“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo: A Critical Analysis

“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo first appeared in her acclaimed 2017 collection The January Children, a work celebrated for its lyrical exploration of diaspora, belonging, and the politics of identity.

“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo

“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo first appeared in her acclaimed 2017 collection The January Children, a work celebrated for its lyrical exploration of diaspora, belonging, and the politics of identity. The poem quickly gained popularity for its bold redefinition of patriotic allegiance, grounding identity not in nation-states but in intimate, everyday relationships and embodied memories. Instead of pledging loyalty to “land” or “border / cut by force to draw blood,” Elhillo centers a deeply personal homeland built from family, community, and love. She lists the ordinary yet sacred details that form her true sense of belonging: “my mother’s / small & cool palms,” “the gap between my brother’s / two front teeth,” “my grandmother’s good brown / hands,” and even the “group text” and “spearmint plant.” The poem’s striking refusal to honor “any government” or “collection of white men carving up / the map with their pens” powerfully articulates the diasporic sentiment of disillusionment with geopolitical nationhood. Its popularity stems from this emotional clarity: the final declaration—“this is my only country”—reimagines homeland as shared love, community resilience, and the chosen bonds of people “crowded / into the booth” or “gathered at the lakeside,” offering readers a radical, tender alternative to traditional nationalism.

Text: “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo

i pledge allegiance to my

homies      to my mother’s

small & cool palms     to

the gap between my brother’s

two front teeth      & to

my grandmother’s good brown

hands       good strong brown

hands gathering my bare feet

in her lap

i pledge allegiance    to the

group text      i pledge allegiance

to laughter & to all the boys

i have a crush on      i pledge

allegiance to my spearmint plant

to my split ends      to my grandfather’s

brain & gray left eye

i come from two failed countries

& i give them back      i pledge

allegiance to no land    no border

cut by force to draw blood    i pledge

allegiance to no government    no

collection of white men carving up

the map with their pens

i choose the table at the waffle house

with all my loved ones crowded

into the booth     i choose the shining

dark of our faces through a thin sheet

of smoke     glowing dark of our faces

slick under layers of sweat     i choose

the world we make with our living

refusing to be unmade by what surrounds

us      i choose us gathered at the lakeside

the light glinting off the water & our

laughing teeth     & along the living

dark of our hair    & this is my only country

Annotations: “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo

Stanza / Line GroupAnnotation (Meaning & Explanation)Literary Devices
1. “i pledge allegiance to my / homies… grandmother’s good brown hands…”The poem opens by redefining allegiance away from the nation-state. Instead, the speaker “pledges” loyalty to intimate bonds—friends, mother, siblings, and grandmother. These sensory details root identity in care, warmth, memory, and Black familial love. Her grandmother’s “good strong brown hands” embody protection and heritage, creating a nation of touch rather than territory.🌿 Imagery (cool palms, brown hands) • 💛 Symbolism (hands = heritage & care) • 🔄 Anaphora (“i pledge allegiance”) • 🌍 Cultural Identity (family as homeland) • 🧡 Sensory Detail (touch, sight)
2. “i pledge allegiance to the group text… spearmint plant… grandfather’s brain & gray left eye”The second movement expands belonging to a humorous mix of contemporary and personal attachments—group chats, crushes, plants, even damaged memory (“grandfather’s brain”). By placing mundane objects beside profound losses, she asserts that the everyday is just as central to identity as family. Community is constructed through affection, habit, and digital connection.🔄 Anaphora • 😂 Juxtaposition (crushes vs. aging grandfather) • 🌱 Symbolism (spearmint plant = growth) • 📸 Visual Imagery (“gray left eye”) • 💫 Modern Identity Marker (group text)
3. “i come from two failed countries… no collection of white men carving up the map…”The poem shifts from intimacy to geopolitical critique. “Failed countries” refers to postcolonial fragmentation, instability, and imposed nationhood. She rejects borders “cut by force to draw blood,” highlighting the violence of colonial cartography. Refusing “white men carving up the map” is a rejection of external power defining her identity. Her allegiance is to people, not governments or nations.⚔️ Political Protest • 🗺️ Historical Allusion (colonial map-making) • ❌ Negation (“no land,” “no government”) • 🔄 Repetition (refusal structure) • 🩸 Violence Imagery (“draw blood”)
4. “i choose the table at the waffle house… refusing to be unmade…”Here the speaker creates an alternative homeland grounded in joy, connection, Black embodiment, and communal survival. The “shining dark of our faces” affirms pride and beauty in Blackness. The repetition of “i choose” asserts agency. Shared meals, sweat, sunlight, and laughter become the ingredients of a chosen nation—one built from presence and resilience, not borders.🌞 Sensory Imagery (light, sweat, smoke) • 🔥 Anaphora/Repetition (“i choose”) • 💪 Resistance Motif (“refusing to be unmade”) • 🌍 Collective Identity (community as self-made nation) • ❤️ Emotional Symbolism (togetherness as homeland)
5. “this is my only country”The poem culminates with a declaration that her only true “country” is the community she loves and the world they build together. This rejects imposed national belonging and affirms a chosen, lived, and relational homeland. Identity becomes a space shaped by people, memory, and love—not geography.🎯 Declarative Statement • 🌟 Tone Shift: Refusal → Affirmation • ❤️ Symbolism (“country” = chosen community) • 🌀 Resolution (conceptual unity)
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo
DeviceExample from the PoemDetailed Explanation
2. Allusion (Historical/Political) 🗺️“white men carving up the map”This alludes to colonial map-making and geopolitical violence. Elhillo invokes the historical reality of European powers dividing Africa and the Middle East, underscoring that national borders are artificial, imposed, and violent. The allusion deepens the critique of nationalism by revealing its colonial roots.
3. Anaphora 🔄Repeated phrase: “i pledge allegiance”The repetition of this phrase mimics the cadence of the American Pledge of Allegiance while subverting it. By redirecting allegiance toward loved ones and intimate realities, the poet dismantles state-centered nationalism and replaces it with a community-centered identity. The repeated incantation becomes a ritual of reclaiming personal agency.
4. Assonance 🎶“shining dark… thin sheet of smoke”The repeated vowel sounds (“i,” “ee”) generate a smooth, flowing auditory texture, reinforcing the softness of shared moments. Assonance in these lines contributes to the poem’s warmth and emphasizes the gentle luminosity of Black faces glowing through smoke and sweat.
5. Contrast / Juxtaposition ⚖️“boys I have a crush on” vs. “grandfather’s brain & gray left eye”By placing light, humorous themes (crushes, group texts) beside symbols of aging, illness, and loss, Elhillo shows how identity is shaped through a full emotional spectrum—joy, desire, grief, and memory. The contrast expands the notion of belonging beyond political borders to include the contradictions of everyday life.
6. Declarative Statement 🎯“this is my only country”This final line delivers a definitive, unwavering assertion. Rather than ending on refusal (“no land”), the poem culminates in affirmation—a chosen, living, relational homeland created through community and survival. The declarative tone transforms the poem from critique to resolution.
7. Enjambment ↘️Lines flow without punctuation across stanzasElhillo uses enjambment to reflect fluid identity unconstrained by political borders. The uninterrupted flow mirrors diaspora’s continuous negotiation of belonging. The breathless motion of the lines reinforces themes of movement, migration, and emotional overflow.
