“Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said: Summary and Critique

Introduction: “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said

  “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said was first published in 1983 in the collection, The World, the Text, and the Critic. This essay holds significant importance in literature and literary theory as it challenges the Eurocentric dominance within literary studies. Said argues that literary texts are not isolated objects but rather are embedded within specific historical, cultural, and political contexts. By examining the “travels” of literary works across different cultures and time periods, he highlights the interconnectedness of global literatures and the importance of considering cultural and political power dynamics in literary analysis.

Summary of “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said  

1. Transformation of Objective World into a Subjective Home: The work begins with a contemplation on how human interaction with texts is not just an analytical act, but a transformative one that turns an impersonal world into a familiar home, suggesting a profound loneliness in academic isolation (“But most literary scholars find themselves now, once again, out in the cold”).
2. Disciplinary Fragmentation and Intellectual Alienation: Said discusses how modern academic disciplines, particularly those linked to literature and criticism, suffer from fragmentation, leading to a sense of alienation among scholars. The integration and wholeness that once characterized literary studies have given way to specialization and a disconnection from the cohesive narrative of literature (“There seem to be too many interruptions, too many distractions”).
3. Critique of Contemporary Literary Criticism: The text critiques the current state of literary criticism, highlighting its shift towards revisionism and its distancing from traditional literary qualities. Critics now frequently utilize other disciplines like psychoanalysis, sociology, and linguistics, diverging from conventional norms and expanding the boundaries of what constitutes literary criticism (“In short there seems nothing inherently literary about the study of what have traditionally been considered literary texts”).
4. Historical and Cultural Displacement of Theoretical Approaches: Said explores how theories migrate and transform when they move from one cultural or historical context to another. This displacement often leads to a distortion or a shift in the application and understanding of the theory, making it necessary to re-evaluate theoretical frameworks continuously in light of their practical impacts on the real world (“What happens to it when, in different circumstances and for new reasons, it is used again and, in still more different circumstances, again?”).
5. Limits of Theory and the Role of Critical Consciousness: A significant part of the discussion is dedicated to the limitations of theoretical approaches when they are not tempered by critical consciousness. Said argues that theories often become rigid and dogmatic if not continuously subjected to scrutiny and adapted to new contexts. Critical consciousness should act as a balancing force, helping to maintain the relevance and applicability of theories in changing social and cultural landscapes (“Theory, in short, can never be complete, just as one’s interest in everyday life is never exhausted by simulacra, models, or theoretical abstracts of it”).
6. Resistance to Theoretical Dominance and Overreach: Said warns against the dangers of theories that attempt to encompass too much, potentially leading to a theoretical overreach where they dominate discourse to the point of excluding other valuable perspectives. He advocates for a persistent skepticism and a recognition of the complexity of social reality, which always contains elements that resist theoretical categorization and simplification (“Indeed I would go as far as saying that it is the critic’s job to provide resistances to theory, to open it up toward historical reality, toward society, toward human needs and interests”).

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said  

Term	Definition	Explanation
Reification	The process by which human activities and relationships become treated as things or objects, often with negative consequences.	Lukacs uses this term to describe the way capitalism transforms human life into a series of disconnected, alienated objects.
Crisis	A moment when the “qualitative existence” of things “suddenly becomes the decisive factor.”	Lukacs suggests that crises can be moments when individuals can break free from reification and become aware of their agency.
Critical Consciousness	A consciousness that is aware of its own subjectivity and can “think generally” about the world.	Lukacs argues that critical consciousness is necessary to overcome reification and achieve social change.
World Vision	A collective consciousness expressed in the work of certain highly gifted writers.	Goldmann uses this term to describe the shared worldview of a group of people, which is often reflected in their literature.
Theory	A body of ideas that can be used to understand and explain the world.	In this context, theory is often associated with critical consciousness and the ability to see beyond the surface of reality.
Totality	A concept that refers to the interconnectedness of all things in society.	Williams uses this term to describe the idea that understanding any aspect of society requires considering its broader context.
Reified Consciousness	A consciousness that is trapped within the capitalist system and sees the world only as a collection of objects.	Lukacs argues that reified consciousness is a product of capitalism and prevents individuals from seeing the world in its totality.

Contribution of “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said  to Literary Theory/Theories

Contribution	Explanation
Challenged Eurocentrism	Said argued that literary studies had been dominated by a Eurocentric perspective, which marginalized non-Western literatures. He emphasized the importance of considering the historical, cultural, and political contexts of literary works to understand their significance.
Introduced Intertextuality	Said introduced the concept of intertextuality, which highlights the interconnectedness of texts and their relationship to broader cultural and historical contexts. This idea challenged the traditional notion of the literary text as an isolated object.
Emphasized the Political Nature of Literature	Said argued that literature is not simply a form of artistic expression but also a political act. He demonstrated how literary works can be used to challenge dominant ideologies and promote social change.
Promoted Global Literary Studies	Said’s work helped to establish global literary studies as a field of inquiry. He encouraged scholars to study literatures from around the world and to consider the ways in which they are interconnected.
Influenced Postcolonial Theory	Said’s ideas about colonialism and its impact on literature have been influential in the development of postcolonial theory. He argued that postcolonial literature can be seen as a form of resistance to colonial power and a means of reclaiming cultural identity.

Examples of Critiques Through “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said

Criticism Against “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said  

1. Overemphasis on Colonialism: Some critics argue that Said’s work overemphasizes the role of colonialism in shaping literature, neglecting other factors such as cultural, historical, and social influences.
2. Essentialism: Critics have accused Said of essentializing cultures and reducing them to monolithic entities, ignoring the diversity and complexity within them.
3. Lack of Attention to Formal Elements: Some argue that Said’s focus on the political and cultural contexts of literature overshadows the importance of analyzing the formal elements of texts, such as language, style, and narrative structure.
4. Overreliance on Biographical Information: Critics have questioned Said’s reliance on biographical information about authors to interpret their works, arguing that this can lead to a reductionist approach.
5. Limited Engagement with Other Theories: Some argue that Said’s work does not adequately engage with other literary theories, such as feminism, Marxism, and structuralism.
6. Oversimplification of Power Dynamics: Critics have suggested that Said’s analysis of power dynamics between the West and the East is overly simplistic, ignoring the complexities and nuances of these relationships.

Suggested Readings: “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said  

Representative Quotations from “Traveling Theory” by Edward W. Said  with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“But most literary scholars find themselves now, once again, out in the cold.”	This quote reflects Said’s observation on the isolation felt by scholars due to the evolving nature of literary criticism, which has moved away from traditional, cohesive methods to more fragmented and specialized approaches.
“There seem to be too many interruptions, too many distractions.”	Said comments on the challenges that arise from the lack of a unified field in literary studies, with the proliferation of theories and methodologies leading to a disjointed academic discipline.
“In short there seems nothing inherently literary about the study of what have traditionally been considered literary texts.”	This quote criticizes the modern state of literary criticism, where traditional texts are often approached through lenses (like psychoanalysis or linguistics) that stray from purely literary analysis.
“What happens to it when, in different circumstances and for new reasons, it is used again and, in still more different circumstances, again?”	Said questions the stability and consistency of theories as they travel across different contexts, highlighting the transformation that theories undergo through time and space.
“Theory, in short, can never be complete, just as one’s interest in everyday life is never exhausted by simulacra, models, or theoretical abstracts of it.”	This emphasizes the inherent incompleteness of theoretical approaches, suggesting that they can never fully encapsulate the complexities of real life.
“Indeed I would go as far as saying that it is the critic’s job to provide resistances to theory, to open it up toward historical reality, toward society, toward human needs and interests.”	Said advocates for a critical approach that challenges existing theories, encouraging a continual reassessment to ensure theories remain relevant and connected to real-world concerns.
“The problem is that Foucault’s use of the term pouvoir moves around too much, swallowing up every obstacle in its path.”	This critique of Foucault’s expansive use of the concept of power exemplifies how theories can become overly dominant, overshadowing other important aspects of analysis.
“Theory we certainly need, for all sorts of reasons that would be too tedious to rehearse here.”	Said acknowledges the necessity of theory in providing frameworks and tools for understanding and interpreting texts, despite its limitations.
“It transfixes both its users and what it is used on.”	Here, Said warns of the dangers when theory becomes dogmatic, potentially stifling both the scholars who use it and the subjects it is applied to.
“And what is critical consciousness at bottom if not an unstoppable predilection for alternatives?”	This quote encapsulates Said’s view of the essence of critical consciousness: a persistent drive to explore and create alternatives, keeping intellectual inquiry vibrant and dynamic.