“The Shout” by Simon Armitage

The poem “The Shout” by Simon Armitage psychologically deals with the unrest and violence in society through its ironic and suggestive title.

Introduction to “The Shout”

The poem “The Shout” psychologically deals with the unrest and violence in society. The word shout is also very persuasive which expresses the gist of the poem. The poet says that the world was a peaceful place in the past. They had limited needs and limited greed. Therefore, violence was not rampant. He compares the past with the present and says that the world is crying over the injustice and cruelties perpetrated in the world in different shapes. The poem revolves around the shout of a boy who later loses his life and he is no more alive to raise his voice. The poet could hear his voice but now that voice has become silent. “The Shout”is ironic and indicates the incapacity of the world to maintain peace and safety of the people while lamenting the world’s policies to silence the voices which often emerge for peace and harmony among the people and nations of the world.

Innocence and “The Shout”

“The Shout”deals with both innocence of the boy and his violent death. He is seen playing with the poet and raising his voice so that it could reach the other side of the divide. The divide symbolizes the seas and his voice for peace could reach all the continents. Then suddenly, the poem takes a serious turn. The boy loses his life in a gunshot. It makes a hole in his mouth so that he could no more speak. The poem cynically looks at the world affairs. The poet himself says in his interview “I think we’re a crueler, more cynical place”. The growing population, burgeoning industrial progress, and growing selfishness among the people and the nations have upset the people psychologically.

The Message of “The Shout”

“The Shout”has a serious message in it. The shout in the poem is meant to awaken the people from their ignorance and slumber. Owing to this slumber, the world is getting more and more violent. In the present context, the poem seems more related when the menace of terrorism is nibbling the peace of the world. The poem seems to have gotten some inspiration from Edvard Munch’s “The Scream” painting. It was also created in the background which symbolizes violence, while screaming is a natural reaction to that. Therefore, this poem is a painting in verse form. The images like the school and the farm evoke feelings of civilization, awareness, and nature. The boy’s shout conveys the message of an innocent and an SOS call for this globe. The gun on the other hand suggests anti-peace elements which have silenced the voices. It shows its domination.

Poet and “The Shout”

Despite this, the poet does not seem disappointed. He knows that the boy’s voice and cry could no more be heard but he believes that its echoes will always reach the world. This voice and shout cannot be suppressed. Moreover, the poet believes that this shout will echo through different forms of arts and literature. Art and literature are very influential in making this world a safe place. All these forms of literature such as poetry, drama, music, and painting are essential for society. They reflect that particular society and reform its ills. All the other forms of reformation can be silenced but expression through literature can hardly be contained. Even in the strict Soviet era, the artists continued writing despite many obstacles.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, it can be said that the poem “The Shout” has shot directly at the world’s most important issue which is related to peace and security. Through an innocent boy’s shout, the poet wants to create a voice that may cross all seas and continents. The boy loses his life but his words resonate in the air and the poet can hear those words. It is a world that has become violent and terror-stricken. Nobody is secure, especially, in third-world countries. The poet does not lose heart and seems to continue his struggle for peace through his writings. The poem psychologically analyses the world’s situation and throws light on its current situation while maintaining hope that the shout will always resonate throughout the world.

Works Cited
  1. Armitage, Simon. The Shout. Knopf, 2012.
Relevant Questions about “The Shout”
  1. How does Simon Armitage employ narrative structure and point of view in “The Shout,” and what impact does this have on the reader’s understanding of the poem’s central themes and events?
  2. In “The Shout,” what is the significance of the titular shout and its effects on the characters and the landscape? How does Armitage use sound and imagery to convey the power and mystery of this event?
  3. Analyze the symbolism and metaphorical elements in “The Shout.” What do the various elements and objects in the poem, such as the rabbit, the gloves, and the stones, represent or signify in relation to the poem’s themes and messages?

“Because I could not Stop for Death”: Analysis

Emily Dickinson’s popular poem “Because I could not Stop for Death” is considered a masterpiece of the spiritual journey of a mystic from this world to the other world.

Introduction to “Because I could not Stop for Death”

Emily Dickinson’s popular poem “Because I could not Stop for Death” is considered a masterpiece of the spiritual journey of a mystic from this world to the other world. Published posthumously in 1890 under the title of “The Chariot,” this poem brings into light the desire of the poet to welcome death, which is generally considered an unwelcomed companion. In fact, this poem tells a story personifying Death as a male companion. The woman, who happens to be the poet herself, sits with Death in the carriage to go to eternity. The gentleman, Death, takes her politely on the ride. However, against the conventions, there is also a strange and somewhat esoteric stranger in the carriage. This mysterious stranger is Immortality. The time given in the poem is of late-afternoon. The journey entails the carriage and all three passengers going through wheat fields, with the children playing in the ground and the setting sun. The journey seems a spiritual ride toward death which is not considered a good subject of poetry. However, it seems that the poet still remembers that this journey took place centuries ago. Although several themes have been woven into this spiritual strand, the most beautiful thing about this poem is that every incident, every turn, and every scene demonstrates the skill of using beautiful images, triggering a sort of mystic response from its readers. “Because I could not Stop for Death” shows imagery and figurative language, the spiritual journey toward Eternity, and the use of literary and poetic devices have added to the smooth reading and good comprehension of the poem.

Imagery and Figurative Language in “Because I could not Stop for Death”

Whereas the imagery and figurative language is concerned, “Because I could not Stop for Death” has ample evidences. The very title of the poem “Because I could not stop for Death” shows that “Death” has initial capitals which points to its being a proper noun and a person. This means that Dickinson has personified Death as an individual who takes her on a long ride. In his book, All Things Dickinson: An Encyclopedia of Emily Dickinson’s World, Wend Martin claims that this entire poem is an allegory in which the poet “ironically personifies death as a gentleman”, while the rest of the poem is woven around this theme. The metaphor of passing and the poet’s ambivalence toward this universal phenomenon of death lend an eerie atmosphere to the final imagery of the grave and graveyard (535). The ambivalence is perhaps embedded within the poet’s mind as well as in the poem itself because the double meanings of death a good as well as a deceitful companion becomes accentuated when the poem reaches the end. The images of “the School, Fields of Gazing Grain, the Setting Sun, the Dews, the Ground, A Swelling in the Ground” are enough to point out the use of images intended to enhance its specific meanings. The expertise of the poet could be gauged from the fact that she has used highly informal language used in everyday conversation and that too as if it is a dialogue between the poet and Death, her friend. Yet, this has not marred the spiritual quality of the poem. Rather, this colloquial diction has enhanced the seriousness of the message of the poem such as, “We paused before a House that seemed / A Swelling of the Ground” where this becomes very somber that now it is the grave where they have paused (17-18).

Presentation of Spiritual Journey in “Because I could not Stop for Death”

Another interpretation of the poem “Because I could not stop for Death” is the presentation of a spiritual journey from life to death and from the physical to the spiritual world. However, this journey is contrary to common journeys that poets narrate regarding their spiritual odysseys. In fact, this is a very simple journey having profound symbolic meanings. If death and immortality in small letters are taken from a Christian perspective, it means a person goes with death to have a better place to live in paradise. The time becomes irrelevant when a person dies. As Dickinson has pointed out in the last lines that “Since then-’tis Centuries-”, it means this is the journey from transience to eternity. However, another interpretation points to Death as a male suitor taking the poet away from this humdrum of life. The poet has presented this suitor very beautifully as a kind person who comes and takes her on the final journey. This represents her love for Death which other common people dread to think. Commenting on this aspect of the poem, Charles Anderson argues “Although she was aware this is a last ride, since his ‘Carriage’ can only be a hearse, its terror is subdued by the ‘Civility’ of the driver who is merely serving the end of ‘Immortality” (Anderson). However, the important point of this journey is that the poet has made the readers see and observe and not think and analyze. This aspect of the poem has made it a literal journey toward spiritualism.