8. Imagery (Sensory & Visual) 🌿“small & cool palms,” “laughing teeth”The poem is filled with vivid tactile and visual imagery that roots identity in embodied experiences—hands touching, sweat glistening, faces shining, teeth laughing. These images create a physical, sensory homeland built from warmth, bodies, and relationships rather than geographic boundaries.
9. Irony 😏“pledge allegiance… to my split ends”Elhillo uses humor to undercut the solemnity of national pledges. Pledging allegiance to trivial things like split ends pokes fun at the absurdity of being forced to swear loyalty to an abstract, often violent entity. The ironic tone exposes the hollowness of patriotic rituals compared to the authenticity of personal connections.
10. Metaphor 🔥“this is my only country”“Country” functions metaphorically as a community of loved ones, not a physical territory. The metaphor redefines citizenship as something lived, chosen, and emotionally grounded. It rejects nationalism’s demand for loyalty to land and state, replacing it with loyalty to people and shared existence.
11. Mood (Warm, Intimate) 🌅“my grandmother’s good brown hands”The poem cultivates a mood of warmth, affection, and closeness. The recurring references to touch, bodies, sweat, and laughter evoke an intimate emotional landscape. This mood counters the coldness of political boundaries and underscores the poem’s central belief that emotional connection is the true site of belonging.
12. Personification 🌷“the world we make with our living”“World” is personified as something actively co-created. This emphasizes agency—identity is not inherited from the state but formed through daily gestures of survival, love, and presence. Personification here elevates community to a living, breathing entity.
13. Political Protest / Resistance ✊“i pledge allegiance to no government”Elhillo’s refusal to pledge allegiance is a clear act of political resistance. Rejecting borders “cut by force” and governments built from violence exposes the harm of nationalism. The poem becomes a manifesto of refusal, reclaiming autonomy from colonial and patriarchal power structures.
14. Refrain (Repeated Motif) 🔁“i choose…”The repeated phrasing “i choose” marks a radical claim to self-determination. After listing all the systems she rejects, the poet asserts active choice—community, joy, Black embodiment, survival. The refrain functions as a mantra of empowerment and agency.
15. Sensory Detail 👁️👂✋“slick under layers of sweat”The poem appeals strongly to touch, smell, sight, and sound. Sweat, smoke, cool palms, laughter, and glinting light all create a fully embodied experience. These sensory details show that the poet’s “country” is lived physically and emotionally, not mapped on paper.
16. Symbolism 💛“hands,” “faces,” “table at the waffle house”Everyday objects symbolize ancestry, identity, and chosen community. Hands represent heritage and care; faces represent collective identity; the table symbolizes gathering and belonging. These symbols craft a new emotional geography of home.
17. Tone Shift 🌟From refusal (“i give them back”) to affirmation (“i choose us”)The poem shifts from a tone of rejection—handing back failed countries—to one of joyful affirmation of community. This tonal evolution represents healing: abandoning imposed identities and embracing self-made ones.
18. Understatement 🙃“two failed countries”Calling entire geopolitical histories “failed countries” is an understated way of referencing war, colonialism, corruption, and displacement. The understatement intensifies the emotional impact by compressing enormous trauma into a simple phrase.
19. Visual Imagery (Light/Dark Contrast) ✨“shining dark of our faces”Elhillo uses luminous descriptions of Black skin to affirm beauty, identity, and shared joy. The contrast of “shining” with “dark” subverts negative stereotypes and reclaims Blackness as radiant, resilient, and proud.
20. Voice (Personal, Confessional) 🧡First-person “i” throughoutThe confessional voice allows the poem to function as a personal manifesto. Speaking directly, vulnerably, and unapologetically, Elhillo turns the poem into both a self-portrait and a political statement. The voice blends intimacy with resistance, forming a deeply emotional autobiography.
Themes: “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo

🟦 Theme 1: Reimagining Allegiance Through Intimacy

“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo redefines the concept of allegiance by shifting it away from the traditional expectation of national loyalty and toward a deeply intimate, personal network of relationships that form the speaker’s emotional homeland. Through a sequence of lovingly specific images—such as “my mother’s / small & cool palms,” “the gap between my brother’s / two front teeth,” and “my grandmother’s good brown / hands”—Elhillo constructs an alternative geography of belonging that resists state authority while celebrating human connection. This reimagined allegiance functions as a quiet but powerful critique of nationalist discourse, particularly when the speaker insists on pledging “to the group text” or “to laughter,” thereby elevating mundane acts of community into sacred oaths. The poem’s thematic strength lies in its argument that real loyalty emerges from care, memory, and shared lived experience rather than flags, borders, or formal political structures.


🟩Theme 2: Rejecting Borders and Colonial Nationhood

“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo foregrounds a profound rejection of imposed borders and the violence that underlies modern nation-states, particularly those drawn through militarized or colonial processes. When the speaker declares that she comes “from two failed countries / & i give them back,” she articulates a refusal to inherit political wounds that she did not create, thereby challenging the notion that citizenship should automatically dictate identity. Elhillo intensifies this critique by renouncing “any land” and “any border / cut by force to draw blood,” linking nationhood directly to historical trauma and displacement. The phrase “white men carving up / the map with their pens” evokes the legacy of colonial cartography, suggesting that states themselves are artificial constructs maintained through oppression. The poem’s central theme therefore rests upon the idea that rejecting these borders is an act of self-preservation, allowing the speaker to reclaim agency through personal geography rather than political boundaries.


🟥 Theme 3: Diaspora, Displacement, and Fragmented Identity

“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo captures the emotional complexity of diasporic identity, presenting the speaker as someone shaped by multiple historical ruptures and cultural inheritances that do not easily align with neat national categories. Her assertion that she belongs to “two failed countries” encapsulates a sense of inherited displacement—an existential weight that diasporic individuals often carry as they navigate identities formed across fractured geographies. This sense of fragmentation is countered by the speaker’s active choice to disengage from official national markers and instead reconstruct her identity through everyday artifacts of memory: her grandfather’s “brain & gray left eye,” her “spearmint plant,” or the “boys / i have a crush on.” By threading together these intimate registers, the poem suggests that diaspora is not merely a condition of loss but also a fertile space for creating hybrid, self-defined belonging. Elhillo’s theme thus revolves around transforming displacement into self-authored identity.


🟨 Theme 4: Creating Community as an Act of Resistance

“Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo presents community-building as an active form of resistance against systems that aim to divide, marginalize, or politically erase individuals. The poem’s concluding vision—of loved ones “crowded / into the booth” at a Waffle House or “gathered at the lakeside” where “the light glint[s] off the water & our / laughing teeth”—illustrates the speaker’s deliberate creation of a shared world that thrives despite the fractures surrounding it. In claiming that “this is my only country,” she asserts that communal joy, mutual care, and collective embodiment constitute a sovereign space more authentic than any state-defined nation. The phrase “refusing to be unmade by what surrounds / us” signals a conscious defiance against dehumanizing forces that seek to fragment identities. Thus, community becomes not only a source of comfort but a radical political stance—an insistence that love and belonging can flourish beyond institutional borders or nationalist expectations.

Literary Theories and “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo
Literary TheoryApplication to the Poem with Textual References
🟦 Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial theory illuminates the poem’s critique of colonial map-making and the violent logic of imposed nationhood. Elhillo’s rejection of state-bound identity—“i pledge allegiance to no land / no border cut by force to draw blood”—directly addresses the historico-political processes by which colonial powers divided territories regardless of cultural or communal integrity. The line “no collection of white men carving up / the map with their pens” explicitly names the racialized authority behind colonial cartography, exposing how borders are instruments of domination rather than belonging. Postcolonial reading emphasizes how the speaker’s identity emerges outside these structures, formed instead through memory, intimacy, and community.
🟩 Diaspora StudiesDiaspora theory helps unpack the poem’s negotiation of fragmented belonging and inherited displacement. The speaker’s admission, “i come from two failed countries / & i give them back,” reflects the ambivalence often felt by individuals whose identities are shaped by multiple, contested homelands. Instead of internalizing national shame or failure, the speaker reconstructs identity through affective ties—her “mother’s small & cool palms,” the “gap between my brother’s / two front teeth,” and the “good strong brown hands” of her grandmother. Diaspora theory highlights how the poem transforms the condition of displacement into a self-fashioned, borderless identity anchored in familial and communal bonds.
🟥 Feminist TheoryFeminist theory foregrounds the poem’s emphasis on matriarchal lineage, bodily memory, and lived, embodied experience as sources of identity and resistance. The repeated references to women’s hands—“my mother’s / small & cool palms” and “my grandmother’s good brown / hands”—reveal the poem’s grounding in female inheritance and intergenerational care. These women provide the speaker’s first notions of safety, intimacy, and belonging—countering the male-dominated realm of “government” and “white men carving up / the map.” Feminist analysis highlights how the poem privileges domestic, relational, and emotional knowledge over traditional patriarchal structures of citizenship and power.
🟨 New HistoricismNew Historicism situates the poem within the overlapping historical contexts of migration, failed postcolonial state-building, and racialized U.S. nationalism. The poem’s refusal of national allegiance—“i pledge allegiance to no government”—cannot be separated from the histories of violence, coups, border conflict, and civil war embedded in the speaker’s ancestral nations. Similarly, her chosen homeland, described as “the table at the waffle house / with all my loved ones crowded / into the booth,” reflects a contemporary American landscape shaped by racial inequities and immigrant precarity. New Historicist reading emphasizes how the poem negotiates personal identity within broader political forces while still asserting micro-histories of care and daily life as more authentic than official narratives.
Critical Questions about “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo

1. 🌍 How does “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo challenge traditional notions of nationalism?

In “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo, the poet challenges conventional nationalism by shifting loyalty from the state to intimate, everyday relationships, thereby redefining allegiance as a deeply personal rather than political act. Instead of venerating the abstract idea of a nation-state, Elhillo pledges allegiance to her “homies,” her mother’s “small & cool palms,” and her grandmother’s “good brown hands,” grounding belonging within a network of affection, memory, and embodied connection. Her explicit refusal to pledge loyalty to “any land,” “any border cut by force,” or “any collection of white men carving up the map” exposes the violence, arbitrariness, and colonial inheritance of modern nationhood. By positioning chosen community above state-defined identity, she destabilizes the notion that borders and governments should dictate one’s sense of self. Ultimately, the poem critiques nationalism’s emptiness and asserts that genuine belonging emerges from living, loving, and surviving alongside one’s people.


2. ✊ In what ways does the poem articulate resistance against colonial and postcolonial identity formation?

In “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo, resistance manifests through the deliberate rejection of inherited identities shaped by colonial map-making and postcolonial instability. When she writes that she comes from “two failed countries,” Elhillo gestures toward the fractured political realities produced by colonial borders that ignored cultural and historical coherence. Her refusal to pledge allegiance to any government, especially those born from “white men carving up the map,” becomes an act of decolonial defiance that challenges the legitimacy of imposed national identities. The poem resists narratives that demand uncritical loyalty to unstable states by centering the speaker’s agency to define who or what deserves her allegiance. By choosing personal relationships, intergenerational memory, and communal joy over state affiliation, Elhillo constructs a selfhood grounded in lived experience rather than geopolitical designation. Her resistance is therefore both emotional and political, reclaiming identity from colonial violence and postcolonial disillusionment.


3. 💛 How does Elhillo use intimate, domestic imagery to redefine concepts of home and belonging?

In “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo, intimate domestic imagery becomes the foundation on which the poet rebuilds the meaning of home and belonging. Instead of locating home in a physical country, she situates it in the small, tender details of family and community—her mother’s “cool palms,” her brother’s gap-toothed smile, and her grandmother’s “good strong brown hands.” These details create an affective geography where belonging is rooted in sensory connection rather than territory. The domestic scenes—crowded booths at the Waffle House, shared laughter, spearmint plants, split ends—construct a homeland made of moments rather than institutions. By elevating these everyday images, Elhillo transforms domestic space into a sanctuary of identity that resists the violence and instability associated with national borders. Home becomes a living, relational space defined through collective memory, intimacy, and chosen companionship, rather than imposed citizenship.


4. ✨ What vision of community does the poem ultimately affirm through its closing declaration, “this is my only country”?

In “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo, the final declaration—“this is my only country”—reveals a vision of community built on mutual care, shared resilience, and chosen belonging. The poem has already rejected the idea that nations created through colonial force and political violence can meaningfully define identity. Instead, the “country” she claims is composed of loved ones gathered in smoky booths, at lakesides, and in the intimacy of everyday life. This vision emphasizes that community is not inherited through citizenship but forged through joy, laughter, survival, and collective embodiment. Her chosen “country” becomes a sanctuary shaped by emotional commitment rather than legal allegiance. Through this closing affirmation, Elhillo proposes a radical reimagining of belonging—one in which identity thrives not through loyalty to borders but through the continual act of choosing one another. The poem thus celebrates community as a living, dynamic homeland created through presence and love.

Literary Works Similar to “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo
  1. 🟦 Home” by Warsan Shire
    Similar because it explores displacement, fractured homelands, and the emotional violence of borders, echoing Elhillo’s rejection of nations “cut by force to draw blood.”
  2. 🟩 If They Come for Us” by Fatimah Asghar
    Similar because it centers chosen family, diasporic belonging, and identity formed through community, aligning with Elhillo’s allegiance to loved ones instead of states.
  3. 🟥 “Someday I’ll Love Ocean Vuong” by Ocean Vuong
    Similar because it builds identity through intimate memories and self-definition, mirroring Elhillo’s creation of a personal homeland shaped by relationships.
  4. 🟨 “Identity Card” by Mahmoud Darwish
    Similar because it challenges imposed national identities and asserts selfhood against political and colonial narratives, resonating with Elhillo’s refusal of “any government.”
Representative Quotations of “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“i pledge allegiance to my homies” 💛Opening of the poem where the speaker subverts the patriotic pledge by redirecting allegiance toward friends instead of the state.Bold (Cultural Studies): This challenges state-centered identity by prioritizing interpersonal bonds, suggesting identity is socially constructed through community rather than nationalism.
“my mother’s small & cool palms” 🌿The speaker evokes intimate physical memory as a source of belonging, foregrounding family over nation.Bold (Feminist Theory): Centers maternal touch as a formative force, emphasizing women’s bodies and care as foundational sites of identity.
“my grandmother’s good brown hands” ✨Reaffirms multigenerational Black familial heritage as central to selfhood.Bold (Black Feminist Thought): Celebrates Black womanhood, grounding identity in inherited resilience and embodied history rather than imposed borders.
“i come from two failed countries & i give them back” ❌The speaker renounces inherited national identities shaped by colonial trauma and instability.Bold (Postcolonial Theory): Rejects the failure of postcolonial nationhood, critiquing arbitrary borders and the limits of state legitimacy.
“no border cut by force to draw blood” ⚔️The poem condemns violent nation-making and colonial cartographic practices.Bold (Decolonial Theory): Exposes the brutality behind national boundaries, revealing the colonial violence embedded in geopolitical lines.
“no collection of white men carving up the map” 🗺️Direct reference to the Berlin Conference–style division of colonized lands.Bold (Historical Materialism): Highlights how colonial powers exercised control through mapping, linking geography to domination and economic exploitation.
“i choose the table at the waffle house with all my loved ones crowded into the booth” 🍽️Community gathering becomes an alternative homeland rooted in shared joy and presence.Bold (Affect Theory): Emphasizes emotional proximity and shared experience as the true foundation of belonging, rather than political structures.
“the shining dark of our faces through a thin sheet of smoke” 🌙Affirms beauty, intimacy, and shared embodiment within the Black community.Bold (Critical Race Theory): Reclaims Blackness as luminous and communal, resisting racialized narratives that devalue dark bodies.
“refusing to be unmade by what surrounds us” ✊The community persists despite external pressures, racism, and historical trauma.Bold (Resistance Theory): Frames survival as an act of collective resistance, asserting identity against oppressive forces.
“this is my only country” 🎯Final declaration in which the speaker defines her “country” as her chosen community, not a state.Bold (Constructivist Identity Theory): Identity is shown as constructed through relational choice and emotional commitment, not inherited nationality.
Suggested Readings: “Self-Portrait with No Flag” by Safia Elhillo