Theory Article Summaries Archives - Page 48 of 66

“The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

Introduction: “The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

“The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1982 in the New Left Review journal, holds significant importance in literature and literary theory due to its provocative exploration of the decline of literary criticism in the late 20th century. Eagleton, a renowned literary theorist and Fellow of Wadham College, Oxford, argues that criticism has become increasingly marginalized and irrelevant in a postmodern era dominated by consumerism and cultural relativism. His essay challenges the prevailing assumptions about the role of criticism and offers a provocative vision for its future.

Summary of “The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

The Dilemma of Socialist Literature Teaching

Teaching Literature as Politically Relevant: Eagleton questions the political relevance of teaching literature during global capitalist crises, as most literature teachers did not choose their subject for political reasons but because of enjoyment.

Two Traditions in Socialist Thought on Literature: There are two traditions in socialist thought regarding literature:
- Humanistic/Utopian: This tradition, including figures like Marx, Engels, and Adorno, argues that literature is relevant because it can restore creative capacities oppressed by capitalism.
- Negative Hermeneutics: The second tradition, including critics like Plekhanov and Macherey, sees literature as a tool to demystify ideological contradictions.

The Challenge of Combining Both Traditions

Difficulty in Combining Positive and Negative Approaches: While theoretically possible, Eagleton explains that combining the two traditions in practice seems forced. If the goal is to demystify ideology, it seems odd to choose literature over more immediate forms of ideological discourse like advertisements or political speeches.

Questioning the Political Role of Literature

Literature’s Political Defense is Flawed: Eagleton suggests that defending literature politically is increasingly challenging, as literature appears disconnected from the lives of most people. This disconnection calls into question whether literature can genuinely serve as a vehicle for political transformation.

Redefining the Role of Literary Criticism

From Literature to Cultural Studies: Eagleton advocates for a shift from the traditional study of literature to a broader concept of “cultural studies,” which would include the analysis of ideologies, feminism, discourse, and media such as film and psychoanalysis. This shift acknowledges that literature is only one part of a broader cultural and ideological framework.
- Quotation: “Literature is the sign for that space because at the moment we have no other term: ‘cultural studies’ is certainly better.”

The Crisis of Literary Studies

Literary Studies as a Non-Subject: Eagleton argues that literary studies do not have a unified method or object. The variety of methods, from biographical analysis to linguistic techniques, reveals the lack of coherence in the field.
- Quotation: “Methodologically speaking, literary studies are a non-subject.”
Philology vs. Humanism: Literary studies have historically been split between the rigorous analysis of texts (philology) and the broader humanistic approach inherited from figures like Arnold and Leavis, leading to an ideological conflict within the discipline.

The Failure of Positivism in Literary Criticism

Positivism and Humanism in Literary Criticism: Literary criticism has often tried to blend empiricism with idealism. Figures like Leavis, Frye, and New Critics sought to marry rigorous analysis with humanistic values, though this approach ultimately led to contradictions and a crisis within the field.

The Illusion of Literary Unity

No Unity in Object or Method: Eagleton argues that there is no stable object (i.e., “literature”) or method that unites literary studies. What defines literature is often subjective, based on arbitrary decisions about what is “well written” or “valuable.”
- Quotation: “The unity of the object is every bit as illusory as the unity of the method.”

The Political End of Literary Criticism

Rhetoric as a Replacement for Literary Criticism: Eagleton proposes replacing literary criticism with the study of rhetoric, defined as the analysis of how discourse produces effects in the social and ideological realm. This shift aligns criticism with political goals, analyzing all forms of discourse, from bus tickets to TV advertisements.
- Quotation: “Our present aim should be to abolish ‘literary criticism’ and revive rhetoric in its place.”
Rhetoric as a Tool for Political Transformation: For Eagleton, the ultimate purpose of studying discourse is to understand and challenge its role in maintaining power structures, contributing to the broader goal of political transformation.

Conclusion: Political Transformation Through Discourse

Literature’s Role in Ideological Critique: Eagleton suggests that instead of viewing literary criticism as an isolated practice, it should be incorporated into broader political critique. The study of discourse, whether literary or otherwise, should focus on its political and ideological effects, with the aim of contributing to revolutionary culture.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Term/Concept	Explanation
Humanistic/Utopian Tradition	A tradition in socialist thought that views literature as politically relevant because it can help restore creative capacities oppressed by capitalism.
Negative Hermeneutics	A critical approach that uses literature to expose and demystify ideological contradictions, viewing literature as a tool for ideological critique.
Demystification	The process of revealing and critiquing hidden ideologies within cultural products (like literature) that support capitalist or bourgeois society.
Philology	The study of texts through linguistic, historical, and textual criticism, often seen as a more rigorous, technical, and professional approach to literature.
Bourgeois Humanism	A tradition in literary studies, particularly associated with figures like Arnold and Leavis, emphasizing the humanistic and moral dimensions of literature.
Positivism	An empirical approach that seeks to apply scientific methods to literary criticism, aiming for objective and systematic analysis.
Rhetoric	Eagleton advocates for reviving rhetoric, the study of how discourse (any form of communication) produces effects, linking it to the analysis of power and ideology.
Discourse	Broadly refers to any form of communication (literature, film, advertisements, etc.), focusing on its ideological effects and the ways it constructs social relations.
Cultural Studies	A proposed replacement for traditional literary studies, encompassing a broader analysis of cultural practices, ideologies, and discourses beyond just literature.
Ideology Critique	The analysis of how cultural products, including literature, reinforce or challenge dominant ideologies, often used in Marxist criticism.
Liberal Humanism	A tradition in literary criticism focused on the moral, ethical, and humanizing effects of literature, often criticized for its idealistic or abstract approach to literature.
Structuralism	A theoretical approach that analyzes cultural phenomena (including literature) through the underlying structures and systems (such as language or signs) that shape them.
Signifying Practices	Refers to the ways in which signs, symbols, and discourses create meaning within cultural and ideological contexts.
Performative	A term from speech act theory (introduced by Austin), focusing on how discourse not only describes the world but also acts to produce effects in the world.

Contribution of “The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

Critique of Traditional Literary Studies

Challenges the Unity of Literary Studies: Eagleton argues that literary studies lack a coherent method or object, making them a “non-subject” in academic discourse.
- Quotation: “Methodologically speaking, literary studies are a non-subject.”
Questions the Relevance of Literature in Ideological Critique: Eagleton critiques the idea that literature, especially “high” literature, is the best tool for ideological critique in a capitalist society.
- Quotation: “Why lay bare the operations of ideology in D. H. Lawrence rather than in television advertisements, women’s magazines, and John Locke?”

Shift from Literature to Cultural Studies

Proposes Expanding Literary Criticism into Cultural Studies: Eagleton suggests broadening the field to encompass other signifying practices like film, advertisements, and everyday life, calling for a shift to “cultural studies.”
- Quotation: “‘Literature’ is the sign for that space because at the moment we have no other term: ‘cultural studies’ is certainly better.”

Revival of Rhetoric as a Critical Tool

Advocates for the Return of Rhetoric: Eagleton calls for the revival of rhetoric, not just as the study of literary devices but as an analysis of how any discourse produces social and ideological effects.
- Quotation: “Our present aim should be to abolish ‘literary criticism’ and revive rhetoric in its place.”

Politicization of Literary Criticism

Promotes Politically Engaged Criticism: Eagleton emphasizes the need for literary criticism to be explicitly political, aligning itself with broader social and revolutionary goals.
- Quotation: “It is a unity not of discourses or objects but of intentional practices… It is a question, not of what we do to ‘literature’ or what ‘literature’ does to us, but of what all this doing is for in the first place.”

Criticism of Humanist and Positivist Approaches

Critiques the Humanist and Positivist Blending in Literary Criticism: Eagleton critiques the hybrid of idealism and positivism found in much of modern literary criticism, particularly in the works of figures like Leavis and Frye.
- Quotation: “Leavis and Richards yoked the distressing vagueness of Arnoldian humanism to the thorough business of technical analysis.”

Destabilization of the Literary Canon

Questions the Definition of “Literature” as a Distinct Object: Eagleton destabilizes the idea of literature as a unified, inherently valuable object, arguing that the categorization of literature is socially and ideologically constructed.
- Quotation: “You have a choice between maintaining the increasingly implausible thesis that there is indeed an inherently definable object named Literature… or of frankly conceding that they have something in common because you and your friends have decided that they do.”

Pluralistic Approach to Discourse Analysis

Advocates for Methodological Pluralism in Criticism: Eagleton promotes a pluralistic approach to the study of discourse, allowing for various methods as long as they contribute to the political goal of ideological critique.
- Quotation: “Rhetorical critics are unashamed pluralists: anything which contributes to the goal of political transformation is acceptable.”

Examples of Critiques Through “The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Critique Through Eagleton’s Framework
D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers	Critique through Negative Hermeneutics: Instead of focusing on its literary qualities, Eagleton would argue for using Sons and Lovers to reveal the ideological contradictions in Lawrence’s representation of family and individual desire. This novel could be seen as crystallizing middle-class anxieties around sexuality and social mobility under capitalism. Quotation: “Why lay bare the operations of ideology in D. H. Lawrence rather than in television advertisements, women’s magazines, and John Locke?”
William Blake’s Songs of Innocence and Experience	Critique through Utopian-Humanistic Tradition: Blake’s poetry, particularly in Songs of Innocence and Experience, could be analyzed as an expression of the human spirit’s creative potential, oppressed by industrial capitalism. Eagleton would likely see value in Blake’s visionary literature for restoring awareness of human capacities that capitalism represses. Quotation: “Literature is politically relevant because it can restore to us that sense of creative capacities repressed by capitalism and realisable under socialism.”
Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice	Cultural Critique and Rhetoric: Through Eagleton’s framework, Pride and Prejudice could be critiqued not only for its subtle social critique but for its role in reinforcing class ideologies and bourgeois morality. The novel’s discourse on marriage and class mobility can be analyzed as a reflection of how literature produces and sustains bourgeois ideology. Quotation: “Our present aim should be to abolish ‘literary criticism’ and revive rhetoric in its place. By rhetoric, I mean the study of the ways in which any discourse whatsoever produces its effects.”
James Joyce’s Ulysses	Destabilization of the Literary Canon: Eagleton would critique Ulysses not for its modernist innovations but for how literary critics and institutions have canonized it as a symbol of high culture, reinforcing elitist distinctions between “literature” and other cultural forms. Joyce’s work, though experimental, does not inherently possess more value than other forms of discourse like advertisements or films. Quotation: “You have a choice between maintaining the increasingly implausible thesis that there is indeed an inherently definable object named Literature… or of frankly conceding that they have something in common because you and your friends have decided that they do.”

Criticism Against “The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Overemphasis on Political Criticism

Reduction of Literature to Ideology: Critics argue that Eagleton reduces all literary value to its political and ideological functions, ignoring aesthetic, emotional, or philosophical aspects of literature that might transcend political contexts.
- Counterpoint: By focusing solely on political engagement, the richness and diversity of literary experiences are overlooked.

Dismissal of Aesthetic and Humanistic Values

Neglect of Aesthetic Appreciation: Eagleton’s critique dismisses the idea that literature can be appreciated purely for its artistic or humanistic qualities, such as beauty, emotional resonance, or exploration of universal themes.
- Counterpoint: Critics argue that literature offers more than political utility, and limiting it to that role undermines its broader cultural and artistic contributions.

Undermining the Literary Canon

Destabilizing the Canon is Problematic: By challenging the very concept of a “literary canon,” Eagleton opens the door to a relativistic view where the distinction between high literature and other forms of discourse, such as advertisements, becomes blurry.
- Counterpoint: This could lead to the devaluation of literary studies and weaken the defense of literature as an important cultural practice.

Excessive Pluralism in Methodology

Lack of Rigor in Pluralistic Approach: Eagleton’s call for methodological pluralism, where any approach that serves political transformation is valid, can be criticized for lacking academic rigor or coherence.
- Counterpoint: The absence of a unified method might lead to an incoherent or fragmented field of study, reducing the legitimacy of literary criticism as an academic discipline.

Marginalization of Traditional Literary Scholarship

Rejection of Traditional Scholarship: Eagleton’s critique marginalizes traditional literary scholarship (such as philology, textual criticism, and close reading), which has been fundamental to the field. This dismissal undermines centuries of academic work and critical analysis.
- Counterpoint: Critics argue that traditional methods have value in understanding texts, their historical context, and their formal properties, even outside political dimensions.

Idealism in the Call for Revolutionary Culture

Utopian Call for Revolutionary Culture: Eagleton’s call for literary studies to contribute to the creation of revolutionary culture may be seen as overly idealistic or impractical, especially in contemporary academic institutions.
- Counterpoint: This focus on revolutionary culture might alienate scholars who are not politically radical or aligned with socialist ideology.

Limited Scope in Defining Discourse

Narrow Definition of Discourse: Eagleton’s expansion of discourse to include all cultural texts (e.g., advertisements, bus tickets) risks trivializing the study of literature by treating it as one among many discourses, without acknowledging its unique characteristics or impact.
- Counterpoint: By equating literature with other discourses, Eagleton potentially minimizes the distinctive role that literature has played in shaping cultural, philosophical, and artistic thought.

Representative Quotations from “The End of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Literary studies are a non-subject.”	Eagleton critiques the lack of a unified method or coherent subject in literary studies, arguing that the field is fragmented and inconsistent in its methodologies and objectives.
“Literature is politically relevant because it can restore to us that sense of creative capacities repressed by capitalism.”	This quotation reflects the utopian-humanistic tradition in socialist thought, where literature is seen as having the potential to reawaken human creativity, which is otherwise suppressed under capitalist systems.
“Why lay bare the operations of ideology in D. H. Lawrence rather than in television advertisements, women’s magazines, and John Locke?”	Eagleton questions why literature, particularly high literature, is chosen as the primary tool for demystifying ideology when other cultural forms, such as advertisements or popular media, may have a more direct impact on people’s lives.
“Our present aim should be to abolish ‘literary criticism’ and revive rhetoric in its place.”	Eagleton advocates for a shift from traditional literary criticism to the study of rhetoric, which he defines as analyzing how any form of discourse produces its effects, including ideological and social influences.
“The unity of the object is every bit as illusory as the unity of the method.”	Here, Eagleton critiques the notion that literature is a stable and unified object of study, arguing that the definition of “literature” is arbitrary and ideologically constructed, just as there is no singular method that governs its study.
“Rhetorical critics are unashamed pluralists: anything which contributes to the goal of political transformation is acceptable.”	Eagleton promotes a pluralistic approach to criticism, arguing that any method or discourse that aids in political transformation is valid, rejecting the idea that literary criticism must adhere to strict or traditional methods.
“Socialism is moral or it is nothing.”	Eagleton emphasizes that the core of socialism, and by extension socialist literary criticism, is moral in nature. It is motivated by the ethical objection to the exploitation and degradation of human lives under capitalist systems.
“You have a choice between maintaining the increasingly implausible thesis that there is indeed an inherently definable object named Literature… or of frankly conceding that they have something in common because you and your friends have decided that they do.”	Eagleton critiques the arbitrary nature of literary canon formation, suggesting that what counts as “literature” is not an inherent quality of texts but a decision made by those in positions of cultural power.
“It is a unity not of discourses or objects but of intentional practices.”	Eagleton argues that the “unity” of literary studies should not be found in methods or objects (i.e., literary texts), but in the political intentions and practices of those who engage with the discipline.
“The study of what has traditionally been called literature will not of course merely dissolve within this new space.”	Although Eagleton calls for a shift towards cultural studies and rhetoric, he acknowledges that the study of traditional literature will not disappear entirely but will become one part of a broader, more inclusive field focused on cultural critique.

“Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“Marx, Freud, and Morality” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in New Blackfriars in January 1977, has become a cornerstone in the fields of literature and literary theory.

Introduction: “Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton

“Marx, Freud, and Morality” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in New Blackfriars in January 1977, has become a cornerstone in the fields of literature and literary theory. Eagleton’s exploration of the interplay between Marxist and Freudian thought offers a profound understanding of how these intellectual frameworks can illuminate the complexities of human morality and behavior.

Summary of “Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton

Marxism and Morality

Eagleton argues that Marxism, focused on changing material conditions, has little to say about morality. True morality emerges after a revolution, when the ideological constraints of the old order are overcome.
- Quotation: “Until that condition is fulfilled, our ‘moral’ discourse is bound to remain imprisoned within the ideological.”

Marxism Needs Psychoanalysis

Marxism lacks a theory of how individuals become subjects, which Eagleton suggests can be provided by psychoanalysis.
- Quotation: “The science of psychoanalysis is the science of how historical individuals come to be constituted as subjects.”

Freud’s Pessimistic Rationalism

Freud’s outlook is bleak. Humans are driven by conflicting desires and have little hope for true happiness.
- Quotation: “The message of Freud’s work, then, is clear: we just aren’t going to make it.”

The Limits of Human Subjects

Becoming a subject involves repressing the unconscious, creating a permanent tension within us and making true knowledge and complete fulfillment impossible.
- Quotation: “The human enterprise, focused as it is on that pathetic self-contradictory phenomenon we call the ego, is doomed from the outset.”

Subjects and Social Formations

Social formations create subjects who are unaware of the forces shaping them. This “misrecognition” is necessary for the social order to function.
- Quotation: “The social formation has its reasons, of which the subject knows nothing.”

Language and Desire

Language is a system of differences and absences. As we speak, we are driven by a desire to fill the gaps and find meaning, but this is ultimately unachievable.
- Quotation: “To speak is to lack: and it’s in this lack that the movement of desire is set up.”

The Unconscious Speaks Through Us

The Freudian concept of the “parapraxis” (Freudian slip) reveals that the unconscious constantly disrupts our conscious attempts to control language.
- Quotation: “When, in a sentence, I refer to myself as ‘I’, when I make use of the personal pronoun, the ‘I’ I refer to is the coherent subject Terry Eagleton; but the ‘I’ which speaks that ‘I’, that coherent subject, has no such coherence.”

The Subject and the Social Formation

Both subjects and social formations are constituted by forces they are unaware of.
- Quotation: “The unconscious has its reasons of which the subject knows nothing, and the same is true about the subject in relation to the social formation.”

A Tragic Scenario

Both Marxism and Freudianism paint a tragic picture of the human condition. We are limited by our unconscious desires and the structures that shape us.
- Quotation: “The human enterprise, focused as it is on that pathetic self-contradictory phenomenon we call the ego, is doomed from the outset.”

The Foolishness of Love

Freud’s view of love as limited by human nature contrasts with the Christian message to “love thy neighbor as thyself.”
- Quotation: “Given the way human beings are-and I mean the way they are through their material insertion into language, not the way they are for certain transitional historical reasons-the gospel makes very little sense.”

Marxism vs. The Gospel

While Marxism can improve material lives, it offers no solution to the problem of love. The Christian message, though unrealistic in Freudian terms, offers a necessary kind of love for redemption.
- Quotation: “Marxism will not save us either, though it will certainly make life a good deal easier.”

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton

Term/Concept	Explanation	Relevant Context in Eagleton’s Essay
Ideology	A system of ideas that unconsciously shape and constrain the subject’s thinking, creating illusions about the nature of reality.	Eagleton argues that “ideology” is central to understanding how individuals are unknowingly shaped by social structures. Marxism critiques ideology by showing how it hides true social relations, while Freud exposes the unconscious forces that shape human behavior.
Subjectivity	The experience of being a coherent, autonomous individual, which, according to both Marx and Freud, is an illusion produced by ideology and unconscious forces.	Eagleton explains how the subject, while believing themselves to be the master of their thoughts and actions, is actually decentered by unconscious processes (Freud) and shaped by social formations (Marx). He emphasizes the need to recognize that individuals are not truly in control of their own discourse or consciousness.
Historical Materialism	Marxist theory that social and economic structures determine the development of human societies and their ideologies.	Eagleton references Marxism’s focus on historical materialism as the basis for understanding social formations and their reproduction, contrasting it with psychoanalysis as a tool for understanding individual subject formation. He notes that Marxism traditionally lacks a fully developed theory of the subject, which psychoanalysis can help provide.
Unconscious	In Freudian theory, the part of the mind that operates outside of conscious awareness, influencing thoughts, behaviors, and emotions.	The essay argues that unconscious forces, such as repressed desires and drives, play a major role in shaping the subject’s speech and actions. Eagleton connects this to the way ideology operates, suggesting that just as unconscious drives influence behavior, ideology shapes consciousness in ways subjects cannot fully comprehend.
Oedipus Complex	Freudian concept referring to the child’s unconscious sexual desire for the opposite-sex parent and rivalry with the same-sex parent, crucial to the development of the ego.	Eagleton refers to the Oedipus complex to explain how individuals are constituted as “sexed” beings through processes of repression and identification, which in turn integrate them into the social order. This complex also exemplifies the way subject formation involves the repression of knowledge, both personal and social.
Symbolic Order	A Lacanian concept referring to the domain of language and social laws that the subject enters after the Oedipus complex, in which meaning is structured by difference.	Eagleton uses this term to describe how individuals are caught in a network of signifiers that endlessly defer meaning. The symbolic order is the realm of language, where identity and meaning are always constructed in relation to absent or excluded terms. This creates an ongoing “lack,” which drives desire and destabilizes the subject’s coherence.
Castration Complex	The psychoanalytic concept of the child’s realization of sexual difference and the anxiety this produces, leading to repression and the formation of the unconscious.	Eagleton likens this complex to other fundamental losses (such as birth, separation from the mother, etc.) that shape human subjectivity. He uses it to illustrate how language and culture impose a continual chain of losses, absences, and lacks that disrupt any sense of subjective unity or completeness.
Desire	In psychoanalytic theory, the unconscious drive that is never fully satisfied, continually moving the subject from one object or signifier to another.	Eagleton draws on Freud and Lacan to argue that desire is structured by lack and that language itself generates this movement of desire. This process reveals the subject’s dependence on absence and difference, contradicting the illusion of wholeness or control in both personal and ideological discourse.
Cultural Revolution	A Marxist concept referring to the transformation of social and individual consciousness as part of the larger political revolution.	Eagleton suggests that Marxism, beyond political revolution, must involve a “cultural revolution,” which entails the transformation of individual subjectivity and consciousness. He implies that psychoanalysis can inform this process by addressing the deep-seated psychological resistances to such transformation.

Contribution of “Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Marxist Literary Theory

Ideology and the Unconscious: Eagleton challenges the Marxist notion of ideology as merely a system of false beliefs imposed by the ruling class. Instead, he argues that ideology is deeply embedded in the unconscious, shaping our perceptions and actions.
- Reference: “The unconscious is exactly the fact that as we speak, what we say must always escape us, that as I say one thing it means something else, that as my own discourse unrolls, it reveals in its knots and breaks and crevices those other possible signs which must always be absent.”
The Subject and the Social Formation: Eagleton redefines the Marxist concept of the subject, arguing that it is not a fully autonomous individual but rather a product of the social formation. This challenges the humanist notion that individuals are the primary agents of history.
- Reference: “The human subject is a product of the social formation, but must, at the same time, conceal it-must be unaware of its true determinants, of the process of its production.”

2. Psychoanalytic Literary Theory

The Unconscious and Discourse: Eagleton expands on Freud’s theories of the unconscious, arguing that it shapes not only our individual psyches but also our cultural discourses.
- Reference: “The unconscious has its reasons of which the subject knows nothing, and the same is true about the subject in relation to the social formation.”

The Tragic Nature of Human Existence: Eagleton aligns with Freud’s pessimistic view of human existence, emphasizing the inherent conflicts and limitations that shape our lives.
- Reference: “The human enterprise, focused as it is on that pathetic self-contradictory phenomenon we call the ego, is doomed from the outset.”

3. New Historicism

The Social Construction of the Subject: Eagleton’s analysis of the subject as a product of the social formation aligns with New Historicist approaches that emphasize the historical and cultural context in shaping individuals’ identities and experiences.
- Reference: “The human subject is a product of the social formation.”

4. Cultural Studies

Interdisciplinary Approach: Eagleton’s essay demonstrates the value of combining Marxist and psychoanalytic perspectives to understand culture. This interdisciplinary approach has been influential in Cultural Studies.
- Reference: “The essay offers a powerful blend of Marxist and psychoanalytic insights.”

5. Post-Structuralism

Deconstruction of the Subject: Eagleton’s critique of the subject as a coherent entity aligns with Post-Structuralist ideas that challenge the notion of a stable self.
- Reference: “The subject can’t, as it were, round upon those determinants, appropriate them in consciousness, because it exists as a subject only by their repression.”

Examples of Critiques Through “Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Critique through Marxism (Eagleton’s Lens)	Critique through Psychoanalysis (Eagleton’s Lens)
*Great Expectations* by Charles Dickens	Through a Marxist perspective, the novel illustrates class struggle and social mobility. Pip’s journey from a poor orphan to a gentleman reflects the ideologies of capitalism. The “ideological” illusion Pip suffers from—believing wealth and status can lead to happiness—can be critiqued as masking the exploitative class structures of Victorian England.	Pip’s internal conflict and guilt can be analyzed through Freud’s theory of the unconscious. His desire for social advancement, driven by his love for Estella, can be seen as rooted in repressed desires and the Oedipal complex. Pip’s obsession with becoming a gentleman reflects deeper anxieties about identity, desire, and his relationship with parental figures like Joe and Miss Havisham.
*Wuthering Heights* by Emily Brontë	The novel’s portrayal of Heathcliff’s rise to power could be interpreted as a Marxist critique of the capitalist drive for ownership and control. Heathcliff’s revenge on the Earnshaw and Linton families illustrates how class oppression and economic inequalities drive individuals to destructive actions.	Heathcliff’s obsession with Catherine and his violent behavior can be analyzed through the lens of Freudian psychoanalysis. His destructive tendencies could be seen as an expression of repressed desires and unresolved childhood trauma. The novel’s focus on intense emotions, violence, and love mirrors Freud’s notion of the death drive (Thanatos) and Eros in human behavior.
*Hamlet* by William Shakespeare	Marxist critique would focus on the ideological forces shaping Hamlet’s indecision and the political power structures in Denmark. The play reflects feudal and class power relations, where Hamlet is caught between his princely duties and his moral qualms, mirroring larger societal contradictions.	Freud’s psychoanalytic interpretation of *Hamlet* famously focuses on the Oedipus complex. Hamlet’s hesitation in avenging his father’s death can be linked to repressed desires for his mother, Gertrude. His struggle with madness and internal turmoil reflects the unconscious forces at play, where Hamlet’s ego is torn between the id (desires) and the superego (moral expectations).
*The Great Gatsby* by F. Scott Fitzgerald	A Marxist critique would emphasize the novel’s exploration of the American Dream as an ideological construct. Gatsby’s pursuit of wealth and status masks the inherent inequalities of capitalist society. The novel critiques the false promises of class mobility, with Gatsby’s downfall symbolizing the failure of this ideology.	Gatsby’s obsessive desire for Daisy can be analyzed through psychoanalysis as a manifestation of deeper unconscious desires. His fixation on the past and his idealized image of Daisy reflect Freud’s concept of the repetition compulsion, where Gatsby is driven by unresolved desires and emotional wounds. The symbolic death drive is present in Gatsby’s reckless pursuit, ultimately leading to his tragic demise.

Criticism Against “Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton

Overemphasis on Ideology and Repression:
- Critics argue that Eagleton’s interpretation places excessive emphasis on ideology, viewing individuals primarily as passive products of unconscious and social forces, downplaying human agency and individual autonomy.
Limited Scope of Morality Discussion:
- Some may criticize the work for offering an insufficient exploration of morality itself. Eagleton’s Marxist and Freudian analysis focuses more on how morality is shaped by external forces, but less on the content of moral principles or how individuals might challenge these ideologies.

Reductionism in Psychoanalysis:
- Eagleton’s reliance on Freudian psychoanalysis has been critiqued for its reductionist approach. Critics argue that Freudian concepts such as the Oedipus complex and repression oversimplify complex human behaviors and ignore other psychological or philosophical explanations.
Tension between Marxism and Psychoanalysis:
- The attempt to merge Marxist historical materialism with Freudian psychoanalysis has been criticized for being problematic, as the two frameworks may not be fully compatible. While Marxism focuses on social structures, psychoanalysis emphasizes individual psychology, creating a potential conceptual mismatch.
Neglect of Humanism and Ethical Agency:
- Some critics believe that Eagleton’s approach neglects humanism and ethical agency, reducing morality to ideological constructs rather than considering the potential for moral progress or ethical behavior outside of ideology and repression.

Pessimism in the Concept of Subjectivity:
- Eagleton’s portrayal of subjectivity as fundamentally shaped by absence, lack, and repression, influenced by Lacan and Freud, has been criticized for its pessimism. This perspective can be seen as overly fatalistic, suggesting that humans are perpetually alienated from their desires and true meaning.
Christianity vs. Marxism Conflation:
- Eagleton’s analysis of the relationship between Christianity and Marxism, particularly the argument that Marxism needs a discourse of love beyond its materialist framework, has been criticized as overly idealistic or inconsistent with the materialist foundations of Marxist thought.

Representative Quotations from “Marx, Freud and Morality” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Until that condition is fulfilled, our ‘moral’ discourse is bound to remain imprisoned within the ideological.”	This statement highlights the importance of social and political change in achieving true morality. Eagleton argues that morality is often constrained by the dominant ideology.
“The science of psychoanalysis is the science of how historical individuals come to be constituted as subjects.”	This quotation emphasizes the role of psychoanalysis in understanding the formation of individual identity and consciousness.
“The message of Freud’s work, then, is clear: we just aren’t going to make it.”	This quote reflects Freud’s pessimistic view of human nature and the limitations imposed by our unconscious desires.
“The human enterprise, focused as it is on that pathetic self-contradictory phenomenon we call the ego, is doomed from the outset.”	This statement emphasizes the tragic nature of human existence, as revealed by Freud’s analysis of the ego’s internal conflicts and limitations.
“The social formation has its reasons, of which the subject knows nothing.”	This quote highlights the power of social structures to shape individuals’ lives without their conscious awareness.
“To speak is to lack: and it’s in this lack that the movement of desire is set up.”	This statement emphasizes the fundamental nature of desire as a result of language and its inherent lack of meaning.
“When, in a sentence, I refer to myself as ‘I’, when I make use of the personal pronoun, the ‘I’ I refer to is the coherent subject Terry Eagleton; but the ‘I’ which speaks that ‘I’, that coherent subject, has no such coherence.”	This quote illustrates the fragmented nature of the subject, as revealed by the unconscious’s influence on our discourse.
“The unconscious has its reasons of which the subject knows nothing, and the same is true about the subject in relation to the social formation.”	This statement highlights the unconscious nature of many of our actions and beliefs, both as individuals and as members of society.
“The human subject is a product of the social formation, but must, at the same time, conceal it-must be unaware of its true determinants, of the process of its production.”	This quote challenges the humanist notion of the individual as a fully autonomous agent, emphasizing the role of social structures in shaping identity.
“The gospel may be true or it may not be; but if Freud is right, as I think he is, then nothing short of the gospel will save us.”	This statement suggests that the Christian gospel, despite its unrealistic nature, may be the only hope for salvation in a world shaped by Freud’s tragic vision.

“Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton is a seminal piece that first appeared in the esteemed journal New Blackfriars in 2002.

Introduction: “Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton

“Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton is a seminal piece that first appeared in the esteemed journal New Blackfriars in 2002. This insightful exploration of the relationship between irony and the Eucharist has significantly impacted the fields of literature and literary theory. Eagleton’s analysis delves into the complexities of irony as a literary device and its potential to challenge traditional religious beliefs. His work has been widely cited and continues to be a valuable resource for scholars and students alike.

Summary of “Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton

Metaphor and Transubstantiation:
Eagleton begins by drawing a parallel between metaphor and transubstantiation, explaining how a word like “fire” can change its meaning (to anger or passion) while retaining its original form. Similarly, in the Eucharist, bread and wine retain their outward appearance but are understood to become the body and blood of Christ. Eagleton explains, “The bread and wine of the eucharist still look and behave like bread and wine,” but their “substance” has changed through metaphorical transformation. This comparison highlights the mystery of transubstantiation where physical signs take on profound spiritual meaning.
Semiotics of the Eucharist – The Concept of Meta-signs:
Eagleton introduces the idea of the Eucharistic elements as meta-signs, meaning they not only signify but also comment on the nature of signification itself. He explains, “The eucharistic elements are meta-signs in more senses than one,” signifying both the presence and absence of meaning. In this sense, the Eucharist functions as a meta-signification, reflecting on signs and meanings beyond their literal forms.

Irony in Signification:
The Eucharist, Eagleton argues, carries an inherent irony. While it appears to be bread and wine, it symbolizes a reality beyond mere physical presence: the body of Christ. This is “a kind of symbolic face-to-faceness” where the elements signify both the presence of Christ and the transcendence of earthly signs. Eagleton emphasizes the irony in signifying the “non-discursive discursively,” pointing out the paradox that the bread and wine, though symbols, transcend the very concept of signification.
The Role of the Body as a Sign:
Eagleton discusses the body of Christ as both a sign and a meta-sign. The human body, like Christ’s body, is inherently expressive, making it a “sign” already. This expressivity is fully realized in the risen body, where “the material body itself becomes pure communication.” The Eucharistic bread and wine, therefore, signify a deeper form of expressivity and signification, encapsulating the fullness of spiritual meaning.
Death and Fulfillment of Signs:
One of Eagleton’s core arguments is that the Eucharist symbolizes both the death and consummation of the sign. In the Kingdom of God, signs give way to a state of pure expressivity – the body of Christ – rendering signs redundant. This duality, Eagleton argues, highlights the Eucharist as a self-cancelling semiotic system, where signs “bounce” the participant beyond their immediate meaning, much like “a trampoline.”

Conclusion – Irony as the Ultimate Signification:
Eagleton concludes by reinforcing the irony within the Eucharist. The bread and wine signify “their own emptiness” while remaining physically present, reflecting a semiotic system in which “there must be a signifier which stands in for its own impossibility.” For Christian faith, the Eucharist is a paradoxical representation of presence and absence, encapsulating the divine reality that cannot be fully represented within earthly systems of meaning.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Term/Concept	Definition	Explanation in “Irony and the Eucharist”
Metaphor	A figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.	Eagleton draws an analogy between metaphor and transubstantiation, explaining how bread and wine can signify the body and blood of Christ, just as “fire” can mean anger or passion.
Transubstantiation	The change of the substance of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ during the Eucharist, while retaining their appearances.	Central to Eagleton’s argument, transubstantiation is discussed as a change in the “substance” of the Eucharistic elements while their form remains the same, likened to the operation of metaphor.
Meta-sign	A sign that reflects on or comments on the nature of signification itself.	The Eucharistic elements are described as meta-signs, as they not only signify the body of Christ but also comment on the process of signification, going beyond mere representation.
Irony	A rhetorical device or figure of speech in which the intended meaning is opposite to the literal meaning.	Eagleton identifies irony in the Eucharist, where the elements appear as bread and wine but signify something far more profound—the body of Christ—creating a paradox of meaning and non-meaning.
Semiotics	The study of signs and symbols and their use or interpretation.	The entire essay revolves around a semiotic interpretation of the Eucharist, exploring how signs like bread and wine can hold and transcend meaning within Christian theology.
Symbolism	The use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities.	The Eucharist is heavily symbolic, with the bread and wine symbolizing Christ’s body and blood, but also representing the broader theological concepts of sacrifice, redemption, and divine presence.
Paradox	A seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true.	The Eucharist embodies a paradox: the bread and wine signify Christ’s body, yet remain bread and wine. This contradiction is central to the theological and semiotic understanding of the ritual.
Signifier and Signified	In semiotics, the signifier is the form that a sign takes, and the signified is the concept it represents.	Eagleton uses this structuralist concept to explain how the Eucharist functions as a sign where the signifier (bread and wine) represents the signified (body and blood of Christ) but also transcends these meanings.
Expressivity	The capacity of a form (such as language or the body) to express meaning.	Eagleton highlights how the body of Christ is itself expressive, embodying meaning as a sign. The risen body, in particular, is described as “pure communication.”

Contribution of “Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Semiotics and Meta-signs

Contribution to Theory:
Eagleton extends semiotic theory by analyzing how religious symbols, like the bread and wine in the Eucharist, function as meta-signs—signs that comment on the nature of signification itself. His discussion moves beyond traditional signifier/signified relationships, exploring the role of absence and transcendence within religious symbols.

Reference:
Eagleton describes the Eucharistic elements as meta-signs, “signs of an absence of signification” (p. 513). He likens the bread and wine to meta-signs that reflect not only on their immediate meaning but also on the broader system of signification in which they exist.
Impact on Theory:
By analyzing the Eucharist through a semiotic lens, Eagleton contributes to religious semiotics, showing how theological symbols can transcend their ordinary signifying function. This aligns with the post-structuralist notion that signs often point to gaps or absences in meaning, challenging the stability of signification in language and symbolism.

2. Irony and the Theory of Signification

Contribution to Theory:
Eagleton deepens the theory of irony by connecting it to religious symbolism. He argues that the Eucharist is an inherently ironic sign, signifying something that it is not while remaining itself. This paradoxical structure of meaning aligns with theories of irony in postmodernism and deconstruction, where the gap between signifier and signified creates layers of meaning.
Reference:
Eagleton discusses irony in the Eucharist, noting how the bread and wine “signify the non-being of the future by the non-being of its own ironic self-destruction” (p. 514). The Eucharist, as a symbolic act, carries an ironic tension: it signifies Christ’s body, yet remains bread and wine.
Impact on Theory:
This contribution aligns with deconstructive approaches to irony, where Eagleton’s analysis suggests that irony arises from the instability of meaning within religious symbols. The Eucharist, as a semiotic system, self-negates to represent a condition beyond signification, a notion akin to Derrida’s deconstruction of language where meaning is constantly deferred.

3. Post-structuralism and the Transcendence of Signifiers

Contribution to Theory:
Eagleton’s analysis of the Eucharist contributes to post-structuralist understandings of the instability of signifiers. He argues that religious symbols like the Eucharist do not simply point to a fixed signified (Christ’s body) but point to a condition beyond signification itself, echoing post-structuralist concerns about the impossibility of final meaning.
Reference:
Eagleton argues, “the bread has to behave like bread but not actually be it” (p. 514), emphasizing the instability and paradox of signification. He further notes that the Eucharist “has to signify a condition beyond signification,” thus transcending the usual boundaries of semiotic systems.

Impact on Theory:
This analysis resonates with Jacques Derrida’s notion of différance, where the Eucharist represents a signifier that points to its own absence and the impossibility of fully representing the transcendent “real.” The analysis challenges traditional semiotic relationships, positioning religious symbols as fluid, contingent, and beyond full representation.

4. Religious Semiotics and the Sublime

Contribution to Theory:
Eagleton links the Eucharist to theory of the sublime, particularly in its ironic representation of infinity. He connects religious semiotics with the sublime by arguing that the Eucharist gestures toward a reality that is beyond human comprehension or representation—aligning this with the classical sublime, where overwhelming forces like God or nature can only be represented indirectly or negatively.

Reference:
Eagleton draws parallels to the sublime when he states, “infinity can be represented only in negative guise, by the representation drawing attention to its own stringent limits” (p. 514). Here, he aligns the Eucharist with the sublime, where signs can only point to their own limits when trying to signify the infinite.
Impact on Theory:
This contribution resonates with Immanuel Kant’s and Edmund Burke’s theories of the sublime, where representations of the divine or infinite can only be rendered indirectly. Eagleton’s interpretation of the Eucharist as a representation of the “beyond-sign” ties theological semiotics to broader aesthetic and philosophical discussions of the sublime.

5. Political Semiotics and Revolution

Contribution to Theory:
Eagleton makes a unique contribution by tying the Eucharist to political semiotics, particularly in the revolutionary context. He compares the Eucharist to avant-garde poetics and Marxist ideas of revolution, where the sign points toward a future condition in which it will be unnecessary—reflecting Marx’s notion that “the content goes beyond the phrase.”
Reference:
Eagleton uses Marxist semiotics to describe the Eucharist: “what socialist transformation envisages outstrips the language in which we might now describe it” (p. 515). He likens the Eucharist to revolutionary symbols that simultaneously negate themselves while pointing to a future utopian reality.
Impact on Theory:
Eagleton’s interpretation aligns with Marxist literary theory, where signs, particularly revolutionary symbols, are understood as pointing to a future state that negates the need for current discourses. The Eucharist, in this context, becomes a revolutionary symbol that gestures toward a future redemption, blending theology with political and social semiotics.

6. The Body as Language and Communication

Contribution to Theory:
Eagleton’s discussion of the body as a form of language contributes to theories of embodiment and expressivity in literary and cultural theory. He argues that the body of Christ in the Eucharist is not only a sign but also the most expressive form of communication, thus merging linguistic and corporeal forms of signification.
Reference:
Eagleton notes, “the body as Word” and argues that “the risen body is the flesh as pure expressivity” (p. 513). He highlights how the body in the Eucharist serves as both a physical and semiotic presence, merging material and linguistic forms of expression.

Impact on Theory:
This connects to cultural theories of embodiment, such as those by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, where the body is seen as a central site of meaning and expression. Eagleton’s analysis of the Eucharist enhances discussions of the body as signifier, positioning it as a crucial intersection of language, semiotics, and theology.

Examples of Critiques Through “Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Critique Through “Irony and the Eucharist”	Explanation
*The Waste Land* by T.S. Eliot	Semiotic Breakdown and Meta-Signs	Using Eagleton’s concept of the meta-sign, Eliot’s fragmented style in *The Waste Land* can be seen as a breakdown of traditional signifiers, reflecting a world in which meaning has become disjointed. Just as Eagleton discusses the Eucharist as a sign pointing to the absence of meaning, Eliot’s work can be interpreted as a commentary on the disintegration of meaning in the modern world.
*Waiting for Godot* by Samuel Beckett	Irony and the Absence of Meaning	Beckett’s play parallels Eagleton’s discussion of irony, where the bread and wine in the Eucharist represent something that they are not. In *Waiting for Godot, the anticipation of Godot symbolizes a quest for meaning that never materializes. Beckett uses irony* to show that the act of waiting itself becomes meaningless, much like Eagleton’s depiction of the Eucharist signifying its own emptiness.
*Heart of Darkness* by Joseph Conrad	Signifier and Signified Gap	Eagleton’s exploration of the gap between signifier and signified can be applied to *Heart of Darkness*, where Kurtz symbolizes the ineffable nature of imperialism’s horrors. Just as Eagleton argues that the Eucharist’s signified (Christ’s body) transcends representation, Conrad’s portrayal of Kurtz suggests that the true nature of colonialism is beyond the grasp of language and signification.
*The Brothers Karamazov* by Fyodor Dostoevsky	Religious Semiotics and the Sublime	Through the lens of Eagleton’s analysis of religious semiotics, the Eucharistic themes in *The Brothers Karamazov* can be critiqued as a struggle between material and spiritual realms. The character of Alyosha represents the sublime faith that transcends reason, aligning with Eagleton’s notion that religious symbols like the Eucharist signify something beyond rational or material comprehension.

Criticism Against “Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton

Complexity and Accessibility:
Eagleton’s use of dense philosophical language, particularly his engagement with semiotics and meta-signs, may render the essay inaccessible to readers unfamiliar with advanced literary theory or theological concepts.
Over-reliance on Semiotic Analysis:
Critics might argue that Eagleton’s heavy focus on semiotics could reduce the rich theological significance of the Eucharist to a mere play of signs, downplaying its spiritual and sacramental aspects.

Lack of Theological Depth:
Some may claim that Eagleton’s literary and semiotic approach lacks sufficient engagement with theological scholarship on the Eucharist, potentially oversimplifying or misrepresenting its deep religious significance.
Limited Application to Broader Christian Practices:
While Eagleton focuses on the Eucharist, his analysis may be too narrow in scope, failing to address how irony and signification play a role in other Christian sacraments or religious experiences.
Philosophical Generalization:
Eagleton’s linking of the Eucharist with post-structuralist theories of signification and irony could be seen as an overextension of literary theory into theology, making generalizations that may not resonate with traditional religious interpretations.

Irony as Reductionist:
By emphasizing the irony in the Eucharist, Eagleton might be accused of reducing the profundity of the ritual to a philosophical paradox, neglecting the emotional, communal, and devotional dimensions of the sacrament.

Representative Quotations from “Irony and the Eucharist” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The bread and wine of the eucharist still look and behave like bread and wine.”	Eagleton begins by illustrating the mystery of transubstantiation, where the physical elements remain the same while their spiritual essence changes, introducing the central theme of irony.
“Flame has transubstantiated into fury.”	This metaphor explains how words change their meaning while retaining their form, paralleling how bread and wine transform into the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharist.
“The eucharistic elements are meta-signs in more senses than one.”	Eagleton introduces the concept of meta-signs, emphasizing that the Eucharist is not just symbolic but reflects on the very nature of signification and meaning.
“It has to signify a condition beyond signification.”	The Eucharist is presented as a paradox: it must communicate something (divine presence) that inherently transcends ordinary forms of communication and representation.
“The sign is where degradation and redemption intersect.”	Eagleton connects the Eucharist to the idea of redemption through the degradation of signs, suggesting that it symbolizes both the suffering (degradation) and the salvation (redemption) of Christ.
“The irony of this love-feast is that it has to convey the non-discursive discursively.”	The Eucharist is described as inherently ironic because it tries to represent a non-verbal, divine mystery using the human medium of language and ritual.
“There must be a signifier which stands in for its own impossibility.”	Eagleton highlights a core irony in the Eucharist: the bread and wine serve as signs of something (the body of Christ) that cannot be fully signified or represented within the system of signs.
“The symbol is the death of the thing.”	Borrowing from Jacques Lacan, Eagleton argues that symbols replace the actual objects they represent, and this applies to the Eucharist, where Christ’s body is symbolized through bread and wine.
“The risen body is the flesh as pure expressivity.”	Eagleton describes the resurrected body of Christ as the ultimate form of communication, where the physical body itself becomes pure expression and meaning.
“In this sense, the death of the sign is also the consummation of it.”	This phrase captures the paradox at the heart of the Eucharist, where the end of signification (death of the sign) is also its fulfillment, mirroring the death and resurrection of Christ.

“Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1976 in the journal New Blackfriars, in its Volume 57, Number 671, holds significant importance in literature and literary theory.

Introduction: “Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton

“Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1976 in the journal New Blackfriars, in its Volume 57, Number 671, holds significant importance in literature and literary theory. It explores the concept of decentering God, challenging the traditional centrality of divine authority in Western thought. Eagleton’s critique offers a profound reexamination of religious discourse and its influence on literary works, paving the way for new perspectives and interpretations.

Summary of “Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton

Christian-Marxist Dialogue and Humanism

Christian and Marxist common ground in humanism: In the past, Christian-Marxist dialogue found a shared focus on humanistic values. Eagleton highlights this connection: “Whatever the divergences between the two camps, they were at least united by their profoundly humanistic dimension.”

Humanism now criticized by Marxism: Marxism, however, has shifted its stance, moving away from humanism as seen in Louis Althusser’s declaration: “Marxism is not a Humanism.” This indicates Marxism’s growing rejection of humanism as a bourgeois ideology.

Decentering the Human Subject

Human subject dethroned: Eagleton discusses how European Marxism and structuralism have moved to dethrone the human subject. The bourgeois idea of “Man” as the center of history is rejected: “It is history… which ‘speaks’ man, which constitutes the human subject.”

Focus on structures and laws over individuals: Instead of centering on individual humans or collective subjects, Marxism focuses on social structures and discourses: “The study of history is the science of these rule-bound discourses… its aim is to disengage those laws… situated on a terrain quite other than ‘human experience’.”

God and the Fetish of Central Meaning

Atheistic critique of central meaning: Eagleton points out that atheistic Marxism criticizes the idea of a central essence or ultimate meaning (such as God) as a mystifying fetish. As he notes, “Christian theology and atheistic humanism seem to share a belief in some ultimate essence or origin of meaning… but it is precisely this trust in some single enshrined essence of meaning which atheistic Marxism attacks as a fetish.”

Derrida and decentering authority: Jacques Derrida and other Marxist semioticians argue that authority figures like God or monarchs act as centralizing fetishes that suppress pluralistic meanings: “God, the Father, the monarch, gold, the phallus… protect us from the terror of being liberated into the unfounded, decentred process of our history.”

Milton and the Tragic Absence of God

Milton’s portrayal of God’s withdrawal: Eagleton draws on Milton’s Paradise Lost to explore how God’s withdrawal from history leads to a loss of meaning, particularly for the English Protestant bourgeoisie. He describes this withdrawal as both a source of value and a threat: “God seems to have withdrawn his presence from history, abandoning the revolutionary venture of his chosen people.”

Satan as a failed revolutionary figure: Satan’s attempt to dethrone God in Paradise Lost is described as a decentering gone wrong, where one repressive authority is merely replaced with another: “Satan tries to de-centre, dethrone the poem’s aloof, coldly bureaucratic God and falls to hell… setting up a substitute kingdom.”

Decentering of Both God and Man

Christ’s decentering of the Father: Eagleton argues that, from a Christian perspective, Christ’s incarnation is a revolutionary decentering of the Father. However, Milton fails to recognize this because of his theological stance: “In Christ, the Father decentres himself among men… but Milton cannot understand this due to his Arianism.”

Simultaneous decentering of Man: Eagleton claims that the decentering of God leads to the decentering of Man, aligning Christian thought with traditional Marxism: “The Christian stands… with the more traditional Marxist who decentres both [God and Man].”

Pluralistic Meaning in History and Faith

Ceaseless decentering in history and faith: Eagleton concludes that, for Christian faith, the process of decentering in history is mirrored by the triune God, whose meaning is dispersed and pluralistic: “The ceaseless decentring and deconstructing of Man by the discourses that ‘live’ him is part of that deeper movement… which is, for Christian faith, the triune God.”

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton

Term/Concept	Explanation	Reference/Context in Text
Humanism	A belief in the value and agency of human beings, typically focusing on human experiences and achievements.	Eagleton critiques how Marxism rejects humanism, once central to the Christian-Marxist dialogue. “Marxism is not a Humanism.”
Structuralism	A theoretical approach that sees human culture as a structure, where elements are interrelated and governed by rules.	Marxism and structuralism work together to “de-centre” the human subject, focusing on structures instead of individuals.
Decentering	The process of challenging and removing something or someone from the center of meaning or authority.	Central theme in Eagleton’s work, especially regarding the dethroning of “Man” and “God” from history.
Historical Materialism	A Marxist theory that history develops through material conditions rather than ideas or beliefs.	Eagleton discusses how traditional Marxism moves away from humanism toward a more structural analysis.
Fetishism	The attribution of inherent value or power to an object, often in a way that masks its true function or origin.	A critique of how centralizing ideas (God, the monarch, gold) act as fetishes, obscuring the plurality of meanings.
Atheism	The absence of belief in deities, often used in contrast to theism.	Eagleton notes how atheism becomes politically relevant in rejecting the centralized authority of God in society.
Semiotics	The study of signs and symbols, particularly how meaning is created and communicated.	Eagleton refers to Marxist semioticians who explore how language and signs structure society and thought.
Discourse	A system of knowledge and meaning that governs how we speak, think, and act in society.	History is seen as a set of discourses that ‘speak’ man, rather than the other way around.
Arianism	A theological belief that Jesus Christ is subordinate to God the Father, contrary to the doctrine of the Trinity.	Eagleton discusses how Milton’s Arianism affects his understanding of the decentering of God and Man.
Deconstruction	A method of critical analysis that seeks to uncover multiple meanings within a text, showing how they undermine their own logic.	Eagleton applies Derrida’s concept of deconstruction to explore how authority figures like God or monarchs are decentered.
Transcendence	The belief in something that goes beyond ordinary experience, often related to God or an ultimate truth.	Eagleton critiques both Christian and Marxist humanism for seeking a transcendental meaning or essence.

Contribution of “Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

Marxist Theory

Critique of Humanist Marxism: Eagleton critiques the humanistic interpretation of Marxism, focusing on structural and materialist interpretations.
- “Marxism is not a Humanism.” – Aligns with Althusser’s rejection of humanist Marxism.

Decentering the Human Subject: Eagleton argues that history is shaped by social structures, not individual human beings or collective subjects.
- “It is history… which ‘speaks’ man, which constitutes the human subject.”
Emphasis on Social Formations: Eagleton shifts the focus from human subjects to social formations as key players in history.
- “The subjects of history are not ‘men’, not even ‘social classes’, but… social formations.”

Structuralism

Focus on Structures Over Individuals: Eagleton applies structuralist principles by emphasizing that human beings are products of larger societal structures.
- “The study of history is the science of these rule-bound discourses… its aim is to disengage those laws.”
Human Experience Subordinated to Structures: Eagleton argues that societal structures shape history rather than individual human experience.
- “Like the unconscious, [history] has its reasons of which ‘living individuals’ know nothing.”

Poststructuralism

Decentering and Plurality of Meaning: Reflecting poststructuralist ideas, Eagleton emphasizes the ceaseless decentering of meaning, rejecting any fixed or centralized authority.
- “The ceaseless decentring and deconstructing of Man… is part of that deeper movement.”

Critique of Centralized Authority: Eagleton critiques the concept of centralized meaning, such as God or Man, as oppressive and misleading.
- “Atheistic Marxism attacks… some single enshrined essence of meaning… as a fetish.”
Instability of Meaning: Aligning with Derrida’s deconstruction, Eagleton argues that meaning is fluid and always being remade, rejecting any notion of fixed truths.
- “We are always already in the midst of meaning, traversed by the multiple codes which ‘speak‘ us.”

Examples of Critiques Through “Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Critique Through Eagleton’s “Decentering God”	Reference/Explanation
*Paradise Lost* by John Milton	Decentering of God’s authority: Milton’s portrayal of God reflects a distant, bureaucratic authority figure, leading to Satan’s failed rebellion.	“God seems to have withdrawn his presence from history… Satan tries to de-centre, dethrone… God.”
	Milton’s struggle with God’s authority: Eagleton critiques Milton’s failure to resolve the tension between free will and divine authority.	“Milton… torn as he is between the absolute authority of God and the revolutionary freedom of man.”
*The Hidden God* by Lucien Goldmann	God as an absent, unintelligible force: Goldmann critiques how God’s withdrawal from history leaves the world unintelligible, a reflection of a historical deadlock.	“God is at once present and absent in the world, robbing it of value because of his withdrawal.”
	Historical context of God’s absence: Eagleton uses Goldmann’s analysis to show how the emergence of bourgeois rationalism led to God’s withdrawal.	“Goldmann situates this ideology in… a deadlocked transitional phase… between absolutist-monarchical and bourgeois society.”
*Samson Agonistes* by John Milton	Decentering of God in history: Eagleton applies decentering to Milton’s portrayal of God as distant and arbitrary, leading to the tragic isolation of Samson.	“By the time of Samson Agonistes… God is the utterly remote presence whose arbitrary decrees you obey.”
	Failure to de-center the human subject: Milton does not manage to decenter the human subject in history due to his theological stance.	“Milton… is incapable of recognising… that Christ’s decentring of the Father is simultaneously a decentring of Man.”
*The Fall of Man* (Biblical Narrative)	Critique of authority and rebellion: Eagleton critiques the Biblical Fall of Man as a revolutionary decentering attempt (by Satan) that fails and re-establishes repressive authority.	“Satan tries to de-centre, dethrone the poem’s aloof, coldly bureaucratic God and falls to hell.”
	Theological implications of decentering: Eagleton suggests that both God’s authority and human freedom are at odds, creating contradictions within the narrative.	“The Christian stands… with the more traditional Marxist who decentres both.”

Criticism Against “Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton

Overemphasis on Structuralism

Neglect of Human Agency: Critics may argue that Eagleton’s focus on social structures over individual agency dismisses the role of human experience in shaping history.
- By asserting “history… constitutes the human subject,” Eagleton downplays individual contributions, which could be seen as reductive.

Excessive Reliance on Marxist Framework

Reduction of Complex Religious Thought to Materialism: Eagleton’s Marxist analysis might oversimplify religious belief systems, reducing them to mere ideological constructs without engaging with their spiritual or metaphysical dimensions.
- The claim that “the centrality of Man is merely a displacement of the supremacy of God” may be seen as an overly simplistic interpretation of religious humanism.

Dismissal of Humanism

Critique of Humanism as Dated: Some may argue that Eagleton’s rejection of humanism is unnecessarily dismissive, ignoring how humanistic principles can coexist with more structural analyses.
- Eagleton’s statement that “humanism… forestalls us from thinking through society as structure” overlooks the continuing relevance of human-centered perspectives.

Ambiguity in Deconstruction

Potential for Theoretical Vagueness: Eagleton’s embrace of poststructuralist ideas, such as deconstruction, may lead to a lack of clarity or practical application, as meaning becomes constantly deferred and fluid.
- The notion that “meaning is ceaselessly exterior to itself” could be criticized for creating interpretive instability, making it difficult to engage with concrete political or literary critique.

Underestimation of Theological Complexity

Simplification of Christian Theology: Critics may argue that Eagleton simplifies complex theological debates, particularly regarding Milton and the decentering of God, without fully exploring the spiritual and philosophical nuances.
- His critique of Milton’s Arianism, for example, may be seen as reductive: “Milton… incapable of recognising the other side of that truth.”

Representative Quotations from “Decentering God” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Marxism is not a Humanism.”	Eagleton aligns with Althusser’s view, rejecting the idea that Marxism should focus on human-centered perspectives.
“It is history… which ‘speaks’ man, which constitutes the human subject.”	Eagleton emphasizes that history, shaped by social structures and discourses, creates individuals rather than vice versa.
“The subjects of history are not ‘men’, not even ‘social classes’, but… social formations.”	This challenges the humanistic view by centering on social structures rather than human subjects or collective groups.
“Atheistic Marxism attacks… some single enshrined essence of meaning… as a fetish.”	Eagleton critiques both religious and humanist ideologies for focusing on a central, fixed meaning, which he views as limiting.
“Like the unconscious, [history] has its reasons of which ‘living individuals’ know nothing.”	This reflects Eagleton’s structuralist influence, suggesting that individuals are unaware of the larger social forces shaping them.
“Satan tries to de-centre, dethrone the poem’s aloof, coldly bureaucratic God and falls to hell.”	Eagleton uses Milton’s Paradise Lost as an example of a failed attempt to decenter authority, illustrating the dangers of misguided rebellion.
“We are always already in the midst of meaning, traversed by the multiple codes which ‘speak’ us.”	Eagleton emphasizes the poststructuralist idea that meaning is never fixed, but constantly shaped by various cultural codes.
“For it is not that Christ is the medium by which the privileged subject of the Father reduplicates itself in the privileged subject of Man.”	Eagleton critiques the Christian humanist idea that Christ serves to restore the central authority of Man, offering a different theological reading.
“The ceaseless decentring and deconstructing of Man by the discourses that ‘live’ him is part of that deeper movement.”	This quotation illustrates Eagleton’s alignment with poststructuralism and Marxism, advocating for continuous deconstruction of both God and Man.
“Milton… torn as he is between the absolute authority of God and the revolutionary freedom of man.”	Eagleton identifies the central tension in Milton’s work, where the conflict between divine authority and human freedom remains unresolved.

“O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks: A Critical Analysis

“O Little Town of Bethlehem,” a beloved Christmas carol, was penned by Phillips Brooks in 1867, and included in his collection of hymns, “Carols for Christmastide.”

Introduction: “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

“O Little Town of Bethlehem,” a beloved Christmas carol, was penned by Phillips Brooks in 1867, and included in his collection of hymns, “Carols for Christmastide.” The poem’s simple yet evocative imagery and heartfelt sentiment have made it a timeless classic. The main idea of the carol is to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ and the hope and peace that his coming brings to the world. The poem’s qualities include its use of vivid imagery, such as “street lamps gleaming,” to create a sense of wonder and awe. Additionally, the carol’s repetition of the refrain “O holy night” reinforces its message of reverence and devotion.

Text: “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

O little town of Bethlehem, how still we see thee lie!
Above thy deep and dreamless sleep the silent stars go by.
Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light;
The hopes and fears of all the years are met in thee tonight.
For Christ is born of Mary, and gathered all above,
While mortals sleep, the angels keep their watch of wond’ring love.
O morning stars, together proclaim the holy birth,
And praises sing to God the King, and peace to men on earth!

How silently, how silently, the wondrous Gift is giv’n;
So God imparts to human hearts the blessings of His Heav’n.
No ear may hear His coming, but in this world of sin,
Where meek souls will receive Him still, the dear Christ enters in.
Where children pure and happy pray to the blessed Child,
Where misery cries out to Thee, Son of the mother mild;
Where charity stands watching and faith holds wide the door,
The dark night wakes, the glory breaks, and Christmas comes once more.
O holy Child of Bethlehem, descend to us, we pray;
Cast out our sin, and enter in, be born in us today.
We hear the Christmas angels the great glad tidings tell;
Oh, come to us, abide with us, our Lord Emmanuel!

Annotations: “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

Line	Annotation
O little town of Bethlehem, how still we see thee lie!	The speaker observes the quiet and peaceful nature of Bethlehem at night, suggesting a sense of calm and stillness.
Above thy deep and dreamless sleep the silent stars go by.	The town is in a deep, undisturbed sleep, with only the stars silently moving overhead, highlighting a tranquil scene.
Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light;	Despite the darkness of the streets, there is a spiritual light shining, representing the birth of Christ as the eternal source of hope.
The hopes and fears of all the years are met in thee tonight.	Bethlehem becomes a symbolic place where humanity’s long-held hopes and anxieties converge with the birth of Christ.
For Christ is born of Mary, and gathered all above,	The birth of Christ is highlighted, referencing the Virgin Mary and the heavenly realm’s attention to this momentous event.
While mortals sleep, the angels keep their watch of wond’ring love.	While humans are unaware, angels are watching over this sacred event, filled with love and awe.
O morning stars, together proclaim the holy birth,	The stars, symbolizing celestial bodies or perhaps angels, are called upon to celebrate and announce Christ’s birth.
And praises sing to God the King, and peace to men on earth!	A joyful proclamation of praise is offered to God, with the hope of peace being brought to humanity through Christ.
How silently, how silently, the wondrous Gift is giv’n;	The birth of Christ, described as a “wondrous Gift,” is delivered quietly and without grandeur, emphasizing humility.
So God imparts to human hearts the blessings of His Heav’n.	God’s blessings are bestowed upon humanity through Christ, touching the hearts of individuals.
No ear may hear His coming, but in this world of sin,	The coming of Christ goes unnoticed by most, yet He enters a world darkened by sin.
Where meek souls will receive Him still, the dear Christ enters in.	Christ is welcomed into the hearts of those humble and open to His message, reinforcing themes of humility and acceptance.
Where children pure and happy pray to the blessed Child,	Children, innocent and joyful, pray to Christ, the “blessed Child,” portraying an image of purity and devotion.
Where misery cries out to Thee, Son of the mother mild;	Even in times of suffering and distress, people call out to Christ for comfort and salvation.
Where charity stands watching and faith holds wide the door,	Acts of love and faith prepare the way for Christ’s arrival, symbolizing readiness to receive Him.
The dark night wakes, the glory breaks, and Christmas comes once more.	The metaphorical “dark night” of sin and suffering gives way to the light and glory of Christ’s birth, marking the celebration of Christmas.
O holy Child of Bethlehem, descend to us, we pray;	The speaker prays for Christ, the holy child born in Bethlehem, to come to them personally, asking for His presence.
Cast out our sin, and enter in, be born in us today.	A plea for spiritual renewal, asking Christ to remove sin and dwell within the believer’s heart.
We hear the Christmas angels the great glad tidings tell;	The joyous news of Christ’s birth is proclaimed by angels, a familiar theme in the nativity story.
Oh, come to us, abide with us, our Lord Emmanuel!	A final prayer asking Christ (Emmanuel, meaning “God with us”) to dwell with the people and be present in their lives.

Literary And Poetic Devices: “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

Device	Definition	Example	Explanation
Alliteration	The repetition of initial consonant sounds.	“silent stars”	Emphasizes the quiet and peaceful atmosphere.
Anaphora	The repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or sentences.	“O little town of Bethlehem” (repeated at the beginning of each stanza)	Creates a sense of rhythm and emphasizes the central theme.
Assonance	The repetition of vowel sounds within words.	“deep and dreamless sleep”	Adds a musical quality and reinforces the theme of peace.
Contrast	The juxtaposition of opposing ideas or images.	“dark streets shineth the everlasting Light”	Highlights the significance of Christ’s birth amidst darkness.
Imagery	The use of vivid language to create mental images.	“silent stars go by”	Paints a picture of a peaceful night sky.
Metaphor	A comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.”	“The hopes and fears of all the years are met in thee tonight”	Suggests that Bethlehem symbolizes the meeting point of humanity’s hopes and fears.
Onomatopoeia	The use of words that imitate sounds.	“How silently, how silently”	Emphasizes the peaceful and quiet nature of Christ’s birth.
Personification	Giving human qualities to non-human things.	“O morning stars, together proclaim the holy birth”	The stars are portrayed as active participants in the celebration.
Repetition	The repeated use of words, phrases, or lines.	“O holy Child of Bethlehem” (repeated at the beginning of the final stanza)	Reinforces the central theme and creates a sense of urgency.
Rhyme	The correspondence of sounds at the end of words.	“above” and “love,” “giv’n” and “Heav’n”	Adds a musical quality and makes the poem easier to memorize.
Symbolism	The use of objects or images to represent something else.	Bethlehem represents the birthplace of Christ and a symbol of hope.
Syntax	The arrangement of words in a sentence.	“Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light”	The inverted sentence structure creates a sense of wonder and emphasis.
Tone	The author’s attitude toward the subject matter.	Reverent, peaceful, and hopeful	The tone reflects the sacredness of the event being described.
Verse Form	The pattern of lines and stanzas.	Four-line stanzas with an ABAB rhyme scheme	Provides a structure and rhythm for the poem.
Word Choice	The selection of specific words to convey meaning and evoke emotions.	“everlasting Light,” “wond’ring love,” “blessed Child”	The words chosen contribute to the poem’s religious and emotional impact.
Figurative Language	The use of language that is not meant to be taken literally.	Metaphors, similes, personification, and symbolism	Adds depth and meaning to the poem.
Parallelism	The use of similar grammatical structures.	“Where children pure and happy pray to the blessed Child,” “Where misery cries out to Thee, Son of the mother mild”	Creates a sense of balance and rhythm.
Antithesis	The juxtaposition of contrasting ideas or images.	“For Christ is born of Mary, and gathered all above, While mortals sleep, the angels keep their watch of wond’ring love”	Highlights the contrast between the divine and human realms.
Enjambment	The continuation of a sentence across lines of poetry.	“O little town of Bethlehem, how still we see thee lie! Above thy deep and dreamless sleep the silent stars go by.”	Creates a flowing rhythm and emphasizes the connection between ideas.
Hyperbole	Exaggeration for effect.	“the everlasting Light”	Emphasizes the significance of Christ’s birth.

Themes: “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

The Birth of Christ and Divine Grace: The poem primarily focuses on the birth of Jesus Christ and the divine grace associated with this event. This is evident in lines like “For Christ is born of Mary, and gathered all above” and “How silently, how silently, the wondrous Gift is giv’n.” The poem emphasizes the significance of Christ’s birth as a source of hope, peace, and salvation for humanity.
The Contrast Between Darkness and Light: The poem contrasts the darkness of the world with the light brought by Christ’s birth. This is exemplified in lines such as “Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light” and “The dark night wakes, the glory breaks, and Christmas comes once more.” The contrast underscores the transformative power of Christ’s coming.
The Importance of Faith and Hope: The poem highlights the significance of faith and hope in the face of adversity. It encourages readers to believe in the power of Christ and to maintain hope for a better future. Lines like “Where charity stands watching and faith holds wide the door” and “O holy Child of Bethlehem, descend to us, we pray” emphasize the importance of these virtues.

The Universal Appeal of Christmas: The poem’s message of peace, hope, and love resonates with people of all faiths and backgrounds. It emphasizes the universal significance of Christmas as a time for reflection, celebration, and renewal. Lines like “O morning stars, together proclaim the holy birth” and “And praises sing to God the King, and peace to men on earth!” convey this message of unity and goodwill.

Literary Theories and “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

Literary Theory	Application to “O Little Town of Bethlehem”	References from the Poem
Theological/Religious Criticism	Focuses on the poem’s reflection of Christian beliefs about Christ’s birth, redemption, and divine grace. It emphasizes God’s intervention in human history through the birth of Christ.	1. “For Christ is born of Mary, and gathered all above, While mortals sleep, the angels keep their watch of wond’ring love.” — Depicts Christ’s birth as a divine event witnessed by angels. 2. “The hopes and fears of all the years are met in thee tonight.” — Christ as the fulfillment of humanity’s long-held hopes and fears, symbolizing salvation.
Historical/Cultural Criticism	Examines the poem in the context of 19th-century Christian values and the cultural significance of Bethlehem. The poem mirrors traditional views of Christmas and its religious importance.	1. “O morning stars, together proclaim the holy birth” — A reflection of the traditional Christian imagery associated with the nativity. 2. “O holy Child of Bethlehem, descend to us, we pray” — Emphasizes the historical and cultural importance of Bethlehem in Christian tradition, especially during the 19th century.
Symbolism/Allegory	Explores how Bethlehem, light, and darkness symbolize spiritual truths. Bethlehem represents the human heart, while light represents Christ, and darkness symbolizes sin or spiritual ignorance.	1. “Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light” — The “everlasting Light” symbolizes Christ, illuminating the spiritual darkness of the world. 2. “No ear may hear His coming, but in this world of sin, Where meek souls will receive Him still, the dear Christ enters in.” — Depicts spiritual transformation and redemption through Christ’s humble arrival.

Critical Questions about “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

How does the poem portray the relationship between humanity and divinity? The poem portrays a close relationship between humanity and divinity, emphasizing the accessibility of God through Christ. Lines such as “For Christ is born of Mary” and “The dear Christ enters in” highlight the incarnation of God in human form. The poem suggests that Christ’s birth bridges the gap between heaven and earth, making God accessible to all.
What is the significance of the imagery of darkness and light in the poem? The imagery of darkness and light serves as a powerful symbol of the contrast between sin and salvation. The darkness represents the world’s state of sin and despair, while the light symbolizes the hope and redemption brought by Christ’s birth. Lines like “Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light” and “The dark night wakes, the glory breaks” emphasize this contrast and the transformative power of Christ’s coming.

How does the poem address the themes of hope and peace? The poem offers a message of hope and peace, suggesting that Christ’s birth brings hope for humanity and a promise of peace on earth. Lines such as “And praises sing to God the King, and peace to men on earth!” and “The dear Christ enters in” convey this message. The poem suggests that through faith in Christ, individuals can find hope and peace in the midst of life’s challenges.
How does the poem’s use of repetition and imagery contribute to its overall impact? The poem’s use of repetition and imagery plays a crucial role in its overall impact. The repetition of certain phrases, such as “O Little Town of Bethlehem,” creates a sense of rhythm and emphasizes the central theme. The vivid imagery, including the description of the night sky and the birth of Christ, helps to evoke emotions and create a powerful mental picture. Together, these elements contribute to the poem’s enduring appeal and its ability to touch the hearts of readers.

Literary Works Similar to “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

“Silent Night” by Franz Gruber and Joseph Mohr: This Christmas carol shares a similar theme of celebrating the birth of Christ and the peace it brings to the world.

“It Came Upon a Midnight Clear” by Edmund Sears: This poem also emphasizes the peaceful and miraculous nature of Christ’s birth, using celestial imagery to convey the divine event.
“O Come, O Thou Faithful and True” by John Mason Neale: Both poems express adoration and reverence for Jesus Christ, focusing on his divine nature and the salvation he offers.
“Angels We Have Heard on High” by Henry Baker: This carol shares a similar theme of angels announcing the birth of Christ and the joy and wonder it brings.

Representative Quotations of “O Little Town of Bethlehem” by Phillips Brooks

Quotation	Context	Theoretical Perspective
“O little town of Bethlehem, how still we see thee lie!”	Opening line, depicting the peacefulness and stillness of Bethlehem on the night of Christ’s birth.	Symbolism/Allegory: Bethlehem symbolizes the humble and quiet reception of divine grace, representing the human heart open to Christ.
“Above thy deep and dreamless sleep, the silent stars go by.”	Describes the serenity of the town, with only the stars moving overhead, setting a calm, sacred atmosphere.	Theological/Religious Criticism: The stillness reflects a world unaware of the divine event about to occur, emphasizing the mystery of God’s intervention in human history.
“Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light;”	Contrasts the physical darkness of Bethlehem with the spiritual illumination brought by Christ’s birth.	Symbolism/Allegory: The “everlasting Light” symbolizes Christ, who brings spiritual enlightenment to the world, which is darkened by sin.
“The hopes and fears of all the years are met in thee tonight.”	Refers to the birth of Christ as the fulfillment of humanity’s long-held hopes and fears.	Theological/Religious Criticism: Christ’s birth is portrayed as the answer to mankind’s deepest anxieties and aspirations, offering salvation and peace.
“For Christ is born of Mary, and gathered all above,”	Refers to the nativity scene, with the birth of Christ observed by angels in heaven.	Historical/Cultural Criticism: Highlights traditional Christian narratives of the nativity and the divine nature of Christ’s birth, as celebrated in 19th-century culture.
“While mortals sleep, the angels keep their watch of wond’ring love.”	Angels watch over humanity as they remain unaware of the sacred event taking place.	Theological/Religious Criticism: The presence of angels signifies divine protection and love, while mortals remain spiritually unaware of Christ’s arrival.
“How silently, how silently, the wondrous Gift is giv’n;”	Describes the humble and quiet manner in which Christ enters the world.	Symbolism/Allegory: Christ’s arrival represents the quiet, unseen transformation of the soul that occurs without fanfare but has profound spiritual significance.
“No ear may hear His coming, but in this world of sin,”	The world is too spiritually unaware to hear or recognize Christ’s arrival in the midst of sin.	Theological/Religious Criticism: Suggests that spiritual deafness prevents humanity from fully understanding or recognizing divine intervention in a sinful world.
“Where meek souls will receive Him still, the dear Christ enters in.”	Refers to Christ being welcomed into the hearts of the humble and faithful.	Symbolism/Allegory: Christ entering “meek souls” symbolizes spiritual openness and humility as the path to receiving divine grace.
“O holy Child of Bethlehem, descend to us, we pray;”	A prayer for Christ to come into the hearts of the faithful, asking for divine presence and spiritual renewal.	Theological/Religious Criticism: Reflects the desire for personal salvation and closeness to Christ, central to Christian spiritual practice and belief.

“Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton first appeared in 1982 in the International Socialism journal.

Introduction: “Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

“Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton first appeared in 1982 in the International Socialism journal. This essay is considered a seminal piece in Marxist literary theory, marking a significant contribution to the field. Eagleton’s work explores the relationship between literature and society, arguing that literary texts are shaped by and reflect the social, economic, and political conditions of their time. His analysis offers a critical perspective on the role of literature in perpetuating or challenging dominant ideologies.

Summary of “Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Origins in Marx and Engels’ Work
- Marxist literary criticism traces its roots to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Their work provides a scattered but foundational set of ideas on literary form, realism, and aesthetics.
- Marx’s contribution to aesthetics is interwoven with his larger debates on material production, labor, and commodification, making literary criticism less of an isolated practice and more of a part of his general theory of superstructures. (Lifshitz, 1973).
Materialist Criticism and Historical Context
- A central theme in Marxist criticism is the material basis of cultural practices. Marx and Engels explored the relationship between aesthetic superstructures and material history, although they didn’t formulate a full theory of ideological superstructures.
- Marxist criticism must account for how history produces literary texts as complex signifiers, requiring criticism to be understood as a product of specific historical epochs and contexts.
Bolshevik Revolution and Post-Revolutionary Marxist Criticism
- The Bolshevik Revolution marks a seismic shift in Marxist criticism, leading to the intersection of different critical modes, particularly seen in the collision of ideas in Trotsky’s Literature and Revolution.
- Pre-revolutionary critics like Georgi Plekhanov adhered to a sociological and anthropological form of criticism, while post-revolutionary critics like Lenin and Gorki advocated for a committed, politically engaged literature. This laid the groundwork for concepts like socialist realism.
Contradictions within Marxist Aesthetic Theory
- After the revolution, Marxist aesthetics grappled with multiple theoretical problems: the relationship between art and class structure, the role of art in revolutionary politics, and the dilemma of whether bourgeois culture should be assimilated or destroyed.
- The dominance of socialist realism under Stalin marked a setback for more nuanced, materialist aesthetic practices. This led to a return to the ideas of Marx, Engels, and Hegel by critics like Georg Lukács and the Frankfurt School, who tried to preserve the critical function of art in the face of Stalinist repression (Jay, 1973).
Diverse Marxist Approaches
- Marxist aesthetics evolved into multiple streams. Brecht and Benjamin, for instance, rejected the idealism of earlier Marxist critics, focusing on the material conditions of artistic production. They viewed art as a transformative practice, not just a reflection of political ideology (Benjamin, 1973).
- Other critics, such as Galvano Della Volpe, applied a rational materialist analysis to literary texts, focusing on semiotic codes and literary form. His work reflects an alignment with the Russian Formalists’ detailed attention to textual structures.
The Need for a Structural-Historical Approach
- Eagleton argues for a conjuncture of different critical modes—attention to literary form (from the Hegelian tradition), an understanding of art as material production (from Futurism and Constructivism), and a semiological critique of texts (from Formalism). These modes need to be combined to create a genuinely materialist literary criticism.
- The failure to achieve this synthesis has led to the dominance of partial, internally imbalanced approaches in Marxist criticism, resulting in theoretical stagnation in some areas.
Contemporary Marxist Criticism
- In the English context, Eagleton critiques the eclecticism of materialist criticism, which lacks a scientific basis and relies too much on empirical sociology or romantic idealism. He cites Raymond Williams as an example of a critic who, while pioneering, does not fully embody a Marxist approach.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Term/Concept	Explanation	Relevance in Eagleton’s Essay
Aesthetics	The philosophical study of beauty and art, particularly its principles and forms.	Eagleton discusses how Marx and Engels did not develop a systematic aesthetics, but their work offers foundational ideas.
Superstructure	In Marxist theory, the social, political, and ideological systems that arise from the economic base.	Literary texts are seen as part of the superstructure, reflecting and mediating material history.
Materialism	A focus on material conditions (economy, labor) as the basis for understanding society and culture.	Marxist literary criticism emphasizes the material basis of cultural practices and their economic roots.
Dialectical Materialism	The Marxist methodology of understanding history and society through the contradictions of material conditions.	This method is central to Marxist criticism, which views literary texts through their relation to material production.
Realism	A style of writing that depicts life as it is, often focusing on the struggles of everyday people.	Realism is valued in Marxist criticism for its ability to reveal the material conditions of society.
Reflectionism	The theory that art reflects society and its class structures.	Critiqued by Eagleton as insufficiently nuanced, especially in the works of Plekhanov and early Marxist critics.
Commitment in Art	The idea that literature and art should be politically engaged and promote revolutionary values.	Figures like Lenin and Gorki advocated for a committed literature to support revolutionary change.
Socialist Realism	A Soviet aesthetic that promoted art as a tool for advancing socialist ideals, often through idealized depictions of the working class.	Eagleton critiques its eventual degeneration under Stalinism as a reduction of art to political propaganda.
Formalism	A literary theory focused on the structure and form of literary texts rather than their content.	Eagleton discusses its relevance in the Russian context, particularly in contrast to Marxist materialist approaches.
Semiotics	The study of signs and symbols in language and literature, analyzing how meaning is produced.	Eagleton points to critics like Galvano Della Volpe, who combined Marxist theory with semiotic analysis of texts.
Bourgeois Culture	The culture of the middle/upper class, often critiqued in Marxism for being tied to capitalist interests.	Marxist critics debate whether bourgeois culture should be assimilated or destroyed in revolutionary practice.
Hegelianism	A philosophical tradition based on the work of Hegel, emphasizing dialectics and historical development.	Influences Marxist aesthetics, particularly in the work of Lukács and the Frankfurt School.
Proletkult	A Soviet cultural movement that aimed to develop a new, proletarian art form distinct from bourgeois culture.	Eagleton discusses its failure to produce a lasting materialist aesthetic, overshadowed by socialist realism.
Textual Ideology	The idea that literary texts carry implicit ideologies related to the class structures of society.	Marxist critics analyze how ideology manifests in literature, often through contradictions and ambiguities.
Conjuncture	A specific historical moment where different forces or modes of criticism collide or intersect.	Eagleton uses this concept to describe key periods in Marxist criticism, such as the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution.

Contribution of “Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

Beyond “Reflectionism”: Eagleton criticizes simplistic views that see literature as merely reflecting social structures. He argues for a more complex understanding where literary texts are shaped by, but also potentially challenge, dominant ideologies.
Multiple Strata of Marxist Criticism: Eagleton identifies different historical moments and trends within Marxist criticism. He highlights the tension between “reflectionism,” revolutionary aesthetics, and the focus on textual production and semiotics.
The Importance of the Bolshevik Revolution: The essay emphasizes the pivotal role of the Bolshevik revolution in shaping Marxist criticism. It brought various critical modes like revolutionary aesthetics, formalism, and futurism into sharp focus.

The Need for Conjuncture: Eagleton proposes the necessity of a “conjuncture” where historical materialism combines with the strengths of other critical approaches. This includes attention to:
- Textual Form and Ideology: Building on Hegelian aesthetics, a focus on how form, value, ideology, and history interrelate within a text.
- Material Practice and Production: Analyzing literature as a form of production with its own social relations, drawing from the work of Brecht and Benjamin.
- Textual Codes and Conventions: Studying how meaning is constructed through language and codes, as explored by Formalism and semiotics.
Against Eclecticism: Eagleton argues against simply borrowing from different approaches. He emphasizes the need for a rigorous and unified “scientific aesthetics” grounded in historical materialism.

Examples of Critiques Through “Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Marxist Critique
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen	While Austen’s novel critiques the superficiality of class-based marriage, it also reinforces the patriarchal norms of the time. The characters’ concerns with wealth, status, and marriage proposals reflect the societal pressures of the era.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald	Fitzgerald’s novel exposes the emptiness of the American Dream and the corrupting influence of wealth. The characters’ pursuit of material success and their ultimate downfall highlight the destructive nature of capitalism.
The Jungle by Upton Sinclair	Sinclair’s novel provides a scathing critique of the capitalist system through its depiction of the harsh working conditions and exploitation of immigrant workers in the meatpacking industry. The novel calls for social and economic reforms to address the injustices faced by the working class.
Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison	Ellison’s novel explores the experiences of an unnamed African American protagonist who struggles to find his identity in a racist society. The novel critiques the invisibility and marginalization of Black people in America, highlighting the systemic racism embedded within the capitalist system.

Criticism Against “Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Lack of a Fully Developed Aesthetic Theory by Marx and Engels
- Critics argue that Marx and Engels did not formulate a comprehensive or systematic theory of art and aesthetics, making later Marxist critics rely on fragmented insights.
Overemphasis on Material Conditions at the Expense of Artistic Autonomy
- Some argue that Marxist criticism reduces art to mere reflections of economic and social conditions, neglecting the autonomy of artistic creativity and innovation.

Simplistic Reflectionism in Early Marxist Critics
- Eagleton critiques the simplistic notion of “reflectionism,” particularly in the works of Georgi Plekhanov, which suggests that literature directly mirrors class structures without accounting for the complexity of artistic representation.
Reduction of Art to Political Propaganda in Socialist Realism
- The concept of socialist realism, particularly during Stalinism, is seen as a reductive approach to art that forces it into political propaganda, stifling creativity and diversity in literary expression.
Internal Contradictions within Marxist Criticism
- Marxist literary criticism struggles with its own contradictions, such as whether bourgeois culture should be assimilated or destroyed, or whether artistic value can be separated from political progressiveness.

Over-reliance on Historical Contextualization
- Critics suggest that Marxist criticism sometimes focuses too heavily on the historical and material context of literature, potentially ignoring the aesthetic, formal, or symbolic elements of texts.
Neglect of the Formal and Semiotic Aspects of Literature
- While Eagleton acknowledges the importance of formalism and semiotics, critics note that traditional Marxist criticism often overlooks the intrinsic formal properties of a literary text in favor of broader ideological or material concerns.
Eclecticism in Contemporary Materialist Criticism
- Eagleton critiques the eclectic nature of contemporary materialist criticism, which often lacks a coherent methodology and borrows too freely from other theoretical approaches, diluting its effectiveness.

Failure to Adequately Address Modern Forms of Art and Literature
- Some critics argue that Marxist literary criticism struggles to deal with contemporary, postmodern forms of art and literature, which do not easily fit into its frameworks based on realism, class struggle, and historical materialism.

Representative Quotations from “Marxist Literary Criticism” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Marxist criticism begins, naturally, with the work of Marx and Engels themselves.”	Eagleton emphasizes the foundational role of Marx and Engels in Marxist literary criticism, though their work on literature was often fragmentary.
“…it is still remarkable how many of the issues now central to the development of a Marxist criticism emerge in embryonic form in their oeuvre.”	Despite the lack of a systematic theory, Eagleton highlights how Marx and Engels laid the groundwork for many key topics in Marxist literary criticism.
“It is the materialist method of the Grundrisse and Capital, not hints gleaned from the ‘literary criticism’, which must form the basis of anything worthy of the title of a ‘Marxist criticism’.”	Eagleton argues that Marxist criticism should be based on the broader materialist method of Marx’s economic and social theories, not just literary insights.
“The problem for Marxist criticism… is how it comes about that history produces (and reproduces) that set of ambiguous significations which we term the literary text.”	Eagleton identifies a key challenge for Marxist criticism: understanding how historical processes produce literary texts and the meanings they carry.
“Before the revolution, Marxist criticism was nurtured largely in the shadow of the later Engels.”	Eagleton discusses how early Marxist criticism was heavily influenced by Engels, whose approach combined sociological and anthropological insights.
“…socialist realism, the concept of literary partisanship, degenerate into the theoretical nullity of proletkult and its Stalinist aftermath.”	This quote critiques the decline of socialist realism into a tool for political propaganda under Stalinism, losing its critical and aesthetic value.
“The epistemological problem: is art reflection, refraction, creation, transformation, reproduction, production?”	Eagleton outlines the complex theoretical issues that Marxist criticism faces when trying to define the relationship between art and society.
“The failure to achieve this synthesis has had dire consequences; as the strata have been wedged apart, each has displayed a tendency to subside internally under its own unsupported weight.”	Eagleton laments the fragmentation of different critical approaches within Marxist criticism, resulting in their internal weaknesses.
“One might formulate the problem paradoxically by saying that our best Marxist critic – Raymond Williams – is not in fact a Marxist.”	Eagleton provocatively suggests that while Raymond Williams made significant contributions to literary criticism, he does not fully embody Marxist theory.
“…the need for a scientific aesthetics cannot be ignored.”	Eagleton concludes by calling for a more rigorous, systematic approach to aesthetics within Marxist literary criticism to go beyond mere interpretation.

“The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1967 in the journal New Blackfriars, is considered a significant contribution to the fields of literature and literary theory.

Introduction: “The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton

“The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1967 in the journal New Blackfriars, is considered a significant contribution to the fields of literature and literary theory. Eagleton argues that liberalism, while valuable in promoting individual rights and freedoms, ultimately fails to address the underlying social and economic inequalities that perpetuate injustice. He critiques liberalism’s emphasis on formal equality and its neglect of the structural power imbalances that shape society. This essay helped to establish Eagleton as a leading figure in Marxist literary criticism and continues to be widely discussed and debated in academic circles.

Summary of “The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton

The Focus on Liberal Christian Tradition
Terry Eagleton critiques Rosemary Haughton’s book as a significant contribution to liberal Christian thought. It successfully connects psychological, literary, and Christian insights to explore themes like love, freedom, and maturity in personal relationships. However, Eagleton argues that the book is deeply embedded in the liberal tradition, focusing on personal experience and neglecting broader societal structures, politics, and history.
The Limits of Individualism and Personal Experience
Eagleton notes that Haughton’s focus is primarily on individual experience and the psychological dimensions of human relationships. This leads to a narrow interpretation of what it means to be human. While the personal aspects are sensitively handled, the exclusion of political and historical struggles, collective actions, and broader social commitments weakens the analysis of humanity.

Critique of Christian Liberalism’s Inward Focus
According to Eagleton, Christian liberalism, as represented in Haughton’s work, emphasizes an inward spiritual experience over external social realities. This creates a dualism between the personal and societal, where external actions and institutions are seen as mere aids to personal spiritual growth, rather than integral components of human experience. Eagleton argues that Christianity should integrate personal and political dimensions rather than treating them separately.
The Problem of Liberalism’s Open-Endedness
Eagleton critiques the liberal emphasis on openness and exploration without commitment to specific truths or actions. He draws parallels to Mill, Arnold, and Leavis in this regard, suggesting that Haughton’s perspective prioritizes openness and self-exploration over firm commitment to political or religious truths. This results in a version of Christianity that lacks depth and fails to address real social change.
The Dualism of Flesh and Spirit
Haughton’s approach reinforces a Cartesian dualism between flesh and spirit, where the body and social institutions are necessary but secondary to the spiritual life. Eagleton challenges this view, asserting that Christian and political radicalism involve transforming the “flesh” or material reality into a language through which the spirit is expressed. This holistic view contrasts with the liberal tendency to separate the inward and external aspects of life.

Inadequate Integration of the Social and Political
Eagleton contends that liberal Christianity, as portrayed in Haughton’s book, alienates political and social behaviors from the authentic self. He argues that political and social structures are not external constraints but integral parts of human experience and freedom. By relegating politics to the external, liberalism fails to engage with the full complexity of human life.
The Role of Rules and Culture
Eagleton praises Haughton’s metaphor of learning the rules of perspective in art, suggesting that this is an insightful description of how human culture works. Humans internalize rules and conventions that make their experiences meaningful. However, Eagleton believes Haughton undercuts this insight by treating rules as superficial scaffolding rather than essential structures for human life and relationships.
The Need for Radical Transformation
In conclusion, Eagleton calls for a more radical approach that surpasses the limits of liberalism. He argues that a true Christian and political radicalism must integrate personal experience with social and political realities, rather than treating them as separate or in opposition. Until this integration is achieved, liberalism will remain limited in its ability to effect meaningful social change.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Term/Concept	Explanation	Context in “The Limits of Liberalism”
Liberalism	A political and philosophical ideology emphasizing individual freedom, personal rights, and open inquiry.	Eagleton critiques the liberal Christian tradition, which emphasizes personal experience over broader political and social realities.
Dualism	The division of two opposing forces or concepts, such as body vs. spirit or individual vs. society.	Eagleton highlights the dualism in Haughton’s work between inward spiritual life and external social structures.
Christian Liberalism	A strand of Christianity that emphasizes personal spirituality and exploration, often at the expense of dogma.	Eagleton critiques this focus for its lack of engagement with political and social action.
Dogma	A principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.	Eagleton contrasts liberalism’s open-endedness with the commitment and exclusivity often associated with Christian dogma.
Individualism	The focus on the individual’s self-expression and autonomy, often in contrast to collective or societal norms.	Eagleton critiques Haughton for prioritizing individual spiritual growth over social or political engagement.
Sacrament	A religious ceremony regarded as an outward and visible sign of inward and spiritual divine grace.	Eagleton discusses how Haughton downplays the role of material and social structures in favor of inward spiritual authenticity.
Romanticism	A literary and cultural movement emphasizing emotion, individualism, and nature.	Eagleton references Romanticism when critiquing Haughton’s view of personal spiritual freedom as opposed to broader social institutions.
Political Radicalism	A belief in fundamental societal change, often through revolutionary or profound structural transformation.	Eagleton contrasts Christian liberalism’s personal focus with political radicalism, which seeks to transform society as a whole.
Cartesian Dualism	A philosophical term referring to Descartes’ division between mind (spirit) and body (flesh).	Eagleton critiques the dualism in Haughton’s work that separates the flesh (social reality) from the spirit (authentic inner life).
Symbolism	The use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities beyond the literal meaning.	Eagleton discusses how external actions and social institutions can be seen as symbols through which spiritual life is expressed.
Situational Ethics	The idea that ethical decisions should be based on the context of a situation rather than fixed moral rules.	Eagleton identifies this approach in Haughton’s work, where external actions and moral codes are considered secondary to inward authenticity.
Cultural Alienation	The feeling of being estranged from the dominant values or norms of society.	Eagleton argues that Haughton’s liberalism leads to a political alienation where personal authenticity is separated from social engagement.

Contribution of “The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

This excerpt from Eagleton’s “The Limits of Liberalism” critiques Rosemary Haughton’s book “Trying to be Human.” Here are some key points of Eagleton’s argument, focusing on specific theories from the text:

Limited Scope: Eagleton argues Haughton focuses too narrowly on the personal and psychological aspects of Christianity, neglecting the social, political, and historical context (p. 353). He suggests a more complete picture requires considering collective action and social struggles (p. 353).
Liberal Oversimplification: Eagleton criticizes Haughton’s portrayal of Christianity as solely promoting openness, exploration, and self-discovery. He argues Christianity also has a history, doctrines, and commitments that define it (p. 354).

Individual vs. Societal: Eagleton finds fault with Haughton’s view of Christianity opposing social structures and institutions. He argues that authentic human relationships and communication exist within these structures, not entirely separate from them (p. 354-355).
False Duality: Eagleton criticizes the book’s portrayal of a split between “spirit” and “flesh.” He argues that external structures like laws, customs, and institutions are not just limitations but also the language through which the spirit expresses itself (p. 354-356).
Importance of Rules: Eagleton disagrees with the book’s suggestion that rules and codes are merely external constraints on authenticity. He argues that interiorizing them is essential for human culture and authentic living (p. 356-357).

Examples of Critiques Through “The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Critique
Rosemary Haughton’s Trying to be Human	Overemphasis on the personal and psychological aspects of Christianity, neglecting the social, political, and historical context.
John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty	Liberal emphasis on individual rights and freedoms without considering the structural power imbalances that shape society.
Matthew Arnold’s Culture and Anarchy	Liberal belief in the power of culture to improve society without addressing underlying social and economic inequalities.
E.M. Forster’s A Passage to India	Liberal portrayal of the clash between East and West as a conflict between individual freedom and cultural tradition, neglecting the power dynamics of colonialism.

Criticism Against “The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton

Narrow Focus on Personal Experience
Eagleton is criticized for placing too much emphasis on the personal, psychological, and individual dimensions of Christianity, neglecting broader societal, political, and historical perspectives.
Overemphasis on Dualism
Eagleton’s critique of liberalism often hinges on a dualistic view of personal versus societal, or flesh versus spirit, which some critics argue oversimplifies the relationship between individual and collective experience.
Lack of Engagement with the Positive Aspects of Liberalism
Critics might argue that Eagleton fails to acknowledge the strengths of liberalism, such as its emphasis on personal freedom, individual rights, and openness to multiple viewpoints, which can be seen as vital in a pluralistic society.

Dismissal of Exploration and Openness
Eagleton’s critique of liberalism’s emphasis on openness, exploration, and personal honesty may be seen as too harsh, especially since these values are often considered crucial for intellectual and spiritual growth.
Insufficient Consideration of Modern Liberal Thought
Eagleton’s critique largely focuses on traditional liberalism without sufficiently addressing the evolution of liberal thought, especially its more recent attempts to incorporate social justice, political activism, and institutional change.
Heavy Reliance on Christian Radicalism
Some critics may argue that Eagleton’s call for a more radical, politicized version of Christianity is overly idealistic and may not resonate with the practical realities of contemporary faith communities.

Tendency to Romanticize Radicalism
Eagleton’s preference for political radicalism over the more gradual, reformist tendencies of liberalism might be criticized for romanticizing revolutionary change without fully accounting for the complexities and risks involved.
Overgeneralization of Liberalism’s Limitations
Eagleton’s blanket critique of liberalism as being disconnected from real social change might overlook the fact that liberal values have played a significant role in progressive reforms and political movements throughout history.

Representative Quotations from “The Limits of Liberalism” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The liberal tradition is not the only one in modern Christianity, and when it stands alone, as it does here, it demonstrates at once its strengths and failures.”	Eagleton acknowledges both the strengths and weaknesses of the liberal Christian tradition, indicating that its focus on individual experience can be valuable, but insufficient without addressing broader societal issues.
“The meaning of the human, the book implicitly suggests, is precisely in this deeper entry into an understanding of felt relationship.”	Eagleton critiques Haughton’s narrow focus on personal relationships as the core of humanity, ignoring the political and collective dimensions that shape human experience.
“The Christian life is characterized as a search, an exploration… But like radical politics, it unites this openness with a closedness.”	Eagleton points out that while exploration is important in Christianity, it must be coupled with commitment to certain truths or actions, a balance lacking in liberalism’s constant openness.
“The liberal, unending openness, objectified to a goal— a dogma— by an English liberal tradition…is no more satisfying in itself than the closed and killing dogmatism of the English Communist Party.”	Eagleton critiques liberalism’s tendency toward indefinite openness without firm commitments, comparing it to the opposite extreme of rigid dogmatism, which is equally unsatisfactory.
“The second, major defect of Christian liberalism is an option for the inward against the external, the personal against society.”	This quote captures Eagleton’s central criticism of liberalism’s inward focus on personal spirituality at the expense of engaging with external social and political realities.
“The fact that these are not scaffolding, but the structure of the spirit, the ways in which human life becomes real and formulable, is then blurred over.”	Eagleton argues that external structures like social institutions are not mere aids to spirituality but essential elements that give form and meaning to human life, a nuance overlooked in Haughton’s liberal view.
“Politics…deals with the outside aspects of humanity, the personal-authentic-psychological with the real inwardness.”	This reflects Eagleton’s critique of liberalism’s separation of politics from personal authenticity, suggesting that political behavior is as integral to human identity as inward spiritual experience.
“Human beings live by actively interiorizing rules, codes, conventions…which make that experience humanly possible.”	Eagleton emphasizes the importance of social conventions and rules in shaping human experience, countering the liberal preference for spontaneous, unstructured personal freedom.
“Christians are virtuous not by rejecting rules and codes…but by coming to act spontaneously in accordance with them.”	Eagleton highlights the Christian ideal of internalizing moral and social rules, aligning them with personal virtue, contrasting this with liberalism’s tendency to reject external rules.
“When rules are set against authenticity, a whole set of dualisms follow: law against spontaneity, politics against the individual, flesh against spirit.”	This quote summarizes Eagleton’s critique of the false dualisms created by liberalism, where rules and societal structures are seen as opposed to personal authenticity and spiritual freedom.

“The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1983 in the New Literary History journal, has been instrumental in shaping the landscape of literary theory.

Introduction: “The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

“The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1983 in the New Literary History journal, has been instrumental in shaping the landscape of literary theory. His exploration of the role of criticism in society and its relationship to power has had a profound impact on scholars and students alike. The book’s second edition, reprinted by Verso in 1984, solidified its status as a foundational text in literary studies.

Summary of “The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

1. Criticism vs. Creation:

Eagleton highlights the historical distinction between criticism and creative works. Creative activity is considered superior to criticism, as seen in Wordsworth’s view that time spent on criticism would be better devoted to original composition. However, Eagleton argues that criticism is essential for the development of a rich intellectual environment that can nurture creative genius.

Reference: Wordsworth’s letters reflect his belief in the supremacy of creative works over criticism (p. 26).

2. The Role of Criticism in Society:

Criticism’s purpose is to “see the object as in itself it really is,” offering a clear and truthful reflection on literature, theology, philosophy, art, and science. Criticism helps establish a coherent intellectual climate that provides the creative powers with the ideas and materials they need to thrive.

Reference: Eagleton emphasizes the importance of establishing a “current of true and fresh ideas” (p. 28).

3. Critical Power as a Precursor to Creation:

Great literary epochs are rare because they require not only the creative power of individuals but also the presence of an intellectual atmosphere rich in ideas. Criticism helps lay the groundwork for these ideas, preparing the elements necessary for creative genius to flourish.

Reference: “The creative power has, for its happy exercise, appointed elements” that are often shaped by the critical power (p. 29).

4. Criticism and Historical Movements:

Eagleton draws a comparison between the intellectual underpinnings of the French Revolution and earlier disinterested intellectual movements, such as the Renaissance. He argues that the practical, political focus of the Revolution limited its potential for generating significant creative works.

Reference: The political nature of the French Revolution contrasted with the intellectual movements of the Renaissance (p. 32).

5. The Practical Application of Ideas:

Criticism should maintain its independence from practical concerns, focusing instead on intellectual rigor and disinterested examination. Critics should avoid being swayed by political or practical interests, ensuring that their work contributes to intellectual and cultural growth.

Reference: Eagleton emphasizes the need for criticism to be “disinterested” and free from practical ends (p. 36).

6. The Influence of Criticism on National Culture:

In Eagleton’s view, English culture has historically undervalued intellectual curiosity and free play of the mind, prioritizing practical concerns over the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. Criticism can help counteract this tendency by encouraging a more open engagement with new ideas.

Reference: “The practical man” in England resists intellectual exploration, preferring action over thought (p. 41).

7. Criticism’s Slow but Crucial Role:

Though Eagleton acknowledges that the impact of criticism may seem slow and subtle, he insists that it is essential for the development of higher truths and the broadening of cultural perspectives. The critic must resist the allure of immediate practical outcomes in favor of long-term intellectual progress.

Reference: Criticism’s proper work is “slow and obscure,” but it is necessary for cultivating adequate ideas (p. 40).

8. The Ideal of Disinterested Criticism:

Eagleton argues that true criticism must be disinterested, focusing on the pursuit of knowledge and understanding rather than aligning with specific political or practical agendas. This ideal ensures that criticism contributes meaningfully to cultural and intellectual development.

Reference: Criticism must “know the best that is known and thought in the world” without becoming entangled in practical considerations (p. 37).

9. Criticism’s Future:

Eagleton envisions a future where criticism plays a central role in fostering creative activity by developing a rich intellectual atmosphere. While criticism itself may not offer the same fulfillment as creative work, it lays the foundation for future generations of artists and thinkers.
Reference: Criticism prepares the groundwork for a “promised land” of creative activity, even if the critic does not directly participate in it (p. 49).

Literary Terms/Concepts in “The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Term/Concept	Definition	Explanation in Eagleton’s Text
Criticism	The analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of literary works.	Eagleton argues that criticism involves seeing “the object as in itself it really is” and establishing a current of true ideas that influence creative work. He sees it as a crucial precursor to creation, forming the intellectual environment in which creative genius can flourish.
Creative Power	The ability to produce original literary or artistic work, considered the highest form of human intellectual activity.	Eagleton recognizes that the creative power is superior to criticism but asserts that criticism is necessary for the creative power to have the intellectual materials (ideas) it needs to work with effectively.
Disinterestedness	A critical approach that is free from political, practical, or personal bias.	Eagleton insists that criticism should remain disinterested, meaning that it should not serve practical or political interests. Instead, it should focus purely on the intellectual task of understanding and spreading the best knowledge and ideas.
Intellectual Atmosphere	The environment of ideas and knowledge within which creative works are produced.	According to Eagleton, great creative epochs arise when there is a rich intellectual atmosphere. Criticism helps build this atmosphere by developing and circulating ideas that can inspire and nourish creativity.
Epoch of Creation	A period in history marked by significant and original creative activity.	Eagleton argues that epochs of creative power are rare and often rely on the intellectual work done in preceding times of criticism. He refers to past creative periods like those of Aeschylus and Shakespeare as examples of times when criticism had already prepared the necessary intellectual climate.
Synthesis	The combination of ideas to form a cohesive and comprehensive whole.	Eagleton describes the role of creative genius as one of synthesis, meaning that it works by combining existing ideas in new and effective ways, rather than by discovering new ideas (which is more the work of philosophers).
Intellectual Progress	The advancement of knowledge, understanding, and the quality of ideas within a culture or society.	Eagleton sees criticism as central to intellectual progress, helping society move beyond narrow or outdated ideas by critically engaging with the best ideas available, regardless of their practical or political consequences.
The Practical Spirit	A mindset focused on the utility and application of ideas in everyday, political, or economic life.	Eagleton criticizes the “practical spirit” of English society, which prioritizes practical outcomes over intellectual exploration. He argues that criticism must avoid becoming entangled with this spirit in order to truly contribute to intellectual and cultural progress.
Free Play of the Mind	The unrestrained exploration of ideas for their own sake, without concern for practical applications.	Eagleton champions the “free play of the mind” as essential to criticism. He argues that criticism should value ideas in themselves, seeking to understand them without regard to whether they serve practical, political, or economic interests.
Creative Epochs	Periods in history when literature and art flourish, producing great works.	Eagleton asserts that such epochs require a rich intellectual environment prepared by criticism. He contrasts epochs of creation with epochs of intellectual stagnation, where criticism has failed to establish the necessary intellectual atmosphere for creativity.
Intellectual and Spiritual Expansion	A period where thought and culture grow dynamically, embracing new ideas and perspectives.	Eagleton contrasts this with periods of concentration, where society turns inward and intellectual stagnation occurs. He suggests that criticism should aim to foster intellectual and spiritual expansion by engaging with ideas disinterestedly and promoting fresh, true ideas.
Philistinism	A derogatory term for the rejection or undervaluing of culture, intellectual pursuits, and the arts.	Eagleton uses “Philistinism” to describe the tendency in English society to prioritize practical concerns over intellectual and cultural activities, a mindset that he argues criticism should actively work to counter.

Contribution of “The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

Literary Theory/Theory	Eagleton’s Contribution	Reference from “The Function of Criticism”
New Historicism	Eagleton’s emphasis on the intellectual and historical context shaping literary creation aligns with New Historicism, which views literature as a product of its historical circumstances. He highlights how literature cannot exist in a vacuum and requires a rich intellectual atmosphere shaped by criticism.	Eagleton discusses how great literary epochs depend on the “power of the moment” and the intellectual conditions surrounding them (p. 29).
Marxist Literary Theory	Eagleton contributes to Marxist theory by discussing the material and intellectual conditions necessary for great creative works to emerge. He argues that criticism plays a role in establishing an intellectual climate, which in turn allows for the flourishing of literature, suggesting a dialectical relationship between society and art.	“The critical power… tends to establish an order of ideas” and enables the creation of literature by ensuring the best ideas of the time are available (p. 28).
Cultural Materialism	Eagleton’s insistence on the importance of cultural and intellectual forces in shaping literary production resonates with Cultural Materialism. He critiques English society’s fixation on practical concerns, arguing that criticism must remain disinterested and independent from political or economic interests.	Eagleton critiques the “practical spirit” of English society and emphasizes the importance of criticism being independent of practical concerns (p. 36).
Poststructuralism	Eagleton critiques the hierarchical relationship between creative and critical power, which challenges traditional notions of authority in literature. He argues that criticism is not subordinate to creation but essential to enabling the conditions for creation, which resonates with poststructuralist decentering of authority.	Eagleton challenges the idea that “the critical power is of lower rank than the creative” and argues for the value of criticism in enabling creation (p. 27).
Reader-Response Theory	Although Eagleton does not directly engage with Reader-Response Theory, his emphasis on criticism shaping intellectual climates implies that critics influence how texts are understood. By establishing currents of true ideas, criticism affects how readers and future critics interpret and engage with literary works.	Eagleton discusses how criticism helps create “a current of true and fresh ideas,” which impacts the way literary works are received and understood by readers and critics (p. 37).
Romanticism vs. Enlightenment Debate	Eagleton contrasts Romanticism’s focus on creativity with Enlightenment ideals of reason and critical inquiry. He criticizes Romantic thinkers like Wordsworth for undervaluing criticism, suggesting that Enlightenment-style critical effort is essential for sustained creativity, thus engaging with the Romanticism-Enlightenment debate.	Wordsworth’s view of criticism as inferior to creative activity is critiqued, as Eagleton argues that the critical effort is necessary to produce substantial and long-lasting creative work (p. 27).
Humanism	Eagleton contributes to the humanist tradition by emphasizing the role of criticism in fostering intellectual growth and human perfection. He suggests that criticism helps individuals and societies to move beyond self-satisfaction and toward a more profound understanding of ideas and culture, a key tenet of humanist thought.	Eagleton states that criticism should “lead man towards perfection” by engaging with the best ideas and fostering an intellectual climate that values excellence (p. 37).

Examples of Critiques Through “The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Example of Critique Using Eagleton’s “The Function of Criticism”
William Wordsworth’s “The Prelude”	Critique would focus on how Wordsworth’s poetry could have benefited from a richer intellectual atmosphere. Eagleton suggests that Wordsworth, despite his creative genius, lacked a broader engagement with literature, especially German thinkers like Goethe, which limited the philosophical depth and variety of his poetic thought.
Lord Byron’s “Don Juan”	Eagleton would critique Byron’s work for its lack of critical foundation, arguing that while Byron possessed strong creative power, his poetry lacks the intellectual rigor and knowledge of life and the world that would sustain it. The absence of a strong critical environment left Byron’s work comparatively “empty of matter.”
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s “Faust”	Eagleton praises Goethe as an example of how strong critical engagement enriches creative output. Goethe’s work, particularly “Faust,” would be seen as nourished by his intellectual engagement with life, literature, and criticism. Goethe’s wide-ranging learning and synthesis of ideas serve as a model for how criticism fosters enduring creativity.
Percy Bysshe Shelley’s “Prometheus Unbound”	Shelley’s poetry, like Byron’s, would be critiqued for its incoherence, which Eagleton might attribute to a lack of sufficient critical foundation. Although rich in passion and energy, Shelley’s work suffers from an intellectual environment that failed to fully engage with the complexities of modern thought, making his poetry less coherent and less enduring.

Criticism Against “The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton

Overemphasis on Ideas: Critics argue that Eagleton’s focus on ideas and intellectual atmosphere is excessive, neglecting the importance of other factors such as social, cultural, and historical contexts in shaping literary production.

Underestimation of Creative Intuition: Some contend that Eagleton downplays the role of intuition and creative genius in literary creation. They argue that great works of art often emerge from subconscious impulses rather than conscious intellectual effort.
Historical Specificity: Critics have questioned the generalizability of Eagleton’s claims. They argue that his observations about the relationship between criticism and creativity may not hold true in all historical and cultural contexts.
Limited Definition of Criticism: Eagleton’s definition of criticism as “the free play of the mind on all subjects” has been criticized as overly narrow. Some argue that criticism can also involve other forms of engagement, such as interpretation, evaluation, and social commentary.

Neglect of Power Dynamics: Critics have suggested that Eagleton’s focus on ideas and intellectual atmosphere overlooks the power dynamics that shape literary production and reception. They argue that factors such as class, race, and gender can significantly influence the production and consumption of literature.
Overemphasis on Western Canon: Some critics have accused Eagleton of privileging Western literature and Western intellectual traditions. They argue that his analysis does not adequately account for the diverse literary traditions and critical practices found around the world.

Representative Quotations from “The Function of Criticism” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The critical power is of lower rank than the creative. True; but…men may have the sense of exercising this free creative activity in other ways than in producing great works of literature or art.”	Eagleton acknowledges that creative work is often valued more than criticism but argues that critical activity also involves creativity, as it engages with intellectual ideas and helps shape the conditions for future creativity.
“Criticism must maintain its independence of the practical spirit and its aims.”	Eagleton stresses that criticism should remain detached from political, practical, and material interests. This disinterestedness allows criticism to focus purely on intellectual growth and avoid being manipulated by external pressures or interests.
“Its business is to do this with inflexible honesty, with due ability; but its business is to do no more.”	Criticism’s primary role is to disseminate and understand the best knowledge and ideas available. Eagleton suggests that it must stay within its own domain and not become involved in broader political or practical applications.
“It is the business of the critical power…to see the object as in itself it really is.”	This statement reflects Eagleton’s belief that criticism should strive to understand works of literature and art in their purest form, without distorting them to fit preconceived notions, ideologies, or practical agendas.
“The exercise of creative power in the production of great works of literature…is not at all epochs and under all conditions possible.”	Eagleton argues that not all historical moments are ripe for great creative works. The conditions necessary for such works—such as the intellectual atmosphere and critical foundation—must be in place, and these are shaped by criticism.
“Criticism first; a time of true creative activity, perhaps…when criticism has done its work.”	Eagleton asserts that criticism often precedes periods of creative flourishing. The critical analysis and circulation of ideas help to build the intellectual climate that fosters the production of great literary works.
“The grand work of literary genius is a work of synthesis and exposition, not of analysis and discovery.”	Here, Eagleton defines the role of literary creation as combining and presenting ideas rather than discovering new ideas, which he views as more of a philosophical endeavor. Critics help by making those ideas available for synthesis by creative geniuses.
“A free play of the mind upon all subjects, being an essential provider of elements, without which a nation’s spirit must, in the long run, die of inanition.”	Eagleton emphasizes that the intellectual freedom to explore ideas is crucial for the health of a society’s culture and spirit. Without such freedom, both the creative and critical faculties will stagnate.
“Men may have the sense of exercising free creative activity in criticising.”	Eagleton reframes the role of criticism by suggesting that, although it is often seen as secondary to creation, it too is a form of creative engagement. Critics can exercise their intellectual faculties in meaningful and innovative ways.
“Disinterestedness…means simply keeping aloof from what is called ‘the practical view of things.'”	Eagleton stresses the need for criticism to be objective and detached, focused solely on the intellectual and artistic value of works rather than their practical applications or immediate societal benefits. This helps criticism remain pure in its purpose.

“The End of English” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“The End of English” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1986 in the Journal of Literary Studies, is considered a pivotal moment in the evolution of literary theory.

Introduction: “The End of English” by Terry Eagleton

“The End of English” by Terry Eagleton, first appeared in 1986 in the Journal of Literary Studies, is considered a pivotal moment in the evolution of literary theory, marking a shift away from traditional approaches and embracing a more politically conscious and interdisciplinary perspective. Eagleton’s essay challenges the notion of English literature as a unified and timeless body of work, instead arguing that it is a socially constructed discourse shaped by historical, political, and economic forces. This groundbreaking insight has had a profound impact on the field of literary studies, inspiring scholars to examine literature within broader cultural and ideological contexts.

Summary of “The End of English” by Terry Eagleton

Colonial Modernism as a Literary Revolt
Eagleton explores how Irish and American writers like James Joyce and T.S. Eliot used their outsider status to challenge and transform English literary traditions. These writers, free from the emotional ties to England, “objectify and appropriate” its traditions to their own ends, positioning themselves both “inside and outside” the dominant discourse. This allowed for a “profoundly dialogical” form of modernism, where peripheral figures like Joyce and Synge exploited English conventions while subtly mocking them. As Eagleton notes, modernist writers “revealingly inhabit English culture” but maintain a critical distance from it.
English Literary Tradition as Imperialist and Nationalist
The Victorian era’s English literature reflected the anxieties of the imperial middle class, attempting to establish a unified national identity. However, this identity was challenged by three interrelated events: World War I, modernism, and shifts in capitalist production. Eagleton argues that modern English literature “was violently assailed” by these global forces, creating a tension between national cultural formations and a rising internationalism. This led to English literary criticism adopting a regressive stance, turning back toward an “imaginary past” rather than engaging with the radical modernist movement.

Modernism vs. Englishness
Eagleton discusses how modernism, rooted in cosmopolitanism and transgression, collided with English nationalism. He draws a distinction between modernism’s borderless, international vision and the insular, reactionary nature of the English literary establishment, represented by figures like F.R. Leavis. The struggle of modernism to find acceptance in England is explained by the nation’s “resistance to subversive cultural forms” and its focus on maintaining national identity through literary realism and liberal empiricism. This resulted in modernism being seen as a foreign aberration and pushed to the margins of English culture.
The Decline of Empire and the Collapse of “Englishness”
Eagleton posits that English literature’s global significance was buttressed by the reach of the British Empire, which allowed the English language to “subsume all regional particularities” and position itself as a universal medium. However, with the decline of empire, English literature began to lose its global guarantee. Eagleton refers to this as the “pathetic farce” of Commonwealth Literature, marking the diminishing global relevance of English literature. The “loss of empire” marked a significant blow to the cultural ideology of Englishness.
Postmodernism and the Erosion of Liberal Humanism
Eagleton highlights how postmodernism has further threatened the ideology of “Englishness.” He identifies the audio-visual dominance of contemporary culture as symptomatic of this threat, noting that while postmodernism deconstructs traditional literary forms, it also exposes the “increasing irrelevance” of English literary discourse. Eagleton notes the irony that postmodern theories of cultural relativism and intertextuality have arisen at a time when Englishness is “culturally speaking, pretty much like North America,” stripped of its unique identity and authenticity.

Theory as the New Battleground
In the absence of a vibrant national literature, Eagleton argues that critical theory has become the new space for contesting cultural and political ideas. He draws a parallel between the earlier struggles of modernism and contemporary theory, suggesting that the debates over “high modernism” are being re-enacted within literary criticism today. The rise of theory represents a shift away from traditional Englishness and towards a more international, politically charged discourse.

Quotations:

“It is the colonised and dispossessed who shall inherit the literary earth.”
“English literature was violently assailed by three phenomena: the Great War, the explosion of modernism, and the mutation of the capitalist mode of production.”

“Empire was England’s secret weapon against a promiscuous modernism.”

Literary Terms/Concepts in “The End of English” by Terry Eagleton

Term/Concept	Definition	Explanation in Eagleton’s Context
Modernism	A movement in literature and the arts characterized by a break with traditional forms.	Eagleton examines how modernist writers like Joyce and Eliot, positioned outside the English tradition, challenged and subverted its conventions, bringing in international and cosmopolitan elements.
Colonialism	The practice of acquiring political control over another country, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.	Eagleton connects the rise of English literature with British imperialism and shows how colonized writers used the English language to critique and subvert imperial culture.
Liberal Humanism	An ideology that emphasizes the autonomy of the individual, moral values, and universal truths.	Eagleton argues that the English literary tradition is steeped in liberal humanism, which is increasingly irrelevant in the postmodern and post-colonial world.
Postmodernism	A cultural, artistic, and literary movement characterized by a rejection of traditional narratives, embracing relativism and fragmentation.	Postmodernism, according to Eagleton, poses a significant threat to the ideology of “Englishness,” especially as it undermines fixed narratives and notions of cultural stability.
Cosmopolitanism	The ideology that all human beings belong to a single community based on shared morality.	Eagleton highlights the cosmopolitan nature of modernist writers, who transcended national boundaries and engaged with diverse literary traditions.
Parody	A work created to imitate, make fun of, or comment on an original work, often as a form of critique.	Eagleton describes how modernist writers like Joyce parodied English literary conventions, using them as tools to both inhabit and critique English culture.
Imperialism	A policy of extending a country’s power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means.	Eagleton links the rise of English literature and its academic study to the British Empire’s desire to create a cohesive national identity, now challenged by post-colonial and global developments.
Hegemony	The dominance of one group over others, culturally, politically, or ideologically.	Eagleton sees the English literary tradition as an expression of bourgeois, imperial hegemony, which is now being undermined by modernist and postmodernist forces.
Avant-garde	Works that are experimental, radical, or unorthodox, particularly in art and literature.	Eagleton discusses how modernist writers, operating from the margins, adopted avant-garde techniques to break away from bourgeois and imperialist literary traditions.
Nativism	A policy or belief that favors the interests of native inhabitants over those of immigrants or colonizers.	Eagleton refers to the conservative reaction of English critics who sought to defend “native” Englishness against the perceived threats of modernist cosmopolitanism and colonial influence.
Discourse	Written or spoken communication, often associated with power structures and ideologies.	Eagleton examines the “discourse” of English literature as a form of cultural power, historically used to support imperialism and liberal humanism.
Cultural Relativism	The idea that a person’s beliefs and practices should be understood based on that person’s own culture, rather than judged against the criteria of another.	Postmodernism, according to Eagleton, embraces cultural relativism, challenging the universalizing tendencies of liberal humanism and the English literary tradition.
Realism	A literary movement aimed at representing everyday experiences and conditions as they are, without idealization or romanticism.	Eagleton argues that English literature’s traditional attachment to realism was a defense against the disruptive forces of modernism and the declining empire.
Internationalism	The principle of cooperation and understanding between nations.	Eagleton identifies modernism’s internationalism as opposed to the insular nature of the English literary tradition, which sought to preserve a national cultural identity.
Aesthetic Elitism	The belief that certain art forms, styles, or cultural products are inherently superior to others.	Eagleton critiques how modernist and colonial writers often became isolated due to their aesthetic elitism, resulting from their marginalized cultural positions.

Contribution of “The End of English” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Post-colonial Theory
Eagleton’s “The End of English” contributes significantly to post-colonial theory by exploring the complex relationship between English literature and colonialism. He argues that the peripheral figures, such as Irish and American writers, used the English literary tradition as both a medium for expression and a tool for critique. By doing so, they subverted the dominant English literary canon while simultaneously being excluded from it.

Quotation: “It is the colonized and dispossessed who shall inherit the literary earth… able to carry through this audacious feat of inverted imperialism precisely because they lacked those vested emotional interests in an English literary tradition.”
This reflects a post-colonial inversion where the colonized gain agency by subverting and appropriating the colonizer’s language and literary culture.

2. Modernism and Literary Subversion
Eagleton’s analysis engages with modernist theory, particularly how modernist writers like James Joyce, T.S. Eliot, and Samuel Beckett, positioned themselves both within and outside of English cultural discourse. He discusses how modernists challenged traditional literary forms and nationalistic ideologies by blending global and cosmopolitan influences.

Quotation: “Modernism’s bold dissolution of national formations, that heady transgression of frontiers between both art-forms and political states…”
This underlines modernism’s rejection of national boundaries and traditional literary forms, aligning with modernist literary theory, which emphasizes fragmentation, formal experimentation, and transnational perspectives.

3. Critique of Liberal Humanism
A major contribution of Eagleton’s article is its critique of liberal humanism. He challenges the assumption that literature should focus on universal human values, individuality, and moral truths, which he argues were deeply intertwined with imperialist ideologies. The collapse of empire and the rise of modernism, he suggests, has made liberal humanism increasingly irrelevant in contemporary literary studies.

Quotation: “English literature was the product of a Victorian imperial middle class, anxious to crystallize its spiritual identity in a material corpus of writing.”
This illustrates Eagleton’s argument that liberal humanism is a remnant of the imperial era, shaped by bourgeois ideology and no longer relevant in a post-imperial, postmodern world.

4. The Role of Criticism in the Postmodern Age
Eagleton’s work engages with postmodern literary theory, particularly its deconstruction of traditional literary criticism and narratives. He argues that postmodernism further destabilizes the discourse of “Englishness” by challenging linear histories, stable subjectivities, and the centrality of written texts. He also notes the rise of cultural studies and theory as new battlegrounds for literary discourse, shifting away from traditional criticism.

Quotation: “The final discrediting of ‘native Englishness’ in a post-modernist epoch at least clarifies the issues at stake.”
This speaks to the postmodern condition where fixed notions of national identity and literary traditions are discredited, allowing for a multiplicity of voices and perspectives in literary discourse.

5. The Intersection of Modernism and Capitalism
Eagleton also contributes to Marxist literary theory by linking the rise of modernism to the contradictions inherent in capitalist development. He argues that modernism was not only a reaction to the collapse of traditional national formations but also to the rhythms of global capitalism, which erodes local identities while fostering a cosmopolitan, market-driven culture.

Quotation: “The contradiction of such a system is that in order to secure the political and ideological conditions for the international circulation of commodities, it needs to exploit exactly the national allegiances and identities which its economic activities constantly undermine.”
This aligns with Marxist theories of capitalism’s contradictory nature and its role in the production of cultural forms, including literature.

6. Cultural Imperialism and the Global Reach of English
Eagleton critiques the way cultural imperialism is sustained through the English language, which became a global tool of dominance through the British Empire. He argues that the global spread of English allowed England to maintain a form of hegemony even as its political empire collapsed, aligning this critique with cultural materialism.

Quotation: “English was a language in which one could be internationally at home, subsuming all regional particularities… Empire was England’s secret weapon against a promiscuous modernism.”
This critique shows how cultural imperialism is sustained by language, making English a tool for both global dominance and exclusion of other cultural identities.

Examples of Critiques Through “The End of English” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Critique through “The End of English”	Key Concepts from Eagleton’s Text
Ulysses by James Joyce	Eagleton would view Ulysses as a quintessential example of a colonial modernist work, where Joyce, a peripheral Irish writer, subverts and appropriates the English language. Joyce’s complex narrative form challenges imperialist traditions of language and identity.	– Modernism – Colonial Modernism – Subversion of English Literary Tradition
The Waste Land by T.S. Eliot	Eliot’s The Waste Land embodies the modernist breakdown of national and cultural boundaries. Eagleton might critique Eliot’s cosmopolitan approach, where fragments of different cultures are appropriated and integrated, reflecting the collapse of English cultural hegemony.	– Cosmopolitanism – Breakdown of National Formations – Modernism’s Challenge to “Englishness”
Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett	Eagleton might argue that Waiting for Godot exemplifies the post-colonial condition of alienation from one’s own language. Beckett, an Irish writer, writes in French, signaling the dislocation of identity and language central to modernism and post-colonialism.	– Disinheritance from Mother Tongue – Post-Colonial Alienation – Modernist Deracination
Mrs Dalloway by Virginia Woolf	Through Eagleton’s lens, Mrs Dalloway can be critiqued for its bourgeois liberal humanism, focusing on the internal consciousness of individuals. Eagleton would argue that Woolf’s modernist technique remains anchored in the subjective experience of the imperial center.	– Liberal Humanism – Bourgeois Consciousness – Resistance to Radical Modernist Subversion of Imperial Norms

Criticism Against “The End of English” by Terry Eagleton

Overemphasis on Political Ideology:Critics argue that Eagleton focuses too heavily on the political and ideological implications of literature, often overshadowing aesthetic and literary qualities. This Marxist approach reduces literature to merely a tool for class struggle and imperialist critique, ignoring the artistic innovations and individual expressions in the works he critiques.
Reductionist View of English Literature: Eagleton’s argument that English literature is primarily a product of Victorian imperialism and bourgeois ideology is seen as reductionist by some scholars. They claim that this perspective overlooks the diversity of English literary traditions, which include dissenting voices and works critical of empire and nationalism.

Limited Engagement with Postcolonial Voices: While Eagleton discusses postcolonialism and the subversion of the English literary tradition, some critics suggest that he doesn’t fully engage with postcolonial writers from non-Western regions. His focus remains on Irish, American, and European modernists, neglecting voices from Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean.
Neglect of Feminist Perspectives: Eagleton’s critique largely overlooks feminist perspectives in literature, failing to engage with how gender intersects with imperialism and modernism. Scholars argue that his analysis of works like Mrs. Dalloway underplays the role of gender in shaping narratives of identity and alienation within English literature.
Postmodernism Critique Oversimplified: Some critics claim that Eagleton’s dismissal of postmodernism as a threat to “Englishness” lacks nuance. They argue that postmodernism is more than just a critique of national identity; it offers valuable insights into fragmentation, plurality, and the complexities of cultural production in a globalized world.

Binary Between National and Cosmopolitan Literature: Eagleton establishes a rigid binary between English national literature and modernist cosmopolitanism. Critics argue that this dichotomy oversimplifies the relationship between local and global influences in literature, failing to recognize how even English writers were shaped by cosmopolitan movements and global exchanges.
Nostalgic for Marxist Criticism: Some critics view Eagleton’s critique as overly nostalgic for the Marxist critical tradition, particularly his longing for the kind of politically engaged criticism associated with movements like Scrutiny. This focus on a specific type of Marxist literary criticism is seen as outdated in a more pluralistic academic environment.

Representative Quotations from “The End of English” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“It is the colonized and dispossessed who shall inherit the literary earth.”	Eagleton argues that writers from colonized or peripheral nations, such as Ireland and America, have taken over the English literary tradition, challenging the imperial center by appropriating and subverting its language and conventions.
“English literature was the product of a Victorian imperial middle class, anxious to crystallize its spiritual identity in a material corpus of writing.”	Eagleton critiques how English literature, as a discipline, emerged from imperialist and bourgeois concerns, particularly in the Victorian era, where it was used to forge a cohesive national identity and justify colonial domination.
“Modernism’s bold dissolution of national formations, that heady transgression of frontiers between both art-forms and political states…”	This highlights how modernist writers broke down traditional boundaries, not just in literary form but in cultural and political spheres, moving away from the rigid nationalisms that defined English literary tradition and embracing cosmopolitanism.
“Empire was England’s secret weapon against a promiscuous modernism.”	Eagleton argues that the British Empire allowed English literature to resist modernism’s destabilizing forces. The global reach of the English language enabled the country to maintain its cultural hegemony even as modernist and internationalist movements threatened national boundaries.
“Post-modernism, whether it knows it or not, is the appropriate coding of this real historical situation.”	Eagleton suggests that postmodernism reflects the current historical condition, particularly the disintegration of national and imperial identities, and the global commodification of culture. It captures the fragmented, decentered nature of contemporary capitalism.
“Liberal humanism, already in the process of being historically superseded, remains the major subjacent ideology of English studies.”	He critiques how liberal humanism—focused on universal values and individual morality—continues to dominate English literary studies, even though it has become irrelevant in the face of modern and postmodern cultural shifts.
“The contradiction of such a system is that in order to secure the political and ideological conditions for the international circulation of commodities, it needs to exploit exactly the national allegiances and identities which its economic activities constantly undermine.”	This emphasizes the paradox of capitalism, where national identities are manipulated to maintain political control, while global economic activities erode those very identities, creating a tension within capitalist societies.
“The final discrediting of ‘native Englishness’ in a post-modernist epoch at least clarifies the issues at stake.”	Eagleton points out that in the postmodern age, the concept of “native Englishness” is no longer tenable, and this collapse clarifies the cultural and ideological conflicts between global capitalism and its political opponents.
“Criticism confronts the unenviable destiny of becoming its own avant-garde, doubly estranged from its contemporary cultural moment.”	Eagleton argues that English literary criticism has become increasingly disconnected from contemporary cultural production. In trying to preserve past traditions while opposing modernism, criticism has become an avant-garde movement of its own, detached from the realities of current culture.
“The experiences of both modernism and colonialism were kept at bay, but in the latest historical irony now offer to repossess the metropolitan culture from inside in the shape of post-modernism.”	Eagleton identifies a historical irony: while English literature resisted both modernism and colonialism, these forces have now returned in the form of postmodernism to challenge and undermine the core ideologies of English culture from within.

“Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton: Summary and Critique

“Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton first appeared in 1998 in the journal Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies.

Introduction: “Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton

“Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton first appeared in 1998 in the journal Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies. This article holds significant importance in literature and literary theory due to its critical examination of the term “postcolonialism” itself. Eagleton challenges the assumptions and limitations of the concept, arguing that it often obscures rather than illuminates the complex realities of postcolonial experiences. His essay has sparked important debates and continues to influence discussions on postcolonial theory and its applications.

Summary of “Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton

Critique of the Term “Postcolonialism”:
- Eagleton opens by emphasizing how postcolonial theorists often start by questioning the very concept of postcolonialism. The term is viewed as oversimplified, falsely homogeneous, and problematic in addressing ongoing forms of colonization, both direct and indirect.
- He asserts that postcolonialism is criticized for presenting a chronological issue where the colonial condition still persists. It “suggests a confident posteriority to a condition which still prevails in transformed guise” (Eagleton, 1998).
Distinction Between Postcolonialism and ‘Postcolonialism’:
- Eagleton differentiates between two forms of postcolonialism: the political-economic reality of former colonies and the academic, theoretical construct labeled ‘postcolonialism’.
- The latter has its roots in Western intellectual history and operates within the scope of modern theoretical concepts. “‘Postcolonialism’ is a way of analysing a true state of affairs in terms of certain currently rather modish western theoretical concepts” (Eagleton, 1998).
Hostility Toward Essentialism:
- A major aspect of ‘postcolonialism’ is its hostility to essentialism, which includes the rejection of a universal human nature. Postcolonialists reject liberal humanist ideals that generalize human experiences, preferring to focus on cultural differences.
- Eagleton challenges this approach by pointing out its inherent contradictions, such as replacing one form of essentialism with another when cultural difference is emphasized over universal humanity.
Criticism of Key ‘Postcolonial’ Concepts:
- Concepts such as hybridity, non-exclusivity, and openness to the Other are integral to ‘postcolonialism’. However, Eagleton argues that such ideals can be hypocritical because they implicitly assume the value of a common humanity, a notion they outwardly reject.
- Furthermore, Eagleton notes that not all forms of hybridity or difference are positive, citing examples such as exclusionary nationalist movements (Mussolini vs. Mozambique).
Rejection of Totalities:
- Eagleton critiques postcolonial theorists for their rejection of systematic thinking and totalities. He points out that, in the real world, social and economic systems are interconnected and can have widespread consequences (e.g., a crisis in Asia affecting the West).
- He criticizes postcolonialism for ignoring this reality, stating that the dismissal of totalities is a weakness in the face of global economic and political interconnectedness.
Suppression of Class Struggle:
- Eagleton accuses ‘postcolonialism’ of sidelining class struggle in favor of cultural identity politics. He notes that postcolonial discourse has played a role in displacing socialist ideas and class-based political movements.
- The focus on cultural identity, he argues, has emerged partly due to the difficulty of addressing more significant political conflicts in the West.
Culturalism and Political Ethic:
- Eagleton views ‘postcolonialism’ as a form of culturalism that inflates the importance of cultural factors in global politics. He critiques the tendency to focus on identity and marginality rather than on economic issues such as trade agreements and military alliances.
- He suggests that the acknowledgment of cultural difference, while necessary, should not overshadow the broader ethical imperative of human solidarity and reciprocity.
Conclusion – The Conflict Between Postcolonialism and ‘Postcolonialism’:
- Eagleton concludes by calling for a conflict between postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism’, arguing that while openness, dialogue, and hybridization are important, ‘postcolonialism’—as the theoretical construct—should ultimately “lose out.”
- He emphasizes that solidarity and coherence in political action are necessary for addressing real-world inequalities, implying that the academic focus on cultural hybridity is insufficient.

Literary Terms/Concepts in “Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Term/Concept	Explanation	Quotation/Reference
Postcolonialism	Refers to the political, cultural, and economic conditions of former colonies after they gained independence, often addressing the lingering effects of colonialism.	“There is obviously a lot of the globe which used to be colonized directly and is now colonized by other means…” (Eagleton, 1998)
‘Postcolonialism’	A theoretical framework, rooted in Western intellectual history, that critically examines postcolonial conditions using contemporary concepts such as hybridity, identity, and cultural difference. This version is more abstract and controversial.	“At the same time, there is a particular theoretical agenda known as ‘postcolonialism’…” (Eagleton, 1998)
Essentialism	The belief in an intrinsic, unchanging human nature or characteristics. In postcolonial theory, it is rejected as a means of suppressing cultural difference and homogenizing identities.	“Postcolonialism usually entails… a fierce hostility to… ‘essentialism’.” (Eagleton, 1998)
Hybridity	A key concept in postcolonial theory, hybridity refers to the mixing of cultures, identities, and ideas resulting from colonial encounters. Postcolonialists often view this as positive, but Eagleton questions its universal virtue.	“Or take the favoured ‘postcolonial’ concepts of hybridity, non-exclusivity, multiplicity…” (Eagleton, 1998)
Non-exclusivity	The idea that identities or cultures are not rigidly defined and can be open to multiple influences. This concept is aligned with the postcolonial emphasis on fluidity and rejection of fixed categories.	“Non-exclusivity… openness to the Other, the dissemination of difference…” (Eagleton, 1998)
Multiplicity	Refers to the postcolonial idea that identities and realities are plural, diverse, and cannot be reduced to singular narratives.	“Multiplicity… openness to the Other, the dissemination of difference…” (Eagleton, 1998)
Transgressiveness	A postcolonial term denoting the act of crossing cultural, social, or political boundaries, often associated with resistance to established norms and power structures.	“Take the favoured ‘postcolonial’ concepts of… transgressiveness…” (Eagleton, 1998)
Culturalism	A concept Eagleton critiques, where cultural factors are given disproportionate importance in explaining global inequalities, often sidelining economic and political dimensions.	“‘Postcolonialism’, like postmodernism in general, is among other things a brand of culturalism, which inflates the significance of cultural factors in human affairs.” (Eagleton, 1998)
Anti-Essentialism	The rejection of the idea of a universal human nature or essence. Postcolonialists often argue that this view allows for the recognition of cultural difference without resorting to generalizations.	“A fierce hostility to… ‘essentialism’… means rejecting the idea of a general common humanity, or human nature, as a liberal humanist stratagem for suppressing cultural difference.” (1998)

Contribution of “Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton to Literary Theory/Theories

Critiques the Term “Postcolonialism”:
- It oversimplifies diverse situations (Bullet point 1).
- It suggests a false sense of “post” – colonialism still exists in new forms (Bullet point 2).
- It focuses on trendy Western theories instead of the realities of postcolonial societies (Bullet point 3).
Distinguishes Between “Postcolonialism” and “‘Postcolonialism'”:
- “Postcolonialism” refers to the actual state of former colonies (exploitation by new means) (Bullet point 1).
- “‘Postcolonialism'” refers to a specific theoretical approach with limitations (Bullet point 3).
Highlights Issues with “‘Postcolonialist'” Theory:
- Overemphasis on cultural factors and identity over economic realities (Bullet points 4 & 5).
- Disdain for class struggle as a concept (Bullet point 6).
- Neglect of global power structures like the IMF (Bullet point 5).
- Preference for celebrating difference over human solidarity (Bullet point 5).

Overall Argument:

Eagleton argues that “‘postcolonialism'” theory, while well-intentioned, suffers from limitations. It prioritizes trendy Western ideas and cultural factors over the harsh realities of ongoing economic exploitation faced by former colonies. He suggests a more nuanced approach that acknowledges both cultural complexities and the importance of class struggle and global economic structures.

Examples of Critiques Through “Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton

Literary Work	Critique Using Eagleton’s Concepts	Relevant Concept
*Heart of Darkness* by Joseph Conrad	Eagleton’s critique would focus on the way Conrad presents a Eurocentric perspective of Africa, where colonial subjects are either marginalized or dehumanized. While postcolonialism addresses this imbalance, ‘postcolonialism’ might analyze it through modern theoretical constructs like hybridity and cultural difference.	Eurocentrism, Hybridity
*Wide Sargasso Sea* by Jean Rhys	Eagleton would likely praise the novel for exposing the consequences of colonialism, particularly its psychological impact on the colonized, while critiquing ‘postcolonialism’ for overly theoretical discussions on identity politics and hybridity that may overshadow material concerns like class and economic exploitation.	Culturalism vs. Class Struggle
*Things Fall Apart* by Chinua Achebe	Eagleton would acknowledge Achebe’s exploration of colonial disruption in traditional African society but might critique ‘postcolonialism’ for focusing too heavily on cultural identity, potentially overlooking the broader economic systems of exploitation highlighted in the novel.	Cultural Identity, Class Struggle
*A Passage to India* by E.M. Forster	Eagleton might critique Forster’s novel for presenting cultural encounters between British and Indian characters through a lens of essentialism and cultural difference. While postcolonialism addresses this, ‘postcolonialism’ may overly focus on hybridity and dialogue, downplaying the material inequalities of the British Empire.	Essentialism, Hybridity vs. Materialism

Criticism Against “Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton

Oversimplification of Postcolonialism:
- Critics argue that Eagleton oversimplifies the vast and complex field of postcolonial theory by reducing it to a binary between postcolonial reality and ‘postcolonial’ theoretical abstraction.
Dismissal of Cultural Identity Politics:
- Eagleton’s critique of postcolonialism as a form of “culturalism” is seen as dismissive of the significance of cultural identity in postcolonial struggles. Critics contend that he undermines the importance of recognizing marginalized identities and their fight against cultural hegemony.

Excessive Focus on Class Struggle:
- Eagleton’s emphasis on class struggle as the primary lens for analyzing postcolonial societies is criticized for being overly Marxist, neglecting the specificities of race, ethnicity, and culture, which are central to postcolonial analysis.
Inadequate Engagement with Postcolonial Theorists:
- Some critics suggest that Eagleton does not engage deeply enough with key postcolonial theorists like Edward Said, Gayatri Spivak, or Homi Bhabha, whose works are foundational in shaping the field of postcolonial studies.
Undervaluation of Hybridity and Difference:
- Eagleton’s skepticism toward concepts like hybridity, multiplicity, and transgressiveness is seen by some as reactionary. Postcolonial theorists argue that these ideas are crucial for understanding the fluid, dynamic identities and conditions of postcolonial societies.

Neglect of Global Economic and Political Systems:
- Although Eagleton criticizes ‘postcolonialism’ for focusing on cultural factors, some critics point out that his essay itself lacks substantive analysis of the global economic and political systems that sustain neocolonialism.
Elitism and Overly Theoretical Approach:
- Eagleton’s language and critique are sometimes viewed as elitist, catering more to an academic audience and lacking practical relevance for real-world postcolonial struggles and movements.
Binary Opposition Between Postcolonialism and ‘Postcolonialism’:
- Critics argue that the binary opposition between postcolonialism (as reality) and ‘postcolonialism’ (as theory) in Eagleton’s essay is artificial, as both aspects are interrelated and influence each other.

Minimization of the Role of Cultural Studies:
- Eagleton’s critique downplays the role of cultural studies in postcolonialism, which has been instrumental in exploring how colonial power is exercised not just politically and economically but also through culture, media, and representation.

Representative Quotations from “Postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism'” by Terry Eagleton with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“There must surely be in existence somewhere a secret handbook for aspiring postcolonial theorists…”	Eagleton humorously critiques the formulaic nature of postcolonial writing, where theorists begin by questioning the legitimacy of the term “postcolonialism.”
“The term ‘postcolonialism’ won’t do because it falsely homogenizes a set of diverse conditions…”	Eagleton points out the flaws in the term “postcolonialism,” arguing that it simplifies and generalizes complex historical and cultural situations.
“There is something called postcolonialism and … something called ‘postcolonialism’ too.”	He makes a distinction between the real political-economic conditions of postcolonial societies and the theoretical, intellectual construct labeled ‘postcolonialism.’
“‘Postcolonialism’ is a way of analysing a true state of affairs in terms of certain currently rather modish concepts.”	Eagleton critiques ‘postcolonialism’ for relying heavily on trendy Western theoretical concepts rather than focusing on concrete material conditions.
“Postcolonialism usually entails… a fierce hostility to… ‘essentialism.'”	This highlights the postcolonial rejection of universal human nature and emphasis on cultural difference, a key critique Eagleton engages with.
“Or take the favoured ‘postcolonial’ concepts of hybridity, non-exclusivity, multiplicity, transgressiveness…”	Eagleton challenges the overuse of concepts like hybridity and multiplicity in ‘postcolonialism,’ arguing that they are often applied without critical examination of their actual value in specific contexts.
“Not all differences are positive, not all exclusions are pathological.”	Eagleton warns that the celebration of difference in postcolonial theory can be simplistic, and some exclusions, such as rejecting harmful ideologies, can be necessary.
“‘Postcolonialism’, like postmodernism in general, is among other things a brand of culturalism…”	He critiques ‘postcolonialism’ for focusing too much on cultural identity and symbolism while neglecting larger material and economic realities, which he views as more pressing in global power dynamics.
“Class struggle is now embarrassingly passé, whereas the affirmation of cultural identity is not.”	Eagleton points out that ‘postcolonialism’ has shifted attention away from class-based political struggles to cultural identity, which he believes is a less urgent political focus in many postcolonial contexts.
“It would be enheartening… to see this welcome new journal staging a conflict between postcolonialism and ‘postcolonialism’.”	Eagleton encourages a critical dialogue between the real conditions of postcolonialism and the theoretical concerns of ‘postcolonialism,’ calling for a more grounded approach to addressing global inequalities.

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30