetoric is not merely a tool of persuasion but a mode of survival in the world of literary competition. Poets use these devices to revise and reinterpret the works of their predecessors, which he aligns with Vico’s idea that “ignorance is the mother of wonder.”
• Defense Mechanisms in Poetry
  He links poetic creation to psychic defense mechanisms, suggesting that poets engage in a process of repression and substitution that mirrors Freud’s concept of defense against instincts. For Bloom, poetry involves “defensive processes,” where strong poets must continually wrestle with their influences to forge new meanings.
• Gnosticism and Revisionism
  Bloom draws parallels between Gnosticism and poetic misprision, arguing that strong poets, much like Gnostics, seek to rewrite and reinterpret traditional narratives to claim authority over their creative output. This revisionism is presented as a struggle for poetic freedom, an attempt to transcend the limitations imposed by history and tradition.
• The Sublime and the Strong Poet
  Bloom concludes by exploring the concept of the Sublime, identifying Milton and Satan in Paradise Lost as exemplars of this mode. He asserts that the strongest poets achieve a kind of “Counter-Sublime” by transforming repression into creative power. In Bloom’s framework, repression is not merely a psychological burden but a source of poetic strength that allows the poet to transcend time and tradition.

Quote from Bloom:
“Poems are not psyches, nor things…they are defensive processes in constant change, which is to say that poems themselves are acts of reading.”

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

Literary Term/Concept	Explanation	Context in Bloom’s Essay
Psyche	Refers to the human mind or soul, often linked to internal forces, desires, and instincts.	Bloom explores the psyche as a battlefield where the poet’s internal desires clash with literary tradition, driving the creative process.
Text	A woven construct, a fabrication of words that engages in continuous intertextuality.	Poetry is framed as a text that exists within a broader network of literary works, always referring to or rewriting prior texts.
Revisionism	The act of reinterpreting or rewriting earlier works to assert new meanings or personal interpretations.	Central to Bloom’s theory, where poets revise their precursors’ works to create original interpretations and assert their individuality.
Misprision	A “creative misreading” of precursor texts, where poets reinterpret earlier works to forge new meanings.	Poets must misread the works of their predecessors to create space for their own creative expression, avoiding direct imitation.
Intertextuality	The idea that all texts are interconnected, and no text exists in isolation from other literary works.	Bloom emphasizes that every poem is an inter-poem, inherently tied to a network of previous texts, thus rejecting the notion of poetic autonomy.
Poetic Repression	The poet’s need to suppress certain influences or predecessors in order to create original work.	Poets selectively repress traces of their precursors’ works to assert their own voice, but this repression is always partial, leading to a complex relationship with literary history.
Strong Poet	A poet who engages deeply with tradition and struggles to assert their individuality by creatively revising past works.	The “strong poet” dares to challenge the influence of past poets, driven by personal desire rather than the pursuit of objective truth.
Tropes	Figures of speech or rhetorical devices used to shape meaning in poetry (e.g., irony, metaphor, metonymy).	Tropes are seen as central to poetic creation, with strong poets using them to revise and reinterpret previous works, thus engaging in rhetorical revisionism.
The Sublime	A concept in literature that refers to overwhelming grandeur or emotional intensity, often linked to transcendence.	Bloom discusses how strong poets, like Milton’s Satan, achieve the Sublime through their struggle with tradition, leading to a heightened, often paradoxical, form of poetic expression.
Nachträglichkeit (Retroactive Meaning)	A Freudian term referring to the process by which later events give new meanings to earlier ones.	Bloom applies this concept to poetry, where later poets reinterpret earlier works in ways that create new meanings for both the precursor and the later poet’s own work.
Rhetoric	The art of persuasion through language, often employing figures of speech or argumentation.	Bloom argues that rhetoric is central to poetry, with poets using it not just for persuasion but as a means of defending their originality and resisting the influence of their precursors.
Clinamen	A swerve or deviation in literary creation, a concept borrowed from Lucretius to describe the act of misreading or revision.	Bloom uses the term “clinamen” to explain how poets deviate from their precursors in order to assert their own creativity, representing the initial stage in the process of revision.
Tessera	A completion or “filling in” of the gaps left by precursor texts, often through reinterpretation or antithetical completion.	Tessera refers to the poet’s attempt to complete or respond to their precursors’ works, adding to or transforming the original text’s meaning, often in a contradictory or opposing manner.
Askesis	A process of self-restraint or reduction, often seen as a form of creative discipline in poetry.	Bloom uses “askesis” to describe how poets limit or restrain themselves to focus their creativity, often as a way of sublimating their struggle with their literary predecessors.
Daemonization	The stage where the poet intensifies their creative process, often through hyperbole, to assert their individuality.	In Bloom’s framework, daemonization represents the poet’s heightened struggle to overcome the influence of their precursors, often marked by extreme or exaggerated poetic expression.
Metalepsis (Transumption)	The substitution of one term for another, often in a complex chain of figurative associations that transforms earlier meanings.	Bloom sees metalepsis as a final trope in the revisionary process, where the poet transcends previous meanings by transforming and reinterpreting the works of their precursors in profound ways.
Freudian Repression	The psychological process of pushing desires or memories out of conscious awareness, often linked to creative expression.	Bloom relates Freudian repression to the poet’s need to suppress certain influences or aspects of their own creativity, using this suppression as a source of poetic power.

