Introduction: “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights”
Written by Jeremy Peters and Lizette Alvarez, the article “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights” presents the writers’ arguments concerning the Orlando shooting targeting the gay community and the subsequent loss of lives. The article discusses political polarization, highlighting how despite the tragic events, accusations are exchanged between Republicans and others regarding their stance on the transgender and gay community. Simultaneously, calls for gun control and condemnation of radical Islam emerge. Amidst this tumult, the expressions of grief underscore the ongoing struggle for equal rights for the gay community across various American states, where echoes of Biblical injunctions against such individuals persist. The article emphasizes that over “150 pieces of legislation” related to LGBTQ+ rights are still pending, with some states outright refusing to recognize these rights. The argument presented is compelling, incorporating essential elements of logical discourse. Furthermore, the writers reinforce their argument using rhetorical devices strategically, maintaining a professional and journalistic tone while employing appropriate figurative language.
Rhetorical Devices in “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights”
In terms of rhetorical devices, it appears that the writers recognize the potent impact of employing pathos. They begin their article with a pathos-driven approach, highlighting the emotional weight of the “massacre in Orlando” and the perceived lack of a suitable response from Republicans (Peters and Alvarez A17). This suggests their belief in a significant divide between Democrats and Republicans, which the incident failed to bridge. Throughout the piece, the writers continue to use pathos to underscore their position on the incident and the existing political polarization.
Moreover, effective logos is employed through the inclusion of quotations and factual information. References to individuals such as Mitt Romney and Trump lend both logos and pathos to the narrative, as their expressions of grief and sorrow carry weight due to their stature. Additionally, the authors bolster their argument with strong logos, citing statistics such as the 150 “pieces of legislation pending in state legislatures” and referencing FBI data regarding the suppression of gays comparable to that of Jews (Peters and Alvarez A17).
The use of ethos is evident through the authors’ names, as they are established journalists with credibility stemming from their association with the New York Times. However, the effectiveness of these rhetorical devices would have been diminished without the professional tone maintained throughout the article.
Tone of “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights”
The writers have skillfully employed a professional journalistic tone throughout the article, beginning with a strong, direct opening sentence that sets the tone for the entire piece. This indirect opening effectively captures the gravity of the incident and its potential implications without any ambiguity. Throughout the article, the focus remains on the central topic introduced in the opening line, with the writers adopting a journalistic approach to address questions and report statements accurately.
Quotations from prominent leaders are presented within quotation marks, maintaining journalistic integrity, while the writers offer clear interpretations to elucidate their meanings. This journalistic tone is consistent, occasionally taking on a serious or even sarcastic tone, such as in the closing remarks about a CNN anchorperson. However, the seriousness of the topic is maintained, and any humor or informality is avoided, as the subject matter demands a formal and serious approach.
The vocabulary chosen aligns with the journalistic style, ensuring clarity and precision in conveying the message. This formal tone is essential, given the gravity of the issue being discussed – the loss of human lives and the ongoing struggle for equal rights. Thus, the writers have effectively utilized a professional journalistic tone to address the topic appropriately and maintain the necessary level of seriousness throughout the article.
Figurative Language in “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights”
The writers demonstrate adept use of figurative language throughout the article, employing metaphors like “bridge the chasm” in the opening line to vividly convey the divide between two groups and the potential for the incident to serve as a unifying force (Peters and Alvarez A17). This metaphorical tone persists, with phrases like “stunning speed” in the fourth paragraph showcasing their skill in utilizing figurative language (Peters and Alvarez A17).
Moreover, the choice of words is meticulously tailored to suit the context of each paragraph or even each sentence. The transition from emotive language to legal and then political discourse exemplifies their mastery of language as a craft. For instance, the use of “harsh backlash” in the third paragraph segues seamlessly into a discussion about the legal complexities surrounding gay marriages and identity, underscoring their significance to Democrats (Peters and Alvarez A17).
In essence, the authors wield language effectively to bolster their argument, employing appropriate language at various points to align with the nuances of their message. This adept use of figurative language enhances the readability and persuasiveness of their writing, showcasing their skill in sculpting each sentence to convey their intended meaning.
Conclusion: “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights”
In conclusion, the writers effectively engage their intended audience through the adept use of rhetorical devices, setting a tone that is formal and serious from the outset. This tone is evident from the opening expression of grief to the closing sentiment of potential hopelessness. Furthermore, the inclusion of figurative language enhances the impact of their message, while the careful selection of appropriate wording ensures clarity and precision in conveying their argument.
The incorporation of legal and political terminology adds depth and context to the discussion, enabling readers to grasp the complexities of the issue at hand. Overall, the writers employ a variety of rhetorical tools with skill and precision, but it is the combination of formal tone, strategic use of figurative language, and apt choice of terminology that distinguishes their persuasive writing. These elements are deployed sparingly yet effectively throughout the article, contributing to its overall impact and persuasiveness.
Works Cited: “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights”:
Peters, Jeremy W., and Lizette Alvarez. “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights.” New York Times, 16 June 2016, p. A17(L). Global Issues in Context, ccco.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A455256671/GIC?u=aur58810&xid=0f17ccc5. Accessed 15 Oct. 2023.
Relevant Questions about “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights”
- How has the tragic loss of lives, as discussed in “A Death Toll Fails to Narrow a Chasm on Gay Rights,” influenced public discourse and policy-making regarding LGBTQ+ rights?
- In what specific ways have societal attitudes and legislative responses remained divided despite the sobering impact of the death toll mentioned in the article?
- Can the failure to narrow the chasm on gay rights, highlighted in the New York Times piece, be attributed to entrenched social