Grand Narrative in Literature & Literary Theory

Grand Narratives are comprehensive storytelling frameworks that aim to offer all-encompassing explanations of complex phenomena.

Etymology of Grand Narrative

The term “Grand Narrative” has its etymological roots in the French language, specifically from the phrase “grand récit.” “Grand” in French means “big” or “grand,” while “récit” translates to “narrative” or “story.”

This term is often used to describe a comprehensive and overarching narrative or story that seeks to provide a unified explanation or interpretation of complex historical or societal events.

Meanings of Grand Narrative
Key Points
Grand Narratives are comprehensive storytelling frameworks that aim to offer all-encompassing explanations of complex phenomena.
Typically, they refer to dominant metanarratives that assert universal truths and often claim to be the ultimate explanations for various aspects of human existence.
These narratives delve into historical, ideological, or cultural contexts, seeking to make sense of the world through a particular lens or perspective.
Grand Narratives are frequently subjected to critique and deconstruction, as scholars and theorists examine their limitations, biases, and potential for excluding alternative viewpoints.
In the realm of postmodern thought, Grand Narratives are challenged, with an emphasis on embracing plural perspectives and acknowledging the diversity of human experiences.
They suggest that reality is fragmented and open to multiple interpretations, rather than adhering to a single, overarching narrative.
Within this framework, there is a focus on exploring localized or counter-narratives that challenge the dominance of the grand narrative, highlighting the voices and experiences that may have been marginalized or silenced.
Grand Narratives play a significant role in shaping culture and society and are subject to ongoing critical analysis, as scholars seek to understand their influence and impact on our understanding of the world.
Definition of Grand Narrative as a Theoretical Term

Grand narrative, as a theoretical term, refers to an overarching and comprehensive narrative framework that seeks to provide a unified interpretation of complex historical, societal, or philosophical phenomena.

It often encompasses metanarratives, which assert the existence of universal truths or explanations for human existence and history. In critical and postmodern discourse, the concept of grand narrative challenges the authority and validity of such overarching narratives, emphasizing the diversity of perspectives and highlighting the limitations and potential biases inherent in these all-encompassing accounts.

Grand Narrative: Theorists, Works, and Arguments
Theorists Associated with Grand Narrative:
  • Jean-François Lyotard: Introduced the term “grand narrative” in his work The Postmodern Condition, where he critiqued the dominance of overarching narratives in modern thought.
Works Exploring Grand Narrative:
  • Jean-François Lyotard’s The Postmodern Condition: Notable for its critique of grand narratives and its influence on postmodern thought.
Arguments and Concepts Related to Grand Narrative:
  • Critique of Totalizing Narratives: Theorists like Lyotard argue that grand narratives attempt to totalize and oversimplify complex realities, suppressing alternative viewpoints.
  • Fragmentation and Plurality: The concept highlights the fragmented nature of reality and asserts the existence of multiple, diverse narratives that challenge universal explanations.
  • Postmodern Skepticism: Grand narratives are seen as emblematic of modernist thought and are met with skepticism in postmodern discourse, which values diversity and multiple perspectives.
  • Cultural and Ideological Impact: Grand narratives have a significant influence on culture and ideology, shaping worldviews, ethics, and political beliefs.
  • Shift in Paradigm: The critique of grand narratives represents a shift away from the notion that a single narrative can encompass all aspects of human experience and history, advocating for a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of knowledge and truth.
Grand Narrative and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevanceUsage
StructuralismStructuralism explores underlying structures and patterns in literature.Grand narratives can be analyzed as overarching structural elements shaping literary meaning and organization.
PostcolonialismPostcolonialism examines colonialism’s legacies and power dynamics.Grand narratives, like colonial narratives, are critiqued for propagating imperialistic ideas and deconstructed to reveal marginalized voices and counter-narratives.
Feminist TheoryFeminist theory explores gender roles, patriarchy, and societal norms.Grand narratives related to gender, such as traditional roles, are challenged and deconstructed to expose their contribution to women’s oppression.
DeconstructionDeconstruction uncovers language and meaning’s instability and ambiguity.Grand narratives are deconstructed to reveal their language reliance and to demonstrate multiple interpretations.
PostmodernismPostmodernism challenges universal truths and embraces plurality.Grand narratives are critiqued for imposing a single truth and postmodern literature highlights diverse narratives and meanings.
Reader-Response TheoryReader-response theory focuses on reader interpretation.Grand narratives can be viewed as constructs readers engage with differently, depending on their experiences and perspectives.
Psychoanalytic TheoryPsychoanalytic theory explores the unconscious and human psyche.Grand narratives may be analyzed as expressions of collective desires, fears, or societal anxieties found in literature.
Grand Narrative in Literary Criticism
  1. Narrative Deconstruction in Contemporary Novels:
    • In contemporary literature, works like David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas and Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad break away from conventional narrative structures. Critics use the concept of grand narrative to examine how these novels deconstruct societal grand narratives, showcasing the richness and diversity of human experiences. These narratives challenge the idea that a single, universal story can adequately represent complex realities.
  2. Postcolonial Critique:
    • Recent novels such as Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Half of a Yellow Sun and Aravind Adiga’s The White Tiger are examined through a postcolonial lens. Grand Narrative is employed to critique these works for their engagement with grand colonial narratives. These novels offer counter-narratives that challenge and deconstruct imperialistic ideologies, shedding light on the marginalized voices and perspectives often silenced by dominant narratives.
  3. Feminist Analysis:
    • Contemporary feminist literary criticism focuses on recent works like Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Carmen Maria Machado’s Her Body and Other Parties. These works are scrutinized for their exploration of gender-based Grand Narratives. Critics use Grand Narrative as a tool to reveal how these narratives perpetuate or dismantle traditional gender roles, exposing their role in the oppression of women.
  4. Identity and Identity Politics:
    • In the realm of contemporary poetry and short stories, the concept of grand narrative is applied to works like Claudia Rankine’s poetry. These works challenge societal narratives related to race, identity, and belonging. Literary critics analyze how these narratives deconstruct and redefine identity, highlighting the complexities of contemporary identity politics.
  5. Reader-Response and Plurality:
    • Drawing from reader-response theory, scholars explore how diverse readers engage with recent literary works. The concept of grand narrative is used to emphasize the plurality of interpretations that can emerge from these texts. It underscores the idea that readers bring their unique perspectives and experiences to the narrative, enriching the overall discourse.
  6. Metafiction and Narrative Experimentation:
    • Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children and Ali Smith’s How to Be Both exemplify narrative experimentation in contemporary literature. Grand Narrative is employed to analyze how these authors play with narrative structures, challenging conventional storytelling. These works often blur the lines between reality and fiction, prompting critical discussions about the reliability and limitations of grand narratives in literature.

In contemporary literary criticism, grand narrative serves as a powerful analytical tool for evaluating and interpreting recent literary works. It enables scholars to explore how authors engage with, subvert, or deconstruct overarching narratives, offering fresh perspectives on the complexities of contemporary society.

Suggested Readings
  1. Anderson, Walter Truett. Reality Isn’t What It Used to Be: Theatrical Politics, Ready-to-Wear Religion, Global Myths, Primitive Chic, and Other Wonders of the Postmodern World. HarperOne, 1992.
  2. Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi, University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
  3. McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. Routledge, 2003.
  4. Miller, J. Hillis. The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man, Eliot, Trollope, James, and Benjamin. Columbia University Press, 1987.
  5. Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Vintage Books, 1979.
  6. West, Cornel. The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism. University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.
You may read more on Theoretical Terms below:

Commodification in Literature & Literary Theory

Commodification refers to the process by which goods, services, or intangible concepts are transformed into marketable entities.

Etymology of Commodification

The term “commodification” traces its roots to the word “commodity,” which itself originates from the Latin word “commodus,” meaning “convenient” or “useful.”

The concept of commodification emerged in the 19th century primarily in the context of economics and sociology. It refers to the process by which goods, services, or even ideas are transformed into marketable or exchangeable entities, emphasizing their monetary value over their inherent qualities or societal implications.

This term won currency as a critical concept in understanding the transformation of various aspects of human life and culture into commodities within capitalist systems.

Meanings of Commodification
Meaning of CommodificationHow it is Used in Literature
Commodity FetishismIn literature, the concept of commodity fetishism is used to explore how goods take on mystical qualities in capitalist societies, overshadowing their true significance. It is often used to critique consumerism and portray the dehumanizing effects of capitalism.
Cultural CommodificationIn literature, cultural commodification is used to analyze the appropriation and commercialization of cultural elements like language, symbols, or traditions. Authors employ this concept to explore its impact on cultural authenticity and integrity.
Literary CommodificationWithin literature, the theme of literary commodification is used to highlight the commercialization of literature itself, often emphasizing profit over artistic or intellectual value. It can serve as a lens to critique the publishing industry and examine the complex relationship between art and commerce.
Commodification of IdentityLiterature employs the concept of commodification of identity to delve into how personal identity is commodified, leading individuals to conform to market-driven expectations. This theme is used to address issues related to identity politics, conformity, and the loss of individuality in consumer-driven societies.
Environmental CommodificationIn ecological literature, environmental commodification is used to scrutinize the exploitation and commercialization of natural resources. Authors use this concept to shed light on the resulting ecological degradation and environmental crises stemming from the commodification of the environment.
Technological CommodificationIn literature, technological commodification is utilized in the context of the digital age to explore how aspects of human life, such as privacy, personal data, and emotions, are commodified. Dystopian or speculative fiction often uses this concept to speculate on the potential consequences of technological commodification.
Definition of Commodification as a Theoretical Term

Commodification, as a theoretical term, refers to the process by which goods, services, or intangible concepts are transformed into marketable entities within a capitalist system. This transformation typically emphasizes their exchange value and profit potential while often overlooking their intrinsic qualities or social implications. In academic discourse, commodification is a critical concept used to analyze the impact of market forces, consumerism, and commercialization on various aspects of society, culture, and human life.

