Introduction: Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
The article “The Last Flight of Spaceship Shuttle Challenger” and the speeches delivered by Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush address similar incidents. Both the article and President Ronald’s speech focus on the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, which occurred only 73 seconds after its launch. President Ronald’s speech, delivered within 8 hours of the tragic incident, aimed not only to inform those watching the live launch on television but also to offer condolences to the victims’ families and commend the heroes for their bravery and determination.
Conversely, the article delves into technical details and the root causes behind the incident. It explores the sequence of events leading to the disaster, potential technical failures, and the overall organizational failure that resulted in the destruction of the space shuttle. President George W. Bush’s speech follows a similar theme to President Ronald’s but pertains to a different incident—the tragic destruction of the space shuttle Columbia. The objective of this speech was to pay tribute to the astronauts and scientists involved in the Columbia incident, maintaining the same tone and scenario while acknowledging the uniqueness of the separate events.
Article on Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
“The Last Flight of the Space Shuttle Challenger” is authored by Michael T. Kores, a professor at Illinois State University, while the first speech was delivered by the 40th President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, and the second speech was given by President George W. Bush. As Professor Michael T. Kores wrote about the sequence of events leading to the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger, his tone leaned more towards the technical details of the space shuttle. In contrast, the speeches delivered by both Presidents had to be delivered with remorse, as they were both announcing a significant tragedy their country had recently faced.
Speakers of Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
Regarding the speakers, the first article, President Ronald Reagan’s speech, and the speech delivered after the incident involving the space shuttle Columbia have been appropriately executed. As anticipated, Professor Michael provides numerous technical arguments, data, and reasoning concerning the root cause of the incident and the sequence of events that led to this tragedy in American skies. In the case of the speeches given by the two Presidents, both of them not only extend their condolences to the families of the victims but also ensure that the entire nation takes pride in their heroes.
Reagan, Bush, and Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
It is evident that President Ronald Reagan and President Bush delivered their speeches under similar circumstances. Despite a significant difference in the timeline between the two speeches, they were both delivered during a period when the entire nation and the world were in mourning, having lost many American heroes. In contrast, Professor Michael’s article on the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger was presented well after the incident. It was composed and presented after extensive research work. The circumstances under which the article was written and published differed considerably when compared to the live speeches given by President Reagan and President Bush.
Article Focus on Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
Concerning Professor Michael’s article, its primary focus was not to extend condolences to the entire nation but to generate knowledge and awareness among the people. The technical arguments and details provided by Professor Michael in the paper, such as “The Commission concluded that the cause of the accident was the failure of the pressure seal in the aft field joint of the solid rocket motor” (Kores), demonstrate that the information presented was comprehensive and fitting for the occasion. In comparing the speeches, President Reagan’s address was more suited to the occasion than President Bush’s, as Reagan also acknowledged the children who were watching the live broadcast (Reagan). President Bush’s speech was notably brief and lacked sufficient remorse to suit the solemnity of the occasion.
Audience and Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
The target audience for the technical paper or article written by Professor Michael was entirely different from the audience to whom the speeches were delivered. Readers of the article would likely be individuals interested in understanding the root cause of the incident, the sequence of events leading to the Challenger tragedy, and the technicalities behind rocketry. Those with a keen interest in science and technology would find value in this research article. On the other hand, the speeches were delivered on the very same day as the incidents occurred, with millions of people watching the live broadcast of the Challenger and Columbia launches. The target audience for the speeches comprised those individuals who were shocked and astonished by the incidents unfolding right before their eyes, either in person or live on television sets.
Speeches on Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
As mentioned earlier, the speech delivered by President Reagan had more substance and was emotional enough to suit the occasion. He makes reference to another incident that occurred nineteen years ago and pays respect to the heroes lost by comparing them to the explorer Sir Francis Drake, who had also lost his life in a similar quest. President Reagan also addresses the children who were watching the live telecast of the incident and witnessed the Space Shuttle Challenger burst into flames (Reagan). On the other hand, the speech delivered by President Bush was concise and to the point. It lacked the emotional depth needed to meet the expectations of the target audience. Regarding the article, Professor Michael has conducted thorough research and presents compelling arguments. He focuses on the importance “to develop an appreciation of the human side of the management and its influence on the Shuttle Disaster” (Kores).
Purpose of Spaceship Shuttle Challenger Article and Speeches
The purpose of the article written by Professor Michael is to identify the sequence of events that might have taken place before the Space Shuttle Challenger was destroyed within 73 seconds of its launch (Kores). Another interesting aspect that the professor has covered is highlighting the human nature and its effect on the management once the incident had occurred. Naturally, such incidents are undesirable, making it crucial to learn lessons when they do occur. Even though the two speeches were delivered at different times and by two different Presidents, their ultimate purpose was the same: to extend condolences to the families of the victims, pay respect to the heroes lost, and mourn the incident not only within the nation but also worldwide.
All three documents—the article, the speech delivered by President Reagan, and that by President Bush—fulfill their ultimate purpose to a large extent. The article aims to explain the sequence of events prior to the incident and the role of human management in these incidents. Professor Michael does a good job providing details about the potential failures due to environmental factors and also offers “an analysis of the organizational failings” (Kores). The speeches delivered by President Reagan and President Bush play their part well considering the circumstances under which they were delivered. The purpose of these two speeches was to deliver the tragic news to the people of America and mourn the death of the astronauts on board, achieved by paying respect to the seven heroes lost in each space shuttle.
Conclusion: Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
Each of the three documents had a unique subject matter, and they each served distinct purposes. The speeches were delivered to express condolences to the families and ensure that the impact of this tragedy was felt not only within the United States of America but also worldwide. On the other hand, the article “The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger” serves a different purpose altogether. It is not written to offer condolences; instead, the entire article aims to identify the root causes of the incident and the sequence of events that led to the tragedy. Moreover, the article delves into organizational failures, providing the most convincing arguments and a detailed description of the event. It includes technical details supporting the structural failure that occurred and references to the management and human factors to identify the causes of organizational failure. All in all, the article provides a comprehensive platform for all details regarding the Space Shuttle Challenger and its tragic accident.
Works Cited: Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
- Tass. “The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger.” Tass, 28 Jan. 1986, https://tass.com/science/852733.
Relevant Questions: Spaceship Shuttle Challenger
- How does the Tass article “The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger” contribute to our understanding of the events surrounding the Challenger disaster on January 28, 1986?
- What key details or insights does the Tass article provide regarding the technical aspects and potential causes of the Space Shuttle Challenger’s tragic failure?
- In what ways does the Tass article address the broader implications of the Challenger disaster, such as its impact on space exploration, safety protocols, and public perception of space missions?