“Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank: Summary and Critique

Introduction: “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank

“Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank first appeared in the The Sewanee Review in Spring 1945 (Vol. 53, No. 2). Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press, the essay examines the concept of spatial form in literature, challenging traditional sequential or temporal narrative structures. Frank revisits Lessing’s distinctions between literature and visual arts to frame his discussion on the evolving aesthetic sensibilities of modern literature. His analysis focuses on how spatial form—characterized by a reader’s simultaneous apprehension of textual elements—redefines narrative strategies in works by modernists like Joyce, Eliot, and Proust. This shift toward spatiality reflects broader cultural changes, emphasizing the interconnected, reflexive relationships within texts. Frank’s essay remains a seminal contribution to literary theory, offering profound insights into the structural transformations that continue to influence modern and postmodern literary critique.

Summary of “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank

---

---

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank

Theoretical Term/Concept	Explanation	Examples/References
Spatial Form	A narrative structure where elements are presented simultaneously or reflexively rather than sequentially in time.	Modern poetry by T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound; novels like James Joyce’s Ulysses and Marcel Proust’s works (Frank, p. 229–240).
Time-Logic vs. Space-Logic	Time-logic emphasizes linear progression, while space-logic involves the simultaneous perception of elements.	Traditional narrative unfolds linearly, while modernist works juxtapose elements spatially (Frank, p. 230).
Juxtaposition	The placement of narrative elements or images side by side to create meaning without linear progression.	Flaubert’s county fair scene in Madame Bovary; Pound’s imagery in poetry (Frank, p. 231–232, 227).
Reflexive Reference	The idea that elements within a text refer to one another internally, forming a cohesive whole when viewed together.	Seen in Pound’s Cantos and Joyce’s Ulysses, where readers must connect scattered references (Frank, p. 229, 235).
Narrative Fragmentation	Breaking up the linear flow of a narrative to present scattered pieces that the reader must synthesize.	Joyce’s Ulysses fragments narrative details, requiring reflexive reading (Frank, p. 234–235).
Simultaneity	Aesthetic effect where multiple events or images are experienced at once, rather than sequentially.	Flaubert’s layered depiction of the county fair scene (Frank, p. 231).
Image	A unified intellectual and emotional complex presented in an instant, rather than discursively.	Ezra Pound’s definition of the image in Imagism (Frank, p. 227).
Modernist Form	A structure that disrupts traditional narrative progression to prioritize spatial and reflexive perceptions.	T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land and Joyce’s Ulysses (Frank, p. 233–235).
Pure Time	Proust’s concept of transcending chronological time to perceive past and present simultaneously.	Discussed in Proust’s In Search of Lost Time, analyzed by Frank (Frank, p. 237–239).
Impressionist Techniques	A method of presenting “pure views” or isolated snapshots, requiring readers to synthesize them.	Proust’s character portrayals compared to Impressionist painters (Frank, p. 239–240).
Fragmentation in Poetry	A technique where poems eschew linear structure, instead presenting disjointed images or ideas.	Seen in Eliot’s The Waste Land and Pound’s Cantos (Frank, p. 230).
Cinematic Narration	A method akin to film editing, cutting between different narrative levels or perspectives to build simultaneity.	Flaubert’s depiction of simultaneous county fair activities (Frank, p. 231).
Discontinuous Presentation	Characters or events are shown in non-sequential snapshots, emphasizing change over time when juxtaposed.	Proust’s presentation of characters at different life stages (Frank, p. 239).
Reflexive Perception	A reader’s active engagement in synthesizing fragmented elements into a cohesive understanding of the text.	Essential for understanding modernist works like Ulysses or Nightwood (Frank, p. 234).

Contribution of “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank to Literary Theory/Theories

