Category: Theory Article Summaries

Introduction: “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff

“Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff first appeared in SubStance (Vol. 36, No. 2, Issue 113: The Future of Anarchism, 2007), published by the University of Wisconsin Press. This seminal work explores the intersections between classical anarchist thought and poststructuralist philosophy, particularly critiquing Todd May’s concept of “post-anarchism.” Antliff delves into the historical and philosophical roots of anarchism, revisiting key figures like Emma Goldman, Peter Kropotkin, and Michael Bakunin to challenge the poststructuralist framing of classical anarchism as naive or overly humanist. Instead, he argues that classical anarchism’s understanding of power as a socially embedded and generative force is both sophisticated and actionable. The essay underscores the importance of integrating anarchist principles with critiques of domination, offering a compelling counter-narrative to the claims of poststructuralist theorists like May. Antliff’s analysis enriches literary theory by bridging political philosophy and anarchist praxis, advocating for a nuanced reevaluation of power dynamics in both historical and contemporary contexts. This work remains vital for scholars exploring the evolution of anarchism and its implications for socio-political critique.

Summary of “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff

1. Poststructuralist Anarchism and Its Critique of Oppression
   Allan Antliff explores Todd May’s foundational work on poststructuralist anarchism, which critiques oppression as a dispersed social phenomenon rather than a centralized structure. May contrasts anarchism’s nuanced understanding of domination with Marxism, arguing that Marxism’s reliance on hierarchical power limits its potential for addressing societal inequalities (Antliff, 2007, p. 49).
2. Limitations of Classical Anarchism According to Poststructuralism
   May contends that classical anarchism, rooted in a “humanist” conception of inherent goodness, lacks a constructive theory of power. He suggests poststructuralist anarchism transcends this limitation by recognizing power as both productive and tactical (p. 62).
3. Revisiting Classical Anarchism’s Conception of Power
   Antliff refutes May’s claims, demonstrating that classical anarchists like Emma Goldman, Peter Kropotkin, and Michael Bakunin viewed power as generative and integrated into social and moral liberation. Kropotkin, for instance, argued for a morality based on the unceasing critique of social norms, framing power as essential to achieving individual and collective liberation (p. 113).
4. Anarchism’s Situated Politics and Social Critique
   Goldman emphasized anarchism’s focus on dismantling oppressive structures, including religion, capitalism, and government, to create a society based on voluntary cooperation and individual differentiation (p. 62). This political framework rejects static moral absolutes and encourages the proliferation of diverse social identities and values.
5. The Creative and Destructive Dynamics of Power
   Bakunin famously described power as inherently creative and destructive, a duality vital for individual freedom and collective equality. He argued that liberty thrives in mutual recognition and the socialization of property, contrasting sharply with the hierarchical models of Marxism (p. 267).
6. Poststructuralist Oversight of Anarchist Theoretical Depth
   Antliff criticizes poststructuralist anarchists like Saul Newman for misrepresenting classical anarchism as disconnected from societal power dynamics. He attributes this oversight to a genealogy of thought influenced by structuralism and Marxism, which underestimated the anarchist critique of hierarchical power (p. 120).
7. Historical Evidence of Anarchism’s Practical Application
   Antliff highlights the Moscow Federation of Anarchist Groups during the Russian Revolution as an example of anarchism in practice. Guided by Stirner’s egoist philosophy, the Federation implemented horizontal power structures and voluntary associations, countering the centralized authority of the Communist regime (p. 179).
8. Stirner’s Egoism and Its Revolutionary Implications
   Max Stirner’s concept of egoism, emphasizing individual self-determination and rejection of abstract principles, deeply influenced anarchist thought. Stirner’s critique of state authority and hierarchical morality informed the Federation’s insurgent practices and its commitment to perpetual resistance (p. 453).
9. Anarchism’s Alternative Theorization of Power and Freedom
   Antliff concludes that classical anarchism offers a robust framework for understanding power as socially situated and intrinsically linked to liberation. Unlike poststructuralist critiques, anarchist theory integrates materialist, individualist, and social dimensions of freedom, providing a historical basis for its claims (p. 490).

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff

Theoretical Term/Concept	Definition/Explanation	Source/Reference in Text
Poststructuralist Anarchism	A theoretical approach combining anarchist political philosophy with poststructuralist critiques of power and domination.	Explored in Todd May’s work and critiqued by Antliff (Antliff, 2007, pp. 49-62).
Power as Generative	The idea that power is not solely oppressive but can be a source of creativity, self-expression, and social liberation.	Emphasized by classical anarchists like Kropotkin and Bakunin (Antliff, 2007, pp. 113, 267).
Critique of Representation	The rejection of hierarchical and representational forms of politics that distance leaders from the people they represent.	Central to classical anarchism’s anti-authoritarian ethos (Antliff, 2007, p. 50).
Humanism in Classical Anarchism	A contested concept; May criticizes classical anarchism as reliant on the notion of inherent human goodness.	Critiqued by May; refuted through Goldman’s and Kropotkin’s situated politics (Antliff, 2007, pp. 62, 113).
Egoism	Stirner’s philosophy advocating individual self-determination and rejection of external authorities and absolute truths.	Detailed in Stirner’s The Ego and Its Own and its influence on the Moscow Federation (Antliff, 2007, p. 453).
Morality as Social Construct	The view that moral norms are not absolute but arise from social and historical contexts, subject to continual critique.	Kropotkin’s and Stirner’s anarchist morality theories (Antliff, 2007, pp. 113, 108).
Insurrection vs. Revolution	Stirner’s distinction: revolutions change who holds power, while insurrections reject domination altogether.	Discussed in Stirner’s critique of hierarchical power (Antliff, 2007, p. 453).
Horizontal Power Structures	Organizational models that distribute power equally among participants rather than centralizing it.	Practiced by the Moscow Federation during the Russian Revolution (Antliff, 2007, p. 179).
Anarchist Subjectivity	The anarchist idea of individuality as a process of self-liberation intertwined with collective freedom.	Explored in Bakunin’s and Goldman’s works (Antliff, 2007, pp. 267, 62).
Poststructuralist Critique of Humanism	The rejection of the Enlightenment subject as autonomous and self-contained, influential in poststructuralism.	Rooted in the structuralist critique and adopted by figures like Saul Newman (Antliff, 2007, p. 120).

Contribution of “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff to Literary Theory/Theories

Examples of Critiques Through “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff

Literary Work	Critique Through Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism	Key References from Antliff
George Orwell’s 1984	– Analyze the hierarchical and oppressive power structures in the Party as examples of representational politics that anarchism seeks to dismantle. – Explore Winston’s resistance as an insurrectional act rejecting centralized power.	Critique of representational politics (Antliff, 2007, p. 50). Insurrection vs. revolution (p. 453).
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World	– Critique the morality of the World State as a constructed system of domination, echoing Kropotkin’s emphasis on challenging societal norms. – Examine the characters’ struggles for individuality within a collectivist, oppressive system.	Morality as a social construct (Antliff, 2007, p. 113). Generative power of individuality (p. 108).
Toni Morrison’s Beloved	– Explore Sethe’s reclaiming of her narrative as an act of anarchist self-determination, challenging societal oppressions like racism and slavery. – Examine the fragmented storytelling as reflective of horizontal power structures.	Decentralized structures and horizontal power (Antliff, 2007, p. 179). Generative force of power (p. 113).
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein	– Critique Victor’s attempt to impose absolute knowledge and control over life as a violation of Stirner’s rejection of abstract truths. – Analyze the creature’s struggle for self-identity and liberation as anarchist resistance.	Stirner’s egoism and critique of absolute truths (Antliff, 2007, pp. 453, 490). Individual liberation (p. 62).

Criticism Against “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff

Representative Quotations from “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Anarchism interrogated relations of domination with the goal of destroying all representational forms of power.” (p. 50)	This emphasizes anarchism’s opposition to hierarchical and representational politics, a concept central to its critique of systems of power.
“The anarchist project, he argued, is based on a fallacious ‘humanist’ notion that ‘the human essence is a good essence, which relations of power suppress and deny.'” (p. 62)	This critiques classical anarchism’s perceived reliance on a humanist framework, suggesting a theoretical limitation that poststructuralist anarchism seeks to overcome.
“Goldman critiques religion for oppressing us psychologically, capitalist economics for endangering our corporal well-being, and government for shutting down our freedoms.” (p. 62)	This encapsulates anarchism’s multifaceted critique of domination, offering a foundation for understanding liberation across psychological, physical, and social dimensions.
“Kropotkin’s subject, who exercises power by shaping her own values to accord with a ‘superabundance’ of life, is antithetical to May’s claim regarding ‘classic’ anarchism.” (p. 108)	This disputes the portrayal of classical anarchism as lacking a nuanced conception of power, highlighting Kropotkin’s generative view of individual agency.
“The destructive urge is also a creative urge.” (p. 267)	Bakunin’s famous declaration underlines anarchism’s paradoxical approach to power, where dismantling oppressive systems is inherently tied to creating new, freer social orders.
“Morality entailed the unceasing interrogation of existing social norms, in recognition that morals are social constructs, and there are no absolutes guiding ethical behavior.” (p. 113)	This reflects the anarchist rejection of absolute truths, aligning with poststructuralist critiques of fixed morality in favor of fluid, contextual ethics.
“The insurgent strives to be constitutionless.” (p. 453)	Stirner’s notion of insurrection challenges traditional revolutionary goals, promoting perpetual resistance and individual sovereignty over abstract systems of power.
“The poststructuralist anarchist would shed the husk of humanism, the better to exercise power ‘tactically’ within an ethical practice guided by Habermas’s universalist theory of communicative action.” (p. 146)	This outlines poststructuralist anarchism’s evolution, focusing on tactical engagement with power and ethical dialogue rather than overarching ideological frameworks.
“Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, and socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality.” (p. 269)	Bakunin’s synthesis of freedom and socialism critiques both unbridled individualism and state-centric socialism, providing a balanced framework for anarchist theory.
“If labor becomes free, the state is lost.” (p. 152)	Stirner’s argument links liberation of labor to the dissolution of the state, connecting anarchist critiques of capitalism with anti-statist principles.

Suggested Readings: “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism” by Allan Antliff

1. Antliff, Allan. “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism.” SubStance, vol. 36, no. 2, 2007, pp. 56–66. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25195125. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.
2. WILLIAMS, LEONARD. “Hakim Bey and Ontological Anarchism.” Journal for the Study of Radicalism, vol. 4, no. 2, 2010, pp. 109–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41887660. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.
3. Feiten, Elmo. “Would the Real Max Stirner Please Stand Up?” Blasting the Canon, edited by Ruth Kinna and Süreyyya Evren, Punctum Books, 2013, pp. 117–37. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2354036.9. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.
4. David Struthers. “‘The Boss Has No Color Line’: Race, Solidarity, and a Culture of Affinity in Los Angeles and the Borderlands, 1907–1915.” Journal for the Study of Radicalism, vol. 7, no. 2, 2013, pp. 61–92. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.14321/jstudradi.7.2.0061. Accessed 24 Dec. 2024.

Introduction: “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss

“Poststructuralism and the ‘Paraliterary'” by Rosalind Krauss first appeared in the journal October (Vol. 13, Summer 1980, pp. 36-40) and was published by The MIT Press. In this seminal piece, Krauss engages with the profound influence of poststructuralist theory on literature, focusing particularly on the works of Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes. She introduces the concept of the “paraliterary,” a space where the traditional boundaries between literature and criticism dissolve, giving rise to hybrid forms that defy conventional literary norms. Krauss critiques the broader literary establishment’s resistance to this shift, emphasizing the subversion of unified narratives and authorship in favor of fragmented, multi-voiced expressions. This article is significant for its incisive analysis of how poststructuralist thought destabilizes entrenched literary practices and offers a new lens for interpreting texts. By highlighting the interplay of cultural codes and the “already-written,” Krauss not only sheds light on the evolution of critical theory but also its enduring relevance in understanding postmodern literature.

Summary of “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss

---

---

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss

Term/Concept	Explanation	Reference in Text
Paraliterary	A hybrid form of writing that dissolves the boundaries between literature and criticism, incorporating multiple voices.	Krauss (1980), p. 36.
Stereographic Space	The interplay of cultural codes and clichés within a text, creating layers of meaning without a single denotational origin.	Barthes’s concept as explained by Krauss, p. 39.
Denotation and Connotation	The reversal of the traditional hierarchy where denotation is seen as foundational, with Barthes arguing connotation generates denotation.	Krauss (1980), p. 39.
Fragmentation	The breakdown of unified narratives, emphasizing multiplicity and diversity of voices within the text.	Krauss (1980), p. 38.
De-Origination	The process by which texts reject a singular origin or authorial intent, instead embracing intertextuality and cultural codes.	Krauss (1980), p. 39.
Pastiche	Realism as a reproduction of existing representations rather than an authentic depiction of reality.	Barthes’s critique of realism, p. 39.
Technocratization	The institutionalization of advanced critical theories within academic settings, seen as a barrier to wider cultural impact.	Critique of Dickstein’s views on poststructuralism, p. 37.
Multiplicity of Meanings	The rejection of extracting singular meanings, emphasizing the coexistence of diverse interpretations within a text.	Barthes’s approach in S/Z, p. 39.
Cultural Codes	Pre-existing stereotypes, clichés, and conventions within a culture that inform the construction and reading of texts.	Barthes’s analysis in S/Z, as discussed by Krauss, p. 39.
Critical Text as Literature	The redefinition of literary criticism as a creative act, merging it with literary writing.	Barthes’s works like The Pleasure of the Text, p. 38.

Contribution of “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss to Literary Theory/Theories

---

Examples of Critiques Through “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss

Literary Work	Critique Using Poststructuralism and the Paraliterary	Key Concepts from Krauss
Sarrasine by Honoré de Balzac	Barthes critiques the notion of denotation as primary, arguing that the “already-written” cultural codes (e.g., stereotypes about beauty and gender) shape meaning.	Stereographic space; Denotation as the last connotation (Krauss, 1980, p. 39).
The Pleasure of the Text by Roland Barthes	Barthes’s work blurs the line between criticism and literature, creating a hybrid form where the text itself becomes an act of writing about writing.	Paraliterary as a genre; Fragmentation and multi-voiced narratives (p. 38).
Restitutions by Jacques Derrida	Derrida uses a fragmented narrative style, including interruptions by a “woman’s voice,” to theatricalize critical discourse, critiquing linear philosophical exposition.	Multi-voiced narrative; Theatricalization of critical writing (p. 37).
Modern Realist Novels (General)	Barthes critiques realism for being “pastiche,” arguing that it replicates representations rather than reality itself, challenging its claim to authenticity.	Pastiche; Rejection of realism as mimetic art (p. 39).

Criticism Against “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss

---

Representative Quotations from “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The paraliterary space is the space of debate, quotation, partisanship, betrayal, reconciliation; but it is not the space of unity, coherence, or resolution that we think of as constituting the work of literature.” (p. 38)	Krauss defines the “paraliterary” as a fragmented and dynamic domain, contrasting it with traditional literature’s emphasis on coherence and resolution. This challenges the foundational assumptions of literary unity, emphasizing multiplicity and discontinuity in poststructuralist texts.
“Denotation is no more than the last of the connotations (the one which seems both to establish and to close the reading).” (p. 39)	This quotation encapsulates Barthes’s reversal of traditional semiotics, arguing that what is perceived as denotation (literal meaning) is constructed by layers of cultural connotations. This undermines the hierarchy that positions denotation as primary and connotation as secondary in literary interpretation.
“To depict is to unroll the carpet of the codes, to refer not from a language to a referent, but from one code to another.” (p. 39)	Barthes critiques realism by describing it as a process of referencing pre-existing codes rather than reality itself. This challenges the idea of literature as mimetic and aligns with poststructuralist views that texts are intertextual, constructed from cultural systems rather than individual representation.
“Writing sets up the pretense that denotation is the first meaning, but for Barthes, denotation is the last block to be put in place.” (p. 39)	This reinforces the constructed nature of meaning in texts, where what seems foundational (denotation) is actually an effect of prior cultural coding. This challenges readers to interrogate the assumptions behind what appears to be “natural” or “obvious” in literary works.
“Criticism without the Argument… voices without the Author.” (p. 38)	Krauss highlights the paraliterary’s rejection of traditional criticism and authorship. By embracing multiplicity and decentering the author, poststructuralist texts create new forms of engagement that defy conventional expectations of structured argument and singular voice.
“Realism consists not in copying the real but in copying a (depicted) copy of the real.” (p. 39)	This statement critiques realism as derivative and self-referential rather than an authentic representation of reality. Barthes’s notion of “pastiche” disrupts the traditional view of realism, emphasizing its reliance on prior cultural representations rather than objective truth.
“Nothing is buried that must be ‘extracted’; it is all part of the surface of the text.” (p. 39)	Krauss reflects Barthes’s argument that meaning is not hidden beneath the text but is evident on its surface, constructed by cultural codes. This opposes the formalist approach of uncovering hidden meanings and redefines the act of reading as engaging with surface interrelations rather than depth analysis.
“What is created, as in the case of much of Derrida, is a kind of paraliterature.” (p. 38)	This emphasizes the innovative form of Derrida’s and Barthes’s writings, which blur the boundaries between criticism and literature. The “paraliterary” genre disrupts expectations, turning theoretical critique into an act of creative production, merging the two realms.
“The painstaking, almost hallucinatory slowness with which Barthes proceeds through the text of Sarrasine provides an extraordinary demonstration of this chattering of voices which is that of the codes at work.” (p. 39)	Krauss praises Barthes’s meticulous analysis of Sarrasine, illustrating how texts are constructed through a multiplicity of intersecting codes. This showcases poststructuralist methods in action, focusing on textual interrelations rather than singular meanings.
“To take the demonstration of the de-originated utterance seriously would obviously put a large segment of the critical establishment out of business.” (p. 40)	Krauss critiques traditional criticism for its resistance to poststructuralist theories that challenge the foundational concepts of authorship and originality. She argues that these innovations threaten the viability of conventional critical approaches, highlighting the institutional inertia against adopting poststructuralist ideas.

Suggested Readings: “Poststructuralism and the “Paraliterary” by Rosalind Krauss

1. Krauss, Rosalind. “Poststructuralism and the ‘Paraliterary.’” October, vol. 13, 1980, pp. 36–40. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3397700. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
2. Siedell, Daniel A. “Rosalind Krauss, David Carrier, and Philosophical Art Criticism.” Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 38, no. 2, 2004, pp. 95–105. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3527320. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
3. LOVATT, ANNA. “Rosalind Krauss’s ‘The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths’, 1985.” The Burlington Magazine, vol. 153, no. 1302, 2011, pp. 601–04. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23055426. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.

Introduction: “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough

“Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough first appeared in Theory and Society in August 1992, published by Springer. Clough explores the intersections and tensions between poststructuralist theory, deconstruction, and postmodern ethnography, particularly critiquing the ways in which these paradigms challenge empirical social science and realism. She delves into how poststructuralism disrupts traditional Marxist frameworks by emphasizing psychoanalysis and the processes of unconscious desire, offering a critique of the totalizing tendencies within realist narrativity. Importantly, Clough highlights the ambivalence within postmodern ethnography, which, while aiming to transcend traditional scientific paradigms, risks reifying empirical positivities through its focus on subjectivity and multicultural identities. This paper is pivotal in literary and sociological theory as it reinforces the need for a critical re-reading of cultural narratives, urging scholars to scrutinize the power dynamics embedded in knowledge production and representation. Through this lens, Clough not only critiques realism but also offers a framework for understanding the discursive construction of authority in social sciences and cultural criticism.

Summary of “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough

Theoretical Term/Concept	Explanation	Relevance in Clough’s Argument
Poststructuralism	A theoretical approach emphasizing the instability of meaning, the role of language in shaping reality, and the critique of totalizing narratives.	Used to critique Marxism, realism, and essentialist interpretations, while advocating for an understanding of identity and authority as constructed through unconscious processes (Clough, 1992, p. 545).
Deconstruction	A critical methodology, developed by Jacques Derrida, that interrogates binary oppositions, defers meaning, and exposes the contradictions within texts.	Applied to critique the realist narratives in ethnography and cultural criticism, revealing their reliance on invisible mechanisms of desire and authority (p. 548).
Psychoanalysis	A theoretical framework, particularly Lacanian psychoanalysis, that explores unconscious processes, desire, and subjectivity in language and identity.	Central to poststructuralism’s critique of realism and Marxism; used to analyze how unconscious desire shapes discursive constructions of identity and authority (p. 545).
Realist Narrativity	The narrative structure that claims empirical objectivity while masking its own constructed nature.	Critiqued for its “double inscription,” where it presents itself as both fact and discursive construction, concealing the role of desire in constructing authority (p. 548).
Multicultural Subjectivity	The representation of subjectivity as shaped by intersections of race, ethnicity, class, gender, and sexuality in a multicultural framework.	Clough critiques postmodern ethnography for oversimplifying subjectivity, failing to address unconscious dynamics, and relying on realist methodologies (p. 549).
Difference vs. Duality	The poststructural critique of binary oppositions (duality) in favor of understanding multiplicities and deferrals of meaning (difference).	Clough emphasizes the importance of deconstructing oppositions, arguing that difference cannot simply replace duality without addressing unconscious processes like “othering” (p. 546).
Authorial Desire	The projection of unconscious desires onto the “author” or subject within discourses of knowledge and authority.	Used to critique the authority embedded in realist narratives and scientific knowledge, revealing how these are shaped by projections and displacements of desire (p. 547).
Ethnography	A research methodology traditionally associated with anthropology, focused on studying cultures and identities through observation and narrative.	Postmodern ethnography is critiqued for its reliance on realist narrativity and its ambivalence toward poststructural deconstruction, as it often fails to address unconscious processes (p. 547).
Knowledge/Power	A concept from Foucault emphasizing how knowledge systems are inherently tied to structures of power.	Clough applies this to critique how scientific and cultural narratives construct authority and truth through relations of power and unconscious desire (p. 546).
Differance	Derrida’s concept describing the simultaneous deferral and differentiation of meaning within language and identity.	Highlighted as a critical process for understanding the persistence of “othering” and unconscious dynamics in identity construction, which are often ignored in postmodern ethnography (p. 546).
Scientificity	The perceived objectivity and authority of science, often critiqued in poststructuralism for its reliance on constructed discourses.	Clough critiques the “will to scientificity” in both social sciences and realist narratives, arguing for a critical engagement with science as a constructed form of knowledge (p. 550).
Global and Local	The interplay between global systems of power and local cultural identities, often explored in postmodern ethnography.	Postmodern ethnography’s focus on the “local” is critiqued for neglecting the broader psychoanalytic and deconstructive implications of identity formation (p. 544).

Contribution of “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough to Literary Theory/Theories

Examples of Critiques Through “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough

Literary Work	Aspect Critiqued	Application of Clough’s Framework	Relevant Concept
Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness	The construction of colonial authority and identity.	The narrative’s realist form masks its constructed nature, presenting imperialism as a natural order. Clough’s critique would expose the unconscious projection of European authorial desire onto the colonized “other,” revealing how the narrative consolidates authority through mechanisms of “othering” (p. 547).	Realist Narrativity, Othering, Authorial Desire
Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse	The fragmented subjectivity of characters and resistance to traditional realist structure.	Woolf’s deconstruction of linear narratives aligns with Clough’s emphasis on psychoanalytic deferral and displacement. Clough’s framework highlights how Woolf critiques the unified subject and instead explores unconscious dynamics of identity and familial desire (p. 545-546).	Psychoanalysis, Differance, Deconstruction
Toni Morrison’s Beloved	The representation of identity and trauma in the context of slavery.	Morrison’s narrative foregrounds multicultural subjectivity and the persistence of trauma as an unconscious force shaping identity. Clough’s critique would focus on how Morrison’s use of fragmented timelines and haunting narratives challenges realism and exposes the interplay of power, memory, and unconscious desire (p. 549).	Multicultural Subjectivity, Unconscious Desire, Power/Knowledge
Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale	The critique of totalitarianism and gendered oppression.	Atwood’s dystopian narrative critiques the power structures of realism in its portrayal of a patriarchal society. Clough’s framework would analyze the text’s depiction of authority and resistance as constructed through unconscious desires and psychoanalytic projections of control and identity (p. 546-547).	Authority and Desire, Feminist Psychoanalysis, Realist Critique

Key Insights from the Table

1. Realist Narrativity: Works like Heart of Darkness are critiqued for using realist structures to mask colonial power dynamics and project authorial desires.
2. Psychoanalytic Processes: To the Lighthouse demonstrates Clough’s emphasis on deferral and unconscious processes in literary narratives.
3. Multicultural Subjectivity and Power: Beloved exemplifies Clough’s critique of identity construction in the intersections of trauma and power.
4. Authority and Desire: The Handmaid’s Tale aligns with Clough’s focus on the construction of authority and gendered oppression through narrative.

Criticism Against “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough

Representative Quotations from “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Poststructuralism breaks up the relationship of Marxism and psychoanalysis, breaking with Marxism by pitting psychoanalysis against the totalization and teleology of a Marxism analysis.” (p. 545)	Highlights poststructuralism’s rejection of grand narratives like Marxism by emphasizing the fragmented and unconscious processes central to psychoanalysis.
“The poststructural rereading of these texts restores to psychoanalysis its capacity to be a profound criticism of totalistic, biologistic, or essentialist interpretations.” (p. 545)	Shows how poststructuralism reclaims psychoanalysis as a tool for critiquing reductive or deterministic frameworks, such as those seen in traditional Marxism or realism.
“Realist narrativity produces the real in invisible relays between what nevertheless remains apparently opposed, such as fact and fiction, content and form.” (p. 548)	Critiques realism for its “double inscription,” where it conceals the constructed nature of reality by presenting oppositions as natural.
“Deconstructive criticism, like psychoanalysis, refers representation to ‘a knot’ of words, things, and desire that can neither be definitively combined nor indefinitely separated.” (p. 548)	Explains how deconstruction reveals the interconnectedness and instability of language, desire, and representation, mirroring psychoanalytic processes.
“Postmodern ethnography, as Smith describes it, is something more like a politicized or, better, oppositional ethnomethodology or phenomenology.” (p. 547)	Critiques postmodern ethnography for lacking the critical depth of deconstruction, reducing its methodology to a form of phenomenological opposition.
“Multicultural subjectivity cannot refer only to the crossing of social, political, cultural, and economic borders. They must also be referred to itineraries of unconscious (authorial) desire.” (p. 549)	Argues that identity in multicultural contexts must account for unconscious dynamics, not just external social or cultural factors.
“Realism constitutes a certain form of reading and writing in which a ‘split-perception’ is required between actual experience-out-there and the narrative or discursive construction of it as such.” (p. 547)	Critiques realism for its reliance on the illusion of transparency, which disguises the constructed nature of its narratives.
“Oppositions or dualisms can only be temporarily deconstructed by means of critical interpretation that wedges itself between, deferring the act of opposing.” (p. 546)	Emphasizes that deconstruction does not destroy oppositions but reveals their instability, encouraging critical interpretation to explore their dynamics.
“Cultural criticism must go beyond reducing border transgressions in and of identity to cultural logics or structural imperatives.” (p. 550)	Suggests that cultural criticism needs to address unconscious processes and the symbolic dynamics of identity, rather than just focusing on sociopolitical structures.
“The authority of realism is constituted through fantasmatic substitutions, projections, displacements, etc., which nonetheless appear as empirical positivities, as the facticity of actual experience.” (p. 547)	Analyzes how realism creates an illusion of factuality by concealing the subjective and unconscious processes behind its narratives.

Suggested Readings: “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism” by Patricia T. Clough

1. Clough, Patricia T. “Poststructuralism and Postmodernism: The Desire for Criticism.” Theory and Society, vol. 21, no. 4, 1992, pp. 543–52. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/657709. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
2. Agger, Ben. “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance.” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 17, 1991, pp. 105–31. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083337. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
3. FAWCETT, BARBARA. “Disability and Social Work: Applications from Poststructuralism, Postmodernism and Feminism.” The British Journal of Social Work, vol. 28, no. 2, 1998, pp. 263–77. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23714814. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
4. Caplan, Jane. “Postmodernism, Poststructuralism, and Deconstruction: Notes for Historians.” Central European History, vol. 22, no. 3/4, 1989, pp. 260–78. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4546152. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.

Introduction: “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan

“In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan first appeared in TDR (1988-) in Vol. 33, No. 3 (Autumn, 1989), spanning pages 58-71, and was published by The MIT Press. This seminal work critically examines the evolving methodologies of feminist theatre and performance criticism through the lenses of materialist feminism, postmodernism, and poststructuralism. Dolan navigates the ideological conflicts between traditional liberal feminism, radical feminism, and the materialist critique, highlighting how poststructuralist perspectives challenge fixed notions of identity and representation. By dissecting the intersections of theory and practice, she advocates for a politically charged critique of representation as a producer of meaning rather than a mere mirror of societal norms. Her argument reshapes the discourse, offering tools to dismantle patriarchal structures within theatre and promoting innovative feminist strategies in performance. This article holds lasting importance in literary and performance theory by forging a bridge between feminist praxis and the broader theoretical critiques of culture and representation.

Summary of “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan

• Historical Context and Challenges in Feminist Criticism:
  • In the late 1970s and early 1980s, feminist theatre criticism was torn between aesthetics and political ideology. Critics sought to support women’s artistic production while grappling with gender representation and comparison to undefined aesthetic standards (Dolan, 1989, p. 58).
  • Early feminist criticism aimed to address women’s historical invisibility in theatre, often relying on sociological analysis (p. 58).
• Impact of French Theory:
  • The introduction of French feminist theory, through figures like Hélène Cixous and Julia Kristeva, reshaped feminist criticism by emphasizing female textuality and challenging patriarchal structures (p. 59).
  • This shift introduced a new vocabulary to American feminist criticism, aligning it with poststructuralist tools like deconstruction (p. 59).
• Materialist Feminism and Representation:
  • British materialism further influenced feminist criticism by analyzing representation as a producer of meaning, moving away from the mimetic view of theatre (p. 59).
  • Materialist feminists argued that representation perpetuates ideological systems, emphasizing spectator interpretation based on gender, race, class, and sexuality (p. 60).
• Theoretical Divides in Feminism:
  • Dolan identifies three main approaches in feminist theatre criticism:
    1. Liberal feminism emphasizing traditional play criticism.
    2. Radical feminism using mimesis to validate women’s identities.
    3. Materialist feminism employing poststructuralist and Marxist critiques to analyze ideological representations (p. 60).
  • Conflicts arose, particularly at forums like the Women and Theatre Program (WTP), between these ideological camps, highlighting tensions in feminist methodologies (p. 61).
• Poststructuralism and Identity Politics:
  • Poststructuralism challenges fixed notions of identity, proposing that subjectivity is fluid and shaped by competing discourses (p. 60).
  • Radical feminists often resisted this, defending the idea of a coherent female identity (p. 61).
  • Materialist feminism, however, positions identity as a site of struggle and transformation, rejecting essentialist views (p. 61).
• Feminist Postmodern Performance:
  • Postmodern performance styles, characterized by narrative disruption and fragmented identities, align with materialist feminist analysis (p. 62).
  • These approaches aim to critique traditional realism and generate new representations that interrogate cultural norms (p. 62).
• Defense of Theory:
  • Dolan defends poststructuralist feminist theory against accusations of elitism, emphasizing its ability to reveal the ideological underpinnings of representation (p. 65).
  • She acknowledges critiques from radical feminists and activists, such as Barbara Christian, who argue that theory risks silencing marginalized voices (p. 65).
• Examples of Theory in Practice:
  • Dolan highlights performances by artists like Anna Deavere Smith and Kate Bornstein to illustrate feminist postmodernism in action. These works destabilize traditional narratives and provoke spectators to question assumptions about identity and representation (pp. 66-68).
• Commitment to Political Change:
  • Feminist postmodernism remains committed to uncovering and challenging ideological constructs, fostering historical and cultural revision for social change (p. 69).
  • Dolan advocates for a continually shifting, self-reflective theoretical stance, enabling theorists to engage with multiple perspectives and contradictions (p. 70).

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan

Theoretical Term/Concept	Definition/Explanation	Context in Dolan’s Argument
Materialist Feminism	Analyzes representation as a producer of cultural meaning rather than a mirror of societal norms.	Focuses on how representations perpetuate ideological systems, challenging traditional realism and advocating for a critique of gendered, racial, and classed discourses (p. 59).
Poststructuralism	A theoretical approach that deconstructs fixed meanings, viewing identity and representation as fluid.	Questions essentialist notions of identity and emphasizes the role of discourse in shaping subjectivity. Dolan aligns this with feminist performance criticism (pp. 60-61).
Deconstruction	A method of analysis that reveals the instability of meaning within texts and representations.	Employed to critique traditional realism and “authorial intent,” suggesting that meaning is historically and culturally contingent (p. 61).
The Death of the Author	A concept by Roland Barthes positing that authorial intent is irrelevant in interpreting texts.	Challenges the primacy of the playwright and locates meaning in the reception of performance by the audience, emphasizing the spectator’s active role (p. 61).
Postmodernism	A style characterized by narrative fragmentation, decentered subjects, and a break from realist conventions.	Provides a framework for feminist performance strategies that critique conventional modes of representation and provoke new cultural understandings (p. 62).
Identity Politics	A framework that defines subjectivity through positions within race, class, gender, or sexuality.	Critiqued by poststructuralist feminists for its static view of identity, while radical feminists defend its role in validating women’s experiences (p. 61).
Representation	The process through which cultural meanings are produced and circulated.	Analyzed as an active site where ideological meanings are created, rather than as a passive reflection of reality (p. 59).
Écriture Féminine	A concept advocating for a “feminine” writing style rooted in female corporeality and experience.	Inspired by French feminists like Cixous, Dolan considers its potential application in feminist theatre and performance (p. 59).
Mimesis	The imitation or reflection of reality in art and literature.	Critiqued as a patriarchal framework that perpetuates traditional gender norms. Materialist feminists advocate for antimimetic strategies (p. 60).
Hermeneutics	The theory and methodology of interpretation, especially of texts.	Explored in the shift of responsibility for meaning-making from the author and actor to the audience, reshaping theatrical paradigms (p. 61).
Spectatorship	The role and perspective of the audience in interpreting performance.	Redefined by poststructuralist and postmodern theories as an active, participatory process in the construction of meaning (p. 61).
Intersectionality	An analytical framework considering overlapping systems of oppression, such as race, gender, and class.	Implied in Dolan’s emphasis on the differentiated reception of cultural signs by diverse audiences (p. 59).
Critique of Realism	Challenges realism’s claim to reflect universal truth and its reliance on unified characters.	Postmodern and materialist feminist analyses argue that realism enforces ideological norms and limits representation of diverse subjectivities (p. 62).
Cultural Studies	An interdisciplinary field examining cultural practices and their relationship to power structures.	Integrated into feminist performance criticism to analyze theatre as an ideological apparatus (p. 59).
Theoretical Backlash	Resistance to poststructuralist and materialist feminist critiques from radical feminists and activists.	Reflects tensions within feminism over theory’s perceived elitism and its implications for political activism (p. 65).

Contribution of “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan to Literary Theory/Theories

• Materialist Feminist Criticism:
  • Dolan redefines feminist criticism by shifting from sociological approaches that treat theatre as a mirror to analyzing representation as an ideological producer of cultural meanings (Dolan, 1989, p. 59).
  • Highlights the importance of intersectionality in interpreting representation, emphasizing the diverse perspectives of spectators based on race, class, gender, and sexuality (p. 59).
• Poststructuralist Feminism:
  • Integrates poststructuralist principles into feminist criticism, deconstructing fixed notions of identity and prioritizing the fluidity and contestation of subjectivity (p. 60).
  • Contributes to debates about the “death of the author,” arguing for the decentralization of authorial intent and a focus on audience reception in meaning-making (p. 61).
• Postmodern Performance Theory:
  • Advocates for postmodern strategies in theatre, such as fragmented narratives and decentered subjects, to challenge traditional realism and enable feminist critique (p. 62).
  • Argues that postmodernist styles create opportunities for new representations that disrupt patriarchal norms and provoke critical engagement from audiences (p. 62).
• Critique of Realism in Theatre and Literature:
  • Dolan critiques traditional realism as an ideological tool that reinforces conservative gender roles and advocates for antimimetic forms that expose and subvert these structures (p. 60).
  • Emphasizes the political potential of experimental forms in destabilizing fixed meanings and enabling feminist interventions (p. 62).
• Intersection of Cultural Studies and Feminism:
  • Integrates cultural studies into feminist performance theory, analyzing theatre as an active ideological apparatus rather than a passive cultural artifact (p. 59).
  • Encourages the application of Marxist critiques to unpack how theatre perpetuates social arrangements and hierarchies (p. 60).
• Identity Politics and Representation:
  • Contributes to debates on identity politics, critiquing essentialist views of identity while proposing identity as a fluid, contested site of struggle shaped by discursive and historical forces (p. 61).
  • Engages with the challenges of representing diverse subjectivities in feminist theatre and the tensions between radical and materialist feminist approaches (p. 61).
• Feminist Theory and Spectatorship:
  • Redefines the role of spectatorship in theatre, positioning the audience as active participants in the production of meaning (p. 61).
  • Connects this redefinition to poststructuralist critiques, challenging traditional hierarchies of playwright, director, and actor (p. 61).
• Defense of Theory in Feminism:
  • Dolan defends the use of poststructuralist theory in feminist discourse, countering critiques that it is elitist or apolitical by emphasizing its role in exposing power structures and enabling social critique (p. 65).
  • Highlights the productive tension between feminist theory and activism, advocating for a nuanced engagement with postmodern and poststructuralist critiques (p. 65).

Examples of Critiques Through “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan

Literary Work	Relevant Concept from Dolan	Application of the Concept in Critique
Sophocles’ Antigone	Critique of Realism and Mimesis	Critiques the mimetic approach of classical theatre as patriarchal, highlighting how Antigone reinforces fixed gender roles and power structures (Dolan, 1989, p. 60).
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet	Death of the Author and Representation	Challenges the dominance of Shakespeare’s intent, emphasizing audience interpretation of Ophelia’s representation as a marginalized, gendered subject (p. 61).
Caryl Churchill’s Top Girls	Postmodern Performance and Feminist Poststructuralism	Analyzes the fragmented narrative structure and decentered subjectivities in Top Girls, showing how it disrupts traditional patriarchal narratives and gendered identity (p. 62).
Marsha Norman’s ‘night, Mother	Identity Politics and Representation	Evaluates the portrayal of female subjectivity and mental health, critiquing essentialist identity politics while exploring complex intersections of gender and autonomy (p. 61).

Criticism Against “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan

• Elitism in Theoretical Language:
  • Critics argue that the use of poststructuralist and postmodern jargon makes the work inaccessible to a wider audience, particularly activists and practitioners outside academic circles (Dolan, 1989, p. 65).
• Marginalization of Radical Feminist Identity Politics:
  • Dolan’s embrace of poststructuralist critiques is seen by some as dismissive of radical feminism’s focus on coherent identity and lived experience as a foundation for feminist solidarity (p. 61).
• Detachment from Practical Theatre-Making:
  • Theoretical frameworks discussed in the work are criticized for being overly abstract, with limited practical application for theatre practitioners aiming to create politically effective works (p. 66).
• Overemphasis on Postmodernism:
  • Some critiques suggest that Dolan’s preference for postmodern performance styles, such as fragmented narratives and decentered subjects, risks alienating audiences unfamiliar with or resistant to these styles (p. 62).
• Neglect of Marginalized Voices:
  • While Dolan integrates intersectionality into her critique, some argue that her reliance on Eurocentric theories (e.g., Derrida, Lacan) overlooks the contributions of non-Western or marginalized feminist thinkers (p. 65).
• Potential Undermining of Feminist Activism:
  • By challenging essentialist notions of identity, Dolan’s alignment with poststructuralism is accused of weakening feminist activism’s historical reliance on shared experiences of oppression (p. 61).
• Focus on Theory over Sociology:
  • The work is critiqued for moving away from sociological analyses of theatre as a reflection of societal conditions, which some view as critical for feminist performance criticism (p. 59).

Representative Quotations from “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Feminist theatre and performance criticism has arrived at the end of the decade with its contours shaped roughly by three different analytical methods.”	Highlights the diversity in feminist criticism—liberal, radical, and materialist approaches—each engaging differently with ideology, identity, and representation.
“The heralded ‘death of the author’ displaces the playwright’s primacy and locates the responsibility for producing meaning in the hermeneutic sphere.”	Reflects poststructuralism’s shift from authorial intent to audience interpretation, emphasizing the participatory nature of meaning-making in performance.
“Representation is a site for the production of cultural meanings that perpetuate conservative gender roles.”	Suggests that representations in theatre are not passive reflections but active reinforcements of social and ideological norms, calling for critical deconstruction of these portrayals.
“Poststructuralism questions the liberal humanist notion that men or women are free individuals capable of mastering the universe.”	Undermines essentialist and universalist ideas of individual autonomy by exploring the roles of discourse and ideology in shaping subjectivity.
“The feminist project is unflaggingly political, as it studies not simply the superficial structure of performance, but its effect on the culture.”	Frames feminist criticism as a deeply political endeavor focused on dismantling oppressive structures in cultural and performative contexts.
“Postmodernist performance style breaks with realist narrative strategies, heralds the death of unified characters, and decenters the subject.”	Discusses how postmodern aesthetics challenge traditional narratives and characters, aligning with feminist goals of disrupting patriarchal structures in theatre.
“Materialist feminist performance criticism uses poststructuralism to deconstruct both traditional, male-identified realism and woman-identified ritual.”	Acknowledges how materialist feminism critiques not only male-dominated forms but also essentialist feminist practices, promoting fluid and intersectional representations.
“The assertion of identity is not the goal… but a point of departure for a multivalent, shifting ground of subjectivity.”	Supports a dynamic understanding of identity, rejecting fixed or totalizing notions and emphasizing the fluidity of gender, race, and class intersections.
“Feminist postmodernism does not play indulgently with meaninglessness or plurality… it is committed to sifting through the referents of material reality.”	Differentiates feminist postmodernism from apolitical postmodernism, emphasizing its commitment to creating meaning and addressing real-world issues.
“Critics writing for feminist presses usually chose to validate what they saw; those writing in academic venues generally took a sociological approach.”	Describes the tension between validating feminist artistic production and critically engaging with its ideological implications, a challenge that shaped early feminist performance criticism.

Suggested Readings: “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory” by Jill Dolan

1. Dolan, Jill. “In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory.” TDR (1988-), vol. 33, no. 3, 1989, pp. 58–71. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1145987. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
2. Giroux, Henry A. “Rethinking the Boundaries of Educational Discourse: Modernism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.” College Literature, vol. 17, no. 2/3, 1990, pp. 1–50. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25111851. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
3. Mcevoy, John G. “Modernism, Postmodernism and the Historiography of Science.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, vol. 37, no. 2, 2007, pp. 383–408. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.1525/hsps.2007.37.2.383. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
4. Jay, Gregory S. “Values and Deconstructions: Derrida, Saussure, Marx.” Cultural Critique, no. 8, 1987, pp. 153–96. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1354215. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.

Introduction: “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp

“Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp first appeared in World Literature Today, Vol. 89, No. 6, in November/December 2015, published by the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma. This piece explores the profound intersections between visual art and poetry, highlighting the centuries-old ekphrastic tradition that bridges these creative mediums. Camp, both a poet and an artist, delves into how poetry offers a unique lens to interpret, extend, and reimagine art, transforming visual experiences into evocative literary expressions. She underscores that writing about art transcends mere critique or description, enabling poets to interact dynamically with artworks and create layered, multidimensional narratives. By engaging deeply with visual forms, poets traverse boundaries, stepping into “liminal spaces” where perception and creativity merge. This work is significant in literary theory as it reinforces the transformative power of interdisciplinary engagement, illustrating how art and poetry together can reveal deeper truths about human experience, aesthetics, and the nature of creation itself.

Summary of “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp

• Art and Poetry: A Symbiotic Relationship
  Lauren Camp emphasizes the historic and ongoing interplay between poetry and visual art, noting that each medium enhances the other in unique ways. She curates poems inspired by contemporary art, underscoring how poets interpret and transform visual creations into literary expressions (Camp, 2015, p. 36).
• The Personal Impact of Art
  Camp reflects on her experiences with art, illustrating how visual pieces evoke deeply personal and lasting impressions. Referencing Georgia O’Keeffe, she argues that shapes and colors often convey meaning more powerfully than words, providing fertile ground for poetic exploration (Camp, 2015, p. 36).
• The Mystical Bond Between Mediums
  Both poetry and art require an “unknowing” that allows for creative vulnerability. Camp asserts that when combined, these forms can produce intensely evocative results, offering audiences fresh perspectives on the artwork and the poet’s imaginative interpretation (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• The Ekphrastic Tradition
  Rooted in the ancient Greek practice of ekphrasis—“speaking out”—writing poetry about art builds upon this tradition. Camp highlights how poets like W.H. Auden and William Carlos Williams reframed myths through Breughel’s The Fall of Icarus, showing the potential for art-inspired poetry to generate new insights (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• The Power of Transformation
  Camp argues that art-inspired poetry transcends mere critique or mimicry, enabling poets to reshape and expand the meaning of visual works. This transformative potential creates an original piece of art, distinct from its source (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Tributes to the Artist and Beyond
  Ekphrastic poetry often serves as a tribute to the artist while also offering a platform for personal reflection or commentary on broader themes. For example, poems in the collection reflect on global events, personal histories, and imagined narratives, inspired by the art they describe (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Interdisciplinary Creativity
  Camp explores how artists like Wafaa S. Jdeed integrate both writing and visual art, blurring the boundaries between mediums. This approach highlights the capacity for each discipline to inform and elevate the other, enriching creative output (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Crossing the Liminal
  Camp concludes that writing about art allows poets to step into a “liminal space,” borrowing perspectives from visual works while imprinting their own voices. This interplay challenges creative norms, offering profound insights into human experience and the nature of creativity itself (Camp, 2015, p. 37).

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp

Term/Concept	Explanation	Reference
Ekphrasis	Derived from Greek roots (ek meaning “out” and phrasis meaning “speaking”), it refers to the practice of describing or responding to visual art through poetry.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Liminal Space	Refers to a transitional or transformative state where boundaries are crossed, allowing poets to explore new dimensions of creativity through art-inspired writing.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Interdisciplinary Creativity	The blending of artistic mediums (e.g., poetry and visual art) to create new, evocative forms of expression that transcend traditional boundaries.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Personal Resonance	The unique, subjective impact that art has on individuals, influencing their emotional and creative responses in distinct ways.	Camp (2015, p. 36)
Transformative Potential	Poetry inspired by visual art doesn’t replicate but reimagines its source, offering new perspectives and meanings that enrich both forms.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Experience and Expression	Borrowed from Aldous Huxley’s idea that experience is shaped by one’s creative response, this concept links poetic expression to personal interaction with art.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Creative Vulnerability	Both art and poetry demand an “unknowing” or openness, allowing creators to venture into uncertain territories to produce evocative results.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Art as a Catalyst	Visual artworks serve as stimuli for writers, prompting explorations of themes ranging from personal narratives to broader cultural critiques.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Tribute and Extension	Ekphrastic poetry often honors the original artwork while expanding upon its themes, adding layers of interpretation and commentary.	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Symbiotic Relationship	The historical and ongoing dialogue between visual art and poetry, with each medium enriching and transforming the other.	Camp (2015, p. 36)

Contribution of “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp to Literary Theory/Theories

• Interdisciplinary Aesthetics
  Camp contributes to the understanding of interdisciplinary aesthetics by demonstrating how poetry and visual art influence each other. This aligns with the theory that blending disciplines expands creative possibilities, creating “intensely evocative new things” (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Reader-Response Theory
  Camp emphasizes the personal and subjective experience of art, which resonates with reader-response theory. She asserts that “what affects us in art is deeply personal” and that poetry captures individual emotional connections to visual stimuli (Camp, 2015, p. 36).
• Poststructuralism and Multiplicity of Meaning
  The article supports poststructuralist ideas by suggesting that ekphrastic poetry creates multiple layers of meaning. Camp states that the poem “may diverge from the painting and enter its own world,” allowing for varied interpretations and disrupting singular narratives (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Ekphrastic Tradition in Literary Theory
  Camp expands the literary understanding of ekphrasis, framing it as a transformative dialogue between art and poetry. She underscores the ancient Greek origins of ekphrasis—”speaking out”—and its modern potential to empower poetic expression (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Hermeneutics and Interpretation
  By highlighting how poets interpret and reimagine art, Camp contributes to hermeneutics, the theory of understanding and interpretation. She argues that ekphrastic poetry can uncover deeper insights into the artist’s process and purpose (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Aesthetic Theory and the Sublime
  Camp’s reflections on the mystical and transformative nature of engaging with art and poetry contribute to aesthetic theory, especially concepts of the sublime. She describes the process as “crossing the liminal” into a space of profound creative resonance (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Feminist Literary Criticism
  By referencing artists like Georgia O’Keeffe and examining how women poets reinterpret their works, Camp aligns with feminist criticism, showcasing how art and poetry can serve as platforms for female voices and interpretations (Camp, 2015, p. 36).
• Cultural and Historical Contextualization
  Camp situates ekphrastic poetry within broader cultural and historical frameworks, showing how it can reflect global influences, such as works inspired by Remedios Varo or the 2015 Venice Biennale (Camp, 2015, p. 37).
• Deconstruction of Medium Boundaries
  The article deconstructs the rigid boundaries between visual and literary mediums, encouraging poets to use art as “a surface from which to create,” transforming one medium into another through creative reinterpretation (Camp, 2015, p. 37).

Examples of Critiques Through “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp

Literary Work	Critique Through Camp’s Lens	Key Concepts from Camp	References
“Musée des Beaux Arts” by W.H. Auden	This poem uses Brueghel’s The Fall of Icarus to emphasize human indifference to suffering. Camp’s lens highlights how ekphrasis allows poets to reframe visual art into powerful commentary on human behavior.	Ekphrasis, Multiplicity of Meaning, Interpretation	Camp (2015, p. 37)
“Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” by William Carlos Williams	Williams diverges from Auden by focusing on the pastoral scene, reflecting Camp’s assertion that poetry may “diverge from the painting and enter its own world.”	Subjective Interpretation, Ekphrastic Tradition	Camp (2015, p. 37)
“From Painter to Painter” by Ramón Gaya	Gaya’s poem portrays painting as an act of probing the unknown, resonating with Camp’s idea of creative vulnerability and the mystical bond between mediums.	Creative Vulnerability, Aesthetic Theory	Camp (2015, p. 37)
Prose Poems on Photos of Family Members by Lola Créïs	Créïs transforms family photos into prose poems, extending their meaning. Camp critiques this as a tribute that simultaneously creates new dimensions.	Tribute and Extension, Personal Resonance	Camp (2015, p. 37)

Criticism Against “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp

• Limited Exploration of Critical Art Theory
  While Camp discusses the creative interplay between poetry and visual art, she does not deeply engage with critical art theory or historical art movements, which could provide a richer analytical foundation.
• Overemphasis on Subjectivity
  The article heavily relies on the personal and subjective experience of art, potentially sidelining the broader cultural, social, or political implications of ekphrastic poetry.
• Absence of Diverse Literary Frameworks
  Camp’s focus remains within the tradition of Western literary and artistic practices, with minimal attention to non-Western frameworks that could add greater global perspective to the discussion.
• Lack of Systematic Analysis
  The article presents a collection of insights and examples but does not provide a structured theoretical model or methodology for analyzing ekphrastic poetry comprehensively.
• Idealization of the Artistic Process
  Camp’s portrayal of the “mystical” bond between art and poetry may appear overly romanticized, neglecting the technical, deliberate, and sometimes commercial aspects of both mediums.
• Insufficient Critical Engagement with Counterarguments
  The article does not address potential critiques of ekphrasis, such as accusations of derivative creativity or the limitations of interpreting one medium through another.
• Limited Attention to Audience Reception
  While Camp explores how poets interact with art, she largely ignores how audiences engage with and interpret ekphrastic works, which is a critical component of literary theory.
• Simplification of Medium Boundaries
  Although Camp celebrates the blending of art and poetry, critics might argue that her discussion simplifies the complexities and tensions inherent in crossing medium boundaries.

Representative Quotations from “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“What affects us in art is deeply personal: a photograph, an illustration, a style, a color.”	Highlights the subjective nature of art, suggesting that individual experiences and interpretations play a significant role in how art and poetry intersect.
“Poetry and visual art have the ability to highlight and shadow even the smallest intimacy.”	Emphasizes the nuanced ways poetry and visual art can reveal and amplify emotional and sensory details, forming a complementary relationship.
“Joining the two has the potential to build an intensely evocative new thing.”	Suggests that blending poetry and visual art creates unique and powerful expressions that transcend the limitations of individual mediums.
“The resulting poem may help an audience understand the work.”	Demonstrates the role of ekphrastic poetry as a mediator, offering deeper insights into visual art and potentially unveiling the artist’s intent.
“Ekphrasis…can be broken down to ek, ‘out,’ and phrasis, ‘speaking.’ Speaking out.”	Provides a linguistic and historical foundation for ekphrastic poetry, linking it to its ancient Greek origins and the tradition of “speaking out” through art-inspired writing.
“A writer can use art to write about the artist, or about self, current events, or for any other purpose.”	Expands on the versatility of ekphrastic poetry, illustrating its capacity to engage with diverse themes and contexts beyond just the artwork itself.
“Writers can’t mimic what’s on the canvas or the pedestal or in the frame.”	Argues that ekphrastic poetry is inherently interpretative rather than imitative, reflecting the poet’s personal engagement with the art.
“Writing about art can also be a way to pay tribute to a creator or creation.”	Suggests that ekphrastic poetry serves as both homage to the artist and an extension of their creative work.
“By a happy dispensation of nature, the poet generally possesses the gift of experience in conjunction with that of expression.”	Cites Aldous Huxley to connect poetic creativity with the ability to distill and reinterpret personal experiences through engagement with art.
“No matter how we approach it, we are crossing the liminal, stepping into a revolutionary perspective, one that belongs to another, one we appropriate and color with our own selves.”	Central idea of the article, capturing the transformative process of engaging with art through poetry, crossing into new creative dimensions.

Suggested Readings: “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” by Lauren Camp

1. Lauren Camp. “Crossing the Liminal: Why Write Poetry About Art?” World Literature Today, vol. 89, no. 6, 2015, pp. 36–37. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.7588/worllitetoda.89.6.0035. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
2. Hill, Gary, et al. “Liminal Performance.” PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, vol. 20, no. 1, 1998, pp. 1–25. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3245872. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
3. CHERLIN, MICHAEL. “Liminal Space.” Music’s Making: The Poetry of Music, the Music of Poetry, State University of New York Press, 2024, pp. 37–46. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18254152.9. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
4. Brégent-Heald, Dominique. “Liminal Borderlands.” Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico, and Canada during the Progressive Era, University of Nebraska Press, 2015, pp. 41–90. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1d98c93.7. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.

Introduction: “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger

“Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger first appeared in the 1991 Annual Review of Sociology (Vol. 17, pp. 105–131). This article explores the intersections and contributions of critical theory, poststructuralism, and postmodernism to sociology and broader intellectual traditions. Agger highlights the critiques these perspectives offer against positivism, presenting them as transformative lenses to study contemporary society. The paper delves into empirical and conceptual applications within sociology, including deviance, gender, and media studies, while challenging traditional disciplinary boundaries. Its significance lies in advocating for methodological reflexivity and interdisciplinarity, encouraging sociologists to reconsider the assumptions underlying their empirical practices. This work remains influential in reshaping sociological methodologies and integrating insights from broader cultural and philosophical discourses, offering critical interventions in literary theory and beyond.

