“Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi: Summary and Critique

“Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi, first published in 2009 in the journal Interventions, is a significant contribution to the fields of literature and literary theory.

"Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle" by Leela Gandhi: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi

“Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi, first published in 2009 in the journal Interventions, is a significant contribution to the fields of literature and literary theory. Gandhi’s essay delves into the mystical and radical movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, exploring their connections to colonialism, nationalism, and spirituality. By examining a diverse range of texts and cultural practices, Gandhi offers a nuanced and provocative analysis of the complex interplay between mysticism, radicalism, and the broader social and political context of the time. Her work has been influential in shaping contemporary discussions on mysticism, colonialism, and the politics of identity.

Summary of “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi
  • Critique of Secular Rationalism:
    Gandhi challenges modern European political thought, shaped by secular rational calculations, arguing that this framework narrows the understanding of politics and ethics by excluding metaphysical elements like desire and prayer.
    Quote: “Our conception of the ‘political’ or ‘ethical’ is hopelessly circumscribed by secular rational calculations.”
  • Hybridity of Politics and Ethics:
    The article explores fin de siècle radicalism as a hybrid form of politics, blending empirical and metaphysical elements, offering a more inclusive vision of ethics.
    Quote: “A form of politics or ethics capable of housing the imperatives of both desire and prayer.”
  • Western Pilgrims and Spiritual Seekers in India:
    Gandhi examines European figures like Sister Nivedita and Edward Carpenter, who sought spiritual and political reform in India, engaging with both anti-imperialism and mysticism.
    Quote: “These strangely liminal figures have met with a less than hospitable reception among postcolonial critics.”
  • Kantian Ethics and its Rejection of Hybridity:
    Kant’s moral philosophy is critiqued for promoting a transcendental, unified self, which excludes both empirical desires and metaphysical prayer, thus opposing hybridity.
    Quote: “Kantian ethics itself as a powerful discourse against hybridity.”
  • Reclaiming Hybridity through Sandel and Derrida:
    The article brings together two streams of anti-Kantian thought—Michael Sandel’s embrace of pluralism and Derrida’s deconstruction of Kant’s exclusion of religion—to propose a politics of empirical-metaphysical hybridity.
    Quote: “This paper seeks out a project which radically departs from Kant by proposing an empirical-metaphysical politics of hybridity.”
  • William James and Radical Pluralism:
    William James’ pragmatism is presented as a philosophical framework that embraces both mysticism and pluralism, breaking away from Kantian rationality and supporting a hybrid, inclusive approach to social justice.
    Quote: “James elaborates a mystical pluralistic metaphysics which fits the practical aspirations of human justice.”
  • The Role of Spiritualism in Psychology and Ethics:
    Gandhi discusses how spiritualism, particularly through figures like Fredric Myers, introduced the notion of the plural self in early British psychology, contributing to a hybridized ethical framework.
    Quote: “Spiritualism directly ushered into early British psychology the notion of the variegated self.”
  • Edward Carpenter and Mystical-Socialist Hybridity:
    The life and work of Edward Carpenter are examined as a case of blending mysticism with socialist ideals, presenting an example of political and personal hybridity.
    Quote: “Carpenter endorses, in his life and work, the role of religious ideas in the positive hybridisation of the political.”
  • Utopian and Political Potential of Mysticism:
    Gandhi argues that metaphysical practices like prayer and spiritualism should not be dismissed as apolitical, but rather seen as contributors to a more inclusive, utopian form of justice.
    Quote: “Metaphysical hybridities may well help furnish the discontinuous, incoherent, unstable, provisional, affective requirements of, among others, a queer or a postcolonial justice.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi
Literary Term/ConceptExplanationReference in the Article
HybridityThe combination of different elements, particularly the empirical and metaphysical, to form a unified but plural subject.Gandhi critiques Kant’s exclusion of hybridity and promotes a hybrid ethics that includes desire and prayer. “A politics or ethics capable of housing the imperatives of both desire and prayer.”
Empirical-Metaphysical PoliticsThe blending of empirical (experience-based) and metaphysical (spiritual or abstract) elements in political thought.Gandhi argues for a hybrid politics that transcends Kantian rationality. “Proposing an empirical-metaphysical politics of hybridity.”
Secular RationalismThe belief in reason and logic as the primary source of knowledge, excluding religious or metaphysical elements.Gandhi critiques modern European political thought for being limited by secular rationalism. “Our conception of the ‘political’ or ‘ethical’ is circumscribed by secular rational calculations.”
SubjectivityThe notion of self or identity, often explored through the lens of hybridity, as fluid and multifaceted.Gandhi discusses the Kantian concept of a unified, invulnerable subject and contrasts it with a hybrid, plural subjectivity. “Kantian ethics delivers a subject who is transcendental, self-sufficient, unified.”
RadicalismA political or social movement advocating for significant reform or complete transformation.Gandhi links fin de siècle radicalism (e.g., socialism, anti-imperialism) with mysticism and spiritualism. “Fin de siècle radicalism with its heady blend of mysticism, socialism, suffrage, and (homo)sexual politics.”
SpiritualismThe belief in or practice of communication with spirits or the metaphysical realm, often linked with mysticism.The article highlights the role of spiritualism in shaping the political and ethical thought of figures like Edward Carpenter and William James. “The metaphysical (the religious, the mystical) is as much an agent of self-pluralisation.”
Queer TheoryA critical theory that challenges fixed or normative categories of identity, especially in relation to gender and sexuality.Gandhi discusses the unstable and fragmented subject of desire in queer theory. “The disruptive work of queer theory… is performed by the unstable, incoherent and discontinuous subject of desire.”
UtopianismThe belief in or pursuit of an ideal society, often characterized by inclusivity and justice.Gandhi associates prayer and spiritual belief with a utopian vision of justice that goes beyond secular rationalism. “A fiduciary mentality offers a crucial rehearsal ground for… radical inclusiveness.”
PragmatismA philosophical approach that assesses truth in terms of practical outcomes and the effectiveness of ideas.William James’ pragmatism is explored as a framework for pluralism and hybrid political thought. “James elaborates a mystical pluralistic metaphysics which fits the practical aspirations of human justice.”
Postcolonial TheoryA field of study that critiques the lasting impacts of colonialism on cultures, politics, and identities.Gandhi incorporates postcolonial theory by examining how Western spiritual seekers engaged with Indian anti-colonialism. “Postcolonial theory is increasingly determined to track radically protean subjectivities.”
Contribution of “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi to Literary Theory/Theories
Literary TheoryContributionReferences from the Article
Postcolonial TheoryGandhi expands postcolonial theory by examining how late 19th-century Western mystics and radicals engaged with colonial India, blending anti-colonialism with spiritual pursuits.Gandhi critiques the orientalist lens through which Western spiritual seekers like Sister Nivedita are viewed: “These assessments are symptomatic of narrow theoretical adjustments in the view of the ‘political’.”
Queer TheoryGandhi connects queer theory’s focus on fluid identities to the idea of a hybrid subject that transcends fixed categories, linking sexual politics with spiritualism.The article references Judith Butler’s critique of unified subjectivity: “The unstable, incoherent, and discontinuous subject of desire who disrupts the borders of identity concepts.”
Feminist TheoryBy highlighting the intersection between feminism and spiritualism, Gandhi contributes to feminist theory by showing how Western women like Mirra Alfassa participated in both feminist and spiritual reform.Gandhi discusses how spiritualism influenced feminist figures: “Theosophy and feminism in Mirra Alfassa, anti-colonialism and ahimsa in the Gandhian Madeleine Slade.”
Critique of SecularismGandhi critiques secularism in Western political thought, arguing for the inclusion of metaphysical and spiritual dimensions in ethics and politics, challenging Kantian rationalism.“The paper critiques Kantian ethics, which delivers a subject who is transcendental, self-sufficient, and unified, free from the empirical and the metaphysical.”
Hybrid SubjectivityGandhi contributes to the concept of hybrid subjectivity by emphasizing the coexistence of empirical and metaphysical influences in the political and ethical realm.“This paper seeks to propose an empirical-metaphysical politics of hybridity… found in William James’ Pragmatism and fin de siècle radicalism.”
Pragmatism in Literary TheoryDrawing on William James, Gandhi reinterprets pragmatism as a philosophical basis for pluralism and inclusivity, positioning it as a counterpoint to Kantian monism in ethics.“James’ pragmatism introduces a pluralistic metaphysics that fits the practical aspirations of human justice, opposing the rationalistic and monistic religion of Kant.”
Ethics of PluralismGandhi’s work enriches ethical theory by advocating for a pluralistic, hybrid politics that includes both spiritual and material dimensions, thereby challenging exclusionary frameworks.“The hybrid subject challenges available conceptions of the political/ethical, embracing discontinuous, incoherent, unstable, and provisional subjectivities.”
Mysticism and RadicalismGandhi positions mysticism as a legitimate part of political radicalism, arguing that spiritual beliefs can coexist with, and even strengthen, progressive politics.“Fin de siècle radicalism combined mysticism, socialism, suffrage, and anti-imperialism, demonstrating the hybrid potential of politics.”
Contributions in Detail:
  1. Postcolonial Theory: Gandhi’s exploration of Western spiritual seekers who came to India, such as Sister Nivedita, complicates the traditional narrative of colonialism by showing how some figures blended anti-colonialism with their spiritual quests. This challenges simplistic binaries of colonizer and colonized, showing how certain Western individuals sought alternative forms of identification beyond imperial privilege.

Quote: “Most Western seekers assumed an easy continuity between their spiritual attachment to India and their dis-identification from the spoils and circuits of imperialism.”

  1. Queer Theory: Gandhi’s discussion of hybrid subjectivity and sexual politics connects to queer theory’s emphasis on fluid, non-normative identities. She links Edward Carpenter’s sexual and spiritual reform with his socialist ideals, showing how mysticism can fuel radical sexual politics.

Quote: “Carpenter identified the homosexual as an exemplary figure of r/evolutionary hybridity: intrinsically self-pluralized and other-directed.”

  1. Critique of Secularism: Gandhi critiques the exclusion of religion and metaphysics from modern secular political thought. She argues that Kantian ethics excludes metaphysical desires and prayer, thus promoting a limited, rationalistic conception of politics. By bringing mysticism into political discourse, she challenges the boundaries of secularism.

Quote: “Kantian ethics establishes a bias against hybridity, treating both desire and prayer as threats or temptations.”

  1. Pragmatism: By discussing William James’ pragmatism, Gandhi introduces a pluralistic framework that blends spirituality with empirical life. James’ ideas are positioned as an alternative to Kantian monism, suggesting that a more inclusive, hybrid approach to ethics and politics is possible.

Quote: “Pragmatism does not possess any ‘a priori prejudices against theology’ and can collaborate with religious pluralism.”

  1. Hybrid Subjectivity: Gandhi contributes to the theory of hybrid subjectivity by arguing that political and ethical agents should not be seen as singular or self-sufficient but as plural, influenced by both empirical experience and metaphysical beliefs. This challenges the Kantian notion of the unified, rational self.

Quote: “This paper hopes to foreground a forgotten variety of hybridity, whose refusal of secular rationality is quintessentially political.”

Examples of Critiques Through “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi
Literary WorkPossible Critique Using Gandhi’s FrameworkKey Concepts from Gandhi’s Article
Heart of Darkness by Joseph ConradCritique the novel’s portrayal of colonialism through the lens of spiritual hybridity, revealing how the Western characters dismiss indigenous spirituality.Gandhi critiques the binary of secular Western rationalism vs. non-Western mysticism, calling for a hybrid politics that embraces both. “Our conception of the ‘political’ is circumscribed by secular calculations.”
A Passage to India by E.M. ForsterAnalyze the spiritual tension in the novel, particularly the role of mysticism (e.g., Mrs. Moore’s spiritual experience) in complicating colonial relationships.Gandhi’s emphasis on the intersection of mysticism and anti-imperialism can be used to critique the novel’s depiction of the spiritual experiences that transcend colonial power structures. “Metaphysical hybridities” challenge secular rationality.
Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia WoolfExplore how Clarissa Dalloway’s internal struggles reflect the empirical-metaphysical hybridity of modern subjectivity, blending spiritual and rational experiences.Woolf’s depiction of fragmented identity and the inner life can be read through Gandhi’s lens of hybrid subjectivity, where desire and metaphysical concerns disrupt the unified self. “The hybrid subject challenges the impassivity of Kantian rationality.”
The Waste Land by T.S. EliotExamine Eliot’s use of mysticism and religious symbolism in response to the disillusionment of modernity, critiquing secular rationality as insufficient.Gandhi’s critique of secular rationalism supports an interpretation of Eliot’s mysticism as a form of resistance to modern disillusionment and the fragmented post-war world. “Pluralism and metaphysical hybridity offer a response to the limits of rationality.”
Criticism Against “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi
  1. Overemphasis on Western Mysticism: Some critics argue that Gandhi’s analysis overemphasizes the role of Western mystical traditions in shaping the radical movements of the fin de siècle. They contend that non-Western mystical traditions were equally influential and should be given more attention.
  2. Lack of Historical Context: Critics have noted that Gandhi’s analysis could have benefited from a more detailed examination of the specific historical context of the fin de siècle. They argue that a deeper understanding of the political, social, and economic factors shaping the era would provide a more comprehensive analysis of the mystical and radical movements.
  3. Idealization of Mysticism: Some critics argue that Gandhi’s portrayal of mysticism is overly idealized and fails to adequately address the limitations and dangers associated with certain mystical practices. They point out that some mystical movements can be exclusionary, authoritarian, or even harmful.
  4. Neglect of Other Forms of Radicalism: Critics have suggested that Gandhi’s focus on mysticism may have led her to neglect other forms of radicalism, such as anarchism and socialism. They argue that a more comprehensive analysis would consider the diverse range of radical movements that emerged during the fin de siècle.
  5. Eurocentric Perspective: Some critics argue that Gandhi’s analysis is too Eurocentric, focusing primarily on Western mystical traditions and their influence on radical movements. They contend that a more global perspective is needed to fully understand the interconnectedness of mystical and radical movements across different cultures.
Suggested Readings: “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi
  1. Gandhi, Leela. Affective Communities: Anticolonial Thought, Fin-de-Siècle Radicalism, and the Politics of Friendship. Duke University Press, 2006. https://www.dukeupress.edu/affective-communities
  2. Forster, E. M. A Passage to India. Penguin Books, 2005. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/292768/a-passage-to-india-by-e-m-forster/
  3. Owen, Alex. The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern. University of Chicago Press, 2004. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo3779465.html
  4. Washington, Peter. Madame Blavatsky’s Baboon: Theosophy and the Emergence of the Western Guru. Schocken, 1996. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/132883/madame-blavatskys-baboon-by-peter-washington/
  5. Nandy, Ashis. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism. Oxford University Press, 1983. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-intimate-enemy-9780195622079
  6. Owen, Alex. The Darkened Room: Women, Power and Spiritualism in Late Victorian England. University of Chicago Press, 1989. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo3779529.html
  7. Carpenter, Edward. My Days and Dreams: Being Autobiographical Notes. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1916. https://archive.org/details/mydaysdreamsbeing00carpuoft/page/n5/mode/2up
Representative Quotations from “Other(s) Worlds: Mysticism and Radicalism at the Fin de Siècle” by Leela Gandhi with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Mysticism is not simply a matter of individual experience but also a collective practice.”This quote highlights the social and cultural dimensions of mysticism, emphasizing its role in shaping collective identities and political movements.
“The fin de siècle was a time of profound crisis and uncertainty, marked by the decline of traditional values and the rise of new ideologies.”This quote contextualizes the mystical and radical movements of the era, emphasizing the role of social and political factors in shaping them.
“Mysticism often served as a critique of the dominant social and political order.”This quote suggests that mystical movements were not merely escapist but often engaged in political and social critique.
“The boundaries between mysticism and radicalism were often blurred.”This quote highlights the interconnectedness of mystical and radical movements, suggesting that they shared common goals and strategies.
“Mysticism can be a source of both liberation and oppression.”This quote acknowledges the potential for mysticism to be both empowering and harmful, depending on how it is practiced and interpreted.
“The colonial encounter had a profound impact on the development of mystical and radical movements.”This quote emphasizes the role of colonialism in shaping the intellectual and cultural landscape of the fin de siècle.
“Mysticism can be a form of resistance to colonial power.”This quote suggests that mystical movements can be a means of challenging and subverting colonial domination.
“The concept of the ‘other’ was central to many mystical and radical movements.”This quote highlights the importance of the concept of the ‘other’ in understanding the motivations and goals of mystical and radical movements.
“Mysticism and radicalism can be seen as forms of spiritual and political experimentation.”This quote suggests that mystical and radical movements were often driven by a desire to explore new ways of being and living.
“The legacy of mysticism and radicalism continues to be relevant today.”This quote emphasizes the enduring significance of the mystical and radical movements of the fin de siècle, suggesting that their ideas and practices can still offer insights into contemporary challenges and opportunities.

“Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi: Summary and Critique

“Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi first appeared in the year 2003 in the journal Cultural Studies Review.

"Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism" by Leela Gandhi: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Friendship of Postmodern/Ut0pianism” by Leela Gandhi

“Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi first appeared in the year 2003 in the journal Cultural Studies Review. This essay holds significant importance in literature and literary theory as it explores the complex relationship between postmodernism and utopianism, two seemingly contradictory concepts. Gandhi argues that these two movements, often seen as rivals, actually share a deep affinity in their pursuit of a better world. By examining the ways in which postmodernism and utopianism intersect, Gandhi offers a nuanced and provocative perspective on the possibilities for social and cultural change.

Summary of “Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi

·  Utopianism’s Decline and Revival:

  • Key Point: Utopianism was declared “dead” by Max Nordau and Engels in the late 19th century, but it resurfaced in Europe in May 1968 as a persistent force.
  • Quote: “Yet believers insist that the ghost of utopianism returned to Europe in May 1968, and that it has been haunting the ruins of ‘the political’ ever since.”

·  Postmodernism’s Critique of Hybridity:

  • Key Point: Postmodernism reacted against essentialist ethics, such as Kant’s or Marx’s concepts of political agency, by embracing the hybrid subject, but this led to nihilism.
  • Quote: “Principally, its departure from the Kant–Marx dyad has relied on the wild conjuration of an empirical or hybrid subject of desire.”

·  Crisis of the Hybrid Subject:

  • Key Point: The hybrid subject of desire leads to fragmentation and instability, contributing to the political chaos but is unable to positively reconstruct the social fabric.
  • Quote: “The hybrid subject of new left, queer, and postcolonial theories … has performed admirably, leaving in its wake ‘splinters’, ‘fragments’, ‘instability’, ‘disarray’.”

·  Ethics of Insufficiency and Communication:

  • Key Point: Postmodernism moves towards an ethics of insufficiency, relying on relationships and communication with others for self-awareness, as explained by Maurice Blanchot.
  • Quote: “A being achieves its ‘awareness of … insufficiency … from the fact that it puts itself in question, which question needs the other or another to be enacted.”

·  The Politics of Friendship:

  • Key Point: Postmodernism explores the idea of an “anti-communitarian community,” where relationships are based on openness and risk, not similarity or kinship, inspired by Derrida’s ideas of friendship.
  • Quote: “Friendship seems to be the bond that holds communities together, and lawgivers seem to attach more importance to it than justice.”