Contribution of “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Intertextuality

• Contribution: Bloom asserts that no poem is self-contained, and every poem exists in a network of interrelated texts. He emphasizes that a poem is always a “rewriting” of previous poems, building on the idea that literature is inherently dialogical.
• Reference: Bloom argues, “Any poem is an inter-poem, and any reading of a poem is an inter-reading. A poem is not writing, but rewriting, and though a strong poem is a fresh start, such a start is a starting-again” (p. 234). This statement reinforces the idea that poems are deeply enmeshed in a web of prior literary works, adding to the theory of intertextuality introduced by thinkers like Julia Kristeva and Mikhail Bakhtin.

2. Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism

• Contribution: Bloom’s exploration of repression and poetic creation is heavily influenced by Freudian psychoanalysis, particularly in terms of how poets handle their influences. He adapts the Freudian concept of repression, using it to describe how poets deal with the weight of literary precursors. Bloom links the creative process to psychic defenses, arguing that poetry is a result of both conscious and unconscious processes.
• Reference: Bloom discusses the role of repression in poetic creativity, asserting that “even the strongest poet must take up his stance within literary language” (p. 236), implying that repression of past influences is a key element in the creation of strong poetry. This connection to Freudian repression contributes to Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism, particularly how unconscious influences shape literary texts.

3. Anxiety of Influence and Revisionist Criticism

• Contribution: Bloom’s most significant contribution to literary theory is his Anxiety of Influence, which he expands on in this essay. He argues that poets are driven by a competitive relationship with their predecessors, and the act of poetic creation is a struggle to overcome the influence of earlier poets. The process of creative misreading or misprision is how a poet establishes their own originality.
• Reference: Bloom states, “The strong poet dares the error of reading all of reality as a text, and all prior texts as openings for its own totalizing and unique interpretations” (p. 233). This idea is central to his Revisionist Criticism, where poets must wrestle with and revise the works of their precursors to assert their own poetic identities. This approach influenced deconstruction and post-structuralist theories, particularly those concerning authorship and textuality.

4. Rhetorical Theory

• Contribution: Bloom situates poetry as deeply rhetorical, focusing on the use of tropes and rhetoric as key mechanisms through which poets engage in revision. He argues that poetry is not merely about meaning but about persuading the reader through rhetorical strategies, suggesting that the act of writing poetry is fundamentally rhetorical.
• Reference: He claims, “Rhetoric can be seconded only by rhetoric, for all that rhetoric can intend is more rhetoric” (p. 233). In this view, poetry becomes a persuasive system of tropes, aligning with the ancient rhetorical tradition while also contributing to modern rhetorical theory, where language is seen as a means of constructing reality.

