March 3, 2024 - English Studies

“A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

“A Small, Good Thing,” written by Raymond Carver, first appeared in The New Yorker in 1983.

Introduction: “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

“A Small, Good Thing,” written by Raymond Carver, first appeared in The New Yorker in 1983. Later included in his critically acclaimed 1984 collection Cathedral, the short story became one of his most beloved works and a literary classic. With its poignant and understated exploration of grief and unexpected human connection, “A Small, Good Thing” continues to resonate with readers today.

Main Events in “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

Birthday Tragedy: On his eighth birthday, Scotty is hit by a car while walking to school. He initially seems alright but soon collapses into unconsciousness.
Hospitalization: Scotty is rushed to the hospital where he slips into a coma. Doctors offer reassurance, but the prognosis remains uncertain.

Parental Vigil: Ann and Howard keep a relentless vigil by Scotty’s bedside, clinging to hope while their anxiety and despair grow.
Mysterious Calls: A local baker repeatedly calls about a birthday cake Ann ordered, unaware of the tragedy. The calls become a source of irritation and increasing distress.
Mounting Tension: The baker’s insistence and the parents’ emotional turmoil build unbearable tension. The cake becomes a symbol of their shattered normalcy.

Frustration Peaks: Driven by mounting anger and grief, Ann and Howard decide to confront the baker late at night.
Unexpected Encounter: The baker, a solitary and somewhat gruff man, welcomes them unexpectedly with warmth. He offers coffee and freshly baked rolls.
Shared Humanity: As they sit in the baker’s simple kitchen, he shares stories of his own life and losses. This unexpected connection offers a brief respite from their overwhelming pain.

Moment of Solace: In this shared act of eating and storytelling, a small sense of peace and understanding descends upon the parents.
Ambiguous Ending: The story typically ends without explicitly revealing Scotty’s fate. The focus remains on the fragile power of human connection amidst profound suffering and the lingering question of hope.

Literary Devices in “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

1. Symbolism

The Cake: Represents the hope, normalcy, and celebration Ann and Howard cling to, which starkly contrasts the tragedy they face.
- “…the boy’s birthday cake … with the inscription ‘Happy 8th Birthday Scotty!'”
The Rolls: Become a symbol of shared humanity, comfort, and connection with the baker near the end.
- “They ate rolls and drank coffee… The baker was encouraged. He began to recall other incidents in his life…”

2. Irony

Situational Irony: The stark contrast between the joyful task of ordering a birthday cake and then receiving news of Scotty’s accident is a powerful use of situational irony.
- “Ann Weiss was at the bakery… ‘Happy 8th Birthday Scotty!’ … ‘Scotty, honey, how are you?’…’His head was covered with bandages…'”
Dramatic Irony: The reader is aware of Scotty’s increasingly dire condition, a fact unknown to his parents for much of the story, creating a sense of tension and tragedy.

3. Foreshadowing

The Baker’s Calls: The baker’s increasingly ominous telephone calls foreshadow the negative turn of events.
- “[The baker says] ‘If you could pick it up by five, that would be a big help…I mean, something else has come up… I know you won’t mind, but I’m going to have to ask you to pick it up by one o’clock today.'”

4. Minimalism

Sparse Dialogue and Descriptions: Carver’s signature minimalist style uses simple language with stark detail, leaving room for the reader’s emotional interpretation.
- “It was night in the hospital room…She closed her eyes and tried to think about Scotty.”
Understated emotion: Characters’ feelings are often implied, not explicitly stated, increasing the emotional impact.

5. Imagery

Vivid Hospital Scenes: Create a feeling of sterile dread and helplessness.
- “It was night in the hospital room…Nurses moved about softly, and from another room she could hear someone moaning”

6. Metaphor

Darkness and Sleep: Represent the unknown, fear, and possible death
- “… she tried to think about Scotty. But she was afraid to think about Scotty… She fell asleep… She slept hard.”

7. Simile

Comparison to an Animal: Likens Ann to a cornered animal, emphasizing her desperation and vulnerability
- “She went back and forth in her mind… like a trapped animal.”

8. Allusion

Biblical References: Subtly appear when Ann sees a black family praying, potentially alluding to a shared experience of grief and searching for spiritual comfort .
- “They were in the same kind of waiting as she was in… the woman’s lips moved silently.”

9. Juxtaposition

Celebration and Tragedy: The initial birthday scene juxtaposed with the accident heightens the emotional impact .
Waiting and Uncertainty: The contrast between the characters’ anxious waiting and the doctor’s clinical detachment reveals the gulf between the emotional and the medical.

10. Diction

Simple, Everyday Language: Creates a sense of realism and immediacy.
Repetition of Words: Words like “wait”, “phone”, and “Scotty” reinforce the characters’ obsessive focus.

11. Epiphany

Final Moment of Connection: The sharing of food and stories with the baker represents a small epiphany of shared humanity and solace for the characters and the reader.

12. Ambiguity

Open Ending: The story does not give a clear resolution about Scotty’s fate, leaving the reader to ponder the themes of hope, despair, and the fleeting nature of solace.

13. Tone Shifts:

From mundane to tense to resigned, reflecting the emotional rollercoaster.

14. Understatement:

Minimizes direct expressions of emotion, increasing the story’s power.

15. Motif

Waiting: The act of waiting for news and resolution drives the narrative.

