Intertextual Space in Literature & Literary Theory

Intertextual space, as a theoretical term, refers to the dynamic and multifaceted network of references, relationships, and influences that exist among different texts within the realm of literature and culture.

Etymology of Intertextual Space

The term “intertextual space” finds its roots in literary and semiotic studies, where it emerged as a concept that refers to the interconnected web of references and relationships between different texts. Coined in the latter half of the 20th century, it embodies the idea that no text exists in isolation, but rather within a complex network of intertextual relationships.

The prefix “inter-“ signifies the betweenness or interconnectedness of these textual references, and “textual space” alludes to the realm in which these references and interactions occur.

This concept underscores the notion that texts draw upon and are influenced by other texts, creating a rich tapestry of meaning and cultural resonance, and it has become a fundamental aspect of contemporary literary and cultural analysis, highlighting the intricate dialogue that exists within the world of written and visual communication.

Meanings of Intertextual Space
AspectMeaning
Interconnected Web of ReferencesIntricate network of text references, emphasizing that no text stands alone.
Complex Network of RelationshipsDynamic connections between texts, highlighting the interplay of ideas and influences.
Interwoven Cultural ResonanceTexts drawing on cultural and historical contexts, enriching overall meaning.
Dialogue of MeaningTexts engaging in ongoing reference-based dialogue, creating layers of interpretation.
Foundation of Contemporary AnalysisFundamental to modern literary and cultural analysis, emphasizing interconnectedness of texts.
Definition of Intertextual Space as a Theoretical Term

Intertextual space, as a theoretical term, refers to the dynamic and multifaceted network of references, relationships, and influences that exist among different texts within the realm of literature and culture.

It signifies the interconnectedness of texts, where each work draws upon and responds to other texts, creating layers of meaning, interpretation, and cultural resonance. This concept underscores the idea that no text stands alone but rather exists in a complex web of intertextual relationships, enriching the discourse and shaping contemporary analysis of literature and culture.

Intertextual Space: Theorists, Works and Arguments
  1. Julia Kristeva:
    • Works: Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art
    • Arguments: Kristeva introduced the idea of intertextuality as part of her semiotic approach to literature. She argued that texts are interwoven with other texts, and intertextual space is where these intersections occur. It is a space where different meanings and signifiers come together, creating new interpretations and layers of significance.
  2. Roland Barthes:
    • Works: The Pleasure of the Text
    • Arguments: Barthes discussed intertextuality in the context of the pleasure of reading. He argued that readers derive pleasure from recognizing intertextual references and connections between texts. Intertextual space allows readers to actively engage with a text and find deeper meaning through these references.
  3. Mikhail Bakhtin:
    • Works: The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
    • Arguments: Bakhtin’s concept of the “carnivalesque” and the dialogic nature of language is closely related to intertextual space. He emphasized the idea that texts are in constant dialogue with one another, creating a dynamic interplay of voices and meanings within the literary discourse.
  4. Umberto Eco:
    • Works: The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts
    • Arguments: Eco explored the idea of the “open work” and the role of the reader in interpreting texts. He discussed how intertextual references allow readers to participate actively in creating meaning and interpreting texts in a personal and unique way.
  5. Postmodern Literature:
    • Works: Various postmodern novels and literary movements
    • Arguments: Postmodern literature, as a whole, often embraces and foregrounds intertextuality. Authors like Thomas Pynchon and Jorge Luis Borges, for instance, use intertextual references extensively to create intricate, multi-layered narratives that challenge traditional notions of authorship and originality.

These theorists and works contribute to the understanding of intertextual space as a dynamic and rich field of literary analysis where texts engage in a continuous dialogue, and readers actively participate in the creation of meaning.