Summary of “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger

---

---

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger

Theoretical Concept/Term	Definition/Explanation	Associated Theorists/Works
Critical Theory	A framework developed by the Frankfurt School to critique capitalist society and its cultural and ideological underpinnings.	Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas
Domination	The dual process of external exploitation and internalized self-discipline in capitalist societies.	Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse
False Consciousness	The inability of individuals to perceive the systemic nature of their exploitation under capitalism.	Marx, Lukács
Commodity Fetishism	The mystification of social relations in capitalism, where commodities are imbued with value detached from their production.	Marx, expanded by Frankfurt School
Dialectical Imagination	A method of critique that sees social facts as mutable and emphasizes the potential for societal transformation.	Jay, Adorno, Horkheimer
Reification	The process by which social relations are perceived as fixed and unchangeable objects.	Lukács, Frankfurt School
Poststructuralism	A critique of structuralism that emphasizes the instability of meaning and the constructed nature of knowledge.	Derrida, French Feminists
Deconstruction	A method of reading that reveals contradictions and suppressed meanings within texts.	Derrida
Undecidability	The idea that texts inherently contain conflicts that prevent fixed interpretations.	Derrida
Difference/Différance	The concept that meaning arises through difference and is always deferred, never fully present.	Derrida
Postmodernism	A critique of grand narratives and universalizing theories, emphasizing pluralism and localized knowledge.	Lyotard, Foucault, Baudrillard
Grand Narratives	Totalizing frameworks, such as Marxism, that attempt to explain all social phenomena.	Lyotard
Discourse/Practice	The interconnected systems of knowledge and power that shape social realities and behaviors.	Foucault
Hyperreality	A state in which reality is replaced by simulations and media-created images.	Baudrillard
New Social Movements	A focus on identity-based and non-class-based movements (e.g., feminism, environmentalism) as sites of resistance.	Habermas
Communication Theory	Habermas’s theory emphasizing rational dialogue and consensus as a means to counter systemic domination.	Habermas
Interdisciplinarity	The breaking down of disciplinary boundaries to integrate knowledge from multiple fields.	Derrida, Agger
Critical Cultural Studies	A method of analyzing cultural practices and media as sites of ideological and political struggle.	Frankfurt School, Baudrillard, Cultural Studies

Contribution of “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger to Literary Theory/Theories

• Critical Theory and the Critique of Cultural Forms
  • Frankfurt School Influence on Literary Theory: Agger highlights how critical theory, particularly the Frankfurt School, critiques cultural forms like literature as ideological mechanisms of domination. This approach aligns literature with broader socio-economic structures, emphasizing its role in reproducing capitalist ideology (Adorno & Horkheimer, 1972).
  • Dialectical Imagination in Literary Analysis: The article underscores the role of dialectical imagination, which challenges positivist readings of texts and emphasizes their historical and transformative potential (Jay, 1973; Agger, 1989b).
• Poststructuralism and Deconstruction in Literary Studies
  • Undecidability in Textual Interpretation: Agger discusses Derrida’s concept of undecidability, which reveals internal contradictions in texts and challenges fixed meanings (Derrida, 1976). This directly contributes to deconstructive literary theory by showing how texts generate multiple, often conflicting interpretations.
  • Difference and Differance: Derrida’s theories of difference/différance, as discussed by Agger, inform literary theories by rejecting the idea of stable meaning, emphasizing the relational nature of language in literary texts (Culler, 1982).
• Postmodernism and the Fragmentation of Narrative
  • Rejection of Grand Narratives in Literature: Agger highlights Lyotard’s critique of grand narratives, which resonates in postmodern literary theory by celebrating fragmented, non-linear, and localized storytelling (Lyotard, 1984).
  • Hyperreality and Literary Representation: Drawing on Baudrillard, Agger explores how literature reflects hyperreality, where texts blur the line between fiction and reality, offering a critique of representation itself (Baudrillard, 1981).
• Feminist Contributions to Literary Theory
  • Poststructural Feminism in Literary Studies: The article references French feminist theorists (e.g., Kristeva, Cixous, Irigaray), emphasizing their role in exposing the gendered dimensions of literary discourse and challenging patriarchal language structures (Weedon, 1987).
  • Deconstructing Male-Centric Narratives: Feminist deconstruction critiques traditional literary narratives for their exclusionary practices, enabling a reading that prioritizes marginalized voices (Richardson, 1988).
• The Sociology of Literature and Cultural Production
  • Reading Literature as Cultural Discourse: Agger applies poststructuralist and postmodern frameworks to literary texts, treating them as cultural products embedded within power structures and ideological practices (Foucault, 1977).
  • Literature and the Political Economy of Signs: Borrowing from Baudrillard, the analysis links literary texts to the broader political economy of signs, emphasizing their role in constructing and contesting cultural meaning (Baudrillard, 1981).
• Interdisciplinarity in Literary Analysis
  • Blurring Disciplinary Boundaries: Agger advocates for integrating insights from sociology, philosophy, and cultural studies into literary analysis, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach that enriches literary theory (Derrida, 1987; Foucault, 1980).
  • Literary Criticism as Reflexive Practice: By aligning literary theory with critical sociology, Agger stresses the importance of reflexivity in reading and writing, highlighting how literary texts shape and are shaped by their socio-cultural contexts (Habermas, 1971).

Examples of Critiques Through “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger

Literary Work	Theoretical Framework	Key Critique	Reference from Agger
Franz Kafka’s The Trial	Critical Theory (Frankfurt School)	The novel is critiqued as a reflection of alienation and systemic domination in modern capitalist bureaucracy. Kafka’s depiction of the court system mirrors the ideological mechanisms described by Horkheimer and Adorno.	Frankfurt School’s critique of domination and alienation (Agger, 1991).
Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse	Poststructuralism (Derrida’s Deconstruction)	The novel’s fragmented narrative structure is analyzed for its undecidability, challenging traditional notions of linear storytelling and stable meaning. Woolf’s portrayal of time and memory resonates with Derrida’s différance.	Derrida’s concept of undecidability and différance (Agger, 1991).
Don DeLillo’s White Noise	Postmodernism (Lyotard, Baudrillard)	The novel critiques consumer culture and media’s creation of hyperreality, as depicted in the obsessive fear of death and the bombardment of advertisements.	Baudrillard’s hyperreality and Lyotard’s rejection of grand narratives (Agger, 1991).
Toni Morrison’s Beloved	Postmodern and Feminist Critical Theory	Morrison’s exploration of slavery and memory is examined as a subversion of dominant historical narratives, giving voice to silenced perspectives. The text deconstructs patriarchal and Eurocentric accounts of history.	Feminist cultural studies and postmodern subversion of grand narratives (Agger, 1991).

Criticism Against “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger

• Excessive Abstraction: Critics argue that Agger’s work relies heavily on abstract theoretical discussions, which may alienate readers seeking more practical or empirical applications.
• Overemphasis on Positivism’s Flaws: While the critique of positivism is thorough, some suggest Agger overemphasizes its limitations without sufficiently addressing its contributions to sociology and science.
• Ambiguity in Definitions: Agger’s blending of critical theory, poststructuralism, and postmodernism may blur distinctions between these schools of thought, leading to conceptual ambiguity.
• Limited Empirical Integration: The focus on theoretical critique often sidelines empirical validation, raising concerns about the applicability of these ideas to contemporary sociological practices.
• Resistance to Synthesis: Critics might point out that Agger’s attempt to synthesize these three frameworks into a unified critique risks oversimplifying their unique perspectives and intellectual contributions.
• Accessibility Concerns: The dense academic language used throughout the article may render it less accessible to broader audiences or those outside of academic sociology and literary theory.
• Potential for Political Bias: Agger’s alignment with critical theory’s Marxist roots could be critiqued for introducing ideological bias, which some readers might perceive as detracting from objectivity.
• Limited Engagement with Opposing Views: The article may be criticized for not engaging deeply enough with counterarguments or the strengths of perspectives it critiques, such as positivism or mainstream sociological methodologies.

Representative Quotations from “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“Critical theory…attunes empirical social researchers to the assumptions underlying their own busy empiricism.”	This highlights critical theory’s emphasis on reflexivity in social sciences, urging researchers to examine their own biases and ideological commitments that influence their methodologies and interpretations.
“Poststructuralism reveals how language itself helps constitute reality, offering new ways to read and write science.”	This underscores the role of language in shaping social realities. Poststructuralism critiques positivist approaches by emphasizing the constructed nature of meaning and the necessity of rethinking scientific discourse as a textual phenomenon.
“Postmodernism…refuses the totalizing claims of grand narratives like Marxism that attempt to explain the world.”	Postmodernism challenges overarching frameworks or universal truths, advocating for pluralistic, fragmented perspectives that better reflect diverse social and cultural experiences.
“Positivism functions ideologically where it promotes passivity and fatalism.”	Agger critiques positivism for fostering a sense of inevitability in social structures, which discourages critical engagement and transformative action.
“Deconstruction challenges the hierarchy of writing over reading, cultural production over cultural reception.”	This quotation articulates the Derridean idea of deconstruction, which seeks to dismantle traditional power dynamics in literary and cultural studies, highlighting the active role of interpretation.
“Marcuse…calls surplus repression the disciplining mechanism of late capitalism.”	Agger draws from Marcuse’s theory to explain how modern capitalism intensifies psychological and social control, ensuring conformity and limiting revolutionary potential.
“Every text is a contested terrain…what it appears to ‘say’ cannot be understood without its assumptions.”	This reflects Derrida’s notion of undecidability, where texts harbor implicit meanings and contradictions, requiring deeper critical interrogation beyond their surface content.
“Foucault insists that knowledge must be traced to different discourse/practices that frame the knowledge formulated.”	Agger references Foucault’s discourse analysis, emphasizing how institutional and societal practices shape what is accepted as knowledge, thus making social phenomena historically contingent.
“Postmodern sociology views the social world from the multiple perspectives of class, race, gender, and other positions.”	This demonstrates the postmodernist rejection of universalism, advocating instead for a mosaic approach that values the diversity of experiences and identities in sociological analysis.
“Critical theory challenges social science to look beyond the appearance of given social facts toward new social facts.”	Agger connects critical theory with an activist stance in sociology, where understanding the malleable and historically constructed nature of social realities opens pathways for transformative change.

Suggested Readings: “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance” by Ben Agger

1. Agger, Ben. “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance.” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 17, 1991, pp. 105–31. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083337. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
2. Darcy Tetreault. “Three Forms of Political Ecology.” Ethics and the Environment, vol. 22, no. 2, 2017, pp. 1–23. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.22.2.01. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
3. EVANGELISTA, JOHN ANDREW G. “On Queer and Capital: Borrowing Key Marxist Concepts to Enrich Queer Theorizing.” Philippine Sociological Review, vol. 61, no. 2, 2013, pp. 349–69. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43486379. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
4. Frauley, Jon. “Synoptic Vision: Metatheory, Conceptualisation, and Critical Realism.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, vol. 42, no. 3, 2017, pp. 293–324. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/90014109. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.

Introduction: “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille

“The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille first appeared in The Journal of Homosexuality in 1994, marking a significant contribution to art history and queer theory. Camille explores the cultural and symbolic evolution of Hippolyte Flandrin’s Figure d’Étude, painted in 1835, as it transitioned from an academic study to a “gay icon.” The painting’s initial neutrality and formal emptiness allowed it to be reinscribed with various meanings over time, reflecting shifts in societal attitudes toward homosexuality. Camille situates the painting within the broader framework of abjection, drawing on Julia Kristeva’s psychoanalytic theory to argue that the figure embodies the conflicted visibility of the homosexual body in a society steeped in repression and surveillance. By tracing the image’s reception history—through its reinterpretations in photography, mass reproductions, and contemporary gay culture—Camille reveals how its gaze and posture both encapsulate and challenge stereotypes of the isolated, eroticized, and “othered” male body. The essay’s nuanced examination of identity, subjectivity, and representation underscores its importance in literary and cultural theory, offering profound insights into the intersections of art, sexuality, and politics.

Summary of “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille

Theoretical Term/Concept	Definition/Explanation	Context in the Article
Abjection (Julia Kristeva)	Refers to what disturbs identity, order, and system, often associated with feelings of repulsion and sublimation.	The figure in Figure d’Étude symbolizes the abject homosexual body, embodying isolation and internalized shame, as well as its cultural sublimation into art and iconography (Camille, 1994, p. 176).
Gaze	A concept in visual culture describing the relationship between viewer and viewed, often implying power dynamics.	The “abject gaze” in the painting reflects the conflicted visibility of the homosexual body, navigating societal repression and the voyeuristic gaze of the viewer (Camille, 1994, p. 164).
Mechanical Reproduction	Walter Benjamin’s idea that the reproduction of art alters its cultural significance and accessibility.	The painting’s widespread reproduction through lithography and photography allowed it to transcend its original academic context and become a symbol in gay subculture (Camille, 1994, p. 164-165).
Gender Performativity (Judith Butler)	The idea that gender is constructed through repeated social and cultural performances.	Camille connects Butler’s notion of performativity to the painting’s role in shaping and reflecting constructed ideas of masculinity and homosexuality (Camille, 1994, p. 165).
Homoeroticism	The representation of same-sex desire through aesthetics or cultural forms.	The painting became an icon of homoeroticism through reinterpretations by artists such as Holland Day and Mapplethorpe, as well as its association with gay subculture (Camille, 1994, p. 161).
Sublime (Romantic Aesthetics)	Aesthetic quality that evokes awe or grandeur, often associated with nature or existential reflection.	The figure’s placement in a Romantic natural setting heightens its sense of isolation and existential melancholy, contributing to its sublime appeal (Camille, 1994, p. 166).
Narcissism (Freudian Theory)	Excessive self-focus or self-love, often used in psychological and aesthetic discussions.	The painting’s inward gaze and pose reflect themes of narcissism, symbolizing the homosexual body as isolated and self-absorbed (Camille, 1994, p. 176).
Queer Iconography	The use of visual symbols and aesthetics to represent or codify queer identity.	Figure d’Étude became a queer icon, particularly in gay culture, symbolizing hidden desires and identity (Camille, 1994, p. 178).
Cultural Appropriation	The adoption or reinterpretation of cultural symbols by different groups for new meanings or contexts.	Artists and photographers reinterpreted the painting, embedding it in gay culture and recontextualizing its homoerotic undertones (Camille, 1994, p. 179-180).
Intersectionality	Examines how overlapping identities (e.g., race, gender, sexuality) create unique experiences of oppression.	Robert Mapplethorpe’s works added a racialized layer to the pose, highlighting the intersection of race and queer aesthetics (Camille, 1994, p. 179).
Stereotyping (Cultural Criticism)	The reduction of complex identities into fixed, oversimplified representations.	Camille critiques the pose’s evolution into a stereotype of the isolated, self-absorbed homosexual body, perpetuating limiting views (Camille, 1994, p. 178-184).

Contribution of “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Psychoanalytic Theory

• Use of Julia Kristeva’s Abjection: Camille employs Kristeva’s concept of abjection to analyze the homosexual body’s dual role as both repellent and alluring, reflecting societal anxieties about deviance and identity (Camille, 1994, p. 176).
• Freudian Narcissism: The figure’s introspective pose is interpreted through Freudian narcissism, symbolizing self-absorption and isolation as a defense against societal rejection (Camille, 1994, p. 176).

2. Queer Theory

• Homoerotic Iconography: The article contributes to queer theory by tracing the painting’s evolution into a “gay icon,” demonstrating how art reconfigures representations of queer identity (Camille, 1994, p. 161-165).
• Gender Performativity (Judith Butler): Camille integrates Butler’s theory of performativity to illustrate how gender and sexuality are culturally constructed and mediated through art and visual culture (Camille, 1994, p. 165).
• Intersectionality in Representation: The analysis of Robert Mapplethorpe’s reinterpretation highlights the intersections of race, sexuality, and power in constructing queer identities (Camille, 1994, p. 179).

3. Visual Culture and the Gaze

• Critique of the Male Gaze: Camille extends the concept of the gaze to include the “abject gaze,” emphasizing how the figure both invites and subverts the viewer’s voyeuristic pleasure (Camille, 1994, p. 164).
• Queer Optics: The article challenges heteronormative frameworks of visual representation, proposing an alternative queer optics that centers the marginal and abject (Camille, 1994, p. 180).

4. Postmodernism and Mechanical Reproduction

• Walter Benjamin’s Theories: Camille applies Benjamin’s concept of mechanical reproduction to explore how mass dissemination of the painting facilitated its resignification in queer subcultures (Camille, 1994, p. 164-165).
• Deconstruction of Normative Narratives: The study deconstructs the narrative of artistic originality by showing how reproductions and reinterpretations add layers of meaning to Figure d’Étude (Camille, 1994, p. 165).

5. Gender and Masculinity Studies

• Normative Masculinity and the Male Nude: The analysis critiques the erasure of erotic markers in 19th-century depictions of the male body, linking it to societal anxieties about non-heteronormative masculinities (Camille, 1994, p. 166-167).
• Shift from Androgyny to Hyper-Masculinity: Camille identifies a historical shift in queer aesthetics from androgynous representations to hyper-masculine forms, reflecting cultural responses to changing perceptions of gender and sexuality (Camille, 1994, p. 178-179).

6. Cultural Studies and Subcultural Theory

• Art as Subcultural Symbol: The painting’s appropriation into gay subcultures exemplifies how cultural artifacts are recontextualized to resist dominant ideologies and affirm marginalized identities (Camille, 1994, p. 178).
• Iconography and Identity: Camille demonstrates how art and visual culture contribute to the formation of collective identities within marginalized communities (Camille, 1994, p. 182).

7. Romantic and Sublime Aesthetics

• Romantic Isolation: The painting’s naturalistic background and introspective figure invoke Romantic notions of the sublime, reinterpreted as queer isolation and longing (Camille, 1994, p. 166).
• Melancholy as a Queer Affect: Camille aligns the figure’s pose and cultural reception with the archetype of the “sad young man,” a recurring motif in queer representation (Camille, 1994, p. 176-178).

Examples of Critiques Through “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille

Literary Work	Critique Through Camille’s Framework	Key Connections to the Article
Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray	The figure of Dorian Gray mirrors the abject gaze and self-absorption discussed by Camille. Dorian’s obsession with his portrait reflects the narcissistic inward gaze of Flandrin’s Figure d’Étude, symbolizing the isolation and moral anxieties surrounding homoerotic desire in Victorian society.	Narcissism and the abject body as central themes (Camille, 1994, p. 176); visibility and repression of homosexual identity (p. 164-165).
Andre Gide’s The Immoralist	Michel’s fascination with youthful male beauty parallels the homoerotic undertones of Figure d’Étude. The work’s exploration of repressed desires and the conflict between social norms and personal identity aligns with Camille’s discussion of the abject gaze and the symbolic sublimation of queer desire in art.	Sublimation of homoerotic desire through art and aesthetics (Camille, 1994, p. 164); cultural policing of desire (p. 178).
Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice	The figure of Tadzio as an aestheticized, distant object of desire echoes the abject and sublime qualities of Flandrin’s painting. The interplay of longing and repression reflects the tension Camille identifies in the male gaze and queer visibility.	The aestheticization of homoerotic desire and the melancholic “gay gaze” (Camille, 1994, p. 176-177); Romantic sublime in queer longing (p. 166).
E.M. Forster’s Maurice	Maurice’s internal conflict and eventual embrace of queer identity reflect the cultural and psychological abjection of the homosexual body. The narrative mirrors Camille’s critique of the invisibility and isolation imposed on queer subjects and their reclamation of identity through private or subcultural contexts.	Cultural construction of queer identity through abjection (Camille, 1994, p. 176-178); queer subculture and appropriation of identity (p. 182).

Criticism Against “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille

Representative Quotations from “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The inactive, abject and inward-turned isolation of the figure with its narcissistic self-absorption makes it, in my view, a profoundly negative stereotype of the gay gaze and the homosexual body.”	Camille critiques Flandrin’s Figure d’Étude for symbolizing a “negative stereotype,” emphasizing isolation and self-absorption, which reflects societal constructs of queer identity as withdrawn and abject. This serves as a point of reflection on how stereotypes about the queer body are internalized and perpetuated.
“Mechanical reproduction was crucial to the appropriation of this body as an icon of various identities in the century that followed.”	Highlighting Walter Benjamin’s concept of mechanical reproduction, Camille explains how the painting’s wide dissemination allowed it to transform into a queer icon. This emphasizes the role of technology in reshaping and recontextualizing cultural artifacts to serve evolving identities, including queer subcultures.
“The homosexual body could only come ‘out’ and about in Walter Benjamin’s ‘age of mechanical reproduction.’”	Camille ties Benjamin’s theory to the visibility of queer identities, suggesting that mass reproduction of images played a vital role in enabling the “coming out” of the homosexual body into public consciousness and queer aesthetics.
“Part of the complex identification with the picture lies in its simultaneously denigrating and idealizing the body that it presents to us.”	This duality reflects the ambiguous reception of queer representations, where Flandrin’s work evokes admiration for its aesthetics but also perpetuates reductive stereotypes. Camille critiques this tension as emblematic of broader societal attitudes toward queer bodies.
“The male gaze, as it has been theorized…positions and spectacularizes the female body. But what of the gaze that identifies with the abject female body, or identifies itself with the male body as object of the male gaze?”	Camille questions the limits of traditional gaze theory, probing how queer spectatorship disrupts or aligns with heterosexual norms. This inquiry challenges the binary logic of gendered gazes, highlighting the fluidity and multiplicity of queer subjectivities.
“Stereotypes are means of representing social groups as fixed and already known in order to control them. But stereotypes are also produced and maintained within the very groups being labeled.”	This observation underscores how queer communities simultaneously resist and internalize stereotypes. Camille critiques the perpetuation of limiting images like Flandrin’s pose within queer culture, emphasizing the need to deconstruct and reclaim representations actively.
“Flandrin’s picture ultimately comes to stand at the end of this century…as the fetish of the narcissistic anus, closed in order to preserve itself from death.”	Camille uses provocative language to critique the modern interpretation of the painting, arguing that it symbolizes isolation and self-preservation in the context of queer identity. This reflects contemporary anxieties around sexuality and mortality, particularly in the wake of the AIDS crisis.

Suggested Readings: “The Abject Gaze and the Homosexual Body” by Michael Camille

1. Kerry Boeye. “A Bibliography of the Writings of Michael Camille.” Gesta, vol. 41, no. 2, 2002, pp. 141–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4126580. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
2. Camille, Michael. “The Pose of the Queer: Dante’s Gaze, Brunerto Latini’s Body.” Queering the Middle Ages, edited by Glenn Burger and Steven F. Kruger, NED-New edition, vol. 27, University of Minnesota Press, 2001, pp. 57–86. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttszw5.7. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
3. Camille, Michael. “The abject gaze and the homosexual body: Flandrin’s Figure d’Etude.” Gay and lesbian studies in art history. Routledge, 2013. 161-188.

Introduction: “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler

“Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler first appeared in 2009 in Feminist Theory (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 77–98), critiques the expansion of Julia Kristeva’s influential concept of abjection. Tyler examines how Kristeva’s theory has been adopted and adapted within feminist literature, particularly in Anglo-American and Australian contexts, to analyze the portrayal of maternal bodies and identities. While acknowledging the productivity of the concept for feminist theory, Tyler critiques the risk of reinforcing historical patterns of disgust and dehumanization toward the maternal body through Kristeva’s abject paradigm. She proposes a shift from Kristeva’s psychoanalytic framework, which often reiterates a matricidal logic, toward a more politically and socially grounded understanding of abjection. This approach challenges the cultural scripts that render maternal bodies abject, emphasizing the lived realities and social locations of those subjected to abjection. Tyler’s work is significant for its interrogation of the limits of Kristeva’s framework and for its call to rethink maternal subjectivity beyond its traditional abject associations, offering a vital contribution to feminist theory and cultural critique.

Summary of “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler

---

---

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler

Term/Concept	Definition	Context in the Article
Abjection	A psychoanalytic concept describing the process of expulsion of what is deemed impure or threatening to identity.	Central to Kristeva’s theory; associated with the maternal body and bodily processes such as birth, fluids, and decay (Kristeva, 1982).
Maternal Abjection	The specific designation of the maternal body as abject, embodying cultural disgust and monstrosity.	Tyler critiques Kristeva’s framing of the maternal as a primary site of abjection, arguing it reinforces patriarchal disgust towards maternal bodies (Tyler, 2009: 79).
Matricide	The symbolic or psychic “killing” of the mother as a necessary condition for individuation and subjectivity.	Kristeva posits matricide as essential to individuation, but Tyler challenges this as a patriarchal construction of subjectivity (Kristeva, 1989; Tyler, 2009: 86).
Kristevan Paradigm	Julia Kristeva’s psychoanalytic framework, which positions abjection as central to subjectivity and culture.	Tyler critiques feminist theorists for uncritically adopting this paradigm, which perpetuates the abjection of maternal bodies (Tyler, 2009: 83).
Transgressive Potential	The idea that encounters with the abject can disrupt or subvert cultural norms.	Tyler critiques this focus in feminist theory, arguing it neglects the lived consequences of being abject (Tyler, 2009: 83–85).
Affirmative Abjection	A feminist strategy of embracing abjection to reclaim marginalized identities or challenge norms.	Tyler warns that this risks reaffirming rather than challenging misogynistic representations, especially of maternal bodies (Covino, 2000; Tyler, 2009: 85).
Cultural Abject	Representations of abjection in cultural texts, such as literature, art, and film.	Feminist theorists often map how cultural texts depict women and maternal bodies as abject, but Tyler argues this focus overlooks the lived effects of abjection (Creed, 1993; Tyler, 2009: 83).
Abject Criticism	A feminist method of analyzing cultural texts to identify and challenge abjection.	Tyler critiques the focus on cultural representation for failing to address real-world violence and marginalization of women (Tyler, 2009: 83–84).
Monstrous-Feminine	A concept describing the maternal body as grotesque and horrifying, especially in cultural texts.	Borrowed from Creed’s analysis of horror cinema, it aligns maternal bodies with fear and revulsion (Creed, 1993; Tyler, 2009: 83).
Social Abjection	A broader view of abjection as structural violence and exclusion that dehumanizes individuals or groups.	Tyler advocates for a shift from psychoanalytic to social-political accounts of abjection, focusing on lived experiences of marginalization and violence (Tyler, 2009: 94).
Lived Abjection	The experience of being reduced to an “abject thing” through societal or interpersonal dehumanization.	Explored through testimonies of battered pregnant women, Tyler highlights how maternal abjection manifests in real-world violence and abuse (Tyler, 2009: 87).
Constitutive Outside	Judith Butler’s term for elements excluded from the symbolic order that define and reinforce social boundaries.	Tyler references Butler to critique how maternal abjection operates as a “constitutive outside” in both psychoanalytic theory and cultural norms (Butler, 1993: 188; Tyler, 2009: 86).
Communities of the Abject	Networks or groups formed around shared experiences of abjection, offering solidarity and resistance.	Tyler discusses online spaces like chat rooms where battered women form communities to reclaim agency and visibility (Tyler, 2009: 92).
Psychosocial Mechanisms	Processes that combine psychological and social factors to produce abjection.	Tyler emphasizes the need for theories that address the psychosocial dynamics of abjection, especially in lived experiences of marginalization (Tyler, 2009: 89).

Contribution of “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Critique of Psychoanalytic Literary Theory
   • Challenges Julia Kristeva’s psychoanalytic framework of abjection, especially its reliance on the concept of matricide as foundational to subjectivity (Tyler, 2009: 79).
   • Questions the universalist premises of Kristeva’s theory, arguing that it reinforces patriarchal structures rather than dismantling them (Tyler, 2009: 86).
2. Feminist Literary Theory
   • Critiques feminist adaptations of Kristeva’s abject paradigm, warning against its uncritical adoption as a feminist methodology (Tyler, 2009: 83–84).
   • Highlights the risk of reproducing misogynistic representations of women and maternal bodies through “affirmative abjection” strategies (Tyler, 2009: 85).
   • Advocates for a re-centering of “lived bodily experience” within feminist theory, as proposed by Toril Moi and Iris Marion Young, to move beyond abstract conceptualizations of the maternal (Tyler, 2009: 79, 94).
3. Cultural Studies and Film Theory
   • Expands the critique of abjection in feminist cultural studies, specifically through analyses of the maternal body in horror cinema (e.g., Creed’s “monstrous-feminine”) (Tyler, 2009: 83).
   • Calls for a shift in focus from symbolic representations of the abject maternal to the real-world social and political consequences of such representations (Tyler, 2009: 83–85).
4. Poststructuralism and Deconstruction
   • Engages with Judith Butler’s theories of the “constitutive outside” to critique how abjection is used to reinforce boundaries of social order and intelligibility (Butler, 1993; Tyler, 2009: 86).
   • Emphasizes the contingent and constructed nature of maternal abjection, arguing that it is not an essentialist condition but a reiterative socio-historical phenomenon (Tyler, 2009: 94).
5. Sociological and Political Literary Theory
   • Introduces the concept of “social abjection,” expanding the term to encompass structural violence and marginalization beyond psychoanalytic contexts (Tyler, 2009: 94).
   • Advocates for a political reimagining of abjection to address lived experiences of exclusion and violence, particularly toward women and maternal bodies (Tyler, 2009: 94).
6. Aesthetic and Art Theory
   • Critiques the use of abjection in avant-garde and feminist art criticism, which often frames abject representations as inherently transgressive or liberatory (Tyler, 2009: 83).
   • Warns against aestheticizing or fetishizing the maternal abject, arguing that such approaches risk reaffirming the cultural disgust they aim to critique (Tyler, 2009: 85).
7. Intersection of Theory and Practice
   • Proposes an interdisciplinary approach that connects literary and cultural theories of abjection with sociological data on violence against maternal bodies (Tyler, 2009: 87).
   • Highlights the importance of integrating theory with lived accounts of marginalization to develop more effective critiques of systemic violence (Tyler, 2009: 94).

Examples of Critiques Through “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler

Literary Work	Type of Critique Through “Against Abjection”	Explanation Using Tyler’s Framework
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley	Critique of the “Monstrous Maternal”	Explores how the absent maternal and the monstrous creation reflect cultural abjection of the maternal body. Tyler’s argument on the “maternal as abject” reveals the implicit matricidal anxiety in the narrative.
Beloved by Toni Morrison	Deconstruction of Maternal Abjection	Uses Tyler’s critique to analyze how the maternal body is subjected to abjection through systemic violence, while also showcasing resilience and reclamation of maternal subjectivity.
The Bloody Chamber by Angela Carter	Critique of Affirmative Abjection in Feminist Literature	Examines how Carter’s use of grotesque and abject imagery risks perpetuating negative cultural constructions of femininity and maternity, aligning with Tyler’s warnings against “affirmative abjection.”
Dracula by Bram Stoker	Critique of the “Monstrous-Feminine” in Gothic Literature	Highlights the portrayal of female vampires as abject maternal figures, aligning with Tyler’s critique of how horror narratives construct female bodies as sites of horror and cultural disgust.

Criticism Against “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler

• Over-reliance on Kristeva’s Framework
  Critics argue that Tyler’s critique depends heavily on Julia Kristeva’s foundational theory of abjection, potentially limiting the originality of her intervention and tethering her analysis to Kristeva’s psychoanalytic underpinnings.
• Neglect of Broader Intersectional Dimensions
  While Tyler addresses social and political abjection, her analysis does not extensively explore intersectional factors such as race, class, and sexuality in shaping experiences of maternal abjection, which could have enriched her critique.
• Ambiguity in “Social and Political Account of Abjection”
  Tyler calls for a shift to a more social and political account of abjection but does not always provide concrete or systematic ways to implement this in feminist theory or praxis.
• Risk of Universalizing Maternal Experiences
  By critiquing Kristeva’s universalism, Tyler risks replicating similar universal tendencies by not sufficiently acknowledging the diversity and specificity of maternal experiences across cultures and contexts.
• Limited Engagement with Non-Western Perspectives
  The article primarily critiques Anglo-American and Australian feminist theory, without significant engagement with non-Western feminist discourses, potentially narrowing the scope of her critique.
• Ambivalence Toward Affirmative Abjection
  Tyler critiques the use of “affirmative abjection” in feminist cultural criticism but offers limited alternatives for feminist theorists aiming to reclaim or reinterpret abject representations in empowering ways.
• Focus on Maternal Abjection at the Expense of Other Forms
  The article’s primary focus on maternal abjection could be seen as narrowing the broader applicability of the concept, potentially sidelining other significant forms of abjection such as racial, queer, or disabled bodies.
• Insufficient Practical Application
  While theoretically robust, some critics may find Tyler’s work less actionable in addressing real-world instances of violence and marginalization beyond academic feminist debates.

Representative Quotations from “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“This article is about the theoretical life of ‘the abject’.”	Tyler outlines the purpose of her work, which is to critically analyze the use and implications of Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection in feminist theory, particularly regarding maternal bodies and identities.
“Employing Kristeva’s abject paradigm risks reproducing histories of violent disgust towards maternal bodies.”	Tyler critiques the reliance on Kristeva’s concept of abjection in feminist theory, arguing that it perpetuates rather than challenges societal disgust and marginalization of maternal bodies.
“In place of the Kristevan model of the abject, it argues for a more thoroughly social and political account of abjection.”	Tyler proposes an alternative approach to abjection that focuses on its social and political dimensions rather than psychoanalytic roots, to better address the lived experiences of marginalized groups.
“Matricide is our vital necessity, the sine qua non condition of our individuation.”	Quoting Kristeva, Tyler critiques the universal assumption that subjectivity requires the violent rejection of the maternal, suggesting it reflects and reinforces patriarchal norms.
“Feminist theory needs to ascertain what the structural and conceptual limits of the Kristevan abject are.”	Tyler emphasizes the importance of critically examining the limitations of Kristeva’s abjection theory, especially its utility in theorizing maternal subjectivity and its potential complicity in harmful cultural scripts.
“What is completely absent from her account is any discussion of what it might mean to be that maternal abject.”	Tyler highlights a gap in Kristeva’s theory, pointing out that it fails to consider the lived realities and experiences of individuals positioned as abject, particularly mothers.
“Abjection is not just a psychic process but a social experience.”	Tyler broadens the scope of abjection to include its tangible social and political implications, such as dehumanization and exclusion, beyond Kristeva’s psychoanalytic focus.
“The maternal can only be produced as a site of horror through representational practices which figure ‘her’ as in excess of a singular body/identity.”	Tyler argues that cultural representations of the maternal as abject rely on violent dismemberment and fragmentation of maternal bodies, reinforcing their dehumanization.
“The myopic focus within feminist abject criticism on the transformative potential of excavating ‘the cultural abject’… risks marginalizing lived experiences.”	Tyler critiques the tendency in feminist theory to celebrate the subversive potential of abjection while neglecting the real-world consequences for those who are socially constructed as abject.
“Abjection has effects on real bodies; abjection hurts.”	Tyler underscores the physical and emotional harm caused by the social and cultural processes of abjection, particularly through violence against women and maternal bodies.

Suggested Readings: “Against Abjection” by Imogen Tyler

1. Lipschitz, Ruth. “Abjection.” The Edinburgh Companion to Animal Studies, edited by Lynn Turner et al., vol. 1, Edinburgh University Press, 2018, pp. 13–29. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctv2f4vjzx.6. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
2. Tyler, Imogen. “Against abjection.” Feminist theory 10.1 (2009): 77-98.
3. Lowe, Cassie. “The Abject in Education.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 54, no. 3, 2020, pp. 17–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.3.0017. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.

Introduction: “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter

“Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter first appeared in the Southern Journal of Philosophy in 2004 (Vol. XLJI, Supplement). This article explores the intersections of Freud’s psychoanalytic theories, particularly castration theory and fetishism, with Julia Kristeva’s concept of abjection. Chanter revisits Freud’s framework of identification, challenging its paternal emphasis and his systematic avoidance of maternal identification. By integrating Kristeva’s notion of abjection, Chanter pushes beyond its traditional sexual difference framework to critique Freud’s assumptions regarding race and primitivism. This work is significant in literary theory as it interrogates the foundational structures of psychoanalytic discourse, advocating for a re-evaluation of maternal authority and its implications for understanding identity, race, and gender. Chanter’s analysis broadens the theoretical landscape, providing nuanced insights into the unconscious biases embedded in cultural and psychoanalytic narratives.

Summary of “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter

Theoretical Term/Concept	Definition/Description	Relevance in Chanter’s Argument
Abjection	A concept from Julia Kristeva, referring to the process of separating oneself from what is deemed unclean or threatening to subjectivity.	Used to critique Freud’s neglect of the maternal and to propose a rethinking of subject formation, emphasizing the maternal body and its role in identity construction (Chanter, p. 49-50).
Castration Theory	Freud’s theory positing that fear of losing the penis drives male psychosexual development and informs gender roles.	Critiqued for its phallocentric focus; Chanter challenges its exclusion of maternal identification and its implications for understanding race and gender (p. 51).
Fetishism	A psychological mechanism described by Freud, where a substitute object denies and acknowledges castration anxiety simultaneously.	Linked to racial and gendered discourses; Chanter critiques its use as a way to suppress maternal significance while sustaining patriarchal norms (p. 50-55).
Phallic Phase	Freud’s developmental phase where the penis becomes the central organ of sexual identity.	Seen as symptomatic of Freud’s difficulty reconciling maternal and paternal roles; Chanter argues this phase reinforces the marginalization of the maternal (p. 51-52).
Identification	A process in which an individual aligns themselves emotionally or psychologically with another person, often the parent.	Critiqued for its patriarchal bias in Freud’s work, where identification is tied predominantly to the father; Chanter argues for a rethinking that incorporates maternal identification (p. 50-51).
Object-Choice	Freud’s term for the selection of a love object, typically associated with the mother in early development.	Chanter explores the interplay between identification and object-choice, highlighting the tension in Freud’s prioritization of paternal identification over maternal object-choice (p. 50-52).
The Phallus	A symbolic representation of power and authority in psychoanalytic theory, central to Freud and Lacan’s frameworks.	Critiqued for perpetuating patriarchal structures; Chanter argues that its symbolic dominance marginalizes maternal authority and reinforces fetishistic logics (p. 55).
Racialized Other	A term describing how psychoanalytic theory incorporates race as a category of difference subordinate to sexual difference.	Chanter critiques Freud for using racial difference to obscure unresolved issues of sexual difference, thereby intertwining race and gender in problematic ways (p. 50).
Maternal Identification	The emotional or psychological alignment with the mother, often overshadowed by Freud’s focus on paternal identification.	Central to Chanter’s critique; she calls for rehabilitating maternal identification as vital to understanding subjectivity, abjection, and identity (p. 50-51).
The Enigma of Woman	Freud’s concept of woman as an unresolved mystery in psychoanalytic theory.	Chanter argues that Freud’s difficulty in addressing the “enigma of woman” is tied to broader exclusions, including racial and maternal dimensions (p. 50).
Disavowal	A psychological mechanism where reality is both acknowledged and denied, often related to fetishism.	Used by Chanter to illustrate how Freud’s theories suppress maternal influence and shore up patriarchal structures (p. 55-56).
Totemic Ritual	Freud’s concept linking primitive societies’ rituals to the development of social, moral, and religious structures.	Chanter critiques the use of primitivism as a parallel to psychoanalytic development, noting its racialized implications and its role in suppressing maternal significance (p. 59).
Pleasure Principle vs. Reality Principle	Freud’s framework contrasting the human drive for immediate pleasure with the constraints imposed by reality.	Chanter links this dichotomy to the dynamics of abjection and fetishism, illustrating how it informs gendered and racialized narratives in psychoanalytic theory (p. 51).

Contribution of “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter to Literary Theory/Theories

Examples of Critiques Through “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter

Literary Work	Critique Through Chanter’s Lens	Key Concepts Referenced
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein	The creature’s rejection by society and Victor’s denial of parental responsibility can be analyzed as processes of abjection, emphasizing the suppression of maternal identification.	Abjection, maternal identification, phallic symbolic, repression of the maternal (Chanter, p. 49-50).
Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s The Yellow Wallpaper	The narrator’s descent into madness reflects the abjection of the feminine body and psyche, showcasing patriarchal suppression and the erasure of maternal authority in caregiving roles.	Abjection, phallocentrism, gendered marginalization, repression of the maternal (p. 50, 55).
Toni Morrison’s Beloved	The haunting presence of Sethe’s dead daughter illustrates abjection as a confrontation with repressed maternal trauma and racialized histories of exclusion.	Abjection, racialized other, intersections of race and gender, maternal loss (p. 50-51, 63).
Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness	The portrayal of Africa as a space of “primitivism” and Kurtz’s breakdown exemplify Freud’s reliance on racialized narratives to navigate sexual and cultural difference.	Racialized other, primitivism, psychoanalysis and race, fetishistic disavowal (p. 50, 59).

Criticism Against “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter

Representative Quotations from “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The abject can be used as a resource to rework the fetishistic discourses that have come to dominate a good deal of contemporary theory, including film theory and race theory.”	Chanter highlights the critical potential of abjection as a framework to challenge established discourses, particularly those rooted in fetishism. This underscores abjection’s relevance beyond psychoanalysis, extending it to cultural and theoretical domains such as film and race studies.
“Sexual difference founders on the rock of racial difference.”	Chanter critiques Freud’s inability to think through sexual difference without simultaneously relying on unexamined assumptions about race. She posits that psychoanalysis avoids confronting race, thereby revealing an interdependency that remains under-theorized in Freud’s work.
“Kristeva’s notion of abjection deals with affect, not with an idea that is disavowed.”	This statement distinguishes Kristeva’s approach to abjection from fetishism. While fetishism relies on denial and substitution, abjection engages with affective responses to boundaries and exclusions, offering a different conceptual entry point for rethinking psychoanalysis and social systems.
“Freud’s phallic phase…can be read as symptomatic of Freud’s suppression of maternal identification.”	Chanter argues that Freud’s introduction of the phallic phase reflects an implicit effort to marginalize maternal identification. This critique reconfigures Freud’s theory, suggesting that maternal roles were systematically downplayed to prioritize paternal figures in identity formation.
“The attribution to women of a fetishistic substitute or imaginary penis…has been extended to discourses on race.”	This quotation critiques the ways Freud’s theory of fetishism, originally about sexual difference, is uncritically adapted to racial difference. Chanter highlights the danger of transferring psychoanalytic assumptions about the phallus to racialized others, risking the perpetuation of racialized stereotypes.
“The reign of the phallus is thoroughly fetishistic.”	Chanter critiques the centrality of the phallus in psychoanalysis, describing it as an extension of fetishistic logic. She challenges the emphasis on the phallus, arguing that it overshadows other dynamics, such as maternal identification and abjection, in psychoanalytic theories of identity.
“Abjection offers a new way of rethinking what is at issue in the Lacanian mirror stage, by pushing back the question in a way that doesn’t foreclose the maternal body as a locus of the inception of meaning.”	Here, Chanter proposes that abjection provides a means to revisit Lacanian psychoanalysis, particularly its conceptualization of subject formation. By centering the maternal body, she seeks to challenge Lacan’s focus on paternal authority and the symbolic order.
“The white man knows that the racialized other is castrated—without power—but nonetheless attributes to him a mystical, magical, transcendent, threatening aura.”	Chanter critiques racialized applications of fetishism, arguing that Freud’s logic of fetishism reappears in racial discourses. The racialized other is paradoxically perceived as powerless yet threatening, a contradiction that mirrors the fetishist’s simultaneous acknowledgment and denial of castration.
“There is a sense in which the logic of fetishism produces, retroactively as it were, the logic of the phallus.”	Chanter reinterprets the relationship between fetishism and the phallus, suggesting that the former retroactively constructs the latter. This challenges the presumed primacy of the phallus in psychoanalytic theory, opening up alternative ways of understanding subjectivity and identity.
“Is there a way of recasting the abject so that its processes do not line up along lines that systematically disenfranchise certain groups at the expense of others?”	This question encapsulates Chanter’s broader aim: to reconfigure abjection as a tool for inclusivity and equity. By interrogating the structures of exclusion embedded in psychoanalytic and cultural frameworks, she seeks to develop a more just and expansive theoretical approach.

Suggested Readings: “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism” by Tina Chanter

1. DOHMEN, JOSH. “Disability as Abject: Kristeva, Disability, and Resistance.” Hypatia, vol. 31, no. 4, 2016, pp. 762–78. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44076536. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
2. Lloyd, Moya. “Julia Kristeva (1941–).” Contemporary Critical Theorists: From Lacan to Said, edited by Jon Simons, Edinburgh University Press, 2006, pp. 135–51. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvxcrrt8.13. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
3. Singh, Surti. “Spectacle and Revolt: On the Intersection of Psychoanalysis and Social Theory in Julia Kristeva’s Work.” New Forms of Revolt: Essays on Kristeva’s Intimate Politics, edited by Sarah K. Hansen and Rebecca Tuvel, State University of New York Press, 2017, pp. 23–42. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18253903.6. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
4. Chanter, Tina. “Abjection, or Why Freud Introduces the Phallus: Identification, Castration Theory, and the Logic of Fetishism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2004).