Characterization in “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

Carver’s “A Small, Good Thing” features subtly complex characterization despite its stylistic minimalism. Let’s explore the key figures:

Ann and Howard Weiss

Initially Defined by Ordinary Life: When we first meet them, they’re engaged in the mundane: getting a birthday cake, planning a party. This ordinariness makes their tragedy all the more impactful.
Understated Grief: Carver doesn’t offer long, anguished outpourings of emotion. Grief manifests in small, telling gestures—Ann’s inability to truly think about Scotty, Howard’s nervous energy.
Transformation Through Shared Experience: The encounter with the baker forces them from private grief into a shared space of vulnerability. This subtly shifts their portrayal from devastated parents to people capable of finding brief solace in connection.

The Baker

Starts as Antagonistic: His insistent phone calls make him initially unsympathetic, almost a representation of the relentless cruelty of fate.
Reveals Hidden Humanity: As he stays open in the night, sharing coffee and rolls, he becomes a surprising symbol of human compassion. He’s not untouched by tragedy himself but finds a way to extend a lifeline, however small, in the darkness.
Archetypal Figure: In some ways, he reads like an archetype – the solitary wise man offering food as a symbol of comfort and connection.

Scotty

Defined by Absence: Scotty is mostly a silent presence. We see the cake, his empty bed. This absence makes him both heartbreaking and universal. He embodies any child facing the unthinkable.

Minor Characters

Dr. Francis: Represents the impersonal aspect of medicine, his clinical detachment contrasting with the parents’ emotions. This allows for a critique of how medical systems sometimes fail the emotional needs of patients and families.
Franklin’s Family: Their brief appearance emphasizes the universality of pain and the human need for connection during hardship.

What Makes Carver’s Characterization Unique

Focus on the Unspoken: The characters’ inner lives are implied, requiring the reader to actively engage their own emotions in the story.
Transformation, not Resolution: The story doesn’t aim to resolve trauma, but to capture the moment when characters are forced to evolve in order to cope.
Symbolism of Everyday Objects: The cake, the rolls – mundane objects carry enormous emotional weight, illustrating how small acts and shared experiences hold meaning in even the darkest times.

Major Themes in “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

Here’s a breakdown of the major themes found in Raymond Carver’s “A Small, Good Thing,” along with how they are explored in the story:

1. The Fragility of Joy and the Inevitability of Suffering

The Birthday Contrast: The story starts with celebratory normalcy: ordering the cake, preparing for a party. The suddenness of Scotty’s accident brutally juxtaposes how easily and unexpectedly tragedy can strike, shattering ordinary happiness.
The Waiting Room as Purgatory: The hospital becomes a liminal space between hope and despair, underscoring the universally shared experience of suffering and loss.

2. Isolation vs. Connection

Initial Isolation: Ann and Howard are trapped in their own anxieties, isolated from each other and from the world. Carver highlights this through their stilted conversations and the separate ways they try to cope.
The Baker as a Connection: The initially abrasive baker becomes the catalyst for human connection. The shared act of eating, talking, and remembering creates a bridge across their separate sorrows.
Ambiguous Power of Connection: The ending doesn’t suggest resolution, but the fleeting possibility of connection as a means of surviving the darkness.

3. The Limits of Communication and Understanding

Miscommunication with the Doctor: Dr. Francis’s detached delivery of information and clinical coldness emphasizes the gap between medical language and the emotional experience of the parents. This highlights the inadequacy of words in the face of immense grief.
Silence as Communication: The most powerful moments are those of shared silence – Ann and Howard at Scotty’s bedside, or sharing rolls with the baker. These emphasize how profound communication can sometimes exist beyond verbal language.

4. The Search for Meaning in the Face of the Absurd

The Unanswered “Why”: The story doesn’t provide an explanation for Scotty’s accident or potential fate. This reflects the often senseless nature of tragedy, forcing both the characters and the reader to confront the incomprehensible.

Small Gestures as Meaning-Making: Baking, sharing food, talking about past hardships – these become tiny acts of defiance in the face of the absurd. They offer not answers, but a way to exist in defiance of meaningless suffering.

Writing Style in “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

Sparse Prose and Dialogue

Short, Simple Sentences: Carver favors unadorned sentences and minimal modifiers, leaving the impact to rest on carefully chosen nouns and verbs. For example, “His head was covered in bandages. He didn’t move.”

Understated Dialogue: Conversations are clipped, with emphasis on what characters don’t say. This forces the reader to infer emotions and navigate the fraught subtext in conversations.

Emotional Impact Through Implication

Show, Don’t Tell: Carver doesn’t give us long descriptions of emotions. Instead, he reveals inner turmoil through gestures or actions. For example, Ann’s struggle to imagine Scotty, or Howard’s constant nervous movement, reveal their grief far more effectively than if directly stated.

“The Iceberg Theory”: Like Hemingway, Carver believed stories should focus on surface details, implying a vastness of emotion below the surface. The reader becomes a co-creator, filling in the emotional blanks.

Focus on the Ordinary

Working-Class Characters: Carver often writes about ordinary people, like the Weisses and the baker, grappling with everyday concerns. This adds universal relatability to the story.

The Power of Mundane Detail: The cake, the rolls, the repetitive phone calls – these objects take on heightened significance because of the tragedy surrounding them. This underscores that profound experiences can occur within the seemingly mundane.

Ambiguity and Open Endings

Unresolved Fate: The reader never gets definitive clarity about Scotty’s fate. This ambiguity denies neat closure, mimicking the uncertainty of life and making the story linger in the reader’s mind.

Emphasis on the Moment: Carver cares less about the past or future and more on the intense emotional present of his characters. This allows for subtle shifts and glimmerings of hope, but never simplistic resolution.

Use of Symbols and Motifs

Objects with Emotional Weight: The cake and the rolls transform from symbols of joy/annoyance to vessels for grief and finally shared humanity.

Recurring Motifs: Acts of waiting, phone calls, and sleep/wakefulness create a pattern that builds tension and reflects the characters’ changing emotional states

Literary Theories and Interpretation of “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

1. Reader-Response Theory

Emphasis on the Reader’s Experience: This theory suggests that the meaning of a text isn’t fixed but actively constructed by the reader. Carver’s minimalism and ambiguity provide plenty of space for the reader’s emotional response.

Interpretation #1: Focus on Grief: A reader heavily influenced by personal experiences of grief might focus on Ann and Howard’s suffering, the story becoming an exploration of how parents cope with the unthinkable.
Interpretation #2: Focus on Connection: Another reader might focus on the final scene with the baker, interpreting it as a testament to the resilience of the human spirit in the face of darkness.

2. New Criticism

The Text Itself: This theory focuses on close analysis of literary devices within the story itself, aiming for objective interpretation.
Example: Analyzing the cake’s symbolism, from celebratory object to painful reminder to connection point, without necessarily delving into the author’s intent or the reader’s personal experience.

3. Psychoanalytic Theory

Unconscious Motivations: A Freudian reading might examine the characters’ actions as manifestations of repressed desires or anxieties.
Possible Interpretation: The baker, initially harsh, could be seen as unknowingly projecting his own past grief. The shared meal becomes a subconscious ritual of connection, seeking solace he cannot verbalize.

4. Feminist Theory

Gender Roles and Silence: A feminist lens might examine how Ann is defined by motherhood and domestic roles. Is her silence a reflection of societal expectations of a grieving woman?
Counterpoint: The baker, who offers the traditionally female act of feeding, could be subverting gendered roles and offering the type of emotionally direct support society typically denies to men.

5. Deconstruction

Challenging Binary Oppositions: Deconstruction would focus on unsettling seemingly clear contrasts in the story: joy/sorrow, life/death, connection/isolation.
Questioning the Ending: Does the shared meal truly indicate a shift towards healing, or does it highlight the futility of small gestures in the face of immense tragedy?

Important Note:

No Single “Right” Interpretation: Different theories offer different lenses, each highlighting unique aspects of the story.

Carver’s Style Invites This: Carver’s subtle complexities and lack of neat resolution make his work particularly well-suited to analysis through various theoretical frameworks.

Questions and Thesis Statements about “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

1. Question: How does Carver’s minimalist style influence the reader’s emotional experience of the story?

Thesis: Carver’s minimalist style intentionally leaves emotional and narrative gaps, forcing the reader to actively participate in the creation of meaning and experience a heightened intensity of grief, uncertainty, and the longing for connection.

2. Question: To what extent does the open-ended conclusion offer genuine hope, or does it underscore the enduring futility of human connection in the face of tragedy?

Thesis: The ambiguous ending of “A Small, Good Thing” highlights a powerful tension between the fleeting but potent nature of human connection and the overwhelming presence of senseless suffering, leaving the reader to determine the balance between hope and despair.

3. Question: How does the evolving symbolism of the birthday cake illuminate the profound shifts in the characters’ perspectives on life and suffering?

Thesis: The birthday cake transforms from a symbol of joyous anticipation to a painful reminder of loss, and ultimately, a catalyst for a shared experience of grief and humanity, reflecting the characters’ forced journey from the ordinary to the harrowing depths of the human experience.

4. Question: Does the character of the baker function primarily as an antagonist to heighten the parents’ suffering, or does he reveal an unexpected dimension of compassion and vulnerability within himself?

Thesis: The baker’s initial abrasiveness and subsequent softening illustrate the intricate duality of human experience, where those who seem isolated in their own pain can ultimately offer unexpected solace and connection to others.

5. Question: In what ways does the story challenge or support traditional expectations of how grief and trauma should be expressed or processed?

Thesis: “A Small, Good Thing” subverts expectations of overt emotional outpouring by portraying grief as fractured, internalized, and often expressed through seemingly insignificant details and gestures, offering a more realistic and nuanced portrayal of trauma.

Short Question-Answer “A Small, Good Thing” by Raymond Carver

Question: Why is the story’s title ironic?

Answer: The title suggests a comforting, positive resolution, which drastically contrasts with Scotty’s accident (“His head was covered in bandages. He didn’t move”) and the unsettling open ending. This irony spotlights how even small acts of kindness cannot erase immense suffering.

Question: How does silence function as a form of communication in the story?

Answer: The most potent moments of the story involve silence – Ann and Howard at Scotty’s bedside (“They sat quietly…She closed her eyes”), and the shared, quiet meal with the baker (“They ate rolls and drank coffee…”). These emphasize that connection and empathy can transcend language.

Question: Does the doctor’s clinical detachment serve a purpose in the story?

