“Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme): A Critical Analysis

“Jack and Jill,” the traditional nursery rhyme, first appeared in 1765 in Mother Goose’s Melody, a collection of nursery rhymes widely attributed to John Newbery.

"Jack and Jill" (Traditional Nursery Rhyme): A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)

“Jack and Jill,” the traditional nursery rhyme, first appeared in 1765 in Mother Goose’s Melody, a collection of nursery rhymes widely attributed to John Newbery. Initially sung by parents and caregivers as a simple, rhythmic story, the rhyme recounts the tale of two characters, Jack and Jill, who climb a hill to fetch a pail of water, only to stumble and fall. The rhyme’s main ideas revolve around adventure, mishaps, and resilience, which can be understood as playful yet cautionary for children. Its popularity stems from its catchy, rhythmic structure that appeals to young listeners, as well as its relatable storyline, teaching lessons on persistence despite small misfortunes. This enduring appeal has kept “Jack and Jill” alive in cultural memory, allowing it to be passed down across generations.

Text: “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)

Jack and Jill went up the hill
To fetch a pail of water.
Jack fell down and broke his crown,
And Jill came tumbling after.

Up Jack got, and home did trot,
As fast as he could caper,
He went to bed to mend his head,
With vinegar and brown paper.

Annotations: “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)

LineTextDevicesExplanation
1“Jack and Jill went up the hill”Alliteration, Imagery, RhythmThe repetition of the “J” sound in “Jack” and “Jill” (alliteration) enhances the rhythm. Imagery of characters going uphill creates a visual scene.
2“To fetch a pail of water.”Assonance, Simple RhymeThe repetition of the “a” sound in “pail” and “water” is assonance, while “hill” and “water” end on similar sounds, making it rhythmically appealing.
3“Jack fell down and broke his crown,”Metaphor, Rhyme, Alliteration“Crown” is a metaphor for Jack’s head, adding humor. The line rhymes with “after” (next line), and the “J” and “c” sounds create alliteration.
4“And Jill came tumbling after.”Rhyme, Imagery, PersonificationThe rhyme with “crown” and “after” creates a memorable sound. Imagery shows Jill falling, and personification gives the fall a human-like quality.
5“Up Jack got, and home did trot,”Inversion, ImageryUnusual word order (inversion) is used to fit the rhyme and rhythm. Imagery shows Jack getting up and moving quickly.
6“As fast as he could caper,”Simile, Rhythm“As fast as he could caper” is a simile comparing Jack’s speed to capering, creating a lively, rhythmic flow.
7“He went to bed to mend his head,”Internal Rhyme, ImageryInternal rhyme in “bed” and “head” enhances rhythm. Imagery suggests Jack going to rest, evoking a sense of calm after the fall.
8“With vinegar and brown paper.”Imagery, Symbolism, Historical ReferenceImagery of traditional remedies (vinegar and paper) reflects old healing practices, symbolizing simple and folk cures for injuries.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)
DeviceExampleExplanation
Alliteration“Jack and Jill”The repetition of the “J” sound in “Jack” and “Jill” adds a rhythmic, catchy quality to the rhyme.
Assonance“To fetch a pail of water”The repeated “a” sound in “pail” and “water” creates a subtle musical quality, enhancing the rhythm of the line.
Ballad FormEntire rhymeThe rhyme follows a simple, ballad-like structure with short, rhyming lines, making it easy to remember and recite.
Consonance“Jack fell down and broke his crown”The repeated “k” sound in “Jack,” “broke,” and “crown” adds to the rhythm and helps unify the line.
End Rhyme“hill” / “water,” “crown” / “after”The rhyme scheme (ABCB) adds a pleasing musicality, making it easier for children to remember and repeat.
Imagery“Jack and Jill went up the hill”The line creates a mental image of two children climbing a hill, helping readers visualize the scene.
Internal Rhyme“bed” and “head”The rhyme within the line creates a harmonious sound, adding to the rhythmic structure of the nursery rhyme.
Inversion“Up Jack got, and home did trot”Reversing the usual word order emphasizes Jack’s quick action and fits the rhyme scheme, maintaining the rhythmic flow.
Irony“broke his crown”The phrase is ironically humorous, as “crown” metaphorically refers to his head, downplaying the injury with a lighthearted tone.
Metaphor“broke his crown”“Crown” is used metaphorically for Jack’s head, adding a playful tone by likening a head injury to a broken royal crown.
Narrative StructureEntire rhymeThe rhyme tells a short, complete story with a beginning, middle, and end, making it an effective narrative for children.
Onomatopoeia“tumbling”The word “tumbling” mimics the sound and motion of falling, helping readers hear and feel Jill’s action.
Personification“And Jill came tumbling after”Jill’s fall is described as intentional, almost as if she had control, adding liveliness to her character.
Refrain“Jack and Jill”The title phrase is commonly repeated or remembered as a refrain, giving it a rhythmic, memorable quality.
RhythmEntire rhymeThe consistent beat and meter make the rhyme feel lively and engaging, ideal for recitation by children.
Rhyme SchemeABCBThe structured rhyme scheme (ABCB) gives the poem a predictable rhythm, making it easy to remember and recite.
Simile“As fast as he could caper”The line compares Jack’s speed to capering (dancing or skipping), making the action vivid and playful for readers.
Simple LanguageEntire rhymeThe use of straightforward words and phrases makes the rhyme accessible and enjoyable for young children.
Symbolism“vinegar and brown paper”The use of vinegar and brown paper as a remedy symbolizes traditional, simple folk cures, grounding the rhyme in a past era.
Visual Imagery“With vinegar and brown paper”This phrase creates a visual of Jack’s remedy, painting a picture of his homemade bandage, adding a relatable, comforting touch.
Themes: “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)
  • Adventure and Exploration: The theme of adventure is central to “Jack and Jill,” as it begins with the characters embarking on a journey to fetch a pail of water. The act of climbing “up the hill” signifies a quest, reflecting children’s natural curiosity and willingness to explore their surroundings. This adventurous spirit is relatable to young audiences, inviting them to engage in their own explorations. However, the adventure takes a sudden turn when Jack “fell down,” reminding readers that while exploration can be exciting, it also comes with risks and unexpected consequences.
  • Injury and Recovery: Injury is another significant theme in “Jack and Jill,” particularly highlighted by Jack’s misfortune when he “broke his crown.” This phrase serves as a metaphor for a head injury, introducing a moment of vulnerability and the reality of physical mishaps that can occur during play. The subsequent line, “He went to bed to mend his head,” emphasizes the theme of recovery, suggesting that rest and care are essential after experiencing pain. This portrayal can resonate with children, teaching them about the importance of taking care of oneself after an accident.
  • Resilience and Perseverance: Resilience is exemplified through Jack’s response to his fall. After tumbling down, he quickly “got up” and “trot[ted] home as fast as he could caper.” This determination to rise after a setback illustrates a key lesson about perseverance in the face of adversity. The rhyme conveys that despite the challenges and accidents one might encounter, the ability to recover and continue moving forward is a valuable trait. This theme encourages young listeners to embrace resilience in their own lives.
  • Friendship and Cooperation: The relationship between Jack and Jill highlights the theme of friendship and cooperation. Their joint venture to fetch water symbolizes teamwork, as they undertake the task together. However, their subsequent falls also illustrate how mishaps can affect friends. When Jill “came tumbling after,” it suggests that friends often share in each other’s experiences, both good and bad. This connection between Jack and Jill emphasizes the importance of supporting one another during both triumphs and challenges, reinforcing the value of friendship in children’s lives.
Literary Theories and “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)
Literary TheoryApplication to “Jack and Jill”References from the Poem
StructuralismStructuralism focuses on the underlying structures that shape narratives. In “Jack and Jill,” the rhyme adheres to a clear narrative structure, presenting a beginning (the ascent), a middle (the fall), and an end (the recovery). This structure helps convey the universal theme of adventure leading to consequences.The rhyme begins with the ascent: “Jack and Jill went up the hill,” progresses through the conflict of falling (“Jack fell down and broke his crown”), and concludes with recovery (“He went to bed to mend his head”).
PsychoanalysisA psychoanalytic approach might explore the unconscious motivations and fears represented in the rhyme. Jack’s fall can be seen as a metaphor for childhood fears of failure and injury, reflecting a child’s psychological development and their coping mechanisms when facing adversity.The line “Jack fell down and broke his crown” symbolizes a child’s fear of physical harm, while “He went to bed to mend his head” suggests a return to safety and care, revealing the coping process in the face of fear.
Feminist TheoryFrom a feminist perspective, “Jack and Jill” can be analyzed in terms of gender roles and dynamics. Jill’s role in the rhyme may reflect traditional gender expectations, as she is portrayed as a secondary character who follows Jack. The narrative raises questions about agency and equality in their friendship.Jill “came tumbling after,” indicating her dependence on Jack in the adventure. The rhyme’s simplicity could be critiqued for not providing Jill with a more active role, prompting discussions about the portrayal of gender in children’s literature.
Critical Questions about “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)
  • What does the rhyme suggest about the nature of childhood adventures?
  • “Jack and Jill” presents childhood adventures as a blend of excitement and danger. The opening lines depict a typical childhood quest: “Jack and Jill went up the hill / To fetch a pail of water.” This initiation into adventure captures the spirit of exploration inherent in childhood. However, the subsequent fall signifies the risks associated with such pursuits. When Jack “fell down and broke his crown,” it reflects the unforeseen consequences that can arise from innocent endeavors. Thus, the rhyme illustrates that while childhood adventures are crucial for development and learning, they also carry inherent dangers that must be acknowledged.
  • How does the poem portray the theme of resilience in children?
  • Resilience is a prominent theme in “Jack and Jill,” as evidenced by Jack’s swift recovery after his fall. Following the mishap, the poem states, “Up Jack got, and home did trot,” emphasizing his ability to rise quickly and continue on his way. This portrayal serves as a valuable lesson for young readers, illustrating that setbacks are a natural part of life and that the capacity to bounce back is essential. The imagery of Jack “going to bed to mend his head” suggests that rest and care are vital components of recovery, reinforcing the idea that resilience involves both physical and emotional healing.
  • What role do Jack and Jill’s actions play in defining their characters?
  • The actions of Jack and Jill in the rhyme serve to define their characters and establish their dynamic. Jack’s initiative to climb the hill with Jill reflects a sense of adventure and leadership, as he takes the lead in their quest for water. However, his fall reveals a vulnerability that humanizes him. Jill’s reaction—“came tumbling after”—suggests loyalty and a willingness to follow Jack, but also a lack of agency in their adventure. Together, their interactions highlight a friendship built on shared experiences, yet they also raise questions about the roles assigned to each character, prompting discussions on the dynamics of friendship and support in childhood relationships.
  • In what ways does “Jack and Jill” reflect traditional views on healing and care?
  • The rhyme incorporates traditional views on healing and care through the imagery of remedies used for injuries. After Jack’s fall, he seeks to “mend his head / With vinegar and brown paper,” which reflects historical practices for treating wounds. This reference offers insight into the folk remedies commonly used in the past, suggesting a simplicity and resourcefulness in care. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of nurturing and recovery within childhood experiences. The reliance on such traditional methods underscores a cultural context where healing is often portrayed as an intimate process, reinforcing the idea that care and support are integral to overcoming challenges, especially for children.
Literary Works Similar to “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)
  1. “Humpty Dumpty”
    Similar to “Jack and Jill,” this nursery rhyme explores themes of mishap and recovery, depicting the fall of Humpty Dumpty and the inability to restore him, which serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of vulnerability.
  2. “Hickory Dickory Dock”
    This playful poem features a mouse’s adventures with a clock, reflecting the whimsical nature of childhood exploration and the unexpected events that can unfold during innocent escapades.
  3. “Hey Diddle Diddle”
    Like “Jack and Jill,” this nursery rhyme presents a fantastical scenario where animals engage in unusual activities, celebrating imagination and the joyful absurdity of childhood.
  4. “The Itsy Bitsy Spider”
    This poem mirrors the theme of resilience found in “Jack and Jill,” as the spider encounters setbacks but perseveres in climbing the water spout, emphasizing the importance of determination in the face of challenges.
  5. “Little Bo Peep”
    Similar to “Jack and Jill,” this rhyme tells the story of a character dealing with loss and the journey to recovery, as Little Bo Peep searches for her lost sheep, highlighting themes of responsibility and the resolution of misadventures.
Representative Quotations of “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“Jack and Jill went up the hill”Introduces the characters and sets the stage for their adventure.Narrative Structure: Establishes the beginning of the story and introduces key elements.
“To fetch a pail of water.”Describes the purpose of their journey, a common childhood task.Realism: Reflects everyday activities of children, grounding the rhyme in relatable experiences.
“Jack fell down and broke his crown,”Highlights the moment of conflict as Jack faces a mishap.Psychoanalysis: Suggests underlying fears of injury and failure present in childhood experiences.
“And Jill came tumbling after.”Jill’s reaction to Jack’s fall showcases her role in the adventure.Feminist Theory: Raises questions about agency and gender roles in their relationship.
“Up Jack got, and home did trot,”Jack’s resilience is illustrated as he quickly recovers from his fall.Resilience: Emphasizes the importance of bouncing back after setbacks, a key trait in childhood development.
“He went to bed to mend his head,”Indicates Jack’s need for care and healing following his injury.Symbolism: The act of going to bed symbolizes safety and the process of recovery.
“With vinegar and brown paper.”Describes the traditional remedy Jack uses to heal.Cultural Context: Reflects historical practices of care and healing, connecting to folk traditions.
“As fast as he could caper,”Illustrates Jack’s energetic response after getting up.Imagery: Creates a vivid picture of youthful energy and joy in movement, evoking the spirit of childhood.
“And broke his crown”The metaphorical use of “crown” for his head indicates vulnerability.Metaphor: Highlights the fragility of childhood and the potential for harm in play.
“To fetch a pail of water.”Serves as a reminder of the innocence and simplicity of childhood tasks.Childhood Innocence: Reflects the simplicity and joy in childhood activities, reinforcing the theme of exploration.
Suggested Readings: “Jack and Jill” (Traditional Nursery Rhyme)
  1. Cassidy, Vincent. “Jack and Jill.” Modern Language Notes, vol. 66, no. 1, 1951, pp. 38–39. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2909939. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  2. HUXLEY, H. H. “JACK AND JILL.” The Classical Outlook, vol. 62, no. 3, 1985, pp. 100–100. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43934929. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  3. Levine, Mark. “Jack and Jill.” The Iowa Review, vol. 26, no. 2, 1996, pp. 124–25. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20154282. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  4. Howard, Ben. “Jack and Jill.” The Poetry Ireland Review, no. 72, 2002, pp. 66–66. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25579957. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  5. Báiréad, Peadar. “Jack and Jill.” Comhar, vol. 23, no. 6, 1964, pp. 24–24. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/20551732. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  6. Bardige, Betty, and T. Berry Brazelton. “Jack and Jill.” At A Loss For Words: How America Is Failing Our Children, Temple University Press, 2005, pp. 3–20. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14bs934.6. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.

“Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye: A Critical Analysis

“Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye, first appeared in her 1995 poetry collection, Words Under the Words, explores the concept of fame in a unique, introspective way, examining the idea not as public acclaim but as an intimate, personal connection to people, places, and things.

"Famous" by Naomi Shihab Nye: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye

“Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye, first appeared in her 1995 poetry collection, Words Under the Words, explores the concept of fame in a unique, introspective way, examining the idea not as public acclaim but as an intimate, personal connection to people, places, and things. In the poem, Nye redefines fame through simple, everyday relationships, like the river being “famous to the fish” or the buttonhole being “famous to the button.” By embracing the ordinary and reimagining fame as an act of attention and respect, Nye invites readers to find value in the small and often overlooked aspects of life. The poem’s widespread inclusion in textbooks can be attributed to its accessible language and universal theme, making it a popular choice for teaching perspective, empathy, and appreciation of life’s quieter moments. Its popularity endures as it encourages readers to reflect on the impact and significance they bring to the world, even in unnoticed ways.

Text: “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye

The river is famous to the fish.

The loud voice is famous to silence,  

which knew it would inherit the earth  

before anybody said so.  

The cat sleeping on the fence is famous to the birds  

watching him from the birdhouse.  

The tear is famous, briefly, to the cheek.  

The idea you carry close to your bosom  

is famous to your bosom.  

The boot is famous to the earth,  

more famous than the dress shoe,  

which is famous only to floors.

The bent photograph is famous to the one who carries it  

and not at all famous to the one who is pictured.  

I want to be famous to shuffling men  

who smile while crossing streets,  

sticky children in grocery lines,  

famous as the one who smiled back.

I want to be famous in the way a pulley is famous,   

or a buttonhole, not because it did anything spectacular,  

but because it never forgot what it could do.

Annotations: “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
  1. “The river is famous to the fish.”
    • Interpretation: The river is essential to the fish’s existence. It is a source of life and sustenance, and for the fish, it is the whole world.
    • Meaning: Fame is relative, depending on perspective.
  2. “The loud voice is famous to silence,”
    • Interpretation: Loudness defines silence, highlighting that one’s presence is understood only in contrast to the other.
    • Meaning: Fame or identity often exists in contrast.
  3. “which knew it would inherit the earth before anybody said so.”
    • Interpretation: Silence is eternal, whereas voices and sounds fade. Silence’s “inheritance” is inevitable.
    • Meaning: Silence represents timeless endurance and wisdom.
  4. “The cat sleeping on the fence is famous to the birds watching him from the birdhouse.”
    • Interpretation: The cat, a potential threat, holds the birds’ attention and concern, making it “famous” to them.
    • Meaning: Fame can be rooted in fear or vigilance.
  5. “The tear is famous, briefly, to the cheek.”
    • Interpretation: Tears mark the cheek temporarily, emphasizing the transient nature of certain moments of recognition or “fame.”
    • Meaning: Fame can be fleeting and temporary.
  6. “The idea you carry close to your bosom is famous to your bosom.”
    • Interpretation: Personal ideas or dreams are deeply cherished and intimate, meaningful to the individual alone.
    • Meaning: Fame is subjective and private, tied to one’s inner self.
  7. “The boot is famous to the earth, more famous than the dress shoe, which is famous only to floors.”
    • Interpretation: The boot, practical and worn outdoors, has a closer connection to the natural world, unlike the dress shoe meant for interiors.
    • Meaning: True recognition may come from practicality and authenticity.
  8. “The bent photograph is famous to the one who carries it and not at all famous to the one who is pictured.”
    • Interpretation: Memories and personal mementos hold value for the holder, not necessarily for the person depicted.
    • Meaning: Fame or importance is often unrecognized by those it involves.
  9. “I want to be famous to shuffling men who smile while crossing streets, sticky children in grocery lines, famous as the one who smiled back.”
    • Interpretation: The poet yearns for a simple, compassionate connection with others, to be known for small acts of kindness.
    • Meaning: Fame here is defined by humility and human connection.
  10. “I want to be famous in the way a pulley is famous, or a buttonhole, not because it did anything spectacular, but because it never forgot what it could do.”
    • Interpretation: The poet desires a modest, reliable, and purposeful fame—like tools that serve a specific function without fanfare.
    • Meaning: True value lies in being consistently purposeful.

Literary And Poetic Devices: “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
DeviceExampleExplanation
Alliteration“famous to the fish”Repetition of the “f” sound adds rhythm and emphasizes the subject “fish” and its relationship to “fame.”
Allusion“inherit the earth”Refers to the Biblical phrase “the meek shall inherit the earth,” adding depth to the meaning of silence and patience.
Anaphora“I want to be famous… I want to be famous”Repetition of “I want to be famous” emphasizes the poet’s personal desire for a humble, relational type of fame.
Antithesis“The loud voice is famous to silence”The juxtaposition of loudness and silence highlights the contrasting ways in which things gain meaning or “fame.”
Consonance“The bent photograph is famous to the one who carries it”The repetition of the “t” sound creates a gentle rhythm, emphasizing the relationship between the photograph and its owner.
Contrast“boot is famous to the earth… dress shoe… floors”Comparing the outdoor boot to the indoor dress shoe highlights practical fame vs. superficial fame, deepening the theme.
Ephemeral Imagery“The tear is famous, briefly, to the cheek”Focus on the tear’s short-lived fame underscores the transient nature of some connections.
Hyperbole“in the way a pulley is famous”Exaggerates the idea of fame by attributing it to mundane objects, suggesting the importance of modest, utilitarian fame.
Imagery“The cat sleeping on the fence… birds watching him from the birdhouse”Visual description makes the reader picture the scene, emphasizing fame as a watchful or observant presence.
Irony“famous to silence”Ironically describes fame in silence, a state traditionally opposite to the notion of fame.
Metaphor“The river is famous to the fish”Compares the river’s significance to fame, suggesting that fame is a relative concept based on dependency or reliance.
Oxymoron“famous to silence”Combines contradictory ideas (fame and silence), creating a paradox that expands the understanding of fame.
Parallelism“famous to the fish… famous to silence… famous to your bosom”Repetition of structure emphasizes the varied ways in which different entities can hold significance or “fame.”
Paradox“not at all famous to the one who is pictured”Highlights the irony that fame can be deeply meaningful to one person and insignificant to another, presenting fame as inherently subjective.
Personification“The idea you carry close to your bosom is famous to your bosom.”Gives human qualities to “idea” and “bosom,” implying an intimate and protective relationship, as if the bosom cherishes the idea.
Repetition“famous to”Repeating “famous to” throughout the poem reinforces the idea that fame is relational and varies by perspective.
Simile“famous as the one who smiled back”Compares the poet’s desired fame to the simple, reciprocal act of smiling back, illustrating a non-glamorous, human connection.
Symbolism“pulley” and “buttonhole”These objects symbolize humble, everyday functionality, suggesting the poet’s desire for a fame rooted in reliability rather than grandeur.
Synecdoche“The bent photograph is famous to the one who carries it”The photograph represents memories or a person, showing how small items can embody significant, private meanings.
Understatement“not because it did anything spectacular”Downplays the concept of fame by implying that it doesn’t have to be spectacular; this highlights a quieter, more modest form of significance.
Themes: “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
  1. Relational Fame
    Nye redefines fame as a relational concept, where significance is dependent on the perspective and relationship between entities. For instance, “The river is famous to the fish” suggests that fame is not an objective measure but rather is based on one’s need or reliance on another. Similarly, “The cat sleeping on the fence is famous to the birds” emphasizes that fame can come from watchful observation, where the birds perceive the cat as notable, even though the rest of the world might not. This theme conveys that fame is inherently subjective, tied to how one affects those close or attentive to them.
  2. Transient and Fleeting Significance
    Nye highlights the ephemeral nature of some forms of fame, acknowledging that some things are only famous for a moment. For instance, “The tear is famous, briefly, to the cheek” illustrates that fame, like a tear, may only last for a short while before it fades away. This idea of temporary significance suggests that fame doesn’t always endure; it can be a passing recognition that holds meaning only in specific instances. Through this line, Nye reflects on how certain impacts, while meaningful, are not everlasting.
  3. Humility and Everyday Utility
    In the poem, Nye celebrates the fame of ordinary, humble things that quietly fulfill their roles, such as a “pulley” or a “buttonhole.” These objects are “famous” not because they attract attention, but because they serve a purpose without demanding recognition. The poet’s desire to be “famous in the way a pulley is famous” underscores her respect for functional, unassuming significance. Here, fame is tied to humility and utility, suggesting that quiet dependability and purpose are valuable, even if unnoticed by the masses.
  4. The Value of Personal Connections
    Nye’s depiction of fame centers on intimate, personal interactions rather than widespread acclaim. Her wish to be “famous to shuffling men who smile while crossing streets, sticky children in grocery lines” emphasizes a type of fame grounded in personal kindness and connection. Instead of grand gestures, she values small, shared moments, aspiring to be remembered as the “one who smiled back.” This theme highlights that fame, in its most meaningful form, is about connecting with others on a personal level, making ordinary exchanges memorable.
Literary Theories and “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
Literary TheoryExplanationReferences from the Poem
Reader-Response TheoryThis theory emphasizes the reader’s role in interpreting the text, as meaning is constructed through individual experiences. In “Famous,” each reader may interpret fame differently based on personal values and societal notions.Lines like “The river is famous to the fish” and “The tear is famous, briefly, to the cheek” invite readers to consider their unique definitions of fame, shaping meaning through personal connections to these images.
Postmodern TheoryPostmodernism often challenges conventional ideas and blurs boundaries. “Famous” subverts traditional definitions of fame by portraying it as relative, humble, and grounded in personal significance rather than public acclaim.Nye’s desire to be “famous in the way a pulley is famous” disrupts the idea of fame as grand or public, showing it as small, functional, and uncelebrated. This is a postmodern shift away from fame’s typical representation.
Humanistic TheoryHumanistic theory in literature focuses on individual human values, empathy, and the inherent worth of every person. “Famous” reflects these principles, especially in the poet’s wish to be remembered for small, kind acts.The line “I want to be famous to shuffling men… sticky children in grocery lines” centers on human connections and modest forms of recognition, valuing personal worth and kindness over societal admiration.
Critical Questions about “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
  • How does the poem redefine the concept of fame?
  • In “Famous,” Naomi Shihab Nye redefines fame as something personal, intimate, and often unnoticed by the broader public. Traditionally, fame is seen as public recognition and admiration by a large audience. However, Nye challenges this view by presenting fame as relational and dependent on perspective. For example, she writes, “The river is famous to the fish,” suggesting that significance arises through dependence rather than public visibility. Similarly, “The cat sleeping on the fence is famous to the birds watching him from the birdhouse” reflects a type of fame rooted in awareness and attention within a specific relationship. Through these examples, Nye’s portrayal of fame emphasizes that its meaning is subjective and varies based on individual connection rather than universal acknowledgment.
  • What role does humility play in the poem’s concept of fame?
  • Humility is central to Nye’s concept of fame in “Famous.” Rather than portraying fame as a grand accomplishment, she focuses on objects and experiences that are quietly purposeful, valuable because of their utility and reliability. The poet’s desire to be “famous in the way a pulley is famous, or a buttonhole” underscores her preference for a humble, unobtrusive kind of fame. Pulley and buttonhole are everyday objects that serve an essential function without attracting attention, symbolizing fame that lies in being dependable and useful. Through these lines, Nye suggests that true fame might not be tied to spectacle but instead rooted in modest service and steady presence.
  • How does the poem’s imagery contribute to its theme of relational fame?
  • The imagery in “Famous” reinforces the theme of fame as something relational and often subtle. Each line uses familiar, everyday images that emphasize fame through relationships and perspective. For instance, “The tear is famous, briefly, to the cheek” uses a simple, fleeting image to show that fame can exist in intimate, momentary encounters. Likewise, “The bent photograph is famous to the one who carries it” suggests that fame or importance can be deeply personal, meaningful only to the person who holds it. By grounding the concept of fame in relatable images, Nye’s use of imagery makes the theme accessible and invites readers to find meaning in personal, quiet moments of significance.
  • In what way does the poet’s definition of fame challenge societal norms?
  • Nye’s portrayal of fame in “Famous” is a direct challenge to societal norms that equate fame with visibility, wealth, or influence. Society often measures fame by public recognition or media attention, associating it with celebrity culture. However, Nye disrupts this notion by celebrating a fame that is unnoticed by the masses, exemplified by her desire to be “famous to shuffling men who smile while crossing streets” and “sticky children in grocery lines.” These lines imply that fame is about connection, kindness, and simple human interactions rather than prestige. By presenting fame in this way, Nye questions societal values, suggesting that meaningful fame is found in relationships, compassion, and small, everyday actions.
Literary Works Similar to “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
  1. “The Peace of Wild Things” by Wendell Berry
    This poem, like “Famous,” reflects on finding solace and purpose in nature’s simplicity, offering an alternative view on peace and fulfillment outside of human recognition.
  2. “Wild Geese” by Mary Oliver
    Oliver’s poem celebrates personal authenticity and belonging within the natural world, similar to how Nye redefines fame as something relational and rooted in individual connections.
  3. “The Way It Is” by William Stafford
    Stafford’s poem speaks to the constancy of purpose in life, paralleling Nye’s desire to be “famous” for reliability, much like a pulley or buttonhole fulfilling its role without spectacle.
  4. “To Be of Use” by Marge Piercy
    This poem praises the dignity of work and the value of contributing to the world meaningfully, akin to Nye’s depiction of fame through humble, everyday acts and objects.
  5. “Love After Love” by Derek Walcott
    Walcott’s poem emphasizes self-acceptance and inner worth, echoing Nye’s theme of personal fame as a quiet, introspective recognition rather than public acclaim.
Representative Quotations of “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“The river is famous to the fish.”Opens the poem by presenting fame as a concept based on dependency.Reader-Response Theory: Fame is subjective, understood differently by each reader based on personal relationships.
“The loud voice is famous to silence.”Juxtaposes loudness and silence, redefining fame as a contrast between opposites.Structuralism: Fame and identity are constructed through binary oppositions, with one defining the other.
“The cat sleeping on the fence is famous to the birds.”Fame here is tied to attention, as the birds’ vigilance gives the cat a notable presence.Psychoanalytic Theory: Fame may be rooted in conscious attention and unconscious feelings like fear or awareness.
“The tear is famous, briefly, to the cheek.”Depicts fame as fleeting, lasting only as long as the tear’s journey on the cheek.Temporal Theory: Fame is not always permanent; time influences its intensity and duration.
“The idea you carry close to your bosom is famous to your bosom.”Shows fame as an intimate, private connection to one’s own thoughts and dreams.Humanistic Theory: Fame is an inward value; true significance often lies in personal worth rather than recognition.
“The boot is famous to the earth.”Compares the practical fame of a boot to the superficial fame of a dress shoe.Marxist Theory: Suggests value in practical, utilitarian roles over superficial, aesthetic recognition.
“The bent photograph is famous to the one who carries it.”Fame here is sentimental, linked to personal memory rather than public importance.Memory Studies: Personal objects carry significance and “fame” in private contexts, associated with memory.
“I want to be famous to shuffling men who smile while crossing streets.”Reflects a desire for quiet, compassionate connections rather than public acclaim.Existentialism: True meaning is found in genuine human connections, not in societal accolades.
“I want to be famous in the way a pulley is famous.”Expresses the wish for fame grounded in purpose, like a tool that reliably fulfills its role.Postmodernism: Challenges the notion of fame as grandeur, valuing functional significance over spectacle.
“not because it did anything spectacular, but because it never forgot what it could do.”Emphasizes consistency and reliability over attention-seeking actions.Existential Theory: Significance lies in self-awareness and fulfilling one’s purpose without needing validation.
Suggested Readings: “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye
  1. Najmi, Samina. “Naomi Shihab Nye’s Aesthetic of Smallness and the Military Sublime.” MELUS, vol. 35, no. 2, 2010, pp. 151–71. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20720720. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  2. MARCHI, LISA. “The Everyday as Protean and Enchanting: Naomi Shihab Nye’s Tender Spot.” The Funambulists: Women Poets of the Arab Diaspora, Syracuse University Press, 2022, pp. 23–42. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1m46fd7.6. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  3. Bedaiwi, Hayat. “Understanding the ‘Other’ in Naomi Shihab Nye’s You & Yours.” Islamophobia Studies Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 2022, pp. 66–81. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/48676237. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  4. PICKENS, THERÍ A. “Ghosts of Disability in Naomi Shihab Nye’s Transfer.” Sex, Identity, Aesthetics: The Work of Tobin Siebers and Disability Studies, edited by Jina B. Kim et al., University of Michigan Press, 2021, pp. 77–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.11769364.8. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  5. Nye, Naomi Shihab. You and Yours. No. 93. BOA Editions, Ltd., 2005.

“On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén: Summary and Critique

“On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén first appeared in 1994 in Comparative Literature Studies۔

"On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters" by Claudio Guillén: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén

“On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén first appeared in 1994 in Comparative Literature Studies, published by Penn State University Press. In this article, Guillén examines the nuanced role of letter writing in bridging everyday communication with literary forms. He argues that the letter, while often not regarded as purely literary, holds the potential for what he terms “literariness”—a quality that emerges through the interplay of authenticity, style, and structure. By exploring historical practices and the evolution of letter writing from functional to poetic and even fictional, Guillén highlights how letters can embody a blend of factual narrative and imaginative expression. This fusion creates a unique space where personal voice and public dialogue intersect, reflecting both the individual and cultural ethos of their times. His insights contribute significantly to literary theory by challenging the boundaries between literary and non-literary genres, underscoring the letter as a site of creativity and intimacy that carries profound implications for understanding the development of narrative and epistolary fiction.

Summary of “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén

Conceptual Boundaries of Literariness and Letter Writing

  • Guillén explores how letters, while rooted in everyday communication, often exhibit qualities that border on literary art. He draws on historical examples to examine whether well-crafted letters could be seen as inherently “literary” (Guillén, p. 3).
  • Madame de Sévigné’s letters serve as an example, where her style-oriented approach emphasizes crafting an impression of truthfulness, blending stylistic elegance with authentic expression (Guillén, p. 1).

Literacy, Literariness, and Poeticity in Epistolary Writing

  • Guillén traces the evolution of epistolary genres, which he views as a continuum ranging from basic literacy to literariness and even poeticity. He discusses Garcia Berrio’s distinction between “literariness” as an intentional choice and “poeticity” as a symbolic value inherent to the writing process (Guillén, p. 2).
  • The ancient transition from oral to written communication represented a crucial shift that required adherence to societal conventions, reflecting both cultural values and personal expression (Nagy, p. 3).

The Role of Genre in Defining Literariness

  • Guillén underscores the importance of genre, noting that literary genres—like the familiar letter, verse epistle, and epistolary novel—evolve within historical contexts and shape their literariness. He argues that these forms adapt conventions to communicate deeply personal themes, such as love and friendship, as seen in Garcilaso de la Vega’s verse epistle to Boscán (Guillén, p. 14).
  • A genre-centered approach allows for appreciating the nuances of letters that navigate between personal sincerity and public literary value, evident in Cicero’s letters and their blend of personal philosophy with literary stylization (Guillén, p. 12).

Interplay of Fictionality and Epistolary Illusion

  • Guillén discusses the “fictional impulse” within letters, where even non-fictional writing can adopt literary techniques that imbue it with an aura of fictionality. This concept is demonstrated through Rousseau’s La Nouvelle Héloïse and Richardson’s Pamela, both of which use the letter format to craft immersive, narrative-driven experiences (Guillén, p. 19).
  • The Lettres Portugaises, often believed to be authentic, exemplifies the allure of epistolary fiction, where readers were captivated by the perceived sincerity of the letters, blurring the line between fiction and reality (Guillén, p. 20).

Historical Evolution and Literary Reflection in Letters

  • Guillén traces the role of letters from ancient Greek manuals to Renaissance works, noting how epistolary styles adapted to serve both practical and literary functions. Texts like Aretino’s letters broke with tradition by combining self-expression with structured spontaneity, influencing later European literary practices (Guillén, p. 16).
  • Petrarch’s collection of letters shows a conscious structuring that bridges everyday correspondence with the artistic aspirations of a unified narrative, reinforcing how letters evolved as vehicles of literary exploration (Guillén, p. 13).

Letters as Vehicles of Emotional and Social Commentary

  • Guillén emphasizes how letters express affection, friendship, and introspection. For instance, Donne’s letters to friends reflect an emotional and philosophical depth that positions the familiar letter as both a medium for intimate self-reflection and a piece of literary expression (Guillén, p. 22).
  • Guillén notes that Dr. Johnson’s view on letters illustrates the tension between expressing genuine emotion and crafting it for public reception, reflecting the delicate balance between private sentiment and literary flair in epistolary writing (Guillén, p. 5).

Conclusion: The Enduring Appeal of the Epistolary Form

  • Guillén concludes by highlighting the timelessness of letters as a literary form that lies “on the edge of literariness.” Even in their simplest forms, letters embody a blend of authenticity, style, and genre conventions that engage both personal and public audiences, making them a unique part of literary history (Guillén, p. 23).

Literary Terms/Concepts in “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén
Literary Term/ConceptDefinitionExplanation in the Article
LiterarinessThe quality or characteristic of being literary or having literary value.Guillén examines how letters, while rooted in practical communication, can exhibit elements of literary art, thus existing “on the edge of literariness” (Guillén, p. 3).
Epistolary IllusionThe concept that letters create an impression of authenticity and spontaneity, often blending fiction and reality.Seen in works like Lettres Portugaises, where readers are led to believe in the sincerity of the letters, creating a blur between fiction and non-fiction (Guillén, p. 20).
GenreA category of literary composition characterized by specific conventions and styles.Guillén highlights the role of epistolary genres, including the familiar letter, verse epistle, and epistolary novel, which adapt conventions to suit emotional expression and communication (Guillén, p. 14).
PoeticityThe quality that brings out an imaginative, symbolic dimension in writing, going beyond literal meaning.Based on Garcia Berrio’s concept, poeticity arises in letters when they express symbolic, often anthropological themes, making the writing resonate on multiple levels (Guillén, p. 2).
FictionalityThe constructed, imaginative aspect of a text that allows it to represent fictional events or realities.Guillén notes how letters can contain a “fictional impulse,” where even personal correspondence may create fictionalized self-images and narratives (Guillén, p. 19).
Microlinguistic AnalysisA close examination of linguistic details, such as word choice and syntax, within a text.Guillén discusses how such scrutiny may not always capture the full scope of meaning in letters, suggesting that genre and historical context also play crucial roles (Guillén, p. 3).
Formal ChoicesDeliberate stylistic decisions made by the writer regarding structure, language, and genre conventions.In letters, formal choices impact the tone and purpose; for instance, Petrarch’s structured collection of letters showcases how intentional organization enhances literariness (Guillén, p. 13).
IntersubjectivityThe shared understanding and connection between individuals, often emphasized in personal writing.Guillén highlights that letters like those by Donne emphasize intersubjectivity, as the writer crafts a narrative for a specific recipient, fostering emotional and intellectual connection (Guillén, p. 22).
BrevitasThe quality of conciseness or brevity in writing.A valued quality in epistolary writing, where writers often aim for clarity and brevity while conveying emotional depth, as in Ben Johnson’s verse epistles (Guillén, p. 11).
Self-ReflexivityWhen a text reflects on its own creation, form, or status as a work of literature.Seen in Donne’s letters, which not only convey friendship but also reflect on the nature of epistolary communication itself (Guillén, p. 9).
Monothematic TraditionThe focus on a single subject within a piece of writing, especially common in letters.This tradition, emphasized by Aretino, allowed letters to explore a single theme deeply, creating an illusion of spontaneity despite meticulous planning (Guillén, p. 16).
Epistolary FormThe format and stylistic conventions of letter writing as a literary genre.Guillén discusses the evolution of the epistolary form, which conveys intimacy and immediacy, even in structured, literary compositions like Richardson’s Pamela (Guillén, p. 19).
Conditional LiterarinessThe idea that some texts are considered literary based on their formal qualities and historical context.Genette’s theory posits that works like historical texts or letters become literary not by nature but by readers’ appreciation of their style and form (Guillén, p. 18).
Sincerity in ExpressionThe appearance of genuine, heartfelt communication in writing, often sought in letters.Guillén explains how letters, especially in familiar genres, prioritize an expression of true sentiment, creating an “illusion of truth” for readers, as with Marianne’s letters in Lettres Portugaises (Guillén, p. 1).
Rhetorical StyleThe use of persuasive or decorative language to enhance the impact of writing.Madame de Sévigné’s letters exemplify a rhetorical style that combines affectionate language with a crafted structure to engage her audience and convey credibility (Guillén, p. 1).
Theoretical MetalanguageLanguage used to reflect on or critique the nature and function of a text itself.Guillén notes how letters like those of Cicero incorporate theoretical musings on epistolary form and appropriateness, blending literary analysis with practical communication (Guillén, p. 10).
Illusion of Non-FictionalityThe perception that a fictional letter or novel is based in reality, often used to enhance authenticity.In Lettres Portugaises, readers believed in the letters’ authenticity, a technique that later influenced epistolary novels, creating a blend of fictional narrative and realistic presentation (Guillén, p. 20).
Social Function of LettersThe role of letters in maintaining social norms and relationships, such as friendship and affection.Guillén discusses how letters serve social functions, guided by norms of courteous expression, thus enabling the cultivation of interpersonal relationships, as seen in Petrarch’s collection (Guillén, p. 22).
Contribution of “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén to Literary Theory/Theories
Literary TheoryContributionReferences
Theory of LiterarinessGuillén differentiates between literariness, poeticity, and literacy, establishing a continuum of communication that illustrates how letters can embody literary qualities while remaining functional forms of communication. He posits that literariness is a conscious choice by writers.“The epistolary process of communication can be viewed as moving along a continuum that may reach or shift or combine three main levels or categories of achievement: literacy, literariness, and poeticity.” (p. 2)
Epistolary TheoryThe article underscores the epistolary genre’s historical development, from ancient rhetorical training to modern expressions. Guillén discusses how letters have been influenced by literary conventions while maintaining their unique communicative purposes.“A letter should be written rather more carefully than a dialogue. Dialogue imitates impromptu conversation, whereas a letter is a piece of writing and is sent someone as a kind of gift.” (p. 10)
Poetics of CommunicationGuillén emphasizes the communicative aspect of letters, suggesting that their primary function is to convey personal sentiments and establish relationships. This highlights the social dynamics at play within the epistolary form and how letters serve as a medium for both personal and public expression.“The principal message then is the act of communication itself or the will-to-communication.” (p. 9)
Genre StudiesThe article positions letters within the context of literary genres, discussing how they interact with and are influenced by established forms like poetry and prose. Guillén argues for a nuanced understanding of genre that recognizes the blending of literary and non-literary aspects in letters.“Literary genre has been the combat zone in illlo tempore, the locus of choice, tension, and encounter between the writer and the genres embodied in models.” (p. 12)
Rhetorical TheoryBy analyzing the rhetorical strategies employed in letters, Guillén points out how authors like Cicero and Madame de Sévigné shaped their correspondence to reflect specific styles and audiences, illustrating the blend of formality and personal touch in epistolary writing.“The beauty of a letter is in the expression of affection and courtesy.” (p. 10)
Narrative TheoryGuillén explores the fictional elements of letters, discussing how even non-fictional correspondence can possess narrative qualities. He highlights how letters can create self-constructed identities for the writers, merging fiction with reality and exploring the fluidity of self-representation.“To compose a letter may lead the writer toward fiction before he even begins to approach literature.” (p. 5)
Self-Reflexivity in WritingThe article discusses how letters often reflect on their own status and function, leading to an awareness of their literary qualities. Guillén connects this reflexivity with the broader tradition of letters in literature, positioning it as a space for both personal and theoretical exploration.“The more the letter writer enters the regions of literariness the more he frets and worries about what he is doing.” (p. 9)
Theoretical MetalanguageGuillén engages with the concept of a theoretical metalanguage, emphasizing how authors reflect on their own writing processes and styles, thus creating a critical discourse around the act of letter writing itself.“The rich tradition of the theory of the letter makes its appearance in all the epistolary genres since Greece and Rome.” (p. 9)
Examples of Critiques Through “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén
Literary WorkCritique Through Guillén’s FrameworkRelevant Aspects from Guillén
Lettres Portugaises by GuilleraguesGuillén examines the illusion of nonfictionality in Lettres Portugaises, where the protagonist’s passionate letters create a fictionalized world while still appearing personal and authentic. The epistolary form enhances the emotional realism, bridging fiction and lived experience.“The epistolary illusion of non-fictionality” allows for a unique narrative that appears to be genuine correspondence while subtly blurring fiction and reality. (p. 19)
La Nouvelle Héloïse by Jean-Jacques RousseauGuillén critiques how Rousseau’s epistolary novel embodies genre-specific literariness, using letters to convey inner emotional landscapes that reflect on societal ideals and personal conflicts. The novel illustrates Rousseau’s exploration of love and morality through letter-writing as a narrative device.Guillén describes how the epistolary novel uniquely reflects both private sentiment and public moral debates, offering intimate yet socially reflective storytelling. (p. 18)
Pamela by Samuel RichardsonPamela utilizes letters to give readers access to the protagonist’s private thoughts, embodying Guillén’s idea of the blurred line between fiction and reality. Richardson’s letters generate an authentic voice, inviting readers to experience the character’s personal growth as authentic communication.Guillén discusses how letters can appear “natural and convincing” while creating fictional self-image and events within the daily reality. (p. 7)
Letters to Atticus by CiceroCicero’s letters are critiqued for their historical and rhetorical qualities; Guillén analyzes how these letters establish a complex dynamic between personal reflection and public discourse, showing how letters reveal private perspectives while engaging in broader philosophical debates.Guillén emphasizes the duality of letters as both personal reflections and public statements, highlighting the genre’s complex balance of privacy and audience. (p. 10)
Criticism Against “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén
  • Overemphasis on Literariness and Formal Structure
    Guillén’s focus on “literariness” and formal qualities may overlook the emotional and cultural functions of letter-writing, limiting the analysis to structural aspects rather than thematic depth or historical context.
  • Insufficient Attention to Non-Western Epistolary Traditions
    The study largely centers on Western epistolary genres, neglecting the rich letter-writing traditions in other cultures, which might offer alternative perspectives on literariness and genre.
  • Assumption of a Clear Boundary Between Fiction and Nonfiction
    Guillén suggests a “razor’s edge” between fact and fiction, but this binary may be overly simplistic, especially given the complex ways letters can blend personal truth and artistic expression.
  • Neglect of Reader-Response Dynamics
    Guillén focuses on the writer’s intent and stylistic choices, but does not deeply explore how readers interpret and interact with letters, particularly in cases where letters are read as private communications or as public texts.
  • Limited Engagement with Contemporary Theoretical Perspectives
    While Guillén references figures like Genette and Derrida, the piece might lack engagement with more contemporary theories of epistolary studies or digital media, which could offer fresh insights into literariness in letter writing.
  • Idealization of the Epistolary Genre’s Aesthetic Value
    Guillén’s analysis sometimes assumes an inherent aesthetic or literary value in the epistolary form, potentially overlooking how some letters function primarily as pragmatic or utilitarian communications, rather than as literary expressions.
  • Lack of Interdisciplinary Approach
    The study could benefit from an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates psychology, sociology, or anthropology to enrich understanding of the personal and relational dimensions of letters beyond their literary qualities.
Representative Quotations from “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
Literariness is an option to which the writer and the reader may commit themselves from the beginning.Guillén highlights the concept of “literariness” as a conscious choice in the writing and reading of letters, underscoring that letters can be crafted with literary intention rather than serving as mere practical communication.
A letter should be written rather more carefully than a dialogue.This quote points to the unique stylistic requirements of letter writing, suggesting that letters demand a deliberate tone and structure that goes beyond casual conversation, marking their distinct literary potential.
The epistolary process of communication can be viewed as moving along a continuum…Guillén introduces the idea of letters existing on a continuum from mere literacy to high levels of literariness and poeticity, emphasizing the fluid, dynamic nature of letters within literary theory.
The writing of letters as a practical task, unmindful of literature, immersed in daily life…Here, Guillén discusses how letter writing often operates outside literary intentions, embedded in everyday practices, but has the potential to cross into literariness through style, purpose, or emotional weight.
There is hardly an act in our daily experience…as likely as the writing of a letter to propel us toward inventiveness and transformation of fact.Guillén suggests that letters naturally encourage imaginative and interpretative transformations, serving as a bridge between personal expression and fiction.
This convergence of privacy and publicity is not an exclusive feature of literary letters.This quote reflects on the dual nature of letters as both personal, private acts and potential public documents, a trait that adds complexity to their literary analysis and understanding.
The letter does not offer all-enveloping alternative environments as a narrative will…Guillén contrasts letters with narrative forms, suggesting that letters create fictional elements within everyday reality rather than crafting entirely fictional worlds, thus positioning them uniquely in literary theory.
What pretends to be available for reading by that second person is actually reread…by another public at another point in historical time.This illustrates how letters, though written for a specific recipient, are often recontextualized by different readers, giving them layers of meaning that evolve with time and audience.
There is a norm that we encounter in practically all writings in the itinerary of the theory of the letter: the need for brevitas.Guillén emphasizes “brevitas” (brevity) as a guiding principle in letter writing, suggesting that conciseness is often valued in letters and serves as an aesthetic element marking their literary quality.
The literariness of the familiar letter, arising as it does from everyday non-literary writing, poses the most difficult problems.Guillén addresses the challenge of defining the literariness of personal letters, as they straddle the line between practical and aesthetic purposes, making them complex subjects for literary categorization.
Suggested Readings: “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters” by Claudio Guillén
  1. Guillén, Claudio. “On the Edge of Literariness: The Writing of Letters.” Comparative Literature Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, 1994, pp. 1–24. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40246915. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  2. “Front Matter.” Comparative Literature Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, 1994. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40246914. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  3. “Back Matter.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, vol. 13, no. 2, 1994, pp. 410–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/464129. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.

“Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov: Summary and Critique

“Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov first appeared in the Comparative Literature journal (Vol. 59, No. 2) in Spring 2007, published by Duke University Press on behalf of the University of Oregon.

"Literature, Literariness, and the Brain" by Vladimir E. Alexandrov: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov

“Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov first appeared in the Comparative Literature journal (Vol. 59, No. 2) in Spring 2007, published by Duke University Press on behalf of the University of Oregon. Alexandrov’s work engages deeply with the intersections of literature, linguistics, and neuroscience, probing into how literary qualities might uniquely interact with brain processes. He questions the traditional concept of “literature,” noting its evolving nature in the field of literary studies, where perspectives on its essence have grown increasingly skeptical and culturally relativistic. Alexandrov’s work draws on Jakobson’s theory of “literariness”—the quality that distinguishes literary language by focusing on the form of language itself, as opposed to mere communication. He aligns Jakobson’s insights with current findings in cognitive science and neuroscience, which suggest that the brain engages differently with language when it possesses literary qualities like metaphor and complex structure. His exploration proposes that structured literary discourse may activate distinct cognitive processes, which supports the possibility of a neuroscientific basis for literariness, thus bridging a gap between the humanities and cognitive science. This work underscores a potentially foundational role for literature in understanding language’s impact on the brain, suggesting that the unique processing involved in literary reading can deepen our grasp of both brain functions and cultural production.

Summary of “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov
  • Exploring the Definition of Literature:
    • Alexandrov examines the ambiguous and contested nature of “literature” as a concept, noting that it is often viewed as “a social construct or a reader’s projection” (Alexandrov 98).
    • He critiques how various scholars, like E.D. Hirsch and Terry Eagleton, have suggested that “there is no ‘essence’ of literature whatsoever” (Alexandrov 98).
  • The Influence of Post-Structuralism on Literariness:
    • The shift from essentialist views of literature to relativist perspectives is highlighted, with Alexandrov tracing this evolution to the influence of post-structuralism and cultural studies, which question the traditional notion of “literariness” (Alexandrov 98-99).
    • This shift has led to a reorientation in academia, prioritizing cultural artifacts and societal contexts over intrinsic literary features (Alexandrov 99).
  • Linking Jakobson’s Poetic Function and Neuroscience:
    • Alexandrov explores Roman Jakobson’s idea of “literariness” as a “poetic function” that involves a “focus on the message itself” (Alexandrov 102).
    • He aligns this with recent neuroscientific evidence suggesting that structured language, which emphasizes literary devices, engages unique brain mechanisms (Alexandrov 104).
  • Hemispheric Specialization in Language Processing:
    • The article presents findings that different brain hemispheres process language in distinct ways, with the left hemisphere generally managing “sequential, syntactically and grammatically organized linguistic meaning” and the right hemisphere engaging with “coarse” and metaphorical meanings (Alexandrov 113).
    • Alexandrov argues that this division aligns with Jakobson’s distinction between the “metaphoric” and “metonymic” poles of language (Alexandrov 107).
  • Right Hemisphere and Literary Creativity:
    • The right hemisphere’s role in creating “global coherence” across a text and processing figurative language is noted, with Alexandrov citing that damage to the right hemisphere impairs abilities related to metaphor, irony, and overall narrative structure (Alexandrov 109).
    • He posits that creativity in literature involves the unique cooperation of both hemispheres, which may correspond to Jakobson’s concept of the “poetic function” (Alexandrov 111).
  • Literariness as a Cognitive and Cultural Construct:
    • Alexandrov suggests that while neuroscience can shed light on the cognitive processes involved in reading literature, “literariness” may still be seen as a cultural construct, varying by tradition and function (Alexandrov 113).
    • He acknowledges that “within the realm of human beliefs, there is no absolute ground that can be used to adjudicate what individuals choose to view as true, good, and real” (Alexandrov 115).
  • Implications for Literary Studies and Humanities:
    • By integrating cognitive science, Alexandrov argues that literary studies might reclaim the significance of “literariness” as an academic focus, potentially bridging divides between the humanities and sciences (Alexandrov 114).
    • He concludes that understanding literature’s impact on the brain could renew academic interest in the intrinsic qualities of literary texts (Alexandrov 114-115).
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov
Literary Term/ConceptDefinitionExplanation/Reference
LiteratureA socially constructed term often viewed as a reader’s projection or value-laden category.Alexandrov discusses how literature is perceived as “a social construct or a reader’s projection” and suggests that the concept lacks a universally accepted essence (Alexandrov 98).
LiterarinessThe inherent quality that distinguishes literary texts, often marked by the “poetic function” focusing on language itself.Alexandrov explores “literariness” through Jakobson’s notion of the “poetic function” as it focuses on the structure and message of language, rather than its content alone (Alexandrov 102).
Poetic FunctionJakobson’s term for the function of language that emphasizes form, structure, and the message itself over content.Alexandrov uses Jakobson’s concept to argue that literariness involves emphasizing the “message itself” and creating structured language that engages readers in unique cognitive ways (Alexandrov 102).
Metaphoric PoleA type of language structure characterized by associative, spatial relations; associated with selection and substitution.Alexandrov connects this “pole” to the right hemisphere’s ability to process metaphor and non-linear associations, linking it to Jakobson’s idea of literary language’s focus on similarity and metaphor (Alexandrov 107).
Metonymic PoleA type of language structure characterized by syntagmatic, linear relations, often involving causal or sequential connections.Associated with the left hemisphere, this pole reflects Jakobson’s view that language is also constructed through linear, syntactical connections, especially in everyday discourse (Alexandrov 107).
DefamiliarizationA literary technique making the familiar appear strange, thereby enhancing perception of language.Linked to Viktor Shklovsky, this concept emphasizes how literary language “estranges” common phrases or ideas, aligning with the brain’s unique engagement with complex literary structures (Alexandrov 108).
Global CoherenceThe brain’s process of integrating individual sentences into an overarching text structure or meaning.Alexandrov highlights the right hemisphere’s role in achieving this coherence, which is crucial for understanding the overarching narrative structure in literary texts (Alexandrov 109).
Hemispheric SpecializationThe brain’s division into left and right hemispheres, each processing language differently, with the left handling sequential, syntactical language and the right managing metaphor and “global coherence.”Alexandrov details how each hemisphere’s specialization supports different aspects of language, suggesting that both hemispheres are essential in processing literariness in complex literary texts (Alexandrov 113).
Ideology in LiteratureThe view that literature is a construct shaped by historical, cultural, and social values rather than inherent qualities.Alexandrov notes that post-structuralism questions “literature” as an essential concept, viewing it instead as ideologically shaped by “value judgments” and historical variability (Alexandrov 98).
Cultural StudiesAn academic field focusing on broader human artifacts, practices, and social ideologies rather than purely traditional literary texts.The rise of cultural studies has shifted focus away from traditional “literature,” broadening the scope of literary analysis to include cultural and sociopolitical factors (Alexandrov 99).
Empirical UniversalismIdentifying cross-cultural invariants in human experience and cultural artifacts without imposing cultural norms universally.Cited by Alexandrov as a balance between universalism and relativism, empirical universalism respects genuine human constants without cultural imposition, particularly relevant in comparative studies of literariness (Alexandrov 100).
Sequential vs. Spatial ProcessingLeft hemisphere’s preference for processing language sequentially and logically, while the right hemisphere focuses on spatial, metaphorical associations.Alexandrov uses this distinction to explain how different structures in language engage each hemisphere, suggesting that literature’s metaphoricity requires both types of processing (Alexandrov 107).
Aesthetic ExperienceThe subjective engagement with beauty and form in literature, often linked with cognitive processes involving both hemispheres.Alexandrov connects aesthetic experience in reading to cognitive processes like defamiliarization and coherence building, which demand the brain’s full engagement (Alexandrov 109).
Paranormal and Creativity LinkThe association between creativity and cognitive processing in the right hemisphere, sometimes linked with unusual mental experiences, including paranormal beliefs or schizophrenia.Alexandrov discusses studies connecting the associative, non-linear processes in the right hemisphere with traits like creativity and apophenia, or seeing connections among disparate elements (Alexandrov 111).
Contribution of “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov to Literary Theory/Theories
  • Revisiting Formalist Theories of Literariness:
    • Alexandrov reaffirms Roman Jakobson’s Formalist idea of “literariness” by connecting it with neuroscience, suggesting that literary language’s unique structure (poetic function) has neurological implications (Alexandrov 102).
    • This connection revives Formalist emphasis on “what makes a text literary,” grounding it in cognitive science (Alexandrov 102).
  • Supporting Structuralism through Language Processing:
    • By linking structured linguistic processing in the brain to Jakobson’s concepts, Alexandrov supports Structuralism’s focus on the deep structures of language, especially through binary oppositions like metaphoric vs. metonymic (Alexandrov 107).
    • He proposes that structured discourse, such as that found in literary texts, has distinct neural engagement, echoing Structuralist insights into underlying patterns and structures (Alexandrov 108).
  • Engaging with Post-Structuralist Skepticism of “Essence” in Literature:
    • Alexandrov addresses Post-Structuralist critiques of essentialism in literature by examining the brain’s response to literariness. He suggests that, while cultural perspectives on literature are valid, there may also be neurological bases for experiencing literariness (Alexandrov 98).
    • This contribution allows for a “sliding scale” of literariness that aligns with Post-Structuralist notions of fluidity while exploring possible cognitive underpinnings (Alexandrov 114).
  • Contribution to Cognitive Poetics and Reader-Response Theory:
    • The article contributes to Cognitive Poetics by exploring how the brain’s hemispheres process literary versus non-literary texts, suggesting that complex structures and metaphors require unique cognitive engagement (Alexandrov 104).
    • This aligns with Reader-Response Theory’s emphasis on the reader’s role, proposing that the neurological engagement with literariness impacts how meaning is constructed during reading (Alexandrov 109).
  • Reinforcing Defamiliarization from Russian Formalism:
    • Alexandrov applies Viktor Shklovsky’s concept of “defamiliarization” by linking it with neural responses to metaphor and unusual language structures, suggesting that the brain processes defamiliarized language differently, making it more memorable and engaging (Alexandrov 108).
    • This neuroscientific grounding adds empirical support to the Formalist idea that literary texts make readers “see the world anew” (Alexandrov 109).
  • Proposing a Bridge Between Humanities and Neuroscience:
    • The article contributes to Interdisciplinary Theory by demonstrating how literary theory can benefit from and contribute to cognitive science. Alexandrov suggests that literature scholars can engage with neuroscience without reducing literature to a purely scientific phenomenon (Alexandrov 114).
    • This bridge challenges the “two cultures” divide by proposing methods of studying literature that are informed by empirical evidence (Alexandrov 115).
  • Highlighting the Role of Cultural Studies in Literary Definition:
    • Alexandrov acknowledges the shift toward Cultural Studies in literary departments, noting how the study of “literature” has broadened to include other cultural artifacts. He ties this trend to a reevaluation of traditional literary hierarchies (Alexandrov 99).
    • His work invites Cultural Studies to consider cognitive dimensions in the cultural production and reception of texts (Alexandrov 100).
  • Encouraging Empirical Universalism within Literary Studies:
    • The article supports the concept of “empirical universalism,” proposing that while cultural variability in interpreting literature is valid, there may also be cross-cultural cognitive responses to structured literary forms (Alexandrov 100).
    • This approach suggests a balance between cultural relativity and cognitive constants in the appreciation of literariness (Alexandrov 100).

Examples of Critiques Through “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov

Literary WorkCritique Based on Alexandrov’s ConceptsRelevant Concept from Alexandrov
“The Waste Land” by T.S. EliotEliot’s use of fragmented structure, cultural references, and varied voices can be seen as engaging both hemispheres of the brain, as it requires readers to make metaphorical and associative connections while navigating complex, layered meanings.Hemispheric Specialization and Global Coherence: The right hemisphere engages with fragmented and associative elements, while the left processes the syntactic structure, making the text’s complexity cognitively engaging (Alexandrov 109).
“One Hundred Years of Solitude” by Gabriel García MárquezThe magical realism in García Márquez’s narrative defamiliarizes familiar concepts, leading readers to interpret supernatural events as part of daily life. This estrangement aligns with the brain’s preference for poetic function and metaphorical processing in literature.Defamiliarization and Metaphoric Processing: The text’s defamiliarization challenges readers to reframe reality, requiring both hemispheres for metaphorical understanding and coherence, engaging the brain in unique interpretive processes (Alexandrov 108).
“Beloved” by Toni MorrisonMorrison’s exploration of trauma, memory, and fragmented identity reflects the right hemisphere’s engagement with associative and spatial memory processing, as readers connect past and present narrative fragments to construct a cohesive meaning.Memory and Global Coherence: The non-linear narrative engages the right hemisphere in reconstructing fragmented memories, while the left hemisphere seeks narrative structure, mirroring trauma’s disjointed nature (Alexandrov 113).
“Ulysses” by James JoyceJoyce’s stream-of-consciousness technique and linguistic play activate the poetic function, as readers must process unconventional syntax, multiple perspectives, and associative language, thus demanding unique cognitive involvement.Poetic Function and Defamiliarization: The complex language structure forces readers into a state of heightened awareness and associative thinking, requiring both hemispheres to process Joyce’s wordplay and narrative shifts (Alexandrov 108).
Criticism Against “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov
  • Over-Reliance on Neuroscience without Direct Literary Testing:
    • Alexandrov uses findings from neuroscience to infer how the brain might respond to literary texts, but he acknowledges that no studies have directly tested readers’ brain activity while reading complete literary works. This lack of direct evidence may weaken the link between neuroscience and literary theory (Alexandrov 114-115).
  • Possible Reduction of Literature to Cognitive Mechanisms:
    • While Alexandrov aims to bridge humanities and science, some may argue that his approach risks reducing literature’s cultural and artistic value to mere neurological processes. This could overlook the complex historical, emotional, and ideological aspects that also shape literary engagement.
  • Insufficient Engagement with Post-Structuralist Perspectives:
    • Alexandrov attempts to address post-structuralist skepticism but may not fully account for the field’s emphasis on the instability of meaning and the fluidity of language. Critics may feel his model inadvertently reintroduces an essentialist view of “literariness,” which post-structuralism critiques (Alexandrov 98).
  • Limited Cultural Perspective in Defining Literariness:
    • Although Alexandrov acknowledges that definitions of literariness vary across cultures, his approach largely draws on Western literary traditions and theories, like Jakobson’s formalism. Critics might argue this narrow scope fails to account for diverse literary traditions where “literariness” could be defined differently (Alexandrov 113).
  • Challenges in Applying Findings to Diverse Literary Genres:
    • Alexandrov’s focus on structured, metaphor-rich texts may not easily extend to all literary forms, such as minimalist prose or genre fiction, which don’t necessarily rely on dense linguistic complexity. This may limit his theory’s applicability across the broad spectrum of literary styles.
Representative Quotations from “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“What relevance, if any, does this work have for those of us who study what is customarily called ‘literature’?” (p. 97)Alexandrov opens by questioning the connection between cognitive science and literary studies, setting the stage for his exploration of how neuroscience might inform our understanding of literariness.
“A widespread…view today…is that ‘literature’ is a social construct or a reader’s projection and thus a mystification.” (p. 98)This quotation highlights the modern skepticism about the concept of literature, emphasizing how contemporary theory often sees literature as socially and culturally constructed rather than intrinsic.
“The ‘poetic function’ projects the principle of equivalence from the axis of selection into the axis of combination.” (p. 102)Citing Roman Jakobson, Alexandrov uses the poetic function to explain how literary language emphasizes structure and form, which can affect cognitive processing differently than everyday language.
“If certain kinds of structured discourse are shown to engage the human brain in ways that others do not, then there may be justification for…’literary.'” (p. 104)Alexandrov suggests that if neuroscientific evidence shows distinct brain engagement with structured, literary language, it may support re-establishing “literariness” as a meaningful category, potentially giving literary theory a new empirical foundation.
“The right hemisphere quickly activates a loose or ‘coarse’ range of meanings associated with a word…while the left focuses on the most probable meaning.” (p. 113)Here, Alexandrov explains how each hemisphere processes language differently, with the right handling broader, associative meanings and the left focusing on specific, contextually appropriate meanings—key for understanding how readers interpret layered literary language.
“Defamiliarization…can be seen as prefiguring Jakobson’s concept of the ‘poetic function.'” (p. 108)Alexandrov links Viktor Shklovsky’s concept of defamiliarization with Jakobson’s poetic function, suggesting that making language strange or unfamiliar can deepen readers’ engagement, echoing Formalist theory.
“A literary work is one in which the poetic function dominates the other five but does not necessarily eliminate any of them.” (p. 102)Alexandrov notes that literariness is marked by the dominance of the poetic function, but other language functions remain present, indicating that literary language is distinct in emphasis rather than fundamentally different.
“The success of literature professors in undermining ‘literature’ as a defining concept has resulted in their cutting off the academic branch they were sitting on.” (p. 99)This critical observation suggests that by questioning the concept of “literature” so thoroughly, literary scholars have inadvertently weakened the foundations of their own field, leaving it vulnerable to challenges within academia.
“Beauty is information.” (p. 113)Quoting Yuri Lotman, Alexandrov implies that literariness is not just about aesthetic pleasure but also about a densely layered structure of meaning, which cognitively enriches the reader’s experience.
“In short, a more prominent role for the right hemisphere would presumably cause an utterance to be structured differently.” (p. 107)Alexandrov suggests that the right hemisphere’s associative processing might influence how literary language is structured, offering insights into how cognitive processing affects literary composition and style.
Suggested Readings: “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain” by Vladimir E. Alexandrov
  1. Alexandrov, Vladimir E. “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain.” Comparative Literature, vol. 59, no. 2, 2007, pp. 97–118. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40279363. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  2. McNAMER, SARAH. “The Literariness of Literature and the History of Emotion.” PMLA, vol. 130, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1433–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44017160. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  3. Zamora, Margarita. “Historicity and Literariness: Problems in the Literary Criticism of Spanish American Colonial Texts.” MLN, vol. 102, no. 2, 1987, pp. 334–46. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2905693. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.

“Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson: Summary and Critique

“Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson first appeared in Handbook of Narratology (2016) and examines the complex interplay between factual narratives and literary value.

"Factuality And Literariness" by Anders Pettersson: Summary and Critique
Introduction: “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson

“Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson first appeared in Handbook of Narratology (2016) and examines the complex interplay between factual narratives and literary value. In this chapter, Pettersson explores why factual accounts are traditionally seen as lacking literary merit, yet posits that historical and contextual shifts in literary theory have nuanced this perception. He proposes a dual perspective: one that recognizes a stable literary aesthetic, traditionally favoring fictional, imaginative texts, and another that considers how cultural contexts affect which narratives are valued as literature. Pettersson argues that factual discourse, often defined by its reliance on verifiable truth and assertion, is distinct from literature, which invites imaginative engagement and subjective experience. However, he suggests that some factual works, such as Churchill’s speeches and Alexievich’s documentary narratives, may transcend their informational basis and attain a form of literariness by inviting emotional and reflective experiences. This work is significant in literary theory as it expands the boundaries of literariness, highlighting the fluidity of literary categories and the subjective nature of what is deemed “literary” over time.

Summary of “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson
  • Objective and Scope: Pettersson’s chapter discusses why factual narratives are often viewed as non-literary, while also examining how historical and cultural contexts can alter perceptions of literariness. He notes that a “fixed literary perspective” traditionally downplays the value of factual narratives in literature but suggests that “historical and contextual variability” (p. 602) impacts how we understand literature across time.
  • Complexity of Factuality and Literariness: Pettersson identifies both factuality and literariness as complex concepts, noting that factual discourse involves assertions vouched for by the speaker or writer, which are aimed at conveying truth (p. 602). In contrast, literature often includes elements of imagination and subjective engagement, highlighting an inherent difference between these types of discourse.
  • Literature as a Social Construct: He asserts that literature lacks a definitive, universally accepted essence; rather, “the concept of literature is a category introduced by individuals and societies” (p. 603) and varies widely in its application over time and across societies. Thus, what qualifies as literature has no “true manner” of classification dictated by cultural reality alone.
  • Historical Shifts in the Concept of Literature: The idea of what constitutes literature has evolved, especially during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, when “poetry, fictional prose, and drama” came to be viewed as central forms of literary art (p. 604). However, in earlier periods, genres such as oratory, history, and philosophy were also considered part of literature, reflecting a “wider conception of literature” (p. 605).
  • Literariness Beyond Fictionality and Style: Pettersson downplays fictionality and stylistic craftsmanship as primary attributes of literariness, emphasizing instead the notion of “experience-inviting” discourse. He describes this as a use of language that allows readers to “reflect on, ponder over, and explore” representations, thus engaging with texts on a deeper, more personal level (p. 607).
  • Factual Narratives with Literary Value: Despite the usual separation of factual discourse from literary value, Pettersson explains that factual texts can acquire literariness when they also invite significant experiences. Using Winston Churchill’s speech “Give Us the Tools” and Svetlana Alexievich’s The Unwomanly Face of War, he illustrates how factual narratives can resonate emotionally, inviting readers to “form a kind of cognitive and emotional perspective on wider issues” (p. 610).
  • Cultural and Institutional Influences on Literariness: Pettersson notes that the perception of literariness often depends on institutional and cultural contexts, such as libraries, literary awards, and literary studies, which apply varying degrees of inclusiveness (p. 606). This flexibility can result in works of factual discourse being awarded literary recognition, even as libraries might classify the same works differently.
  • Conclusion: Pettersson concludes by emphasizing the variability of the concept of literature, especially in Western culture. He suggests that “experience-inviting discourse” encapsulates a key quality of what contemporary society considers literary, but acknowledges that literariness remains a question of definition, context, and evolving cultural standards (p. 611).
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson
Literary Term/ConceptDefinition/ExplanationReference/Explanation in Pettersson’s Work
FactualityThe quality of a narrative that asserts or presents information as verifiable truth.Pettersson defines factual discourse as “dominated by assertion,” where the writer or speaker vouches for the truth of the statements (p. 602).
LiterarinessThe quality or characteristic that makes a text literary, often through imaginative or stylistic features.Pettersson notes the challenge of defining literariness, suggesting it varies historically and culturally, shaped by societal standards (p. 602).
Experience-Inviting DiscourseLanguage use that encourages readers to engage in emotional and reflective experiences beyond the factual content.He describes this as discourse that allows readers to “reflect on, ponder over, and explore” representations, fostering personal engagement (p. 607).
Social Construction of LiteratureThe idea that literature is not a fixed category but is shaped by cultural and historical contexts.Literature is “a category introduced by individuals and societies for sorting texts” and lacks a “true manner” of distinguishing between literary and non-literary (p. 603).
Historical Variability of LiteratureThe concept that the boundaries of what is considered literature have shifted over time.Pettersson discusses how genres like oratory, history, and philosophy were once central to literature but gradually narrowed to imaginative forms (p. 604).
FictionalityThe quality of being fictional or imaginary, often associated with literature but not essential to it.Pettersson downplays fictionality as a defining characteristic of literature, arguing that non-fictional texts can also possess literary value if experience-inviting (p. 607).
Institutional ContextThe role of cultural institutions, like libraries and literary awards, in defining and categorizing literature.He explains that institutions apply varying standards, with literary awards sometimes recognizing factual works as literary based on inclusive criteria (p. 606).
Classical and Modern LiteratureThe contrast between early broad definitions of literature and modern narrowed conceptions focusing on imagination.Originally, literature encompassed poetry, oratory, history, and philosophy; modern views align more with fiction, poetry, and drama (p. 604-605).
AssertionThe act of presenting statements as truth, a key feature of factual discourse.Factual discourse is “dominated by assertion” where the author vouches for truth, as opposed to inviting imaginative interpretation (p. 602).
Core Idea of Literary ValueThe central quality that defines literature as valuable, often subjective and influenced by cultural expectations.Pettersson argues that literary value may center around the potential to invite meaningful, reflective experiences rather than strictly fictional or aesthetic elements (p. 607).
Contribution of “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson to Literary Theory/Theories
Literary TheoryContributionReferences in Pettersson’s Work
FormalismChallenges formalism by suggesting that literariness is not solely dependent on formal or stylistic elements but also on context and reader engagement with experience-inviting discourse.Pettersson downplays the idea of “a ‘literary’ style or form as a really crucial element” of literature (p. 607).
StructuralismContrasts structuralist rigidity in defining literature by proposing that definitions of literariness vary by historical and social contexts, rejecting a universal literary structure.He argues against a fixed definition of literature, emphasizing that it’s “socially and historically constructed” (p. 603).
Reception TheoryAligns with Reception Theory by focusing on the reader’s engagement and the cognitive-emotional impact, or experience-inviting nature, of the text.Pettersson describes experience-inviting discourse as inviting readers “to reflect on, ponder over” the representations (p. 607).
HistoricismReinforces Historicism by examining how the concept of literariness has evolved over time, influenced by the cultural and social contexts of different eras.He reviews the “historical alterability of the concept of the literary” and its varying criteria through the centuries (p. 603-604).
PoststructuralismEngages with Poststructuralist views on language and meaning by emphasizing that literature is a fluid concept constructed by social and cultural influences, without inherent essence.Pettersson argues that literature “is a category introduced by individuals and societies for sorting texts” rather than an inherent truth (p. 603).
Genre TheoryBroadens Genre Theory by exploring how factual narratives can cross into literary territory under certain criteria, blurring traditional genre boundaries.He illustrates that “factual discourse” can achieve “more or less of a literary character” depending on context and intention (p. 611).
Reader-Response TheorySupports Reader-Response Theory by emphasizing the active role of the reader in finding value and meaning within texts, particularly factual ones that engage on a personal level.Pettersson’s idea of “experience-inviting discourse” emphasizes reader interaction over the inherent qualities of the text (p. 607).
Literary Canon TheoryQuestions the fixed boundaries of the literary canon by examining how certain factual works, like those by Churchill and Alexievich, can be recognized as literary depending on institutional contexts.He highlights how Nobel awards and library classifications apply “fairly strict criteria,” yet these vary significantly (p. 606).
NarratologyContributes to Narratology by offering a nuanced approach to factual narratives, recognizing that narrativity and literariness can intersect in unexpected ways.Pettersson’s exploration of factual narratives with “literary quality” suggests narrative structure alone doesn’t define literature (p. 611).
Examples of Critiques Through “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson
Literary WorkCritique Through Pettersson’s FrameworkExplanation
Winston Churchill’s “Give Us the Tools”While primarily a factual speech, it achieves literary quality by inviting audiences to emotionally engage with Britain’s WWII resilience.Pettersson suggests that factual narratives like Churchill’s speech can acquire literariness through “experience-inviting discourse” (p. 607).
Svetlana Alexievich’s The Unwomanly Face of WarAlexievich’s oral history combines factual testimonies with deeply personal perspectives, transforming historical facts into emotionally resonant literature.Pettersson argues that factual works, though centered on assertion, can reach literary status when they invite reflective experiences (p. 611).
Truman Capote’s In Cold BloodCapote’s blending of factual reporting with novelistic techniques creates a hybrid form that pushes traditional boundaries between fact and literature.Pettersson’s critique would likely recognize Capote’s work as “factual discourse with literary quality,” crossing genre lines (p. 611).
Elie Wiesel’s NightWiesel’s factual recounting of the Holocaust invites readers to confront profound human suffering, balancing documentation with emotional depth.By Pettersson’s standards, Night exemplifies how factual narratives can carry “experience-inviting” qualities, adding literary depth (p. 607).
Criticism Against “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson
  • Ambiguity in Defining Literariness: Pettersson’s concept of “experience-inviting discourse” as a marker of literariness can be criticized as overly vague, leaving too much room for subjective interpretation. This ambiguity may undermine his attempt to provide a clearer framework for what constitutes literary quality.
  • Overreliance on Contextual Variability: By emphasizing historical and cultural variability, Pettersson’s framework may risk relativism, making it difficult to apply consistent standards across literary analysis. This could make his model less practical for distinguishing between literary and non-literary texts.
  • Downplaying the Role of Fictionality and Style: Critics might argue that Pettersson undervalues fictionality and stylistic qualities, which have been traditionally central to defining literature. By minimizing these elements, he may neglect essential aspects that many believe contribute to the uniqueness and appeal of literature.
  • Limited Scope in Western Contexts: Pettersson explicitly focuses on Western literary traditions, which could be seen as limiting. His framework may not effectively address literariness in non-Western cultures, where oral traditions, diverse narrative forms, and other cultural factors play significant roles in defining literature.
  • Insufficient Engagement with Alternative Literary Theories: Some may argue that Pettersson does not sufficiently address established theories like Formalism, Structuralism, or Poststructuralism, potentially weakening his position by not engaging in a more detailed critique of these perspectives.
  • Potential for Over-Expansion of the Literary Canon: Pettersson’s inclusive approach could lead to an over-expansion of the literary canon, where nearly any factual discourse could be deemed literary. This could dilute the concept of literariness, making it challenging to maintain meaningful distinctions between different types of discourse.
Representative Quotations from “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“The concept of literature is a category introduced by individuals and societies for sorting texts…” (p. 603)Pettersson emphasizes that literature is a social construct, shaped by collective cultural definitions rather than intrinsic qualities.
“The distinction between what is to be considered literature and what not is socially and historically constructed.” (p. 603)This highlights the fluidity of literary categorization, implying that what counts as literature varies over time and by context.
“I will take it for granted that the distinction…has been applied in different ways and for different purposes.” (p. 603)Pettersson acknowledges that literature’s boundaries are flexible and have served different roles across historical periods.
“Experience-inviting use of language as a particularly important element in our current ideas about what constitutes the literary.” (p. 607)He introduces “experience-inviting” discourse as a central criterion for literariness, focusing on emotional and cognitive engagement.
“Factual discourse… is dominated by assertion… the speaker or writer vouches for the truth.” (p. 602)Here, Pettersson defines factual discourse as truth-claiming, which contrasts with literature’s imaginative and reflective qualities.
“Literature, like all human utterance, comes with a presumption of relevance to the addressee.” (p. 607)He suggests that literature is inherently meant to engage readers, providing relevance beyond mere information.
“Nothing prevents factual discourse from also entertaining the ambition to incite… a literary character.” (p. 611)Pettersson argues that factual works can achieve literary value if they invite broader reflections, blurring traditional genre lines.
“I have consistently confined myself to Western culture.” (p. 611)This limitation acknowledges that his conclusions may not apply universally, especially in non-Western literary traditions.
“Today, the general sentiment in the humanities is far more relativistic…” (p. 605)He observes that contemporary literary studies are increasingly open to diverse interpretations, moving away from strict definitions.
“A more liberal understanding of what is literary comes into play in the presentation of literary awards…” (p. 606)Pettersson notes that institutions like literary awards often use broader criteria for literariness, impacting what is considered literary.
Suggested Readings: “Factuality And Literariness” by Anders Pettersson
  1. Pettersson, Anders. “Narrative Factuality: A Handbook.” In Narrative Factuality: A Handbook, edited by Monika Fludernik and Marie-Laure Ryan, 601-612. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2020.
  2. Alexandrov, Vladimir E. “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain.” Comparative Literature, vol. 59, no. 2, 2007, pp. 97–118. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40279363. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  3. McNAMER, SARAH. “The Literariness of Literature and the History of Emotion.” PMLA, vol. 130, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1433–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44017160. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.
  4. Ramchand, Kenneth. “West Indian Literary History: Literariness, Orality and Periodization.” Callaloo, no. 34, 1988, pp. 95–110. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2931112. Accessed 6 Nov. 2024.

“Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón: A Critical Analysis

“Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón first appeared in her 2018 poetry collection, The Carrying, like many others in the collection, explores themes of resilience, growth, and the quiet strength found in observing the natural world.

"Instructions on Not Giving Up" by Ada Limón: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón

“Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón first appeared in her 2018 poetry collection, The Carrying, like many others in the collection, explores themes of resilience, growth, and the quiet strength found in observing the natural world. Limón draws on the metaphor of spring leaves unfurling after winter to reflect on human perseverance and renewal, celebrating small, everyday acts of endurance. The poem’s popularity stems from its relatable, hopeful message and its accessible, yet profound, language. Through simple, vivid imagery, Limón encourages readers to find solace and beauty in the persistence of life, making this poem a widely cherished piece, particularly during times of collective hardship or personal struggle.

Text: “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón

More than the fuchsia funnels breaking out
of the crabapple tree, more than the neighbor’s
almost obscene display of cherry limbs shoving
their cotton candy-colored blossoms to the slate
sky of Spring rains, it’s the greening of the trees
that really gets to me. When all the shock of white
and taffy, the world’s baubles and trinkets, leave
the pavement strewn with the confetti of aftermath,
the leaves come. Patient, plodding, a green skin
growing over whatever winter did to us, a return
to the strange idea of continuous living despite
the mess of us, the hurt, the empty. Fine then,
I’ll take it, the tree seems to say, a new slick leaf
unfurling like a fist to an open palm, I’ll take it all.

Annotations: “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
LineAnnotationLiterary Devices
More than the fuchsia funnels breaking outThe speaker notices details in nature, specifically vibrant colors emerging in spring.Imagery, Alliteration
of the crabapple tree, more than the neighbor’sEmphasizes a sense of community and shared experience in observing nature.Imagery
almost obscene display of cherry limbs shovingSuggests an overwhelming, almost exaggerated beauty, hinting at nature’s boldness.Hyperbole, Personification
their cotton candy-colored blossoms to the slate sky of Spring rainsContrasts bright colors with a gray sky, creating a vivid image of spring’s beauty amid harsh weather.Imagery, Color Symbolism, Contrast
it’s the greening of the trees that really gets to meFocus shifts to the subtler, enduring renewal of leaves, highlighting resilience.Imagery, Personification
When all the shock of white and taffy, the world’s baubles and trinkets,Compares spring blossoms to frivolous, decorative items, symbolizing transient beauty.Metaphor, Imagery
leave the pavement strewn with the confetti of aftermath,The fallen petals are likened to confetti, marking an end to the initial burst of spring.Metaphor, Imagery
the leaves come. Patient, plodding, a green skin growing over whatever winter did to us,The leaves’ growth represents healing and continuity, slowly covering up past hardships.Personification, Imagery, Symbolism
a return to the strange idea of continuous living despite the mess of us, the hurt, the empty.Reflects on life’s persistence through difficulties, symbolizing resilience and renewal.Symbolism, Repetition, Enjambment
Fine then, I’ll take it, the tree seems to say,The speaker imagines the tree’s acceptance of life’s challenges, embodying resilience.Personification, Dialogue
a new slick leaf unfurling like a fist to an open palm,Compares the unfolding of a leaf to a hand opening, symbolizing acceptance and peace.Simile, Imagery, Symbolism
I’ll take it all.Reinforces the message of resilience and acceptance in the face of challenges.Repetition, Personification
Literary And Poetic Devices: “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
DeviceExampleExplanation
Alliteration“fuchsia funnels”The repetition of the “f” sound creates a rhythmic, flowing effect, enhancing the vivid image of flowers.
Assonance“greening of the trees that really gets to me”The repetition of the “e” sound creates a melodic effect, emphasizing the speaker’s emotional connection.
Contrast“cotton candy-colored blossoms to the slate sky”Contrasts bright, playful colors with a dark sky, highlighting spring’s beauty amid harsh weather.
Dialogue“Fine then, I’ll take it, the tree seems to say”Imagined dialogue with the tree personifies it, making nature seem resilient and accepting.
Enjambment“the leaves come. Patient, plodding, a green skin”The sentence runs onto the next line, mimicking the continuous growth and renewal in nature.
Hyperbole“obscene display of cherry limbs shoving”Exaggerates the growth of cherry blossoms to emphasize nature’s abundance and boldness in spring.
Imagery“cotton candy-colored blossoms to the slate sky”Creates a vivid visual of spring flowers against a gray sky, stimulating the reader’s senses.
Juxtaposition“shock of white and taffy, the world’s baubles”Juxtaposes the light, decorative quality of blossoms with a deeper, reflective tone on life’s transience.
Metaphor“the world’s baubles and trinkets”Compares spring blooms to trinkets, suggesting beauty that is fleeting and ornamental.
Mood“a return to the strange idea of continuous living”Sets a contemplative mood, evoking resilience and a reflective sense of renewal despite challenges.
Oxymoron“patient, plodding”Combines patience with plodding, suggesting both steady and deliberate growth in nature.
Parallelism“the hurt, the empty”Creates a rhythm and balance by pairing abstract nouns, reinforcing the sense of emotional weight.
Personification“a green skin growing over whatever winter did to us”Gives leaves human-like qualities, as if they are healing, symbolizing resilience.
Repetition“I’ll take it, I’ll take it all”Repeats the phrase to emphasize acceptance of life’s challenges and resilience.
Simile“unfurling like a fist to an open palm”Compares a new leaf to a hand opening, symbolizing acceptance and the unfolding of life.
Symbolism“greening of the trees”Green leaves symbolize renewal and healing, contrasting with the harshness of winter.
Syntax“Fine then, I’ll take it, the tree seems to say”The simple, direct syntax mirrors the straightforward message of resilience and acceptance.
Tone“a new slick leaf unfurling”The tone is reflective and hopeful, underscoring nature’s quiet persistence and beauty.
Vivid Verbs“shoving…strewn”Powerful verbs add dynamism to the imagery, conveying energy and motion in nature’s renewal.
Visual Imagery“confetti of aftermath”Creates a visual of fallen petals as confetti, symbolizing the remnants of past beauty.
Themes: “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
ThemeExplanationReferences from the Poem
Resilience and RenewalThe poem emphasizes the quiet resilience of nature, particularly in the way trees persist and renew each spring.“a green skin growing over whatever winter did to us,” “a new slick leaf unfurling”
Beauty in SubtletyWhile spring often brings vibrant blossoms, the speaker finds a deeper beauty in the steady, patient greening of trees.“More than the fuchsia funnels breaking out,” “it’s the greening of the trees that really gets to me”
Acceptance of HardshipThe tree’s response to winter’s effects symbolizes an acceptance of life’s struggles, choosing to grow despite them.“Fine then, I’ll take it,” “a return to the strange idea of continuous living despite the mess”
Cycles of Life and NatureThe poem reflects on nature’s cycles, with winter giving way to spring, symbolizing life’s continuous renewal.“whatever winter did to us,” “the confetti of aftermath,” “continuous living despite the mess”
Literary Theories and “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
  • Ecocriticism
    This theory examines the relationship between literature and the natural world, emphasizing environmental awareness. In Limón’s poem, nature is not just a backdrop but a force of resilience and healing. The lines “a green skin growing over whatever winter did to us” and “a new slick leaf unfurling” suggest a deep appreciation for nature’s cycles, positioning the environment as an active participant in human renewal.
  • Humanism
    Humanism emphasizes the value of human experiences, resilience, and personal growth. Limón’s poem centers on universal themes of enduring hardship and finding strength, illustrated by lines like “I’ll take it, the tree seems to say” and “a return to the strange idea of continuous living despite the mess of us.” These lines reflect an acceptance of life’s challenges, connecting human resilience with the natural world’s cycles.
  • Psychoanalytic Criticism
    Through a psychoanalytic lens, this poem could represent the unconscious mind’s healing processes, mirroring psychological recovery with nature’s renewal. The speaker’s fixation on the “greening of the trees” over the “shock of white and taffy” in spring blossoms suggests an internal desire for stability and healing rather than surface beauty. The tree’s “unfurling like a fist to an open palm” may symbolize an unconscious movement from tension to acceptance, mirroring the release of suppressed emotions.
Critical Questions about “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
  • How does Limón use imagery to convey the poem’s themes of resilience and renewal?
  • Limón employs vivid, contrasting imagery to underscore themes of resilience and the subtler beauty of renewal. Rather than focusing on the showy, transient blooms of spring, she describes “the greening of the trees” as what “really gets to” her. This shift in focus from “fuchsia funnels breaking out” and “cotton candy-colored blossoms” to the steady emergence of green leaves symbolizes a deeper, more enduring kind of growth. By choosing the “patient, plodding” leaves over the fleeting petals, Limón highlights resilience through nature’s quiet persistence, suggesting that true strength often lies in gradual, unnoticed renewal.
  • What role does personification play in the poem’s message?
  • Personification is central to the poem, ascribing human qualities to trees and leaves, which reflects a shared resilience between nature and humans. For example, Limón writes, “Fine then, I’ll take it, the tree seems to say,” giving the tree a voice of acceptance and strength. This line implies that nature embraces challenges and adapts to adversity, mirroring the resilience Limón advocates for in human life. By personifying the tree, she connects readers with nature on an emotional level, suggesting that just as the tree “takes” what winter has done, humans, too, can bear hardship and continue to grow.
  • How does the poem explore the contrast between surface beauty and deeper resilience?
  • Limón contrasts the vibrant but ephemeral beauty of spring blossoms with the quieter endurance of leaves to illustrate resilience. She describes blossoms as “the world’s baubles and trinkets,” portraying them as temporary adornments that “leave the pavement strewn with the confetti of aftermath.” In contrast, the leaves that follow are “patient, plodding,” representing a more profound beauty rooted in survival and continuous growth. This contrast suggests that resilience isn’t showy or immediate but is instead steady and enduring, urging readers to value this deeper form of beauty in their own lives.
  • What significance does the metaphor of “a fist to an open palm” have in the poem?
  • The metaphor of “a fist to an open palm” serves as a powerful symbol of transformation and acceptance. By comparing the leaf’s unfurling to a hand opening, Limón conveys a shift from tension to release, from resistance to openness. This image not only captures the physical act of a leaf opening but also reflects a psychological acceptance of life’s challenges. It suggests that resilience involves moving from a stance of defensiveness to one of openness, embodying the poem’s core message of embracing growth and renewal, even in the face of hardship.
Literary Works Similar to “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
  1. “Wild Geese” by Mary Oliver – Like Limón’s poem, this piece encourages self-acceptance and connection with nature, offering comfort and strength through the natural world’s enduring patterns.
  2. “The Peace of Wild Things” by Wendell Berry – Berry’s poem shares Limón’s theme of finding solace and healing in nature, presenting the natural world as a refuge from human struggles.
  3. “Famous” by Naomi Shihab Nye – Nye’s poem, similar to Limón’s, explores the beauty of ordinary things and resilience, focusing on how unnoticed or humble qualities hold deep significance.
  4. “Love After Love” by Derek Walcott – This poem speaks to themes of self-rediscovery and renewal, mirroring Limón’s focus on acceptance and continuous growth through difficult times.
  5. “The Trees” by Philip Larkin – Larkin’s work also centers on the resilience and cyclical nature of trees, using them as a metaphor for life’s enduring and renewing processes, much like Limón does.
Representative Quotations of “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“More than the fuchsia funnels breaking out”Limón begins with the vibrant blooms of spring but quickly moves beyond surface beauty.Ecocriticism – Highlights nature’s varied expressions.
“almost obscene display of cherry limbs shoving”Describes the bold, overwhelming display of cherry blossoms.Aesthetic Theory – Examines beauty that is almost excessive.
“it’s the greening of the trees that really gets to me”Limón focuses on the understated but steady growth of leaves as a source of inspiration.Humanism – Celebrates resilience and quiet endurance.
“a green skin growing over whatever winter did to us”Suggests nature’s ability to heal and cover past wounds.Psychoanalytic Criticism – Symbolizes recovery and healing.
“a return to the strange idea of continuous living”Reflects on life’s persistence despite challenges.Existentialism – Life’s continuation amid struggle.
“Fine then, I’ll take it, the tree seems to say”Personifies the tree as accepting life’s challenges.Ecocriticism – Nature as a model for resilience.
“unfurling like a fist to an open palm”Compares a new leaf’s opening to a hand opening in acceptance.Psychoanalytic Theory – Symbolizes letting go and openness.
“I’ll take it all.”Represents resilience, accepting both beauty and hardship.Humanism – Embraces the full spectrum of experience.
“confetti of aftermath”Describes fallen petals as remnants of spring’s transient beauty.Aesthetic Theory – Beauty in the aftermath of vitality.
“the hurt, the empty”Acknowledges life’s struggles and voids, which are covered by growth.Existentialism – Addresses pain as part of the human condition.
Suggested Readings: “Instructions on Not Giving Up” by Ada Limón
  1. Limón, Ada. Instructions on Not Giving Up. Expedition Press, 2019.
  2. Limón, Ada. The Carrying: Poems. Milkweed Editions, 2021.

“In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop: A Critical Analysis

“In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop first appeared in 1976 as part of her posthumously published collection, Geography III.

"In the Waiting Room" by Elizabeth Bishop: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop

“In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop first appeared in 1976 as part of her posthumously published collection, Geography III. The poem is renowned for its introspective depth, focusing on themes of identity, self-awareness, and the nature of belonging. Set in a waiting room of a dentist’s office, the poem captures a pivotal moment in the young narrator’s life as she experiences an intense awareness of herself and others. This revelation is sparked by reading National Geographic, where images and ideas about the wider world force her to confront existential questions about human connection, mortality, and individuality. Its popularity lies in Bishop’s vivid, almost cinematic language, which seamlessly combines the personal with the universal. Through a child’s perspective, Bishop eloquently explores profound themes that resonate with readers, prompting them to reflect on their own identity and place in the world.

Text: “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop

In Worcester, Massachusetts,
I went with Aunt Consuelo
to keep her dentist’s appointment
and sat and waited for her
in the dentist’s waiting room.
It was winter. It got dark
early. The waiting room
was full of grown-up people,
arctics and overcoats,
lamps and magazines.
My aunt was inside
what seemed like a long time
and while I waited I read
the National Geographic
(I could read) and carefully
studied the photographs:
the inside of a volcano,
black, and full of ashes;
then it was spilling over
in rivulets of fire.
Osa and Martin Johnson
dressed in riding breeches,
laced boots, and pith helmets.
A dead man slung on a pole
–“Long Pig,” the caption said.
Babies with pointed heads
wound round and round with string;
black, naked women with necks
wound round and round with wire
like the necks of light bulbs.
Their breasts were horrifying.
I read it right straight through.
I was too shy to stop.
And then I looked at the cover:
the yellow margins, the date.
Suddenly, from inside,
came an oh! of pain
–Aunt Consuelo’s voice–
not very loud or long.
I wasn’t at all surprised;
even then I knew she was
a foolish, timid woman.
I might have been embarrassed,
but wasn’t. What took me
completely by surprise
was that it was me:
my voice, in my mouth.
Without thinking at all
I was my foolish aunt,
I–we–were falling, falling,
our eyes glued to the cover
of the National Geographic,
February, 1918.

I said to myself: three days
and you’ll be seven years old.
I was saying it to stop
the sensation of falling off
the round, turning world.
into cold, blue-black space.
But I felt: you are an I,
you are an Elizabeth,
you are one of them.
Why should you be one, too?
I scarcely dared to look
to see what it was I was.
I gave a sidelong glance
–I couldn’t look any higher–
at shadowy gray knees,
trousers and skirts and boots
and different pairs of hands
lying under the lamps.
I knew that nothing stranger
had ever happened, that nothing
stranger could ever happen.

Why should I be my aunt,
or me, or anyone?
What similarities–
boots, hands, the family voice
I felt in my throat, or even
the National Geographic
and those awful hanging breasts–
held us all together
or made us all just one?
How–I didn’t know any
word for it–how “unlikely”. . .
How had I come to be here,
like them, and overhear
a cry of pain that could have
got loud and worse but hadn’t?

The waiting room was bright
and too hot. It was sliding
beneath a big black wave,
another, and another.

Then I was back in it.
The War was on. Outside,
in Worcester, Massachusetts,
were night and slush and cold,
and it was still the fifth
of February, 1918.

Annotations: “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
StanzaAnnotation
“In Worcester, Massachusetts, I went…”The opening lines establish the setting: Worcester, Massachusetts, where the young narrator accompanies her Aunt Consuelo to a dentist’s appointment. The description of the waiting room and winter atmosphere immediately creates a sense of confinement and anticipation, both of which play a role in the narrator’s heightened sensitivity and eventual existential crisis.
“The waiting room was full of grown-up…”Bishop describes the waiting room filled with “grown-up people” wearing heavy winter clothing, emphasizing the contrast between the young narrator and the adults around her. The ordinary details—overcoats, lamps, and magazines—highlight the mundane setting, which makes the surreal internal experience the narrator is about to undergo even more jarring.
“My aunt was inside what seemed like…”While her aunt is with the dentist, the narrator passes time by reading National Geographic. Her fascination with the magazine’s contents, from volcanoes to exotic images, foreshadows the deepening awareness of a broader, unfamiliar world. This quiet curiosity will soon lead to an unexpected realization about identity and existence.
“the inside of a volcano, black, and full…”Bishop catalogs various images the young girl encounters in the magazine: a volcano, explorers, unsettling depictions of people from foreign cultures, and graphic images. These images expose the narrator to concepts of death, cultural difference, and physical oddity, symbolizing her first encounter with the strangeness of the human condition.
“Suddenly, from inside, came an oh!”The sudden sound of her aunt’s pained cry interrupts her reading, drawing her back into the present. The aunt’s cry is an ordinary but startling reminder of vulnerability and pain, contrasting with the magazine’s exotic images. This cry triggers an unexpected reaction in the narrator, blurring the line between herself and her aunt.
“I wasn’t at all surprised…”The narrator feels a profound shock, realizing that she has momentarily experienced her aunt’s voice as her own. This line captures her unsettling, almost mystical, feeling of merging identities, leading her to question her sense of self. It hints at the idea that individual identities are interconnected, an essential theme in the poem.
“Without thinking at all, I was my foolish…”Bishop conveys the narrator’s confusion and fear as she feels herself falling, detached from reality and caught in an existential crisis. This sensation of “falling” suggests her disorientation and dread, as she realizes her individuality is fragile, even arbitrary. The poem explores the limits of self-perception and identity.
“I said to myself: three days and you’ll…”To ground herself, the narrator recalls her upcoming birthday, a fact that she repeats in an effort to anchor her identity and separate herself from the others. This internal monologue reflects her attempt to resist the dizzying realization of her own “oneness” with humanity and to stop the feeling of disassociation.
“But I felt: you are an I, you are an…”Bishop explores the formation of the self, with the narrator becoming aware that she is an “I,” an individual yet part of a larger collective (“one of them”). This realization brings both fear and curiosity, as she questions her connection to others and the inevitability of her place in the human experience.
“I gave a sidelong glance…at shadowy…”The narrator glances at the other adults, seeing only fragmented, impersonal details (knees, boots, hands) rather than whole people. This partial view emphasizes her sense of alienation and detachment, while also illustrating her reluctance to confront the full implications of her self-realization.
“I knew that nothing stranger had ever…”Recognizing the gravity of her experience, the narrator feels that nothing could surpass the strangeness of this moment. Bishop highlights the shock and wonder of self-awareness, suggesting that this experience is formative, unique, and perhaps even beyond rational comprehension.
“What similarities—boots, hands, the family…”The narrator searches for the commonalities that connect her to others, pondering the shared traits that bind humanity together. This introspective line reflects the poem’s central theme: the simultaneous isolation and interconnectedness of individuals within a shared human experience.
“How had I come to be here, like them…”The narrator reflects on the randomness of existence and her place among others. Her astonishment at “overhearing” a cry of pain (her aunt’s voice) underscores her awareness of shared human vulnerability, a key motif in the poem that resonates with the young narrator’s growing comprehension of mortality and individuality.
“The waiting room was bright and too hot…”The setting, once ordinary, now feels overwhelming and oppressive, mirroring the narrator’s emotional turmoil. She envisions waves closing in, symbolizing the crushing realization of her own existence and connection to others. Bishop skillfully conveys this intense, almost claustrophobic realization of belonging to a collective humanity.
“The War was on. Outside, in Worcester…”Returning to the external world, Bishop situates the scene in a specific historical context—February 5, 1918, during World War I. This detail grounds the narrator’s inner crisis in the harsh reality of a world in conflict, linking her personal revelation to the larger theme of human suffering and shared history.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
Literary DeviceExampleExplanation
Alliteration“falling, falling”The repetition of the “f” sound emphasizes the narrator’s feeling of descent and disorientation.
Allusion“National Geographic”Reference to National Geographic serves as a symbol of the broader world and unfamiliar cultures, sparking the narrator’s existential realization.
Ambiguity“I was my foolish aunt, I–we–were falling”The ambiguous merging of identities blurs boundaries between the narrator and her aunt, deepening the poem’s exploration of self and interconnectedness.
Assonance“Osa and Martin Johnson”The repetition of the “a” sound connects words sonically, creating a sense of rhythm and drawing attention to these explorers, symbols of adventure and the unknown.
Caesura“three days and you’ll be seven years old.”The pause in the middle of this line mirrors the narrator’s attempt to ground herself amid her existential uncertainty.
Consonance“shadowy gray knees”Repeated “s” and “y” sounds create a soft, eerie tone, reflecting the narrator’s fearful curiosity as she observes the adults around her.
Diction“foolish, timid woman”Bishop’s choice of words, like “foolish” and “timid,” reflects the narrator’s immature judgment of her aunt, showing the child’s perspective.
Enjambment“and while I waited I read / the National Geographic”The line continues without pause, mirroring the natural flow of thoughts as the young narrator immerses herself in the magazine.
Foreshadowing“It got dark early”The early darkness foreshadows the dark, introspective journey the narrator will soon experience, as well as her descent into existential thoughts.
Hyperbole“I knew that nothing stranger could ever happen”The exaggeration emphasizes the profound impact of the realization on the narrator, marking this moment as life-altering.
Imagery“black, naked women with necks wound round and round”Vivid descriptions of cultural artifacts and people she sees in the magazine create a strong visual impact, emphasizing the narrator’s exposure to foreign, unfamiliar ideas.
Irony“I–we–were falling”It’s ironic that the narrator, in trying to differentiate herself from her aunt, feels an intense connection and unity, highlighting the complexity of identity.
Juxtaposition“night and slush and cold, and it was still…”The juxtaposition of the mundane external world and the narrator’s intense internal experience highlights the disparity between inner and outer realities.
Metaphor“falling, falling, our eyes glued to the cover”The act of “falling” represents the narrator’s descent into an overwhelming sense of identity and existential realization.
Metonymy“family voice”Referring to her “family voice” suggests the traits or characteristics inherited from her aunt, symbolizing the connection to her lineage and shared identity.
Mood“The waiting room was bright and too hot”This description creates a stifling, uncomfortable mood, mirroring the narrator’s anxiety and unease as she grapples with her self-awareness.
Personification“our eyes glued to the cover”Giving eyes the ability to be “glued” to something personifies the intense, almost hypnotic nature of her reading experience.
Simile“necks wound round and round with wire / like the necks of light bulbs”Comparing necks to “light bulbs” emphasizes the surreal and shocking imagery the narrator encounters, reflecting her young perspective.
Symbolism“the yellow margins, the date”The National Geographic magazine symbolizes the wider world, and the date signifies a fixed moment in history, grounding the narrator’s existential awakening.
ToneReflective, introspectiveBishop’s reflective tone enhances the contemplative and questioning nature of the poem, capturing the narrator’s journey into self-discovery.
Themes: “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
  1. Identity and Self-Discovery: The poem explores a young girl’s burgeoning sense of self as she becomes aware of her distinct identity. In the line, “I was saying it to stop / the sensation of falling off / the round, turning world,” the narrator tries to ground herself in her identity by noting that she will soon be seven years old. This moment reflects the narrator’s attempt to grapple with the overwhelming realization that she is both an individual and part of a larger human collective. The sudden awareness of herself as “an Elizabeth” hints at the narrator’s first recognition of her place in the world, marking a powerful moment of self-discovery.
  2. Human Connection and Universality: The theme of human interconnectedness surfaces as the narrator experiences a strange merging of identities with her Aunt Consuelo. When she hears her aunt’s voice, she feels, “Without thinking at all / I was my foolish aunt, / I–we–were falling, falling.” This line captures her realization that individual identities are not entirely separate; she is connected to her aunt and, by extension, to humanity. The narrator’s experience of this connection leads her to ponder shared traits, asking, “What similarities—boots, hands, the family voice,” that unify people, suggesting a recognition of universal human traits.
  3. Exposure to the Wider World: Bishop uses the magazine National Geographic as a symbol of the narrator’s first encounter with unfamiliar cultures, geography, and even mortality. The images of “black, naked women with necks / wound round and round with wire” and “a dead man slung on a pole” introduce her to aspects of human experience and the vastness of the world beyond her own. These striking images force the narrator to confront the foreign and often unsettling realities of the world, sparking both fascination and discomfort as she contemplates her place in it. This confrontation with the unknown opens her eyes to the broader, complex human experience.
  4. The Mystery of Existence: The poem delves into existential wonder as the narrator questions the nature of being. In the lines, “Why should I be my aunt, / or me, or anyone?” the narrator’s existential inquiry reveals her struggle to understand her own existence and the randomness of identity. This questioning represents the innate mystery of why we are who we are and why we are connected to others in the ways we are. The line, “nothing stranger / could ever happen,” captures the profundity of this revelation, highlighting the awe and confusion of confronting one’s own existence and its inexplicability.
Literary Theories and “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
Literary TheoryExplanationReferences from the Poem
Psychoanalytic TheoryFrom a psychoanalytic perspective, the poem reflects the narrator’s subconscious exploration of self and identity. The shock of hearing her aunt’s voice and feeling it as her own suggests a merging of identities that Freud might interpret as a disruption of the ego, or self-boundaries.The line, “Without thinking at all / I was my foolish aunt, / I–we–were falling, falling,” exemplifies this blurring of self and other, which Freud might see as a moment where unconscious thoughts challenge the narrator’s sense of a stable, defined self.
ExistentialismExistential theory explores themes of self-awareness, individuality, and the search for meaning—core ideas in Bishop’s poem. The young narrator’s sudden awareness of herself as “an I” highlights existential questions about the nature of identity and one’s place in a vast, impersonal world.When the narrator reflects, “you are an I, / you are an Elizabeth, / you are one of them,” she faces the existential realization of her existence, individuality, and kinship with others, encapsulating the poem’s focus on self and universal human existence.
Feminist TheoryThrough a feminist lens, the poem can be seen as a commentary on female identity, self-perception, and societal expectations. The narrator’s experience in a female space (accompanying her aunt) and her reaction to images of women in National Geographic reflect her emerging awareness of womanhood.The narrator’s description of the “black, naked women with necks / wound round and round with wire” reveals her discomfort and fascination with feminine images, which may symbolize her conflicted view of female identity and the societal objectification of women’s bodies.
Critical Questions about “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
  • How does the poem explore the theme of self-awareness and identity?
  • In “In the Waiting Room,” the young narrator experiences a moment of sudden self-awareness that profoundly impacts her understanding of identity. This theme is vividly depicted when she realizes, “you are an I, / you are an Elizabeth, / you are one of them.” This recognition is unsettling for her, as it merges her sense of self with the larger collective humanity, sparking an internal crisis where she questions why she is “one of them.” The poem captures the moment when a child first grapples with the concept of individuality while simultaneously feeling connected to others. This exploration of identity is intensified when she hears her aunt’s cry and, for a fleeting moment, cannot distinguish between her aunt’s voice and her own: “Without thinking at all / I was my foolish aunt, / I–we–were falling, falling.” This instance blurs the boundaries of self, making her ponder her existence as separate yet intertwined with others, a key moment in the formation of self-awareness.
  • What role does the setting play in the narrator’s psychological journey?
  • The setting of the poem—a dentist’s waiting room in Worcester, Massachusetts—serves as both a literal and symbolic space for the narrator’s psychological awakening. The mundane, confined environment, described as “bright and too hot,” enhances the narrator’s sense of discomfort and unease. It is a place of waiting, emphasizing the theme of transition and anticipation. The narrator’s internal experience contrasts sharply with the seemingly ordinary surroundings, highlighting how profound realizations can emerge in the most unassuming places. The physical confinement of the waiting room mirrors her existential containment within her identity, which she suddenly perceives as fragile. This contrast between the banal setting and the depth of her inner turmoil underscores the poem’s exploration of self-awareness within ordinary contexts.
  • How does the poem address the concept of belonging and alienation?
  • Bishop’s poem poignantly captures the narrator’s struggle with both belonging and alienation as she grapples with her place in the world. The narrator initially feels separate from the “grown-up people” around her, yet when she experiences the visceral connection to her aunt, she is startled by the sudden unity with others: “I was my foolish aunt, / I–we–were falling, falling.” This merging of identities reveals a paradox of belonging; though she senses a kinship with humanity, she also feels alienated by the strange, uncomfortable realization that she, too, is part of it. This duality is further emphasized when she asks, “Why should I be my aunt, / or me, or anyone?” Here, the narrator questions the arbitrariness of her individuality, suggesting that belonging is both inevitable and isolating. The poem ultimately presents belonging as a complex, sometimes disquieting, aspect of selfhood.
  • What is the significance of the images from National Geographic in the poem?
  • The images from National Geographic serve as a catalyst for the narrator’s exploration of identity and the wider world. The photographs she encounters—”the inside of a volcano,” “black, naked women with necks wound round and round with wire,” and “a dead man slung on a pole”—introduce her to the unfamiliar and often disturbing aspects of human existence. These depictions of foreign cultures and mortality confront her with the complexity and diversity of the world beyond her sheltered life. The visceral reaction she has to these images, particularly her horror at the sight of women’s breasts, symbolizes her innocence grappling with raw, unfiltered humanity. The magazine, with its vivid and exotic pictures, forces the narrator to reckon with human difference, mortality, and her own place in this larger, often frightening reality, propelling her towards a new understanding of herself and the human experience.
Literary Works Similar to “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
  1. “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. Eliot
    Like Bishop’s poem, this work delves into a character’s inner thoughts and existential doubts, exploring themes of identity, isolation, and the fear of self-discovery.
  2. “Birches” by Robert Frost
    Frost’s poem reflects on innocence and the transition to self-awareness, much like Bishop’s exploration of a child’s encounter with a broader understanding of life and identity.
  3. “Ariel” by Sylvia Plath
    Plath’s poem portrays a powerful journey of self-realization and transformation, similar to the narrator’s profound moment of identity awareness in “In the Waiting Room.”
  4. “Song of Myself” by Walt Whitman
    Whitman’s celebration of individual identity and interconnectedness with humanity parallels Bishop’s themes of belonging and the search for self in a larger world.
  5. “The Fish” by Elizabeth Bishop
    Another of Bishop’s own works, this poem also examines human empathy and connection through observation, reflecting on identity and mortality, similar to “In the Waiting Room.”
Representative Quotations of “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“In Worcester, Massachusetts, I went with Aunt Consuelo”The opening line situates the poem in a specific, mundane setting, emphasizing the ordinariness that contrasts with the narrator’s internal transformation.New Historicism – The specific historical and geographic setting grounds the poem in reality, allowing for analysis of cultural and social context.
“the waiting room was full of grown-up people”The young narrator feels surrounded by adults, highlighting her separation from them and her status as a child.Psychoanalytic Theory – Emphasizes the child’s awareness of the adult world, a significant factor in her identity formation and individuation.
“Without thinking at all I was my foolish aunt”The narrator’s shocking realization of her voice merging with her aunt’s symbolizes a blurring of identities.Existentialism – Reflects existential questioning as the narrator’s self merges momentarily with another, challenging boundaries of individual identity.
“I was saying it to stop the sensation of falling off the round, turning world”The narrator tries to stabilize herself during her existential crisis, clinging to facts as a grounding mechanism.Phenomenology – Explores the subjective experience of the narrator, who perceives her identity and reality slipping away.
“you are an I, you are an Elizabeth”The narrator suddenly recognizes herself as a distinct individual, a transformative realization of her own identity.Identity Theory – Examines the self-awareness that arises when the narrator perceives herself as an “I,” marking a moment of self-identification.
“What similarities—boots, hands, the family voice”The narrator questions the traits that unite her with others, pondering what connects her to humanity.Structuralism – Focuses on the elements (voice, hands) that signify shared human experience, revealing the structures underlying identity.
“Why should I be my aunt, or me, or anyone?”This line expresses the narrator’s bewilderment at her own existence and identity, questioning the arbitrary nature of selfhood.Existentialism – Embodies existential uncertainty, as the narrator questions why she exists as herself, touching on ideas of randomness in identity.
“How had I come to be here, like them, and overhear a cry of pain”The narrator reflects on her shared vulnerability with others after hearing her aunt’s cry, emphasizing human connection.Humanism – Highlights shared human experiences, with the narrator feeling connected to others through empathy and a common experience of pain.
“The waiting room was bright and too hot”The setting becomes stifling and uncomfortable, reflecting the narrator’s internal sense of anxiety and disorientation.Psychoanalytic Theory – The oppressive setting mirrors the narrator’s growing psychological discomfort as she confronts her self-awareness.
“The War was on. Outside, in Worcester, Massachusetts, were night and slush and cold”References to World War I ground the narrator’s crisis in a larger, shared historical context, linking personal and global experience.New Historicism – The mention of World War I ties the individual experience to broader historical and social contexts, underscoring collective trauma.
Suggested Readings: “In the Waiting Room” by Elizabeth Bishop
  1. Edelman, Lee, and Elizabeth Bishop. “The Geography of Gender: Elizabeth Bishop’s ‘In the Waiting Room.'” Contemporary Literature, vol. 26, no. 2, 1985, pp. 179–96. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1207932. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  2. Flynn, Richard. “ELIZABETH BISHOP’S SANITY: Childhood Trauma, Psychoanalysis, and Sentimentality.” Elizabeth Bishop and the Literary Archive, edited by Bethany Hicok, Lever Press, 2019, pp. 45–64. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.11649332.7. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  3. Travisano, Thomas. “The Elizabeth Bishop Phenomenon.” New Literary History, vol. 26, no. 4, 1995, pp. 903–30. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20057324. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  4. White, Heather Cass. “Elizabeth Bishop’s Calling.” Twentieth Century Literature, vol. 48, no. 2, 2002, pp. 117–49. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3176014. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  5. Treseler, Heather. “‘TOO SHY TO STOP’: Elizabeth Bishop and the Scene of Reading.” Elizabeth Bishop and the Literary Archive, edited by Bethany Hicok, Lever Press, 2019, pp. 17–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.11649332.6. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.

“In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden: A Critical Analysis

“In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden, first appeared in 1940 as part of Auden’s collection Another Time, reflects on the life and influence of William Butler Yeats.

"In Memory of W.B. Yeats" by W.H. Auden: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden

“In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden, first appeared in 1940 as part of Auden’s collection Another Time, reflects on the life and influence of William Butler Yeats, paying homage to the Irish poet’s impact on literature while also exploring broader themes of mortality, the role of the poet in society, and the enduring power of poetry. Structured in three parts, Auden moves from a personal lament for Yeats to a philosophical reflection on the nature of poetry and its ability to outlast individual lives. The poem is notable for its contemplative tone and memorable lines, such as “poetry makes nothing happen,” which has sparked considerable discussion about the political and social function of poetry. Auden’s nuanced approach to mourning—balancing admiration with a sober recognition of death’s finality—has contributed to the work’s lasting appeal and established it as one of the defining poetic elegies of the 20th century.

Text: “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden

I

He disappeared in the dead of winter:
The brooks were frozen, the airports almost deserted,
And snow disfigured the public statues;
The mercury sank in the mouth of the dying day.
What instruments we have agree
The day of his death was a dark cold day.

Far from his illness
The wolves ran on through the evergreen forests,
The peasant river was untempted by the fashionable quays;
By mourning tongues
The death of the poet was kept from his poems.

But for him it was his last afternoon as himself,
An afternoon of nurses and rumours;
The provinces of his body revolted,
The squares of his mind were empty,
Silence invaded the suburbs,
The current of his feeling failed; he became his admirers.

Now he is scattered among a hundred cities
And wholly given over to unfamiliar affections,
To find his happiness in another kind of wood
And be punished under a foreign code of conscience.
The words of a dead man
Are modified in the guts of the living.

But in the importance and noise of to-morrow
When the brokers are roaring like beasts on the floor of the bourse,
And the poor have the sufferings to which they are fairly accustomed
And each in the cell of himself is almost convinced of his freedom
A few thousand will think of this day
As one thinks of a day when one did something slightly unusual.

What instruments we have agree
The day of his death was a dark cold day.

II

You were silly like us; your gift survived it all:
The parish of rich women, physical decay,
Yourself. Mad Ireland hurt you into poetry.
Now Ireland has her madness and her weather still,
For poetry makes nothing happen: it survives
In the valley of its making where executives
Would never want to tamper, flows on south
From ranches of isolation and the busy griefs,
Raw towns that we believe and die in; it survives,
A way of happening, a mouth.

III

Earth, receive an honoured guest:
William Yeats is laid to rest.
Let the Irish vessel lie
Emptied of its poetry.

In the nightmare of the dark
All the dogs of Europe bark,
And the living nations wait,
Each sequestered in its hate;

Intellectual disgrace
Stares from every human face,
And the seas of pity lie
Locked and frozen in each eye.

Follow, poet, follow right
To the bottom of the night,
With your unconstraining voice
Still persuade us to rejoice;

With the farming of a verse
Make a vineyard of the curse,
Sing of human unsuccess
In a rapture of distress;

In the deserts of the heart
Let the healing fountain start,
In the prison of his days
Teach the free man how to praise.

Annotations: “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
StanzaAnnotationLiterary Devices
IThe first stanza opens with a cold, stark setting that reflects the poet’s death in winter. Auden uses imagery of “frozen brooks” and “deserted airports” to evoke a bleak, unfeeling world. He juxtaposes the poet’s death with the indifference of nature and society, symbolized by the “wolves” and “peasant river” that continue unaffected. Auden suggests that Yeats’ influence is now in the hands of others (“he became his admirers”), hinting at how a poet’s legacy is reshaped by those who survive them.Imagery: “dead of winter,” “brooks were frozen”
Personification: “silence invaded the suburbs”
Symbolism: winter and frozen imagery represent death and emotional numbness
Juxtaposition: Yeats’ death vs. indifferent world
Metaphor: “the provinces of his body revolted”
IIIn the second stanza, Auden speaks directly to Yeats, acknowledging his imperfections (“You were silly like us”) but celebrating the resilience of his poetry. He famously states, “poetry makes nothing happen,” suggesting that poetry’s value lies beyond political or social influence; it exists as “a way of happening.” Auden contrasts poetry with the daily grind of life, indicating that while poetry may not change the world, it endures and offers solace.Direct Address: Auden addresses Yeats as “You”
Irony: “poetry makes nothing happen” contrasts poetry’s cultural value
Metaphor: poetry as “a mouth” and “a way of happening”
Personification: “Mad Ireland hurt you into poetry”
Contrast: poetry’s endurance vs. the transient world
IIIThe final stanza offers a farewell to Yeats as Auden calls on nature (“Earth, receive an honoured guest”) to lay him to rest. This section evokes the political tensions of Europe, symbolized by “the dogs of Europe bark,” underscoring the dark and divided times Yeats leaves behind. Auden also calls upon Yeats to continue inspiring through poetry, encouraging a “rapture of distress” and “healing fountain” for the “deserts of the heart.” He concludes with an uplifting message, urging poetry to “teach the free man how to praise,” highlighting its redemptive power.Apostrophe: Auden addresses Earth and Yeats directly
Symbolism: “Irish vessel” represents Yeats’ poetic legacy
Alliteration: “sing of human unsuccess”
Imagery: “nightmare of the dark,” “dogs of Europe bark”
Metaphor: “vineyard of the curse” symbolizes finding beauty in pain
Oxymoron: “rapture of distress”
Literary And Poetic Devices: “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
DeviceExampleExplanation
Alliteration“As one thinks of a day when one did something slightly unusual.”The repetition of the “s” sound emphasizes the musical quality of poetry, even when discussing failure.
Apostrophe“Earth, receive an honoured guest”Directly addressing Earth, Auden personifies it as a being capable of honoring Yeats.
Assonance“parish of rich women, physical decay”Repetition of the “i” sound creates a melodic quality, enhancing the mournful tone.
Consonance“Let the Irish vessel lie / Emptied of its poetry”Repetition of the “l” sound creates a subtle rhythm, reinforcing the finality of Yeats’ passing.
Direct Address“You were silly like us”Auden addresses Yeats directly, creating an intimate and reflective tone, as if speaking to a friend.
End-Stopped Line“The current of his feeling failed; he became his admirers.”The period at the end of the line halts the flow, underscoring the finality of Yeats’ transformation after death.
Enjambment“Each in the cell of himself is almost convinced of his freedom”The line flows into the next, reflecting the continuous nature of self-deception.
Epigram“For poetry makes nothing happen”A short, memorable statement that encapsulates a philosophical view on poetry’s practical impact.
Imagery“The mercury sank in the mouth of the dying day”Vivid image that portrays the coldness and stillness of Yeats’ final day, setting a somber scene.
Irony“poetry makes nothing happen”Auden states this paradoxically; poetry is, in fact, deeply influential on an emotional and cultural level.
Juxtaposition“wolves ran on through the evergreen forests” vs. “silence invaded the suburbs”Contrasts the indifference of nature with the personal sorrow of Yeats’ death.
Metaphor“The provinces of his body revolted”The breakdown of Yeats’ body is likened to rebellious provinces, symbolizing his loss of control.
Mood“The day of his death was a dark cold day”Establishes a somber and reflective atmosphere, mirroring the sorrow of the poet’s passing.
Oxymoron“rapture of distress”Contrasts two opposing ideas, suggesting that poetry finds beauty in pain or tragedy.
Paradox“Teach the free man how to praise”Suggests that those who are “free” still need guidance in expressing gratitude or understanding life.
Personification“Silence invaded the suburbs”Silence is given agency, emphasizing the pervading stillness and solemnity following Yeats’ death.
Repetition“The day of his death was a dark cold day”The phrase is repeated, emphasizing the unchanging nature of the somber event.
Simile“You were silly like us”Yeats is compared to others in a relatable way, humanizing him and showing his vulnerability.
Symbolism“Irish vessel”Represents Yeats himself and his poetic legacy, now “emptied” after his passing.
ToneReflective, mournful, contemplativeThe tone conveys respect and loss, as Auden mourns Yeats while contemplating the nature of poetry.
Themes: “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
  1. The Legacy of the Poet: Auden reflects on the enduring influence of William Butler Yeats after his death, suggesting that although the poet has passed, his work lives on, shaped by his admirers and their interpretations. In the first stanza, Auden notes that Yeats “became his admirers,” implying that a poet’s legacy is held and transformed by others. Auden further explores this by stating, “The words of a dead man / Are modified in the guts of the living,” emphasizing that Yeats’ poetry will continue to evolve and resonate differently with future generations, ensuring his lasting presence in literary consciousness.
  2. The Power and Limitations of Poetry: A significant theme is the nature of poetry and its role in society. Auden famously writes, “For poetry makes nothing happen: it survives,” reflecting a dual view that while poetry may not cause direct social change, it endures as a meaningful art form. Auden describes poetry as “a way of happening, a mouth,” suggesting that it provides a voice and an outlet for human emotion, offering solace and continuity even when it does not effect practical change. This line captures the idea that poetry’s power lies not in altering the world but in bearing witness to it and preserving human experiences.
  3. Mortality and the Passage of Time: The theme of mortality pervades the poem, as Auden contemplates Yeats’ death against the coldness of winter, symbolizing the finality and stillness of life’s end. He writes, “The day of his death was a dark cold day,” repeating this line to underscore the somber and unchanging reality of death. Auden juxtaposes Yeats’ death with the unaffected world around him—“the wolves ran on through the evergreen forests”—implying that life and nature remain indifferent to individual mortality. This theme highlights the inevitability of death and the persistence of time, contrasting the fleeting human life with the continuous cycles of nature.
  4. Political and Social Division: In the final stanza, Auden addresses the state of Europe, portraying a continent fractured by hatred and intolerance. He describes a Europe where “each sequestered in its hate,” indicating the pervasive nationalism and conflict of the era. Auden’s imagery of “dogs of Europe bark” and “the seas of pity…locked and frozen in each eye” conveys the sense of an unfeeling, hostile world in need of healing. In this context, Auden calls upon Yeats to “teach the free man how to praise,” suggesting that poetry has the potential to inspire compassion and understanding in divided times, offering a hopeful, if challenging, task for poets.
Literary Theories and “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
Literary TheoryApplication to the PoemReferences from the Poem
FormalismFormalist criticism focuses on the structure, style, and use of literary devices within the text. In Auden’s poem, the structure is deliberate, with three distinct sections that each serve a unique purpose: mourning Yeats’ death, reflecting on poetry’s purpose, and offering a final farewell. Formalist critics would examine how Auden’s choice of meter, repetition, and imagery shape the reader’s response to Yeats’ death.The repetition in “The day of his death was a dark cold day” emphasizes the somber tone, while the rich imagery, such as “the mercury sank in the mouth of the dying day,” conveys a sense of decay and finality.
New HistoricismNew Historicism examines literature within its historical and cultural context. Auden’s poem reflects the tense political climate of 1930s Europe, with references to the political turmoil and division of the time, symbolized by “dogs of Europe bark” and “seas of pity…locked and frozen.” A New Historicist reading would explore how Auden’s concerns about societal and political conflicts influenced his reflections on Yeats’ poetry and the role of poets in turbulent times.The lines, “And the living nations wait, / Each sequestered in its hate,” capture the fraught atmosphere of Europe, while “poetry makes nothing happen” suggests Auden’s view of the limited influence of poetry in a politically charged world.
Reader-Response TheoryReader-Response Theory focuses on the reader’s interpretation and emotional engagement with the text. In “In Memory of W.B. Yeats,” Auden invites readers to grapple with the ideas of legacy, death, and the impact of art. The line “poetry makes nothing happen” can evoke varied responses, with some readers possibly finding it disheartening and others seeing it as a celebration of poetry’s lasting, non-political influence.The line “Now he is scattered among a hundred cities / And wholly given over to unfamiliar affections” can lead readers to ponder Yeats’ legacy, shaping their personal reactions to the idea of a poet’s life and work continuing after death.
Critical Questions about “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
  • How does Auden view the role of poetry in society, and what might he mean by the statement “poetry makes nothing happen”?
  • Auden’s statement, “poetry makes nothing happen,” is one of the poem’s most thought-provoking lines, suggesting a nuanced view of poetry’s role in society. On the surface, this line implies that poetry lacks direct power to instigate social or political change. However, Auden does not dismiss poetry’s significance; he views it as an enduring art form that “survives / In the valley of its making.” Rather than effecting tangible outcomes, poetry provides a “way of happening” that resonates emotionally and intellectually with individuals, separate from societal structures. This perspective highlights poetry as a means of personal reflection and emotional survival, offering solace and insight even if it does not change practical realities. By positioning poetry as something that “flows on south / From ranches of isolation,” Auden implies that poetry’s true power lies in its ability to provide meaning and resilience amid life’s challenges.
  • What is the significance of winter imagery in the poem, particularly in connection to Yeats’ death?
  • Auden’s use of winter imagery establishes a bleak, somber atmosphere that reflects the finality of Yeats’ death. Opening with “He disappeared in the dead of winter,” Auden creates a scene of cold stillness, where “the brooks were frozen” and “snow disfigured the public statues,” representing the desolate impact of Yeats’ passing on the literary world. Winter traditionally symbolizes death and dormancy, and here it underscores the emotional void left by the poet’s absence. By noting that “The mercury sank in the mouth of the dying day,” Auden emphasizes the waning warmth and vitality as Yeats’ life fades. This winter setting mirrors the numbness of loss and reflects a world seemingly indifferent to individual suffering and mortality, heightening the poem’s reflective tone on the transience of life.
  • In what way does Auden both praise and critique Yeats, and why might this duality be important to the poem’s message?
  • Auden approaches Yeats with a blend of admiration and critical realism, acknowledging his achievements while not idealizing him. He addresses Yeats directly, stating, “You were silly like us,” emphasizing that, despite his genius, Yeats was fallible and human. This line invites readers to appreciate Yeats as a relatable figure, marked by the same personal flaws and societal limitations as others. Auden’s line “Mad Ireland hurt you into poetry” suggests that Yeats’ poetry was born out of Ireland’s historical turmoil, which both inspired him and inflicted pain. By presenting Yeats as both elevated and flawed, Auden enhances the elegy’s authenticity, illustrating that even great poets contend with personal and cultural challenges. This duality reinforces the poem’s message that a poet’s impact is enduring, yet shaped by human vulnerability.
  • How does Auden address the political climate of Europe in the poem, and what effect does this have on his view of Yeats’ legacy?
  • Auden subtly weaves references to Europe’s political unrest into his elegy, suggesting that Yeats’ legacy exists within a broader context of turmoil and division. In the final stanza, he describes a “nightmare of the dark” where “all the dogs of Europe bark,” symbolizing the nationalist tensions and fears engulfing the continent. The image of “each sequestered in its hate” evokes the isolation and hostility that pervade society, highlighting a climate in which nations and individuals are increasingly divided. This context affects Auden’s view of Yeats’ legacy, as it portrays the poet’s art as a potential balm or guide in dark times. By urging Yeats to “teach the free man how to praise,” Auden suggests that poetry can foster unity, resilience, and emotional freedom, even amid a fractured world. This juxtaposition between Yeats’ poetic legacy and the political turmoil underscores the poem’s reflection on the enduring power of art in uncertain times.
Literary Works Similar to “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
  • “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” by Thomas Gray
    Like Auden’s poem, Gray’s elegy reflects on mortality and the legacy of those who have passed, contemplating how individuals are remembered after death.
  • “Adonais” by Percy Bysshe Shelley
    Shelley’s elegy for John Keats, much like Auden’s for Yeats, honors a fellow poet and explores themes of loss, legacy, and the immortality of poetic influence.
  • “When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom’d” by Walt Whitman
    Whitman’s poem, written in memory of Abraham Lincoln, mirrors Auden’s work in its exploration of national loss and the poet’s role in memorializing significant figures.
  • “Lycidas” by John Milton
    Milton’s pastoral elegy mourns the death of a fellow poet and reflects on the impermanence of life, similar to Auden’s musings on the poet’s mortality and the resilience of art.
  • “To an Athlete Dying Young” by A.E. Housman
    Housman’s poem considers the fleeting nature of fame and youth, akin to Auden’s reflections on the lasting impact of Yeats’ poetry after death.
Representative Quotations of “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“He disappeared in the dead of winter”Opens the poem with a stark, somber setting to mirror Yeats’ death, symbolizing the end of warmth and vitality.Formalism: Examines the use of seasonal imagery to reflect tone.
“The day of his death was a dark cold day.”Repeated refrain that emphasizes the bleakness of Yeats’ passing, reinforcing the poem’s mournful tone.Structuralism: Considers repetition as a means to underscore themes.
“He became his admirers.”Suggests that Yeats’ legacy is now in the hands of those who interpret and continue his work.Reader-Response Theory: Highlights how readers shape a poet’s legacy.
“You were silly like us; your gift survived it all.”Auden acknowledges Yeats’ flaws while affirming that his poetic talent transcends human weaknesses.Humanism: Emphasizes shared humanity and the endurance of art.
“Mad Ireland hurt you into poetry.”References Ireland’s political turmoil as a source of Yeats’ inspiration, indicating how suffering shapes creativity.New Historicism: Contextualizes the influence of cultural and political strife on art.
“For poetry makes nothing happen: it survives”Auden’s famous line suggesting that while poetry may not cause change, it persists beyond immediate impact.Existentialism: Explores the idea that art exists independently of social effects.
“A way of happening, a mouth.”Describes poetry as a mode of expression rather than an agent of action, focusing on its intrinsic value.Formalism: Examines how language and form define the role of poetry.
“The wolves ran on through the evergreen forests”Uses nature’s indifference to suggest that life continues despite individual deaths, highlighting the theme of mortality.Naturalism: Emphasizes nature’s impersonal, ongoing cycles.
“In the prison of his days / Teach the free man how to praise.”Concluding lines, calling on poetry to offer guidance and foster gratitude even in difficult times.Romanticism: Celebrates poetry as a means of transcending limitations.
“The words of a dead man / Are modified in the guts of the living.”Reflects on how a poet’s work is transformed by those who read and reinterpret it after their death.Post-Structuralism: Suggests that meaning is reshaped by individual interpretation.
Suggested Readings: “In Memory of W.B. Yeats” by W.H. Auden
  1. Auden, Wystan Hugh. In memory of WB Yeats. Hamdset in type & printed at Virginia Arts of the Book Center, 2017.
  2. Regan, Stephen. “W.B. Yeats: Irish Nationalism and Post-Colonial Theory.” Nordic Irish Studies, vol. 5, 2006, pp. 87–99. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30001545. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  3. Harries, Owen. “Poets on Power (and Its Loss).” The National Interest, no. 33, 1993, pp. 115–20. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42894903. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  4. Hildebidle, John. “Human Clay: Some People in Auden’s Poetry, 1936-1941.” Modern Language Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, 1982, pp. 83–98. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3194297. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.

“In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson: A Critical Analysis

“In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson first appeared in 1850, published as part of a collection of elegiac verses dedicated to his dear friend Arthur Henry Hallam, who had died suddenly in 1833.

"In Memoriam A.H.H." by Alfred, Lord Tennyson: A Critical Analysis
Introduction: “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

“In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson first appeared in 1850, published as part of a collection of elegiac verses dedicated to his dear friend Arthur Henry Hallam, who had died suddenly in 1833. This extended poem, consisting of 131 sections of four-line stanzas, explores themes of grief, faith, love, and the search for meaning in the face of personal loss. Tennyson uses this reflective journey to confront his own doubts about life and death, while addressing broader questions about human existence and spiritual resilience. The poem resonated deeply with readers, particularly in the Victorian era, who were grappling with shifting religious beliefs and scientific discoveries. Its popularity stems not only from its profound emotional depth but also from Tennyson’s lyrical mastery and his ability to articulate universal emotions related to mourning and hope, making “In Memoriam” both a personal tribute and a timeless exploration of human vulnerability.

Text: “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Strong Son of God, immortal Love,

   Whom we, that have not seen thy face,

   By faith, and faith alone, embrace,

Believing where we cannot prove;

Thine are these orbs of light and shade;

   Thou madest Life in man and brute;

   Thou madest Death; and lo, thy foot

Is on the skull which thou hast made.

Thou wilt not leave us in the dust:

Thou madest man, he knows not why,

He thinks he was not made to die;

And thou hast made him: thou art just.

Thou seemest human and divine,

   The highest, holiest manhood, thou.

   Our wills are ours, we know not how;

Our wills are ours, to make them thine.

Our little systems have their day;

   They have their day and cease to be:

   They are but broken lights of thee,

And thou, O Lord, art more than they.

We have but faith: we cannot know;

   For knowledge is of things we see

   And yet we trust it comes from thee,

A beam in darkness: let it grow.

Let knowledge grow from more to more,

   But more of reverence in us dwell;

   That mind and soul, according well,

May make one music as before,

But vaster. We are fools and slight;

   We mock thee when we do not fear:

   But help thy foolish ones to bear;

Help thy vain worlds to bear thy light.

Forgive what seem’d my sin in me;

   What seem’d my worth since I began;

   For merit lives from man to man,

And not from man, O Lord, to thee.

Forgive my grief for one removed,

   Thy creature, whom I found so fair.

   I trust he lives in thee, and there

I find him worthier to be loved.

Forgive these wild and wandering cries,

   Confusions of a wasted youth;

   Forgive them where they fail in truth,

And in thy wisdom make me wise.

I

I held it truth, with him who sings

   To one clear harp in divers tones,

   That men may rise on stepping-stones

Of their dead selves to higher things.

But who shall so forecast the years

   And find in loss a gain to match?

   Or reach a hand thro’ time to catch

The far-off interest of tears?

Let Love clasp Grief lest both be drown’d,

   Let darkness keep her raven gloss:

   Ah, sweeter to be drunk with loss,

To dance with death, to beat the ground,

Than that the victor Hours should scorn

   The long result of love, and boast,

   `Behold the man that loved and lost,

But all he was is overworn.’

II

Old Yew, which graspest at the stones

   That name the under-lying dead,

   Thy fibres net the dreamless head,

Thy roots are wrapt about the bones.

The seasons bring the flower again,

   And bring the firstling to the flock;

   And in the dusk of thee, the clock

Beats out the little lives of men.

O, not for thee the glow, the bloom,

   Who changest not in any gale,

   Nor branding summer suns avail

To touch thy thousand years of gloom:

And gazing on thee, sullen tree,

   Sick for thy stubborn hardihood,

   I seem to fail from out my blood

And grow incorporate into thee.

III

O Sorrow, cruel fellowship,

   O Priestess in the vaults of Death,

   O sweet and bitter in a breath,

What whispers from thy lying lip?

‘The stars,’ she whispers, `blindly run;

   A web is wov’n across the sky;

   From out waste places comes a cry,

And murmurs from the dying sun:

‘And all the phantom, Nature, stands—

   With all the music in her tone,

   A hollow echo of my own,—

A hollow form with empty hands.’

And shall I take a thing so blind,

   Embrace her as my natural good;

   Or crush her, like a vice of blood,

Upon the threshold of the mind?

IV

To Sleep I give my powers away;

   My will is bondsman to the dark;

   I sit within a helmless bark,

And with my heart I muse and say:

O heart, how fares it with thee now,

   That thou should’st fail from thy desire,

   Who scarcely darest to inquire,

‘What is it makes me beat so low?’

Something it is which thou hast lost,

   Some pleasure from thine early years.

   Break, thou deep vase of chilling tears,

That grief hath shaken into frost!

Such clouds of nameless trouble cross

   All night below the darken’d eyes;

   With morning wakes the will, and cries, 

‘Thou shalt not be the fool of loss.’

V

I sometimes hold it half a sin

   To put in words the grief I feel;

   For words, like Nature, half reveal

And half conceal the Soul within.

But, for the unquiet heart and brain,

   A use in measured language lies;

   The sad mechanic exercise,

Like dull narcotics, numbing pain.

In words, like weeds, I’ll wrap me o’er,

   Like coarsest clothes against the cold:

   But that large grief which these enfold

Is given in outline and no more.

VI

One writes, that `Other friends remain,’

   That `Loss is common to the race’—

   And common is the commonplace,

And vacant chaff well meant for grain.

That loss is common would not make

   My own less bitter, rather more:

   Too common! Never morning wore

To evening, but some heart did break.

O father, wheresoe’er thou be,

   Who pledgest now thy gallant son;

   A shot, ere half thy draught be done,

Hath still’d the life that beat from thee.

O mother, praying God will save

   Thy sailor,—while thy head is bow’d,

   His heavy-shotted hammock-shroud

Drops in his vast and wandering grave.

Ye know no more than I who wrought

   At that last hour to please him well;

   Who mused on all I had to tell,

And something written, something thought;

Expecting still his advent home;

   And ever met him on his way

   With wishes, thinking, `here to-day,’

Or `here to-morrow will he come.’

O somewhere, meek, unconscious dove,

   That sittest ranging golden hair;

   And glad to find thyself so fair,

Poor child, that waitest for thy love!

For now her father’s chimney glows

   In expectation of a guest;

   And thinking `this will please him best,’

She takes a riband or a rose;

For he will see them on to-night;

   And with the thought her colour burns;

   And, having left the glass, she turns

Once more to set a ringlet right;

And, even when she turn’d, the curse

   Had fallen, and her future Lord

   Was drown’d in passing thro’ the ford,

Or kill’d in falling from his horse.

O what to her shall be the end?

   And what to me remains of good?

   To her, perpetual maidenhood,

And unto me no second friend.

VII

Dark house, by which once more I stand

   Here in the long unlovely street,

   Doors, where my heart was used to beat

So quickly, waiting for a hand,

A hand that can be clasp’d no more—

   Behold me, for I cannot sleep,

   And like a guilty thing I creep

At earliest morning to the door.

He is not here; but far away

   The noise of life begins again,

   And ghastly thro’ the drizzling rain

On the bald street breaks the blank day.

VIII

A happy lover who has come

   To look on her that loves him well,

   Who ‘lights and rings the gateway bell,

And learns her gone and far from home;

He saddens, all the magic light

   Dies off at once from bower and hall,

   And all the place is dark, and all

The chambers emptied of delight:

So find I every pleasant spot

   In which we two were wont to meet,

   The field, the chamber, and the street,

For all is dark where thou art not.

Yet as that other, wandering there

   In those deserted walks, may find

   A flower beat with rain and wind,

Which once she foster’d up with care;

So seems it in my deep regret,

   O my forsaken heart, with thee

   And this poor flower of poesy

Which little cared for fades not yet.

But since it pleased a vanish’d eye,

   I go to plant it on his tomb,

   That if it can it there may bloom,

Or, dying, there at least may die.

IX

Fair ship, that from the Italian shore

   Sailest the placid ocean-plains

   With my lost Arthur’s loved remains,

Spread thy full wings, and waft him o’er.

So draw him home to those that mourn

   In vain; a favourable speed

   Ruffle thy mirror’d mast, and lead

Thro’ prosperous floods his holy urn.

All night no ruder air perplex

   Thy sliding keel, till Phosphor, bright

   As our pure love, thro’ early light

Shall glimmer on the dewy decks.

Sphere all your lights around, above;

   Sleep, gentle heavens, before the prow;

   Sleep, gentle winds, as he sleeps now,

My friend, the brother of my love;

My Arthur, whom I shall not see

   Till all my widow’d race be run;

   Dear as the mother to the son,

More than my brothers are to me.

X

I hear the noise about thy keel;

   I hear the bell struck in the night:

   I see the cabin-window bright;

I see the sailor at the wheel.

Thou bring’st the sailor to his wife,

   And travell’d men from foreign lands;

   And letters unto trembling hands;

And, thy dark freight, a vanish’d life.

So bring him; we have idle dreams:

   This look of quiet flatters thus

   Our home-bred fancies. O to us,

The fools of habit, sweeter seems

To rest beneath the clover sod,

   That takes the sunshine and the rains,

   Or where the kneeling hamlet drains

The chalice of the grapes of God;

Than if with thee the roaring wells

   Should gulf him fathom-deep in brine;

   And hands so often clasp’d in mine,

Should toss with tangle and with shells.

XI

Calm is the morn without a sound,

   Calm as to suit a calmer grief,

   And only thro’ the faded leaf

The chestnut pattering to the ground:

Calm and deep peace on this high world,

   And on these dews that drench the furze,

   And all the silvery gossamers

That twinkle into green and gold:

Calm and still light on yon great plain

   That sweeps with all its autumn bowers,

   And crowded farms and lessening towers,

To mingle with the bounding main:

Calm and deep peace in this wide air,

   These leaves that redden to the fall;

   And in my heart, if calm at all,

If any calm, a calm despair:

Calm on the seas, and silver sleep,

   And waves that sway themselves in rest,

   And dead calm in that noble breast

Which heaves but with the heaving deep.

XII

Lo, as a dove when up she springs

   To bear thro’ Heaven a tale of woe,

   Some dolorous message knit below

The wild pulsation of her wings;

Like her I go; I cannot stay;

   I leave this mortal ark behind,

   A weight of nerves without a mind,

And leave the cliffs, and haste away

O’er ocean-mirrors rounded large,

   And reach the glow of southern skies,

   And see the sails at distance rise,

And linger weeping on the marge,

And saying; `Comes he thus, my friend?

   Is this the end of all my care?’

   And circle moaning in the air:

‘Is this the end? Is this the end?’

And forward dart again, and play

   About the prow, and back return

   To where the body sits, and learn

That I have been an hour away.

XIII

Tears of the widower, when he sees

   A late-lost form that sleep reveals,

   And moves his doubtful arms, and feels

Her place is empty, fall like these;

Which weep a loss for ever new,

   A void where heart on heart reposed;

   And, where warm hands have prest and closed,

Silence, till I be silent too.

Which weep the comrade of my choice,

   An awful thought, a life removed,

   The human-hearted man I loved,

A Spirit, not a breathing voice.

Come, Time, and teach me, many years,

   I do not suffer in a dream;

   For now so strange do these things seem,

Mine eyes have leisure for their tears;

My fancies time to rise on wing,

   And glance about the approaching sails,

   As tho’ they brought but merchants’ bales,

And not the burthen that they bring.

XIV

If one should bring me this report,

   That thou hadst touch’d the land to-day,

   And I went down unto the quay,

And found thee lying in the port;

And standing, muffled round with woe,

   Should see thy passengers in rank

   Come stepping lightly down the plank,

And beckoning unto those they know;

And if along with these should come

   The man I held as half-divine;

   Should strike a sudden hand in mine,

And ask a thousand things of home;

And I should tell him all my pain,

   And how my life had droop’d of late,

   And he should sorrow o’er my state

And marvel what possess’d my brain;

And I perceived no touch of change,

   No hint of death in all his frame,

   But found him all in all the same,

I should not feel it to be strange.

XV

To-night the winds begin to rise

   And roar from yonder dropping day:

   The last red leaf is whirl’d away,

The rooks are blown about the skies;

The forest crack’d, the waters curl’d,

   The cattle huddled on the lea;

   And wildly dash’d on tower and tree

The sunbeam strikes along the world:

And but for fancies, which aver

   That all thy motions gently pass

   Athwart a plane of molten glass,

I scarce could brook the strain and stir

That makes the barren branches loud;

   And but for fear it is not so,

   The wild unrest that lives in woe

Would dote and pore on yonder cloud

That rises upward always higher,

   And onward drags a labouring breast,

   And topples round the dreary west,

A looming bastion fringed with fire.

XVI

What words are these have falle’n from me?

   Can calm despair and wild unrest

   Be tenants of a single breast,

Or sorrow such a changeling be?

Or cloth she only seem to take

   The touch of change in calm or storm;

   But knows no more of transient form

In her deep self, than some dead lake

That holds the shadow of a lark

   Hung in the shadow of a heaven?

   Or has the shock, so harshly given,

Confused me like the unhappy bark

That strikes by night a craggy shelf,

   And staggers blindly ere she sink?

   And stunn’d me from my power to think

And all my knowledge of myself;

And made me that delirious man

   Whose fancy fuses old and new,

   And flashes into false and true,

And mingles all without a plan?

XVII

Thou comest, much wept for: such a breeze

   Compell’d thy canvas, and my prayer

   Was as the whisper of an air

To breathe thee over lonely seas.

For I in spirit saw thee move

   Thro’ circles of the bounding sky,

   Week after week: the days go by:

Come quick, thou bringest all I love.

Henceforth, wherever thou may’st roam,

   My blessing, like a line of light,

   Is on the waters day and night,

And like a beacon guards thee home.

So may whatever tempest mars

   Mid-ocean, spare thee, sacred bark;

   And balmy drops in summer dark

Slide from the bosom of the stars.

So kind an office hath been done,

   Such precious relics brought by thee;

   The dust of him I shall not see

Till all my widow’d race be run.

XVIII

‘Tis well; ’tis something; we may stand

   Where he in English earth is laid,

   And from his ashes may be made

The violet of his native land.

‘Tis little; but it looks in truth

   As if the quiet bones were blest

   Among familiar names to rest

And in the places of his youth.

Come then, pure hands, and bear the head

   That sleeps or wears the mask of sleep,

   And come, whatever loves to weep,

And hear the ritual of the dead.

Ah yet, ev’n yet, if this might be,

   I, falling on his faithful heart,

   Would breathing thro’ his lips impart

The life that almost dies in me;

That dies not, but endures with pain,

   And slowly forms the firmer mind,

   Treasuring the look it cannot find,

The words that are not heard again.

XIX

The Danube to the Severn gave

   The darken’d heart that beat no more;

   They laid him by the pleasant shore,

And in the hearing of the wave.

There twice a day the Severn fills;

   The salt sea-water passes by,

   And hushes half the babbling Wye,

And makes a silence in the hills.

The Wye is hush’d nor moved along,

   And hush’d my deepest grief of all,

   When fill’d with tears that cannot fall,

I brim with sorrow drowning song.

The tide flows down, the wave again

   Is vocal in its wooded walls;

   My deeper anguish also falls,

And I can speak a little then.

XX

The lesser griefs that may be said,

   That breathe a thousand tender vows,

   Are but as servants in a house

Where lies the master newly dead;

Who speak their feeling as it is,

   And weep the fulness from the mind:

   `It will be hard,’ they say, `to find

Another service such as this.’

My lighter moods are like to these,

   That out of words a comfort win;

   But there are other griefs within,

And tears that at their fountain freeze;

For by the hearth the children sit

   Cold in that atmosphere of Death,

   And scarce endure to draw the breath,

Or like to noiseless phantoms flit;

But open converse is there none,

   So much the vital spirits sink

   To see the vacant chair, and think,

‘How good! how kind! and he is gone.’

XXI

I sing to him that rests below,

   And, since the grasses round me wave,

   I take the grasses of the grave,

And make them pipes whereon to blow.

The traveller hears me now and then,

   And sometimes harshly will he speak:

   `This fellow would make weakness weak,

And melt the waxen hearts of men.’

Another answers, `Let him be,

   He loves to make parade of pain

   That with his piping he may gain

The praise that comes to constancy.’

A third is wroth: `Is this an hour

   For private sorrow’s barren song,

   When more and more the people throng

The chairs and thrones of civil power?

‘A time to sicken and to swoon,

   When Science reaches forth her arms

   To feel from world to world, and charms

Her secret from the latest moon?’

Behold, ye speak an idle thing:

   Ye never knew the sacred dust:

   I do but sing because I must,

And pipe but as the linnets sing:

And one is glad; her note is gay,

   For now her little ones have ranged;

   And one is sad; her note is changed,

Because her brood is stol’n away.

XXII

The path by which we twain did go,

   Which led by tracts that pleased us well,

   Thro’ four sweet years arose and fell,

From flower to flower, from snow to snow:

And we with singing cheer’d the way,

   And, crown’d with all the season lent,

   From April on to April went,

And glad at heart from May to May:

But where the path we walk’d began

   To slant the fifth autumnal slope,

   As we descended following Hope,

There sat the Shadow fear’d of man;

Who broke our fair companionship,

   And spread his mantle dark and cold,

   And wrapt thee formless in the fold,

And dull’d the murmur on thy lip,

And bore thee where I could not see

   Nor follow, tho’ I walk in haste,

   And think, that somewhere in the waste

The Shadow sits and waits for me.

XXIII

Now, sometimes in my sorrow shut,

   Or breaking into song by fits,

   Alone, alone, to where he sits,

The Shadow cloak’d from head to foot,

Who keeps the keys of all the creeds,

   I wander, often falling lame,

   And looking back to whence I came,

Or on to where the pathway leads;

And crying, How changed from where it ran

   Thro’ lands where not a leaf was dumb;

   But all the lavish hills would hum

The murmur of a happy Pan:

When each by turns was guide to each,

   And Fancy light from Fancy caught,

   And Thought leapt out to wed with Thought

Ere Thought could wed itself with Speech;

And all we met was fair and good,

   And all was good that Time could bring,

   And all the secret of the Spring

Moved in the chambers of the blood;

And many an old philosophy

   On Argive heights divinely sang,

   And round us all the thicket rang

To many a flute of Arcady.

XXIV

And was the day of my delight

   As pure and perfect as I say?

   The very source and fount of Day

Is dash’d with wandering isles of night.

If all was good and fair we met,

   This earth had been the Paradise

   It never look’d to human eyes

Since our first Sun arose and set.

And is it that the haze of grief

   Makes former gladness loom so great?

   The lowness of the present state,

That sets the past in this relief?

Or that the past will always win

   A glory from its being far;

   And orb into the perfect star

We saw not, when we moved therein?

XXV

I know that this was Life,—the track

   Whereon with equal feet we fared;

   And then, as now, the day prepared

The daily burden for the back.

But this it was that made me move

   As light as carrier-birds in air;

   I loved the weight I had to bear,

Because it needed help of Love:

Nor could I weary, heart or limb,

   When mighty Love would cleave in twain

   The lading of a single pain,

And part it, giving half to him.

XXVI

Still onward winds the dreary way;

   I with it; for I long to prove

   No lapse of moons can canker Love,

Whatever fickle tongues may say.

And if that eye which watches guilt

   And goodness, and hath power to see

   Within the green the moulder’d tree,

And towers fall’n as soon as built—

Oh, if indeed that eye foresee

   Or see (in Him is no before)

   In more of life true life no more

And Love the indifference to be,

Then might I find, ere yet the morn

   Breaks hither over Indian seas,

   That Shadow waiting with the keys,

To shroud me from my proper scorn.

XXVII

I envy not in any moods

   The captive void of noble rage,

   The linnet born within the cage,

That never knew the summer woods:

I envy not the beast that takes

   His license in the field of time,

   Unfetter’d by the sense of crime,

To whom a conscience never wakes;

Nor, what may count itself as blest,

   The heart that never plighted troth

   But stagnates in the weeds of sloth;

Nor any want-begotten rest.

I hold it true, whate’er befall;

   I feel it, when I sorrow most;

   ‘Tis better to have loved and lost

Than never to have loved at all.

Annotations: “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
StanzaSummary
IExplores the theme of faith amidst uncertainty, highlighting belief in divine presence and creation. Man is called to trust in God despite the inability to fully comprehend Him.
IIReflects on the cycle of life and death, contrasting the timeless nature of the yew tree with the transient lives of men. The yew becomes a symbol of endurance and continuity amid mortality.
IIIConfronts the duality of nature, described as both beautiful and cruel, which mirrors human sorrow and joy. The poet questions if embracing nature’s darker side is a wise choice.
IVDescribes surrender to sleep as a form of escape from grief, where the heart longs for answers but is left in solitude and loss, mourning what is irrevocably gone.
VDiscusses the limits of language to express grief, noting how words only partially reveal the depth of sorrow and that such expression can numb pain temporarily.
VIReflects on the unhelpful platitudes offered by others, underscoring that while loss is universal, each experience of grief is deeply personal and cannot be soothed by generalizations.
VIIThe speaker returns to the house of his friend, feeling an acute absence. The empty doorway becomes a powerful symbol of loss, as familiar spaces now feel desolate.
VIIICompares a lover returning to find his beloved gone to the speaker’s own sense of emptiness when revisiting places he shared with his lost friend. The joy of past memories now darkens.
IXEnvisions Arthur’s return to England, asking the ship to bear his remains gently, preserving his memory in the voyage. The sea journey symbolizes the path of mourning.
XPonders the duality of the ship, which brings joy to others but carries sorrow for the speaker, as it brings his friend’s lifeless body back. The vessel becomes a symbol of finality.
XIFinds a strange sense of peace in the calm morning, aligning the external world’s stillness with his internal despair, feeling a kinship with nature’s quiet grief.
XIIImagines himself as a bird flying towards Arthur’s ship, showing a strong desire to reconnect with him. The speaker’s restless spirit mirrors his unsettled grief.
XIIIDescribes grief as a haunting presence, like a widow mourning forever, recognizing that the sense of loss is eternal and profound, impossible to fully overcome.
XIVImagines an impossible reunion with Arthur, highlighting the depth of his yearning and the pain of realizing that such reunions are only dreams.
XVObserves the shifting seasons and turbulent winds, mirroring the internal turmoil of grief and the desire for peace amidst the raging emotions of loss.
XVIExamines the strange coexistence of calm and despair within, comparing it to a lake that holds reflections of life but remains unmoved by them.
XVIIPrays for Arthur’s safe return across the seas, symbolizing the speaker’s enduring love and hope that, despite death, Arthur’s spirit remains protected.
XVIIIFinds solace in knowing Arthur rests in his homeland, where he can be remembered and cherished among familiar places and people.
XIXDescribes Arthur’s burial near the Severn, connecting the natural ebb and flow of the river to the speaker’s fluctuating emotions, which mirror the rhythm of grief.
XXNotes how smaller griefs can be shared with others, but the deeper, frozen sorrow remains a private, isolating experience that words cannot touch.
XXIJustifies his continued mourning in song despite criticism, asserting that his grief is an intrinsic need, much like a bird that sings because it must.
XXIIRecalls happy memories with Arthur, underscoring the shared companionship that once gave life its meaning and the painful void left in its absence.
XXIIIWanders mentally, reflecting on the simplicity of his joyful past with Arthur, contrasting it with the complex sorrow that now consumes him.
XXIVQuestions if grief romanticizes the past, pondering whether the memories seem brighter because of the darkness of the present sorrow.
XXVReflects on how love made burdens bearable in the past, suggesting that mutual support lightened life’s weight, which now feels heavier in Arthur’s absence.
XXVIAsserts that love endures beyond time and death, pushing back against the cynicism that denies lasting connections, despite the loss.
XXVIIConcludes with the famous line, “‘Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all,” affirming the transformative power of love, even amid loss.
Literary And Poetic Devices: “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
DeviceExampleExplanation
AlliterationStrong Son of God, immortal Love,    Whom we, that have not seen thy face ” (Stanza I)Repetition of the initial “s” and “w” sounds creates a musical quality, emphasizing the contrasting emotions of calm and unrest.
Allusion“Strong Son of God, immortal Love” (Stanza I)Refers to Jesus Christ as the “Son of God,” connecting the poem’s themes to Christian beliefs about life, death, and resurrection.
Apostrophe“O Sorrow, cruel fellowship” (Stanza III)Directly addresses abstract concepts like “Sorrow,” personifying them and emphasizing the poet’s personal interaction with grief.
Assonance“One writes, that ‘Other friends remain,'” (Stanza VI)Repetition of the “i” sound in “writes” and “remain” creates internal rhyme, enhancing the line’s rhythm and solemnity.
Caesura“I hold it true, whate’er befall;” (Stanza XXVII)A pause in the middle of the line emphasizes the speaker’s firm belief in the value of love despite loss.
Consonance“Let Love clasp Grief lest both be drown’d” (Stanza I)Repetition of the “l” and “d” sounds at the start and end of words creates harmony and enhances the line’s mournful tone.
End Rhyme“to one clear harp in divers tones, / Of their dead selves to higher things.” (Stanza I)The rhyme of “tones” and “things” creates closure and musicality, typical of the ABBA rhyme scheme used throughout the poem.
Enjambment“The far-off interest of tears?” (Stanza I)The thought spills over from one line to the next, maintaining flow and reflecting the continuity of grief and questioning.
Epiphora“And thou hast made him: thou art just.” (Stanza I)Repetition of “thou” at the end of phrases emphasizes God’s control over creation and judgment.
Imagery“Old Yew, which graspest at the stones” (Stanza II)Vivid description of the yew tree as it wraps around tombstones, evoking visuals of death and nature’s persistence.
Irony“Too common! Never morning wore / To evening, but some heart did break.” (Stanza VI)Though grief is universal, it feels intensely personal; the “common” experience of loss is ironically isolating for the speaker.
Juxtaposition“Calm despair and wild unrest” (Stanza XVI)Contrasts “calm” with “wild unrest” to highlight the inner conflict and paradoxical nature of mourning.
Metaphor“a hollow form with empty hands” (Stanza III)Nature is described as a “hollow form,” symbolizing the emptiness and lack of meaning the poet feels in grief.
Oxymoron“calm despair” (Stanza XVI)Combines opposing ideas to express the complexity of the poet’s emotions, finding calm within sorrow.
Personification“Thy fibres net the dreamless head” (Stanza II)The yew tree is given human-like qualities, as its “fibres” encircle the dead, suggesting a connection between life and death.
Refrain“Tears, idle tears” (appears in other works too)Although not as common in In Memoriam, Tennyson often returns to similar phrases, underscoring the recurrence of grief and sorrow.
Rhetorical Question“Or reach a hand thro’ time to catch / The far-off interest of tears?” (Stanza I)Asks a question to provoke thought and highlight the uncertainty of future comfort or meaning in grief.
Simile“Like dull narcotics, numbing pain” (Stanza V)Compares the act of writing about grief to a narcotic, emphasizing how expression dulls but does not resolve pain.
Symbolism“Dark house” (Stanza VII)Represents the emptiness left after Arthur’s death, with the “dark house” symbolizing both the physical and emotional void.
Synecdoche“O Father, wheresoe’er thou be” (Stanza VI)Uses “Father” to represent all parents mourning lost children, universalizing the theme of parental grief.
Themes: “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
  1. Grief and Mourning: The overwhelming sorrow of losing his friend Arthur Henry Hallam permeates the entire poem, with Tennyson delving deeply into the complex and enduring nature of grief. In Stanza VII, he returns to the “dark house” where Hallam once lived, symbolizing the void left by his absence and evoking a haunting sense of loss: “Behold me, for I cannot sleep, / And like a guilty thing I creep.” The persistent emptiness and longing for his friend reflect Tennyson’s inability to find closure, highlighting how grief lingers and shapes one’s existence.
  2. Faith and Doubt: Tennyson grapples with faith and the role of divine power in life and death, often questioning the justice and purpose of human suffering. In the opening lines, he addresses God as “Strong Son of God, immortal Love,” admitting that people must “By faith, and faith alone, embrace, / Believing where we cannot prove.” This sentiment captures his struggle between trusting in a higher purpose and wrestling with doubt, especially in light of personal loss. The poem reflects Victorian concerns with reconciling traditional religious beliefs with the uncertainties of a changing world.
  3. Love and Friendship: The profound bond between Tennyson and Hallam is at the heart of In Memoriam, celebrating the transformative power of friendship and love. Tennyson finds solace and meaning in the memory of Hallam, expressing that love endures beyond death. In Stanza XXVII, he famously concludes, “‘Tis better to have loved and lost / Than never to have loved at all,” suggesting that the emotional growth and resilience gained from love are worth the pain of loss. This enduring connection with Hallam becomes both a source of strength and an idealized memory.
  4. The Nature of Knowledge and Progress: Tennyson often contemplates the limitations of human knowledge and the balance between intellectual growth and spiritual reverence. In Stanza LIV, he urges, “Let knowledge grow from more to more, / But more of reverence in us dwell,” recognizing the importance of scientific and intellectual progress but warning against losing sight of spirituality and humility. This theme echoes Victorian anxieties about the potential moral consequences of rapid advancements in science, suggesting that wisdom must be tempered with a deeper respect for life’s mysteries.
Literary Theories and “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
Literary TheoryExplanationReferences from the Poem
Psychoanalytic TheoryPsychoanalytic theory, particularly Freudian ideas, analyzes Tennyson’s mourning process, focusing on his internal struggle with grief and loss. Tennyson’s grief can be seen as a journey through Freudian stages of mourning and melancholia, with lingering feelings of despair and the struggle to detach from Hallam’s memory.In Stanza VII, Tennyson reflects on his sorrow by revisiting the “dark house” of his friend’s absence: “Behold me, for I cannot sleep, / And like a guilty thing I creep.” This haunting return to loss suggests an unresolved attachment to Hallam, reflecting the psychological impact of bereavement.
Religious and Theological CriticismThis approach examines Tennyson’s exploration of faith, doubt, and the afterlife, which are prominent in the poem. He confronts questions of divine justice, the existence of God, and human suffering, reflecting Victorian anxieties about religion. Tennyson’s struggle with faith and hope amid despair resonates with the theological debates of his time, particularly the conflict between science and faith.Tennyson’s address to God in Stanza I, “Strong Son of God, immortal Love… / Believing where we cannot prove,” underscores his ambivalence about belief without proof. This sentiment, echoed throughout, reflects his search for spiritual consolation amidst doubt and sorrow.
RomanticismRooted in Romantic ideals, this approach highlights Tennyson’s focus on intense emotion, individual experience, and nature’s symbolism in the face of mortality. Like the Romantics, Tennyson views personal grief as a means to connect with broader existential questions, valuing subjective experience as a source of insight and wisdom.In Stanza XVI, he combines contrasting emotions, “calm despair and wild unrest,” to portray the depth of his sorrow. His introspective journey through grief reflects Romantic ideals of finding universal truth in personal experience, nature, and introspection.
Critical Questions about “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
  • How does Tennyson reconcile faith and doubt in the face of personal tragedy?
  • Throughout “In Memoriam,” Tennyson grapples with profound questions of faith, especially concerning life, death, and the possibility of an afterlife. His dedication to God is clear from the opening lines, “Strong Son of God, immortal Love,” where he admits, “Believing where we cannot prove” (Stanza I). Yet, as he continues, his belief wavers, and he finds himself in moments of despair, unable to fully accept the loss of his friend Hallam as part of a divine plan. The poet’s oscillation between devotion and skepticism captures a struggle that reflects the larger Victorian crisis of faith, as scientific discoveries began to challenge traditional religious beliefs. Does Tennyson find solace in his faith, or is he left with more unanswered questions?
  • What role does nature play in shaping Tennyson’s experience of grief and mourning?
  • Nature is a pervasive and complex presence in “In Memoriam,” symbolizing both the constancy of life cycles and the indifferent passage of time. In Stanza II, Tennyson meditates on the yew tree, which “graspest at the stones” that mark graves, showing how nature intertwines with death. The poet’s ambivalence toward nature’s beauty and cruelty becomes a reflection of his own emotional turmoil—he sees it as a reminder of life’s continuity but also of his own mortality. Through this lens, Tennyson appears to wrestle with whether nature offers comfort in its timelessness or simply indifference to human suffering, leaving the reader to question whether he finds any true solace in the natural world.
  • How does Tennyson portray the impact of loss on personal identity and self-perception?
  • The loss of Hallam profoundly alters Tennyson’s sense of self, leaving him to navigate his identity in the absence of his closest companion. Stanza VII poignantly illustrates this as he returns to the “dark house” where Hallam once lived, confessing, “Behold me, for I cannot sleep, / And like a guilty thing I creep.” Here, Tennyson’s grief manifests as both physical and emotional displacement, where he feels like a stranger in familiar spaces. This sense of estrangement extends inward as he questions his purpose and ability to move forward. Does Tennyson ultimately discover a new sense of self through his mourning, or does he remain overshadowed by his loss?
  • In what ways does Tennyson explore the theme of love’s endurance beyond death?
  • Tennyson reflects on the endurance of love throughout “In Memoriam,” considering it a force that transcends even the boundaries of death. He famously asserts, “‘Tis better to have loved and lost / Than never to have loved at all” (Stanza XXVII), suggesting that love’s worth is not diminished by loss. This enduring love is evident as Tennyson continues to converse with Hallam’s memory and imagine his presence, maintaining a spiritual connection despite Hallam’s physical absence. The poem leaves readers to ponder whether Tennyson’s love ultimately provides him with comfort or if it serves to deepen his sorrow, as he remains bound to a friend who can never return.
Literary Works Similar to “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
  1. “Adonais” by Percy Bysshe Shelley
    Like In Memoriam, this elegy mourns the death of a close friend, poet John Keats, and grapples with themes of immortality and nature’s role in human loss.
  2. “Lycidas” by John Milton
    Milton’s pastoral elegy reflects on the untimely death of a friend, incorporating nature and divine justice, much like Tennyson’s meditation on fate and faith.
  3. “When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom’d” by Walt Whitman
    Written in memory of Abraham Lincoln, this elegy shares Tennyson’s themes of national and personal mourning, as well as the cyclical symbolism of nature.
  4. “Thyrsis” by Matthew Arnold
    In this pastoral elegy, Arnold laments the loss of his friend Arthur Hugh Clough, expressing a similar sense of deep, personal sorrow and searching for meaning.
  5. “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” by Thomas Gray
    Gray’s elegy contemplates death and memory in a rural setting, resonating with Tennyson’s exploration of life, loss, and the desire for remembrance beyond the grave.
Representative Quotations of “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
QuotationContextTheoretical Perspective
“‘Tis better to have loved and lost / Than never to have loved at all.” (Stanza XXVII)Tennyson reflects on the value of love, asserting that the experience of deep affection outweighs the pain of loss.Romanticism – Highlights the Romantic belief in the transformative power of love and emotional experience.
“Strong Son of God, immortal Love, / Whom we, that have not seen thy face…” (Stanza I)Opens the poem with a reverent address to God, revealing Tennyson’s struggle between faith and doubt.Religious and Theological Criticism – Examines the poet’s need for faith amidst spiritual uncertainty.
“Let knowledge grow from more to more, / But more of reverence in us dwell.” (Stanza LIV)Tennyson calls for a balance between intellectual progress and spiritual reverence.Victorian Skepticism – Reflects Victorian anxieties over scientific advancement potentially eroding faith.
“Behold me, for I cannot sleep, / And like a guilty thing I creep.” (Stanza VII)Tennyson describes returning to his friend’s house, now empty, embodying his overwhelming sense of loss.Psychoanalytic Theory – Reveals the depth of Tennyson’s unresolved grief and lingering attachment to Hallam.
“I sometimes hold it half a sin / To put in words the grief I feel.” (Stanza V)Expresses Tennyson’s reluctance to articulate his grief, viewing words as inadequate for deep sorrow.Expressivist Theory – Examines the limitations of language to capture intense emotions authentically.
“Our little systems have their day; / They have their day and cease to be.” (Stanza I)Comments on the transient nature of human beliefs and institutions.Structuralism – Highlights human constructs as fleeting and imperfect representations of divine truth.
“And thou hast made him: thou art just.” (Stanza I)Despite his grief, Tennyson acknowledges God’s justice in creating life and death.Religious and Theological Criticism – Reflects an attempt to reconcile divine justice with personal suffering.
“The path by which we twain did go, / Which led by tracts that pleased us well…” (Stanza XXII)Remembers the joyful memories shared with Hallam, contrasting them with present sorrow.Nostalgia Theory – Examines how memory romanticizes the past, intensifying grief by highlighting its loss.
“And all the phantom, Nature, stands— / A hollow echo of my own.” (Stanza III)Tennyson portrays nature as a reflection of his inner emptiness, finding no solace in its beauty.Ecocriticism – Considers nature as a mirror of human emotions, symbolizing alienation rather than comfort.
“Forgive these wild and wandering cries, / Confusions of a wasted youth.” (Stanza L)Tennyson asks forgiveness for the despair expressed in his mourning, suggesting a feeling of guilt.Moral Criticism – Indicates self-reproach for his perceived weakness, highlighting Victorian ideals of stoicism.
Suggested Readings: “In Memoriam A.H.H.” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
  1. Rosenberg, John D. “Stopping for Death: Tennyson’s ‘In Memoriam.'” Victorian Poetry, vol. 30, no. 3/4, 1992, pp. 291–330. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40002470. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  2. Hsiao, Irene. “Calculating Loss in Tennyson’s in Memoriam.” Victorian Poetry, vol. 47, no. 1, 2009, pp. 173–96. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40347430. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  3. Wright, Jane. “Appreciating Memorialization: In Memoriam, A. H. H.” Tennyson Research Bulletin, vol. 9, no. 1, 2007, pp. 77–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45288551. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  4. Hackenbracht, Ryan. “Shapes of Things to Come: Milton, Evolution, and the Afterlife of Species in Tennyson’s In Memoriam, A. H. H.” Milton’s Moving Bodies, edited by Marissa Greenberg and Rachel Trubowitz, Northwestern University Press, 2024, pp. 181–212. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18654577.14. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  5. Gray, Erik. “The Title of ‘In Memoriam.'” Tennyson Research Bulletin, vol. 9, no. 3, 2009, pp. 248–50. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45288794. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  6. Ricks, Christopher. “The Title of ‘In Memoriam’: A Few Further Considerations.” Tennyson Research Bulletin, vol. 9, no. 4, 2010, pp. 376–77. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45288030. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.

“On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc: Summary And Critique

“On Reading and Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc first appeared in 2022 in the journal SRAZ, contributing a critical discourse to the ongoing evolution of literary theory.

"On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory" by Barbara Dolenc: Summary And Critique
Introduction: “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc

“On Reading and Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc first appeared in 2022 in the journal SRAZ, contributing a critical discourse to the ongoing evolution of literary theory. Dolenc’s work re-evaluates the significance of literariness, especially as it is framed by the philosophies of Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze. She addresses the dynamic and often conflicting definitions of “literariness,” a concept foundational to understanding what makes a text “literary.” By examining how Derrida’s deconstructive reading and Deleuze’s event-based approach open possibilities for interpreting literariness, Dolenc suggests a shift away from rigid institutional definitions of literature. Her study implies that reading should move beyond merely verifying theoretical postulates and instead approach the text as a unique linguistic event. This reconceptualization challenges literary theory to continuously redefine its purpose, given the unsettled nature of what constitutes “literary” work, thus keeping theory itself in a state of becoming. This work is pivotal for its contribution to literary scholarship, as it underscores the necessity of theory to adapt and embrace the inherent indeterminacies within literary texts, expanding the discourse on how literature can be understood and valued within academia.

Summary of “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc
  • Literary Theory’s Evolution and Limitations
    Barbara Dolenc examines the concept of literariness and its foundational role in literary theory, particularly through the lens of Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze. She addresses how traditional, institutionalized literary theory often struggles with defining its core objectives, partly due to the varying and conflicting approaches within the field. According to Dolenc, the complexity of literariness challenges literary theory’s sustainability, highlighting an inherent tension in defining “what is literature” amidst a “stiff competition” of theories (Dolenc, 2022, p. 35).
  • The Concept of Literariness
    Dolenc delves into the genealogy of literariness, referencing Roman Jakobson’s view that “the subject of literary scholarship is not literature but literariness,” which underscores the search for what inherently makes a work literary. This focus, rooted in Russian formalism and structuralism, aims to isolate literariness from general aesthetics or philosophy, legitimizing literary study through specific methodologies (Jakobson, 1997, p. 179; Dolenc, 2022, p. 36). However, the latter half of the 20th century, influenced by deconstruction, questioned literary theory’s authority to define literature’s essence, suggesting that “literary theories cannot seem to agree” on fundamental principles (Solar, 2014, p. 30).
  • Deconstruction and the Literary Text
    The work discusses Derrida’s deconstructive perspective, which reframes literariness not as an intrinsic property of the text but as a construct of the “experience of literature.” Derrida insists that literature is defined through its openness to interpretation and connection to other discourses, challenging readers to see literariness as “a correlative of an intentional relation to the text” that evolves with each reading (Derrida, 1992b, p. 45; Dolenc, 2022, p. 38). This iterative and context-sensitive approach to texts allows literature to resist definitive categorization within the “literary institution.”
  • Deleuze’s Sense of Event and Literariness
    Dolenc also explores Deleuze’s notion of “event” as a key component of literariness, viewing literature as a “bloc of sensations,” inherently dynamic and always in a state of “becoming” through the reader’s interaction. This idea positions literature as an experience of constantly shifting interpretations, produced rather than discovered, and driven by a “logic of inventing a style in literature” (Deleuze & Guattari, 1994, p. 164; Dolenc, 2022, p. 39). According to Deleuze, the literary text, through its unique style and syntax, creates a “foreign language within language,” offering an eventful space for continuous and limitless reading.
  • Redefining Literary Theory
    Ultimately, Dolenc calls for a literary theory that acknowledges its own instability and capacity for “deconstruction in aporetic experience,” which resists predefined methods and embraces the undecidable nature of literariness (Dolenc, 2022, p. 41). She argues that a renewed literary theory would prioritize the text’s singularity, focusing on how each reading becomes an event in itself, rather than reducing it to a fixed methodological framework. This perspective asserts that the potential of literary theory lies in its openness to reformation, embracing each reading as a unique encounter with the “unreadable” aspects of literariness.
Literary Terms/Concepts in “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc
Term/ConceptDefinitionExplanation in Context
LiterarinessThe quality that makes a text “literary”; introduced by Roman Jakobson as “that which makes of a given work a work of literature.”Dolenc examines literariness as a central focus in literary theory, suggesting that it distinguishes literary texts from non-literary ones through their unique qualities.
DeconstructionA philosophical approach, primarily developed by Jacques Derrida, that critiques the notion of fixed meaning and emphasizes the fluidity of interpretation.Dolenc explores how deconstruction questions the foundations of literariness, challenging the idea of static literary definitions and encouraging interpretive openness.
EventA concept by Deleuze, referring to the occurrence within language that creates meaning; it is not an essence but an effect of language in action.Dolenc suggests that literariness is an “event” that happens in the act of reading, where meaning arises through dynamic interaction with the text rather than static elements.
IterabilityThe capacity for a text to be read and reinterpreted in different contexts, central to Derrida’s concept of textuality.Dolenc argues that iterability allows literary texts to transcend their original contexts, providing a basis for continuous and evolving interpretations.
SingularityThe unique, one-time occurrence or characteristic of a text or reading experience.For Dolenc, each reading is a singular experience, a unique encounter with the text that cannot be replicated or standardized.
InstitutionalizationThe process by which theories and approaches become formalized and accepted within academic structures.Dolenc critiques how institutionalized literary theory can sometimes limit the scope of interpretation, creating rigid frameworks around what constitutes “literary theory.”
InterdisciplinarityIntegrating methods or insights from multiple academic disciplines to enrich understanding.Dolenc highlights interdisciplinary approaches, particularly through Derrida and Deleuze’s philosophies, to address the multifaceted nature of literariness.
AporiaA state of puzzlement or unresolved contradiction, especially relevant in deconstructive readings.Dolenc sees literary theory in an “aporetic” state, suggesting that its inherent contradictions provide an impetus for ongoing theoretical exploration and re-evaluation.
MimetologismDerrida’s term related to the concept of mimesis, critiquing representations of reality as inherently limited or flawed.Dolenc uses mimetologism to discuss how literary theory navigates the balance between reflecting “truth” and embracing interpretation beyond mere replication of reality.
CountersignatureThe act of responding to a text in a way that acknowledges its singular event while creating a new, unique response.Dolenc suggests that reading and interpretation are countersignatures, where each reading reaffirms and uniquely engages with the text.
Foreign Language within LanguageThe transformation of language to convey new meanings within an existing language framework, as described by Deleuze.In the context of literary texts, Dolenc argues that the creation of new syntaxes or expressions within language reflects a becoming-other, creating layers of meaning.
CanonA collection of works considered authoritative or representative in a given field.Dolenc refers to the canon as a traditional way to define literariness, critiquing its limitations in recognizing the evolving nature of what constitutes literature.
FormalismAn approach to literary analysis that emphasizes structural elements of the text rather than contextual factors like authorial intent or historical setting.Dolenc discusses formalism’s focus on the “aesthetic function” and literariness, noting its influence on literary theory despite its limitations.
Contribution of “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc to Literary Theory/Theories
  1. Deconstruction
    Dolenc extends Derrida’s principles of deconstruction to argue that literariness itself resists definitive categorization, asserting that literature is best understood as an “experience” rather than an essence. Through deconstruction, she challenges the institutionalized structure of literary theory, arguing that fixed methodologies limit the interpretive possibilities of texts. Instead, deconstruction enables a fluid, open-ended reading that values the singularity and unique event of each text (Dolenc, 2022, p. 41; Derrida, 1992b, p. 45).
  2. Formalism and Russian Formalism
    Building on the Russian Formalists’ notion of literariness, particularly Roman Jakobson’s idea that literariness is “that which makes of a given work a work of literature,” Dolenc critiques the limitations of purely formalist approaches. She acknowledges the value of formalism’s focus on intrinsic elements within the text but critiques its inadequacy in addressing the dynamic interaction between text and reader. Dolenc’s perspective thus challenges formalism to accommodate the shifting and relational aspects of literariness (Jakobson, 1997, p. 179; Dolenc, 2022, p. 36).
  3. Reader-Response Theory
    Dolenc’s emphasis on the role of the reader aligns with reader-response theory, which sees meaning as co-created through the act of reading. She argues that literariness is realized in the “intentional relation to the text,” highlighting the reader’s active role in creating meaning. This perspective reinforces the idea that literariness is not a fixed property but an event occurring through each unique engagement with the text, suggesting a reorientation of literary theory to foreground the reader’s interpretive experience (Dolenc, 2022, p. 38; Derrida, 1992b, p. 44).
  4. Post-Structuralism and the Concept of Iterability
    Dolenc engages with Derrida’s concept of iterability, or the idea that a text can be detached from its original context and reinterpreted infinitely. By supporting the iterative nature of texts, Dolenc situates her argument within post-structuralism, which recognizes the openness of texts to various interpretations. Her focus on iterability highlights that literariness is not confined to the text’s original context, but instead gains significance through its potential for reinterpretation and transformation across contexts (Dolenc, 2022, p. 39; Derrida, 1982, p. 315).
  5. Interdisciplinary Approaches and Cultural Studies
    Dolenc’s work advocates for an interdisciplinary approach, considering insights from philosophy, linguistics, and cultural studies. She argues that literary theory can benefit from embracing interdisciplinary methodologies, especially given how theories from Derrida and Deleuze challenge traditional literary norms. This openness to other fields reflects the evolving landscape of literary studies, where cultural studies, in particular, have reshaped literary theory to include broader social, ideological, and cultural contexts (Dolenc, 2022, p. 36).
  6. Aporia and Institutional Critique
    Reflecting Derrida’s concept of aporia, or unresolved contradictions, Dolenc critiques the institutionalized literary theory for limiting interpretive possibilities by imposing rigid structures. She argues that literary theory’s current state, caught in an “aporetic experience of re-evaluation,” needs to evolve by embracing the uncertainties of interpretation rather than adhering to standardized methodologies. This perspective aligns with the critique of institutionalized literary studies and supports a more flexible, adaptive theoretical approach (Dolenc, 2022, p. 41; Derrida, 1981a, p. 70).
  7. Theories of the Literary Canon
    Dolenc’s critique of canonical approaches in literary theory questions the traditional selection of texts deemed “literary” based on historical or aesthetic conventions. Her discussion opens up the canon to texts that may challenge or expand definitions of literariness, supporting a move toward inclusivity and responsiveness to contemporary cultural shifts. This re-evaluation encourages literary theory to reconsider its criteria for canon formation, enabling new texts and interpretations to gain recognition (Dolenc, 2022, p. 41).
Examples of Critiques Through “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc
Literary WorkDolenc’s Theoretical PerspectiveExample Critique
Hamlet by William ShakespeareDeconstruction & Iterability: Dolenc emphasizes Derrida’s notion of iterability, suggesting that a text’s meaning evolves with each reading and context.Through Dolenc’s lens, Hamlet is not confined to any single interpretation but is perpetually open to re-interpretation. Each reading may emphasize different aspects—such as existential questions, political implications, or psychological depth—highlighting the play’s “iterative structure” (Derrida, 1982, p. 315).
To the Lighthouse by Virginia WoolfReader-Response Theory & Event of Reading: Dolenc values the reader’s role in creating meaning, positioning the reading experience as an “event” where literariness is realized.Through Dolenc’s framework, To the Lighthouse becomes a literary “event,” as each reader’s unique experience constructs different meanings, whether focusing on themes of memory, time, or identity. Woolf’s text thus invites the reader to engage actively, making the text’s literariness contingent on this engagement (Dolenc, 2022, p. 38).
Waiting for Godot by Samuel BeckettAporia & Unresolved Meaning: Dolenc’s approach incorporates Derrida’s idea of aporia, suggesting that unresolved questions can be integral to a text’s literariness.Waiting for Godot exemplifies an aporetic text through its cyclical dialogue and lack of resolution. Dolenc’s approach would critique the play’s deliberate ambiguity, asserting that its meaning is found within the tension of its unanswered questions, challenging readers to engage with its existential uncertainties (Dolenc, 2022, p. 41).
The Waste Land by T.S. EliotInterdisciplinarity & Cultural Studies: Dolenc advocates for an interdisciplinary approach, allowing multiple contexts and discourses to inform a text’s literariness.Applying Dolenc’s perspective, The Waste Land can be analyzed as a “bloc of sensations,” drawing on diverse cultural, historical, and religious references. This approach allows readers to interpret Eliot’s fragmented style and layered allusions as a reflection of cultural disintegration, making the poem an event in cultural critique (Deleuze/Guattari, 1994, p. 164).
Criticism Against “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc
  • Overemphasis on Deconstruction
    Critics may argue that Dolenc’s heavy reliance on Derridean deconstruction limits her analysis, potentially overshadowing other valuable theoretical approaches. By focusing mainly on deconstruction and iterability, the text might neglect more concrete methods that could enhance practical literary analysis.
  • Lack of Practical Application
    Dolenc’s theoretical discussions on literariness as an “event” or “experience” may feel abstract and difficult to apply practically. Critics might contend that her approach lacks clear guidelines or frameworks for real-world literary analysis, making it challenging for students or scholars seeking actionable insights.
  • Marginalization of Traditional Literary Theory
    By critiquing formalist and canonical approaches, Dolenc risks sidelining established literary theories that many believe still hold relevance. Some may argue that her approach disregards the value of formalism, structuralism, and other traditional frameworks that continue to be instrumental in literary studies.
  • Potential for Relativism
    Dolenc’s embrace of an open, reader-centered interpretation may lead to an “anything goes” mentality, where interpretations lack stability or accountability. This perspective could risk reducing literary theory to a subjective exercise, weakening its rigor and making it harder to establish any shared, objective understanding of texts.
  • Challenges in Institutional Contexts
    Her critique of institutionalized literary theory might be seen as impractical, given that academic frameworks require structure and methodology. Critics could argue that Dolenc’s ideal of a continuously evolving theory disregards the need for standardized practices in educational settings, potentially complicating the teaching and assessment of literature.
Representative Quotations from “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc with Explanation
QuotationExplanation
“Literariness is not a natural essence, an intrinsic property of the text.” (Derrida 1992b: 44)Dolenc underscores that literariness does not inherently reside within a text itself but emerges from the interpretive act of reading, challenging static or essentialist views of what constitutes “literary” in a work.
“The subject of literary scholarship is not literature but literariness.” (Jakobson, 1997, p. 179)Dolenc references Jakobson to highlight that literary studies should focus on the distinctive qualities that make a work “literary,” suggesting that literariness itself, rather than the text alone, is the true subject of literary theory.
“Theory’s answer is still, of course, a reading.” (Dolenc, 2022, p. 41)For Dolenc, literary theory remains tied to the act of reading, implying that each interpretive engagement with a text reaffirms theory’s purpose and prevents it from becoming static or overly methodological.
“Deconstruction…does not settle for methodical procedures but opens up a passageway.” (Derrida, 1992a, p. 337)Dolenc uses Derrida’s description of deconstruction to emphasize its capacity to disrupt and redefine fixed interpretive methods, enabling literary theory to be flexible and inventive rather than rigid and prescriptive.
“Is it necessary to read works by Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze… given that the theory has been institutionalized?”Dolenc questions whether literary theory benefits from returning to Derrida and Deleuze, critiquing the constraints that institutionalized approaches place on theoretical innovation and the potential enrichment these thinkers bring to theory.
“If the imperative of literary theory is reading literary texts, the state of undecidability is a challenge.” (Dolenc, 2022, p. 41)Dolenc posits that literary theory must embrace the inherent ambiguities in reading, which challenges the discipline to evolve and continually question the limitations and possibilities of interpretation.
“The event of the literary text happens in reading.” (Dolenc, 2022, p. 38)This statement reflects Dolenc’s view that literariness arises dynamically during the act of reading, emphasizing that the literary text is not a static object but a participatory event created through interpretation.
“It is possible to re-evaluate the objectives and the purpose of a theoretical approach to a literary text.”Dolenc advocates for a continual reassessment of literary theory’s goals, particularly as theories like deconstruction and reader-response challenge conventional methodologies and encourage more adaptable frameworks.
“Formal analysis belongs to the order of calculable guarantees and decidable evidence.” (Derrida, 2005, p. 152)Dolenc echoes Derrida’s critique of formal analysis, suggesting that literary theory should move beyond rigid, calculable approaches that limit interpretive richness and often ignore the evolving nature of literariness.
“Writing is always incomplete, always in the midst of being formed.” (Deleuze, 1998, p. 1)Through Deleuze’s words, Dolenc emphasizes the fluid and ongoing nature of writing and literature, presenting literary texts as unfinished and perpetually open to interpretation, in contrast to finalized or definitive readings.

Suggested Readings: “On Reading And Literariness: The (Im)Possibility of Literary Theory” by Barbara Dolenc

  1. Dolenc, Barbara. “On reading and literariness: The (im) possibility of literary theory.” Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia: Revue publiée par les Sections romane, italienne et anglaise de la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Zagreb 67 (2022): 35-42.
  2. Alexandrov, Vladimir E. “Literature, Literariness, and the Brain.” Comparative Literature, vol. 59, no. 2, 2007, pp. 97–118. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40279363. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  3. Zamora, Margarita. “Historicity and Literariness: Problems in the Literary Criticism of Spanish American Colonial Texts.” MLN, vol. 102, no. 2, 1987, pp. 334–46. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2905693. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
  4. McNAMER, SARAH. “The Literariness of Literature and the History of Emotion.” PMLA, vol. 130, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1433–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44017160. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.