Commodification: Theorists, Works and Argument
TheoristWorkKey Points
Marxist PerspectiveKarl Marx – Capital (Das Kapital)Karl Marx argued that literature and culture are commodities produced and consumed within a capitalist system, serving the interests of the ruling class by promoting their ideology.
Cultural Studies ApproachStuart Hall – Encoding and Decoding in the Television DiscourseStuart Hall’s cultural studies approach highlights how literature and culture can be commodified and used for ideological manipulation, emphasizing the role of power and control in this process.
Postcolonial CritiqueFrantz Fanon – The Wretched of the EarthFanon’s work in postcolonial theory examines how colonial powers commodify the culture and literature of colonized peoples, reinforcing colonial dominance and devaluing colonized culture.
Feminist AnalysisSimone de Beauvoir – The Second SexSimone de Beauvoir’s feminist perspective addresses the commodification of women in literature, arguing that women are often objectified and reduced to commodities within patriarchal narratives.
Consumer Culture and PostmodernismJean Baudrillard – The Consumer Society: Myths and StructuresBaudrillard’s postmodernist view explores how literature and culture become commodities in a consumer-driven society, blurring the boundaries between reality and representation.
Literary Canon and Cultural CapitalPierre Bourdieu – Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of TasteBourdieu’s theory of cultural capital examines how literature is commodified within the literary canon, with the selection of works reflecting the interests and values of the dominant social class.
Globalization and World LiteraturePascale Casanova – The World Republic of LettersCasanova’s work explores the commodification of literature within a global context, highlighting how the global literary market commodifies authors from different cultures, often favoring Western norms.
Commodification and Literary Theories
TheoryUse of CommodificationAnalysis
Marxist Literary TheoryMarxist literary theory employs the concept of commodification to view literature as a product of capitalism, where literary works themselves become commodities.It conducts an analysis that explores how literature either serves the interests of the ruling class by promoting its ideology or challenges the status quo by exposing class contradictions.
Cultural StudiesCultural Studies examines how culture, including literature, is produced, consumed, and commodified within society.Its analysis delves into the role of power, identity, and ideology in the cultural production and consumption of literature, highlighting how literature reflects and shapes cultural norms.
Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial theory uses the concept of commodification to analyze how colonizers commodified the culture and literature of colonized peoples, often reducing them to exoticized commodities.Its analysis investigates how colonial literature perpetuates imperialist control, devalues colonized culture, and reinforces colonial power dynamics.
Feminist Literary TheoryFeminist literary theory focuses on the commodification of women in literature, examining how women are objectified and reduced to commodities within patriarchal narratives.The analysis within this theory explores how literature both challenges and perpetuates gender stereotypes and inequalities, providing insights into gender dynamics in society.
Postmodern Literary TheoryPostmodernism sees literature within a consumer-driven, media-saturated society, where signs and symbols are commodified.The analysis here centers on how literature blurs the boundaries between reality and representation, often critiquing the commodification of culture and language in a postmodern context.
New HistoricismNew Historicism employs the concept of commodification to consider how literature is shaped by historical and cultural contexts.Its analysis investigates how literature reflects and negotiates power dynamics, economic structures, and cultural practices within the specific historical period in which it was created.
Critical TheoryCritical theory examines literature’s role in shaping and reflecting society’s values and norms, often within a commodified context.Its analysis investigates how literature can critique and subvert commodification, offering alternative perspectives on culture and society, and questioning dominant ideologies.
Commodification as a Literary Device

Commodification as a literary device involves the portrayal of objects, characters, or concepts as marketable commodities within a narrative, often to critique consumerism or explore the dehumanizing effects of capitalism. This literary technique serves to illuminate the pervasive influence of economic forces on individuals and societies, inviting readers to reflect on the commodification of human experiences and values in contemporary culture. By employing commodification in their narratives, authors engage with broader socio-economic issues, offering readers a lens through which to analyze the impact of market-driven ideologies on human lives and relationships.

Examples: Commodification in Literary Criticism
Work and ThemeTheoretical PerspectiveType of Commodification
Nausea by Jean-Paul Sartre (French)Existentialist Literary TheoryThe novel explores the protagonist’s existential nausea and alienation in a modern capitalist society, where everyday objects and the self become commodities, highlighting the commodification of meaning and existence.
“The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka (Czech-German)Psychoanalytic Literary TheoryKafka’s story portrays the protagonist’s transformation into an insect, becoming a commodity exploited by his family, reflecting themes of alienation, dehumanization, and the commodification of the individual.
“The Hollow Men” by T.S. Eliot (British-American)Postmodernist Literary TheoryThe poem delves into the spiritual emptiness and fragmentation in the modern world, highlighting the commodification of religious and cultural symbols and the elusive nature of meaning.
“The Society of the Spectacle” by Guy Debord (French)Critical Theory and Media StudiesDebord’s essay critiques the concept of the spectacle in a consumer-driven society, where everything becomes a commodity mediated through images, reflecting the commodification of everyday life and perception.
Suggested Readings
  1. Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Translated by Ben Fowkes, Penguin Books, 1990.
  2. Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press, 1991.
  3. Hall, Stuart. The Cultural Studies Reader. Edited by Simon During, Routledge, 1993.
  4. Baudrillard, Jean. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. Translated by Chris Turner, Sage Publications, 1998.
  5. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing, 2008.
  6. Frow, John. Time and Commodity Culture: Essays on Cultural Theory and Postmodernity. Oxford University Press, 1997.
  7. Slater, Don. Consumer Culture and Modernity. Wiley, 1997.
  8. du Gay, Paul et al., editors. Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life. Sage Publications, 1997.
  9. Lash, Scott and Celia Lury, editors. Global Culture Industry: The Mediation of Things. Polity Press, 2007.

Binary Opposition in Literature & Literary Theory

Etymology of Binary Opposition

The term “binary opposition” is a concept that occurs in structuralist and post-structuralist linguistic theory. It is not a word with a traditional etymological origin. However, the two key components of the term, “binary” and “opposition,” each have their own etymological roots:

  1. Binary: The word “binary” comes from the Latin word “binarius,” which means “consisting of two.” It is related to the Latin word “bini,” which means “two by two” or “in pairs.” The term “binary” is commonly used in various fields to describe systems or concepts that involve two distinct and contrasting elements.
  2. Opposition: The word “opposition” is derived from the Latin word “oppositio,” which is a combination of “ob” (against) and “ponere” (to place). It refers to the act of placing things against each other or in contrast to each other. In linguistics and literary theory, “opposition” is used to describe the relationship between two contrasting or antithetical elements within a linguistic or conceptual system.

In the context of literary theory and structuralism, “binary opposition” refers to the structural relationship between two contrasting or opposing elements such as light and dark, male and female, good and evil. They are often used to create meaning and structure within narratives and language. This concept is particularly associated with the work of structuralist theorists like Ferdinand de Saussure and Claude Lévi-Strauss.

Meanings of Binary Opposition
Binary Opposition in TheoryMeanings
Structuralist LinguisticsIn linguistics, binary opposition refers to the fundamental concept of contrasting pairs of elements or concepts in language, such as phonemes, morphemes, or syntactic structures. It is a central idea in the structuralist approach to language analysis, as championed by Ferdinand de Saussure.
Literary TheoryIn literary theory, binary opposition denotes the pairing of contrasting themes, characters, or concepts within a narrative or text. These opposing elements often serve to create conflict, meaning, and structure in literature. It has been influential in various literary theories, including structuralism and post-structuralism.
Cultural StudiesBeyond linguistics and literature, binary opposition is applied in cultural studies to analyze how societies construct meaning through contrasting pairs of concepts, such as civilization/barbarism or self/other. This concept helps examine how power dynamics and social hierarchies are established through the binary categorization of ideas and identities.
Post-StructuralismIn post-structuralist thought, binary opposition is deconstructed and critiqued. Scholars like Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault argue that such oppositions are not fixed and natural but are socially constructed and subject to change. Post-structuralism questions the stability and hierarchy implied by binary oppositions.
Definition of Binary Opposition as a Theoretical Term

Binary Opposition, as a theoretical term in literary theory, refers to a fundamental concept that centers on the categorization and exploration of contrasting pairs of elements or concepts within a narrative or text. This concept serves as a critical tool for analyzing the inherent tension, conflict, and structural organization present in literature. By juxtaposing and highlighting opposing ideas or characters, binary opposition contributes to the development of meaning, themes, and narrative dynamics within literary works.

Binary Opposition: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Ferdinand de Saussure: The Swiss linguist who introduced the concept of binary opposition as a fundamental principle in structuralist linguistics, emphasizing the contrast between linguistic elements as a basis for meaning.
  • Claude Lévi-Strauss: A prominent anthropologist and structuralist thinker who applied binary oppositions to analyze cultural myths and narratives, proposing that they reflect deep structures of the human mind.
  • Jacques Derrida: A post-structuralist philosopher known for deconstructing binary oppositions, arguing that they are not stable or hierarchical but are contingent and subject to interpretation.
Works:
  • Course in General Linguistics (1916) by Ferdinand de Saussure: Saussure’s influential work lays the foundation for structuralist linguistics and introduces the concept of binary oppositions in language.
  • The Structural Study of Myth (1955) by Claude Lévi-Strauss: In this essay, Lévi-Strauss applies binary oppositions to the analysis of myths, demonstrating how they reveal underlying cultural structures.
  • Of Grammatology (1967) by Jacques Derrida: Derrida challenges the stability of binary oppositions and argues for the deconstruction of such pairs, introducing the concept of “différance.”
Arguments:
  • Structural Analysis: The concept of binary opposition is used for structural analysis, revealing how contrasting elements contribute to the organization and meaning of texts, both in language and culture.
  • Deconstruction: Post-structuralist thinkers like Derrida argue against the fixed and hierarchical nature of binary oppositions, contending that they are contingent and subject to reinterpretation.
  • Narrative and Conflict: Binary oppositions often serve as the basis for narrative conflict and character development in literature, highlighting the tension between opposing forces or ideas.

These theorists, works, and arguments provide a foundational understanding of the role of binary opposition in linguistics, cultural analysis, and literary theory.

