Attitudes: Creating and Critiquing It

Attitude in literature is like the mood or feeling the author or characters have about a particular subject, idea, or situation in a story.

Introduction to Attitudes

Attitudes in literature are like the mood or feeling the author or characters have about a particular subject, idea, or situation in a story. It’s the way they express their thoughts and emotions, whether they’re happy, sad, excited, or even skeptical.

This attitude can shape the overall tone of the story, influencing how readers feel as they read it. It’s like the author’s way of showing their perspective or viewpoint through the words and actions of the characters and the choices they make in the story.

Literary Examples of Attitudes
  1. Optimistic Attitudes:
    • Example: In Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations, the character of Joe Gargery embodies an optimistic attitude. Despite his humble background and hardships, Joe maintains a positive outlook on life and values kindness and moral integrity.
    • Explanation: Joe’s optimistic attitude serves as a stark contrast to the novel’s darker themes. His unwavering kindness and optimism illustrate the potential for goodness and redemption, offering hope amidst adversity.
  2. Cynical Attitudes:
    • Example: In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, the character of Tom Buchanan exemplifies a cynical attitude. He is skeptical about love, morality, and the American Dream, often displaying a dismissive and self-centered outlook.
    • Explanation: Tom’s cynical attitude reflects the moral decay and disillusionment of the Jazz Age. His skepticism underscores the novel’s critique of materialism and superficiality.
  3. Sarcastic Attitudes:
    • Example: In Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, the character of Elizabeth Bennet frequently employs sarcasm in her interactions, particularly with Mr. Darcy. For instance, she responds to Darcy’s proposal with biting sarcasm.
    • Explanation: Elizabeth’s use of sarcasm is a defense mechanism against societal expectations and her perception of Darcy’s arrogance. It adds humor and depth to the novel’s exploration of class and marriage.
  4. Tragic Attitudes:
    • Example: In William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” the titular character, Hamlet, embodies a tragic attitude. He grapples with existential questions, experiences profound sorrow, and is haunted by thoughts of death and betrayal.
    • Explanation: Hamlet’s tragic attitude is central to the play’s exploration of human suffering and the consequences of moral ambiguity. It contributes to the play’s enduring status as a tragedy.
  5. Romantic Attitudes:
    • Example: Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights portrays the passionate and obsessive love between Heathcliff and Catherine. Their intense emotions and the wild, untamed landscape reflect a romantic attitude.
    • Explanation: The romantic attitude in Wuthering Heights underscores the theme of destructive love and the enduring power of emotions. It contrasts with societal norms, emphasizing the depth of human passion.
  6. Realistic Attitudes:
    • Example: In Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, the protagonist, Santiago, exhibits a realistic attitude toward life in the face of adversity. He acknowledges the challenges of his fishing expedition and the harsh realities of the sea.
    • Explanation: Santiago’s realistic attitude reflects Hemingway’s “iceberg theory” of writing, emphasizing the understated and unspoken aspects of life. Santiago’s resilience in the face of struggle embodies a stoic and realistic perspective.
How to Create an Attitudes
  1. Determine Your Attitudes:
    • Decide on the specific attitude you want to convey in your writing, whether it’s optimism, skepticism, humor, or any other emotional or intellectual stance.
  2. Select the Right Tone:
    • Choose a tone that aligns with your desired attitude. The tone sets the emotional quality of your writing, so opt for one that effectively communicates your chosen attitude.
  3. Use Appropriate Language:
    • Select words and phrases that reflect the attitude you want to convey. Positive and negative language choices can significantly impact how your attitude comes across.
  4. Create Vivid Imagery:
    • Use descriptive language and sensory details to paint a vivid picture that evokes the chosen attitude in your readers. Show, don’t just tell, to make the attitude more compelling.
  5. Edit for Consistency:
    • Review your writing to ensure that the attitude you’ve established remains consistent throughout the piece. Remove any elements that may contradict the intended attitude.

By following these five steps, you can effectively create and convey your desired attitude in your writing with clarity and impact.

Benefits of Using Attitudes
  1. Authenticity: Infusing your own attitude into your writing lends it an unmistakable authenticity. Your personal beliefs and emotions shine through, creating a genuine connection with your readers. This authenticity makes your writing relatable and trustworthy.
  2. Emotional Impact: Your attitude can evoke strong emotions in your readers. Whether you convey enthusiasm, empathy, or conviction, your genuine feelings resonate with your audience on an emotional level, making your writing more engaging and memorable.
  3. Distinctive Voice: Your attitude contributes to the development of your unique writer’s voice. It sets you apart from other writers, giving your work a distinct identity. Readers often appreciate writers with a strong and consistent voice.
  4. Clarity of Message: Expressing your own attitude clarifies your message. It helps you communicate your intentions and beliefs more effectively, reducing the risk of misinterpretation. Your writing becomes a clear and potent vehicle for conveying your ideas.
  5. Reader Connection: Your attitude fosters a deeper connection with your readers. When readers sense your sincerity and passion, they are more likely to connect with your writing and become loyal followers. This connection can lead to a dedicated readership and increased influence as a writer.
Attitude and Literary Theories
TheoryCritique
Reader-Response TheoryReader-response theorists emphasize the role of the reader in shaping interpretations. Individual attitudes lead to diverse readings.
New CriticismNew Critics focus on the text’s formal elements but may oversimplify attitude, overlooking broader socio-cultural contexts.
Feminist TheoryFeminist theory critiques gender roles and stereotypes in literature, emphasizing literature’s impact on societal attitudes.
Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial theory explores colonial attitudes in literature, highlighting its role in understanding colonial history’s effects.
Psychoanalytic TheoryPsychoanalytic theory delves into subconscious motivations but may overlook broader societal factors influencing literary attitude.
Suggested Readings
  1. Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Wiley, 1990.
  2. Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press, 1982.
  3. Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press, 2000.
  4. Holland, Norman N. 5 Readers Reading. Yale University Press, 1991.
  5. Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
  6. Lentricchia, Frank. After the New Criticism. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  7. Nussbaum, Martha C. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press, 1990.
  8. Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Vintage, 1979.
  9. Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton University Press, 1978.
  10. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Methuen, 1987.
More Literary Devices below:

Attitude: A Literary Device

The literary device of “attitude” refers to the author’s emotional and intellectual stance or disposition expressed through the text’s tone, language choices, and character perspectives.

Etymology of Attitude

The word “attitude” in a literary context, originally derived from the French word “attitude,” had its roots in 17th-century Italy, particularly in the field of art. In this context, “attitude” referred to a pose or posture struck by a figure in a painting or sculpture.

With time, it evolved to encompass a broader range of expressions and behaviors, both in the visual arts and in literature. In literary analysis, “attitude” pertains to the author’s tone, perspective, or disposition toward the subject matter, characters, or themes in a work of literature, and it plays a crucial role in conveying the author’s intentions and the overall mood of the text.

Meaning of Attitude
  • Authorial Tone: The author’s emotional and intellectual stance in the text.
  • Narrative Voice: The way the author presents the story’s events and characters.
  • Character Attitudes: The beliefs, emotions, and responses of characters.
  • Theme and Message: The influence on the central themes and message of the work.
  • Style and Language Choices: How the author’s attitude affects language and style.
  • Reader Engagement: How the author’s attitude affects reader involvement.
  • Cultural and Historical Context: How cultural and historical factors shape attitude.
  • Irony and Satire: Use of attitude for irony or satire.
  • Shifts in Attitude: Changes in attitude throughout the text.
  • Reader’s Interpretation: How attitude aids in interpretation and analysis.
Definition of Literary Device of Attitude

The literary device of “attitude” refers to the author’s emotional and intellectual stance or disposition expressed through the text’s tone, language choices, and character perspectives. It shapes the reader’s interpretation and engagement with the work, influencing themes, character development, and overall literary impact. Attitude is a critical element in analyzing an author’s intentions and the emotional resonance of a literary piece.

Common Features of an Attitude
  1. Tone: The emotional quality and mood of the text.
  2. Diction and Language Choices: Words and language reflecting the author’s attitude.
  3. Character Perspectives: Beliefs, values, and emotions of characters.
  4. Narrative Voice: The chosen narrative style influencing attitude perception.
  5. Impact on Theme and Message: Shaping themes and conveying the author’s message.
Types of Attitudes
  1. Positive Attitude: Characters or narrators express optimism, favorability, or enthusiasm towards people, events, or themes in the text.
  2. Negative Attitude: Characters or narrators exhibit pessimism, disapproval, or hostility towards people, events, or themes within the narrative.
  3. Neutral Attitude: A lack of emotional bias is evident in the text, with a balanced and objective presentation of characters and events.
  4. Sarcastic Attitude: Authors or characters employ sarcasm to convey an attitude that contradicts the literal meaning of their words, often for satirical or critical effect.
  5. Cynical Attitude: Characters or narrators display distrust, skepticism, or a pessimistic view of human nature or society.
  6. Optimistic Attitude: Characters or authors express hope, positivity, and a favorable outlook on life, often in the face of challenges.
  7. Satirical Attitude: Authors use humor, wit, and irony to criticize or mock individuals, institutions, or societal norms.
  8. Romantic: Characters or authors idealize love, emotions, and personal relationships, often emphasizing passion and emotional intensity.
  9. Realistic : An objective portrayal of life and events without idealization or exaggeration, reflecting the complexities of everyday existence.
  10. Tragic : Characters or authors emphasize the inevitability of suffering, fate, and the darker aspects of the human condition.
Shakespearean Attitudes
AttitudeExample with Explanation
Love and PassionIn “Romeo and Juliet,” Shakespeare portrays the passionate love between Romeo and Juliet, emphasizing the intensity of their emotions: “But, soft! What light through yonder window breaks? It is the east, and Juliet is the sun.”
Tragic Fate“Macbeth” explores the tragic consequences of ambition and fate as Macbeth’s ambition leads to his downfall: “Out, out, brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more.”
Comedic AttitudeIn “A Midsummer Night’s Dream,” Shakespeare uses humor and mistaken identities to create a lighthearted comedic atmosphere: “Lord, what fools these mortals be!”
Skepticism and DeceitIn “Hamlet,” the character of Hamlet embodies skepticism and deceit as he grapples with the moral ambiguity of avenging his father’s murder: “Frailty, thy name is woman!”
Ambition and PowerIn “Julius Caesar,” the play explores the consequences of ambition and political power, with Brutus questioning the motives of Caesar’s supporters: “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”
Jealousy and Betrayal“Othello” delves into the destructive effects of jealousy and betrayal as Iago manipulates Othello: “O, beware, my lord, of jealousy; it is the green-eyed monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on.”
Fate and Free WillIn “King Lear,” Shakespeare explores the tension between fate and free will as Lear’s choices lead to tragic consequences: “As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods. They kill us for their sport.”
Hope and Redemption“The Tempest” conveys a sense of hope and redemption as Prospero forgives his enemies and seeks reconciliation: “The rarer action is in virtue than in vengeance.”
Duality and Ambiguity“Macbeth” features themes of duality and moral ambiguity, especially in the character of Lady Macbeth: “Look like the innocent flower, but be the serpent under’t.”
Transience of LifeIn “Sonnet 18,” Shakespeare reflects on the fleeting nature of beauty and life: “But thy eternal summer shall not fade.”
Suggested Readings
  1. Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. University of Chicago Press, 1983.
  2. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell, 2008.
  3. Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Harvard University Press, 1982.
  4. Green, Keith. Genres of Modernity: Contemporary Indian Novels in English. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
  5. Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
  6. Leitch, Vincent B., et al. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. W. W. Norton & Company, 2018.
  7. Lodge, David. The Art of Fiction. Penguin Books, 1992.
  8. Wellek, René, and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1956.
  9. Wimsatt, W. K., and Monroe C. Beardsley. “The Intentional Fallacy.” The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. University Press of Kentucky, 2010.
  10. Woolf, Virginia. “Mr. Bennett and Mrs. Brown.” In Collected Essays, edited by Leonard Woolf, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1967.
More Literary Devices below:

Metafiction in Literature & Literary Theory

Metafiction, as a theoretical term in literature, refers to a narrative strategy characterized by self-reflexivity, where a work of fiction intentionally draws attention to its own artificiality and the process of storytelling.

Etymology of Metafiction

The term “metafiction” is a compound word derived from two Greek roots: “meta,” meaning “beyond” or “transcending,” and “fiction,” referring to literary works of imaginative storytelling.

 Coined in the mid-20th century, notably associated with the works of literary critic and novelist Patricia Waugh, metafiction represents a self-reflective narrative mode that goes beyond traditional fiction by emphasizing its own artificiality and the act of storytelling.

Metafictional texts often incorporate elements such as self-aware characters, authorial intrusions, and explicit references to the creative process, thereby challenging the illusion of reality in storytelling. This invites readers to contemplate the nature of fiction itself and the complex interplay between literature and reality.

Meanings of Metafiction
AspectMeaning
Narrative Self-ReflectionMetafiction involves a form of storytelling that deliberately draws attention to its own constructed nature and the process of narration.
Playful and Self-AwareMetafictional works often exhibit a playful and self-aware quality, with characters or narrators acknowledging their existence within a fictional world or making reference to the act of writing.
Authorial IntrusionIt may include instances where the author intrudes into the narrative, breaking the fourth wall, and interacting directly with the reader.
Challenging Reality IllusionMetafiction challenges the conventional illusion of reality in literature by foregrounding the artificiality of the text, encouraging readers to question the boundary between fiction and reality.
Exploration of Creative ProcessIt explores the creative process itself, with writers using metafiction to comment on the act of writing, storytelling conventions, and the role of the author.
Interrogating Truth and FictionMetafiction often raises questions about the relationship between truth and fiction, prompting readers to consider the subjectivity of reality and the ways in which stories shape our understanding of the world.
Critical ExaminationIn literary theory, metafiction is a subject of critical examination, as scholars analyze how it challenges traditional narrative structures and engages with broader philosophical and epistemological questions about literature.
Definition of Metafiction as a Theoretical Term

Metafiction, as a theoretical term in literature, refers to a narrative strategy characterized by self-reflexivity, where a work of fiction intentionally draws attention to its own artificiality and the process of storytelling.

This self-awareness often manifests through devices such as authorial intrusion, characters acknowledging their fictional existence, or explicit references to the act of writing. Metafiction serves as a critical tool to challenge conventional narrative norms and provoke contemplation on the nature of fiction and its relationship with reality.

Metafiction: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Patricia Waugh: A prominent literary critic who has extensively discussed metafiction in her theoretical writings, contributing to its critical analysis.
  • Linda Hutcheon: Known for her theories on postmodernism in literature, Hutcheon explores metafiction as a significant element within postmodern narratives in her theoretical works.
Theoretical Books:
  • Narrative Imagination and Everyday Life by Patricia Waugh: In this theoretical work, Waugh delves into the concept of metafiction and its implications for narrative and storytelling.
  • A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction by Linda Hutcheon: Hutcheon’s book offers a comprehensive exploration of postmodernism in literature, with significant attention to metafiction as a key component of postmodern narratives.
Key Arguments:
  • Deconstruction of Traditional Narratives: Metafiction challenges conventional narrative structures, breaking down boundaries between fiction and reality, author and reader, and often subverting linear storytelling.
  • Interrogation of Truth and Fiction: Metafiction prompts readers to question the distinction between truth and fiction, exploring how narratives shape our understanding of reality.
  • Exploration of Authorship and Creativity: Many metafictional works, as discussed in these theoretical writings, delve into the role of the author and the creative process, emphasizing the constructed nature of storytelling.
  • Engagement with Postmodern Themes: Metafiction aligns with postmodern themes of skepticism, self-reflexivity, and the rejection of grand narratives, as elucidated in these theoretical works.
  • Aesthetic Innovation: Metafiction serves as a vehicle for experimenting with narrative techniques, pushing the boundaries of literary conventions, and inviting readers to engage with storytelling in novel and thought-provoking ways, as analyzed in these theoretical works.
Metafiction and Literary Theories
  • Postmodernism: Metafiction is closely associated with postmodern literature, which challenges established norms and embraces self-reflexivity. Theorists like Jean-François Lyotard and Jean Baudrillard analyze metafiction as a means of deconstructing traditional narrative structures and exploring the fragmented nature of contemporary culture.
  • Narratology: Within the study of narrative structures, metafiction is pertinent because it disrupts and calls attention to the conventions of storytelling. Narratologists such as Gérard Genette and Roland Barthes examine how metafictional elements impact the reader’s engagement with a narrative.
  • Reader-Response Theory: Scholars like Wolfgang Iser and Stanley Fish have explored how readers interact with metafictional texts. Metafiction often invites readers to actively engage with the text, making them aware of their role as interpreters, aligning with the principles of reader-response theory.
  • Authorship and Intertextuality: Theoretical frameworks that examine the author’s role and intertextuality, such as Roland Barthes’ “The Death of the Author” and Julia Kristeva’s concept of intertextuality, are relevant to metafiction. It often blurs the lines between author and narrator and frequently incorporates intertextual references to other works, inviting analysis within these contexts.
  • Structuralism and Post-Structuralism: Metafiction can be analyzed through structuralist and post-structuralist lenses, with theorists like Claude Lévi-Strauss and Michel Foucault exploring how narratives construct meaning and how metafiction disrupts these constructs.
  • Deconstruction: As a form of literary deconstruction, it challenges binary oppositions and hierarchies found in traditional narratives. Jacques Derrida’s deconstructionist theories can be applied to analyze the destabilizing effects of metafiction on narrative structures.
  • Fictionality and Semiotics: The concept of fictionality and semiotics in literature, as explored by Umberto Eco and other semioticians, is pertinent to metafiction. It often calls attention to the constructed nature of signs and symbols within a narrative.
Metafiction in Literary Criticism
  1. If on a winter’s night a traveler by Italo Calvino: This novel stands as a quintessential example of metafiction, adopting a narrative-within-a-narrative format that actively engages the reader. It consistently reflects on the act of reading and the construction of stories, emphasizing the self-aware nature of the narrative.
  2. Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabokov: Pale Fire is a complex work of metafiction that presents itself as a scholarly commentary on a poem authored by a fictional figure. The commentary, written by a character named Charles Kinbote, evolves into a narrative in its own right, blurring the lines between authorship, commentary, and the narrative itself. This novel epitomizes the intricate interplay between reality and fiction within a narrative.
  3. House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski: This novel is renowned for its intricate and unconventional narrative structure. It incorporates multiple layers of storytelling, including footnotes, appendices, and commentary. The story revolves around a family’s encounter with a mysterious house, and the novel becomes a meditation on the act of reading and interpreting a text. It challenges readers’ perceptions of reality and fiction.
  4. Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut: Vonnegut’s novel is a classic example of metafiction, particularly within the science fiction genre. The protagonist, Billy Pilgrim, becomes “unstuck in time,” experiencing events in a non-linear manner. Vonnegut himself appears as a character in the narrative, engaging with the story and commenting on the complexities of narrating war experiences. The novel prompts reflection on the reliability of memory and the traditional structure of war narratives.

These novels have garnered extensive literary analysis and criticism due to their innovative use of metafiction, inviting readers to contemplate the nature of storytelling, the role of authors, and the intricate relationship between fiction and reality.

Suggested Readings
  1. Calvino, Italo. If on a winter’s night a traveler. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1981.
  2. Danielewski, Mark Z. House of Leaves. Pantheon Books, 2000.
  3. Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. University of Illinois Press, 1985.
  4. Hutcheon, Linda. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1984.
  5. Nabokov, Vladimir. Pale Fire. Vintage, 1989.
  6. Waugh, Patricia. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. Routledge, 1984.
  7. Waugh, Patricia. Feminine Fictions: Revisiting the Postmodern. Routledge, 2009.
  8. Waugh, Patricia, editor. Metafiction and Metahistory in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
  9. Waugh, Patricia. Postmodernism: A Reader. Routledge, 1992.
  10. Vonnegut, Kurt. Slaughterhouse-Five. Delacorte Press, 1969.
You may read more on Theoretical Terms below:

Identity in Literature & Literary Theory

Identity, as a theoretical term, encompasses the complex and multifaceted sense of self, encompassing one’s individuality, social roles, and affiliations within a broader context.

Etymology of Identity

The term “identity” derives from the Latin word “identitas,” rooted in “idem,” signifying “the same.” Initially emerging in philosophical and mathematical contexts, it evolved to denote self-sameness and the nature of what remains unchanged over time.

Philosophers like John Locke significantly contributed to its development, particularly in discussions about it on personal level.

In contemporary usage, it encompasses various dimensions, including personal, cultural, and gender identity, becoming a pivotal concept in understanding self-concept, social interactions, and group affiliations.

Meanings of Identity
AspectMeaning
1. Character Refers to the defining traits and experiences of fictional characters, shaping their roles in the narrative.
2. CulturalExplores characters’ ties to their cultural heritage, ethnicity, and how these aspects influence their actions and perspectives.
3. Identity CrisisAddresses characters’ struggles with self-discovery, personal growth, and questions about their roles in the world.
4. IntersectionalityAnalyzes how various aspects (e.g., race, gender, class) intersect and impact characters’ experiences.
5. Symbolic Involves the use of symbols to represent deeper facets of characters’ identities or narrative themes.
6. National and Political Examines characters’ affiliations with their nation or political ideologies, exploring patriotism and conflicts.
7. Gender and Sexual Challenges societal norms by exploring characters’ experiences related to gender and sexuality.
8. Identity NarrativesUtilizes characters’ personal stories and transformations as a narrative device within the work.
Definition of Identity as a Theoretical Term

Identity, as a theoretical term, encompasses the complex and multifaceted sense of self, encompassing one’s individuality, social roles, and affiliations within a broader context.

It involves a person’s self-perception, how they are perceived by others, and how various aspects, such as cultural, gender, and social identities, intersect and influence their experiences and interactions.

In theoretical discussions, it serves as a pivotal concept for understanding human subjectivity, social dynamics, and the construction of meaning within diverse cultural, historical, and sociopolitical contexts.

Identity: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Erik Erikson: Known for his theory of psychosocial development, Erikson explored how individuals develop a sense throughout their lifespan.
  • Judith Butler: Her work on performativity and gender identity challenged traditional notions of its fixed categories and emphasized the performative aspects of gender.
  • Stuart Hall: A cultural theorist, Hall emphasized the idea as a construct influenced by cultural and social contexts.
  • Kimberlé Crenshaw: Introduced the concept of intersectionality, highlighting how multiple aspects of identity (e.g., race, gender) intersect and shape individuals’ experiences.
Works:
  • Identity: Youth and Crisis by Erik Erikson: In this influential book, Erikson discusses the formation of it in adolescence and the role of its crises in personal development.
  • Gender Trouble by Judith Butler: This seminal work challenges the binary concept of gender and argues that gender identity is performative, created through repeated actions and behaviors.
  • Cultural Identity and Diaspora by Stuart Hall: Hall’s essay explores the complexities of cultural identity in a globalized world and the notion of “diaspora” in relation to identity.
  • Mapping the Margins by Kimberlé Crenshaw: Crenshaw’s work on intersectionality sheds light on how overlapping social categories impact the experiences of marginalized groups.
Arguments:
  • Identity as a Social Construct: Theorists argue that it is not inherent but socially constructed, shaped by cultural norms, expectations, and historical contexts.
  • Identity as Performative: Judith Butler’s argument suggests that individuals “perform” their identities through repeated actions and behaviors, challenging the idea of fixed identities.
  • Identity and Power Dynamics: Discussions often revolve around how power structures, including race, gender, and class, influence its formation and experiences.
  • Intersectionality: Kimberlé Crenshaw’s argument highlights the need to consider multiple intersecting aspects to understand individuals’ lived experiences more fully.

These theorists, works, and arguments are central to the academic discourse surrounding this concept of identity in various disciplines, including psychology, gender studies, cultural studies, and sociology.

Identity and Literary Theories
Literary TheoryRelevance of Identity
Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial literary theory is highly relevant as it explores how the legacy of colonialism profoundly influences it on individual and collective level. It delves into the complexities of its negotiation in the context of colonization, decolonization, and postcolonial societies. Moreover, it sheds light on the intricate relationships between colonizers and the colonized, offering insights into identity struggles in these contexts.
Feminist TheoryFeminist literary theory is crucial for understanding how gender identity, sexuality, and the construction of femininity and masculinity are portrayed and contested in literature. It scrutinizes the impact of gender roles and stereotypes on character development and plot, contributing to nuanced discussions about identity. Renowned authors like Virginia Woolf and Simone de Beauvoir have made significant contributions to these explorations.
Queer TheoryQueer theory challenges traditional notions of sexual orientation and gender identity within literary works, making it an essential lens for examining it. It delves into how LGBTQ+ characters and themes are depicted in literature, shedding light on their subversive potential and their impact on societal norms. Works by LGBTQ+ authors, such as Audre Lorde and James Baldwin, provide profound insights into the intricate dimensions of sexual and gender identity.
Identity NarrativesIdentity narratives are pivotal for unraveling characters’ journeys of self-discovery and its formation in literature. These narratives explore how personal histories, cultural backgrounds, and diverse experiences shape characters’ identities, enriching the depth of character portrayals. Esteemed authors like J.D. Salinger and Zora Neale Hurston effectively employ identity narratives to convey protagonists’ quests for self-understanding.
Psychological TheoryPsychological theories play a significant role in literary analysis by delving into characters’ inner workings and the development of self-identity. Concepts from psychoanalysis, such as Freud’s ego, superego, and id, offer valuable tools to analyze the complexities. Works like Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground exemplify how psychological theory contributes to the exploration of individual identity intricacies.
IntersectionalityIntersectionality is an invaluable perspective in literary theory as it emphasizes the interconnectedness of various aspects, including race, gender, and class. It provides a framework for understanding how these intersecting identities shape characters’ experiences and perspectives. Authors like Toni Morrison, in her work “Beloved,” skillfully illuminate the intricate interplay between race and gender in narrative explorations of identity.
Identity in Literary Criticism
  1. White Teeth by Zadie Smith (2000):
    • In White Teeth, Zadie Smith explores the intricacies of it on cultural and generational level in a multicultural London setting.
    • The novel delves into the lives of characters like Archie Jones and Samad Iqbal, who grapple with their identities as immigrants and fathers in a rapidly changing society.
    • Themes of hybrid identity, cultural clashes, and the search for a sense of belonging are central to the character-driven narrative.
  2. The Namesake by Jhumpa Lahiri (2003):
    • Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake follows the journey of Gogol Ganguli, a first-generation Indian-American, as he navigates its complexities.
    • The novel examines how Gogol’s given name reflects his dual cultural heritage and his struggle to reconcile his Indian roots with his American upbringing.
    • Themes of cultur, generational differences, and the search for self-identity are central to Gogol’s character arc.
  3. Atonement by Ian McEwan (2001):
    • In Atonement, Ian McEwan delves into how the characters’ choices and actions shape their individual and collective identities.
    • The narrative follows characters like Briony Tallis, whose actions as a young girl have a profound impact on her sense of self and her relationships with others.
    • The novel explores themes of guilt, forgiveness, and the enduring influence of a single event on the characters’ identities.
  4. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Díaz (2007):
    • Junot Díaz’s novel focuses on the life of Oscar Wao, a Dominican-American who identifies as a “ghetto nerd.”
    • The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao delves into Oscar’s struggles with his cultural, masculinity, and the stereotypes associated with being a Dominican male in the United States.
    • Themes of immigration, diaspora, and the quest for self-acceptance are central to Oscar’s character development.

These novels, published around the year 2000, offer rich character-driven narratives that provide insightful explorations of cultural, generational, and individual identity within the specific contexts of the stories they tell.

Suggested Readings
  1. Baldwin, James. Giovanni’s Room. Dial Press, 1956.
  2. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
  3. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, 1991, pp. 1241-1299.
  4. Díaz, Junot. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. Riverhead Books, 2007.
  5. Erikson, Erik. Identity: Youth and Crisis. Norton, 1968.
  6. Lahiri, Jhumpa. The Namesake. Mariner Books, 2003.
  7. McEwan, Ian. Atonement. Anchor Books, 2001.
  8. Morrison, Toni. Beloved. Knopf, 1987.
  9. Smith, Zadie. White Teeth. Vintage Books, 2000.

Heteronormativity in Literature & Literary Theory

Heteronormativity is a theoretical term used to describe a pervasive social and cultural framework that assumes and privileges heterosexuality as the normative and expected sexual orientation.

Etymology of Heteronormativity

The term “heteronormativity” emerged in academic discourse in the late 20th century and is derived from two components: “hetero,” meaning “different” or “other,” and “normativity,” which denotes the establishment and reinforcement of societal norms.

Heteronormativity refers to a social and cultural framework that presumes and enforces heterosexuality as the default and normative sexual orientation, often marginalizing or pathologizing non-heterosexual identities and relationships. It implies an alignment of gender roles, where binary notions of male and female are expected to conform to specific, traditional patterns, reinforcing the idea that only opposite-sex relationships are legitimate and acceptable.

The term emerged within queer theory and critical gender studies to critique and deconstruct these normative assumptions and to advocate for greater inclusivity and recognition of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities in society and culture.

Meanings of Heteronormativity
AspectMeaning
Narrative RepresentationDominant portrayal of heterosexual relationships as the norm, often sidelining non-heterosexual experiences.
Character StereotypesUse of stereotypes reinforcing traditional gender roles and heterosexual norms, limiting character depth.
Social CommentaryReflection of societal norms and biases in literary works, shedding light on cultural expectations.
Critique and SubversionActively challenging and subverting heteronormative norms in literature to question the status quo.
Identity ExplorationExploration of characters’ struggles with societal pressures regarding their sexual orientation and identity.
Intersectional AnalysisExamination of how heteronormativity intersects with other forms of oppression and discrimination.
Queer LiteratureCentral theme in queer literature, challenging and deconstructing heteronormative assumptions.
Feminist and Gender StudiesFocus on gender-based power dynamics and relationships in literature, addressing or perpetuating norms.
Literary Critique and AnalysisLens for critical analysis of how societal norms shape literary works and their reception.
Cultural and Historical ContextExploration of how societal shifts in attitudes and laws are reflected in literary representations.
Definition of Heteronormativity as a Theoretical Term

Heteronormativity is a theoretical term used to describe a pervasive social and cultural framework that assumes and privileges heterosexuality as the normative and expected sexual orientation.

It encompasses a set of implicit and explicit societal expectations, norms, and values that reinforce the idea of opposite-sex attraction as the default, while marginalizing and stigmatizing non-heterosexual orientations. This concept is employed in critical theory and cultural studies to analyze and critique the ways in which these norms shape and influence various aspects of society, including literature, media, politics, and interpersonal relationships.

Heteronormativity: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  1. Judith Butler: Renowned for her work on performativity and gender identity, especially in Gender Trouble (1990), Butler challenges and deconstructs heteronormative assumptions and norms.
  2. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick: In her writings, including Epistemology of the Closet (1990), Sedgwick has been influential in queer theory, analyzing how heteronormativity impacts the construction of sexual identities.
Works:
  1. The History of Sexuality by Michel Foucault (1976): Foucault’s examination of the historical development of sexual norms and practices sheds light on the emergence of performativity as a cultural construct.
  2. The Well of Loneliness by Radclyffe Hall (1928): This novel, known for its exploration of lesbian love, faced censorship and legal challenges due to its defiance of heteronormative conventions.
Arguments:
  1. Normalization of Heterosexuality: Heteronormativity normalizes and privileges heterosexuality as the standard, making it a central argument in discussions of LGBTQ+ rights and representation.
  2. Exclusion of Non-Heteronormative Identities: Central to LGBTQ+ activism and advocacy, this argument highlights how heteronormativity excludes and marginalizes non-heterosexual identities.
  3. Impact on Literature and Media: Scholars argue that heteronormativity influences the portrayal of relationships and characters in literature and media, limiting diversity and perpetuating stereotypes.
  4. Intersectionality: The argument that heteronormativity intersects with other forms of oppression, such as racism and sexism, highlights the need for an inclusive approach to social justice.

These theorists, works, and arguments contribute to the critical analysis and deconstruction of heteronormativity, shedding light on its societal impact and implications for diverse sexual and gender identities.

These theorists, works, and arguments contribute to the critical analysis and deconstruction of heteronormativity, shedding light on its societal impact and implications for diverse sexual and gender identities.

Heteronormativity and Literary Theories
  1. Queer Theory: Heteronormativity is central to queer theory, as it critically examines and challenges the normative assumptions and expectations around heterosexuality. Queer theory seeks to deconstruct and explore how literature reinforces or subverts these norms, making it a foundational concept in this field.
  2. Feminist Theory: Feminist literary analysis often engages with heteronormativity to examine how gender roles and expectations are constructed and enforced in literature. It explores how literature can perpetuate or challenge these norms and their impact on women’s experiences.
  3. Gender Studies: Gender studies within literary theory delve into the complexities of gender identity and expression. Heteronormativity serves as a framework for analyzing how literature reflects and reinforces binary gender roles and expectations.
  4. Postcolonial Theory: Heteronormativity intersects with postcolonial theory when analyzing the impact of colonialism on gender and sexuality norms in literature. It allows for a deeper exploration of how colonial powers imposed and perpetuated heteronormative values.
  5. Critical Race Theory: Critical race theorists employ heteronormativity as a lens to examine how racial norms and stereotypes intersect with normative ideas of sexuality and gender in literature. This intersectionality reveals the complexities of identity and oppression.
  6. Marxist Theory: In Marxist literary theory, heteronormativity is relevant when analyzing how literature reflects and reinforces societal class structures and relationships. It contributes to understanding how economic and social factors intersect with normative ideas of sexuality.
  7. Literary Realism: Heteronormativity plays a role in realist literature, as authors aim to depict characters and relationships that align with societal norms. The tension between realism and challenging normative values becomes evident in these works.
  8. Narrative Theory: Narrative theory often explores how heteronormativity shapes character development and relationships in literary narratives. It sheds light on how normative expectations influence narrative structures.
  9. Cultural Studies: Cultural studies scholars examine how literature reflects and influences cultural attitudes and norms, including those related to sexuality and gender. Heteronormativity is a key aspect in such analyses.
  10. Identity Politics: Literature that addresses identity politics frequently explores how characters navigate and resist heteronormative norms within the context of social and political movements, making it a critical lens in these discussions.
Heteronormativity in Literary Criticism
WorkCritique of Heteronormativity
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen– In this classic 19th-century novel, Jane Austen explores the heteronormative society of the time, centering around Elizabeth Bennet and her interactions with Mr. Darcy.
– The society depicted in the novel places great importance on marriage, particularly for women like Elizabeth, as a means of social and financial security.
Elizabeth Bennet, the protagonist, subtly challenges these norms by rejecting proposals based solely on financial considerations, seeking a loving and equal partnership.
Giovanni’s Room by James Baldwin– James Baldwin’s novel delves into the complexities of sexuality and identity in 1950s America and Europe, following David, the protagonist, as he navigates his relationships.
– The narrative explores how societal expectations and norms regarding heterosexuality can lead to internalized homophobia and the suppression of one’s true identity.
– Through David’s struggles with his own sexuality and relationships, the novel critiques the damaging effects of heteronormativity on LGBTQ+ individuals.
Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides– In Middlesex, Jeffrey Eugenides tells the story of Cal Stephanides, an intersex protagonist, and their journey of self-discovery.
– The novel challenges heteronormativity as Cal navigates a world that often insists on binary gender and sexual norms.
– It explores Cal’s efforts to fit into a heteronormative world while also seeking to understand their own unique identity.
Orlando by Virginia Woolf– Virginia Woolf’s Orlando is a novel that spans centuries and explores the fluidity of gender and sexuality.
– The eponymous character, Orlando, undergoes significant transformations, experiencing both male and female identities throughout the novel, thus challenging conventional notions of heteronormativity.
– Woolf’s work can be seen as a critique of rigid gender and sexual roles, celebrating the freedom to express one’s true self beyond societal norms.
Suggested Readings
  1. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
  2. Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Vintage, 1990.
  3. Halberstam, Judith. Female Masculinity. Duke University Press, 1998.
  4. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. University of California Press, 1990.
  5. Warner, Michael. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Harvard University Press, 1999.
  6. Weeks, Jeffrey. The World We Have Won: The Remaking of Erotic and Intimate Life. Routledge, 2007.
  7. Jagose, Annamarie. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York University Press, 1996.
  8. Rubin, Gayle S. Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, edited by Henry Abelove, et al., Routledge, 1993.
  9. Munoz, Jose Esteban. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York University Press, 2009.
  10. Berlant, Lauren, and Warner, Michael. Sex in Public. Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2, 1998, pp. 547-566.

Habitus in Literature & Literary Theory

Habitus, as a theoretical term, refers to the set of ingrained dispositions, behaviors, and cultural norms that individuals acquire through socialization and their life experiences.

Etymology of Habitus

The term “habitus” originates from Latin, where it originally meant “condition” or “state of being.” In its academic usage, especially in the field of sociology and cultural studies, the concept of “habitus” was developed and popularized by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu in the mid-20th century.

Bourdieu adapted the term to describe the ingrained and socially acquired dispositions, behaviors and tastes that individuals develop through their life experiences and social interactions, shaping their cultural preferences and social practices.

In this context, it serves as a foundational concept for understanding how social structures and individual agency intersect to produce patterns of behavior, belief, and identity.

Meanings of Habitus
AspectMeaning
Character DevelopmentIt is used to analyze the development of literary characters and their behavior. It explores how characters’ backgrounds, social contexts, and life experiences shape their dispositions and actions within the narrative.
Cultural ContextLiterary works often depict characters embedded in specific cultural contexts. It allows for the examination of how characters’ cultural backgrounds and social milieus influence their perceptions, values, and responses to situations.
Social Class and IdentityIt is relevant for exploring issues of social class and identity in literature. It helps in understanding how characters’ habitus, shaped by their socioeconomic backgrounds, affect their interactions, aspirations, and self-perception.
Symbolism and RepresentationThis concept is applied to the analysis of symbols and metaphors in literature, revealing deeper layers of meaning related to characters’ social conditioning and personal histories.
Authorial VoiceAuthors often infuse elements of their own habitus into their works, influencing the narrative’s perspective and the portrayal of characters and settings. Analyzing habitus sheds light on the author’s biases and perspectives.
Literary RealismIn realist literature, the concept of habitus is integral to creating authentic and relatable characters. Authors aim to depict characters whose behaviors and choices align with their established habitus, contributing to the authenticity of the narrative.
Character Agency and TransformationIt is also used to explore how characters challenge or transform their established dispositions and habits over the course of a narrative, illustrating their agency and potential for change.
Cultural CritiqueIn postcolonial, feminist, and critical race theories, the concept of habitus serves as a tool for critiquing and deconstructing dominant cultural norms and biases embedded in literary works.
Definition of Habitus as a Theoretical Term

Habitus, as a theoretical term, refers to the set of ingrained dispositions, behaviors, and cultural norms that individuals acquire through socialization and their life experiences.

It encompasses the subconscious and taken-for-granted ways in which individuals perceive, react to, and engage with the world, reflecting their social backgrounds and environments. Developed by French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, the concept of habitus is instrumental in understanding how social structures and individual agency interact to produce patterns of behavior, belief, and identity within a given society.