Answer: Dr. Francis’ coldness (“The doctor was a short man with a clipped mustache…”) highlights the gap between the medical facts of Scotty’s condition and the emotional turmoil of his family. It underscores the dehumanizing aspects of tragedy when reduced to medical terminology.

Question: Why does the story focus on such ordinary details (the cake, the rolls)?

Answer: By imbuing mundane objects with emotional weight—from the birthday cake with its inscription to the simple rolls—Carver shows that profound meaning and change can exist within seemingly insignificant moments of everyday life.

Question: Is the ending hopeful or despairing?

Answer: The ambiguity of the ending is intentional. The shared meal suggests a flicker of connection, but Scotty’s potential fate remains unknown. This tension invites a reader’s personal interpretation, reflecting their own outlook on the world and the balance between connection and suffering.

“Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Originally published in 1948 by Ralph Ellison, “Battle Royal” is a short story that has become a cornerstone of American literature.

Introduction: “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Originally published in 1948 by Ralph Ellison, “Battle Royal” is a short story that has become a cornerstone of American literature. Part of Ellison’s influential novel Invisible Man, the story follows a young Black man invited to deliver a speech at a gathering of wealthy white men. However, upon arrival, he’s forced to participate in a humiliating and brutal “battle royal” with other Black youths. Blinded by sacks, they fight for the amusement of the white audience.

Famous for its powerful themes of racism, identity, and the fight for social justice, “Battle Royal” has been widely anthologized. A stark portrayal of the ongoing struggle for equality faced by Black Americans, the story remains a relevant and popular work even today.

Main Events in “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Invitation and Dreams: A young Black man, striving for acceptance and recognition, receives a formal invitation to give a speech at a gathering of the town’s most important white men. He imagines this will be his chance to finally break through the barriers of race.

Degrading Spectacle: Upon his arrival at a hotel ballroom, he becomes an uncomfortable spectator to a degrading spectacle: a blonde woman, adorned with an American flag tattoo, dances provocatively to entertain the raucous white audience.
Surprise Announcement: Before giving his speech, the young man is informed that he’ll participate in a “battle royal” – a brutal entertainment for the white men. He and other Black youths are blindfolded and thrown into a boxing ring.
Blindfolded Fight for Survival: Forced to fight for the amusement of the crowd, the blindfolded boys punch wildly and viciously at each other. The young man, driven by anger and fear, attacks the largest of his opponents.

Pain and Mockery The fight turns into a bloody mess, the white men shouting and jeering. The protagonist endures punches and kicks, the pain intensifying with each blow.
Electrified “Reward”: Beaten but determined, the young man finally emerges as the last one standing. His “reward” turns into further humiliation as the coins he’s given spill onto an electrified rug, causing him to writhe in pain.
Distorted Speech: Battered and shaken, he rises to give his carefully prepared speech on humility and social responsibility. But the experience warps his words, filling them with the bitterness of betrayal.

Unexpected “Prize”: Surprisingly, he is awarded a briefcase containing a scholarship to a Black college. However, this unexpected opportunity brings little comfort after the night’s events.
Shattered Illusions: The protagonist leaves the gathering disillusioned and broken. His dreams of acceptance are shattered, replaced by a painful awareness of the deep racial divisions within his society.
Invisible Yet Seen: The night’s trauma haunts him, forever shaping his worldview. He sees himself as both invisible in the eyes of white society, yet painfully visible as a target of their cruelty and manipulation.

Literary Devices in “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Allusion: A reference to a well-known person, place, or event. Example: The protagonist’s speech contains allusions to famous historical figures such as Booker T. Washington and Abraham Lincoln.
Foreshadowing: A hint or clue about events that will occur later in the story. Example: The protagonist’s dream of his grandfather foreshadows the theme of the story’s ending.
Imagery: The use of descriptive language to create vivid mental images. Example: The description of the protagonist’s bloody and bruised face after the battle royal creates powerful imagery.

Irony: A contrast between what is expected and what actually occurs. Example: The protagonist’s speech on the importance of education is ironic, given the violent and dehumanizing events of the story.
Metaphor: A comparison between two unlike things without using “like” or “as.” Example: The protagonist’s blindness during the battle royal is a metaphor for his inability to see the true nature of his situation.
Motif: A recurring symbol or theme that is used throughout the story. Example: The motif of the protagonist’s briefcase symbolizes the promise of education and opportunity.

Onomatopoeia: Words that imitate the sound they represent. Example: The sound of the protagonist being knocked to the ground during the battle royal is described with onomatopoeic language.
Paradox: A statement that contradicts itself but is nevertheless true. Example: The idea of “an invisible man” is a paradoxical statement that underscores the theme of invisibility and marginalization in the story.
Personification: Giving human qualities to non-human things. Example: The description of the electric carpet-shocker as a “sadistic bastard” is an example of personification.

Repetition: Repeating words or phrases for emphasis. Example: The phrase “social equality” is repeated throughout the protagonist’s speech to emphasize his message.
Satire: Using humor to criticize and expose societal flaws and vices. Example: The story’s depiction of the white audience’s enjoyment of the violent and dehumanizing battle royal is a satirical commentary on the racism and hypocrisy of American society.
Simile: A comparison between two unlike things using “like” or “as.” Example: The protagonist’s feeling of being “like a dog” during the battle royal is a simile.