Intertextual Space and Literary Theories
TheoryRelevance
Poststructuralism/DeconstructionPoststructuralism and deconstruction emphasize the instability of language and meaning. Intertextual space is relevant as it shows how texts reference and respond to each other, highlighting the ever-shifting nature of language and interpretation.
Reader-Response TheoryIn reader-response theory, the focus is on how readers interpret and interact with texts. Intertextual space is relevant because it emphasizes how readers actively engage with texts by recognizing intertextual references and creating their own interpretations.
Postcolonial TheoryPostcolonial theory addresses colonialism and the effects of imperialism on literature and culture. Intertextual space is relevant as it shows how texts may reference or challenge dominant colonial narratives and contribute to postcolonial discourse.
Feminist TheoryFeminist theory explores gender roles and representation. Intertextual space is relevant because it can reveal how texts reference or subvert traditional gender norms and stereotypes, influencing the portrayal of characters and themes.
StructuralismStructuralism focuses on the underlying structures and systems in literature. Intertextual space is relevant as it demonstrates how texts disrupt or reinforce these structures and contribute to the overall coherence and meaning within the larger system of signs and symbols.
Psychoanalytic TheoryPsychoanalytic theory explores the psychological aspects of characters and narratives. Intertextual space is relevant because it can reveal the inner conflicts, desires, and fears of characters through intertextual references and how they relate to psychological concepts within the text.
Marxist TheoryMarxist theory examines social and economic structures and class relations. Intertextual space is relevant because it can show how texts reference class struggle, wealth disparities, or the critique of the bourgeoisie, highlighting economic injustices and class divisions.
Formalism/New CriticismFormalism emphasizes the intrinsic elements of a text, such as structure and language. Intertextual space is relevant as it can be examined in terms of its impact on the narrative structure, symbolism, and themes within a text.
Intertextual Space in Literary Criticism
  1. Ulysses by James Joyce:
    • Critique: In Ulysses, James Joyce extensively employs intertextual space to create a complex web of references and allusions. He draws from various sources, including Homer’s Odyssey, Shakespeare’s works, and the Bible. This intertextual richness enriches the novel’s depth and complexity, allowing readers to explore the connections between the modern and the classical world. The intertextual space in Ulysses challenges traditional narrative forms and invites readers to actively engage in deciphering the layers of meaning.
  2. Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys:
    • Critique: In Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys reimagines the story of Bertha Mason from Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. Rhys uses intertextual space to subvert the colonial and racial narratives present in Brontë’s novel. By referencing Jane Eyre and inhabiting its interstices, Rhys critiques and reframes the characters and events, emphasizing the colonial context and giving a voice to Bertha. Intertextual space is essential in this novel to deconstruct and reconstruct the original narrative.
  3. The Hours by Michael Cunningham:
    • Critique: The Hours is a novel that weaves together the lives of three women from different time periods, drawing heavily from Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway. The intertextual space created by Michael Cunningham allows for a poignant exploration of the connections between the characters and the influence of Woolf’s work on their lives. This intertextual approach enriches the narrative by highlighting the enduring relevance of Woolf’s themes and characters.
  4. The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay by Michael Chabon:
    • Critique: In this novel, Michael Chabon explores the world of comic books and superheroes, drawing on the intertextual space between real historical events and the fictional superhero genre. Chabon references the Golden Age of Comics and the escapism it offered during World War II. The intertextual space enhances the novel’s exploration of the power of storytelling and the blurred lines between reality and fantasy, creating a compelling narrative about the human need for heroism.

These four novels showcase the versatility and significance of intertextual space in literary criticism. They demonstrate how references, allusions, and connections to other texts enrich the narrative, challenge traditional storytelling, and offer fresh perspectives on familiar stories. Intertextual space serves as a powerful tool for literary critics to analyze and appreciate the depth and complexity of these works.

Terms Relevant to Intertextual Space
  1. Intertextuality: The relationship between texts where one text refers to, quotes, or influences another, creating a network of connections and references.
  2. Intertextual References: Specific instances in a text where references to other texts, authors, or cultural elements are made, contributing to intertextual space.
  3. Paratext: Elements surrounding a text, such as titles, subtitles, footnotes, and prefaces, that provide additional intertextual context and meaning.
  4. Quotation: The act of directly using words or passages from another text within a new text, often for emphasis, contrast, or resonance.
  5. Allusion: An indirect reference to another text, person, event, or cultural element, often relying on the reader’s knowledge to make connections.
  6. Palimpsest: A text that bears traces of multiple layers of writing and meaning, where older texts are partially erased or covered by newer ones, revealing intertextual depth.
  7. Parody: A form of intertextuality where a text mimics and humorously exaggerates the style, themes, or conventions of another text for comedic or critical effect.
  8. Homage: A respectful acknowledgment or tribute to another text, author, or cultural work within a new text, often demonstrating admiration or influence.
  9. Transposition: The process of adapting or reimagining elements from one text into another, reshaping and reinterpreting them in the new context.
  10. Subversion: The act of challenging, deconstructing, or altering the conventions, narratives, or ideologies present in another text through intertextual engagement.
Suggested Readings
  1. Barthes, Roland. S/Z: An Essay. Hill and Wang, 1974.
  2. Genette, Gérard. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. University of Nebraska Press, 1997.
  3. Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Columbia University Press, 1980.
  4. Riffaterre, Michael. Text Production. Columbia University Press, 1983.
  5. Stam, Robert. Subversive Pleasures: Bakhtin, Cultural Criticism, and Film. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
  6. Todorov, Tzvetan. Genres in Discourse. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  7. Woolf, Virginia. Mrs. Dalloway. Harcourt, 1925.
  8. Woolf, Virginia. Orlando: A Biography. Harcourt, 1928.
  9. Woolf, Virginia. To the Lighthouse. Harcourt, 1927.
Read more on Theoretical Terms below:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *