Ambiguity in Literature & Theory

Ambiguity is a literary device that creates multiple possible meanings or interpretations of a text, often through the use of language that is intentionally vague or unclear.

Ambiguity in Literature: Etymology

The word ambiguity in literature comes from the Latin word “ambiguitas,” which means “doubtfulness” or “uncertainty.” The Latin root word “ambigere” means “to be uncertain” or “to doubt.”

Meanings of Ambiguity in Literature and Literary Theory
Aspect of Ambiguity in LiteratureExplanation
Multiple InterpretationsTexts, characters, or events with multiple possible understandings, leading to diverse interpretations.
Intentional Language UseDeliberate use of language with multiple meanings to enhance complexity and depth within a text.
Challenging ConventionsUsing ambiguity in literature to challenge or subvert traditional literary norms and cultural assumptions.
Reader’s PerspectiveThe role of ambiguity in shaping the reader’s interpretation and influencing the derived meaning from the text.
Exploration of ThemesUtilizing ambiguity to delve into intricate themes such as identity, power, or morality.
Literary Device InteractionThe interplay between ambiguity and other literary devices, including irony, metaphor, or symbolism.
Creating SuspenseUtilizing ambiguity to generate tension and suspense by leaving readers uncertain about the true meaning of a situation or event.
Interpretation and AnalysisThe significance of ambiguity in literature in the interpretation and analysis of literature, and how readers and critics engage with ambiguous texts.
Explanation of Ambiguity in Literary Theories

Ambiguity also plays a significant role in other literary theories, such as:

Literary TheoryDescription
PostmodernismPostmodern literary theory emphasizes the ambiguous nature of language and meaning. It highlights how texts resist straightforward interpretation and fixed meaning. Ambiguity is seen as a central feature of postmodern literature, challenging traditional literary conventions and cultural norms.
Reader-response theoryReader-response theory emphasizes the reader’s role in interpreting and creating meaning in a text. Ambiguity is viewed as a key factor in shaping the reader’s understanding. The reader’s experiences and perspectives significantly contribute to the meaning they derive from a text, with ambiguity encouraging active engagement and interpretation.
DeconstructionDeconstruction is a critical approach that uncovers underlying assumptions and contradictions in a text. It uses ambiguity to expose these tensions, emphasizing the inherent instability of language and the potential for multiple interpretations. Ambiguity in literature reveals the complexity and multiplicity of meaning within a text.
Feminist theoryFeminist literary theory explores the construction and reinforcement of gender roles and stereotypes through language and representation. Ambiguity plays a role in challenging traditional gender norms and expectations. It is used to explore the complexity and diversity of human experiences and identities.
Ambiguity as a Literary Device
  • Ambiguity is a literary device that creates multiple possible meanings or interpretations of a text, often through the use of language that is intentionally vague or unclear.
  • It can be used to add complexity to a text, to reflect the uncertainty and complexity of real life, and to encourage readers to engage more deeply with the text.
  • Ambiguity can take many forms, including:
    • Double meanings: words or phrases that can be interpreted in more than one way, such as puns, homonyms, or metaphorical language.Unclear pronouns: using pronouns like “he,” “she,” or “it” without clear referents, leading to ambiguity in meaning.Ambiguous syntax: using sentence structures that can be interpreted in more than one way, such as sentences with multiple possible subjects or verbs.Open endings: endings that leave the reader uncertain about the outcome of the story or the fate of the characters.Multiple narrators: IT means using multiple narrators with conflicting or incomplete perspectives, leading to showing ambiguity in literature and uncertainty about the truth of events.
    • Symbolism: using symbols that have multiple possible interpretations, leading to showing ambiguity in literature in the meaning of the text.
Examples of Ambiguity in Literature
Literary WorkLiterary TheoryDescription
“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. EliotModernismThe poem utilizes ambiguity to mirror the fragmented and uncertain nature of modern life. The speaker’s internal monologue is filled with conflicting and elusive images, creating disorientation and alienation. Lines like “Do I dare / Disturb the universe?” and “In the room, the women come and go / Talking of Michelangelo” challenge fixed meanings and reader assumptions, aligning with the hallmark of modernist literature, which aimed to break from tradition and capture the complexities of the modern world.
Beloved by Toni MorrisonFeminist TheoryThe novel employs ambiguity to explore motherhood, race, and identity complexities. Sethe is portrayed ambiguously as both a victim and perpetrator of violence, challenging traditional notions of femininity and motherhood. The novel’s title, Beloved, has dual interpretations, referring to both a literal ghost and the psychological burden of slavery. This ambiguity allows exploration of how women navigate oppressive societal structures and the enduring impact of the past on the present.
“The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins GilmanReader-Response TheoryThe story shows the use of ambiguity in literature to engage and encourage interpretation by the reader. An unreliable narrator and an ambiguous ending leave the reader uncertain about the protagonist’s madness and overall meaning. The protagonist’s ambiguous relationship with the wallpaper allows for multiple interpretations, such as a symbol of her oppression or a reflection of her mental state. Ambiguity challenges traditional gender roles and highlights power dynamics in marriage and medicine.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott FitzgeraldPostmodernismThe novel utilizes ambiguity in literature to challenge the American Dream and traditional narrative structures. Enigmatic and multi-dimensional characters, along with a fragmented, non-linear plot, reflect the elusive nature of the Dream. The ambiguous ending, leaving Gatsby’s dream and Daisy’s feelings unresolved, permits multiple interpretations and challenges readers’ assumptions about love, wealth, and success in America.
“Hamlet” by William ShakespeareDeconstructionThe play employs ambiguity in literature to reveal contradictions and tensions in language and meaning. Hamlet’s character is replete with paradoxes and ambivalences, challenging the traditional hero archetype. The ambiguous ending leaves readers uncertain about the story’s true interpretation. For instance, Hamlet’s soliloquy “To be, or not to be” contains multiple ambiguities, questioning the meaning of “being” and the implications of “not being.” Ambiguity deconstructs language and meaning hierarchies and exposes underlying contradictions in human experience.
Suggesting Readings
  1. Empson, William. Seven Types of Ambiguity. New Directions, 2004.
  2. Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Cornell University Press, 1983.
  3. Lodge, David. The Art of Fiction. Penguin, 1992.
  4. Prince, Gerald. Dictionary of Narratology. University of Nebraska Press, 1987.
  5. Ricœur, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language. Routledge, 2004.
  6. Shklovsky, Viktor. Theory of Prose. Dalkey Archive Press, 1991.
  7. Warhol, Robyn R., and Diane Price Herndl (Eds.). Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. Rutgers University Press, 1997.
  8. Wolf, Werner (Ed.). Metareference across Media: Theory and Case Studies. University of Michigan Press, 2009.

Canon in Literature & Literary Theory

Canon, in the realm of literature and the arts, comprises a select and culturally sanctioned collection of works that are deemed exemplary, influential, and indispensable in a specific literary tradition

Etymology of Canon

The term “canon” in literature refers to a collection or list of works considered to be authoritative, exemplary, or culturally significant in a specific literary tradition, genre, or period. The etymology of the word “canon” in this context could be traced back to ancient Greek and Latin:

  1. Ancient Greek: The Greek word “κανών” (pronounced “kanón”) originally meant a straight rod or bar used for measuring or alignment. It was also used metaphorically to refer to a standard or rule. In the context of literature, “canon” drew from this metaphorical usage to denote a set of standard or accepted works.
  2. Latin: The Latin language adopted the term “canon” from Greek, and it retained a similar meaning of a rule or standard. In Latin, “canon” was used in various fields, including religion and law, to refer to authoritative texts or doctrines.
Meanings of Canon
  • A straight rod or bar used for measuring or alignment, originally in ancient Greek.
  • Metaphorically, a standard or rule, also derived from ancient Greek.
  • In Latin, it continued to mean a rule or standard, applied in various fields.
  • In literature, a collection or list of works considered authoritative, exemplary, or culturally significant within a particular tradition, genre, or period.
Definition of Canon as a Theoretical Term

Canon, in the realm of literature and the arts, comprises a select and culturally sanctioned collection of works that are deemed exemplary, influential, and indispensable in a specific literary tradition, genre, or cultural milieu. These works establish fundamental benchmarks, shaping aesthetic and thematic criteria while also reflecting the prevailing values and norms of their time or community. The concept of a literary or artistic canon holds significant sway in guiding critical discourse, shaping scholarly analysis, and contributing to cultural identities and heritage.

Canon Used by Theorists
Theorists:
  • T.S. Eliot: Eliot discussed the literary canon as a means to define and uphold the cultural and literary traditions that contribute to the continuity and coherence of a society.
  • Harold Bloom: Bloom explored the concept of the Western literary canon and introduced the idea of the “anxiety of influence” regarding how later writers engage with established canonical works.
  • Michel Foucault: Foucault examined the idea of the literary and cultural canon as a tool of power, demonstrating how it can be used to shape and control cultural discourse.
Works Associated with Canon:
Arguments About Canon:
  • Preservation of Cultural Heritage: Theorists argue that the canon in literature preserves important cultural and literary heritage, ensuring that future generations have access to foundational texts.
  • Gatekeeping and Exclusion: Critics also argue that the canon can be exclusive, perpetuating biases and overlooking marginalized voices and works.
  • Evolution and Expansion: Some theorists advocate for an evolving and expanding canon in literature that reflects changing societal values and includes a broader range of voices and perspectives.
Canon and Literary Theories
TheoryCanons
Marxist Literary TheoryEconomic Determinism: Emphasizes the role of economic structures and class struggle in literature.
Social Context: Analyzes how literature reflects and reinforces societal class divisions and power dynamics.
Material Conditions: Examines how the material conditions of society influence the creation and reception of literature.
Ideological Critique: Focuses on exposing and critiquing the ideologies embedded in literary works.
Feminist Literary TheoryGender Representation: Analyzes how literature portrays gender roles, stereotypes, and the experiences of women.
Patriarchy Critique: Investigates how literary texts may perpetuate or challenge patriarchal norms and power structures.
Intersectionality: Considers how race, class, and other factors intersect with gender in literature.
Recovery and Redefinition: Aims to recover and reinterpret the voices and contributions of marginalized female authors.
Postcolonial Literary TheoryColonial Legacy: Examines the impact of colonialism on literature, identity, and culture.
Subaltern Voices: Highlights the perspectives and voices of colonized or marginalized peoples.
Hybridity: Explores the blending of cultures and identities in postcolonial literature.
Resistance and Decolonization: Focuses on literature as a tool for resistance and decolonization.
Queer Literary TheorySexuality and Gender Identity: Analyzes how literature represents and challenges normative notions of sexuality and gender.
Queer Reading: Interprets texts from queer perspectives, emphasizing non-normative sexualities.
Subversion of Norms: Explores how literature can subvert heteronormative narratives and binaries.
LGBTQ+ Representation: Examines how LGBTQ+ characters and themes are depicted in literature.
New CriticismClose Reading: Emphasizes a detailed analysis of the text itself, disregarding authorial intent or historical context.
Formal Elements: Focuses on the formal aspects of literature, such as structure, imagery, symbolism, and language.
Autotelic: Regards the literary work as self-contained and self-sufficient, with intrinsic value.
Objective Criticism: Strives for objectivity in the interpretation of literature.
Structuralist Literary TheoryStructural Analysis: Concentrates on the underlying structures and systems in literature.
Language and Signs: Examines how language and signs function in literature.
Narrative Structures: Analyzes the underlying narrative patterns and conventions in literary texts.
Semiotics: Draws on semiotic theory to understand the sign systems at play in literature.
Canon as a Literary Device

As a literary device, “canon” refers to the deliberate inclusion or reference to a specific set of texts, ideas, or cultural elements within a literary work. Authors use this device to establish authority, create intertextual connections, explore themes, or make cultural commentary. It serves to enrich the depth and meaning of the narrative while contributing to character development and the overall context of the story.

Canon in Literature
FeatureRepresentative WorkHow it is a Canon
Foundational TextsRepresentative work: Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”“Hamlet” is considered a foundational text in the Western literary canon, essential for understanding the development of drama and the complexities of human psychology.
Authoritative InfluenceRepresentative work: Homer’s “The Odyssey”“The Odyssey” by Homer has exerted authoritative influence on epic poetry and adventure narratives, setting stylistic and thematic standards for subsequent works.
Enduring RelevanceRepresentative work: Jane Austen’s Pride and PrejudicePride and Prejudice remains relevant due to its exploration of social class, relationships, and individualism, speaking to universal human experiences.
Cultural SignificanceRepresentative work: Dante’s “Divine Comedy”“The Divine Comedy” reflects the cultural and religious values of medieval Italy and has become a symbol of Italian literature and identity.
Exclusivity and ControversyRepresentative work: James Joyce’s Ulysses“Ulysses” is known for its controversial content and exclusion from some educational curricula, sparking debates about its place in the modernist canon.
Evolution and RevisionRepresentative work: Toni Morrison’s BelovedBeloved challenged the traditional canon by introducing African American voices and narratives, prompting a reevaluation and expansion of literary canons.
Educational ImportanceRepresentative work: Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry FinnHuckleberry Finn is a staple in literature courses, shaping curricula and providing a foundation for discussions of race, identity, and American culture.
Diversity and InclusivityRepresentative work: Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall ApartThings Fall Apart is instrumental in diversifying canons by introducing African literature and perspectives into global literary studies.
Interpretative FrameworkRepresentative work: Aristotle’s “Poetics”Aristotle’s “Poetics” serves as a foundational text for understanding the structure and principles of dramatic literature, providing an interpretative framework for analysis.
Suggested Readings
  1. Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. Harcourt, 1994.
  2. Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Blackwell, 1990.
  3. Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. University of Chicago Press, 1993.
  4. Jenkins, Keith. Re-thinking History. Routledge, 2003.
  5. Said, Edward W. The World, the Text, and the Critic. Harvard University Press, 1983.
  6. Tanselle, G. Thomas. A Rationale of Textual Criticism. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.
  7. West, Martin L. Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique. B. G. Teubner, 1973.
  8. Wood, Michael. The Magician’s Doubts: Nabokov and the Risks of Fiction. Princeton University Press, 1994.
  9. Zunshine, Lisa. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Ohio State University Press, 2006.