Day: January 24, 2024

Introduction: Gender Neutral Bathroom

The controversy surrounding gender neutral bathroom has become particularly complex with the presence of a third category—non-gendered individuals, such as those who identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community and transgender. These individuals often encounter distressing situations when using gender-specific restrooms. They may face derogatory remarks from men or insults from women due to their gender identity, which may not align with traditional norms. Jacob Tobia, in a Time article, eloquently describes the predicament faced by individuals like them, highlighting the constant dilemma of choosing between men’s and women’s restrooms and the potential social backlash (Tobia).

Tobia emphasizes the conflicting nature of this decision, as they risk unsettling others regardless of their choice. The challenges transgender individuals face in performing a simple task, such as using a public bathroom, are compounded by societal stigma and resultant distress. In this context, gender-neutral bathrooms emerge as a necessity, offering safety, freedom from violence, and a transformative approach to the concept of gender equality.

Types: Gender Neutral Bathroom

Gender-neutral bathrooms offer a safe and inclusive environment for individuals of all genders. By eliminating gender specifications, these spaces mitigate the need for individuals to be scrutinized based on their gender identity. Legislative measures enforcing gender-neutral bathrooms would extend this safety to everyone, including transgender and LGBTQ+ individuals. Nico Lang, in his article, emphasizes that the significance of gender-neutral bathrooms extends beyond the transgender community. He argues that it is about providing better and safer options for everyone, as these facilities remove the need to question or challenge someone’s gender identity (Lang).

The absence of gender-specific distinctions in these bathrooms helps avoid queer expressions and biased alerts that can arise when using gendered spaces. Therefore, the safety and comfort of non-gendered individuals are significantly enhanced in gender-neutral bathrooms. Additionally, the adoption of gender-neutral facilities contributes to the reduction of violence triggered by prejudicial remarks, fostering a more inclusive and tolerant environment for all.

Violence and Gender Neutral Bathroom

Violence can ensue when prejudicial remarks about gender specificity provoke a strong reaction from the victim, who may not possess the same level of patience as others. These incidents of violence, though occasionally curtailed, can escalate into physical altercations resulting from verbal abuse. Jacob Tobia echoes this sentiment in their article, asserting that gender-neutral bathrooms can help eliminate slurs, creating a violence-free environment by eradicating “state-sanctioned discrimination” (Tobia).

Moreover, the advocacy for gender-neutral bathrooms aligns with a broader movement for gender equality. Tobia suggests that utilizing the same shared space contributes to the attainment of true gender equality, a goal integral to a democratic society. This approach signifies the extension of rights to all sections of the country, emphasizing the importance of fostering an environment where individuals of diverse gender identities can coexist peacefully without fear of discrimination or violence.

Rights and Gender Neutral Bathroom

True equality remains elusive until discrimination in all its forms is eradicated, necessitating the opening of every public space to all communities, irrespective of race or gender. This signifies the extension of rights to every group within society. Robert Barnes and Moriah Balingit, in their commentary on issues faced by transgender students in schools, underscore the students’ awareness that “gender identity is a civil right” crucial for safeguarding their well-being (Barnes and Balingit). This awareness highlights the significance of protecting the gender identity of every individual, positioning gender-specific bathrooms as a potential violation of civil rights. In this context, the call for gender-neutral bathrooms aligns with the broader goal of creating an inclusive society where every individual enjoys equal rights and protection.

Conclusion: Gender Neutral Bathroom

It can be confidently asserted that gender-neutral bathrooms offer benefits rather than problems. These facilities not only provide safety benefits for transgender and LGBTQ+ individuals but also shield them from racial and gender-specific slurs. By mitigating the potential for violence that may arise when individuals of diverse gender identities encounter others in gender-specific spaces, gender-neutral bathrooms contribute to a safer environment. Furthermore, they reinforce the principle that every section or group in society has the right to utilize public spaces safely. As such, gender-neutral bathrooms emerge as a crucial need of the hour, playing a vital role in safeguarding the rights and well-being of transgender and LGBTQ+ individuals.

Works Cited: Gender Neutral Bathroom

1. Barnes, Robert and Moriah Balingit. ” Supreme Court takes up school bathroom rules for transgender students.” The Washington Post. 28 Oct. 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-takes-up-school-bathroom-rules-for-transgender-students/2016/10/28/0eece4ea-917f-11e6-a6a3-d50061aa9fae_story.html?utm_term=.6bc862c1b459. Accessed 18 Jan. 2022.
2. Lang, Nico. “Why All Public Bathrooms Should be Gender Specific.” The Daily Beast. 18 Apr. 2016. https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-all-public-bathrooms-should-be-gender-neutral/. Accessed 18 Jan. 2022.
3. Tobia, Jacob. ” Why All Bathrooms Should Be Gender-Neutral. Time. 23 Mar. 2017. http://time.com/4702962/gender-neutral-bathrooms/ Accessed 18 Jan. 2022.

Relevant Questions About Gender Neutral Bathroom

1. What are the key arguments and perspectives surrounding the implementation of gender neutral bathrooms, considering both the supporters and opponents of this initiative?
2. How do gender neutral bathrooms contribute to fostering inclusivity and accommodating the needs of individuals who identify outside the traditional binary gender categories?
3. What challenges and concerns arise in the implementation of gender neutral bathrooms, and how can institutions and societies address these issues to ensure a safe and comfortable environment for everyone?

Introduction: Devastating Beauty

Teal Pfeifer, in his essay “Devastating Beauty,” presents two interconnected yet distinct arguments. The initial argument revolves around women’s beauty standards. Pfeifer observes that advertisements in magazines often showcase thinner and more emaciated female bodies, sending misleading messages to women about achieving a particular standard of beauty. These misguided signals are rooted in a societal acceptance of visual culture, despite the detrimental impact of such media representations.

The second argument stems from the first, emphasizing that women become victims of an unrealistic beauty standard propagated by these advertisements. This victimization, in turn, contributes to both physical and psychological issues as women strive to conform to the unrealistic images presented in the media. Pfeifer suggests that women should take a stand by boycotting such magazines rather than succumbing to the pressure, believing that this collective action can effectively address the issue at its roots.

Writing Choice of Devastating Beauty

This essay is highly persuasive in its approach. Firstly, the writer seamlessly transitions from a narrative to a descriptive style, articulating a clear thesis in a single paragraph. Additionally, the incorporation of external sources lends support to the argument. Secondly, the writer provides compelling evidence in the form of statistics and examples. A notable instance is the comparison between the beauty standards of women in the 1950s and the present, emphasizing changes in height and weight. Statistical data on the dissatisfaction and mental health issues faced by women exposed to such images further strengthens the argument. The mention of over 80 percent of young girls aspiring to achieve these standards and the inclusion of academic references substantiate the detrimental impact.

Moreover, the writer supports the suggestion of a boycott with persuasive historical examples, citing the cases of Rosa Parks and Cesar Chavez. Notably, the essay successfully establishes a connection between the individual damage caused by unrealistic beauty standards and the collective power of community boycotts. The concluding statement, “we are the ones who decide whether or not their images will be purchased,” reinforces the central argument and encapsulates the persuasive circle the writer navigates.

Arguments in Devastating Beauty

Thirdly, both arguments presented in the essay are robust. The first argument addresses the self-inflicted physical harms caused by the images, particularly on the bodies of young girls, and the psychological issues they endure. The second argument advocates for a social boycott of these images, drawing parallels with historically significant social boycotts.

The strength of these arguments lies in the ample evidence provided, including statistical data, studies, and academically proven examples. However, there are two points where the evidence may appear lacking, but upon closer examination, the arguments remain sound. On page three, the author introduces the idea of changing thought patterns and brain chemistry, which might seem speculative. Yet, the argument is substantiated by the rhetorical question involving an optimistic lady interestingly looking at a style magazine. The essay then navigates to how this change may not be automatic but is possible, introducing the compelling solution of social boycott supported by relevant examples.

Issues in Devastating Beauty

One perceived deficiency in the essay is the transition from a personal narrative in the opening to a more argumentative style in the second paragraph. The initial narrative lacks a clear argument, and the shift to an argumentative essay style becomes apparent in the second paragraph. Nevertheless, the essay gains strength in the subsequent paragraphs with well-supported arguments, including evidence and statistics. The solution proposed, supported by two convincing examples, provides a solid conclusion. The essay effectively comes full circle, connecting the initial narrative with the ultimate answer – the power of social boycott.

Conclusion: Devastating Beauty

In short, a critical examination of the essay reveals a commendable use of a compelling hook and introduction to engage the reader. However, a notable area for improvement lies in the formulation of a more robust thesis statement. The existing statement, though clear, lacks the depth and specificity needed to serve as a strong argumentative guide for what follows. A thesis statement, ideally one that is debatable, should succinctly encapsulate the main argument and set the tone for the ensuing discussion. Despite this structural aspect, the remainder of the essay stands out for its persuasiveness and coherence. The well-supported arguments, bolstered by evidence and statistics, contribute to a compelling narrative that underscores the detrimental impact of beauty standards. The essay successfully navigates through historical examples, such as Rosa Parks and Cesar Chavez, to present a powerful solution in the form of a social boycott. In essence, while the essay could benefit from refining its thesis statement, its overall strength lies in the persuasive and well-articulated presentation of ideas throughout the body.

Works Cited: Devastating Beauty

1. Pfeifer, Teal, and Devastating Beauty. “Teal Pfeifer’s Argument Essay (MLA Style).” (2007).

Relevant Questions About Devastating Beauty

1. How does the concept of “devastating beauty” manifest in different aspects of art, literature, or culture, and what impact does it have on individuals’ perceptions and experiences?
2. In what ways can the portrayal of beauty in media and society lead to unrealistic standards and expectations, potentially causing harm to individuals’ self-esteem and mental well-being?
3. How does the juxtaposition of beauty and destruction in various narratives and artistic expressions contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities and contradictions inherent in the human experience?

Introduction: Condemned to be Free

My reading of J.P. Sartre’s article “Condemned to be Free” has served three objectives. The first is that my confusion about the term existentialism has been dispelled after reading this. The second is that I have encountered several other topics that he has explained thoroughly, with nothingness or “nada” being one of them. This concept serves as the very foundation of Sartre’s entire body of work. Despite the numerous explanations and details presented by other writers of his caliber about existentialism, Sartre’s work has successfully aided in helping others comprehend this complex phenomenon. The cornerstone of his entire body of work is encapsulated in his popular statement: “Man is condemned to be free.”

Being and Nothingness and Condemned to be Free

His popular work incorporated in this article was “Being and Nothingness,” and the striking quote he wrote is “Existentialism is Humanism.” If taken seriously, both of these concepts have profound repercussions for us as human beings. Further, deep reading made me aware of several other aspects of our existence that Sartre explained in detail. These include determinism, free will, the reality of moral values, the idea of God, and our relationships with both God and each other. Sartre debated on two major points. The first is “existence precedes essence,” in which he categorized his theme into two aspects: the first being “being-in-itself,” and the second being “being-for-itself.” “Man is condemned to be free” is the second major theme that he successfully and meticulously explained.

Existentialism and Condemned to be Free

Sartre maintained that the philosophy of existentialism is intricately connected to our lives, encompassing both positive and negative connotations. Taken in a negative light, existentialism can be viewed as a reaction against harmony and organized thoughts, challenging systems, order, systematic thinking, and classical schools of thought, including Aristotelianism, Thomism, as well as aspects of religion, literature, and politics. On the positive side, existentialism could be interpreted as embracing freedom, a life lived through abstract ideas, a rejection of dogmas, and a strong emphasis on individualism.

Consciousness and Condemned to be Free

It is also noteworthy that Sartre’s use of consciousness implies self-reflective awareness rather than simple awareness. The foundation of his philosophy, asserting that only self-conscious human beings can be free, is rooted in his explanation of non-conscious objects and self-conscious subjects. He not only explains that human beings are free but also emphasizes that they are free at every moment they choose to exercise their free will, stating that they are “condemned to be free.” He adds that they are “condemned to be free” because, in this context, there are not two options; they cannot refrain from exercising their free will. They are only free, and that is all. The only non-freedom act is that they are not free to perform the act of not being thrown into this world by chance. After that, a person has full freedom over their actions.

Conclusion: Condemned to be Free

Building upon my understanding of this philosophy, I delved deeper into Sartre’s other concepts, particularly freedom and nothingness. According to Sartre, freedom resides in imagination, and without it, one cannot claim to be truly free. Imagination not only distinguishes us from animals but also gives us a sense of conscience. Through imagination, we can transcend the world of materialism and explore various possibilities. Based on this, Sartre asserts that “a man is what he makes of himself.” We construct and deconstruct, create and destroy based on our imagination.

However, Sartre acknowledges that there are limitations to exercising free will in certain aspects of our lives, such as family, culture, birth, and religion. Turning to the concept of nothingness, Sartre denies the presence of any natural law or a fixed concept of human nature. He contends that the mind is empty, and the heart is nothing. Connecting freedom and nothingness, Sartre explains why man is “condemned to be free.” This exploration further deepens the understanding of Sartre’s existentialist philosophy.

Works Cited: Condemned to be Free

1. Sartre, Jean-Paul. “Condemned to be free.” Journey into Philosophy. Routledge, 2016. 394-405.

Relevant Questions about Condemned to be Free

1. How does Jean-Paul Sartre’s idea of being “condemned to be free” challenge traditional notions of fate and determinism, and what implications does it have for individual responsibility and agency?
2. In what ways does the concept of being “condemned to be free” contribute to Sartre’s existentialist philosophy, and how does it shape his views on human existence, choice, and authenticity?
3. How can the idea of being “condemned to be free” be applied to contemporary discussions about autonomy, decision-making, and the societal expectations placed on individuals in various cultural and social contexts?

Introduction: Online Degree Programs

With the advent of high-speed internet, education has undergone significant changes, leading to the introduction of numerous online degree programs by various universities. The term “online education” has become commonplace within the academic community and among students. Western universities in the United States, Canada, and several other countries now offer online degree programs. The rapid speed and widespread availability of the internet and digital devices have facilitated the offering of online degree courses, replacing traditional by-mail or distance learning programs.

According to M. Lee and Marlanda English, “These degree program often offer significant advantages in terms of cost and convenience” (1). Simultaneously, they argue that online degree programs provide valuable opportunities for individuals who are unable to leave work and attend traditional colleges or universities (1). However, there is another perspective intent on proving otherwise, and not without reason. Critics argue that the popularity of online degree programs has suffered due to the existence of diploma mills, which churn out degrees at a wholesale rate without imparting solid skills or knowledge to students. They assert, “These companies cater to individuals seeking to purchase fraudulent credentials” (1).

Bright Side of Online Degree Programs

The positive aspect of online degree program is that they provide competitive education opportunities for individuals who may have missed the chance to attend traditional colleges or universities but are proficient in internet and digital technology, with spare time after work. In this context, M. Tucker and Kathryn Cook argue that these program offer flexible alternatives to adults and graduates aiming to enhance their educational credentials in the competitive job market (2). They base their argument on the expansion of the US economy, the job market, and the increasing competition in skills. According to them, online degree programs present a valuable opportunity for individuals to educate themselves with knowledge and skills that hold value in the job market.

Their argument holds merit, considering the rapid expansion of the American job market and the growing interest of people in the virtual world to pursue education at their convenience. Therefore, their assertion that “The increasing enrollment for online degree program is proof of the success of online education” is valid (2). However, they overlook the drawbacks that have emerged in online education, specifically concerning fraud and deception involving both students and the institutions awarding degrees or fake institutions.

Dark Side of Online Degree Program

The less favorable aspect of this issue is that these program are often considered inferior or have been labeled as such compared to traditional classroom teaching or face-to-face on-campus programs. This perception arises from the lack of live interaction between students and teachers in online education. In this context, Lynn-nore Chittom and Maureen McMohan argue that credibility is a significant concern. They point out that students obtaining online degrees may not meet the same standards as those awarded for on-campus programs. Additionally, there is pressure from employers who openly express a lack of interest in candidates with online degrees (2p). Moreover, the proliferation of online institutions issuing fake degrees for a certain amount of money raises serious concerns.

Furthermore, Chittom and McMohan highlight issues related to communication during online teaching, the importance of self-discipline, and the development of social skills, which students traditionally learn in schools and colleges. However, these aspects might be lacking in the online education environment. Despite these challenges, it’s important to question whether online degree program should be dismissed entirely.

Common Grounds in Online Degree Programs Issue

Not at all. In fact, there are certain common grounds. Online programs offer significant advantages for several reasons. They provide a flexible alternative with adaptable timing, along with the benefits of convenient communication and location. Adult students, who form a substantial portion of online learners, often find it easier to grasp concepts through written communication.

While concerns about credibility exist, many universities offering online degree programs, such as Phoenix and DeVry University, have established credibility. There is a shared belief that online education has become a valuable tool for imparting knowledge and skills to students and individuals seeking to enhance their learning urgently. Simultaneously, it is crucial to address issues related to fake practices and deceptive behavior by some students attempting to present themselves as skilled when they may not be.

Viable Options About Online Degree Programs

In this context, it is crucial to find a viable solution that allows education to continue and enables individuals to acquire the necessary skills and knowledge for their respective fields. To address this issue, I propose a comprehensive threefold solution, encompassing accreditation of institutions, a ban on diploma mills, and verification of student behavior.

The first solution involves initiating degrees only through accredited and verified institutions, ensuring their recognition in the market. Governments can take the lead in launching program to verify the legitimacy of such institutions.

The second solution entails the establishment of a government body responsible for verifying degrees, ensuring their authenticity and quality.

The third solution focuses on discouraging students from obtaining fake degrees and cracking down on diploma mills that produce such fraudulent credentials. A global-level comprehensive program can be implemented to create verified and durable online education programs, ensuring that every individual has access to education without facing discrimination.

Conclusion: Online Degree Programs

Given the critical importance of education in a market economy, it is imperative that online degree program continue. These programs offer numerous advantages, providing equal access to education for individuals throughout society, with flexibility in terms of timing, affordability, and location. While they do have some drawbacks, such as issues with accreditation, a potential lack of social skills among students, and communication challenges, online degree programs have proven highly beneficial for individuals who may have missed the opportunity to attend traditional schools or colleges.

The solutions to these challenges lie in finding common ground, as both supporters and critics acknowledge the importance and value of continuing online education. It is essential, however, that these programs become more advantageous and beneficial through monitoring and improvements. By doing so, online degree program can effectively disseminate skills and tools to sections of society that may have limited access to traditional educational opportunities.

Works Cited: Online Degree Programs

1. Chittom, Lynn-nore and Maureen McMahon. “Counterpoint: Online Degree Programs are Inferior to Traditional Forms of Higher Education.” Points of View: Online Degree Programs. 3/1/2016, p3-3. 1p. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ccco.idm.oclc.org/pov/command/detail?vid=5&sid=30ffa697-aec7-4f9c-81b8-f8e15aa17b52%40sdc-v-sessmgr03
2. Lee, M., and Marlanda English. “Online Degree Programs: An Overview.” Points of View: Online Degree Programs, Mar. 2016, p. 1. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=28675288&site=pov-live&scope=site.
3. Tucker M. and Kathryn Cook. “Point: Online Degree Programs Offer a Competitive Edge.” Points of View: Online Degree Programs. 01 Mar. 2016. p2-2. 1p. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ccco.idm.oclc.org/pov/command/detail?vid=3&sid=30ffa697-aec7-4f9c-81b8-f8e15aa17b52%40sdc-v-sessmgr03.

Relevant Questions About Online Degree Programs

1. How can accreditation bodies and educational institutions collaborate to ensure the credibility and quality of online degree program, addressing concerns related to non-accreditation?
2. What strategies can be implemented to enhance the social and communication skills of students enrolled in online degree program, considering the potential drawbacks in these areas compared to traditional on-campus education?
3. In what ways can governments and educational authorities globally work together to regulate and eliminate diploma mills, ensuring that individuals pursuing online degree program receive legitimate credentials, and discouraging fraudulent practices in the online education sector?

Introduction: Racial Profiling

Racial profiling involves segregating certain individuals based on specific characteristics and features that are deemed prominent in determining the likelihood of involvement in criminal activities within a particular section, group, or ethnicity. It is a practice employed by law enforcement agencies that encourages them to apprehend or arrest individuals based on their race, ethnicity, or religion. For instance, some communities are still labeled as violent and susceptible to certain crimes, leading to increased instances of stop and search.

Pilar Quezzaire and Tracy DiLascio assert that “racial profiling is most commonly perpetrated against ethnic minorities, with many instances occurring in reaction to specific crimes” (1). While the topic is both interesting and controversial, it requires a solution, as not all individuals of a particular race are criminals, and not all individuals of another race are innocent. Various other factors need consideration, and finding a middle ground between extreme views is crucial for addressing the issue. Therefore, it is essential to acknowledge that there is a spectrum of likelihood regarding such behaviors and to explore solutions for ending racial profiling.

Power and Racial Profiling

Since time immemorial, humanity’s pursuit of power has driven individuals to discriminate against others, finding faults to dehumanize them and establish dominance. This has manifested as profiling, where individuals are categorized based on certain traits and features in their characters or behavior, fostering a sense of superiority. As the saying goes, “Human beings naturally ascribe qualities to those unlike themselves” (1). Social sciences have been employed to codify these features, leading to the development of racial profiling concepts concerning whites and nonwhites (1).

Supporters of profiling argue that it is grounded in reality, asserting that people exhibit common habits based on their race, ethnicity, or tribe. To some extent, when examined within the broader research context, this perspective seems plausible, suggesting that social sciences may have some validity in their theoretical framework concerning discrimination. However, the concern raised by proponents of profiling is that crimes cannot be effectively addressed by investigations grounded in profiles created based on discriminatory features.

Violence and Racial Profiling

However, the opposing group contends that the predisposition to violence is not exclusive to African Americans. Despite being declared illegal in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, profiling persists in one form or another. It has become customary to associate various groups based on religion or ethnicity with certain activities or crimes, categorizing them as either likely or unlikely offenders. Even though profiling is legally prohibited in the United States, it still prevails within institutions where crimes are attributed to specific groups through profiling, such as Muslims, African Americans, and Chinese.

Pilar Quezzaire and Tracy DiLascio further emphasize that “Law enforcement agencies insist that profiling based on many factors is necessary to find criminals and protect the public” (1). Therefore, denying the existence of racial profiling altogether is seen as a mere practice, as it continues to persist in various forms despite legal prohibitions.

Middle Ground in Profiling

Nowadays, there are middle grounds in the ongoing debate. It is the responsibility of security agencies to monitor individuals they find suspicious. While research reveals instances of racial profilings, this pseudoscience does not guarantee one hundred percent accurate results. For instance, not all Muslims are terrorists, and not all individuals of African descent are criminals. However, this reality is often overlooked, leading criminals to exploit the pretext of racial profiling by the police or security agencies.

The common ground between both arguments is the acknowledgment that profiling exists in certain forms, where certain groups and races are presumed to be more likely to commit unlawful acts. Simultaneously, it is recognized that stereotyping has diminished, and contemporary racial profiling is often based on information or suspicious movements rather than broad generalizations.

Solution of Racial Profiling

The proposed solution to the issue is acknowledging that profiling exists at all levels. The need of the hour is to admit its existence against certain groups and ethnicities and to put an end to it. A constructive way forward is to involve the affected communities when instances of profiling occur and seek their feedback on the matter. Attributing every violent act to African Americans or Muslims as a terror-related incident does not resolve the underlying issues; instead, it fosters bias and prejudice among other communities, potentially leading to violence. Therefore, it is preferable for the initial stages of investigation to focus on indiscriminate interrogation rather than resorting to profiling. This approach can help address the root causes of incidents without perpetuating harmful stereotypes.

Conclusion: Racial Profiling

Therefore, it is crucial thatprofiling comes to an end following the acknowledgment of its existence. This is important as it unfairly designates certain ethnicities, races, and groups as scapegoats for investigative failures and crimes. The continuation of this profiling contributes to the polarization of society, fostering racial segregation and discrimination on both group and national levels, which becomes a stain on the nation’s image. Hence, the proposed third solution advocates for thorough investigation before resorting to racial profiling as a means to put an end to this practice.

Works Cited: Racial Profiling

1. Quezzaire, Pilar and Tracey M. DiLascio. “Racial Profiling: An Overview.” Points of View: Racial Profiling, 30 Sept. 2016, p. 1. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db

Relevant Questions about Racial Profiling

1. How does the practice of racial profiling impact the relationship between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve?
2. What measures can be implemented to address and prevent instances of racial profiling in law enforcement and other institutions?
3. How do legal frameworks and policies contribute to either mitigating or perpetuating profiling, and what changes can be made to promote fairness and equity in these systems?