Habitus: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Pierre Bourdieu: Pierre Bourdieu, a prominent French sociologist, is the foremost theorist associated with this concept. His extensive body of work, including Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste and Outline of a Theory of Practice serves as the foundational framework for understanding habitus.
Key Works:
  • Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1979): In this seminal work, Bourdieu investigates how habitus influences cultural preferences, taste, and social distinctions. It offers critical insights into the role of habitus in perpetuating social inequalities and class distinctions.
  • Outline of a Theory of Practice (1972): This foundational book outlines Bourdieu’s theoretical framework of habitus, emphasizing its role in shaping individuals’ practices and behaviors across various social fields.
Arguments:
  • Reproduction of Social Structures: Bourdieu’s central argument revolves around how habitus contributes to the reproduction of social structures. He contends that individuals from different social backgrounds internalize distinct habitus, perpetuating social hierarchies and class distinctions.
  • Embodied Culture: Bourdieu asserts that habitus embodies culture, encompassing the tacit knowledge, dispositions, and practices that individuals inherit from their social milieu. This embodied culture significantly influences how people engage with the world and make choices.
  • Structural Constraints: It’s essential to recognize that habitus is not entirely autonomous; it operates within structural constraints and opportunities. Bourdieu argues that individuals’ habitus both reflects and reacts to the broader social, economic, and cultural contexts in which they live.

These theorists, works, and arguments collectively form the foundation of the concept of habitus, offering profound insights into how social structures, cultural dispositions, and individual agency intersect to shape human behavior and identity.

Habitus and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevanceExamples in Literature Works
Cultural StudiesCultural studies scholars use it to analyze how characters’ backgrounds and social conditioning influence their behavior and choices. It aids in understanding how characters embody cultural norms and navigate cultural conflicts within literary works.– In Zadie Smith’s White Teeth, characters’ cultural backgrounds significantly influence their actions and decisions, reflecting the impact of habitus.
Postcolonial TheoryIt is pertinent in postcolonial literature, where characters often grapple with the impact of colonialism on their identities. It allows for the examination of how colonial history and cultural conditioning shape characters’ perceptions and actions.– In Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, the protagonist’s habitus is shaped by pre-colonial Igbo culture, which later clashes with colonial influences.
Feminist TheoryFeminist literary analysis frequently incorporates it to explore how women’s identities are constructed and constrained by societal norms. It sheds light on the ways in which female characters negotiate and resist the expectations imposed upon them.– In Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, the habitus of women in Gilead reflects the oppressive patriarchal society they inhabit.
Marxist TheoryIn Marxist literary theory, it is relevant for understanding how characters’ socioeconomic backgrounds and class affiliations influence their roles and interactions within narratives. It contributes to the analysis of social hierarchies and class struggles depicted in literature.– In Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations, the habitus of characters like Pip reflects their class positions and social mobility.
Psychoanalytic TheoryPsychoanalytic readings often consider habitus in conjunction with characters’ inner conflicts and psychological motivations. It helps in unraveling the psychological dimensions of characters’ behaviors and choices.– In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, the habitus of Jay Gatsby is explored in relation to his unrequited love for Daisy Buchanan.
Identity StudiesHabitual analysis is crucial in identity studies within literary theory. It assists in examining how characters construct, negotiate, and sometimes transcend their identities, whether related to race, gender, sexuality, or other aspects.– In Toni Morrison’s Beloved, the habitus of Sethe and her family is central to the exploration of the impact of slavery on their identities.
Realism and NaturalismIn realist and naturalist literature, habitus plays a fundamental role in creating authentic and believable characters. Authors aim to depict characters whose actions align with their established social backgrounds, enhancing the authenticity of the narrative.– In Emile Zola’s Germinal, the habitus of coal miners is vividly portrayed, contributing to the novel’s realistic depiction of their lives.
Narrative TheoryHabitual considerations are relevant to narrative theory, as they contribute to the understanding of character development and transformation over the course of a narrative. It sheds light on the intricate relationship between characters’ dispositions and their evolving roles within a story.– In Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre, the habitus of the titular character evolves as she matures and faces various challenges.
Habitus in Literary Criticism
  1. The Nickel Boysby Colson Whitehead (2019):
    • In this novel, it can be employed to understand the contrasting experiences of the two main characters, Elwood and Turner, as they navigate a racially segregated society in the 1960s.
    • Elwood’s it is deeply influenced by his idealism and belief in justice, rooted in his upbringing. His adherence to these values leads him into conflict with the oppressive system.
    • Turner, on the other hand, has a more pragmatic habitus shaped by his survival instincts. His choices are influenced by a different set of values, reflecting the impact of his own upbringing and experiences.
    • By applying habitus to these characters, the novel explores how individual dispositions interact with external circumstances and societal structures.
  2. Such a Fun Ageby Kiley Reid (2019):
    • In this contemporary novel, it can be used to analyze the complexities of race, class, and identity within the lives of the characters.
    • The protagonist, Emira, navigates a world where her habitus as a young Black woman clashes with the expectations and stereotypes imposed on her by her employer and society.
    • Emira’s habitus is shaped by her own aspirations and values, which often come into conflict with the habitus of those around her.
    • The novel sheds light on how habitus influences interactions and perceptions in a modern, racially charged environment.
  3. The Vanishing Halfby Brit Bennett (2020):
    • In this novel, habitus can be applied to the characters of Stella and Desiree, twin sisters who take divergent paths in life.
    • Stella’s habitus leads her to pass as white, concealing her racial identity to escape the limitations placed on Black individuals during the 1950s.
    • Desiree’s habitus, on the other hand, is rooted in her pride in her racial identity and her determination to embrace it.
    • The novel explores how habitus shapes the choices and trajectories of these sisters, leading to vastly different lives and identities.
  4. Leave the World Behindby Rumaan Alam (2020):
    • In this contemporary novel, habitus can be used to analyze the interactions and tensions between two families who come from different socio-economic backgrounds.
    • The novel explores how the habitus of the urban, affluent family clashes with the rural, working-class lifestyle of the homeowners.
    • The characters’ behaviors and expectations are influenced by their respective habitus, leading to misunderstandings and conflicts as they navigate an unexpected crisis together.
    • By examining the characters’ habitus, the novel delves into themes of class, race, and privilege in a tense and suspenseful narrative.

In these four contemporary novels, the application of it enhances the understanding of character motivations, choices, and conflicts within the context of societal structures and personal dispositions. It provides a valuable lens through which to analyze the complexities of human behavior and identity in the modern world.

Suggested Readings
  1. Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press, 1984.
  2. Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Routledge, 1993.
  3. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
  4. Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Cornell University Press, 1981.
  5. Leitch, Vincent B. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. W. W. Norton & Company, 2018.
  6. Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Vintage, 1979.
  7. Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Bronte to Lessing. Princeton University Press, 1977.
  8. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Routledge, 1987.
  9. Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One’s Own. Harcourt, 1929.
  10. Zizek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso, 1989.

Fluidity of Identity in Literature & Literary Theory

Fluidity of Identity, as a theoretical term, refers to the recognition that individual identities are not static or fixed but rather exhibit a dynamic and adaptable nature that can evolve over time.

Etymology of Fluidity of Identity

The concept of “fluidity of identity” refers to the dynamic and malleable nature of one’s self-concept, personal characteristics, and affiliations, which can shift and evolve over time. The etymology of this term can be traced to various academic disciplines, including psychology, sociology, and gender studies.

  1. In psychology, it finds roots in the study of personality development and self-identity, acknowledging that individuals may adapt and change in response to life experiences and maturation.
  2. In sociology, it reflects the understanding that societal and cultural contexts can influence how individuals perceive and express their identities.
  3. Gender studies have also played a significant role, as the concept has been used to challenge traditional notions of fixed gender roles and emphasize the potential for diverse and non-binary gender identities.

Briefly, the term “fluidity of identity” encapsulates the recognition that identity is not a static construct but rather a complex and evolving aspect of human experience shaped by various internal and external factors.

Meanings of Fluidity of Identity
AspectMeaning
Dynamic Self-Concept“Fluidity of Identity” refers to the dynamic and adaptable nature of an individual’s self-concept and how it may change over time.
Societal and Cultural InfluenceIt acknowledges that societal and cultural contexts can significantly influence how individuals perceive, express, and even reshape their identities.
Gender DiversityIn the context of gender studies, it highlights the recognition and acceptance of diverse and non-binary gender identities, challenging traditional, fixed gender roles.
Psychological GrowthFrom a psychological perspective, it relates to the study of personality development, recognizing that individuals may change and adapt in response to life experiences and maturation.
Complex and Ever-EvolvingOverall, “Fluidity of Identity” underscores that identity is a complex and ever-evolving aspect of human experience, shaped by a multitude of internal and external factors that can vary over time.
Definition of Fluidity of Identity as a Theoretical Term

Fluidity of Identity, as a theoretical term, refers to the recognition that individual identities are not static or fixed but rather exhibit a dynamic and adaptable nature that can evolve over time.

It encompasses the idea that societal, cultural, and personal factors play significant roles in shaping and reshaping one’s self-concept and affiliations. This concept is often applied in fields such as psychology, sociology, and gender studies to explore the multifaceted nature of identity and its responsiveness to various influences and experiences.

Fluidity of Identity: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Judith Butler: In her work on performativity and gender identity, Gender Trouble, Butler challenges fixed notions of identity and explores the fluidity of gender expression.
  • Erving Goffman: Goffman’s The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life highlights the performative nature of identity and how individuals adapt their self-presentation in various social contexts.
  • Stuart Hall: Hall’s work on cultural identity, as discussed in Cultural Identity and Diaspora, emphasizes the influence of culture, ethnicity, and history on the fluid construction of identity.
Key Works:
  • In Gender Trouble, Judith Butler discusses the performativity of gender identity and how it can be fluid and contingent on social norms.
  • The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life by Erving Goffman explores how individuals manage their identities through impression management and adaptability.
  • Stuart Hall’s essay “Cultural Identity and Diaspora” delves into the complexities of cultural identity and its fluidity in the context of globalization and migration.
Arguments:
  • Performativity of Gender: Butler’s argument in Gender Trouble posits that gender identity is not inherent but performed, allowing for fluidity and adaptability in the expression of one’s gender.
  • Impression Management: Goffman’s work in The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life highlights the role of impression management in shaping identity, emphasizing the adaptability of identity in response to social situations.
  • Cultural Hybridity: Stuart Hall’s perspective, as discussed in “Cultural Identity and Diaspora,” emphasizes that cultural identity is not fixed but can be hybrid and fluid, shaped by interactions between different cultures and historical contexts.

These theorists, works, and arguments have significantly contributed to our understanding of the fluidity of identity and how it is constructed and adapted within various social, cultural, and historical contexts.

Fluidity of Identity and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevance
Postcolonial TheoryFluidity of Identity is pertinent in postcolonial literature, where characters often grapple with the multifaceted impact of colonialism on their identities. These characters may navigate hybrid identities that emerge from the intersection of colonial and indigenous cultures, showcasing the fluidity of identity in a postcolonial context.
Feminist TheoryIn feminist literary analysis, Fluidity of Identity is crucial when examining how women’s identities are shaped and reshaped by societal norms, patriarchy, and personal experiences. Feminist literature often explores the journey of female characters as they assert agency and navigate the complexities of their identities.
Queer TheoryFluidity of Identity is central to queer theory, which challenges binary notions of gender and sexuality. Queer literature often portrays characters who defy conventional categories, exemplifying the fluidity and diversity of human identity beyond traditional norms.
PostmodernismPostmodern literary theory embraces the idea of fragmented and multiple identities. Authors in postmodern literature frequently experiment with narrative techniques, blurring the boundaries between characters and narrators, thereby highlighting the fluidity and ambiguity of identity.
Psychoanalytic TheoryIn psychoanalytic readings of literature, the concept of Fluidity of Identity intersects with the exploration of characters’ unconscious desires and motivations. Characters may grapple with shifting identities as they confront their inner conflicts and repressed memories.
IntersectionalityThe concept of Fluidity of Identity aligns with intersectionality theory, which acknowledges the layered and interconnected nature of identities. Literature that engages with intersectionality often portrays characters with complex and evolving identities shaped by various factors, such as race, gender, class, and sexuality.
Narrative TheoryFluidity of Identity is relevant to narrative theory, where characters’ development and transformations are central. Narratives often trace characters’ evolving self-concepts, highlighting the intricate relationship between identity and storytelling.
Identity PoliticsLiterature that addresses identity politics frequently explores how characters navigate their identities within the context of social and political movements. These characters may experience shifts in identity as they engage with activism and advocacy.
Fluidity of Identity in Literary Criticism
  1. by Jeffrey Eugenides (2002): This Pulitzer Prize-winning novel explores the fluidity of gender and identity through the life of its protagonist, Cal Stephanides, who is intersex. The narrative traces Cal’s journey of self-discovery and how societal norms shape and reshape their understanding of identity.
  2. by Zadie Smith (2000): This novel examines the fluidity of identity within the context of multiculturalism and immigration in London. Through the characters of Archie, Samad, and their families, the story explores how cultural, generational, and racial identities evolve and intersect.
  3. by Jhumpa Lahiri (2003): This novel tells the story of Gogol Ganguli, an Indian-American navigating the complexities of dual identities. It explores the fluidity of identity as Gogol grapples with his Bengali heritage and his American upbringing, shedding light on the challenges of cultural assimilation.
  4. by Virginia Woolf (1928): Woolf’s novel is a classic exploration of the fluidity of gender and time. The protagonist, Orlando, experiences a mysterious transformation from a man into a woman and spans centuries, highlighting how identity can transcend both gender and historical context.
  5. by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (2013): This novel follows Ifemelu, a Nigerian woman who emigrates to the United States. It delves into the fluidity of cultural and racial identity as Ifemelu navigates her experiences as an African immigrant in America and grapples with her evolving sense of self.

These novels offer diverse perspectives on the fluidity of identity, exploring how personal, cultural, and societal factors shape and reshape characters’ understanding of who they are and how they navigate the world.

Suggested Readings
  1. Eugenides, Jeffrey. Middlesex. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002.
  2. Lahiri, Jhumpa. The Namesake. Houghton Mifflin, 2003.
  3. Smith, Zadie. White Teeth. Random House, 2000.
  4. Adichie, Chimamanda Ngozi. Americanah. Alfred A. Knopf, 2013.
  5. Woolf, Virginia. Orlando. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1928.
  6. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
  7. Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books, 1959.
  8. Hall, Stuart. “Cultural Identity and Diaspora.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, Lawrence & Wishart, 1990.
  9. Stryker, Susan. Transgender History. Seal Press, 2008.
  10. Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Aunt Lute Books, 1987.

Biopower in Literature & Literary Theory

Biopower, as a theoretical term, refers to the exercise of political power and control by states, institutions, or societal norms over the biological aspects of individuals and populations.

Etymology of Biopower

The term “biopower” originates from the work of French philosopher Michel Foucault in the mid-20th century. It represents a concept rooted in the intersection of power and biology. Foucault introduced this notion to describe the ways in which modern states and institutions exert control over individuals and populations through the regulation and management of their biological lives.

Biopower emphasizes the governance of health, reproduction, and the overall well-being of populations, often through techniques such as medicalization, surveillance, and the establishment of norms and standards.

It signifies a shift from traditional sovereign power, which focuses on individual life and death, to a more diffuse and pervasive form of power that targets the biological existence of entire populations, making it a critical concept in contemporary political and social theory.

Meanings of Biopower
AspectMeaningExample
Control and RegulationCharacters or societies subjected to external control and regulation affecting their biological and social lives.– A dystopian novel where a totalitarian government enforces strict population control measures.
Surveillance and DisciplineLiterary exploration of surveillance and disciplinary mechanisms exerting biopower. Characters constantly observed, monitored, or shaped by societal norms.– A novel where characters are under constant surveillance, and their behavior is controlled by a powerful organization.
Identity and SubjectivityTension between conforming to social expectations and asserting individual agency and identity. Impact of biopower on characters’ self-perception and societal perceptions.– A coming-of-age story where the protagonist grapples with societal norms that limit their self-expression.
Biopolitics and LiteratureLiterary engagement with political decisions affecting characters’ biological well-being. Exploration of issues like reproductive rights, healthcare, and the environment.– A novel that delves into the ethical dilemmas surrounding genetic engineering and its consequences on society.
Resistance and AgencyPortrayal of characters resisting or challenging biopower, seeking autonomy and agency. Narratives highlighting possibilities for individual and collective resistance.– A novel where a group of rebels fights against a dystopian regime’s biopolitical control, striving for freedom.
Dystopian and Utopian NarrativesAppearance of biopower dynamics in dystopian and utopian literature. Imagining extreme scenarios of control or liberation as cautionary tales or alternative visions of the future.– A utopian novel envisioning a society where biopower is harnessed for the betterment of humanity.
Literary Theory PerspectiveUse of biopower as a framework for analyzing power structures, social norms, and the negotiation of existence in literature. Understanding literature’s reflection and critique of politics and the control of life.– A critical analysis of a literary work using biopower theory to deconstruct the power dynamics at play in the narrative.
Definition of Biopower as a Theoretical Term

Biopower, as a theoretical term, refers to the exercise of political power and control by states, institutions, or societal norms over the biological aspects of individuals and populations.

It encompasses the regulation and management of various aspects of life, including health, reproduction, and the body itself, through techniques such as medicalization, surveillance, and the establishment of norms and standards.

This concept, introduced by Michel Foucault, highlights the shift from traditional forms of sovereignty to a more diffuse and pervasive mode of power that operates at the intersection of politics and the biological existence of human beings.

Biopower: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Michel Foucault: The concept of biopower was introduced and extensively developed by Michel Foucault in his works on power, discipline, and governmentality.
Key Works:
  • The Birth of Biopolitics (1978): Michel Foucault’s lectures at the Collège de France, where he first articulated the concept of biopower in the context of neoliberalism and governmentality.
  • Society Must Be Defended (1976): Foucault’s lectures examining the historical emergence of biopower and its connections to state racism and sovereignty.
Arguments:
  • Emergence of Biopower: Foucault argued that in modern societies, there was a shift from traditional sovereign power (focused on life and death) to biopower, which governs and regulates the biological life of populations.
  • Control Over Life: Biopower involves the regulation of various aspects of life, including health, sexuality, reproduction, and the body, often through techniques of surveillance, medicalization, and the establishment of societal norms.
  • Governmentality: Foucault’s concept of governmentality posits that biopower operates through complex governmental techniques and strategies, influencing how individuals and populations conduct themselves in everyday life.
  • Neoliberalism and Biopolitics: Foucault’s analysis of neoliberalism highlighted how biopower played a central role in shaping economic and political policies, emphasizing individual responsibility and market-driven governance.

These theorists, works, and arguments have been foundational in shaping our understanding of biopower as a theoretical concept in critical theory and social philosophy.