5. Poetic Misprision as a Mechanism of Literary Development

• Contribution: Bloom’s theory of misprision—a creative misreading of past works—positions poetic creation as an inherently revisionist act. He suggests that poets must misinterpret their predecessors to create new meanings and establish their own voices.
• Reference: Bloom asserts, “This remembering is a misprision, or creative misreading, but no matter how strong a misprision, it cannot achieve an autonomy of meaning, or a meaning fully present, that is, free from all literary context” (p. 235). His theory of misprision is a crucial element of literary evolution, suggesting that literature progresses through acts of misinterpretation rather than direct influence, a concept that engages with post-structuralist notions of difference and deferral in meaning (as discussed by Derrida).

6. The Sublime in Post-Enlightenment Poetry

• Contribution: Bloom revises the notion of the Sublime, which traditionally refers to an overwhelming sense of awe or grandeur in art and literature. He argues that in the post-Enlightenment era, the Sublime is achieved through the poet’s struggle with their precursors, an inner conflict that results in hyperbolic, extreme expression.
• Reference: Bloom writes, “The strongest artists…prevail by reattaining the Sublime, though a greatly altered Sublime” (p. 247). This redefinition of the Sublime places it within the context of literary revisionism, suggesting that the Sublime is no longer about external grandeur but about internal, psychological struggle.

7. Poetic Immortality and Gnosticism

• Contribution: Bloom incorporates Gnostic philosophy into his theory of poetic creation, arguing that strong poets, like Gnostics, seek to “divine” their own origins through their work, striving for a form of poetic immortality. This aligns with the Gnostic rejection of conventional religious tradition, mirroring the poet’s rejection of literary tradition to assert originality.
• Reference: Bloom states, “A strong poet, for Vico or for us, is precisely like a gentile nation; he must divine or invent himself, and so attempt the impossibility of originating himself” (p. 237). This Gnostic approach to poetry contributes to theories of authorship and individual genius in literature, where the poet is seen as a self-creator.

Examples of Critiques Through “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

Literary Work	Critique Through Bloom’s Lens (Poetry, Revisionism, Repression)	Key Bloomian Concepts Applied
John Milton’s Paradise Lost	Milton’s depiction of Satan reflects the strong poet’s struggle to achieve the Sublime by resisting the influence of previous epic traditions (e.g., Homer, Virgil). Satan, with his rebellious and rhetorical brilliance, represents a figure who asserts himself through creative misprision, turning the traditional model of epic heroism on its head.	Sublime, Poetic Misprision, Daemonization: Satan embodies Milton’s engagement in revisionism by hyperbolically reimagining the hero, defying predecessors like Dante’s Satan.
William Wordsworth’s Prelude	Wordsworth can be viewed as revising Milton and attempting to overcome his anxiety of influence through the creation of a deeply personal and introspective epic. His repression of Milton’s grand theological scope allows him to develop a more subjective, Romantic vision of nature and self. Wordsworth’s work is an attempt to rewrite epic poetry in his own image, emphasizing human consciousness over grand cosmological themes.	Repression, Intertextuality, Anxiety of Influence: Wordsworth represses the influence of Milton to construct a more personal, psychological epic focused on individual experience.
T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land	Eliot’s intertextuality and allusive style showcase the poet’s awareness of literary precursors and his need to engage in revisionism. Through his fragmented form and collage of references, Eliot performs a creative misreading of prior texts (e.g., Dante, Shakespeare, and the Bible). His work embodies a modernist anxiety of influence, where he both draws upon and subverts the meanings of his literary heritage.	Intertextuality, Poetic Misprision, Anxiety of Influence: Eliot consciously rewrites and revises earlier texts, creating a mosaic of fragmented influences to reflect modernity’s fractured experience.
Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Ode to the West Wind	Shelley’s ode can be seen as a struggle with his Romantic precursors, particularly Wordsworth and Milton. The West Wind symbolizes a force of transformation, reflecting Shelley’s desire to assert his poetic autonomy through a powerful, elemental image. He revises Wordsworth’s naturalism by portraying nature as a revolutionary and destructive force, rather than a peaceful, pastoral presence.	Misprision, Clinamen, Revisionism: Shelley swerves from Wordsworth’s view of nature, reinterpreting it as a force for radical change, thereby asserting his own poetic vision.