Technical Aspects of “Because I could not Stop for Death”

As far as the technical aspects of “Because I could not Stop for Death” are concerned, it is a remarkable poem not only from the view of its word choice but also from its rhythm and rhyme scheme. The poem comprises total six stanzas, each having five lines. The stanzas have been made balanced through the use of iambic tetrameter and trimester as each line has either four feet or three feet, making it have a good musical rhyme. The use of end rhyme and internal rhyme have further made it oscillate from the first to the second line and then move back and forth, strengthening its rhythmic quality further. With it, the poet has used very good figures of sounds such as the use of alliteration. The repetition of the sound of “c” ion the first line and “t” in the 24th lines have balanced each line. Campbell, in his article, “Critical Perspectives on Selected Poems by Emily Dickinson”, says, “What holds the poem so remarkably taut is the steady, unruffled tone” (Campbell). This tone changes with the use of technical devices as the poet moves from one stanza to another. The first stanza shows that Emily Dickinson is happy to go on this journey with this gentleman named, Death. She seems fully confident. However, as the journey moves forward, she becomes confused in the third and fourth stanzas. In fact, this is the mention of some worldly things which seem to present her confusion about whether she is leaving this world happily or sadly. Death, in fact, is taking her toward her grave. However, she thinks it is immortality, while death is the actual death.

Conclusion

In short, this poem “Because I could not stop for Death” has made Emily Dickinson to be remembered as one of the best spiritual and mystical poets. She has written several poems and presented the concept of death in several other poems, but it has never been presented in such a gentle playful mood as in “Because I could not stop for death.” The poem has achieved the status of a classical poem on the basis of the use of images during the last journey. Different figures of speech such as the use of personification, metaphors, alliterations, paradoxes, and use of mechanics have accentuated the meanings of this spiritual journey. Further beauty has been added with technical devices such as the use of mechanics, rhyme scheme, rhythm, and above all its meter. In this connection, the efforts of the poet need appreciation because it is not easy to handle such a complicated theme in such a nice manner. Only an accomplished poet can bring smoothness and comprehension in such an abstruse piece of poetry. Emily Dickinson has done it remarkably and successfully.

Bibliography (in APA)
  1. Campbell Dr. “Critical Perspectives on Selected Poems by Emily Dickinson.” WSU. Retrieved on March 15, 2016 from http://public.wsu.edu/~campbelld/amlit/dickinsoncriticism.pdf.
  2. Martin, W. (2014). All Things Dickinson: An Encyclopedia of Emily Dickinson’s World. ABC-CLIO. Print. 532-536.
  3. Anderson, C.R. “On 712 (“Because I could not stop for Death”).” American Poetry. Retrieved on March 15 2016 from http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/a_f/dickinson/712.htm.
  4. Dickinson, E. “Because I could not stop for Death.” Poetry Foundation. Retrieved on March 15, 2016 from http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/177119
Relevant Questions about “Because I could not stop for Death”
  1. How does Emily Dickinson use personification and metaphor to portray Death as a courteous and patient suitor in “Because I could not stop for Death,” and what effect does this portrayal have on the poem’s tone and themes?
  2. What is the significance of the journey and the various stops, such as the school, the grain field, and the setting sun, in “Because I could not stop for Death”? How do these stops contribute to the poem’s exploration of mortality and the afterlife?
  3. Dickinson’s poem “Because I could not stop for Death” explores the concept of time and the inevitability of death. How does the poem address the theme of immortality and the enduring nature of the soul? What literary devices and imagery does Dickinson employ to convey these ideas?

Epics: Creating and Critiquing Them

Epics are lengthy and sophisticated forms of literary works that typically recounts the heroic exploits and adventures of legendary figures or mythological characters.

Introduction to Epics

An epic is a lengthy and sophisticated form of literary work that typically recounts the heroic exploits and adventures of legendary figures or mythological characters. Epics are characterized by their grand scope, often encompassing vast time periods and expansive geographical settings, and they are known for their use of elevated and formal language. These narratives hold profound cultural and historical significance, serving as mirrors of the values, beliefs, and ideals of the societies that give rise to them. Epics delve into universal themes like courage, fate, love, and the human condition, often conveying moral lessons and profound wisdom. With deep historical roots tracing back to ancient oral storytelling traditions, epics have left an enduring impact on literature and culture across various civilizations and epochs.

Types of Epic
TypeExplanationExample
Heroic EpicHeroic epics are a genre of literature that primarily focuses on the heroic deeds and adventures of courageous and often legendary protagonists.Beowulf
National EpicNational epics are literary works that celebrate and often mythologize the historical events and cultural identity of a specific nation or culture.The Aeneid
Religious EpicReligious epics explore profound religious or mythological themes, often delving into the relationships between humans and the divine.The Mahabharata
Didactic EpicDidactic epics serve as vehicles for conveying moral lessons and ethical values through their narratives.The Divine Comedy
Mock EpicMock epics employ humor and satire to mock or parody the conventions typically associated with epic poetry.The Rape of the Lock
Literary EpicLiterary epics are written in emulation of classical epic forms, often exploring complex themes and narratives.Paradise Lost
Folk EpicFolk epics are part of the oral tradition, passed down through generations within indigenous or rural communities.The Epic of Sundiata
Courtly EpicCourtly epics were popular in medieval courts and frequently revolve around chivalric ideals, courtly love, and heroic adventures.The Song of Roland
How to Write Epics
  1. Select a Theme and Heroic Figure: Begin by choosing a theme or central idea for your epic. This could be a heroic quest, a moral lesson, or an exploration of cultural values. Next, identify your epic’s heroic figure or protagonist. Ensure that the character embodies the qualities and virtues relevant to your chosen theme.
  2. Outline the Epic Structure: Create a detailed outline that encompasses the structure of your epic. Typically, an epic consists of several distinct parts, including the introduction, the journey or quest, challenges and obstacles, climactic events, and a resolution. Outline the key events and episodes that will advance the narrative.
  3. Develop Elevated Language and Style: Academic epics are known for their elevated and formal language. Pay attention to your diction, use of metaphors, similes, and other literary devices. Ensure that your language is both poetic and majestic, conveying the significance of the events and characters in your narrative.
  4. Incorporate Cultural and Moral Significance: Infuse your epic with cultural and moral elements that reflect the values and beliefs of the society from which it originates. Address universal themes such as courage, fate, love, and the human condition. Consider how your epic can impart moral lessons and wisdom to its audience.
  5. Edit and Revise Diligently: Academic epics require meticulous editing and revision. Ensure that your narrative flows smoothly, and your language remains consistent. Check for grammatical and stylistic errors. Seek feedback from peers or professors to refine your work further.
Benefits of Writing and Reading Epics
  1. Cultural Reflection and Preservation:
    • Writing: Epics provide a means to preserve and transmit cultural heritage, as they often reflect the values, beliefs, and historical context of a society.
    • Reading: Reading epics allows individuals to gain insight into different cultures and historical periods, fostering cultural understanding and appreciation.
  2. Moral and Ethical Education:
    • Writing: Creating epics allows authors to impart moral lessons and ethical values, serving as a didactic tool for readers.
    • Reading: Reading epics exposes audiences to complex moral dilemmas and ethical choices, encouraging critical thinking and moral development.
  3. Exploration of Universal Themes:
    • Writing: Epics offer a platform to explore universal themes such as courage, fate, love, and the human condition, making them relevant across cultures and eras.
    • Reading: Engaging with epic narratives provides readers with opportunities for introspection and a deeper understanding of human nature.
  4. Artistic and Literary Mastery:
    • Writing: Crafting epics challenges writers to hone their storytelling skills, master poetic language, and develop intricate narrative structures.
    • Reading: Reading epics exposes individuals to exemplary writing styles and literary techniques, enriching their literary appreciation and critical analysis abilities.
  5. Inspiration and Cultural Impact:
    • Writing: Creating an epic can inspire and shape literature, art, and cultural expression for generations, leaving a lasting impact on society.
    • Reading: Reading epics offers readers a source of inspiration, fostering creativity and influencing various forms of artistic and intellectual endeavors.
Epic and Literary Theories
TheoryCritique of EpicsExample
Formalism/New CriticismFormalist analysis often concentrates primarily on internal elements, such as structure, language, and symbolism. While this approach can yield valuable insights into an epic’s craftsmanship, it tends to overlook the broader cultural and historical context that informs the narrative, potentially missing crucial layers of meaning.In Paradise Lost by John Milton, formalist analysis may focus on its intricate use of blank verse but overlook its theological and political implications.
Historical CriticismHistorical criticism, while valuable for providing context, sometimes oversimplifies the complex interactions between a text and its historical background. It runs the risk of reducing the epic to a mere reflection of its time, neglecting its timeless or universal aspects that transcend its historical origins.Applying historical criticism to The Iliad by Homer may emphasize its depiction of ancient Greek society but overlook the enduring themes of heroism and war.
Reader-Response TheoryReader-response theory emphasizes the role of the reader’s interpretation in shaping the meaning of a text. However, it can be subjective, varying greatly among individual readers. Additionally, this approach might not always account for the author’s original intent, potentially leading to divergent and even contradictory interpretations of the same epic.When using reader-response theory to analyze The Odyssey, readers may interpret Odysseus’ character differently, affecting their understanding of his heroism.
Feminist TheoryFeminist analysis can unveil important gender-related issues within epics, shedding light on representations of women and power dynamics. However, it sometimes imposes contemporary gender norms on the text, potentially leading to anachronistic readings that may not fully consider the historical context and evolving perspectives on gender in the epic.Applying feminist theory to Beowulf may reveal the significance of female characters like Grendel’s mother but could also project modern feminist ideals onto the text.
Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial analysis often prioritizes postcolonial concerns, such as imperialism and cultural clashes, in epics. While this perspective provides valuable insights into the ideological underpinnings and the impact of these narratives on postcolonial discourse, it occasionally overlooks the intrinsic artistic and literary value of the epics themselves.A postcolonial reading of The Aeneid by Virgil may highlight its role in promoting Roman imperialism but may not fully explore its poetic qualities and narrative depth.
Suggested Readings
  1. Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton University Press, 2003.
  2. Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press, 2000.
  3. Homer. The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fagles, Penguin Classics, 1990.
  4. Homer. The Odyssey. Translated by Robert Fagles, Penguin Classics, 1997.
  5. Miller, Dean A. Epic Hero. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
  6. Nagy, Gregory. The Ancient Greek Hero in 24 Hours. Harvard University Press, 2013.
  7. Tolkien, J. R. R. The Lord of the Rings. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2005.
  8. Vergil. The Aeneid. Translated by David West, Penguin Classics, 2003.
  9. Winkler, Martin M. The Roman Salute: Cinema, History, Ideology. Ohio State University Press, 2009.

Epic: A Literary Device

An epic is a lengthy and narrative literary genre that typically recounts the heroic exploits and adventures of legendary or mythological figures.

Etymology of Epic

The word “epic” traces its etymology to the ancient Greek term “epos,” which means “word,” “story,” or “tale.” In Greek literature, an “epos” referred to a narrative poem that celebrated heroic deeds and adventures, often focusing on legendary figures and their accomplishments.

The concept of the epic genre was further refined by Aristotle in his Poetics, where he identified specific characteristics of epic poetry such as its elevated language and grand scope.

With time, the term “epic” has evolved to include not only poetry but also any narrative work of art or literature characterized by its grandeur, heroic themes, and a sense of timeless significance. This evolution reflects the enduring influence of ancient Greek literature on Western literary traditions.

Meanings of Epic
AspectMeaningExplanation
Heroic NarrativeAn epic often serves as a heroic narrativeIt recounts the adventures and achievements of legendary or mythological figures.
Grand ScaleEpics typically encompass vast themesThey have storylines spanning great distances and periods.
Elevated LanguageKnown for elevated and formal languageEpics use poetic and majestic diction.
Cultural SignificanceFrequently hold cultural and historical significanceThey reflect the values, beliefs, and ideals of the society from which they originate.
Universal ThemesExplore universal themes like courage and loveThey are relevant across different cultures and eras, delving into themes of the human condition.
Didactic ElementsOften contain didactic elementsThey impart moral lessons and wisdom through their narratives.
InspirationCan inspire literature, art, and cultureEpics leave a lasting impact on society, shaping various forms of expression for generations.
Historical RootsOriginated in ancient civilizationsThe epic genre has its roots in oral storytelling traditions and can be traced back to civilizations like the Greeks and Mesopotamians.
Definition of Epic

An epic is a lengthy and narrative literary genre that typically recounts the heroic exploits and adventures of legendary or mythological figures. Characterized by their grand scale, epics often span vast distances and periods, using elevated and formal language.

They hold cultural and historical significance, reflecting the values and ideals of the society from which they originate, while exploring universal themes and often containing didactic elements.

Literary Examples of Epics
  1. The Iliad and The Odysseyby Homer: These ancient Greek epics are foundational works of Western literature with The Iliad focusing on the Trojan War and The Odyssey chronicling the adventures of Odysseus as he tries to return home.
  2. The Mahabharata and The Ramayana: These are two major epics from ancient India. The Mahabharata tells the story of the Kurukshetra War and explores philosophical and ethical themes, while The Ramayana follows the journey of Lord Rama in his quest to rescue his wife Sita.
  3. The Epic of Gilgamesh: An ancient Mesopotamian epic, it features Gilgamesh, a Sumerian king, and his quest for immortality. It is one of the earliest known works of literature.
  4. Beowulf: This Old English epic poem tells the story of the hero Beowulf and his battles against monsters and dragons. It is a classic of Anglo-Saxon literature.
  5. The Aeneid by Virgil: This Roman epic follows the journey of Aeneas, a Trojan hero, as he seeks to establish the foundations of Rome. It is considered a national epic of ancient Rome.
  6. The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri: Although it takes the form of an allegorical poem, this work is often considered an epic. It narrates Dante’s journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven.
  7. Paradise Lost by John Milton: This 17th-century English epic explores the fall of Lucifer and the biblical story of Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden.
  8. The Epic of Sundiata: This West African epic recounts the life and achievements of Sundiata Keita, the founder of the Mali Empire.

These are just a few examples, and epics exist in many other cultures and languages, each contributing to the rich tapestry of world literature.

Suggested Readings
  1. Hainsworth, J. B., and W. S. Maguiness. The Odyssey: A Commentary. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 1993.
  2. Homer. The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fagles, Penguin Classics, 1990.
  3. Homer. The Odyssey. Translated by Robert Fagles, Penguin Classics, 1997.
  4. Longinus. On the Sublime. Translated by W. H. Fyfe, Harvard University Press, 1995.
  5. Mandelbaum, Allen. The Aeneid of Virgil. Bantam, 1981.
  6. Miller, Dean A. Epic Hero. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
  7. Nagy, Gregory. The Ancient Greek Hero in 24 Hours. Harvard University Press, 2013.
  8. Rosenberg, Donna. World Mythology: An Anthology of Great Myths and Epics. McGraw-Hill, 2000.
  9. Virgil. The Aeneid. Translated by David West, Penguin Classics, 2003.

Decolonial Theory in Literature

Decolonial Theory in Literature is a critical framework that aims to challenge and dismantle the Eurocentric perspectives dominating the study of literature.

Introduction to Decolonial Theory in Literature

Decolonial Theory in Literature is a critical framework that aims to challenge and dismantle the Eurocentric perspectives dominating the study of literature. It aims analyze and deconstruct the historical legacies of colonialism and imperialism pervading literary texts. Instead, it focuses on how these narratives perpetuate power imbalances and marginalize non-Western cultures and voices. By centralizing the experiences and knowledge of colonized peoples, Decolonial Theory in Literature endeavors to create a more inclusive and equitable understanding of literature and its societal implications.

Criticism Against Decolonial Theory in Literature
  1. Essentialism: Critiques argue that decolonial theory may occasionally oversimplify the experiences and identities of colonized or marginalized groups, reducing them to overly broad categories. This oversimplification can overlook the intricate diversity and complexities within these experiences and identities.
  2. Overemphasis on Victimhood: Some scholars contend that decolonial theory tends to portray colonized peoples exclusively as victims, potentially perpetuating a sense of powerlessness and neglecting to recognize their agency and resistance in the face of colonial oppression.
  3. Political Bias: Critics assert that decolonial theory can exhibit political bias, prioritizing a particular ideological agenda over objective literary analysis. This may lead to the prioritization of activism over scholarly rigor.
  4. Lack of Engagement with Aesthetics: Certain literary analysts argue that decolonial theory primarily concentrates on the political and ideological aspects of literature, often disregarding the aesthetic and artistic qualities of literary works. This can result in a narrow interpretation of literature.
  5. Oversimplification of Colonialism: Critics suggest that decolonial theory may oversimplify the intricate historical and socio-political contexts of colonialism and imperialism. It might not comprehensively address the nuances characterizing various colonial experiences.
  6. Lack of Interdisciplinarity: Some scholars argue that decolonial theory within literature often remains within the boundaries of literary studies, failing to engage adequately with other disciplines such as history, anthropology, or sociology. This limited scope could hinder a comprehensive understanding of the colonial past and its enduring impacts.
  7. Inclusivity and Representation: Critics point out that tensions may arise within decolonial theory regarding who has the authority to represent marginalized or colonized groups. Concerns regarding representation and inclusion surface, raising questions about who qualifies as a legitimate voice in decolonial discussions.
  8. Eurocentric Critique: Some critics argue that decolonial theory might unintentionally replicate Eurocentric models of critique and evaluation by placing Euro-American literature and theory at the center of analysis, even when scrutinizing colonialism.

It is important to note that these criticisms do not invalidate the significance of Decolonial Theory in Literature in challenging dominant narratives. Rather, they contribute to ongoing debates within the academic discourse, fostering a more nuanced understanding of the theory’s strengths and limitations.

Examples of Decolonial Theory

There are numerous examples of decolonial theory being applied to literary works, including plays, poems, novels, and short stories. Here are a few examples:

WorkCritiquing Through Decolonial Theory in Literature
The Tempest by William ShakespeareDecolonial theorists analyze the depiction of Caliban, a colonized indigenous man, as savage and subhuman, highlighting how it reflects broader patterns of portraying indigenous peoples as inferior and in need of civilization.
The Inconvenient Indian by Thomas KingDrawing on decolonial theory, King critically examines Western literature and popular culture’s portrayal of indigenous peoples, revealing how these representations reinforce colonial power structures and perpetuate harmful stereotypes, perpetuating the marginalization of indigenous communities.
The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot DiazDecolonial theorists praise the exploration of power dynamics through language and its recognition of the lasting impacts of colonialism and imperialism in the Caribbean, shedding light on the ongoing effects on people’s lives in the region.
The Grapes of Wrath by John SteinbeckDecolonial theorists analyze the portrayal of the dispossession of indigenous peoples in California, illustrating how white settlers benefited from this dispossession, and thus, contributing to the critique of colonial legacies embedded in the narrative.
The Sun Is Also a Star by Nicola YoonDecolonial theorists appreciate the exploration of race, ethnicity, and immigration intersections, recognizing the ongoing legacy of colonialism in the United States and its influence on the lives of the characters, particularly in the context of diasporic experiences.
Keywords in Decolonial Theory in Literature

Here are some keywords in decolonial theory literary theory:

  1. Colonialism: This theory centrally concerns itself with the enduring legacy of colonialism, examining its pervasive effects on societies, cultures, and individuals.
  2. Power: Decolonial theorists actively explore power relations, scrutinizing how colonialism has profoundly shaped hierarchies of power and privilege.
  3. Marginalization: This theory firmly highlights the experiences of historically marginalized groups, particularly indigenous peoples and people of color, drawing attention to the persistent ramifications of their marginalization across time.
  4. Resistance: This theory places significant emphasis on resistance to colonialism and the proactive development of alternative modes of thought and action.
  5. Hybridity: This theory aptly acknowledges the intricate interplay of cultures, recognizing how colonialism has engendered novel forms of cultural expression and hybridity.
  6. Agency: Decolonial theorists actively underline the agency of colonized peoples in their resistance and challenges against colonialism, emphasizing the cruciality of acknowledging such agency in comprehending colonialism and its consequences.
  7. Epistemology: Decolonial theory in literature critically interrogates the production and legitimization of knowledge within colonial contexts, endeavoring to foster alternative epistemologies rooted in the experiences and perspectives of marginalized communities.
  8. Identity: This theory actively examines the construction of identities and how colonialism has significantly shaped and reinforced specific identity categories.
  9. Language: Decolonial theorists diligently scrutinize the ways in which language has been harnessed to bolster colonial power structures, while also recognizing its potential to challenge and subvert those very structures.
    1. Global South: It prominently highlights the experiences of countries and peoples situated in the global South, shedding light on how colonialism has profoundly shaped their historical trajectories and contemporary realities.
Suggested Readings
  1. Ahmad, Aijaz. In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. Verso, 1992.
  2. Bhambra, Gurminder K., et al. Decolonising the University. Pluto Press, 2018.
  3. Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Richard Philcox, Grove Press, 2004.
  4. Mignolo, Walter D. The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization. University of Michigan Press, 1995.
  5. Nandy, Ashis. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism. Oxford University Press, 1983.
  6. Quijano, Anibal. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, vol. 1, no. 3, 2000, pp. 533-580.
  7. Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. Vintage Books, 1994.
  8. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard University Press, 1999.
  9. Young, Robert J.C. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, 2001.

Decolonial Literary Theory

Decolonial literary theory is a critical framework that seeks to challenge and dismantle the enduring legacies of colonialism in the realm of literature and literary studies.

Introduction to Decolonial Literary Theory

The term “decolonial” comes from “decolonize,” which means to undo or challenge the effects of colonialism. Decolonial literary theory is a critical framework that seeks to challenge and dismantle the enduring legacies of colonialism in the realm of literature and literary studies. Drawing from postcolonial theory, it focuses on questioning dominant Western narratives, exposing power imbalances, and centering the voices and experiences of marginalized communities and cultures.

By deconstructing the colonial underpinnings in literature, this approach aims to promote a more inclusive, equitable, and diverse understanding of literary production and interpretation, encouraging a broader appreciation of the world’s diverse literary traditions.

Meanings of Decolonial Literary Theory
AspectMeaning
Critique of Colonial LegaciesExamining lasting colonial impacts on culture and literature.
Empowerment of Marginalized VoicesAmplifying marginalized and indigenous voices in literature.
Language as ResistanceUsing language to challenge colonial power dynamics.
Intersectional AnalysisConsidering how oppression intersects in literature.
Challenging Binary ThinkingQuestioning fixed identities and promoting hybridity.
Decolonization of MethodologiesAdopting culturally sensitive research methods.
Resistance and LiberationUsing literature for resistance and envisioning liberation.
Global RelevanceAddressing colonial legacies worldwide.
Decolonial Literary Theory: Origin, Theorists, Works and Arguments
Origin of Decolonial Literary Theory:
  • Emerged in the late 20th century as a response to the enduring impact of colonialism on literature and culture.
  • Rooted in postcolonial theory but emphasizes the necessity of decolonizing both content and methods of literary analysis.
Prominent Decolonial Literary Theorists:
  1. Frantz Fanon:
    • Author of The Wretched of the Earth (1961).
    • Pioneered the concept of decolonizing the mind and highlighted the psychological effects of colonialism on literature and identity.
  2. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o:
    • Known for his work Decolonizing the Mind (1986).
    • Advocated for African writers to return to their native languages and challenge the dominance of European languages in literature.
  3. Gloria Anzaldúa:
    • Author of Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza (1987).
    • Focused on the borderlands as a space where identities and languages intersect, challenging colonial borders.
Key Works in Decolonial Literary Theory:
  1. The Location of Culture by Homi Bhabha (1994):
    • Explores hybridity and the third space as strategies for subverting colonial discourse.
  2. Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate edited by Mabel Moraña, Enrique Dussel, and Carlos A. Jáuregui (2008):
    • Examines the impact of coloniality on Latin American literature and culture.
  3. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples by Linda Tuhiwai Smith (1999):
    • Discusses the importance of indigenous voices and methodologies in decolonizing research.
Key Arguments in Decolonial Literary Theory:
  • Language and Identity: It emphasizes the role of language in shaping identities and calls for the revitalization of indigenous languages in literature.
  • Borderlands and Hybridity: It focuses on liminal spaces where cultures intersect, challenging fixed identities and binary thinking.
  • Coloniality and Power Structures: It analyzes how colonial legacies continue to influence power dynamics in literature, representation, and academia.
  • Resistance and Decolonization: It encourages writers to engage in decolonial praxis by challenging colonial narratives and promoting indigenous voices.
  • Intersectionality: It recognizes that decolonization efforts intersect with other social justice movements, such as feminism and anti-racism.
Principles of Decolonial Literary Theory

Decolonial theory is a complex and multifaceted field of study, but there are several key principles that are central to its approach:

PrincipalExplanation
Critique of Colonial LegacyDecolonial literary theory critically examines how colonialism has shaped literary canons, genres, themes, and the representation of cultures and identities within literary works.
Empowering Marginalized VoicesIt seeks to give voice to the experiences and perspectives of marginalized and oppressed communities that have been historically silenced or overshadowed by colonial power structures.
Unveiling Power ImbalancesThis theory aims to uncover and address the power imbalances present in literary production and reception, exposing Eurocentric biases that have influenced literary scholarship.
Promotion of Diversity and InclusivityThis approach emphasizes the importance of recognizing and embracing the diversity of literary traditions worldwide, moving beyond a narrow Western-centric lens.
IntersectionalityThis theory acknowledges the intersections of various forms of oppression, such as race, gender, class, and sexuality, and explores how these intersections influence literary representation.
Decentering the WestIt challenges the dominance of Western literary theories and critiques, advocating for the integration of non-Western perspectives and traditions in literary studies.
Decolonizing Literary PedagogyThis theory calls for a reevaluation of literary curricula and pedagogical approaches to ensure a more inclusive and decolonized teaching of literature.
Engagement with Indigenous KnowledgeDecolonial literary theory recognizes and respects indigenous knowledge systems and oral traditions, encouraging their inclusion in the study of literature.
Interrogating Language and TranslationIt explores the implications of language use and translation in literary works, considering how power dynamics affect linguistic representation and understanding.
Resistance and TransformationDecolonial literary theory highlights literary works that resist colonial ideologies and imaginaries while envisioning alternative narratives and pathways towards societal transformation.
Suggested Readings
  1. Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Aunt Lute Books, 1987.
  2. Bhambra, Gurminder K., et al. Decolonizing the University. Pluto Press, 2018.
  3. Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Richard Philcox, Grove Press, 2004.
  4. Mignolo, Walter D. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Duke University Press, 2011.
  5. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann, 1986.
  6. Quijano, Aníbal. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South 1.3 (2000): 533-580.
  7. Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Vintage Books, 1979.
  8. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge, 2014.
  9. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard University Press, 1999.

Objectification in Literature & Literary Theory

Objectification, as a theoretical term, refers to the process of reducing individuals, typically women, to the status of objects or commodities, stripping them of their subjective agency and inherent humanity.

Etymology of Objectification

The term “objectification” gained prominence in late 20th-century philosophical and sociological discourse, notably through Simone de Beauvoir’s groundbreaking work, The Second Sex published in 1949. Martha Nussbaum further developed this concept in her book Sex and Social Justice published in 1999.

Rooted in these academic contributions, objectification refers to the reduction of a person, often women, to the status of an object, frequently for sexual or aesthetic gratification, effectively stripping them of their subjective agency and humanity.

This concept continues to be a focal point in gender studies, ethics, and social psychology, shedding light on the intricate interplay between culture, power dynamics, and individual identity.

Meanings of Objectification
AspectMeanings
CharacterThe portrayal of characters as mere objects or symbols, devoid of depth or agency, often for thematic or allegorical purposes.
NarrativeThe treatment of elements within a narrative, such as objects, settings, or even other characters, as symbolic entities with reduced autonomy serve primarily as tools for storytelling.
AuthorialThe distancing of the author from the narrative or characters, emphasizes the text’s autonomy over the author’s personal perspective or intention.
Readerly ObjectificationThe process by which readers may reduce characters or elements in a text to simplistic stereotypes or overlook their complexity, potentially reinforcing objectification themes present in the work.
Feminist LiteraryThe examination of how literature can reinforce or challenge societal objectification of women, often addressing issues of gender, power, and representation.
Postcolonial LiteraryThe analysis of how literature can perpetuate or critique colonialist objectification of cultures and people, explores themes of identity, imperialism, and resistance.
Definition of Objectification as a Theoretical Term

Objectification, as a theoretical term, refers to the process of reducing individuals, typically women, to the status of objects or commodities, stripping them of their subjective agency and inherent humanity.

It often manifests in media, literature, or societal practices where individuals are portrayed primarily for their physical attributes or as mere symbols, reinforcing harmful stereotypes and power imbalances.

In feminist theory and critical discourse, objectification is analyzed as a mechanism that perpetuates gender inequality and dehumanizes individuals through the lens of object-like qualities.

Objectification: Theorists, Works, and Arguments
Origin of Objectification:
  • The term “objectification” gained prominence in late 20th-century philosophical and sociological discourse, particularly through feminist theory and critical scholarship. It emerged as a crucial concept in discussions about the dehumanization and reduction of individuals, especially women, to the status of objects or commodities.
Key Theorists:
  • Simone de Beauvoir: A pioneering feminist philosopher, Simone de Beauvoir, is renowned for her seminal work, The Second Sex (1949). In this groundbreaking book, she critically examined the objectification of women in society and delved into its profound implications for gender inequality and women’s oppression.
  • Martha Nussbaum: A contemporary philosopher, Martha Nussbaum, explored the concept of objectification in her essay “Objectification,” which is a part of her book Sex and Social Justice (1999). Nussbaum’s work focuses on the philosophical dimensions, especially concerning issues of sexual objectification and the ethical concerns it raises.
Notable Works:
  • Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex (1949): This groundbreaking work provides a comprehensive analysis of this concept regarding women in society. It explores how women have historically been treated as objects and delves into the implications of this objectification on gender inequality and women’s liberation.
  • Martha Nussbaum’s Sex and Social Justice (1999): Nussbaum’s essay “Objectification” in this book offers a philosophical examination of the concept. It explores various aspects of objectification, including its ethical dimensions and its effects on human dignity and justice.
Key Arguments in Objectification Theory:
  • Reduction to Object Status: It involves the reduction of individuals, particularly women, to the status of objects or commodities. It emphasizes their physical attributes over their agency or humanity, treating them as objects of desire, adornment, or utility.
  • Reinforcement of Gender Inequality: It perpetuates gender inequality by reinforcing harmful stereotypes and power imbalances. It limits the opportunities and autonomy of those who are objectified, contributing to their marginalization and devaluation.
  • Necessity of Recognition and Challenge: Recognizing and challenging it is essential for achieving social justice, gender equality, and human dignity in contemporary society. This involves not only critiquing objectification in media, literature, and everyday life but also advocating for changes in societal norms and practices that perpetuate it. It is a critical step towards dismantling oppressive systems and fostering a more equitable and just society.
Objectification and Literary Theories
  1. Objectification is a central concept in feminist literary theory. Feminist scholars analyze how literature often objectifies women by reducing them to mere symbols, sexual objects, or stereotypes. They examine how female characters are portrayed and how their agency and complexity are often overshadowed by their physical attributes or roles in relation to male characters. Feminist literary theory aims to expose and challenge these objectifying representations to promote a more nuanced and equitable portrayal of women in literature.
  2. In Marxist literary theory, objectification can be seen in the way characters are depicted as commodities or as products of their social and economic circumstances. Literary works are examined for how they reflect and critique capitalist systems that objectify individuals by reducing them to their economic worth or social class.
  3. Marxist theorists explore how literature can reveal the dehumanizing effects of objectification within a capitalist society.Postcolonial literary theory examines how literature can perpetuate or critique the objectification of cultures and peoples in the context of colonialism and imperialism. It explores how colonial narratives often reduce colonized people and their cultures to exotic stereotypes or objects of conquest. Postcolonial theorists seek to deconstruct these objectifying representations and reclaim agency and identity for marginalized groups
  4. Psychoanalytic theory, as developed by Sigmund Freud and later theorists, delves into the psychological aspects of objectification. It explores how literary works can manifest and analyze the unconscious desires and objectifying tendencies of characters. This perspective can reveal how objectification operates on a psychological level, affecting both the characters within the narrative and the reader’s interpretation.
  5. Objectification also plays a role in reader-response theory, which focuses on how readers engage with and interpret literary texts. Readers may objectify characters or elements within a text by reducing them to simplistic symbols or judgments. Reader-response theorists examine how different readers may approach objectification differently and how it influences their interpretation of the text.
Objectification in Literary Criticism
  1. by Margaret Atwood (1985): In Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, objectification is a central theme. The story is set in a totalitarian society where women are reduced to their reproductive function and treated as objects of the state. Literary critics have explored how the author critiques patriarchal power structures and religious extremism through the objectification of women. This novel is often analyzed in feminist literary criticism for its portrayal of female characters as objects of control and reproduction.
  2. by Bret Easton Ellis (1991): Bret Easton Ellis’s controversial novel American Psycho offers a complex examination of objectification, particularly through the lens of violence and consumerism. Literary critics have debated the extent to which the novel objectifies women and the protagonist’s obsession with appearances and materialism. The work has been scrutinized within the context of postmodernism and the dehumanizing effects of consumer culture.
  3. by Amy Tan (1989): In Amy Tan’s novel The Joy Luck Club, objectification is explored in the context of cultural identity and generational conflicts. Critics have examined how the characters grapple with being objectified or stereotyped based on their Chinese heritage by both Western society and their own families. The novel is often discussed in the context of postcolonial and multicultural literary criticism, highlighting issues of cultural objectification and assimilation.
  4. by Toni Morrison (1987): Toni Morrison’s Beloved explores this with reference to African American slaves during and after the era of slavery. Critics have analyzed the novel’s portrayal of the dehumanizing effects of slavery and how characters are objectified by both the institution of slavery and society at large. Literary criticism of Beloved often intersects with postcolonial and African American literature studies, emphasizing the importance of reclaiming agency and humanity in the face of historical objectification.

In each of these works, literary criticism can examine how it operates on various levels, whether through gender, cultural, or racial dynamics. Critics may explore how these authors challenge or reinforce

Suggested Readings
  1. Bartky, Sandra Lee. “Foucault, Femininity, and the Modernization of Patriarchal Power.” In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on Resistance, edited by Irene Diamond and Lee Quinby, 61-86. Northeastern UP, 1988.
  2. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
  3. hooks, bell. The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. Washington Square Press, 2004.
  4. Nussbaum, Martha C. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford UP, 1999.
  5. O’Neill, Onora. “A Simplified Account of Human Capability.” In Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities, edited by Martha C. Nussbaum and Jonathan Glover, 39-58. Oxford UP, 1995.
  6. Scheman, Naomi. Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege. Routledge, 1993.
  7. Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. HarperCollins, 1991.
You may read more on Theoretical Terms below:

Oedipus Complex in Literature & Literary Theory

The Oedipus Complex, a foundational concept in psychoanalytic theory developed by Sigmund Freud, is a theoretical term that describes a child’s complex set of emotions and desires during the phallic stage of psychosexual development.

Etymology of Oedipus Complex

The term “Oedipus Complex” finds its etymological origins in ancient Greek mythology and Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory. It derives from the Greek mythological figure Oedipus, who, unwittingly, fulfilled a prophecy by killing his father and marrying his mother.

In Freud’s psychoanalytic framework, the Oedipus Complex represents a crucial developmental stage in a child’s psychosexual development, typically occurring during the phallic stage. It involves a child’s unconscious desire for their opposite-sex parent and a sense of rivalry and hostility toward their same-sex parent.

The complex plays a pivotal role in Freud’s understanding of early childhood sexuality and the formation of the individual’s personality and gender identity. While the term “Oedipus Complex” maintains its historical nomenclature, it remains a foundational concept in psychoanalytic theory, despite being critiqued and modified by subsequent psychoanalytic thinkers.

Meanings of Oedipus Complex
AspectKey Meanings
Character Motivation and ConflictPsychological Depth: In literature, characters often grapple with Oedipal desires and conflicts. These desires can manifest as complex relationships with parental figures, leading to internal struggles, guilt, and moral dilemmas. This psychological depth adds complexity to character development and plot dynamics.
Family Dynamics and Narrative ComplexityIntricate Family Dynamics: The Oedipus Complex can introduce intricate family dynamics in literary works, where characters’ interactions with parents and the resolution of Oedipal conflicts contribute to the narrative’s complexity. This can be seen in works where characters’ motivations are intertwined with their parental relationships.
Exploration of Gender and IdentityGender and Identity Analysis: Literary theorists have used the Oedipus Complex to examine themes of gender and identity in literature. It provides a framework to analyze how characters’ desires and identifications with parental figures influence their development and understanding of gender roles.
Psychological Depth and SymbolismSymbolic Exploration: Literature often employs Oedipal themes symbolically to delve into the depths of human psychology. The Oedipus Complex serves as a metaphor for broader themes of desire, power, and the human psyche, enabling authors to explore the intricacies of the human condition.
Subversion and DeconstructionChallenging Norms: Some literary works subvert or deconstruct traditional Oedipal narratives, challenging Freud’s theories and societal norms. These subversions can lead to innovative storytelling and critical examinations of psychoanalytic ideas.
Archetypal PatternsUniversal Themes: This is part of the broader exploration of archetypal patterns in literature. It reflects universal themes related to family, identity, and the human experience, making it a valuable lens for literary analysis.
Definition of Oedipus Complex as a Theoretical Term

The Oedipus Complex, a foundational concept in psychoanalytic theory developed by Sigmund Freud, is a theoretical term that describes a child’s complex set of emotions and desires during the phallic stage of psychosexual development. It centers on the child’s unconscious attraction to the opposite-sex parent, typically the mother, while harboring feelings of rivalry and hostility toward the same-sex parent, often the father.

This complex is marked by a desire to possess the parent of the opposite sex and the fear of retaliation by the parent of the same sex. It plays a pivotal role in shaping a child’s psychosexual development, personality formation, and understanding of gender and societal norms.

Oedipus Complex: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Key Theorists:
  • Sigmund Freud: The concept of the Oedipus Complex was developed by Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis. It is a fundamental element of his psychosexual theory and is elaborated in various works, including The Interpretation of Dreams and “Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality.”
Key Works:
  • The Interpretation of Dreams (1899): Freud discusses the Oedipus Complex in the context of dream analysis, exploring its significance in the interpretation of dreams.
  • Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905): Freud delves into the Oedipus Complex as a central aspect of his theory of human sexuality, emphasizing its role in the development of personality and gender identity.
Arguments and Key Concepts:
  • Triangular Desire: Freud argued that during the phallic stage of psychosexual development, children experience triangular desire, with the child desiring the opposite-sex parent (typically the mother) while viewing the same-sex parent (typically the father) as a rival.
  • Resolution and Identification: The Oedipal conflict is resolved through the process of identification, where the child internalizes the values and norms of the same-sex parent, forming the basis of their superego and contributing to their gender identity.
  • Psychological Development: Freud contended that the Oedipus Complex plays a pivotal role in the formation of personality and the development of sexual and social identity.
  • Critiques and Modifications: While the Oedipus Complex remains influential, subsequent psychoanalysts and scholars have critiqued and modified Freud’s theories, offering nuanced perspectives and alternative interpretations of the complex.

The Oedipus Complex, as outlined by Freud, remains a cornerstone of psychoanalytic theory, offering insights into the intricate interplay of desire, identity, and family dynamics in human development and literature.

Oedipus Complex and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevance to the Oedipus Complex
Psychoanalytic Literary TheoryCore Concept: This is at the core of psychoanalytic literary theory. It provides a framework for analyzing characters’ motivations, desires, and conflicts in literature. Analysts explore how characters’ relationships with parental figures influence their behavior and decisions, adding depth to character analysis and plot interpretation.
Feminist Literary TheoryCritique of Gendered Implications: Feminist literary theorists have examined the Oedipus Complex to critique its gendered implications. They explore how Freud’s theory reflects and reinforces patriarchal norms and power structures. It is analyzed as a tool of social control and the reinforcement of traditional gender roles.
Gender and Queer TheoryIntersection with Identity: Gender and queer theorists engage with the Oedipus Complex to explore how it intersects with non-binary and LGBTQ+ identities in literature. They investigate how characters’ desires and identifications with parental figures relate to normative notions of gender and sexuality, and how queer readings can challenge or subvert Oedipal narratives.
Marxist Literary TheoryAnalysis of Power Dynamics: Marxist literary theorists may analyze it in the context of class and power dynamics in literature. While not central to Marxism, the Oedipus Complex can symbolize forms of social power and dominance, contributing to discussions of societal hierarchies and exploitation.
Reader-Response TheoryReader’s Interpretation: Reader-response theorists consider how readers engage with and interpret it as it is presented in literary texts. The theory explores how readers’ personal experiences and cultural backgrounds shape their understanding of characters’ Oedipal conflicts and desires.
Archetypal CriticismUniversal Themes: Archetypal critics recognize the Oedipus Complex as an archetypal pattern that reflects universal themes of family, identity, and desire. It is examined as part of the broader exploration of recurring literary motifs and symbols.
Oedipus Complex in Literary Criticism
  1. Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” is a classic example where the Oedipus Complex has been widely analyzed. Critics have pointed to Hamlet’s complex relationship with his mother, Queen Gertrude, as indicative of Oedipal desires. Hamlet’s ambivalence and deep-seated conflicts surrounding his mother’s remarriage to his uncle are seen as reflective of the Oedipus Complex, adding layers of psychological depth to the character.
  2. by D.H. Lawrence: D.H. Lawrence’s novel “Sons and Lovers” is often discussed in the context of the Oedipus Complex. The protagonist, Paul Morel, is thought to exhibit Oedipal tendencies in his close and complicated relationship with his mother. Critics have explored how Paul’s struggles with intimacy and his romantic relationships are influenced by his unresolved Oedipal conflicts.: Franz Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” is interpreted through the lens of the Oedipus Complex, particularly regarding the character of Gregor Samsa. Critics have examined how Gregor’s transformation into a giant insect and his subsequent alienation from his family can be seen as an expression of his unconscious desire to escape his Oedipal conflicts.
  3. Eugene O’Neill’s play “Long Day’s Journey into Night” explores complex family dynamics and psychological conflicts. Critics have noted the presence of Oedipal themes in the relationships between the characters, particularly the strained connection between the son, Edmund, and his mother, Mary. The play delves into the characters’ repressed desires and emotional struggles.
Suggested Readings
  1. Freud, Sigmund. The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated by James Strachey, Basic Books, 2010.
  2. Jones, Ernest. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 2, Basic Books, 1961.
  3. Kernberg, Otto F. Love Relations: Normality and Pathology. Yale University Press, 1995.
  4. Lawrence, D.H. Sons and Lovers. Penguin Classics, 2006.
  5. Miller, Alice. The Drama of the Gifted Child: The Search for the True Self. Basic Books, 1997.
  6. O’Neill, Eugene. Long Day’s Journey into Night. Yale University Press, 2014.
  7. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Edited by Harold Jenkins, Arden Shakespeare, 2002.
  8. Sophocles. Oedipus Rex. Translated by David Grene, University of Chicago Press, 2018.
  9. Volkan, Vamik D. The Infantile Psychotic Self and Its Fates: Understanding and Treating Schizophrenics and Other Difficult Patients. Jason Aronson, 1995.
  10. Zaretsky, Eli. Secrets of the Soul: A Social and Cultural History of Psychoanalysis. Vintage, 2005.

Phallic in Literature & Literary Theory

Etymology of Phallic

The term “phallic” derives its etymology from the ancient Greek word “phallos.” It referred to a representation of the male genitalia, specifically, the erect penis. In ancient Greece, phallic symbols and images were commonly used in religious and cultural contexts to symbolize fertility, masculinity, and the generative power of nature.

With time, phallic evolved into a range of meanings beyond its literal representation of male anatomy. In contemporary academic discourse, “phallic” often occurs metaphorically to connote ideas related to masculinity, power, dominance, and sexual symbolism.

It is frequently utilized in fields such as psychology, literature, and gender studies to explore themes of sexuality, gender roles, and the dynamics of power within various cultural and societal contexts.

Meanings of Phallic
AspectKey Meanings and Interpretations
Sexual SymbolismRepresents Male Genitalia: In literature, it describes symbols representing the male genitalia, particularly the erect penis. They signify sexual desire, potency, and virility.
Masculinity and PowerSymbolizes Male Dominance: Phallic symbols explore themes of masculinity and power dynamics, symbolizing male dominance, authority, and control within a narrative or text.
Freudian AnalysisLinked to Oedipus Complex: In Freudian analysis, this symbol is central. It’s associated with the Oedipus complex, representing the male child’s desire for the mother and rivalry with the father.
Gender and IdentityDeconstructs Gender Roles: Its symbolism deconstructs traditional gender roles and examines how societal norms shape characters’ behavior, prompting discussions about gender identity.
Subversion and CritiqueChallenges Masculinity Norms: Authors use its symbols to subvert or critique traditional masculinity norms, challenging established power structures and cultural norms.
Psychoanalysis and LiteratureAnalyzes Psychological Significance: In psychoanalytic literary theory, its symbols are analyzed for their psychological and symbolic significance, delving into characters’ unconscious desires and fears.
Gender StudiesFeminist Perspective: In gender studies and feminist literary theory, phallic symbols are scrutinized for their role in reinforcing or challenging patriarchy and traditional gender hierarchies, exploring how they can be subverted or reclaimed by female authors.
Definition of Phallic as a Theoretical Term

Phallic, as a theoretical term, refers to symbols, imagery, or motifs within literature and cultural discourse that symbolically represent the male genitalia, particularly the erect penis. These symbols are often laden with connotations related to sexuality, masculinity, and power dynamics.

In literary and cultural analysis, it occurs to explore themes of sexual desire, dominance, and the influence of gender norms on narratives and societal structures.

Phallic: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Key Theorists:
  • Sigmund Freud: Freud’s psychoanalytic theory introduced the concept of the phallic stage in psychosexual development, which has influenced discussions of phallic symbolism in literature.
  • Jacques Lacan: Lacan, a French psychoanalyst, expanded on Freud’s ideas and introduced the concept of the phallus as a symbolic signifier in language and desire.
Key Works:
  • The Interpretation of Dreams (1899) by Sigmund Freud: Freud’s seminal work laid the groundwork for understanding the role of the phallic stage in human development and its implications for literature.
  • The Language of the Self: The Function of Language in Psychoanalysis (1968) by Jacques Lacan: In this work, Lacan delves into the concept of the phallus as a symbol of desire and linguistic signification.
Arguments and Key Concepts:
  • Phallic Stage: Freud’s theory posits that during the stage of psychosexual development, children develop a strong attachment to their genitalia and begin to understand gender differences.
  • Oedipus Complex: Freud argues that during the phallic stage, children experience the Oedipus complex, where a son desires his mother and views his father as a rival.
  • Symbolic Significance: Both Freud and Lacan emphasize the symbolic significance of the phallus, representing not just male genitalia but also desire, power, and lack within the realm of language and culture.
  • Gender and Identity: The theorists’ works have been applied to analyze how phallic symbolism in literature reflects and shapes gender roles, identity, and power dynamics.
  • Language and Desire: Lacan’s concept of the phallus as a linguistic signifier has led to discussions of how language constructs and mediates desire in literature and culture.

Phallic symbolism, as explored by Freud and Lacan, plays a pivotal role in psychoanalytic and linguistic analyses of literature, offering insights into the complexities of human desire, gender, and language.

Phallic and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevance to Phallic Symbolism
Psychoanalytic Literary TheoryExplanation: Psychoanalytic literary theory explores the psychological dimensions of literature, drawing from Freud’s concept of the Oedipus complex and the phallic stage of development. Phallic symbolism is highly relevant as it helps analyze characters’ desires, relationships with parents, and gender roles in literature. It delves into the subconscious elements of literature and their representation through symbols.
Feminist Literary TheoryExplanation: Feminist literary theory examines gender and power dynamics in literature. Phallic symbolism is relevant as it often embodies patriarchal ideologies and masculine dominance. It allows feminists to scrutinize how such symbols reinforce traditional gender hierarchies and oppressive structures, as well as how female authors may subvert or reclaim these symbols to challenge norms and highlight issues of agency and identity.
Gender and Queer TheoryExplanation: Gender and queer theories explore gender identity, sexuality, and sexual identity in literature. Phallic symbols can be examined in queer readings to understand their interaction with non-binary or LGBTQ+ identities in literature. This analysis investigates how phallic symbols intersect with normative notions of sexuality and gender and their relevance to queer desires and identities.
Marxist Literary TheoryExplanation: While phallic symbolism is not central to Marxism, it may be relevant in discussions of power dynamics, particularly regarding class and gender. Phallic symbols can symbolize not only sexual potency but also forms of social power and dominance. Marxist analysis can examine how the use of phallic symbolism in literature reflects or critiques class-based hierarchies and exploitation.
Phallic in Literary Criticism
  1. In John Cheever’s short story “The Swimmer,” the swimming pool becomes a recurring phallic symbol. The protagonist, Neddy Merrill, embarks on a journey through his suburban neighborhood by swimming from pool to pool, symbolizing his desire for escape and renewal. As he progresses, the pools represent his pursuit of youth, potency, and a sense of masculinity. However, as the story unfolds, the pools also become symbols of his descent into existential crisis and loss of virility, reflecting the complexities of midlife masculinity.
  2. T.S. Eliot’s poem “The Waste Land” contains several references to phallic symbolism, often associated with themes of impotence and spiritual decay. For instance, the poem includes the image of the “fishing with a small green worm” in a river, which can be interpreted as a phallic symbol and a commentary on modern society’s loss of vitality. While this poem is not recent, its enduring influence on modern literature makes it worth mentioning.
  3. by Han Kang (2007, English translation 2015): In Han Kang’s novel The Vegetarian, the character Yeong-hye’s decision to become a vegetarian becomes a powerful symbol of resistance against societal norms and expectations. The act of refusing to consume meat can be seen as a form of rejecting traditional gender roles and power structures. As the story unfolds, it explores the consequences of this decision and the impact it has on her identity and relationships, touching on themes of desire and control.
Suggested Readings
  1. Freud, Sigmund. The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated by James Strachey, Basic Books, 2010.
  2. Lacan, Jacques. The Language of the Self: The Function of Language in Psychoanalysis. Translated by Anthony Wilden, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
  3. Han Kang. The Vegetarian. Translated by Deborah Smith, Hogarth, 2015.
  4. Melville, Herman. Moby-Dick; or, The Whale. Penguin Classics, 2003.
  5. Perkins Gilman, Charlotte. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” In The Yellow Wallpaper and Other Stories, edited by Robert Shulman, Dover Publications, 1997, pp. 1-19.
  6. Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. Oxford University Press, 1977.
  7. Cheever, John. “The Swimmer.” In The Stories of John Cheever, Vintage, 2003, pp. 421-436.
  8. Eliot, T.S. The Waste Land. W. W. Norton & Company, 2012.

“The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”

Like the albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”, symbols in literature go beyond their intended meanings.

Introduction to Albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”

Like the albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”, symbols in literature go beyond their intended meanings. It is up to the reader to extract meanings of his own choice but with reference to the poem or comparative study of the other pieces published in the same genre or other genres. The symbol could be a bird, an object, or even an animal. Albatross – a bird has found its usage as a symbol in several poetic pieces. It is interpreted in several ways in English poetry but it is quite strange that the same symbol has been used by two different poets in the same sense and representing the same meanings. Whereas Baudelaire’s albatross is the poet himself, an odd man out, the albatross of Coleridge represents something that is good, an innocent bird and even faultless. Yet both poets have concluded the same. The albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” represents goodness whereas, in the first poem, its defiance invites divine wrath, in other its derision demonstrates human stupidity.

Albatross in Coleridge

Albatross of Coleridge is someone like Christ. It is a faultless, and “innocent bird” (Saeed) because Biblical studies have also supported two facts about birds; the first one is that the Spirit of God takes the form of a bird, and the second is that birds are spiritual beings. When Coleridge says that “As if it had been a Christian soul, /We hailed it in God’s name. (Coleridge ll. 63-66)”. This is the point where the sailors want to shoot the bird. And they did but they are also sure that it is a “Christian soul” (66) and have nothing to do with some evil spirit or bad omen. This is exactly similar to what happens to Christ. The message of the murder of the albatross in this poem is to convey that human beings have always shunned or killed the messengers of God (Saeed) for it happened with Christ and it is happening with the poet in “The Albatross” as well where Baudelaire compares himself with albatross, a bird which is “kings of the sky” (Baudelaire 5) with “great wings” (6), seems quite ugly and comic now, and the sailors after catching him are playing tricks and making fun of it. Baudelaire has actually the same philosophy that the Urdu poet Iqbal has about the poets. He states in Urdu “a poet is a second messenger of God” (Iqbal) which means that though he is not a prophet, he is JHis representative to spread goodness, but people often kill prophets and turn a blind eye to the poets and here Baudelaire equals himself with the bird saying “The poet resembles this prince of cloud and sky” (Baudelaire 13). It leads to what is called the victimization of the bird by the sailors and the poet by the society. It means the albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” could be different.

Albatross in “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”

Society has always treated birds and poets both with derision and prophets with cruelty. In “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” they kill the bird. It means that they have killed the innocent, or the Christian soul (Saeed), and this killing of the bird was rather a stupidity of the worst kind as the Wedding-Guest had to say, “God save thee, ancient Marinere! / “From the fiends that plague thee thus.” (Coleridge I. 36-38). Michael Raiger compares this idea with several theological studies from Augustine’s doctrines to Milton’s Paradise Lost, saying this is an arbitrary action and it is a psychological issue that arbitrary action takes place when a person is either stupid or has lost sanity. The mariner involved in the killing of the bird himself says “…a saint took pity on / My soul in agony,” (Coleridge IV 11-12).  This mental condition borders insanity and intense despair. Hence this is the point where a person knowingly or unknowingly commits mistakes and demonstrates his stupidity. Similarly, the mob has also the same psyche and Baudelaire is fully aware of this mob psyche of either killing the prophets like sailors or torturing the poets with their stupid derision and neglect whereas a poet becomes “the butt of hoots and jeers” (Baudelaire 15). It is due to the reason that he preaches goodness and does the job of prophets. However, the poets cannot walk with the crowds and stand apart. They cannot mix with them like Albatross which looks beautiful from far off but is quite clumsy and awkward when caught. Similarly, the poet seems to be prevented “from walking” (16) by his “giant wings) (16) which here mean his thoughts. Peter Curman, a Swedish poet has also said the same thing about the poet in his poem “The Monastery Madman” saying that “They say he’s mad. / Anyone who has inside his head / A macro- or microcosm / Must be mad” (Curman 9-13) to support the claim of Coleridge and Baudelaire in the albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” for which they have used the symbol.

Conclusion

Concluding the argument, it is fair to state that the major objective of both poets was to prove the innocence of the albatross like the prophets and poets through the albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”. And they have used this symbol to bring home their readers in which they have proved highly successful. Both have used this symbol as a representation of goodness and innocence that often becomes a victim of mass cruelty and human stupidity. The divine wrath that human beings invite is often the result of this defiance of innocent and goodness and victimization of sane souls such as prophets and messengers. Hence, the albatross in in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” is a spiritual bird that brings a message of goodness.

Works Cited
  1. Baudelaire, Charles. The Albatross. 2012. RPO. <http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poems/albatross>. Accessed 07 Dec. 2013.
  2. Coleridge, Sameul Taylor. “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner.” n.d. Poetry Foundation. <http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/173253>. Accessed 07 Dec. 2013.
  3. Curman, Peter. “The Monastery Madman.” n.d. TSWTC. <http://www.tswtc.org/documents/tsvetanka.htm>. Accessed 07 Dec. 2013.
  4. Iqbal, Muhammad. Gabriel’s Wings. Lahore, Pakistan: Sang-e-Meel Publications, 1984.
  5. Rogers, Michael. “I Shot the Albatross.” The Journal of the Friends of Coleridge 28 (2006): 73-82.
  6. Saeed, Dr. Ismael Mohammadfahim. “The Bird Symbol in English Romantic and Post-Romantic Poetry.” n.d. IRCO. <http://www.ircoedu.uobaghdad.edu.iq/uploads/42/The%20Bird%20Symbol-Amended-%20Final.pdf.>. Accessed 07 Dec. 2013.
Relevant Questions in Albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”: Poet, Albatross, and Jesus
  1. How do the portrayals of the albatross in “The Albatross” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Charles Baudelaire respectively, serve to symbolize the poet’s message or the overarching themes in their respective works?
  2. In “The Albatross” by Charles Baudelaire and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, how does the albatross hold significance within the context of the Christian allegory present in both poems, and how does it relate to the character of Jesus?
  3. Analyzing the killing of the albatross in both “The Albatross” by Charles Baudelaire and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, how does this pivotal event shape the moral and spiritual journey of the characters in each poem, and what commentary do the poets offer on human actions and their consequences through this shared symbol?