---

Theory	Contribution by Joseph Frank	References from the Article
Formalism and Structuralism	– Emphasizes the internal structure of a text, focusing on reflexive relationships within the work.	Frank highlights the importance of perceiving modernist texts as spatial wholes rather than linear narratives (p. 229).
Narratology	– Challenges traditional narrative theories focused on sequential progression by advocating for spatial analysis.	Frank discusses the fragmented narrative forms in modernist literature, such as in Ulysses and Proust’s novels (p. 234–239).
Imagism and Modernist Aesthetics	– Develops Ezra Pound’s concept of the “image” as a simultaneous intellectual and emotional complex.	Frank quotes Pound’s definition of the image and explores its implications in spatial form (p. 227).
Phenomenology and Reader-Response	– Shifts focus to the reader’s role in synthesizing fragmented texts into cohesive meanings.	Frank states that understanding works like The Waste Land or Ulysses requires active engagement from the reader (p. 235).
Intermediality	– Bridges the gap between visual arts and literature by analyzing how spatial and temporal forms overlap.	Inspired by Lessing’s Laocoön, Frank redefines spatial and temporal distinctions in art and literature (p. 223–225).
Postmodernism	– Anticipates postmodern emphasis on fragmented narratives and decentralization of authorial control.	Frank examines Joyce’s Ulysses, where the author effaces himself and leaves interpretation to the reader (p. 234).
Temporal vs. Spatial Aesthetics	– Introduces the idea of “spatial form” as an organizing principle in modern literature, contrasting it with temporal logic.	Frank contrasts traditional narrative with spatially constructed forms, emphasizing simultaneity (p. 231).
Impressionism in Literature	– Compares literary techniques to Impressionist art, where juxtaposed moments allow the audience to synthesize meaning.	Frank compares Proust’s method to Impressionist painters, blending disparate elements into a unified whole (p. 239–240).
Symbolism and Reflexive Meaning	– Explores how modernist texts use symbols and fragments to create meanings through internal reference.	Frank describes Eliot’s The Waste Land and Pound’s Cantos as relying on reflexive reference within the text (p. 230).

---

Key Contributions Explained

1. Revisiting Lessing’s Theories: Frank builds upon Laocoön’s distinction between the spatial arts and temporal arts, redefining it for modernist literature, thus contributing to intermedial studies and aesthetics (p. 223–225).
2. Innovations in Narrative Structure: By conceptualizing spatial form, Frank challenges narratology’s traditional assumptions of sequential storytelling, aligning with later developments in postmodernism and structuralism (p. 231–235).
3. Reader’s Role in Meaning-Making: Anticipating reader-response theories, Frank emphasizes the active role of readers in synthesizing fragmented narratives, enhancing modern literary theory’s focus on audience interpretation (p. 235).
4. Integration of Visual and Literary Analysis: Frank’s comparison of literature with Impressionist art offers a cross-disciplinary perspective, enriching symbolic and aesthetic theories in literature (p. 239).
5. Temporal-Spatial Dichotomy: Frank’s differentiation between temporal and spatial aesthetics introduces a framework to analyze the evolution of literary form, influencing future studies in modernist and postmodernist literature (p. 240).

Examples of Critiques Through “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank

---

Literary Work	Critique Through Spatial Form	Key Observations by Frank	References from the Article
Ezra Pound’s Cantos	– Represents fragmented and juxtaposed images, forcing the reader to perceive elements reflexively in spatial terms.	The poem’s structure is deliberately disconnected, requiring the reader to connect scattered references (Frank, p. 229).	Pound’s “anecdotal method” disrupts sequential expectations, creating meaning through spatial relationships (p. 229).
T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land	– Challenges temporal narrative by juxtaposing fragmented images and historical references, forming spatial unity.	Eliot’s work requires the reader to suspend sequential logic and apprehend the relationships between fragments (Frank, p. 230).	Reflexive reference within word groups creates meaning, emphasizing the modernist shift to spatial aesthetics (p. 230).
James Joyce’s Ulysses	– Breaks traditional narrative structure, relying on spatial connections and reflexive references for coherence.	Joyce’s fragmented narrative forces readers to synthesize meaning spatially, much like modernist poetry (Frank, p. 234–235).	Frank highlights how Ulysses recreates a holistic sense of Dublin through scattered details, engaging the reader actively (p. 235).
Marcel Proust’s In Search of Lost Time	– Uses discontinuous presentation of characters and events, enabling readers to perceive time through spatialized moments.	Proust’s technique mirrors Impressionist painting, where readers juxtapose snapshots to understand time’s passage (Frank, p. 239–240).	Frank compares Proust’s portrayal of characters to Impressionist methods, emphasizing simultaneous perception (p. 239).

---

Key Insights

1. Modernist Innovation: All four works disrupt traditional narrative temporality, relying on spatial form to enhance aesthetic and intellectual engagement.
2. Reader’s Role: These works require active participation from readers, who must synthesize fragmented elements to construct meaning.
3. Thematic Depth: Spatial form allows authors to explore complex themes, such as memory, history, and cultural identity, through nonlinear methods.