Introduction: “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington

“The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington first appeared in Hypatia in Winter 1998, as part of Volume 13, No. 1. Published by Wiley on behalf of Hypatia, Inc., this essay examines the performative elements of Julia Kristeva’s Powers of Horror, situating them within the broader context of her earlier works. Harrington emphasizes the interplay between abjection and Kristeva’s theoretical practice, arguing that this dynamic is central to Kristeva’s critique of Hegelian and Freudian traditions. The essay delves into the “speaking abject,” exploring the complex ways Kristeva’s text performs the rupture and disintegration central to its critique of identity and subjectivity. This work is significant in literature and literary theory for its innovative articulation of the intersections between ethics, aesthetics, and the performative nature of theoretical discourse, offering profound insights into the limits of language, identity, and cultural practices.

Summary of “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington

Theoretical Terms/Concepts in “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington

Theoretical Term/Concept	Explanation	Context/Significance
Abjection	The state of being cast off, representing what is rejected from the self but remains intimately connected.	Central to Kristeva’s theory; reveals the breakdown of subjectivity and the borders between self and other, highlighting the primal loss of the maternal body (Powers of Horror, p. 5).
Performative Structure	A textual strategy where the text enacts the theory it articulates.	Kristeva’s texts (e.g., Powers of Horror) perform the abject through a blending of voices, disrupting traditional narrative forms and mirroring the fragmented nature of the subject.
Subject-in-Process/On-Trial	A dynamic view of the subject as constantly in flux and negotiation with the symbolic and semiotic.	Challenges static notions of subjectivity; shows the subject’s existence as a process tied to linguistic and social structures (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 33).
Semiotic and Symbolic	The interplay between primal drives and structured language systems.	The semiotic disrupts the symbolic order, and the abject emerges in the gaps between these systems, exposing the instability of meaning (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 25).
Manque (Lack)	The foundational loss that structures desire and subjectivity.	Central to the experience of abjection, as the subject encounters the void within itself and misrecognizes its relationship with the maternal (Powers of Horror, p. 12).
Phobia as Metaphor	Phobia represents the subject’s attempt to manage fear tied to the abject.	Phobia manifests as a displacement of fear onto external objects, illustrating the subject’s struggle with primal loss and the unnameable (Powers of Horror, p. 35).
Countertransference	The analyst’s identification with the patient’s unconscious dynamics.	In Kristeva’s writing, this process allows for an empathetic engagement with the abject and the possibility of giving voice to the unspeakable (Stabat Mater, p. 162).
Catharsis	The purgation or release of emotions, traditionally associated with artistic or psychoanalytic processes.	Kristeva critiques traditional catharsis, proposing instead a process of confronting and integrating the abject without resolution (Powers of Horror, p. 27).
Borderline Subjectivity	A fragmented form of subjectivity marked by the collapse of clear distinctions between self and other.	The borderline subject exemplifies the abject’s destabilizing effects on identity, illustrating the tensions between internal drives and external structures (Powers of Horror, p. 8).
Ethical Practice	An engagement with the abject that resists fixed boundaries and embraces heterogeneity.	Kristeva connects ethics and aesthetics through the performative structure of her texts, advocating for openness to ambiguity and contradiction (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 233).
Sublimation	The process of transforming primal drives into culturally and socially acceptable expressions.	Writing becomes a form of sublimation, where the abject is indirectly confronted and transformed through language (Powers of Horror, p. 18).
Heterogeneity	The coexistence of diverse, often contradictory elements within the subject or text.	Central to Kristeva’s critique of totalizing systems, heterogeneity allows for the articulation of the semiotic within the symbolic (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 131).
Pas de Deux	A “dance” between dual voices or perspectives within the text.	Reflects Kristeva’s performative blending of the autobiographical (“I”) and theoretical (“one”) to mirror the abject’s disruptive nature (Powers of Horror, p. 139).
Negativity	The precondition for signification, linked to the semiotic disruption of the symbolic.	Negativity precedes negation and is foundational to the Kristevan subject’s engagement with language and desire (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 119).
Analyst as Writer	The theorist occupies a dual role as both observer and participant in the dynamics of abjection.	Kristeva’s writing enacts the analytic process, where the abject is both studied and experienced through language (Powers of Horror, p. 152).
Impossible Catharsis	The unattainable resolution of the abject’s disruptive effects.	Kristeva argues that the abject cannot be fully purged but must remain a site of ongoing tension and engagement (Powers of Horror, p. 31).

Contribution of “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington to Literary Theory/Theories

1. Psychoanalytic Theory

• Exploration of Abjection: Extends Kristeva’s concept of abjection by showing how it destabilizes subjectivity, particularly through its performative dimensions in language and literature. (Powers of Horror, pp. 5-6)
• Borderline Subjectivity: Discusses how the borderline subject illuminates the psychic mechanisms of abjection, shedding light on the interplay between the semiotic and symbolic in literary texts. (Powers of Horror, pp. 8-9)
• Role of Fear and Phobia: Provides a psychoanalytic reading of fear and its displacement in phobic metaphors, linking it to literary expression. (Powers of Horror, pp. 35-37)

2. Feminist Theory

• Critique of Traditional Psychoanalysis: Harrington highlights how Kristeva’s work disrupts Freud and Lacan’s patriarchal frameworks, particularly by addressing the maternal and its repression. (Stabat Mater, p. 162)
• Ethical Feminism: Proposes a feminist ethics grounded in the engagement with the abject, challenging traditional binary oppositions such as self/other, male/female. (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 233)
• Performative Writing as Feminist Praxis: The enactment of abjection through performative writing critiques the phallocentric language systems. (Powers of Horror, pp. 140-142)

3. Poststructuralist Theory

• Destabilization of Subjectivity: Builds on Kristeva’s notion of the subject-in-process to question stable, unified notions of identity, aligning with poststructuralist critiques. (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 119)
• Interplay of Semiotic and Symbolic: Shows how the semiotic disrupts the symbolic, paralleling poststructuralist concerns with the instability of meaning. (Powers of Horror, pp. 18-20)
• Text as Performance: Demonstrates how Kristeva’s work enacts the theories it articulates, aligning with poststructuralist ideas of performativity in writing. (Powers of Horror, pp. 139-140)

4. Literary Aesthetics

• Reimagining Catharsis: Challenges classical notions of catharsis in literature, proposing instead an “impossible catharsis” that retains the tension of the abject. (Powers of Horror, p. 31)
• Heterogeneous Texts: Highlights the blending of voices (autobiographical and theoretical) in Kristeva’s texts as an innovative aesthetic practice. (Stabat Mater, p. 162)
• Abjection in Literature: Positions the abject as a central force in literary production, offering a new lens to analyze texts dealing with horror, loss, and fragmentation. (Powers of Horror, pp. 210-212)

5. Ethical Philosophy and Literature

• Linking Ethics and Aesthetics: Explores how Kristeva’s writing connects ethics with literary aesthetics through the acknowledgment of heterogeneity and abjection. (Revolution in Poetic Language, pp. 233-234)
• Abjection as Ethical Engagement: Proposes that encountering the abject in literature fosters ethical awareness by forcing the subject to confront its boundaries. (Powers of Horror, pp. 18-20)

6. Postmodern Theory

• Subjectivity as Process: Aligns with postmodern concerns about fluid, fragmented identities by emphasizing the subject-in-process/on-trial. (Powers of Horror, pp. 8-9)
• Textual Multiplicity: Highlights the multiplicity and heterogeneity of voices within Kristeva’s texts, resonating with postmodernism’s rejection of metanarratives. (Powers of Horror, pp. 140-142)
• Temporal Disruptions: Reflects on the notion of time as an anterior future, echoing postmodern temporal paradoxes. (Revolution in Poetic Language, p. 232)

7. Rhetoric and Semiotics

• Language as Abjection: Explores how language becomes a site of abjection, where the signifier’s arbitrariness mirrors the subject’s existential fears. (Powers of Horror, pp. 37-38)
• Phobia and Metaphor: Examines the rhetorical strategies of phobia as metaphors for the unnameable, connecting linguistic play with psychic structures. (Powers of Horror, pp. 35-37)

Examples of Critiques Through “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington

Literary Work	Critique Through Harrington’s Lens	Key Concepts Applied	References to Harrington’s Analysis
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein	The monster as an embodiment of the abject: rejected by society and creator, representing the borderline subject in crisis.	– Abjection – Subject-in-process – Fear and phobia as metaphors	Kristeva’s concept of “manque” and the “speaking abject” illuminate Victor’s fear of the monstrous and his own failure to confront it (Harrington, pp. 35-38).
Toni Morrison’s Beloved	Sethe’s haunting by Beloved illustrates maternal abjection, with the act of infanticide revealing a confrontation with the primal loss.	– Maternal abjection – Fear as unspeakable – Impossible catharsis	Maternal body as the site of trauma and its repression ties into Harrington’s use of Kristeva’s “Stabat Mater” (Harrington, p. 162).
Samuel Beckett’s Endgame	The fragmented narrative and existential dread reflect abjection as a breakdown of meaning and identity in a desolate world.	– Heterogeneity – Subjectivity in flux – Language as fetishized and fragmented	Harrington’s exploration of linguistic abjection reveals the play’s fragmented dialogue as a metaphor for existential lack (Harrington, pp. 140-142).
Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar	Esther’s mental breakdown mirrors the abjection of self, with her inability to reconcile societal expectations and personal identity.	– Semiotic vs. symbolic tension – Phobia as a metaphor – Subjectivity on trial	Harrington’s analysis of the semiotic and symbolic interplay aligns with Esther’s disconnection and desire for self-definition (Harrington, pp. 18-20).

Criticism Against “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington

• Complexity and Accessibility
  • Harrington’s analysis is dense and heavily reliant on Kristeva’s philosophical framework, making it challenging for readers unfamiliar with Kristeva’s work or psychoanalytic theory.
  • The performative and layered writing style may obscure the central arguments for readers seeking clarity.
• Overreliance on Kristeva’s Framework
  • The critique leans heavily on Kristeva’s theories without sufficiently interrogating their limitations or offering alternative perspectives.
  • Critics argue that this dependence may stifle broader interpretations and applications of abjection.
• Limited Engagement with Feminist Critiques
  • While addressing feminist ethics, Harrington’s focus on abjection could have engaged more deeply with critiques from contemporary feminist scholars who challenge Kristeva’s ambiguous stance on the maternal and the semiotic.
  • The analysis risks reinforcing gender binaries through its framing of maternal abjection.
• Insufficient Application to Non-Western Literatures
  • The focus on Western philosophical and literary traditions limits the scope of the discussion, leaving out potential cross-cultural or global applications of abjection.
  • Critics point out that the essay does not adequately consider how abjection might function in different cultural or historical contexts.
• Tendency Toward Theoretical Abstraction
  • The essay’s engagement with theoretical abstraction, particularly regarding the subject-in-process and the semiotic/symbolic divide, may alienate readers seeking concrete applications.
  • Some critiques suggest a need for more tangible literary examples to illustrate the theory effectively.
• Ambiguity in Ethical Implications
  • While Harrington emphasizes the ethical dimensions of Kristeva’s abjection, critics argue that the practical implications of these ethics remain unclear.
  • The connection between ethics, aesthetics, and the abject, though innovative, is underdeveloped in terms of real-world applications.

Representative Quotations from “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington with Explanation

Quotation	Explanation
“The abject collapses in a burst of beauty that overwhelms us—and ‘that cancels our existence.'”	Harrington emphasizes the duality of the abject as both horrifying and sublime. This collapse of boundaries forces us to confront our mortality and sense of identity, engaging both aesthetics and ethics to question the foundations of human existence.
“The speaking abject must be approached through these splits.”	The fragmented structure of Kristeva’s theory mirrors the fragmentation of the abject. Harrington highlights the need to address the abject through multiple perspectives—psychological, linguistic, and ethical—capturing its paradoxical nature.
“Language is both a tool and a battleground for negotiating the abject.”	Harrington underscores Kristeva’s view that language is where the abject manifests most intensely, as it constantly negotiates between the expressible and the inexpressible, the symbolic and the semiotic. This makes language a site of both empowerment and vulnerability.
“Kristeva’s work choreographs the paradox of the speaking subject as theorist and patient.”	This statement reflects the performative nature of Kristeva’s analysis, where the subject in process/on trial is not only observed but enacted. The theorist becomes both the analyst and the analyzed, embodying the abject through her own fragmented voice.
“The abject is elaborated through a failure to recognize its kin; nothing is familiar.”	Harrington reiterates Kristeva’s description of the abject as rooted in primal loss, making it alien even to the subject experiencing it. This misrecognition creates a destabilizing force within the subject, shaping their identity and perception of others.
“Writing is the primary analog of a phobia: in the play of the sign, Kristeva sees the heterogeneity that marks phobia and abjection.”	Writing becomes an enactment of the abject, illustrating the oscillation between creation and destruction inherent in abjection. For Kristeva, literature provides a medium to explore and articulate this tension, allowing the unspeakable to be symbolized.
“To create/perform these ruptures is to tell the story of the speaking subject in its perpetual struggle.”	Harrington emphasizes the ethical and aesthetic necessity of rupture in Kristeva’s text. This performance reflects the subject’s ongoing process of self-definition and negation, aligning with Kristeva’s notion of a revolutionary practice in art and theory.
“The abject is ‘not yet a place,’ a no-ground that the speaking subject must articulate backward.”	The abject resides in a liminal space that cannot be directly addressed. Instead, it must be circumscribed through indirect articulation, revealing the inherent instability of identity and language. Harrington interprets this as Kristeva’s method of engaging with the abject as an unresolved and disruptive force.

Suggested Readings: “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s “Powers of Horror” by Thea Harrington

1. Harrington, Thea. “The Speaking Abject in Kristeva’s ‘Powers of Horror.’” Hypatia, vol. 13, no. 1, 1998, pp. 138–57. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810610. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
2. STILL, JUDITH. “Horror in Kristeva and Bataille: Sex and Violence.” Paragraph, vol. 20, no. 3, 1997, pp. 221–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43263665. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
3. POWRIE, PHIL. “The W/Hole and the Abject.” Paragraph, vol. 26, no. 1/2, 2003, pp. 222–31. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43263726. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
4. SMITH, ANNE-MARIE. “Transgression, Transubstantiation, Transference.” Paragraph, vol. 20, no. 3, 1997, pp. 270–80. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43263668. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.