
Introduction: “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse
“Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse first appeared in Nations and Nationalism 1(2) in 1995, spanning pages 163–173. The article explores the complex relationship between nationalism and racism in modern history, emphasizing that while nationalism could exist independently of racism, their alliance in the late 19th and early 20th centuries made racism more operational and politically potent. Mosse defines racism as a distinct and total ideology, centered on the human body as both a symbol and a means of exclusion. He argues that racism functioned as a civic religion, shaping social hierarchies through myths, symbols, and aesthetic ideals derived from anthropology, history, and classical imagery. The essay highlights how nationalism, as a flexible and widely adaptable ideology, absorbed elements of racism, particularly in its more extreme, integral forms. However, Mosse insists that nationalism was not inherently racist and could resist racial exclusivity, distinguishing between nationalist patriotism and the racist drive for purity and dominance. His work remains influential in literary theory and historical studies by illustrating how racist ideology constructs rigid, totalizing worldviews, often through visual and symbolic representations of the ideal and the counter-type. Through this lens, Mosse contributes to a broader discourse on the dangers of conflating national identity with racial hierarchies, offering insights relevant to both historical analysis and contemporary debates on identity politics and exclusion.
Summary of “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse
Main Ideas:
- Distinction Between Racism and Nationalism:
- Racism and nationalism are often linked, but nationalism is a flexible ideology that can exist without racism. However, when the two align, “nationalism made racism a reality, and racism came to dominate nationalism” (Mosse, 1995, p. 163).
- Racism as an Ideology and a Totality:
- Racism is a distinct, self-sustaining ideology that “encompasses the whole human personality—its looks, behavior, and intellect” (p. 164).
- It is a “worldview as complete as other ideologies which evolved during the nineteenth century, such as socialism or conservatism” (p. 165).
- The Role of Aesthetics and Anthropology in Racism:
- Racism was reinforced by scientific disciplines such as anthropology, history, and physiognomy, creating rigid standards of human appearance and superiority. “Anthropology, history, and this new aesthetic consciousness were all concerned with the search for roots, they could fulfill a longing for immutability and certainty in a world of rapid social change” (p. 164).
- The Symbolism of the Human Body in Racism:
- Unlike nationalism, which relied on abstract symbols like flags or anthems, racism used “the human body itself as its most potent symbol” (p. 163).
- Racial aesthetics borrowed heavily from classical Greek ideals, where “harmony, proportion, and ‘quiet greatness’ were seen as the ultimate expressions of racial superiority” (p. 166).
- Racism’s Need for a Counter-Type:
- Racism constructs an “ideal type” and a “counter-type” (p. 169).
- The racial enemy, whether Jews, Blacks, or other marginalized groups, was depicted as the antithesis of the racial ideal. “Through the counter-image, we obtain the greatest clarity of what our own ideals should be” (p. 171).
- Gender and Racism:
- Racism was deeply gendered, with the male body serving as the primary symbol of racial superiority. “Masculinity symbolized the active life, the hope for the victory of the race over its enemies and the subsequent construction of the ideal racist society” (p. 167).
- Women were depicted as either mothers of the race or the nation, reinforcing strict gender roles (p. 167).
- The Political Implications of Racism and Nationalism:
- Nationalism is flexible and has been linked with various ideologies (liberalism, conservatism, socialism), while racism is an “uncompromising worldview that does not tolerate ambiguity” (p. 165).
- The alliance between nationalism and racism often led to extreme political movements, most notably in Nazi Germany: “Racism was the catalyst which pushed German nationalism over the edge, from discrimination to mass extermination” (p. 171).
- Racism as a Civic Religion:
- Racism functioned as a “civic religion” with its own myths, symbols, and rituals (p. 165).
- It promised “immutability and redemption, much like traditional religious belief” (p. 165).
- The Danger of Trivializing Racism:
- The contemporary misuse of the term “racism” dilutes its historical significance. “A tendency to trivialize racism has been much more common; to make use of the term in contemporary polemics in order to designate all those acts which create or maintain disadvantage” (p. 164).
- Conclusion: Nationalism Can Resist Racism:
- While nationalism has historically aligned with racism, it does not have to be racist. “Coming to understand the relationship between racism and nationalism should lead us to build upon the fact that nationalism, as patriotism, always managed to resist the racist temptation” (p. 173).
Key Takeaways:
- Racism is a rigid, totalizing ideology, while nationalism is more flexible.
- The human body serves as the primary symbol in racist ideology, reinforcing stereotypes of superiority and inferiority.
- Racism constructs a “counter-type” as a necessary enemy to its racial ideal.
- While nationalism and racism have often merged, nationalism is not inherently racist and has alternative, more inclusive traditions.
- Understanding the distinction between the two is essential to resisting racism’s influence in nationalist movements.
Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse
Term/Concept | Definition/Explanation | Reference from the Article |
Racism as a Total Ideology | Racism is a complete worldview, shaping identity through biological, cultural, and aesthetic markers. | “Racism is a totality. It encompasses the whole human personality—its looks, behavior, and intellect” (Mosse, 1995, p. 164). |
Nationalism’s Flexibility | Nationalism can adapt to different political ideologies, including liberalism, conservatism, and socialism, making it distinct from racism. | “Nationalism was by far the more flexible ideology, making alliances with almost every political or social movement” (p. 165). |
Human Body as a Symbol | Racism is distinguished from nationalism in that it is visually focused, using the human body as a marker of racial identity. | “The human body itself became the predominant racial symbol” (p. 165). |
Ideal Type vs. Counter-Type | Racism constructs an ideal racial stereotype and contrasts it with an inferior “counter-type,” reinforcing racial hierarchies. | “Racism centred upon the construction of stereotypes as living and familiar symbols” (p. 165). |
Civic Religion | Racism functions as a belief system with rituals, myths, and symbols akin to a religious structure. | “Racism can be called a civic religion, and like any system of religious belief it created its own world of myth and symbol” (p. 165). |
Racial Aesthetics | Racist ideology borrows from classical ideals of beauty, especially Greek sculptures, to establish physical standards of superiority. | “The rediscovery of Greek sculpture… set the tone, even if it was modified by subsequent taste” (p. 166). |
Masculinity in Racism | The male body represents the ideal racial type, emphasizing physical strength, control, and virility, while women are relegated to reproductive roles. | “Masculinity symbolized the active life, the hope for the victory of the race over its enemies” (p. 167). |
Trivialization of Racism | The modern misuse of the term “racism” in political discourse dilutes its historical and ideological significance. | “A tendency to trivialize racism has been much more common… to designate all those acts which create or maintain disadvantage” (p. 164). |
Racism’s Need for an Enemy | Racism depends on an enemy figure (Jews, Black populations, etc.) to define itself and justify exclusion and violence. | “Racism depended upon the existence of its enemies, it had always defined itself as at war against hostile and inferior races” (p. 169). |
Integral Nationalism | A form of nationalism that seeks absolute unity and often aligns with racism to define an exclusive national identity. | “Without such a marriage [to nationalism], European racism would have remained impotent” (p. 165). |
Symbolism in Racism and Nationalism | Both ideologies rely on symbols to create identity, but while nationalism uses flags and anthems, racism uses physical stereotypes. | “Nationalism could annex many of the ideas and the stereotype I have discussed because it too was based upon the principle of separateness” (p. 168). |
Racism as a Revolutionary Ideology | Racism, rather than being purely reactionary, functions as a dynamic force advocating radical change. | “Racism supported existing manners and morals and sought to eliminate the socially dangerous counter-type” (p. 172). |
Contribution of “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse to Literary Theory/Theories
- Influence on the Representation of the Other:
- Mosse explores how racism constructs the “counter-type” as an enemy figure, a central concern in postcolonial studies.
- “Racism depended upon the existence of its enemies, it had always defined itself as at war against hostile and inferior races” (Mosse, 1995, p. 169).
- Racial Stereotyping and Colonial Discourse:
- His analysis of bodily aesthetics in racial ideology parallels colonial narratives that portray the colonized as inferior based on physical features.
- “The very construction of the human body, its size, sinews, muscles and bones, were made to bear witness to the superiority or inferiority of a race and its culture” (p. 165).
2. Structuralism and Semiotics
- Symbolism in National and Racial Identity:
- Mosse highlights how nationalism and racism use symbols to construct meaning, resonating with semiotic analyses of cultural narratives.
- “Nationalism could annex many of the ideas and the stereotype I have discussed because it too was based upon the principle of separateness” (p. 168).
- Binary Oppositions in Racial Ideology:
- The racial “ideal type” versus “counter-type” functions as a binary structure akin to Levi-Strauss’s structuralist oppositions (e.g., civilized vs. uncivilized).
- “Through the counter-image we obtain the greatest clarity of what our own ideals should be” (p. 171).
3. Feminist Literary Theory & Gender Studies
- Masculinity as a National and Racial Ideal:
- Mosse examines how racial ideology constructs masculinity as an active, dominant force while relegating women to reproductive roles.
- “Masculinity symbolized the active life, the hope for the victory of the race over its enemies and the subsequent construction of the ideal racist society” (p. 167).
- Gendered Nationalism and the Role of Women:
- Women in nationalist discourse are depicted either as “mothers of the nation” or passive figures, reinforcing patriarchal ideals in literature and cultural narratives.
- “Women as public symbols were either mothers of the family or mothers of the nation, such as Germania, Britannia or the sedate Marianne” (p. 167).
4. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory
- Racial Stereotypes and Projection:
- The racial counter-type functions as a projection of societal fears, similar to Freud’s theory of the “Other” as a repressed desire or anxiety.