Symbolism: Using an object or action to represent an abstract idea. Example: The protagonist’s briefcase symbolizes the promise of education and opportunity that is denied to black Americans.
Tone: The author’s attitude towards the subject matter of the story. Example: The story’s tone is one of anger and frustration at the dehumanizing effects of racism and oppression.
Verbal Irony: A contrast between what is said and what is actually meant. Example: The white men’s praise for the protagonist’s speech is an example of verbal irony, as they do not truly believe in the message he is conveying.

Characterization in “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Character	Description	Key Traits	Symbolic Meaning
The Protagonist (Narrator)	A young Black man in the American South, eager to gain acceptance and opportunity	Intelligent, ambitious, initially naive	Symbolizes the struggle of Black Americans seeking a place in a society rigged against them
The Grandfather	The protagonist’s deceased grandfather whose deathbed words haunt him	Subversive, resistant to oppression, carries guilt over compromises made	Represents an older generation’s complicated relationship to white power structures
The White Men	Wealthy, powerful white men in the town who organize the event	Sadistic, racist, hypocritical	Represent the oppressive power structures of white society
The Blonde Woman	A scantily clad dancer meant to entertain the white men	Objectified, used as a tool	Embodies the exploitation and sexualization of women, also highlighting the men’s warped views of race and gender
The Other Black Youths	Participants in the battle royal	Victims of circumstance, fearful, some fueled by desperation	Represent the diversity within the Black community and how systemic oppression can pit individuals against one another

Major Themes in “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Racism and Dehumanization:
- The entire premise of the “battle royal” as entertainment for white men exposes their deep-seated racism and disregard for the humanity of Black people.
- The electrified rug incident further emphasizes the white men’s cruelty and their view of Black people as objects for their amusement.

The Illusion of Opportunity:
- The initial invitation and the scholarship offer create a false sense of hope for the protagonist, demonstrating how opportunity is often dangled as a cruel illusion for Black Americans.
- The scholarship takes on a bitter meaning after the humiliation, highlighting the false promise of “reward” within a racist system.

Invisibility and Identity:
- The protagonist’s struggle to be seen and recognized as an individual, in contrast to the white audience seeing him only as a stereotype.
- The blindfold during the fight symbolizes the blindness of white society to the true complexity and humanity of Black people.

Betrayal and Disillusionment
- The protagonist’s naive belief in the sincerity of the invitation is shattered by the night’s events.
- This leads to a deep sense of disillusionment with the possibility of acceptance and equality within the current social order.

The Legacy of Oppression
- The grandfather’s deathbed warning about undermining from within highlights the long history of struggles for Black liberation.
- The protagonist inherits this burden, carrying both the pain of oppression and a lingering spirit of resistance.

Writing Style in “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Vivid Depictions: Ellison uses graphic descriptions of violence (the chaotic brawl), psychological torment (the protagonist’s humiliation), and the electric shock to create a visceral experience for the reader.
Exploring Complexity: The story goes beyond physical violence to delve into the protagonist’s complex inner world. We witness his initial hope, confusion during the fight, and ultimate disillusionment.
Powerful Symbolism: Objects like the blindfolds and the electrified rug become symbolic of larger societal issues – the blindness of racism and the electric shock of oppression.

Precise Language: Ellison’s word choice is sharp and deliberate, creating an atmosphere of tension and unease. For example, the term “battle royal” itself is a twisted joke, highlighting the barbarity of the event.
Stream-of-Consciousness: The narrative style puts readers directly in the protagonist’s mind, experiencing his thoughts and feelings as they unfold. This creates a sense of immediacy and allows for a deeper understanding of his emotions.
Social Commentary: “Battle Royal” is not just about a singular event. It’s a powerful critique of American racism and the dehumanizing treatment of Black Americans.

Literary Theories and Interpretation of “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Theory	Key Concepts	How it Applies to “Battle Royal”
Marxist Criticism	Economic class struggle, power dynamics, exploitation, alienation	Examines the power imbalance between wealthy white men and the Black youths. The battle royal is a display of power, reinforcing class division. The scholarship is an empty promise, perpetuating a cycle of exploitation.
Psychoanalytic Criticism	Unconscious desires, dream analysis, repression, symbolism	Explores the protagonist’s repressed anger, the grandfather’s dream as a subconscious warning symbol, and the psychological trauma inflicted by the events.
Feminist Criticism	Gender roles, objectification of women, patriarchal power structures	Analyzes the blonde dancer as a tool to reinforce toxic masculinity and the white men’s power. It highlights the intersection of race and gender oppression.
Critical Race Theory	Systemic racism, challenging white-centric narratives, lived experiences of marginalized groups	Centers the story within the larger context of American racism. The events are not isolated but part of a system designed to maintain white supremacy. Prioritizes the Black protagonist’s perspective.
Postcolonial Criticism	Legacy of colonialism, power imbalances, identity formation under oppression	Explores the lingering impact of historical oppression on the Black community. The protagonist’s struggle for identity mirrors the larger struggle for Black self-determination in a post-colonial world.

Questions and Thesis Statements about “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

Marxist Theory

Original Thesis: “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison can be interpreted through the lens of Marxist theory, which exposes the exploitative nature of capitalism and highlights the power dynamics at play between the wealthy white men and the poor black boys in the story.
Revised Thesis: “Battle Royal” depicts the ways in which capitalism exploits and dehumanizes Black Americans for the benefit of the white ruling class, revealing the inherent class conflict within American society.