Binary Opposition and Literary Theories

Binary opposition is a concept that plays a significant role in several relevant literary theories, contributing to the analysis and interpretation of literature in distinct ways. Here are some of the key literary theories where binary opposition is relevant, along with their significance:

1. Structuralism:
  • Significance: Structuralism, notably championed by Ferdinand de Saussure, emphasizes the importance of binary oppositions in language and literature. In structuralism, binary pairs of linguistic elements (such as good/evil, man/woman) are seen as fundamental in organizing meaning. They help reveal how language operates and how meaning is constructed through contrast.
2. Post-Structuralism:
  • Significance: Post-structuralism, represented by Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault, challenges the stability and hierarchy of binary oppositions. It argues that these oppositions are not fixed and that they often conceal complexities and power dynamics. Derrida’s concept of “deconstruction” involves examining binary pairs to uncover hidden meanings and contradictions.
3. Feminist Literary Theory:
  • Significance: In feminist literary theory, binary oppositions are used to explore gender roles and stereotypes. The concept of the “male gaze,” as discussed by Laura Mulvey, highlights how binary gender distinctions influence the representation of women in literature and film. Feminist scholars analyze and critique these oppositions to address issues of power, agency, and identity.
4. Postcolonial Literary Theory:
  • Significance: Postcolonial theory employs binary oppositions to examine the colonial perspective and the power dynamics at play in colonial and postcolonial narratives. It explores how these oppositions, such as colonizer/colonized, are used to depict and often stereotype different cultures and identities. Postcolonial scholars deconstruct these oppositions to challenge Eurocentric viewpoints.
5. Queer Theory:
  • Significance: Queer theory uses binary oppositions to explore sexuality and identity in literature. It questions traditional heteronormative distinctions (e.g., heterosexual/homosexual) and analyzes how these binary categories are challenged or subverted in texts. Queer theorists highlight how non-normative desires and identities disrupt established norms.
6. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory:
  • Significance: Psychoanalytic theory, influenced by Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan, looks at binary oppositions as mirrors of psychological dynamics. Characters’ conflicts, desires, and anxieties are often represented through these oppositions. It helps in understanding the inner workings of characters’ minds and motivations in literature.
7. Reader-Response Theory:
  • Significance: Reader-response theory acknowledges that readers’ interpretations are shaped by binary oppositions and their own subjectivities. Readers engage with texts through their own perspectives, and these oppositions influence their understanding and emotional response. It underscores the importance of individual reader engagement with the text.
Binary Opposition in Literary Criticism
Literary WorkBinary OppositionSignificance
Frankenstein by Mary ShelleyCreator vs. CreationIn Shelley’s novel, the binary opposition between Victor Frankenstein (the creator) and the Creature (his creation) is central. This opposition serves as a vehicle for exploring themes of responsibility, morality, and the consequences of scientific ambition.
“Ode to a Nightingale” by John KeatsLife vs. DeathKeats’ poem presents the binary opposition of the fleeting, ecstatic experience of life and the eternal, unchanging realm of death represented by the nightingale’s song. This contrast highlights the tension between the transient nature of human existence and the allure of timeless beauty.
“The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan PoeSanity vs. MadnessIn this psychological thriller, the binary opposition of the narrator’s claims of sanity and the evidence of his madness through his actions creates a sense of suspense and horror. Poe uses this opposition to explore the limits of human reason and the descent into madness.
“Macbeth” by William ShakespeareAmbition vs. ConscienceIn Shakespeare’s tragedy, the binary opposition between Macbeth’s unchecked ambition and his tormenting conscience plays a central role. This opposition drives the character’s moral decline and the overarching theme of the corrupting influence of power.
Suggested Readings
  1. Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers, Hill and Wang, 2013.
  2. Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Routledge, 2002.
  3. Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
  4. Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Vintage, 1994.
  5. Freud, Sigmund. The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated by James Strachey, Oxford University Press, 1999.
  6. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Structural Study of Myth. Yale University Press, 1989.
  7. Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin, Open Court, 1986.
  8. Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine, Simon & Schuster, 2003.
  9. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Edited by J. Paul Hunter, W. W. Norton & Company, 2012.
  10. Stevenson, Robert Louis. Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Dover Publications, 2003.

Gaze in Literature & Literary Theory

Most times, women are seen through the male gaze, so they are often shown as housewives, girlfriends, or objects of desire. Yorgos Lanthimos

Etymology of Gaze

The word gaze evolved from Middle English. Its roots can be traced back to the Old Norse word “gās,” which meant “goose.”

  • Shift in Meaning: Over time, it acquired additional meanings related to looking or staring fixedly.
  • Possibly Goose-Related: The term’s evolution may be linked to the notion of a goose’s fixed and alert gaze.
  • Contemporary Definition: By the late Middle English period, it had assumed its current meaning of looking intently or steadily at something or someone.
  • Academic Significance: In academic contexts, the study of the “gaze” has become a critical concept, explored in fields like film studies, gender studies, and art theory, to understand how individuals observe, interpret, and interact with visual stimuli and their surroundings.
Meanings of Gaze
MeaningDescription
To Look IntentlyIt refers to the act of looking at something or someone with a focused and fixed attention, often implying a deep or prolonged examination.
To StareGaze also denotes a prolonged and sometimes intense stare directed toward an object, person, or scene, typically suggesting a contemplative or mesmerized state.
To Observe CloselyIt implies a deliberate and careful observation of details, as in “gaze upon a work of art” or “gaze at the stars.”
To GawkIn certain contexts, gaze is used pejoratively to describe an open-mouthed, often thoughtless, and sometimes impolite form of staring.
To Express EmotionIt conveys various emotions or intentions, such as love, longing, curiosity, admiration, or even menace, depending on the context.
A Fixed or Prolonged LookGaze refers to the duration or quality of a look, suggesting that it is not fleeting but enduring or persistent.
In a Theoretical ContextThe term is often used in academic and critical discourse to analyze the act of looking, particularly in relation to power dynamics, gender, and cultural perspectives.
Definitions of Gaze as a Theoretical Term
  1. In theoretical discourse, the term “gaze” refers to a critical concept used to analyze how individuals or groups visually engage with and interpret objects, people, or images within various cultural, social, and power contexts.
  2. It also carries connotations of the observer’s subjectivity, highlighting how their perspective and the act of looking can influence perceptions, identities, and power relations, particularly in fields like film studies, gender studies, and visual culture analysis.
  3. Understanding it involves examining not only what is observed but also the underlying dynamics of agency, control, and social constructs that shape how individuals see, interpret, and are seen in the visual realm.
Gaze: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Laura Mulvey: Mulvey’s essay “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” (1975) is foundational in feminist film theory. She introduced the concept of the “male gaze,” highlighting how cinema often objectifies women and positions the viewer in the perspective of a heterosexual male viewer.
  • Michel Foucault: Foucault’s work, particularly in The Birth of the Clinic (1963) and Discipline and Punish (1975), explores the dynamics of surveillance and the gaze as a tool of power and control in disciplinary societies.
Works:
  • “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” by Laura Mulvey: In this influential essay, Mulvey argues that classical Hollywood cinema constructs the male viewer as an active agent while reducing female characters to passive objects of desire, reinforcing patriarchal power structures.
  • The Birth of the Clinic by Michel Foucault: Foucault examines how the gaze of medical professionals and the institution of the clinic shape the perception of illness, patients, and the medical gaze itself.
Key Arguments:
  • The Male Gaze (Mulvey): Mulvey’s central argument revolves around the male gaze in cinema, suggesting that the camera and narrative position viewers as heterosexual males, leading to the objectification and fetishization of women on screen.
  • Panopticism (Foucault): Foucault’s concept of the panopticon, introduced in Discipline and Punish, highlights how the constant possibility of being watched creates a self-regulating society, where individuals internalize the gaze of authority and conform to societal norms.

These theorists, works, and arguments are pivotal in th discussions surrounding this concept of and its implications in various fields, including film studies, gender studies, and the analysis of power dynamics in society.

Gaze in Literary Theories
TheoryUse in Theory
Feminist Literary TheoryFeminist literary theory often examines the “gaze” through the lens of gender and power dynamics. It explores how the narrative perspective and descriptions within texts can reinforce or subvert traditional gender roles and stereotypes. The “male gaze” as discussed by Laura Mulvey, is a central concept in this context, highlighting how male authors and readers may objectify female characters in literature.
Psychoanalytic Literary TheoryPsychoanalytic theory, particularly influenced by Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan, interprets the “gaze” as a reflection of psychological dynamics. It analyzes how characters’ obsessions, voyeurism, and the act of looking in literature can reveal deeper unconscious desires, anxieties, and conflicts.
Postcolonial Literary TheoryIn postcolonial theory, it is used to scrutinize the colonial perspective and the power dynamics at play in colonial and postcolonial narratives. It explores how colonial literature often depicted colonized cultures as exotic “others,” emphasizing how the colonizers’ gaze impacted the representation of colonized people and landscapes.
Queer TheoryQueer theory utilizes the “gaze” to examine how sexuality and desire are portrayed in literature. It explores how characters’ looks, gazes, and the act of seeing can reveal hidden or repressed queer desires, as well as how texts may challenge or subvert traditional heteronormative representations of love and desire.
Reader-Response TheoryReader-response theory explores how readers’ perspectives and subjectivities influence their interpretation of texts. The “gaze” is considered as an aspect of the reader’s engagement with a literary work, shaping their understanding and emotional response to characters and situations.
Postmodern Literary TheoryPostmodern literary theory engages with the “gaze” as part of a broader examination of representation, reality, and fiction. It questions the reliability of the narrator’s gaze, highlighting the potential for unreliable narrators and multiple perspectives in literature.

In each of these literary theories, it plays a significant role in the analysis of how characters, authors, and readers engage with textual and visual elements, uncovering themes related to power, desire, gender, sexuality, and

Gaze and Literary Criticism
WorkLiterary TheoryCriticism Under Gaze
Pride and Prejudice by Jane AustenFeminist Literary TheoryIn this novel, the male gaze is critically examined through the character of Mr. Darcy and his initial judgments of Elizabeth Bennet based on her appearance. The narrative challenges traditional gender roles as Elizabeth resists the objectifying gaze and asserts her agency, contributing to feminist critique.
“The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan PoePsychoanalytic Literary TheoryPoe’s short story offers a psychoanalytic reading of the narrator’s obsession with the old man’s “vulture eye.” The gaze represents the narrator’s psychological conflict and descent into madness, showcasing how the act of looking can mirror inner turmoil and repressed desires.
“A Far Cry from Africa” by Derek WalcottPostcolonial Literary TheoryWalcott’s poem examines the postcolonial perspective by critiquing the colonial gaze upon Africa. It underscores how the colonizer’s gaze exoticizes and objectifies colonized cultures, highlighting power imbalances and the impact of the colonizer’s gaze on identity and representation.
Stone Butch Blues by Leslie FeinbergQueer TheoryIn Leslie Feinberg’s novel, the protagonist’s experiences are analyzed through queer theory, focusing on how the gaze of society often misunderstands or misrepresents Jess’s identity as a stone butch lesbian. The novel challenges traditional gender norms and heteronormative expectations through the character’s gaze upon herself and others.
Suggested Readings
Books:
  1. Mulvey, Laura. Visual and Other Pleasures. Indiana University Press, 1989.
  2. Jay, Martin.Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. University of California Press, 1994.
  3. Foucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith, Routledge, 2003.
  4. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 2006.
  5. Doane, Mary Ann. The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Harvard University Press, 2002.
  6. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Robert Hurley et al., University of Minnesota Press, 1983.

Articles:

Fetishism in Literature & Literary Theory

Fetishism, as a theoretical concept in anthropology and cultural studies, posits that certain objects or symbols within a society hold profound cultural, religious, or ritual significance, often representing deeper societal values and beliefs.

Etymology of Fetishism

The term “fetish” and its derivative “fetishism” have their origins in the Portuguese word “feitiço,” which means “charm” or “sorcery.”

During the 15th century, Portuguese explorers encountered objects and religious practices in Africa that they considered mysterious and linked to spiritual beliefs. They referred to these objects as “feitiço,” eventually adapting it into “fetish” in English.

With time, the term evolved to include not only objects believed to have magical powers but also the fixation or obsession with non-sexual or sexual objects and practices.

In the context of fetishism in literature and theory, it refers to the sexual fascination or obsession with specific objects or body parts.

Meanings of Fetish/ism
MeaningDescription
Fetish (1) – An Inanimate Object with Special SignificanceIn this context, a fetish refers to a small, often portable inanimate object believed to possess magical or religious significance, and it is often used in rituals or as a source of protection.
Fetish (2) – Sexual Attraction to Inanimate ObjectsIn a sexual context, fetish denotes a specific object or body part that arouses sexual desire and is often essential for sexual gratification. This pertains to a form of sexual preference.
Fetishism (1) – Belief in the Supernatural Power of ObjectsFetishism, within religious or cultural contexts, involves the belief that certain objects possess supernatural powers or spirits and are revered or used for various rituals.
Fetishism (2) – Sexual FetishismSexual fetishism is a psychological phenomenon in which an individual becomes sexually aroused by a particular object, body part, or situation that is not typically considered sexual in nature. This can become a necessary element for sexual satisfaction.
Definition of Fetish/ism as a Theoretical Term
  1. Fetishism, as a theoretical concept in anthropology and cultural studies, posits that certain objects or symbols within a society hold profound cultural, religious, or ritual significance, often representing deeper societal values and beliefs.
  2. In the realm of psychology, fetishism is viewed as a paraphilic disorder, where individuals derive sexual arousal and satisfaction primarily from specific objects, body parts, or situations, deviating from conventional sexual norms and preferences.
  3. In Marxist theory, fetishism refers to the idea that commodities in a capitalist society acquire an illusory value and social power, obscuring the underlying exploitative relations of production, thus leading to a distorted perception of economic reality among individuals.
Fetish/ism: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Fetishism Theorists:
  • Karl Marx: Marx introduced the concept of commodity fetishism in his seminal work “Capital,” arguing that in capitalist societies, commodities take on a mystical and fetishistic character, concealing the exploitative nature of labor relations.
Works on Fetishism:
  • Sigmund Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905): Freud explored the concept of sexual fetishism, emphasizing its psychological origins and its role in human sexuality.
  • Walter Benjamin’s The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1936): Benjamin examined the fetishization of art and mass-produced objects in modernity, particularly how mechanical reproduction altered the aura of artwork.
  • Marcel Mauss’s “The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies” (1925): Mauss explored the concept of the gift as a form of fetishism, where objects exchanged in traditional societies acquire social and spiritual significance beyond their material value.
Key Arguments on Fetishism:
  • Commodity Fetishism (Marx): Marx argued that in capitalist economies, commodities are imbued with fetishistic qualities, masking the exploitative relations of production and making them appear as if they have intrinsic value.
  • Sexual Fetishism (Freud): Freud posited that sexual fetishism arises from unresolved conflicts during psychosexual development, wherein individuals transfer sexual desire onto specific objects or body parts.
  • Fetishism of the Art Object (Benjamin): Benjamin asserted that the reproducibility of art in the modern era leads to the loss of its aura, making mass-produced objects and images the new fetishized artifacts.
  • Gift Exchange as Fetish (Mauss): Mauss argued that in traditional gift economies, objects given and received become imbued with symbolic and spiritual meaning, transcending their material worth and becoming fetishes of social bonds and obligations.
Fetish/ism in Literary Theories
  1. Marxist Literary Theory:
    • In Marxist literary theory, fetishism examines how commodities or objects within a text symbolize social and economic relations. It uncovers how authors use material objects to comment on class structures and capitalist exploitation. For example, a literary work depicts characters obsessing over luxury goods, highlighting the fetishization of consumer culture.
  2. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory:
    • Psychoanalytic theory, especially Freudian psychoanalysis, explores sexual fetishism within literary texts. Analysts examine characters’ fixations on specific objects or body parts and how these fetishes relate to their psychological development and conflicts.
  3. Postcolonial Literary Theory:
    • In postcolonial theory, the concept of fetishism applies to how colonial powers fetishize and exoticize the cultures, customs, or artifacts of colonized peoples. This perspective reveals power dynamics and the dehumanization of colonized subjects in literature.
  4. Feminist Literary Theory:
    • Feminist literary theory uses fetishism to analyze how gendered objects or stereotypes are represented in literature. It sheds light on how certain objects or behaviors fetishize, contributing to the objectification and subjugation of women in literary texts.
  5. Deconstructionist Literary Theory:
    • In deconstructionist theory, the concept of fetishism deconstructs the binary oppositions and hierarchies within a text. It examines how certain terms or ideas fetishize and are given privileged status, revealing the instability of meaning in literature.
  6. Cultural Studies:
    • Cultural studies often explore how cultural artifacts, including literature, fetishize as symbols of national identity, political ideologies, or social norms. This approach uncovers the ways in which literature participates in the creation and maintenance of cultural fetishes.
  7. Queer Theory:
    • Queer theory applies fetishism to analyze how LGBTQ+ identities and desires are represented in literature. It explores how certain objects, clothing, or behaviors fetishize within queer narratives and the implications of these fetishes for identity and sexuality.
  8. Structuralism and Semiotics:
    • In structuralist and semiotic approaches, fetishism investigates the signifiers and signifieds within a text. Analysts explore how certain words or symbols fetishize, creating layers of meaning and interpretation.

In each of these literary theories, the concept of fetishism provides a unique lens through which to examine the themes, characters, and symbols within literary works, revealing deeper insights into their cultural, social, and psychological significance.

Fetish/ism and Literary Criticism
WorkExplanation of Fetish/ism
Jane Eyre by Charlotte BrontëMr. Rochester’s confinement of Bertha Mason in the attic serves as a manifestation of fetishism, symbolizing his fixation on control and dominance. This act also reflects broader societal norms and expectations, akin to cultural fetishism, where characters are constrained by rigid conventions.
The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret AtwoodIn this dystopian society, women’s bodies are fetishized and subjected to state control. The Red Center, where women are trained as “handmaids,” represents an extreme form of the fetishization of fertility and authority over women’s bodies. The novel critically examines patriarchal power structures and the fetishization of traditional gender roles.
“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. EliotThe protagonist, J. Alfred Prufrock, exhibits a personal form of fetishism through his intense self-consciousness and fixation on his perceived inadequacies. His self-doubt and fear of rejection can be seen as a type of emotional fetishism, impacting his relationships and self-esteem.
“The Bear” by William FaulknerWhile not Canadian or British, Faulkner’s work often includes elements of fetishism. In “The Bear,” Ike’s profound obsession with hunting and the wilderness can be viewed as a form of fetishization of the natural world. His deep attachment to the bear symbolizes his complex relationship with nature and his own identity.
Suggested Readings

Books:

  1. Freud, Sigmund. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Translated by James Strachey, Basic Books, 2000.
  2. Marx, Karl. Capital: Critique of Political Economy. Translated by Ben Fowkes, Penguin Books, 1990.
  3. Wiegman, Robyn. Object Lessons. Duke University Press, 2012.
  4. Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland and Stewart, 1985.
  5. Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Translated by Harry Zohn, Harvard University Press, 2008.
  6. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Robert Hurley et al., University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
  7. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Wiley, 2008.
  8. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 2006.
  9. Bersani, Leo. Is the Rectum a Grave?: And Other Essays. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
  10. Greenberg, Jonathan. Modernism, Fetishism, and the Novel. Princeton University Press, 2016.

Edited Collections:

  1. Maltz, Diana Fuss, ed. The Essential Difference. Routledge, 1996.
  2. Weiss, Gail, and Honi Fern Haber, eds. Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture. Routledge, 1999.

Articles:

  1. Mitchell, Juliet. “The Consequences of Feminism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 28, no. 3, 2003, pp. 802-818.
  2. Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen, vol. 16, no. 3, 1975, pp. 6-18.
  3. Williams, Linda. “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess.” Film Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, 1991, pp. 2-13.

Erasure in Literature & Literary Theory

In literary theory, “erasure” represents a critical concept that denotes the deliberate omission or effacement of textual or cultural elements to reveal underlying power dynamics, ideological biases, or marginalized voices.

Etymology of Erasure

The term “erasure” finds its etymological origins in the Middle English word “erasen,” which can be traced back to the Old French “eraser.” It ultimately comes from the Latin “erasus,” the past participle of “erasere,” signifying the act of scraping off or rubbing out. It reflects the concept of deliberate or inadvertent removal that has been metaphorically extended to encompass various forms of obliteration and suppression in academic discourse.

 Meanings of Erasure
  • Linguistic Origins: The etymology of “erasure” traces back to Middle English with roots in Old French and Latin, denoting physical removal through scraping or rubbing.
  • Historical Context: In historical scholarship, “erasure” pertains to the deliberate omission or suppression of specific events, figures, or narratives from records, potentially distorting our understanding of the past.
  • Identity and Culture: In discussions of identity and culture, “erasure” signifies the marginalization or negation of certain cultural, racial, or gender identities, leading to their under-representation or omission in mainstream narratives.
  • Memory and Trauma: In the realm of psychology and trauma studies, “erasure” refers to mechanisms by which individuals may suppress or forget distressing memories as a coping mechanism.
  • Technological Usage: In the context of data and technology, “erasure” describes the removal of digital information or files, emphasizing the potential permanence or traceability of digital actions.
Definition of Erasure as a Theoretical Term

In literary theory, “erasure” represents a critical concept that denotes the deliberate omission or effacement of textual or cultural elements to reveal underlying power dynamics, ideological biases, or marginalized voices. It encompasses the intentional erasure of characters, narratives, or themes from a literary work, highlighting the significance of what is absent as much as what is present.

Erasure, as a theoretical term, underscores the capacity of authors and texts to shape meaning not only through what is explicitly stated but also through the gaps, silences, and exclusions that invite readers to engage in a process of interpretation and critique, thereby shedding light on the intricacies of narrative construction and cultural representation.

Erasure: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Roland Barthes: Barthes explored the concept of erasure in his work “S/Z,” particularly in the context of readerly and writerly texts. It emphasizes how texts invite readers to actively participate in the process of erasure and meaning-making.
  • Jacques Derrida: Derrida’s deconstructionist theory challenged traditional notions of textual stability, highlighting the inherent erasures within language and the instability of meaning.
  • Michel Foucault: Foucault’s archaeological approach examined the erasure and transformation of discourses over time, revealing the power dynamics at play in the suppression of certain knowledge.
Key Works:
  • “S/Z” by Roland Barthes: In this seminal work, Barthes dissected Balzac’s novella “Sarrasine,” highlighting how the text’s structure and narrative choices involve acts of erasure and rewriting, inviting readers to engage critically with the text.
  • Of Grammatology by Jacques Derrida: Derrida’s exploration of the erasure of the authorial presence and the instability of meaning in written language challenged conventional literary and philosophical ideas.
  • The Order of Things by Michel Foucault: In this work, Foucault discussed the historical erasure of epistemes and how the classification of knowledge contributes to the formation of new forms of knowledge and erasure.
Key Points:
  • Theoretical Erasure: These theorists argue that literary texts are inherently marked by erasures, absences, and gaps that prompt readers to engage critically with the text, unveiling the complex layers of meaning and ideology.
  • Power and Knowledge: It is seen as a manifestation of power dynamics, where dominant ideologies suppress alternative narratives, identities, or voices, leading to the erasure of marginalized perspectives.
  • Reader-Text Interaction: In literature, it encourages readers to become active participants in the creation of meaning, emphasizing the co-authorship of texts and the role of interpretation in uncovering what has been erased or concealed.
Erasure and Literary Theories
Literary TheoryUse of and Meanings
Marxist TheoryMarxist theory critically examines the presence of erasure of class struggles within narratives, emphasizing how capitalism perpetuates these omissions. It underscores the importance of recognizing the invisible labor and exploitation often concealed in literary works.
Feminist TheoryIn feminist theory, it is used to analyze the phenomenon of gender erasure within texts, highlighting and challenging the pervasive gender biases. This theory advocates for inclusive representations of women and non-binary individuals, seeking to rectify the historical omission of their experiences and voices.
Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial theory delves into the cultural erasure perpetrated by colonial powers, exploring the suppression of indigenous cultures, languages, and identities. It underscores the necessity of recovering and celebrating these marginalized elements to rectify historical injustices and foster cultural diversity.
Queer TheoryQueer theory scrutinizes sexuality erasure in literature, dissecting how heteronormative narratives often erase or stigmatize non-heterosexual identities and relationships. It advocates for acknowledging and validating queer experiences, striving for more inclusive representations in literary works.
Deconstructionist TheoryDeconstructionist theory emphasizes the inherent linguistic instability, revealing how texts contain erasures and contradictions. It seeks to challenge fixed meanings and invites multiple interpretations by deconstructing and exposing these textual inconsistencies.
Psychoanalytic TheoryPsychoanalytic theory investigates the phenomenon of psychological erasure within literature, exploring how characters may employ acts of erasure to suppress traumatic memories or obscure facets of their psyche. This often results in the creation of complex psychological narratives.
Critical Race TheoryCritical race theory examines how literary texts and societal structures may erase or downplay the experiences and contributions of racial minorities. It aims to shed light on systemic racism and its effects, advocating for a more equitable representation of marginalized racial perspectives.
Reader-Response TheoryReader-response theory emphasizes the active engagement of readers with texts and how readers may uncover erasures or gaps in the narrative. This interaction contributes significantly to the meaning-making process, allowing readers to participate in shaping the interpretation of the text.
New HistoricismNew historicism investigates how historical texts and narratives contribute to the perpetuation or challenge of erasure concerning certain historical events, voices, or perspectives. It underscores their role in shaping cultural memory and highlights their impact on our understanding of the past.
Erasure in Literary Criticism
NovelLiterary Criticism Example
Frankenstein by Mary ShelleyIn the critical analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, scholars often discuss the erasure of the female characters’ voices and agency in the novel, particularly in the case of Justine Moritz. Critics argue that the novel portrays the erasure of women’s experiences and perspectives, reflecting the social and cultural norms of Shelley’s time.
The Waste Land by T.S. EliotIn literary criticism of T.S. Eliot’s poem The Waste Land, scholars explore the erasure of coherent narrative and conventional structure in the poem. The poem’s fragmented and allusive style erases traditional linear storytelling, inviting readers to piece together its meaning from fragmented cultural references and voices.
Beloved by Toni MorrisonIn discussions of Toni Morrison’s Beloved, critics examine the erasure of individual and collective memory as a central theme. The characters in the novel grapple with traumatic memories that have been repressed or erased, illustrating the lasting impact of slavery and its effects on identity.
The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins GilmanIn the analysis of Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s short story The Yellow Wallpaper, literary critics often focus on the erasure of the female protagonist‘s autonomy and voice. The story depicts her descent into madness as her husband and societal norms silence her, erasing her agency and self-expression.
Keypoints of Erasure in Theoretical Writings
  • Erasure as a Gesture:
    • This gesture, or placing it under erasure, involves crossing out a word as well as the act that involves crossing through it.
  • Heidegger’s Use of Erasure:
    • Martin Heidegger employed this practice in his work The Question of Being, where he notably crossed through the word “Being.”
    • Heidegger’s purpose was to demonstrate that the term “Being” could no longer be employed conventionally because its underlying concept had slipped away and been forgotten in the discourse surrounding it.
  • Presupposition of “Being”:
    • Heidegger contended that the very notion of “Being” was always presupposed, implying that any question asking, “what is ‘Being’?”, could only be articulated because the idea of “Being” allowed for the contemplation of the being of “Being.”
  • Challenging Assumptions:
    • By crossing through the word, Heidegger aimed to release it from the assumptions that the term was fully understood or that the meaning of “Being” was somehow grasped.
    • He also challenged the presumption that asking the question, “what is ‘Being’?”, implied an expectation of a definitive answer.
  • Derrida’s Perspective:
    • Jacques Derrida, in reference to Heidegger’s practice, pointed out that the act of crossing through is not merely a negative gesture.
    • Instead, it signifies how, while signification remains essential, the concept of the idea of “Being” as a ‘transcendental signified’ has arrived at a specific limit in Heidegger’s text.
  • Placing Terms under Erasure:
    • Derrida also employed the technique of placing some terms as “sous rature” (under erasure) because these terms had exhausted their conventional function in metaphysical and logical discourse.
    • Such terms no longer retained their full sense, nor did they signify a presence or origin for which the signifier stood. Instead, they indicated other structural traces, much like themselves, within the realm of language and thought.
Suggested Readings
  1. Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
  2. Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith, Vintage Books, 2010.
  3. Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Translated by Richard Miller, Hill and Wang, 1974.
  4. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 2008.
  5. Morrison, Toni. Beloved. Alfred A. Knopf, 1987.
  6. Eliot, T.S. The Waste Land. Faber & Faber, 1922.
  7. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Oxford University Press, 2008.
  8. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” In The Yellow Wallpaper and Other Stories, edited by Robert Shulman, Oxford University Press, 1995.
  9. Perkins, David. Romanticism and Animal Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  10. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 2006.

Episteme in Literature & Literary Theory

Episteme encompasses the underlying principles, rules, and categories that govern knowledge production and legitimize certain forms.۔

Etymology of Episteme

The term “episteme” traces its roots to ancient Greek, specifically the word “ἐπιστήμη” (epistēmē), signifying “knowledge” or “science.”

In ancient Greek philosophy, “episteme” denoted true and certain knowledge, distinguishing it from mere opinion or belief. This concept of objective and systematic understanding had a substantial influence on the development of Western philosophy and remains relevant in contemporary academic discourse (literary writing), especially in discussions related to the structure and evolution of knowledge within various fields of study.