Criticism Against “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank

• Overemphasis on Spatiality: Critics argue that Frank undervalues the role of temporal progression in modernist works, which often balance spatial and temporal dynamics.
• Limited Applicability: Some suggest that spatial form, as described by Frank, may not apply universally across modernist literature, focusing mainly on select elite texts.
• Neglect of Reader Diversity: Frank’s theory assumes an idealized, highly engaged reader capable of synthesizing complex spatial narratives, which may not align with broader audience practices.
• Reductionist Interpretation: Critics have pointed out that Frank’s emphasis on spatiality risks oversimplifying the multifaceted narrative strategies employed by modernist authors.
• Lack of Historical Context: Some argue that Frank does not adequately situate his analysis within the broader cultural and historical shifts influencing modernist experimentation.
• Underrepresentation of Non-Western Texts: The essay’s focus on Anglo-European modernism overlooks contributions from other traditions that may employ or challenge spatial form.
• Dependency on Visual Analogies: Frank’s reliance on comparisons to visual art forms like Impressionism might oversimplify the complexities of literary techniques.

Representative Quotations from “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Time and space were the two extremes defining the limits of literature and the plastic arts in their relation to sensuous perception.”	This highlights the core argument that literature, traditionally seen as a temporal art, is increasingly adopting spatial characteristics, bridging temporal progression and spatial juxtaposition in modernist works.
“An image… is that which presents an intellectual and emotional complex in an instant of time.” (Ezra Pound)	Frank uses Pound’s definition of the image to illustrate how modernist poetry emphasizes spatial immediacy, rejecting linear narrative progression in favor of evoking simultaneous impressions.
“The conception of poetic form that runs through Mallarmé to Pound and Eliot… can be formulated only in terms of the principle of reflexive reference.”	Reflexive reference, where textual elements rely on spatial juxtaposition rather than sequential development, is a pivotal concept for understanding the aesthetic of modernist poetry and literature as argued by Frank.
“The reader is intended to apprehend their work spatially, in a moment of time, rather than as a sequence.”	This statement encapsulates the essence of spatial form in modernist literature, where texts are constructed to be experienced as a whole, defying traditional temporal logic.
“Flaubert dissolves sequence by cutting back and forth between the various levels of action in a slowly-rising crescendo.”	This description of Flaubert’s technique in Madame Bovary exemplifies how spatial form disrupts linear narrative flow to achieve a simultaneous perception of multiple narrative layers.
“Joyce, in his unbelievably laborious fragmentation of narrative structure, proceeded on the assumption that a unified spatial apprehension… would ultimately be possible.”	Frank acknowledges Joyce’s ambition to create a cohesive yet fragmented narrative in Ulysses, demanding spatial synthesis from readers to construct meaning.
“To experience the passage of time, Proust learned, it was necessary to rise above it and to grasp both past and present simultaneously in a moment of what he called ‘pure time’.”	Proust’s concept of ‘pure time’ reflects Frank’s spatial form theory, where juxtaposition of moments creates a layered understanding of time, transcending linearity.
“Modern poetry asks its readers to suspend the process of individual reference temporarily until the entire pattern of internal references can be apprehended as a unity.”	This emphasizes how modern poetry demands a new kind of reader engagement, one that prioritizes spatial integration over sequential interpretation.
“What Joyce does, instead, is to present the elements of his narrative… in fragments, as they are thrown out unexplained in the course of casual conversation.”	Joyce’s fragmented narrative style in Ulysses is used as a prime example of spatial form, requiring readers to piece together the narrative through a non-linear, spatial process of understanding.
“By juxtaposing disparate images of his characters spatially, in a moment of time, Proust forces the reader to experience the effects of time’s passage.”	Frank illustrates how Proust’s narrative technique in In Search of Lost Time compels readers to synthesize temporal shifts into a spatial comprehension, mirroring the essence of spatial form.

Suggested Readings: “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts” by Joseph Frank

1. Frank, Joseph. “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: An Essay in Two Parts.” The Sewanee Review, vol. 53, no. 2, 1945, pp. 221–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27537575. Accessed 27 Nov. 2024.
2. Holtz, William. “Spatial Form in Modern Literature: A Reconsideration.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 4, no. 2, 1977, pp. 271–83. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342963. Accessed 27 Nov. 2024.
3. Mitchell, W. J. T. “Spatial Form in Literature: Toward a General Theory.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 3, 1980, pp. 539–67. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343108. Accessed 27 Nov. 2024.
4. Rabkin, Eric S. “Spatial Form and Plot.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 4, no. 2, 1977, pp. 253–70. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342962. Accessed 27 Nov. 2024.