Key Questions:
- How does the initial invitation and promise of opportunity serve to manipulate the protagonist and obscure the exploitative nature of the event?
- How does the “battle royal” itself function as a microcosm of capitalist competition, emphasizing the way the system pits the oppressed against each other?
- In what ways does the “reward” of the scholarship perpetuate, rather than disrupt, the existing power structures and economic inequalities?

Critical Race Theory

Original Thesis: The themes of critical race theory are evident in “Battle Royal,” as the story exposes the institutionalized racism and power structures in American society, highlighting the pervasive nature of racism and the physical and psychological violence experienced by black Americans.

Revised Thesis: “Battle Royal” demonstrates how racism isn’t merely individual prejudice but rather a system designed to uphold white supremacy; the story reveals how this systemic racism manifests in both overt violence and insidious psychological manipulation.
Key Questions:
- How does the setting of the story (the hotel, the gathering of powerful white men) itself embody the institutional power structures of white supremacy?
- In what ways do the events of the “battle royal” serve as a ritualized reinforcement of racial hierarchy, even if some white attendees don’t consciously view it that way?
- How does the language used by the white men and the protagonist’s forced speech expose the psychological violence inherent within a racist system?

Short Question-Answer “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison

What is the significance of the “battle royal” scene in the story?

The “battle royal” scene in Ralph Ellison’s story is significant in several ways. It serves as a metaphor for the struggle of black Americans to gain equality and dignity in a society that denies them these basic human rights. It also highlights the brutal and dehumanizing nature of racism and the psychological trauma it inflicts upon its victims. The scene is also significant in that it serves as a turning point for the protagonist, who realizes the futility of trying to win the approval of the white men and recognizes the need to fight for his own identity and self-worth.

How does Ellison use symbolism to convey the themes of the story?

Ellison employs several symbols throughout the story to convey its central themes. For example, the blindfold worn by the protagonist during the “battle royal” can be seen as a symbol of the blindness of American society to the injustice and violence faced by black Americans. Similarly, the protagonist’s speech about the importance of education can be seen as a symbol of the power of knowledge and the need for black Americans to empower themselves through education.

How does the narrative structure of “Battle Royal” contribute to its meaning?

The nonlinear narrative structure of “Battle Royal” contributes to its meaning by highlighting the fragmented and disjointed nature of the protagonist’s experiences as a black American in a racist society. The story is told in a series of flashbacks and memories, reflecting the protagonist’s own fragmented and confused sense of self. This narrative structure also emphasizes the importance of memory and history in understanding the struggles of black Americans and the need for them to reclaim their own history and identity.

How does Ellison’s use of imagery contribute to the story’s themes?

Ellison’s use of vivid imagery throughout the story helps to convey its central themes, such as the violence and brutality of racism, the struggle for identity and self-worth, and the importance of education and knowledge. For example, the scene in which the protagonist is forced to fight other black boys while blindfolded is depicted in brutal and graphic detail, emphasizing the dehumanizing nature of racism. Similarly, the imagery of the protagonist’s grandfather’s dying words, which call for resistance against oppression, serves as a powerful symbol of the need for black Americans to fight against the oppressive forces that seek to deny them their humanity.

“The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Written by William Carlos Williams, “The Use of Force” is a short story that was published in 1938 and has gained significant popularity since then.

Introduction: “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Written by William Carlos Williams, “The Use of Force” is a short story that was published in 1938 and has gained significant popularity since then. The story revolves around a doctor who is called to examine a sick child and ends up using force to examine her throat. Through the doctor’s internal monologue, the reader gains insight into his thought process and the tension that arises between the doctor and the child’s parents. The story’s popularity can be attributed to Williams’ unique writing style and his ability to capture the complexities of human nature, particularly the struggle for power and control. Overall, “The Use of Force” is a thought-provoking story that forces the reader to question the morality of using force, even in situations where it may seem necessary.

Main Events in “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

The Call: A doctor is summoned to examine a young girl named Mathilda who is suspected of having diphtheria.
Initial Resistance: The child’s parents are hesitant and provide minimal information, hindering the doctor’s assessment.

The Examination Attempt: The doctor tries to gently examine Mathilda’s throat, but she fiercely resists.
Escalation: The tension escalates as the child scratches at the doctor, knocking off his glasses and refusing to cooperate.
Parental Ineffectiveness: Despite the parents’ pleas for Mathilda to comply, she remains defiant, and their words prove useless.

The Doctor’s Frustration: Growing impatient, the doctor warns the parents about the severity of diphtheria and the danger to their daughter.
Forced Examination: The parents agree to let the doctor proceed, and a violent struggle ensues as he forcibly examines the girl’s throat.
The Struggle: Mathilda fights ferociously, biting the tongue depressor, while her parents become anguished and overwhelmed.

Fury and Force: In the heat of the moment, the doctor loses his composure, his actions driven by rage and a warped sense of duty. He violently forces a spoon into Mathilda’s throat.
Discovery and Aftermath: The doctor confirms diphtheria but feels shaken by his own brutality. Matilda, defeated but furious, attempts to attack him.

