Tag: Theory Article Summaries

1. The Geografictional Imperative in Canadian Literature

• Omhovère builds on Barbara Godard’s (2000) concept of the “geografictional imperative” in Canadian literature, suggesting that geography possesses an inherent artistic force that writers attempt to capture and translate into fiction.
• The study explores how geographical references, such as “fault line” or “moraine,” extend beyond their scientific meaning to acquire symbolic significance in literature (Omhovère, p. 345).

---

2. Geography as an Artistic and Symbolic Process

• Traditional literary geography focuses on how literature describes real-world geography, but Omhovère reverses this perspective by exploring how geographical elements shape narrative verisimilitude and symbolic meaning.
• The study questions how geography fills gaps in landscape writing, surpassing scientific accuracy and descriptive realism to become a form of artistic expression (Omhovère, p. 346).

---

3. The Perception of Space and its Cultural Mediation

• Drawing from James Turrell’s artistic experiments and René Magritte’s La Condition humaine, Omhovère argues that perception is not neutral but shaped by cultural conventions.
• The study applies Henri Maldiney’s distinction between sensation and perception, suggesting that landscape writing is a way to recover sensory experiences often obscured by representation (Omhovère, p. 347).

---

4. The Role of Landscape in Human Experience

• Landscape is not merely a visual object but a medium through which human subjectivity connects with the environment.
• Augustin Berque’s concept of the ecumene—the intersection of human culture and the environment—is central to this idea (Omhovère, p. 348).

---

5. The Western Tradition of Landscape Representation

• European languages often use the same word for landscape and its artistic representation, revealing how deeply culture mediates our understanding of space.
• In contrast, Indigenous languages such as Montagnais prioritize other sensory modes, demonstrating alternative ways of perceiving geography (Omhovère, p. 349).

---

6. Canadian Postmodernism and the Challenge to Spatial Hierarchies

• Canadian postmodern literature, influenced by historiographical metafiction, disrupts traditional spatial binaries such as center/margin and metropolis/hinterland.
• Linda Hutcheon (1988) argues that Canadian postmodernism self-consciously engages with both literary tradition and socio-political context, making it inherently political (Omhovère, p. 350).

---

7. The Role of Geography in Canadian National Identity

• Writers like George Bowering use geographic imagery to challenge colonial aesthetic values and question national identity.
• The use of the term locus instead of “setting” or “landscape” signals an attempt to move away from traditional literary conventions and instead focus on self-location (Omhovère, p. 351).

---

8. Geography as a Form of Topophilia

• Robert Kroetsch’s The Lovely Treachery of Words explores the intimate connection between geography and personal identity, using the phrase, “I wear geography next to my skin” (Omhovère, p. 352).
• The contrast between “place” and “space” in literature reflects tensions between local specificity and global abstraction.

---

9. The Evolution of Landscape Perception in Contemporary Literature

• Traditional notions of landscape as a framed, distanced view are replaced by phenomenological perspectives that emphasize bodily engagement and multi-sensory experience.
• Erwin Straus argues that landscape is not an object to be seen but an experience that envelops the perceiver, making it “invisible” in its full presence (Omhovère, p. 353).

---

10. The Limitations of Thematic Criticism in Literary Geography

• Omhovère critiques thematic criticism, which overemphasizes continuity and consensus in literature while ignoring dissent and innovation.
• She rejects geographical determinism, which assumes a rigid link between environment and cultural production (Omhovère, p. 354).

---

11. The Documentary Impulse in Canadian Literature

• The historiographical metafiction of Margaret Atwood, Robert Kroetsch, and Rudy Wiebe revisits colonial documents such as explorers’ journals to challenge historical narratives.
• In these works, geography is not merely descriptive but functions as a destabilizing force that questions imperial representations (Omhovère, p. 355).

---

12. Postcolonial Geography and Iterative Structures in Fiction

• Homi Bhabha’s concept of “third space” applies to Canadian literature, where the repetition of colonial geographic discourse creates ruptures that challenge its authority.
• Writers like Carol Shields, Jane Urquhart, and Michael Ondaatje use geography not for realism but to interrogate subjectivity and spatial representation (Omhovère, p. 356).

---

13. Robert Kroetsch’s Badlands and the Unwriting of Colonial Geography

• Badlands subverts traditional exploration narratives by fragmenting the colonial gaze.
• Scenes describing the Alberta badlands shift from structured European landscape descriptions to an ungraspable terrain, resisting assimilation into Western aesthetic conventions (Omhovère, p. 357).

---

14. Aritha van Herk’s Places Far From Ellesmere and Feminist Geography

• Van Herk’s geografictione explores how geography shapes female identity and challenges patriarchal literary traditions.
• Geography is depicted as an active force that shapes bodies and relationships, rather than a static backdrop (Omhovère, p. 358).

---

15. The Subversive Power of Geography in Contemporary Canadian Writing

• Writers like Shields, Wiebe, Kroetsch, and Ondaatje use geography to critique colonialism, cultural mediation, and artistic representation.
• Geography functions as both a documentary tool and a poetic device, reinforcing a unique spatial sensibility in Canadian literature (Omhovère, p. 359).

---

16. The Poetics of Geography as an Alternative to Thematic Analysis

• Rather than treating geography as a theme, Omhovère argues for its function as an aesthetic and symbolic force in literature.
• Terms from physical geography, such as “fault line” or “erosion,” are repurposed in fiction to evoke processes of cultural transformation and identity formation (Omhovère, p. 360).

---

17. The Role of Geography in the Canadian Literary Canon

• Geography is central to Canadian literary criticism, often invoked to explain the nation’s literary identity.
• However, this perspective risks reducing literature to a reflection of environment rather than recognizing its artistic and ideological complexity (Omhovère, p. 361).

---

18. The Impact of Geographical Representation on Reader Perception

• Literature configures readers’ experience of space, influencing their aesthetic and political understandings.
• Omhovère draws on Paul Ricoeur to argue that artistic representation, rather than simple mimesis, reconfigures reality (Omhovère, p. 362).

---

19. Geography and Genre: Fiction as an Act of World-Building

• Omhovère applies Steven Connor’s concept of “transitivity” to narrative, emphasizing that fiction not only reflects but also constructs new ways of experiencing space.
• Canadian literature uses geography to form alternative spatial imaginaries beyond colonial or nationalist frameworks (Omhovère, p. 363).

---

20. Conclusion: The Poetics of Geography as an Ongoing Inquiry

• Omhovère calls for a renewed focus on how geography functions as an artistic and epistemological tool in literature.
• Rather than merely mapping real-world spaces, Canadian fiction uses geography to challenge representation, identity, and history, forming a “poetics of geography” that remains a rich field for literary exploration (Omhovère, p. 364).

Main Ideas:

• Comparative Literature vs. History:
  • Gould critiques the disparity between history and comparative literature regarding global representation.
  • She notes that “history has proven more capable than literature of reversing the Eurocentric trend,” while comparative literature remains largely Eurocentric. (p.170)
  • History has incorporated non-European narratives effectively, but comparative literature is “fundamentally limited to Western Europe” (Moretti 2000, 54).
• Eurocentrism in Comparative Literature:
  • Comparative literature has not achieved the global reach envisioned by Goethe.
  • Eurocentric biases in comparative literature are evident in anthologies like the Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism (NATC), where “less than one hundred pages are devoted to non-European literary-theoretical traditions.” (p.174)
  • Historical inquiry tends to be more inclusive and “addresses itself empirically to the entire world,” unlike comparative literature, which remains mostly Western-centric. (p.172)
• Institutional and Disciplinary Bias:
  • The structure of academia privileges history over literature when studying non-European cultures. Universities hire scholars of non-European history rather than non-European literature. (p.172-173)
  • Even within European institutions, comparative literature departments primarily focus on European languages, with little representation of non-European literatures. (p.173)
• Genre Criticism and Its Exclusion of Non-European Traditions:
  • Western genre criticism, such as Fowler’s Kinds of Literature (1982), assumes the irrelevance of non-European literary traditions. (p.168)
  • Fowler’s lineage of genre studies moves from Aristotle to Sidney, “eliding all contributions from non-European literary traditions during the intervening millennium.” (p.168)
  • Islamic poetics, including Al-Jurjani’s work on takhyil (imagination), is ignored in dominant Western theories, despite its relevance to literary discourse. (p.169)
• The Concept of the ‘Untranslatable’ in Comparative Literature:
  • Theories of untranslatability, as advanced by Spivak and Apter, dominate comparative literature, but they may unintentionally reinforce Eurocentrism. (p.171)
  • If comparative literature privileges the ‘untranslatable,’ it risks limiting its scope to what is already translated and therefore remains Eurocentric. (p.171)
• Colonialism and Internalized Eurocentrism in Literary Studies:
  • Prominent Arab and Middle Eastern scholars, such as Taha Hussein, “internalized colonial perspectives,” identifying their own traditions primarily with European intellectual heritage. (p.170)
  • Hussein, for example, claimed that “Egypt had regular, peaceful, and mutually beneficial relations only with the Near East and Greece,” disregarding the deep influence of Persian and Islamic civilizations. (p.170)
  • This Eurocentric approach affects the way non-European literatures are studied within their own regions.
• Area Studies and Its Limitations:
  • While area studies have provided a space for non-European literatures, they often treat literature as secondary to historical and political contexts. (p.173)
  • Area studies are more historically than literarily oriented, meaning literary studies outside of Europe remain marginalized. (p.173)
• Canonization and the Exclusion of Non-European Theories:
  • The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism (NATC) reinforces Western dominance by selecting non-European theorists only when they engage with European frameworks.
  • Adunis, Karatani Ko-jin, Zehou Li, and C. D. Narasimhaiah are included in NATC primarily because they “illuminate Western perspectives and traditions.” (p.175)
  • There is little to no representation of premodern non-European literary theory in the major anthologies. (p.175)
• Challenges for Comparative Literature in a Global Context:
  • Comparative literature in North America and Europe is declining, while it is thriving in the Arab world.
  • Scholars in Middle Eastern and Persian studies engage with comparative literature in a way that “challenges Eurocentric biases and incorporates non-Western methodologies.” (p.180)
  • Muhammad Ghunaymi Hilal, a leading figure in Arab comparative literature, contributed significantly by studying Arab-Persian literary relations, which counters the Eurocentric model of literary studies. (p.180)
• Moving Beyond European-Centric Comparison:
  • Comparative literature must break free from its Western-centered model by integrating global literary theories and traditions.
  • The discipline should learn from history’s methodological inclusivity and expand beyond its current Euro-American focus. (p.183)
  • By decolonizing comparative literature and embracing the broader literary traditions of the world, the discipline can be revitalized. (p.184)

Conclusion:

Gould calls for a fundamental restructuring of comparative literature to move beyond its Eurocentric limitations. She argues that the discipline must integrate non-European literary traditions on their own terms rather than through the lens of Western theoretical frameworks. By adopting the methodological inclusivity of history and area studies while maintaining a focus on literary analysis, comparative literature can evolve into a truly global discipline.

1. Postcolonial Literary Theory

• Critique of Eurocentrism in Comparative Literature
  • Gould highlights how comparative literature remains largely Eurocentric, in contrast to history, which has become more inclusive of non-European perspectives.
  • “Comparative investigations into the meaning and substance of literary knowledge are absent from most major scholarly journals concerned with non-European literary traditions.” (p.167)
• Internalized Colonialism in Non-European Scholarship
  • She examines how scholars from colonized regions have often adopted European literary frameworks at the expense of their own traditions.
  • “Taha Hussein’s efforts to purge Egypt’s cultural heritage of all non-European ancestries and to graft onto it a European genealogy is profoundly entangled with the legacies of colonial hegemony.” (p.170)
• Calls for a Decolonization of Literary Studies
  • Advocates for a shift away from Eurocentric paradigms and the integration of non-European texts and methodologies.
  • “There is no intrinsic link between comparativist readings of European texts and the encounter with subaltern knowledge.” (p.182)

---

2. Comparative Literature Theory

• Critique of the Institutional Biases in Comparative Literature
  • Gould argues that comparative literature departments have failed to move beyond European traditions, despite the discipline’s supposed global nature.
  • “Few Comparative Literature departments in research universities across the country have full-time faculty in non-European languages.” (p.172)
• Encouragement of Non-European Literary Theories
  • Calls for the inclusion of classical Arabo-Persian literary theories, such as takhyīl (imagination), to enrich comparative literature.
  • “Al-Jurjani’s defense of poetic imagery in the Qur’an, and his proposal that the study of pre-Islamic poetry was a necessary prelude to understanding the Qur’an, interestingly dovetails with Sir Philip Sydney’s Defense of Poesy.” (p.169)
• Reassessment of Canon Formation in Comparative Literature
  • Criticizes the limited geographical and temporal scope of canonical anthologies like The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism.
  • “Out of over three thousand pages of text, less than one hundred are devoted to non-European literary-theoretical traditions.” (p.174)

---

3. Translation Studies and Untranslatability Theory

• Examines the Role of the “Untranslatable” in Comparative Literature
  • Discusses how the concept of “untranslatability” limits the scope of comparative literature.
  • “The untranslatable has been framed as the object and goal of comparative literary studies… If comparative literary studies must privilege the untranslatable, then where does that leave the discipline’s imperative to compare?” (p.171)
• Argues that Comparative Literature Over-Relies on Already Translated Texts
  • Highlights how the discipline often depends on translations, which affects its epistemic reach.
  • “If the untranslatable is the necessary (or ideal) point of departure for comparative literature, then it follows that the discipline is best off basing itself on what has already been translated.” (p.171)

---

4. Literary Historiography and World Literature Theory

• Challenges the Temporal Bias in Literary Studies
  • Points out that many literary theories exclude non-European texts and medieval non-Western contributions.
  • “Fowler’s normative trajectory…leads directly from Aristotle to Sir Philip Sidney, eliding all contributions from non-European literary traditions during the intervening millennium.” (p.168)
• Critique of Presentism in Literary Theory
  • Argues that literary studies prioritize modern theories at the expense of historical diversity.
  • “The editorial policy of privileging the contemporary at the expense of the past perhaps stemmed from a reasonable desire to make the inclusion of still-living theorists an anthological priority.” (p.176)
• Advocates for a More Inclusive World Literature Model
  • Calls for a return to Goethe’s vision of Weltliteratur that is truly global, rather than Eurocentric.
  • “Goethe’s concept of world literature sought to transcend national boundaries, yet comparative literature has failed to achieve this vision.” (p.174)

---

5. Subaltern Studies and the Role of Marginalized Voices in Literary Theory

• Emphasizes the Role of Non-European Scholars in Expanding the Archive
  • Points out that while historians like Ranajit Guha have extended the archive of subaltern voices, literary studies have lagged behind.
  • “Guha’s work has substantially extended the historical archive, something yet to be done in comparative literature.” (p.177)
• Highlights the Need for Non-European Comparative Literary Approaches
  • Discusses how Arab and Persian scholars are developing new comparative frameworks outside of the Western model.
  • “Even as Spivak presides over the ‘death of a discipline’ in the Euro-American context, scholars from the Arab and Persian world are learning to approach their literary pasts in ways informed by European methodologies but not subordinate to them.” (p.180)

---

6. Canon Formation and Literary Pedagogy

• Exposes the Structural Barriers to the Inclusion of Non-European Literary Traditions
  • Argues that non-European literary traditions are sidelined not just in research but also in pedagogy.
  • “At Middle Eastern universities, comparative studies are commonly situated in English literature departments, making fluency in English a prerequisite for comparativism.” (p.172)
• Critique of Western-Centric Anthologies
  • Points out that even when non-European theorists are included, they are framed in relation to Western theory.
  • “For each of these inclusions, the merit of the text is gauged by the extent of its interaction with Kant, Marx, Eliot, Leavis, or with foundational issues in the Continental and Anglophone literary-critical traditions.” (p.176)

---

Conclusion: Gould’s Call for a Reorientation of Literary Theory

Rebecca Gould’s The Geography of Comparative Literature makes a strong case for rethinking literary theory through a more globally inclusive lens. By exposing the Eurocentric biases in comparative literature, translation studies, and canon formation, she urges scholars to broaden their methodologies and incorporate non-European traditions more meaningfully. Her work aligns with postcolonial theory, subaltern studies, and world literature while offering a unique critique of how institutional structures limit the comparative scope of literary studies.

1. Overemphasis on Eurocentrism Without Providing Concrete Alternatives

• While Gould effectively critiques Eurocentrism in comparative literature, she does not provide a clear roadmap for restructuring the discipline beyond calling for the inclusion of non-European traditions.
• Critics argue that her approach focuses on dismantling existing structures rather than proposing a practical methodology for incorporating non-European literary theories.
• Limited Engagement with Non-Western Theorists

• Although Gould advocates for the inclusion of non-European literary traditions, she largely references Western scholars such as Moretti, Chakrabarty, and Spivak, rather than extensively engaging with primary sources from non-Western traditions.
• Some critics believe that her work could be stronger if she engaged directly with untranslated non-Western theoretical texts instead of relying on their reception in Western academia.
• Generalization of Comparative Literature’s Institutional Structure

• Gould critiques American and European comparative literature departments for their lack of diversity in literary traditions, but her argument assumes a uniform structure across all institutions.
• Scholars have pointed out that many comparative literature programs in non-Western countries (e.g., in China, India, and the Arab world) have already embraced a more global perspective, making her critique less universally applicable.
• Binary Oppositions Between Literature and History

• Gould presents history as more successful than comparative literature in overcoming Eurocentrism. However, critics argue that this creates an artificial dichotomy between the two disciplines.
• Some scholars believe that comparative literature has also made significant strides in decolonizing its methodologies, and history itself is still affected by Eurocentric narratives.
• Neglect of Linguistic Barriers in Expanding the Comparative Field

• While advocating for global inclusivity in literary studies, Gould does not address the practical challenge of linguistic accessibility.
• The need for scholars to acquire multiple linguistic competencies remains a significant barrier in expanding comparative literature beyond European traditions, yet this issue is largely overlooked in her argument.
• Assumption that Literary Studies Must Follow the Model of History

• Gould frequently argues that comparative literature should learn from history’s approach to global scholarship, yet some argue that literature and history have fundamentally different methodologies.
• Critics question whether literary studies should be expected to adopt the same archival and empirical methods as history, rather than developing its own comparative frameworks.
• Neglect of Modern Postcolonial and World Literature Approaches

• Postcolonial studies and world literature have already expanded the field of comparative literature to include non-European traditions, yet Gould largely critiques outdated models without fully acknowledging contemporary shifts.
• Scholars such as David Damrosch, Aamir Mufti, and Pheng Cheah have contributed to world literature studies that address many of the issues she raises, making her critique seem somewhat retrospective rather than forward-looking.
• Idealization of the Non-European Perspective Without Examining Internal Biases

• While advocating for the inclusion of non-European traditions, Gould does not critically engage with the internal biases and exclusions that exist within non-European literary cultures themselves.
• For instance, Arabic and Persian literary traditions have their own hierarchical structures that marginalize certain voices (e.g., subaltern, indigenous, or gendered perspectives), which her argument does not fully address.
• Lack of Discussion on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Comparative Literature

• Modern comparative literature has increasingly embraced interdisciplinary approaches (e.g., cultural studies, digital humanities, and media studies), yet Gould focuses primarily on textual and archival comparisons.
• Some scholars argue that a more interdisciplinary perspective would help comparative literature evolve in a global direction rather than solely following historical methods.
• Ambiguous Definition of the “Geography” in Comparative Literature

• The article critiques the Western-centered geography of comparative literature, but does not clearly define how literary geography should be restructured.
• While Gould suggests expanding to non-European traditions, she does not engage with how geographical concepts (e.g., border studies, migration studies) might reshape comparative literature in practice.