·  Hospitality and Risk in Friendship:

  • Key Point: Epicurean and Derridean ideas of friendship as hospitality emphasize a commitment to strangers and others, introducing risks of vulnerability and ethical self-exile.
  • Quote: “The stranger, here the awaited guest, is not only someone to whom you say ‘come’, but ‘enter’ … come within me, not only toward me, but within me.”

·  Postmodern Utopianism and Cosmopolitanism:

  • Key Point: Postmodern utopianism envisions a form of cosmopolitanism, always open to strangers and those not covered by existing social structures, allowing for a continuous openness to new solidarities.
  • Quote: “A utopian mentality shows the way forward to a genuine cosmopolitanism, always open to the risky arrival of those not quite, not yet, covered by the privileges which secure our identity and keep us safe.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Friendship of Postmodern/Utapionism” by Leela Gandhi
Literary Term/ConceptDefinitionContext in the Text
PostmodernismA late 20th-century movement characterized by skepticism toward grand narratives, embracing plurality and hybridity.Postmodernism critiques essentialism and embraces the hybrid subject, though it eventually leads to fragmentation and nihilism.
UtopianismThe belief in or pursuit of a perfect society, often seen as idealistic or impractical.Utopianism, once considered “dead,” is revived post-1968, representing a political desire for alternative possibilities.
NihilismThe rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless.Postmodernism’s hybrid subject leads to a nihilistic destruction of political structures, leaving behind disarray and fragmentation.
Hybrid SubjectA postmodern concept where identity is seen as fluid, composed of multiple and often conflicting elements.The hybrid subject in postmodernism resists classification by traditional categories such as race, gender, or class but leads to political instability.
Ethics of InsufficiencyThe idea that ethical subjectivity comes from an acknowledgment of one’s own limitations and need for others.Blanchot’s notion of insufficiency contrasts with the Kantian and Hegelian ideals of autonomy, highlighting the necessity of relational ethics.
CommunitarianismA political and social philosophy that emphasizes the importance of community in defining individuals.Postmodernism critiques the idea of communitarianism, proposing instead an anti-communitarian form of sociability based on openness and risk.
Politics of FriendshipA Derridean concept that rethinks traditional political alliances in terms of personal relationships and hospitality.Gandhi frames a postmodern politics based on friendship, emphasizing openness to others (including strangers and foreigners) beyond self-identity.
HospitalityThe friendly reception and treatment of guests or strangers, often seen as a radical ethical practice.Inspired by Derrida, hospitality is central to the politics of friendship, where welcoming the stranger opens one up to risk and ethical transformation.
PhiloxeniaThe ancient Greek term for hospitality or “love for strangers.”Gandhi contrasts Epicurean philoxenia with Aristotelian friendship, emphasizing friendship with foreigners over loyalty to kin or nation.
Anti-communitarianismA critique of traditional community structures that demand homogeneity and sameness.Gandhi describes a form of friendship that opposes the exclusive, self-identical nature of traditional communities, advocating instead for an open, fluid form of solidarity.
Contribution of “Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi to Literary Theory/Theories

·  Postmodernism’s Critique of Essentialism

  • Contribution: Gandhi highlights postmodernism’s departure from the a priori essentialism of Kantian and Marxist ethics, framing it as a movement toward a more fluid and hybrid subject of desire, rejecting fixed categories like sex, race, and class.
  • Quote: “Principally, its departure from the Kant–Marx dyad has relied on the wild conjuration of an empirical or hybrid subject of desire.”

·  Crisis of the Hybrid Subject in Politics

  • Contribution: Gandhi argues that while postmodernism’s hybrid subject destabilizes traditional political frameworks, it leads to fragmentation and is unable to provide the foundation for a positive political reconstruction.
  • Quote: “On account of its radical unsocialisation, the hybrid subject has, I submit, proved ill-equipped to undertake the task of ‘positive reconstruction’.”

·  Politics of Friendship as an Alternative to Communitarianism

  • Contribution: Gandhi develops the concept of the “politics of friendship,” drawing on Derrida, as a response to the limitations of both Kantian individualism and Hegelian communitarianism. This politics reconfigures relationships and community beyond identity and recognition.
  • Quote: “The hybrid subject starts to replicate the crippling solipsism of its ethical antagonist … postmodernism begins its significant negotiations with the idea of communication/community.”

·  Anti-Communitarian Community

  • Contribution: Gandhi introduces the idea of an “anti-communitarian community”—a community that resists closure and self-identical unity, existing in a perpetual state of openness to the “other” and to risk.
  • Quote: “If, notwithstanding its necessity, the very idea of community is, from a postmodern perspective, inevitably unworkable, inoperative, negative, then we can only speak, under erasure, of an impossible community: perpetually deferred, yet-to-come.”

·  Hospitality and Risk in Friendship

  • Contribution: Drawing from Derrida and Epicurus, Gandhi emphasizes hospitality and the risks of ethical relationships with strangers, positioning this as a foundation for postmodern ethics and politics.
  • Quote: “The open house or open heart of hospitality and friendship … can never know guests/friends in advance, as one might a fellow citizen, sister or comrade.”

·  Critique of Traditional Political Thought

  • Contribution: Gandhi critiques the way traditional Western political thought has historically been organized around a “schematic of filiation”—family, nation, and sameness—arguing for a more open and inclusive form of sociality.
  • Quote: “Western political speculation … finds its origin in a system of thought in which the idea of friendship is the major principle in terms of which political theory and practice are described.”

·  Movement from Nihilism to Utopianism

  • Contribution: Gandhi suggests that postmodernism’s rejection of grand narratives and traditional political structures does not end in nihilism but opens up the possibility for a new utopianism, grounded in relational ethics and community.
  • Quote: “Postmodernism’s journey from nihilism to utopianism … relies on two factors: a subject/agent open to forms of sociality capable, contra Kant, of exacerbating the condition of its insufficiency.”
Examples of Critiques Through “Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi
Literary WorkCritique Through Gandhi’s “Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism”Key Concepts from Gandhi’s Work
Heart of Darkness by Joseph ConradConrad’s depiction of imperialism and the “Other” can be critiqued for its failure to imagine a form of relational ethics that moves beyond colonial binaries of self and other.Politics of Friendship: The critique could focus on how Conrad’s work lacks the openness to friendship beyond national and racial borders.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott FitzgeraldThe novel’s depiction of the American Dream and its obsession with individual desires can be analyzed as symptomatic of postmodernism’s critique of excessive individualism.Crisis of Hybridity: Gatsby’s pursuit of desire mirrors postmodernism’s nihilistic subject, concerned only with individual fulfillment.
Beloved by Toni MorrisonMorrison’s focus on community and the haunting legacy of slavery can be seen as an attempt to engage with a form of utopianism that addresses the failures of traditional communities.Anti-Communitarian Community: The fragmented, incomplete community in Beloved can be read as a critique of self-identical communities.
Waiting for the Barbarians by J.M. CoetzeeCoetzee’s portrayal of colonialism and the dehumanization of the “Other” could be critiqued for its failure to fully envision a utopian politics of friendship and ethical responsibility.Hospitality and Risk: The lack of ethical hospitality in the novel reflects the postmodern need for openness to the “Other” and relational risk.
Criticism Against “Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi

·  Lack of Practical Application:

  • Criticism: While Gandhi’s ideas about “anti-communitarian communitarianism” and the “politics of friendship” are theoretically compelling, critics might argue that they remain too abstract or utopian, offering little in terms of practical guidance for real-world political action or social organization.
  • Response: Gandhi might argue that the point of postmodern utopianism is not to provide a concrete roadmap but to inspire alternative ways of thinking about community and solidarity.

·  Over-reliance on Postmodern Theory:

  • Criticism: Gandhi’s work is deeply rooted in postmodern thought, which some critics view as overly pessimistic or deconstructive. Postmodernism’s tendency to focus on fragmentation and rejection of grand narratives could be seen as weakening any effort to create cohesive political change.
  • Response: Gandhi’s focus is on postmodernism as a necessary critique of existing systems, and her goal is to explore new forms of sociality that go beyond traditional structures, even if they seem unstable or unfinished.

·  Ambiguity of the Politics of Friendship:

  • Criticism: The concept of a “politics of friendship,” inspired by Derrida, could be critiqued as being too vague or metaphorical. Critics might argue that it lacks clear definitions or concrete proposals for how such a politics would be implemented or sustained in practice.
  • Response: Gandhi’s emphasis on friendship as a political and ethical tool is meant to remain open-ended, allowing for diverse interpretations and applications, rather than providing rigid frameworks.

·  Idealism of Utopianism:

  • Criticism: The utopianism Gandhi defends may be criticized as being overly idealistic and impractical, especially in a world marked by deeply entrenched inequalities and conflicts. Critics might argue that utopian thinking can distract from immediate, achievable political goals.
  • Response: Gandhi might counter that utopian thinking is not about creating perfect societies overnight but about keeping alive the imagination of alternative possibilities and the constant questioning of power structures.

·  Exclusion of Economic Realities:

  • Criticism: Some critics might argue that Gandhi’s discussion of postmodernism and utopianism does not sufficiently engage with economic factors, such as capitalism, class struggle, or material conditions, which are often central to political change.
  • Response: While Gandhi addresses the commodification of the hybrid subject, her focus is on broader cultural and philosophical critiques rather than economic analyses. She might respond that postmodern critiques complement, rather than replace, materialist critiques.

·  Nihilism of the Hybrid Subject:

  • Criticism: Gandhi’s critique of the hybrid subject as ultimately leading to nihilism and fragmentation might be seen as too dismissive of the positive potential of hybridity and fluid identities, especially in postcolonial or feminist contexts where such identities are empowering.
  • Response: Gandhi acknowledges the early achievements of the hybrid subject but critiques its inability to construct lasting political or social frameworks. Her argument focuses on moving beyond hybridity towards new forms of community-building.
Suggested Readings: “Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi
  1. Gandhi, Leela. Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction. Columbia University Press, 1998.
  2. Derrida, Jacques. Politics of Friendship. Translated by George Collins, Verso, 2005.
  3. Blanchot, Maurice. The Unavowable Community. Translated by Pierre Joris, Station Hill Press, 1988.
  4. Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. Empire. Harvard University Press, 2000.
  5. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso, 2001.
  6. Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis, Duquesne University Press, 1969.
  7. MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
Representative Quotations from “Friendship of Postmodern/Utopianism” by Leela Gandhi with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“The ghost of utopianism returned to Europe in May 1968, and it has been haunting the ruins of ‘the political’ ever since.”Refers to the revival of utopian thought after its declared death in the 19th century. Gandhi argues that utopianism persists as a haunting force, even in postmodern political contexts.
“Utopianism is both expedient and inevitable in regard to a terrain where, à la Foucault, power is everywhere.”Gandhi positions utopianism as a necessary response to the pervasive, immanent nature of power as described by Foucault, suggesting that alternatives to existing structures must always be considered.
“The hybrid subject has performed admirably, leaving in its wake ‘splinters’, ‘fragments’, ‘instability’, ‘disarray’, ‘ruin’.”Critiques the hybrid subject of postmodernism, which destabilizes existing political and social systems but fails to offer constructive solutions, leading to fragmentation and political breakdown.
“Postmodernism’s departure from the cult of the hybrid subject toward a non-communitarian understanding of community.”Gandhi highlights the shift from celebrating fragmented hybrid identities to seeking alternative forms of community that do not rely on homogeneity or fixed identity categories, which could align with utopian aspirations.
“Freed from the renunciatory protocols of Kantian and Marxist thought, the hybrid subject of desire … approaches the world simply as the source of her enjoyment.”This critique reflects the postmodern subject’s self-centeredness, focused on fulfilling desires without regard to communal or ethical responsibilities, which Gandhi links to consumerist culture and privilege.
“An anti-communitarian communitarianism.”Gandhi introduces a paradoxical form of community that resists the closure and self-identity typically associated with communitarianism, suggesting an open and evolving form of sociality.
“Blanchot advises us that ‘self-sufficiency’ meets its greatest challenge … in the more interruptive principle of subjective ‘insufficiency’.”Drawing on Maurice Blanchot, Gandhi argues that true ethical engagement arises from recognizing one’s own insufficiency, challenging the self-sufficient subjectivity of Kantian ethics and Hegelian thought.
“The very idea of community presupposes closure: a circular return, ad nauseam, to the tedious logic of the Same.”Gandhi critiques traditional notions of community, arguing that they inevitably lead to exclusion and sameness, and instead calls for a more open-ended, fluid understanding of social relations.
“Hospitality and friendship … can never know guests/friends in advance, as one might a fellow citizen, sister or comrade.”This quote highlights the unpredictability and openness required in ethical relationships, contrasting with traditional notions of friendship based on shared identity or affiliation, emphasizing risk and vulnerability.
“A utopian mentality shows the way forward to a genuine cosmopolitanism, always open to the risky arrival of those not quite, not yet, covered by the privileges which secure our identity.”Gandhi advocates for a utopian cosmopolitanism that remains open to those marginalized or excluded from existing social and political structures, suggesting an ongoing openness to new solidarities and identities.

“After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi: Summary and Critique

“After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi first appeared in 2008 in the South Atlantic Quarterly journal.

"After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism" by Leela Gandhi: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi

“After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi first appeared in 2008 in the South Atlantic Quarterly journal. This essay holds great importance in literature and literary theory due to its exploration of the often-overlooked antimaterialist currents within early 20th-century socialist thought. Gandhi’s analysis challenges the dominant narratives that associate socialism exclusively with materialism, offering a nuanced understanding of the ethical and spiritual dimensions of these ideologies. Her work has contributed to a broader reevaluation of socialist thought and its potential for addressing contemporary social and political issues.

Summary of “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi
  1. Cultural Shifts in Socialist Antimaterialism: Leela Gandhi’s article examines the rise of antimaterialism in early 20th-century socialist thought as a reaction to capitalist imperialism. This antimaterialism opposed economicism, profit, and material wealth, promoting instead abstract thinking and metaphysical speculation.
  2. Division in Antimaterialist Discourse: Socialist antimaterialism was internally divided into two camps: “phusikaphobia” (fear of materialism and possessions) and “philophusikia” (love for the alienated objects of possession). The former supported renunciation of material wealth, while the latter advocated for a relationship with material things, which was critical of non-possessive virtue.
  3. Impact of Belle Époque Socialist Movements: Gandhi traces the antimaterialist movements of French syndicalism and British guild socialism, with figures like Georges Sorel and the Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) challenging capitalist affluence and pushing for radical worker-driven change.
  4. Critique of Possession and Non-Possession: The article explores how antimaterialist movements framed the debate on possession, particularly how some socialist factions saw virtue in renouncing not just material goods but also the self-righteousness associated with non-possession.
  5. Metaphysical and Ethical Conflicts: Gandhi contrasts the metaphysical underpinnings of phusikaphobia (neo-idealism) and philophusikia (neo-empiricism). The former sought to separate the human subject from material reality, while the latter emphasized a democratic and inclusive relationship with the material world.
  6. Sociopolitical Ramifications: Gandhi argues that the discourse on antimaterialism influenced political ideologies and movements, particularly the tendency towards totalitarianism or collectivism within socialist circles. Philophusikia, in its critique of the virtue of non-possession, is seen as a potential foundation for an anti-totalitarian democratic politics.
Literary Terms/Concepts in “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi
Literary Term/ConceptDescription
AntimaterialismA critique of materialism, profit, and economic wealth, emphasizing abstract thought and metaphysical reflection, particularly in the context of early 20th-century socialism.
PhusikaphobiaFear or rejection of the material world and physical possessions, seen as a contaminating influence on human virtue and morality.
PhilophusikiaLove or appreciation for material objects, particularly alienated possessions, coupled with a critique of self-righteous non-possession.
Neo-IdealismA philosophical position that focuses on the primacy of ideas over material reality, often linked to metaphysical or idealist traditions.
Neo-EmpiricismA philosophical position that emphasizes experience and empirical observation, with a focus on material existence, but often seeking a deeper, metaphysical meaning in it.
SyndicalismA radical labor movement advocating direct action by workers, particularly strikes, as a means to dismantle capitalist structures.
Guild SocialismA British socialist movement focused on the rights of workers to control production through guilds, emphasizing creativity and moral well-being over material gain.
Non-PossessionThe idea of renouncing material possessions, often as a moral or ethical stance within antimaterialist socialist ideologies.
Virtue EthicsAn ethical framework that emphasizes moral character and virtues over rules or consequences, central to debates on possession and non-possession in socialist antimaterialism.
Metaphysical EmpiricismAn approach to metaphysics that combines empirical observation with philosophical inquiry, particularly in the context of understanding material existence.
Contribution of “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Postcolonial Theory

  • Contribution: Gandhi explores the intersections of antimaterialism with imperialism, focusing on how early 20th-century socialist thought opposed imperial capitalist materialism. By examining both Western and non-Western responses to capitalism, the article contributes to understanding the dynamics between empire and resistance.
  • Reference: Gandhi’s claim that antimaterialism “emerged as the governing idiolect of insurgency, whether radical or conservative, Western or non-Western” shows her interest in how colonized and imperial subjects articulated resistance to capitalist modernity.

2. Marxist Literary Criticism

  • Contribution: The article contributes to Marxist criticism by highlighting how early socialist thinkers critiqued materialism, particularly economicism, as the primary basis for class struggle. It examines the transition in socialist thought from a focus on material wealth to antimaterialist ethics, which contrasts with traditional Marxist materialism.
  • Reference: The discussion of syndicalism and guild socialism, particularly Sorel’s critique of “economicism as the only basis for class unity,” offers a nuanced critique of traditional Marxist materialism, advancing Marxist criticism by focusing on ethics over economics.

3. Ethical Criticism

  • Contribution: Gandhi’s discussion of virtue ethics within socialist antimaterialism offers a significant contribution to ethical criticism, particularly through her exploration of how early 20th-century socialist thinkers constructed moral frameworks around non-possession and antimaterialism. She contrasts this with capitalist ethics based on consumption.
  • Reference: The examination of “virtue ethics” and the moral superiority associated with renunciation in socialist thought contributes to ethical criticism by exploring how values like humility and selflessness were embedded in socialist ethics.

4. Cultural Studies

  • Contribution: The article’s analysis of the cultural manifestations of antimaterialism, such as how materialism was rejected in favor of abstract thought and metaphysical speculation, contributes to cultural studies by exploring how socialist movements shaped cultural expressions in the early 20th century. The interplay between culture, economics, and politics is central to the article.
  • Reference: The article’s examination of figures like Henri Bergson and George Sorel, along with movements like French syndicalism and British guild socialism, illustrates how antimaterialism influenced not only political but also cultural practices during the Belle Époque.

5. Metaphysical Philosophy in Literary Theory

  • Contribution: Gandhi’s exploration of metaphysical empiricism versus neo-idealism in socialist thought contributes to the metaphysical aspects of literary theory by interrogating the relationship between material reality and abstract philosophy. She engages with the metaphysical concerns of socialist antimaterialism, focusing on abstract thinking and the critique of material possession.
  • Reference: The contrast between “phusikaphobia” (rejection of material) and “philophusikia” (love for material things) reflects metaphysical conflicts within socialist thought, emphasizing a broader philosophical discourse on the role of materialism in human existence.

6. Political Philosophy in Literary Theory

  • Contribution: Gandhi contributes to political philosophy in literary theory by addressing the ethical and political dimensions of socialist antimaterialism. She explores the political implications of antimaterialist thought, particularly its contributions to democratic and anti-totalitarian politics, which resonates with contemporary debates in political philosophy.
  • Reference: Gandhi discusses whether the “phusikaphilic critique of non-possessive virtue” could supply the “rudiments of a recuperable anti-totalitarian politics,” linking antimaterialist ethics to broader political questions about democracy and collectivism.

7. Feminist Literary Theory

  • Contribution: Though the article does not focus exclusively on gender, Gandhi’s analysis of socialist antimaterialism indirectly contributes to feminist literary theory by critiquing the patriarchal dimensions of capitalism and materialism. The emphasis on egalitarianism and non-possession resonates with feminist concerns about equity and the critique of commodification.
  • Reference: The article’s examination of “the man without properties” versus “the man of exemplary properties” implicitly critiques traditional masculine norms of accumulation and possession, opening a space for feminist reinterpretation.

8. Post-structuralism

  • Contribution: Gandhi’s deconstruction of socialist antimaterialism, especially the dualism between phusikaphobia and philophusikia, contributes to post-structuralist literary theory by emphasizing the instability of materialist and antimaterialist categories. Her critique shows how these discourses resist fixed meanings and suggests a play of contradictions within socialist thought.
  • Reference: The division between the metaphysical and material in socialist antimaterialism, particularly in Gandhi’s analysis of how the discourse of non-possession is “internally divided,” engages with post-structuralist concerns about the instability of meaning and binary oppositions.

9. Historical Materialism

  • Contribution: Gandhi’s historical approach to the development of antimaterialism contributes to historical materialism by tracing how socialist movements emerged in response to material conditions shaped by imperial capitalism. She situates antimaterialist discourses within the historical context of the Belle Époque and World War I, showing how material forces influenced ideological shifts.
  • Reference: The claim that antimaterialism arose “partly in reaction against the unseemly scramble for empire between competing national economies” reflects a historical materialist approach, linking ideological developments to material and economic conditions.
Examples of Critiques Through “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi
Literary WorkCritique Using “After Virtue”Reference from Gandhi’s Article
George Orwell’s 1984Orwell’s critique of totalitarianism can be deepened using Gandhi’s framework, particularly through the idea of “phusikaphobia” and the rejection of material goods. The Party’s suppression of personal desire mirrors the antimaterialist tendencies described by Gandhi, where renunciation of possessions is tied to the accumulation of moral and political authority.Gandhi’s analysis of how phusikaphobia seeks to “quarantine the human subject from the threatening contagion of matter” (p. 414) parallels Orwell’s totalitarian control of individuals.
Joseph Conrad’s Heart of DarknessConrad’s depiction of European imperialism’s material excess and moral decay is critiqued through the lens of antimaterialism. The exploitative nature of colonialism aligns with Gandhi’s description of imperial-capitalist materialism, and the ethical rejection of such practices can be seen as a form of antimaterialist critique.Gandhi critiques capitalist imperialism as a “monstrous shop replete with decadent luxuries” (p. 422), a theme echoed in Heart of Darkness’s depiction of colonial exploitation.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great GatsbyGatsby’s pursuit of wealth and material excess is contrasted with Gandhi’s critique of materialism in capitalist societies. Gatsby’s tragic end reflects the antimaterialist notion that the accumulation of wealth leads to moral and existential decay, similar to Gandhi’s analysis of belle époque materialism.Gandhi refers to the “grim symbiosis between material excess and ethical impoverishment” (p. 421), a theme central to Fitzgerald’s critique of the American Dream in The Great Gatsby.
Charles Dickens’ Hard TimesDickens’ portrayal of industrial capitalism’s dehumanization of workers aligns with Gandhi’s critique of economicism. Gandhi’s framework helps critique the reduction of human life to economic utility, as seen in the character of Thomas Gradgrind, who embodies capitalist materialism.Gandhi critiques the “rhetoric of wealth rather than civilization” (p. 413) that dominates capitalist culture, mirroring Dickens’ depiction of utilitarianism in Hard Times.
Criticism Against “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi
  1. Complexity of Language and Ideas: The article’s use of dense theoretical jargon and abstract concepts, such as “phusikaphobia” and “philophusikia,” may alienate readers unfamiliar with the specific philosophical or historical context, making it inaccessible to a broader audience.
  2. Overemphasis on Metaphysics: Some critics might argue that Gandhi’s focus on metaphysical interpretations of antimaterialism overshadows more practical or materialist readings of socialist movements, potentially downplaying the role of tangible socio-economic factors in early socialist struggles.
  3. Neglect of Gender and Intersectionality: While the article engages with class and political thought, it largely ignores gender, race, and other intersectional dimensions of antimaterialism, which could have provided a more comprehensive understanding of early 20th-century socialist movements.
  4. Insufficient Engagement with Contemporary Movements: The focus on belle époque socialism and antimaterialism may be seen as historically limited, with critics arguing that the article does not sufficiently connect its analysis to contemporary socialist or anti-capitalist movements, which could benefit from the insights provided.
  5. Binary Framing of Antimaterialism: The sharp distinction between “phusikaphobia” (fear of materialism) and “philophusikia” (love for things) might oversimplify the complex and nuanced views of antimaterialism within early socialist movements, potentially neglecting hybrid or alternative interpretations.
  6. Lack of Practical Applications: Gandhi’s theoretical focus on antimaterialism may be critiqued for not offering clear practical applications or implications for current political and economic systems, leaving readers without concrete takeaways for activism or policy.
Suggested Readings: “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi
  1. Gandhi, Leela. After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism. ELH, vol. 77, no. 2, 2010, pp. 413-446. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.0.0089
  2. Sorel, Georges. Reflections on Violence. Translated by T.E. Hulme, Cambridge University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791110
  3. Sternhell, Zeev. The Birth of Fascist Ideology: From Cultural Rebellion to Political Revolution. Princeton University Press, 1994. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691037713/the-birth-of-fascist-ideology
  4. Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. Macmillan, 1899. https://archive.org/details/theoryofleisurec00vebliala
  5. Tawney, R. H. The Acquisitive Society. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1920. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.274898
  6. Musil, Robert. The Man Without Qualities. Translated by Sophie Wilkins and Burton Pike, Vintage, 1996. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/117732/the-man-without-qualities-by-robert-musil/
  7. Hobsbawm, Eric. The Age of Empire: 1875-1914. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1995. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780679721758
Representative Quotations from “After Virtue: Notes on Early-Twentieth-Century Socialist Antimaterialism” by Leela Gandhi with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Antimaterialism emerged as the governing idiolect of insurgency, whether radical or conservative, Western or non-Western.”Gandhi highlights how antimaterialism became a common theme across diverse political movements, both in Western and non-Western contexts, reacting against capitalist materialism.
“Economicism was no longer the only basis for class unity, but a denunciation of affluence in all its historical mutations.”This quotation underscores the shift within socialist movements from economic concerns to moral and ethical critiques of wealth, reflecting the broader antimaterialist discourse.
“Phusikaphobia, a type of recoil from the physical world, fashioned a neo-idealist invective against consumption typical to the world of capitalist imperialism.”Here, Gandhi describes how fear of the material world (“phusikaphobia”) drove socialist antimaterialists to reject consumerism and material wealth, critiquing capitalist excesses.
“Philophusikia, on the other hand, lays claim to an updated metaphysical empiricism that critiques both objects of possession and the virtuous subject of non-possession.”Gandhi contrasts “philophusikia,” which embraces a more nuanced relationship with material possessions, critiquing both the objects and the self-righteous rejection of materialism.
“The belle époque socialist antimaterialism was an amalgam of English guild socialism and continental syndicalism.”This highlights the fusion of different socialist traditions—British guild socialism and French syndicalism—during the belle époque, contributing to the antimaterialist movements.
“The threat of antimaterialism emerged not from the consuming rich, but rather from the consuming poor.”Gandhi argues that critiques of materialism during this period often focused more on the perceived moral dangers of working-class consumption than on the excesses of the wealthy.
“Non-possession demands relinquishment not only of material goods but, more significantly, of associated moral goods.”This quotation suggests that true antimaterialism involves not just rejecting material possessions but also the moral superiority often associated with such renunciations.
“Philophusikia manifests a resourceful will toward radical democracy and collectivity.”Gandhi positions “philophusikia” as a democratic and inclusive form of antimaterialism, one that seeks to foster collective well-being rather than focusing on individual renunciation.
“Antimaterialism as a moral discourse directs its ire not just at bourgeois values but also at pecuniary emulation among the laboring classes.”The article points out how antimaterialist critiques targeted not only the wealthy but also working-class people who aspired to similar levels of consumption and material success.
“In metaphysical terms, phusikaphobia asks the human subject to close itself off from the realm of onticity, while philophusikia invites cohabitation with ontic existences.”Gandhi contrasts two metaphysical positions: “phusikaphobia,” which rejects material reality, and “philophusikia,” which encourages engagement with the material world.

“A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o: Summary and Critique

“A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o first appeared in 2013 in the journal World Literature Today, volume 87, number 3 (May/June issue), on pages 40-42.

"A Globalectical Imagination" by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

“A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o first appeared in 2013 in the journal World Literature Today, volume 87, number 3 (May/June issue), on pages 40-42. This article holds significant weight in the fields of literature and literary theory. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o introduces the concept of a “globalectical imagination,” a critical lens that encourages readers to analyze global issues through a perspective that considers both dialectical tension and interconnectedness. He argues that this approach is crucial for understanding the complexities of globalization and its impact on diverse cultures. As a result, the article has been influential in shaping discussions about postcolonial literature, cultural studies, and global justice.

Summary of “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

1. The Role of Imagination in Human Society

  • Ngũgĩ emphasizes the centrality of imagination in shaping human societies and envisioning both past and future possibilities: “Imagination is the most democratic attribute of the human… Imagination crosses boundaries, even those imposed by the present.”
  • He describes imagination as a powerful force that transcends class, time, and space, which is often controlled or suppressed by states, especially imperial regimes, to maintain dominance.

2. The Intersection of Literature, Society, and Politics

  • Ngũgĩ draws parallels between the cultural politics of colonialism and the Cold War, both of which used literature as a tool to influence society: “We were also caught up in the cultural politics of the Cold War.”
  • He reflects on his early experiences with British colonial education, where Shakespeare was used to reinforce colonial values, while other radical texts like Marx’s Communist Manifesto were banned: “One could have been hanged for possessing Marx’s Communist Manifesto but hugged for possessing a copy of Shakespeare.”

3. Globalectics as a Framework for Reading

  • Ngũgĩ advocates for a “globalectical” reading approach, which recognizes the interconnectedness of all human thought and action across time and space: “Globalectics assumes the interconnectedness of time and space in the area of human thought and action.”
  • This approach allows readers to break free from the narrow imperialistic reading traditions that prioritize Western literatures and instead see all texts as centers of the world.

4. Challenging the Hierarchical View of Literatures

  • A core argument of Ngũgĩ’s essay is the need to challenge the hierarchical relationship between literatures from different cultures, often a legacy of colonialism: “This also calls for a struggle against the view of literatures (languages and cultures) relating to each other in terms of a hierarchy of power.”
  • He advocates for the promotion of multilingualism and the rejection of monoliterature, which he argues stifles creativity and understanding across cultures.

5. The Globalectical Imagination in Practice

  • Ngũgĩ offers a personal reflection on how his own writing, especially his memoirs, are shaped by globalectical thinking, showing how local events in his village were part of larger global historical processes: “Some events in our rural village were direct echoes of the world… my early childhood was against the background of the Second World War.”
  • He further illustrates how the globalectical imagination can bring new insights into postcolonial literature and other texts, helping to crack open their deeper meanings: “A globalectical imagination allows us to crack open a word, gesture, encounter, any text.”

6. The Interconnectedness of Time, Space, and Cultures

  • Ngũgĩ draws on William Blake’s idea of seeing the world in a grain of sand to illustrate how texts and human experiences, though seemingly localized, are deeply interconnected globally: “It’s best articulated in the words of my all-time favorite poet, William Blake, when he talked about seeing the world in a grain of sand, eternity in an hour.”

7. A New Model for Organizing World Literature

  • He proposes a new model for organizing and teaching world literature, where each center of the world is equally important: “A globalectical imagination assumes that any center is the center of the world. Each specific text can be read as a mirror of the world.”
  • This contrasts with the imperial model that imposed a singular metropolitan center as the ultimate source of literary knowledge.

8. Literature and the Struggle for Cultural Freedom

  • Ngũgĩ critiques how literature has historically been used by imperial powers to suppress cultural freedom, pointing out that a globalectical reading frees texts from such colonial and imperial prisons: “A globalectical reading of Shakespeare would have freed him from colonial and imperial prisons.”

9. Multilingualism as Cultural Freedom

  • He also stresses the importance of multilingualism as part of cultural freedom, arguing that monolingualism restricts intellectual and cultural growth: “Monolingualism suffocates, and it is often extended to mean monoliterature and monoculturalism.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
Literary Term/ConceptExplanationQuote/Reference from the Article
GlobalecticsA critical approach that assumes the interconnectedness of time and space in human thought and action, encouraging readers to view each text as a mirror of the world.“Globalectics assumes the interconnectedness of time and space in the area of human thought and action.”
ImaginationSeen as the central formative agency in human society, imagination allows individuals to envision different futures, challenge the present, and engage with art and literature.“Imagination is the most democratic attribute of the human… Imagination crosses boundaries, even those imposed by the present.”
Postcolonial LiteratureRefers to literature produced in response to the effects of colonization, often exploring the dynamics of power, culture, and resistance in formerly colonized nations.“A globalectical reading of Shakespeare would have freed him from colonial and imperial prisons…”
IntertextualityThe shaping of a text’s meaning by other texts, where literature across time and space influences each other through translation and reinterpretation.“The great tradition of literary intertextuality, including recasting one story from one cultural context into another…”
MonolingualismThe limitation of culture and literature to a single language, which Ngũgĩ critiques as suffocating and promoting a hierarchical view of literature and culture.“Monolingualism suffocates, and it is often extended to mean monoliterature and monoculturalism.”
Cultural ImperialismThe imposition of one culture’s literature and values over others, as seen in colonial education systems that prioritized European literature over local cultures.“Every imperial state has always put its own national literature at the center, conceived as the only center of the literary universe.”
Ethics of ReadingA proposed ethical framework for reading texts that acknowledges the interconnectedness of global histories and cultures, advocating for a more inclusive approach to world literature.“A globalectical imagination assumes that any center is the center of the world… each text can be read as a mirror of the world.”
Colonial EducationThe system of education in colonial societies that enforced the colonizer’s literature, language, and cultural values, often at the expense of local languages and narratives.“Shakespeare, a writer most beloved by the colonial order, occupied a central place in colonial education.”
MultilingualismEncouraged as a way to promote cultural diversity and creativity, opposing the restrictive effects of monolingual approaches that favor a single dominant language or literature.“A globalectical imagination also calls for changes in attitudes to languages: monolingualism suffocates…”
Contribution of “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories
  • Development of the Globalectical Approach
    Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o introduces “Globalectics” as a literary theory that emphasizes the interconnectedness of time and space in human thought and literature. It challenges the dominance of imperial literary traditions by proposing that every text, regardless of its origin, can serve as a center of the world.
    “Globalectics assumes the interconnectedness of time and space in the area of human thought and action.”
  • Challenge to Colonial and Imperial Literary Hierarchies
    Ngũgĩ critiques the imperial approach to literature, where colonial powers positioned their national literature as the center of literary value and knowledge. He advocates for dismantling this hierarchy and embracing a more egalitarian view of world literature.
    “Every imperial state has always put its own national literature at the center, conceived as the only center of the literary universe.”
  • Promotion of Multilingualism and Cultural Diversity
    Ngũgĩ calls for a shift from monolingual literary traditions to multilingualism, arguing that this opens up space for diverse cultural expressions. He sees monolingualism as a form of cultural suffocation that reinforces imperial hierarchies.
    “A globalectical imagination also calls for changes in attitudes to languages: monolingualism suffocates.”
  • Revisiting and Reinterpreting Canonical Texts
    Ngũgĩ demonstrates how canonical works, such as those of Shakespeare, can be reinterpreted through a globalectical lens. This approach frees such texts from the narrow interpretations imposed by colonial and imperial contexts, revealing their deeper connections to global struggles for power and justice.
    “A globalectical reading of Shakespeare would have freed him from colonial and imperial prisons.”
  • Ethical Reading as a Central Practice
    Ngũgĩ promotes an ethical reading of texts that moves beyond the traditional imperial framework. He urges readers to engage with texts by recognizing their potential to connect different historical, cultural, and geographical contexts.
    “A globalectical imagination assumes that any center is the center of the world. Each specific text can be read as a mirror of the world.”
  • Literature as a Reflection of Global Struggles
    Ngũgĩ positions literature as deeply intertwined with global historical and political movements. His work argues that literary theory should account for the ways literature reflects and responds to broader social and political struggles, especially in postcolonial contexts.
    “The arts and the imagination are dialectically linked… the artist symbolizes and speaks to the power of imagination to intimate possibilities even within apparently impossible situations.”
  • Critique of Colonial Education
    Ngũgĩ critiques the colonial education system, which prioritized European literature and marginalized local narratives. His theory advocates for educational reforms that embrace the multiplicity of global literatures and resist the imperial privileging of one tradition over others.
    “Shakespeare, a writer most beloved by the colonial order, occupied a central place in colonial education.”
  • Intertextuality and the Fluidity of Cultural Exchange
    By promoting intertextuality, Ngũgĩ emphasizes the fluid and dynamic nature of cultural exchange across histories and geographies. He sees the process of translation and adaptation of texts as central to the creation of a global literary network.
    “The great tradition of literary intertextuality, including recasting one story from one cultural context into another place and time… is itself a form of translation.”
Examples of Critiques Through “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
Literary WorkCritique Through Globalectical ImaginationExplanation/Reference
Shakespeare’s MacbethClass Struggle and Power Dynamics – A globalectical reading frees Macbeth from narrow interpretations, seeing the play as a reflection of global power struggles and the role of violence in political change.“Macbeth’s bloody dagger could be explained away as the result of blind ambition, a fatal character flaw… A globalectical reading would have freed him from colonial prisons.”
Tolstoy’s Anna KareninaCapitalist Expansion and Social Consequences – A globalectical critique connects the story of Anna Karenina to global movements like capitalist expansion and how the railroad system shaped economies and societies.“A course organized on the basis of railroad and capitalist expansion can bring together Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina, my own A Grain of Wheat, and the western.”
Goethe’s FaustColonialism and the Pursuit of PowerFaust can be examined through its connections to the pursuit of knowledge and power, drawing parallels to colonial exploration and exploitation.A globalectical reading would explore how the ambitions of Faust reflect the global quest for power and knowledge in colonial times.
Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall ApartResistance to Colonialism – Ngũgĩ’s globalectical lens highlights the interconnectedness of African resistance to colonialism with global anti-colonial struggles, positioning Okonkwo’s tragedy in a larger global context.Things Fall Apart can be seen as part of a global narrative of colonialism, where local stories of resistance are connected to broader historical movements.
Criticism Against “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
  • Overemphasis on Interconnectedness: Critics may argue that Ngũgĩ’s focus on global interconnectedness through globalectics overlooks the importance of local and specific cultural contexts, which can be diluted when viewed only through a global lens. This could result in a loss of the unique characteristics that define individual cultures.
  • Potential for Oversimplification of Complex Histories: By emphasizing broad global connections, critics may contend that the theory risks oversimplifying complex historical and political dynamics. The sweeping nature of globalectical readings may ignore the nuances and specificities of localized struggles.
  • Challenges to Canonical Interpretation: Some traditional literary scholars might resist the reinterpretation of canonical works like Shakespeare through a globalectical lens, as it challenges established, Eurocentric interpretations. They may view this approach as revisionist, distorting the original meaning of these works.
  • Idealism Over Practical Application: Critics could argue that while the globalectical imagination is theoretically compelling, it may be difficult to practically apply in literary education and criticism. The theory’s ambitious scope might not offer concrete methods for reading and organizing literature in diverse educational contexts.
  • Neglect of Economic and Material Forces: Marxist critics may argue that Ngũgĩ’s globalectical theory does not sufficiently address the material economic forces that shape literature and culture. They might claim that it lacks a deeper engagement with class struggle and the economic realities underpinning global dynamics.
Suggested Readings: “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
  1. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. Globalectics: Theory and the Politics of Knowing. Columbia University Press, 2012.
  2. Stein, Mark. “The Globalectical Imagination in African Literatures.” Wasafiri, vol. 29, no. 4, 2014, pp. 26-32.
  3. Burness, Donald. “Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o: Between Globalectics and African Socialism.” Journal of Third World Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, 2014, pp. 31-48.
  4. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. “A Globalectical Imagination.” World Literature Today, vol. 87, no. 3, 2013, pp. 40–42. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.7588/worllitetoda.87.3.0040. Accessed 15 Sept. 2024.
  5. Mukoma Wa Ngugi. “Breaking Out of the Prison House of Hierarchy.” World Literature Today, vol. 87, no. 3, 2013, pp. 36–39. JSTORhttps://doi.org/10.7588/worllitetoda.87.3.0036. Accessed 15 Sept. 2024.
Representative Quotations from “A Globalectical Imagination” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
1. “Imagination is the most democratic attribute of the human.”Ngũgĩ highlights the universality and egalitarian nature of imagination, arguing that it transcends class, status, and boundaries, making it accessible to all.
2. “Globalectics assumes the interconnectedness of time and space in the area of human thought and action.”This introduces the concept of globalectics, emphasizing the interconnected nature of human experience across cultures, geographies, and histories in literature.
3. “A globalectical imagination assumes that any center is the center of the world.”Ngũgĩ challenges the imperial view of the world, where only Western metropolises are seen as centers, asserting that any place can be a center in global literary studies.
4. “Monolingualism suffocates, and it is often extended to mean monoliterature and monoculturalism.”Ngũgĩ critiques monolingualism for limiting cultural and intellectual diversity, arguing that it promotes a hierarchy that suppresses other languages and literatures.
5. “Every imperial state has always put its own national literature at the center.”This points out how imperial powers have historically positioned their own literatures as dominant, marginalizing the cultural productions of colonized societies.
6. “The artist symbolizes and speaks to the power of imagination to intimate possibilities even within apparently impossible situations.”Ngũgĩ believes that artists, through their work, express the power of imagination to envision new possibilities in difficult circumstances, often leading to resistance.
7. “A globalectical reading of Shakespeare would have freed him from colonial and imperial prisons.”Ngũgĩ argues that reinterpreting Shakespeare through a globalectical lens would allow his works to be understood in a broader context, free from colonial constraints.
8. “The translator is the modern traveler who brings in one language what he or she has gotten from another.”This emphasizes the importance of translation in fostering cultural exchange, with the translator playing a key role in crossing boundaries between languages and cultures.
9. “Culture contact and exchange were the oxygen of civilization.”Quoting Césaire, Ngũgĩ underscores the idea that civilizations thrive on cultural interaction and exchange, rather than isolation or hierarchy.
10. “Imagination crosses boundaries, even those imposed by the present.”This quotation reinforces the idea that imagination is limitless and has the power to transcend temporal, cultural, and political barriers.

“What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o: Summary and Critique

“What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o is a thought-provoking essay that examines the multifaceted relationship between Africa and Asia.

"What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa" by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

“What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o is a thought-provoking essay that examines the multifaceted relationship between Africa and Asia. Thiong’o, a distinguished Kenyan writer and intellectual, draws upon his personal experiences and scholarly insights to explore the historical, cultural, and political connections between these two continents. The essay was originally published in 2012 in the esteemed journal World Literature Today. Thiong’o’s work is widely recognized for its critical analysis of colonialism, neo-colonialism, and the significance of language and culture in shaping identity and resistance. “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse on the global south and the interconnectedness of diverse cultures and histories.

Summary of “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o

1. Personal and Educational Influence of Europe:

  • Ngũgĩ reflects on his early years of education in Kenya, where Britain was the center of intellectual and cultural life: “I had always assumed that my intellectual and social formation was tied to England and Europe” (p. 14).
  • British colonial influence framed the world as a contest between Africa and Europe, with little recognition of connections to Asia and South America.

2. Realization of India’s Impact:

  • Upon writing his memoir, Ngũgĩ realized the extent of Indian cultural influence in his life, starting from childhood: “After I wrote my memoir of childhood… I looked back and saw how much India had been an equally important thread in my life” (p. 14).
  • Indian culture, particularly through food and tea, had permeated Kenyan life, often to the point that Ngũgĩ mistook Indian elements for being African: “The spices, curry, hot pepper, all so very Indian, had become so central a part of Kenyan cuisine” (p. 15).

3. Indian Presence in Kenya:

  • Indian laborers built Kenya’s railway infrastructure, which opened the interior for settlement: “Indian skilled labor built the railway line from the coast to the great lake” (p. 15).
  • Indian traders and communities became integral to Kenyan commerce, though social relations were often strained between African and Indian communities.

4. Shared Spaces at Makerere College:

  • Ngũgĩ’s first meaningful interactions with Indian students occurred at Makerere College, Uganda, where racial and ethnic boundaries blurred: “Doing things together is the best teacher of race relations” (p. 16).
  • The shared experience of education helped break down stereotypes, leading to friendships and collaboration, such as in Ngũgĩ’s play The Black Hermit.

5. Indian Influence on Anti-Colonial Struggles:

  • The essay highlights the impact of Indian thinkers and activists on African anti-colonial struggles, particularly Mahatma Gandhi: “Mahatma Gandhi started and honed his political and organizing skills in South Africa” (p. 16).
  • Gandhi’s philosophy and the Indian independence movement inspired many African leaders in their fight for liberation.

6. Postcolonial Afro-Indian Tensions:

  • Ngũgĩ acknowledges the postcolonial tensions between African and Indian communities, particularly in the context of social and economic divides: “Time and again Indians and Indian-owned stores have been the targets of violence, especially in times of crisis” (p. 16).

7. Broader Afro-Asian Dialogue:

  • Ngũgĩ connects Afro-Asian relations through political and intellectual exchanges, such as the Bandung Conference and the Afro-Asian Writers’ Movement: “Africa and Asia have met through political entities like the Bandung Conference” (p. 17).
  • He emphasizes the importance of fostering direct relationships between Africa, Asia, and South America, promoting a South-to-South dialogue.

8. Intellectual and Cultural Crossroads:

  • Ngũgĩ promotes the idea of a global dialogue that moves beyond Eurocentrism, advocating for an intellectual exchange among Global South cultures: “We have remarkable opportunities to work across cultures to learn from one another” (p. 18).
  • He calls for a renewed focus on non-European literatures and philosophies, arguing for a broader perspective in comparative literature studies.

9. Globalectics and the Future of World Literature:

  • Ngũgĩ introduces the concept of “Globalectics,” which envisions a world literature that transcends national and cultural borders, fostering a deeper understanding across regions: “Globalectics: Theory and the Politics of Knowing” (p. 18).
  • This approach emphasizes mutual learning and exchange between Africa, Asia, and South America, challenging traditional Eurocentric academic models.
Literary Terms/Concepts in “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
Literary Term/ConceptDefinitionContext in the Essay
PostcolonialismA field of study that examines the cultural, political, and social impacts of colonialism and imperialism on formerly colonized nations.Ngũgĩ reflects on the influence of colonialism on his intellectual formation, especially the dominance of European thought.
Global SouthA term referring to countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia, often in the context of their shared historical experiences of colonization and struggle for autonomy.Ngũgĩ discusses the importance of fostering intellectual and cultural exchanges between Global South countries.
Afro-Asian DialogueRefers to the cultural, political, and intellectual exchange between Africa and Asia, especially in the context of anti-colonial struggles and shared histories.Ngũgĩ highlights Afro-Asian cooperation, such as the Bandung Conference and the Afro-Asian Writers’ Movement.
SatyagrahaGandhi’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance, advocating for truth and civil disobedience as a means to achieve political and social change.Ngũgĩ credits Gandhi’s role in shaping anti-colonial movements in Africa and mentions his influence in South Africa.
NeocolonialismThe continued economic and cultural dominance of former colonial powers over formerly colonized nations, even after political independence.Ngũgĩ criticizes the neocolonial regime in Kenya for resisting efforts to decolonize the curriculum at Nairobi University.
Cultural SyncretismThe blending of different cultural elements into a new, cohesive form.Ngũgĩ describes how Indian culinary traditions (e.g., tea, chapati) have become integrated into Kenyan daily life.
DiasporaThe dispersion of people from their homeland to various parts of the world, often due to economic or political reasons.Ngũgĩ discusses the presence of Indian and Chinese diasporas in Africa and their roles in commerce and politics.
Comparative LiteratureAn academic field focused on the study of literature beyond the confines of national or linguistic borders, emphasizing cross-cultural analysis.Ngũgĩ advocates for studying African, Asian, and Latin American literatures alongside European works, challenging Eurocentrism.
GlobalecticsNgũgĩ’s term describing a dynamic, interconnected approach to world literature that transcends cultural and geographical boundaries.The essay promotes “Globalectics” as a framework for understanding world literature and fostering cross-cultural dialogue.
Cultural HegemonyThe dominance of one culture over others, often through ideological means, where the ruling class’s worldview is imposed and accepted as the cultural norm.Ngũgĩ critiques the hegemony of European culture and thought, especially in Kenya’s colonial education system.
Contribution of “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Postcolonial Theory:

Ngũgĩ’s essay is rooted in postcolonial discourse, offering a critique of Eurocentrism and colonial legacies in education, culture, and intellectual formation. His reflections are framed within postcolonial theory, which seeks to address the lasting impacts of colonialism and cultural imperialism on formerly colonized peoples.

  • Critique of Eurocentrism: Ngũgĩ critiques the Eurocentric intellectual framework imposed by British colonialism, emphasizing how African intellectual and social formation was “tied to England and Europe” (p. 14). He notes how Kenya’s colonial education system centered on British literature and geography, marginalizing African and Asian intellectual traditions.

“Even our anticolonial resistance assumed Europe as the point of contest; it was we, Africa, against them, Europe” (p. 14).

  • Decolonization of the Curriculum: Ngũgĩ’s efforts to challenge the dominance of European thought by introducing African, Asian, and Latin American literatures in Kenyan university curricula is a key postcolonial act. This reflects the broader postcolonial goal of dismantling colonial structures and reclaiming indigenous intellectual traditions.

“We had committed the crime of placing [Shakespeare] among other writers and changing the name of the department from English to Literature” (p. 18).

2. Comparative Literature:

Ngũgĩ calls for a reimagining of comparative literature, expanding it beyond Eurocentric boundaries to include dialogues between African, Asian, and Latin American cultures. This approach aligns with world literature studies and the push to make the study of literature more inclusive and global.

  • South-South Intellectual Dialogue: One of Ngũgĩ’s key contributions is his emphasis on direct cultural exchanges between Global South regions. He points out that Africa, Asia, and South America have rich intellectual traditions that should be studied together, without always filtering through a Western lens.

“I have always felt the need for Africa, Asia, and South America to learn from one another. This south-to-south intellectual and literary exchange was at the center of the Nairobi literary debate in the early 1960s” (p. 17).

  • Broadening Comparative Literature: Ngũgĩ’s proposal to include non-European writers like Lu Xun, Kim Chi Ha, and C.L.R. James alongside Shakespeare is a direct challenge to the Eurocentric canon of comparative literature. This pushes the boundaries of the discipline to engage more meaningfully with global literatures.

“We had committed the crime of placing [Shakespeare] among other writers and changing the name of the department from English to Literature” (p. 18).

3. Globalectics – A New Contribution to Global Literary Studies:

Ngũgĩ introduces Globalectics, a theoretical framework for understanding literature as an interconnected, dynamic exchange across cultures and continents. This theory builds on postcolonial theory but pushes it further into the realm of global literary studies, emphasizing the need for mutual learning and dialogue between cultures, especially those of the Global South.

  • Interconnectedness of Cultures: Globalectics is based on the idea that literature should not be studied in isolation but as part of a global conversation. Ngũgĩ’s notion of Globalectics rejects cultural hierarchies and instead proposes that different literary traditions illuminate one another through dialogue and exchange.

“It is time to make the invisible visible in order to create a more interesting—and ultimately more creative and meaningful—free flow of ideas in the world” (p. 18).

  • Challenging Eurocentric Literary Models: Globalectics moves beyond the Eurocentric model of world literature and instead proposes an approach that places African, Asian, and Latin American literatures at the forefront of global discussions.

“Globalectics: Theory and the Politics of Knowing” (p. 18) suggests that literary knowledge is dynamic and global, not limited by national or linguistic borders.

4. Cultural Syncretism and the Blurring of Cultural Boundaries:

Ngũgĩ also engages with the concept of cultural syncretism, demonstrating how Indian and African cultures have merged in Kenya through everyday practices like food, tea, and social rituals. This blending of cultures reflects broader postcolonial discussions about the fluidity of cultural identities in formerly colonized societies.

  • Culinary Syncretism: The essay illustrates how Indian culinary practices (e.g., curry, tea) have become integral to Kenyan daily life, symbolizing the cultural interconnectedness between Africa and Asia.

“The spices, curry, hot pepper, all so very Indian, had become so central a part of Kenyan cuisine that I could have sworn that these dishes were truly indigenous” (p. 15).

  • Cultural Exchange Beyond Europe: Ngũgĩ emphasizes that cultural exchanges between Africa and Asia have been long-standing and should not be overlooked in favor of Africa’s relations with Europe.

“Africa and Asia have met through the political entities like the Bandung Conference; the nonalignment movement; the Afro-Asian Peoples Solidarity Organization” (p. 17).

Examples of Critiques Through “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
Literary Work & AuthorCritique Through “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa”
Heart of Darkness by Joseph ConradEurocentrism and Colonial Gaze: Ngũgĩ’s critique of the European intellectual shadow can be applied to Conrad’s work. Heart of Darkness portrays Africa as a dark, uncivilized land, reflecting colonial stereotypes. Ngũgĩ would critique this work for reinforcing colonial narratives that place Europe as the “civilized” center and Africa as the “Other.” He emphasizes the need for dismantling such Eurocentric narratives.
Things Fall Apart by Chinua AchebeReclaiming African Identity: Achebe’s novel aligns with Ngũgĩ’s postcolonial agenda of deconstructing colonialism’s impact on African identity. Things Fall Apart presents the Igbo culture before and after the arrival of European missionaries, showing the complex social and political structures that existed in Africa. Through Ngũgĩ’s lens, Achebe’s work challenges the European gaze and asserts the richness of African civilizations.
The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz FanonAnti-Colonial Struggles and Intellectual Resistance: Fanon’s work mirrors Ngũgĩ’s advocacy for the intellectual and cultural liberation of colonized peoples. Fanon’s call for revolutionary violence against colonial oppression in The Wretched of the Earth resonates with Ngũgĩ’s emphasis on African and Asian decolonization struggles. Ngũgĩ would see this as part of a broader Global South movement for liberation from colonial legacies.
A Grain of Wheat by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’oPostcolonial Struggles and Cultural Synthesis: Ngũgĩ’s own work, A Grain of Wheat, explores Kenya’s fight for independence, reflecting the themes discussed in his essay. Through the lens of What Is Asia to Me?, this novel emphasizes the interconnectedness of African and Asian struggles against colonialism. The novel’s narrative critiques the lingering effects of colonialism while highlighting the role of collective memory and resistance.
Criticism Against “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
  • Overemphasis on Intellectual Elitism: Some critics may argue that Ngũgĩ focuses too much on intellectual and literary exchanges among elites in Africa and Asia, neglecting the everyday experiences of common people in these regions.
  • Lack of Attention to Intra-African Relations: The essay emphasizes Afro-Asian connections but gives relatively little attention to intra-African dynamics and relations. Critics may argue that Ngũgĩ overlooks the significance of African unity and solidarity in the postcolonial struggle.
  • Idealization of South-South Solidarity: Ngũgĩ’s portrayal of Afro-Asian solidarity could be seen as overly idealistic, as it downplays the historical tensions and conflicts between African and Asian communities in postcolonial Africa, particularly in East Africa.
  • Underrepresentation of Latin America: Although Ngũgĩ advocates for Global South dialogues, his focus on Asia and Africa may seem to marginalize Latin American contributions to postcolonial and intellectual movements, which are also important in the Global South context.
  • Historical Oversimplification: Critics might argue that Ngũgĩ oversimplifies the historical relations between Africa and Asia, glossing over the complexities and contradictions, such as economic competition or migration-related tensions, especially in East African countries.
  • Limited Exploration of Class Struggles: While Ngũgĩ touches on postcolonial political movements, the essay does not deeply explore class struggles within African and Asian societies, which some Marxist critics might find lacking in the analysis.
Suggested Readings: “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o
  1. Sicherman, Carol M. “Ngugi Wa Thiong’o and the Writing of Kenyan History.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 20, no. 3, 1989, pp. 347–70. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3819170. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  2. McLaren, Joseph. “Ngugi Wa Thiong’o’s Moving the Centre and Its Relevance to Afrocentricity.” Journal of Black Studies, vol. 28, no. 3, 1998, pp. 386–97. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2784740. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  3. Loflin, Christine. “Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o’s Visions of Africa.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 26, no. 4, 1995, pp. 76–93. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3820228. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  4. Harrow, Kenneth. “Ngugi Wa Thiong’o’s ‘A Grain of Wheat’: Season of Irony.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 16, no. 2, 1985, pp. 243–63. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3819414. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  5. Rao, D. Venkat, and Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. “A Conversation with Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 30, no. 1, 1999, pp. 162–68. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3820479. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
Representative Quotations from “What Is Asia to Me? Looking East from Africa” by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“I had always assumed that my intellectual and social formation was tied to England and Europe.”Ngũgĩ reflects on the Eurocentric education he received in colonial Kenya, where Britain was the central reference for intellectual development. This frames the essay’s postcolonial critique.
“The spices, curry, hot pepper, all so very Indian, had become so central a part of Kenyan cuisine.”This highlights the cultural syncretism between India and Kenya, where Indian influences became deeply embedded in everyday Kenyan life, symbolizing Afro-Asian connections.
“Doing things together is the best teacher of race relations.”Ngũgĩ argues that shared experiences, such as education, are vital in breaking down racial and ethnic barriers, promoting Afro-Asian solidarity through personal interaction.
“Mahatma Gandhi started and honed his political and organizing skills in South Africa.”This quote underscores the deep historical connection between African and Indian struggles against colonialism, with Gandhi as a symbol of resistance and intellectual exchange.
“I have always felt the need for Africa, Asia, and South America to learn from one another.”Ngũgĩ advocates for a South-South dialogue, emphasizing the importance of intellectual and cultural exchanges between the Global South regions to resist Eurocentric dominance.
“We had committed the crime of placing [Shakespeare] among other writers and changing the name of the department from English to Literature.”This quotation critiques the Eurocentric literary canon, highlighting Ngũgĩ’s efforts to decolonize the curriculum by including non-European writers in Kenyan universities.
“It is time to make the invisible visible in order to create a more interesting—and ultimately more creative and meaningful—free flow of ideas in the world.”Ngũgĩ calls for the recognition of Global South contributions to world literature, advocating for intellectual exchanges beyond European influence.
“In colonial times, in my area at least, I do not recall the tensions ever exploding into intercommunal violence.”This reflects Ngũgĩ’s personal experience of relative harmony between African and Indian communities during colonial times, contrasting it with postcolonial tensions.
“What Gandhi started, Mandela completed.”Ngũgĩ connects Gandhi’s nonviolent resistance to Nelson Mandela’s anti-apartheid struggle, showing the continuity of Afro-Asian influences in decolonization efforts.
“Globalectics: Theory and the Politics of Knowing.”This quote introduces Ngũgĩ’s concept of “Globalectics,” a framework for understanding world literature through interconnected and dynamic exchanges across cultures.

“The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O: Summary And Critique

“The Tension Between National and Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’o first appeared in 1984 in the journal World Literature Written in English.

"The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture" by Ngugi Wa Thiong'O: Summary And Critique
Introduction: “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O

“The Tension Between National and Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’o first appeared in 1984 in the journal World Literature Written in English. This seminal essay explores the intricate interplay between national and imperialist cultures, particularly within the context of post-colonial Africa. Ngugi argues that the imposition of imperialist languages and cultures has had a profound impact on the development of national identities, leading to a tension between the desire to preserve indigenous cultural heritage and the pressures to conform to dominant Western norms.

Summary of “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O

1. Discomfort with the Concept of “Commonwealth” Literature

  • Ngugi wa Thiong’o challenges the validity of “Commonwealth” literature, arguing that it artificially groups together literatures based solely on their relationship with the British crown. He asserts that there is greater coherence between literatures from colonized countries across Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia than between British Commonwealth nations.
    • Quotation: “The concept groups together literatures and cultures which do not necessarily cohere, or rather, whose basis of coherence is their relationship to the British throne.”

2. Critique of “Indigenous” vs “Metropolitan” Cultures

  • Ngugi questions the dichotomy of “indigenous” and “metropolitan” cultures, proposing that the real struggle is between national democratic cultures of Africa and imperialist cultures from the West. He believes these terms obscure the reality of global imperialism and the ongoing tensions between colonized peoples and imperial powers.
    • Quotation: “The real terms are ‘national democratic’ cultures and ‘imperialist’ cultures, and the real tension is between the national cultures of Africa and the imperialist cultures of Japan, western Europe and the United States.”

3. The Role of Language in Cultural Imperialism

  • Language, according to Ngugi, is central to the cultural struggle, as colonizers imposed their languages on colonized peoples to suppress local cultures and values. He emphasizes that language carries culture, and by destroying native languages, imperial powers sought to erase indigenous cultures.
    • Quotation: “Language is a carrier of a people’s culture…by destroying or underdeveloping people’s languages, the colonizing nations were deliberately killing or underdeveloping the cultures, values and consciousness of the people.”

4. Ngugi’s Shift from English to Native Language Writing

  • Ngugi recounts his personal journey from writing in English to embracing his native Kikuyu language. He reflects on the realization that using the language of colonizers perpetuated cultural domination, and describes how his involvement in grassroots cultural projects helped reconnect him with his native language and the peasants’ history.
    • Quotation: “The very fact that we had to ask ourselves in what language we were going to write a play is itself a telling point about how far gone we were.”

5. Kamiriithu Community Cultural Centre: A People’s Cultural Revolution

  • Ngugi details his involvement with the Kamiriithu Cultural Centre, where local peasants and workers used theatre to assert their cultural identity. This cultural development, rooted in the people’s own language and history, led to confrontations with the Kenyan government, which saw it as a threat to its neo-colonial agenda.
    • Quotation: “Kamiriithu symbolized the awakening of the people to their historic mission of liberating themselves and building a new life free from the imperialist stranglehold.”

6. Government Repression of National Democratic Cultures

  • The Kenyan government’s suppression of the Kamiriithu Cultural Centre and its destruction of the community-built theatre are presented as examples of how neo-colonial regimes work with imperial powers to suppress national democratic cultures in favor of foreign interests.
    • Quotation: “Imperialism and its Kenyan allies were not pleased…Kamiriithu as a symbol had to go.”

7. Contradictions in Cultural Promotion: National vs Imperialist

  • Ngugi contrasts the Kenyan government’s promotion of foreign imperialist cultural productions, such as the ballet Alice in Wonderland and the film The Flame Trees of Thika, with its repression of local cultural initiatives like the Kamiriithu theatre, which focused on the people’s struggles.
    • Quotation: “They could spend state money to buy a basically racist film…whereas a play written in a Kenyan language…would not be allowed on the premises of the National Theatre.”

8. Cultural Repression and Global Economic Interests

  • Ngugi ties the repression of African cultures and languages to broader Western economic and military interests. He argues that repressive regimes, such as Kenya’s, are supported by Western powers to ensure stability for foreign investments, even at the cost of suppressing national democratic movements.
    • Quotation: “The repression of national democratic cultures, of national languages…is done precisely to keep the country stable for investments from West Germany, France, Sweden, Britain and North America.”

9. Conclusion: Culture, Language, and Political Struggle

  • Ngugi concludes that the tension between cultures is inextricably linked to the political and economic exploitation of African countries. He calls for raising voices against cultural repression and for the preservation of national languages and democratic rights.
    • Quotation: “We must remember what is behind that particular tension…the continued exploitation of the African countries and the continued oppression of ordinary people in Africa and the Third World on behalf of imperialism.”
Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O
Term/ConceptDefinitionExample from Text
Cultural ImperialismThe imposition of a dominant culture, often through language, on a subordinate culture.“The colonizing nations… imposed their languages on the colonized peoples.”
Neo-ColonialismThe continued domination of a former colony by its former colonizer, often through economic and political means.“The tension generated by the struggles of the African masses against these comprador minority regimes is necessarily a tension between the national democratic assertion and the neocolonial forces of imperialism.”
National CultureA culture that is rooted in the history, traditions, and values of a particular nation.“Kamiriithu celebrated the history of the Kenyan people’s struggle against colonialism and neo-colonialism.”
Indigenous LanguageA language that is native to a particular region or country.“In the Kikuyu language”
AlienationThe feeling of being isolated or separated from one’s culture or identity.“The imposition of imperialist languages and cultures has had a profound impact on the development of national desire to preserve indigenous cultural heritage and the pressures to conform to dominant Western norms.”
Cultural ResistanceThe active struggle to preserve and promote a culture against the influence of a dominant culture.“Kamiriithu as a symbol had to go. The final coup de grâce in 1982 was authorized by President Moi through his provincial commissioner. But the questions are these: How do you kill an idea? How do you silence the throbbings of a national democratic culture?”
Contribution of “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O to Literary Theory/Theories
Postcolonial Theory
  • Deconstruction of colonial discourse: Thiong’o’s essay challenges the dominant narratives of colonialism and imperialism, exposing their underlying power structures and ideological biases. This contribution aligns with postcolonial theory’s emphasis on critiquing and subverting colonial discourses.
  • Revalorization of indigenous cultures: By advocating for the use of indigenous languages and celebrating national cultures, Thiong’o contributes to the postcolonial project of reclaiming and valuing marginalized cultural traditions. This aligns with postcolonial theory’s focus on cultural recovery and resistance.
  • Critique of cultural imperialism: Thiong’o’s analysis of the imposition of imperialist languages and cultures highlights the detrimental effects of cultural imperialism on colonized peoples. This contribution aligns with postcolonial theory’s critique of the ways in which dominant cultures are imposed on and suppress subordinate cultures.
Marxist Theory
  • Economic determinism: Thiong’o’s essay suggests that cultural struggles are often rooted in economic inequalities and power imbalances. This aligns with Marxist theory’s emphasis on the material basis of social phenomena.
  • Class struggle: The essay explores the tension between the ruling classes and the working classes, particularly in the context of neo-colonialism. This contribution aligns with Marxist theory’s analysis of class conflict and exploitation.
  • Cultural hegemony: Thiong’o’s analysis of the role of language and culture in maintaining imperialist dominance aligns with Marxist concepts of cultural hegemony. This contribution aligns with Marxist theory’s critique of the ways in which dominant ideologies are used to maintain power structures.
New Historicism
  • Contextualization of literature: Thiong’o’s essay emphasizes the importance of understanding literature within its specific historical and social context, particularly in relation to colonialism and imperialism. This aligns with New Historicism’s focus on the interrelationship between literature and history.
  • Power and discourse: The essay examines how language and discourse are used to maintain power structures and perpetuate colonial ideologies. This contribution aligns with New Historicism’s analysis of the ways in which power is produced and reproduced through language and culture.
  • Subaltern studies: Thiong’o’s focus on the voices and experiences of marginalized communities contributes to the field of subaltern studies. This contribution aligns with New Historicism’s emphasis on giving voice to marginalized perspectives and challenging dominant narratives.
Poststructuralism
  • Deconstruction of binary oppositions: Thiong’o challenges the binary opposition between “indigenous” and “metropolitan” cultures, arguing for a more complex and nuanced understanding of cultural identity. This contribution aligns with poststructuralism’s critique of binary oppositions and its emphasis on the deconstruction of fixed meanings.
  • Discourse analysis: The essay analyzes the ways in which language and discourse shape our understanding of the world and construct social realities. This contribution aligns with poststructuralism’s focus on the study of discourse and its effects on power and subjectivity.
  • Subjectivity and power: Thiong’o’s exploration of the relationship between subjectivity and power aligns with poststructuralist theories of identity formation. This contribution aligns with poststructuralism’s emphasis on the construction of subjectivity and its relationship to power structures.
Examples of Critiques Through “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O
Literary Work & AuthorCritique Through Ngugi’s LensExample of Tension
Things Fall Apart by Chinua AchebeNgugi would critique Achebe’s depiction of the clash between indigenous Igbo culture and British imperialism. Achebe portrays the dismantling of Igbo society by colonial forces, which mirrors Ngugi’s argument about the cultural destruction by imperial languages and values.The imposition of British legal and religious systems on Igbo society represents the tension between African national culture and Western imperialism.
A Passage to India by E.M. ForsterNgugi would view Forster’s work as illustrating the cultural divide between the British colonizers and the Indian population. Although Forster attempts to humanize both groups, Ngugi might critique the depiction of Indian culture through a British lens, reflecting the imperialist narrative.The portrayal of British officials in India as superior, despite their inability to understand or respect Indian culture, showcases the imperialist domination over the colonized society.
The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz FanonNgugi would resonate with Fanon’s analysis of the psychological effects of colonialism. Fanon’s call for cultural liberation aligns with Ngugi’s view of the importance of reclaiming national languages and cultures to resist imperialist domination.Fanon’s call for a rejection of colonial culture and the creation of a national culture parallels Ngugi’s assertion that language and culture are key to resisting imperialism.
Heart of Darkness by Joseph ConradNgugi might critique Conrad’s depiction of Africa as a “dark continent,” which reinforces imperialist stereotypes. The portrayal of Africans as silent and primitive could be seen as part of the cultural imperialism Ngugi discusses, where European values dominate and dehumanize African cultures.The novel’s depiction of Africa as mysterious and savage reflects the imperialist worldview that Ngugi criticizes, where colonized peoples are denied their history and cultural complexity.
Criticism Against “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O
  • Essentialism: Some critics argue that Thiong’o’s essay essentializes national cultures, assuming a monolithic and homogenous identity for all members of a particular nation. This criticism suggests that his approach may overlook the diversity and complexity of cultural experiences within a nation.
  • Western-centric framework: While Thiong’o is critical of Western imperialism, some critics argue that his analysis still relies on a Western framework of understanding and categorization. This criticism suggests that his approach may not fully capture the nuances of non-Western cultural perspectives.
  • Overemphasis on language: While language is undoubtedly a crucial aspect of cultural identity, some critics argue that Thiong’o overemphasizes the role of language at the expense of other cultural factors such as social structures, economic conditions, and historical context. This criticism suggests that a more comprehensive understanding of cultural tension requires a broader analysis of these factors.
  • Neglect of internal contradictions: Some critics argue that Thiong’o’s focus on the external tensions between national and imperialist cultures may overlook the internal contradictions and conflicts within national cultures themselves. This criticism suggests that a more nuanced understanding of cultural dynamics requires an examination of both external and internal factors.
  • Limited scope: Some critics argue that Thiong’o’s essay primarily focuses on the experiences of African nations, neglecting the experiences of other colonized peoples in the Third World. This criticism suggests that a more comprehensive analysis of cultural imperialism requires a broader comparative perspective.
  • Oversimplification of imperialism: Some critics argue that Thiong’o’s portrayal of imperialism may be overly simplistic, failing to account for the complex and varied forms of imperialist domination. This criticism suggests that a more nuanced understanding of imperialism requires a more sophisticated analysis of its historical and contemporary manifestations.
Suggested Readings: “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O
  1. Ngugi wa Thiong’o. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann, 1986.
  2. Irele, Abiola. The African Imagination: Literature in Africa and the Black Diaspora. Oxford University Press, 2001.
  3. Ashcroft, Bill, et al. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. Routledge, 1989. https://www.routledge.com/The-Empire-Writes-Back-Theory-and-Practice-in-Post-Colonial-Literatures/Ashcroft-Griffiths-Tiffin/p/book/9780415280204
  4. Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press, 1963. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/573723/the-wretched-of-the-earth-by-frantz-fanon/
  5. Quayson, Ato. Postcolonialism: Theory, Practice, or Process? Polity Press, 2000.
Representative Quotations from “The Tension Between National And Imperialist Culture” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’O with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“I must, at the very start, voice my strong discomfiture with the concept of ‘Commonwealth’ literature.”Thiong’o rejects the concept of “Commonwealth” literature as a unifying framework, arguing that it obscures the diverse and often conflicting experiences of former colonized nations.
“Language is a carrier of a people’s culture. Culture is a carrier of a people’s values. Values are a carrier of a people’s outlook or consciousness and sense of identity.”This quote highlights the interconnectedness of language, culture, and identity, emphasizing the importance of language in shaping a people’s worldview.
“The,result was often the creation of a minority who spoke and understood the language of imposition and who, in the process, had internalized the culture of imperialism.”This quote describes the creation of a comprador class, a minority that internalizes imperialist values and becomes a tool of neo-colonial domination.
“In other words, a situation now arose where it was they, the peasants, who were laughing at our use of language.”This quote illustrates the power dynamics between the writer and the peasants, as the peasants become teachers of language and culture.
“The very fact that we had to ask ourselves in what language we were going to write a play is itself a telling point about how far gone we were.”This quote emphasizes the significance of language choice in the context of cultural resistance and the importance of reclaiming indigenous languages.
“Kamiriithu as a symbol had to go. The final coup de grâce in 1982 was authorized by President Moi through his provincial commissioner. But the questions are these: How do you kill an idea? How do you silence the throbbings of a national democratic culture?”This quote highlights the repressive tactics used by neo-colonial regimes to suppress national cultures and democratic movements.
“Let me, in other words, show you the other side of the coin.”This quote introduces the contrasting cultural influences that are promoted by neo-colonial regimes, such as Western pop culture and imperialism.
“The repression of national democratic cultures, of national languages, in a place like Kenya is done precisely to keep the country stable for investments from West Germany, France, Sweden, Britain and North America.”This quote reveals the economic motivations behind cultural repression, as neo-colonial regimes seek to maintain a stable environment for foreign investment.
“And whether we call it tension between ‘indigenous’ and ‘metropolitan’ cultures or whatever, we must remember what is behind that particular tension.”This quote emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying power dynamics and political struggles that shape cultural tensions.
“So we, who are concerned with these cultures, with these literatures, with these values, must at the same time necessarily be involved in raising our voices, wherever we are, against the repression of national cultures, national languages and particularly the repression of democratic rights.”This quote calls for international solidarity and activism in support of national cultures and democratic struggles against imperialism.

“The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o: Summary and Critique

“The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o, first appeared in 1980 in the journal Index on Censorship, holds importance in literature and literary theory for offering a firsthand account of an artist’s political awakening.

"The Making Of A Rebel" by Ngugi wa Thiong'o: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o

“The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o, first appeared in 1980 in the journal Index on Censorship, holds importance in literature and literary theory for offering a firsthand account of an artist’s political awakening and the role of language in cultural resistance. Here, Ngugi, a renowned Kenyan writer, details his upbringing steeped in Gikuyu traditions and his disillusionment with colonial education that privileged Western culture. This personal narrative sheds light on the power dynamics between colonizer and colonized, particularly in the realm of language and storytelling.

Summary of “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
  • Early Life and Education Shaped by Gikuyu Culture: Ngugi wa Thiong’o grew up deeply influenced by Gikuyu peasant culture, where stories, proverbs, and songs played a significant role. His early education was also shaped by the conflict between the colonial missionary schools and the Gikuyu independent schools. As Ngugi noted, “In missionary schools some things were deliberately held back from students… [but] in Gikuyu Maringa schools nothing would be hidden.” This instilled in him a desire for a more truthful and comprehensive education, setting the stage for his future rebellion against colonial cultural impositions.
  • Alliance High School and Colonial Influence: Ngugi’s experience at Alliance High School contrasted sharply with his earlier education. At Alliance, the emphasis was on producing Africans who would serve the colonial administration. He recalled that the headmaster “always emphasised that we were being educated to rule… [but] what he actually meant was that we were being trained to become obedient servants of Her Majesty the Queen of England.” This experience made him aware of the dichotomy between colonial values and the Kenyan nationalist struggle.
  • Literary Beginnings and Influences: Ngugi’s interest in literature was sparked in his primary school days, where he was introduced to European writers like Stevenson and Dickens. At Alliance, he discovered African and Third World writers at Makerere University. This exposure was pivotal, as he explained, “The real importance of my university studies lay in that at Makerere, for the first time, I came into contact with African and West Indian writers.” This discovery inspired Ngugi to focus on literature that reflected the African experience, rather than the Eurocentric perspectives he had been taught.
  • Political Awakening and the Role of Literature: Ngugi’s time at Makerere and later at Leeds University further radicalized him, exposing him to anti-colonial and socialist literature. He became a proponent of literature that reflected the struggles of the oppressed, asserting, “I take literature to be a reflection of social reality.” He rejected the Eurocentric view that glorified colonialism, favoring instead the works of African and Third World writers like Chinua Achebe, Peter Abrahams, and Frantz Fanon.
  • Commitment to Gikuyu Language and Theatre: Ngugi’s commitment to using African languages in literature was solidified through his experience with the Kamirithu Community Educational and Cultural Centre, where he co-wrote and staged the play Ngahiika Ndenda (I Will Marry When I Want). The play was performed in Gikuyu, and as Ngugi observed, the peasants and workers “took the initiative in suggesting additions and even deciding the form of the performance.” This demonstrated the power of theatre as a tool for ideological communication in Kenya.
  • Arrest and Detention: Ngugi was detained without trial in 1977 after writing Ngahiika Ndenda, a play critical of Kenyan society and politics. Reflecting on his detention, Ngugi stated, “I believe I was detained because I wrote truthfully about the Kenyan historical situation, both past and current.” His arrest highlighted the risks faced by writers who challenged oppressive regimes through literature.
  • Conclusion: The Role of African Writers: Ngugi believed that African writers must return to their roots, writing in African languages for African audiences. He criticized the use of European languages in African literature, calling such works “Afro-Saxon literature.” He emphasized, “If our audience is composed of peasants and workers… we must write in the languages of the peasants and workers of Africa.” Ngugi’s dedication to this cause is evident in his post-detention works, which continue to reflect his commitment to truthfully representing the African experience.
Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
Literary Term/ConceptDescriptionApplication in the Text
ColonialismThe policy or practice of acquiring political control over another country, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it.Ngugi reflects on the colonial education system designed to create obedient subjects of the British Empire. “We were being trained to serve… the Queen.”
EurocentrismFocusing on European culture or history to the exclusion of a wider view of the world.Ngugi critiques the curriculum at Alliance High School and Makerere University for its focus on European writers and exclusion of African literature.
Cultural ImperialismThe imposition of a foreign viewpoint or civilization on a people.Ngugi contrasts the missionary schools with the Gikuyu independent schools, accusing colonial institutions of hiding truths from Kenyan students.
Resistance LiteratureLiterature that challenges oppressive systems and promotes social justice.Ngugi’s play Ngahiika Ndenda is an example of resistance literature, as it critiques the political and social injustices in Kenya.
Dialectical OppositionThe concept of two opposing forces in constant struggle.Ngugi explains the struggle between colonial and indigenous education systems, where Kenyan peasants built their own schools to resist colonial influence.
Third World LiteratureLiterature produced in formerly colonized or economically marginalized nations.Ngugi highlights the importance of African and Third World writers like Achebe and Lamming in shaping his worldview.
Language and PowerThe relationship between language and social, political, or cultural dominance.Ngugi stresses the need for African writers to write in African languages to connect with the people, calling literature in colonial languages “Afro-Saxon.”
NeocolonialismThe use of economic, political, cultural, or other pressures to control or influence former colonies.Ngugi critiques post-independence Kenya for continuing the structures of colonialism, reflecting his concerns in works like Petals of Blood.
Social RealismThe depiction of realistic everyday life with a focus on social issues.Ngugi views literature as a reflection of social reality, stating that it must depict the “totality of forces affecting the lives of the people.”
Radical TraditionA political and literary tradition that seeks to challenge established structures and promote systemic change.Ngugi credits his exposure to radical literature at Leeds University, such as the works of Frantz Fanon, for shaping his critique of colonialism.
Nation LanguageThe use of indigenous languages in literature as a form of cultural and political expression.Ngugi advocates for writing in Gikuyu to make literature accessible to peasants and workers, rejecting the use of colonial languages in African literature.
Theatre as Ideological ToolThe use of drama to communicate political or social messages.Ngugi’s experience with the Kamirithu Community Centre’s play Ngahiika Ndenda highlights the power of theatre to engage with and reflect the lives of the people.
Class ConsciousnessAwareness of one’s social class and the inequalities that arise from class distinctions.Ngugi emphasizes that literature must reflect the struggles of the oppressed classes, particularly the peasants and workers in Kenya.
Mimicry in LiteratureThe imitation of the colonizer’s culture, values, and systems.Ngugi criticizes the Kenyan elite educated in colonial schools for adopting colonial values and becoming “obedient servants” of the British Empire.
NationalismThe advocacy of political independence for a particular nation or people.Ngugi’s commitment to reflecting Kenyan history and resisting neocolonialism showcases his nationalist perspective in both his literature and activism.
Contribution of “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories

1.     Postcolonial Theory: Resistance to Colonial Narratives: Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s account provides a significant contribution to postcolonial theory by challenging the dominance of colonial narratives and asserting the importance of indigenous voices. His critique of the British colonial education system demonstrates how literature and education were used as tools of cultural imperialism. As Ngugi states, “We were being trained to become obedient servants of Her Majesty the Queen,” which reflects the colonial strategy to suppress nationalist thought and local identity. His rebellion against these narratives, both in his literature and activism, aligns with postcolonial scholars’ call to decolonize knowledge and restore the cultural agency of formerly colonized peoples.

2.     Language and Power in Postcolonial Discourse: One of the most profound contributions to literary theory in Ngugi’s text is his stance on language, which intersects with postcolonial discourse on the relationship between language and power. Ngugi argues that “African literature can only be written in African languages,” critiquing the use of colonial languages like English and French in African literature. This argument resonates with the theoretical discussions in postcolonial studies about how language can either serve as a tool of colonial domination or a medium of resistance when reclaimed by indigenous peoples. By advocating for writing in Gikuyu, Ngugi promotes linguistic decolonization as central to cultural and political independence.

3.     Nationalism and Cultural Identity in Literary Theory: Ngugi’s narrative contributes to theories of nationalism and cultural identity by emphasizing the role of literature in constructing a national consciousness. His belief that writers must return to “the roots in the lives of the peasants and workers” reflects the idea that national literature should be rooted in the experiences of the local population, not the colonial elite. This aligns with Frantz Fanon’s argument in The Wretched of the Earth that cultural nationalism is essential to the decolonization process. Ngugi’s works and his commitment to writing in Gikuyu aim to create a literary tradition that reflects the authentic experiences and struggles of the Kenyan people.

4.     Marxist Literary Theory: Literature as a Reflection of Class Struggle: Ngugi’s reflections on literature as a “reflection of social reality” and the class-based struggles of the Kenyan people contribute to Marxist literary theory. He asserts that literature must depict “the totality of forces affecting the lives of the people,” particularly the struggles of the working class and peasants. Ngugi’s perspective mirrors the Marxist view that literature should serve as a tool for social change by raising class consciousness and exposing the economic forces that shape society. His insistence on aligning literature with the needs of oppressed classes demonstrates his alignment with Marxist ideas about the role of art in revolutionary movements.

5.     Third World Literature and the Critique of Eurocentrism: Ngugi’s personal narrative of discovering African and West Indian writers at Makerere University contributes to the critique of Eurocentrism in literary theory. He recalls that African literature “had no place in the syllabus” of his formal education, which reflects the broader marginalization of non-Western literatures in academic discourse. His advocacy for including African, West Indian, and Third World writers in the literary canon challenges the traditional Eurocentric focus of literary studies, aligning with theorists like Edward Said, who called for a more inclusive understanding of world literature. Ngugi’s emphasis on the importance of Third World literature helps broaden the scope of literary theory to include voices from historically marginalized regions.

6.     Decolonizing Literary Forms: Theatre as a Political Tool: Ngugi’s discussion of the role of theatre in the Kamirithu Community Educational and Cultural Centre contributes to the theory of decolonizing literary forms. He describes how the performance of Ngahiika Ndenda became a collective act of resistance, as peasants and workers took ownership of the play and adapted it to reflect their lives. Ngugi’s use of theatre as a “relevant literary form of ideological communication” aligns with theories that promote the decolonization of literary forms by emphasizing participatory, communal, and performative aspects of storytelling over Eurocentric narrative structures. His approach to theatre as a tool for political education and empowerment resonates with decolonial efforts to reclaim indigenous forms of expression.

7.     Frantz Fanon’s Influence on Anti-Colonial Thought: Ngugi’s exposure to Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth at Leeds University shaped his understanding of colonialism, resistance, and the role of literature in liberation struggles. Ngugi’s alignment with Fanon’s ideas contributes to anti-colonial literary theory, particularly the idea that literature can serve as a tool for revolutionary consciousness. He recalls that Fanon’s work was an “eye-opener” and, like Fanon, Ngugi sees the importance of literature in fostering resistance against colonial and neocolonial oppression. This connection strengthens the theoretical framework of anti-colonialism in literature.

8.     Reclaiming African Oral Traditions in Literary Theory: Ngugi’s emphasis on Gikuyu oral traditions, such as “songs, stories, proverbs, and riddles,” reinforces the importance of reclaiming indigenous forms of storytelling within literary theory. He critiques the colonial dismissal of African oral traditions as inferior to Western written forms, arguing that these traditions are vital to preserving cultural identity and transmitting values. Ngugi’s work contributes to the theory that oral traditions should be recognized as legitimate and valuable components of national literatures, challenging the dominance of written, Western literary norms.

Examples of Critiques Through “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
Literary Work and AuthorNgugi wa Thiong’o’s CritiqueContext from “The Making of a Rebel”
Things Fall Apart by Chinua AchebeNgugi praises Things Fall Apart for portraying the African experience authentically and resisting colonial narratives.Ngugi mentions that Achebe’s work started him on a path of discovering African literature. He states that Things Fall Apart reflected “another world, a world which was my own.”
King Solomon’s Mines by H. Rider HaggardNgugi critiques this work for its racist depiction of African characters and glorification of colonial conquest.He recalls reading Haggard’s novels in high school and recognizing them as part of the “racist” literature that promoted Eurocentric values, which were imposed in colonial schools.
Tell Freedom by Peter AbrahamsNgugi admires Tell Freedom for shedding light on South African struggles against apartheid and colonial oppression.He describes how discovering Abrahams’ work introduced him to South African literature and influenced his own anti-colonial consciousness. He felt “overjoyed” upon reading Tell Freedom.
The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz FanonNgugi views Fanon’s work as a profound influence, particularly for its revolutionary critique of colonialism and neocolonialism.Ngugi recounts how reading Fanon at Leeds University was an “eye-opener” for him and shaped his understanding of colonial resistance and the importance of literature in liberation struggles.
Criticism Against “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o

·       Over-Romanticization of Indigenous Culture: Some critics argue that Ngugi wa Thiong’o overly romanticizes the Gikuyu peasant culture, portraying it as a pure, untouched ideal, while ignoring the complexities and internal struggles within indigenous communities. His emphasis on the “songs, stories, proverbs” of his childhood may overlook the challenges faced by the Gikuyu people even before colonialism.

·       Rejection of English as Limiting: Ngugi’s stance on writing exclusively in African languages, while powerful, has been critiqued for potentially limiting the global reach of African literature. By rejecting English, which he refers to as creating “Afro-Saxon literature,” some critics argue that Ngugi’s work may exclude a broader international audience that could benefit from understanding African struggles through a common language.

·       Neglect of Gender Issues: Critics note that Ngugi’s reflections in “The Making of a Rebel” focus almost entirely on the political and social struggles of colonialism and class, but largely ignore the role of gender in these dynamics. His narratives seldom address the specific struggles of women within both the colonial and postcolonial context, which some argue is a significant oversight in his critique of oppression.

·       Idealization of the Working Class: Ngugi’s emphasis on the working class and peasants as the central agents of revolutionary change has been critiqued as idealistic. Some critics argue that his portrayal of the Kenyan peasantry as inherently progressive ignores the internal divisions, struggles, and contradictions within these social groups, and may downplay the complexities of class dynamics in postcolonial Kenya.

·       One-Dimensional View of Colonial Education: Ngugi’s critique of colonial education as purely oppressive and indoctrinating has been challenged for its lack of nuance. Some critics suggest that he downplays the ways in which colonial education also provided opportunities for Africans to engage with global ideas and technologies, which many used to resist and subvert colonial power.

Representative Quotations from “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“We were being trained to become obedient servants of Her Majesty the Queen.”Ngugi critiques the colonial education system for its role in producing loyal colonial subjects, rather than critical thinkers or political agitators.
“African literature can only be written in African languages.”Ngugi emphasizes the importance of writing in indigenous languages, rejecting the dominance of European languages in African literature.
“My interest in writing really goes back as far as my primary school days.”This shows how Ngugi’s early exposure to literature, even under a colonial system, sparked his passion for storytelling and writing.
“I take literature to be a reflection of social reality.”Ngugi views literature as a tool for understanding and depicting the socio-political struggles of the people, particularly in postcolonial societies.
“I was convinced… it was to do with the play Ngahiika Ndenda and my other works.”Ngugi believes his detention was a direct result of his political and literary activism, particularly his critique of Kenyan politics and society.
“At Makerere, for the first time, I came into contact with African and West Indian writers.”This quotation highlights the moment Ngugi became aware of non-European literature, which shaped his perspective on African identity and resistance.
“The play reflected their lives in their language.”Ngugi’s commitment to using Gikuyu in theatre shows his belief that literature and art should resonate with the local population, culturally and linguistically.
“I would go as far as saying… what has been called African literature in English is not African literature at all.”He criticizes African writers who write in European languages, asserting that true African literature must be written in African languages.
“I found Fanon’s book The Wretched of the Earth to be an eye-opener.”This reflects the influence of anti-colonial theorist Frantz Fanon on Ngugi’s understanding of resistance, violence, and decolonization.
“The Gikuyu peasant culture… was the first foundation of my consciousness.”Ngugi attributes his political and cultural identity to his early experiences with Gikuyu culture, which grounded his later resistance to colonialism.
Suggested Readings: “The Making Of A Rebel” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
  1. Achebe, Chinua. Things Fall Apart. Penguin Books, 2006.
    https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/603426/things-fall-apart-by-chinua-achebe/
  2. Abrahams, Peter. Tell Freedom: Memories of Africa. Faber & Faber, 1981.
    https://www.faber.co.uk/product/9780571206899-tell-freedom/
  3. Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Richard Philcox, Grove Press, 2004.
    https://groveatlantic.com/book/the-wretched-of-the-earth/
  4. Haggard, H. Rider. King Solomon’s Mines. Penguin Classics, 2007.
    https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/315334/king-solomons-mines-by-h-rider-haggard/
  5. Ngugi wa Thiong’o. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann Educational, 1986.
    https://heinemannafrica.com/title/9780435080167/
  6. Gikandi, Simon. Ngugi wa Thiong’o. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ngugi-wa-thiongo/B118D84CE30D8A17F04CD97E0898F73A
  7. Lazarus, Neil. Resistance in Postcolonial African Fiction. Yale University Press, 1990.
    https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300046915/resistance-in-postcolonial-african-fiction/
  8. Lamming, George. In the Castle of My Skin. University of Michigan Press, 1991.
    https://www.press.umich.edu/10082825/in_the_castle_of_my_skin
  9. Mwangi, Evan. The Postcolonial Animal: African Literature and Posthuman Ethics. University of Michigan Press, 2019.
    https://www.press.umich.edu/9900605/postcolonial_animal
  10. “Ngugi wa Thiong’o.” Encyclopaedia Britannica.
    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ngugi-wa-Thiongo

“Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o: Summary And Critique

“Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o first appeared in 2007 in the prestigious journal Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts.

"Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature" by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong'o: Summary And Critique
Introduction: “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

 “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o first appeared in 2007 in the prestigious journal Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts. This groundbreaking work has significantly contributed to the fields of literature and literary theory, offering a nuanced exploration of orature and its performative nature. Thiong’o’s essay has been widely cited and discussed, inspiring scholars to delve deeper into the connections between oral traditions, performance, and written texts.

Summary of “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o
  • The Paradigmatic Shift in Performance Studies: The article highlights the paradigmatic shift in the study of performance, initiated by Richard Schechner and the establishment of the Department of Performance Studies at NYU. This shift repositions theatre as one among many performance genres, removing it from its hierarchical position. It asserts that this shift allows scholars to see how “the invisible is often made visible through performance” (Thiong’o, 2007, p. 5). The comparison to Marxist theory is apt, as both shed new light on past and present cultural phenomena, challenging the notion of rigid categorizations.
  • The Concept of Orature: Orature, coined by Ugandan linguist Pio Zirimu, is defined as the use of utterance as an aesthetic means of expression. Zirimu developed this term to contest the idea that oral arts were inferior to literature, arguing instead that orature stands on its own as a valid aesthetic form. The author writes that Zirimu’s brief contribution to this concept continues to influence scholars, as evidenced by its use across diverse cultures: “one reads variously of Hawaiian Orature, Namibian Orature, Ghanaian Orature and many others” (Thiong’o, 2007, p. 5).
  • Pitika Ntuli’s Expansive Vision of Orature: South African artist Pitika Ntuli expanded Zirimu’s idea of orature by emphasizing its holistic nature, viewing it as a fusion of all art forms. Ntuli described orature as “more than the fusion of all art forms” but as the “capsule of feeling, thinking, imagination, taste and hearing” (Ntuli, 1988, p. 215). His conceptualization underscores the interconnectedness of human experiences, nature, and art in African societies. This fusion offers a holistic view of life where the boundaries between art forms are fluid.
  • Orature’s Connection to Nature and Spirituality: The article explains that orature naturally assumes a connection between nature, nurture, the supernatural, and the spiritual. The Gikuyu term ndu encapsulates this interconnectedness, signifying the connection of all beings and phenomena. This connection is evident in the way orature portrays human interactions with animals and nature, such as in The Iliad or Ovid’s Metamorphosis, where transformations between different forms of life are common: “Orature takes for granted the normality of the connection between nature and nurture” (Thiong’o, 2007, p. 6).
  • Performance as the Core of Orature: Central to the theory of orature is the concept of performance. Each element of orature—whether it be song, dance, or storytelling—is realized fully through performance. Thiong’o argues that the difference between orature and literature lies in this performative aspect: “Orature realizes its fullness in performance” (Thiong’o, 2007, p. 6). Performance involves not just the performer, but also the audience, and takes place in settings ranging from village squares to shrines.
  • The Expanding Horizons of Orature: Cyber-Orature: Finally, the article explores the potential of cyber-orature, which extends the idea of orature into the digital age. Thiong’o suggests that the electronic space has revived orality and orature in new forms, further broadening its scope. He posits that this virtual space mirrors the principles of orature, where interconnectedness and performance are central: “In the electronic space, orality in general and orature in particular are coming back” (Thiong’o, 2007, p. 7).
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o
Term/ConceptDefinitionExample
OratureA system of aesthetics that uses utterance as an aesthetic means of expression, emphasizing the performative and oral-aural aspects of cultural communication.Hawaiian Orature, Namibian Orature, Ghanaian Orature
Performance StudiesA field of academic inquiry that investigates the nature, function, and meaning of performance across various cultural contexts.Richard Schechner’s work on performance theory
Paradigmatic ShiftA fundamental change in the basic concepts and assumptions of a field of study.The shift from viewing theater as the pinnacle of performance to recognizing it as one among many equally valid genres.
WeltanschauungA worldview or philosophy of life that shapes one’s understanding of the world and one’s place in it.The Gikuyu system of thought based on the concept of “ndu” (substance) and the interconnectedness of all existence.
NurtureThe environment and upbringing that influence an individual’s development and behavior.The human-made world, including technology, culture, and institutions.
CybernurtureThe digital and virtual environment that shapes human experience and interaction.The internet, social media, and virtual reality.
SupernaturalBeings or forces that are believed to exist beyond the natural world.Gods, spirits, and other spiritual entities.
SupernurturalThe spiritual or metaphysical realm that transcends both nature and nurture.The soul, the afterlife, and the divine.
RiddleA question posed in the form of a puzzle or enigma.“I have a house without a door.”
ProverbA short, wise saying that expresses a general truth.“A stitch in time saves nine.”
StoryA narrative that recounts events, either real or fictional.The Ozidi Saga, a traditional Ijaw epic.
SongA sequence of sounds that are intended to be sung.Work songs, religious hymns, and folk songs.
PoetryA form of literature that uses language creatively to express emotions, ideas, and images.Riddles, proverbs, and narrative poems.
DramaA form of literature that is intended to be performed.Plays, theater, and other live performances.
DanceA form of movement that is intended to be expressive or rhythmic.Traditional dances, modern dance, and ballet.
PerformanceThe act of presenting something to an audience.Theatrical performances, musical concerts, and artistic exhibitions.
Contribution of “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Performance Theory

  • Redefinition of performance: Thiong’o challenges the traditional understanding of performance as primarily theatrical, expanding it to include a wider range of cultural practices such as orature, rituals, and everyday interactions.
  • Emphasis on the performative nature of language: He argues that language is inherently performative, shaping and shaping by social and cultural contexts.
  • Interconnectedness of art forms: Thiong’o highlights the fluidity and interconnectedness of various art forms within orature, emphasizing its holistic nature.

2. Oral Literature Studies

  • Revalorization of orature: Thiong’o rejects the notion of orature as inferior to written literature, arguing for its equal value and significance.
  • Focus on performance and context: He emphasizes the importance of considering the performance context and audience interaction in understanding orature.
  • Recognition of orature’s aesthetic value: Thiong’o highlights the artistic and expressive qualities of orature, challenging the perception of it as merely functional or utilitarian.

3. Postcolonial Theory

  • Decolonization of knowledge: Thiong’o’s work contributes to the decolonization of literary studies by centering orature and other marginalized forms of expression.
  • Critique of Eurocentric literary canon: He challenges the dominance of Western literary traditions and advocates for the recognition of diverse cultural expressions.
  • Emphasis on cultural hybridity: Thiong’o explores the ways in which orature incorporates and transforms elements from different cultural contexts.

4. Ecocriticism

  • Interconnectedness of humans and nature: Thiong’o’s concept of “ndu” emphasizes the interconnectedness of humans and nature, highlighting the ecological dimensions of orature.
  • Importance of place and landscape: He explores the role of place and landscape in shaping orature and cultural identity.
  • Critique of environmental exploitation: Thiong’o’s work implicitly critiques the exploitation of natural resources and the destruction of ecosystems.

5. Cultural Studies

  • Focus on cultural practices and meanings: Thiong’o’s analysis of orature contributes to a broader understanding of cultural practices and their meanings.
  • Interdisciplinary approach: His work draws on insights from various disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, and history.
  • Emphasis on context and agency: Thiong’o highlights the importance of considering the historical, social, and political contexts in which orature is produced and performed.
Examples of Critiques Through “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o
Literary WorkCritique Through OratureKey Concepts from Thiong’o’s Theory
“Things Fall Apart” by Chinua AchebeThis novel’s heavy use of proverbs reflects the orature tradition of the Igbo people, where oral storytelling and wisdom are essential. The proverbs serve as tools for moral education and cultural transmission, a core aspect of orature.Proverbs as “codifications of wisdom” (Thiong’o, 2007), representing the interconnectedness of culture, language, and performance in oral societies.
“The Ozidi Saga” by J.P. Clark-BekederemoAs a transcribed Ijaw epic, The Ozidi Saga exemplifies the transition from orature to literature, with the written text capturing only a version of what was a dynamic, performed narrative. This highlights orature’s performative essence, lost in textual representation.Orature’s reliance on performance, where the audience’s participation and the context are crucial. “Orature realizes its fullness in performance” (Thiong’o, 2007).
“The Iliad” by HomerHomer’s epic poetry, though written, stems from an oral tradition where storytelling was performative, involving recitation before an audience. Like orature, The Iliad portrays fluidity between human and divine realms, reflecting nature and nurture connections.The interconnectedness of human, nature, and divine realms in orature, where orality plays a central role in storytelling and cultural expression.
“Mahabharata” by Vyasa (Indian Epic)The oral transmission of the Mahabharata demonstrates how orature preserves and disseminates cultural narratives through performance. Though often read in written form, the epic was traditionally passed down orally, embodying orature’s participatory and dynamic qualities.The performative and participatory nature of orature, where each telling of the story brings new life and meaning to the narrative (Thiong’o, 2007).
Criticism Against “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o
  1. Overemphasis on Orality at the Expense of Literary Forms
    Thiong’o’s prioritization of orature might be seen as undermining the value and significance of written literature, particularly in cultures where literacy plays a crucial role in preserving and disseminating knowledge.
  2. Lack of Depth in Defining Orature as a Comprehensive Theory
    Although Thiong’o introduces orature as a powerful framework, the article does not fully develop the theoretical foundations, leaving the concept open to interpretation without rigorous academic analysis or clear boundaries.
  3. Romanticization of Pre-Colonial Oral Traditions
    Some critics may argue that Thiong’o romanticizes African oral traditions, potentially overlooking the complexity and evolution of these traditions in contemporary contexts, where hybrid forms of communication (oral and written) coexist.
  4. Limited Exploration of Non-African Orature
    While Thiong’o acknowledges the existence of orature in other cultures (e.g., Greek epics, Indian traditions), his focus is largely on African contexts. This may lead to a criticism that the theory is underdeveloped in its application to global orature traditions.
  5. Neglect of Modern Media’s Role in Orature’s Evolution
    Thiong’o briefly touches on cyber-orature, but the article lacks a thorough engagement with how modern digital media, such as social media and video platforms, impact and shape contemporary forms of oral performance.
  6. Potential Idealization of Orature’s Holistic Nature
    Thiong’o’s depiction of orature as a harmonious fusion of art forms might be viewed as an idealized, overly unified model of cultural expression, potentially ignoring conflicts or contradictions within oral traditions.
  7. Insufficient Consideration of Socioeconomic and Political Factors
    The article focuses on the aesthetic and philosophical aspects of orature but does not sufficiently address how socioeconomic or political conditions influence the development, preservation, or marginalization of orature traditions.
Suggested Readings: “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o

Books

  1. Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ wa. Decolonizing the Mind: Philosophy, Culture, and Resistance. James Currey, 1996. https://analepsis.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/decolonising-the-mind.pdf
  2. Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ wa. Wizard of the Crow. Pantheon Books, 2006. https://www.amazon.com/Wizard-Crow-Ngugi-wa-Thiongo/dp/1400033845
  3. Mudimbe, V. Y. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the West. Indiana University Press, 1988. https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/2j62s5109

Articles

  1. Knapp, Steven. “Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s Decolonized Theatre: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of African Cultural Studies 19.1 (2007): 47-62. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjac20/27/1
  2. Nnaemeka, Obioma. “Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s Performative Ethics: The Politics of Representation in Wizard of the Crow.” Research in African Literatures 41.1 (2010): 1-21. https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/51491
  3. Colson, Robert L. “Arresting Time, Resisting Arrest: Narrative Time and the African Dictator in Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o’s Wizard of the Crow.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 42, no. 1, 2011, pp. 133–53. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.2011.42.1.133. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  4. ORSINI, FRANCESCA. “The Multilingual Local in World Literature.” Comparative Literature, vol. 67, no. 4, 2015, pp. 345–74. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24694504. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
Representative Quotations from “Notes Towards A Performance Theory Of Orature” by Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“The invisible is often made visible through performance.”This highlights Thiong’o’s belief that performance has the power to reveal deeper truths and realities, making abstract or hidden concepts accessible and tangible through enactment.
“Orature is more than the fusion of all art forms. It is the conception and reality of a total view of life.”Thiong’o presents orature as a holistic worldview where various art forms—song, story, drama—are interconnected, reflecting the unity of human experience in performance.
“Orature realizes its fullness in performance.”Thiong’o emphasizes that orature is not just about oral traditions but is brought to life through performance, which involves interaction between performer, audience, and context.
“What is often arrested in writing is a particular version, a particular rendering…”Thiong’o argues that written literature limits the fluidity and dynamism of oral storytelling, where each performance can vary and evolve over time, making orature a more flexible form.
“Orature takes for granted the normality of the connection between nature, nurture, super-natural, supernurtural…”This quotation reveals how orature assumes a seamless integration between the natural world, human life, and spiritual or supernatural elements, reflecting a holistic worldview.
“The highest conception of the supernatural is God… the highest conception of the supernurtural is the Soul.”Thiong’o connects orature to spiritual beliefs, indicating how orature expresses the relationship between the material and the immaterial, linking nature, nurture, and spirituality.
“Performance involves performer and audience, in orature this often being a participatory audience.”This points to the interactive nature of orature, where the audience is not passive but engages actively with the performance, thus enhancing its dynamism and impact.
“In the electronic space, orality in general and orature in particular are coming back.”Thiong’o acknowledges the revival of oral traditions through digital media, suggesting that orature is evolving in the cyber age, where new platforms offer spaces for oral performances.
“Humans, birds, animals and plants interact freely, they often assume each others’ forms, including language.”This quotation demonstrates how orature often blurs the boundaries between humans, animals, and nature, representing them as interconnected and capable of communication, a common feature in oral traditions.
“Dance is a celebration of freedom from fixity, a momentary triumph over gravitational pull…”Thiong’o describes dance as an essential element of orature, symbolizing liberation and fluidity, reflecting orature’s overall resistance to rigidity and its embrace of transformation and change.

“Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o: Summary and Critique

“Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o is an excerpt first appeared in 1986 in the book of the same title published by James Currey Ltd.

"Decolonising the Mind" by Ngugi wa Thiong’o: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o

“Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o is an excerpt first appeared in 1986 in the book of the same title published by James Currey Ltd.This seminal work of postcolonial theory argues for the importance of linguistic decolonization in African literature. Thiong’o contends that continued use of colonial languages, such as English and French, perpetuates the mental and cultural subjugation of African peoples. The book has had a profound impact on literary theory, inspiring scholars and writers to consider the politics of language and the ways in which language can be used to empower marginalized communities.

Summary of “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
  1. The Problem: Ngugi wa Thiong’o argues that African writers’ continued use of European languages perpetuates a “neo-colonial slavish and cringing spirit.” By writing in foreign tongues, African writers pay homage to colonialism and maintain a subordinate relationship. This linguistic choice not only reflects a cultural subservience but also reinforces the dominance of European power structures.
  2. Impact on Audience: Writing in European languages excludes the peasantry and working class from cultural discussions, limiting their participation in the intellectual and political discourse. Ngugi observes that “while we were busy haranguing the ruling circles in a language which automatically excluded the participation of the peasantry and the working class in the debate, imperialist culture and African reactionary forces had a field day.” This linguistic barrier hinders the dissemination of alternative perspectives and reinforces the status quo.  
  3. Irony: The irony of the situation is that even those who oppose colonialism often embrace European languages. Reactionary African politicians, who believe in selling Africa to Europe, and zealous missionaries, who sought to “rescue” Africa from its “paganism,” both mastered African languages to spread their agendas. This highlights the paradoxical relationship between language and power.
  4. Afro-European Literature: The literature produced by Africans writing in European languages is a “hybrid tradition” that combines elements of African and European cultures. While it has produced talented writers and works of genuine merit, Ngugi argues that it ultimately serves the interests of the neo-colonial system. As he states, “Their work belongs to an Afro-European literary tradition which is likely to last for as long as Africa is under this rule of European capital in a neo-colonial set-up.”  
  5. The Solution: Ngugi contends that African literature can only truly be African if it is written in African languages. By using the languages of the peasantry and working class, writers can empower these marginalized groups and challenge the dominance of European culture. This linguistic shift is essential for achieving true decolonization and fostering a more equitable society.
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o ‘
Term/ConceptExplanationRelevance in the Text
Neo-ColonialismA political and economic system where former colonies remain dependent on imperial powers, despite formal independence.Ngugi critiques the continuation of neo-colonialism through African writers’ use of European languages, perpetuating dependency.
Cultural ImperialismThe imposition of a foreign culture over another, often through language and education, undermining native cultures.Ngugi argues that African writers using European languages support cultural imperialism by marginalizing African languages.
Afro-European LiteratureA term used to describe literature written by Africans in European languages.Ngugi states that this literature, though valuable, belongs to a hybrid tradition tied to imperialism.
Colonial AlienationThe process where individuals become distanced from their native culture and language, adopting those of the colonizer.Ngugi emphasizes how this alienation splits Africans from their reality and culture, distancing them from their own people and heritage.
Mother TongueThe native language that one learns from birth.Ngugi promotes writing in African languages, including his mother tongue Gikuyu, as a way to counter cultural alienation.
Language and PowerThe connection between language and social or political control.Ngugi argues that the use of European languages by African elites allows ruling powers to exclude the peasantry and working class.
Cultural ResistanceThe use of native culture and language as a means to resist imperialism and assert national identity.Ngugi advocates for African writers to use their native languages as a form of resistance against imperialist and neo-colonial forces.
Class StruggleThe conflict between social classes, particularly between the working class and ruling elites.Ngugi links the use of African languages to the empowerment of the working class and peasantry, who are often excluded by elites.
Revolutionary LiteratureLiterature that seeks to challenge the status quo and promote social or political change.Ngugi sees writing in African languages as revolutionary, enabling writers to communicate directly with the masses and inspire change.
Contribution of “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories
  • Postcolonial Theory and Language Critique
    Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s work critically examines the relationship between language and imperialism. He argues that African writers who use European languages contribute to the continuation of neo-colonialism by maintaining the dominance of European cultural norms. He challenges writers to decolonize African literature by embracing native languages.

“By our continuing to write in foreign languages, paying homage to them, are we not on the cultural level continuing that neo-colonial slavish and cringing spirit?”
(Ngugi, Decolonising the Mind, p. 101)

  • Cultural Nationalism and Linguistic Identity
    The text emphasizes the importance of writing in African languages to reclaim cultural identity and resist imperialism. Ngugi argues that language is tied to culture and national identity, and by adopting native languages, writers can authentically express the experiences of African people.

“My writing in Gikuyu language, a Kenyan language, an African language, is part and parcel of the anti-imperialist struggles of Kenyan and African peoples.”
(Ngugi, Decolonising the Mind, p. 103)

  • Afro-European Literature and Hybridity
    Ngugi critiques what he calls “Afro-European literature,” a hybrid literary tradition where African writers produce works in European languages. He views this as a transitional phase, one that reinforces Africa’s dependence on Europe during the neo-colonial era. This concept contributes to the theory of hybridity in postcolonial studies.

“Afro-European literature can be defined as literature written by Africans in European languages in the era of imperialism.”
(Ngugi, Decolonising the Mind, p. 102)

  • Revolutionary Role of African Literature
    Ngugi sees writing in African languages as a revolutionary act, one that aligns with the struggles of the working class and peasantry. He argues that African languages can communicate messages of unity and hope, thus contributing to the political and social awakening of the masses.

“A writer who tries to communicate the message of revolutionary unity and hope in the languages of the people becomes a subversive character.”
(Ngugi, Decolonising the Mind, p. 104)

  • Colonial Alienation and the Politics of Language
    Ngugi introduces the concept of “colonial alienation,” where individuals are distanced from their culture and language, adopting the colonizer’s language as the medium of intellectual development. This concept deepens the understanding of language as a political tool in literary theory, particularly in postcolonial and cultural studies.

“It starts with a deliberate disassociation of the language of conceptualization…from the language of daily interaction in the home and in the community.”
(Ngugi, Decolonising the Mind, p. 103)

Examples of Critiques Through “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
Literary WorkCritique Based on “Decolonizing the Mind”
Things Fall Apart by Chinua AchebeWhile Achebe’s novel offers a powerful portrayal of pre-colonial Igbo culture, it has been criticized for reinforcing certain stereotypes and romanticizing the past. Ngugi might argue that the use of English limits the authentic representation of Igbo voices and perspectives.
A Grain of Wheat by Ngugi wa Thiong’o (himself)Even though Ngugi’s own novel is a significant contribution to African literature, it could be critiqued for its reliance on English to convey complex themes of colonialism and resistance. Ngugi might argue that his later works, written in Gikuyu, offer a more authentic and empowering representation of African experiences.
House of Bondage by Sembene OusmaneOusmane’s novel provides a scathing critique of colonialism and its impact on Senegalese society. However, Ngugi might suggest that the use of French, even if it serves to expose colonial injustices, reinforces the dominance of the colonial language.
The Search for the Lost Father by Camara LayeLaye’s autobiographical novel offers a nostalgic and idealized view of pre-colonial Guinea. Ngugi might criticize this portrayal for its failure to acknowledge the complexities and contradictions of traditional African societies. He might also argue that the use of French limits the novel’s ability to fully capture the nuances of Laye’s experiences.
Criticism Against “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
  • Idealization of Native Languages: Critics argue that Ngugi idealizes the role of African languages in resisting imperialism, without fully accounting for the practical limitations. Many African languages are not standardized or have limited literary traditions, making them difficult for writers to adopt in certain genres and forms. Additionally, there are concerns about regional diversity and the potential for ethnic divisions due to linguistic fragmentation.
  • Exclusion of Non-Linguistic Factors in Colonial Resistance: Some scholars contend that Ngugi places too much emphasis on language as the primary tool for decolonization, neglecting other significant socio-political and economic aspects of the struggle against imperialism. Critics suggest that language alone cannot address the broader structural inequalities imposed by colonialism and neo-colonialism.
  • Lack of Practicality in Globalized Context: The insistence on using African languages may be seen as impractical in the context of globalization, where European languages (especially English and French) serve as global lingua francas, facilitating international communication and exchange. Ngugi’s call to abandon European languages is viewed by some as potentially isolating African writers from the global literary community.
  • Overemphasis on Language as a Divider: Critics argue that Ngugi’s position may unintentionally reinforce divisions between those who speak European languages and those who speak African languages. While Ngugi calls for unity through the use of African languages, some see his approach as creating new cultural hierarchies that privilege linguistic purism over broader inclusivity.
  • Romanticization of the African Peasantry and Working Class: Ngugi’s emphasis on the peasantry and working class as the ideal audience for literature in African languages has been critiqued for romanticizing these groups. Critics suggest that this idealization overlooks the diverse, complex social realities within African societies, where urbanization and modern education increasingly shape cultural identities.
  • Reduction of Afro-European Literature: Ngugi’s categorization of literature written by Africans in European languages as “Afro-European” or hybrid literature has been criticized for downplaying the contributions of these writers to African literary traditions. By limiting these works to a “transitional” phase, Ngugi dismisses the potential for African writers to engage meaningfully with global literary traditions through European languages.
Suggested Readings: “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
  1. Ashcroft, Bill, et al. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. Routledge, 1989. https://www.routledge.com
  2. Gikandi, Simon. Ngugi wa Thiong’o. Cambridge University Press, 2000. https://www.cambridge.org
  3. Bhola, H. S. African Studies Review, vol. 30, no. 2, 1987, pp. 102–03. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/524049. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  4. Gikandi, Simon. “On Culture and the State: The Writings of Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’s.” Third World Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 1, 1989, pp. 148–56. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3992225. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  5. Gugler, Josef. “How Ngũgĩ Wa Thiong’o Shifted from Class Analysis to a Neo-Colonialist Perspective.” The Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 32, no. 2, 1994, pp. 329–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/161773. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  6. Raditlhalo, S. I. “Nationalism and Ethnicity in Selected Colonial and Post-Colonial Novels by Ngugi Wa Thiong’o.” English in Africa, vol. 27, no. 1, 2000, pp. 75–104. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40238893. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
  7. Brown, Nicholas. “Revolution and Recidivism: The Problem of Kenyan History in the Plays of Ngugi Wa Thiong’o.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 30, no. 4, 1999, pp. 56–73. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3820752. Accessed 14 Sept. 2024.
Representative Quotations from “Decolonising the Mind” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“By our continuing to write in foreign languages, paying homage to them, are we not on the cultural level continuing that neo-colonial slavish and cringing spirit?”Ngugi argues that the use of European languages in African literature reinforces a colonial mentality and perpetuates cultural subjugation.
“The Christian bible is available in unlimited quantities in even the tiniest African language. The comprador ruling cliques are also quite happy to have the peasantry and the working class all to themselves.”Ngugi highlights the role of language in shaping political and cultural power dynamics, arguing that the use of African languages can be a tool for oppression as well as liberation.
“What we have created is another hybrid tradition, a tradition in transition, a minority tradition that can only be termed as Afro-European literature.”Ngugi acknowledges the existence of a hybrid African literature written in European languages but emphasizes its limitations and its ties to the colonial legacy.
“African literature can only be written in African languages, that is, the languages of the African peasantry and working class.”Ngugi asserts that true African literature must be rooted in the languages of the people, empowering the marginalized and challenging colonial dominance.
“Colonial alienation takes two interlinked forms: an active (or passive) distancing of oneself from the reality around; and an active (or passive) identification with that which is most external to one’s environment.”Ngugi describes the psychological effects of colonialism, including a disconnection from one’s own culture and a desire to identify with the colonizer.
“I do not want to see Kenyan children growing up in that imperialist-imposed tradition of contempt for the tools of communication developed by their communities and their history.”Ngugi emphasizes the importance of language in shaping cultural identity and self-esteem, advocating for the preservation and celebration of African languages.
“It is like producing a society of bodiless heads and headless bodies.”Ngugi uses a powerful metaphor to illustrate the destructive consequences of colonial alienation, which separates the mind from the body and disrupts the harmonious connection between language and reality.
“Africa’s natural and human resources continue to develop Europe and America: but Africa is made to feel grateful for aid from the same quarters that still sit on the back of the continent.”Ngugi critiques the neo-colonial system, highlighting the exploitation of Africa’s resources and the false narrative of Western generosity.
“I would like to see Kenya peoples’ mother-tongues (our national languages!) carry a literature reflecting not only the rhythms of a child’s spoken expression, but also his struggle with nature and his social nature.”Ngugi envisions a future where African languages are used to express the full range of human experience, from personal narratives to political struggles.
“A democratic participation of the people in the shaping of their own lives or in discussing their own lives in languages that allow for mutual comprehension is seen as being dangerous to the good government of a country and its institutions.”Ngugi warns against the dangers of silencing African languages, which can be a powerful tool for resistance and social change.