Literary Devices in “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Imagery: Vivid sensory details evoke the tension and physical struggle.
- “catlike movement” of the child’s hands
- “She had magnificent blonde hair, in profusion”
Point of View: First-person narration from the doctor’s perspective, highlighting his escalating frustration and the ethical conflict.

Dialogue: Reveals the power dynamics among the doctor, the child, and her parents.
- The parents’ ineffectual pleas contrasted with the doctor’s increasingly forceful commands.
Symbolism:
- The tongue depressor and spoon represent tools of medical power but also the oppressive force the doctor uses.
- Diphtheria symbolizes the hidden danger lurking beneath the situation’s surface.
Contrast:
- The child’s outward beauty vs. her inner strength and defiance.
- The stark language of the struggle vs. the clinical opening of the story.
Diction: Word choices reveal shifts in the doctor’s tone.
- Moves from professional (“sore throat?”) to dismissive (“the savage brat”)
Metaphor:
- The child is compared to a “heifer,” emphasizing her animalistic resistance.
- The doctor’s battle with the child becomes a metaphor for the struggle between reason and primal emotion.
Juxtaposition: The parents’ apologetic demeanor is juxtaposed sharply with the violence of the examination scene.
Foreshadowing: Early hints, like the “picture children” reference and the mention of diphtheria cases, subtly build suspense.

Internal Conflict: The doctor battles with his own conflicting impulses – the desire to help vs. the brutality he unleashes.
Tone Shift: The story moves from a somewhat detached medical tone to a raw, emotionally charged one.
Irony:
- The doctor, meant to be a healer, acts with damaging force.
- The parents’ desire to protect their child inadvertently leads to her being hurt.
Allusion: The subtle reference to children dying of neglect hints at the broader social context and consequences of inaction.

Repetition: Of phrases like “open your mouth” emphasizes the relentless pressure on the child.
Sentence Structure: Short, fragmented sentences during the struggle mirror the chaos and the doctor’s unhinged state of mind.

Characterization in “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Character	Description	Key Actions/Dialogue	Analysis
The Doctor	Initially professional and detached.	* “Has she had a sore throat?” (clinical assessment) * “I’m here to look at her throat…possibly die of it” (direct warning) * “I ground my teeth in disgust” (shows frustration) * “It was a pleasure to attack her” (violent outburst)	The story’s central figure, embodies the conflict between duty and brutality. His initial composure erodes, revealing anger and a warped desire for control.
Mathilda	A young girl, outwardly beautiful but fiercely resistant.	* Silent defiance, scratches at the doctor, fights examination * “Stop it! Stop it! You’re killing me!” (resists violently) * Attempts to attack the doctor after the diagnosis	Represents a force of will and fear, defying the doctor’s expectations. Her silence makes her both inscrutable and a catalyst for the doctor’s internal struggle.
The Parents	Anxious and apologetic, yet ultimately passive.	* “Is this the doctor?” (timid greeting) * “We tho’t you’d better look her over” (defer to authority) * “You bad girl…” (ineffectual scolding) * “You get out…Do you want her to die of diphtheria?” (torn between protection and fear)	Highlight the power imbalance between doctor and family. Their weakness, while frustrating, contrasts the child’s unexpected strength and fuels the story’s central conflict.

Major Themes in “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

The Corrupting Influence of Power:
- The doctor initially represents a position of authority and knowledge.
- His frustration leads to a misuse of power, revealing its potential to transform even a healer into an aggressor (“It was a pleasure to attack her”).
The Struggle Between Reason and Emotion:
- The doctor attempts a rational, clinical approach but succumbs to primal rage.
- This is illustrated by his internal conflict and the shift in his language, from professional to overtly violent.
Limits of Parental Authority:
- The parents desire to protect Mathilda but lack the power to control her or the situation.
- Their pleas are ineffective, highlighting their helplessness against both the disease and the doctor’s actions (“You bad girl…”).
Ethical Dilemmas in Medicine:
- The doctor grapples with the line between necessary medical intervention and brutal force.
- The story questions whether the ends (a correct diagnosis) justify the violent means.
The Nature of Defiance and Resistance:
- Mathilda, though small, displays fierce resistance to authority and the threat of pain.
- Her fight symbolizes the struggle of an individual against a system, even if ultimately unsuccessful.
Hidden Dangers:
- Diphtheria lurks beneath the surface, as does the potential for violence in the doctor.
- This theme suggests the existence of unseen threats and complexities beneath seemingly ordinary situations.

Writing Style in “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Direct & Sparse: Williams favors short, unadorned sentences and simple vocabulary. This creates an immediacy and matter-of-fact tone.
- “They were new patients to me…”
- “Come on, Mathilda, open your mouth…”
Emphasis on Dialogue: Much of the story consists of dialogue between the doctor, the child, and the parents. This allows for the power dynamics and emotional tension to surface organically.
- The parents’ repeated pleas: “Look how kind he is to you.”
- Mathilda’s cries of resistance: “Stop it! Stop it! You’re killing me!”
Imagery: Williams uses vivid sensory details selectively, often focusing on physicality and struggle.
- “… her hands clawed instinctively for my eyes …”
- “… her tongue was cut and she was screaming in wild hysterical shrieks.”
First Person Narration: The story is told from the doctor’s perspective, allowing us to see his internal conflict and the progression of his anger. This perspective also raises questions about his reliability.