Meanings of Episteme
MeaningExplanation
Historical EpistemeThe historical episteme refers to the dominant system of knowledge, beliefs, and intellectual frameworks that prevailed during a specific period in history. It encompasses the prevailing ideas, methods of inquiry, and epistemological paradigms of that era.
EpistemologyEpistemology is a branch of philosophy that investigates the nature and scope of knowledge, how it is acquired, and the criteria for justified beliefs. It delves into questions about what knowledge is and how humans come to know and understand the world.
Scientific EpistemeScientific episteme pertains to the accepted principles, theories, and methodologies within a particular scientific discipline or field. It encompasses the collective knowledge and practices guiding scientific research in that area.
Epistemic CommunitiesEpistemic communities are groups of experts or professionals who share a common body of knowledge, values, and practices. They often influence policies and decisions in their respective fields through their expertise.
Epistemic ShiftAn epistemic shift signifies a significant change in the prevailing system of knowledge and understanding. It is frequently associated with paradigm shifts in scientific disciplines or transformative changes in societal beliefs and perspectives.
Epistemological AssumptionsEpistemological assumptions are the foundational beliefs or presuppositions about knowledge and reality that shape how individuals or cultures approach and interpret the world. These assumptions can vary across different epistemic frameworks.
Epistemic JustificationEpistemic justification concerns the reasons or grounds for accepting a belief as knowledge. It explores what makes a belief rational, justified, or reliable, examining the criteria that establish the legitimacy of knowledge claims.
Epistemic RelativismEpistemic relativism is a philosophical position suggesting that knowledge and truth are context-dependent and relative to specific cultural, historical, or social contexts. It challenges the idea of absolute or universal knowledge.
Epistemic AuthorityEpistemic authority pertains to the recognition of individuals or institutions as credible sources of knowledge within a particular domain. It is tied to trust and expertise and is often granted to those deemed knowledgeable and reliable.
Epistemic VirtuesEpistemic virtues refer to intellectual virtues like honesty, open-mindedness, and critical thinking. These virtues contribute to the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge by fostering qualities conducive to sound reasoning and inquiry.
Epistemic ClosureEpistemic closure explores whether one’s belief system is open or closed to new information, evidence, or alternative viewpoints. It delves into questions regarding the willingness to consider and incorporate new knowledge or perspectives.
Epistemic NormsEpistemic norms are the rules or guidelines that govern the acquisition, dissemination, and evaluation of knowledge. These norms can vary across different intellectual and cultural contexts and provide standards for epistemic conduct.
Definition of Episteme as a Theoretical Term

In academic discourse, the term “episteme” is used as a theoretical concept derived from the works of philosopher Michel Foucault. In this context, an “episteme” represents a historically contingent and structured system of knowledge that shapes the way individuals and societies perceive and understand the world.

It encompasses the underlying principles, rules, and categories that govern knowledge production and legitimize certain forms of knowledge in a particular historical and cultural context. Essentially, an episteme reflects the prevailing intellectual framework and the accepted modes of knowledge in a specific era, serving as a lens through which reality is constructed and interpreted.

Episteme: Theorists, Works, and Arguments
Michel Foucault:
  • Notable Works: The Order of Things (“Les Mots et les Choses”), The Archaeology of Knowledge (“L’Archéologie du Savoir”).
  • Central Arguments: Foucault introduced the concept of “episteme” to describe the historically contingent systems of knowledge that shape and govern the way people think and understand the world in specific time periods. He argued that epistemes are fundamental to the production of knowledge and the emergence of new intellectual frameworks.
Thomas Kuhn:
  • Notable Work: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
  • Central Arguments: While Kuhn’s work primarily focuses on the philosophy of science, he contributed to the understanding of epistemic shifts by proposing the concept of “paradigm shifts.” Kuhn argued that scientific progress occurs through the replacement of one prevailing paradigm (episteme) with another, fundamentally altering the way knowledge is constructed and perceived.
Gaston Bachelard:
  • Notable Work: The Poetics of Space (“La Poétique de l’Espace”).
  • Central Arguments: Bachelard’s work explores the epistemic aspects of space and place. He argued that our understanding of space is influenced by cultural and historical epistemes, and he delved into the ways in which our perceptions of space are shaped by our epistemological frameworks.
Edward Said:
  • Notable Work: Orientalism.
  • Central Arguments: Said’s critique of Orientalism involves examining how Western knowledge systems (epistemes) have historically constructed and represented the East, often perpetuating colonial power dynamics. He argued that Orientalism reflects and reinforces Western epistemological dominance.
Julia Kristeva:
  • Notable Work: Revolution in Poetic Language.
  • Central Arguments: Kristeva explored the intersection of language and the psyche. While her work is broader than episteme, she contributed to the understanding of how language reflects and shapes epistemological frameworks. She examined how linguistic structures embody cultural and historical knowledge paradigms.
Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari:
  • Notable Work: Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia.
  • Central Arguments: Deleuze and Guattari expanded on Foucault’s ideas, emphasizing the relationship between power, desire, and knowledge. They argued that epistemes are not static but are entwined with processes of desire and social control, challenging conventional notions of knowledge production.

These theorists and their works have significantly contributed to the exploration of the concept of “episteme” and its implications for understanding how knowledge is generated, structured, and transformed within different historical, cultural, and intellectual contexts.

Episteme and Literary Theories
TheoryExplanation of Relevance to Episteme
Structuralism and Post-StructuralismStructuralism examines underlying language and narrative structures influenced by the prevailing episteme.
Post-Structuralism extends this by revealing how power and knowledge intersect in texts, influenced by historical epistemic paradigms.
New HistoricismNew Historicism explores literature’s relationship with historical context, considering the specific epistemological framework of the time and how it informs and shapes literary works.
Feminist Literary TheoryThis theory analyzes the construction of gender and power in literature, often uncovering gendered knowledge systems within texts and their connection to societal norms and epistemological perspectives.
PostcolonialismPostcolonial theory investigates colonialism’s impact on literature, revealing the Eurocentric epistemologies underlying colonial discourse and their reflection in literary texts.
Reader-Response TheoryReader-response theory emphasizes readers’ interpretations. Episteme analysis reveals how readers’ backgrounds and historical contexts influence their understanding of texts and the epistemic shifts that may occur.
Psychoanalytic TheoryPsychoanalytic theory delves into the subconscious aspects of literature. Episteme analysis uncovers the cultural and historical knowledge systems shaping the repressed desires and anxieties expressed in texts.
Critical Race TheoryThis theory examines racial power dynamics in literature. Episteme helps reveal racialized knowledge systems embedded in texts and their role in the construction of racial identities and experiences
Episteme in Literature: Examples of Critiques
TitleCritique of Literary Work with Reference to Episteme
Frankenstein by Mary ShelleyCritique of Episteme: The novel critiques the Enlightenment-era epistemic confidence in unchecked scientific progress, highlighting the dangers of unrestrained scientific inquiry and ethical disregard.
Heart of Darkness by Joseph ConradCritique of Episteme: The novella challenges the Eurocentric episteme of European imperialism, revealing the dehumanizing effects of colonialism and questioning the validity of imperialist knowledge claims.
1984 by George OrwellCritique of Episteme: Orwell’s dystopian novel critiques a totalitarian episteme that manipulates knowledge and truth through language control, illustrating the power of epistemic control in maintaining dominance.
The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins GilmanCritique of Episteme: This short story critiques the patriarchal episteme of the late 19th century, showing how medicalized attitudes toward women’s mental health harm women, exposing epistemic norms’ detrimental consequences.
Brave New World by Aldous HuxleyCritique of Episteme: The novel critiques a future society built on a technocratic episteme that prioritizes pleasure and stability over individuality and critical thinking, raising questions about sacrificing depth for conformity.
Suggested Readings
  1. Descartes, René. Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated by Donald A. Cress, Hackett Publishing Company, 1993.
  2. Goldman, Alvin I. Epistemology and Cognition. Harvard University Press, 1986.
  3. Quine, Willard Van Orman. Word and Object. MIT Press, 2013.
  4. Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2001.
  5. Sosa, Ernest, et al., editors. Epistemology: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing, 2010.
  6. Audi, Robert. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Routledge, 2010.
  7. Gettier, Edmund L. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis, vol. 23, no. 6, 1963, pp. 121-123.
  8. BonJour, Laurence. Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.
  9. Plantinga, Alvin. Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford University Press, 1993.

Écriture Féminine in Literature and Literary Theory

Écriture féminine represents a style of writing that seeks to break away from traditional patriarchal linguistic structures and embrace a more fluid, embodied, and personal form of expression.

Etymology of Écriture Féminine

“Écriture Féminine” is a French term that translates to “feminine writing” in English. It was coined in feminist literary theory during the 1970s as a response to the male-dominated literary canon.

The term “écriture” means “writing” or “inscription,” and “féminine” means “feminine” in French. This concept aims to foreground and celebrate women’s voices and experiences in literature, challenging traditional norms, exploring female subjectivity, and deconstructing gender stereotypes through innovative writing styles and themes. Interestingly, it intends to do/achieve all within the framework of women’s unique perspectives and experiences.

Meanings of Écriture Féminine
AspectDescription
Female SubjectivityIt underscores the significance of female subjectivity in literature, aiming to give voice to women’s experiences, thoughts, and emotions. It often challenges conventional, patriarchal literary forms and styles by offering unique perspectives.
Body-Centered WritingThis aspect explores themes deeply connected to the female body, including menstruation, childbirth, and sexuality. It does so to subvert the historically male-centered and patriarchal representation of the female body in literature, offering alternative narratives.
Fluidity and PlayfulnessÉcriture féminine encourages writers to adopt a more fluid and playful approach to language and narrative. This can manifest through unconventional narrative structures, wordplay, and the use of fragmented or poetic language, all to challenge traditional, linear storytelling.
Rejecting PhallogocentrismA core tenet of Écriture féminine is its challenge to the dominance of what is known as “phallogocentrism” – the male-centered, patriarchal language and discourse that has historically shaped literature and culture. Writers and theorists following this approach seek to deconstruct and subvert these established structures.
Collective ExpressionÉcriture féminine can be viewed as a collective expression of women’s voices and experiences. It often draws on the shared experiences of women to create a sense of solidarity and empowerment among female writers, fostering a community of diverse voices.
Diversity of VoicesWhile Écriture féminine highlights the distinctiveness of women’s writing, it also emphasizes that there is no single, monolithic “feminine” voice or style. Women writers come from diverse backgrounds and have unique experiences. Écriture féminine,  thus, celebrates this diversity by embracing a multitude of perspectives.
Influence on Feminist Lit.Écriture féminine has left a lasting mark on feminist literature and theory, particularly in the fields of women’s studies and literary criticism. It has inspired writers and scholars to explore innovative approaches to both writing and analyzing literature from a feminist perspective, contributing significantly to the evolution of feminist discourse.

Écriture féminine: Definition as a Rhetorical Term

Defintion of “Écriture féminine” is a theoretical term in feminist literary criticism that originated in the 1970s, primarily associated with French feminists such as Hélène Cixous and Luce Irigaray. It represents a style of writing that seeks to break away from traditional patriarchal linguistic structures and embrace a more fluid, embodied, and personal form of expression. This concept emphasizes the importance of women’s experiences and voices in literature and challenges conventional norms of language and narrative.

Écriture Féminine: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Hélène Cixous: A prominent French feminist theorist associated with Écriture féminine. She co-authored the influential essay “The Laugh of the Medusa,” which is a foundational text for the movement.
  • Luce Irigaray: Another influential feminist thinker who contributed to Écriture féminine. Her work, such as “Speculum of the Other Woman,” explores issues of language, sexuality, and femininity.
Works:
  • “The Laugh of the Medusa”: Co-authored by Hélène Cixous, this essay argues for women to reclaim their voices and their bodies in writing. It emphasizes the importance of writing as a means of self-expression and empowerment.
  • “Speculum of the Other Woman”: Luce Irigaray’s work challenges traditional representations of women in literature and language. It explores the concept of sexual difference and how it relates to language and culture.
Key Arguments:
  • Female Subjectivity: Écriture féminine emphasizes the importance of female subjectivity in literature. It seeks to give voice to women’s experiences, thoughts, and emotions, often in ways that challenge traditional, male-dominated literary forms and styles.
  • Body-Centered Writing: One central idea is the connection between women’s writing and the female body. It often explores themes related to the female body, including menstruation, childbirth, and sexuality, as a way to challenge the historically male-centered representation of the female body in literature.
  • Rejecting Phallogocentrism: Écriture féminine challenges the dominance of what is called “phallogocentrism,” which is a term used to describe the male-centered, patriarchal language and discourse that has historically shaped literature and culture. Feminist writers and theorists who adhere to Écriture féminine seek to deconstruct and subvert these dominant structures.
  • Collective Expression: It can also be seen as a collective expression of women’s voices and experiences. It often draws on the shared experiences of women to create a sense of solidarity and empowerment.
  • Diversity of Voices: While Écriture féminine emphasizes the distinctiveness of women’s writing, it also recognizes that there is no single “feminine” voice or style. Women writers come from diverse backgrounds and experiences, and Écriture féminine celebrates this diversity.
  • Influence on Feminist Literature: It has had a significant influence on feminist literature and theory, particularly in the fields of women’s studies and literary criticism. It has inspired writers and scholars to explore new ways of writing and analyzing literature from a feminist perspective.
Écriture Féminine and Literary Theories
Écriture Féminine and Literary TheoriesRelevance and Key Points
Feminist Literary TheoryAmplification of Women’s Voices: Écriture Féminine prioritizes giving voice to women’s experiences, thoughts, and emotions in literature.
Intersectionality: It aligns with intersectionality, recognizing that women’s experiences are shaped by factors like race, class, and gender.
Challenge to Gender Norms: Écriture Féminine challenges traditional gender roles and narratives, promoting a more diverse and inclusive literary landscape.
Subversion of Female Bildungsroman: It subverts the traditional female bildungsroman genre to reflect the unique journeys of women.
PoststructuralismDeconstruction of Patriarchal Structures: Écriture Féminine engages in the deconstruction of patriarchal language and narrative structures, aiming to subvert their influence.
Language and Identity: It explores how language constructs gender and identity, aligning with theories of performativity and the textuality of gender.
Psychoanalytic TheoryExploration of the Female Psyche: Écriture Féminine delves into the female psyche, often exploring subconscious and repressed experiences.
Challenging Traditional Psychoanalysis: It challenges and reinterprets traditional psychoanalytic concepts of femininity and sexuality through literary expression.
Queer TheoryFluidity of Gender and Sexuality: Écriture Féminine embraces the fluidity of gender and sexuality, challenging fixed notions of identity.
Inclusivity: It contributes to a more inclusive literary landscape by amplifying LGBTQ+ voices and experiences.
Queering Traditional Canons: Some works within Écriture Féminine may engage in queering traditional literary canons, further expanding perspectives.
Écriture Féminine: Examples in Literature
  1. “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman:
    • Explanation: Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s short story exemplifies Écriture Féminine. Presented in the form of a journal, it chronicles the descent into madness of a woman afflicted with postpartum depression. Isolation prompts her to perceive a woman trapped within the room’s yellow wallpaper. The story serves as a powerful critique of the patriarchal medical establishment and the constraining societal norms of the 19th century.
  2. The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood:
    • Explanation: Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel investigates themes of female subjugation and resistance within a totalitarian society. Narrated by Offred, a woman forced into the role of a “handmaid” for reproductive purposes, it employs Écriture Féminine to delve into Offred’s inner thoughts, emotions, and memories. This narrative approach provides a nuanced and personal perspective on the female experience within a dystopian world, challenging conventional gender norms and exploring the consequences of patriarchal control.
  3. The Awakening by Kate Chopin:
    • Explanation: Published in the late 19th century, Kate Chopin’s novel tells the tale of Edna Pontellier, a woman who rejects societal expectations to explore her desires and identity. Écriture Féminine is evident in Chopin’s portrayal of Edna’s internal struggles and desires, notably her awakening to her own sexuality and yearning for independence. Through Edna’s journey, the novel critiques the constrained roles available to women in the Victorian era and advocates for women’s autonomy and self-discovery.
  4. Orlando by Virginia Woolf:
    • Explanation: Virginia Woolf’s novel, Orlando, is an experiment that challenges conventional notions of gender and time. It traces the life of Orlando, who transitions from a young nobleman into a woman over several centuries. Woolf employs fluid and playful language, blurring gender and temporal boundaries to illustrate Orlando’s evolving identity. This showcases Écriture Féminine through Woolf’s exploration of gender fluidity and her celebration of a non-linear narrative style, enabling a more authentic portrayal of gender and identity.
Suggested Readings
  1. Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Translated by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs, vol. 1, no. 4, 1976, pp. 875-893.
  2. Irigaray, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman. Translated by Gillian C. Gill. Cornell University Press, 1985.
  3. De Beauvoir, Simone. The Second Sex. Translated by Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chevallier. Vintage Books, 2011.
  4. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 2006.
  5. Woolf, Virginia. Orlando. Harcourt, Inc., 1928.
  6. Gilbert, Sandra, and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press, 2000.
  7. McHale, Brian. The Cambridge Introduction to Postmodernism. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  8. Oliver, Kelly, editor. French Feminism Reader. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000.

Deterritorialization in Literature & Theory

Deterritorialization, as a theoretical term, refers to the process of dismantling or destabilizing established boundaries, structures, or territorial constraints within various domains, such as philosophy, sociology, and cultural studies.

Etymology of Deterritorialization

The term “deterritorialization” originated in the field of sociology and was further developed in post-structuralist and postmodern philosophy. French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari played a key role in shaping this concept.

It combines the prefix “de-” (which signifies “undoing” or “removal”) with “territorialization” (referring to the process of defining and establishing boundaries and territories).

In this context, “deterritorialization” emphasizes the dismantling or deconstruction of established boundaries, structures, or territorial constraints. It describes the destabilization of fixed meanings, identities, and structures in various domains, including literature, art, and sociology.

Meanings of Deterritorialisation
MeaningsExplanation
Deconstruction of BoundariesDeterritorialization refers to the breaking down or deconstruction of established boundaries, structures, or territorial constraints in various domains.
Unsettling Fixed MeaningsIt signifies the destabilization of fixed meanings, identities, and structures, challenging established norms and definitions.
Transcending Territorial LimitsIn the context of philosophy, sociology, and cultural studies, it often involves transcending or going beyond the limitations imposed by geographical or cultural territories.
Fostering Creativity and ChangeDeterritorialization can be seen as a process that fosters creativity and facilitates change by encouraging the exploration of new ideas and perspectives.
Application in Art and LiteratureIt has been used in art and literature to describe works that challenge conventional boundaries and offer new interpretations and experiences.
Key Concept in PostmodernismDeterritorialization is a key concept in postmodern philosophy, emphasizing the fluidity and instability of meanings and identities in a rapidly changing world.
Influence on Cultural StudiesIt has had a significant influence on cultural studies, particularly in analyzing how culture and identity evolve in a globalized and interconnected world.
Definition of Deterritorialization as a Theoretical Term

Deterritorialization, as a theoretical term, refers to the process of dismantling or destabilizing established boundaries, structures, or territorial constraints within various domains, such as philosophy, sociology, and cultural studies. This concept challenges conventional norms and definitions by transcending geographical or cultural limitations, fostering creativity, and encouraging the exploration of new ideas. In the context of postmodern philosophy, deterritorialization underscores the fluid and unstable nature of meanings and identities in a rapidly evolving world, influencing cultural studies in its analysis of the evolving dynamics of culture and identity within a globalized and interconnected context.

Theorists about Deterritorialization, Works, and Argument
TheoristWorkArgument
Gilles Deleuze and Félix GuattariA Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (1980)They argue that traditional territorial boundaries are becoming obsolete in the modern world due to capitalism’s constant reconfiguration of space. They introduce the concept of the “rhizome” to explain the fluid and interconnected nature of social and cultural phenomena.
Arjun AppaduraiModernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (1996)Appadurai extends the concept of deterritorialization to explore the global flows of culture, technology, and media. He introduces the idea of “scapes” to emphasize the fluid and deterritorialized nature of contemporary cultural dynamics.
Manuel CastellsThe Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture series (1996-2003)Castells examines the role of information technology in deterritorializing economic activities and shaping a network society. He discusses how communication networks and the internet transcend geographical boundaries, enabling new forms of social organization and economic production.
David HarveyThe Condition of Postmodernity (1989)Harvey explores how capitalism’s spatial dynamics inherently lead to deterritorialization. He discusses the continual restructuring of space and time by capitalism, highlighting the importance of urbanization in understanding the deterritorialization of economic and social life.
Deterritorialisation in Literary Theories
Literary TheoryApplication of Deterritorialization
Poststructuralism and DeconstructionIn poststructuralism and deconstruction, deterritorialization challenges the fixed meanings and binary oppositions inherent in language and literature. It disrupts traditional boundaries and destabilizes established norms, leading to a more fluid and open interpretation of texts.
Feminist Literary TheoryWithin feminist literary theory, deterritorialization subverts patriarchal narratives and structures. It destabilizes gender norms and explores alternative narratives that transcend traditional territorial limits imposed on women’s voices.
PostcolonialismIn postcolonial literature, deterritorialization breaks away from colonial boundaries and colonialist narratives. It explores subaltern histories, dismantles imperialist structures, and represents diverse cultural perspectives.
Psychoanalytic Literary TheoryIn psychoanalytic theory, deterritorialization unravels the boundaries of the conscious and unconscious mind. It explores characters undergoing transformative journeys and the dismantling of psychological constraints.
Marxist Literary TheoryIn Marxist literary theory, deterritorialization analyzes how literature challenges class boundaries and capitalist structures. It explores socioeconomic alternatives and dismantles economic hierarchies.
Narrative TheoryIn narrative theory, deterritorialization examines how literary narratives disrupt traditional storytelling conventions. It explores nonlinear narratives, blurs boundaries between reality and fiction, and destabilizes narrative structures.