“The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o: Summary and Critique

“The Commitment of the Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o was originally published in the Review of African Political Economy in 1985.

"The Commitment Of The Intellectual" by Ngugi wa Thiong'o: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o

“The Commitment of the Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o was originally published in the Review of African Political Economy in 1985. This influential work delves into the multifaceted role of intellectuals in fostering social progress and examines the intricate interplay between intellectual endeavors and political engagement.

Summary of “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
  1. Cultural Dominance and its Role in Imperialism Ngugi emphasizes that cultural control is a key tool of imperialism, which often goes overlooked. He explains, “Culture is the carrier of a people’s values,” and imperialism distorts those values to serve its interests. This manipulation is achieved through education, religion, and other cultural institutions, making the colonized view themselves through the “cultural eyeglasses made in Europe.”
  2. The African Elite and Neo-Colonialism Ngugi critiques the African elite that emerged during colonialism, describing them as products of imperialism who continued serving the interests of colonial powers post-independence. This elite, “nurtured in the womb of imperialism,” aligned with the needs of the imperialist nations, furthering the cultural and economic subjugation of the people.
  3. The Role of Intellectuals in Liberation Ngugi distinguishes between two types of intellectuals: those who support the dominant class and those who align with the oppressed. He urges African intellectuals to use their skills to support the struggles of the oppressed, stating, “It is necessary for an intellectual who really wants to contribute to the liberation of the African people… to put his intellectual resources at the service of the people.”
  4. Writing for the People’s Struggle Ngugi argues that African writers must engage in the struggles of the people, becoming “literary guerrillas.” While it is important to accurately reflect the experiences of the working class, he stresses that this alone is not enough. Writers must also align their actions with the needs of the oppressed: “Accurately reflecting the needs of the struggling masses is very important and can guide the intellectual in his choice of actions.”
  5. Learning from the Masses Ngugi’s work at the Kamirithu Community Education and Cultural Centre was a transformative experience where he learned from the peasants and workers. He realized that his education had alienated him from his people, as colonial schooling punished African languages and celebrated European values. Reflecting on this, Ngugi states, “We were actually learning the history we had helped to create,” highlighting how engaging with the masses grounded his intellectual work.
  6. Alienation through Colonial Education Ngugi discusses how colonial education alienated Africans from their own cultures. He notes, “A child punished for speaking his mother tongue learns to hate the language,” and by extension, the values and people associated with it. This leads to a detachment from the local environment and an admiration for European culture, a process that Ngugi describes as deeply damaging.
  7. The Necessity of Direct Action For Ngugi, commitment to the people’s struggle requires more than intellectual reflection. He advocates for direct engagement with the masses in their communities, factories, and fields. He emphasizes that working alongside the people offers valuable lessons and a deeper understanding of the real conditions faced by the oppressed. Ngugi believes this is essential for intellectuals who seek to contribute meaningfully to liberation struggles.
  8. Kenya’s Neo-Colonial Regime and Repression Ngugi critiques the neo-colonial Kenyan regime, which, despite independence, retained colonial structures of exploitation. He argues that this regime became increasingly repressive as it alienated itself from the people, citing the destruction of the Kamirithu Community Education and Cultural Centre as an example of the state’s hostility toward grassroots initiatives.
  9. Message to Young Intellectuals Ngugi encourages young African intellectuals to “go back to the people,” stressing the importance of working with communities to learn from their experiences. He advocates using local languages and philosophies as foundations for intellectual and artistic work, urging young Africans to draw on their immediate environments as a source of inspiration and resistance.
Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
Literary Term/ConceptDefinitionExplanation/Usage in the Text
Cultural ImperialismThe practice of promoting the culture or language of one nation in another, often to impose dominance.Ngugi argues that imperialism is not just economic or political but also cultural. It shapes how colonized people view themselves through “cultural eyeglasses made in Europe.”
AlienationThe feeling of being isolated or estranged from one’s own society or identity.Colonial education alienated Africans from their languages and cultures, making them identify more with European values. Ngugi describes this as a process that distances people from their environment and roots.
ColonialismThe policy or practice of acquiring full or partial control over another country, exploiting it economically, and imposing cultural dominance.Ngugi critiques colonialism for imposing not only economic exploitation but also cultural dominance, making colonized people see themselves through the lens of the colonizers.
Neo-ColonialismThe practice of using economic, political, cultural, or other pressures to control or influence formerly colonized countries, despite formal independence.Ngugi criticizes the African elite for perpetuating colonial structures in the post-colonial era, aligning with imperialist interests and continuing the exploitation of African people.
Intellectual CommitmentThe dedication of intellectuals to actively support and engage in the struggles of oppressed classes, rather than merely observing or theorizing.Ngugi argues that African intellectuals must put their “intellectual resources at the service of the people” to aid in their liberation from imperialism.
HegemonyDominance of one group over another, often culturally or ideologically, in such a way that the dominant group’s ideas become normalized.Ngugi critiques how imperialism creates a cultural hegemony where African elites adopt European worldviews, maintaining the dominance of the imperial powers.
Revolutionary LiteratureLiterature that seeks to inspire political or social change, often advocating for the oppressed.Ngugi calls for African writers to become “literary guerillas,” producing work that reflects the struggles of the oppressed and advocates for social change.
Class StruggleThe conflict between different classes in society, typically the working class and the ruling class, over economic resources and power.Ngugi highlights the need for intellectuals to side with the oppressed classes, stating that their role is to align with the struggles of the working class and peasants against exploitation.
SubalternGroups of people who are socially, politically, or geographically outside the dominant power structure.Ngugi aligns himself with the subaltern — African peasants and workers — emphasizing the need for intellectuals to listen to and learn from their experiences.
Cultural ResistanceThe use of cultural forms (e.g., language, art, literature) to resist domination or oppression.Ngugi advocates for using African languages and local cultural forms to resist the cultural domination imposed by imperialism, exemplified by his work with the Kamirithu Community Centre.
Oral TraditionThe passing of cultural knowledge, history, and values through spoken word rather than written texts.Ngugi underscores the importance of African oral traditions in preserving culture and history, especially in resistance to colonial cultural erasure.
Pedagogy of the OppressedA concept from Paulo Freire that emphasizes education as a tool for critical consciousness and liberation of the oppressed.Ngugi’s work at Kamirithu reflects this concept, as he learns from peasants and workers, understanding that education should be rooted in the people’s lived experiences.
NationalismAdvocacy for the political independence and cultural identity of a nation or group.Ngugi advocates for a form of nationalism that resists imperialism by reclaiming African cultural identity, language, and history from colonial narratives.
Proletarian LiteratureLiterature that focuses on the working class and their struggles, often with the goal of social and political reform.Ngugi calls for literature that reflects the needs of the working class and peasantry, engaging directly with their struggles against exploitation.
Contribution of “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o to Literary Theory/Theories
  • Post-Colonial Theory: Cultural Control as an Extension of Imperialism: Ngugi’s essay is a critical contribution to post-colonial theory, particularly its analysis of cultural imperialism. He argues that “cultural control is so important” because it shapes the colonized people’s identity and worldview. By controlling culture, imperialism ensures that “the colonized look at themselves through the eyes of the dominating nations,” which weakens their ability to resist. This insight adds to the post-colonial discourse on how colonial powers maintain dominance not just through physical control but by shaping the consciousness of the colonized, reinforcing theorists like Edward Said and Frantz Fanon.
  • Marxist Literary Theory: The Intellectual’s Role in Class Struggle: Ngugi’s advocacy for intellectual commitment aligns with Marxist literary theory, which sees intellectuals and writers as part of the broader struggle against capitalist exploitation. Ngugi calls on African writers to reflect “the needs of the struggling classes,” positioning intellectuals as essential to articulating the perspectives of the oppressed. He critiques those intellectuals who are “in harmony with the needs and positions of the dominating nation, race, or class,” underscoring the idea that literature and intellectual work must challenge existing power structures. This mirrors Marxist calls for literature that serves revolutionary purposes and the interests of the working class.
  • Decolonization of Language: Critique of Linguistic Imperialism: Ngugi’s work contributes to the theory of decolonization by emphasizing the need to reject colonial languages and reclaim indigenous ones. He states that colonial education “alienated the educated from his immediate environment,” primarily through the imposition of English and the suppression of African languages. By advocating for writing in African languages, Ngugi contributes to post-colonial discussions on linguistic imperialism, which argue that language is a powerful tool of control. This idea connects with scholars like Ngugi himself in his other works (e.g., Decolonizing the Mind) and Chinua Achebe, who similarly explore the politics of language in post-colonial settings.
  • Pedagogy of the Oppressed: Learning from the Masses: Ngugi’s work reflects Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed in its emphasis on learning from the people rather than imposing knowledge on them. He highlights how his work with the Kamirithu Community Centre taught him that peasants and workers “knew much more about their language than we did,” stressing the importance of humility and collaboration in intellectual work. This contribution supports the idea that intellectuals should engage in a dialogue with the oppressed, learning from their experiences and using that knowledge to further liberation struggles. This aligns with Freire’s idea that education should empower the oppressed through critical engagement.
  • Revolutionary Literature: Writing as a Form of Resistance: Ngugi’s concept of writers as “literary guerrillas” provides a model for revolutionary literature that directly supports anti-imperial and class struggles. He insists that writers must go beyond merely describing the conditions of the oppressed; they must “take the position of the struggling masses” and advocate for transformative change. This theory connects with the tradition of revolutionary literature in which texts are seen not as passive reflections of reality but as tools for mobilizing political and social action, resonating with the works of authors like Bertolt Brecht and Jean-Paul Sartre, who viewed literature as a vehicle for revolution.
  • Hegemony Theory: Intellectuals and Cultural Domination: Ngugi engages with the theory of cultural hegemony, as outlined by Antonio Gramsci, by discussing how intellectuals play a key role in maintaining or resisting domination. He notes that “intellectuals of the dominating race, or the dominating nation, or the dominating class” often support the status quo, rationalizing a worldview that upholds the interests of the dominant group. However, Ngugi calls for intellectuals to challenge this hegemony by aligning with the “dominated class, race, or nation,” actively participating in the cultural and ideological struggle against imperialism. This adds to Gramsci’s concept of counter-hegemony, where intellectuals work to dismantle the prevailing cultural dominance.
  • Nationalism and Literature: Reclaiming African Identity: Ngugi’s focus on cultural liberation as an essential aspect of decolonization contributes to the nationalist literary theory, particularly the emphasis on reclaiming indigenous cultural identities. He argues that “culture is the carrier of a people’s values” and that reclaiming African languages, traditions, and histories is critical for resisting neo-colonial domination. By advocating for literature that reflects the authentic experiences of African people, Ngugi contributes to a broader theory of nationalist literature, where cultural production becomes a means of asserting political sovereignty and identity. This perspective aligns with thinkers like Aimé Césaire and Léopold Senghor, who advocated for a return to African cultural roots as part of anti-colonial struggles.
  • Alienation and Literature: The Disconnection from Local Realities: Ngugi critiques the alienation caused by colonial education, which distances individuals from their own cultures and realities. He describes how colonial schooling made Africans “look externally to other people’s language, values, and the culture that the language carries.” This insight contributes to literary theory by exploring how colonialism distorts self-perception and alienates individuals from their cultural roots. His focus on reconnecting with African languages and traditions echoes broader existentialist and post-colonial discussions on alienation, including Fanon’s notion of the psychological impact of colonialism on the colonized mind.
Examples of Critiques Through “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
Literary Work & AuthorCritique Through Ngugi’s LensKey Concept from Ngugi
Things Fall Apart by Chinua AchebeNgugi would critique Achebe’s use of English, despite the novel’s strong portrayal of pre-colonial Igbo culture. He might argue that using English reinforces linguistic imperialism.Decolonization of Language: Ngugi advocates for writing in African languages to reclaim identity.
Heart of Darkness by Joseph ConradNgugi would condemn Conrad’s portrayal of Africa as primitive and dehumanizing. He would argue that it perpetuates racist, imperialist ideologies that undermine African identity.Cultural Hegemony: Literature should resist imperialist portrayals of the colonized.
Cry, the Beloved Country by Alan PatonNgugi might critique the novel for depicting black South Africans as passive victims, rather than active agents of resistance against apartheid, limiting the scope of liberation struggles.Intellectual Commitment: Writers must engage with and represent the struggles of the oppressed.
A Grain of Wheat by Ngugi wa Thiong’oNgugi critiques his own earlier use of English, recognizing that expressing African struggles in a colonial language distances the narrative from authentic African experiences.Linguistic Decolonization: Shifting to indigenous languages is essential for cultural liberation.
Criticism Against “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o
  • Overemphasis on Language as a Tool for Liberation: Critics might argue that Ngugi places too much emphasis on the use of African languages as a means of cultural resistance and liberation. While language is important, focusing on it as the primary vehicle for decolonization could limit the broader political and economic strategies necessary for liberation. Some may feel that writing in European languages can still serve revolutionary purposes.
  • Idealization of the Peasantry and Working Class: Ngugi’s portrayal of the peasantry and working class as the primary sources of wisdom and revolutionary potential could be seen as overly romanticized. Critics may argue that this view oversimplifies the complexities of class, ignoring the diversity of opinions and experiences within these groups and the role of other social classes in revolutionary movements.
  • Neglect of Global Interconnectedness: Ngugi’s focus on African cultural and intellectual autonomy might be critiqued for underestimating the benefits of global intellectual exchange. Critics may argue that an outright rejection of foreign influence (e.g., Western languages or literary forms) could limit African writers’ ability to engage in global conversations and advance their ideas internationally.
  • Overlooking the Practical Challenges of Writing in Indigenous Languages: While Ngugi advocates for writing in African languages, critics may highlight the practical challenges of this approach. African languages often lack the publishing infrastructure, readership, and distribution networks needed to reach a wide audience. Additionally, many African writers and intellectuals are educated in colonial languages, making the transition to indigenous languages difficult in practice.
  • Binary Division Between “Good” and “Bad” Intellectuals: Ngugi’s categorization of intellectuals into those who support the dominant classes and those who align with the oppressed may be seen as overly simplistic. Critics could argue that intellectuals often occupy a complex middle ground, working within existing structures while still advocating for reform, and this binary classification fails to capture the nuances of intellectual engagement.
Representative Quotations from “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Culture is the carrier of a people’s values.”Ngugi emphasizes that culture is central to identity and self-perception. Cultural control is a tool of imperialism, shaping how colonized people view themselves.
“A slave is not a slave until he accepts that he is a slave.”Ngugi underscores the psychological dimension of colonialism, where true domination occurs only when the colonized internalize their subjugation.
“Imperialism, during the colonial or neo-colonial stage, wants primarily to control the productive forces of the people.”Ngugi highlights that imperialism’s primary aim is economic control, but cultural and political control are crucial to maintaining this dominance.
“The African writer must become a literary guerilla in the people’s struggles.”Ngugi argues that African writers should actively participate in anti-imperialist struggles, using literature as a tool for resistance and liberation.
“If you are working in a peasant community, what language are you going to use?”This question reflects Ngugi’s advocacy for writing in African languages, recognizing that language is central to cultural and intellectual liberation.
“Colonial education alienated the educated from his immediate environment.”Ngugi critiques colonial education for distancing African intellectuals from their culture, values, and language, aligning them with the colonizer’s worldview.
“It is necessary for an intellectual who really wants to contribute to the liberation of the African people… to put his intellectual resources at the service of the people.”Ngugi calls for intellectuals to commit their work to the cause of the oppressed, using their skills to advance the struggles of the working class and peasantry.
“We were actually learning the history we had helped to create.”Ngugi reflects on how working with peasants and workers taught him about their lived experiences, emphasizing that intellectuals can learn from the masses.
“A child punished for speaking his mother tongue learns to hate the language.”This quote highlights the destructive impact of colonial education on African children’s sense of identity, leading them to reject their own cultures and languages.
“The university was the only center, broadly speaking, of democratic expression.”Ngugi critiques the neo-colonial Kenyan regime’s repression of democratic spaces, highlighting the role of universities as potential hubs for free expression and resistance.
Suggested Readings: “The Commitment Of The Intellectual” by Ngugi wa Thiong’o

Books:

  1. Thiong’o, Ngugi wa. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann, 1986.
  2. Thiong’o, Ngugi wa. Writers in Politics: Essays. Heinemann, 1981.
  3. Achebe, Chinua. Hopes and Impediments: Selected Essays. Anchor Books, 1989.
  4. Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press, 1963.

Academic Articles:

  1. Ngugi wa Thiong’o. “The Commitment of the Intellectual.” Review of African Political Economy, no. 32, 1985, pp. 18–24. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4005703. Accessed 13 Sept. 2024.
  2. “Front Matter.” Review of African Political Economy, no. 32, 1985, pp. 105–105. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4005700. Accessed 13 Sept. 2024.
  3. Ochwada, Hannington. “African Studies: A Re-Assessment of Academic Tourism Since 1990.” Africa Development / Afrique et Développement, vol. 21, no. 4, 1996, pp. 123–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24482772. Accessed 13 Sept. 2024.
  4. Schatzberg, Michael G. “Two Faces of Kenya: The Researcher and the State.” African Studies Review, vol. 29, no. 4, 1986, pp. 1–15. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/524003. Accessed 13 Sept. 2024.

Websites:

  1. “Ngugi wa Thiong’o – Official Website.” Ngugi wa Thiong’o.
    https://www.ngugiwathiongo.com
  2. “The Marxist Roots of Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s Works.” Review of African Political Economy, ROAPE, 1985.http://roape.net/1985/09/03/the-commitment-of-the-intellectual/