Explanation of the Critiques:

1. John Milton’s Paradise Lost:
   Through Bloom’s lens, Paradise Lost is a profound example of the Sublime achieved through poetic misprision. Satan’s rhetoric and rebellious nature are a reflection of Milton’s struggle to transcend his literary predecessors (e.g., Homer, Dante). Milton’s Satan represents a daemonization of previous epic heroes, where the protagonist’s hyperbolic self-assertion becomes a method of achieving poetic strength.
2. William Wordsworth’s Prelude:
   Wordsworth’s Prelude rewrites the epic tradition by focusing on subjective experience rather than grand religious or cosmological themes. His approach reflects repression of Milton’s theological concerns, allowing Wordsworth to create a uniquely Romantic form of the epic that centers on the individual’s relationship with nature and consciousness. This repression enables Wordsworth to engage in poetic misprision by asserting his own vision against Miltonic influence.
3. T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land:
   Eliot’s The Waste Land is an exemplary text for intertextuality, in which Eliot both engages with and revises a multitude of earlier texts. His use of fragmentation, allusion, and myth reflects an intense anxiety of influence where Eliot wrestles with the overwhelming presence of literary tradition. By misreading these sources, Eliot crafts a modernist work that simultaneously acknowledges and subverts its precursors.
4. Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Ode to the West Wind:
   In Ode to the West Wind, Shelley revises the naturalism of Wordsworth by presenting nature as a transformative, revolutionary force rather than a source of tranquility. This represents a clinamen, or swerve, from the Romantic tradition, where Shelley seeks to assert his own poetic power through the imagery of the West Wind. The poem embodies Bloom’s concept of revisionism by reinterpreting nature in a more dynamic, volatile manner.

Criticism Against “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

• Overemphasis on Influence and Anxiety
  Critics argue that Bloom places too much importance on the concept of anxiety of influence, suggesting that it oversimplifies the creative process by reducing it to a struggle against predecessors. This focus diminishes other factors such as historical context, social influences, or personal experiences in the creative act.
• Neglect of Diversity in Literary Traditions
  Bloom’s theory is criticized for being overly focused on a narrow Western canon, particularly the Romantic and post-Enlightenment tradition. His exclusion of non-Western, minority, or feminist voices has been seen as limiting and outdated, ignoring the diversity of global literary traditions and how different cultural backgrounds might influence poetic creation.
• Psychological Reductionism
  Some critics contend that Bloom’s reliance on Freudian psychoanalysis to explain the poet’s creative process is overly reductive. They argue that framing poetry as a battle of repressed desires and misreadings limits the broader understanding of literary creativity and fails to account for other psychological, philosophical, or aesthetic influences beyond repression and revision.
• Elitism and Canon Worship
  Bloom’s focus on “strong poets” and his promotion of the Western literary canon have been criticized as elitist. His valorization of canonical figures (e.g., Milton, Wordsworth) tends to dismiss contemporary, experimental, or non-canonical writers, reinforcing traditional literary hierarchies rather than opening up space for new voices.
• Obscurantism and Complexity
  Some critics find Bloom’s writing unnecessarily dense, with his use of terms like misprision, daemonization, and clinamen perceived as arcane or overly complex. This has led to accusations that Bloom’s work is inaccessible and obscures rather than clarifies the process of poetic creation.
• Lack of Engagement with Formalist or Structuralist Criticism
  Bloom’s theory is often criticized for its lack of attention to formalist and structuralist concerns. By focusing predominantly on the relationship between poets and their precursors, he neglects to consider the formal and structural aspects of the text itself, such as language, syntax, and narrative technique.
• Gender Bias and Marginalization of Female Poets
  Bloom’s critical framework is seen by some as marginalizing female poets, focusing predominantly on male figures within the Western canon. His theory, critics argue, does not adequately address how female poets may engage with literary tradition and influence differently, nor does it challenge patriarchal structures within the literary canon.