In each of these literary theories, deterritorialization serves as a critical lens for analyzing how literature challenge, deconstruct, or transcend established boundaries, structures, and norms, fostering creativity and innovation in the realm of literary analysis and critique.

Deterritorialisation as a Device

Deterritorialization, in a literary context, refers to the thematic and narrative exploration of displacement, disorientation, and the breaking of familiar boundaries within a work of fiction. It is used to examine the psychological and physical journeys of characters, symbolizes cultural and societal shifts, and address themes such as identity, belonging, and alienation, contributing to the broader narrative and thematic depth of the literary work.

Deterritorialisation in Literary Criticism
Literary WorkDeterritorialization Example
Franz Kafka’s The MetamorphosisThe novella exemplifies deterritorialization through the transformation of the protagonist, Gregor Samsa, into a giant insect, symbolizing a radical departure from his human identity and familiar world, resulting in his alienation from family and society.
Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot”Beckett’s play showcases deterritorialization in a desolate, featureless landscape where two characters, Vladimir and Estragon, experience dislocation and detachment from a meaningful existence, emphasized by their repetitive actions and dialogues.
T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land”Eliot’s poem utilizes deterritorialization techniques such as fragmented narrative, multiple voices, and shifting perspectives to depict the blurring of boundaries between past and present, cultures, and individuals, reflecting the disorientation of a post-World War I world.
Toni Morrison’s BelovedIn this novel, deterritorialization is explored through Sethe, a character who escapes slavery but is haunted by her traumatic past. The narrative shifts between temporal and narrative perspectives, blurring boundaries between past and present, reality and memory, reflecting the ongoing impact of historical trauma and dislocation.
Gabriel García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of SolitudeMárquez’s novel illustrates deterritorialization through the fictional town of Macondo, where time, space, and reality are fluid. Magical realism is intertwined with everyday life, challenging conventional boundaries and creating a sense of detachment from traditional reality, contributing to the novel’s unique atmosphere.
Suggested Readings
  1. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi, University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
  2. Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
  3. Castells, Manuel. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Vol. 1-3, Blackwell, 1996-2003.
  4. Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Wiley-Blackwell, 1990.
  5. Kafka, Franz. The Metamorphosis. Translated by Stanley Corngold, Bantam Books, 1972.
  6. Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. Grove Press, 1954.
  7. Eliot, T.S. The Waste Land. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1922.
  8. Morrison, Toni. Beloved. Knopf, 1987.
  9. García Márquez, Gabriel. One Hundred Years of Solitude. Translated by Gregory Rabassa, Harper & Row, 1970.
You may read more on Theoretical Terms below:

Collective Unconscious in Literature & Theory

The collective unconscious consists of the sum of the instincts and their correlates, the archetypes. Just as everybody possesses instincts. Carl Jung

Etymology of Collective Unconscious
OriginCoined by Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung.
Components“Collective” derived from Latin “collectivus,” meaning shared or collective, and “unconscious” referring to the hidden aspect of the mind.
First Use of Collective Unconscious
YearCarl Jung introduced the term in 1916.
PublicationIt first appeared in his work titled The Structure of the Unconscious.
ConceptJung used the term to describe a shared reservoir of universal human experiences and archetypal symbols in the deepest layers of the human psyche.
InfluenceThe concept of the collective unconscious has had a significant impact on psychology, literature, and cultural studies, becoming a fundamental concept in Jungian analytical psychology.
Meanings of Collective Unconscious
  • Definition: It is a concept in analytical psychology developed by Carl Jung.
  • Shared Repository: It refers to the part of the unconscious mind that contains shared memories, experiences, and symbols common to all humans, across cultures and throughout history.
  • Universal Archetypes: In it, Jung identified universal archetypes or primal images that influence human behavior and thought patterns.
  • Influence on Dreams and Myths: These archetypes often manifest in dreams, myths, and cultural symbols, shaping human creativity and cultural expression.
  • Personal and Cultural Relevance: While the collective unconscious contains universal elements, it also interacts with an individual’s personal experiences and cultural context, influencing their psychology and behavior.
Definition of Collective Unconscious as a Theoretical Term

The term “collective unconscious” in literary theory refers to a shared reservoir of universal human experiences, symbols, and archetypes that reside in the human psyche. This theoretical concept posits that certain recurring themes, motifs, and symbols found in literature and across cultures are derived from this collective source, transcending individual experiences.

It also underscores the idea that literature often taps into these archetypal elements to evoke common emotional and psychological responses in readers, fostering a sense of cultural and human continuity. Here is the main theorist, his work and his argument about it.

Collective Unconscious: Theorists, Works and Argument
TheoristsWorksArguments
Carl JungThe Structure of the Unconscious (1916)Archetypal Analysis: This theory suggests that literature often draws upon universal archetypes and symbols embedded in the human collective psyche. Literary critics and theorists use this framework to analyze and interpret recurring motifs and themes in literature.
Cultural Universality: The argument posits that certain literary themes and symbols persist across cultures and time periods because they tap into the shared reservoir of the collective unconscious. This perspective highlights the enduring relevance of literature and its ability to resonate with diverse audiences.
Depth of Meaning: It advocates of the concept argue that recognizing the influence it enhances the depth of literary analysis by revealing underlying psychological and cultural dimensions in texts, enriching our understanding of literary works.
Collective Unconscious and Literary Theories
Literary TheoryExplanation
Archetypal TheoryExplanation: In archetypal theory, it is a central concept. It focuses on the analysis of recurring archetypes and symbols in literature that are drawn from the collective unconscious. These archetypes are universal and evoke deep, shared meanings and emotions.
Psychoanalytic TheoryExplanation: It is a key component of psychoanalytic theory, particularly in the context of Sigmund Freud’s theories. It explores the subconscious aspects of characters and themes in literature, delving into the hidden motivations, desires, and conflicts that are influenced by the collective unconscious.
Mythological TheoryExplanation: Mythological theory emphasizes the role of myths and mythic elements in literature. The collective unconscious is seen as the source of these mythic patterns and motifs that reappear in storytelling across cultures and time periods.
Jungian Literary TheoryExplanation: This specific branch of literary theory is deeply rooted in Carl Jung’s analytical psychology, which heavily relies on the concept of the collective unconscious. Jungian literary theory explores how literature reflects and draws upon the archetypes and symbols embedded in the collective unconscious, offering insights into characters, plots, and themes.
Cultural TheoryExplanation: Cultural theorists may incorporate the concept to analyze how shared cultural symbols and narratives impact literature. It helps to understand how certain cultural archetypes and symbols become deeply ingrained in literary works, reflecting broader cultural themes and influences.
Interpretive TheoryExplanation: In interpretive theory, it could be be used as a framework for interpreting literary texts on a deeper psychological and symbolic level. It allows theorists to uncover hidden layers of meaning and analyze the profound impact of universal symbols on literary works.
Collective Unconscious as a Literary Concept

The collective unconscious, as a literary concept, serves to imbue literary works with archetypal symbols and themes that connect the readers on a universal level. It enables authors to tap into a shared human reservoir of deep-seated emotions, experiences, and cultural symbols, fostering a deeper connection between the text and its audience.

By using it, authors explore timeless themes and evoke powerful emotional responses, enriching the literary experience.

Examples in Literary Criticism
ExampleDescription
Jungian Archetypal AnalysisDescription: Jungian literary criticism explores it by analyzing archetypal characters and symbols in literature. It emphasizes the hero’s journey and other universal archetypes as products of the collective unconscious.
Example: Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a Thousand Faces identifies the hero’s journey as a recurring archetype in literature, showcasing the collective unconscious’s impact on storytelling.
Mythological InterpretationsDescription: Literary theorists draw on it to interpret mythological elements in literature. It identifies recurring mythic patterns and motifs as products of the collective unconscious, shaping literary structures and themes.
Example: Northrop Frye’s Anatomy of Criticism analyzes the influence of mythic structures on literature, demonstrating the collective unconscious’s role in storytelling.
Psychoanalytic ExplorationDescription: Psychoanalytic literary criticism, influenced by Freud’s theories and the collective unconscious, examines subconscious elements in literature, including the Oedipus complex and other psychological themes.
Example: Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams is applied to analyze familial relationships and conflicts in literature.
Cultural and Feminist TheoriesDescription: Cultural and feminist literary theories incorporate the collective unconscious to explore cultural and gender-specific archetypes in literature. It examines societal norms and their connection to the collective unconscious.
Example: The Madwoman in the Attic by Gilbert and Gubar discusses the portrayal of the “madwoman” archetype in literature and its relationship to cultural norms and the collective unconscious.
Interpretive Literary AnalysisDescription: The collective unconscious serves as a foundation for interpretive literary analysis, revealing hidden layers of meaning and symbolism in literature. It uncovers the influence of cultural myths and symbols.
Example: Roland Barthes’ Mythologies explores how everyday objects and practices acquire cultural myths and symbols, demonstrating the collective unconscious’s role in language and representation in literature and society.
Suggested Readings
  1. Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton University Press, 2008.
  2. Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press, 1957.
  3. Freud, Sigmund. The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated by James Strachey, Basic Books, 2010.
  4. Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press, 2000.
  5. Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers, Hill and Wang, 2013.
You may read more on Theoretical Terms below: