
Introduction: “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
“Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser first appeared in 1980 as part of his poetry collection Sure Signs: New and Selected Poems. The poem is a poignant example of narrative through objects, using everyday remnants of life to tell the story of a vanished family. Its central ideas revolve around loss, abandonment, and the quiet narratives embedded in rural American life. The poem personifies inanimate objects—the “Bible with a broken back,” the “sandbox made from a tractor tire,” and the “toys… like branches after a storm”—to reconstruct the lives of the absent figures. Its popularity stems from Kooser’s ability to evoke an entire emotional history through sparse imagery and indirect narration, letting readers piece together the untold story. As the closing lines suggest, “Something went wrong, they say,” the poem’s power lies in the unresolved mystery and the haunting echo of human presence through silent evidence.
Text: “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
He was a big man, says the size of his shoes
on a pile of broken dishes by the house;
a tall man too, says the length of the bed
in an upstairs room; and a good, God-fearing man,
says the Bible with a broken back
on the floor below the window, dusty with sun;
but not a man for farming, say the fields
cluttered with boulders and the leaky barn.
A woman lived with him, says the bedroom wall
papered with lilacs and the kitchen shelves
covered with oilcloth, and they had a child,
says the sandbox made from a tractor tire.
Money was scarce, say the jars of plum preserves
and canned tomatoes sealed in the cellar hole.
And the winters cold, say the rags in the window frames.
It was lonely here, says the narrow country road.
Something went wrong, says the empty house
in the weed-choked yard. Stones in the fields
say he was not a farmer; the still-sealed jars
in the cellar say she left in a nervous haste.
And the child? Its toys are strewn in the yard
like branches after a storm—a rubber cow,
a rusty tractor with a broken plow,
a doll in overalls. Something went wrong, they say.
Annotations: “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
| Stanza | Annotation (Simple English) | Literary Devices Used |
| Stanza 1“He was a big man…” | This stanza tells us about the man who lived in the farmhouse. We learn about him through objects left behind—his big shoes, a long bed, a Bible, broken dishes, and poor farmland. He was likely religious and tall, but not good at farming. | – Personification: Objects “say” things- Imagery: Visual clues (shoes, bed, Bible, fields)- Irony: God-fearing but failed at farming- Symbolism: Bible = faith, leaky barn = failure |
| Stanza 2“A woman lived with him…” | This stanza shifts to the woman. The house decorations (wallpaper, shelves) suggest her presence. A child also lived there, shown by a sandbox. Food jars and rags in windows tell us money was tight and winters were harsh. The lonely country road hints at their isolation. | – Symbolism: Lilac wallpaper = attempt at beauty/love; canned goods = hard times- Imagery: Visual (sandbox, jars, rags)- Mood: Loneliness and poverty- Personification: Objects again “say” what happened |
| Stanza 3“Something went wrong…” | This stanza reveals that something tragic or troubling happened. The house is empty, toys are scattered as if people left suddenly. The jars remain sealed—perhaps the woman left quickly. The scattered toys suggest a sudden departure, leaving the child’s world behind. | – Foreshadowing: “Something went wrong” builds suspense- Symbolism: Toys = lost innocence; sealed jars = unfinished plans- Simile: “like branches after a storm” compares toy scattering to destruction- Tone: Mysterious and somber |
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
| 🔤 Device | 💬 Example from the Poem | 📘 Explanation |
| 🔁 Alliteration | “Bible with a broken back” | Repeats the “b” sound for rhythm and emphasis. |
| 🎵 Assonance | “rags in the window frames” | Repetition of vowel sounds softens the tone. |
| 🧠 Connotation | “leaky barn” | Implies hardship and failure without direct statement. |
| ⚖️ Contrast | “God-fearing man” vs. “not a man for farming” | Shows a contradiction between spiritual faith and practical struggle. |
| ⏩ Enjambment | “He was a big man, says the size of his shoes / on a pile of broken dishes…” | Allows the poem to flow like natural speech or thought. |
| 🔮 Foreshadowing | “Something went wrong” | Builds suspense and suggests an ominous event occurred. |
| 🆓 Free Verse | Entire poem | Lacks regular rhyme or meter, mimicking natural narrative. |
| 🔄 Hyperbaton (Inversion) | “says the size of his shoes” | Changes normal word order for stylistic effect. |
| 🖼️ Imagery | “sandbox made from a tractor tire” | Creates a vivid visual of rural, improvised life. |
| 🎭 Irony | “a good, God-fearing man”… “not a man for farming” | Highlights a gap between faith and worldly failure. |
| 🧷 Juxtaposition | * |
Themes: “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
🏚️ 1. Abandonment and Loss: A central theme of “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser is the quiet but haunting presence of abandonment. The poem’s setting—a deserted home overtaken by nature—speaks volumes through lines like “Something went wrong,” and “the empty house in the weed-choked yard.” These clues suggest that the family left abruptly and under troubling circumstances. The child’s toys “strewn in the yard like branches after a storm” reinforce the emotional impact of the loss. Through the voice of abandoned objects, the poem conveys not just physical desertion, but emotional and social disconnection, turning absence into a form of quiet tragedy.
👪 2. Family and Domestic Life: “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser subtly constructs a picture of a small, close-knit family using ordinary domestic details. We learn that “a woman lived with him,” and that “they had a child,” not through people’s voices, but through remnants like lilac wallpaper, oilcloth on shelves, and a sandbox made from a tractor tire. These artifacts of daily life reveal a woman’s effort to create warmth and beauty, and a child’s simple joys. This theme reflects the emotional depth hidden in mundane details, suggesting that even the most modest rural household holds complex, unspoken stories of care, effort, and connection.
💰 3. Poverty and Struggle: Economic hardship runs beneath the surface of “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser, emerging through visual and tactile details. Lines like “money was scarce, say the jars of plum preserves” and “the leaky barn” paint a picture of persistent struggle. The man’s failure at farming—“say the fields cluttered with boulders”—speaks to both personal limitation and the harshness of rural life. The rags stuffed in the window frames to keep out cold wind show how the family coped with limited resources. Together, these details depict a life marked by resilience amid hardship, and the quiet toll of poverty on hopes and plans.
🌾 4. The Voice of Objects / Storytelling Through Things: A unique and powerful element in “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser is its narrative technique, where inanimate objects “speak” the story. The repetition of “says the…” gives agency to shoes, jars, fields, and toys. This personification allows the reader to reconstruct a narrative from what’s left behind. For example, the “Bible with a broken back” reveals the man’s faith, while the “still-sealed jars” suggest a sudden, unplanned departure. Through this poetic device, Kooser demonstrates how material objects carry memory, meaning, and emotional truth, telling stories that humans leave untold.
Literary Theories and “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
| 📚 Literary Theory | 💬 Poem Reference | 📘 Application to Abandoned Farmhouse |
| 🧠 Psychoanalytic Theory | “Something went wrong, says the empty house”“still-sealed jars in the cellar” | This theory explores unconscious fears, repressed trauma, and internal conflict. The man’s failure, the woman’s hurried departure, and the scattered toys suggest hidden psychological distress and family breakdown. The sealed jars can symbolize suppressed emotions or unresolved past events. |
| 🧺 Marxist Theory | “Money was scarce, say the jars of plum preserves”“leaky barn,” “rags in the window frames” | A Marxist reading focuses on economic struggle and class. The family’s poverty is central—seen in their attempt to preserve food, insulate windows, and live with a collapsing barn. The poem critiques how working-class families are often left behind, unable to sustain themselves economically. |
| 🏞️ Ecocriticism | “the weed-choked yard,” “fields cluttered with boulders” | Ecocriticism analyzes the relationship between humans and nature. The poem presents a failed attempt to live off the land—fields resist cultivation, nature slowly reclaims the farmhouse. It reflects human vulnerability against environmental forces and the land’s refusal to cooperate, leading to abandonment. |
| 👓 New Criticism / Formalism | Repetition of “says the…”, use of personification and imagery | Formalist analysis focuses on structure, language, and literary devices. The poem’s meaning is built through form: personification of objects tells the story, imagery reveals emotions, and repetition builds rhythm and theme. Every clue is internal—no external context is needed to understand the emotional arc. |
Critical Questions about “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
❓1. What role does personification play in shaping the narrative of “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser?
Personification is the core narrative device in “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser, transforming lifeless objects into storytellers. Rather than using a human speaker, Kooser allows items such as shoes, a Bible, and children’s toys to “speak” about the absent characters. Phrases like “says the size of his shoes” and “says the Bible with a broken back” invite readers to construct the family’s history from material clues. This strategy turns the farmhouse into a silent witness, encouraging readers to engage in detective-like reading. The objects don’t just decorate the setting—they narrate it, evoking mystery, emotion, and a sense of haunting absence.
❓2. How does “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser use imagery to develop tone?
“Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser employs vivid and concrete imagery to develop a tone of quiet sorrow and mystery. Descriptions like “the weed-choked yard,” “rags in the window frames,” and “toys… like branches after a storm” create stark visual impressions of decay and emotional disruption. This sensory language draws the reader into a physical space that feels worn, forgotten, and full of unanswered questions. By letting images imply rather than explain, Kooser maintains a subtle, respectful distance from his subjects, allowing the reader to feel the quiet weight of abandonment and loss without melodrama.
❓3. What does “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser suggest about rural American life?
Through its focus on physical remnants and domestic detail, “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser offers a window into the hardship, isolation, and fragility of rural American life. The man is “not a man for farming,” and the barn is leaky, fields rocky—suggesting a failed attempt to survive off the land. Lines like “money was scarce” and “the winters cold” reflect both economic and environmental struggles. Yet there is tenderness in the woman’s decorating and the child’s handmade sandbox, which signal care amidst hardship. The poem captures both the resilience and vulnerability of working-class rural families.
❓4. Why is the line “Something went wrong” repeated in “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser?
The repeated line “Something went wrong” in “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser acts as a refrain that ties together the clues scattered throughout the poem. It is a powerful moment of emotional recognition—an acknowledgment that the quiet story unfolding through objects is one of disruption, possibly tragedy. This phrase frames the entire poem, suggesting that despite the surface calm and quiet, a deeper narrative of personal collapse or family disintegration lies beneath. The ambiguity of the line invites interpretation: did poverty break the family apart, did someone die, or did mental illness or violence play a role? The repetition leaves readers in a thoughtful state of unresolved reflection.
Literary Works Similar to “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
- 🏡 “The House on the Hill” by Edwin Arlington Robinson
Similarity: Both poems explore themes of abandonment and nostalgia, using imagery of deserted homes to suggest lost lives and faded memories. - 📦 “Those Winter Sundays” by Robert Hayden
Similarity: Like Kooser’s work, this poem reflects on unsaid family stories and the emotional weight of domestic spaces, emphasizing sacrifice and silence through details. - 🌾 “After Apple-Picking” by Robert Frost
Similarity: Uses rural imagery and symbolic labor to express inner struggle and fatigue, similar to how Kooser depicts the man’s failure as a farmer through visual clues. - 🧸 “My Papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke
Similarity: Both poems rely on concrete objects and domestic scenes to reveal deeper emotional layers within family dynamics, leaving much unsaid. - 👢 “Digging” by Seamus Heaney
Similarity: This poem also centers on memory, inheritance, and rural labor, using physical detail (a spade, soil) to explore personal and generational identity, like Kooser’s use of farming imagery.
Representative Quotations of “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
| 🔖 Quotation | 🧭 Context | 📘 Explanation | 🧠 Theoretical Perspective |
| “He was a big man, says the size of his shoes” | Opening line of the poem | Begins the story by letting objects describe the man, implying physical stature and presence. | New Criticism – Focus on textual clues for character portrayal |
| “a good, God-fearing man, says the Bible with a broken back” | Describes the man’s moral identity | The Bible symbolizes faith, but its broken spine may imply spiritual wear or struggle. | Psychoanalytic Theory – Suggests conflict between inner belief and life conditions |
| “but not a man for farming, say the fields cluttered with boulders” | Juxtaposition to his good intentions | Reveals practical failure despite spiritual strength, symbolized through nature’s resistance. | Marxist Theory – Highlights economic failure and class struggle |
| “A woman lived with him, says the bedroom wall papered with lilacs” | Introduces the woman through domestic detail | Suggests femininity, care, and an attempt to bring beauty into a hard life. | Feminist Theory – Focus on the woman’s silent labor and identity |
| “and they had a child, says the sandbox made from a tractor tire” | Depicts the child’s presence | Improvised toy reveals creativity in hardship and a family’s love. | Ecocriticism – Shows adaptation to environment using natural/industrial remnants |
| “Money was scarce, say the jars of plum preserves” | Describes the family’s economic condition | Preserved food hints at both thrift and anxiety about survival. | Marxist Theory – Underscores poverty and domestic labor’s value |
| “the winters cold, say the rags in the window frames” | Reflects physical hardship | Resourceful insulation shows struggle and suffering in silence. | Sociological Theory – Suggests resilience under poor living conditions |
| “Something went wrong, says the empty house” | A key turning point in the narrative | Introduces the idea of crisis or tragedy without explanation, creating mystery. | Psychoanalytic Theory – Points to trauma or disruption beneath the surface |
| “a doll in overalls” | One of the child’s abandoned toys | Evokes innocence, gender ambiguity, and sudden interruption of childhood. | Gender Theory – Challenges norms through gender-neutral imagery |
| “like branches after a storm” | Describes scattered toys | Powerful simile suggesting sudden destruction and emotional wreckage. | Structuralism – Emphasizes metaphor and symbol as narrative structures |
Suggested Readings: “Abandoned Farmhouse” by Ted Kooser
- Vogel, Mark, and Janet Tilley. “Modern Poetry in the Classroom: Story Poems and the Stories We’ve Been Waiting to Tell.” The English Journal, vol. 82, no. 6, 1993, pp. 86–89. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/820175. Accessed 17 June 2025.
- Winn, Harbour, et al. “On the Outside Looking In: An Interview with Ted Kooser.” Conversations with Ted Kooser, edited by John Cusatis, University Press of Mississippi, 2025, pp. 109–18. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.24215708.14. Accessed 17 June 2025.
- Whalen, Peter, et al. “A Way to Start: A Conversation with Ted Kooser.” Conversations with Ted Kooser, edited by John Cusatis, University Press of Mississippi, 2025, pp. 33–39. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.24215708.8. Accessed 17 June 2025.
- Harris, Judith, and Ted Kooser. “A Conversation with Ted Kooser: In Dialogue with Judith Harris.” Conversations with Ted Kooser, edited by John Cusatis, University Press of Mississippi, 2025, pp. 194–203. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.24215708.23. Accessed 17 June 2025.