Lack of Sentimentality: Williams avoids overly emotional language or explicit moralizing. The story’s impact comes from the stark presentation of the events and the doctor’s own troubled reflections.

Literary Theories and Interpretation of “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Literary Theory	Key Concepts	Application to “The Use of Force”
Psychoanalytic Criticism	* Examines unconscious desires, motivations, and repressed conflicts. * Explores how characters’ actions relate to Freudian concepts like the id, ego, and superego.	* Analyze the doctor’s escalating rage as a manifestation of repressed impulses or unresolved psychological conflicts. * Explore the child’s defiance as a form of resistance to patriarchal authority figures.
Feminist Criticism	* Analyzes how gender roles and power dynamics are constructed and portrayed. * Questions traditional representations of women and challenges patriarchal assumptions.	* Examine the power imbalance between the male doctor and the young female patient. * Consider whether the story reinforces or critiques stereotypical portrayals of male authority and female vulnerability.
Marxist Criticism	* Focuses on socioeconomic class, power struggles, and the exploitation of the powerless. * Exposes how social and economic forces shape the actions of characters.	* Interpret the doctor-patient relationship as reflective of broader class dynamics. Could the parents’ deference be linked to their socioeconomic status? * Explore the story as a commentary on the potential for abuse of power within social hierarchies.
Reader-Response Criticism	* Emphasizes the reader’s role in creating meaning from the text. * Recognizes that interpretations can vary based on the reader’s experiences and perspectives.	* Highlights potential ambiguity in the story – how might different readers sympathize with the doctor, the child, or the parents? * Consider how the doctor’s internal conflict might create a divided response in readers.
New Historicism	* Examines literature in its historical context, recognizing that both the work and its interpretations are shaped by the time period. * Questions how historical events or social conditions might influence the story.	* Investigate how medical practices and societal views on childhood in the early 20th century color the doctor’s actions and the family’s reactions. * Consider whether the diphtheria epidemic adds a sense of urgency and desperation to the story.

Questions and Thesis Statements about “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Research Question	Thesis Statement
To what extent is the doctor a reliable narrator, and how does his perspective shape the reader’s understanding of the events?	The doctor’s first-person narration in “The Use of Force” reveals a gradual descent into rage and brutality, calling into question his reliability and highlighting the potential for subjective bias in storytelling.
How does the portrayal of the parents in “The Use of Force” contribute to the story’s exploration of power dynamics and responsibility?	The parents’ weakness and passivity in “The Use of Force” underscore the power imbalance within the doctor-patient dynamic and raise questions about parental responsibility and the limits of protectiveness in the face of medical authority.
In what ways does William Carlos Williams use vivid imagery and sensory details to create a sense of tension and immediacy in “The Use of Force”?	Williams’s use of stark imagery and sensory details in “The Use of Force” intensifies the depiction of the physical struggle, contributing to the story’s visceral impact and mirroring the heightened emotional state of both the doctor and the child.
How does the doctor’s internal conflict reflect broader ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of force in medicine?	The doctor’s struggle in “The Use of Force” highlights the tension between the necessity of medical intervention and the potential for violence, raising complex ethical questions about the limits of medical power and the use of force in the name of healing.
Does the story ultimately condemn the doctor’s actions, or does it leave room for a more ambiguous interpretation of his motivations and the complexities of the situation?	“The Use of Force” presents a morally complex scenario, where the doctor’s violent actions create a sense of unease yet the context of a potentially fatal illness complicates a purely condemnatory reading.

Short Question-Answer “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams

Q1: What triggers the doctor’s shift from professional detachment to violent frustration?

A1: The doctor’s initial attempts at reasoned communication and gentle examination are met with fierce resistance from Mathilda. This defiance, combined with the parents’ ineffectual pleas and the looming threat of diphtheria, gradually erodes his composure. His frustration morphs into a warped desire to dominate the situation, leading to his brutal use of force.

Q2: Why does the child resist the examination so vehemently?

A2: The story doesn’t provide a definitive answer, leaving Mathilda’s motivations somewhat ambiguous. It’s possible she’s terrified of pain, instinctively resists any form of control, or is deliberately concealing her sore throat for reasons unknown. This ambiguity adds to the tension, making her an unpredictable and compelling force within the story.

Q3: How does Williams’ use of imagery contribute to the story’s impact?

A3: Williams uses vivid, often disturbing, imagery to emphasize the physical struggle and emotional intensity. Details like Mathilda’s “catlike” attack, the splintering tongue depressor, and her blood-filled screams create a visceral, unsettling experience for the reader. This mirrors the doctor’s own disturbed state of mind.

Q4: What is the significance of the parents’ passivity?

A4: The parents’ helplessness underscores the power imbalance between themselves and the doctor, upon whom they depend for their child’s well-being. Their ineffectual pleas highlight their lack of control and the limits of their ability to protect Mathilda. This forces them into complicity with the doctor, furthering the story’s ethical complexity.

Q5: Does the story offer a clear moral judgment?

A5: “The Use of Force” offers no easy answers. While the doctor’s actions are disturbing, the context of a potential diphtheria diagnosis adds a layer of urgency. The story forces the reader to grapple with the complexities of the situation, questioning the boundary between necessary medical intervention and unacceptable violence.

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
				1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30	31