Day: January 25, 2024

Introduction: My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies

Having lived through numerous years of my life, I often find myself reflecting on my encounter with my logical fallacies. I’ve discovered that many of the people I’ve met over the years have turned out to be entirely different from my initial assumptions about them. Upon closer examination, I’ve realized that many of my observations were superficial or shallow, primarily stemming from faulty reasoning. It’s not that the fault lies in my thinking; rather, it was the hasty nature of my decision-making process. In the past, I tended to judge people based on superficial perceptions or shallow thinking.

Even now, I take a moment to make decisions about people, whether it involves maintaining a positive relationship, engaging in a deal, or terminating a connection following a particular incident. However, I acknowledge that in many instances, the faulty reasoning I’ve employed was rooted in hasty decisions, leading to inevitable mistakes. Upon reflection, I recall instances where my decisions were influenced by logical fallacies.

Analyzing my current life, I recognize that I have often fallen prey to the logical fallacy of hasty generalization. I’m beginning to see the adverse effects this has had on me, as I frequently become a victim of misidentification and appeal to fear—an additional logical fallacy. Upon a careful examination of these fallacies, I find myself on the wrong side, with faulty reasoning impacting my understanding of the people around me in my current environment.

My Situation and My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies

A couple of years ago, during a routine grocery shopping visit to 9th Avenue, I encountered a situation that exposed the flaws in my reasoning. As part of my regular routine, I visited a nearby grocery store for fresh produce. On one occasion, I noticed a turbaned man with a thick, neatly trimmed beard, and, influenced by the prevailing discussions about Afghan Muslims, I hastily assumed he was from Afghanistan and a devout Muslim. This immediate judgment triggered an unfamiliar sense of alarm within me, despite having never experienced such feelings towards bearded individuals before. His features, somewhat distinct from those around me, intensified my apprehension, influenced by the ongoing discourse about the Afghan retreat and the Taliban takeover.

On the second day, encountering him again in the same grocery store, my fear prompted me to blurt out “Salam-Alaikum,” a Muslim greeting. His quizzical look and the store owner’s smile hinted at my error, but I couldn’t identify my mistake.

During my third visit to the grocery store a few days later, the bearded man, still present, took me aside and explained, in impeccable British English, that he was a British Sikh, not a Muslim. This revelation left me sheepish, realizing the extent of my mistaken identity. He clarified that he followed Sikhism, a religion prevalent in Indian Punjab, where having a beard is a religious obligation. My assumption that all bearded and turbaned individuals were Muslims was a hasty generalization, a logical fallacy I had held onto for an extended period.

Reflecting on this incident, I acknowledged my faulty reasoning and recognized another logical fallacy—appeal to fear. My initial fear stemmed from associating the bearded Sikh with the recent Taliban events, fueled by media coverage. However, his friendly demeanor and explanation shattered my misconceptions. The fear I felt was an overestimation, as he was neither a Muslim nor an Afghan, debunking the flawed association between Afghans and the Taliban.

This encounter served as a valuable lesson, prompting me to question and rectify my hasty generalizations and unfounded fears, emphasizing the importance of avoiding such logical fallacies in understanding and interacting with diverse individuals.

Conclusion: My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies

Putting it briefly, my encounter with my logical fallacies involved both hasty generalization and appeal to fear. The initial mistake of mistaking a Sikh man for a Muslim, driven by a hasty generalization, was corrected when he clarified his religion and attire, dismantling my flawed reasoning. This correction also dispelled the appeal to fear, as I realized that not all individuals with certain features or from specific regions adhere to stereotypes. I have since refrained from judging people based solely on their appearance and engage in interactions to form informed opinions rather than relying on these two faulty reasoning. Avoiding such judgments is crucial to prevent racial segregation, discrimination, and unwarranted fear, promoting a more open and understanding perspective.

Works Cited: My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies

1. Fantino, Edmund, Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino, and Anton Navarro. “Logical fallacies: A behavioral approach to reasoning.” The Behavior Analyst Today 4.1 (2003): 109.
2. Roberts, W. Rhys. Rhetoric. Courier Corporation, 2004.

Relevant Questions about My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies

1. What insights did you gain from reflecting on your experience in “My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies,” and how did it shape your understanding of reasoning and argumentation?
2. How did your awareness of logical fallacies evolve throughout “My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies,” and what steps did you take to address or rectify them in your thinking and communication?
3. In “My Encounter with My Logical Fallacies,” how did your personal encounters with logical fallacies influence your approach to critical thinking, and what strategies did you adopt to improve the overall coherence and validity of your arguments?

Introduction: Mothering and Its Demands

Mothering and its demands often place women in a complex interplay of societal expectations, personal sacrifices, and the emotional intricacies that shape their journey through the realms of family and identity. Mothering is inherently a feminine domain, encompassing not just the act of giving birth but also extending to the profound care and love that persists even for babies who may not live to see the world. It’s a full-time commitment that goes beyond the pride of giving birth to baby girls. This aspect, understood uniquely by girls and prospective mothers, is eloquently emphasized by feminist writers Jamaica Kincaid and Anais Nin in their stories “Girl” and “Birth.”

Both writers portray mothers as sacrificial figures who love and care for their children, whether alive or unborn. The mothers are intricately connected to their offspring, an integral part of their bodies, a sentiment explicitly expressed in their stories. Despite the common theme of giving birth to or nurturing baby girls, the narration methods differ—Kincaid employs an advisory monologue, while Nin uses a first-person narrative detailing the experience of birthing a six-month-old baby. Despite these distinctions, the central topic remains consistent: the journey of bringing a baby girl into the world and raising her.

In showcasing their love and motherly care, these writers illustrate that mothers possess a diverse set of tools gifted to them by Mother Nature. These tools serve as means for demonstrating affection, embodying maternal characteristics of sacrifice, and repetitively expressing care for their children.

Daughters, Mothering and Its Demands

Both mothers vividly express not only a motherly love but also a distinctly feminist affection for their daughters. Mothers, driven by the wisdom gained through their experiences, are compelled to equip their daughters with essential skills for navigating the challenges of the world. This nurturing instinct remains unwavering, even if the daughters are yet to arrive or, tragically, are no longer a part of the world.

In Kincaid’s “Girl,” the mother imparts a barrage of advice to her daughter, offering guidance on practical matters like coloring hair and, more significantly, on dealing with the perceived dangers posed by men. The mother’s instructions on loving a man and, if unsuccessful, resorting to other methods underscore the protective nature of her guidance (Kincaid 321). The lessons extend beyond relationships, encapsulating essential skills for successfully managing a household—an intricate web of knowledge passed down through maternal love.

Similarly, in “Birth,” the mother defies the doctor’s advice, unwilling to push out the child, as she recognizes it as a fragment of her body, a manifestation of deep motherly love for the deceased baby girl (Nin 588). This profound connection prevents her from parting with this fragment, even if labeled a “demon” by medical professionals, eliciting the doctor’s frustration over her refusal to comply. The narrative underscores the powerful and enduring nature of a mother’s love, even in the face of societal norms or medical recommendations.

Mothering and Its Demands of Sacrifice

Mothers, particularly when it comes to their daughters, embody a spirit of sacrifice, as demonstrated by Kincaid’s portrayal of a maternal figure who has already sacrificed much to raise her daughter. The extensive harangue, serving as a treatise for her daughter, reveals the wealth of experience the mother has accumulated. Her primary objective is to ensure her daughter’s success in life, even if she herself has not achieved it. The advice on dealing with men, expressed as “this is how to make both ends meet,” reflects the mother’s upbringing in challenging circumstances, illustrating the necessary skills a girl should acquire (Kincaid 321).

Similarly, in “Birth,” the mother remains unyielding to the doctor’s and nurse’s recommendations. Even when the doctor attempts an intervention, she fiercely rebukes him. Her sacrifice is evident as she endures internal fires, bruises, and pain, yet refuses to hasten the delivery of her baby into the world before its time (Nin 590). The mother, akin to Kincaid’s character, aims to prepare her daughter for the world, recognizing that even in death within her womb, the baby should at least be perfectly formed (Nin 591). This act serves as a source of solace, affirming that her daughter remains a complete and beautiful entity.

Mothering and Its Demands

Mothers, whether in the act of giving birth or imparting advice, exhibit a tendency toward repetition, inherent in their nurturing nature as architects of the future generation. This inclination to reiterate serves as a mechanism to ensure the well-being of their children, demonstrating a belief that repetition is integral to instilling values and lessons. In Kincaid’s narrative, the mother invests her entire life into a brief lecture characterized by numerous repetitions—guiding her daughter on various tasks and behaviors. For instance, when advising on ironing clothes, she repeats phrases like “this is how you iron your father’s khaki shirt” and “this is how you iron your father’s khaki pants,” emphasizing the importance of repetition in imparting crucial values (Kincaid 320).

Similarly, the mother in “Birth” not only repeats her own thoughts but also anticipates and repeats what she is going to say. Phrases like “I push,” “he is angry,” “doctor says,” and the repeated insistence of “Show it to me” underscore the pervasive use of repetition (Nin 590-591). This rhetorical device appears ingrained in the essence of motherhood, a tool passed down through generations, possibly by nature itself, as mothers play a pivotal role in training and teaching the future generation. While mothers may have various tools in their caregiving arsenal, the tool of repetition serves as a powerful means to convey the intensity of a mother’s care and concern for her children.

Conclusion: Mothering and Its Demands

In short, both feminist writers, Anais Nin and Jamaica Kincaid, infuse their motherly perspectives into their respective stories. The universality of their messages is accentuated by the deliberate portrayal of mothers as anonymous figures, enhancing the effectiveness of their narratives. The absence of specific names for the mothers makes the messages universally relatable, as the figure of a mother carries inherent significance and resonance for everyone. The sacrificial nature of a mother’s love, evident in both “Birth” and “Girl,” positions them as exemplars of maternal devotion. The mothers in these stories not only embody profound love but also impart crucial skills to their daughters, utilizing rhetorical tools to convey essential life lessons. Despite the universality of the theme, both writers present the character of the mother uniquely. “Girl” unfolds as a continuous harangue, an unceasing flow of maternal guidance, while “Birth” takes the form of a one-sided monologue detailing the experience of the first childbirth, capturing the mother’s extreme pain. The authors skillfully emphasize the distinctive aspects of the mother’s character while ensuring that the portrayal remains universally resonant.

Works Cited: Mothering and Its Demands

1. Nin, Anais. “Birth.” From Charters, Ann. Ed. The Story and Its Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction. 6^th Ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s. 2003. Print. 588-591.
2. Kincaid, Jamaica. “Girl.” From Charters, Ann. Ed. The Story and Its Writer: An Introduction to Short Fiction. 6^th Ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s. 2003. Print. 320-321.

Relevant Questions: Mothering and Its Demands

1. How do the stories “Birth” by Anais Nin and “Girl” by Jamaica Kincaid explore the challenges and demands of motherhood?
2. What cultural and societal influences are depicted in the stories that shape the expectations and roles of mothers in “Birth” and “Girl”?
3. How do the protagonists in “Birth” and “Girl” navigate the complexities of their roles as mothers, and what do their experiences reveal about the broader themes of femininity and identity within Mothering and Its Demands?

Introduction: Millennials Are Not Getting Married

Millennials are not getting married at the same rates as previous generations, citing reasons such as financial instability, the inconvenience of married life, and a focus on higher education and career goals. Marriage, declared a sacred institution in both religious and social terms, appears to be at stake due to the onslaught of technology and financial pressure on the current generation. This is the very reason why this generation is called millennials, as they are born in the technologically most advanced era. Marriage and millennials seem to be opposed, standing at opposite poles in the current social fabric. This not only takes a heavy toll on the social structure but also jeopardizes the future of the existing social setup, as noted by Katrina Alcorn in her declaration of a “Generation Child-Free.” She adds that this situation bodes poorly for the economy of the United States, with the birthrate already falling below 1.9 (Alcorn).

This implies that millennials are hesitant to marry, and if they do, they often choose not to have children. However, this is not the whole story. In reality, they avoid marriage due to financially unstable careers, the inconvenience of married life, and the pursuit of higher education or better career goals.

Comparison: Millennials Are Not Getting Married

Millennials are showing a reluctance to marry compared to previous generations, largely attributed to financial instability in their lives. Belinda Luscombe highlights two plausible factors—absence of jobs and diminished importance placed on marriage—citing a Pew Research report to substantiate her claims. According to Pew, not only are millennials marrying in fewer numbers, but they are also delaying marriage, citing reasons such as difficulty finding the right partner, financial instability, and unsettled lives (Luscombe).

However, the primary factor appears to be financial stability, as emphasized by Maureen Henderson. She asserts that millennials who are financially secure do not express a reluctance to marry. Henderson argues that there is a “financial logic to it,” indicating that the decision not to marry, delay it indefinitely, or refrain from hastily taking the plunge is rooted in financial considerations (Henderson). Once again, financial stability emerges as a critical factor, leading to life inconveniences.

Millennials Are Not Getting Married Due to Responsibility

Inconvenience, in this context, implies that millennials are hesitant to take on the responsibilities of married life, which demands not only a full-time commitment but also the obligations associated with raising children. Taylor Tepper emphasizes this point, noting that marriage entails children, and raising kids consumes a significant amount of time (Tepper). Conversely, Maureen Henderson directly quotes Gallup, stating that marriage is, to some degree, a matter of timing and convenience, underscoring the perspective that marriage is not perceived as a necessity by millennials (Henderson).

The millennials’ view that marriage is not essential aligns with the notion that they can marry when it’s convenient for them, reflecting the product of an era shaped by the Great Recession. Katrina Alcorn, quoting Dr. Stewart Friedman’s monumental work on millennials, points out that this generation is grappling with anxiety about its future, contributing to their perception that there is no convenient time to get married, particularly as many are already burdened with debt (Alcorn). This reiterates the consistent theme that financial instability is a significant factor.

Furthermore, millennials’ reluctance to embrace married life is also linked to their desire to avoid having children. This reluctance is intertwined with their financial concerns, further reinforcing the notion that economic stability plays a pivotal role in shaping their views on marriage and family life.

Millennials Are Not Getting Married Due to Kids

Having kids after married life is a natural progression, but it adds substantial responsibilities to the lives of the couple. Taylor Tepper eloquently explores this aspect of millennials’ lives, drawing from his own experience of feeling like a prisoner and a machine to the happiness of his two-year-old toddler. The responsibilities of caring for the child not only take away moments of enjoyment but also disrupt dreams of vacations and other luxuries. Tepper describes his two-hour “spell of cleaning, organizing, and readying” as the realization of a Millennial nightmare, a sentiment shared by many in this generation (Tepper).

Tepper quotes Dr. Friedman, emphasizing that becoming a parent comes at a significant price, one that many millennials are not ready to pay due to various economic and personal reasons. He points to the American maternity leave and expensive childcare system as contributing factors to millennials’ aversion to having kids, highlighting that raising a child means sacrificing self-interest for the sake of the child (Tepper). In essence, having kids translates to a loss of time and convenience, two elements millennials are unwilling to compromise as they prioritize their education and career aspirations.

Millennials Are Not Getting Married: Carreer Oriented Women

Specifically, for millennial women, prioritizing a career over having kids is more prevalent, whereas millennial men show less enthusiasm. Quoting Dr. Friedman on the impact of the Recession Period, student loans, and fears of the future, Katrina Alcorn rightly emphasizes that this generation, characterized by anxiety, prioritizes obtaining a good education and establishing a solid career before considering marriage (Alcorn). Nanette Fondas also cites Dr. Friedman, noting that millennials find it challenging to integrate work with parenting. The percentage of people with plans for children has decreased to 42%, with uncertainty about managing “manageable lives” being a significant factor (Fondas).