Representative Quotations from “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“A poem is not writing, but rewriting, and though a strong poem is a fresh start, such a start is a starting-again.”	Bloom emphasizes that all poetry is inherently intertextual and revisionist, building on previous works rather than emerging as wholly original creations.
“The strong poet dares the error of reading all of reality as a text, and all prior texts as openings for its own totalizing and unique interpretations.”	This highlights the boldness of strong poets, who reinterpret reality and previous literary works through their personal, often unique, perspectives, turning tradition into opportunity.
“Any poem is an inter-poem, and any reading of a poem is an inter-reading.”	Bloom reinforces the idea that every poem exists within a network of other texts, denying the notion of a self-contained or isolated literary work.
“Rhetoric can be seconded only by rhetoric, for all that rhetoric can intend is more rhetoric.”	Bloom suggests that poetry is a series of rhetorical acts, and one rhetorical system can only be answered or revised by another. This places rhetoric at the heart of poetic creation.
“Even the strongest poet must take up his stance within literary language.”	A strong poet cannot escape the confines of literary tradition, but must work within it to create something new and individual through the act of revision.
“Poetry lives always under the shadow of poetry.”	This quote reflects Bloom’s belief that influence is unavoidable in poetry, and every new poem is haunted by the works of previous poets.
“Repression becomes contaminated by instinct, and so becomes compulsive and at least partly repressed, which rhetorically means hyperbolical or Sublime.”	Bloom links Freudian repression to the poetic process, arguing that repression leads to the Sublime, a heightened or exaggerated poetic expression driven by unconscious forces.
“The curse of an increased belatedness, a dangerously self-conscious belatedness, is that creative envy becomes the ecstasy, the Sublime, of the sign-system of poetic language.”	This describes how modern poets are increasingly aware of their belatedness (coming after a long literary tradition), and their creative envy manifests as intense, Sublime expression.
“Every poet is belated, that every poem is an instance of what Freud called Nachträglichkeit or ‘retroactive meaningfulness.'”	Bloom applies Freud’s notion of retroactive meaning to poetry, arguing that every poem gains significance through its relationship with, and revision of, earlier works.
“Poems are not psyches, nor things, nor are they renewable archetypes in a verbal universe… They are defensive processes in constant change.”	Bloom argues that poems are not static objects but dynamic processes, continuously evolving through revision and misprision as they engage with both the past and the present.

Explanation of the Quotations:

These quotes and their explanations showcase the core ideas of Bloom’s theory from “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression”. Central to Bloom’s framework are the concepts of revisionism, intertextuality, and repression, where strong poets engage in a struggle with their precursors, misreading and revising earlier works to assert their own creative voices. Bloom also emphasizes the dynamic and rhetorical nature of poetry, asserting that it is always a process of rewriting and reinterpretation rather than an isolated act of creation.

Suggested Readings: “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression” by Harold Bloom

1. Bloom, Harold. “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 2, no. 2, 1975, pp. 233–51. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342901. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
2. Diehl, Joanne Feit. “‘Come Slowly: Eden’: An Exploration of Women Poets and Their Muse.” Signs, vol. 3, no. 3, 1978, pp. 572–87. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3173172. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
3. Purser, J. W. R. The Review of English Studies, vol. 14, no. 54, 1963, pp. 209–11. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/513524. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
4. Beach, Christopher. “Ezra Pound and Harold Bloom: Influences, Canons, Traditions, and the Making of Modern Poetry.” ELH, vol. 56, no. 2, 1989, pp. 463–83. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2873068. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
5. Schultz, Susan M. “‘Returning to Bloom’: John Ashbery’s Critique of Harold Bloom.” Contemporary Literature, vol. 37, no. 1, 1996, pp. 24–48. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1208749. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.