“We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller: Summary and Critique

Introduction: “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller

“We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller is a short essay that explores the complexities of freedom in the modern world. Cixous begins by questioning the very definition of freedom, arguing that it is a concept that is often misunderstood and misused. She then goes on to discuss the various threats to freedom that exist today, both overt and subtle. Finally, Cixous offers a hopeful message about the possibility of achieving true freedom, even in the face of adversity.

The essay is written in a clear and concise style, and it is filled with insightful observations and provocative ideas. It is a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate about the meaning and importance of freedom.

Here are some of the key points that Cixous makes in the essay:

• The concept of freedom is often misunderstood and misused.
• There are many threats to freedom in the modern world, both overt and subtle.
• It is possible to achieve true freedom, even in the face of adversity.

Summary of “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller

• Reflections on Freedom and the Self: Cixous begins by contemplating the nature of freedom, influenced by her invitation to speak at an Amnesty lecture. She questions whether the concept of the “self,” as defined by eighteenth-century ideologies of human rights, still exists and whose freedom is now at stake. She challenges the traditional notions of freedom and identity, suggesting that these ideas have been both liberating and limiting due to unforeseen repressive aspects tied to phallocentric and colonial discourse. This leads to a dual approach of both constructing and deconstructing these philosophies (“Cixous,” 201-202).
• Freedom in a Fragmented World: The author reflects on the current era as one of dissociation and reorganization, marked by civil wars and nationalist fervor. She describes a “double temporality,” where the “twilight of freedom” coincides with the “bitter dawn of liberty,” a period of turmoil and fear of nonrecognition. In this context, individuals and nations define themselves through rejection of the other, illustrating a neurosis driven by a fear of losing identity (“Cixous,” 202-203).
• The Poet’s Struggle with State Authority: Cixous discusses the intrinsic conflict between poets and state power, highlighting the persecution of poets like Mandelstam, who was exiled for the “crime of poetry.” She argues that poetry, with its clandestine strength, poses a threat to tyranny because of its ability to convey profound truths that resonate beyond mere words. This ongoing tension between poetry and power underscores the enduring fear of the word by those in authority (“Cixous,” 204-206).
• Suffering and Compassion in Poetry: Drawing on Akhmatova’s “Requiem,” Cixous explores the relationship between suffering and compassion, emphasizing how the pain of others deepens one’s own suffering. She reflects on the ability of poetry to articulate this shared suffering, creating a sense of communal identity among those who suffer. This connection between poets and their audiences is forged in the crucible of shared experiences, particularly in times of great injustice (“Cixous,” 206-208).
• The Role of the Poet in Society: Cixous asserts that poets play a crucial role as witnesses to history, particularly in the violent twentieth century. She identifies a lineage of poets—from Mandelstam to Tsvetayeva—who have created a transnational and translinguistic epic of memory, linking their works across cultures and time. These poets, often persecuted and silenced, nonetheless preserved the truth and created a “liturgy” of resistance (“Cixous,” 206-207).
• The Intersection of Language and Freedom: The text delves into the power of language as both a refuge and a tool for those dispossessed. Cixous argues that even when language is persecuted, it remains vital and “enriched” by the struggles it endures. This preservation of language is crucial, especially in times of silence and oppression, as it carries the legacy of resistance and the possibility of future expression (“Cixous,” 209-210).
• Critique of Contemporary Society: Cixous critiques modern societies, particularly their superficial adherence to democratic ideals while perpetuating systemic lies and crimes. She highlights the complicity of the media and other institutions in maintaining these deceptions, often through subtle, socially accepted forms of violence. This critique extends to the treatment of women and minorities, who are often marginalized and silenced in these so-called free societies (“Cixous,” 211-213).
• The Dangers of Fear and Conformity: Fear, according to Cixous, governs the actions of writers, journalists, and intellectuals in contemporary society. This fear—of social exclusion, of losing prestige, of being unmasked—leads to self-censorship and a betrayal of true freedom. Despite this, Cixous urges a commitment to courage and the pursuit of truth, even at the risk of isolation and suffering (“Cixous,” 214-215).
• The Ethical Imperative of Writing: Finally, Cixous addresses the ethical responsibilities of writers, particularly the need to break free from societal constraints and embrace the “wild beast” within that drives authentic, fearless writing. She emphasizes that true writing, which transcends the superficial and confronts deep truths, is an act of liberation. This commitment to writing as a form of resistance is essential for both personal and societal freedom (“Cixous,” 216-218).

Literary Terms/Concepts in “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller

Literary Term/Concept	Definition	Example/Explanation from the Text
Deconstruction	A critical approach developed by Jacques Derrida that seeks to uncover and challenge underlying assumptions, binaries, and contradictions within texts and concepts. It involves dismantling and examining structures to reveal hidden meanings and biases.	Cixous employs deconstruction to challenge traditional notions of freedom and identity, revealing how these concepts are intertwined with oppressive structures such as patriarchy and colonialism. She questions established definitions and seeks to reconstruct them in more inclusive and liberating ways.
Phallocentrism	A perspective or ideology that centers the male point of view and male experience, often marginalizing or devaluing female perspectives. It is closely associated with patriarchal structures and gender biases.	The essay critiques the phallocentric underpinnings of traditional human rights discourses, highlighting how they exclude or suppress women’s experiences and voices. Cixous advocates for recognizing and valifying feminine perspectives in discussions about freedom and identity.
Intertextuality	The shaping of a text’s meaning by other texts through references, quotations, or the adoption of styles and themes. It acknowledges that texts are interconnected and that meaning is constructed through these relationships.	Cixous references and engages with works by other poets and writers such as Mandelstam, Akhmatova, Kafka, and Lispector. These intertextual connections enrich her arguments and illustrate the shared struggles and themes across different contexts and literary traditions.
Metaphor	A figure of speech that describes an object or action by comparing it to something else, highlighting similarities between the two and adding depth or symbolism to the description.	Throughout the essay, Cixous uses metaphors like “the infernal taste of paradise” to describe complex experiences such as finding moments of joy and humanity within suffering and oppression. These metaphors convey profound emotional and philosophical insights.
Duality	The presence of two contrasting or complementary aspects within a single concept or entity. It often explores the tension and interplay between opposites.	Cixous discusses the duality of freedom and oppression, highlighting how they can coexist and define each other. She explores the simultaneous experiences of joy and suffering, and how understanding one necessitates an understanding of the other.
Stream of Consciousness	A narrative technique that attempts to depict the multitudinous thoughts and feelings that pass through a character’s mind, often in a continuous and uninterrupted flow.	The essay incorporates a fluid and associative writing style that mirrors the stream of consciousness, moving seamlessly between personal reflections, literary analysis, and philosophical musings. This technique allows Cixous to explore ideas deeply and subjectively.
Existentialism	A philosophical movement emphasizing individual existence, freedom, and choice. It posits that individuals are responsible for giving meaning to their lives in an inherently meaningless or indifferent universe.	Cixous reflects on the individual’s responsibility to seek and define freedom amidst societal constraints and absurdities. She emphasizes personal agency and the courage required to live authentically and ethically in the face of oppression and uncertainty.
Epistemology	The study of knowledge, its nature, sources, limitations, and validity. It explores how we know what we know and what justifies our beliefs.	The essay questions the established knowledge systems that define concepts like freedom and identity. Cixous examines how these concepts are constructed and challenges the legitimacy and inclusivity of traditional epistemological frameworks.
Allusion	An indirect reference to a person, event, work, or concept, often enriching the meaning by connecting it to broader contexts and associations.	Cixous alludes to historical events, literary works, and philosophical ideas, such as referencing Gandhi when discussing love in politics, to deepen her exploration of freedom and resistance. These allusions provide layers of meaning and connect her arguments to wider human experiences.
Symbolism	The use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities, imbuing objects, characters, or events with deeper, often abstract meanings beyond their literal sense.	The “gate” in her description of the Khmer camps serves as a powerful symbol separating freedom and captivity, yet also highlighting their interconnectedness and the arbitrary nature of such divisions. It represents barriers both physical and conceptual.
Narrative Voice	The perspective and personality through which a story is communicated, influencing how the story is perceived and interpreted.	Cixous employs a reflective and authoritative narrative voice that combines personal experience with scholarly insight. Her voice conveys urgency and passion, inviting readers to engage deeply with the ethical and philosophical issues she raises.
Postcolonialism	An academic discipline that analyzes the cultural, political, and economic impacts of colonialism and imperialism, often critiquing the lingering effects of colonial structures and ideologies.	The essay critiques colonialist influences on concepts of freedom and identity, examining how colonial power dynamics continue to shape and restrict individual and collective freedoms. Cixous highlights the need to decolonize these concepts to achieve true liberation.
Lyricism	A quality of expression that is poetic, expressive, and emotional, often characterized by a musicality and depth of feeling.	Cixous’s prose is infused with lyricism, using poetic language and rhythms to convey complex emotions and ideas. This stylistic choice enhances the emotive power of her arguments and engages readers on an aesthetic level.
Dialectics	A method of argument or reasoning that involves the contradiction between two interacting forces or ideas, leading to their resolution or synthesis.	The essay employs dialectical thinking by exploring the contradictions between freedom and oppression, individuality and collectivism, revealing deeper truths through the examination and reconciliation of these opposites.
Allegory	A narrative in which characters and events symbolize broader concepts and ideas, often conveying moral, social, or political messages.	Cixous’s depiction of the Khmer camps serves as an allegory for the complexities of freedom and captivity, illustrating how suffering and hope coexist and how oppressive systems can reveal deeper understandings of humanity and resilience.
Transcendence	The act of going beyond ordinary limits or experiences, often relating to spiritual or existential elevation above mundane existence.	She discusses how engaging deeply with suffering, truth, and authentic expression allows individuals to transcend societal constraints and attain a higher understanding of freedom and selfhood.
Polyphony	The presence of multiple voices, perspectives, or themes within a single work, contributing to its richness and complexity.	The essay incorporates various voices and perspectives, including those of other poets and thinkers, creating a polyphonic narrative that reflects the multifaceted nature of freedom and human experience.
Irony	A literary device where the intended meaning is different from the literal meaning, often highlighting contrasts between expectations and reality.	Cixous highlights the irony of societies that claim to uphold freedom and democracy while perpetuating systemic oppression and silencing dissenting voices. This contrast underscores the hypocrisy inherent in certain political and social structures.
Metonymy	A figure of speech in which a thing is referred to by the name of something closely associated with it.	References to “the Word” symbolize broader concepts such as truth, expression, and resistance. By invoking “the Word,” Cixous connects language to the fundamental human struggle for freedom and identity.

Contribution of “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller to Literary Theory/Theories

Examples of Critiques Through “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller

Literary Work & Author	Critique/Interpretation by Hélène Cixous
“Requiem” by Anna Akhmatova	Suffering and Compassion: Cixous interprets Akhmatova’s “Requiem” as a profound expression of shared suffering and compassion. She emphasizes how Akhmatova, through her poetry, becomes a voice for the collective pain experienced by mothers standing in line outside prisons in Leningrad. The poem exemplifies how personal grief transcends into a communal experience, symbolizing the collective struggle against oppression (“Cixous,” 206-208).
“Hope Against Hope” by Nadezhda Mandelstam	The Power of Poetry in Oppression: Cixous draws on Mandelstam’s experiences to highlight the enduring power of poetry in the face of tyranny. She critiques the state’s fear of the written word, as seen in the persecution of Mandelstam, who was exiled for his poetry. Cixous underscores that the state’s reaction to poetry, often seen as a threat, is a testament to the unyielding power of language to challenge oppressive regimes (“Cixous,” 204-206).
“The Noise of Time” by Osip Mandelstam	Historical Witness and Memory: Cixous uses Mandelstam’s prose work “The Noise of Time” to illustrate how poets serve as witnesses to the “noises of history,” chronicling the tumultuous events of the twentieth century. She critiques the erasure and persecution of poets, arguing that their work, even when suppressed, forms a vital record of historical truth and resistance. Mandelstam’s writing becomes a symbol of the resilience of human memory and the poet’s role in preserving it (“Cixous,” 205-207).
“Circonfession” by Jacques Derrida	Deconstruction and the Power of Language: Cixous engages with Derrida’s “Circonfession” to explore the complex relationship between language and meaning. She critiques the conventional understanding of language, using Derrida’s work to demonstrate how words carry multiple, often contradictory meanings. This deconstructionist approach highlights the limitations of language in capturing the full essence of human experience, while also acknowledging its power to transcend and subvert established norms (“Cixous,” 216-217).

Criticism Against “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller

1. Lack of Concrete Solutions: Critics argue that while Cixous eloquently explores the complexities of freedom, oppression, and identity, the essay offers little in terms of concrete solutions or actionable steps. The philosophical and abstract nature of the work can leave readers feeling overwhelmed by the depth of the issues without a clear path forward.
2. Overemphasis on Poetic Language: Some critics contend that Cixous’s use of dense, poetic language, while powerful, can obscure meaning and make the essay inaccessible to a broader audience. The lyrical style, though evocative, may alienate readers who are not accustomed to such a heavily stylized form of academic writing.
3. Elitism in Intellectual Discourse: The essay has been criticized for its potential elitism, as it assumes a high level of familiarity with literary and philosophical references. This can create a barrier to entry for readers who may not have a background in the specific texts and authors Cixous engages with, thereby limiting the work’s accessibility and inclusivity.
4. Ambiguity and Vagueness: Some readers find fault with the essay’s tendency towards ambiguity, where key concepts like freedom and identity are deconstructed to the point of becoming vague. This lack of clarity can make it difficult to discern Cixous’s ultimate stance or the practical implications of her arguments.
5. Excessive Focus on Personal Reflection: Critics have pointed out that the essay’s heavy reliance on personal reflection and anecdotal experience might detract from a more rigorous, objective analysis of the broader social and political issues at hand. The introspective approach, while insightful, may not resonate with all readers looking for a more detached critique.

Suggested Readings: “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller

Representative Quotations from “We Who Are Free, Are We Free?” by Hélène Cixous and Chris Miller with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Cowards die many times before their death”	This quotation, borrowed from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, sets the tone for Cixous’s exploration of fear and courage. It underscores the idea that those who live in fear experience a metaphorical death repeatedly, in contrast to those who embrace freedom and face life’s challenges boldly.
“Am I free? Have I ever been free? have we? have you?”	This rhetorical questioning reflects Cixous’s deep inquiry into the nature of freedom. It challenges the reader to consider the conditions under which freedom is experienced or denied, both individually and collectively.
“The poem is stronger than the poet.”	Cixous emphasizes the enduring power of poetry, suggesting that the creation often transcends its creator. This statement highlights the idea that art, particularly poetry, carries a force that can resist oppression and communicate truths beyond the limitations of the poet.
“We are assassinated from far off and from nearby, from close up.”	This metaphorical statement critiques modern societies, where Cixous argues that subtle and pervasive forms of violence and deceit infiltrate everyday life. It points to the insidious nature of systemic oppression and the ways in which truth is often obscured or distorted.
“Language is where they excavate and build their palaces and their tombs.”	Cixous here reflects on the power of language as both a creative and destructive force. For those dispossessed or oppressed, language becomes the primary tool for constructing meaning, identity, and resistance, even as it can also be a place of loss and mourning.
“What limits my liberty? What limits our liberty?”	This quotation captures the central concern of the essay: the exploration of the boundaries and constraints placed on freedom. Cixous invites readers to consider the external and internal forces that limit individual and collective liberty.
“A poet will never be the president of a great state, no woman who is a woman, nobody whose tongue is free, will ever be president.”	This statement critiques the structures of power that exclude those who are truly free in their expression, particularly women and poets. It highlights the tension between creative freedom and political authority, suggesting that true freedom of expression is incompatible with holding power in conventional structures.
“We who are free, are we free?”	This central question encapsulates the essay’s theme, challenging the assumption that those who live in democratic societies are truly free. Cixous probes the superficiality of such freedoms and the deeper, often invisible, constraints that still bind individuals and societies.
“We need both sides, and to know the one through the other.”	Cixous suggests that understanding freedom requires experiencing and recognizing both freedom and its opposite, oppression. This duality is essential for a full comprehension of liberty’s value and the responsibilities it entails.
“The desert can be the gift of God, and God can be the gift of the desert.”	This metaphorical statement reflects Cixous’s exploration of existential and spiritual themes, where the emptiness or challenges (the “desert”) one faces can be both a trial and a source of profound insight or divine presence. It speaks to the transformative potential of hardship.

---