- “The racial myths are familiar enough, they concern the faraway origins, the hardships and triumphs of the race, leading to redemption when the race wars are won” (p. 165).
- Racism as an Unconscious Collective Desire:
- The need for absolute racial purity mirrors psychoanalytic anxieties about contamination, reflecting the superego’s imposition of rigid ideological purity.
- “Racism leaves nothing to chance. Whether it legitimizes itself through science or through pseudo-historical scholarship, it does not tolerate what Ezra Pound once called an ‘Indeterminate Wobble’” (p. 165).
5. Critical Race Theory (CRT)
- Racism as a Socially Constructed Ideology:
- Mosse’s work supports CRT’s assertion that race is not biologically determined but a social construct shaped by historical narratives.
- “Racism as a political slogan could lead to such absurdities as the United Nations first declaring that Zionism is racism, and then repealing this assertion, as if racism’s finality was not one of its chief and most fateful characteristics” (p. 164).
- The Institutionalization of Racism Through Nationalism:
- His analysis of how nationalism made racism operational aligns with CRT’s focus on systemic racism.
- “Nationalism made racism a reality, and racism came to dominate nationalism once an alliance between the two movements had been consummated” (p. 163).
6. Cultural Studies & Identity Theory
- The Construction of National Identity Through Aesthetic Ideals:
- Mosse shows how national identity is shaped through visual and literary representations, influencing cultural studies’ analysis of media and literature.
- “Anthropology, history, and this new aesthetic consciousness were all concerned with the search for roots, they could fulfill a longing for immutability and certainty in a world of rapid social change” (p. 164).
- Populism and the Role of Nationalism in Culture:
- His analysis of nationalist movements as populist forces informs cultural studies on how political ideologies manipulate cultural identity.
- “The racist utopia was populist, it stood outside the present political system” (p. 172).
Examples of Critiques Through “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse
Author & Work | Critique Through Mosse’s Lens | Key Reference from Mosse (1995) |
Joseph Conrad – Heart of Darkness | – The novel reinforces racial hierarchies by depicting Africans as the “counter-type” in contrast to European civilization. – Conrad’s portrayal aligns with Mosse’s argument that racism relies on bodily aesthetics to establish superiority and inferiority. – The novel reflects colonial nationalism’s justification of imperialism as a civilizing mission. | “Racism depended upon the existence of its enemies, it had always defined itself as at war against hostile and inferior races” (p. 169). |
Margaret Mitchell – Gone with the Wind | – The novel romanticizes the Confederacy, reinforcing racial stereotypes that Mosse identifies as central to racist nationalism. – The depiction of African Americans as passive or inferior supports the aesthetic and cultural markers of racial hierarchy. – The nostalgia for the “Old South” mirrors Mosse’s discussion of nationalism’s tendency to mythologize history. | “Nationalism, even if it was tolerant and respected the culture of other nations, always contained elements which might lead to a greater exclusiveness” (p. 168). |
Adolf Hitler – Mein Kampf | – Mosse’s work directly critiques the racial ideology found in Mein Kampf, which constructs an “ideal type” (Aryan) and “counter-type” (Jews, Slavs, etc.). – The book exemplifies Mosse’s argument that racism functions as a civic religion with myths, symbols, and calls for purification. – Hitler’s ideas reflect the extremist nationalism that Mosse warns leads to the weaponization of racism. | “Nationalism made racism a reality, and racism came to dominate nationalism once an alliance between the two movements had been consummated” (p. 163). |
Chinua Achebe – Things Fall Apart | – Achebe’s novel subverts the racist nationalist narrative by presenting African society before European colonization. – The book challenges Mosse’s observation that racism was often legitimized through anthropology by portraying Igbo customs as complex and structured. – The colonial figures in the novel embody the “civilizing mission” that Mosse critiques as a justification for racial hierarchy. | “Racism used history, anthropology and aesthetic sensibilities in order to set a standard of human looks, beauty and behaviour” (p. 164). |
Criticism Against “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse
1. Overemphasis on European Context
- Mosse’s analysis is heavily Eurocentric, focusing primarily on racism and nationalism in Europe while neglecting parallel developments in colonial and postcolonial settings.
- Critics argue that his framework does not fully account for non-Western experiences of racism and nationalism, such as in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
2. Underestimation of Economic Factors
- Mosse emphasizes cultural and aesthetic elements of racism but does not sufficiently engage with economic motivations behind racist ideologies.
- Some scholars argue that racism was not just about aesthetics and nationalism but was deeply tied to economic exploitation, capitalism, and colonial labor systems.
3. Lack of Intersectional Analysis
- His work does not engage deeply with intersectionality, particularly how race interacts with class, gender, and sexuality.