---

Summary of Key Criticisms:

✅ Strengths: Raises important issues about Eurocentrism in comparative literature, highlights overlooked literary traditions, and calls for more inclusivity.
❌ Weaknesses: Lacks concrete solutions, generalizes institutional structures, and does not fully acknowledge contemporary global shifts in literary studies.

Feminist Geography as an Emerging Field

• Kennedy introduces feminist geography as a developing discipline that challenges traditional geographic thought by incorporating gendered perspectives.
• She argues that geography has historically been shaped by patriarchal norms that exclude women’s spatial experiences.
• Feminist geography seeks to “put women back into the equations of understanding and mapping our world” (Kennedy, 2004, p. 79).
• She emphasizes that geography is not neutral but instead reflects the “socially created gender structure of society” (p. 79).

Gendered Language and Landscape Perception

• Kennedy discusses how exploration and geographic discourse are embedded with gendered language.
• She cites Annette Kolodny’s The Lay of the Land (1975), which argues that land has often been metaphorically feminized, portrayed as passive and awaiting male conquest.
• The terminology used in caving and exploration, such as referring to cave passages as “virgin” and caves as “wombs,” reinforces patriarchal conceptualizations of space (p. 79).
• This gendered framing affects not only how land is perceived but also how it is treated, leading to exploitative relationships between humans and nature.

Historical Exclusion of Women in Geography

• Kennedy highlights the historical marginalization of women in geography and cartography.
• She references the Royal Geographical Society’s refusal to grant women full membership until 1913, despite their contributions to exploration and travel writing (p. 82).
• Women geographers and explorers, such as Isabella Bird Bishop and Gertrude Bell, were often dismissed, even though their work significantly advanced the field.
• Kennedy cites Morag Bell and Cheryl McEwan’s research on how women’s involvement in geographic exploration was systematically ignored (p. 82).

Feminist Geography and Literary Analysis

• Kennedy argues for applying feminist geography to literature, as both fields examine representations of space and power.
• She notes that feminist geography “has rarely been applied to literary analysis” (p. 80) but believes it can offer new insights.
• Using feminist geography to analyze literature can expose hidden gendered structures and create a more interdisciplinary academic approach.

Ursula K. Le Guin’s Sur as a Case Study

• Kennedy applies feminist geography to Ursula K. Le Guin’s short story Sur, which reimagines exploration through a feminist perspective.
• The story follows a secret expedition of South American women who reach the South Pole before the famous male explorers but leave no record of their achievement.
• Unlike traditional male explorers, who claim land and seek recognition, the women in Sur embark on their journey for self-discovery.
• Kennedy highlights how their refusal to plant a flag or claim credit challenges the patriarchal narrative of exploration (p. 84).

Critique of Traditional Mapping Methods

• Kennedy argues that maps are not objective representations of reality but instead tools of power.
• She cites J.B. Harley, who asserts that maps are “instruments of state policy and an instrument of sovereignty” (p. 81).
• Feminist geography encourages critical map reading, questioning what is included, omitted, and how names reflect gendered hierarchies.
• In Sur, the women playfully name landmarks rather than imposing rigid, authoritative place names (p. 85).

Women’s Connection to Landscape and Self-Discovery

• Kennedy contrasts Sur with traditional male exploration narratives, arguing that women’s relationship with the landscape is based on connection rather than conquest.
• She references Mona Domosh and Joni Seager, who found that women travelers often focus on personal and emotional responses to landscapes rather than territorial claims (p. 86).
• In Sur, the protagonist describes Antarctica as a place of belonging, writing, “I felt that I was home at last” (Le Guin, qtd. in Kennedy, p. 86).
• This reflects a feminist reimagining of space, where landscape is not something to be conquered but something to be experienced.

Feminist Geography and Ecofeminism

• Kennedy highlights the overlap between feminist geography and ecofeminism, both of which critique how patriarchal societies exploit both women and nature.
• She cites Patrick Murphy, who describes a “two-pronged rape and domination of the earth and the women who live on it” (p. 79).
• In Sur, the contrast between the women’s respectful approach to the Antarctic landscape and the wasteful destruction left by male explorers reinforces ecofeminist critiques of environmental exploitation (p. 86).

Future Directions for Feminist Geography

• Kennedy emphasizes the growing importance of feminist geography in academia and activism.
• She highlights recent feminist geographic research on women’s mobility in cities, labor market conditions, and housing accessibility (p. 79).
• She also notes that despite progress, women remain underrepresented in geographic disciplines such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) (p. 87).

Conclusion: Expanding the Boundaries of Literary and Geographic Studies

• Kennedy calls for a more interdisciplinary approach that integrates feminist geography into literary analysis.
• She argues that literature instructors should not hesitate to “go off-road” and incorporate feminist geographic perspectives into their teaching (p. 88).
• She ultimately advocates for a more inclusive approach to geography and literature, recognizing and valuing women’s perspectives on space and place.

1. Feminist Literary Theory

• Definition: Feminist literary theory examines how gender roles, power structures, and patriarchal ideologies influence literature. It critiques male-dominated narratives and explores how literature represents women’s experiences.
• Kennedy’s Contribution:
  • Kennedy applies feminist theory to geographic discourse, arguing that landscapes are often feminized and objectified, reinforcing male dominance.
  • She critiques the absence of women in traditional exploration narratives, stating that “landscape is often viewed as passive, fertile, and ripe” for male conquest (p. 79).
  • She uses Sur as an example of how feminist literature can challenge traditional narratives by placing women in roles historically reserved for men. The women in Sur reject hierarchical leadership and conquest-driven exploration (p. 84).
• Theoretical Implication:
  • Her approach broadens feminist literary theory by incorporating spatial and environmental analysis, reinforcing the idea that literature does not exist in isolation from physical geography.
  • It aligns with Elaine Showalter’s theory of the female tradition, which argues that women have historically produced their own literary narratives but have been excluded from mainstream literary history (Showalter, 1977).
  • Kennedy supports this idea, emphasizing that feminist geography allows for “reading against the grain” to uncover women’s overlooked contributions to space and literature (p. 86).

---

2. Ecocriticism (Ecofeminism as a Subfield)

• Definition: Ecocriticism examines the relationship between literature and the environment, while ecofeminism specifically explores how the exploitation of nature parallels the oppression of women.
• Kennedy’s Contribution:
  • She discusses how patriarchal societies have historically justified the domination of both nature and women through similar language and metaphors (p. 79).
  • She references Patrick Murphy’s observation that the environment and women are subjected to a “two-pronged rape and domination” under patriarchal ideology (p. 79).
  • In Sur, the contrast between the women’s respectful engagement with Antarctica and the destruction left by male explorers highlights ecofeminist themes (p. 86).
• Theoretical Implication:
  • Kennedy extends Cheryll Glotfelty’s foundational ecocritical argument that literature shapes and reflects human relationships with nature.
  • Her work aligns with Val Plumwood’s ecofeminist theory, which critiques the Western tradition of separating culture (male) from nature (female) and argues for a more integrated, non-hierarchical approach to the environment.
  • By linking feminist geography with ecofeminism, Kennedy provides a cross-disciplinary lens to analyze literature’s treatment of both gender and environment.

---

3. Postcolonial Literary Theory

• Definition: Postcolonial literary theory examines how colonialism has shaped literature, particularly in the representation of power, space, and cultural identity. It often critiques the Eurocentric perspective in exploration narratives.
• Kennedy’s Contribution:
  • She discusses how third-world feminists and postcolonial scholars critique traditional mapping and spatial hierarchies (p. 80).
  • She highlights how colonial exploration narratives often erase indigenous and female perspectives, reinforcing European male dominance over land and people.
  • In Sur, the women’s decision to leave no mark on the landscape contrasts with colonial practices of naming and claiming territories (p. 85).
• Theoretical Implication:
  • Kennedy’s argument aligns with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s concept of the subaltern, which examines how marginalized voices—especially women in postcolonial contexts—are silenced in dominant narratives (Spivak, 1988).
  • Her critique of male-centric exploration literature parallels Edward Said’s analysis of how Western texts construct non-Western spaces as passive, reinforcing imperialist ideologies (Orientalism, 1978).
  • By applying postcolonial perspectives to feminist geography, Kennedy expands postcolonial theory to include spatial and environmental critiques.

---

4. Deconstruction and Poststructuralist Literary Theory

• Definition: Deconstruction, introduced by Jacques Derrida, argues that meaning in texts is unstable and shaped by power relations. Poststructuralist theory questions traditional binaries and dominant narratives.
• Kennedy’s Contribution:
  • She applies Derridean deconstruction to maps, arguing that they are not neutral representations of reality but rhetorical constructs that reflect political and social hierarchies (p. 81).
  • She states that maps “construct a mythic geography,” reinforcing dominant ideologies through the selection, omission, and classification of space (p. 81).
  • She analyzes how Sur disrupts traditional binary oppositions (male/female, explorer/nature, conqueror/conquered) by presenting a non-hierarchical approach to exploration (p. 85).
• Theoretical Implication:
  • Her critique of maps aligns with J.B. Harley’s argument that cartography is a form of discourse that perpetuates state and colonial power (Harley, 1992).
  • She extends poststructuralist literary theory by demonstrating how spatial discourse—like literary texts—is shaped by ideology and can be deconstructed.

---

5. Spatial Literary Criticism

• Definition: Spatial literary criticism examines how space and geography influence narrative structures, themes, and characters. It intersects with feminist geography in analyzing gendered spatial experiences.
• Kennedy’s Contribution:
  • She emphasizes how literature constructs and reinforces spatial hierarchies, arguing that literary texts can be read as geographic texts (p. 80).
  • She applies Henri Lefebvre’s theory of spatial production, which argues that space is socially and politically constructed, not merely a passive backdrop to human activity.
  • She critiques how women’s mobility has historically been restricted in both literature and real life, citing how urban planning has reinforced gender hierarchies (p. 79).
• Theoretical Implication:
  • Kennedy contributes to the growing field of literary geography, aligning with theorists like Yi-Fu Tuan and Michel de Certeau, who analyze how literature shapes spatial perceptions.
  • She extends Doreen Massey’s feminist spatial theory, which argues that space is not neutral but actively shaped by gendered power relations.