Biopower and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevance
Postcolonial TheoryBiopower can be applied to postcolonial literature to examine how colonial powers exerted control over the biological and social lives of colonized populations. It can shed light on the ways in which colonizers imposed medical, racial, and cultural norms on colonized peoples.
Feminist TheoryBiopower is relevant in feminist literary analysis by exploring how patriarchy and societal norms have regulated women’s bodies, sexuality, and reproductive rights. This perspective can be applied to feminist literature to analyze themes of gender oppression, autonomy, and resistance.
Queer TheoryIn queer theory, biopower can be used to investigate how societal norms have historically regulated and pathologized non-heteronormative sexualities and identities. It can inform readings of queer literature that challenge or subvert these norms.
EcocriticismBiopower has relevance in ecocriticism when examining literature that deals with environmental issues. It allows for the exploration of how political and economic systems exert control over ecosystems and the biological world, as well as how literature can critique or engage with these dynamics.
Marxist TheoryBiopower intersects with Marxist literary theory when analyzing literature that deals with class struggle, economic control, and the commodification of life. It can be used to explore how capitalist systems regulate and exploit labor forces within literary contexts.
Critical Race TheoryCritical race theorists can employ biopower as a lens to analyze how racial norms, stereotypes, and systemic racism affect the lives and bodies of racialized individuals in literature. This perspective can be applied to texts that address issues of race, identity, and resistance.
Disability StudiesBiopower is relevant in disability studies when examining how societal norms and medical institutions have historically framed disability and determined who is considered “normal.” It can be used to analyze literature that engages with disability issues and challenges these norms.
Biopower in Literary Criticism
  1. by Aldous Huxley (1932): In this classic dystopian novel, biopower is critiqued through a futuristic society where characters such as Bernard Marx and Lenina Crowne are genetically engineered and conditioned to conform to predetermined social roles. The World State wields complete control over reproduction, health, and behavior, profoundly shaping the lives of individuals like John “the Savage” and Mustapha Mond.
  2. by Margaret Atwood (1985): Within this novel, a biopower critique unfolds in a totalitarian society. Women, including the protagonist Offred, are controlled and subjugated through strict reproductive regulations enforced by figures like Aunt Lydia and the Commander. This regime strips women of autonomy over their bodies, showcasing the power of biopolitical control.
  3. by Kazuo Ishiguro (2005): This novel explores the dynamics of biopower in a disturbing dystopian world where characters like Kathy H., Tommy D., and Ruth C. are raised as cloned individuals intended for organ donation. The narrative delves deeply into themes of identity, agency, and the commodification of human life, casting a haunting light on the experiences of these characters.
  4. by Naomi Alderman (2016): In this speculative fiction novel, biopower takes on a unique twist as women, including characters like Roxy and Allie, develop a biological ability to generate electric shocks. The story meticulously examines how this newfound power fundamentally alters gender dynamics and societal control, affecting a wide range of characters and their relationships.
  5. by Ta-Nehisi Coates (2019): Set within the historical context of slavery in the United States, this novel interweaves elements of biopower. The narrative centers around characters like Hiram Walker, the protagonist, who possesses a mysterious power known as “conduction.” This power plays a pivotal role in their struggle for freedom, shedding light on the complex dynamics of liberation and control within the lives of enslaved individuals.
Suggested Readings
  1. Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  2. Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. Empire. Harvard University Press, 2000.
  3. Lemke, Thomas. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York University Press, 2011.
  4. Mbembe, Achille. Necropolitics. Duke University Press, 2019.
  5. Rabinow, Paul, and Nikolas Rose. Biopower Today. Princeton University Press, 2006.
  6. Rose, Nikolas. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press, 2007.
  7. Shaviro, Steven. Discognition. Repeater, 2016.
  8. Sloterdijk, Peter. You Must Change Your Life: On Anthropotechnics. Polity Press, 2013.
  9. Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press, 1998.
  10. Weizman, Eyal. Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. Verso, 2007.

Master Slave Dialectic in Literature & Literary Theory

The Master-Slave Dialectic is a philosophical concept, primarily articulated by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, which elucidates the intricate interplay of power, recognition, and identity.

Introduction: Master-Slave Dialectic

Master-Slave Dialectic is a philosophical concept coined by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel to explain how individuals and societies develop through conflict and mutual recognition.

In this framework, the “Master” represents the dominant or controlling party, while the “Slave” symbolizes the subservient or controlled entity.

The dialectical process occurs as the Master depends on the Slave’s labor but also seeks recognition from them. This tension and interplay between dominance and recognition shape the evolution of human consciousness and social dynamics, a central theme in Hegel’s philosophy.

Etymology of Master-Slave Dialectic
  • The term “Master-Slave dialectic” originates from the philosophical framework of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, an 18th and 19th-century German philosopher.
  • In this concept, “Master” signifies the dominant or controlling entity, while “Slave” represents the subservient or controlled counterpart within a hierarchical relationship.
  • The term “dialectic,” derived from the Greek word “dialektikē,” meaning “the art of discussion,” underscores the methodological approach through which opposing forces or ideas resolve contradictions through reasoned discourse.
  • Hegel introduced this concept in his “Phenomenology of Spirit” (1807) to illustrate the development of self-consciousness and the progression of human history through conflicts between individuals and groups.
  • The etymology of “Master-Slave dialectic” encapsulates Hegel’s exploration of the interplay between dominant and subordinate forces, a fundamental element of his dialectical philosophy and the understanding of human consciousness and historical evolution.
Meanings of Master-Slave Dialectic
MeaningExplanation
Power DynamicsThis concept explores the power imbalances and struggles for dominance within literary narratives, often manifesting as characters or groups vying for control or recognition.
Character RelationshipsIt represents complex interpersonal dynamics between characters, where one assumes the role of the “Master” while others may be in the position of “Slave,” leading to conflicts, identity formation, and character development.
Themes of Subjugation and LiberationThe dialectic is a lens through which to analyze themes of subjugation, oppression, and liberation in literature, as characters and societies grapple with hierarchical structures and seek autonomy.
Identity and Self-RealizationLiterary works employing this dialectic often delve into questions of individual and collective identity, as characters strive for self-realization, agency, and the recognition of their inherent worth.
Narrative TensionIt creates narrative tension and conflict, driving the plot forward as characters navigate power struggles, challenges to authority, and quests for autonomy and self-discovery.
Definition of Master-Slave Dialectic as a Theoretical Term

The Master-Slave Dialectic is a philosophical concept, primarily articulated by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, which elucidates the intricate interplay of power, recognition, and identity. Within this framework, the “Master” embodies the dominant or controlling entity, while the “Slave” signifies the subordinate or controlled counterpart. It symbolizes a dialectical process wherein individuals or groups engage in struggles for dominance, resulting in transformative shifts in power dynamics, self-realization, and societal hierarchies.

Master-Slave Dialectic: Theorists, Works and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Originated and developed the concept in his philosophical works, most notably in Phenomenology of Spirit. Hegel’s elaboration of the dialectic is a cornerstone of his philosophical system, exploring the dynamics of human self-consciousness and societal evolution.
Works:
  • Phenomenology of Spirit by Hegel: The primary text where the Master-Slave Dialectic is introduced and extensively explored. In this work, Hegel examines the progression of self-consciousness through the interactions between individuals and groups.
Arguments:
  • Recognition and Identity: The dialectic illustrates how individuals and groups engage in a struggle for mutual recognition. Through this process, they develop their self-consciousness and identity, as recognition from others becomes essential for defining one’s existence and worth.
  • Power Dynamics: It delves into the complex power dynamics between the “Master” and “Slave” entities. The “Master” is initially in control but becomes dependent on the labor of the “Slave.” This imbalance leads to conflicts, challenges to authority, and shifts in power relationships.
  • Existential Freedom: The dialectic argues that genuine freedom and self-realization can only be achieved through the struggle for recognition and the dissolution of master-slave relationships. This ongoing process shapes the course of human history and societal progress as individuals and groups seek to break free from subjugation and attain autonomy and selfhood.

Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit and the Master-Slave Dialectic have had a profound impact on philosophical thought, influencing discussions on human relationships, power structures, and the development of self-consciousness and identity.

Master-Slave Dialectic and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevance of The Master-Slave Dialectic
Marxist Literary TheoryRelevant for analyzing class struggles, power imbalances, and oppression in literature. The dialectic helps in understanding how one class dominates another and the potential for revolution and liberation within literary narratives.
Feminist Literary TheoryPertinent for examining gender dynamics, patriarchy, and the struggle for recognition and agency in female characters. The dialectic aids in exploring power structures between genders and the portrayal of women’s autonomy in literature.
Postcolonial Literary TheoryImportant for studying colonization, resistance, and the dynamics of colonizer and colonized. The dialectic provides insights into imperialism, identity, and the decolonization process within literary narratives set in postcolonial contexts.
Psychoanalytic Literary TheoryRelevant for exploring characters’ inner conflicts, subconscious struggles, and their quest for self-recognition. The dialectic can illuminate the manifestation of psychological power dynamics and inner struggles in the narrative.
Identity and Representation TheoriesUseful in analyzing how characters construct and negotiate their identities in relation to dominant societal norms. The dialectic can be applied to explore themes related to gender, race, ethnicity, and other aspects of identity in literature.
Narrative and Conflict TheoriesSignificant for understanding the development of plot, tension, and resolution in literary narratives. The dialectic’s emphasis on power struggles and conflict contributes to the analysis of character interactions and their impact on the narrative arc and thematic development.
Master-Slave Dialectic in Literary Criticism
  1. Novel – Frankenstein by Mary Shelley:
    • Relevance: In Frankenstein, the relationship between Dr. Frankenstein and his creation, the Creature, exemplifies the Master-Slave Dialectic. Initially, Dr. Frankenstein wields power over his creation, but the Creature’s struggle for recognition and autonomy leads to a shift in power dynamics. The novel explores themes of creation, responsibility, and the consequences of playing the role of the “Master.”
  2. Play – Othello by William Shakespeare:
    • Relevance: In Shakespeare’s tragedy Othello, the Master-Slave Dialectic is embodied in the manipulation and power struggle between Othello and Iago. Othello, as the “Master” of his own fate, falls victim to Iago’s cunning manipulation, leading to his tragic downfall. The play delves into themes of jealousy, manipulation, and the destructive consequences of power imbalances.
  3. Short Story – The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka:
    • Relevance: Kafka’s The Metamorphosis explores the Master-Slave Dialectic within the internal struggles of the protagonist, Gregor Samsa. After his transformation into an insect-like creature, Gregor experiences a shift in power dynamics within his own family. His family members initially take on the role of the “Masters,” but as the story unfolds, Gregor’s alienation and isolation challenge these dynamics, leading to a reevaluation of power and identity.
  4. Science Fiction – Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick:
    • Relevance: This novel, which inspired the film Blade Runner, portrays a future society where humans use androids as slaves. The Master-Slave Dialectic is evident as the androids, initially perceived as “Slaves,” seek autonomy and recognition of their humanity. The novel raises questions about the power dynamics between humans and androids, as well as themes of empathy, identity, and oppression.

These examples illustrate how the Master-Slave Dialectic can be identified and analyzed in various literary genres, shedding light on power struggles, identity formation, and conflicts within the narratives.

Suggested Readings
  1. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A.V. Miller, Oxford University Press, 1977.
  2. Kafka, Franz. The Metamorphosis. Translated by Stanley Corngold, Bantam Classics, 1996.
  3. Shakespeare, William. Othello. Edited by E. A. J. Honigmann, Arden Shakespeare, 2006.
  4. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. Edited by D. L. Macdonald and Kathleen Scherf, Broadview Press, 1999.
  5. Dick, Philip K. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Del Rey, 1996.

Performativity in Literature & Literary Theory

Performativity, as a theoretical term, refers to the idea that language and social actions do not merely represent or describe reality but actively create and shape it.

Etymology of Performativity

The term “performativity” has its origins in the field of linguistics and gained prominence within academic discourse through the influential work of philosopher and gender theorist Judith Butler in the late 20th century.

Its etymology can be traced back to the linguistic concept of “performative utterances,” initially introduced by philosopher J.L. Austin in the mid-20th century. Austin contended that certain types of speech acts, such as declarations and promises, possess the capacity not solely to describe reality but also to effect changes in the social sphere through the very act of speaking.

Judith Butler further expanded upon this notion in the context of gender and identity, asserting that gender identity is not an inherent trait but rather a construct that is enacted and constituted through repeated performances of gender roles.

Consequently, the concept of performativity, in a broader sense, has come to signify the idea that language and actions do not merely mirror pre-existing identities and norms but actively participate in their creation and shaping. This concept has become central to contemporary gender studies and social theory.

Meanings of Performativity
AspectMeaning
Linguistic PerformativityLanguage not only describes but also performs actions. Specific words or phrases can bring about effects or consequences.
Gender PerformativityGender identity is constructed through social actions and expressions. People “perform” their gender roles.
Theatrical PerformativityIndividuals take on roles or personas for entertainment or artistic purposes.
Corporate PerformativityCompanies and individuals engage in performative actions to project an image or achieve goals.
Ritualistic PerformativityRituals, ceremonies, and symbolic actions convey cultural or religious significance.
Political PerformativityPolitical actions, speeches, or gestures convey messages, gain support, or enact change.
Identity PerformativityIndividuals construct and express identities through actions and self-presentation. Identity is fluid and performative.
Queer PerformativityLGBTQ+ individuals challenge gender and sexual norms through performative acts.
Social Media PerformativityPeople curate idealized online identities that may not reflect their offline reality.
Cultural PerformativityCultures express values and beliefs through performative acts like festivals and traditions.
Economic PerformativityFinancial markets and actors engage in actions that influence outcomes, regardless of underlying fundamentals.
Technology PerformativityTechnology shapes and performs actions in society, affecting human behavior and interactions.
Definition of Performativity as a Theoretical Term

Performativity, as a theoretical term, refers to the idea that language and social actions do not merely represent or describe reality but actively create and shape it. It posits that utterances and behaviors can bring about specific effects or outcomes, contributing to the construction of social norms, identities, and power structures.

This concept, popularized by theorists like Judith Butler, challenges traditional notions of language and identity by emphasizing their dynamic and performative nature within cultural and societal contexts.

Performativity: Theorists, Works, and Arguments
Theorists:
  • Judith Butler: A prominent theorist in the realm of performativity, Judith Butler introduced the concept of gender performativity in her groundbreaking work Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. She argues that gender is not a fixed identity but is constructed through repeated social actions and performances, challenging traditional notions of gender as binary and innate.
  • John Austin: John Austin’s work How to Do Things with Words laid the foundation for the theory of linguistic performativity. He explored how language can be performative, not just descriptive, and introduced concepts like illocutionary acts and perlocutionary acts to examine the functions of speech beyond simple communication.
  • Erving Goffman: Erving Goffman’s sociological perspective, as presented in The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, revolves around the idea of dramaturgy. He argued that individuals engage in impression management, adopting different roles and personas in various social situations. This theory emphasizes how individuals perform their identities in everyday interactions.
Key Works:
  • Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity by Judith Butler: This seminal work challenges traditional notions of gender by proposing that it is performative. Butler explores how individuals enact and express their gender roles through repeated social performances, deconstructing the idea of gender as a fixed or innate identity.
  • How to Do Things with Words by John Austin: In this work, Austin introduces the concept of speech acts and performativity in language. He argues that utterances can have performative effects, such as making promises or declarations, beyond their descriptive function, reshaping our understanding of language’s role in shaping reality.
  • The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life by Erving Goffman: Goffman’s sociological classic delves into the dramaturgical aspects of social interaction. He describes how individuals engage in impression management, adopting various roles and masks to present themselves differently in different social contexts. This work illuminates the performative nature of identity in daily life.
Key Arguments:
  • Judith Butler’s Argument: Butler contends that gender identity is a social construct, not an inherent trait. She asserts that individuals continually perform and enact their genders through behaviors and expressions, challenging the fixed categories of male and female and emphasizing the fluidity of gender identity.
  • John Austin’s Argument: Austin’s argument centers on the idea that language is not solely about conveying information but can also be performative, capable of bringing about actions and consequences. He introduces the distinction between locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts to illustrate how speech can shape reality.
  • Erving Goffman’s Argument: Goffman’s argument revolves around the concept of dramaturgy, where individuals engage in impression management and role-playing to construct their social identities. He emphasizes that social life is akin to a theatrical performance, with individuals actively shaping their roles and presentations in various social contexts.
Performativity and Literary Theories
  1. Queer Theory: Performativity plays a central role in queer theory, which explores how gender and sexuality are socially constructed. Judith Butler’s notion of gender performativity, as discussed in her work Gender Trouble, has been influential in this regard. Literary scholars in queer theory analyze how characters and narratives challenge or conform to traditional gender and sexual norms through performative acts.
  2. Poststructuralism and Deconstruction: Performativity aligns with poststructuralist and deconstructionist approaches to literature. These theories emphasize the instability and multiplicity of meaning in texts. Literary critics draw on performativity to examine how language itself performs and subverts meaning, highlighting the performative aspects of literary discourse.
  3. Feminist Literary Theory: Gender performativity is often examined in the context of feminist literary theory. Scholars explore how literary texts depict and challenge conventional gender roles and how characters enact gender performances. This analysis can reveal the ways in which literature reinforces or subverts patriarchal norms.
  4. Dramatic and Theatrical Analysis: Literature with a strong theatrical or dramatic element, such as plays and performance poetry, lends itself naturally to performativity analysis. Scholars examine how characters’ speeches and actions not only convey the plot but also perform social roles, power dynamics, and conflicts within the narrative.
  5. Authorship and Literary Identity: Performativity can also be applied to the concept of authorship. Scholars explore how authors perform their literary identities and engage in self-presentation through their works, prefaces, and public personas. This approach highlights the constructed nature of authorial identity.
  6. Reader Response Theory: Performativity can be relevant in understanding how readers engage with texts. Scholars consider how readers perform interpretations of literary works, and how their readings can vary based on their own social and cultural contexts. This perspective underscores the interactive and performative nature of reading.
  7. Experimental and Metafictional Literature: Some contemporary literature is explicitly concerned with the performative aspects of language and narrative. In works of metafiction, authors draw attention to the constructed nature of storytelling, blurring the line between fiction and reality. Performativity becomes a key theme and analytical tool in understanding such texts.
  8. Language and Discourse Analysis: Literary theorists often draw on linguistic concepts related to performativity when analyzing the language and discourse within literary texts. They explore how characters‘ utterances and dialogues can have performative effects, shaping the narrative and its implications.
Performativity in Literary Criticism
WorkApplication
Macbeth by William ShakespeareIn Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the performative aspect of ambition is central to the narrative. Macbeth’s actions, driven by his ambition and his wife’s encouragement, lead to a series of violent deeds. Performativity analysis would focus on how Macbeth’s language and actions perform his transformation from a nobleman to a power-hungry tyrant. Lady Macbeth’s soliloquy, where she calls upon spirits to “unsex” her and “stop up the access and passage to remorse,” demonstrates her performative role as a manipulative and ruthless character. Literary criticism would examine how her language and actions contribute to the construction of gender and power dynamics within the play.
The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret AtwoodIn Atwood’s dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, performativity is a key theme. The society of Gilead enforces strict gender roles, and women are assigned specific roles based on their fertility. Literary critique would explore how the characters, particularly the Handmaids, perform their assigned roles and the ways in which language and behavior contribute to the oppressive regime’s power. The protagonist, Offred, performs the role of a Handmaid as she narrates her experiences. Her internal monologue, which is often at odds with her outward compliance, highlights the tension between the performative and authentic self. Literary analysis would delve into how this tension reflects the broader themes of control and resistance.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott FitzgeraldIn Fitzgerald’s novel, The Great Gatsby, performativity is evident in the characters’ attempts to construct and perform their social identities. Jay Gatsby, in particular, constructs an elaborate persona to win back Daisy Buchanan. Literary critique would examine how Gatsby’s extravagant parties and lavish lifestyle serve as performative acts to recreate his identity. Daisy Buchanan also engages in performative behavior, conforming to societal expectations of upper-class women. The critique would explore how her performances, such as her voice “full of money,” contribute to the novel’s critique of the superficiality of the Jazz Age.
Orlando by Virginia WoolfIn Woolf’s novel Orlando, the protagonist experiences both gender and time transitions. Literary analysis through the lens of performativity would focus on how Orlando’s transformation from a man to a woman and her experiences across different historical periods highlight the fluidity of identity and the performative nature of gender roles. The novel’s exploration of the performative aspects of gender identity is particularly relevant. Orlando’s experiences as both male and female underscore the notion that gender is not inherent but constructed through repeated actions and societal expectations.
Suggested Readings
  1. Austin, John. How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press, 1962.
  2. Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Routledge, 1993.
  3. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
  4. Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, 1959.
  5. Green, Adam Isaiah. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  6. Gubar, Susan. Racechanges: White Skin, Black Face in American Culture. Oxford University Press, 1997.
  7. Halberstam, Jack. The Queer Art of Failure. Duke University Press, 2011.
  8. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Duke University Press, 2011.
  9. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. University of California Press, 1990.
  10. Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. Zone Books, 2002.
You may read more on Literary Theory below: