Month: October 2023

Etymology of Cultural Appropriation

The term “cultural appropriation” emerged in the late 20th century as part of critical discourse concerning cultural dynamics and representation. Its etymology is rooted in the critical examination of how dominant cultures adopt elements of marginalized or minority cultures, often without permission or understanding.

The concept of appropriation underscores the imbalance of power and privilege in society. It implies the taking or borrowing of cultural elements such as clothing, symbols, rituals, language, or art and using them outside of their original context.

It is often associated with issues of commodification, commoditization, and misrepresentation, as it tends to reinforce stereotypes or trivialize cultural practices, while simultaneously erasing their historical and social significance.

The term serves as a foundation for discussions of cultural sensitivity, identity, and the power dynamics inherent in cross-cultural interactions. It highlights the need for respect and acknowledgment of the sources of cultural elements and has spurred ongoing debates about the ethics and responsibilities of those who engage in such practices.

Meanings of Cultural Appropriation

Aspect	Meanings
Borrowing Cultural Elements	It involves the borrowing, adoption, or imitation of elements from one culture by individuals or groups belonging to another culture, often without permission or understanding.
Power Imbalance	It is characterized by a power imbalance, where the culture that appropriates is typically dominant, while the culture being appropriated from is often marginalized or disadvantaged.
Lack of Respect	It typically involves a lack of respect or understanding of the cultural elements being borrowed, often leading to the misrepresentation or trivialization of those elements.
Erosion of Cultural Significance	It can result in the erosion of the cultural significance of these elements, as they are detached from their original context and may be commodified for profit.
Reinforcement of Stereotypes	It may reinforce stereotypes and perpetuate harmful misconceptions about the culture being appropriated from, further marginalizing the affected group.
Ethical and Social Concerns	It raises ethical and social concerns about the responsibilities of those who appropriate elements from other cultures and the need for cultural sensitivity and respect in cross-cultural interactions.

Definition of Cultural Appropriation as a Theoretical Term

Cultural appropriation, as a theoretical term, refers to the adoption, imitation, or borrowing of elements from one culture by individuals or groups belonging to another culture, often without permission, understanding, or proper respect.

 It is characterized by a power imbalance where the appropriating culture is typically dominant, while the culture being appropriated from is often marginalized or disadvantaged.

This concept raises ethical and social concerns, highlighting the responsibilities of those who engage in cultural appropriation and emphasizing the need for cultural sensitivity and respect in cross-cultural interactions.

Cultural Appropriation: Theorists, Works and Arguments

Theorists:

1. Edward Said: Although primarily known for his work on Orientalism, Said’s ideas about cultural representations and power dynamics are relevant to discussions of cultural appropriation. His work highlights how dominant cultures often construct skewed narratives about other cultures, leading to misrepresentations and appropriation.
2. Bell Hooks: As a feminist scholar, Hooks has explored issues related to cultural appropriation in the context of race, class, and gender. She offers critical perspectives on the ways in which dominant cultures appropriate and commodify elements of marginalized cultures.

Works:

1. Orientalism by Edward Said: This seminal work critiques the Western portrayal of the East and how it contributes to cultural misrepresentations and appropriation.
2. Black Looks: Race and Representation by Bell Hooks: In this book, Hooks examines the commodification of Black culture and the implications of cultural appropriation, particularly as it relates to race and identity.

Arguments:

1. Power Imbalance: It is often discussed in the context of a power imbalance, where dominant cultures appropriate elements from marginalized cultures, reinforcing existing inequalities.
2. Erosion of Cultural Significance: Critics argue that it can result in the erosion of the cultural significance of appropriated elements, as they are often detached from their original context and commodified for profit.
3. Misrepresentation and Stereotypes: Cultural appropriation is associated with the perpetuation of stereotypes and the misrepresentation of cultures, further marginalizing the affected groups.
4. Cultural Exchange vs. Appropriation: One argument revolves around the distinction between cultural exchange, which involves respectful sharing and appreciation of cultures, and cultural appropriation, which often lacks respect and understanding.
5. Ethical Responsibility: Scholars and activists argue that those who engage in cultural appropriation bear an ethical responsibility to be aware of the implications of their actions and to engage with cultural elements in a respectful and informed manner.

These theorists, works, and arguments contribute to ongoing discussions and debates surrounding it, examining the power dynamics, consequences, and ethical considerations involved in the appropriation of cultural elements.

Cultural Appropriation and Literary Theories

1. Postcolonial Theory: Cultural appropriation is a central concern in postcolonial literature and theory. Postcolonial scholars often analyze how dominant cultures have appropriated and misrepresented the cultures of colonized or marginalized peoples. These discussions shed light on the power dynamics, identity, and resistance present in postcolonial literature.
2. Feminist Literary Criticism: Cultural appropriation is relevant in feminist literary criticism, especially when examining the appropriation of women’s experiences and voices. This theory highlights how dominant cultures have historically appropriated and distorted women’s narratives, reinforcing patriarchal norms.
3. Queer Theory: In the context of queer theory, cultural appropriation is examined concerning the appropriation of LGBTQ+ culture. Scholars explore how certain cultural elements, such as language or fashion, have been appropriated, often without understanding the experiences or struggles of the queer community.
4. Ethnic and Racial Studies: Cultural appropriation is a central theme in ethnic and racial studies within literature. Scholars analyze how literature often reflects cultural appropriation and misrepresentation, contributing to stereotypes and the erasure of marginalized voices and experiences.
5. Reader-Response Theory: Cultural appropriation can be assessed from a reader-response perspective, where readers engage with texts and analyze the ways in which literature reflects or challenges cultural appropriation. This theory allows for discussions of how readers respond to texts that involve appropriation and misrepresentation.
6. Cultural Studies: Cultural studies, which explores the interplay of culture, power, and identity, is directly concerned with cultural appropriation in literature. This theory critically examines how cultural elements are appropriated, commodified, and represented within literary works.

In these literary theories, the discussion often revolves around power dynamics, representation, identity, and the responsibilities of authors and readers. It underscores the need for cultural sensitivity, ethical awareness, and the recognition of the potential harm caused by cultural appropriation in literary works.

Cultural Appropriation in Literary Criticism

Short Story 1: “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson

• Relevant Literary Theory: Social and Cultural Studies
• Critique: Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” has been critiqued for it because it involves the ritualistic stoning of a character, reminiscent of ancient practices. Critics argue that the story appropriates elements of cultural practices related to communal rituals and ceremonies without a full understanding of their historical and cultural significance. This raises questions about the potential insensitivity in the narrative’s portrayal of cultural practices.

Short Story 2: “Everyday Use” by Alice Walker

• Relevant Literary Theory: African-American Studies
• Critique: Alice Walker’s “Everyday Use” has been lauded for its exploration of African-American heritage and identity. However, some critics argue that the story could be seen as culturally appropriative when the character Dee seeks to claim her African heritage by changing her name and demanding traditional quilts. The story raises questions about the appropriation of African cultural elements by African-Americans and the complexities of identity and heritage.

Short Story 3: “The Last Rung on the Ladder” by Stephen King

• Relevant Literary Theory: Psychoanalytic Theory
• Critique: Stephen King’s short story “The Last Rung on the Ladder” has faced criticism for appropriating elements of mental illness and suicide for the sake of horror and suspense. Critics argue that the story may be seen as exploiting serious psychological issues for entertainment, raising ethical concerns about the appropriation of mental health themes for literary purposes.

Short Story 4: “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World” by Gabriel García Márquez

• Relevant Literary Theory: Magical Realism
• Critique: Gabriel García Márquez’s “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World” has been analyzed in terms of cultural appropriation due to its use of magical realism. While the story is celebrated for its unique narrative style, some critics argue that it appropriates elements of Latin American culture and folklore to create its magical elements. This appropriation raises questions about the portrayal of cultural elements in magical realism and the potential misrepresentation of Latin American culture.

These critiques of short stories illustrate how cultural appropriation can be examined within the context of literary criticism, taking into account various literary theories and their implications for the appropriation of cultural elements in storytelling.

Suggested Readings

1. Hooks, Bell. Black Looks: Race and Representation. South End Press, 1992.
2. King, C. Richard, and David E. Stannard. Being and Race: Black Writing Since 1970. Indiana University Press, 1988.
3. Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Pantheon, 1978.
4. Yaszek, Lisa. The Future Is Female! 25 Classic Science Fiction Stories by Women, from Pulp Pioneers to Ursula K. Le Guin. Library of America, 2018.
5. Young, Robert J.C. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture, and Race. Routledge, 1995.

Etymology of Consilience

The term “consilience” finds its etymological origins in the Latin language, specifically from the words “con” meaning “together” and “salire” meaning “to jump” or “leap.”

Coined by the 19th-century philosopher and scientist William Whewell, consilience signifies the convergence or unification of knowledge and ideas from diverse disciplines. It represents the idea that when evidence and theories from different fields mutually support and reinforce each other, a more comprehensive and integrated understanding of the world could be achieved, leading to a strengthened and more robust foundation for knowledge in various academic and intellectual pursuits.

This concept has had a lasting influence on fields such as science, philosophy, and the philosophy of science.

Meanings of Consilience

Aspect	Meanings
Interdisciplinary Convergence	Consilience refers to the coming together or convergence of knowledge, evidence, and ideas from different disciplines or academic fields to form a unified understanding.
Unity of Knowledge	It implies the integration of various branches of knowledge to create a coherent and comprehensive view of the world, emphasizing the interconnectedness of diverse fields.
Reinforcement of Understanding	Consilience signifies that when theories and evidence from different domains support each other, they collectively strengthen the validity and reliability of knowledge.
Bridge Between Disciplines	It serves as a conceptual bridge between disparate areas of study, encouraging collaboration and synthesis of ideas across academic boundaries.
Enhanced Epistemological Foundations	The concept of consilience has been influential in philosophy and the philosophy of science, emphasizing the importance of a unified, multifaceted approach to knowledge acquisition and theory-building.

Definition of Consilience as a Theoretical Term

Consilience, as a theoretical term, refers to the principle of integrating and unifying knowledge from diverse academic disciplines to create a comprehensive and interconnected understanding of a given subject or phenomenon.

It posits that when evidence and theories from different fields converge and mutually support one another, it enhances the overall validity and reliability of the knowledge base. This concept underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the synthesis of ideas to strengthen the epistemological foundations of various academic pursuits.

Consilience: Theorists, Works and Arguments

Theorists:

• William Whewell: William Whewell, a 19th-century philosopher and scientist, is credited with coining the term “consilience.” He emphasized the importance of integrating knowledge from various academic disciplines to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the world. Whewell saw consilience as a means to bridge gaps between different fields of study and promote interdisciplinary collaboration.
• E.O. Wilson: The renowned biologist E.O. Wilson further popularized the concept of consilience in his book Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. In this work, Wilson argued that various branches of science and human understanding should come together to form a unified body of knowledge, highlighting the unity and interconnectedness of scientific disciplines.

Works:

• Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge by E.O. Wilson: This seminal work by E.O. Wilson explores the concept of consilience and presents a compelling argument for the unity of knowledge. In the book, Wilson discusses how the convergence of scientific and intellectual pursuits across disciplines can lead to a more profound and coherent comprehension of the world, advocating for the integration of knowledge from various fields.

Arguments:

• The Unification of Knowledge: The central argument of consilience is the unification of knowledge. It asserts that knowledge should not be compartmentalized but rather integrated and interconnected across diverse academic domains. This integration leads to a comprehensive and coherent understanding of the world, emphasizing the interconnectedness of different fields of study.
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Consilience underscores the significance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the synthesis of ideas from various fields. It promotes the idea that when scholars from different disciplines work together, they can achieve a more multifaceted and holistic approach to knowledge acquisition, leading to breakthroughs and deeper insights.
• Strengthening Epistemological Foundations: Consilience argues that when theories and evidence from different disciplines converge and mutually support one another, they collectively enhance the validity and reliability of knowledge. This strengthens the epistemological foundations of academic pursuits, making the resulting knowledge more robust and dependable.

Consilience and Literary Theories

1. Interdisciplinary Approaches: Consilience encourages interdisciplinary collaboration and the integration of knowledge from various fields. In the context of literary analysis, this can involve drawing from psychology, history, sociology, philosophy, and other disciplines to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a literary work. For example, a consilient approach might incorporate psychological theories to analyze the characters’ motivations or historical context to interpret the social and political themes within a novel.
2. Biographical and Contextual Analysis: Literary theories often involve examining an author’s life, historical context, and cultural influences to better understand their works. Consilience promotes the idea that these factors should be considered collectively to gain a richer interpretation of the text. By connecting the author’s biography with their social and historical context, scholars can provide more nuanced readings of literary works.
3. Cognitive Literary Theory: Cognitive literary theory, which explores the cognitive processes underlying the reading and interpretation of literature, aligns with the consilient approach. It combines insights from cognitive science, psychology, and literature to understand how readers engage with texts and how literary works evoke emotional and intellectual responses.
4. Literary Darwinism: Consilience is also relevant to literary Darwinism, which applies principles from evolutionary psychology and biology to the analysis of literature. This approach suggests that certain themes, narratives, and character traits found in literature can be understood as products of human evolutionary history. Consilience supports the idea that this interdisciplinary approach can provide valuable insights into the universality of literary themes and their connection to human nature.
5. Environmental Humanities: In the study of ecocriticism and environmental literature, consilience can be applied to understand the intersection of literature, science, and environmental issues. This approach recognizes the importance of integrating insights from ecology, environmental science, and literary analysis to explore how literature reflects and shapes our understanding of the environment and sustainability.

In essence, consilience promotes a holistic and interconnected approach to literary analysis. It encourages scholars to consider various perspectives and disciplines when interpreting literary works, thereby enriching the depth and scope of literary theories. This interdisciplinary approach can lead to more profound insights and a broader understanding of the complex relationships between literature, culture, and human experience.

Consilience in Literary Criticism

Novel	Critique
Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman	– Psychological Analysis: Explore the psychological depths of the characters, including their motivations and fears. Analyze how the novel’s fantastical and dark world influences the characters’ mental states.   – Urban Studies: Examine the novel’s portrayal of London, particularly the subterranean world, and connect it to urban studies. Consider how this hidden London reflects urban issues such as marginalization, inequality, and the invisible parts of the city. – Mythology and Folklore: Investigate the novel’s use of mythology and folklore to shape its world. Analyze how Gaiman incorporates elements of British and international myth to create a unique narrative.
The Nightingale by Kristin Hannah	– Historical Context: Place the novel in its historical context, World War II, and analyze how it portrays the experiences of women during the war. Consider how the characters’ choices and challenges reflect broader historical realities. – Feminist Literary Criticism: Apply feminist literary criticism to assess the representation of women in the novel. Analyze how the two main characters embody different feminist perspectives and the novel’s commentary on gender roles. – Sociological Perspective: Examine the societal norms and expectations of the time and how they influence the characters’ decisions. Consider how the novel engages with sociological theories about war and its impact on communities.
The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes	– Philosophical Analysis: Investigate the philosophical themes of memory, time, and subjectivity in the novel. Analyze how Barnes engages with philosophical concepts of identity and perception. – Cognitive Literary Theory: Apply cognitive literary theory to understand how the novel’s narrative structure affects readers’ understanding and interpretation of the story. Explore the cognitive processes involved in piecing together the narrative. – Psychological Depth: Delve into the psychology of the main character, Tony, and how his memory and perceptions shape the story. Consider how the novel portrays the fallibility of human memory and its impact on our understanding of the past.
Middlemarch by George Eliot	– Sociological Perspective: Examine the societal dynamics and class structure depicted in the novel. Analyze how Eliot’s portrayal of the town of Middlemarch reflects sociological concepts of community and social change. – Feminist Literary Criticism: Apply feminist literary criticism to assess the representation of female characters, including Dorothea Brooke. Consider how Eliot challenges or reinforces traditional gender roles. – Historical Context: Place the novel in its historical context, the early 19th century, and consider how it reflects the social and political issues of the time. Analyze the novel’s commentary on reform, science, and the changing role of women in society.

Suggested Readings

1. Chalmers, Alan F. “Science and Its Fabrication.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 25, no. 2, 2000, pp. 204-225.
2. Wilson, Edward O. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. Knopf, 1998.
3. Ziman, John. “Is Science Losing Its Objectivity?” Nature, vol. 394, no. 6688, 1998, pp. 339-340.
4. Ziman, John. Real Science: What It Is and What It Means. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Etymology Of Collective Human Experience

The term “collective human experience” is a conceptual construct rooted in the English language, emerging from the fusion of two key elements. “Collective” finds its origins in the Latin “collectivus,” meaning “gathered together” or “assembled as a whole.”

It conveys the idea of unity, shared attributes, or commonality among a group of individuals. “Human,” on the other hand, originates from the Latin “humanus,” signifying “pertaining to man” or “related to mankind.”

It encapsulates the notion of humanity and all that is characteristic of the human species. In its contemporary usage, “collective human experience” denotes the cumulative, shared, and interconnected aspects of human existence, encompassing culture, history, emotions, knowledge, and the profound interplay of individuals within the broader context of society and civilization.

This term is often invoked in academic discourse to explore the universal aspects of human life that transcend individual variations and are integral to understanding human society and culture.

Meanings Of Collective Human Experience

Aspect	Meaning
Literary Theory	Shared, universal themes in literature across cultures and time, making human experiences relatable in literary works.
History and Sociology	Examination of shared patterns, behaviors, and experiences in the evolution of societies, cultures, and major events.
Psychology and Anthropology	Study of shared human behaviors, cognition, and cultural impact on individuals and groups in society.
Philosophy	Philosophical inquiry into human existence, ethics, morality, and the human condition through shared experiences.
Education	Curriculum development focusing on common elements of human history, culture, and society for a well-rounded education.
Cultural Studies	Analysis of how culture, artifacts, and media reflect and shape shared human experiences and their influence on culture.
Fine Arts and Creativity	Artistic exploration of universal themes like love, loss, identity, and societal issues to resonate with a broad audience.
Religious Studies	Investigation of how religious beliefs and practices address questions about human existence, purpose, and morality through shared experiences.
Environmental Studies	Study of interactions between humans and the environment, focusing on sustainability, resource use, and the impact of human activities.
Communication and Media	Exploration of how media portrays social issues, cultural trends, and political events, reflecting and influencing shared human experiences.

Definition Of Collective Human Experience As A Theoretical Term

Collective human experience, as a theoretical term, signifies the shared, universal aspects of human existence that transcend individual differences and are relevant across cultures and historical contexts.

It encapsulates the common threads of human emotions, themes, and conditions that are explored in various academic disciplines and artistic expressions. This concept serves as a foundational lens through which to understand the interconnectedness of human life, culture, and society, fostering a broader understanding of humanity’s shared narratives and experiences.

Collective Human Experience: Theorists, Works And Arguments

Theorist	Key Work	Argument
Carl Jung	Jung’s theories, particularly his idea of the “collective unconscious”	Jung argued that universal symbols and archetypes in the collective unconscious underlie storytelling and mythology, tapping into common human experiences and emotions.
Joseph Campbell	The Hero with a Thousand Faces	Campbell’s monomyth theory posits a universal pattern in the hero’s journey, reflecting the collective human experience with stages like the call to adventure and return with newfound wisdom.
Northrop Frye	Anatomy of Criticism	Frye suggests literature draws from a collective pool of symbols and archetypes that resonate with human experience, creating recurring themes in literature.
Vladimir Propp	Morphology of the Folktale	Propp’s work outlines narrative functions and character roles in folktales, revealing common elements of the human experience, such as the struggle between good and evil.
Sigmund Freud	The Interpretation of Dreams, and Totem and Taboo	Freud’s psychoanalytic theory explores the role of the subconscious and repressed desires in literature, providing a means to understand the collective human psyche.
Rita Felski	The Limits of Critique	Felski challenges conventional literary analysis, suggesting that literature has the power to engage readers’ emotions, providing a deeper understanding of the collective human experience beyond traditional critical analysis.
Mikhail Bakhtin	Ideas on dialogism and polyphony	Bakhtin’s work highlights how literature reflects the multivocal nature of the human experience by representing diverse perspectives, voices, and social interactions.

Collective Human Experience And Literary Theories

1. Archetypal Criticism:
   • Relevance: Archetypal criticism, often associated with Northrop Frye, explores recurring symbols, motifs, and character types that are common across different cultures and literary works. These archetypes reflect the collective human experience by tapping into universal themes and emotions.
2. Mythological and Heroic Criticism:
   • Relevance: The study of myths, heroes, and heroines, as Campbell exemplifies though monomyth theory, is deeply rooted in the collective human experience. Myths and hero narratives often embody universal themes and journeys that resonate with people across the world.
3. Psychoanalytic Criticism(Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung):
   • Relevance: Freud and Jung’s theories emphasize the role of the unconscious mind and the collective unconscious in shaping human behavior and, consequently, literary expression. Literature frequently delves into the collective human experience by exploring repressed desires, fears, and universal symbols.
4. Feminist Criticism:
   • Relevance: Feminist literary criticism, while focused on gender and societal roles, also delves into the collective experiences of women in various cultures and historical periods. It examines how women’s experiences, struggles, and identities are portrayed in literature, shedding light on shared female experiences.
5. Cultural and Postcolonial Criticism:
   • Relevance: These critical approaches explore how literature reflects the experiences of marginalized and colonized communities. They highlight shared struggles, challenges, and the impact of cultural clashes, making the collective human experience relevant in the context of colonial and postcolonial narratives.
6. Reader-Response and Affective Approaches:
   • Relevance: These approaches, including the work of Rita Felski, focus on how readers engage with and emotionally respond to literature. They stress the importance of the collective human experience in readers’ emotional connections with texts, emphasizing the affective power of literature.
7. Dialogism and Intertextuality (Mikhail Bakhtin):
   • Relevance: Bakhtin’s ideas on dialogism emphasize the multiplicity of voices and perspectives in literature. This reflects the diversity of human experiences, as different characters and viewpoints contribute to a more comprehensive portrayal of the human condition.
8. Structuralism and Narratology:
   • Relevance: Structuralist and narratological approaches often analyze the underlying structures and patterns in literature. These structures frequently contain recurring themes and elements that contribute to the exploration of the collective human experience.
9. Postmodernism:
   • Relevance: Postmodern literature often challenges and deconstructs traditional narratives, but in doing so, it frequently engages with common themes and questions about human existence, identity, and meaning, making the collective human experience a central concern.

In these various literary theories and approaches, the collective human experience plays a crucial role in understanding how literature connects people across time and cultures by exploring common themes, emotions, and universal aspects of the human condition. These theories help us uncover the shared aspects of humanity that are expressed through the written word.

Collective Human Experience In Literary Criticism

1. by Arundhati Roy (Indian Novel): Critique: Arundhati Roy’s novel delves into complex themes of family, love, caste, and societal norms in Kerala, India. It portrays the struggle of individuals against oppressive societal structures, making it relevant to the collective human experience of resistance against injustice. The novel also explores the universal themes of love, loss, and the impact of childhood experiences on adult lives.
2. by Jostein Gaarder (Norwegian Novel): Critique: Jostein Gaarder’s novel takes readers on a philosophical journey through the history of Western philosophy. It explores fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, and identity, making it relevant to the collective human experience of seeking meaning and understanding in life. The novel’s exploration of these philosophical themes resonates with readers worldwide.
3. by Mohsin Hamid (Pakistani Novel): Critique: Mohsin Hamid’s novel tells the story of a Pakistani man who experiences the post-9/11 world and undergoes a personal transformation. The book delves into themes of identity, belonging, and the impact of global events on individuals. It addresses the collective human experience of navigating cultural and political divides and the search for one’s place in an evolving world.
4. by Rohinton Mistry (Indian-Canadian Novel): Critique: While Rohinton Mistry is an Indian-born author who later became a Canadian citizen, his novel A Fine Balance provides a compelling portrayal of life in India. The novel explores the human experience of resilience and survival in the face of adversity, as it follows the lives of four characters during the political and economic upheavals in India. It speaks to the universal theme of the human spirit’s capacity to endure and find hope in challenging circumstances.

These novels, from India, Norway, and Pakistan, offer readers insights into the collective human experience by addressing themes of love, identity, resistance, philosophical exploration, and survival. Despite their diverse cultural and geographic settings, they connect with readers on a universal level, reflecting common aspects of the human condition.

Suggested Readings

1. Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton University Press, 1949.
2. Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. The University of Chicago Press, 2015.
3. Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press, 1957.
4. Jung, Carl. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Routledge, 1969.
5. Mistry, Rohinton. A Fine Balance. Knopf Canada, 1995.
6. Propp, Vladimir. Morphology of the Folktale. University of Texas Press, 1968.
7. Roy, Arundhati. The God of Small Things. Random House, 1997.
8. Gaarder, Jostein. Sophie’s World. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1991.
9. Hamid, Mohsin. The Reluctant Fundamentalist. Harcourt, 2007.

Etymology of Authorial Intent

The etymology of “authorial intent” can be traced to the late Middle English period, where “authorial” derives from the Latin word “auctor” meaning “originator” or “promoter,” while “intent” stems from the Latin “intentus,” signifying “purpose” or “aim.”

Together, “authorial intent” refers to the purpose or intended meaning of the originator, typically applied in literary and artistic contexts to understand an author’s intended message or interpretation.

Meanings of Authorial Intent

Authorial Intent in Literature	Authorial Intent in Literary Theory
– Interpretive Framework: It pertains to the concept that understanding an author’s original intentions can provide valuable insights into the meaning and interpretation of a literary work.	– Hermeneutics: In literary theory, it is a central aspect of hermeneutics, the study of interpretation, where it plays a role in deciphering meaning.
– Narrative Analysis: It involves examining an author’s conscious choices in terms of plot, characters, and themes to discern the intended message or thematic exploration.	– New Criticism: This critical approach emphasizes close reading of the text and often focuses on authorial intent as a primary means of analysis.
– Character Motivations: It can help readers analyze why characters behave a certain way and how their actions contribute to the overall message.	– Death of the Author: Some postmodern and structuralist theorists have challenged the significance of authorial intent, arguing that the text’s meaning should be divorced from the author’s intentions.
– Literary Criticism: Literary theorists and critics often debate the relevance and limitations of considering authorial intent in the interpretation of texts.	– Reader-Response Theory: This theory suggests that a reader’s interpretation, rather than authorial intent, is of primary importance in understanding a text.

Definition of Authorial Intent as a Theoretical Term

Authorial intent, as a theoretical term in literary analysis, refers to the presumed intentions or purposes of an author in creating a literary work. It involves the study and interpretation of a text with the aim of uncovering the meaning or messages intended by the author through elements such as plot, characters, and themes.

It serves as a framework for understanding the relationship between the author’s creative choices and the resulting textual content.

Authorial Intent: Theorists, Works and Arguments

• William K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley: Notable proponents of the New Criticism movement who emphasized the significance of authorial intent in literary analysis.

Works on Authorial Intent:

• “The Intentional Fallacy” (1946): An influential essay by Wimsatt and Beardsley, critiquing the reliance on the author’s intentions in interpreting a text and advocating for a focus on the text itself.
• “The Death of the Author” (1967): A seminal essay by Roland Barthes, which challenges the idea of authorial intent and suggests that readers’ interpretations are paramount.

Arguments Surrounding Authorial Intent:

• Relevance in Interpretation: Some argue that authorial intent is crucial for understanding a text’s true meaning and context, providing valuable insights into an author’s purpose.
• Reader-Centered Perspectives: Contrarily, proponents of reader-response theories contend that authorial intent should be secondary to how readers engage with and interpret a text, emphasizing the active role of the reader.
• Interpretive Freedom: Critics of a strict reliance on authorial intent argue that it can limit diverse interpretations and overlook the richness of multiple readings a text can offer.

Authorial Intent and Literary Theories

1. New Criticism:
   • Relevance: New Critics, such as William K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley, considered it as essential in interpreting a text. They believed that understanding an author’s intended meaning was crucial for a comprehensive analysis of literature.
2. Reader-Response Theory:
   • Relevance: Reader-response theorists, like Wolfgang Iser and Stanley Fish, often downplay its significance . They argue that a text’s meaning is co-created through the interaction between the reader and the text, making the reader’s response central while it becomes less important.
3. Historical Criticism:
   • Relevance: In historical criticism, it is valuable for contextualizing a work within the historical and cultural milieu of its creation. It helps in understanding how an author’s intentions were shaped by the era in which they wrote.
4. Biographical Criticism:
   • Relevance: This approach places a strong emphasis on an author’s life and experiences as influencing their works. Authorial intent plays a significant role in biographical criticism by connecting an author’s personal history to the themes and content of their writing.
5. Intentional Fallacy Critique:
   • Relevance: Critics who subscribe to the intentional fallacy critique, influenced by the works of Wimsatt and Beardsley, argue against relying solely on it. They suggest that interpreting a text solely through the author’s intent can lead to misinterpretations and should be avoided.
6. Poststructuralism and Deconstruction:
   • Relevance: Poststructuralist thinkers like Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes questioned this concept, positing that it is impossible to fully access or discern the author’s intentions. They argued that meaning in a text is multifaceted and dynamic, undermining the authority of authorial intent.
7. Psychoanalytic Criticism:
   • Relevance: Psychoanalytic critics, such as Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan, explore how an author’s subconscious desires and conflicts may manifest in their writing. Understanding authorial intent in this context can illuminate the psychological dimensions of literary works.
8. Feminist Criticism:
   • Relevance: In feminist literary theory, it could be relevant when analyzing how gender issues and societal norms are portrayed in literature. It helps in assessing whether authors intended to challenge or perpetuate gender stereotypes.

In summary, its relevance in literary theories varies widely, with some theories prioritizing it as a crucial element of interpretation, while others challenge its significance in favor of reader engagement or alternative approaches to understanding texts.

Authorial Intent in Literary Criticism

Work	Critique
The Testaments by Margaret Atwood (2019)	Margaret Atwood is known for her feminist themes and dystopian narratives. In The Testaments, she revisits the world of her acclaimed novel The Handmaid’s Tale with the intention of expanding and concluding the story. Critique: Analyzing Atwood in this context is valuable, as it helps readers appreciate her commentary on the role of women in society and the dangers of authoritarian regimes. However, some critics argue that readers should also consider how the book’s interpretation may evolve in the changing socio-political landscape.
Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens (2018)	Perspective: Delia Owens, a wildlife scientist, wrote this novel with the intent of blending a murder mystery with vivid descriptions of nature and a coming-of-age story. Critique: Examining Owens’ authorial intent allows readers to appreciate the importance of the natural world in the story and the protagonist’s relationship with it. However, some argue that readers should also be free to interpret the novel’s themes of isolation, resilience, and love without being constrained by the author’s intent.
The Vanishing Half by Brit Bennett (2020)	Perspective: Brit Bennett explores themes of identity, race, and family in her novel, intending to shed light on the complexities of passing as another race and the consequences of such decisions. Critique: Acknowledging Bennett’s authorial intent is essential to grasp the novel’s core themes and social commentary. However, some critics contend that interpreting the characters and their choices from multiple perspectives, including those outside the author’s intent, enriches the reader’s experience and deepens the discussion of racial identity.
The Nickel Boys by Colson Whitehead (2019)	Perspective: Colson Whitehead’s novel is inspired by real events and intends to expose the injustices faced by Black youths in a brutal reform school in the 1960s. Critique: Considering Whitehead’s authorial intent is crucial to understanding the historical and social context of the story. However, some argue that the novel’s power lies in its ability to prompt readers to reflect on broader issues of systemic racism, rather than solely adhering to the author’s specific intentions.

Suggested Readings

1. Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Image, Music, Text, edited by Stephen Heath, Hill and Wang, 1977, pp. 142-148.
2. Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. University of Chicago Press, 1961.
3. Eco, Umberto. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Indiana University Press, 1979.
4. Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press, 1980.
5. Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
6. Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
7. Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. Routledge, 2002.
8. Ryan, Marie-Laure. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Indiana University Press, 1991.
9. Said, Edward W. The World, the Text, and the Critic. Harvard University Press, 1983.
10. Wimsatt, William K., and Monroe C. Beardsley. “The Intentional Fallacy.” The Sewanee Review, vol. 54, no. 3, 1946, pp. 468-488.

You may read more on Theoretical Terms below:

• Literalize in Literature & Literary Theory
• Cultural Relativism in Literature & Literary Theory
• Decolonization in Literature & Literary Theory
• Cultural Universals in Literature & Literary Theory
• Cultural Imperialism in Literature & Literary Theory

Etymology of Ambivalence

The term “ambivalence” originates from the Latin word “ambivalens,” which is a combination of “ambi” (meaning “both”) and “valens” (meaning “strong” or “powerful”).

The concept of ambivalence was first introduced in psychology and psychoanalysis by Swiss psychiatrist Eugen Bleuler in the early 20th century to describe the coexistence of conflicting emotions or attitudes within an individual.

It has since been widely adopted in academic and clinical discourse to characterize the simultaneous presence of contradictory feelings or evaluations, reflecting the tension between opposing forces or tendencies in human cognition and emotion.

Meanings of Ambivalence

Aspect	Meaning
Conflict of Emotions	Coexistence of conflicting feelings towards a subject or situation.
Mixed Feelings	Having dual, indecisive emotions that hinder clear decisions.
Psychological Duality	Manifestation of inner turmoil due to opposing attitudes.
Complex Attitudes	Acknowledging contradictory beliefs or opinions within a person.
Inconsistency	Resulting in behavior and decision inconsistencies due to wavering choices.
Analysis in Psychology	A critical concept in psychology for understanding human behavior and emotions.
Social and Cultural Impact	Influencing how individuals and groups respond to societal issues and relationships.
Literary and Artistic Use	Common theme in literature and the arts, adding depth and complexity to characters and narratives.
Therapeutic Considerations	Addressed in therapy, particularly in motivational interviewing, to resolve conflicting feelings for constructive decisions.

Definition of Ambivalence as a Theoretical Term

Ambivalence, as a theoretical term, refers to the coexistence of conflicting emotions or attitudes within an individual, often involving a simultaneous experience of both positive and negative sentiments toward a particular subject, person, or situation.

It represents the complex interplay of contradictory feelings and the psychological duality that arises when opposing desires or inclinations compete, potentially leading to inner turmoil.

Ambivalence is a crucial concept in various fields, including psychology, sociology, and literature, as it underscores the intricate nature of human emotions and decision-making.

Ambivalence: Theorists, Works and Arguments

Theorists:

• Sigmund Freud: Pioneered the concept of ambivalence in psychoanalysis, highlighting its role in the development of complex emotions.
• Eugen Bleuler: Introduced the term “ambivalence” in the context of schizophrenia and its impact on emotional conflicts.

Works:

• _Sigmund Freud’s “Mourning and Melancholia” (1917): Discusses ambivalence in the grieving process, emphasizing the coexistence of love and aggression toward the lost object, providing a nuanced understanding of how ambivalence shapes emotions.
• _Eugen Bleuler’s “Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias” (1911): Introduces ambivalence as a central feature of schizophrenia, where patients may simultaneously hold contradictory feelings, thereby offering a diagnostic lens for understanding the complexities of this disorder.

Arguments:

• Freud’s argument: Centers on the idea that ambivalence is a fundamental aspect of human emotions, impacting various psychological processes, including mourning, attachment, and self-identity, thereby enriching our comprehension of the intricate web of human emotions.
• Bleuler’s argument: In the context of schizophrenia, he emphasizes how it contributes to the disordered thought and emotional experiences in this psychiatric condition, highlighting its diagnostic significance and its critical role in understanding the psychological underpinnings of the disorder.

Ambivalence and Literary Theories

• Psychoanalytic Theory: Ambivalence is a central theme in psychoanalytic literary criticism, heavily influenced by Sigmund Freud’s work. This theory explores how characters’ inner conflicts, contradictory emotions, and complex desires contribute to the depth and complexity of literary works. For example, the concept of ambivalence can be used to analyze characters torn between their conscious desires and unconscious drives.
• Reader-Response Theory: It could be crucial in reader-response theory, where the reader’s own experiences and emotions are considered integral to the interpretation of a text. Ambivalence can mirror the reader’s own emotional responses to the text and influence their interpretation of characters and plot.
• Feminist Literary Theory: In feminist literary criticism, it is often examined in the context of gender and power dynamics. It can be used to analyze the complex relationships between male and female characters and the conflicting emotions and desires that may arise within these relationships. For example, exploring ambivalence can shed light on how female characters may be torn between societal expectations and personal desires.
• Postcolonial Theory: Ambivalence is also pertinent in postcolonial literary theory, where it is employed to investigate the complex relationships between colonizers and the colonized, the simultaneous attraction and repulsion toward Western ideals, and the conflicting loyalties and identities of characters in postcolonial settings.
• Narrative Theory: Ambivalence can be integral to narrative theory, where it can be used to examine the complexity of characters and their development throughout a story. It can highlight how characters’ emotions and attitudes evolve and create tension and suspense in the narrative.
• Modernism and Ambiguity: In the realm of modernist literature, ambivalence and ambiguity often go hand in hand. Modernist works frequently leave room for multiple interpretations and evoke contradictory emotions, leading readers to grapple with uncertainty and ambivalence in their responses to the text.

Ambivalence in Literary Criticism

Novel	Literary Theory	Critique
The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger	Psychoanalytic Criticism	In The Catcher in the Rye, the character Holden Caulfield exhibits profound ambivalence towards the adult world and his transition into it. Drawing from psychoanalytic theory, one can analyze how Holden’s ambivalence is rooted in his fear of losing his innocence (the id) while dealing with societal expectations (the superego). This ambivalence reflects Freudian concepts of the conscious ego grappling with unconscious desires, enhancing the novel’s exploration of adolescent angst.
Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë	Feminist Criticism	In Wuthering Heights, the ambivalence of characters like Heathcliff and Catherine can be viewed through a feminist lens. The novel underscores the constraints and expectations placed on women during the 19th century. Feminist criticism can highlight the ambivalence Catherine experiences as she struggles to reconcile her love for Heathcliff with her societal duty to marry Edgar. Ambivalence, in this context, serves as a commentary on gender roles and restrictions.
One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez	Magical Realism	In this novel, ambivalence takes on a surreal and magical quality, often blurring the line between reality and fantasy. From a magical realism perspective, ambivalence becomes a narrative tool to depict the multifaceted nature of human experience and history. The characters’ ambivalence towards time and reality is woven into the fabric of the story, enhancing the novel’s exploration of the magical and the mundane.
Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky	Existentialism	In Crime and Punishment, the protagonist Raskolnikov grapples with a profound ambivalence towards morality, ethics, and societal norms. Analyzed through an existentialist lens, the novel explores the existential dilemma of choice and responsibility. Raskolnikov’s inner conflict exemplifies the existentialist notion of the individual’s anguish and ambivalence in the face of moral choices and the consequences of their actions.

Suggested Readings

1. Freud, Sigmund. The Ego and the Id. Translated by Joan Riviere, Hogarth Press, 1927.
2. Glover, Edward. On the Early Development of Mind. Imago Publishing, 1956.
3. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by Bruce Fink, W. W. Norton & Company, 2006.
4. McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. Routledge, 1987.
5. Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, translated by Wade Baskin, McGraw-Hill, 1959.
6. Segal, Hanna. Klein. Harvard University Press, 1979.
7. Stevenson, Robert Louis. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Penguin Classics, 2003.
8. Wimsatt, William K., and Beardsley, Monroe C. The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. University Press of Kentucky, 1954.
9. Woolf, Virginia. To the Lighthouse. Harcourt, Brace and World, 1927.

You may read more on Theoretical Terms below:

• Moral Dilemmas in Literature & Literary Theory
• Misrepresentation in Literature & Literary Theory
• Minimalism in Literature & Literary Theory
• Materiality in Literature & Literary Theory
• Material Agency in Literature & Literary Theory