---

Conclusion: Expanding Literary Theory Through Feminist Geography

Kennedy’s work makes a significant contribution to multiple literary theories by integrating feminist geography into literary analysis. Her interdisciplinary approach:

1. Challenges traditional feminist literary criticism by incorporating spatial analysis.
2. Strengthens ecocritical and ecofeminist discussions by linking gender and environmental exploitation.
3. Broadens postcolonial literary theory to include geographic critiques of colonial exploration.
4. Applies deconstruction and poststructuralist theory to mapping and spatial narratives.
5. Advances spatial literary criticism by demonstrating how literature constructs gendered spaces.

1. Limited Engagement with Non-Western Feminist Geography

• Kennedy primarily references Western feminist geographic discourse, with limited exploration of non-Western and Indigenous spatial theories.
• Although she acknowledges third-world feminists (p. 80), she does not fully integrate their perspectives or methodologies.
• Critics might argue that her approach centers Euro-American feminist perspectives, potentially marginalizing global feminist geography movements that emphasize localized, decolonized spatial understandings.

2. Oversimplification of Feminist Geography’s Relationship with Literature

• While Kennedy argues that feminist geography can be fruitfully applied to literary studies (p. 80), she does not fully engage with how literary representations of space differ from real-world geography.
• Some scholars might critique her for treating literature as a direct reflection of spatial realities, rather than acknowledging the fictional, symbolic, and constructed nature of literary spaces.
• A more nuanced discussion of how narrative spaces function differently from physical geographies would strengthen her argument.

3. Overreliance on Ecofeminism

• Kennedy integrates ecofeminist perspectives (p. 79), particularly in her discussion of gendered landscapes and nature as feminine, but she does not sufficiently address critiques of ecofeminism.
• Scholars such as Stacy Alaimo and Karen Warren have critiqued ecofeminism for essentializing women’s connection to nature, reinforcing traditional gender roles rather than challenging them.
• Kennedy’s argument could benefit from a discussion of alternative feminist environmental perspectives, such as new materialism or posthumanist ecocriticism.

4. Lack of Engagement with Class and Economic Geography

• Kennedy emphasizes gendered space but does not sufficiently explore how class and economic structures intersect with geography.
• Feminist economic geographers have examined how poverty, labor conditions, and urban planning disproportionately affect women—areas that Kennedy only briefly mentions (p. 79).
• A more intersectional approach, integrating Marxist feminism or feminist labor geography, could have deepened her analysis.

5. Idealization of Sur as a Feminist Exploration Narrative

• Kennedy presents Ursula K. Le Guin’s Sur as a subversive alternative to patriarchal exploration narratives (p. 84), but some critics might argue that it romanticizes female exploration rather than truly challenging power structures.
• The story’s refusal to claim space or leave a mark can be seen as reinforcing the idea that women must remain invisible in historical narratives rather than reclaiming agency.
• A more critical reading of Sur might question whether it offers a radical feminist alternative or simply reinforces women’s exclusion from geographic discourse.

6. Lack of Concrete Methodology for Applying Feminist Geography to Literature

• While Kennedy argues for using feminist geography as a literary analytical tool (p. 80), she does not provide a clear methodology for doing so.
• She offers examples and theoretical connections, but a more structured framework for applying spatial analysis to literary texts would make her argument more practical for literary scholars.
• A stronger theoretical bridge between feminist geography and literary studies would improve the interdisciplinary approach she advocates.

7. Insufficient Critique of Traditional Geographic Thought

• Kennedy critiques cartographic silence and patriarchal mapping (p. 81), but she does not fully deconstruct mainstream geographic epistemology.
• She assumes that feminist geography is merely an addition to traditional geography, rather than exploring how geography itself might need a more radical restructuring.
• Critics might argue that her analysis remains too embedded within the existing disciplinary framework, rather than pushing for a more transformative, decolonized approach to spatial theory.

1. Text as a Spatial Event

• Hones argues that reading and writing are spatial, geographical events occurring in a specific context. This perspective moves beyond traditional reader-response theory by emphasizing how a text “happens” in space and time (p. 1302).
• “Our shared text event is happening now in place and time, at the intersection of all these things” (p. 1302).
• The reading of a text is a dynamic, relational act influenced by social, technological, and environmental factors, including the reader’s physical surroundings and social context.

2. Multiplicity of Interpretation in Literary Geography

• Literary geography benefits from an openness to multiple interpretations, recognizing that different readings arise based on varied social and spatial contexts.
• “Fictional text events are not only relational by nature and generated within social contexts to start with, but further only become publicly accessible when subsequently articulated within the mediating context of a particular social situation” (p. 1303).
• The multiplicity of literary geography accommodates varying interpretations rather than seeking a single definitive understanding.

3. Defining Literary Geography: Between Discipline and Subject Matter

• There has been an ongoing debate about whether literary geography is a distinct discipline or simply a methodological approach.
• Some scholars see geography and literature as separate fields, while others view them as interconnected texts that shape and inform each other.
• “Geography and literature [are] not as the conjunction of two essentially distinct, coherent disciplines, but as a field of textual genres – the novel, the poem, the travel guide, the map, and the regional monograph” (p. 1304).

4. Academic Divergence: Textual Analysis vs. Material Practices

• The field of literary geography has split into two main approaches:
  1. Textual Analysis: Close readings of texts using literary theory.
  2. Material Practices: Examining how texts are produced, disseminated, and consumed in the public sphere.
• “A gap appears to be opening up in literary geography between… ever more complex readings of the meanings of texts, spaces, and their conjunctions, and studies of the geographies of production and dissemination and embodied practices of reading and writing” (p. 1307).

5. Overcoming Disciplinary Boundaries

• A major challenge in literary geography is the disciplinary divide between geography and literary studies, as each field has different audiences, terminologies, and methodologies.
• Literary scholars incorporate geographical concepts but rarely engage with geographers’ work on literature, and vice versa.
• “Disciplinary differences – differences in purpose, context, vocabulary, and authorial audience – thus inhibit the development of ‘a genuinely interdisciplinary field’” (p. 1308).
• Hones suggests that recognizing academic criticism as one form of public interpretation could bridge these divides.

6. Location of Meaning in Texts

• There is no single, stable meaning within a text; instead, meaning emerges from interactions between author, reader, and context.
• Literary geography aligns with theories of place as relational and dynamic.
• “Schweickart and Flynn (2004) suggest that… the text is not a container of stable, objective meaning, that the reader is a producer of meaning, and that readings are necessarily various” (p. 1310).

7. Reading Across Borders in Literary Geography

• The organization of literary geography into categories such as author, text, and genre limits interdisciplinary connections.
• Conventional categorization hinders broader collaborations across different aspects of literary geography.
• “The potential development of a collaborative community in literary geography has been seriously inhibited by the fact that it is both easy and conventional to organize work in this way” (p. 1313).

8. Literary Geography as a Collaborative Field

• Hones advocates for a broader and more inclusive approach to literary geography that acknowledges differences in academic practice while fostering productive collaboration.
• “By taking responsibility for the production of meaning as readers, while abandoning the illusion of control as writers, literary geographers working together across the spectrum of the field could collaboratively generate a productive sense of community” (p. 1314).

Conclusion: Towards a Spatial Understanding of Texts

• By viewing texts as spatial and relational events, literary geography can evolve into a more cohesive field.
• Scholars must recognize the diverse contexts in which meaning is produced and interpreted.
• “The process of identifying more clearly the various but overlapping spatial contexts and communities within which readings are not only generated and shared but also assessed… should make it easier to accept contrasting approaches” (p. 1314).

1. Reader-Response Theory

• Hones extends reader-response theory by emphasizing the spatial and contextual nature of reading, arguing that texts are not static but emerge through interactions between readers, writers, and their environments.
• “The idea of text as event – that a text ‘happens’ when read – is well established in literary studies, particularly in the fields of reader-response and reception” (p. 1302).
• She builds on the work of Machor and Goldstein (2001) and Schweickart and Flynn (2004) but critiques the tendency to overlook the geographical dimensions of reading experiences.

2. Spatial Theory (Doreen Massey’s Concept of Space)

• Hones applies Doreen Massey’s theory of space to literary texts, suggesting that literary meaning is relational, dynamic, and produced through spatial interactions.
• “The event of text, too, can be articulated in explicitly spatial terms as ‘the coming together of the previously unrelated, a constellation of processes rather than a thing’ (Massey 2005, 141)” (p. 1311).
• She conceptualizes reading as a geographical practice, positioning texts as spatial events rather than static objects.

3. Intertextuality and Literary Geography

• Hones advances the study of intertextuality by integrating literary geography, showing that texts exist within spatial and social networks that shape their interpretation.
• “A wide range of mutually informative geographical work with literary texts is currently being produced in the context of radically different disciplinary conversations, for different purposes, and in different academic and social contexts” (p. 1304).
• She builds on poststructuralist ideas of textual interconnectedness (Kristeva, Barthes) and applies them to spatial reading practices.

4. The Sociology of Literature (Bourdieu’s Field Theory)

• Hones aligns with Bourdieu’s field theory by emphasizing the role of institutional and social contexts in shaping literary meaning.
• “What kinds of interpretation are considered appropriate? How is disagreement managed? How is originality assessed and how much is it valued?” (p. 1308).
• She argues that interpretations of texts are not universal but emerge within specific academic, cultural, and geographical fields.

5. Postcolonial Literary Criticism

• Hones contributes to postcolonial approaches by highlighting the geographies of literary production and reception, showing how literary texts are embedded in global power structures and material geographies.
• “Disciplinary differences – differences in purpose, context, vocabulary, and authorial audience – thus inhibit the development of ‘a genuinely interdisciplinary field’” (p. 1309).
• Her analysis parallels Edward Said’s Orientalism (1978) by showing how literary texts are shaped by spatialized power relations.

6. Performance Studies and Performativity

• She integrates performativity theory into literary geography by arguing that reading and writing are performative acts shaped by spatial and social contexts.
• “By understanding the significance of the context of knowledge production in these terms, and accepting the extent to which academic performances are always embedded in ‘a contextually specific process of social negotiation’” (p. 1309, citing Thrift 1996, 8).
• This builds on the work of Judith Butler’s performativity theory but applies it to literary reception and criticism.

7. Ecocriticism and Materiality of Reading

• Hones contributes to ecocriticism by emphasizing the material conditions of reading (e.g., book formats, digital screens, physical spaces).
• “The physical words on the page are involved: the text, the font, the layout, the page, and the screen. Writing and reading technologies are part of it, too” (p. 1302).
• This aligns with material ecocriticism, which examines how texts interact with physical environments and technologies.

8. Cultural Geography and the Literary Imagination

• Hones bridges literary theory and cultural geography, arguing that literature actively produces geographical knowledge and spatial imaginaries.
• “Texts are shaped by their production and dissemination in different geographical and cultural contexts” (p. 1307).
• She extends the work of Livingstone (2005) and Keighren (2006) on the geographies of reading and book history.

1. Overemphasis on Spatial Event at the Expense of Textual Structure

• Critics argue that Hones’ focus on the geographical event of reading diminishes the role of traditional narrative structure, plot, and literary techniques in shaping meaning.
• By shifting the emphasis to the social and spatial contexts of reading, the intrinsic literary aesthetics of the text may be overlooked.

2. Insufficient Engagement with Authorial Intent

• The argument that texts are created through interaction rather than authorial design (p. 1302) challenges conventional literary theories that emphasize authorial control over meaning.
• Some critics argue that disregarding the author’s intent may lead to overly relativistic readings, where any interpretation is equally valid.

3. Limited Consideration of Power and Ideology in Space

• While Hones acknowledges that texts are shaped by social and cultural contexts, her work does not extensively engage with postcolonial, feminist, or Marxist critiques of space.
• The role of power dynamics in shaping spatial meaning (e.g., how colonialism influences spatial reading practices) is underdeveloped.

4. Theoretical Complexity and Accessibility Issues

• The article is highly theoretical and abstract, making it challenging for literary scholars unfamiliar with geography to fully engage with its concepts.
• The dense discussion of spatiality, mediation, and performativity may alienate readers who are accustomed to more text-centered literary criticism.

5. Disconnection from Reader-Response Theories

• While Hones builds on reader-response theory, she diverges by prioritizing spatial interaction over cognitive or emotional reader experiences.
• Some scholars argue that personal, psychological, and subjective elements of reading are just as crucial as spatial ones but receive little attention in her framework.

6. Limited Application to All Literary Genres

• The focus on spatial production of text meaning works well for modernist and postmodern narratives but may be less applicable to classical literature, poetry, or experimental texts where spatial interaction is less central.
• The method might struggle to account for works that are highly abstract, surreal, or non-narrative in nature.

7. Lack of Empirical Evidence for Readerly Spatial Interaction

• Hones assumes that reading is always a geographical event, but she provides little empirical data (e.g., reader surveys, ethnographic studies) to support this claim.
• The extent to which actual readers experience texts as spatial interactions remains speculative rather than demonstrated through evidence.

1. The Centrality of Space, Place, and Time in Geography

• Lawton emphasizes that geography is fundamentally about answering three essential questions: “Where is it? Why is it there? What follows from it being there?” (Lawton, 1983, p. 193).
• Despite evolving methodologies, the concepts of location, spatial relationships, human-environment interactions, and temporal change remain crucial to geographical inquiry.
• Geography has undergone shifts from positivism in the 1960s to incorporating humanistic, phenomenological, and Marxist perspectives (Lawton, 1983, p. 193).

2. Geography as an Essential Discipline

• Geography remains relevant because it deals with “man’s use of and relationships to the habitable earth” and the ways humans modify their environments (Lawton, 1983, p. 193).
• The subject is both a scientific and humanistic discipline, engaging with “hard” and “soft” methodologies (Lawton, 1983, p. 194).
• There is concern over the fragmentation of geography as a discipline, but its holistic nature enables it to address contemporary issues such as environmental change and spatial inequality (Lawton, 1983, p. 194).

3. The Interrelationship of Space, Place, and Time

• Lawton highlights that “only space and time make existence possible” (Lawton, 1983, p. 196), illustrating how geography inherently links spatial and temporal dimensions.
• Geography operates on different scales, from the micro (individual spaces) to the macro (global patterns) (Lawton, 1983, p. 195).
• The integration of spatial and temporal analysis is crucial to understanding both natural and human-induced changes in landscapes and societies (Lawton, 1983, p. 196).

4. The Evolution of Spatial Analysis in Geography

• Spatial structures became a focus in geography during the 1950s and 1960s, leading to studies on “location, interaction and flow” (Lawton, 1983, p. 197).
• However, despite theoretical advancements, Lawton argues that geography has not developed a “single, well-developed conceptual and methodological framework for spatial analysis” (Lawton, 1983, p. 197).
• Philosophers such as Kant and Liebnitz debated whether space is an absolute reality or a relational construct, influencing geographical thought (Lawton, 1983, p. 198).

5. The Significance of Place in Human Geography

• Place is more than a location; it carries meaning, identity, and historical continuity (Lawton, 1983, p. 200).
• The experience of place varies among individuals and communities, shaped by cultural background, education, and personal experience (Lawton, 1983, p. 196).
• Some geographers argue that “space and place lie at the core of our discipline” (Lawton, 1983, p. 200), emphasizing the importance of subjective interpretations of space.

6. Social and Symbolic Aspects of Place

• Social spaces are structured by human interactions, influencing “patterns of friendship, class relations, and cultural expressions” (Lawton, 1983, p. 199).
• Symbols in the landscape, such as religious and political structures, reflect societal values (Lawton, 1983, p. 201).
• The urban environment, in particular, illustrates how “the city is more than a place in space, it is a drama in time” (Lawton, 1983, p. 202).

7. The Role of Time in Geography

• Geography must incorporate temporal dimensions to fully understand spatial processes (Lawton, 1983, p. 202).
• The discipline employs both functional (ecological) and genetic (historical) explanations to analyze geographic phenomena (Lawton, 1983, p. 203).
• Changes in landscapes and societies are driven by both gradual processes and abrupt shifts, such as industrialization and environmental crises (Lawton, 1983, p. 204).

8. Time-Space Convergence and the Changing Perception of Distance

• Technological advancements have altered the perception of space by reducing travel time and enabling instantaneous communication (Lawton, 1983, p. 204).
• Lawton refers to “plastic space”—the idea that distance is increasingly relative due to modern transportation and communication networks (Lawton, 1983, p. 205).
• He argues that geography must adapt to these shifts, integrating space-time relationships to understand contemporary spatial dynamics (Lawton, 1983, p. 205).

9. Conclusion: The Future of Geography

• Lawton asserts that geography must maintain its multi-dimensional perspective, avoiding rigid adherence to any single theoretical approach (Lawton, 1983, p. 205).
• He encourages geographers to embrace both scientific and humanistic perspectives, ensuring the subject remains relevant to contemporary global challenges (Lawton, 1983, p. 206).
• The study of “the future of the past” is essential, as geography helps project past and present trends onto potential future scenarios (Lawton, 1983, p. 204).

1. Spatial Theory and Literary Geography

• Lawton reinforces the idea that geography is essential for understanding literary spaces, as “geography is about the spatial arrangement of human activities” (Lawton, 1983, p. 193).
• His discussion of spatial interactions and mental maps (Gould & White, 1974) can be applied to how literature constructs imagined geographies (Lawton, 1983, p. 196).
• The idea that “places are more than locations; they are repositories of meaning” (Lawton, 1983, p. 200) is fundamental to literary settings and narrative spatiality.

2. Postmodern Literary Theory and the Concept of Place

• Lawton’s assertion that “perceived space is shaped by cultural and individual experiences” (Lawton, 1983, p. 196) aligns with postmodernism’s rejection of fixed meanings and emphasizes subjective spatial interpretations.
• His discussion of placelessness (Relph, 1976) and urban alienation (Ley & Cybriwsky, 1974) reflects postmodern literature’s exploration of fragmented identities and spaces (Lawton, 1983, p. 201).
• He critiques the collapse of space and time in modernity, stating that “we may well witness the ultimate collapse of space by time” due to globalization (Lawton, 1983, p. 204). This resonates with postmodern concerns about hyperreality (Baudrillard) and spatial-temporal dislocation in literature.

3. Humanistic and Phenomenological Literary Approaches

• Lawton references Yi-Fu Tuan’s humanistic geography, emphasizing subjective experiences of space: “Space and place lie at the core of our discipline” (Lawton, 1983, p. 200). This supports phenomenological literary analysis, which explores personal and existential spatial encounters.
• His claim that “place is deeply rooted in human consciousness and historical continuity” (Lawton, 1983, p. 200) ties into Gaston Bachelard’s The Poetics of Space, which examines intimate spatial experiences in literature.

4. Marxist Literary Theory and the Politics of Space

• Lawton’s discussion of social space as a reflection of class structures (Lawton, 1983, p. 199) aligns with Marxist geography, which examines capitalism’s impact on space and place (Harvey, 1969).
• He critiques the commodification of space, highlighting urban planning’s role in social division, a theme explored in literature dealing with economic displacement and marginalization (Lawton, 1983, p. 201).
• His reference to historical geography (Lawton, 1983, p. 202) aligns with Marxist literary theory’s interest in historical materialism, particularly how spaces are shaped by economic forces over time.

5. Postcolonial Theory and the Construction of Place

• Lawton’s exploration of place identity (Lawton, 1983, p. 200) contributes to postcolonial discourse, where space is contested through narratives of colonization and resistance.
• He references symbolic landscapes (Lawton, 1983, p. 201), which postcolonial critics analyze as sites of imperial power or indigenous reclamation in literature.
• His discussion of cultural landscapes and memory (Lawton, 1983, p. 201) connects to postcolonial literature’s emphasis on erased histories and spatial reclamation (e.g., in the works of Salman Rushdie and Derek Walcott).

6. Ecocriticism and Environmental Literary Theory

• Lawton emphasizes human-environment interactions, stating that “man has been influenced by and has changed his environment” (Lawton, 1983, p. 193), aligning with ecocritical concerns.
• His discussion of cultural landscapes and human impact (Lawton, 1983, p. 201) supports literary ecocriticism, which examines how literature represents and critiques environmental change.
• The notion of time-space substitution (Lawton, 1983, p. 204), where modern technology distorts human relationships with the environment, can be applied to dystopian literature and climate fiction.

7. Narrative Theory: Time and Space in Storytelling

• Lawton’s statement that “the city is more than a place in space, it is a drama in time” (Lawton, 1983, p. 202) resonates with narrative theory’s emphasis on temporality and spatiality.
• His discussion of historical geography (Lawton, 1983, p. 202) informs historical fiction’s use of setting as a dynamic, evolving space.
• He highlights how time-space compression alters narrative structures, making “the future of the past” (Lawton, 1983, p. 204) a crucial element in historical and speculative fiction.

Introduction: Bridging Geography and Literature

• In “Locating Imaginary Homelands: Literature, Geography, and Salman Rushdie,” Joanne P. Sharp explores the intersection of geographical studies and fictional literature.
• Geographers traditionally treat literature as a tool to enhance their own geographical descriptions, but Sharp argues that literature can offer a “voice” that provides alternative insights into geographical processes (Sharp, 1996, p. 120).
• This paper delves into how literary texts, such as Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses, can serve as a critical resource for geographers (Sharp, 1996, p. 121).

Geography’s Use of Literature: A Critical Reassessment

• Geographers often utilize literary texts merely for “decorative” purposes, using them to create vivid depictions of landscapes (Tuan, 1978, p. 195).
• Sharp critiques this limited view, urging a more profound engagement with literary texts, beyond mere “causal ransacking,” to explore how fiction can provide a deeper understanding of space and identity (Sharp, 1996, p. 122).
• According to Caviedes (1987), literary texts often convey the essence of a place in ways that geographers, constrained by scientific language, cannot achieve (Sharp, 1996, p. 120).

Humanistic Geography and the Subversive Power of Literature

• Sharp highlights the work of humanistic geographers, such as Pocock (1981), who view literature as a reflection of the “human condition” and argue that fiction offers “truths” beyond mere factual reality (Sharp, 1996, p. 123).
• Literature’s potential to destabilize conventional geographical understandings is emphasized, advocating for its role in representing alternative spatial relations, migration, and identity formation (Sharp, 1996, p. 124).

Salman Rushdie: A Case Study in Geo-Literary Critique

• Rushdie’s novels, particularly The Satanic Verses, are presented as “self-consciously spatial texts,” exploring territorial identities and the hybrid subjectivity of migration (Sharp, 1996, p. 127).
• Sharp discusses how Rushdie’s blending of magical realism and cultural references challenges fixed geographical and cultural boundaries, portraying the fluidity of postcolonial identities (Rushdie, 1991, p. 376; Sharp, 1996, p. 128).

The Geopolitics of Reception and the “Rushdie Affair”

• Sharp examines how Rushdie’s work, especially The Satanic Verses, sparked significant geopolitical and cultural debates, particularly after the fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini (Sharp, 1996, p. 130).
• The “Rushdie Affair” illustrates how literature’s power to question religious and cultural boundaries can trigger both intellectual and political responses, revealing the limitations of conventional geographical narratives (Said, 1993, p. 373).
• The conflict between the reception of Rushdie’s work in the West and the Islamic world highlights the role of literature in the geopolitics of representation (Sharp, 1996, p. 132).

Conclusion: The Power and Limits of Literary Geography

• Sharp concludes that literature, through its subversive potential, offers geographers a way to rethink the rigid distinctions between “us” and “them” in the mapping of identities.
• By examining the hybridized narratives of Rushdie’s characters, Sharp demonstrates the impossibility of authentic, fixed identities and how literature’s ability to “spiral away” from the real allows for new understandings of space and identity (Rushdie, 1991, p. 409; Sharp, 1996, p. 133).
• The article ultimately calls for a deeper, more critical engagement between geography and literature, recognizing the complex ways in which both disciplines construct and deconstruct the world (Sharp, 1996, p. 134).

Contribution to the Interdisciplinary Dialogue Between Geography and Literature

• Sharp’s article advocates for a deeper integration of literary texts into geographical studies, urging that geographers view literature not just as illustrative but as an alternative source that can offer valuable insights into geographical processes. She argues that literature can provide a “voice” that engages with the geographies created by academics, contributing to a more holistic understanding of space, migration, and identity (Sharp, 1996, p. 121).

Expansion of Humanistic Geography Through Literature

• Sharp’s work contributes to the field of humanistic geography by demonstrating how literary texts engage with the “human condition,” offering more than just geographical descriptions but also exploring the emotional and cultural dimensions of space. By introducing the notion that literature can provide a narrative “voice,” she challenges traditional geographers to rethink how they use literary sources (Sharp, 1996, p. 123).

Literature as a Tool for Subverting Geographical Norms

• The article underscores the subversive potential of literature, showing that fiction can destabilize established geographical and cultural norms. Sharp highlights how authors like Salman Rushdie use fiction to critique and challenge geographical realities, offering new ways of seeing and understanding space that transcend conventional geographic boundaries (Sharp, 1996, p. 125).

Application of Postmodern Literary Theory to Geography

• Sharp incorporates postmodern theory into geography, particularly the idea of the “crisis of representation” that challenges the objectivity of scientific discourse. She argues that geographical studies, like literary texts, are influenced by subjective interpretation and ideological lenses. This theoretical framework encourages a shift in geography toward more critical, subjective interpretations of space (Sharp, 1996, p. 124).

Theoretical Engagement with Hybrid Identities and Postcolonial Theory

• Sharp’s exploration of cultural hybridity, especially in the context of postcolonial theory, demonstrates the role of literature in constructing hybrid identities. By analyzing Rushdie’s characters as embodying hybrid subjectivities, she expands the theoretical discussion on identity, emphasizing fluidity and the blending of cultural influences, which is central to postcolonial studies (Sharp, 1996, p. 127).

Geo-Graphing as a Literary and Geographical Practice

• Sharp introduces the concept of geo-graphing, a term she uses to describe the way Rushdie’s texts map out new understandings of space and identity, particularly through magical realism and intertextuality. This concept adds to literary theory by connecting narrative practices with geographical representations, further demonstrating how literature can “write the earth” (Sharp, 1996, p. 127).

Reinterpretation of the Politics of Reception in Literary Theory

• Sharp’s analysis of the “Rushdie Affair” provides a unique contribution to literary theory by emphasizing how geopolitical context influences the reception of literary works. She shows that literature’s reception is not passive but is actively shaped by political and cultural tensions, which ties into debates within literary theory about the role of the reader and the power dynamics in interpreting texts (Sharp, 1996, p. 130).

Overemphasis on the Geographical Perspective

• Critics may argue that Sharp’s focus on geography as a framework for analyzing literature limits the scope of literary analysis. By prioritizing geographical implications, the emotional, psychological, and thematic complexities of the literature may not be fully explored.

Reduction of Literature to Geographical Terms

• Some critics might feel that Sharp’s approach reduces literary texts to mere tools for understanding geography. By analyzing works primarily through geographical and spatial lenses, the literary elements such as narrative style, character development, and symbolism could be underemphasized.

Neglect of Literary Aesthetics

• Sharp’s analysis may be seen as neglecting the aesthetic qualities of the literary works she critiques. For instance, the artistic merit, language, and stylistic techniques employed by authors might be overlooked in favor of reading the text through a geographical or political lens.

Limited Application of Theory

• Sharp’s use of geography and literature as interconnected fields might be considered too narrow, as it doesn’t fully engage with other interdisciplinary approaches, such as psychology, sociology, or gender theory, which could offer deeper or alternative interpretations of the texts.

Cultural Bias in Geographical Interpretations

• Some critics may argue that Sharp’s geographical critique reflects a Western-centric view of space and identity, potentially overlooking other global or local perspectives. This could limit the universality of her approach, making it less applicable to diverse literary traditions or non-Western contexts.

Overreliance on Postcolonial Theory

• Sharp’s use of postcolonial theory, particularly when analyzing hybrid identities, may be critiqued for overemphasizing postcolonial issues without considering the full range of experiences that contemporary literature engages with. This might result in a limited perspective on the works she critiques.

Insufficient Attention to Reader Reception

• While Sharp mentions the importance of the reception of Rushdie’s work, critics may argue that her focus on the text itself and its geographical themes overlooks the diversity of responses from readers across different cultures and backgrounds, missing out on a broader, more inclusive analysis.

1. The Problem: Challenges of an Untracked Classroom

• Cone describes the transition from a four-track English class system to a two-track system, eliminating lower-level ability grouping (Cone, 1990, p. 60).
• She expresses concerns about balancing instruction for students with widely varying reading and writing abilities (p. 61).
• Quote: “What if the parents of the higher-achieving students objected to having their children mixed with students who read and wrote poorly?” (Cone, 1990, p. 61).

2. A Solution: Teaching English Through Geography

• A student’s misconception that India is in Africa led Cone to design a geography-based English curriculum (p. 60).
• The approach aimed to create a shared foundation of knowledge and eliminate ability-based divisions.
• Quote: “Instead of building a multidimensional classroom around the teaching of required texts and discourse modes, I would concentrate on geography or, more precisely, cultural geography” (Cone, 1990, p. 60).