The decline in the number of people planning for kids has various reasons, including the increased number of jobs for women, a shift in gender roles, and a preference for marrying individuals with stable jobs. Fonda argues that the primary issue is financial, as not all millennials can afford to make arrangements like marrying working women and sharing work responsibilities (Fondas). Thus, the combination of a full-time commitment to work, a desire for higher education, mounting student loans, and lingering anxiety from the Recession period collectively dissuades millennials from rushing into marriage. However, this does not imply that millennials are avoiding marriage altogether.

Millennials Are Not Getting Married Due to Decreasing Number

It indicates that while the number of millennials getting married has significantly decreased, some still manage to navigate marriage and parenthood successfully, as exemplified by Taylor Tepper. Tepper highlights that child-rearing becomes more manageable when individuals align their self-interest with that of their children, acknowledging that experiencing the “sublime joy of yielding your wants and desires” is not an easy task (Tepper). Similarly, Nanette Fondas suggests that millennials, having experienced harsh economic realities, are reluctant to burden their children. Their “realistic outlook on work and life explains the current baby bust,” she argues, emphasizing that if they choose to marry, they approach it with a “pragmatic and sensible” mindset (Fondas).

This implies that millennials are more conscientious about the times and the future than the previous generation. They recognize the responsibility involved in bringing a child into the world, as emphasized by Taylor Tepper, and, as a result, they choose to marry when they feel they can prove themselves to be responsible and capable of providing for their children.

Conclusion: Millennials Are Not Getting Married

Putting it briefly, millennials have multiple reasons for refraining from marriage, as highlighted by Fondas, including “long work hours, heavy student debt, job and career stress, anticipated work-family conflict, and health and social tradeoffs” (Fondas). It is evident that these considerations weigh heavily on the minds of millennials, who are aware that marriage often leads to the additional responsibility of raising children.

As a result, adopting a sensible and pragmatic approach to marriage becomes a practical solution that many millennials choose to pursue. While some individuals within this generation can effectively balance work, parenting, and married life, they are in the minority. Their numbers are not as significant as those in the previous generation. For the majority of millennials, marriage is not viewed as a necessity but rather as an achievement that they wish to prioritize in their lives with careful consideration of time and convenience. This perspective is why many millennials are either shying away from or delaying this crucial life role.

Works Cited: Millennials Are Not Getting Married

1. Alcorn, Katrina. “Millennials Want Children, But They’re Not Planning on Them.” The New York Times. 08 Jan. 2014. https://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/08/millennials-want-children-but-theyre-not-planning-on-them/?_r=1. Accessed on 24 Jan. 2022.
2. Fondas, Nanette. “Millennials: Too Realistic to Have Children?” The Huffington Post. 07 Nov. 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nanette-fondas/are-millennials-too-realistic-to-have-children_b_4221885.html. Accessed on 24 Jun. 2022.
3. Henderson, J. Maureen. “Does Marriage Make Sense for Millennials?” Forbes. 20 Jan. 2014. https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jmaureenhenderson/2014/01/20/does-marriage-make-sense-formillennials/&refURL=&referrer=#2f59acb3108f. Accessed on 24 Jun. 2022.
4. Luscombe, Belinda. “Why 25% of Millennials Will Never Get Married.” Time. 24 Sep. 2014. http://time.com/3422624/report-millennials-marriage/. Accessed on 24 Jun. 2022.
5. Tepper, Taylor. “Why Millennials Should Have Kids– And Soon.” Time. 17 Sep. 2014. http://time.com/money/3341220/millennialsshould-have-kids/. Accessed on 24 Jun. 2022.

Relevant Questions: Millennials Are Not Getting Married

1. What societal factors contribute to the trend of Millennials Are Not Getting Married, delaying or forgoing marriage?
2. How does the delay in marriage among Millennials Are Not Getting Married impact family structures, social norms, and individual well-being?
3. In what ways do economic factors, such as student debt and housing costs, play a role in Millennials Are Not Getting Married, their decisions regarding marriage?

Introduction: A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

A Syrian Man in Debris,” he iconic image by Baraa Al-Hallabi of the AFP paints a grim picture of war-torn Syria. The depiction of a man calling for help among the debris of gutted shops and falling rubble creates a harrowing representation of the entire year 2016. Susan Chira comments, “Syria’s agony played out before a largely indifferent world” (Chira).”The iconic image by Baraa Al-Hallabi of the AFP paints a grim picture of war-torn Syria. The depiction of a man calling for help among the debris of gutted shops and falling rubble creates a harrowing representation of the entire year 2016. Susan Chira comments, “Syria’s agony played out before a largely indifferent world” (Chira).

The image not only reflects the indifference of the world but also the helplessness of the common people of Syria who have become victims of a colossal civil war. In this conflict, half of the world supports the rebels, labeling them as political opponents engaged in overthrowing a cruel dictator, while the other half supports the same dictator in the name of stability, peace, and the unity of the country.

This image is a significant part of the collection from 2016 as it underscores not only the world’s indifference regarding the assistance it could have provided to end the war but also the conflicting interests of the West and the struggle for survival amid a bloody and protracted civil war.

Importance: A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

The significance of the image lies in its foggy and dusty background, with a man standing alone while another flees to avoid falling rubble. The main figure appears to be calling out to someone, perhaps symbolizing an appeal to God for help. Unfortunately, his voice seems unheard, not reaching the outside world or the people standing above.

The man’s helplessness is evident in the way he extends his hands, attempting to convey his cries to those above. His dusty clothes, worn-out shoes, covered head, and the falling shutter of the shop behind him, with electric wires twisted amid shattered plaster and broken windows, further accentuate his isolation amidst the destruction.

Indifference and A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

The image vividly portrays the utter indifference of the people in a dusty wilderness, reflecting the man’s frustration at this apathy, which he vents through desperate cries captured in his twisted palms. Aleppo, once a citadel of cultural heritage and a symbol of Syrian economic progress, now stands as a poignant example of Western indifference and fecklessness in the face of escalating human suffering, as stated by Thanassis Cambanis in “Aleppo: The Capital of Western Indifference” in The Atlantic.

Cambanis contends that Aleppo illustrates not only Western apathy to human suffering but also a lack of resolve in the face of a growing strategic threat transcending a single catastrophic war. He suggests that both warring parties receive aid from world powers driven by ulterior motives and strategic interests. The young man in the photo symbolizes the civilians caught in the crossfire, crying out to the world to halt the ruthless bombing.

Cambanis further notes that the international community seems to have little concern for its own reputation, mirroring the lack of concern for civilians like the trapped young man depicted in the image. Taken in June 2016, a critical juncture before direct Russian involvement in the war, the photo highlights the continued indifference with which the world turned its back on civilians trapped in senseless bombings from both sides in civilian areas.

Interests and A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

Indeed, the photo suggests a deeper involvement driven by national interests rather than purely strategic concerns. The depicted man could represent various backgrounds — a young person struggling with poverty, a doctor, a member of a marginalized community, a Christian, a Shia, or even a rebel. While these details remain unanswered, his frustration, conveyed through desperate cries, transcends individual identity to reflect the broader frustration of a community, a nation, and a population trapped in a homeland turned battleground, as analyzed by Hanna Kassab in her article “Syria as a Global Battleground: More Actors, More Interests, More Problems.”

Kassab argues that Syria has become a global battleground with diverse actors operating without centralization, driven by different countries seeking revenge on their opponents within the Syrian conflict. This frustration is reminiscent of the Lebanese conflict, but the impact of these images is more profound, particularly in conveying the battle for survival experienced by individuals like the man in the photograph. Trapped underground amid debris, he cries out to the world for help, but assistance seems elusive.

Kate Nelson, from the British newspaper The Independent, emphasizes the horror of the civilian war through various images, including the well-known one of five-year-old Omran Daqneesh. She echoes the sentiment of helplessness, stating that the image of the young boy doesn’t accurately capture the visceral feeling of helplessness and terror when hearing planes circling overhead. Both the young man and the child convey different forms of helplessness—the former vocalizing his distress with strength, while the latter remains speechless, gazing at the world with blank eyes, creating a poignant contrast.

Survival and A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

The image not only reflects helplessness but also serves as a stark portrayal of the relentless struggle for survival amidst the brutal civil war in Aleppo. Robin Wright, in The New Yorker, paints a grim picture of the city’s fall to the Syrian army and Russian forces after a prolonged conflict. He highlights Aleppo’s historical significance, being mentioned in the Bible and representing a center for “three great Abrahamic faiths” (Wright).

Wright emphasizes the dire conditions faced by the population, mentioning that the city’s original population of twenty-two million depended on international aid for daily survival. Quoting a general, he captures the essence of the people’s predicament, stating that they have nothing to lose or gain, and the only options left are surrender or face death: “They don’t have much time. They either have to surrender or die” (Wright).

The image of the young man, coupled with Robin Wright’s observations and the words of General Zaid al-Saleh, collectively narrate the harrowing tale of individuals desperately seeking means and ways of survival in the face of relentless bombardment, portraying the horrors, destruction, and grim situation that has befallen the people of Aleppo.

Conclusion: A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

The scale of destruction in the image serves as a powerful metaphor for the long and protracted war. The young man, nearly encircled by debris, falling plaster, broken windows, and dust, not only raises a voice for help but also emits a desperate cry in the wilderness of war ravages. This cry becomes a rallying call, urging everyone to stand together even in the face of death.

In essence, the image paints a vivid picture of confusion, devastation, and the intertwining of global interests in the tumultuous year of 2016. Its inclusion in the collection is significant as it illustrates the world’s increasing indifference to the war’s ravages unleashed upon Syria and its innocent civilians. The picture poignantly demonstrates the conflicts arising from global interests and how the innocent civilians bear the brunt of these geopolitical struggles. Moreover, it captures the extension of the war, the resilience of the people as they strive to survive, and the immense suffering they endure in the process.

Works Cited: A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

1. Cambanis, Thanassis. “Aleppo: The Capital of Western Indifference.” The Atlantic. 03 Oct. 2016. Web. 22 Feb. 2022.
2. Chira, Susan. “The Year in Pictures 2016.” The New York Times. 22. Dec. 2016. Web. 24 Feb. 2022. [Figure 1]
3. Kassab, Hanna. “Syria as a Global Battleground: More Actors, More Interests, More Problems.” International Policy Digest. 31 Aug. 2016. Web. 22 Feb. 2022.
4. Nelson, Kate. “War photographers explain what makes image of Syrian child so devastatingly powerful.” The Independent. 18 Aug. 2016. Web. 23 Feb. 2022.
5. Wright, Robin. “The Battle for Aleppo, Syria’s Stalingrad Ends.” The New  Yorker. 13 Dec. 2016. Web. 23 Feb. 2022.

Relevant Questions: A Syrian Man in Debris: Photo Rhetoric

1. What emotions does the image evoke, and how does it contribute to the rhetoric surrounding the Syrian civil war?
   • Exploring the emotional impact of the photo can reveal how it effectively communicates the human toll and the devastation caused by the conflict. Understanding the emotional response helps analyze its role in shaping public perception and discourse surrounding the Syrian war.
2. How does the composition of the photograph convey the themes of helplessness, survival, and global indifference?
   • Analyzing the visual elements, such as the placement of the man amidst debris, the state of the surroundings, and his body language, can provide insights into the photographer’s intention and how these elements contribute to the narrative of the Syrian conflict, including the themes of helplessness, survival, and global indifference.
3. What role does the photo play in the broader context of photojournalism and global awareness?
   • Considering the context of the photo within the realm of photojournalism, it’s important to examine how such images contribute to global awareness and understanding of conflicts. Assessing the impact on public opinion, policymaking, and humanitarian efforts helps gauge the photo’s significance beyond its immediate visual representation.