- While he discusses gendered aspects of nationalism, some feminist scholars believe his analysis lacks depth in examining how women of different races experienced racism differently.
4. Limited Discussion on Resistance and Counter-Narratives
- The book focuses on how racism and nationalism became dominant ideologies but offers little analysis of anti-racist movements, resistance literature, or alternative nationalist movements that opposed racism.
- Critics argue that he does not sufficiently discuss figures and movements that challenged racist nationalism from within their own national traditions.
5. Ambiguous Stance on Nationalism
- Mosse acknowledges that nationalism does not necessarily have to be racist, but he does not provide a clear theoretical framework for distinguishing between inclusive and exclusive forms of nationalism.
- Some critics argue that this ambiguity leaves room for misinterpretation and fails to fully address how nationalism can be reformed to resist racism.
6. Oversimplification of Racist Ideology
- Some scholars believe Mosse portrays racism as a rigid and self-contained ideology without fully exploring its fluidity and adaptability in different historical and political contexts.
- The book does not explore how contemporary forms of racism have evolved beyond 19th and 20th-century frameworks.
7. Insufficient Engagement with Contemporary Theories of Race
- Since Mosse’s work was published in 1995, it does not engage with more recent developments in critical race theory, postcolonial theory, and decolonial studies.
- Some scholars argue that his analysis, while insightful, does not incorporate more recent critiques of Eurocentrism and white supremacy in global contexts.
Representative Quotations from “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse with Explanation
Quotation | Explanation |
“Racism is a totality. It encompasses the whole human personality – its looks, behaviour and intellect.” (p. 164) | Mosse argues that racism is not merely an act of discrimination but a comprehensive ideology that dictates social and political structures through rigid racial hierarchies. |
“Racism used history, anthropology and aesthetic sensibilities in order to set a standard of human looks, beauty and behaviour.” (p. 164) | This highlights how racist ideology legitimized itself using pseudo-scientific and aesthetic theories to establish racial superiority, reinforcing cultural stereotypes. |
“Nationalism made racism a reality, and racism came to dominate nationalism once an alliance between the two movements had been consummated.” (p. 163) | Mosse explains that nationalism and racism, though separate, became intertwined when nationalism sought to define itself through racial purity. |
“Racism depended upon the existence of its enemies; it had always defined itself as at war against hostile and inferior races.” (p. 169) | Racism requires a constructed ‘other’—a racial or ethnic enemy—against which superiority is asserted, often leading to exclusion or violence. |
“The human body itself became the predominant racial symbol, and a great deal of racist literature was devoted to an explanation of how one could recognise on sight one’s own as against those of a different race.” (p. 165) | This demonstrates the emphasis on physical appearance in racial ideology, where visual cues were used to define and reinforce racial distinctions. |
“The racial myths are familiar enough; they concern the faraway origins, the hardships and triumphs of the race, leading to redemption when the race wars are won.” (p. 165) | Mosse compares racism to a civic religion, showing how it creates myths and narratives that justify racial supremacy and conflict. |
“Masculinity symbolized the active life, the hope for the victory of the race over its enemies and the subsequent construction of the ideal racist society.” (p. 167) | Racism and nationalism often reinforce gender roles, with masculinity being linked to racial strength and the capacity for dominance. |
“The difference between racism and nationalism is sometimes difficult to determine, because both work with almost the same ideal type, gender differences and separateness.” (p. 168) | Nationalism and racism share structural similarities in their reliance on idealized identity types and exclusionary logic, making them susceptible to merging. |
“Modern society needs an enemy as a foil who would serve to strengthen its self-image.” (p. 171) | This statement critiques how societies use external and internal enemies to define and justify their political and ideological positions. |
“Coming to understand the relationship between racism and nationalism should lead us to build upon the fact that nationalism, as patriotism, always managed to resist the racist temptation.” (p. 173) | Mosse suggests that nationalism can exist without racism, and recognizing their distinction is essential to resisting racialized nationalist ideologies. |
Suggested Readings: “Racism and Nationalism” by George L. Mosse
- Mosse, George L. “Racism and nationalism.” Nations and Nationalism 1.2 (1995): 163-173.
- Tortorice, John. “Bibliography of George L. Mosse.” German Politics & Society, vol. 18, no. 4 (57), 2000, pp. 58–92. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23737475. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
- Mosse, George L., and Anthony J. Steinhoff. “Racism.” The Culture of Western Europe: The Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, University of Wisconsin Press, 2023, pp. 97–112. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv30pnv5q.13. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
- Moro, Renato. “George L. Mosse and Christian Religious Thought in Contemporary History.” Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 56, no. 4, 2021, pp. 896–930. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27199340. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
- Cheng, Yinghong. “From Campus Racism to Cyber Racism: Discourse of Race and Chinese Nationalism.” The China Quarterly, no. 207, 2011, pp. 561–79. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41305257. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.