3. The Journey Begins: Classroom Strategies

• Maps and a banner with the quote “If you don’t read, you are limited to living only one life in only one place” set the theme (p. 60).
• The curriculum was structured as a journey through various countries, incorporating literature, film, and writing assignments.
• Quote: “We would take a journey around the world, reading and writing and talking our way in and out of countries, cultures, and centuries” (Cone, 1990, p. 60).

4. Engaging Students Through Literature and Discussion

• Cone used Julie of the Wolves (George, 1972) to introduce Alaska, fostering discussion and collaborative meaning-making (p. 61).
• Reading was supplemented with geography exercises and discussions about culture and identity.
• Quote: “The time spent reading in class paid off because it encouraged talk: my students quickly became used to asking questions, predicting events, putting themselves into the main character’s predicament” (Cone, 1990, p. 61).

5. Expanding the Model: Brazil and Critical Reading

• The class studied Brazil through various sources, including Time and San Francisco Chronicle articles, introducing students to nonfiction analysis (p. 62).
• Students engaged in cooperative learning groups to summarize articles and refine reading comprehension.
• Quote: “Many of them had read little exposition and argumentation in English class; fiction and biography are the two genres used almost exclusively with students in low reading and writing tracks” (Cone, 1990, p. 62).

6. Films as Learning Tools

• Cone initially resisted using films but discovered their effectiveness in reinforcing literary themes (p. 64).
• Movies like Never Cry Wolf and The Emerald Forest provided visual narratives that deepened understanding.
• Quote: “Once I decided on the journey idea, however, I began to see the vital role films could play” (Cone, 1990, p. 64).

7. Collaborative Learning and Student Engagement

• Students took ownership of the curriculum, suggesting additional films and texts to explore different cultures (p. 64).
• Cone facilitated cooperative learning, reducing the hierarchical teacher-student dynamic.
• Quote: “This emphasis on negotiating meaning with everyone participating has contributed greatly to the breaking down of barriers erected by years of ability grouping” (Cone, 1990, p. 64).

8. Writing and Personal Reflection

• Assignments included personal narratives, interviews, and cultural comparisons, fostering critical thinking and self-reflection (p. 65).
• Students conducted interviews with ESL peers, broadening their perspectives on global experiences.
• Quote: “Here was a group of students who were clearly filled with information and questions and excitement about learning” (Cone, 1990, p. 63).

9. The Final Assessment: Measuring Growth

• The final exam required students to reflect on a book, discussing its main character’s journey and its impact on their own learning (p. 66).
• The year ended with a student-led reading session of interviews they had conducted.
• Quote: “At the end of the period, I read my contribution to the literary magazine. It began with a review of our journey and ended with an acknowledgment of them as students” (Cone, 1990, p. 66).

10. Lasting Impact and Future Plans

• Cone planned to expand the geography-based curriculum, adding texts like Night by Elie Wiesel and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe (p. 67).
• The untracked classroom model proved effective in promoting equity and engagement in English education.
• Quote: “The journey and the year are still open. We’ll go where our literary and media tastes and wanderlust take us” (Cone, 1990, p. 67).

1. Reader-Response Theory

• Encourages students to interpret texts based on personal experiences rather than traditional analysis (Cone, 1990, p. 61).
• Quote: “The time spent reading in class paid off because it encouraged talk: my students quickly became used to asking questions, predicting events, putting themselves into the main character’s predicament” (Cone, 1990, p. 61).
• Students engage in meaning-making through discussion, making literature more interactive and personal.

2. Constructivist Literary Pedagogy

• Advocates for an active, student-centered learning approach where students construct meaning through exploration and collaboration (p. 64).
• Quote: “This emphasis on negotiating meaning with everyone participating has contributed greatly to the breaking down of barriers erected by years of ability grouping” (Cone, 1990, p. 64).
• Literature is not a fixed set of ideas but an evolving conversation shaped by student engagement.

3. Cultural Studies and Postcolonial Literary Theory

• Uses literature and geography to explore diverse cultures, histories, and global perspectives (p. 65).
• Quote: “Instead of building a multidimensional classroom around the teaching of required texts and discourse modes, I would concentrate on geography or, more precisely, cultural geography” (Cone, 1990, p. 60).
• Encourages students to analyze cultural differences, challenging Eurocentric narratives in literary studies.

4. Critical Literacy Theory

• Encourages students to analyze media, nonfiction, and literature critically to understand underlying biases and power structures (p. 62).
• Quote: “Many of them had read little exposition and argumentation in English class; fiction and biography are the two genres used almost exclusively with students in low reading and writing tracks” (Cone, 1990, p. 62).
• Develops students’ ability to question dominant ideologies in literature and media.

5. Multimodal Literary Theory

• Integrates different forms of media—films, maps, news articles—to enhance literary understanding (p. 64).
• Quote: “My experience this year reversed my position on using film in the classroom. In fact, I attribute my students’ excitement about the curriculum in large part to the films we saw and the added dimension they brought to our understanding of the print media we used” (Cone, 1990, p. 64).
• Expands literary analysis beyond written texts, incorporating visual and digital media.

6. Social Constructivist Theory in Literature

• Promotes collaborative learning, where students develop literary meaning through group discussions and shared interpretations (p. 62).
• Quote: “Students of different academic abilities had worked relatively cooperatively” (Cone, 1990, p. 62).
• Literature is understood not individually but through collective discussion and engagement.

7. Culturally Responsive Literary Pedagogy

• Selects texts and themes relevant to students’ backgrounds to make literature more inclusive and meaningful (p. 65).
• Quote: “The selection of diverse texts and global themes made literature relevant to students from different backgrounds” (Cone, 1990, p. 65).
• Challenges the traditional literary canon by integrating global and marginalized voices.

8. Progressive Educational Theory in Literary Studies

• Advocates for student agency, where learners have control over what they read and study (p. 64).
• Quote: “Students influenced the curriculum by suggesting books, films, and discussion topics, shifting ownership of learning from the teacher to the students” (Cone, 1990, p. 64).
• Literature is a tool for empowerment, encouraging students to take an active role in their learning.

1. Overgeneralization of Student Engagement

• While Cone presents her approach as universally effective, student responses to literature and geography-based learning may vary.
• Not all students may engage equally with geography as a foundation for literary analysis.

2. Lack of Rigor in Literary Analysis

• The emphasis on personal connections and cultural geography might overshadow deeper textual analysis.
• Cone’s approach may prioritize accessibility over traditional literary criticism, limiting students’ ability to engage with complex literary theories.

3. Potential for Unequal Learning Outcomes

• Untracked classrooms may still produce disparities in learning, as higher-achieving students may not be sufficiently challenged (Cone, 1990, p. 61).
• Some students might struggle with self-directed learning without structured guidance.

4. Over-Reliance on Multimodal Learning

• The heavy use of films and visual media might reduce emphasis on textual interpretation and critical reading skills.
• Critics might argue that literature should be analyzed primarily through close reading rather than supplementary media.

5. Practical Challenges in Implementation

• The geography-based curriculum requires extensive preparation and access to diverse resources, which may not be feasible in all schools.
• Teachers with limited training in geography or cultural studies may struggle to implement Cone’s interdisciplinary approach effectively.

6. Limited Focus on Traditional Literary Canon

• The article suggests moving away from traditional English curricula, which may disadvantage students preparing for standardized tests or academic literary studies.
• Critics may argue that foundational texts should not be sidelined in favor of contemporary and culturally diverse works.

7. Risk of Superficial Cultural Representation

• While Cone aims for inclusivity, her approach could unintentionally lead to surface-level engagement with cultures rather than deep critical analysis.
• Some critics may argue that discussing different cultures without in-depth historical and political context risks reinforcing stereotypes rather than dismantling them.

8. Insufficient Emphasis on Writing Skills

• Although Cone integrates writing tasks, her focus is largely on discussion and interpretation rather than formal writing instruction.
• Some students might not develop strong analytical writing skills needed for higher education.

9. Resistance from Traditional Educators and Parents

• Parents of high-achieving students may resist mixed-ability grouping, fearing that their children’s learning pace will slow down (Cone, 1990, p. 61).
• Traditional educators may view Cone’s student-led learning as lacking discipline and structure.

10. Overlooked Challenges in Assessing Growth

• Cone uses pre- and post-tests to measure knowledge but does not provide clear metrics for evaluating literary comprehension and critical thinking progress.
• Critics may argue that assessments should be more rigorously structured to track student learning outcomes effectively.

1. The Growing Awareness of Space in Academic Disciplines

• In recent decades, there has been a heightened awareness of the role of space in various disciplines, particularly in geography and the humanities.
• Theorists such as Fredric Jameson and Michel Foucault have emphasized that “we live in spacious times” (Jones, 2008, p. 1).
• The emergence of the New Cultural Geography has challenged traditional views of space as passive, asserting instead that it is “an active force in the world that is imbued with ideology and politics” (Jones, 2008, p. 2).

2. The Interdisciplinary Connection Between Geography and Literature

• Geography has increasingly incorporated language and literature into its studies.
• Barnes and Duncan (1992) argue that the etymology of geography, meaning “earth writing,” suggests an inherent connection to literature.
• The rise of postmodernism and the crisis of representation has led geographers to reconsider the role of subjective narratives in understanding space (Jones, 2008, p. 3).

3. The Traditional Divide Between Geography and Literature

• Historically, geography emphasized objective scientific methods and dismissed literary studies.
• James Duncan and David Ley (1993) state that traditional geography aimed “to produce as accurate a reflection of the world as possible” (Jones, 2008, p. 4).
• This opposition stemmed from the Enlightenment ideal that knowledge should be empirical and measurable.

