Ritualization in Literature & Literary Theory

In theoretical contexts, ritualization refers to the process through which actions or behaviors become imbued with symbolic meaning and cultural significance.

Ritualization in Literature & Literary Theory
Ritualization: Etymology/Term, Meanings and Concept
Etymology/Term:

The term “ritualization” stems from the noun “ritual,” which has its roots in the Latin word “ritus” (religious observance or ceremony). Ritualization describes the process through which ordinary actions, behaviors, or objects become imbued with symbolic meaning and significance within a social or cultural context.

Meanings and Concepts:
  • Transformation of the Ordinary: Ritualization involves taking everyday actions and infusing them with deeper meaning, often connected to social, cultural, or religious values.
  • Symbolism and Performance: Rituals are often symbolic acts that are performed in a specific, formalized way. They can involve stylized gestures, language, and the use of objects.
  • Social Function: Rituals serve various social functions, including:
    • Reinforcing shared values and beliefs
    • Marking transitions or rites of passage
    • Creating a sense of community and belonging
    • Managing emotions and channeling anxieties
  • Evolutionary Origins: Some scholars suggest that ritualization has evolutionary roots in animal behavior, where certain actions became stylized to communicate intentions or appease social hierarchies.
Ritualization: Definition of a Theoretical Term

In theoretical contexts, ritualization refers to the process through which actions or behaviors become imbued with symbolic meaning and cultural significance. It involves the repetition of specific actions, gestures, or ceremonies within a social or cultural context, often serving to reinforce group identity, norms, and values. Ritualization can range from everyday rituals like greeting gestures to more elaborate ceremonial practices found in religious or cultural traditions.

Ritualization: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Erving Goffman: In his work The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Goffman explores the concept of ritualization within the framework of dramaturgy, emphasizing how individuals engage in symbolic interactions to manage impressions and construct social identities.
  • Victor Turner: Turner’s anthropological studies, particularly The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, delve into the significance of ritualization in shaping social structure and fostering community cohesion, highlighting its role in facilitating transitions and resolving social tensions.
Works:
  • The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life by Erving Goffman: This seminal work examines how individuals engage in impression management through ritualized behaviors, presenting themselves in ways that align with societal expectations and norms.
  • The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure by Victor Turner: In this influential text, Turner explores the transformative power of rituals, arguing that they provide a structured framework for individuals to navigate life transitions, resolve conflicts, and reinforce social bonds.
Arguments:
  • Symbolic Interactionism: Both Goffman and Turner draw from symbolic interactionism to argue that ritualization plays a crucial role in the construction and negotiation of social reality, shaping how individuals perceive themselves and others through shared symbolic meanings and gestures.
  • Communitas and Social Cohesion: Turner’s concept of communitas, arising from intense collective experiences during rituals, underscores the role of ritualization in fostering solidarity and cohesion within social groups, transcending hierarchical distinctions and fostering a sense of belonging.
Ritualization: Major Characteristics
  • Formalization and Repetition: Rituals involve a prescribed pattern of actions, language, or objects that are repeated in a consistent manner.
    • Literary Example: Wedding ceremonies across cultures often follow set structures, with repeated vows and symbolic acts.
  • Symbolism: Rituals utilize symbols with deeper meanings beyond their literal interpretation. These symbols often represent social values, cultural beliefs, or religious concepts.
    • Literary Example: Communion in Christian-centered literature symbolizes the sacrifice of Christ and the connection between believers.
  • Performance: Rituals are often performed with an element of theatricality. This can include specific costumes, props, and stylized gestures.
    • Literary Example: Shakespeare’s plays feature elaborate rituals, like the coronation scene in Macbeth, highlighting power and hierarchy.
  • Communal Aspect: Rituals frequently involve a group of participants, reinforcing shared beliefs and creating a sense of social cohesion.
    • Literary Example: Religious festivals or ceremonies in novels often demonstrate the power of collective ritual in shaping a community’s identity.
  • Transformation: Rituals often mark a change in status or a transition from one state to another.
    • Literary Example: Coming-of-age rituals or initiations depicted in literature highlight personal transformation and growth.
Ritualization: Relevance in Literary Theories
Literary TheoryRelevance of Ritualization
StructuralismRitualization can be seen as a form of cultural structure that shapes symbolic systems and codes within literary texts.
Reader-Response TheoryRitualized elements in literature may evoke specific responses from readers, influencing their interpretations and emotional engagement.
Postcolonial TheoryRitualization in literature may reflect and critique colonial power structures, cultural hybridity, and processes of decolonization.
Feminist TheoryRitualized gender roles and behaviors portrayed in literature can be analyzed to uncover underlying power dynamics and patriarchal norms.
Psychoanalytic TheoryRitualization in literature may symbolize unconscious desires, fears, and conflicts, offering insights into characters’ psyches.
Marxist TheoryRitualized practices and ceremonies depicted in literature can be examined to illuminate class relations, ideology, and social hierarchies.
Postmodernist TheoryRitualization in literature may be deconstructed and subverted to challenge dominant cultural norms and question the stability of meaning.
Queer TheoryRitualized performances of gender and sexuality in literature can be explored to deconstruct binary categories and challenge heteronormativity.
EcocriticismRitualized interactions between humans and nature depicted in literature can reveal attitudes towards the environment and ecological concerns.
Post-structuralismRitualization can be viewed as a discursive practice that constructs and maintains meaning within literary texts, subject to continual interpretation.

This table demonstrates how ritualization intersects with various literary theories, providing multiple lenses through which to analyze and interpret literary texts.

Ritualization: Application in Critiques
Literary WorkApplication of Ritualization
The Lottery by Shirley JacksonIn “The Lottery,” the annual ritual of the lottery serves as a powerful critique of blind adherence to tradition and the dangers of collective violence. The ritualized process of selecting a sacrificial victim highlights the societal pressures to conform and participate in harmful practices without questioning their moral implications. Jackson’s portrayal of the ritual’s normalization and the community’s acceptance of violence underscores broader themes of social conformity and the banality of evil.
The Waste Land by T.S. EliotT.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land is rife with ritualized imagery and motifs, reflecting the fragmented and disillusioned post-World War I society. The poem’s depiction of various religious ceremonies, mythical allusions, and cultural rituals underscores the disconnection and spiritual emptiness of the modern world. Through ritualized symbols and rituals, Eliot critiques the loss of collective meaning and the fragmentation of traditional values in the aftermath of war and societal upheaval.
Beloved by Toni MorrisonIn Beloved, Toni Morrison explores the legacy of slavery through the lens of ritualized trauma and memory. Sethe’s haunting rituals to cope with the trauma of her past, such as the repetitive act of “rememory,” exemplify how rituals can serve as a means of confronting and processing collective trauma. Morrison critiques the societal denial of historical atrocities and the enduring psychological scars of slavery, highlighting the importance of acknowledging and ritualizing collective memory for healing and reconciliation.
The Trial by Franz KafkaFranz Kafka’s The Trial presents a surreal and bureaucratic world where rituals of the legal system dominate protagonist Josef K.’s life. The repetitive and ritualized nature of the trial process reflects themes of alienation, powerlessness, and existential angst. Kafka critiques the absurdity of modern life and the dehumanizing effects of institutionalized rituals, illustrating how individuals can become trapped in a labyrinthine system devoid of meaning or justice.
Ritualization: Relevant Terms
TermDefinition
SymbolismThe use of symbols to represent ideas or concepts, often imbued with cultural or contextual significance.
CommunitasA sense of community and solidarity arising from shared experiences, often heightened during ritualized practices.
PerformanceThe enactment or portrayal of actions, gestures, or behaviors, often with symbolic or ritualistic intent.
TraditionLong-established customs or beliefs passed down through generations, often ritualized in cultural or religious practices.
MythologyA body of traditional stories and beliefs, often involving gods, heroes, and supernatural beings, with ritualized significance.
SacredRevered or holy, deserving of respect and veneration, often associated with ritualized practices and spaces.
CeremonyA formal or solemn ritual observance, often marking significant events or transitions in individuals or communities.
Rite of PassageA ritual that marks a person’s transition from one status or phase of life to another, such as birth, puberty, marriage, or death.
GesturesMovements or actions, often symbolic or ritualized, conveying meaning or emotion, especially in social interactions.
InvocationThe act of calling upon a higher power, deity, or spiritual force, often through ritualized prayers or incantations.
Ritualization: Suggested Readings
  1. Bell, Catherine. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford University Press, 1997.
  2. Grimes, Ronald L. Beginnings in Ritual Studies. Revised edition, University of South Carolina Press, 1995.
  3. Humphrey, Caroline, and James Laidlaw. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford University Press, 1994.
  4. Kertzer, David I. Ritual, Politics, and Power. Yale University Press, 1988.
  5. Lewis, Ioan M. Ecstatic Religion: An Anthropological Study of Spirit Possession and Shamanism. 2nd edition, Routledge, 2003.
  6. McCauley, Robert N., and E. Thomas Lawson. Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  7. Moore, Sally Falk, and Barbara G. Myerhoff, editors. Secular Ritual. Van Gorcum, 1977.
  8. Rappaport, Roy A. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  9. Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja. Culture, Thought, and Social Action: An Anthropological Perspective. Harvard University Press, 1985.
  10. Turner, Victor W. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine de Gruyter, 1995.

Rhizome in Literature & Literary Theory

A rhizome proposes a decentralized, non-hierarchical way of understanding networks and systems, contrasting with traditional hierarchical models like trees.

Rhizome in Literature & Literary Theory
Rhizome: Etymology/Term, Meanings and Concept
Etymology/Term:

The word “rhizome” originates from the Ancient Greek word “ῥίζωμα” (rhízōma), meaning “mass of roots”. This references the root-like appearance of these modified plant stems.

Meanings and Concepts:
  • Botanical Definition: A rhizome is a continuously growing, typically horizontal, underground plant stem. It produces shoots above ground and roots below, allowing the plant to propagate and expand.
  • Storage Organ: Rhizomes act as storage units for carbohydrates and proteins, helping plants survive unfavorable seasons and propagate vegetatively.
  • Vegetative Propagation: Rhizomes enable plants to spread and reproduce asexually. New plants can sprout from the rhizome’s nodes.
  • Philosophical Concept: In philosophy, the term “rhizome” was famously used by Deleuze and Guattari to describe a non-hierarchical, interconnected network of ideas and concepts, as opposed to a linear or tree-like structure.
Rhizome: Definition of a Theoretical Term

In theoretical terms, a rhizome refers to a conceptual framework popularized by philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. It proposes a decentralized, non-hierarchical way of understanding networks and systems, contrasting with traditional hierarchical models like trees. Rhizomatic thinking emphasizes connections, multiplicities, and fluidity, suggesting that knowledge, culture, and society grow in a non-linear manner, with interconnected nodes rather than a single, linear progression.

Rhizome: Theorists, Works, and Arguments
Theorist(s)WorksArguments
Gilles Deleuze and Félix GuattariA Thousand Plateaus (and other works)* The rhizome represents a decentralized, non-hierarchical, and interconnected way of thinking. * Knowledge and systems are constantly in flux, without a central point of origin. * The rhizome rejects rigid, linear structures of thought. * It emphasizes multiplicity, becoming, and unexpected connections.
Important Considerations
  • The rhizomatic concept has been applied to diverse fields beyond philosophy, including:
    • Cultural studies (analyzing power structures, fluidity of identity)
    • Literary theory (deconstructing narratives)
    • Hypertext theory (understanding the interconnectedness of digital spaces)
Rhizome: Major Characteristics
  1. Multiplicity and Connectivity: Just as a rhizome grows horizontally, spreading out in multiple directions, literature that embodies this characteristic often features interconnected narratives or themes. Jorge Luis Borges’ “The Garden of Forking Paths” exemplifies this with its complex narrative structure where various storylines branch off from each other, creating a network of interconnected tales.
  2. Non-Linearity: Rather than following a linear narrative arc, rhizomatic literature may present a fragmented or non-linear structure. A prime example is William Faulkner’s “The Sound and the Fury,” where the narrative shifts back and forth in time, reflecting the disjointed perspectives of its characters and the complex nature of memory and consciousness.
  3. Fluidity and De-Centering: Rhizomatic literature often challenges traditional notions of authority and hierarchy. In Toni Morrison’s “Beloved,” the narrative weaves together multiple voices and perspectives, disrupting the dominance of a single authoritative narrative and emphasizing the importance of marginalized voices and histories.

These characteristics collectively illustrate how the rhizome serves as a powerful metaphor for understanding the complexities of literary texts and the interconnectedness of ideas within them.

Rhizome: Relevance in Literary Theories
Literary TheoryRelevance of the Rhizome Concept
PoststructuralismChallenges traditional notions of linear narratives and fixed meanings in texts. Emphasizes the multiplicity of interpretations and the reader’s role in creating meaning.
DeconstructionUndermines the idea of a central, authoritative meaning within a text. Highlights the instability of language and the interconnectedness of seemingly opposing ideas.
Reader-Response TheoryEmphasizes the active role of the reader in constructing meaning. The rhizome suggests that a text’s meaning is not fixed but emerges through the dynamic interaction between the text and the reader’s unique experiences and interpretations.
PostmodernismEmbraces fragmentation, intertextuality, and the play of signifiers. The rhizome provides a model for understanding how texts reference and build upon each other in a non-linear, interconnected web.
Hypertext LiteratureThe non-linear, branching structure of hypertext directly mirrors the rhizomatic concept. The reader can navigate the text in multiple ways, creating their own unique paths and meanings.
Rhizome: Application in Critiques
  1. Moby-Dick by Herman Melville:
    • The rhizomatic perspective can be applied to Moby-Dick to highlight its multiplicity of themes, characters, and narrative threads that spread out like the roots of a rhizome. Rather than a straightforward narrative, the novel explores diverse topics such as obsession, nature, and the human condition, interconnected in a complex web.
    • Melville’s use of non-linear storytelling, including digressions on topics such as whaling practices and marine biology, reflects the rhizomatic structure. These diversions contribute to the richness and depth of the narrative, creating a multi-layered reading experience that resists easy categorization.
  2. One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez:
    • García Márquez’s novel embodies the rhizomatic concept through its portrayal of the Buendía family’s multi-generational saga in the fictional town of Macondo. The narrative branches out in various directions, exploring the interconnectedness of personal and collective histories.
    • The novel’s magical realism blurs the boundaries between reality and fantasy, reinforcing the rhizomatic idea of interconnectedness and fluidity. Events and characters recur across generations, creating a sense of continuity and complexity akin to the rhizome’s growth.
  3. Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace:
    • Wallace’s sprawling novel can be seen as a rhizomatic text due to its fragmented structure, multitude of characters, and interconnected storylines. The narrative branches out in multiple directions, exploring themes such as addiction, entertainment, and existentialism.
    • The novel’s use of footnotes and digressions further reflects the rhizomatic structure, with additional layers of meaning and information branching off from the main text. This non-linear approach challenges readers to engage with the text in a rhizomatic manner, making connections across different sections and perspectives.
  4. The Savage Detectives by Roberto Bolaño:
    • Bolaño’s novel exemplifies the rhizomatic concept through its exploration of literary movements, underground culture, and the search for meaning. The narrative follows a group of poets known as the “visceral realists” across different countries and time periods, creating a network of interconnected stories and experiences.
    • The novel’s episodic structure and shifting perspectives reflect the rhizomatic nature of the narrative, with different characters and events emerging and receding like nodes in a sprawling network. Bolaño’s use of multiple voices and styles underscores the interconnectedness of literature and life, echoing the rhizome’s emphasis on multiplicity and diversity.
Rhizome: Relevant Terms
TermBotanical DefinitionPhilosophical Definition
NodePoints on the rhizome where shoots and roots emerge.Points of connection and potential growth within a network.
InternodeThe section of the rhizome between nodes.The lines of flight or movement between connections.
Lateral GrowthThe horizontal expansion of the rhizome.The spread of ideas or concepts in non-hierarchical ways.
Clonal GrowthAsexual reproduction from the rhizome.Replication and self-similarity within a system.
Determinate GrowthRhizomes with limited growth potential.Ideas or structures with defined boundaries.
Indeterminate GrowthRhizomes with unlimited growth potential.Open-ended systems with potential for constant expansion.
HeterogeneityVariations within a rhizome system.Diversity and difference within a network.
MultiplicityThe presence of multiple nodes and connections.Abundance of potential interpretations or pathways.
DeterritorializationBreaking free from fixed structures or territories.Challenging traditional boundaries and hierarchies.
BecomingA state of constant change and transformation.Emphasizing process and flux over fixed states.
Rhizome: Suggested Readings
  1. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi, University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
  2. Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A.M. Sheridan Smith, Routledge, 2002.
  3. García Márquez, Gabriel. One Hundred Years of Solitude. Harper & Row, 1970.
  4. Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, 1991.
  5. Melville, Herman. Moby-Dick; or, The Whale. Harper & Brothers, 1851.
  6. Morrison, Toni. Beloved. Alfred A. Knopf, 1987.
  7. Wallace, David Foster. Infinite Jest. Little, Brown and Company, 1996.
  8. Bolaño, Roberto. The Savage Detectives. Translated by Natasha Wimmer, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007.
  9. Borges, Jorge Luis. Ficciones. Translated by Anthony Kerrigan, Grove Press, 1962.
  10. Calvino, Italo. Invisible Cities. Translated by William Weaver, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974.

Laïcité in Literature & Literary Theory

Laïcité is a concept originating in France, encompassing the principle of secularism. It advocates for the separation of religion from government affairs and public institutions.

Laïcité in Literature & Literary Theory
Laïcité: Etymology, Meaning, and Concept

The word “laïcité” has its roots in the French language, deriving from the Latin word “laicus,” which in turn originates from the Greek “laikos” (λαϊκός), meaning “of the people” or “common.” In the context of modern political and social thought, laïcité embodies a complex set of principles. Here’s a breakdown of its key meanings and concepts:

Meanings and Concepts
  • Separation of Church and State: Laïcité fundamentally advocates for a clear distinction between religious institutions and the governing structures of a state. This ensures that religion does not hold undue influence over political decisions or the functions of government.
  • Freedom of Conscience: Laïcité guarantees the individual’s right to choose their own religious beliefs (or lack thereof) and to practice their faith freely without coercion or discrimination from the state or any other entity.
  • Neutrality of the State: The state, under the principles of laïcité, remains neutral on matters of religion. It does not promote or favor any particular religious belief system, nor does it interfere in the internal practices of religious groups.
  • Equality Before the Law: Laïcité ensures that all citizens, regardless of their religious affiliations, are treated equally under the law. No citizen can be granted special privileges or subjected to discrimination based on their religious beliefs.
  • Secular Public Sphere: Laïcité promotes a public sphere where discussions and debates on matters of common concern can take place without religious doctrine dominating the discourse. This fosters an environment where rational argument and evidence-based decision-making can prevail.
Laïcité: Definition of a Theoretical Term

Laïcité is a concept originating in France, encompassing the principle of secularism. It advocates for the separation of religion from government affairs and public institutions. In practice, it ensures that individuals are free to practice their religion privately but prohibits the influence of any specific faith in public policy and governance.

Laïcité: Theorists, Works and Arguments

Absolutely! Here’s a breakdown of key theorists, their works, and the core arguments surrounding laïcité:

Key Theorists and Works
  • Aristide Briand: A central political figure in the drafting and passage of the 1905 Law on the Separation of Churches and the State. His work embodies the ideal of the state remaining neutral in matters of religion.
    • Key Work: His speeches and parliamentary debates concerning the 1905 law.
  • Ferdinand Buisson: A prominent educational reformer and advocate of secularism. He viewed laïcité as fundamental to ensuring freedom of conscience in the public education system.
    • Key Work: Dictionnaire de pédagogie et d’instruction primaire (Dictionary of Pedagogy and Primary Instruction), co-edited by Buisson, offers insights into his views on secular education.
  • Jean Jaurès: Socialist leader who supported laïcité while emphasizing the importance of social justice and religious tolerance.
    • Key Work: Speeches and writings on the relationship between socialism, religion, and the French Republic.
  • Jean Baubérot: Modern sociologist and historian regarded as a leading scholar of laïcité. His work traces its historical development and analyzes its application within contemporary French society.
    • Key Works:
      • Laïcité 1905-2005, entre passion et raison (Laïcité 1905-2005, Between Passion and Reason)
      • Histoire de la laïcité en France (History of Laïcité in France)
Central Arguments

Here’s a breakdown of the primary arguments for and against laïcité:

Arguments FOR Laïcité
  • Guarantees Freedom of Conscience: Protects everyone’s right to choose their faith (or lack thereof) without governmental influence.
  • Ensures Equality: Prevents one religion from dominating public life, ensuring equal treatment of citizens regardless of belief.
  • Promotes Social Cohesion: Creates a neutral public space, potentially reducing religious tensions and fostering a shared sense of national identity.
Arguments AGAINST Laïcité
  • Restricts Religious Expression: Can be seen as impinging on individuals’ rights to publicly express their faith, especially for minority religions.
  • Potential for Discrimination: Implementation could lead to the targeting or exclusion of certain religious groups.
  • Secularism as Dogma: Some argue that laïcité itself risks becoming overly rigid and intolerant, potentially undermining the very tolerance it purports to defend.
Laïcité: Major Characteristics
  • Separation of Church and State: The state holds no official religion and avoids interference in religious matters. This means religious institutions and symbols are generally absent from public spaces and government functions.
  • Religious Neutrality: The government maintains impartiality in matters of faith. No religion receives public funding or preferential treatment.
  • Freedom of Conscience: Individuals are free to practice a religion, change religions, or have no religious affiliation at all. The state protects this right and does not discriminate on the grounds of religious belief.
How Laïcité is Reflected in Literature

French literature often wrestles with the complexities of laïcité, revealing societal tensions and personal dilemmas. Here are a few ways it’s explored:

  • Challenges to Religious Authority: Many authors critique organized religion’s influence on politics and society. Works from Enlightenment philosophers like Voltaire to the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo demonstrate this critical tradition.
  • Themes of Identity and Belonging: Literature often explores characters, particularly immigrants or those from religious minorities, struggling to balance their faith within the context of a secular republic. The novels of Tahar Ben Jelloun exemplify this theme.
  • Exploration of Religion in Private Life: Many writers depict the continued importance of faith in family and community life, even within a secular system. Authors like Leïla Slimani, in her novel Adèle, examine this dynamic.
  • Defense of Secular Values: Some works actively defend laïcité as a bulwark against religious extremism and a guarantor of individual liberty. Essays by figures like Caroline Fourest fall into this category.
Specific Literary Examples
  • Voltaire’s Candide: Satirizes religious hypocrisy and intolerance, advocating for reason and secularism.
  • Emile Zola’s J’accuse…!: Open letter passionately defending a Jewish officer wrongly accused of treason, highlighting the need for a secular justice system free from religious bias.
  • Albert Camus’ The Stranger: Mersault’s atheism and indifference to religious convention challenge societal norms.
  • Michel Houellebecq’s Submission: A controversial novel imagining a France under Islamic rule; sparks debate around laïcité and its role in preserving liberal values.

Note: These are just a few examples. Laïcité is a theme that continues to inspire debate and exploration within contemporary French literature.

Laïcité: Relevance in Literary Theories
Literary TheoryRelevance to Laïcité
PostcolonialismExamines the power dynamics and legacies of colonialism on culture and identity. Laïcité, particularly its historical application in French colonies, can be analyzed as a tool of cultural domination or a potential basis for challenging religious and ethnic hierarchies.
FeminismExplores gender inequality and power structures. Laïcité can be seen as both enabling (providing spaces for women free from religious control) or restrictive (limiting religious expression that might be empowering for women in certain contexts).
MarxismFocuses on class struggle and economic systems. Some critics see laïcité as serving the interests of the ruling class, while others argue for its potential in challenging religiously-rooted social and economic inequalities.
StructuralismAnalyzes underlying systems within texts and cultural phenomena. Laïcité itself can be seen as a structural framework that shapes French society and, by extension, literary expression.
Reader-Response TheoryEmphasizes the reader’s role in creating meaning. A reader’s own religious or secular background heavily influences their interpretation of texts dealing with laïcité.
DeconstructionChallenges the stability of meaning and inherent binaries. Laïcité’s emphasis on the separation of religious and secular can be deconstructed, highlighting its inherent ambiguities and the potential for overlap between the two spheres.
Laïcité: Application in Critiques

Here’s how we can apply the principle of laïcité in critiques of four literary works. I’ve chosen a mix of classic and contemporary examples to showcase the concept’s versatility:

1. Voltaire’s Candide
  • Background: A scathing satire of 18th-century European society, particularly targeting religious dogmatism and optimism.
  • Laïcité Lens: Laïcité serves as the philosophical foundation of Voltaire’s critique. The story’s absurdity highlights the dangers of religious influence over reason and secular governance. Candide’s journey can be read as an argument for the separation of church and state and the importance of individual thought.
2. Tahar Ben Jelloun’s Racism Explained to My Daughter
  • Background: A Moroccan-born French author addressing racism and prejudice in a format aimed at informing a young audience.
  • Laïcité Lens: Laïcité provides a framework for Ben Jelloun’s explanation of equality and tolerance. It underpins his argument that differences of faith or ethnicity should not be grounds for discrimination within a secular republic.
3. Michel Houellebecq’s Submission
  • Background: A controversial novel imagining France after an Islamist political takeover.
  • Laïcité Lens: The novel’s very premise is a direct confrontation with laïcité. It explores the potential collapse of French secularism, sparking debates about freedom of expression, religious identity, and the role of laïcité in maintaining a liberal society.
4. Leïla Slimani’s Lullaby
  • Background: A chilling psychological thriller exploring class anxieties and racial tensions within a Parisian household.
  • Laïcité Lens: While not overt, laïcité informs the context of the story. Differences in religion and cultural background underlie tensions between the white Parisian family and their Moroccan nanny. These tensions are played out in the private sphere, reflecting how laïcité’s ideals can be challenged in everyday life.
Key Points to Consider in a Laïcité-Focused Critique
  • Author Intent: Did the author deliberately engage with themes of secularism?
  • Setting and Society: How does the work’s portrayal of French society reflect (or challenge) laïcité?
  • Symbolism: Examine how secular or religious symbols are used and what they represent within the context of laïcité.
  • Character Choices: Do characters’ religious (or non-religious) identities impact their actions, and how does this relate to a secular society?
Laïcité: Relevant Terms
TermDefinition
SecularismThe broad principle of separation between religion and state affairs.
Religious FreedomThe right to practice, change, or abstain from religion without interference.
Religious NeutralityImpartiality of the state towards different religions.
PluralismAcceptance and coexistence of diverse religious and philosophical viewpoints.
Anti-clericalismOpposition to the influence of religious institutions on public life and politics.
Religious ToleranceAcceptance of religious beliefs or practices that differ from one’s own.
State AtheismThe active promotion of atheism by the government, including the suppression of religion. (Contrasts with laïcité’s focus on neutrality)
Establishment ClauseLegal doctrine (such as the First Amendment in the US) preventing the government from establishing an official religion.
TheocracyA form of government in which religious leaders hold authority and religious doctrine guides law.
MulticulturalismA policy or ideology which recognizes and promotes cultural/religious diversity within a society.

Laïcité: Suggested Readings

  1. Baubérot, Jean. Laïcité 1905-2005, entre passion et raison. Seuil, 2004.
  2. Baubérot, Jean, and Valentine Zuber. A History of Secularism in France. Columbia University Press, 2022.
  3. Bowen, John R. Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space. Princeton University Press, 2008.
  4. Kuru, Ahmet T. Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  5. Laborde, Cécile. Secularism and Liberalism as Twins? Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
  6. Mayeur, Jean-Marie, and Madeleine Rebérioux. The Third Republic from Its Origins to the Great War, 1871-1914. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  7. McGowan, Katharine. French Secularism and the “Islamic Veil Affair”. Routledge, 2016.
  8. Scott, Joan Wallach. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton University Press, 2007.
  9. Warner, Carolyn M. Confessions of an Interest Group: The Catholic Church and Political Parties in Europe. Princeton University Press, 2000.
  10. Willaime, Jean-Paul. Europe and the Religions: The Dialogue between the European Union and the Faiths. Routledge, 2016.

Retroculture in Literature & Literary Theory

Retroculture refers to a cultural phenomenon characterized by a nostalgic revival of past styles, trends, and aesthetics within contemporary society.

Retroculture in Literature & Literary Theory
Retroculture: Etymology/Term, Meanings and Concept

Etymology and Term: The term “retroculture” combines the prefix “retro,” meaning backward or behind, with “culture.” It gained prominence in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, describing a widespread cultural engagement with aesthetics, styles, and trends from the past.

Meanings and Concepts
  • Nostalgia as a Driving Force: Retroculture often stems from a yearning for certain periods, whether rooted in personal memories or a broader cultural idealization of the past. This nostalgia can obscure potential complexities or negative aspects of earlier eras.
  • Revival and Reinterpretation: Retroculture frequently involves the re-emergence of past elements, adapted or recontextualized for contemporary sensibilities.
  • The Role of Consumerism: Retroculture intersects with consumerism, as trends and products from the past are repackaged and marketed with a focus on nostalgic appeal.
  • Identity Formation: Retroculture can serve as a means for individuals and communities to explore and shape their identities through conscious engagement with elements of their cultural heritage.
  • Potential for Critique: In some instances, retroculture functions as a form of cultural commentary, juxtaposing the past with the present to critique contemporary issues or societal trends.
Retroculture: Definition of a Theoretical Term

Retroculture refers to a cultural phenomenon characterized by a nostalgic revival of past styles, trends, and aesthetics within contemporary society. It often involves a selective reinterpretation or idealization of elements from previous decades or eras, seeking to evoke a sense of longing or romanticism for the past. Retroculture manifests in various forms, including fashion, music, design, and media, and serves as a means for individuals or groups to construct identities, challenge dominant cultural norms, or express a longing for a perceived simpler or more authentic time.

Retroculture: Theorists, Works, and Arguments
TheoristWork(s)Arguments
Fredric JamesonPostmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (1991)Argues that retroculture is a symptom of postmodernism’s “depthlessness,” where cultural production relies on pastiche and the recycling of past styles rather than innovation.
Simon ReynoldsRetromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past (2011)Explores the pervasive nature of retroculture in music, fashion, and film, examining the interplay of nostalgia, consumerism, and technological shifts.
Svetlana BoymThe Future of Nostalgia (2001)Differentiates between “restorative” and “reflective” nostalgia, suggesting that retroculture can hold both critical potential and a longing for a simpler, often idealized past.
Umberto EcoTravels in Hyperreality (1986)Analyzes the role of simulation and hyperreality in shaping perceptions of the past. Provides a framework for understanding how retroculture can create romanticized or artificial representations of historical periods.
Linda HutcheonA Theory of Parody (1985)Explores parody as a mechanism through which retroculture reinterprets past cultural products. Argues that irony and self-awareness are often present in retrocultural engagements with earlier styles.
Retroculture: Major Characteristics
  1. Nostalgia-Driven: Retroculture is frequently fueled by yearning for the past. This can be personal nostalgia or a more general romanticization of an era.
    • Literary Reference: Nick Carraway’s longing for the Jazz Age in The Great Gatsby (F. Scott Fitzgerald) embodies this nostalgic sentiment.
  2. Revival and Remix: Retroculture reinvents elements of the past, blending them with modern sensibilities. It’s rarely a straightforward copy.
    • Literary Reference: Wide Sargasso Sea (Jean Rhys) reimagines the story of “mad” Bertha Mason from Jane Eyre, offering a new perspective steeped in Caribbean motifs and a postcolonial lens.
  3. Strong Aesthetic Dimension: Retro trends are often expressed through distinct fashion, music, design, and visual cues.
    • Literary Reference: The Virgin Suicides (Jeffrey Eugenides) uses clothing, music, and interior decoration of the 1970s to evoke a particular suburban mood and atmosphere.
  4. Consumerist Element: Retroculture is often intertwined with commercialism. “Vintage” and “throwback” become marketing tools.
    • Literary Reference: Don DeLillo novels like White Noise satirize consumer culture and its obsession with simulated Americana, including idealized representations of the past.
  5. Ambiguous Interpretations: Retroculture can be either celebratory or critical of the past it references, and sometimes it does both at once.
    • Literary Reference: The Handmaid’s Tale (Margaret Atwood) presents a retro-flavored dystopia with a clear critique of the Puritanical and patriarchal elements it draws upon.
Additional Notes:
  • Technology plays a role – the ease of accessing the past (through old photos, movies, music online) contributes to retroculture’s power.
  • Retroculture exists on a spectrum. It ranges from light pastiche to deep social commentary.
Retroculture: Relevance in Literary Theories
Literary TheoryRelevance of Retroculture
PostmodernismRetroculture is significant in postmodernism due to its emphasis on pastiche, parody, and the blurring of distinctions between high and low culture. Retro references are often used to deconstruct traditional narratives and challenge notions of originality and authenticity. Retroculture’s recycling of past styles and narratives reflects postmodernism’s skepticism towards grand narratives and its celebration of cultural hybridity.
Cultural StudiesRetroculture is examined in cultural studies through the lens of collective memory and cultural nostalgia, exploring how it reflects broader social, political, and economic contexts. Cultural studies may analyze retroculture’s role in constructing and reinforcing particular identities, ideologies, and power structures, as well as its potential for resistance and subversion.
MarxismIn Marxist literary theory, retroculture can be viewed as a form of cultural commodification, where the past is selectively commodified and marketed for consumption by capitalist societies. Retro aesthetics may serve to distract from contemporary social inequalities and perpetuate consumerist ideologies. Marxist analysis of retroculture also considers how it reflects and reproduces class divisions and cultural hegemony.
Feminist TheoryRetroculture intersects with feminist theory by revealing shifting gender norms and representations across different historical periods. Feminist analysis may explore how retroculture reinforces or challenges traditional gender roles, stereotypes, and power dynamics, as well as its implications for women’s agency and empowerment. Retro aesthetics may be critiqued for romanticizing or erasing the struggles of marginalized groups, including women.
Psychoanalytic TheoryRetroculture can be examined through psychoanalytic theory by uncovering unconscious desires and anxieties manifested in nostalgic longing for the past. Psychoanalytic analysis may explore how retroculture functions as a form of cultural regression, offering comfort and security in a chaotic present or projecting fantasies of lost innocence and utopian ideals. Retro aesthetics may serve as a site for exploring individual and collective psychic conflicts and resolutions.

This table provides a brief overview of how retroculture intersects with various literary theories and the different aspects of cultural, social, and psychological analysis within each framework.

Retroculture: Application in Critiques
  1. One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez (Colombia): Retroculture can be applied to critique One Hundred Years of Solitude by examining García Márquez’s portrayal of the cyclical nature of history and the nostalgia for a lost golden age in the fictional town of Macondo. The novel blends magical realism with a nostalgic evocation of Colombia’s past, critiquing the impact of colonialism, modernization, and political turmoil on the region. García Márquez explores how collective memory shapes identity and perpetuates myths of cultural origin, while also warning against the dangers of being trapped in the cycles of history.
  2. Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami (Japan): Retroculture can be applied to critique Norwegian Wood by analyzing Murakami’s use of music, fashion, and cultural references from 1960s Japan to evoke a sense of longing and melancholy. The novel follows the protagonist Toru Watanabe as he navigates love, loss, and existential crisis against the backdrop of student protests and social upheaval. Murakami critiques the romanticization of youth and the illusion of nostalgia, suggesting that the past can never be fully recaptured and that true fulfillment lies in embracing the present moment.
  3. The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov (Russia): Retroculture can be applied to critique The Master and Margarita by examining Bulgakov’s satirical portrayal of Soviet society in the 1930s and its suppression of artistic freedom and religious expression. The novel blends elements of fantasy, satire, and historical fiction, critiquing the totalitarian regime through the lens of retro mythology and folklore. Bulgakov explores how nostalgia for pre-revolutionary Russia and the supernatural can serve as a form of resistance against ideological oppression and censorship.
  4. The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle by Haruki Murakami (Japan): Retroculture can be applied to critique The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle by exploring Murakami’s fusion of contemporary Japanese life with elements of nostalgia and surrealism. The novel follows the protagonist Toru Okada as he embarks on a surreal journey to uncover the mysteries of his past and confront the traumas of war and loss. Murakami critiques the alienation and dislocation of modern society while also celebrating the power of memory and imagination to transcend time and space.

In each of these critiques, retroculture serves as a lens through which to analyze themes of memory, identity, and historical consciousness within the context of foreign literary works. These novels engage with the complexities of nostalgia and the interplay between past and present, inviting readers to reflect on the enduring significance of history in shaping individual and collective experiences.

Retroculture: Relevant Terms
TermConcise Definition
NostalgiaA longing for the past, often with a sense of romanticization or idealization. A driving force behind retroculture.
RevivalThe resurgence of past styles, trends, or cultural elements, often within a contemporary context.
RemixThe reinterpretation and reworking of past aesthetics, fashions, or media, often with a contemporary twist.
PasticheAn artistic work that intentionally imitates the style or character of the work of one or more other artists. Often has a playful or ironic element.
VintageTerm describing objects, styles, or items from a previous era, typically possessing a degree of cultural significance or nostalgic appeal.
AppropriationThe act of borrowing or reusing cultural elements from a different context. Central to how retroculture interacts with the past.
HyperrealityA concept where the distinction between the real and the simulated blurs. Relevant in how retroculture can create idealized, almost ‘more real than real’ versions of the past.
SimulationThe imitation of an object, process, or system with the intention to deceive. Used by theorists to analyze how retroculture can create artificial representations of the past.
ConsumerismThe preoccupation with the acquisition of material goods and their associated cultural meanings. A key aspect of many retro-trends.
IdentityRetroculture can be used to explore personal and collective identities by consciously engaging with elements of cultural heritage.
Retroculture: Suggested Readings
  1. Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Harvard University Press, 1984.
  2. Eco, Umberto. Travels in Hyperreality: Essays. Mariner Books, 1990.
  3. Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press, 1991.
  4. Kammen, Michael G. Mystic Chords of Memory: The Transformation of Tradition in American Culture. Vintage Books, 1993.
  5. Lury, Celia. Consumer Culture. Rutgers University Press, 1996.
  6. Reynolds, Simon. Retro Mania. Faber and Faber, 2011.
  7. Sontag, Susan. On Photography. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977.
  8. Toffler, Alvin. Future Shock. Bantam Books, 1970.
  9. Turner, Graeme. Re-inventing the Media. Routledge, 1993.
  10. Wolfe, Tom. The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1968.

Literary Darwinism in Literature & Critiques

Literary Darwinism refers to a late 19th-century and early 20th-century trend of applying the principles of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to the study of literature.

Literary Darwinism in Literature
Literary Darwinism: Term and Concept
Term

Literary Darwinism refers to a late 19th-century and early 20th-century trend of applying the principles of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to the study of literature. This approach often emphasized themes of competition, survival of the fittest, and the influence of environment on literary works. However, the term is considered largely outdated and problematic due to its oversimplification of both Darwinian principles and the complexities of literary creation.

Concept

Literary Darwinism sought to analyze literature through a lens of biological determinism. It viewed literary texts as products of their social and historical environments, with “superior” works naturally rising to prominence. This approach often led to interpretations that reinforced harmful hierarchies based on race, gender, and class. Additionally, it ignored the role of individual creativity and the complex ways in which literature both reflects and shapes cultural values.

Literary Darwinism: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists

While no single theorist codified Literary Darwinism as a unified movement, figures who contributed to its ideas include:

  • Herbert Spencer: British philosopher who applied evolutionary ideas to society, coining the phrase “survival of the fittest.” His influence led to views of literature progressing towards higher, more complex forms.
  • Hippolyte Taine: French critic who emphasized the deterministic influence of race, environment, and historical moment on literature.
  • American Naturalists: Writers like Stephen Crane, Frank Norris, and Theodore Dreiser, whose works often depict characters shaped by heredity and social forces beyond their control.
Works

Directly theorizing Literary Darwinism is less common than works that implicitly reflect its principles:

  • Emile Zola, Germinal (1885): A novel exploring class struggle and hereditary determinism within a French mining town.
  • **John Griffith London (Jack London), The Call of the Wild (1903): A story about a dog’s survival, often interpreted through a lens of biological determinism.
  • Scholarly Articles: Individual articles analyzed literature through an evolutionary lens, but there was no central text outlining a unified Literary Darwinian theory.
Central Arguments
  • Literature as an Organism: Literary works were seen as evolving similarly to biological organisms, subject to natural selection.
  • Determinism: Literary quality and success were pre-determined by factors like the author’s race, gender, social conditions, or historical era.
  • Focus on Struggle and Survival: Themes of competition, survival, and the harsh realities of life were emphasized in interpretations.
  • Hierarchical Views: Literary Darwinism often reinforced problematic ideas about ‘superior’ cultures or races, viewing literary history as linear progression.
Important Considerations
  • Literary Darwinism is largely rejected: Today, it’s mostly studied as a historical phenomenon, not a valid critical approach. Its reductive interpretations and potential for harmful social implications make it problematic.
  • Influences linger: Some evolutionary concepts can be applied to literature in more nuanced ways (see Evolutionary Literary Criticism), but with crucial differences from the deterministic models of Literary Darwinism.
Literary Darwinism: Key Principals
Key PrincipleDefinitionLiterary References
AdaptationLiterature reflects adaptations to environmental challenges and serves evolutionary purposes.Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species”
Natural SelectionLiterary works evolve through natural selection, with successful traits passed down over time.Joseph Carroll’s “Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature”
ReproductionSuccessful literary themes, motifs, and narratives replicate and spread across cultures.Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”
FitnessLiterary texts that resonate with universal human experiences are considered more “fit.”William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”
SurvivalStories that resonate with readers and endure across generations have survival value.Homer’s “The Odyssey”
AdaptabilityLiterature adapts to cultural changes, reflecting shifts in societal norms and values.Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice”
Genetic DriftRandom changes and variations in literary traditions influence the evolution of literature.James Joyce’s “Ulysses”
Cultural EvolutionLiterary evolution is shaped by cultural factors, including technology, politics, and beliefs.George Orwell’s “1984”
InheritanceLiterary traditions inherit and pass down elements from previous works, shaping future texts.Virgil’s “The Aeneid”
Fitness LandscapeThe literary landscape consists of peaks (successful works) and valleys (less successful ones).F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby”
Literary Darwinism: How to Use in Literary Critiques

Steps for Addressing Literary Darwinism

  1. Identify Elements: Look for signs of Literary Darwinist thinking in the text you’re analyzing:
    • Do characters seem driven primarily by biological urges or social forces beyond their control?
    • Is there a focus on themes of competition, survival, or harsh deterministic environments?
    • Are any cultures/races presented as inherently “superior” to others in a way that suggests a hierarchy?
  2. Consider Context:
    • When was the work written? Literary Darwinism was most prominent in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
    • Research the author’s background – were they influenced by the scientific and social theories of the time?
  3. Critique, Don’t Apply: Instead of using Literary Darwinism as your analysis lens, focus on critiquing its presence.
    • How do these deterministic views limit interpretations of the characters and their actions?
    • Does the text reinforce harmful stereotypes or social hierarchies?
    • Discuss how a more nuanced reading of the work challenges the Literary Darwinist ideas it might superficially suggest.
**Case Study: Jack London’s The Call of the Wild **
  • Darwinian Elements: The novel focuses on Buck the dog’s survival, his reversion to primal instincts, and themes of competition in the harsh Yukon environment. A superficial reading could emphasize biological determinism.
  • Context: London was familiar with the ideas of Herbert Spencer and influenced by the harsh realities of the Klondike Gold Rush.
  • Critique: While the novel has Darwinian elements, it can be read more productively as a commentary on the complex relationship between nature and nurture, and the dangers of viewing “civilization” in simplistic hierarchical terms.
Important Reminders
  • Literary Darwinism is flawed; your critique should expose those flaws rather than validate them.
  • Many works with Darwinian themes can be analyzed compellingly through other critical lenses (social critique, environmental studies, etc.).
Literary Darwinism: Criticism Against It
  • Reductionism: Critics argue that Literary Darwinism reduces complex human experiences and creations to simplistic biological or evolutionary explanations.
  • Oversimplification: Critics contend that it oversimplifies the rich tapestry of human culture by attempting to fit all literary phenomena into a narrow evolutionary framework.
  • Ignoring Cultural Context: Critics argue that Literary Darwinism often disregards the cultural, historical, and sociopolitical contexts in which literary works are created and interpreted.
  • Lack of Empirical Evidence: Critics claim that many assertions made by Literary Darwinists lack empirical evidence and rely heavily on speculation.
  • Neglect of Individual Agency: Critics argue that Literary Darwinism neglects the role of individual agency, creativity, and intentionality in the production and reception of literature.
  • Ethical Concerns: Some critics express ethical concerns about reducing human creativity and cultural products to mere byproducts of evolutionary processes, potentially devaluing human experience and expression.
  • Oversights in Evolutionary Psychology: Critics point out limitations and oversights in the application of evolutionary psychology principles to literary analysis, highlighting the complexity of human behavior and cultural evolution.

Literary Darwinism: Key Terms

Key TermDefinition
AdaptationLiterary works evolve to suit environmental and cultural conditions.
Natural SelectionSuccessful literary traits are preserved and passed down over time.
ReproductionSuccessful literary themes, motifs, and narratives are replicated across cultures.
FitnessLiterary texts resonate with universal human experiences, making them more “fit.”
SurvivalEnduring stories across generations possess survival value.
AdaptabilityLiterature adapts to changing cultural norms and values.
Genetic DriftRandom changes influence the evolution of literary traditions.
Cultural EvolutionLiterature evolves in response to cultural shifts, including technology and ideology.
InheritanceLiterary traditions inherit and pass down elements from previous works.
Fitness LandscapeLiterary landscape consists of successful (peaks) and less successful (valleys) works.
Literary Darwinism: Suggested Readings
  1. Buss, David M. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. Basic Books, 2016.
  2. Carroll, Joseph. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. Routledge, 2004.
  3. Gottschall, Jonathan. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Mariner Books, 2012.
  4. Miller, Geoffrey. The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. Anchor Books, 2001.
  5. Nesse, Randolph M., and Williams, George C. Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. Vintage Books, 1996.
  6. Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.
  7. Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Penguin Books, 2003.
  8. Wilson, Edward O. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. Vintage Books, 1999.
  9. Wilson, Edward O. On Human Nature. Harvard University Press, 2004.

Indigenous Narrative in Literature

The term “Indigenous Narrative” broadly refers to the diverse forms of storytelling, oral histories, and artistic expressions that originate from and reflect the worldviews of Indigenous peoples.

Indigenous Narrative in Literature
Indigenous Narrative: Term and Concept
Term

The term “Indigenous Narrative” broadly refers to the diverse forms of storytelling, oral histories, and artistic expressions that originate from and reflect the worldviews of Indigenous peoples. These narratives can take many forms, including creation myths, traditional songs, personal histories, fiction, poetry, and visual arts. Indigenous narratives are critical tools for preserving cultural knowledge, transmitting values across generations, and expressing resistance to colonialism.

Concept

Indigenous narratives offer a unique lens through which to understand the world. These narratives often emphasize themes of interconnectedness with the natural world, respect for ancestors, and the importance of community. They may contain complex symbolism, metaphors, and storytelling techniques that differ from Western literary traditions. Indigenous narratives are not simply entertainment; they embody living histories, philosophies, and a profound connection to land and identity.

Indigenous Narrative: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Key Theorists
  • Gerald Vizenor (Anishinaabe): Prominent figure in Indigenous literary studies. Works include:
    • Manifest Manners: Narratives on Postindian Survivance (1994): Introduces the concept of “survivance” – active resistance and creative presence in the face of colonial narratives.
    • Fugitive Poses: Native American Indian Scenes of Absence and Presence (1998): Explores how Indigenous stories reclaim space and counter colonial erasure.
  • Thomas King (Cherokee): Celebrated novelist, essayist, and scholar. Works include:
    • The Truth About Stories: A Native Narrative (2003): Collection of lectures playfully weaving Indigenous oral tradition with literary analysis.
    • Green Grass, Running Water (1993): Novel that blends myth, history, and contemporary Indigenous experiences in non-linear, subversive ways.
  • LeAnne Howe (Choctaw): Author and theorist. Works include:
    • Choctalking on Other Realities (2013): Examines the power of storytelling, tribalography (Indigenous ways of writing), and how Indigenous narratives work both within and against Western forms.
Foundational Works
  • Traditional Indigenous Stories: The vast and diverse oral traditions of Indigenous peoples worldwide are the foundation of Indigenous narrative. Many have been transcribed and published, often through the work of Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars.
  • **N. Scott Momaday, The Way to Rainy Mountain (1968): ** A seminal work that blends Kiowa oral history, personal reflection, and poetic prose.
  • Leslie Marmon Silko, Ceremony (1977): A powerful novel integrating Laguna Pueblo traditions and storytelling within a story of healing and resilience.
Central Arguments
  • Decolonization of Knowledge: Indigenous narratives challenge Western dominance in knowledge production and assert the validity of Indigenous ways of knowing and storytelling.
  • Power of Story in Identity and Resistance: Indigenous narratives can preserve cultural memory, transmit values, and act as tools for resistance against colonialism and cultural suppression.
  • Distinctive Aesthetics: Indigenous narratives often have storytelling structures, symbolism, and perspectives that differ from Western literary traditions.
  • Survivance and Adaptation: Indigenous narratives are not static but demonstrate resilience, adaptation, and innovation, reflecting the ongoing lived experiences of Indigenous communities.
Indigenous Narrative: Key Principals
  1. Oral Tradition: Many Indigenous cultures have a strong tradition of passing down knowledge, stories, and cultural values orally from generation to generation. These narratives often involve storytelling as a central means of preserving cultural heritage. One literary reference that exemplifies this principle is “The Walum Olum,” a creation narrative of the Lenape people, which was originally transmitted orally before being transcribed.
  2. Interconnectedness: Indigenous narratives frequently emphasize the interconnectedness of all living beings and the environment. This interconnectedness is often portrayed through stories that highlight the relationships between humans, animals, plants, and the land. An example of this can be found in Leslie Marmon Silko’s novel “Ceremony,” where the protagonist Tayo learns about the interconnectedness of all things through his interactions with nature and traditional ceremonies.
  3. Spirituality: Many Indigenous narratives incorporate spiritual elements, reflecting the belief systems and cosmologies of Indigenous cultures. These narratives often explore themes such as the relationship between the physical and spiritual worlds, the significance of ceremonies and rituals, and the connections between humans and higher powers or deities. Sherman Alexie’s “The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven” contains stories that blend realism with spiritual elements, depicting the complex intersection of modern Native American life and traditional beliefs.
  4. Respect for the Land: Indigenous narratives frequently emphasize the importance of respecting and caring for the natural world. These narratives often depict humans as stewards of the land, emphasizing the need for harmony and balance in the relationship between humans and nature. Louise Erdrich’s novel “Tracks” portrays the Anishinaabe people’s deep connection to the land and their efforts to protect it from exploitation and destruction.
  5. Community and Collective Identity: Indigenous narratives often highlight the importance of community and collective identity. These narratives often center around the experiences of Indigenous communities, exploring themes such as family ties, communal responsibility, and the preservation of cultural traditions. Thomas King’s “Green Grass, Running Water” weaves together multiple narratives to portray the interconnected lives of the characters and the importance of community in shaping individual identities.

These principles and literary references offer insight into the rich and diverse storytelling traditions of Indigenous cultures, highlighting the values, beliefs, and perspectives that inform Indigenous narratives.

Indigenous Narrative: How to Use in Literary Critiques
  1. Identify the Work’s Context:
    • Is the author Indigenous? If not, how does the work engage with Indigenous themes or characters?
    • Explore the history and cultural context relevant to the work. Be cautious of applying generalizing assumptions to specific Indigenous groups.
  2. Analyze Narrative Elements:
    • Structure: Is the narrative linear or cyclical? Does it reflect Indigenous oral traditions?
    • Symbolism and Metaphor: What symbols are used, and how do they relate to Indigenous cultural knowledge and worldviews?
    • Character Archetypes: Are there characters that resonate with traditional Indigenous figures (trickster figures, elders, etc.)?
  3. Consider Indigenous Theoretical Concepts:
    • Survivance: Does the work reflect themes of resilience, resistance, and creative adaptation in the face of colonialism?
    • Oral Tradition: Are storytelling techniques reminiscent of oral traditions (e.g., repetition, digressions, non-linearity)?
    • Connection to Land: How is the relationship between people and the natural world portrayed?
  4. Respect Cultural Specificity:
    • Do your research! Understand the specific cultural context of the Indigenous group represented (if applicable).
    • Avoid imposing generalizations or pan-Indigenous interpretations.
    • Acknowledge your position as a reader and how it may differ from the intended audience of an Indigenous work.
**Case Study: Leslie Marmon Silko’s Ceremony **
  • Context: Silko is Laguna Pueblo, and the novel draws heavily on Laguna traditions and creation myths.
  • Narrative Elements: The structure is fragmented and cyclical, mirroring Pueblo storytelling and a worldview of time as spiraling rather than linear.
  • Indigenous Concepts: Themes of healing, restoration, and reconnection to land and community reflect ideas of survivance within a post-colonial context.
  • Respectful Approach: A critique shouldn’t try to definitively “decode” Laguna symbolism, but instead, appreciate its complexity and the cultural knowledge embedded within the work.
Important Things to Remember
  • Indigenous Narrative is not monolithic: There are diverse approaches and traditions within Indigenous storytelling.
  • Center Indigenous voices: Seek out scholarship and critiques by Indigenous scholars for deeper insights.
  • Ethical engagement: Your analysis should show sensitivity to the cultural context and avoid appropriative interpretations.
Indigenous Narrative: Criticism Against It
  1. Authenticity and Representation: Some critics argue that Indigenous narratives, particularly those written or interpreted by non-Indigenous authors, may not accurately represent Indigenous cultures, beliefs, and experiences. This criticism highlights concerns about cultural appropriation and the potential for misrepresentation or stereotyping.
  2. Stereotyping and Essentialism: Indigenous narratives have sometimes been criticized for perpetuating stereotypes or essentializing Indigenous identities, reducing diverse cultures and experiences to simplistic or monolithic portrayals. This criticism emphasizes the need for nuanced and multifaceted representations of Indigenous peoples and communities.
  3. Marginalization and Erasure: Indigenous narratives have historically been marginalized within mainstream literary and academic circles, leading to a lack of visibility and recognition for Indigenous authors and stories. Critics argue that this marginalization contributes to the erasure of Indigenous voices and perspectives from the broader cultural landscape.
  4. Colonial Influences: Some critics argue that Indigenous narratives have been shaped and influenced by colonial processes, including the imposition of Western literary forms, languages, and aesthetics. This criticism highlights the ongoing impact of colonialism on Indigenous storytelling traditions and the need to decolonize literary representations.
  5. Commercialization and Exploitation: Indigenous narratives, particularly those that achieve commercial success, have been criticized for their potential to be commodified and exploited for profit by non-Indigenous individuals or institutions. This criticism raises concerns about cultural appropriation, intellectual property rights, and the ethical responsibilities of authors and publishers.
  6. Interpretation and Ownership: Indigenous narratives often involve complex oral traditions and cultural protocols that may not easily translate into written form. Critics argue that the interpretation and dissemination of Indigenous stories by non-Indigenous individuals or institutions can raise questions of ownership, authority, and accountability.
  7. Political Instrumentalization: Indigenous narratives have sometimes been co-opted or instrumentalized for political purposes, either by Indigenous activists seeking to advance specific agendas or by non-Indigenous actors seeking to tokenize or instrumentalize Indigenous voices for their own ends. This criticism underscores the need for Indigenous narratives to be treated with respect and integrity, rather than being exploited for political gain.
Indigenous Narrative: Key Terms
Key TermDefinition
Oral TraditionTransmission of cultural knowledge through spoken word across generations.
InterconnectednessBelief in the mutual dependence of all living beings and the environment.
SpiritualityCultural beliefs and practices connecting individuals with the spiritual realm.
Land StewardshipResponsible management and care for the land, emphasizing sustainability.
SovereigntyInherent authority and self-governance rights of Indigenous peoples.
CeremonyRituals with cultural, spiritual, and communal significance.
Ancestral KnowledgeWisdom passed down from ancestors, including cultural and ecological insights.
Cultural RevitalizationEfforts to preserve and reclaim Indigenous languages, traditions, and arts.
Indigenous ResilienceCapacity to endure and adapt in the face of historical trauma and oppression.
Land-Based LearningEducation through direct engagement with the land, emphasizing traditional knowledge.
Indigenous Narrative: Suggested Readings
  1. Battiste, Marie, and James (Sa’ke’j) Youngblood Henderson. Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: A Global Challenge. Purich Publishing Ltd., 2000.
  2. Coulthard, Glen Sean. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
  3. Green, Joyce, editor. Indigena: Contemporary Native Perspectives. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1992.
  4. King, Thomas, Cheryl Calver, and Helen Hoy, editors. The Native Critics Collective: An Anthology of Critical Essays. Theytus Books, 2003.
  5. Lyons, Scott Richard. X-Marks: Native Signatures of Assent. University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
  6. Momaday, N. Scott. The Man Made of Words: Essays, Stories, Passages. St. Martin’s Griffin, 1998.
  7. Simpson, Leanne Betasamosake. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance. University of Minnesota Press, 2017.
  8. Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. “Decolonization is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-40.
  9. Vizenor, Gerald, editor. Narrative Chance: Postmodern Discourse on Native American Indian Literatures. University of New Mexico Press, 1989.
  10. Womack, Craig S. Red on Red: Native American Literary Separatism. University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

Gender Performativity Theory in Literature

Gender performativity theory destabilizes the notion of gender as a fixed, biological essence. Instead, it posits that gender is a fluid and dynamic construction produced through reiterated acts.

Gender Performativity Theory in Literature
Gender Performativity Theory: Term and Concept
Term

The term “gender performativity” in gender performativity theory rose to prominence within feminist and queer theory following its articulation by philosopher Judith Butler in her seminal work Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1990). Butler drew upon existing theories of performativity in linguistics and philosophy, specifically J.L. Austin’s concept of speech acts. In the context of gender, performativity shifts the focus from an assumed innate gender identity to the actions and behaviors an individual engages in to signal their gender.

Concept

Gender performativity theory destabilizes the notion of gender as a fixed, biological essence. Instead, it posits that gender is a fluid and dynamic construction produced through reiterated acts, stylized behaviors, and social cues. These “performances” are not mere expressions of an inner gendered self. Rather, they create the very illusion of a stable gender identity. By emphasizing the repetitive and constructed nature of gender expression, Butler challenges traditional gender binaries and the power structures they uphold, opening up possibilities for more diverse and flexible understandings of gender.

Gender Performativity Theory: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Key Theorists
  • Judith Butler: The foremost figure in gender performativity theory. Her groundbreaking works include:
    • Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1990): Butler’s most famous work, where she lays the foundation of performativity theory and how it deconstructs the concept of gender as fixed and inherent.
    • Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex (1993): Explores how the concept of the material body itself is shaped by social discourse.
  • Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick: A key figure in queer theory whose work intersects with Butler’s. Works include:
    • Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (1985): Examines patterns of male relationships and power within literature.
    • Epistemology of the Closet (1990): Explores the construction of sexuality and its impact on identity formation.
Foundational Works
  • J.L Austin: Philosopher of language.
    • How to Do Things With Words (1962): Austin’s concept of speech acts (performative utterances) provided a theoretical basis for Butler’s understanding of gender as produced through performance.
  • Michel Foucault: Philosopher and historian.
    • Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1975): Foucault’s analysis of power, discipline, and how institutions shape subjectivity informed Butler’s understanding of the regulatory power of social norms in shaping gender performances.
Central Arguments
  • Gender is not innate: Gender is not a biological given but rather a social construct produced through repeated actions, behaviors, and social expectations.
  • Performance creates identity: The “performance” of gender precedes and creates the illusion of an inner, essential gender core – one does not have a gender that they are expressing, but gender identity is formed through repeated performances.
  • Subversion of binaries: Performativity theory challenges the rigid binary of male/female and the social structures that uphold it, opening up possibilities for more fluid and diverse gender expressions.
  • Power and regulation: Gender norms are not neutral but serve to maintain power structures. By exposing the performative nature of gender, Butler highlights how these norms can be challenged and subverted.
Gender Performativity Theory: Key Principals
Key Principles
  • Gender as Performance, Not Essence: Gender isn’t something you are, it’s something you do. Literary examples:
    • Shakespeare’s cross-dressing comedies (like Twelfth Night): Characters disguising themselves as the opposite gender highlight the performative nature of gender roles and expectations.
    • Virginia Woolf’s Orlando: A protagonist who lives centuries, shifting between male and female genders, destabilizes notions of fixed gender identity.
  • Repetition and Citation: Gender norms are reinforced through repeated performances that cite an idealized (but non-existent) original. Literary examples:
    • Fairy tales: The repeated tropes of damsels in distress and heroic princes perpetuate restrictive gender roles.
    • Jane Austen’s novels: Societal pressure on women to perform femininity that signifies marriageability.
  • The Body as Inscribed by Power: The material body itself is not outside of discourse but is shaped by social norms and expectations. Literary examples:
    • Gothic literature: Female bodies portrayed as fragile, threatened, in need of male protection.
    • Toni Morrison’s Beloved: Explores how the trauma of slavery is physically and psychologically inscribed on the bodies of Black women.
  • Subversive Potential: By making the performative nature of gender visible, it can be disrupted and challenged. Literary examples:
    • Characters in drag or otherwise flouting gender norms: These become acts of defiance against restrictive expectations.
    • Modernist and Postmodernist Literature: Fragmentation of identity challenges ideas of a fixed gendered self.

Important Note: It’s crucial to remember that not every literary instance of cross-dressing or gender ambiguity is automatically an endorsement of gender performativity. Some works might reinforce rather than disrupt traditional gender constructs. Careful analysis is key!

Gender Performativity Theory: How to Use in Literary Critiques

Here’s a guide on applying Gender Performativity Theory to literary critiques, along with a simplified case study:

Steps for Using Gender Performativity in Literary Critiques
  1. Identify Gender Performances: Look for instances in the text where characters consciously or unconsciously “perform” their gender. Consider:
    • Clothing and appearance
    • Speech patterns and mannerisms
    • Roles characters play (mother, warrior, lover, etc.)
    • How characters interact with others based on gendered expectations
  2. Question the “Naturalness”: Analyze how the text presents these performances. Are they treated as essential and unchanging, or is there a hint they are constructed?
    • Does the text reinforce traditional gender roles or challenge them?
    • Are there characters who defy expectations? How does the text treat them?
  3. Examine Power Structures: Consider how gender performances are tied to power dynamics within the text.
    • Who benefits from upholding traditional gender roles?
    • Are there characters whose gender expressions give them more or less agency?
    • How does the text treat characters who challenge gender norms?
  4. Look for Subversions: Identify moments where the text undermines or exposes the performative nature of gender.
    • Are there instances of deliberate gender-bending or characters who refuse their assigned roles?
    • Does the text highlight the artificiality of gender constructs?
**Case Study: Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night **
  • Gender Performances: Viola disguises herself as a man (Cesario), Olivia falls in love with this male persona, Orsino is attracted to the feminine side of Cesario.
  • Questioning “Naturalness”: The play highlights the fluidity of gender and how easily appearances can deceive. Love for Cesario calls into question traditional notions of heterosexual attraction.
  • Power Structures: Viola gains more agency disguised as a man, yet is also constrained by her assumed gender identity. Olivia’s power as a woman of status is limited by societal expectations of female behavior.
  • Subversions: The comedic chaos caused by gender confusion exposes the absurdity of rigid gender roles. The final resolution (Viola revealing her true identity) hints at the possibility of greater flexibility in gender expression.
Remember:
  • Not every text will be equally rich for this analysis.
  • Gender performativity is just one lens among many you can apply in a literary critique.
  • Your analysis should always be grounded in close textual evidence.
Gender Performativity Theory: Criticism Against It

Here’s a breakdown of some of the main criticisms leveled against Gender Performativity Theory:

  • Neglect of Material Reality: Critics argue that Butler’s emphasis on the discursive construction of gender risks downplaying the material realities of lived experience. These include things like physical differences between bodies, unequal access to resources based on gender, and the very real violence directed at people due to their gender.
  • Overemphasis on Agency: Some critics suggest that performativity theory overstates the individual’s ability to subvert gender norms. Social structures, inequalities, and ingrained cultural beliefs heavily constrain this freedom of performance, especially for marginalized groups.
  • The Problem of the Pre-Discursive Subject: Butler argues that there’s no essential “self” that exists prior to gender performance. However, critics note this leaves little room for understanding how individuals experience and navigate the constraints of assigned gender roles, requiring a degree of self-awareness and agency that performativity theory struggles to accommodate.
  • Lack of Political Strategy: Some scholars argue that while performativity theory effectively deconstructs traditional gender categories, it provides limited guidance on how to build a transformative feminist or queer political movement, ultimately focusing on individual subversion rather than collective change.
  • Risks of Appropriation Ideas of gender fluidity, while liberating, can paradoxically be appropriated by conservative forces to undermine the rights of transgender people. For instance, some argue that womanhood is no longer an identity based on lived experience, but a performance anyone can imitate.
Important Considerations
  • These criticisms don’t invalidate Gender Performativity Theory entirely. It remains a valuable tool for understanding how social forces shape gender.
  • Many of these criticisms have led to productive dialogue and refinements of feminist and queer theory over time.
  • Butler herself has acknowledged some limitations and responded to critics in subsequent works.
Gender Performativity Theory: Key Terms
Key TermDefinition
PerformativityGender is not inherent but enacted through repeated behaviors and actions.
NormativitySocietal norms dictating acceptable gender expressions.
DiscourseLanguage and cultural systems constructing and maintaining gender identities.
SubversionChallenging dominant gender norms through resistance.
DragTheatrical gender performance exposing its artificiality.
HeteronormativityAssumption of heterosexuality as the norm, reinforcing binary gender notions.
QueerChallenges fixed gender and sexual categories, embracing diversity.
ParodyHumorous critique of traditional gender roles.
AgencyIndividual capacity to shape gender identity within societal constraints.
Performativity of SexualityExtension of gender performativity theory to sexual identity, highlighting constructed nature of sexuality.
Gender Performativity Theory: Suggested Readings
  1. Barker, Meg-John, and Julia Scheele. Queer: A Graphic History. Icon Books, 2016.
  2. Bornstein, Kate. Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women, and the Rest of Us. Routledge, 1994.
  3. Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Routledge, 1993.
  4. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
  5. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. Basic Books, 2000.
  6. Halberstam, Jack. Female Masculinity. Duke University Press, 1998.
  7. Kessler, Suzanne J., and Wendy McKenna. Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. University of Chicago Press, 1978.
  8. Meyerowitz, Joanne. How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States. Harvard University Press, 2002.
  9. Nestle, Joan, Clare Howell, and Riki Wilchins, editors. GenderQueer: Voices from Beyond the Sexual Binary. Alyson Books, 2002.
  10. Stryker, Susan. Transgender History: The Roots of Today’s Revolution. Seal Press, 2008.