4. The Postmodern Challenge to Objectivity in Geography

• The postmodern crisis of representation questioned the ability of language and maps to objectively represent reality.
• Duncan and Ley argue that “this revolt against objectivism, rationality and the meta-narratives which have guided enquiry has been one of the central themes in postmodern representation” (Jones, 2008, p. 6).
• Postmodern geographers began embracing qualitative methods, including subjective experiences and fictional literature.

5. The Evolving Role of Maps and Writing in Spatial Representation

• Cartography, once seen as a scientific tool, has been criticized for its colonial and hegemonic biases.
• Blunt and Rose (1994) argue that “maps were themselves colonizing spaces perceived as empty and uninscribed” (Jones, 2008, p. 8).
• Experimental forms of writing, such as montage narratives, challenge the traditional authority of authors in geography (Jones, 2008, p. 9).

6. The ‘New Cultural Geography’ and Its Methodological Shifts

• The New Cultural Geography emerged in the 1980s, advocating for hermeneutic and interpretive approaches to space.
• Barnes and Duncan (1992) suggest that “writing about worlds reveals as much about ourselves as it does about the worlds represented” (Jones, 2008, p. 10).
• Subjective and narrative-driven research methods have since gained prominence.

7. The Work of Marc Brosseau in Literary Geography

• Marc Brosseau’s Des romans-géographes (1996) is a landmark study that argues literature is not just a tool for geographical analysis but a constitutive force of space.
• He criticizes the simplistic use of literature to “prove” geographical arguments, advocating instead for a true dialogue between disciplines (Jones, 2008, p. 12).
• Brosseau states that “the interest of a dialogical relationship lies in its willingness to recognize the other as other” (Jones, 2008, p. 13).

8. The Enduring Influence of Traditional Stereotypes

• Some interdisciplinary works, such as Geography and Literature: A Meeting of the Disciplines (Mallory & Simpson-Housley, 1987), reinforce traditional stereotypes.
• The book treats geography as factual and literature as purely imaginative, limiting true interdisciplinary engagement (Jones, 2008, p. 14).
• Cesar Caviedes, for example, writes that geographers “must often recognize (with envy) the sensitivity and innate intuition with which literary writers extract the purest reality of a region” (Jones, 2008, p. 15).

9. The Role of Walter Benjamin in Literary Spatial Studies

• Walter Benjamin’s idea of the “city as text” has influenced interdisciplinary spatial analysis.
• His work on Paris and the flâneur has inspired studies on urban geography and literary space (Jones, 2008, p. 16).
• Deborah Parsons (2000) extends this idea to explore the female flâneuse, arguing that literature not only reflects but constructs the city (Jones, 2008, p. 17).

10. The City as a Central Focus in Literary Geography

• Paris, London, and New York have been key sites of literary spatial analysis.
• Marcy Schwartz (1999) describes Paris as a “transcultural literary capital” (Jones, 2008, p. 18).
• Pierre-Marc de Biasi (2000) refers to Paris as “Paris-palimpseste, toujours déjà littéraire,” highlighting the city’s long-standing textual identity (Jones, 2008, p. 19).

11. Gaston Bachelard’s Impact on Spatial Poetics

• Bachelard’s La Poétique de l’espace (1957) introduced the study of psychological and poetic space.
• He emphasized the symbolic and experiential aspects of space, moving beyond geometrical analysis (Jones, 2008, p. 20).
• His horizontal and vertical spatial axes remain widely used in both literary and geographical studies (Jones, 2008, p. 21).

12. Postcolonialism and the Spatial Imagination

• Postcolonial theorists have linked geography with cultural identity.
• Indira Karamcheti (1994) states that postcolonialism involves “an imaginative recovery of a ‘local place'” (Jones, 2008, p. 22).
• Mary Louise Pratt’s Imperial Eyes (1992) introduced the contact zone, a spatial concept highlighting colonial encounters (Jones, 2008, p. 23).

13. The Role of Travel Writing in Spatial Analysis

• Travel narratives inherently engage with space and cultural difference.
• Sara Mills (1991) analyzes how colonial-era women’s travel writing reflected power dynamics (Jones, 2008, p. 24).
• Adrien Pasquali (1994) notes a shift toward exploring familiar, local spaces, indicating a postmodern blurring of home and away (Jones, 2008, p. 25).

14. The Use of Maps in Literary Studies

• Franco Moretti’s Atlas of the European Novel (1998) argues that “geography is not an inert container, but an active force” (Jones, 2008, p. 26).
• However, Brosseau warns against “excessive ordering,” cautioning that mapping literature may oversimplify spatial meaning (Jones, 2008, p. 27).

15. Broader Interdisciplinary Initiatives

• The géopoétique movement, led by Kenneth White, seeks to reunite nature and literature (Jones, 2008, p. 28).
• Space and Place: The Geographies of Literature (Norquay & Smyth, 1997) explores how literature disrupts traditional notions of national identity (Jones, 2008, p. 29).

16. The Special Edition’s Contributions

• This edition of Anglia explores interdisciplinary approaches to literature and cultural geography.
• Articles discuss topics such as postcolonial space, landscape history, and the representation of tourist sites in literature (Jones, 2008, p. 30).
• Notably, Russell West-Pavlov argues for rethinking postcolonial geography beyond textual analysis, emphasizing material spatial histories (Jones, 2008, p. 31).

17. The Need for Ongoing Interdisciplinary Dialogue

• The relationship between geography and literature is still evolving.
• Some works, like Brosseau’s, foster true dialogue, while others remain constrained by disciplinary stereotypes.
• The challenge remains to move beyond binary oppositions—such as reality/fiction and objectivity/subjectivity—toward a more integrated approach to understanding space.

1. The Spatial Turn in Literary Studies

• Jones’ work emphasizes the increasing importance of space in literary analysis, highlighting how geography and literature intersect.
• She asserts that “the preoccupation with space has become increasingly interdisciplinary” and that space “plays a role in individual identity formation” (Jones, 2008, p. 2).
• This aligns with the broader spatial turn in humanities, as explored by theorists such as Michel Foucault and Henri Lefebvre.

2. Postmodernism and the Crisis of Representation

• The text contributes to postmodern literary theory by critiquing the Enlightenment notion of objective knowledge and stable representation.
• “Not only has the notion of impartial, objective knowledge been undermined, then, but the means through which knowledge can be articulated has also been called into question” (Jones, 2008, p. 6).
• This builds upon the postmodernist argument that language and representation are inherently unstable (Duncan & Ley, 1993).

3. Literary Cartography and the Problematization of Maps

• Jones explores how literature and geography have traditionally approached space differently, emphasizing how cartography is not merely objective but embedded in cultural narratives.
• “Mapping operates in hegemonic discourses as a form of mimetic representation – it textually represents the gaze through transparent space” (Blunt & Rose, cited in Jones, 2008, p. 8).
• This discussion contributes to literary cartography and aligns with Franco Moretti’s Atlas of the European Novel (1998), which maps literary spaces.

4. The City-as-Text and Urban Literary Studies

• Drawing from Walter Benjamin, Jones highlights how literature and geography converge in urban studies.
• She states, “Benjamin’s work was ground-breaking on a theoretical level due to the strength with which he championed the notion of not only ‘city-as-text’ but also ‘text-as-city'” (Jones, 2008, p. 16).
• This contributes to urban literary studies by framing literature as a constitutive force in shaping perceptions of cities.

5. Postcolonialism and Spatial Critique

• The text engages with postcolonial literary theory by analyzing how colonialism influenced spatial representation in literature.
• “Whereas colonialism involved the physical domination of many of the world’s spaces, postcolonialism involves ‘an imaginative recovery of a ‘local place'” (Karamcheti, cited in Jones, 2008, p. 23).
• This aligns with Mary Louise Pratt’s Imperial Eyes (1992), which introduced the concept of the “contact zone” in colonial literature.

6. Geo-Poetics and Environmental Literary Studies

• Jones highlights Kenneth White’s géopoétique movement, which integrates environmental concerns with literary geography.
• “The enduring nature of this movement as well as its admirable overall aim to ‘renouveler complètement la carte mentale’ [completely renew the mental map]” (White, cited in Jones, 2008, p. 28).
• This contributes to ecocriticism and environmental literary studies by emphasizing literature’s role in shaping ecological consciousness.

7. The Feminist Critique of Spatial Representation

• The article incorporates feminist theory by critiquing how space and objectivity have been historically gendered.
• “Feminist thinkers argue that the idea of objectivity in fact conceals Enlightenment models of the ideal citizen, who was white, male and middle class” (Seidman, cited in Jones, 2008, p. 11).
• This aligns with Alison Blunt and Gillian Rose’s Writing Women and Space (1994), which explores gendered spatial politics.

8. Travel Writing and the Deconstruction of Exoticism

• Jones examines how contemporary travel writing disrupts traditional notions of “home” and “abroad.”
• “The new travelers explore the tastes of Paris, certain suburbs, and J.-D. Urbain designates them as ‘voyageurs de l’interstice'” (Pasquali, cited in Jones, 2008, p. 24).
• This builds on Sara Mills’ Discourses of Difference (1991), which critiques colonialist narratives in travel writing.

9. Literature as Constitutive of Space

• Instead of viewing literature as merely reflecting reality, Jones argues that literature actively shapes perceptions of space.
• “Studying contemporary literature could act as ‘le détonateur d’une nouvelle façon de penser l’espace’ [the catalyst for a new way of thinking about space]” (Brosseau, cited in Jones, 2008, p. 21).
• This contributes to literary geography by positioning literature as an active force in spatial discourse.

10. Interdisciplinary Dialogue between Geography and Literary Studies

• Jones calls for a deeper interdisciplinary exchange between geography and literature, moving beyond superficial uses of literature in geographic studies.
• “The creation of the genuine dialogue that Brosseau calls for aims, in short, to avoid superficial, self-validating interdisciplinary contacts” (Jones, 2008, p. 22).
• This aligns with Glenda Norquay and Gerry Smyth’s Space and Place: The Geographies of Literature (1997), which fosters literary-geographical collaboration.